NC0002305_Wasteload Allocation_19931208

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0002305
Guilford Mills WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
asteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
December 8, 1993
This document is printed on reuse paper - ixtlore any
content orn the re.s erse side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
1
PERMIT NO.: NC0002305
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Guilford Mills, Inc.
Guilford East Division
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Modification
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.965 MGD *
Domestic (% of Flow): 2.0
Industrial (% of Flow): 98.0 %
Comments:
* Modification is for the increase in flow to !.15 MGD. The production
rate has increased tremendusly from 95,000 to 500,000 lbs/day. have
requested PPA and they have submitted EP with a 30 day sampling
report if you would like to see. -1-k'e�.5 Yr.
RECEIVING STREAM: the Northeast Cape Fear River
Class: C-Swamp
Sub -Basin: 03-06-22
Reference USGS Quad: G27SE (please attach)
County: Duplin
Regional Office: Wilmington Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 5/31/94 Treatment Plant Class: class III ?
Classification changes within three miles. twia q
.i f-, 1:;;',�'• 0= r
1 60
No Change within three miles.
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by: (.ttt 71 Date: / 9\ /q3
Randy Kepler (2Uc
Date: 7/22/93
7204,-atgi,77,64,
Date:
Drainage Area (mi ) Z ( Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 7
7Q10 (cfs) 5--Winter 7Q10 (cfs) f b 30Q2 (cfs)
oeeae Rc
A/./3 7
Toxicity Limits: IWC / 7 % ® (1.9654.14oAcuhronii
Instream Monitoring: 23 `�O� ZS /`
2
c ct_ fir
Parameters %G09/P,t74titdt/ (1.4hic/ 1 71 ! /? D
Upstream A e.xp./tam-dLocationsci t
Downstream,(/' CyrWAYi •D Location 41 ,
Recommended Limits: Pre -expansion
Monthly Daily Max.
Avg.
Wasteflow (MGD): 0.965
BOD5 (mg/1): 132.5 rhs/(' 11 16.5
COD (lbs/day): 4750 9500
DO (mom): 5.0 5.0
TSS (lbs/day): 5 /0'14 1 35 2071
Total Chromium (µg/1): di5c,,ss4� �- 266
pH (SU): 4�)(i"'1 %I"Ji''- 6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0
Temperature (°C): monitor monitor
TP (mg/1): monitor monitor
TN (mg/1): monitor monitor
Sulfide (lbs/day): 9.5 18.0
Chronic Toxicity: P/F @19% (Jan, Apr,
Jul, Oct)
Fecal (/100 ml):
Chlorine (µg/1):
Phenols (lbs/day):
Zinc WA):Chloride (mg/1):
Copper (14/1):
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
Temperature (°C):
4.75
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
9.5
Post -expansion
Monthly Daily Max.
Avg.
1.25
8
3000
6.0
1035
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
10
12 li'%.i I1,1/4
6000
6.0
2071
217
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
20
P/F @23% (Jan, Apr, Jul,
Oct)
200
28.0*
5.0 10.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
*Total residual chlorine should only+ be limited/monitored if added to the wastestream.
Comments:
t
1

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
Monthly
Average(lbs/day)
Daily
Maximum (lbs/day)
Comments
BOD5
vu, -1 5t 0-T-i1 J ;ep
-2500.0
based on 40 CFR 410.52 (a)
COD
3090 0-g000
(oc I0;1300,0-
based 40 CFR 4 2 410.53
000 •
on a and (a)(b)
TSS
5450.0
zigo 40790O0
based on 40 CFR 410.52 (a)
1oO0
Total Sulfide *
50ii 10
2.0 11)0.(l
based on 40 CFR 4-1-0752-(-0-arrd 410.53 (a)
Total Phenols
„25 )— 5
10 -5070
based on 40 CFR 41-932 (a) --a 4 410.53 (a)
Total Chromium **
25.0
50.0
based on 40 CFR 410.52 (a) and 410.53 (a)
vvq LIM r , e-i)
-
pH
6.0-9.0 SU
6.0-9.0 SU
based on 40 CFR 410.52 (a)
410.52 is the BPT regs
410.53 is the BAT regs
* T. Sulfide = dissolved and acid soluble (listed in 40 CFR 136
** T. Chromium = hexavalent and trivalent (listed in 40 CFR part 136
1
Type of Product Produced
Lbs/DayyP`roduced
Effluent Guideline Reference
Dyeing and Finishing of Warp Knitted
5(5000 1bs product/day
40 CFR 410 Subpart E Knit Fabric Finishing
Synthetic Fabrics
/ o of c pc, f rzis leitt,

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Guilford Mills, Inc./Guilford
NC0002305
Industrial
Existing
Modification
Northeast Cape Fear River
C-Swamp
030622
Duplin
Wilmington
Kepler
7/22/93
G27SE
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Request # 7555
East Division
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
IWC (%):
02.1076.8330
1988
326
6.5
18
398
19 (@.965 MGD)
23 (@ 1.25 MGD)
Guilford Mills is requesting an expansion of their permitted flow from 0.965 MGD to 1.25 MGD. Very little in
the way of treatment plant modification will be proposed to raise to this level since the existing system is large
enough to accomodate the increase in flow.
Total suspended solids, COD, sulfide, and phenols limits for this facility are based on effluent guidelines (40 CFR
410.52) for Knit Fabric Finishing Subcategory. Determination of these limits is based on production numbers
which are predicted to raise from 95,000 lbs/day to 100,000 lbs/day. Loading of oxygen -consuming wastes should
remain the same at this facility. This means that the BOD5 limit should be reduced from 11 mg/I to 8 mg/1. A
minimum DO should be required at 6.0 mg/l. Chloride monitoring will be given based on APAM results and WET
results. Although the outfall goes into the fringe of a marsh system which makes up the Northeast Cape Fear River
at this point, the entire 6.5 cfs S7Q10 was allowed as dilution in the calculations for toxicants and WET testing for
THIS WLA ONLY. It should be noted that the permit cover letter to the facility will alert Guilford Mills to a
possible change in this dilution factor based on field studies of the receiving stream to be done before the 1996
reissuance of this permit. Fae, C:1 (i,of �o✓ eploy 5ive * b-e 0"invdviedLvx. ma") '-e
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Fc_Z C%cJZ � r� n m •fLi) / 3 C c ,, , iZ D
' iv rTvvl,4sl3
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
r
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
0/1/L--7 Date: ///5/7L3
Date: 1 I /1 1 /,,3G1
Date:
Date:
DtC 1 4 1993

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
COD (lbs/day):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (lbs/day):
Total Chromium (µg/1):
pH (SU):
Temperature (°C):
TP (mg/I):
TN (mg/1):
Sulfide (lbs/day):
Chronic Toxicity:
Phenols (lbs/day):
Zinc (µg/l):
Copper (µg/I):
Oil and Grease (mg/I):
Temperature (°C):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
COD (lbs/day):
DO (mg/I):
TSS (lbs/day):
Total Chromium (µg/1):
pH (SU):
Temperature (°C):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Sulfide (lbs/day):
Chronic Toxicity:
Phenols (lbs/day):
Zinc (µg/1):
Chloride (mg/1):
Copper (µg/1):
Oil and Grease (mg/1):
Temperature (°C):
4 A.Io T (o&d o-- TSS o411
2
PARAMETERS
Daily Avg. Daily Max.
0.965
11 16.5
4750 9500
5.0 5.0
1035 2071
266
6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
9.5 18.0
P/F @ 19% (Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct)
4.75 9.5
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Pre -expansion
Monthly Daily Max.
Avg.
0.965
11
4750
5.0
1035
Post -expansion
Monthly Daily Max.
Avg.
1.25
8
3000
6.0
10901b36
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
12
6000
6.0
--MO a011
217
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
Wa
E tr -,veuJ (0161,ipq #s
4,X�S�►r�6dli.d6
monitor monitor
10 20 El_
P/F @23% (Jan, Apr, Jul,
Oct)
9.5 5.0 10.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
irk-cr�c - SoI )L v►oblanw dbltiw&nwA
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
APAM Data
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow/production
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
16.5
9500
5.0
2071
266
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
9.5 18.0
P/F @19% (Jan, Apr,
Jul, Oct)
4.75
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Parameter(s) Affected
x Chloride
x BOD5, TSS, Phenols, Sulfide,
Cr, WET test, DO
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Northeast Cape Fear River upstream of outfall at nearest accessible point
Downstream Location: Northeast Cape Fear River at Sarecta Bridge
Parameters: Temperature, Conductivity, Dissolved Oxygen
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

. - Facility Name C./t(iLo'e9 M(14v5
Permit # 0 C Pipe #
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is /qI % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
pe orm after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
MJ ✓ Jr4 1 /IUD' . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permits final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 cfs
Permitted Flow MGD
IWC
Basin & Sub -basin CA9-- 63 v 6,z2.--
Receiving Stream C. Cp P Q .
County JjuP'-
mmended by;
Date ///'/9.3
QCL PIF Version 9'91

. Facility Name 67
/4/c-�-0Z-) Permit # Pipe #
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is 23 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed of er t rty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
if* /VY'� / Oc . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
uent discharge below all treatment processes.
permitted final e
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require inunediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
Permitted Flow /.
IWC Z•
Basin & Sub -basin
cfs
z s MGD
GP� 0.3o 22—
Receiving Stream
County
Recommended by:
QCL P!F Version 9191

nn G/et' ' v f('fEt)
do 1- ed nicr
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 9, 1993
MEMORANDUM
To: Randy Kepler
From: Ed Beck
Through: Dave Adkin
Subject: Permit No. NC0002305
Guilford East
Duplin County
c-c_ critic L ram ;'-
.
r/d/fr2
Additional information submitted by the permittee has been
reviewed. The permittee has submitted data which relates wastewater
flow to production rate based on historical information. Projected
flows are then generated which relate to anticipated increases in
production rate. A flow diagram is also presented which describes
the source and flow rate of the contributing waste streams.
It appears that the request to increase the flow is
sufficiently supported. It is therefor recommended, as stated in
the staff report, that a permit be drafted containing effluent
limits designed to protect the receiving waters based on the
current permitted flow, a flow limit of 1.15 MGD, and a flow limit
of 1.25 MGD. It is recommended that limits and monitoring
requirements for fecal col i f orm be added to the permit since there
is a significant contribution of sanitary wastewater. If no
significant adverse comments are received, it is recommended that
a permit be issued for a period consistent with the basinwide
permitting strategy.
EB:NC2305.113
cc: Wilmington Regional Files
Central Files

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section/Rapid Assessment Group
November 5, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: Randy Kepler
THROUGH: Carla Sanderson h
FROM: Dave Goodrich
SUBJECT: Request for Change to Cover Letter for Guilford Mills NPDES Permit
NPDES No. NC0002305
Duplin County
030622
Please include a paragraph in the cover letter to the above -referenced NPDES permit
regarding the potential for limits to change in 1996 based on the results of a hydraulic
investigation at the point of discharge. It was noted on the site visit in August 1993, that
the discharge goes to a swampy fringe of the Northeast Cape Fear River system. Past
limits have been given under the assumption that the effluent mixes completely with the
entire flow of the river system at this point. However, this assumption may overestimate
the amount of dilution immediately available in the river during times of low flow. The
hydraulic investigation will be coordinated with the facility in 1994 or 1995.
Please give me a call if you have questions or comments.

Note to Guilford Mills (Guilford East) WLA File
NC0002305
Northeast Cape Fear River
030622
October 1993
Subject: Expansion Request and Rationale for Limits
In June 1993 DEM received a request from Guilford Mills to expand their existing
flow from 0.965 MGD to 1.15 MGD. Production numbers were given as 500,000 lbs/day
of textiles (automotive upholstery). This request was for a hydraulic increase only, so the
permittee was not anticipating the need for additional construction of wastewater treatment
facilities to accomodate the increase in production and flow.
Since the 500,000 lbs/day represented a very large increase when compared to daily
production numbers in the last permit issuance (95,000 lbs/day), I requested a recheck of
these production numbers from Randy Kepler (P & E). Jimmy Summers of Guilford Mills
confirmed this production rate initially, but then discovered that this was a weekly rate
instead of daily value. He submitted a revised production value of 100,000 lbs/day in a
letter dated August 13, 1993.
At this point, I looked into WLA issues and modeling concerns. This discharge
appeared to enter the Northeast Cape Fear River in a swampy area which would complicate
modeling for the expansion. This coupled with the confusion over existing and future
production levels and wasteflows prompted a site visit on August 20,1993.
During this site visit, issues discussed included expansion (timing, amounts),
production rates (existing and predicted), modeling of oxygen -consuming wastes, and
outfall location. Through 1997 1.25 MGD would need to be discharged to accomodate the
wastewater that would accompany a production rate above 115,000 lbs/day (roughly
estimated at the meeting for a six -day work week). It was the concensus at the meeting that
three permit limits may be necessary in the permit renewal (0.965, 1.15, 1.25 MGD).
Modeling of oxygen -consuming waste was described and the outfall location was visited.
The outfall here is located in a swampy area, and it is still unclear if there is a better
channel where the permittee could pipe the effluent. Unfortunately, time constraints and
poor accessibility at the outfall site did not allow a thorough investigation of the hydraulics
of the Northeast Cape Fear River in this area. It was apparent that solids were building up
in the receiving swamp. This could be traced to an operational problem where pin floc was
being created in the wastewater treatment plant as a result of the operator aerating the
system too much.
Guilford Mills was asked to provide recent production estimates and more accurate
predictions of manufacturing. This information was received on September 22,1993 in a
letter from Jimmy Summers. The content of this letter indicates that by October 1994 (and
possibly before this time) wastewater flow from this facility will exceed 1.15 MGD. After
a brief meeting with Sullins and Kepler, it was decided that the permit should be issued at
0.965 (since no ATC has been issued for flows above this) and 1.25 MGD only.
Production rates were predicted to average 578,364 lbs/week during the next seven
quarters. This would equate to a daily average production rate of 96,393 lbs/day based on
a six -day work week. Since this is close to the 100,000 lbs/day value given on the revised
application, the 100,000 lbs/day value will be used to set effluent guideline limits.

Modeling
Dissolved oxygen is low both upstream and downstream of the discharge. Using
instream data collected by Guilford Mills during the last three summers, Level B default
values were changed to include:
- 75% saturation of D.O. at 27°C (Note: 75th percentile from temperature data and default
temperature matched.)
- CBOD of 5.85 mg/1 (Avg. BOD5 * 1.5)
Velocities were also set to <0.1 fps. Resulting model runs did not predict protection of the
5.0 mg/1 D.O. standard using this information unless wastewater BOD could be discharged
at levels which are not presently achieveable. The question now becomes: can we have
confidence in the Level B model based on the stream characteristics? Obviously, the
discharge does not appear to have an effect on downstream data. Furthermore, the .0200
regulations allow for D.O. concentrations to be lower in swampy areas. After speaking
with Betsy Johnson (CIG - IAU) on these issues, we concluded that the permit could be
issued with equivalent loadings for oxygen -consuming wastes. I will therefore recommend
a BOD5 limit of 8.0 mg/l. A minimum D.O. of 6.0 mg/1 will also be given.
Toxicants
Of more concern than oxygen -consuming wastes is the solids buildup in the creek
(evidenced on the field trip) and the toxicant allowances. Solids buildup is most probably
an operational issue which is beyond the scope of this wasteload allocation. Toxicant
allowances are confused by the swampy nature of the receiving water. Is it appropriate to
count the entire 6.5 cfs flow predicted at S7Q10 flow as dilution given that the discharge
enters the Northeast Cape Fear River on the fringe of a marsh system? Furthermore, is
there a main channel which exists which does carry 6.5 cfs flow during S7Q10 conditions?
On November 3, 1993, the river channel was observed at SR 1700 (downstream sampling
site) to see if the flow was contained in a channel or marshy conditions existed. In fact, the
channel was well defined and, based on a quick examination of the banks, it appeared that
only high flows would cause the channel to act more like a swamp. This may indicate that
there is also a main channel at the point of the Guilford Mills discharge which is not being
reached by their outfall pipe as previously thought.
I contacted Ed Beck (WiRO) and discussed the matters at hand for this discharge.
He indicated that Pat Durrett (WiRO) would probably be visiting with the ORC for
Guilford East to advise on operation of the WWTP to minimize solids. We also spoke
about the need to issue the permit in a timely fashion and the problem with allowing the
entire flow of the Northeast Cape Fear River as the dilution source when the discharge has
only been piped to the fringe of the wetlands surrounding the main channels) conveying
the flow of the river. For the purposes of this renewal, the entire 6.5 cfs flow will be
allowed as dilution, but the facility will be notified in the cover letter that a re-evaluation of
the flow of their receiving stream will be completed before the 1996 renewal which may
necessitate changes in their permit limits for toxicants and their whole -effluent toxicity test.

O
d
J,
v
ig
/0
0
ff/Lpoie_p
St'rc4 m : tz-pi
�1 I
4.n Ste rY1
e . c.1, ____
Store. Ceti CU Lt0 s (Cdr4VOC:iot,) 1/2 FPO
1,67 men =5.1-
&poi -7 .41"
fijt61,1 44- in&✓rlsus �7��!fium)ly
15#14441 di 5k /7602 -Mira.
rcacks „(/// / %4- G(Sa i a av/.
•
a.
5
,., : ,-r
ea
my-r-6 :
/,,ufb- Ai PK-re-4s
(m) curo;1 ( - Piro,
kv disc'
�g � 0 dtst op
�, � � �,g slo.�z
,o., 3y7 41.51
/2

P7c
,t000.39(
rtac4 bekeik
GOIAW M,s
a/t1:-1-2(iit6P.
5c&SM91c-"3 itq6o�.
CARSIMlAkId0 a t.I,ZSM&,O
Wietk
P/cw.5
ea. 3V,)
374 (,
147ti10 :- 1 ? c
3r Z-34g eb
0,1: 3 6 crs
(froU4ihy rfisig ifkrb PI6 j,ivrizkl-Nen v6f)
/%lo res e,h bK r(n
aziohg9/5-0 CigB'z)
aA.Znii2'
510/0 = 0.7
w7Cilo = 3 c
3cA t 1+, 3 tft
Q0- .94 cTs
141 74 (bs4 Ili- IS IPA 04 ef Ma)
e6 �P!eilldt441-4-T7 od-S
61$41 let .-'((4.6q-..34)-3610-- :511,7);.
sia to((77o,ct
Roo) a `Vmac AO I
0. 4 38'4 nu 2" al-14 i fid;r*12)
i iv=7.7c
Kato Zi
Sagv=Ro, q61
Gf
nicifd
oZ.PD76,S330

MODEL RESULTS
Discharger : GUILFORD MILLS
Receiving Stream : NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER
SUMMER
GUILFORD MILLS EXPANSION
USING INSTREAM DO AND BOD5
The End D.O. is 6.13 mg/1.
The End CBOD is 1.37 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 0.12 mg/l.
Segment 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flo
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
4.77
1.80 1
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.25000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
�pDGZ7� L� bocz &fP27 F /,t/reeiI 0/✓d-t. /2Po�--S,
�(5 /S A 52Ality Pvt C/4 P,t-s �l� datjczf il 7 .7
/ SU/11P710A S DG o1,12 LC�cti / 7,2,17,Ys� S

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : GUILFORD MILLS Subbasin : 030622
Receiving Stream : NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER Stream Class: C-SWAMP
Summer 7Q10 : 6.5 Winter 7Q10 : 18.0
Design Temperature: 27.0
'LENGTH' SLOPEI VELOCITY 1 DEPTH' Kd I Kd 1 Ka 1 Ka I KN I KN I KNR 1 KNR I SOD I SOD
mile I ft/mil fps I ft Idesign' @20 Idesignl @20 'design' @20 'design l @20 'design' @20
Segment 1 I 1.801 1.40 I 0.083 12.61 10.28 1 0.20 10.24 I 0.211 0.51 1 0.30 10.51 1 0.00 1 0.00 10.00
Reach l l I I I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 I 1.20) 5.401 0.123 12.15 1 0.29 1 0.21 1 1.39 1 1.201 0.51 10.30 10.51 1 0.00 1 0.00 10.00
Reach 2 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 I 1.801 1.701 0.088 12.56 1 0.28 1 0.20 10.31 1 0.271 0.51 10.30 10.51 1 0.00 1 0.00 10.00
Reach 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 2.30 1.70 0.092 2.64 0.28 0.20 0.33 0.28 0.51 0.30 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reach 4
I Flow 1 CBOD 1 NBOD I D.O. I
cfs I mg/1 1 mg/1 1 mg/1 I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste I 1.938 1 3.000 1 0.000 1 5.000
Headwaters) 6.500 1 5.850 1 1.000 I 6.100
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.170
* Runoff I 0.050 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.170
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.170
* Runoff 1 0.050 I 2.000 I 1.000 1 7.170
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste I 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary 1 0.000 I 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.170
* Runoff 1 0.050 I 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.170
Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste 1 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary 1 0.900 I 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.170
* Runoff I 0.050 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.170

SUMMER
GUILFORD MILLS EXPANSION
USING INSTREAM DO AND BOD5
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I
1 1 0.00 5.85 5.20 0.77 8.44
1 1 0.10 5.75 5.09 0.74 8.44
1 1 0.20 5.66 4.98 0.71 8.45
1 1 0.30 5.58 4.88 0.69 8.45
1 1 0.40 5.50 4.78 0.66 8.46
1 1 0.50 5.42 4.68 0.64 8.46
1 1 0.60 5.35 4.58 0.62 8.47
1 1 0.70 5.28 4.49 0.59 8.47
1 1 0.80 5.22 4.39 0.57 8.48
1 1 0.90 5.16 4.30 0.55 8.48
1 1 1.00 5.10 4.21 0.53 8.49
1 1 1.10 5.05 4.13 0.51 8.49
1 1 1.20 5.00 4.04 0.49 8.50
1 1 1.30 4.96 3.96 0.47 8.50
1 1 1.40 4.91 3.88 0.46 8.51
1 1 1.50 4.88 3.80 0.44 8.51
1 1 1.60 4.84 3.72 0.42 8.52
1 1 1.70 4.81 3.64 0.41 8.52
1 1 1.80 4.77 3.57 0.39 8.53
1 2 1.80 4.77 3.57 0.39 8.53
1 2 1.90 4.93 3.52 0.38 8.53
1 2 2.00 5.08 3.46 0.37 8.54
1 2 2.10 5.21 3.41 0.37 8.54
1 2 2.20 5.34 3.37 0.36 8.55
1 2 2.30 5.47 3.32 0.35 8.55
1 2 2.40 5.58 3.27 0.34 8.56
1 2 2.50 5.69 3.22 0.33 8.56
1 2 2.60 5.79 3.17 0.32 8.57
1 2 2.70 5.88 3.13 0.32 8.57
1 2 2.80 5.97 3.08 0.31 8.58
1 2 2.90 6.06 3.04 0.30 8.58
1 2 3.00 6.14 3.00 0.29 8.59
1 3 3.00 6.14 3.00 0.29 8.59
1 3 3.10 6.11 2.94 0.28 8.59
1 3 3.20 6.08 2.88 0.27 8.60
1 3 3.30 6.06 2.82 0.27 8.60
1 3 3.40 6.04 2.77 0.26 8.61
1 3 3.50 6.02 2.71 0.25 8.61
1 3 3.60 6.00 2.66 0.24 8.62
1 3 3.70 5.99 2.61 0.23 8.62
1 3 3.80 5.97 2.56 0.22 8.63
1 3 3.90 5.96 2.51 0.22 8.63
1 3 4.00 5.95 2.46 0.21 8.64
1 3 4.10 5.94 2.41 0.20 8.64
1 3 4.20 5.93 2.37 0.20 8.65
1 3 4.30 5.92 2.32 0.19 8.65
1 3 4.40 5.91 2.28 0.18 8.66
1 3 4.50 5.91 2.23 0.18 8.66
1 3 4.60 5.91 2.19 0.17 8.67
1 3 4.70 5.90 2.15 0.17 8.67
1 3 4.80 5.90 2.10 0.16 8.68
1 4 4.80 6.02 2.09 0.24 9.58
1 4 4.90 6.02 2.06 0.23 9.58
1 4 5.00 6.02 2.02 0.22 9.59
1 4 5.10 6.01 1.98 0.22 9.59
1 4 5.20 6.01 1.94 0.21 9.60

1 4 5.30 6.01 1.91 0.20 9.60
1 4 5.40 6.01 1.87 0.20 9.61
1 4 5.50 6.02 1.84 0.19 9.61
1 4 5.60 6.02 1.80 0.18 9.62
1 4 5.70 6.02 1.77 0.18 9.62
1 4 5.80 6.03 1.74 0.17 9.63
1 4 5.90 6.03 1.71 0.17 9.63
1 4 6.00 6.04 1.68 0.16 9.64
1 4 6.10 6.04 1.64 0.16 9.64
1 4 6.20 6.05 1.61 0.15 9.65
1 4 6.30 6.06 1.59 0.15 9.65
1 4 6.40 6.07 1.56 0.14 9.66
1 4 6.50 6.07 1.53 0.14 9.66
1 4 6.60 6.08 1.50 0.14 9.67
1 4 6.70 6.09 1.47 0.13 9.67
1 4 6.80 6.10 1.45 0.13 9.68
1 4 6.90 6.11 1.42 0.12 9.68
1 4 7.00 6.12 1.39 0.12 9.69
1 4 7.10 6.13 1.37 0.12 9.69
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow I

SEP-22-'93 FRI 1:00 ID:APPAREL HOME TEXTILE TEL NO:919-316-497E1 #962 PO1
eo)
(Pi:yuilford
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS: GUILFORD MILLS, INC., GREENSBORO, NC
September 22, 1993
Mr. Randy L. Kepler
Environmental Engineer, NPDES Unit
Division of Environmental Management
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626--0535
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
Permit #NC0002305
Guilford East Site
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Kepler:
This letter 1s in response to your inquiry dated September
9, 1993, concerning the referenced permit application.
Please find enclosed a flow diagram of the wastewater flows
from the present facility to the wastewater treatment plant.
Also find attached a table showing the monthly production rates
and associated effluent flow rates for 1993, and the forecasted
production rates and effluent flow rates for the next year and a
half.
As you can see, production is expected to increase sharply
in the 4th Quarter of 1993 with a peak in December 1993. We will
do whatever is necessary to keep our flow at or below our
permitted rate, but it will be unfortunate for the plant and the
area if we have to turn away business because we cannot get a
permit modification by then. Guilford Mills is ready to work
with the state quickly to clear up any permitting questions that
arise. Guilford Mills hopes that the permit modification
increasing the flow rate to 1.15 MGD can be issued within 180
days of the application date (June 9, 1993).
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions
or comments about this information.
Post -It" brand tax transmittal memo 71371
t
oif1t,S U... t oleo\
Prate
G...• l
9
tom. Phan* � (gtel 3 i6 -'-i 3
Pais (ettA "133 — 2444 Fax" (tow) 3(6- ►i1r U
Enclosures
cc: Glenn Brown
Keith Westbrook
Sincerely,
Guilford Mills, Inc.
Jimmy Summers, Manager,
Environmental Services
4925 WEST MARKET STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27407, 919-316-400o, TELEX: 825937, FAX: [phone]
P.O. BOX 26969, GREENSBORO, NC 27419-6969

SEP-22-'93 FRI 15:00 ID:APPAREL HOME TEXTILE TEL NO:919-316-4970
#962 P02
Guilford Mills, Inc.
Guilford East Plant
1993 Product ion/Wastewater
Month Ave lb dyed/week Ave Gal/lb dyed
Jan-93
Feb-93
Mar-93
Apr-93
May-93
Jun-93
Jul-93
Ave YTD
478,573
444,178
443,635
424,934
452,959
459,859
412,972
12.6
13.2
12.8
12.8
12.9
12.9
14.9
13.2
q'jiq
!r-`
/f� 14 Protected Production/Wastewater Levels
Data
Ave * Ef f luent GPD
861,431
837,593
811,218
777,022
834,554
847,454
879,040
839, 684
,r
Notes Based on -
the average Gal/lb dyed figure above (YTD)_
pate Prol. Prod. (lb dyed/weekl
12-1-93 574,051
1-1-94 487,265
4-1-94 550,312
7-1-94 575,847
10-1-94 662,080
1-1-95 562,733
4-1-95 635 A59-
518, 364i 1k)(wqk
q5 iv-216tai)
Prot. Eff. Flow (GPD)
1,082,496
918,843
1,037,731
1,085,883
1,250,000
1,061,154
1,198,294
,,is td;p 4

SEP-22-'93 FRI 15:01 ID:APPAREL HONE TEXTILE TEL NO:919-316-4970 #962 P03
Mows
Pa rsLLQit F LA, .st 4..
a..Im.lt tdttfii.R eft bock si dQ o44 4Yetse,Jsla.
28s000 GPD
—)
Ur- t 4t &QI, re.; ic.S1
g,S .se. 4.3 a'tti
ti'o • WR"-
$0,0OC) GPD
M i "Jet,* s i.k•st wQC j
oStoerS
ft-ir W C..S ^
band G Po
Ki,i.i' Rom:,,. C4 Csem4ret
ba$e Or,
'to, coo , P p ewer?-

.5-0, 000 Gal
Propane
15=0 CF'.N4./4
Far ban
Cor,4.
A.
PUMP 110.
65 w 55
i7S-o.CI5
QroQar-may L r-NG
20- Exc.(
bta _ 300c> 6P13
ups.
Fa,r- �- r7Sa.
•. O '30 Ft H nDl
\ \ NAVYO.
4G\
K e-Z
RQ9 Fr'^ej t�--
4
u S'T' • qa.s rsrnat -to:c o
OtteiK'a-raw a.c��i 00
h OILE2
p Ca. •20a.
'
Ove, w- 3a.a00t
o
Dika-
W=.
Dike.
4
9!
SAINt.111111
. ice.
53 eo S
io
1206m. hlo. 1I
i\i O i 00 •• 95
430 X ri2.95 C19'T7.,)
r.e97z) C Air. Tc""`r ' .
C_ .15!n c.e.
GuILIORe) MILLS
,
la
ZA.1.
T, z,
No.1'zJo..
tbta . c0
t X I0D f rar.,eS
6584) b,DOO GP
No. 2
500 -_
(s97 .)
`"-D I] D ir! c.'' �Ca�c;w.ro
130.9n..
•1 st19
4in 1,1ev,;n.rc
yak
i
23
t�1 o ` B
aro x zoo
(197r)
Lag NMI* , '+Lit to
a.cc 54- Fr . I
Pit
PIC
6 Q't.
r
C9
m! lGi
F.bcf Q'f,cts !i0, b
Rrr� 3rai ',or-, .rs
CH ,ta k1
f
No.3 t�10.7
t r 1,d..0.. Uw„-$3 - (tow G P a
• zOOc,� .. �c ' 0
r--1
1..pr,t 1-�J', �t
(i 97a.) . m
Air T4:.r-�- AtrMvmidiiiar,la Ilgvip.fifr1RFen+fieC7� .��a+ip pasihp �JLgnp' 111.
1 G 1...., 'jio. aR
F"FIC£QH
X. s5 33s'
109
B40,000 GPn
F1oL,s w l i i'Ac.tec t. fro pnr i,b
As preckvc+,15,` IAcreas�es,
I O
o� O- r eciS
i
:05
,rz
2H._5
&re). (+972). ;
6OX40;
G'g . tSto
190 X 22
(497z)
1
7t
5C7x260
(19 re)
C pr.c.
No.5
m
m
r
C
LJ
I-
0�
F 6
10r-t.
5T TE RTE, 11

JEN
.Augu-L 13, 1993
CA bt,f7 Oct -
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Permits and Engineering Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27625-0535
SUBJECT: NPDES PERMIT #NC-0002305
PERMIT MODIFICATION APPLICATION CORRECTION
GUILFORD EAST SITE
KENANSVILL2, DUPL!N COUNT`!
Dear Ms. Sullins:
We have discovered an error in the permit application received by your office on June 9,
1993. Please find enclosed a corrected page 11-3. The error is explained below.
The error is in Section 14b (Products, Line 214b) under the Maximum amount per day
columns (column #3). Instead of 500, the number should be 100. This corresponds to a
maximum daily processing rate of 100,000 LBS/day at the plant. The weekly maximum
processing rate is 500,000 LBS/week, and this was mistakenly entered into column ;3.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions or require further
explanations.
Sincerely,
GUILFORD MILLS, INC.
Jimmy Summers
Manager, Environmental Services
JPS:cp
cc: Ed Beck
File
4925 WEST MARKET STREET • GREENSBORO, N.C. 27401 • P.O. BOX 26969 ° GREENSBORO, N.C. 27419-6969
919-316-4000 • FAX: [phone]

r
13. Activity Description Dive a
narrative description of acltvl%Y
producing this dlscharge.(see
Instructions)
14. Activity Causing Discharge For
each 51C Code which describes
the activity causing this discharge,
supply the type and maximum
amount of either the raw material
consumed (Item 14a) or the product
produced (item 14b) In the units
specified In Table t of the Intlruc-
llon Booklet. For SIC Codes not
listed in Table 1. use raw msterlal
or producllon units normally used
for measuring productlon.(see
Instructions)
a. Raw Materials
* 14a
SIC Code
DISCHARGE SERIAL NUMBER
001
FOR AGENCY usfl
T
It t is I Warp knitting of synthetic fabrics_
Name
Dyeing and
finishing of warp knitted synthetic fabrics.
.�D
Maximum Unit
Amount/Day (See Table I
Shared Discharges
(3)
(4)
(S)
..
4
b. Products
SIC Code
* 4b (1)
2258
Name
(2)
Maximum Unit Shared Discharges
Amount/Day (See Table I) (Serial Number)
00i
(3)
Synthetic Fabrics 10 0
(4)
11-2 .
Q•3

aftrao �T
6,/qA,L5/0\1 (77,AJ f-f rokYi e-r c-
( /z6Ai-r- Fse vt) %5-/liao)
eop ;6 160 aybyi-1117 69 Irer7
P OP1 77DA� »T�
00 7 Low-nael
(di/77q- s
g/Z4fr 5
Mee rfori
64 0-75, c-,IA//,// (` . ,ems_
Sewah` l°'(C) G w
W7/"? //)
(5---,4727 22 % C7,s /01,4-
�
,6;6vciAy/ha,;,(y;) — /05././
rigs [Po vm Myt. c (�/ 7 (NA-klir D- al w0-//ten
y
5i/A44 6(,vi' is
/, 02Cni,p /,) Iwo ye J.
,Call( 15 gX6 y1
J
Pet
1 r�/(
,(
3v /3
4'oo 000 lG/41441,4
5?, roe /bs Avak
9s, ,33 /bs/w.
iep y/ok
could ,5Le 100(©o 14./

�4 /?Z, / �/00 �///b. / 46 //
Qet<
;ocaaszd ffadte61-1;91 -7aw /6V
,Q S / as ��s
u-yu/� (4)
(-f� �C -i/C Cr/, ��J(Q
y
ciko t h /
y
nI `7-/gucv,�. � �f o�#y6liv,5a .��
— 5/Pt 6 1/a.A ' I,S a aTI:e47) (1)i?J !' (;t4.fil• 4! 6/91)
��l%lei'tT/° o ,Xsv Jw ple%/.iSL" •
n Jittd14-RI.S.0
67-i��al/0041+46 of Giy,c,

NE Cape Fear R./Guilford Mills
Upstream at Goshen Swamp
Downstream at Sarecta Bridge
Temperature
D.O.
% Saturation
BOD5
Temperature
D.Q.
% Saturation
BOD5
Date
(°C)
(mg/I)
(%)
(mg/I)
(°C)
(mg/I)
(%)
(mg/I)
930802
27.2
0.8
10
0.4
22.6
4.8
55
1.2
930804
25.6
1.2
15
`''"' "
24.3
4.2
49
930806
25.2
1.1
13
iiiiiiiilii
24.8
4.4
52
930810
26
1.4
17
1.4
25.6
4.8
59
1.4
930811
25
1.8
21
is r:•:
`?''
25.1
5.1
61
930812
23
2.3
26
24
5.4
64
930817
' 25.2
2.2
26
1.4:ii;Iiiii
25.5
4.9
59
1.8
930818
26.1
2.1
26
26.2
5.2
63
930820
25.8
3.4
41
26
6.4
78
930823
24
4.1
48
1.7 r 24.2
7.8
92
2.3
930825
25.2
4.4
52
25.2
8.1
96
930827
25.4
4.2
50
26
7.9
96
930830
26.2
5.2
63
1.2 t`" `" 26.2
7.8
95
1.8
930705
' 28.7
2.4
31
28.9
4.2
54
930713
28.8
1.4
18
28.9
3.1
40
930715
28.3
1
13
f 28.4
2.8
35
930720
27.6
1.1
14
1.3} { 27.6
2.4
30
1.4
930728
27.8
1.3
16
V.V i Y
27.2
7.2
89
78
921001
19.8
7.2
80
2.2 rY r:< 18.7
7.7
82
5.2
921006
22.1
7
80
3 21.1
7.6
84
5
921009
23.1
7
101
24.2
7.4
87
921012
20.9
8.8
93
2.2 ''' 20.1
9
98
5.6
921014
19.2
8.7
84
19
8.9
95
921020
14.9
8.6
88
2.4 is 14
8.7
84
5.2
921022
16.6
8.5
81
14.8
8.6
84
921027
20.6
7.1
78
21.9
7.5
90
921029
20.1
7
78
2.61 k 22.2
7.6
86
5.2
24.4
6.9
81
3.6
920901
23.1
6.6
78
2 .` r.:
920903
23.4
6.5
75
24.8
7.3
87
920908
22.6
6.7
77
3.2
`
23.6
7
82
5
920911
22.2
6.8
78
23.4
7.1
82
920915
20.6
6.8
76
3.8 i`''' > 22.1
7
80
5.2
920917
25.3
7.8
93
23.4
7.8
90
920922
24.3
7.1
84
23.8
7.8
92
920924
22.6
7.3
84
3.6` '` `> 23.6
7.7
90
3
920929
22.8
7.2
83
22.1
7.9
90
920804
25.8
7.8
95
3.2' 26.5
8
98
2.4
920806
25.2
7.9
94
2.8ry1:
25
8.2
98
920811
23.4
8
92
23.8
8.2
96
2.4
920813
23.9
8
94
24.5
8.3
98
920818
23
8.1
93
6.4r`
= =
23.6
8.2
95
6.4
920820
23.3
8.2
94
23.9
8.2
96
920825
23
8
92
10r 24.2
8.3
98
10.8
920827
22.6
8.1
93
23.9
8.4
99
Page 1

NE Cape Fear R./Guilford Mills
Upstream at Goshen Swamp
Downstream at Sarecta Bridge
Temperature
D.O.
% Saturation
BOD5
Temperature
D.O.
% Saturation
BOD5
Date
(°C)
(mg/I)
(%)
(mg/I)
(°C)
(mg/I)
(%)
(mg/I)
920714
27
7.9
98
5.2 26
8
98
5.2
920716
26
8
98
25
8.1
96
920721
24
6.9
81
25
7.3
87
920723
26
6.8
83
6.8 27
6.9
85
6.4
920728
25
6.9
82
7.6
26
7.1
87
5.2
920730
25
7
83
26
7.3
89
911002
25.1
6.5
77
5.6'
``' '
25.1
6.5
73
7.8
911003
20.9
7
78
20.9
7
78
911008
20.2
8
87
20.2
8
87
911011
20.5
8.1
89
20.5
8.1
89
911014
21.2
6.7
74
21
7.2
80
911017
19.6
6.8
74
20
7.2
78
911022
21
6.9
77
'` ` 21
::.:.:::::
6.9
77
911024
19.5
7.1
77
5.1 {:.:.;. 19.5
7.1
77
4
911029
20
6.9
75
20
7
76
910904
28.7
7.4
94
3.7
ili
g,
28.7
7.4
95
2.4
910906
31.4
7.1
95
31.4
7.1
99
910909
26.3
7.3
89
26.3
7.3
89
910911
26
7.2
88
6
26
7.2
88
5.4
910916
27.2
7.5
93
27.2
7.5
93
910920
26
7.8
95
26
7.8
95
910924
23.4
7.3
84
23.4
7.3
84
910926
23.7
5.3
62
5.6
23.7
5.3
62
5.4
910808
24
7.4
87
': r:::=: 24
7.4
87
910809
28
8.5
108
27
8.5
105
910812
24
8.7
102
25
8.7
102
910814
28
6.2
78
8.4
_
is '><
28
6.2
78
4.4
910816
28
7.8
99
28
7.8
99
910821
28
7.1
90
5.4
28
7.1
90
6
910823
27
7.1
88
27
7.1
88
910826
25
7.8
93
25
7.8
93
910830
27
7.6
94
22
7.6
86
!ii.
910710
28.6
7
90
3.4
28.6
7
90
4.8
910712
27.9
7.8
99
27.9
7.8
99
910715
29.9
7.3
96
29.9
7.3
96
910718
30.8
8.5
113
30.8
8.2
109
910722
31.6
7.8
105
31.6
7.8
105
910726
32.5
7.8
106
32.5
7.8
106
910729
23
7.5
86
23.8
7.5
88
910731
24.2
8.8
104
24.2
8.8
104
Average:
24.6035714
6.349
75.141176
3.92 24.625
7.1286
84.47619048
4.3967
75th %lie
27
Page 2

MODEL INPUTS FOR LEVEL B ANALYSIS
GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility Name:
Autlt,Ec<0 Mlu:.
NPDES No.:
_O 1/. C 5
Type of Waste:
j ri 7.
Facility Status:
EX I5T I>J
Receiving Stream:
N(E CPF_ k .
Stream Classification:
C 'tN
Subbasin:
r30c,22/
County:
Du ►9 9
Regional Office:
t)i )2p
Topo Quad:
L-t27 -CCi
FLOW INFORMATION
USGS #
oZ 11)763"3r
Date of Flow Estimates:
/96 F
•
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
_3'
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
/.
Average Flow (cfs):
37g
30Q2 (cfs):
5,r
IWC at Point of Discharge (%):
Jj
Cummulative IWC (%):
MODEL INPUT INFORMATION
r--
y
LENGTH OF REACH (miles)
f . 7
/. Z
/ $
Z • 3
INCREMENTAL LENGTH (miles)
" • f?-
D . ?/'
G>.
C), 7,
WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
FLOW (MGD)
, .
r_
--
CBOD (mg/1)
//
NBOD (mg/I)
D.O. (mg/1)
5. 0
RUNOFF CHARACTERISTICS
7Q10 (cfs/mi2)
r . r%
0 .0 5-
r
, C-�_
QA (cfs/mi2)
7
5. '7
5 %
.5. 7
CBOD (mg/1)
__
NBOD (mg/1)
?
v
D.O. (mg/I)
Cll it , /
_
-->
TRIBUTARY CHARACTERISTICS ,'
7Q10 (cfs)
/701-1..L---
r/OK
h171,-C-'
0.61
QA (cfs)
.-1+
CBOD (mg/1)
2
NBOD (mg/1)
I
cl4/6(0tf k
(.1
D.O. (mg/1)
SLOPE (fpm)
/, it
"-
• J
Name of facility

(gRie) 6-51—
acd;.9'(.Ckfeir
aoq/c/wp (464.*0)
417,4egs.k ar",fity
03D� 22
o/ /574L L,
140.0-/ 41a6,/,;-7( liviy-5 4'-'? r-,5' OP- e
r/1/'. ( c-
�14 // 5- e(Mef �. �$ 4> 6v�',r //7 -. �C
ppL
4mnim/Q / fr/,'y7d c .44 ff9 ./( - &'"/'rn'/7'
a /4?
`e-Pt 4W/6/,‘: ,_ ,(/ khy );j, /g t ,-(Cccf -, c�!?
,/ ,-2t (' l � (�Y $ J f 7e/z. -ce 5 _ -4 /fie -wire e ":- ,,',' r'/ r-��' �!' „- m6,,.,J
.r J,_
?-5' /IBC p. `-%„- cu ArkyS. L41&� �', �. t � l/m 7/
Cew
. _,Ii _ lle,.. &56te,i, 0/4 0 C-41P/7 le., V &---7-- -tes-74. olk----7‘A,. /7o/i)
, ,
7 .......,
1, - /(7 a i , 2..r.- , _
li /12 (7 b 1 • /) v / / / m. /7/5 ,Vtife avipr_1( ,,t„ed 4:_/,;4/1/Et {.(.-,,•1 J-4,:-,,L.-_--44,./ pi-, 4/
L., f i ' t / "-it' - * - /
C rn)71 /''PG --c- 4I-fie7,4 " %� /-6y �rc /I l � (G•(
&- e€ `I / 1 �j , U t- r ..% ,I (•i. fr' "!
f;;',;7726:litt
1.51A (;)/1 ie )__ -14/5 0. eiw/l(ance__
km' /414
•
art" re/4'66kC �1 f � 1 5 /I�/ KA 6• );= 1ci..-C?/V
-fired
'ma . a~#.4 6607e4 4,eaa• ,2
e 6e/f64(....5 ,a,(44'!/ aVeil; Cif:1 I I/1 beCCe0( fzi 5/6/
/;51-e,t-14g -,40.471/4 /;1.574..46! Ac, Alt CT" e aiv
♦S(61/1711 i;�'; (fac CCb%

1t/4 /Ai 893
POs�- se-c gib f� f l�u� r � //iiiif '61 �/i,
ia/nanl AveilLd7wm ij$,o,J
I/tic- 1155cafmg, r 146c)
40p 5-74/0 -= 45-
.235"
J144 77o")
6/lit r 40/11/011
ftity/l i` y 3s = 2/7�y/l
(t) CdiL) (Cw )
QOjJA,/ (/'i )
Are 09-4A,,.rd ,a Wra(/k. 2,7/ji Ikea,
e025,74(e-et.5- Uruxdocumu+fa( a6.✓cc(zfefch'•‘e‘l,i"riIS:
apoym; t 011 ek/ele-, aid Ice0Y-/e(-4- .
OWI) 710 (5116fir/Chimn�i�m :s alvc.a�ly bu:y /mYzd. /ve/s
o/- e44Pn:& and f/i)
iAe, we
GivCFIN+.iek,) 7.S3 m,��
G.� 1041014 /8/j,j. C ./!
4
) ko;,e,41.
oh�sfisu�i)h/rai4"1'd714f
s wer
rrv6�ems. G/w�rid� ofa.�r 0071- atpec✓ h bt �t jti weep,
eafit ihrui is u/urwad/e.- /epilc .wed s,:..,%arm c.i<ahrlrx�n.

. •
Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement
Reporting Form A
(Revised June 1990)
1. Facility Information:
NPDES Permit No: NC D OO2 3 o S Discharge (Pipe) No: D 61 • Year: ! 19 3
Facility Name: r•,u ,1 Est 0, Ji's1 C^ • Class: VI (3)County: D, a 1.r
Persons) Collecting Samples: Kee, westtrock
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical:.. Yes No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory: 1krt - La6cerk4o.r es, rnc.
11. Sampling:
Page 1 of 9
a r.
24 hr composite for main sample / grab sample for purgeable fraction •
--;-
Date Sampled: (composite sample) Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:I "'
Sampling begun (date, time): 2/'v153 l ,°o A .'•• _ . Yes r r
Sampling finished (date, time): Z/"113 91oO14"4 —..& No
Date and time sampled (grab sample): 24 n+ 1g3 q=oo
instructions
The porpose.of this document and the accompanying memo is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described in the permit.
Sampling
1 • Take a 24 hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volaUls
organic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample Is completed Follow any other sampling instructions provided by the laboratory
performing the analysis.
2 - Indicate In the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testlnp was taken.
•
3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space provided on the form.
Analysis
4 - Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, including those to be identified and approximately quantified under the 10
significant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA•approved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods can be substituted
only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM). Read and distribute to the laboratory
performing the analysis the accompanying memo (redder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
5 - Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described in Rem 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis
Monitoring Requirement In the permit) using a GC/MS library search. Tentative Identification Is all that is required; confirmation by standard
Injection Is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal standard having the closest retention time.
•
Reporting.
• • 8 = Quantitatton Limit Targets that should be met are listed on thls Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantita-
tion limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitatlon limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting
a quantitatlon limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical
to within a quantifiable concentration. Ust any quantltatton limit differtent (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided
for this purpose. •
7 - If a chemical Is found to be below the quantltation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or'< ) the quantltatlon limit
In the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected in concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
than the quantitatlon limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected In concentrations above the quan-
titation limits must be quantified. Quantltatlon limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter
the total number of peaks detected in each analytic fraction in the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations
in units of micrograms per liter (ug/1) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be identified under the 10 significant peaks rule
are observed, enter "none" in the space provided for "other" compounds in each appropriate analytic fraction section. Provide the concentra-
tion estimate and retention time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made.
8 - If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, identification basis, and
MS scan number for each. in addition, list internal standards and their retention times.
•
9 - In the section labeled genic Analytical Information" (p. 9), include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
operating conditions, and su gate recovery. Report the size of the GC/MS library being utilized in the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory
representative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
11 - Mali two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTN: Central Files,
Division of Environmental Management, NC DEHNR, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Mali the APAM form separately from Discharge Monitoring
Reports.

•,
A. Purgeable (Volatile Organic) Fraction,
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 84085
EPA Method
0
624
Page 2 of 9
STORET Compound
Number •
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitatlon
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
GCIMS
Confirmation?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for. -
(ugll)
. (ug/1) •
(ug/1)
Yes
No
34210
Acrolein ..
100
<1.00
34215'
Acrylonitrile
100
<loo
34030
Benzene
5
•
<5
32101
Bromodichloromethane
. 5
<5•
32104
Bromoform
5•
34413
Bromomethane
10
< i o
32102
Carbon tetrachloride
5 .
- • .
• <5
.
34301
Chlorobenzene
6
- ..
<5
- 34311
Chloroethane
• 10
< to
34576
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
10
<1.o
32106
Chloroform
5 .
<5
34418
Chloromethane
10
e i 0
.
32105 .
Dibromochloromethane
• . 5
<5
34496
1,1.Dlchloroethane .
5
<5
34531
1,2 Dichloroethane
• 5 t• •-
•-- '`
- (5. -
34501
1,1•Dichloroethylene •
=• 5
<5
•
34546
trans•1,2•Dichloroethylene
5
<5
1 .1,2-Dlchloropropane
6..
<5
IIMMAIMR
' 34704 •
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
5
<5
34699
trans 1;3-Dichloropropene
• • 5
. <5
.�;_ .
34371
Ethylbenzene
8
g
_
<5
34423
Methylene chloride
5
<5
34516
1,1,2,2•Tetrachioroethane
. 7
<5•
34475
Tetrachloroethylene
5 •
<5
34010
Toluene-
6
5 -
<5
�45
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
5
<5
34511
1,1,2•Trichloroethane
• 5
•
<5
39180 -
Trichloroethylene
5
<5
34488
Trich$orofluromethane •
10
<a.o
39175
Vinyl chloride
10
. .
• <a.o
* If different from quantitation limit target

.
Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight •
Estimated
Concentration
(ugll)
•
Library Match
Probability '
(%)
Identification Basis :
(Check all that apply) •
Scan
Number
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Library
Match
Manual
Interpretation
RT
-4
.
•
j
J
•
r r
-
• Complete only If non targeted compounds are present
internal Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)
2. Other purgeables (up to 10 highest peaks)
m
a
0
(o

B. Acid Extractable Fraction, EPA Method
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45582
625
Page 4 of 9
•
0
STORET Compound
Number •
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitatlon
. Limit*
Concentration
Detected
GCIMS
Confirmation?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed fon •
(ugli)
(ugll)
(ugll)
-
Yes
No
34452
4-Chloro,3-triethyiphenol.
10 •
<1.o
• 34586 --•
2-Chlorophenol
10
< to
34601
2,4Dichlorophenol
10
<2. o
,
34606
.2,4-Dimethyiphenol
10
_ ( 1A
•
34616
` 2,4-Dinitrophenol
50
<50
34657
• 2-Methyi-4,6-dinitrophenol
• 50
_ • <50
-
34591
2-Nitrophenol
10 •
< 10
34646
_
4-Nitrophenol
,
50
• <50
.
39032
Pentachiorophenol
50
_ <50
34694
Phenol
10
_
<in
34621
2,4,6-Trichlorophenoi
10
• < io
'
•
• if different from quantitation limit target
•
•

.
.
Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight
,
. '
Estimated
Concentration
(uW1)
•
• •
Library Match •
Probability '
• (%)
.
•
'
Retention
•Time (RT)
. (Min)
.
Identification Basis .
(Check all that apply) .
Scan
Number
•
•
Library
• Match
Manual
Interpretation
RT
' .
.
-
•
.
• _
.
,
.
.
_
• ,
..
_
• _
.
-
.
,
• .
.
•
'
-
•
•
•
,
.
•
•
_
,
' .
-
-
- .
,
,
,
... .
-
-
••
-
. ,
,
-
. .,
...1 •
. ••:,.'
I
.
::.. .
.
.
....,
-
.
\ •
.
-
•
•
•
• • •
•
.
,
[
.
•
.
..
•
.,
.
• •
' •
•
Complete only If norkargeteil compounds are present: •
Internal Standard
Retention
Time ,
• (Mln) •
••
•
2. Other acid extractables (up to 10 highest peaks)
at
0
co

ti
C. Base/Neutral
Number
Fraction
Fraction, EPA Method 625 ' .
Page 6 of 9
of chemicals detected in Fraction
STOREY Number 45583
22 • •
STORET Compound
' Number
Quantltatlon
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit•
Concentration
Detected
• GC/MS
Confirmation?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for.
1
(ugh)
u ( gl1)
1
(ugl ) .
Yes
No
3405
Acenaphthene •
10
< 10
34200
_
Acenaphthylene •-
10
<10 -
34220
Anthracene
10 -
< 10
39120
Benzidine
• 50
<50
34526
Benzo (a) anthracene
10
<io
34247
Benzo (a) pyrene
10
<10
34230
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
10
( in
34521
Benzo (ghl) perylene
10
< 10
34242
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
• 10
34278
Biss2-chioroethoxy) methane
10
<10
34273
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
10
<10
34283
Bls(2-chlorolsopropyl) ether
10
<3.o
39100
Bis(2-ethyihexyl) phthalate
10
28
�/
34636
4-Bromophenxi phenyl ether
10
<10
,
34292
_
Butyl benzyl phthalate
• 10
< 10
34581
2-Chloronaphthalene -
10 •.
•
<10. •
-�
34641
4-Chiorophenyl phenyl ether
= 10
•
<io
•
34320 -
Chrysene
10
. .
ern
n
34556
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene
10
•<
10
•
•
34536
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene .
10
<io
• 34566
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
<io .,
34571
1,4-Dichiorobenacne
- • 10
• <io
34631
3,3-Dichlorobenzldine •
20
<20"
34336
Diethyl phthalate .
10
_
<io
34341
Dimethyi phthalate
• 10
•
<10
39110
Di-n-buty! phthalate
10
-
< 10
•
34611
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10
<10
34626
2,6-Dinitrotoiuene
10
<10
34596
D1-n-octyl phthalate
10
<10
34346
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine •
10
<10
34378 •
Fluoranthene
10
<10
34381
Fluorene •
10
<10
39700
Hexachlorobenzene '
10
<io
'
34391
Hexachlorobutadiene .
10
t 1 n
34386
Hexachlorocyclopentadlene
• 10
< a.0
34396
Hexachloroethane -
10
•
<10
34403
Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene
10
<io
34408
Isophorone
10
_
<10
'34696
Naphthalene
10
<io
34447 •
Nitrobenzene
10
.<10
-
34438•
N-nitrosodimethylamine
10
<10
34428
N-nitroso-di-n•propylamine
10
<10
34433
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
10
<10
34461
Phertanthrene
10
<10 -
34469
Pyrene
_
10 '
<10
-
34551
1,2,4•Trichlorobenzene
10
•
<10
If different from quantitation target

•
06
'
Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight'
Estimated
Concentration
(ug11)
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Identification Basle :
(Check all that apply) '
Scan
Number
Library
Match
Manual
Interpretation
RT
Unknown Hydrocarbon
250
640•
24.40
_ X
1099
_
Unknown
280
,
33
25.04
X
1130
Unknown
280
52
25:10
X • •
1133
Unknown Hydrocarbon
284
y
42
25.3Q
X
-
1143
Unknown Hydrocarbon
278
1 33•
26.39
X1196
Unknown
381
94
_
26:88• -
-
X
.
1220
Unknown
• . 185
44 .
27..02 -
X
'
1227 ,
Unknown
315'
220
-
_
' 28,96
X
1322
Unknown
•282
• 35
29.33 ,
X.
1340
Unknown _
,240
42
31.61
X
1451
Complete only If non -targeted compounds are present:
• Internal Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)
1,4-dichlorobenzene-d4
10.16
13.36
Naphthalene-d8 •
Acenaohthene-dl0
17.84
Phenanthrene-d10
21.64
28.41
Chrysene-d12
Perylene-d12
32.12
i
0
CD
0
10

D. Organochlorine/Organophosphorus Pesticides and PCB's • page a of 9
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 1
Fraction STORET Number 00188
STORET Compound
Number
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected .
Coafirmation?
Dual ColunM
GC1MS
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for (ugll)
Organochlorine Pesticides/PCB's: EPA Method . 6o8
(ugll)
(ugl1)
Yes
No
Yes
No
39330
Aldrin
0.05
Same
BDL
.
x
39337
alpha-BHC
0.05
Same
BDL
x
X
39338
Beta-BHC
0.05
Same
BDL
•x
x
34259
Delta•BHC
0.1
Same
BDL
X
• 39340
Gamma-BHC (Undane)
0.05
Same
BDL
X
X
39350
Chlordane
0.2 .
Same
BDL
X
X
39310
4,4'-DDD
0.1
Same
BDL,
X
X
39320
•4,4 -DDE
0.1
Same
BDL
X
X
39300
4,4'-DDT
0.1
Same
Fun
39380
Dietdrin
0.02
• Same
BDL -
X
X
34361
Endosulfan I (alpha)
0.1
Same
BDL
X
•
X
34356
Endosulfan 11 (beta)
0.1
Same
BDL
X
x
34351
Endosulfan sulfate
0.7
Same
. BDL
X
X
39390
Endrin
0.06
Same .
BDL
X
X •
34366
Endrin aldehyde
0.2
Same
l NI
III
39410
He • tachior
0.05
.. Same
BDL
X
X
39420
Heptachlor epoxide •
: 0.8
Same
BDL -
ill
39480
Methoxychlor
0.5
Same
BD
39755
Mirex
0.2
Same
BDL
X
X
39400
•Toxaphene
2.4
SamP
Anr
11111
-
MI
34671
PCB 1018
0.5
Same
BDL
X
• 39488
PCB 1221
0.5
Same
BDL
lilaMI
39492
PCB 1232 •
0.5
Same
BDL
39496
PCB 1242 •
0.5
Same
BDL
X
nil
39500
PCB 1248 •
0.5
Same
BDL •
X
-
X
39504
PCB 1254
1.0
Same
BDL ..
x
X
39508
PCB 1260
1.0
Same
BDL
X
X
*Methoxychlor DID NOT confirm on secondar
Organophosphorus Pesticides: EPA Method 8141 column.
39560
I Demeton
2.5
Rama
Tam
NM
�:�
39540
Parathion (ethyl)
0.6
. Same
BD
E. Herbicides,
Number.of
Fraction
EPA Method 8150
• •
chemicals detected in Fraction
STORET Number 00148
0
STORET Compound
Number
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit' -
Concentration
Detected
Confirmation?
Dual Column
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for
(ugll)
(ugll)
(ugll)
• Yes
No
397302,4-D
12
0.5
BDL
X
39045
Sllvex • -'�
' 2
0.5
BDL
_
X
39740
2
2,4,5-T , •••
2 •
0.5
BDL
X `
• If different from quantitation limit target

o
..•
7.
r~
---
Organic Analytical Information: Page 9 of 9
`
-
Organic Fraction
Method
Extraction
GC Operating Conditions
Column Description
Surrogates (Spikes'
Batch
Continuous
Length X ID, Film Thickness,
Column Type, Cartier Gas & Flow
Rate, Temperature Program
Compound
•
Recover
%
Purgeable
625
X
75mx0.53mm, 3.0um DB624
ethaneDichloro
112 .•
He,40cm/sec, 40°C •
T$luene-
92 ,
-
(4min),150°C,10°/min
gromofluoro
enzene
94
Acid Extractable . •
625
x
�30minx0.32mm,0.5um,DB5ms
hg�iB.ro-
13 ,
•
He,30cm/sec,40°C(4min)
P2henol-d5
16
300°C,10°/min
bfoi{iopWiencl
24 ,
Base/Neutral Extractable
625
X•
30mx0. 32mm, 0. 5um,DB5MS
zene-ogn
20 •He,30cm/sec,40°C(4min)
2-ff4jobi-
23
300°C,10°/min
Wev$henyl-
71
'
Example: Acid Extractable
625
X
30m x 0.25mm, 025um, DB-5,
He, 30cmisec,40'C(4min) -
270°C,10'lmin
ds • phenol
.
50
GC/MS Library size (number of reference spectra) .
F. Metals and Other Chemicals - • • . - • --3 `) -
Metals Other Chemicals (as listed below) detected in Sample -
Number of and -
Fraction STORET Number 78240
STORET Compound-
Number
Quantltatlon
Limit Target
Quantitatlon
Limit*
_
Concentration
Detected
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for: • .
(ug/1)
(ugll)
(ug11)
01104
Alun,: um
• 50
50
100
01097 +_
Antimony
50
200
580
01002
Arsenic
.10 -
10
BDL
- 01012
Beryllium
25
2 ,
BDL
01027
Cadmium
2
1
BDL
01034
Chromium
5
50
• 96
01042
Copper
2
3
290 •
01051
Lead
10
5
BDL
71900
_
Mercury
0.2
0.2
BDL
01067
_
10
5
BDL
01147
. Selenium
5
5
BDL
01077
Silver
5
5 •
BDL
01092
Zinc
10
3
90
2. Other inorganics:
01007
Barium
_
500
50
BDL
00940
Chloride
1000
1000
14,000
00720
Cyanide
20
10
BDL
00951
_
Fluoride
100
100
310
• If different from quantitation limit target.
Analytical Laboratory Representative: HE: 01 UTH TAN-56N • • .
Signed Chan vviAN MOP, -)Z- •wne n Date: 1/ r 9199 3
Facility Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC): ••
certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signed: -• - Date: