NC0002305_Permit Modification_19980715

NPDES DOCUMENT !CANNINO COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0002305
Guilford Mills WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
("Pe7m=lification
„ ....K .-.��� ..... _.,,... ,.....
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
July 15, 1998
Miss document printed oa reuiae paper - ignore any
content oa the rest -ex -me aide

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Jimmy Summers
Corporate Environmental &
Guilford Mills, Inc.
Post Office Box 26969
Greensboro, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Summers:
Energy Manager
27419-6969
AgITITA
DENR
July 15, 1998
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification
Permit No. NC0002305
Guilford East Facility
Duplin County
The Division issued NPDES permit NC0002305 to Guilford Mills for the above referenced facility on September
16, 1996. The Division has reviewed, and approved, your request for permit modification at the subject facility.
Specifically, you requested that the permit be modified to reflect the discharge of treated wastewater, through a newly
constructed effluent line, to the mainstem of the Northeast Cape Fear River. In accordance with your permit modification
request, the Division is forwarding herewith a modification to the subject permit.
Enclosed please find the modified permit, including cover page, supplement page, map, two effluent pages, and two
special condition pages. These pages should be inserted into your permit and the old ones discarded. This permit
modification is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. Part I1, E.4. addresses the requirements to be followed in case
of change in ownership or control of this discharge. This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits
which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal
Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local government permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Mark McIntire at telephone number (919) 733-
5083, extension 553.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Central Files
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, US EPA
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES Unit, Permit File
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]/FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Permit No. NC0002305
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission,
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Guilford Mills, Incorporated
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater and stormwater from a facility located at
Guilford East Division
NC Highway 11
North of Kenansville
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as the Northeast Cape Fear River in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, III, and IV hereof.
The permit shall become effective August 1, 1998
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on January 31, 2002.
Signed this day July 15,1998
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0002305
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Guilford Mills, Inc., is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 1.5 MGD wastewater treatment facility with the
following components:
• Bar screen
• Parshall flume
• Continuously recording flow meter
• Mechanical lint screen
• Aerated flow -equalization basin with three floating aerators
• Pump station
• Aeration basin with eight floating aerators
• Square aeration basin with four floating aerators
• One round aeration basin with one floating aerator
• Splitter box
• Two clarifiers
• Chlorination 86 dechiorination equipment
• Reaeration basin with one floating aerator
• Twelve sludge drying beds
• Effluent pump station
• Effluent sampler and recording flow meter
The facility is located at Guilford East Division on NC Highway 11 north of
Kenansville in Duplin County (see Part III.A. of this permit) .
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map
into the Northeast Cape Fear River, classified class C-Swamp waters in the Cape
Fear River Basin.

Ii.oparn
ti7ti'r)p.o
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE
,9„:,yete
N•
LIGHT -DUTY ROAD. HARD OR
IMPROVED SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE =11M111i= UNIMPROVED ROI.b\ - =
Latitud-
Map #
Stream
Discharg Class
Receiv g St
Desi Q
Longitude
Sub -basin
C-Swam
Industrial / Domest
Northeast Cape ear River
50
...... '
•
....._ ....--.- ..•a.) ......4" . _mit._
— --4•• —) — '— _
-
t -
- _ ---.,
. .
- — _
__- ----_:/....
-_- ,. ,__
_ _
MiHers-..- .... --' _ --- \; ....
V : 4 .....
ridge— - --7, ---- - .,_ _....
SCALE 1:24 000
0
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
1 MILE
7000 FEET
1 KILOMETER
Guilford East
NC0002305
Duplin County
WWTP

371
1105,7
A (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
Permit No. NC0002305
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until outfall extension to the mainstem of the Northeast Cape Fear River or expiration,
the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location'
Flow �•(,)3i , r`t
1.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
ii
BOD, 5 day, 20'C --.r (( , (-'
83.4 Ibs/day
125.1 Ibs/day
3/Week
Composite
E
BOD, 5 day, 20°C 2
10.0 mg/L
3Week
Composite
E
COD -
;,{
3000 Ibs/day
6000 lbs/day
3/Week
Composite
E
Total Suspended Solids
1035 lbs/day
2071 lbs/day
3Week
Composite
l�—
pH2
3fWeek
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen3
3/Week
Grab
E, U, D
Fecal Coliform
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Weekly
Grab
E
Sulfide iJ;-
11.2 Ibs/day
24.01bs/day
Weekly
Grab
E
Phenols c
5.6 Ibs/day
12.0Ibs/day
Weekly
Grab
E
Chromium l- ; . pic i✓Z i.' , ,`A.1.-;
, . Cv i r. ' c
t•i ite,A .-C. _
, 56.0 pg/L
Weekly
Composite
E
Total Residua) Chlorine" `
19 pg/L
3/Week
Grab
E
Zinc -fgip l`Z ,
2/Month
Composite
E
Copper ;�, '<e s
2/Month
Composite
E
Oil and Grease Lc, _ NC; e& 3 . 'VP'
-<:; ,,Lk,,/.,
2/Month
Grab
E
Chloride
',
2/Month
Composite
E
Temperature (°C)
3/Week
Grab
E, U, D
Conductivity
3/Week
Grab
E, U, D
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Nitrogen
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
E
Notes:
2
3
4
5
Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream in Goshen Swamp at Highway 11 Bridge, D - Downstream in NE Cape Fear River at Sarecta Bridge; Instream
sampling shall be performed three times per week during June through September and once per week during the rest of the year.
The pH shall not be Tess than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
Limit applies only if chlorine is added to the wastestream.
Chronic (Ceriodaphnia), P/F at 90%; January, April, July and October; See condition A (3) of the Supplement to Effluent Limitations Page.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
z;r0ocT t`7 C K

A (2). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
Permit No. NC0002305
During the period beginning upon completion of outfall extension to the mainstem of the Northeast Cape Fear River and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
Flow
Monthly
Average
LIMITS
Weekly
Average
Daily Maximum
ONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Measurement
Frequency
sampre
Type
Sample
Location1
1.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5 day, 20UC
BOD, 5 day, 20°C
COD
Total Suspended Solids
pH2
83.4 Ibs/day
3000 Ibslday
1035 Ibslday
125.1 Ibs/day
10.0 mg/L
6000 Ibs/day
2071 Ibs/day
3/Week
3Week
3/Week
3Week
3/Week
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen3
Fecal Coliform
Sulfide
Phenols
Chromium
Total Residual Chlorine4
200 / 100 ml
11.2 Ibs/day
5.6 Ibslday
400 / 100 ml
24.0 Ibs/day
12.0 Ibslday
186.0 pg/L
28 pg/L
3/Week
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
3/Week
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Grab
E, U, D
E
Zinc
2/Month
Composite
Copper
OH and Grease
2/Month
2/Month
Composite
Grab
Chloride
2/Month
Composite
Temperature (°C)
Conductivity
3/Week
3/Week
Grab
Grab
E, U, D
E, U, D
Chronic Toxicity5
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Composite
Composite
Composite
E
Notes:
1
Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream in Goshen Swamp at Highway 11 Bridge, D - Downstream in NE Cape Fear River at Sarecta Bridge; Instream
sampling shall be performed three times per week during June through September and once per week during the rest of the year.
2 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
3 The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
4 Limit applies only if chlorine is added to the wastestream.
S Chronic (Ceriodaphnia), P/F at 27%; January, April, July and October; See condition A (4) of the Supplement to Effluent Limitations Page.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit No. NC0002305
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A (3). CHRONIC TOXICITYPASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QUATERLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina
Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised November 1995, or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality 90%
(defined as treatment two in the procedure document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring usin thi
procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The tests will be performed during the months of January,
April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent
discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring
Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1
(original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample
must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name,
permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area
of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin
immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly
in the months specified above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to
quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.

Permit No. NC0002305
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS (continued)
A (4). CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QUATERL9
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina
Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised November 1995, or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality i
(defined as treatment two in the procedure document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring usm,
procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The tests will be performed during the months of January,
April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent
discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring
Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1
(original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample
must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the
permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name,
permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area
of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin
immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly
in the months specified above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to
quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.

ATA.
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY
A. PRESTON HOWARD,
JR., P.E.
DIRECTOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 10, 1998
Jimmy Summers
Corporate Environmental and Energy Manager
P.O. Box 26969
Greensboro, NC 27419-6969
Subject: Wasteload Allocation History
Guilford Mills/East Division (NC0002305)
Duplin County
Dear Mr/ i er
As per my recent phone conversation with John Grey, I am enclosing a summarized history
of the wasteload allocations developed for the NPDES permit for the Guilford Mills/East
Division. In our discussion John explained that you had expressed concerns in regard to the
modeling that may have been utilized to determine the wastewater discharge limits for the
referenced facility. I believe the attached chronology may shed some light on those
concerns.
As I explained to John, there has not been a great deal of modeling involved in the
determination of limits for this facility. Rather, as best I can glean from the files, the limits
were originally determined by a combination of simplistic decay analysis and federal effluent
guidelines. Due to our inability to model swamp streams with conventional dissolved
oxygen (DO) models and the available instream data showing low DO levels in that vicinity
of the N.E. Cape Fear River, limits have been carried forth in the permit with no increase in
pollutant loading (for oxygen demanding wastes) since the original promulgation. As the
plant has grown in terms of production and influent volume, as well as influent pollutant
loading, the resulting limits have become more stringent and difficult to meet. I hope my
chronology provides some worthwhile insight into the Division's rationale as it has evolved.
Please be aware that the chronology is taken straight from my file notes, so it may have
arcane abbreviations and/or shorthand that are hard to follow. Please feel call me at 733-
5083, extension 507 if any translations are necessary. Please also contact me if you would
still like to meet and discuss the wasteload allocation in detail after reviewing my summary.
Sincerely,
Jason C. Doll
Environmental Modeler
cc: John Grey - Grey Engineering, Inc.
-D( Mark McIntyre — NPDES Permits Unit
Central Files
P.O. BOX 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Name: Guilford Mills/East Division Permit # NC0002305 Pipe # 001
WLA BACKGROUND/HISTORY
First WLA (F. Westall) 11/77
Analysis was done for a 0.5 MGD discharge to the NECFR (class C-SW) with a DA of 310 mi2 and
7Q10=6.5 cfs. Based on a simplistic velocity and decay rate analysis, water quality limits were assigned for
BOD5/NH3N of 15/12 (mg/1) with DO=5 mg/1. Other limits were also given —* pH=6-9, fecal=1000,
TSS=381/763 #/d. COD=1050/2100 #/d, Cr=0.5/2.0 #/d and limits for phenols and sulfides were assigned at a
non -detect std.
Second WLA (C. Heavener) 2/84
WLA was updated to reflect new BPT guidelines for the textile industry. A water quality limit was
assigned for BOD5 =19 mg/1. Other limits were based on BPT and given as follows:
COD 4000/8000 #/day
TSS I1090/2180 LW/day
Sulfide 10/20 -#/day
Phenols I5/10 k#/day
Total Cr 4.3 otg/1
pH 16-9 .u.
DO 5
BPT limits were based on guidelines from 40 CFR 410.52 and 410.53 for production of 100,000 #/day.
DA is changed to 326 mi2 but stream statistics remained unchanged.
Third WLA (C. Heavener) 4/84
WLA was done for an increase in waste flow to 0.965 MGD. The increase caused the water quality
based limit for BOD5 to be reduced to 11 mg/1 and water quality limit for Cr to 2.26 mg/1. All other limits and
stream flows were renewed unchanged.
Second and third WLAs were based on Level-B models derived from Forest's 1977 WLA.
Fourth WLA (M. Scoville) 3/89
Scoville's WLA was done for a straight renewal with no change in waste flow. Water quality limits for
BOD5, DO and pH remained unchanged. Other limits changed as follows to reflect change in federal
guidelines:
COD I 4750/9500 #lday
TSS 1035/2071 #/day
Sulfide I 9.5/19.0 #/day
Phenols 4.75/9.5 #/day

The Cr limit was updated to 0.266 mg/1 (via mass balance) and notes indicate that the previous limit was
not adequate to protect water quality. A chronic toxicity testing requirement was added to the permit with a P/F
@ 19% limit (reflecting IWC) and monitoring for O&G, Zn and Cu was also added.
Fifth WLA (D. Goodrich)
12/93
WLA was performed for an expansion from 0.965 to 1.25 MGD. WLA cover sheet indicated that
production increased from 95,000 #/day to 500,000 #/day. Water quality based BOD limits were lowered to
reflect no increase in loading to the system from (mon avg/daily max) of 11/16.5 to 8/12 mg/1, and effluent DO
limit was raised to 6.0 mg/1 limits were recommended as follows:
Recommended
Limits
Wasteflow (MGD)
Pre -expansion
Monthly Avg
0.965
Daily Max
Post -expansion
Monthly
1.25
Daily Tax
BOD5 (mg/1)
11
16.5
8
12
COD (lbs/day)
4750
9500
3000
6000
DO (mg/1)
5.0
5.0
6.0
6.0
TSS (lbs/day)
1035
2071
1035
2071
Total Chromium (µg/1)
266
217
pH (SU)
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
Temperature (°C)
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
TP (mg/1)
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/1)
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
Sulfide (lbs/day)
9.5
18.0
10
20
Chronic Toxicity
P/F @ 19% (Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct)
P/F @23% (Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct)
Fecal (/100 ml)
200
Chlorine (g/1)
28.0*
Phenols (lbs/day)
4.75
9.5
5.0
10.0
Zinc (µg/1)
monitor
monitor
Chloride (mg/1)
monitor
monitor
Copper (µg/1)
monitor
monitor
Oil and Grease (mg/1)
monitor
monitor
Temperature (°C)
monitor
monitor
*Total residual chlorine should only be limited/monitored if added to the waste stream.
It should be noted that when the permit was issued that the monthly average concentration limit for
BOD5 was dropped in favor of a 83.4 #/day mass limit. Daily mass limits were still expressed in mass and conc.
at 125.1 #/day and 12 mg/1.

Draft SOC (M. Williams) 5/96
The Wilmington Regional Office has recently raised the concem that the river channel is extremely
braided at the outfall location and that the discharge is no to the main channel, but rather to a side channel with
little or no flow during drought periods. It has been recommended that toxicant and wet test limits be adjusted
accordingly to account for the amount of flow available to the discharge in the immediate outfall area, or that
the outfall be relocated to the main channel, if such a phenomenon exists. The regional office has drafted an
SOC that with required GM to: 1) Do a flow study, develop a survey transect and "model the flow regime" in
the outfall area by 6/30/97; 2) Determine a coarse of action by 7/31/97; 3) Construct necessary improvements
by 9/30/98; and 4) Achieve compliance by 10/30/98. Exact details of the flow study and required "modeling"
are yet to be determined.
Stream Classification
N.E. Cape Fear River C-SW 9/1/74 (from source to Muddy Creek)
Instream Data
DEM Ambient Data
DEM maintains no ambient station in the vicinity of this discharge.
Self Monitoring Instream Data
GM's instream monitoring data from summer of 1993 shows violations of the 5.0 mg/1 DO std.
However, the upstream station shows more frequent and severe excursions below 5.0 mg/1 than downstream.
The differences may be attributable to the changing hydrology of the stream, from braided swamp to defined
channel, but no significant tribs join the river between the upstream and downstream sites.
The data from summers of 1994 and 1995 shows typical seasonal temperature fluctuations but very little
fluctuation in DO levels from winter to summer. Suspiciously high DO levels (7-9 mg/1) for a swamp system
are often reported. The data is suspect and should not be used to draw any substantive conclusions about the
impact of the discharge.
The data also always shows little or no difference between upstream and downstream conductivity
levels.
Current WLA - Approach/Recommendations
Oxygen Demanding Wastes
Due to the uncertainty of the impact of this discharge on the receiving swamp, past expansions have
been permitted with no increase in loading for oxygen demanding wastes. In the last WLA, the monthly
concentration limit for BOD5 was dropped so as not to discourage water conservation measures. Given the
apparent unreliability of the facility's self monitoring instream data, the uncertainty during the past allocations
is as present as ever. The expansion to 1.5 MGD should be permitted with limits reflecting no increase in BOD
load, and the daily max concentration accordingly applied again.
Instream Waste Concentration
This discharge is to a small side channel at the edge of the swamp, rather than to a main channel. The
Division does not currently possess the reconnaissance to determine how far across the swamp the main channel
is or whether or not one even exists.

In a 6/19/96 phone conversation, Mike Williams (Wilmington Regional Office) explained that he had
been to the outfall during low flow conditions, and there was a barely discernable flow reaching the discharge
point. Based on this assessment an IWC of 90% should be assumed until the results of Guilford's flow
study/transect are available. The corresponding permit limits will most likely be superceded by SOC until study
results are available.
The permit should contain a re -opener clause to allow adjustment of all IWC/dilution based limits once
the study is completed and an alternative is chosen by the permittee (see SOC and/or summary in my notes).
WET Test Limits
Past toxicity test has been the std. chronic (Ceriodaphnia) 24 hr quarterly test with a P/F limit of 19%
for 0.965 MGD and 23% for 1.25 MGD. Files show 4/21/95 A to C allowing permittee to construct necessary
facilities to expand to 1.25 MGD, but CMS still shows a flow limit of 0.965 MGD. Facility previously had
problems with toxicity test compliance, failing majority of tests in 1992 and 1993, but has improved
dramatically since, passing last 6 tests in a row and 11 of last 14.
As per above assumption with IWC, WET test limit should be renewed at P/F @ 90% (SOC calls for full
range monitoring). This limit will be adjusted accordingly after study results come in and course of action is
chosen.
Individual Toxicants
Limits and monitoring for toxicants should also be assigned according to the assumed IWC=90% and
then adjusted after a final dilution is reached. The existing permit has monitoring for Cu, Zn, and chloride and a
water quality based limit for Cr.
Facility discharges extremely high levels of Cu, as high as 405 mg/1 in the last two years. Cu
monitoring should continue. If facility did not have such a good tox test record recently, these Cu levels would
warrant serious concerns.
Zinc levels consistently exceed allowable load of 56 mg/1, no Zn monitoring should also continence.
Chromium levels also regularly exceed allowable load, so a water quality limit of 56 mg/1 should be
applied. Highest reported value in the last year was 85 mg/1 on 8/9/95.
Sulfide and phenol limits are stipulated in federal effluent guidelines and should be renewed
accordingly.
Chloride monitoring should continue because chlorides are commonly prevalent in textile waste streams.
Reported levels have been as high as 85 mg/1.
Instream Monitoring
Renew as existing. Clarify sites see fact sheet.
Federal Guideline Limits
Previous guideline limits were based on production rate of 100,000 #/day, but the current production
increase calls for a monthly average production rate of 112,000 #/day and a daily max rate of 120,000 #/day.
The increased rates cause an increase in allowable pollutant loading as calculated by 40 CFR 410.52 (Subpart
E). Due to the uncertainty of this discharge's impact on the receiving swamp system no increase should be
allowed for BOD, COD, or TSS.
Limits for sulfides, phenols and pH should be applied according to the guidelines. However the
guideline limit for Chromium is far less stringent than the limit that would be applied according to NC Water
Quality Stds. The NC Water Quality limit should be used.

4a r2a
.X.re P‘.4 74.
Nc 000 Z3oS-
la�� ��'�.
/4"" /1-94)kieest /47"-C ire,5 ;
A:cG g►.S 7�r 444
f XsrJ 4/} 4.4 as ,�c,� c�Jr .4..� .4 ,1 4 �+`d� s44*"°,.•.,J%� Y
/eiPt � r
/tit 6 04 ✓fig ire ! / /Y (V C 6i / I
We_ r �a-�.- 40,d ' e e yfer4s p z fie.�
6 ..:ate
7fr-Ced .�' �. Tire. f ,.&..�c�►,�+ Aif .
S7d /O 7`dtie WC, 17 .-. .4 6. S cis ,
i 4s~ X•1) (z. 3zs cAs� . 72e re_ c"c‘,.14...c._
7 - (44,C ' ne.
7e- , , Cr 7eC Sul/ a, Ze Pecs, 4.4,
, 7 (z.r f G.$) = 6 ¢, �G --� / ,., ? zsi/L
z,3Zr
C _ so z.3n-t 4.$)
a/Cr
iS /is4, ' w, // ,E.• ci,
4cfre c cvrE s.
8 ,7
acco,a4A7 4 /6 re--/2eel 74_
-7 417C i t Q 4' Jlc,-- a�,tc- � 4" "". /, %lam ,51/V
PSleir A /ly A or, / /'/ A.e. m -0, /ae . i

GUILFO
A1(.00023655
-745976
nF ��'"
A
B SEP 0 5 1997
R
c POINT SOURCE BRANCH
GUILFORD MILLS, I N C. • G R E E N S B O R O,
NC
P.O. Box 26969 • Greensboro, NC 27419-6969 • [phone]
August 29, 1997
Mr. David A. Goodrich
Division of Water Quality
NC DEHNR
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC
27626-0535
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
Permit No. NC0002305, Guilford East Plant
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
In accordance with 2(b)(4) of Special Order by Consent #EMC SOC WQ 96-14,
Guilford Mills is submitting the enclosed NPDES permit application and a check
for $400 for the referenced facility.
As you know, Guilford Mills has submitted a plan to extend the outfall at the
Guilford East Plant to the main channel of the Northeast Cape Fear River. In a
letter dated August 15, 1997, DWQ concurred with the recommended alternative
of relocating the outfall to the main channel of the river. Historically, the
effluent limitations for the Guilford East Plant have been figured using the full
flow of the Northeast Cape Fear River. After DWQ staff visited the outfall in
1994, it was determined that the outfall actually discharged into the fringe of the
swamp bordering the river. As a result, the limits in the permit issued on
November 1, 1996, were figured using a flow rate that was a fraction of the full
river flow. Guilford Mills entered into the consent order with the state in order
to have time to address this situation and to come up with a solution. The
consent order contains in it an increment of progress for the submission of an
NPDES permit application if it is determined that the outfall will be moved and
that new limits are needed. Therefore, this NPDES permit application is being
submitted in order to request that new permit limits be figured for the Guilford
East Plant using the full flow of the Northeast Cape Fear River.

Page 2
Mr. Goodrich
Since the effluent limitations contained in the NPDES permit issued on
November 1, 1994, were figured using the full flow of the river, and since after
the outfall relocation, the effluent will be discharged into the full flow of the
river, we request that the permit limitations in the new permit be returned to
what they were in the permit issued on November 1, 1994, with the following
exceptions: The flow in the new permit should be 1.5 MGD (as contained in the
permit issued November 1, 1996), and the chronic toxicity testing percentage
should be 27% effluent. In summary, Guilford Mills requests the following
limitations in the new permit for the relocated outfall:
• Flow limitation of 1.5 million gallons per day (MGD) .
• Chronic Toxicity testing quarterly (pass/fail) at 27 % effluent, corresponding
to the IWC of the 1.5 MGD effluent flow.
• Chromium daily maximum concentration limit of 217 ug/L at the 1.5 MGD
flow.
• Total Residual Chlorine daily maximum limitation of 28 ug/L at the 1.5
MGD flow. The company believes this is an appropriate limitation for this
parameter since this value is at the limits of detectability.
In the August 15, 1997, letter referenced above, DWQ requested that Guilford
Mills provide the Division with the results of any polymer testing conducted
since the toxicity study report was produced and/or any results not enumerated in
the report. Polymer selection trials started this week and no results are available
yet. All previous results have been provided to DWQ. The Division also
requested in the letter that the NPDES application package contain detailed plans
of how and when the facility plans to use polymer addition or any other methods
of solids removal to mitigate the adverse impacts of the effluent on the receiving
stream. At this point, the facility is going through a polymer selection process.
Once a polymer is selected, bench scale toxicity studies will be performed on
coagulated and uncoagulated samples. This will be followed by field trials and
field toxicity studies. We estimate that this process will take 60 to 90 days. It is
premature at this point to provide detailed plans of how and when the facility
plans to use polymer addition. This information can be provided after the trials
and studies are complete.

Mr. Goodrich
Page 3
Finally, in regards to the potential cooperation of Guilford and Cogentrix in the
outfall relocation project, Guilford Mills has submitted a proposal for this project
to Cogentrix. If Cogentrix is interested in proceeding further, we will contact
you to determine to permitting ramifications.
A copy of the effluent limitations from the permit issued on November 1, 1994,
is attached for your reference. Please call me at [phone] with any
questions or if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
(
Jimmy Summers
Corporate Environmental and Energy Manager
cc: Brent Turner, Keith Westbrook
John Grey - Grey Engineering

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NC0002305
During the period beginning after construction expansion above 0.965 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permitter as specified below:
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Effluent Characteristics Lbs/day Units (Specify) Measurement Sample
Mon. Avq. Daily Max. Mon. Avg. Daily Max. Frequency Type
C1.25 MGD) Recording
/I Composite
12.0 mg
83.4 125.1 Composite
3000.0 6000.0 Composite •
1035.0 2071.0 Grab
10.0 20.0 Grab
5.0 10.0 Composite
200.0 /100m1 400.0 /100m1 p
217.0 µg/I Composite
28.0 µg/I Grab
Grab
Grab
Flow
BOD, 5-Day, 20°C
COD
Total Suspended Residue
Sulfide
Phenols
Fecal Coliform +
Total Chromium
Total Residual Chlorine
Dissolved Oxygen**
Temperature
Chloride
Copper
Oil and Grease
Zinc
Total Phosphorous
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
Chronic Toxicity***
Conductivity
Continuous
3/Week
Weekly
3/Week
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
3/Week
3/Week
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
2/Month
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
3/Week
*Sample
Location
I or E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E, U, D
E, U, D
Composite E
Composite E
.Gefnpe - E
E
E
E
E
U, D
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
• Gefrtposite-
G : �•b
e point,
* Sample mcsampl E - El beut, U - samples.ea Stream at e nearest samples shall be (collected DthreeImmediately
tiimes per week during June, July, AuguBridge.
st, and September andi once
All stream samples shallgrab
per week during the remaining months of the year.
**The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l.
*** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 3%:` January, April, July, and October: SEE Part III, Condition F.
**** Total residual chlorine should only be limited if added to the wastewatream.
+ Fecal Coliform will be a monitoring only parameter for a period of one year after the effective date of the permit. Upon completion of the first year,
the fecal limits will become enforceable if a failure occurs.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored 3 times per week at the effluent by grab
sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

STATEMENT December 8, 1997
P. O. Box 699
Wallace, N.C. 28466
TO WALLACE ENTERPRISE
H. L. OSWALD, Publisher
ALL KINDS OF COMMERCIAL PRINTING
r
Ms. Frances Cotten
NCDEHNR
Division of Water Quality Budget Office
P.O. Box 29535
LRaleigh, NC 27626-0535
DR.
TERMS NET — Due When Statement Is Rendered. No Discount Allowed.
December 8, 1997
Legal - Public Notice
State NPDES Permit - $25.53
.PLEASE INCLUDE INVOICE NO. 2252
ON RETURN REMITTANCE
Discount of may be taken*
* IF YOU QUALIFY FOR A DISCOUNT, PAYMENT MUST BE POSTED IN OUR OFFICE
BEFORE THE 20TH OR DISCOUNT DOES NOT APPLY.
We close our books on the last working day of each month. All bills are payable by the 20th of the month
following the date of billing. If not paid by the 20th, a SERVICE CHARGE of 1'/2% PER MONTH (18%
Annual Rate) will be added to the previous balance or a minimum charge of $1.00.

AFFIDAVIT
OF
PUBLICATION
The Wallace Enterprise
107 N. College Street
P.O. Box 699 • Wallace, NC 28466
State of North Carolina
County of Duplin
Personally appeared before me the under-
signed principle clerk of the above indicated
newspaper published in the City of Wallace,
County and State aforesaid, who, being duly
sworn, says that the advertisement of
(copy attached)
appeared in the issues of said newspaper
on the following day(s))•
)qqIl
Subscribed and sworn to
before this_2____ day
of Det_ VW? b&L
A.D. 19 C /
auirmaa
NOTARY PUBLIC
(Principle Clerk)
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT
. TO ISSUE A STATE
NPDES PERMIT
On the basis of thorough staff review and
application of Article 21 of Chapter 143,
General Statutes of North Carolina, Public
Law 92-500 and other lawful standards and
regulations. the North Carolina Environ-
mental Management Commission proposes
to issue a permit to discharge to the per-
sons listed below effective 1/26/98 and
subject to special conditions.
Persons wishing to comment upon on
object to the proposed determinations are
invited to submit same in writing to the
above address no later than 1 / 10/98. All
comments received prior to that date will
be considered in the formulation of final
determinations regarding the proposed per-
mit. A public meeting may be held where
the Director of the Division of Environmen-
tal Management finds a significant degreel
of public interest In a proposed permit. -
A copy of the draft permit is available by -
writing or calling the Division of Environ- -
mental Management, P.O. Box 29535, Ra- ,++,
Leigh, North Carolina 27626-0535, (919):
733-7015.
The appllcation and other information
may be inspected at these locations during
normal office hours. Copies of the infor-
mation on file are available upon request
and payment of the costs of reproduction.
All such comments or requests regarding a
proposed permit should make reference to
the NPDES permit number listed below.
Date: Dec. 3. 1997.
for A. Preston Howard Jr.. P.E.,
Director, Division of
Environmental Management
t Public notice of intent to issue a State
NPDES permit to the following:
1. NPDES No. NC0002305. Guilford Mills,
Inc.. P.O. Box 498. Kenansville, NC 28349.4
has applied for a permit modification for a
facility located at Guilford East Division,A
N.C. Highway 11. North of Kenansviile,
Duplin County. This modification request
is for the extension of the facility's effluent
discharge line to the mainstem of the North-
east Cape Fear River, a class C-Swamp
stream in the Cape Fear River Basin which
has a 7Q10 flow of 6,5 cfs. The facility dis-
charges 1.5 MGD of treated domestic and
industrial wastewater from 1 outfall. Four
parameters are water quality limited. For
some parameters, the available load capac-
ity of the immediate receiving water will be
consumed. This may affect future water +
quality based effluent limitations for addi-
tional dischargers within this portion of
the watershed.
2252 - Dec. 8, 1997
i--J,,Ja i 13, 41....0

STATEMENT December 8, 1997
P.O. Box 699
Wallace, N.C. 28466
TO WALLACE ENTERPRISE, DR.
H. L. OSWALD, Publisher
ALL KINDS OF COMMERCIAL PRINTING
r
Ms. Frances Cotten
NCDEHNR
Division of Water Quality Budget Office
P.O. Box 29535
L Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 I
1111111
TERMS NET — Due When Statement Is Rendered. No Discount Allowed.
December 8, 1997
Legal - Public Notice PFr•l},c.
State NPDES Permit - $25.53
��� DEC 1 0 1997
UVVQ I3UUUt t r
PLEASE INCLUDE INVOICE NO. 2252
ON RETURN REMITTANCE
Discount of may be taken"
IF YOU QUALIFY FOR A DISCOUNT, PAYMENT MUST BE POSTED IN OUR OFFICE
BEFORE THE 20TH OR DISCOUNT DOES NOT APPLY.
We close our books on the last working day of each month. All bills are payable by the 20th of the month
following the date of billing. If not paid by the 20th. a SERVICE CHARGE of l'h% PER MONTH (18%
Annual Rate) will be added to the previous balance or a minimum charge of $1.00.

Prepared
Date:
I Approved
-e 1,
star.?—/Sc9%
'Received By:
•
Date:
Date Entered:
T
©y:
Vendor ID!!: ,,ifJ
7
Groupl! D
Control!'
Date:
Company: an : p Y /60/
Center
Amount
Account •
A 5725
:
3. 0a
/h 9i 6 f/
•
Vendor Name:
County Code:
Pay Enti-ty:
/ 7-A
Invoice Norther. 2_
Tnvo:i.ce Date: / '
•
Remittance: jt% �. J E •.ri,CJ

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
NORTH CAROLINA. \
Wake County. ss•
The
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT
TO ISSUE A
STATE NPDES PERMIT
0n the basis of thorough staff
review and application of Article
21 of Chapter 143, General Stat-
utes of North Carolina, Public
Law 92-500 and other lawful stan-
dards and regulations, the North
Carolina Environmental Man-
agement Commission proposes
to issue a permit t0 discharge to
the persons listed below effec-
tive 1/26/98 and subiect to special
conditions.
Persons wishing to comment up-
on or obiect to the proposed de-
terminations ore invited to
submit same in writing to the
above address no later than
1/10/98. All comments received
prior to that date will be consid-
ered in the formulation of final
determinations regarding the
proposed permit. A public meet-
ing may be held where the Direc-
tor of the Division of
Environmental Management
finds a significant degree of pub-
lic interest in a proposed permit.
A tapy of the draft permit is
available by writing or calling
the Division of Environmental
Management, P.O. Box 29535,
Raleigh, North Carolina
27626-0535, [phone].
The application and other infor-
mation may be inspected at
these locations during normal Account Number: 73370150
office hours. Copies of the infor-
mation on file are available upon
request and payment of the costs
of reproduction. All such com-
ments or requests regarding a
proposed permit should make
reference to the NPDES permit
number listed below.
Date: Dec. 3, 1997
/s/ David A. Goodrich for
A. Preston Howard Jr., P.E.,
Di rector
Division of
Environmental Management
Public notice of intent to issue a
State NPDES permit to the fol-
lowing:
1. NPDES No. NC0002305. Guil-
ford Mills, Inc., P.O. Box 498, ed from the books and files of the aforesaid Corporation and publication.
Kenansville, NC, 28349 has OP-
plied for a permit modification
for a facility located at Guilford
East Division, N.C. Highway 11,
North of Kenansville, Duplin
County. This modification re—
quest is for the extension of the
facility's effluent discharge )ine
to the mainstem of the Northeast
Cape Fear River, a class C-•
Swamp stream in the Cape Fear
River Basin which has a 7Q10
flow of 6.5 cfs. The facility dis-
charges 1.5 MGD of treated do-
mestic and industrial
wastewater from 1 outfall. Four
parameters are water quality
limited. For some parameters,
the available load capacity of the•
immediate receiving water will:•
be consumed. This may affect
future water quality based efflu-
ent limitations for additional dis-
chargers within this portion of
the watershed.
N&0: December 8, 1997
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly commissioned and authorized to
administer oaths, affirmations, etc., personally appeared
Robert M. Woronoff, Jr., who, being duly sworn or affirmed,
according to law, doth depose and say that he is Treasurer of
THE NEWS AND OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY,
a corporation organized and doing business under the Laws of
the State of North Carolina, and publishing a newspaper
known as THE NEWS AND OBSERVER, in the City of
Raleigh, County an State aforesaid, the said newspaper in
which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement
was published was, at the time of each and every such
publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and
qualifications of Seciton 1-597 of the General Statutes of
North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the
meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North
Carolina, and that as such he makes this affidavit; that he is
familiar with the books, files and business of said corporation
and by reference to the files of said publication the attached
advertisement for NC DEPT OF EHNR was inserted in the
aforesaid newspaper on dates as follows: 12/08/97
Sworn or affirmed to, and subscribed before me, this
10 day of DECEMBER , A.D. 1997
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed my official seal, the day and year aforesaid.
Notary Public
My commission expires 2nd day of JULY , 2000.

EW
BSE
R
ACCOUNT NUMBER
73370150
DATE BILLED
12/08/97
BILLED TO:
Invoice,
for
LEGAL ADVERTISING
remit to:
LEGAL A/R DEPT.
P.O. BOX 2885
RALEIGH, NC 27602
ACCOUNT NAME FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE:
NC DEPT OF EHNR 829-4668
NC DEPT OF EHNR
ENVIRON. MGMT. BUDGET OFFICEE
PO BOX 29535
ATTN: FRANCES COTTEN
RALEIGH NC 27626-0535
INVOICE NR PUBLICATION DATE
DEC 1. 7997
ovN bUVVC,
RATE COST
T74NMJDO1 12/08/97 PUBLIC NOTICE/STATE OF NC/ P 104.OL 2.90 301.60
INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $301.60
DESCRIPTION SPACE
(:::I
cr 77 WEIVEMME
rri GE-s7
WITH PAYMENT
PLEASE RETURN
RETURN REMITTANCE COPY WITH PAYMENT

OCF-5
11/20/95
Page of
1
1.
3
4,
5
6
7
Division: T WQ
Vendor Number:
Vendor Name:
Vendor Address:
Remit Code/Message:
CASI•I DISBURSEMENTS CODE SHEET
Shaded fields (i.e., Terms Code, SAS Item No., & 1099 Code) will be -completed by the Controller's Office
3
5
Grp. No.
��r 1 New Vendor LI
Buy Entity:
PO Number:
Matching Invoices Only
BG a Buying Goods BS = Buying Services
Partial Pmt.
1
6
County Code:
Due Date:
/
/
Budget Code:
(mmldd/yy)
4
3
0
0
Invoice
Number
Invoice
Date
Amount
Cr
Company
Account
Center
1099
code
Accrual
code
-111
ti
DnA
1
_2_
-
-_
------_
-
___
-------i--
3e2
t
1
1
_
1
-
-
16
..6--
1G
1
1
6
6--
6
O
I
535`�_
------
_--
----------
-
-------
�-
__
_-
_
(4,�'t)
6_9_9
-----
---
--
----
-----------1--
-
--_
-
-
-
-
-
•
---
-
---__
-
------
.-
-
---
_
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
—
b
t
t
—�
(!(7
—
G
Sales
Freight
Gross
Tax Arnl
Amt
Arnt
Comments:
FAS Number:
Pay Entity:
0 P©
6
PT = Trade Vendors
PE= Employee Vendors
PN s Non -Trade Vendors
CN a Child Nutrition
PC z Contract Vendors
Controller's Office Use Only:
Control #
MIRO
Prepared By:
c�-
Approved By: C.
Entered By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
DEC 1 5 1997
CASHDIS.XLS
Please use yellow paper.