Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout780032_Routine Inspection_20220215�► � 1iwln Facility Number %1g -S15 vision of Water Resources 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: a -Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ,-'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Farm Name: Owner Name: 0-46-4-e Arrival Time: art,64e/ b.) Departure Time: I1 Owner Email: Phone: Coun Region: G�z Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: ,�/L,, 4 /" Zt/{.�'�� fitTitle: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: �/ o�-h /oo4Q,t,,e2' Latitude: Integrator: Phone: Certification Number: /kia9-05 Certification Number: /c ° 33 33 Longitude: Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Cattle Design Curren Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop, Layer Non -Layer Design Current acit Po Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes /ffrdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: '/ - 32 Date of Inspection:..Z /11 . 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 3 lq Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes J10 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE Structure 5 Structure 6 ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes f No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR ❑ Yes it No ❑ NA 0 NE ❑ Yes .,E1No ❑NA ❑NE El Yes No ❑NA ❑NE n Yes ,,No 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes j21' No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 94.4a44 / 612)41 AV/7tar-- 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ Yes 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? .r No TT - No ❑ NA ❑ NA ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes .2 No 0 NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes J2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (1 Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard �'6Vaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers J -Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑filo ❑ NA El NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes /El'"No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: -7- 3 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. D Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 'Date of Inspection: /,f„Z ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ NA 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ❑ Yes 4:No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA 0 NE ❑ Yes ,.lallo 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,[`No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes AErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to qu Use drawings of fricilit Ta ee97,41- ziOP plcd&te „ea-e,44-e 9,09,f ..)-)1,/,Zoe, /,?-e) fizz--74 Q/Ael adel rae-7,01-4-€ 4 H.,--i.-e;/".,4~,e ,,,,, /--e.,..,/_.„.„4 i-a,..,--,e,r, . ci,..,/,,,ea, c,<)*ci c-aed,C2.— pJT�,; P kur? rf 4' b n k cJ/,‘,z, (,,) -e (,)rr1 7te4_,( 07+ keed 0-A-( ec,)a. -5a---/A7g--1--r -4&0?--71,,‘-7:0t1 k(yee-/--z. c2-0-- A,04 xe--tzLec.440:66/ pee,,pi-ce..iv?ii - ah-o /0.1,z;(5`ite 4,-44---fr/-; _.- /tad' / ti)e, -J,q,0717-ec. ,62_,-x, 4ga,te,A 6i, ,w/ ?"?..00 1,4 9 61 01----n yOu 1/47<02-- M P )kie ei-_3rr ›inoi/e3 C4.1,e . /Qfr;50,1 may, c/ 464,1 g ; /v U c ° C,-Q h'7 k» l /6t /? 4 c9Ce/i5c)cfri) , /1 er Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: 9/i 7>4`�r Date:/) 2/4/2015 FACILITY#: -3). FARM NAME: PERMIT (#19) DUE EVERY 5 YEARS EXPERIATION DATE /J6/ (/ NUMBER OF ANIMALS - CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL „2 OIC CARD yaR NO SOIL TYPES LAGOON LEVEL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20) ide;z3 /Le CROP TYPES - ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST OR NO Irrigation Plan Map ,'YES,OR NO WASTE REPORT (#21) - GOOD FOR 606DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE 3/ 4/NITROGEN LEVEL (,, ` 3 `0 DATE NITROGEN LEVEL DATE NITROGEN LEVEL Ay-e-e44 ,ec/ lt4, oceele, SOIL REPORT (#21) EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE il,;qh - P-I (NO MORE THEN 400) PH (Note if 4 or less) - Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU ZN (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) IRR2 (#21) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CALBRIATION (#24) EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRiTED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION 0%,i� FLOW RATES :// RAIN FALL (#21) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED. j SLUDGE (#21 &25) -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE 61,2 j/ ? / 0: / ( P: LS,6 %RATIO OF SLUDGE `.,< 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) X RAIN BREAKER FORM ��� CROP YEILDS MORTALITY *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st - Ends September 30th Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st - Ends March 31 st Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 1st Rye: Opens September 1st - Ends March 31 st Oats: Opens September 1st- Ends April 15th Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30th Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15th Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31st Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st OLMC-14-e_ 't C f"