WI0100102_Complete File - Historical_20220311

FIFWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
August 7,2015
Mr. Bryan Wymer
Kenan Advantage Group
4366 Mt. Pleasant St.,NW
North Canton, OH 44720
Subject: Completion of 5I Injection Well Permit WIOIOO102
Kenan Advantage Group
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Wymer:
On April 4,2013,the Water Quality'Regional Operations Section(Former Aquifer Protection Section)
issued a 5I groundwater remediation permit to the above for the remediation of contaminated groundwater
located at the Enmark#251, 3300 Asheville Highway,Hendersonville,NC, Henderson County,NC
28791. Expiration date for the permit is March 31, 2018.
A review of the file indicates the Final Project Evaluation(FPE)and injection well construction and/or
abandonment records(or equivalent)have been received, per permit conditions. Additionally, follow up
supplemental monitoring for arsenic was received July 22, 2015, via Groundwater Monitoring Letter
Report July6, 2015. Additional monitoring has indicated arsenic is at pre-injection levels,or meets
standards per NCAC 2L .0202. Therefore,this completes the monitoring and compliance reporting
requirements of your permit.
Please be advised this permit is expired and no further injection activities are permitted. Any future
injection activities must be conducted per the requirements of 15A NCAC 2C .0225 (Revised May 1,
2012). You must submit either(1)a Notification of Intent to Install groundwater remediation wells, or
(2)an Application for Permit to Construct Wells for Injection(whichever is applicable). Please reference
permit number WI0100102 in any future correspondence for this site. Operating an injection well
without a valid permit could result in a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day. Please contact Michael
Rogers at 919-807-6406 or Debra Watts at 919-807-6338 if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
( RECEIVED
Michael Rogers, P.G. (N &FL) Division of Water Resourcett
Hydrogeologist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section AUG 1 3 2015
Division of Water Resources
Water Quall Reolonal ODeraftm
Asheville Re tonal Office
1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27 -
Phone:[phone]\Internet:http:l/www.ncwater.org
An Equal Oppodunity I Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper

Kenan Advantage Group Page 2 of 2
cc: Landon Davidson, WQROS-Asheville Regional Office
Central Office File, W10100102
Chris Singleton, Singleton Environmental Inc.,P.O.Box 2012, Enka,NC 28728
0

4
NDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director
RECEIVED
April 4,2013
Jacqueline Musacchia,VP General Counsel
APR 12 2011
Kenan Advantage Group
4366 Mount Pleasant St.NW Asheville Regional Office
North Canton,OH 44720 Aquifer PfOt@C1i0r1
Re: Issuance of Injection Well Permit
Permit No.WI0100102
Issued to Kenan Advantage Group
Henderson County
Dear Ms. Musacchia:
In accordance with the Permit Renewal Application received on January 2,2013,and additional
information received March 15,2013,we are forwarding permit number W10100102. This permit is to
inject ORC Advanced to remediate groundwater contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons at the
Former Enmark#251 Facility,3300 Asheville Hwy.,Hendersonville,Henderson County,NC 28791.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until March 31,2018,and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations stated therein, including the requirement to submit a final project evaluation as
stated in PART VII—MONPrORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Please read the entire
permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the permit.
Please note the following:
• Per permit condition Part 11.2,please notify the Asheville Regional Office(828-296-4500)at
least 90 days prior to injection.
• Per permit conditions Part VH3 &4,and IX.2(G),within 30 days after each injection event,
please provide the well construction and injection information on the applicable forms
below. Note: If well construction/abandonment information is essentially the same(e.g.,
direct push points or geo-probes),then only one GW-1 or GW-30 is needed. Just indicate in
the comments section on the form the total number of well points. These forms are
available on the Division of Water Quality's website at NCDENR-DWO APS GPU
Reporting Forms
➢ Injection Event Record
➢ Well Construction Record (GW-1)
➢ Well Abandonment Record(GW-30)
1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone]FAX:[phone]
Internet w .nmaterouality.om One
NorthCarolina
An Equal Opportunity\Afrrcmafire Acton Employer
Naturally

Kenan Advantage Group
Page 2 of 2
• Please monitor for field parameters pH,conductivity,and DO as indicated on the
monitoring plan. Some of the more recent monitoring reports did not include these
parameters.
In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of this well for the stated purpose,you should submit an
application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. As indicated in the permit,this
permit is not transferable to any person without prior notice to,and approval by,the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. If you have any questions regarding your permit or the Underground Injection
Control Program please call me at(919) 807-6406.
Best Regards,
o
Michael Rogers, P.G.(NC
Hydrogeologist
cc: Landon Davidson,Asheville Regional Office
Central Office File,WI0100102
Chris Singleton, Singleton Environmental Inc., P.O. Box 2012,Enka,NC 28728

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A WELL FOR INJECTION
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87; Article 21, Chapter 143, and other
applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Kenan Advantage Group
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR OPERATION OF TWENTY-ONE (21) IN SFrU
REMEDIATION/TRACER INJECTION WELLS, defined in Title 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2C .0209(5)(b)(viii), to inject ORC Advanced for the oxidation and
bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. These well points will be located at the Former
Enmark#251 Facility, 3300 Asheville Hwy.,Hendersonville, Henderson County,NC 28791, and
will be operated in accordance with the renewal application received January 2, 2013, and in
conformity with the specifications and supporting data submitted March 15, 2013, all of which
are filed with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and are considered a part of
this permit.
This permit is for Construction and Operation only, and does not waive any provisions of the
Water Use Act or any other applicable Laws, Rules, or Regulations. Operation and use of an
injection well shall be in compliance with Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2C
.0100 and .0200, and any other Laws, Rules, and Regulations pertaining to well construction and
use.
This permit shall be effective, unless revoked, from the date of its issuance until March 31, 2018,
and shall be subject to the specified conditions and limitations set forth in Parts I through X
hereof.
Permit issued this the 4th day of April 2013.
� wZE
Charles Wakiid, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
Permit No.W10100102 PAGE I OF 6
ver. January 2013 UIC-50T

PART I -WELL CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONDITIONS
r -
1. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit and with the standards and
criteria specified in Criteria and Standards Applicable to Injection Wells (15A NCAC 2C
.0200). Any noncompliance with conditions of this permit constitutes a violation of the
North Carolina Well Construction Act and is grounds for enforcement action as provided for
in N.C.G.S. 87-94.
2. This permit shall become voidable unless the facility is constructed in accordance with the
conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting data.
3. This permit is valid only for construction of the number of injection wells described in the
application and other supporting data. Construction of additional injection wells must be
approved in advance by the Aquifer Protection Section.
4. Each injection well shall not hydraulically connect separate aquifers.
5. Each injection well shall be constructed in such a manner that water from land surface cannot
migrate into the gravel pack or well screen.
6. Each injection well shall be secured to reasonably insure against unauthorized access and
use. Each well shall be permanently labeled with a warning that it is for injection purposes
and the entrance to each well must be secured with a locking cap.
7. Each injection well shall be afforded reasonable protection against damage during
construction and use.
8. Each injection well shall have permanently affixed an identification plate.
PART H-WELL CONSTRUCTION SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to constructing each injection well, the Permittee shall
notify the Aquifer Protection Section-Underground Injection Control (UIC) Central Office
staff, telephone number 919-807-6406.
2. At least 90 days prior to injection, the Permittee shall notify the Aquifer Protection Section
staff of the Asheville Regional Office, telephone number 828-296-4500.
3. Bentonite grout shall not be used to seal any water-bearing zone with a chloride
concentration equal to or greater than 1,500 milligrams per liter. In areas where elevated
chloride levels are known to exist or are probable, such as coastal areas, chloride levels shall
be verified in the field to determine existing conditions.
Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 2 OF 6
ver.January 2013 UIC-51/5T

PART III- OPERATION AND USE GENERAL CONDITIONS
' 1: This permit is effective only with respect to the nature, volume of materials, rate of injection,
and number of injection wells as described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This permit is not transferable without prior notice to, and approval by, the Director of the
Division of Water Quality (Director). In the event there is.a desire for the facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit amendment request
must be submitted to the Director, including any supporting materials as may be appropriate,
at least 30 days prior to the date of the change.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility of complying
with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances that may be imposed by other
local, state, and federal agencies having jurisdiction. Furthermore, the issuance of this permit
does not imply that all regulatory requirements have been met.
PART IV-PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The injection facility shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so that there is
no contamination of groundwater which will render it unsatisfactory for normal use.
2. In the event that the facility fails to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance
conditions or failure of the injection zone to adequately assimilate the injected fluid, the
Permittee shall take immediate corrective actions including those actions that may be
required by the Division of Water Quality such as the repair, modification, or abandonment
of the injection facility.
3. The Permittee shall be required to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit even
if compliance requires a reduction or elimination of the permitted activity.
4. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages to
surface or groundwater resulting from the operation of this facility.
PART V- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The injection facility shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2. The Permittee must notify the Division and receive prior written approval from the Director
of any planned alterations or additions in the permitted facility or activity not specifically
authorized by the permit.
3. At least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the initiation of the operation of the facility for
injection, the Permittee must notify by telephone the Aquifer Protection Section-UIC, Central
Office staff, telephone number 919-807-6406' Notification is required so that Division staff
can inspect or otherwise review the injection facility and determine if it is in compliance with
permit conditions.
1 Permit No.W I0100102 PAGE 3 OF 6
ver.January 2013 UIC-5115T

PART VI -INSPECTIONS
1. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water Quality
may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises, or place on
or related to the injection facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with this permit, may inspect or copy any records that must be maintained under
the terms and conditions of this permit, and may obtain samples of groundwater, surface
water, or injection fluids.
2. Department representatives shall have reasonable access for purposes of inspection,
observation, and sampling associated with injection and any related facilities as provided for
in N.C.G.S. 87-90.
3. Provisions shall be made for collecting any necessary and appropriate samples associated
with the injection facility activities.
PART VII-MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. The proposed monitoring plan included in the application shall be followed. Any additional
monitoring, including groundwater, surface water, or soil sampling, deemed necessary by the
Division of Water Quality to ensure surface water and groundwater protection may be
established and an acceptable sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. All sample results shall be submitted to the Aquifer Protection Section's Asheville Regional
Office and the Raleigh Central Office. Monitoring reports shall include, at a minimum,,
analytical data and an update on the status and location of monitoring and injection wells.
Well locations may be given in a table with the name and geographic coordinates or shown
on an updated version of the surveyor's base map.
3. Within 30 days of completion of well construction, a complete Well Construction Record
(Form GW-1) shall be submitted to the addresses specified in Part VII.6 below.
4. The Permittee shall submit an Injection Event Record within 30 days of completing each
injection.
5. The Permittee shall submit a final project evaluation within 9 months after completing all
injection-related activity associated with this permit or.produce an interim evaluation while
submitting a renewal application for this permit. Both the final project evaluation and
interim evaluation shall contain historical monitoring data and updated contaminant plume
and potentiometric surface maps.
6. All monitoring results, forms, and reports required in this Part shall be submitted to:
UIC Program Staff D WQ -Aquifer Protection Section
DWQ—Aquifer Protection Section and Asheville Regional Office
1636 Mail Service Center 2090 U.S. Hwy. 70
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 Swannanoa,NC 28778
Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 4 OF 6 I
ver.January 2013 UIC-5115T

7. The Permittee shall report by telephone, within 48 hours of the occurrence or first knowledge
of the occurrence, to the Asheville Regional Office, telephone number 828-296-4500 any of
the following:
(A)Any occurrence at the injection facility which results in any unusual operating
circumstances;
(B)Any failure due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the facility incapable of
proper injection operations, such as mechanical or electrical failures.
8. Where the Permittee becomes aware of an omission of any relevant facts in a permit
application, or of any incorrect information submitted in said application or in any report to
the Director, the relevant and correct facts or information shall be promptly submitted to the
Director by the Permittee.
9. In the event that the pemutted facility fails to perform satisfactorily, the Permittee shall take
such immediate action as may be required by the Director.
PART VHI-PERMIT RENEWAL
In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, the
Permittee must submit an application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date.
PART IX-CHANGE OF WELL STATUS
1. The Permittee shall provide written notification within 15 days of any change of status of an
injection well. Such a change would include the discontinued use of a well for injection. If a
well is taken completely out of service temporarily, the Permittee must install a sanitary seal.
If a well is not to be used for any purpose that well must be permanently abandoned
according to 15A NCAC 2C .0240, Well Construction Standards.
2. When operations have ceased at the facility and a well will no longer be used for any
purpose, the Permittee shall abandon that injection well in accordance with the procedures
specified in 15A NCAC 2C .0240, including but not limited to the following:
(A)All casing and screen materials may be removed prior to initiation of abandonment
procedures if such removal will not cause or contribute to contamination of the
groundwaters.
(B)The entire depth of each well shall be sounded before it is sealed to insure freedom
from obstructions that may interfere with sealing operations.
(C)The well shall be thoroughly disinfected, prior to sealing, if the Director determines
that failure to do so could lead to the contamination of an underground source of
drinking water.
(D)Drilled wells shall be completely filled with cement grout or bentonite grout, which
shall be introduced into the well through a pipe which extends to the bottom of the
1 Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 5 OF 6
ver.January 2013 UIC-5V5T

well and is raised as the well is filled.
(E)In the case of gravel-packed wells in which the casing and screens have not been
removed, neat-cement, or bentonite grout shall be injected into the well completely
filling it from the bottom of the casing to the top.
(F) In those cases when, as a result of the injection operations, a subsurface cavity has
been created, each well shall be abandoned in such a manner that will prevent the
movement of fluids into or between underground sources of drinking water and in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit.
(G)The Permittee shall submit a Well Abandonment Record (Form GW-30) as specified
in 15A NCAC 2C .0225(k)(1)(A) within 30 days of completion of abandonment.
3. The written documentation required in Part IX (1) and (2) (G) shall be submitted to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
PART X—WORKER PRECAUTIONS DURING APPLICATION
1. Some effects reported to be associated with the product proposed to be used are as follows:
eye, skin, nose, throat, and lung irritation. If the product is released into the environment in a
way that could result in a suspension of fine solid or liquid particles (e.g., grinding, blending,
vigorous shaking or mixing), then proper personal protective equipment should be used. The
application process should be reviewed by an industrial hygienist to ensure that the most
appropriate personal protective equipment is used.
2. Persons working with these products should wear goggles or a face shield, gloves, and
protective clothing. Face and body protection should be used for anticipated splashes or
sprays.
3. Eating, drinking, smoking, handling contact lenses, and applying cosmetics should not be
permitted in the application area during or immediately following application.
4. Safety controls should be in place to.ensure that the check valve and the pressure delivery
systems are working properly.
5. The Material Safety Data Sheets should be followed to prevent incompatible or adverse
reactions and injuries.
Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 6 OF 6 ,
ver.January 2013 UIC-51/5T

i
s � �
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM AN 2 2 2013 v
Date: January 15,2013
To: X Landon Davidson,ARO-APS ❑ David May, WaRO-APS _
❑ Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS ❑ Charlie Stehman,WiRO-APS
❑ Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS ❑ Sherri Knight, WSRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: David Goodrich,Land Application Unit
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: david.goodrichla ncdenr.gov
A. Permit Number: WI0100102
B. Owner: Kenan Advanta cg Group
C. Facility/Operation: Enmark#251 Service Station
❑ Proposed X Existing X Facility X Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ❑ Animal ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon X GW Remediation(ND)or51 Injection
❑ UIC-(5A7)open loop geothermal
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 ❑ 503 Exempt ❑ Animal
2. Project Type. ❑New ❑Major Mod. ❑ Minor-Mod. X Renewal ❑ Renewal w/Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Attached,you will find all information submitted in support of the above-referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days,please take the following actions:
X Return a Completed APSARR Form. - Please comment
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO.*
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office-Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer: 6 i C' Date: ' 3
FORM: APSARR 07/06 Pagel of 1

JAN 2 2 2013 Central Files APS SwP
01/15/13
Permit Number WI0100102 Permit Tracking Slip
Program Category Status Project Type
Ground Water In review Renewal
Permit Type Version Permit Classification
Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well Individual
Primary Reviewer Permit Contact Affiliation
david.goodrich Chris Singleton
Engineer
Coastal SW Rule PO Box 2012
Enka NC 28728
Permitted Flow
Facility
Facility Name Major/Minor Region
Enmark#251 Service Station Minor Asheville
Location Address County
3300 Asheville Hwy Henderson
Hendersonvlle NC 28791 Facility Contact Affiliation
Owner
Owner Name Owner Type
Kenan Advantage Group Non-Government
Owner Affiliation
Gerald Hoover
4366 Mt Pleasant
Dates/Events North Canton OH 44720
Scheduled
Ong Issue App Received Draft Initiated Issuance Public Notice Issue Effective Expiration
12/13/10 01/02/13
Regulated Activities Requested/Received Events
Groundwater remediation RO staff report received
RO staff report requested
Outfall NULL
Waterbody Name Stream Index Number Current Class Subbasin

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P.E. John E. Skvada, 111
Govemor Director Secretary
January 15, 2013
Jacqueline A.Musacchia-VP General Counsel
Kenan Advantage Group
4366 Mt.Pleasant St.NW
North Canton,OH 44720
Subject: Acknowledgement of
Application No. W10100102
Enmark#251 Service Station
Injection In situ Groundwater
Remediation Well System
Henderson County
Dear Ms. Musacchia:
The Aquifer Protection Section acknowledges receipt of your permit application and supporting
documentation received on 01/02/2013. Your application package has been assigned the number listed
above,and the primary reviewer is David Goodrich.
Central and Asheville Regional Office staff will perform a detailed review of the provided
application, and may contact you with a request for additional information. To ensure maximum
efficiency in processing permit applications, the Aquifer Protection Section requests your assistance in _
providing a timely and complete response to any additional information requests.
Please note that processing standard review permit applications may take as long as 60 to 90 days
after receipt of a complete application. If you have any questions, please contact
David Goodrich at(919)807-6352 or [e-mail].
S rely,for 43�'�
Debra J. its
Groundwater Protection Unit Supervisor
uce vide--Regionai Office,-Aquifer Protection Section — --- - ----
Tom Dolan-Enmark Stations, Inc., P.O. Box 576, Savannah,GA 31402
Chris Singleton-Singleton Environmental, Inc.,P.O.Box 2012,Enka,NC 28728
Permit File WI0100102
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center.Ra"h,North Carolina 27699-1636
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.,Ralegh,North Carolina 27604 �iOne
Phone:919607-W4 FAX:[phone] i�Q Caro
Internet:www.ncwaleraual'M.ora Q aro U
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer -"��""""�✓

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
In Situ Groundwater Remediation I Tracer Injection
Do not use this form for the following:
• in situ remediation,tracer,or aquifer test injection wells permitted by rule(ref. 15A NCAC 02C.0217)
• remediation systems that reinject treated contaminated groundwater(ref. 15A NCAC 02T.1600)
Application Number(to be completed by DWQ):
I. APPLICATION INFORMATION
1. Project is: []New [] Modification [X] Renewal without modification [] Renewal with modification
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit,provide:
existing permit number WI0100102 and the issuance date 12/13/2010
For renewal without modifications,fill out sections I& If only, sign the certification on the Iasi page of this form, and obtain
the property owner's signature to indicate consent(fthe applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date.
II. WELL OWNER(generally the responsible party)
1. Name: Kenan Advantage Group
2. Signing Official's Name': Sacqueline A. Musacchia Title: VP General Counsel
• Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in Part IX on page 5.
3. Mailing address of applicant: 4366 Mt. Pleasant St.NW
City: North Canton State: OH Zip: 44720
4. Telephone number: Email:
5. Status(choose one): Individual X Business/Org. FederalStateCounty_Municipality
III. PROPERTY OWNER(if different than well owner)
1. Name: Enmark Stations, Inc. Attn: Tom Dolan
2. Physical address:
City: State: Zip:
3. Mailing address: PO Box 576
City: Savannah State: GA Zip: 31402
4. Telephone number: Email:
IIII. PROJECT CONTACT—Person who can answer technical questions about the proposed injection project.
1. Name: Chris Singleton Title: President
2. Company: Singleton Environmental, Inc.
3. Address: PO Box 2012
4. City: Enka State: NC Zip: 28728
5. Telephone number: 828-667-5001 Email: sineletonenv(�bellsouth.net
Revised 10/8/2012 VIC-51/5T RECEIVEDIDENRIDN Page 1 of
JAN 0 2 2013
Aquifer PrOteCtion SeCtlnn

a .
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
In Situ Groundwater Remediation I Tracer Injection
V. FACILITY INFORMATION
I Facility name: Enmark#251 Ph#:
2. Mailing address: 3300 Asheville Highway
City: Hendersonville County: Henderson State:NC Zip: 28791
3. Geographic Coordinates: Latitude: 35° 21' 42"North Longitude: 820 28' 53"West
Reference Datum: Accuracy: +-4 yards
Method of Collection: GPS
4. Brief description of business: Gasoline Retail Store
VI. INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
1. Source and date of contamination: Spill of gasoline from a tanker while filling USTs
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site(contaminants may be listed in groups, e.g.,gasoline,
diesel,jet fuel,fuel oil, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals,pesticides/herbicides, etc):
Gasoline
3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site(even if outside the injection zone)?
[] Yes If yes,list maximum measured separate phase thickness: feet
[X]No If no,list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site: 3786 ppb
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
[X]UST Section [] Superfund Section(including REC Program and DSCA sites)
[]DWQ Aquifer Protection Section [] Solid Waste Section
[]Hazardous Waste Section [] Other:
5. Incident manager's name: Diane Eskenasy Ph#: 828-296-4500
6. Incident number or other incident mgmt.agency tracking number: 28012
VII. PERMITS
List all applicable permits or construction approvals issued for the facility or incident:
1. Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA:
2. DWQ Non-Discharge or NPDES permits:
3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits:
4. Other environmental permits required by state or federal law: UST Permit,Facility ID 0-034917
Revised 10/8/2012 UIC-51/5T Page 2 of 5

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
In Situ Groundwater Remediation I Tracer Injection
VIII. ATTACHMENTS — provide the following information in separate attachments. The attachments should be
clearly identified and presented in the order below to expedite review of the permit application package.
1. INJECTION ZONE—Specify the horizontal and vertical portion of the subsurface within which the proposed injection
activity will take place and beyond which no violations of groundwater quality standards shall result from the injection as
determined by an approved monitoring plan. The determination shall be based on the hydraulic properties of the specified
zone. Provide any supporting documentation in a separate attachment.
2. HYDROGEOLOGIC EVALUATION—Provide a hydrogeologic evaluation of the injection zone that includes all of
the following:
(A) Regional and local geology and hydrology;
(B) Changes in lithology underlying the facility;
(C) Depth to bedrock;
(D) Depth to the mean seasonal high water table;
(E) Hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and storativity, of the injection zone based on tests of site-specific
material, including a description of the tests)used to determine these parameters;
(F) Rate and direction of groundwater flow as determined by predictive calculations or computer modeling; and
(G) Lithostratigraphic and hydrosttatigraphic logs of any existing test and injection wells.
3. INJECTANT INFORMATION — List each injectant in the space below and provide the following information for each
injectant.NOTE:Approved injectants can be found online at hitp//portal.ncdenr.orzlweb/wq/aps/vwpro. All other substances
must be reviewed by the Division of Public Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Contact the UIC Program for
more information(Ph#919-807-6496).
Reeenesis ORC Advanced- 40 lbs.ORC in 238 gallons of water(30%)
(A) MSDS,concentration at the point of injection,and percentage if present in a mixture with other injectants;
(B) The source of fluids used to dilute, carry, or otherwise distribute the injectant throughout the injection zone. If
any well within the area of review of the injection facility is to be used as the fluid source, then the following
information shall be submitted: location/ID number, depth of source, formation, rock/sediment type, and a
chemical analysis of the water from the source well, including analyses for all contaminants suspected or
historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site;
(C) A description of the rationale for selecting the injectants and concentrations proposed for injection, including an
explanation or calculations of how the proposed injectant volumes and concentrations were determined;
(D) A description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection;
(E) A summary of results if modeling or testing was performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility
for biological,chemical, or physical change in the subsurface; and
(F) An evaluation concerning the development of byproducts of the injection process, including increases in the
concentrations of naturally occurring substances. Such an evaluation shall include the identification of the specific
byproducts of the injection process, projected concentrations of byproducts, and areas of migration as determined
through modeling or other predictive calculations.
4. INJECTION PROCEDURE — Submit a table with a detailed description of the proposed injection procedure that
includes the following:
(A) The proposed average and maximum daily rate and quantity of injectant;
(B) The average maximum injection pressure expressed in units of pounds per square inch(psi); and
(C) The total or estimated total volume to be injected.
Revised 10/8/2012 UIC-51/5T Page 3 of 5

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
In Situ Groundwater Remediation I Tracer Injection
5. FRACTURING PLAN(if applicable)—Submit a detailed description of the fracturing plan that includes the following:
(A) Material Safety Data Sheets of fracturing media including information on any proppants used;
(B) a map of fracturing well locations relative to the known extent of groundwater contamination plus all buildings,
wells,septic systems,underground storage tanks,and underground utilities located within the Area of Review;
(C) a demonstration that buildings, wells, septic systems, underground storage tanks, and underground utilities will
not be adversely affected by the fracturing process;
(D) injection rate and volume;
(E) orientation of bedding planes,joints,and fracture sets of the fracture zone;
(F) performance monitoring plan for determining the fracture well radius of influence;and
(G) if conducted, the results of geophysical testing or pilot test of fracture behavior conducted in an uncontaminated
area of the site.
6. WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS—Submit the following information in tabular or schematic form as appropriate
for each item:
(A) number and depth of injection wells;
(B) number and depth of borings if using multi-level or"nested"well systems;
(C) indication whether the injection wells are existing or proposed;
(D) depth and type of casing;
(E) depth and type of screen material;
(F) depth and type of grout;
(G) indication whether the injection wells are permanent or temporary"direct push"points; and
(H) plans and specifications of the surface and subsurface construction details.
7. MONITORING PLAN—Submit a monitoring plan that includes the following:
(A) target contaminants plus secondary or intermediate contaminants that may result from the injection;
(B) other parameters that may serve to indicate the progress of the intended reactions;
(C) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used;and
(D) a sampling schedule to monitor the proposed injection.
Monitoring wells shall be ofsufficient quantity and location to detect any movement of injection fluids, injection process byproducts,
or formation fluids outside the injection zone. The monitoring schedule shall be consistent with the proposed injection schedule,pace
of the anticipated reactions, and rate of transport of the injectants and contaminants.
8. WELL DATA TABULATION —Provide a tabulation of data on all existing or abandoned wells within the area of
review of the injection well(s)that penetrate the proposed injection zone, including monitoring wells and wells proposed
for use as injection wells. Such data shall include a description of each well's type, depth, and record of construction or
abandonment.
9. MAPS AND CROSS-SECTIONS —Provide scaled, site-specific site plans or maps depicting the location, orientation,
and relationship of facility components including the following:
(A) area map based on the most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area, at a scale of 1:24,000 and showing the
location of the proposed injection site;
(B) topographic contour intervals showing all facility related structures, property boundaries, streams, springs, lakes,
ponds,and other surface drainage features;
(C) all existing or abandoned wells within the area of review of the wells listed in the well data tabulation that
penetrate the proposed injection zone;
(D) potentiometric surface map(s)that show the direction of groundwater movement, existing and proposed wells;
(E) contaminant plume map(s) with isoconcentration lines that show the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume
in soil and groundwater,and existing and proposed wells;
(F) cross-sections) to the known or projected depth of contamination that show the horizontal and vertical extent of
the contaminant plume in soil and groundwater,major changes in lithology,and existing and proposed wells; and
(G) any existing sources of potential or known groundwater contamination, including waste storage, treatment, or
disposal systems within the area of review of the injection well or well system.
Revised 10/8/2012 UIC-51/5T Page 4 of 5

1
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
In Situ Groundwater Remediation I Tracer Injection
IX. CERTIFICATION*(to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent*)
NCAC 15A 02C .0211(e)requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
1. for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
*If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant,then supply a letter signed by the applicant
that names and authorizes their agent.
"I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility offines and imprisonment,for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and ifapplicable, abandon the injection wells)
and all related appurtena7s in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit."
Printed Name and Title: J i 4c�iv1U n MuS�t�� w Ytr( lv } C� CoUys2@ fks f.&,Ct4ll
Signature•71Wji Date:
X. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the permit applicant)
"Owner"means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed.A well is real
property and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
contrary agreement in writing.
"As owner of the property on which the injection well(s)are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s)conform to the Well Construction Standards
('!Title 15A NCAC 02C.0200)."
Printed Name and Title:
Signature: Date:
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments,to:
DWQ-Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
Telephone[phone]
RECEIVEDIDENRIDW
JAN 0 2 200
Revised 10/8/2012 UIC-5I/5T Aquifer projection Section Page 5 of 5

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A W ELL(S)FOR INJECTION
In Situ Groundwater Remediation I Tracer Injection
IX. CERTIFICATION*(to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent*)
NCAC 15A 02C .0211(e)requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
1. for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
*If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant,then supply a letter signed by the applicant
that names and authorizes their agent.
"I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments iherein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility offrnes and imprisonment,for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved.specifications and conditions of the Permit."
Printed Name and Title:
Signature: Date:
X. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the permit applicant)
"Owner"means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed. A well is real
property and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
contrary agreement in writing.
"As owner of the property on which the injection well(s)are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s)conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 02C.0200). "
Enir)ark Sfa Funs 7n
Printed Name and Title:JT&om r s C. U r714✓1 52n'o r 6H S V
Signature: Date: 6eL 1qt bola
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments,to:
DWQ-Aquifer Protection Section
Mail Service Center Rol RECEIVEMENHWQ
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
Telephone[phone]
JAN 0 2 2013
AQuiferProtection Section
Revised 1 0/812 0 1 2 UIC-51/5T Page 5 of 5

Enmark#251-Injection Permit Attachments
A. SITE HISTORY
Enmark#251 is an active gasoline station.
A surface spill of gasoline occurred at Enmark#251 on September 30,2002 during filling
of a 15,000-gallon UST. The hose from Kenan Transport Company's gasoline tanker
truck accidentally detached from the fill port of the UST, and gasoline was released to
surface soils near the UST. Surface soils within the impacted area were excavated on
October 2, 2002. Excavation was continued until field screening with a photoionization
detector (PID) indicated no detectable organic vapors in the soil. However, analytical
results from post-excavation soil samples indicated that concentrations of benzene,
ethylbenzene, and C9-C10 aromatics were above the applicable cleanup levels. Further
excavation was not possible near the source of the spill due to the presence of the USTs.
The excavated soil was hauled off site to a commercial land farm for disposal, and the
excavation area was backfilled with clean soil.
Since soil contamination remained at levels above the applicable state cleanup levels,a
Limited Site Assessment(LSA) was required under NCDENR UST regulations. A Phase
I and Phase II LSA was completed between November 2002 and June 2003. Five
groundwater monitoring wells were installed during the LSA, designated as MW-1
through NM-4 and VMW-1 on Figure 1. MW-1 through MW-4 were installed in the
uppermost alluvial aquifer, and VMW-1 was installed as a double-cased,vertical extent
well completed in the underlying saprolite aquifer. Groundwater samples collected from
these wells during the LSA indicated the presence of benzene, methyl tert-butyl ether
(MTBE), and C5-C8 aliphatics at concentrations above North Carolinas NCAC 2L
groundwater standards. Based on the results of the receptor survey conducted during
the LSA, the site was classified by NCDENR as low risk in accordance with North
Carolina's risk-based corrective action program for UST releases. Soil and groundwater
contaminant concentrations detected during the LSA were below the required cleanup
levels for a low risk site, so the site was eligible for risk-based regulatory closure after
the LSA. However, a risk-based closure would have required recording the presence of
contamination on the property deed, which was not acceptable to Enmark. Therefore,
the ISA Report requested that the site not be closed under the risk-based program, and
recommended completing a probe survey to delineate the groundwater plume,
installing additional shallow monitoring wells as necessary to adequately monitor the
plume, and conducting periodic groundwater sampling events to monitor potential
plume migration and natural attenuation.
Additional groundwater assessment activities,including a probe survey to delineate the
groundwater plume,were completed in September 2003,and documented in the
Groundwater Assessment Report, dated October 9,2003.The Groundwater Assessment Report
recommended the installation of two new monitoring wells, one located sidegradient of
the plume to the west, and one located downgradient of the plume near the northern
property boundary. The report also recommended deepening of existing well MW4,
and implementing periodic groundwater monitoring at the site. Quarterly monitoring

�r
was recommended for the first year, with semi-annual monitoring thereafter as
necessary.
The new monitoring wells were installed,and MW-4 was deepened,in January 2004.
Quarterly groundwater monitoring events were performed in January,April,July,and
October of 2004.After the October 2004 sampling event,the monitoring frequency was
reduced to semi-annually.
The most recent groundwater sampling event was performed in July 2009. In July 2009,
bezene was the only compound at the site exceeding NCAC 2L standards, in MW-1 at a
concentration of 16.4 µg/L. Due to the recent change in the 2L standard for MTBE, the
concentration of MOE detected in MW-6 in July 2009 (89.5 µg/L) is now also above the
2L standards.
B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
The site is located in the eastern portion of the Blue Ridge Geologic Province, which is
characterized by thrust sheets of metamorphic crystalline rocks that are transported
northward by faults over the sedimentary rocks of the Valley and Ridge Province.
According to the geologic map of North Carolina, the uppermost geologic unit near the
site is the Henderson Gneiss, which is an intrusive formation of Cambrian age. The
upper portion of the formation is typically a saprolitic soil weathered from the
underlying metamorphic rocks.
Field observation of soils penetrated during drilling monitoring wells indicate that the
site is underlain by fill material, alluvial deposits, and saprolite. Fill material consisting
of clay, silt, and silty sand is present from ground surface to depths ranging from 3 to 6
feet. Alluvial deposits,consisting primarily of silty and clayey sand with small rounded
gravel, are present beneath the fill material extending to depths ranging from 11 to 13
feet below ground surface. Saprolitic silty clay is present beneath the alluvial deposits to
depths of 40 feet or greater. The depth to bedrock has not been determined at the site.
The uppermost aquifer at the site is unconfined and occurs at depths below ground
surface ranging from approximately 5 feet to 15 feet. Groundwater flow at the site is to
the north at a horizontal gradient of approximately 0.05 ft/ft. A downward vertical
gradient exists from the alluvial deposits to the underlying saprolite. No estimates of
hydraulic conductivity have been performed at the site,however, the average_hydraulic
conductivity in the same alluvial formation at a separate site just south of Enmark#251
was 0.26 ft/day as determined from slug tests.
C. INTECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
The injection fluid will be a slurry that is a mixture of ORC Advanced and potable
water. The slurry mixture will consists of 30% ORC solid by weight. The composition
of ORC Advanced is proprietary mixture of calcium hydroxide oxide, calcium
hydroxide, dipotassium phosphate,and monopotassium phosphate. An MSDS for ORC
Advanced is attached.

J
D. INTECTION RATIONALE
(1) The goal of this project will be to increase the dissolved oxygen concentration of
groundwater in the uppermost aquifer at the site in order to promote increase natural
attenuation of petroleum contamination.
(2) Calculations of the required amount of ORC Advanced were performed by
Regenesis based on historical site information provided by TEC Environmental.
(3) There are no direct reactions between the injectant and the contaminants. The
injectant increases the dissolved oxygen content of the groundwater in an attempt to
stimulate aerobic biodegradation of the contamination. The contaminants are
aerobically biodegraded by existing organisms in the subsurface to form carbon dioxide
and water.
(4) There has been no site-specific modeling or testing performed to investigate the
injectant's potential or susceptibility to change in the subsurface
E. INTECrION PROCEDURES AND EQUII'MENT
Injections will be performed using a direct-push probe. The probed rods will be
advanced to approximately 10 feet below the water table at each injection location. The
rods will then be retracted approximately 2 feet, and the injectant will be pumped
through the rods and into the subsurface using an injection pump. Upon completion of
injection at each location, the probe rods will be removed and the boring will be sealed
with bentonite pellets.
F. MONITORING PLAN
Groundwater monitoring will be performed to track the progress of the remediation.
Quarterly groundwater monitoring will be completed for the first year after the injections,
with semi-annual monitoring thereafter. The schedule for first year groundwater monitoring
after the injections will be as follows:
Event Time After Wells
Injections Sampled
1 3 months NM-1,-3,-6
2 6 months All
3 9 months MW-1, -3,-6
4 12 months All
After the first year of monitoring,the current schedule of semi-annual monitoring of all wells
will be resumed,if necessary,until it can be demonstrated that the cleanup goals for the site
have been met During each monitoring event,each well will be sampled for EPA Method
602 benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) plus methyl tert butyl ether, and

MADEP Method volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH). Field parameters of pH,
conductivity,and dissolved oxygen will also be measured during each sampling event
G. WELL DATA
The only wells within 'Amile of the injection site are the site monitoring wells. A table
of well construction data for the site monitoring wells is attached.
H. MAPS
The requested maps are attached.

L,
Table 1
Well Construction Information and July 2009 Groundwater Elevations
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012
Well Screened 7/31/09 Depth 7/31/09 Groundwater
Well Date Diameter Total Depth Interval Top of Casing Elevation to Water Elevation
Number Installed (inches) (feet BLS) (feet BLS) (feet,assumed datum) (feet) (feet,assumed datum)
MW-1 Nov-02 2 20 5-20 100.00 15.62 84.38
MW-2 May-03 2 18 8-18 102.64 10.65 91.99
MW-3 May-03 2 16 6-16 97.45 14.83 82.62
MW-4 Jan-04 2 10 5-10 91.97 9.80 82.17
MW-5 Jan-04 2 18 3-18 97.84 13.21 84.63
MW-6 Jan-04 1 2 11 6-11 87.09 6.48 80.61
VMW-1 Ma -03 1 2 40 35-40 100.15 16.13 84.02
Notes: 1. BLS=below land surface
2. All monitoring wells are constructed of schedule 40 PVC and have 0.01-inch slotted screens.
3. MW-4 was originally installed to a depth of 7 feet in May 2003,and was deepened to a depth of 10 feet
in January 2004.
4. VMW-1 is a double-cased Type III monitoring well with 6-inch steel outer casing grouted in place to 30 feet.
5. All monitoring wells except MW-4 have flush-mount surface completions. MW-4 is an above-grade completion
with a 2.5-foot stickup.

HENDERSONVILLE QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA-HENDERSON CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) 202-SW
J•.
�9cnlntain IIome UF914:
zo
H_rgN
r
.09 � 1, Mite
:.I Mel,h, ,-�, ry
f
' "�'.� c� •Gri rarst7ale
Site �\
I of a.ol. � o
M,Ic1
Stoney . ...
Mountain
1 Milo
SCALE 1:24000
0 1 M11F
1000 0 1000 1000 3900 4000 5000 6000 MOD FEET
I 5 0 1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
Attachment H (1 )
Proposed Injection Site
Enmark#251 —Mountain Home, NC

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Vertical Extent Monitoring Well Location
1 Inch=40 feet
o Proposed Injection Point m�0
ac O
'f�
_ �O
PmpertV Uno
_ A
MW4 0
Restrooms
w dee Area Ventling &Office
0 MW6 ° J"
P�
\ O O
O O
O
O O
0 m-30 O O
O O O O
O O & I 00
°
O
Fueling Canopy
0 niW-5
0 MW-2
ASHEVILLE HWY. (US 25)
FIGURE 9 TEC
SITE MAP
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home, NC Environmental,

LEGEND
0 Uppermost Aquifer Monitoring Well Location
0 Saprolite Aquifer Monitoring Well Location
SCALE:
1 inch=40 feet O Proposed Injection Point 84.38 Groundwater Elevation In Uppermost Aquifer on 7131/09
(in feet,assumed datum) e
40 Q
(84.02) Groundwater Elevation In Saprolite Aquifer on 7/31/09 �O
(in feet,assumed datum) �31
—90— Groundwater Elevation Contour in the Uppermost Aquifer
— ProParl9 Lino -9A \
_ 0 0, A
11W,6 eW� ern Restrooms �G
80.81 / 82.17 W ed Ares 3� Vend.ng 8 Office
0 d d
m
\ ® O
m
W1
O O / 38
0 O O z O ® 2 -11
B2.82 O 1&W-1� c 5
(84.02 • Ga fi
Fueling Canopy
r^@ PI
01 1- 0
MW6 / 0�
84.63 �^
MW-2
�'o�a 9t99
a
Ware Gmas
Ia
r'Ol
4"n
ASHEVILLE HWY. (US 25)
JULY 2009 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP ■ ` C
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home, NC Environmental

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Proposed Injection Point
1 Inch=40 feet
Benzene Isocontour
a 40 00
�iP�O
NCAC 2L Standard for Benzene=1 pglL
vn4,eny❑� � -- � 09'Li
A
MWd 0
No Restrooms
3d 8 office
MW� Wooded Area Ventling
0 NO
P
\ p O O 16.4
p �6.4 yglL
O
0 MW-3 O
O ONO O EED
O ____
O O fa a G Reg.
\ p Ga dine
Mo _ Pram
some Fueling Canopy
hA'
NO
0 MW-2
NO
Grass
ASHEVILLE HWY. (US 25)
BENZENE ENULY(2009 • ` C
Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC Environmental,-

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: ® Proposed Injection Point
1 inch=40 feet
MTBE Isocontour
S
NCAC 2L Standard for MTBE=20 pgiL
property une
MW 0 w�
p.at Restrooms
80 Wooded Am. Ventling 8 Office
? 1
r408W95 0
O O O MW-/
O O n O ^ 4.60 N91L
0 MW-i- O O fff111% 2KK-11
O Ot 2 O O __
O O O ro 5 Reg.
O O a olive
-o_-- Prem...l
soling- Fueling Canopy
^¢ Plus
I 0 MWS I-A
\ ND
0 MW-2
ND
Grass
ASHEVILLE HWY. (US 25)
ATTACHMENT
TEC
Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC Environmental,

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Vertical Extent Monitoring Well Location
1 inch=40 feet
B
o �00
"�s
.a
MW-a 0 Restrooms
A` s`A
Wootletl Area &Office
Ventling
d�
P
O O
O 0 O
O
(A1-0 MW-1 © O
O 0
0 p ��O
O O •�..v-' 0 r� r—
p 0
Fueling Canopy
0 roiev--=
MW-2
A'
Grass
ASHEVILLE HWY. (US 25)
CROSS SECTION LOCATION • Ev
Enmark #251 - Mountain Home, NC Environmental,.,

_110 A Injection Area
E MW-
2
m MW-'I VMW-
9100 Fill Material(Silt,Sand,8 Clay) MW3
ESilty/Clayey Sand Alluvium
'go MW-6 Clay - - —
---_--
Silty/Clayey Sand Alluvium _ _ _ ——— — —————
__—— J — —_— —————— — — — — Silty Clay Saproltte
,80
0
Silty Clay Saproli[e -------
A 70 Depth of Infection Points
60
SCALE:
Horizontal=Vertical
1 inch=25 feet
0 25
ATTACHMENT H (5) -2 TEC
CROSS SECTION
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home, NC Environmental.

Additional Information for Injection Well Permit Application WI0100102
Enmark#251-Henderson County
1. There was no groundwater flow rate or specific yield information in the Application.
Please provide this velocity rate per year,and the calculations used to find the flow rate.
At the time the Application was prepared, there were no available site-specific hydraulic
conductivity measurements since no previous hydraulic conductivity testing had been
performed. TEC Environmental completed slug tests at the site on November 4, 2010 to
evaluate site-specific hydraulic conductivity. Rising head slug tests were performed on
monitoring wells AM-1,MW-2, and MW-6 since these wells bisect the plume and proposed
injection area. MW-3 was also planned to be tested, however, there was not enough water
column present in the well to perform a test. Field data were analyzed using the Bouwer
and Rice method of slug test analysis.The following table summarizes the results:
Well Hydraulic Conductivity Hydraulic Conductivity
(cm/sec) ft/da
MW-1 1.8 x 104 0.50
NM-2 3.5 x 105 0.099
AM-6 2.3 x 10-0 0.65
Average 1.5 x 10-4 0.42
The seepage velocity of groundwater at the site was estimated using the following equation
(Darcy's Law):
V=Kiln,
where: V=horizontal groundwater seepage velocity
K=hydraulic conductivity
i=horizontal groundwater gradient
n,=effective porosity
By using the average K of 0.42 ft/day, the average horizontal groundwater gradient of 0.05
(determined from previous groundwater elevation contour maps), and assuming an
effective porosity of 0.3, an average horizontal seepage velocity of 0.070 ft/day, or 26
ft/year,was calculated for the uppermost aquifer at the site.
2. The monitoring plan needs to include a pre-injection monitoring event.
and
3. Since ORC Advanced contains phosphate, which can potentially mobilize naturally
occurring arsenic,please add arsenic to the monitoring plan.
The revised monitoring plan is as follows:

MONITORING PLAN
Groundwater monitoring will be performed to track the progress of the remediation. One pre-
injection sampling event of all wells will be completed prior to the injection event to establish
baseline conditions. After injection,quarterly groundwater monitoring will be completed for the first
year. The schedule for first year groundwater monitoring after the injections will be as follows:
Event Time After Wells Sampled
Injections
1 3 months MW-1,-3,-6
2 6 months All
3 9 months NM-1,-3,-6
4 12 months All
After the first year of monitoring, the current schedule of semi-annual monitoring of all wells
will be resumed, if necessary, until it can be demonstrated that the cleanup goals for the site
have been met.
During each monitoring event, each well will be sampled and analyzed for benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) plus methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) by EPA Method 602,
arsenic by EPA Method 6010B, and volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) by the MADEP
Method. Field parameters of pH, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen will also be measured
during each sampling event.
4. Please submit a spill response plan.
The spill response plan is attached.
5. We need at least one North Carolina certified driller certification number to enter into the
database. This does not have to be the final driller who actually ends up installing the
wells.
Steve Taylor
Geologic Exploration,Inc.
Certification#2401
6. We need a little bit more information on how the injection fluids will be mixed (i.e., 5
gallon buckets with water,holding tanks for the fluid with slurry,etc.),and the proposed
estimated injection pressure.
INTECI'ION PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT
Injections will be performed using a direct-push probe. The probed rods will be advanced to
approximately 10 feet below the water table at each injection location. The rods will then be
retracted approximately 2 feet, and the injectant will be pumped through the rods and into the
subsurface.

The ORC Advanced will be mixed in the hopper of a Geoprobe GP300 or GP350 injection
machine. A total of 40 pounds ORC Advanced powder, which is approximately 1.6 5-gallon
buckets,will be mixed and injected per location. The ORC Advanced will be mixed to a slurry
that is approximately 30% solids by weight The 40 pounds of ORC powder for each location
will require approximately 12 gallons of water for mixing. Two batches of ORC Advanced
slurry will have to be mixed at each location due to the size limitation of the injection machine
hopper(9.5-gallon capacity with a 3-inch freeboard).
The slurry will be pumped from the hopper and through the probe rods using the injection
machine's pump. The injection pressure is estimated to be approximately 100 psi. Pressure will
be monitored and adjusted in the field based on the rate the target injection interval will accept
the fluid. ORC Advanced slurry will not be allowed to flow back up the borehole and reach the
ground surface.
Upon completion of slurry injection at each location,potable water will be pumped through the
injection system to force out residual slurry into the formation and flush out the injection
system. Then the probe rods will be removed and the boring will be sealed with bentonite
pellets.

Spill Prevention & Response Plan
Enmark#251 ORC Advanced Injections
3300 Asheville Highway
Hendersonville,NC 28791
Emergency Contact Information
Onsite Emergency Contact Chris Singleton/ Singleton Environmental 828-508-4510
Emergency Response Contacts: Fire/Paramedics/Police: 911
Fire Non-Emergency Line: 828-692-8014
NCDENR Asheville Office 828-296-4500
National Response Center: 800-424-8802
Local Emergency Medical Facility: Park Ridge Hospital
100 Hospital Drive
Hendersonville,NC 28791
828-684-8501
Cleanup Contractor: A&D Environmental,Inc. 800-434-7750
Material Safety Data Sheet Attached
Spill Prevention
Hazardous Substance Manage ment ORC Advanced is a hazardous substance and will be
managed in a way that prevents release. The following general requirements are to be
followed:
• Material Management:
- All containers must be in good condition and compatible with the ORC
Advanced material.
- A minimum freeboard of 3 inches will be maintained in the mixing hopper at all
times to prevent overflow and spillage.
- Care must be taken during mixing of the ORC Advanced slurry to prevent
accidental spills from splashing.
- Injection pressure will be monitored and regulated to prevent ORC Advanced
slurry from flowing up the borehole and onto the ground surface.
- Injection hoses will be inspected and monitored to ensure that they are in good
condition and have no leaks.
- Any spills on the exterior of the containers must be cleaned immediately by
washing with copious amounts of potable water.
- Always wear appropriate personal protective equipment when handling ORC
Advanced such as nitrite gloves,a face shield,and a dust mask.

• Good Housekeeping:
- Store ORC Advanced material in sealed containers or under cover when not in
use;
- Implement preventative maintenance activities to reduce the potential for release
from equipment;
- Immediately clean up and properly manage all small spills or leaks by washing
with copious amounts of water;
- Periodically inspect equipment and hazardous substance storage areas to ensure
leaks or spills are not occurring;
- Keep all work areas clean and in good general condition.
• Secondary containment:
- Secondary containment is not required since no individual containers of ORC
Advanced or ORC Advanced slurry will exceed 55 gallons. ORC Advanced
powder will be delivered to the site in 5-gallon buckets, and the slurry will be
mixed in batches of 9.5 gallons or less.
• Marking4abeling:
- Ensure all markings on the ORC Advanced containers remain legible and visible.
Employee Trainine: All employees performing ORC Advanced injections will have previous
experience performing the work and will be familiar with the contents of this plan
Spill Response
The spill response procedures below shall be implemented immediately if there is a fire,
explosion,or release of ORC Advanced that threatens human health or the environment
Response actions in the event of a spill or release:
Only small quantities of ORC Advanced will be handled at the site. The largest quantity of
release expected will be 9.5 gallons of slurry, since that is the largest volume that will be mixed
at one time. Small releases of this amount or less will be cleaned up as recommended by the
material manufacturer (Regenesis), which is diluting the material with copious amounts of
water.
If a large release of ORC Advanced occurs by some circumstance, local emergency response
personnel will be notified by calling 911, the NCDENR Asheville Regional Office will be
notified, and the National Response Center will be notified. The designated emergency
response contractor, NEO Corporation of Canton, NC, will be called to provide containment
and cleanup of the release. Contact numbers are included on the fast page of this plan.
When reporting the release,prepare to provide the following information:
• Your name and telephone number from where you are calling;
• Exact address of the release;
• Date,time,cause and type of incident(fire,spill,etc.)
0 Material and quantity of the release;

• Current conditions at the site;
• Extent of injuries,if any;and
• Possible hazards to the public health and/or environment.
Evacuation Procedures:
In the event of a release that has the potential for fire,explosion,or other human health hazards,
the area surrounding the release will be evacuated. All personnel will move to a location
upwind and safely away from the release. Since the Enmark station is active, any customers
and employees of the facility will be notified and asked to evacuate to a safe location if
necessary.

Oxygen Release Compound—Advanced (ORC Advanced")
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET(MSDS)
Last Revised: March 13,2007
Section 1 - Material Identification
Supplier:
CAP
REGENESIS
1011 Calle Sombra
San Clemente, CA 92673
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: infonaxeeenesis.com
Chemical A mixture of Calcium OxyHydroxide [CaO(OH)21 and
Description: Calcium Hydroxide [Ca(OH)21.
Chemical Family: Inorganic Chemical
Trade Name: Advanced Formula Oxygen Release Compound
(ORC Advancedrm)
Chemical Synonyms Calcium Hydroxide Oxide; Calcium Oxide Peroxide
Product Used to remediate contaminated soil and groundwater
Use: (environmental applications)
Section 2— Composition
CAS No. Chemical
682334-66-3 Calcium Hydroxide Oxide [CaO(OH)21
1305-62-0 Calcium Hydroxide [Ca(OH)21
7758-11-4 Dipotassium Phosphate(HK204P)
7778-77-0 Monopotassium Phosphate(H2K04P)

Regenesis-ORC Advanced MSDS
Section 3—Physical Data
Form: Powder
Color: White to Pale Yellow
Odor: Odorless
Melting Point: 527 °F (275 °C)—Decomposes
Boiling Point: Not Applicable(NA)
Flammability/Flash NA
Point:
Auto-Flammability: NA
Vapor Pressure: NA
Self-Ignition NA
Temperature:
Thermal 527 °F (275 °C)—Decomposes
Decomposition:
Bulk Density: 0.5—0.65 g/ml (Loose Method)
Solubility: 1.65 g/L @ 68° F(20° C) for calcium hydroxide.
Viscosity: NA
PH: 11-13 (saturated solution)
Explosion Limits % Non-explosive
by Volume:
Hazardous
Decomposition Oxygen, Hydrogen Peroxide, Steam, and Heat
Products:
Hazardous None
Reactions:

Regenesis-ORC Advanced MSDS
Section 4—Reactivity Data
Stability: Stable under certain conditions (see below).
Conditions to Avoid: Heat and moisture.
Incompatibility• Acids, bases, salts of heavy metals, reducing agents, and
flammable substances.
Hazardous Does not occur.
Polymerization:
Section 5—Regulations
TSCA Inventory Listed
List:
CERCLA Hazardous Substance(40 CFR Part 302)
Listed Substance: No
Unlisted Substance: Yes
Reportable Quantity 100 pounds
(RQ):
Characteristic(s): Ignitibility
RCRA Waste D001
Number:
SARA, Title III, Sections 302/303 (40 CFR Part 355 — Emergency Planning and
Notification)
Extremely
Hazardous No
Substance:
SARA, Title III, Sections 311/312 (40 CFR Part 370 — Hazardous Chemical
Reporting: Community Right-To-Know
Immediate Health Hazard
Hazard Category:
Fire Hazard
Threshold Planning 10,000 pounds
Quantity:

Regenesis- ORC Advanced MSDS
Section 5—Regulations (cont)
SARA, Title III, Section 313 (40 CFR Part 372 — Toxic Chemical Release
Reporting: Community Right-To-Know
Extremely
Hazardous No
Substance:
WMMS Oxidizing Material
Classification: C Poisonous and Infectious
Material
Material Causing Other Toxic
D Effects—
Eye and Skin Irritant
Canadian Domestic Not Listed
Substance List:
Section 6—Protective Measures, Storage and Handling
Technical Protective
Measures
Storage: Keep in tightly closed container. Store in dry area, protected
from heat sources and direct sunlight.
Clean and dry processing pipes and equipment before
operation. Never return unused product to the storage
Handling: container. Keep away from incompatible products. Containers
and equipment used to handle this product should be used
exclusively for this material. Avoid contact with water or
humidity.

Regenesis- ORC Advanced MSDS
Section 6—Protective Measures, Storage and Handling (cont)
Personal Protective Equipment(PPE)
Calcium Hydroxide
ACGIH®TLV®(2000)
5 mg/m3 TWA
OSHA PEL
Engineering Total dust-15 mg/m3 TWA
Controls:
Respirable fraction-
5 mg/m3 TWA
NIOSH REL (1994)
5 mg/m3
Respiratory For many conditions, no respiratory protection may be needed;
Protection: however, in dusty or unknown atmospheres use a NIOSH
approved dust respirator.
Hand Protection: Impervious protective gloves made of nitrile, natural rubbber
or neoprene.
Eye Protection: Use chemical safety goggles (dust proof).
For brief contact, few precautions other than clean clothing are
Skin Protection: needed. Full body clothing impervious to this material should
be used during prolonged exposure.
Safety shower and eyewash stations should be present.
Other: Consultation with an industrial hygienist or safety manager for
the selection of PPE suitable for working conditions is
suggested.
Industrial Hygiene: Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
Protection Against NA
Fire&Explosion:
Section 7—Hazards Identification
Emergency Oxidizer— Contact with combustibles may cause a fire. This
Overview: material decomposes and releases oxygen in a fire. The
additional oxygen may intensify the fire.
Potential Health Irritating to the mucous membrane and eyes. If the product
Effects: splashes in ones face and eyes, treat the eyes first. Do not dry
soiled clothing close to an open flame or heat source. Any

Regenesis-ORC Advanced MSDS
clothing that has been contaminated with this product should
be submerged in water prior to drying.
High concentrations may cause slight nose and throat irritation
Inhalation: with a cough. There is risk of sore throat and nose bleeds if
one is exposed to this material for an extended period of time.
Eye Contact: Severe eye irritation with watering and redness. There is also
the risk of serious and/or permanent eye lesions.
Skin Contact: Irritation may occur if one is exposed to this material for
extended periods.
Ingestion: Irritation of the mouth and throat with nausea and vomiting.
Section 8—Measures in Case of Accidents and Fire
After Collect in suitable containers. Wash remainder with copious
Spillage/Leakage/Gas quantities of water.
Leakage:
Extinguishing See next.
Media:
Suitable: Large quantities of water or water spray. In case of fire in
close proximity, all means of extinguishing are acceptable.
Self contained breathing apparatus or approved gas mask
should be worn due to small particle size. Use extinguishing
Further Information: media appropriate for surrounding fire. Apply cooling water to
sides of transport or storage vessels that are exposed to flames
until the fire is extinguished. Do not approach hot vessels that
contain this product.
After contact with skin, wash immediately with plenty of water
First Aid: and soap. In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with
plenty of water and seek medical attention. Consult an
opthalmologist in all cases.
Section 8—Measures in Case of Accidents and Fire
Flush eyes with running water for 15 minutes, while keeping
Eye Contact: the eyelids wide open. Consult with an ophthalmologist in all
cases.
Inhalation• Remove subject from dusty environment. Consult with a
physician in case of respiratory symptoms.

L s
Regenesis- ORC Advanced MSDS
If the victim is conscious, rinse mouth and admnister fresh
Ingestion: water. DO NOT induce vomiting. Consult a physician in all
cases.
Wash affected skin with running water. Remove and clean
Skin Contact: clothing. Consult with a physician in case of persistent pain or
redness.
Evacuate all non-essential personnel. Intervention should only
Special Precautions: be done by capable personnel that are trained and aware of the
hazards associated with this product. When it is safe,
unaffected product should be moved to safe area.
Oxidizing substance. Oxygen released on exothermic
decomposition may support combustion. Confined spaces
Specific Hazards: and/or containers may be subject to increased pressure. If
product comes into contact with flammables, fire or explosion
may occur.
Section 9—Accidental Release Measures
Observe the protection methods cited in Section 3. Avoid
Precautions: materials and products that are incompatible with product.
Immediately notify the appropriate authorities in case of
reportable discharge(> 100 lbs).
Collect the product with a suitable means of avoiding dust
formation. All receiving equipment should be clean, vented,
dry, labeled and made of material that this product is
Cleanup Methods: compatible with. Because of the contamination risk, the
collected material should be kept in a safe isolated place. Use
large quantities of water to clean the impacted area. See
Section 12 for disposal methods.
Section 10—Information on Toxicology
Toxicity Data
Oral Route,LD50,rat,>2,000 mg/kg(powder 50%)
Acute Toxicity: Dermal Route,LD50, rat,>2,000 mg/kg(powder 50%)
Inhalation,LD5o, rat,>5,000 mg/m3 (powder 35%)
Irritation: Rabbit(eyes), severe irritant

,
Regenesis-ORC Advanced MSDS
Sensitization: No data
Chronic Toxicity: In vitro, no mutagenic effect(Powder 501/o)
Target Organ Eyes and respiratory passages.
Effects:
Section 11—Information on Ecology
Ecology Data
10 mg Ca(OH)2/L: pH=9.0
100 mg Ca(OH)Z/L: pH= 10.6
Acute Exotoxicity: Fishes, Cyprinus carpio, LC50,48 hrs, 160 mg/L
Crustaceans, Daphnia sp.,EC50,24 hours, 25.6 mg/L
(Powder 16%)
Mobility: Low Solubility and Mobility
Water—Slow Hydrolysis.
Degradation Products: Calcium Hydroxide
Abiotic Degradation: Water/soil—complexation/precipitation. Carbonates/sulfates
present at environmental concentrations.
Degradation products: carbonates/sulfates sparingly soluble
Biotic Degradation: NA (inorganic compound)
Potential for NA(ionizable inorganic compound)
Bioaccumulation:
Section 11—Information on Ecology(coat)
Observed effects are related to alkaline properties of the
product. Hazard for the environment is limited due to the
product properties of:
Comments: • No bioaccumulation
• Weak solubility and precipatation as carbonate or
sulfate in an aquatic environment.
Diluted product is rapidly neutralized at environmental pH.
Further Information: NA

Regenesis-ORC Advanced MSDS
Section 12—Disposal Considerations
Waste Disposal Consult current federal, state and local regulations regarding
Method: the proper disposal of this material and its emptied containers.
Section 13—Shipping/Transport Information
D.O.T Shipping Oxidizing Solid,N.O.S [A mixture of Calcium OxyHydroxide
Name: [CaO(OH)2] and Calcium Hydroxide [Ca(OH)2].
UN Number: 1479
Hazard Class: 5.1
Label(s): 5.1 (Oxidizer)
Packaging Group: II
STCC Number: 4918717
Section 14—Other Information
HMIS®Rating Health—2 Reactivity— 1
Flammability—0 PPE-Required
HMS®is a registered trademark of the National Painting and Coating Association.
® Health—2 Reactivity— 1
NFPA Rating Flammability—0 OX
NFPA®is a registered trademark of the National Fire Protection Association.
Reason for Issue: Update toxicological and ecological data
Section 15—Further Information
The information contained in this document is the best available to the supplier at
the time of writing, but is provided without warranty of any kind. Some possible
hazards have been determined by analogy to similar classes of material. The items
in this document are subject to change and clarification as more information
become available.

HCDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division e`Water Quality
oaverly Saves Perdue Coleen H Sullins FRECEUVED De =raer,ar.
Goverrio Dlrecto- 6earetar�
December 13,2010 I EEC 22 NUT
Mr. Brian Wymer i Asheville Rogional Office
Kenan Advantage Group Acp iifor P_rot_e_cfion
4366 Mount Pleasant St.,Northwest
North Canton, OH 44720
Ref: Issuance of Injection Permit W10100102
Enmark 4251 Service Station
Hendersonville,Henderson County
Dear Mr. Wymer:
In accordance with the application received on June 27. 2010, and additional information received November 16, 2010,
we are forwarding permit number WI0100102. This permit is to inject ORC Advanced to remediate groundwater
contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons at the Enmark #251 Service Station facility located 3300 Asheville Hwy.,
Hendersonville, Henderson County, NC 28791. This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until November
30, 2012, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations stated therein, including the requirement to submit a final
project evaluation as stated in PART VII — MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENT'S. Please read the
entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the permit.
Please pay special attention to Part VII.1 in the permit. The proposed revised monitoring plan received November
16, 2010, included in the application shall be followed. Also, the direct push borings shall be plugged and
abandoned according to 15A NCAC 2C .0214 (Part M2. of the permit).
You will need to notify this office and the Asheville Regional Office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of operation
of the facility. In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, you must submit
an application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at 919-715-6166 or
Michael Roeers(a,lnedenr¢ov if you have any questions about your permit.
Best
/Reegaardds,,
Michael Rogers,P.G. (NC &FL)
Environmental Specialist
Underground Injection Control Program
cc: Landon Davidson-Asheville Regional Office
David Traylor—TEC Environmental, P.C.
WI0100102 Permit File
Dianne Eskenasy-Division of Waste Management
A.OUi ER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Maii Seance Center,Rale�h,North Carolina 27599-1636
Loanor, 2726 Capital 6oulevarc.Raiagh.North Carolina 27504 Or._ t
Phone.[phone])FAX 1:919-715-0588.FAX [phone]P`Custcrner Service 1-87',E23 74E �I orL tt a!,,A i 1d
lnterre;:w .nmateroualim.oro R.1/!
t'it�it ri2fll.`
r.r Eaoz'_�snunn-• Affirmative Gtuor Emo4:-ye �

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A WELL FOR INJECTION
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87; Article 21, Chapter 143, and other
applicable Laws,Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Kenan Advantage Group
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR OPERATION OF 21 TYPE 5I INJECTION WELLS,
defined in Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2C .0209(c)(3)(C), to inject ORC
Advanced for the oxidation of petroleum hydrocarbons. These injection wells/points will be located
at the Enmark#251 Service Station,3300 Asheville Hwy.,Hendersonville,Henderson County,NC
28791, and will be operated in accordance with the application submitted June 27, 2010. and in
conformity with the specifications and supporting data submitted November 16,2010, all of which
are filed with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and are considered a part of
this permit. � '
This permit is for Construction and Operation only,and does not waive any provisions of the Water
Use Actor any other applicable Laws,Rules,or Regulations. Operation and use of an injection well
shall be in compliance with Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2C .0100 and.0200,and
any other Laws, Rules, and Regulations pertaining to well construction and use.
This permit shall be effective,unless revoked,from the date of its issuance until November 30,2012,
and shall be subject to the specified conditions and limitations set forth in Parts I through X hereof.
Permit issued this the 13th day of December, 2010.
Coleen H. Sullins,Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 1 OF 6
ver. Oct2010 APIUIC-6

PART I- WELL CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit and with the standards and criteria
specified in Criteria and Standards Applicable to Injection Wells(15A NCAC 2C .0200). Any
noncompliance with conditions of this permit constitutes a violation of the North Carolina Well
Construction Act and is grounds for enforcement action as provided for in N.C.G.S. 87-94.
2. This permit shall become voidable unless the facility is constructed in accordance with the
conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting data.
3. This permit is valid only for construction of the number of injection wells described in the
application and other supporting data. Construction of additional injection'wells must be
approved in advance by the Aquifer Protection Section.
4. Each injection well shall not hydraulically connect separate aquifers.
5. Each injection well shall be constructed in such a manner that water from land surface cannot
migrate into the gravel pack or well screen.
6. Each injection well shall be secured to reasonably insure against unauthorized access and use.
Each well shall be permanently labeled with a warning that it is for injection purposes and the
entrance to each well must be secured with a locking cap.
, 7. Each injection well shall be afforded reasonable protection against damage during construction
and use.
8. Each injection well shall have permanently affixed an identification plate.
9. Within 30 days of completion of well construction, a completed Well Construction Record
(Form GW-1) must be submitted for each injection well to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PART II-WELL CONSTRUCTION SPECIAL CONDITIONS
At least forty-eight(48)hours prior to constructing each injection well,the Permittee shall notifythe
Aquifer Protection Section-Underground Injection Control (UIC) Central Office staff, telephone
number [phone] and the Asheville Regional Office Aquifer Protection Section Staff,
telephone number(828) 296-4500.
Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 2 OF 6
ver. Oct.2010 AP/UIC-6

v
PART III - OPERATION AND USE GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature,volume of materials,rate ofinjection,and
number of injection wells as described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This permit is not transferable without prior•notice to, and approval by, the Director of the
Division of Water Quality (Director). In the event there is a desire for the facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee,a formal permit amendment request must
be submitted to the Director, including any supporting materials as may be appropriate, at least
30 days prior to the date of the change.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility of complying with
any and all statutes,rules,regulations,or ordinances which may be imposed by other local,state,
and federal agencies which have jurisdiction. Furthermore,the issuance of this permit does not
imply that all regulatory requirements have been met.
PART IV- PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The injection facility shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so that there is no
contamination of groundwater which will render it unsatisfactory for normal use. In the event
that the facility fails to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance conditions or
failure of the injection zone to adequately assimilate the injected fluid, the Permittee shall take
immediate corrective actions including those actions that may be required by the Division of
Water Quality such as the repair,modification, or abandonment of the injection facility.
2. The Permittee shall be required to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit eves if
compliance requires a reduction or elimination of the permitted activity.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages to
surface or groundwater resulting from the operation of this facility.
PART V-OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The injection facility shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2. The Permittee must notify the Division and receive prior written approval from the Director of
any planned alterations or additions in the permitted facility or activity not specifically
authorized by the permit.
3. At least forty-eight(48)hours prior to the initiation of the operation of the facility for injection,
the Permittee must notify by telephone the Aquifer Protection Section-UIC, Central Office staff,
telephone number(919)715-6166. Notification is required so that Division staff can inspect or
otherwise review the injection facility and' determine if it is in compliance with permit
conditions.
Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 3 OF 6
ver. Oct.20I 0 AP/UIC-6

PART VI - INSPECTIONS
1. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water Quality may,
upon presentation of credentials,enter and inspect any property,premises,or place on or related
to the injection facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with
this permit, may inspect or copy any records that must be maintained under the terms and
conditions of this permit, and may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or injection
fluids.
2. Department representatives shall have reasonable access forpurposes of inspection,observation,
and sampling associated with injection and any related facilities as provided for in N.C.G.S. 87-
90.
3. Provisions shall be made for collecting any necessary and appropriate samples associated with
the injection facility activities.
PART VII - MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. The proposed revised monitoring plan received November 16,2010,included in the application
shall be followed. All sample results shall be submitted to the Aquifer Protection Section's
Asheville Regional Office and the Raleigh Central Office. Any monitoring (including
groundwater,surface water,or soil sampling)deemed necessarybythe Division of Water Quality
to ensure surface and ground water protection, will be established and an acceptable sampling
reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. The Permittee shall submit an Injection Event Record within 30 days of completing each
injection.
3. The Permittee shall produce a final project evaluation within 9 months after completing all
injection-related activity associated with this permit or produce a project interim evaluation
before submitting a renewal application for this permit. This document shall assess the injection
projects findings in a written summary. The final project evaluation shall also contain
monitoring well sampling data, contaminant plume maps and potentiometric surface maps.
4. The monitoring results and the final project evaluation shall be submitted to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
and to:
Aquifer Protection Section
DENR-DWQ Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa,NC 28778
Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 4 OF 6
ver. Oct.2010 AP/UIC-6

5. The Permittee shall report by telephone,within 48 hours of the occurrence or first knowledge of
the occurrence,to the Asheville Regional Office,telephone number(828) 296-4500, any of the
following:
(A)Any occurrence at the injection facility which results in any unusual operating
circumstances;
(B)Any failure due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the facility incapable of
proper injection operations, such as mechanical or electrical failures.
6. Where the Permittee becomes aware of an omission of any relevant facts in a permit application,
or of any incorrect information submitted in said application or in any report to the Director,the
relevant and correct facts or information shall be promptly submitted to the Director by the
Permittee.
7. In the event that the permitted facility fails to perform satisfactorily,the Permittee shall take such
immediate action as may be required by the Director.
PART N7III - PERMIT RENEWAL
In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, the
Permittee must submit an application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date.
PART I% - CHANGE OF WELL STATUS
1. The Permittee shall provide written notification within 15 days of any change of status of an
injection well. Such a change would include the discontinued use of a well for injection. If a
well is taken completely out of service temporarily,the Permittee must install a sanitary seal. If a
well is not to be used for any purpose that well must be permanently abandoned according to
15A NCAC 2C .0214,Well Construction Standards.
2. When operations have ceased at the facility and a well will no longer be used for any purpose,
the Permittee shall abandon that injection well in accordance with the procedures specified in
15A NCAC 2C .0214, including but not limited to the following:
(A)All casing and screen materials may be removed prior to initiation of abandonment
procedures if such removal will not cause or contribute to contamination of the
groundwaters.
(B)The entire depth of each well shall be sounded before it is sealed to insure freedom from
obstructions that may interfere with sealing operations.
(C)The well shall be thoroughly disinfected,prior to sealing,if the Director determines that
failure to do so could lead to the contamination of an underground source of drinking
water.
Permit No.WIO100101 PAGE 5 OF 6
ver. Oct.2010 AP/UIC-6

(D)Drilled wells shall be completely filled with cement grout or bentonite grout,which shall
be introduced into the well through a pipe which extends to the bottom of the well and is
raised as the well is filled.
(E) In the case of gravel-packed wells in which the casing and screens have not been
removed,neat-cement,or bentonite grout shall be injected into the well completely filling
it from the bottom of the casing to the top.
(F) In those cases when, as aresult of the injection operations, a subsurface cavity has been
created, each well shall be abandoned in such a manner that will prevent the movement
of fluids into or between underground sources of drinking water and in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the permit.
(G)The Permittee shall submit a Well Abandonment Record (Form GW-30) as specified in
1 5A NCAC 2C .0213(h)(1) within 30 days of completion of abandonment.
3. The written documentation required in Part IX (1) and (2) (G) shall be submitted to:
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
DENR-Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
PART X—WORKER PRECAUTIONS DURING APPLICATION
1. Some effects reported to be associated with the product proposed to be used are as follows: eye,
skin, nose, throat, and lung irritation. If the product is released into the environment in a way
that could result in a suspension of fine solid or liquid particles (e.g., grinding, blending,
vigorous shaking or mixing), then proper personal protective equipment should be used. The
application process should be reviewed by an industrial hygienist to ensure that the most
appropriate personal protective equipment is used.
2. Persons working with these products should wear goggles or a face shield,gloves,and protective
clothing. Face and body protection should be used for anticipated splashes or sprays.
3. Eating, drinking, smoking, handling contact lenses, and applying cosmetics should not be
permitted in the application area during or immediately following application.
4. Safety controls should be in place to ensure that the check valve and the pressure delivery
systems are working properly.
5. The Material Safety Data Sheets should be followed to prevent incompatible or adverse reactions
and injuries.
Permit No.WI0100102 PAGE 6 OF 6
ver.Oct.2010 AP/UIC-6

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: Julv 29, 2010 County: Henderson
To: Aquifer Protection Central Office Permittee: Kenan Advantage Group
Central Office Reviewer: B. Laverty Project Name: Enmark 9251
Regional Login No: Application No.: WI0100102
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is(check all that apply): ®New ❑ Renewal
❑Minor Modification❑ Major Modification
❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse❑Recycle❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals ❑Attachment B included ❑ 503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt
❑Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Closed-loop Groundwater Remediation ® Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ® Yes or❑No.
a. Date of site visit: July 28,2010
b. Person contacted and contact information: David Taylor(TEC Environmental)- [phone]
c. Site visit conducted by: Brett Laverty
d. Inspection Report Attached: ® Yes or❑No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
® Yes or❑No. If no,please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: ILongitude:
e. Regulated Activities/Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision,food processing,municipal wastewater):
For Disposal and Infection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s): 3300 Asheville Highway Hendersonville,NC
b. Driving Directions: 126 to U.S. Highway 191, turn left on Mountain Road, turn right on Asheville
highway.The Enmark station is approximately 1 miles on left.
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Hendersonville Quad/35082-C4-TF-024
d. Latitude-82/14/18.01 Longitude: 35.362364 N/-82.481578 W
II NEWA/VD Ai�1JOR iVIODIFICATIONAPPLIC.4TIOtVS(tltis section itot nettled fin•renewals or minor
modifleations, skip to neax section)
Description Of Waste(S) And Facilities
1. Please attach completed rating sheet. Facility Classification:
FORM: Old Staff Report.doex I

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV INJECTION WELL PERMITAPPLICATIONS(Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed-loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells,and heat
pump injection wells.)
Description Of Well(S)And Facilities—New,Renewal,And Modification
1. Type of injection system:
❑ Heating/cooling water return flow(5A7)
❑ Closed-loop heat pump system(5QM/5QW)
®In situ remediation(5I)
❑ Closed-loop groundwater remediation effluent injection(5L/"Non-Discharge")
❑ Other(Specify:
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ® Yes ❑No
• What is/are the pollution source(s)? Gasoline UST
• What is the distance of the injection well(s)from the pollution source(s)?DST's are less than 50 ft
from the injection area.
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary?Approximately 80
feet.
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good N Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ® Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High (for injection site itself)
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ® Yes ❑No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site(property lines,wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes or❑No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries,buildings,wells,potential pollution
sources,roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
Injection Well Permit Renewal And Modification Only:
i ui It�at pump s}Stems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or igjactiou well operation (e.g. turbid water,
failure to assimilate injected fluid, poor hcating/cooling)?
❑ Yes ❑ No. If Yes. explain:
2. For closed-loop heat pump systems. has system lost pressure or required make-up fluid since permit issuance
or la;t in,pettiun? ❑ Yes ❑ No. lf.e _c plain:
FORM: Old Staff Report.doex 4

- AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
V EVALUATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.
• MTBE has migrated off site.May need additional monitoring wells down gradient of site.
• A spill response plan needs to be submitted in case of accidental spill or daylighting of injection
fluid.
• ORC Advanced injection fluid contains phosphate,which can potentially mobilize naturally
occurring arsenic. Arsenic needs to be added to post-injection monitoring plan.
• Injection ports will be sealed with dry bentonite pellets.This should be a pre-mixed slurry of
bentonite or cement-type grout.
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet-if needed information is available:
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑Yes ®No. If yes, please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item Reason
• No injection volume given
• What is source of potable water
Provide more detail on injection plan
• How will injection fluid be mixed
• Submit a spill response plan
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
6. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition Reason
Spill response plan Accidental spill or daylighting
Add arsenic to post-injection monitoring Presence of phosphate
Use bentonite or cement-type grout slurry to
2C rules
seal injection ports.
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information;
Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons:
8. Signature of report preparer(s): IrA zo�0
Signature of APS regional supervisor: CZ Z W
FORM: Old Staff Report.docx 6

NCDENR
.North Carolina Departmeritof Environment and;Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Division of Waste Management John E.Skvarla, III
Governor Dexter R. Matthews, Director. Secretary
UST Section,
March,l4„20t3
Kenan Advantage Group
Attn: Mr. Brian Wymer
4366 Mt.Pleasant St.NW
Canton,OH 44120
Re: Enmark Station#251.
3300 Asheville Hwy in Hendersonville
Henderson County
UST Incident Number: 28012
Risk'Glassification:Low
DWQ Injection Permit WI0100102
Dear Mr. Wymer:
I have reviewed the Groundwater Monitoring,Report prepared by Chris Singleton of Singleton
Environmental,Inc.,received bythis office on March 7,2013.Monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3 were
sampled and results were non-detect for petroleum-related compounds and for arsenic.
In a telephone discussion with Mr.Singleton on March 13,2013;we discussed the,detection of
benzene in MW=4 in the December,2011 sampling.evenf.Ve agreed that in an effort to achieve site
closure,all accessible monitoring wellsshould'be sampled in the next quarter.The number of wells to be
sampled in the following quarter(s)will be determined based upon'the results of the upcoming spring
sampling event.
I look forward to your next quarterly.sampling report by the:end of June,2013.If you have any
questions do, ot hesitate to contact me at(828)296=4642.
Sincerely,
Diane M. A. Eskenasy, L.G.
Hydrogeologist
Asheville Regional Office
cc: Tom,Dolan,Enmark Stations,Inc.,P.O.Box 728 Savannah, GA 3,1402
EC: Chris Singleton, Singleton Environmental,Inc;sinolefonerly0bellsooth:neS
Michael Rogers,.Aquifer Protection:Section RCO:michael.rogersamdenraov
Landon Davidson,Aquifer Protection'Section ARO:[e-mail]
UST Regional Offices
Asheville(ARO)-2090 US Highway 70,Swannanon,NC 28778(828)2964500
Fayetteville(FAY)—225 Green Street,Suite 714,Systel Building.Fayetteville,NC28301,[phone]
Mooresville(MOR)—610 East Center:Avenue,Suite 3.01,Mooresville,NC 28115,[phone]-

i
a
Raleigh(RRO)-1628 Mail Semi"Center,,Raleigh,NC 27699(919)791-4200 _
Washington(WAS)-943 Washington Square Mill,Washington,NC 27889(252)946-6491
Wilmington(WIL)-127 Cardinal Drive Extension,Wilmington,,NC;28405�[phone]
Winston-Salem(WS):—585Waughtown.Street,Winston-Salem,NC 27107(336)7713000
Guilford County Environmental 11callh,.1203`Maple Street;Greensboro,.NC 27405,.[phone]
i

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: January 31, 2013 County: Hendersonville
To: Aquifer Protection Central Office Permittee: NCDENR APS UIC
Central Office Reviewer: David Goodrich Project Name: Enmark#251 Service Station
Regional Login No: Application No.: W10100102
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is(check all that apply): ❑New ® Renewal
❑ Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification
❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals ❑Attachment B included ❑503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt
❑ Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Closed-loop Groundwater Remediation ® Other Injection Wells(including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ❑ Yes or N No.
a. Date of site visit: January 31,2013
It. Person contacted and contact information: Chris Singleton 8286675001
c. Site visit conducted by: n/a,site was visited during initial permitting. Site has been discussed with
consultant and we have high confidence in supporting documentation.
d. Inspection Report Attached: ❑Yes or®No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
®Yes or❑No. If no,please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude:
e. Regulated Activities/Type of Wastes(e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For Disposal and Infection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site, or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s): Enmark#251 3300 Asheville Hwy.
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: -82.28.52.58 Longitude: 35.21.43.24
H. NEW AND ALUOR Il10DIFICATIONAPPLIC4TION.S(8tis section not needed for renewals or minor
modifications,.skin to next section)
Description Of Waste(S) kud Facilities
1, Please attach completed rating sheet. Facility Classification:
FORM: wi0100102.doex 1

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
;. Are the new site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) consistent with what was reported by
the soil scientist and/or Professional Engineer'? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
4. Does the application (maps, plans, etc.) represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ❑
Yes❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain: _.
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate and/or acceptable to the Division. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑
N/A. If no, please explain:
G. Are the proposed application rates for new sites (hydraulic or nutrient)acceptable?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑ N/A. If no; please explain:
7. Are the new treatment facilities or any new disposal sites located in a 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If yes, please attach a map showing areas of I00-year floodplain and please explain
and recommend any mitigative measures/special conditions in Part N:
8. Are there any buffer conflicts (new treatment facilities or new disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or❑ No. If yes. please
attach a map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be
incorporated into the permit:
9. Is proposed and/or existing groundwater nlonitorin_ program (number of wells, frequency of monitorim�,
Ino111t019ng parameters, etc:) adequate'? El Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well
network if applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any
changes to the groundwater monitorin program:
10. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification B?)
III RENEWAL AND MODIFICATIONAPPLICATIONS(use previous section()r new or maior nlodircatioll
swen1S
Description Of Waste(S)And Facilities N/A
1. Are there appropriately certified ORCs for the facilities? ❑ Yes or❑No.
Operator in Charge: Certificate#:
Backup-Operator in Charge: Certificate#:
2. Is the design. maintenance and operation (c.g. adequate aeration, sludge wasting, sludge storage, effluent
storage, etc) of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
If no, please explain:
3. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table. etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ❑ Yes or❑ No. If no,please explain:
FORM: wi0100102.docx 2

Y
AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect permit (drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development. etc.)? If yes, please explautIs the residuals management plan for the facility
adequate and/or acceptable to the Division?
❑ Yes or❑ No. If no,please explain:
5. Are the existing.application rates (hydraulic or nutrient) still acceptable? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. It' no, please
explain: ._
h. is the existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, Frequency of monitoring, monitoring,
parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well network if
applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
7. Will seasonal or other restrictions be required For added sites? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A if yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification B?)
8. Are there any buffer conflicts (treatment facilities or disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. if yes, please attach a
map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be incorporated
into the permit:
9. Is the description of the facilities, type and/or volume of waste(s) as written in the existing permit correct'? ❑
Yes or❑No. If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes or ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
11. I1as a review of all sell'monitoring- data been conducted (GW. NDMR. and NDAR as applicable)? ❑ Yes or
❑ No ❑ N/A. Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
12. Check all that apply: ❑ No compliance issues. ❑ Notice(s) of violation within the last permit cycle; ❑
Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under SOC; ❑ Currently under JOC: ❑ Currently under
moratorium. It' any items checked, please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify
answer/comments (such as NOV, NOD etc): Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit,
(SOC, JOC, etc.) been complied with? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Not Determined ❑ N/A.. If no, please explain:
13. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? ❑
Yes or❑No ❑N/A. Ryes, please explain:
FORM: wi0100102.doex 3

e � �
AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV. INJECTION WELL PERMITAPPLICATIONS(Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells,including closed-loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells,in situ remediation injection wells,and heat
pump injection wells.)
Description Of Well(S)And Facilities—New,Renewal,And Modification
I. Type of injection system:
❑ Heating/cooling water return flow(5A7)
❑ Closed-loop heat pump system(5QM/5QW)
M In situ remediation(5I)
❑ Closed-loop groundwater remediation effluent injection(5LP Non-Discharge")
❑ Other(Specify:
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ❑No ®Unkown
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection?❑ Yes M No
• What is/are the pollution source(s)?
• What is the distance of the injection well(s)from the pollution source(s)?Unknown
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary?32 ft
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good M Adequate ❑Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: M Low ❑Moderate ❑High (for injection site itself)
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters,etc.) adequate? M Yes ❑No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No,explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site(property lines,wells, surface drainage)?M Yes or❑No. If
no or no map,please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries,buildings,wells,potential pollution
sources,roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
9. Infection Well Permit Renewal And Modification Only:
I. For heat pump systems, are (here any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation (e. turbid eater.
failure to assimilate injected fluid,poor heating/coolin,*)?
❑ Yes ❑No. If yes. explain: _
3. For closed-loop heat pump systems, has system lost pressure or required make-up fluid since permit issuance
or last inspection? ❑Yes ❑ No. If y-es. explain:
FORM: wi0100102.docx 4

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
3. For renewal or modification of groundwater remediation permits(of any type).will
continued/additional/modified injections have an adverse impact on migration of the plume or manauement of
the contamination incident? ❑ Yes ❑No. if ves. explain:
4. Drillingeontractor: Name:
Address:
Certification number:
5. Complete and attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
FORM: wi0100102.docx 5

ti
AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
V EVALUATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.:
• Renewal was discussed with consultant and site has been visited by APS during initial
application.
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet- if needed information is available:
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑Yes ®No. If yes,please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item Reason
na
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
6. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition Reason
Notify regional office 90 days before injection
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information;
Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons:
8. Signature of report preparer(s):
Signature of APS regional supervisor:
Date: January 31, 2013
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: wi0100102.docx 6

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
September 17, 2010 FRECEIVED
David Traylor
TEC Environmental,PC °rP 21 2GIO
P.O. Box 216
Waynesville,NC 28786 4 Asheville Regional Office
.ggulfer�Protection
Re: Additional Information Request
Injection Well Permit Application WI0100102
Enmark 251
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Traylor:
While reviewing the referenced permit application our staff identified some items that need clarification and/or
additional information. Please address the following items:
• There was no groundwater flow rate(velocity) or specific yield information in the Application.
Please provide this velocity rate per year, and the calculations used to find the flow rate.
• The monitoring plan needs to include a pre-injection sampling event.
• Since ORC Advanced contains phosphate, which can potentially mobilize naturally occurring
arsenic,please add arsenic to the monitoring plan.
• Please submit a spill response plan.
• We need at least one North Carolina certified driller certification number to enter into the database.
This is does not have to be the final driller who actually ends up installing the wells.
• We need a little bit more information on how the injection fluids will be mixed (i.e., 5 gallon buckets
with water,holding tanks for the fluid with slurry etc.), and proposed estimated injection pressure.
Page 1 of 2 Pages

Please submit your responses with any corrected text pages/figures in the same scale and page size for insertion
into the previously submitted UIC Application within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions regarding your permit please call me at [phone] or email me at Michael.Roeers(ancdem.gov.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Best Regards,
Michael Rogers, P.G. (N & FL)
Environmental Specialist
cc: Landon Davidson—Asheville Regional Office
Central Office File—WI0100102
Diane Eskenaty—Division of Waste Management
Gerald Hoover—Kenan Advantage Group
Page 2 of 2 pages

s
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION RECEIVED
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
JUL 16 2610
Date: .Tiny 14, 2010
1 Asheville Regional Office
To: ® Landon Davidson, ARO-APS ❑ David May,WaRO-tom fifer Protection
❑ Art Barnhardt,FRO-APS ❑ Charlie Stehman;
❑ Andrew Pitner,MRO-APS ❑ Sherri Knight, W-SRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: Michael Rogers Groundwater Protection Unit
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
E-Mail. Michael.Rogers(d�ncmail.net
A. Permit Number: WI 0100102
B. Owner: Enmark#251
C. Facility/Operation:
❑ Proposed ® Existing ❑ Facility ❑ Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Tjpe: ❑ Animal ❑ SFR-Surface Irrigation[] Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon ❑ GW Remediation(ND)
® UIC—5I Groundwater Remediation Well
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 ❑ 503 Exempt ❑ Animal
2. Project Type: ® New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. ❑ Renewal ❑ Renewal w/Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
NOTE: I did a preliminary review of the application. I will send an Additional Information letter requesting
additional info such as approximate PSI injection rate,well driller certification number.MSDS sheets,and a request
for pre-injection round of sampling. I will submit the letter with any additional information you want after your
review and submittal of Staff Report.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above-referenced application for your
review,comment, and/or action. Within,please take the following actions:
® Return a Completed APSARR Form and attach laboratory analytical results, if applicable.
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO.'
s Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office-Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer: Date:
FORM: APSARR 07/06 Page 1 of 1

t
RECEIVED/DENR/DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
State of North Carolina JUN 27 2010.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJI CTION W
Type 51 Wells—In Situ Groundwater Remediation/Type 5T Wells—Tracer Injecti in = C
o O o
• Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater,treat it,and reinject the treat dwa't>r. @
• Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form. "j Cp In
• Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being returned.tl
Application Number(to be completed by DWQ): �(/J 1 at rV_
1. GENERAL INFORMATION: s a'
1
1. Applicant's Name(generally the responsible party): Kenan Advantage Group
2. Signing Official's Name*: 660'-b ryboVOL Title: VPtCri✓FNG�
*Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7.
3. Mailing address of applicant: Attn: Mr. Brian Wymer
4366 Mt. Pleasant St.NW
City: North Canton State: OH Zip: 44720
Telephone number: 33n`yOq- IO'71 Faxnumber: 33b-41oq-10'?6
4. Property Owner's Name(if different from Applicant): Enmark Stations.Inc.
5. Property Owner's mailing address: Attn: Mr. Tom Dolan
P.O. Box 576
City: Savannah State: GA Zip: 31402
6. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: David Traylor Title: President
Company: TEC Environmental,P.C.
Address: P.O. Box 216
City: Waynesville State: NC Zip: 28786
Telephone number: 828-454-0465 Fax number: 828-454-0465
Email Address: dtravlorCatecenviro.com
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Project is: (X)New (Modification of existing permit (Renewal of existing permit without modification
( Renewal of existing permit with modification
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit,provide:
existing permit number and the issuance date
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & II only, sign the certification on the last page of this
form,and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent(if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals,submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 1 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells—In Situ Groundwater Remediation/Type 5T Wells—Tracer Injection
III. INCIDENT& FACILITY DATA
A. FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Facility name: Enmark#251
2. Complete physical address of the facility: 3300 Asheville Highway
City: Hendersonville County: Henderson State: NC Zip: 28791
B. INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
1. Describe the source of the contamination: Spill of gasoline from tanker truck while fillip UST
a)
Li
_o c
N rJ C
p O .d
LU 60
N tl
J � �
� N �
N 1
i-
v
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site(contaminants may be listed in groups;ag.,.,��^¢
gasoline,diesel,jet fuel,fuel oil,chlorinated ethenes,chlorinated ethenes,metals,pesticides/herbicides,etc):
Gasoline
3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site(even if outside the injection zone)?
(Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness feet
(X)No If no,list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site: 3,786 ppb
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
(X)UST Section (Superfund Section(including REC Program and DSCA sites)
(DWQ Aquifer Protection Section (Solid Waste Section
(Hazardous Waste Section (Other:
5. Incident managers name Diane Eskenasv and phone number 828-296-4500
6. Incident number or other site number assigned by the agency managing the contamination incident:
28012
C. PERMITS
List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident,including those not
directly related to the proposed injection operation:
1. Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA:
2. DWQ Non-Discharge or NPDES permits:
3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits:
4. Other environmental permits required by state or federal law: UST Permit.Facility ID 0-034917
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 2 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells—In Situ Groundwater Remediation/Type 5T Wells—Tracer Injection
IV. INJECTION DATA
A. INJECTION FLUID DATA
1. List all proposed injectants.
NOTE: Any substance to be injected as a tracer or to promote in situ remediation must be reviewed by the
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section (OEES) of the Division of Public Health, Department of
Health and Human Services. Review the list ofapproved iniectants or contact the UIC Program to determine if
the injectants you are proposing have been reviewed by OEES.
Injectant Repenesis ORC Advanced
Concentration at point of injection: 40 lbs. ORC in 238 eallons water
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: 40 lbs. ORC in 238 gallons water(30%)
Injectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
_U
® I
Injectant: LLI `� o
N s:
Concentration at point of injection: (�o U
0
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
i .
Injectant: IQ� C�
Concentration at point of injection: 01
� 1
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: __ !
2. Source of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above:
(None
(X) Municipal water supply
(Groundwater from private well or any well within V4 mile of injection site
(Air
(Other:
3. If any well within '/a mile of injection site,a private well,or surface water is to be used as the fluid source,supply
the following information:
a. Location/ID number of source: N/A
b. Depth of source:
c. Formation:
d. Rock/Sediment type:
e. In Attachment C,provide a current,complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well,including
analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site.
NOTE.-Ifcontaminated groundwater is to be used as the dilution or chase fluid, this is not the proper permit
application form. You must applyfor a closed-loop groundwater remediation permit using application loan
GlFR,S.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 3 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells—In Situ Groundwater Remediation/Type 5T Wells—Tracer Injection
B. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS E C E V E D
1. Duration of Injection: 2 days I
a. Maximum number of separate injection events: 1 JUL 16 2U G
b. Expected duration of each injection event: 2 days
Asheville Regional Office
c. Expected duration between events(if more than one event): N/A Aquifer Protection
2. Injection rate per well: as sustained by formation gallons per minute(gpm'-
3. Total Injection volume: gallons per day(gpd); 5.000 gallons per event(if separate events)
4. Injection pressure: as needed to inject ORC slurry pounds/square inch(psi)
5. Temperature at point of injection: ambient temp. of dilution water(-60-65) °F
6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled: A pressure gauge will be
on the injection Pump,a set amount of ORC/water mixture will be injected at each of the 21 locations
7. Estimated hydraulic capacity of the well: unknown gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
1. Injection will be via:
( Existing well(s)proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in(2)through(6)below to the best of
your knowledge.
(X) Proposed well(s)to be constructed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in(2)through(6)below
as proposed construction specifications.
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: Geologic Exploration,Inc.
NC Well Contractor Certification number: Geologic has multiple certified drillers,a certified driller will
eerform the injections
3. Date to be constructed: upon permit approval Number of borings: 21
Approximate depth of each boring(feet): 25
4. Screened interval/Injection interval of injection wells:
Depth: 15 to 25 feet below ground surface(if multiple intervals,indicate shallowest and deepest depth).
5. Well casing(N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: ( PVC ( Stainless steel( Other: N/A(nrobe rods)
Casing depth: to ft.
6. Grout(N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: ( Cement ( Bentonite ( Other: N/A(probe rods)
Grout depth: to ft.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 4 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells—In Situ Groundwater Remediation/Type 5T Wells—Tracer Injection
V. ATTACHMENTS
Provide the following items as separate attachments with the given headings: RECEIVED
A. SITE HISTORY
Provide a brief description of the site history including: JUL 16 20 io
(1) site usage historically and present,
(2) origin of the contamination, Asheville Regional Office
(3) previous remedial action(s). Aquifer Protection
NOTE: G.S. 89E-18 requires that any geologic plans, reports, or documents in which the performance is related to the
public welfare or safeguarding of the environment be prepared by a licensed geologist or subordinate under their
direction. G.S. 89E-13 requires that all drawings, reports, or documents involving geologic work prepared or approved
by a licensed geologist, or a subordinate under their direction, be signed and sealed by the licensed geologist.
B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Provide a hydrogeologic description,soils description,and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the
known or projected depth of contamination. The hydrogeologic description shall include:
(1) the regional geologic setting;
(2) significant changes in lithology;
(3) the hydraulic conductivity,transmissivity,and specific yield of the aquifer to be used for injection, including a
description of the test(s)used to determine these parameters;and
(4) the depth to the mean seasonal high water table.
C. INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
Describe the chemical,physical,biological and radiological characteristics of each injectant.Attach the Material Safety
Data Sheet(MSDS)for each injectant. If a private well or a well within Y4 mile of the injection site is used as the source
well, include chemical analysis of source fluid here.
D. INJECTION RATIONALE
Attach a brief description of the rationale for selecting the injectants and concentrations proposed for injection, including:
(1) goals of the injection project;
(2) explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined;
(3) a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may he formed by the injection,and
(4) summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to change
(biological,chemical or physical)in the subsurface.
E. INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT
Provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the proposed injection including but not limited to:
(1) construction plans and materials;
(2) operation procedures;
(3) a detailed diagram of the surface and subsurface portions of the system; and
(4) a planned injection schedule.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 5 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells—In Situ Groundwater Remediation/Type 5T Wells—Tracer Injection
F. MONITORING PLAN RECEIVED:Ue
Provide a plan for monitoring the results of the injection,including:
(1) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used; JUL 1
(2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and
(3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection. Asheville Reoffice
NOTE: The selected monitoring wells must be located so as to detect any movenl ent of . yss b -
products, or formation fluids outside the injection area or zone. The monitoring pa sou target
contaminants as well as secondary or intermediate contaminants which may result from the injection and other
parameters which may serve to indicate the progress of the intended reactions, such as pH, ORP, dissolved oxygen, and
other electron acceptors and donors. The monitoring schedule should be consistent with the pace of the anticipated
reactions and rate of transport of the injectants and contaminants.
G. WELL DATA
Provide a tabulation of data on all existing or abandoned wells within '/a mile of the injection well(s)which penetrate the
proposed injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
Such data shall include a description of each well's use (water supply, monitoring, etc), total depth, screened or open
borehole depth interval,and well construction or abandonment record,if available.
H. MAPS
Attach the following scaled,site-specific maps:
(1) Area map based on the most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area,at a scale of 1:24,000 and
showing the location of the proposed injection site.
(2) Site map including:
a. all property boundaries;
b. all buildings within the property boundary;
c. existing and proposed injection wells or well field(s)
d. any existing sources of potential or(mown groundwater contamination,including waste storage,
treatment or disposal systems within '/, mile of the injection well or well system;
e. all surface water bodies within %mile of the injection well or well system;and
f. all existing or abandoned wells within '/, mile of the injection well(s)which penetrate the proposed
injection zone,including,but not limited to,monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection
wells.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s)including:
a. direction of groundwater movement
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(4) Contaminant plume map(s) including:
a. the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume,including isoconcentration lines
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(5) Cross-section(s)to the known or projected depth of contamination,including:
a. horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume,including isoconcentration lines
b. major changes in lithology
c. existing and proposed monitoring wells
d. existing and proposed injection wells
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 6 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S)FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells—In Situ Groundwater Remediation/Type 5T Wells—Tracer Injection
VI. CERTIFICATION(to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent)
NCAC 15A 2C .021 l(b)requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
1. for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor,respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant,then supply a letter signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with,the approve pecifications and conditions of the Permit.
Printed Name and Title: ��� Q ~ J R �/ {—\
Signature: — Date: ( 0
VII. CONSENT OF PRO RTY OWNER (if the operty is not owned by the applicant)
("Owner" means any person who holds the fee or other properry rights in the well being constructed. A well is
real property and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
contrary agreement in writing.)
As owner of the property on which the injection well(s)are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s}conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C .0200). /t `
'Printed Name and —40/✓1 s ( .. CHs yPevod 3
Signature: Date: 01
7n,- �5�
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments,to:UIC Program CD . 0
RECEIVED/DENR/DWQ Aquifer Protection Section W aD'ti
Aquifer Protection Secton North Carolina DENR-DWQ
JUN 1636 Mail Service Center
2 7 Z��Q Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 I CD
a'
Q
Telephone[phone] v; �
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 7 of 7

Enmark#251 - Injection Permit Attachments
A. SITE HISTORY
Enmark#251 is an active gasoline station.
A surface spill of gasoline occurred at Enmark#251 on September 30,2002 during filling
Of a 15,000-gallon UST. The hose from Kenan Transport Company's gasoline tanker
truck accidentally detached from the fill port of the UST, and gasoline was released to
surface soils near the UST. Surface soils within the impacted area were excavated on
October 2, 2002. Excavation was continued until field screening with a photoionization
detector (PID) indicated no detectable organic vapors in the soil. However, analytical
results from post-excavation soil samples indicated that concentrations of benzene,
ethylbenzene, and C9-C10 aromatics were above the applicable cleanup levels. Further
excavation was not possible near the source of the spill due to the presence of the USTs.
The excavated soil was hauled off site to a commercial land farm for disposal, and the
excavation area was backfilled with clean soil.
Since soil contamination remained at levels above the applicable state cleanup levels,a
Limited Site Assessment (LSA) was required under NCDENR UST regulations. A Phase
I and Phase II LSA was completed between November 2002 and June 2003. Five
groundwater monitoring wells were installed during the LSA, designated as MW-1
through MW4 and VMW-1 on Figure 1. MW-1 through MW4 were installed in the
uppermost alluvial aquifer, and VMW-1 was installed as a double-cased, vertical exten
well completed in the underlying saprolite aquifer.Groundwater samples collected fro m
these wells during the LSA indicated the presence of benzene, methyl tert-butyl ethe Q
(MTBE), and C5-C8 aliphatics at concentrations above North Carolina's NCAC 2 = Q
groundwater standards. Based on the results of the receptor survey conducted durin uJ c
the LSA, the site was classified by NCDENR as low risk in accordance with Nor > �" o 0
CO
Carolina's risk-based corrective action program for UST releases. Soil and groundwate W C
contaminant concentrations detected during the LSA were below the required cleanu J tt
levels for a low risk site, so the site was eligible for risk-based regulatory closure afte W m
the LSA. However, a risk-based closure would have required recording the presence o J L a
contamination on the property deed, which was not acceptable to Enmark. Therefore,
the LSA Report requested that the site not be closed under the risk-based program, and
recommended completing a probe survey to delineate the groundwater plume,
installing additional shallow monitoring wells as necessary to adequately monitor the
plume, and conducting periodic groundwater sampling events to monitor potential
plume migration and natural attenuation.
Additional groundwater assessment activities,including a probe survey to delineate the
groundwater plume,were completed in September 2003,and documented in the
Groundwater Assessment Report,dated October 9,2003.The Groundwater Assessment Report
recommended the installation of two new monitoring wells, one located sidegradient of
the plume to the west, and one located downgradient of the plume near the northern
property boundary. The report also recommended deepening of existing well MW4,
and implementing periodic groundwater monitoring at the site. Quarterly monitoring

was recommended for the first year, with semi-annual monitoring thereafter as
necessary.
The new monitoring wells were installed,and MW-4 was deepened,in January 2004.
Quarterly groundwater monitoring events were performed in January,April,July,and
October of 2004. After the October 2004 sampling event,the monitoring frequency was
reduced to semi-annually.
The most recent groundwater sampling event was performed in July 2009. In July 2009,
bezene was the only compound at the site exceeding NCAC 2L standards, in MW-1 at a
concentration of 16A µg/L. Due to the recent change in the 2L standard for MTBE, the
concentration of MTBE detected in MW-6 in July 2009 (89.5 µg/L) is now also above the
2L standards.
B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
The site is located in the eastern portion of the Blue Ridge Geologic Province, which is
characterized by thrust sheets of metamorphic crystalline rocks that are transported
northward by faults over the sedimentary rocks of the Valley and Ridge Province.
According to the geologic map of North Carolina, the uppermost geologic unit near the
site is the Henderson Gneiss, which is an intrusive formation of Cambrian age. The
upper portion of the formation is typically a saprolitic soil weathered from the
underlying metamorphic rocks.
Field observation of soils penetrated during drilling monitoring wells indicate that the
site is underlain by fill material, alluvial deposits, and saprolite. Fill material consisting
of clay, silt, and silty sand is present from ground surface to depths ranging from 3 to 6 (D
feet. Alluvial deposits,consisting primarily of silty and clayey sand with small rounded U
gravel, are present beneath the fill material extending to depths ranging from 11 to 13 o O
feet below ground surface. Saprolitic silty clay is present beneath the alluvial deposits to LU
ry
depths of 40 feet or greater. The depth to bedrock has not been determined at the site. > _o
LU
The uppermost aquifer at the site is unconfined and occurs at depths below ground V —t
surface ranging from approximately 5 feet to 15 feet. Groundwater flow at the site is to W = '
the north at a horizontal gradient of approximately 0.05 ft/ft. A downward vertical Ba Q)
gradient exists from the alluvial deposits to the underlying saprolite. No estimates of C
hydraulic conductivity have been performed at the site,however, the average hydraulic
conductivity in the same alluvial formation at a separate site just south of Enmark #251
was 0.26 ft/day as determined from slug tests.
C. INTECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
The injection fluid will be a slurry that is a mixture of ORC Advanced and potable
water. The slurry mixture will consists of 30% ORC solid by weight. The composition
of ORC Advanced is proprietary mixture of calcium hydroxide oxide, calcium
hydroxide, dipotassium phosphate, and monopotassium phosphate. An MSDS for ORC
Advanced is attached.

RECEIVED
JIUL 1 G 2G i0
D. INTECTION RATIONALE Asheville Pegion' Office
Aquifer Protection
(1) The goal of this project will be to increase the dissolved oxygen concentration of
groundwater in the uppermost aquifer at the site in order to promote increase natural
attenuation of petroleum contamination.
(2) Calculations of the required amount of ORC Advanced were performed by
Regenesis based on historical site information provided by TEC Environmental.
(3) There are no direct reactions between the injectant and the contaminants. The
injectant increases the dissolved oxygen content of the groundwater in an attempt to
stimulate aerobic biodegradation of the contamination. The contaminants are
aerobically biodegraded by existing organisms in the subsurface to form carbon dioxide
and water.
(4) There has been no site-specific modeling or testing performed to investigate the
injectant's potential or susceptibility to change in the subsurface
E. INTECTION PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT
Injections will be performed using a direct-push probe. The probed rods will be
advanced to approximately 10 feet below the water table at each injection location. The
rods will then be retracted approximately 2 feet, and the injectant will be pumped
through the rods and into the subsurface using an injection pump. Upon completion of
injection at each location, the probe rods will be removed and the boring will be sealed
with bentonite pellets.
F. MONITORING PLAN
Groundwater monitoring will be performed to track the progress of the remediation.
Quarterly groundwater monitoring will be completed for the first year after the injections,
with semi-annual monitoring thereafter. The schedule for first year groundwater monitoring
after the injections will be as follows:
Event Time After Wells
Injections Sampled
1 3 months MW-1,-3,-6
2 6 months All
3 9 months Iv1W-1,-3,-6
4 12 months All
After the first year of monitoring,the current schedule of semi-annual monitoring of all wells
will be resumed,if necessary,until it can be demonstrated that the cleanup goals for the site
have been met. During each monitoring event each well will be sampled for EPA Method
602 benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) plus methyl tert-butyl ether, and

MADEP Method volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH). Field parameters of pH,
conductivity,and dissolved oxygen will also be measured during each sampling event
G. WELL DATA
The only wells within 1/4 mile of the injection site are the site monitoring wells. A table
of well construction data for the site monitoring wells is attached.
H. MAPS
The requested maps are attached.
m
U
0
LU C yU+
l> 61 U
> cv C m
_ o �
con`_
G9 -1 C
V
vi
Q

Table 1
Well Construction Information and July 2009 Groundwater Elevations
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012
Well Screened 7/31/09 Depth 7/31/09 Groundwater
Well Date Diameter Total Depth Interval Top of Casing Elevation to Water Elevation
Number Installed (inches) (feet BLS) (feet BLS) (feet,assumed datum) (feet) (feet,assumed datum)
MW-1 Nov-02 2 20 5-20 100.00 15.62 84.38
MW-2 Ma -03 2 18 8-18 102.64 10.65 91.99
MW-3 Ma -03 2 16 6-16 97.45 14.83 82.62
MW-4 Jan-04 2 10 5-10 91.97 9.80 82.17
MW-5 Jan-04 2 18 3-18 97.84 13.21 84.63
MW-6 Jan-04 2 11 6-11 87.09 6.48 80.61
VMW-1 Ma -03 2 40 35-40 100.15 16.13 84.02
Notes: 1. BLS=below land surface
2. All monitoring wells are constructed of schedule 40 PVC and have 0.01-inch slotted screens.
3. MW-4 was originally installed to a depth of 7 feet in May 2003,and was deepened to a depth of 10 feet
in January 2004.
4. VMW-1 is a double-cased Type III monitoring well with 6-inch steel outer casing grouted in place to 30 feet.
5. All monitoring wells except MW-4 have flush-mount surface completions. MW-4 is an above-grade completion
with a 2.5-foot stickup.
i RECEIVED
JUL 16 2G;0
Asheville Regional Office
Aquifer Protection

RE
HENDERSONVILLE QUADRANGLE �iJL 16 2Gi0
NORTH CAROLINA-HENDERSON CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) 202-SW ional0 ce
Asheville Reg
Aquifer Protectio
ATount;lin Hpm lal
2
No
"6
o• "^`+`� `• e •� 45
• _ ��`P firirrt;y,�` fff ii .f ' dk ..
4�
I
,
C - IL1
ii t
-
3�n nFJy
t�1bLS+it�in �4y, -
a
•N � t`Y$M16 '
i
"`�� • Fes' _.!h,.._r � `". ;�*.:�..,4so�+4��sT.r .4F�:xT � • „,fig ^' . ,
SCALE 1:24000
0 1 MILE
1Q70 0 1000 2000 30M 401XI SGXq 5py0 H100 FCEi
1 5 0 1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM Of 1929
Attachment H (1)
Proposed Injection Site
Enmark #251 - Mountain Home, NC

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Vertical Extent Monitoring Well Location
1 inch=40 feet
0 Proposed Injection Point
0 40
MWA 0
Restrooms
Wooded Area "� &office
p Ventling
P
TOP —
Fueling Canopy
0 MWS
0 MW-2
RECEIVED
JUL FIGURE 1
16 TE?Uld SITE MAP {„AC Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC Environmenfai..,
' Ice
Aquifer Protection

LEGEND
0 Uppermost Aquifer Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Saprolite Aquifer Monitoring Well Location
1 inch=40 feet • Proposed Injection Point 84.38 Groundwater Elevation In Up
permost Aquifer on 7/31/09
(in feet,assumed datum)
0 40
(84.02) Groundwater Elevation in Saprolite Aquifer on 7/31/09
(in feet,assumed datum)
—so— Groundwater Elevation Contour in the Uppermost Aquifer
0
Mwb MWq �a Restrooms
80.61 82.17 W d Arse Vending &Office
• y^
�,/, -+}-- W-1
rua '
(84.02 --6
Fueling Canopy
A '
M
84.63.63 /
0
MW-2
C e`ntlwere.1/
oq Q
/
ro`h�n
i
RECEIVED
f ATTACHMENT H TARM AW&
JUL 16 Mig JULY 2009 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIOIO N CONTOUR MAP ((
Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC ErtvJromnanrar,..
e Regional Office
Protection

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: ® Proposed Injection Point
1 inch=40 feet
Benzene Isocontour
40
NCAC 2L Standard for Benzene=1 pg/L
MW-4 0 v
ND Res[rooms
`NoodeC.Area Ventlng 1£O(flce
0 M
NO O
! 1e.4 yyL
I
i--
�'
5
Fueling Canopy
1
0 MW
NO
0 MW-2
NO
RECEIVED
J)UL 16 2G10 ATTACHMENT H (4) -1 �j"�
j BENZENE -JULY 2009 err
8heville regional Office Enmark #251 - Mountain Home, NC Environmenfal,

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Proposed Injection Point
1 inch=40 feet
- MTBE Isocontour
0 40
NCAC 21.Standard for MTBE=20 pg1L
M 46 c.s1 91 0
Restrooms
80 W ,�oanuc.area Ventlbq
&Office
\
89� 1p e
MW-1
0 4.6 pWL
y
o o - '
0 o D
.. . .� Fueling Canopy
L1 J
0 Mo
ND
0 MW-2
NO
RECE7ZG',0
JUL 1 ATTACHMENT H 0 -2
MTBE-JULY 2009 (/
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home, NC Environmental .
Protection

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Vertical Extent Monitoring Well Location
1 irch=40 feet
40
MW-0 0 mca
Reslrooms
A MW6 Wooded Are &Officea � Ventling
m
Qm`
0_._ 0—
•
o- � Mw-i•'--1
° T Fueling Canopy
0 MW.5 1�}
MW-2
A'
RECEIVED
JUL 16 2610
CROSS SECTION LOCATION TEC
Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC Envimnma raf,..
r
A uifer Protection

A A,
_110 Injection Area
E MbV-2
mVMW-
100 Fill Material(Silt,Sand,&Clay) MW-3
Silty/Clayey Sand Alluvium
�90 MW-6 Clay -- ------
a Sand Alluvium ———'———
a —————-————— ————
60
—:]7ilty/Clayey
———— —— ——— Silty Clay Saprolite
0
a ___
> y Clay Saprolite
w 70
-------------------------
Si, Depth of Injection Points
60
SCALE:
Horizontal=Vertical
1 inch=25 feet
RECEIVED o 25
JUL 16 26'10
Asheville Regional Office ATTACHMENT H (5) -2
A uifer Protection CROSS SECTION
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home, NC Environments!,a

1325 Dills Cove Rd. Phone & Fox
Sylvo, NC 28779 MOUNTAIN GEOLOGY, INC [phone]
06/09/10
RECEIVED
JIJL 16 2G�p
David Traylor
TEC Environmental Asheville Regional Office
P. O. Box 216 A uiter Protection
Waynesville,NC 28786
Re: Enmark Station#251
Mountain House,NC
Geologic Information
Evaluation of the subsurface material descriptions and groundwater measurements
indicate the data was properly collected and the observations and interpretations are
valid.
If you need further information, please contact me at your convenience.
MICHAEL H. OWENS P. G.
}d \a •*
�RIJ7kHWNdF

ti
IFFA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Colleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 13,2010
Gerald Hoover,VP Finance RECEIVED
Kenan Advantage Group
4366 Mt.Pleasant St.NW
North Canton.OH 44720 JUL 16 2GM
3
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No.WIOIOO102 Asheville Regional Office
Enmark#251 Aquifer Protection
Injection In situ Groundwater Remediatin Well(5I)
Henderson
Dear Mr.Hoover:
The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality(Division)acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on June 27,2010.This application package has been assigned the number listed above and will be reviewed by
Michael Rogers.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary.To ensure the
maximum efficiency in processing permit applications,the Division requests your assistance in providing a timely and complete
response to any additional information requests. ,
Please be aware that the Division's Regional Office,copied below,must provide recommendations prior to final action by the
Division.Please also note at this time,processing permit applications can take as long as 60-90 days after receipt of a complete
application.
If you have any questions,please contact Michael Rogers at 919-715-6166,or via e-mail at [e-mail]. If the
reviewer is unavailable,you may leave a message,and they will respond promptly. Also note that the Division has reorganized.To
review our new organizational chart,go to htm://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/documents/dwo orachart.ptl
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT.
Sincerely, (�
for Debra J.Watts
Supervisor
cc: Asheville Regional Office,Aquifer Protection Section
David Traylor-TEC Environmental,PC-PO Box 216,Waynesville,NC 28786
Brian Wymer-Kenan Advantage Group
Permit Application File WIO100102
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Location:2728 Capital Boulevard,Raleigh,North Carolina 27664 -One
Phone:[phone] FAX 1:919-715-0588;FAX 2:919-715.6M k Customer Service'.1-877-623-6748 orthCarolina
Internet:w .ncwateroualitv.ora
An Equal Opportunity t Alfinative.anon Employer ��������✓

TEC
Environmental, rrr 1 2u,1
December 7,2011
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section
DENR-Division of Water Quality DENR-DWQ Asheville Regional Office
1636 Mail Service Center 2090 US Highway 70
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 Swannanoa,NC 28778
Re: lsc Post Injection Groundwater Monitoring Event
Enmark#251
3300 Asheville Highway
Hendersonville,Henderson County,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012
hyection Permit WI 0100102
Dear Mi.Rogers:
This letter report documents the results of the first post-injection groundwater monitoring event
completed at the above-referenced facility in accordance with the requirements of hjection Permit
WI 0100102. A map of the facility (Figure 1) indicating the locations of the seven existing
groundwater monitoring wells is attached.
Field Activities
Three groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-3, and MW-6 on Figure 1) at Enmark #251 were
sampled on October 12,2011,in accordance with the approved groundwater monitoring plan for this
permit. Each monitoring well was sampled in accordance with the procedures specified in the most
recent UST Section Guidelines for Sampling(December 2008). Each well was purged of a minimum of
three well volumes of groundwater prior to sample collection using a disposable bailer. A new
disposable bailer with new cotton twine lanyard was used for purging and sampling each well to
prevent cross-contamination Field parameters of pH, conductivity, temperature, and dissolved
oxygen were measured during purging using calibrated field meters,and are included in Table 1.
Each groundwater sample was transferred directly from the bailer to the appropriate pre-preserved
sample containers provided by the laboratory. The samples were stored on ice and hand-delivered
to Pace Analytical Services in Asheville, North Carolina. Each groundwater sample was submitted
for laboratory analysis of benzene,ethylbenzene,toluene,and xylenes (BTEX)plus methyl tert butyl
ether (MTBE) and isopropyl ether (IPE) by EPA Method 6200B, volatile petroleum hydrocarbons
(VPH) by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) Method, and total
arsenic by EPA Method 200.7. A copy of the chain-of-custody record is included in Attachment A.
176 Ardenlee Drive.Peachtree City. GA 30269 # Phone:[phone] # Intemet wvvw.tmenviro.com

Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
Page 2
December 7,2011
Results
Results of the October 2011 groundwater analyses are summarized in Table 1. A copy of the
laboratory analytical report is included in Attachment A.
Petroleum constituents were detected in monitoring well MW-1 in October 2011,including benzene,
methyl tert-butyl ether (NME), isopropyl ether, C5-C8 aliphatics, and C9-02 aliphatics. No
petroleum constituents were detected m MW-3 or MW-6. Arsenic was also detected in all three
monitoring wells. The concentration of benzene in MW-1, and the concentrations of arsenic in all
three wells, were the only concentrations detected that exceeded the NCAC 2L groundwater
standards.
Summary and Conclusions
TEC Environmental conducted the first post-injection groundwater monitoring event at Erunark
#251 on October 12,2011. The concentration of benzene in MW-1 exceeded North Carolina's NCAC
2L groundwater standard. The concentrations of arsenic in all three wells sampled also exceeded the
NCAC 2L standard. It is currently unknown if the elevated arsenic levels are related to the ORC
Advanced injections, or are the result of sample turbidity. Care will be taken during the next and
subsequent sampling events to obtain samples free of turbidity. All seven monitoring wells are
scheduled to be sampled during the next sampling event, which will allow comparison of arsenic
concentrations from inside and outside the injection area.
Please contact me at the address or telephone number on this letterhead, or by e-mail at
[e-mail],if you have any questions or need further information regarding this site.
Sincerely,
TEC Environmental,P.C.
(J'-, v
David Traylor,P.E.
Environmental Engineer
Attachments
cc: Ms.Diane Eskenasy-DENR Division of Waste Management,UST Section
Mr.Chris Fisher-XL Insurance
Mr.Brian Wymer-Kenan Advantage Group
Mr.Tom Dolan-Colonial Group,Inc.

318d1

Table 1
October 2011 Groundwater Analytical Results
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012/Injection Permit WI 0100102
Constituent Units MW-1 I MW-3 MW-6 2L Standard GCL°
Field Parameters
pH SU 6.50 5.75 6.00 - -
Conductivity µS 243 35 130 - -
Temperature °C 16.2 15.4 16.0 - -
Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 1.58 1.24 2.44 - -
Volatile Organic Compounds (EPA Method 602)
Benzene µg/L 5.5 <1.0 <1.0 1 5,000
Toluene µg/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 600 260,000
Ethylbenzene Lpg/L
Z2.2
<1.0 <1.0 600 84,500
Total xylenes <3.0 <3.0 500 85,500
Isopropyl ether <1.0 <1.0 70 70,000
Meth l tert-bu 1 ether <1.0 <1.0 20 20,000
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (MADEP Method VPH)
C5-C8 Aliphatics µg/L 193 <50 <50 420 NIA'
C9-C12 Aliphatics µg/L 202 <50 <50 4,200 N/A'
C9-C10Aromatics µ /L <50 <50 <50 210 N/A3
Metals(EPA Method 200.7)
Arsenic µg/L 125 343 11.6 10 N/A
Notes: 1. All samples were collected on October 12,2011.
2. <-Indicates that the constituent was not detected. The number
shown is the laboratory reporting limit.
3. 2L Standard refers to the groundwater standards and interim
standards established by 15A NCAC 2L.0202.
4. GCL=Gross Contamination Levels as published in the most
recent UST Section Guidelines for Corrective Action.
5. N/A=Not Applicable-no GCL is published for this constituent.
6. Bold values indicate concentrations that exceed the 21,standards.

FIGURE

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Vertical Extent Monitoring Well Location
1 inch=40 feel
�
0 4o O
Property L _ins __"-_- C
_ — -- 13O
MW-4 0 Ponce �O
Restrooms
&Office
Ventling
Ve MYV-a Waotletl Area
P
MW-1
0 MW-3 0 2KK-1
VMW 1 0 c 5-Rog.
IT$ om.�I
�_orneJ Fueling Canopy
Prue
u Plua
` 0 MW-5
\ 0 MW-2 Grass
\ Grass
ASHEVILLE HWY. (US 25)
FIGURE 9 TEC
SITE MAP
Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC Environmental,u

ATTACHMENT A
Laboratory Analytical Report

e A,, ® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceA aljlicaI 205 East Meadow Road-SuiteA 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800KinceyAve. Suite100
Mw4mcefabscom Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
October 27, 2011
Mr. David Traylor
TEC Environmental
176 Ardenlee Dr.
Atlanta, GA 30369
RE: Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
Dear Mr. Traylor:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 12, 2011.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Tom Williams
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
a``�PcPCi}c REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Pagel of 10
s. This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
i,
HgQ ATpP

9 n /I,,o ® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
acsAnayical 205 Fast Meadow Road-SuiteA 2225 Riverside Dr. 98001(inceyAve. Suite 100
wmvpacefaDscan Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntenwille,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
Charlotte Certification IDS
9800 Kincey Ave.Ste 100,Huntersville,NC 28078 Connecticut Certification#:PH-0104
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification#:37706 Flodda/NELAP Certification#:E87627
North Carolina Field Services Certification#:5342 Kentucky UST Certification#:84
North Carolina Wastewater Certification#:12 Louisiana DHH Drinking Water#LA 100031
South Carolina Certification#:99006001 West Virginia Certification#:357
South Carolina Drinking Water Cert.#:99006003 Virginia/VELAP Certification#:460144
Virginia Drinking Water Certification#:00213
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Dr.,Asheville, NC 28804 South Carolina Certification#:99030001
Florida/NELAP Certification#:E87648 Virginia Certification#:00072
Massachusetts Certification#:M-NC030 West Virginia Certification#:356
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification#:37712 Virgina/VELAP Certification#:460147
North Carolina Wastewater Certification#:40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 2 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
(-,l115'c,AnaVica1" 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
mvwpacelabanw; Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
Analytes
Lab ID Sample ID Method Analysts Reported Laboratory
92104263001 MW-1 MADEP VPH KJM 5 PASI-C
EPA 200.7 JDA 1 PASI-A
SM 6200B AW 17 PASI-C
92104263002 MW-3 MADEP VPH KJM , 5 PASI-C
EPA 200.7 JDA 1 PASI-A
SM 6200B AW 17 PASI-C
92104263003 MW-6 MADEP VPH KJM 5 PASI-C
EPA 200.7 JDA 1 PASI-A
SM 6200B AW 17 PASI-C
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 3 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Without the written consent of Part Analytical Services,Inc..

-® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceAnalytical 205 Past Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kncey Ave. Suite 100
www�acelaEsmrn Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
Sample: MW-1 Lab ID: 92104263001 Collected: 10/12/11 11:30 Received: 10/12/11 16:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(C05-008) 193 ug/L 50.0 1 10/13/11 15:08 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) 202 ug/L 50.0 1 10113/1115:08 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 50.0 1 10/13111 15:08 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 91 % 70-130 1 10113/11 15:08
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 112 % 70-130 1 10/13/11 15:08
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparaflon Method:EPA 200.7
Arsenic 126 ug/L 50.0 10 10/19/11 09:55 10/23/11 12:53 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene 5.5 ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 10/21/11 02:69 179601-23-1
o-Xylene 2.2 ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether 19.5 ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:69 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) 1.7 ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 10.7 ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 1634-04-4
Naphthalene 5.3 ug/L 2.0 1 10/21/11 02:59 91-20-3
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 94 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 02:59 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 104 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 02:59 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 109 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 02:59 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 95 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 02:59 2037-26-5
Date:10/27/2011 10:40AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 4 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

n A,, ® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. PaceAnalytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
al"A aljdical 205 Fast Meadow Road-SuiteA 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
awpamlaeswm Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 26804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] VO4)875-9092
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
Sample: MW-3 Lab ID: 92104263002 Collected: 10/12/11 13:30 Received: 10/12/11 16:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(C05-008) ND ug/L 50.0 1 10/13/11 15:33 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) NO ug/L 50.0 1 10/1311116:33 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) NO ug/L 50.0 1 10/13/11 15:33 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 88 % 70-130 1 10/13/11 15:33
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 110 % 70-130 1 10/13/11 15:33
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Arsenic 34.3 ug/L 5.0 1 10/19/11 09:55 10/22/11 19:03 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 71-43-2
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10121/11 03:22 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene NO ug/L 2.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 10646-7
Chlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 1634-04-4
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 10/21/11 03:22 91-20-3
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 94 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 03:22 460-004
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 102 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 03:22 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 107 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 03:22 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 94 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 03:22 2037-26-5
Date:10/27/2011 10:40 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 5 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
�AceAnayical 205 Fast Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
w wpamlabsccm Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
Sample: MW-6 Lab ID: 92104263003 Collected: 10/12/11 12:30 Received: 10/12/11 16:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(C05-008) NO ug/L 60.0 1 10/13/11 15:67 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 50.0 1 10113/1115:67 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 50.0 1 10/13/11 15:57 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 81 % 70-130 1 10/13/11 15:57
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 102 % 70-130 1 10/13/11 16:57
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Arsenic 11.6 ug/L 5.0 1 10/19/11 09:55 10/22/11 19:08 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 71-43-2
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene NO ug/L 2.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 179601-23-1
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 10646-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 108190-7
D)isopropylether NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether NO ug/L 1.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 1634-04-4
Naphthalene NO ug/L 2.0 1 10/21/11 03:45 91-20-3
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 96 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 03:45 460-00-4
Dibromolluoromethane(S) 103 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 03:45 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 107 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 03:45 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 93 % 70-130 1 10/21/11 03:45 2037-26-5
Date:10/27/2011 10:40AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 6 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
ac-'Analytical 205 Fast Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
mvxPaM1absmm Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
QC Batch: GCV15428 Analysis Method: MADEP VPH
QC Batch Method: MADEP VPH Analysis Description: VPH NO Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92104263001,92104263002,92104263003
METHOD BLANK: 672425 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92104263001,92104263002,92104263003
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Aliphatic(C05-008) ug/L NO 60.0 10/13/1112:14 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ug/L NO 50.0 10/13/11 12:14 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ug/L NO 50.0 10/13/11 12:14 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) % 118 70-130 10/13/11 12:14
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) % 93 70-130 10/13/11 12:14
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE&LCSD: 672426 672427
Spike LCS LCSD LCS LCSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qualifiers
Aliphatic(C05-008) ug/L 300 346 329 115 110 70-130 5 25 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ug/L 300 376 377 125 126 30-130 0 25 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ug/L 100 106 104 106 104 70-130 1 25 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) % 100 98 70-130
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) % 99 100 70-130
Date: 10/27/2011 10:40AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 7 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

�Acamapical
205 ace Analytical East Meadow Roadrces,Inc.-SuiteA Pace Analytical
2225 Riverside Dr. Pace9800 Kintical Services,Inc.
cey Ave. Suite 100
�.yacala6scom Eden,NG 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
QC Batch: MPRP/9239 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 92104263001,92104263002,92104263003
METHOD BLANK: 674243 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92104263001,92104263002,92104263003
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L NO 5.0 10/22/11 18:18
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 674244
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L 500 465 93 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 674245
92104225001 Spike MS MS %Rec
Parameter Units Result Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L NO 500 488 97 70-130
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 674247
92104112003 Spike MS MS %Rec
Parameter Units Result Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L ND 500 513 102 70-130
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 674246
92104229001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L ND NO
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 674248
92104299001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L NO ND
Date:10/27/2011 10:40AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 8 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

a205 East Meadow Road-Suite A Pace Analytical
2225 Riverside Dr. Pace9800KintceyAve. Suite too
m
ac�eAnalytical
w 'Pawfa6&cam Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
QC Batch: MSV/l7031 Analysis Method: SM 6200B
QC Batch Method: SM 6200B Analysis Description: 602 by 6200B
Associated Lab Samples: 92104263001,92104263002,92104263003
METHOD BLANK: 675790 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92104263001,92104263002,92104263003
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 10/21/11 01:50
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 10/21/11 01:50
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 10/21/11 01:50
Benzene ug/L NO 1.0 10121/11 01:50
Chlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 10121/11 01:50
Diisopropyl ether ug/L NO 1.0 10/21/11 01:50
Ethylbenzene ug/L NO 1.0 10/21/11 01:50
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ug/L ND 1.0 10/21/11 01:50
m&p-Xylene ug/L ND 2.0 10/21/11 01:50
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L NO 1.0 10/21/11 01:50
Naphthalene ug/L NO 2.0 10/2111101:50
o-Xylene ug/L NO 1.0 10121/11 01:50
Toluene ug/L NO 1.0 10/21/11 01:50
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) % 106 70-130 10/21/11 01:50
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 95 70-130 10/21/11 01:50
Dibromofluoromethane(S) % 103 70-130 10/21/11 01:50
Toluene-d8(S) % 95 70-130 10/21/11 01:50
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 675791
Spike LCS LCS %Rao
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 55.0 110 60-140
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 55.9 112 60-140
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 48.7 97 60-140
Benzene ug/L 50 50.7 101 60-140
Chlorobenzene ug/L 50 49.3 99 60-140
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 50 52.6 105 60-140
Ethylbenzene ug/L 50 54.9 110 60-140
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ug/L 50 50.4 101 60-140
m&p-Xylene ug/L 100 99.8 100 60-140
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 50 53.6 107 60-140
Naphthalene ug/L 50 45.4 91 60-140
o-Xylene ug/L 50 47.3 95 60-140
Toluene ug/L 50 52.8 106 60-140
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) % 96 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 99 70-130
Dibromofluoromethane(S) % 98 70-130
Toluene-d8(S) % 103 70-130
Date: 10/27/2011 10:40AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 9 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
ac2Analytical 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
w wpawlaba= Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Hunlersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALIFIERS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92104263
DEFINITIONS
OF-Dilution Factor,if reported,represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation,dilution of
the sample aliquot,or moisture content.
NO-Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J-Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL-Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S-Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(8270 listed analyte)decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines,unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate%recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D)-Laboratory Control Sample(Duplicate)
MS(D)-Matrix Spike(Duplicate)
DUP-Sample Duplicate
RPD-Relative Percent Difference
NC-Not Calculable.
SG-Silica Gel-Clean-Up
U-Indicates the compound was analyzed for,but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chlorcethylvinyl ether,Styrene,and Vinyl chloride.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited.Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
LABORATORIES
PASI-A Pace Analytical Services-Asheville
PASI-C Pace Analytical Services-Charlotte
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
N2 The lab does not hold TNI accreditation for this parameter.
Date: 10/27/2011 10:40AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 10 of 10
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.

TEC
r
Environmental, F--g 1 n Null
February 7,2011
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section
DENR-Division of Water Quality DENR-DWQ Asheville Regional Office
1636 Mail Service Center 2090 US Highway 70
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 Swannanoa,NC 28778
Re: Pre-Injection Groundwater Monitoring Event
Enmark#251
3300 Asheville Highway
Hendersonville,Henderson County,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012
Injection Permit WI 0100102
Dear Mr.Rogers:
This letter report documents the results of the pre-injection groundwater monitoring event
completed at the above-referenced facility in accordance with the requirements of Injection Permit
WI 0100102. A map of the facility (Figure 1) indicating the locations of the seven existing
groundwater monitoring wells is attached.
Field Activities
All seven groundwater monitoring wells(MW-1 through MW-6 and VMW-1 on Figure 1)at Enmark
#251 were sampled on January 15, 2011. Prior to sampling, the static depth to groundwater was
measured in each well using an electronic water level tape. The depths to groundwater were
measured from the top of each well casing, and are listed in Table 1. The water level tape was
decontaminated prior to each measurement to prevent cross-contamination of wells.
Each monitoring well was sampled in accordance with the procedures specified in the most recent
UST Section Guidelines for Sampling (December 2008). Each well was purged of a minimum of three
well volumes of groundwater prior to sample collection using a disposable bailer. A new disposable
bailer with new cotton twine lanyard was used for purging and sampling each well to prevent cross-
contamination. Field parameters of pH, conductivity, temperature, and dissolved oxygen were
measured during purging using calibrated field meters,and are included in Table 3.
Each groundwater sample was transferred directly from the bailer to the appropriate pre-preserved
sample containers provided by the laboratory. The samples were stored on ice and were shipped by
overnight courier to Pace Analytical Services in Huntersville, North Carolina. Each groundwater
sample was submitted for laboratory analysis of benzene,ethylbenzene,toluene,and xylenes(BTEX)
plus methyl tert-butyl ether (MME) and isopropyl ether (IPE) by EPA Method 6200B, volatile
petroleum hydrocarbons OTT) by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
176Ardenlee Dave,Peachtree City, GA 30269 4 Phone.[phone] # Intemet:www.tecenviro.com ,

Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
Page 2
February 7,2011
(MADEP)Method,and total arsenic by EPA Method 200.7. A copy of the chain-of-custody record is
included in Attachment A.
Results
The subsections below present the results of the pre-injection monitoring event.
Groundwater Elevation Data
Groundwater elevations were calculated from the depths to water measured at the site on January
15, 2011, and are listed in Table 1. The current groundwater elevations are compared to historical
groundwater elevations in Table 2.
Figure 2 presents a groundwater elevation contour map constructed from the groundwater
elevations measured in January 2011. Figure 2 indicates a general groundwater flow direction to the
north, which is consistent with data collected during previous sampling events at the site. An
average horizontal groundwater gradient of approximately 0.05 ft/ft was calculated for the
uppermost aquifer from Figure 2. This horizontal groundwater gradient is consistent with previous
gradients measured at the site. A downward vertical gradient was observed in January 2011
between the uppermost aquifer and the underlying saprolite aquifer. The January 2011 groundwater
elevation in MW-1 (uppermost aquifer) was 0.54 feet higher than the groundwater elevation in
adjacent VMW-1 (saprolite aquifer). A downward vertical gradient has been consistently measured
at the site in all previous monitoring events.
Groundwater Sampling Results
Results of the January 2011 groundwater analyses are summarized in Table 3, and are discussed
below. A copy of the laboratory analytical report is included in Attachment A.
Petroleum constituents were detected in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-6 in January 2011. The
concentration of benzene in MW-1 was the only concentration detected at the site that exceeded the
NCAC 21, groundwater standards. The following bullets summarize the January 2011 analytical
data for individual wells at the site:
• MW 1: Benzene (14.2 µg/L), MTBE (3.2 µg/L), and IPE (3.1 µg/L) were detected in MW-1.
The concentration of benzene exceeded the NCAC 2L standard of 1 µg/L for benzene.
Historical analytical results for MW-1 are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted on Figure 3.
• MW-3: No constituents analyzed were detected in MW-3. No concentrations detected in
MW-3 have exceeded the NCAC 21, standards since the April 2005 sampling event.
Historical analytical results for MW-3 are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted on Figure 4.
• MW-4: Arsenic was the only constituent detected in MW-4, at a concentration of 6.5 µg/L.
This well has previously had only one detection exceeding NCAC 2L standards,which was a
concentration of benzene of 50.3 µg/L in January 2009. Historical analytical results for MW-4
are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted on Figure 5.

Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
Page 3
February 7,2011
• MW-6: MTBE(1.1 µg/L) and arsenic (5.4 µg/L)were detected in MW-6. The concentration
of MTBE in this well has decreased from a historical high of 146 µg/L in January 2009.
Historical analytical results for MW-6 are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted on Figure 6.
• VMW-1: No constituents analyzed were detected in VMW-1. January 20011 was the sixth
consecutive sampling event in which no constituents analyzed were detected in this well.
Historical analytical results for VMW-1 are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted on Figure
7.
No compounds analyzed were detected in monitoring wells MW-2 or MW-5 in January 2011, and
none have been historically detected in these wells.
Summary and Conclusions
TEC Environmental conducted a pre-injection groundwater monitoring event at Enmark #251 on
January 15, 2011. Groundwater elevations measured during this sampling event indicate a
groundwater flow direction to the north, which is consistent with previous sampling events.
Petroleum constituents were detected in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-6. The concentration of
benzene in MW-1 exceeded North Carolina's NCAC 2L groundwater standard.
Injection of Regenesis ORC Advanced will be performed at the site as soon as the injection event can
be scheduled with the drilling subcontractor. TEC Environmental will notify the Aquifer Protection
Section at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled injection date as required by the permit. The next
groundwater monitoring event will be conducted three months after the injection event, in
accordance with the approved monitoring plan.
Please contact me at the address or telephone number on this letterhead, or by e-mail at
[e-mail] you have any questions or need further information regarding this site.
Sincerely, \'p1eersrraaer
r Ape
TEC Environmental,P.C.
s 24363
David Traylor,P.E.
v
Environmental Engineer41
e,
Attachments
cc: Ms.Diane Eskenasy-DENR Division of Waste Management,UST Section
Mr.Chris Fisher-XL Insurance
Mr.Brian Wymer-Kenan Advantage Group
Mr.Tom Dolan-Colonial Group,Inc.

TABLES

Table 1
Well Construction Information and January 2011 Groundwater Elevations
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012/Injection Permit WI 0100102
Well Screened 1/15/11 Depth 1/15/11 Groundwater
Well Date Diameter Total Depth Interval Top of Casing Elevation to Water Elevation
Number Installed (inches) (feet BLS) (feet BLS) (feet,assumed datum) (feet) (feet,assumed datum)
MW-1 Nov-02 2 20 5-20 100.00 15.09 84.91
MW-2 May-03 2 18 8-18 102.64 10.40 92.24
MW-3 May-03 2 16 6-16 97.45 14.43 83.02
MW-4 Jan-04 2 10 5-10 91.97 9.37 82.60
MW-5 Tan-04 2 18 3-18 97.84 1287 84.97
MW-6 Jan-04 2 11 6-11 87.09 6.25 80.84
VMW-1 Ma -03 2 40 35-40 100.15 15.78 84.37
Notes: 1. BLS=below land surface
2. All monitoring wells are constructed of schedule 40 PVC and have 0.01-inch slotted screens.
3. MW-4 was originally installed to a depth of 7 feet in May 2003,and was deepened to a depth of 10 feet
in January 2004.
4. VMWA is a double-cased Type III monitoring well with 6-inch steel outer casing grouted in place to 30 feet.
5. All monitoring wells except MW-4 have flush-mount surface completions. MW-4 is an above-grade completion
with a 2.5-foot stickup.

Table 2
Historical Groundwater Elevations
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012/ Injection Permit WI 0100102
Well Top of Casing 26-Nov-02 14-Jan-03 7-May-03 10-Sep-03 1 30-Jan-04 22-Apr-04 22-Jul-04
Number Elevation(ft) DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW I Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev.
MW-1_ 100.00 14.48_ 8_5.5_2_ 14.9_9 85.01 11.48 88.52 14.46 85.54_ 14.68 85.32 14.38 85.62 15.20 84.80
MW-2 102.64 8.74 93.90 9.43 93.21 10.12 92.52 9.91 92.73 10.13 92.51
MW-3 97.45 11.32 86.13 13.58 83.57 13.59 83.86 13.75 83.70 14.55 82.90
MW-4 91.97 -* - 5.68 86.29 DRY <82.73 8.96 83.01 8.99 82.98 9.71 82.26
MW-5 97.84 * * 12.31 85.53 12.22 85.62 12.87 84.97
MW-6 87.09 * 5.40 81.69 5.86 81.23 6.35 80.74
VMW-1 100.15 12.54 87.61 NM NM 15.15 85.00 1 15.22 84.93 1 15.86 1 84.29
Well Top of Casing 24-Oct-04 5-Apr-05 2-Nov-05 20-1u1-06 8-Feb-07 15-Jan-08 _ 25-1ul-08
Number Elevation(ft) DTW ]ilev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW j Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev.
MW-1 100.00 14.59 85.41 13.47 86.53 15.42 84.58 14.80 85.20 14.68 85.32 14.78 85.22 16.31 83.69
MW-2 102.64 9.56 93.08 9 20.07 93.57 10. 92.44 9.90 92.74 9.82 92.82_ 10.62 92.02 11.11 91.53
- - --- - -- --- - -- -- -- -
MW-3 97.45 14.00 83.45 13.14 84.31 14.63 82.82 14.20 83.25 13.99 83.46 14.11 83.34 DRY <81.45
MW-4 91.97 9.07 82.90_ 8.50 83.47 9.59 82.38 _9.57 82.40 9.11 82.86 9.05_ 82.92 10.53 81.44
MW-5 97.84 12.30 85.54 11.63 86.21 12.90 84.94 12.41 85.43 12.32 85.52 12.63 85.21 13.80 84.04
-- - )---
MW 6 87.09 5.86 I 8123 5.57 81.52 . 6.29 80.80 6.21 8088 5.04 52.05 5.86 81.23 7.46 1 79.63
-- ----
VMW-1 100.15 15.25 84.90 14.64 85.51 15.88 84.27 15.53 84.62 15.31 84.84 15.56 84.59 16.71 j 83.44
Well Top of Casing 30-Jan-09 31-1ul-09 15-Jan-11
Number Elevation(ft) DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev.
MW-1 100.00 15.49 1 84.51 15.62 84.38 15.09 84.91
MW-2 102.64 11.41 91�3 10.65 91.99 10.40 92.24
M_W-3_ 97.45 15.10 82.35 14.83 82. 22 14.43 83.02
MW-4 _ 91.97 9.47_ 82.50 9.80 82.17 9.37 82.60_
MW-5 ' 97.84 13.23 84.61 13.21 84.63 12.87 84.97
MW-6 87.09 6.37 80.72 6.48 80.61 6.25 80.84
VMW-1 100.15 16.07 84.08 16.13 84.02 15.78 84.37
Notes: 1. DTW=depth to water in feet
2. Elev.=groundwater elevation in feet,assumed datum
3. NM=Not Measured
4. *-Indicates that the well had not yet been installed as of the measurement date.

Table 3
January 2011 Groundwater Analytical Results
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012/ Injection Permit WI 0100102
Constituent Units MW-1 I MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 I MW-6 I VMW-1 121,Standard3j GCL
Pield Parameters
pH SU 6.38 6.26 5.24 5.12 5.17 5.56 5.65
Conductivity µS 262 257 21 290 252 127 59
Temperature °C 14.4 14.2 13.4 11.2 13.1 10.5 15.1
Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 1.61 1.97 1.28 3.07 2.88 3.40 1.28
Volatile Organic Compounds(EPA Method602)
Benzene µg/L 14.2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1 5,000
Toluene µg/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 600 260,000
Eth lbenzene µ /L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 600 84,500
Total xylenes µg/L <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 500 85,500
Isopropyl ether µg/L 3.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 70 70,000
Methyl tert-but 1 ether µ /L 3.2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.1 <1.0 20 20,000
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (MADEP Method VPH)
C5-C8 Aliphatics µg/L <100 <100I <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 420 N/A5
C9-Cl2 Aliphatics µg/L <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 4,200 N/AS
C9-CIO Aromatics µ /L <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 210 N/A5
Metals(EPA Method 200.7)
Arsenic µ /L <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6.5 j <5.0 1 5A <5.0 10 N/A5
Notes: 1. All samples were collected on January 15,2011.
2. <-Indicates that the constituent was not detected. The number shown is the laboratory reporting limit.
3. 21,Standard refers to the groundwater standards and interim standards established by 15A NCAC 2L.0202.
4. GCL=Gross Contamination Levels as published in the most recent UST Section Guidelines for Corrective Action.
5. N/A=Not Applicable-no GCL is published for this constituent.
6. Bold values indicate concentrations that exceed the 21,standards.

a�n Fn° n cic `»'zfem -
r r 6 e`
a I,. '°. ° ❑ o,g °'�° ra ' t I0 N °.ice P o
£ eae �za _x ° m
F,�� m £^
'ZZ ^ r'o S�.\r. �
A.
� I F r
O q I\P^ O\ ° O\ r o
m r" o r o '\r ° � A I
1
z
� 'n I " q A
lopa �ImS
IA n n 0 j
'�W
iP D O d
s ' IA A A
SS aml Ni � i� ? I � 000 o � wa7:iV °� W i°1i � 888 cj� 6' o "i"' ?
5 � I I II I II 1
n n O
a czii uziy� rZn czii W I � vzf000a � 9 m19 � a � >I88e a '° 000lya
$ >Is a � 5 $ 81* � oIG � z V z - � ZIP � N 9j � C AlA
8 I � CIC OO $ al ViaV Na88C C OCO'O
' I '
a
Al m
iI� x
u4 > oo a I89 �
i a n
B �A EL
z ^ Z � V o ^l° [\? n00i nAY ✓ .\�' NZ IZN \ z ^ ^ HzI� Q .A� nI.^. I 0
9 $aN a8I�° y ao00001 `8 a�ba {a" I" o >1- $ �Wi 9iPri o000 �
1 b� Iik
M I N O° ➢1 fr
Z A Z O IT
F� W AI� O 01 �Np I IAA N N yN� L ,tya Z W S ZI 'P Z °` AAAaaNCIY SIN OOOOO 'Y iP aISS '. V O OOVp 'J0
P P P °
alai N8I� ag000 � al i9 � w9888a1 COJc �o'c � � �
N ZIAZp O � �, NAlr i-A. iA+ ,,���3+ NZI�+ Zm ~ tZA " twi Zl`� w ,n+ `A- °� � N � �
alga ° W S8I� be° clm6e N Nal�i > � agSoal. 9N 8
^
Z Z O qOW NI'J � yN . , V I W ZII-�I,Z' N � N Z A A W ZI VW W YA+ In- W
N ''P S'9 '° P WSIDP 00000p In aISa aIYI000PP
I I I ! I �
A A A MIAl i' y.+ Inn
� agoos � glPs00009 a >IgIY E' s a88
i
W � �y3 �y2 iy3 Ce
N Zi A `+ ,+ N� AIN (!I �Np A i� fA+ tA+ to j 'TiI F+IZ W N !!1 Z Fo' A A F'jN n FAn AI n
V 'D SO O OW W SI V N O O O O m Y 'Y I S a N N ,Y I W S S ,OI N O O -lb
p 0
I I I I m
W Y V y) N y I V
,Wp .ZZIA �i bON y� AI� IA+ V \ � IZ WZZ W ZIN ,{p� N °� m A A A'-6i
Y SROO � WNO' � WOOOCp K fn (l� Na baiW Wn"I41OCOIWa
y
iC 'fY ,AnN ^ \ VO ^ r+ \ '(NON ^ �+ � r �WJ Inln �+ ,PW V �' AWWIW
�10 W W I iJ 9181-b O O ZIq (� IP N
V °1 I$1'p °1 H a ,P P W iP N C
!P Z A O O .�f"+' o �A+I �U+' N �A+ r+ O o 4\i N Z I^ D .+ w W I Y ^ n ip ^ A
Oa 8 `b' o� a PgW .io "' ° P9 �IW N ku y PI� r+ P a
N I 45 N ISIo W I8 8 8 1 IW ;
yTy I
I iA+ �A+ fA+ V\I q o Al, NN Q rA+ ,�A+ iA+ F\'n W Z I n Y Y Z Y A n W W W tA+ to l W
V 'D SOOV ip Ol'� I� 00000 �+. Na 800 � yaISO S '�i N000IN �
I I

FIGURES

LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: la Vertical Extent Monitoring Well Location
1 inch=40 feet
0 40
�`<Sn
i
MW4 0
Restrooms
Wooded Aree &Office 3 Vending
, 0 MW-6
P°
t 0 MW.9 MW-i0 -"�.�. ''.
VMW-1 0 io Si. .,n. .
` ' .::,_s E Fueling Canopy
t 0 MW,5
:5
0 MW-2 f3:z*
t
,i
:"�`j'r-':F:%i3.'s.= `,�,'y."i, fi:•`.. 2;j�s
FIGURE 1
SITE MAP N€
Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC 6nvlr:rraerJtat, .

LEGEND
0 Uppermost Aquifer Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Saprolite Aquifer Monitoring Well Location
1 Inch=40 feet 84.91 Groundwater Elevation in Uppermost Aquifer on 1/15111
(In feet,assumed datum) �y
0 40 J
(04.37) Groundwater Elevation in Saprolite Aquifer on 1115111 �}
(in feet,assumed datum) ,
Cs
—90— Groundwater Elevation Contour in the Uppermost Aqu',Fer_ ---- r
� MW-6 o Mvv-4 Restrooms !,
80.84 02.60 W ded Area _p�� Vending &office
� Mw-1
84.91
MW-3 111
83.02
VMW-1 �b tti::e
Fueling Canopy
MWd / gem.
84.97 v
.1 /
9M1 0 MW-2 '%`3
/ 92.24
FIGURE 2
JANUARY 2011 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP
Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC J rw,wnmerEat,„

Figure 3
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in MW-1
4,000 Enmark#251 -Mountain Home,NC
—0 Benzene
v-MTBE
6—05-C8 Aliphatics
4 — — Groundwater elevation
It
It
1 t
3,000 __-___ ____________________________
1 _ _ . - __ . _ _ .
I 1
1 t
1 1 86.53
2,500 -----'-----4-------------------/� --- -- - - - - -----— ..
3 85.521 85.54 85.62 / \
a Q 1 85.32 A 85.4Y
85.20 85,32 85.22
0
a 2,000 -- +-----------------INtjd---- - - -- 64.91
�a58 \ _moo
\ 84.51
O 84.38
c
1,500 �3 6�,/
1,000 --- ------- --
i
500 . - - - - - -- - ______
0 W— I _
Sep-02 Mar-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug-05 Mar-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Feb-09 Aug-09 Feb-10 Aug-10 Feb-11

Figure 4
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in MW-3
600 Enmark#251-Mountain Home,NC
—MTBE --I
6- C5-C8 Aliphatics
e— Groundwater elevation
500 -- ---_9S.]3---- - --- _ .
1
1
1
1
1
400 ---------- -- - ---
- ---- --- - ---- ---- - ---
1 83. 6 A
Or 8�57 p 83. 0 // \\
or i Q 83.4, \ 83.46
s er \ 83.25 83.34
i 3009j 'Q
- - -_______________ d_____ __ IR2.82-�� � __ 83.02
---- --\----------- ------------- -0-
C lY \ 82.62 _—
\ 82.35 —
s \ o
61
O \ i
S�
200 ------------------------- ---
I
100 -----------------------------------------------—
- ----------------------------------------
-- - - ------------
F
t
0
Sep-02 Mar-M Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug-05 Mar-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Feb-09 Aug-09 Feb-10 Aug-10 Feb-11

Figure 5
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in MW4
300
Enmark#261 -Mountain Home,NC
0 Benzene
* MTBE
--* C5-C8 Aliphatics
86.29 — 9— Groundwater elevation
250 ------- 1 -------------------------------------- - ---- I
I
I
1
1
� ---------
------------------------------------------------
------------ -
1
1
z 1 83.47
1 i
`a 83.0732.98 \
1 82.90
150 - _ _ _ ..---8�:�3-�A—@-----�----` 82.86 82.92
PJ \----------------
c 82`.,28 .&2.38 82.40�i \ 82.5 _ _ . --- --____82.6
8217
\ / go- - - - - -
\
50 ----------- -----
------------------------------------- -- ---- -- ----------- — --------
0
Sep-02 Mar-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug-05 Mar-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Feb-09 Aug-09 Feb-10 Aug-10 Feb-11

Figure 6
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in MW-6
160
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home,NC
=�—MTBE
140 --- — -0— Groundwater elevation
------------
----------------- ----------------
82 05
81
G. 81.52 / \
�1.23 81.23 /
100 / 81.23
- - - b --- e�--- ---
-- - - -------
80.80
i H7/ �� - - - -of \ 60.72 .61 .84
\ - - --0
c \ P"�- -- ---- -
O \ �
i \
__________________
C 9.63•
O
t
O
O
60 - - ---------------------------------- - --- - --
40 _________________________ ________ ________________________________________________________ __________
20 ________________________
0
Sen-02 Mar-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug•05 Mar-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Feb-09 Aug-09 Feb-10 Aug-10 Feb-11

Figure 7
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in VMW-1
ODD Enmark#251 -Mountain Home,NC
(3 MTB E
=tom C5-C8 Aliphatics
6— Groundwater elevation
- ------------
87.67I
4\
400 ----------\---------------
----------------
\
J \
= \\ 5.5
` O%4.93 84.90/
3W 1 - -----6`�Q--- - -84.62 --- 84.84
s - 84.59_______________________________________
o �4.2/ \Q4.27����
\
84.37
84.08
\ 84.02 —0
\8 /
200 _ _ . __- _ _ `ei_r
100
- - - - ----------------------—-------------------------------
0
Seq-02 Mar-03 SeP-03 Mar-04 Auq-04 Mar-05 Auq-05 Mar-nF Aun-OF Mar-07 Auq-07 Feh-OF; Aun-O8 Feh-
09 Auq-09 Feb-10 Aun-10 Feb-11

ATTACHMENT A
Laboratory Analytical Report

Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
i „✓' 06) nafy k, S 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
AsheWla,NC 28804 Hun[ersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
January 26, 2011
Mr. David Traylor
TEC Environmental
P.O. Box 216
Waynesville, NC 28786
RE: Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Dear Mr. Traylor:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on January 18, 2011.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current NELAC standards,where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the
report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Tom Williams
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 1 of21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

y Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. J
eAnalytic 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
f.,-✓
Asheville.NO 28804 Huntersville,NO 28078.
'.`
[phone] [phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Charlotte Certification IDs
9800 Kincey Ave.Ste 100,Huntemville,NO 28078 South Carolina Drinking Water Cart.#:99006003
Louisiana/LELAP Certification#:04034 Virginia Certification#:00213
New Jersey Certification M NC012 Connecticut Certification#:PH-0104
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification#:37706 Florida/N ELAP Certification#:E87627 --
North Carolina Field Services Certification#:5342 Kentucky UST Certification#:84
North Carolina Wastewater Certification#:12 Louisiana DHH Drinking Water#LA 100031
Pennsylvania Certification#:68-00784 West Virginia Certification M 357
South Carolina Certification#:99006001
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Dr.,Asheville,NO 28804 North Carolina Wastewater Certification#:40
Connecticut Certification M PH-0106 Pennsylvania Certification#:68-03578
Florida/NELAP Certification M E87648 South Carolina Bioassay Certification M 99030002
Massachusetts Certification#:M-NC030 South Carolina Certification#:99030001
New Jersey Certification#:NC011 Virginia Certification#:00072
North Carolina Bioassay Certification#:9 West Virginia Certification#:356
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification#:37712
i
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 2 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
xp �ehY

y Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
CeAh 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
f^" Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
f-` [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Sample: MW-1 Lab ID: 9285869001 Collected: 01/15/1114:20 Received: 01/18/11 11:45 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(CO5-008) ND ug/L 100 1 01/19/11 22:23 N2
Aliphatic(C09-Cl2) ND ug/L 100 1 01/19/11 22:23 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 100 1 01/19111 22:23 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 115 % 70-130 1 01/19/11 22:23
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 103 % 70-130 1 01/19/11 22:23
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA200.7 Preparation Method:EPA200.7
Aluminum ND ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7429-90-5 ,
Antimony ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-36-0
Arsenic ND ug1L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-38-2
Barium 113 ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-39-3
Beryllium ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 744041-7
_ Boron ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/24/11 15:40 7440-42-8
Cadmium ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-43-9
Calcium 10300 ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-70-2
Chromium ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-47-3
Cobalt 5.0 ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-48-4
Copper ND ug/L 5.0 1 01120/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-50-8
Iron 219 ug/L 50.0 1 01120111 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7439-89-6
Lead ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:56 7439-92-1
Magnesium 787 ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7439-95-4
Manganese 51.4,ug/L 5.0 1 01120/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7439-96-5
Molybdenum ND ug/L 5.0 1 01120/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7439-98-7
Nickel ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-02-0
'Potassium ND ug/L 5000 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-09-7
Selenium ND ug/L 10.0 1 01120/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7782-49-2
Silicon 2870 ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-21-3
Silver ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-22-4
Sodium 11500 ug/L 5000 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-23-5
Strontium 24.4 ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-24-6
Thallium ND ug/L 10.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-28-0
Tin ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-31-5
Titanium ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/20111 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-32-6
Vanadium ND ug/L 6.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-62-2
Zinc ND ug/L 10.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:55 7440-66-6
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM.6200B
Benzene 14.2 ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L. 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 9547-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 108-90-7
Date:011261201102:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 3of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
se '
i '
��1::

� I
-,1 Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
'a ✓ BE,glialytr�al 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
f' :firv+PaJzreAc>x�7:, Asheville,NC28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] a_
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark 4251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Sample: MWA IabID: 9285869001 Collected: 01/1511114:20 Received: 01/18111 11:45 Matrix:Water -
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B '
Diisopropyl ether 3.1 ug/L 1.0 1 01/2011115:03 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-bulyl ether 3.2 ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/1115:03 1634-04-4
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 15:03 91-20-3
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 99 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:03 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 109 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:03 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 111 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:03 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 99 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:03 2037-26-5
1
L_
Date:01/26/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 4 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

:h Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
.� . ce..Amlyh 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Sample: MW-2 Lab ID: 9285869002 Collected: 01/15/11 11:10 Received: 01/18/11 11:45 Mabbc:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(CO5-008) ND ug/L 100 1 01119/11 22:48 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 100 1 01/1911122:48 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 100 1 01/19/11 22:48 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 118 % 70-130 1 01/19/11 22:48
.2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 108 % 70-130 1 01/19/11 22:48
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Arsenic ND ug/L 6.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 19:58 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ugll- 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 1634-04-4
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 15:26 91-20.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 97 % 70.130 1 01/20/11 15:26 46D-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 114 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:26 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 115 % 70-130 1 01/20111 15:26 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:26 2037-26-5
Date:01261201102:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 5of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pam Analytical Services,Inc..

A /I I y .( Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
�f ,✓ 4j6A ]Of���`Yf( 1 2225 Riverside Dr. 980D Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville,NO 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
f [phone]
. . [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251 --
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Sample: MW-3 Lab ID: 9285889003 Collected: 01/15/11 13:55 Received: 01/18/11 11:45 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Cual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH —
Aliphatic(CO5-008) ND ug/L 100 1 01/1911123:13 N2 --
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 100 1 01119/11 23:13 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 100 1 O111911123:13 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 109 % 70-130 1 01/19/11 23:13
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/19/11 23:13
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA200.7 Preparation Method:EPA200.7
Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 22:59 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 100-41-4 -
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/2011115:49 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 1634-04.4
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 15:49 91-20-3
4-Bromo0uorobenzene(S) 98 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:49 460-00-4
Dibromo0uoromethane(S) 113 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:49 1868-53.7
1,2-Dichloroethaned4(S) 119 % 70-130 1 01120/11 15:49 17060-07-0
Toluene-dB(S) 101 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 15:49 2037-26-5
Date:01126/201102:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 6of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc-
.

0 Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
CE1�/k7/j�17 r 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
pwi Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
:✓Mw�'eAe '..
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Sample: MW-4 Lab ID: 9285069004 Collected: 01/15/1112:10 Received: 01/18/1111:45 Matrix:Water
- Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(C05-008) ND ug/L 100 1 01/1911123:38 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 100 1 01/1911123:38 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 100 1 0111911123:38 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 107 % 70-130 1 01/19/11 23:38
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 101 % 70-130 1 01/19/11 23:38
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
-Arsenic 6.5 ug/L 6.0 1 01/20/11 11:30 01/21/11 23:07 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 7143-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01120/11 16:12 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/2011116:12 1634-04-4
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 16:12 91-20-3
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 99 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 16:12 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 104 % 70-130 1 01120/11 16:12 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethaned4(S) 103 % 70-130 1 01120/11 16:12 17060-07-0
Toluened8(S) 99 % 70-130 1 01120/11 16:12 2037-26-5
Date:01/26/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 7 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc, y
2225 Riverside Dr. 980D Kincey Ave Suite 100 -�
Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersvdle,NC 28078
- [phone] (/04)875-9092
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Sample: MW-5 Lab ID: 9285869005 Collected: 01115/1111:45 Received: 01/18/1111:45 Matrix:Water --
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NO Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH -
Aliphatic(C05-008) ND ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 00:03 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 00:03 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 100 1 0112011100:03 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 103 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 00:03
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 96 % 70-130 1 01120/11 00:03
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA200.7 Preparation Method:EPA200.7
Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01120/11 11:30 01/21/11 23:15 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 62008
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01120/11 16:35 71-43-2 �—
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01120111 16:35 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:35 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 16:35 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:35 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:35 95-50.1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:35 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:35 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:35 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/2011116:35 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:35 98-82-8 --
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01120/1116:35 1634-04-4
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01120/11 16:35 91-213-3
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 16:35 460-004
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 98 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 16:35 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 97 % 70-130 1 01/20111 16:35 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 98 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 16:35 2037-26-5 --
Date:01/26/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 8 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

'n Pace Analytical services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
CEAI181y1'! N 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
!'— j y Asheville,NC28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
vlsw.py�}repS Wei;:.
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Sample: MW-6 Lab ID: 9285869006 Collected: 01/15/11 12:45 Received: 01/18/11 11:45 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Quaff
_- VPH NO Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(CO5-008) NO ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 00:28 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) NO ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 00:28 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) NO ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 00:28 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 99 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 00:28
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 92 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 00:28
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Arsenic 6.4•ug/L 5.0 1 0112011111:30 0112111123:29 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:68 71-43-2
Toluene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene NO ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 179601-23-1
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 95-50.1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether NO ug/L 1.0 1 0112011116:58 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 1.1 ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 1634-04-4
Naphthalene NO ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 16:58 91-20-3
4-BromoOuorobenzene(S) 99 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 16:58 460.00-4
Dibromo0uoromethane(S) 114 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 16:58 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-04(S) 121 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 16:58 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 16:58 2037-26-5
Date:01126/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 9of21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

I
0 Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
Wn'df I j}��" \'' 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
J' - Asheville,NO 29804 Huntersville,NO 28078
[phone] [phone] `-
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark 9251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
Sample: VMW-1 Lab ID: 9285869007 Collected: 01/15/11 15:00 Received: 01/18/11 11:45 Matra:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH -
Aliphatic(C05-008) ND ug/L 100 1 0112011100:53 N2 -
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 100 1 01/2011100:53 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 100 1 01/20/11 00:53 N2 `
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 99 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 00:53
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 91 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 00:53
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01120/11 11:30 01/21111 23:33 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01120/11 17:20 100-414
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20111 17:20 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 108-90-7 -
Diisopropylether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01120/11 17:20 98-82-8 -
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 0112011117:20 1634-04-4
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/20/11 17:20 91-20-3
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01120/11 17:20 460-00-0
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 112 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 17:20 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 120 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 17:20 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/20/11 17:20 2037-26-5 -
Date:0126/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 10 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except In full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
x`E :

p iy Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
`W C4�1181, '�Cr�l ij 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
.. Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
QC Batch: GCV/4653 Analysis Method: MADEP VPH
- QC Batch Method: MADEP VPH Analysis Description: VPH NC Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92 85 8690 01,9285869002,9285869003,9285869004,9285869005,9285869006,9285869007
METHOD BLANK: 553000 Matra: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9285869001,9285869002,9285869003,9285869004,9285869005,9285869006,9285869007
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Aliphatic(C0SC08) ug/L ND 100 01/1911116:10 N2
Aliphatic(C09-Cl2) ug/L ND 100 01/19/1116:10 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ug/L ND 100 01/1911116:10 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) % 101 70.130 01/19/11 16:10
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) % 109 70-130 01/19/11 16:10
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE&LCSD: 553001 553002
-- Spike LCS LCSD LCS LCSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Cone. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qualifiers
Aliphatic(CO5-008) ug/L 300 266 255 89 85 70-130 4 25 N2
_ Aliphatic(C09-C12) ug/L 300 335 330 112 110 30-130 2 25 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ug/L 100 101 ND 101 99 70-130 25 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) % 106 101 70-130
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) % 115 109 70-130
Date:01126/201102:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 11 of21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

m Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
C8A1781yt�CrZ1'' 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
QC Batch: MPRP(7748 Analysis Method: EPA200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 9285869001,9285869002
METHOD BLANK: 553370 Matra: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9285869001,9285869002
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L NO 100 0112111118:04
Antimony ug/L NO 5.0 01/21111 18:04
Arsenic ug/L NO 5.0 01/2111118:04
Barium ug/L NO 5.0 Ot/2111118:04
Beryllium ug/L ND 1.0 01/21/11 18:04
Boron ug/L NO 50.0 01/21/11 18:04
Cadmium ug/L NO 1.0 0112111118:04 _
Calcium ug/L NO 100 01/2111118:04
Chromium ug/L NO 5.0 01/21/11 18:04
Cobalt ug/L ND 5.0 01/21/11 18:04
Copper ug/L ND 5.0 01/21/11 18:04
Iron ug/L ND 50.0 01/21/11 18:04
Lead ug/L ND 5.0 01/21/11 18:04
Magnesium ug/L ND 100 01121/11 18:04
Manganese ug/L ND 5.0 01121/11 18:04
Molybdenum ug1L ND 5.0 01121/11 18:04
Nickel ug/L ND 5.0 01121/11 18:04
Potassium ug/L ND 5000 01121/11 18:04
Selenium ug1L ND 10.0 0112111118:04
Silicon uglL ND 100 01121/11 18:04
Silver ug/L ND 5.0 0112111118:04
Sodium ug/L ND 5000 01/21/11 18:04
Strontium ug/L ND 5.0 01/21/11 18:04
Thallium ug/L ND 10.0 01/21/11 18:04
Tin ug/L ND 5.0 01/21/11 18:04
Titanium ug/L ND 5.0 01/2111118:04
Vanadium •ug/L NO 5.0 01/21/11 18:04
Zinc ug/L ND 10.0 0112111118:04
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 553371
Spike LCS LCS %Rao
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers --
Aluminum ug/L 5000 4540 91 85-115
Antimony ug/L 500 452 90 85-115 •J
Arsenic ug/L 500 451 90 85-115 _
Barium ug/L 500 466 93 85-115
Beryllium ug/L 500 462 92 85-115
Boron ug/L 500 475 95 85-115
Cadmium ug/L 500 467 93 85-115
Calcium ug/L 50DO 4540 91 85-115
Chromium uglL Soo 457 91 85-115
Date:01/26/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 12 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. , `--

Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
VPi,A��IJLA! 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Klncey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville,NO 28804 Huntersville,NO 28078
P- [phone] (704)8759092
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 553371
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Cobalt ug/L 500 460 92 85-115
Copper ug/L 500 459 92 85-115
Iron ug/L 5000 4740 95 85-115
Lead ug/L 500 462 92 85-115
Magnesium ug/L 5000 4710 94 85-115
Manganese ug/L 500 457 91 85-115
Molybdenum ug/L 500 462 92 85-115
Nickel ug/L 500 463 93 85-115
Potassium ug/L 5000 4380J 88 85-115
Selenium ug/L 500 440 88 85-115
Silicon ug/L 2500 2360 94 85-115
Silver ug/L 250 233 93 85-115
Sodium ug/L 5000 4420J 88 85-115
Strontium ug/L 500 461 92 85-115
Thallium ug/L 500 441 88 85-115
Tin ug/L 500 466 93 85-115
Titanium ug/L 500 469 94 85-115
Vanadium ug/L 500 456 91 85-115
'Zinc uglL 500 448 90 85-115
_ MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 553372
9285901001 Spike MS MS %Rec
Parameter Units Result Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 573 5000 5910 107 70-130
-- Antimony ug/L NO 500 465 93 70-130
Arsenic ug/L NO 500 478 95 70-130
Barium uglL 18.0 500 478 92 70-130
Beryllium uglL NO 500 478 96 70-130
Boron ug/L 303 500 794 98 70-130
Cadmium uglL NO 500 464 93 70-130
Calcium ug/L 10400 5000 15500 103 70-130
Chromium ug/L NO Boo 461 92 70-130
Cobalt ug/L 5.5 500 462 91 70-130
Copper ug/L 11.2 500 480 94 70-130
Iron ug/L 1210 5000 6060 97 70-130
Lead ug/L NO 500 454 90 70-130
Magnesium uglL 3540 5000 8150 92 70-130
Manganese uglL 61.1 500 514 91 70-130
Molybdenum ug/L NO 500 432 86 70-130
Nickel ug/L 9150 500 9830 136 70-130 MO
Potassium ug/L 14900 5000 22200 144 70-130 MO
Selenium ug/L NO 500 471 94 70-130
Silicon ug/L 2790 2500 5870 123 70-130
Silver ug/L 5.6 250 245 96 70-130
Sodium ug/L 30600 5000 36700 124 70-130
Strontium ug/L 89.5 500 549 92 70-130
Thallium ug/L ND 500 425 84 70-130
Date:01126/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 13 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

i
'y Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
eeAnaf I417( 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Pao.� , e
ace, Asheville,NC28804 Huntersvilie,NC 28078 j
[phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 553372
9285901001 Spike MS MS %Rec
Parameter Units Result Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Tin ug/L NO 500 464 93 70-130
Titanium ug/L 13.5 500 491 96 70-130
Vanadium ug/L NO 500 466 93 70-130
Zinc uglL 54.3 500 525 94 70-130
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 553374
9285904002 Spike MS MS %Rec
Parameter Units Result Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 1180 5000 7250 121 70-130
Antimony ug/L NO 500 536 107 70-130
Arsenic ug/L NO 500 621 124 70.130 -
Barium ug/L 42.4 500 486 89 70-130
Beryllium ug/L NO 500 467 93 70-130
Boron ug/L 76400 500 76200 -30 70-130 MO
Cadmium ug/L NO 500 440 88 70-130
Calcium ug/L 1010000 5000 1020000 154 70-130 MO
Chromium ug/L 5.1 500 476 94 70-130
Cobalt ug/L 28.1 500 452 85 70-130
Copper ug/L ND 500 543 109 70-130
Iron ug/L 7320 5000 115b0 84 70-130
Lead ug/L ND 500 377 75 70-130
Magnesium ug/L 5760 5000 9420 73 70-130
Manganese ug/L 181 500 625 89 70-130 ..
Molybdenum ug/L 435 500 909 95 70-130
Nickel ug/L 327 500 735 82 70-130
Potassium ug/L 512000 5000 612000 -15 70-130 MO
Selenium ug/L 60.5 500 753 138 70-130 MO
Silicon ug/L 5690 2500 8210 101 70-130
Silver ug/L NO 250 308 123 70-130
Sodium ug/L 288000 5000 287000 -20 70-130 MO
Strontium ug/L 845 500 1280 88 70-130
Thallium ug/L NO 500 305 61 70-130 MO
Tin ug/L 15.7 500 433 83 70-130 -
Titanium ug/L NO 500 473 95 70-130
Vanadium ug/L NO 500 465 93 70-130
Zinc ug/L NO 500 553 109 70-130
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 553373
9285813001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L NO 40J
Antimony ug/L NO NO
Arsenic ug/L NO NO
Barium ug/L 23.9 23.3 3
Beryllium ug/L NO ND
Date:01126/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 14 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

'q Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
ceAnafytrca( 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
t [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 553373
-� 9285813001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Boron ug/L 108 102 6
Cadmium ug/L ND ND
Calcium ug/L 3800 3720 2
Chromium ug/L ND 1.61
Cobalt ug/L ND 2.6J
Copper ug/L 35.5 34.9 2
Iron ug/L 1200 1170 2
Lead ug/L ND ND
Magnesium ug/L 1270 1220 3
Manganese ug/L 23.3 22.7 3
Molybdenum ug/L 6.0 3.7J
Nickel ug/L ND 2.8J
Potassium ug/L 44000 42800 3
Selenium ug/L ND ND
Silicon ug/L 4260 4150 3
Silver ug/L ND ND
Sodium ug/L 22600 22000 3
Strontium ug/L 23.7 23.2 2
Thallium ug/L ND ND
Tin ug/L ND ND
Titanium ug/L 11.7 10.9 7
Vanadium ug/L ND ND
Zinc ug/L 35.2 34.6 2
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 553375
9285850002 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 0.27 mg/L 242 12
Antimony ug/L ND ND
Arsenic ug/L ND ND
Barium ug/L 0.013 mg/L 11.9 9
Beryllium ug/L ND ND
Boron ug/L 0.44 mg/L 387 12
Cadmium uglL ND ND
Calcium ug/L 10 mg/L 9270 7
Chromium ug/L ND 1.8J
Cobalt ug/L ND 3.2.1
Copper ug/L 0.015 mg/L 12.3 18
Iron ug/L 0.79 mg/L 722 9
Lead ug/L ND ND
Magnesium uglL 3.1 mg/L 2890 6
Manganese ug/L 0.13 mg/L 118 7
Molybdenum ug/L ND 1.31
Nickel ug/L 0.0058 mg/L 5.5 5
Potassium ug/L 13.7 mg/L 12800 7
.Selenium ug/L ND ND
Silicon ug/L 5.2 mg/L 4890 7
Date:01I2612011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 15 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100 y
f Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078 j
_HNk.peDSP'iRl;
[phone] (704)875�9092'
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark 9251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 553375
9285850002 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Silver ug/L ND .551
Sodium ug/L 49.5 mg/L 46400 6
Strontium uglL 0.047 mg/L 44.2 7
Thallium ug/L ND ND
Tin ug/L ND 2J
Titanium ug/L 0.014 mglt- 11.7 19
Vanadium ug/L ND .46J
Zinc ug/L 0.10 mg/L 88.6 17
Date:0126/201102:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 16 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except In full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
xf.�JL4Ac4cm,.' Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
= QC Batch: MPRPf7749 Analysis Method: EPA200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 9285869003,9285869004,9285869005,9285869006,9285869007
METHOD BLANK 553379 Matrbr: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9285869003.9285869004,9285869005,9285869006.9285869007
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L ND 100 01/21/11 22:52
Arsenic ug/L ND 5.0 01121/1122:52
Cadmium ug/L ND 1.0 01/21/11 22:52
Calcium ug/L ND 100 01/21/11 22:52
Chromium ug/L ND 5.0 0112111122:52
Copper ug/L ND 5.0 01/21/11 22:52
Iron ug/L ND 50.0 01121/1122:52
Lead ug/L NO 5.0 01121/11 22:52
Magnesium ug/L NO 100 01/21/11 22:52
Manganese ug/L NO 5.0 0112111122:52
Nickel ug/L ND 5.0 01/21/11 22:52
Silver ug/L ND 5.0 01121/1122:52
Zinc ug/L ND 10.0 01121/1122:52
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 553380
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 5000 4660 93 85-115
Arsenic ug/L 500 467 93 85-115
Cadmium ug/L 500 487 97 85-115
Calcium ug/L 5000 4800 96 85-115
Chromium ug/L 500 478 96 85-115
Copper ugll- 500 467 93 85-115
Iron ug/L 5000 4920 98 85-115
Lead ug/L 500 480 96 85-115
Magnesium ug/L 5000 4840 97 85-115
Manganese ug1L 500 473 95 85-115
Nickel ug/L 500 482 96 85-115
Silver ug/L 250 242 97 85-115
Zinc ug/L 500 471 94 85-116
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 553381
9285869003 Spike MS MS %Rec
Parameter Units Result Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 281 5000 5180 98 70-130
Arsenic ug/L NO 500 459 92 70-130
Cadmium ug/L NO 500 476 95 70-130
Calcium ug/L 437 5000 5130 94 70-130
Chromium ug/L NO 500 470 94 70-130
Copper ug/L NO 500 458 92 70-130
Date:01/26/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 17 of21
This report shall not be reprotluced,except In full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
ffi`� yq.

bra MAN
,,/'ri Pace Analylicalsemices,Inc. Pace AnalAlcal Services,Inc.
V[if11(t�1I�Ai�.` 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 VGnceyAve. Suite 100 --
f_`" W`'N4xJ.?iwn. Asheville,NC28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
i, [phone]
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 553381 -
9285869003 Spike MS MS %Rae
Parameter Units Result Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Iron ug/L 295 5000 5140 97 70-130
Lead ug/L ND 500 465 93 70-130
Magnesium ug/L 328 5000 5040 94 70-130
Manganese ug/L 37.1 500 501 93 70-130
Nickel ug/L ND 500 471 94 70-130
Silver ug/L ND 250 237 95 70-130
Zinc ug/L ND 500 471 93 70-130
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 553383
9285906001 Spike MS MS %Rae
Parameter Units Result Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 0.29 mglL 5000 5580 106 70-130
Arsenic ug/L ND 500 529 105 70-130
Cadmium ug/L ND 500 484 97 70-130
Calcium ug/L 2.4 mglL 5000 7080 94 70-130
Chromium ug/L ND 500 484 96 70-130
Copper ug/L ND 500 490 97 70-130
Iron ug/L 0.059 mg/L 5000 4820 95 70-130
Lead ug/L ND 500 439 88 70-130
Magnesium ug/L 0.61 ni 5000 5120 90 70-130
Manganese ug/L 0.99 mg/L 500 1420 86 70-130
Nickel ug/L 0.0064 mg/L 500 471 93 70-130
Silver ug/L ND 250 259 104 70-130
Zinc uglL 0.044 mg/L 500 568 105 70.130
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 553382
9285869004 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 965 929 4
Arsenic ug/L 6.5 5.9 9
Cadmium ug/L ND ND
Calcium ug/L 9200 9110 1
Chromium ug/L ND ,48J
Copper ug/L ND ND
Iron ug/L 156 134 15
Lead ug/L ND ND
Magnesium ug/L 3310 3230 2
Manganese ug/L 1530 1510 2
Nickel ug/L ND ND
Silver ug/L ND ND
Zinc ug/L 16.9 16.6 2
Dale:01/26/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 18 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. _

-h Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
✓f aJ'x�'��" 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville,NC28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 553384
9285910001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 173 168 3
Arsenic ug/L ND NO
-- Cadmium ug/L ND NO
Calcium ug/L 3260 3300 1
Chromium ug/L NO .45J
Copper ug/L 10.9 11.3 4
Iron ug/L ND 40.3J
Lead ug/L ND NO
Magnesium ug/L 1270 1280 1
Manganese ug/L 87.7 88.7 1
Nickel ug/L NO NO
Silver ug/L NO NO
Zinc ug/L NO NO
Date:01/26/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 19 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
R:

'n Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
eEAnalyfd . 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve Suite 100
!- Asheville,NC28804 Huntersville,NC 28078-vawp,'y>rsAc4aiii_, i
i. [phone] (704)8759092 �-
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
QC Batch: MSV113779 Analysis Method: SM 6200B
QC Batch Method: SM 6200B Analysis Description: 602 by 6200E
Associated Lab Samples: 9285869001,9285869002,9285869003,9285869004,9285869005,9285869006,9285869007
METHOD BLANK: 553358 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9285869001,9285869002,9285869003,9285869004,9285869005,9285869006,9285869007
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/20/11 13:32
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/20/11 13:32
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/20/11 13:32
Benzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/20/11 13:32
Chlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/20111 13:32
Diisopropyl ether ug/L NO 1.0 01/20/11 13:32
Ethylbenzene ug/L ND 1.0 012011113:32
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ug/L NO 1.0 01/20/11 13:32
m&p-Xylene ug/L NO 2.0 01/20/11 13:32
Methyl-tart-butyl ether ug/L ND 1.0 012011113:32
Naphthalene ug/L ND 2.0 01/20/11 13:32
o-Xylene ug/L ND 1.0 01/20/11 13:32
Toluene ug/L ND 1.0 01120/1113:32
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) % 119 70-130 01120/11 13:32
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 100 70-130 01/20111 13:32
Dibromofluoromethane(S) % 115 70-130 01/20/11 13:32
Toluene-d8(S) % 100 70-130 01/20/11 13:32
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 553359
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 50.2 100 60-140
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 51.3 103 60-140
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 45.3 91 60-140
Benzene ug/L 50 48.6 97 60-140
Chlorobenzene ug/L 50 45.0 90 60-140
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 60 52.2 104 60-140
Ethylbenzene ug/L 50 50.8 102 60-140
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ug/L 50 49.4 99 60-140
m&p-Xylene ug/L 100 111 111 60-140
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 50 49.5 99, 60-140
Naphthalene ug/L 50 42.9 86 60-140
o-Xylene ug/L 50 49.0 98 60-140
Toluene ug/L 50 48.2 96 60-140 ` -
1,2-Dichloroethaned4(S) % 102 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 98 70-130
Dibromofluoromethane(S) % 104 70-130
Toluened8(S) % 102 70-130 i--
Date:01/26/2011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 20 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
NfE4:t'.

.. �J"d Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
C�iQ11$�
F ,�7GQ( !,` 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Mncey Ave. Suite 100
l' Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] (704)8759092
QUALIFIERS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 9285869
DEFINITIONS �-
DF-Dilution Factor,if reported,represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation,dilution of
j the sample aliquot,or moisture content.
- ND-Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
_ J-Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and belowthe adjusted reporting limit.
MDL-Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S-Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(8270Iisted anayte)decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines,unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate%recovery and RPD values.
I
LCS(D)-Laboratory Control Sample(Duplicate)
MS(D)-Matrix Spike(Duplicate)
DUP-Sample Duplicate
RPD-Relative Percent Difference
NC-Not Calculable.
SG-Silica Gel-Clean-Up
U-Indicates the compound was analyzed for,but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each anayte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited.Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
MO Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was outside laboratory control limits.
1. N2 The lab does not hold NELAC accreditation for this parameter.
t
I
i
1
~I
Date:012612011 02:29 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 21 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
J without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

[yT(^/,/, CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY/Analytical Request Document
.r ,.TQl�eArralyticala Thu Cnamwf-CusWpy is a LEGAL DOCUMENT.All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
Pape: I o/
SxOon A Section 8 Section C
Required Client Infounadom Ap lr.d Prof.d Wormutbn: fewoim Inf.mvelon: 1332755
Co�P rppsr. — t ('s v\in v^-fL,l "Pe ro: T� o r— ae.nt.w �eaa c� r4 >r'
Add /(, Ards <<Q 7 �m�m-I r. CoWTo. �UyfG L.�` v�(l n Ytil�•�( REGULATORY AGENCY
peazK-krft G G A-6036 '"((E r CTTk< r NPDES r GROUNDWATER r- DRINNING WATER
Email Xt, r,61 ye_„rwi Purchase Order No.: Pare 3036 UST I- RCRA r- OTHER
mv IO ICCt r`re. R.km o:
3�y87 Fax: Pmiud N. 13.25 1 P.m Site Location
Meremr: yY� wl l •Q/•�(� Nr
R.que Nd Due DaNITATS 1` I Il Pml.ct Nurrou: STATE: 1�
r'O Rocluobtod Analysis Filtered(Y"
y
Becton
n,d Main
e Code.
RwmreacucN lntomiNim MwTaly r CDDE 9 'g COLLECTED Preservatives a lil
MMinp W.w DW 8
Waler WT
Wa6GWater WW C04pw= wvpovre U .
rrry999 STMr EIIDTiMB yW
Bon. SL to i5
SAMPLE ID 01 LAlt AR 0.
Sample IOe MUST BE UNIQUE TissueTS COOI ( ZO m = .
d rer W
OT F
LL VOC _ C'(
m TIATCnMF DATE TIME A 1` S 2 2 2 O Iy d Pace PC�
1 6'I1D "7
z l l t o —1
- 3
qrnv4 _ L4 O
G 114 -7 6
7 Jk_ sw
S
9
10
11
121
Y..-..
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELINQUISHED SY yAFFlIJATION DATE TUIE' ACCEfRED BY./AFFlWTWN GATE TIME SAMPLE CONOfiIONS
1 M 11 loom dl3 A AJL1
ORIGINAL UMPLERNAMEANDSIGNATURE S �
PRINT Nam..f SAMPLER: lei'JD6tr $ L
SIGNATURE of SAMPLE DAnIi ned i E
(MMfD f
'Irp.mnt Nde:aY.�pn^p em rmm you aro.xeptlnp Pate'a NET 30day papnmtmrma eM vprmirg m lam dugee d l.sk perm.iM foram.rv.lmanw paid wiWn N)Wyc F-ALL-O-020rev.07.I5.May-2007

.,AceAna1yYca1­ Client Name: Project 4
Vhere Received: Huntersville 0 Asheville ❑ Eden
:ourler: L] Fed Ex nUPS [I USPS ❑ Client ❑Commercial 0 Pace Other- ,NldnAA4320
El no
13 yes LL ;ustody Seal on Cooler/Box Present: ❑yes no Seals Intact:
11� tip e. Z�,
kii 'M �s
packing Material; ❑ Bubble,Wrap tgBubble Bags E]None E10ther- ON-
hermometer Used: IR Gun:T904 Type of Ice: Wet Blue None [ASamples an Ice,cooling process has begun
emp Correction Factor: Add/Subtract 0 C
oneFantining
:orrected Cooler Tempi: .3. � C Biological Tissue is Frozen: Yes No.
amp should be above freezing to 6*C Comments:
hain of Custody Present: OYe: ONo ONIA I
Iohain of Custody Filled Out: Yes ONo UNIA 2.
hain of Custody Relinquished' Yes UNO ONIA 3.
ampler Name&Signature on COC: Yes ONo OWA 44
amples Arrived within Hold Time: OYes [IN. 13NIA 5.
hort Hold Time Analysis(-972hr): Dyes IAFb ON/A 6.
ush Turn Around Time Requested: Dyes No ONJA 7,
ufficlent Volume: OYes []No 13WA B.
orrect Containers Used: Yes 0No IINIA 9.
-Pace Containers Used: dYes ONP IINZA
ontainers Intact: 4Yes, ONo ONJA 10.
Itered volume received for Dissolved tests OYes ONo VNIA 11.
ample Labelsfnatch COC: ¢IYes CINo DNIA 12.
-includes dateltimeAD/Ahalysis Matrix., .14
containers needing preservation have been checked.
* ONIA 13.
PYii [IN,
containers needing presentation are found to be m 'Ve* ONo 11WA
mpliance with EPA recommendation.
.eptIORS:VOA, WHOM.TOC,O&G,WI-DRO(w Ier) DYes DNa Initial when completed
3miples checked for clechlorination: DYes ONo NIA 14.
3adspace in VOA Vials(>6mm): Dyes No LINIA 15.
ip Blank Present: DYes []No PNIA 16.
ip Blank Custody Seals Present Ores ClNo r NIA
ice Trip Blank Lot#(if purchased):
ilent Notification/Resolution: Field Data Required? Y N
Person Contacted: DateMme:
3ommental l4esolution:
CURF RoviewL V:A:n_ Date: 14Ut q I S RIF Review: IDate: 1 514
)te: Whenever there Is a discrepancy affecting North Carbine mpliance samples,a copy of this form will be sent to the North Cabins DEHNR
artification Office(he out of hold,incorrect preservative,out of temp,incorrect containers)
F-CHR-CS-003-rev.02 28Dec2010

=Regioncal
CEnvironmental, PC
February 8,2012
Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program Aquifer Protection Section
DENR-Division of Water Quality DENR-DWQ Asheville Regional Office
1636 Mail Service Center W90 US Highway 70
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 Swannanoa,NC 28778
Re: Second Post Injection Groundwater Monitoring Event(December 2011)
Enmark#251
3300 Asheville Highway
Hendersonville,Henderson County,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012
Injection Permit WI 0100102
Dear Mr.Rogers:
This letter report documents the results of the second post-injection groundwater monitoring event
completed at the above-referenced facility in accordance with the requirements of Injection Permit
WI 0100102 A map of the facility (Figure 1) indicating the locations of the seven existing
groundwater monitoring wells is attached. Injection of Regenesis ORC Advanced was performed at
the site on May 24 and 25,2011.
Field Activities
All seven groundwater monitoring wells(MW-1 through MW-6 and VMW-1 on Figure 1)at Enmark
#251 were sampled on December 30, 2011. Prior to sampling, the static depth to groundwater was
measured in each well using an electronic water level tape. The depths to groundwater were
measured from the top of each well casing, and are listed in Table 1. The water level tape was
decontaminated prior to each measurement to prevent cross-contamination of wells.
Each monitoring well was sampled in accordance with the procedures specified in the most recent
UST Section Guidelines for Sampling(December 2008). Each well was purged of a mimmum of three
well volumes of groundwater prior to sample collection using a disposable bailer. A new disposable
bailer with new cotton twine lanyard was used for purging and sampling each well to prevent cross-
contamination Field parameters of pH, conductivity, temperature, and dissolved oxygen were
measured during purging using calibrated field meters,and are included in Table 3.
Each groundwater sample was transferred directly from the bailer to the appropriate pre-preserved
sample containers provided by the laboratory. The samples were stored on ice and were hand-
delivered to Pace Analytical Services in Asheville, North Carolina Each groundwater sample was
submitted for laboratory analysis of benzene,ethylbenzene,toluene,and xylenes(BTEX)plus methyl
tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and isopropyl ether (IPE) by EPA Method 6200B, volatile petroleum
hydrocarbons (VPH) by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP)
176 Ardenlee Drive.Peachtree city,GA 30269 # Phone:[phone] # Internet www tecenviro corn

Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
Page 2
February 8,2012
Method,and total arsenic by EPA Method 200.7. A copy of the chain-of-custody record is included
in Attachment A.
Results
The subsections below present the results of the second post-injection monitoring event.
Groundwater Elevation Data
Groundwater elevations were calculated from the depths to water measured at the site on December
30, 2011, and are listed in Table 1. The current groundwater elevations are compared to historical
groundwater elevations in Table 2.
Figure 2 presents a groundwater elevation contour map constructed from the groundwater
elevations measured in December 2011. Figure 2 indicates a general groundwater flow direction to
- 1 the north, which is consistent with data collected during previous sampling events at the site. An
average horizontal groundwater gradient of approximately 0.05 ft/ft was calculated for the
uppermost aquifer from Figure 2. This horizontal groundwater gradient is consistent with previous
gradients measured at the site. A downward vertical gradient was observed in December 2011
between the uppermost aquifer and the underlying saprolite aquifer. The December 2011
groundwater elevation in MW-1 (uppermost aquifer) was 0.92 feet higher than the groundwater
elevation in adjacent VMW-1 (saprolite aquifer). A downward vertical gradient has been
consistently measured at the site in all previous monitoring events.
-' Groundwater Sampling Results
Results of the December 2011 groundwater analyses are summarized in Table 3, and are discussed
below. A copy of the laboratory analytical report is included in Attachment A.
Petroleum constituents were detected in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-4, and MW-5 in December
2011. The concentration of benzene in MW-4 was the only concentration detected at the site that
exceeded the NCAC 21, groundwater standards. The following bullets summarize the December
2011 analytical data for individual wells at the site:
• MW-1: MTBE (2.5 µg/L) and IPE (2.6 µg/L)were detected in MW-1. For the first time since
the January 2008 sampling event, no concentrations in this well exceeded the NCAC 21,
standards. Historical analytical results for MW-1 are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted
on Figure 3.
1
• MW-2: No constituents analyzed were detected in MW-2, and no petroleum constituents
have historically been detected in this well.
• MW-3: No constituents analyzed were detected in MW-3. No concentrations detected in
MW-3 have exceeded the NCAC 21, standards since the January 2008 sampling event.
Historical analytical results for MW-3 are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted on Figure 4.
• MW4: Benzene was the only constituent detected in MW4,at a concentration of 9.4 µg/L,
which exceeded the NCAC 2L standard of 1 µg/L for benzene. This well has had one
S
I

Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
Page 3
�I February8,2012
previous detection of benzene exceeding NCAC 21,standards,which was a concentration of
80.3 µg/L in January 2009. Historical analytical results for MW-4 are summarized in Table 4
and are plotted on Figure 5.
• MW-5: Toluene was detected in MW5 at a concentration of 1.9 µg/L,which was well below
the NCAC 21,standard of 600 µg/L for toluene. No petroleum constituents have previously
been detected in this well.
• MW-6: No constituents analyzed were detected in MW-6. MTBE has previously been
detected in this well at concentrations of up to 146 µg/L(January 2009). Historical analytical
results for MW-6 are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted on Figure 6.
• VMW-1: No constituents analyzed were detected in VMW-1. No petroleum constituents
have been detected in this well since the July 2006 sampling event. Historical analytical
results for VMW-1 are summarized in Table 4 and are plotted on Figure 7.
i
Greater care was taken to obtain low turbidity groundwater samples during the December 2011
_ event to reduce the potential for interference of turbidity on the arsenic analyses. As a result, no
concentrations of arsenic were detected in December 2011, which indicates that elevated arsenic
detected in October 2011 was likely related to sample turbidity.
Summary and Conclusions
TEC Environmental conducted the second post-injection groundwater monitoring event at Enmark
#251 on December 30,2011. Groundwater elevations measured during this sampling event indicate
a groundwater flow direction to the north, which is consistent with previous sampling events.
Petroleum constituents were detected in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-4. The concentration of
yi benzene in MW-4 exceeded North Carolina's NCAC 21,groundwater standard.
Detection of benzene in MW-4 has occurred only once at the site prior to December 2011 detection of
9.4 µg/L. Benzene was detected in MW-4 in January 2008 at a concentration of 80.3 µg/L.
Groundwater elevation contour maps over the period of May 2003 to December 2011 have
consistently shown MW-4 to be side gradient and to the east of the contaminant plume. However,it
is possible that recent precipitation events could have caused a temporary variation of groundwater
flow direction immediately prior to the sampling event, resulting in temporary contaminant
migration to the east. TEC Environmental proposes to add MW-4 to the third post-injection
sampling event,which by the approved groundwater monitoring plan would only include MW-1,
MW-3, and MW-6, to further assess benzene concentrations in MW-4. The third post-injection
sampling is scheduled for March 2012.
i
{

Aquifer Protection Section-UIC Program
Page 4
- February 8,2012
_ Please contact me at the address or telephone number on this letterhead, or by e-mail at
1' [e-mail],if you have any questions or need further information regarding this site.
Sincerely, ,`t``ttttpt�ualavua,Qy/fie'`
TEC Environmental,P.C. S '.s
t
Q EL
EL
$ 24363
David Traylor,P.E.
rC
Environmental Engineer
IIIIIII U?IIIet
Attachments
2 cc: Ms.Diane Eskenasy,-DENR Division of Waste Management,UST Section
Mr.Chris Fisher-XL Insurance
Mr.Brian Wymer-Kenan Advantage Group
Mr.Tom Dolan-Colonial Group,Inc.
1
l
�I
1
�1
i
_ 1
i
f

i
�I
l
, I
TABLES
i
I
I

_) --j -j J —J —j -j - - - J - J J —
Table 1
Well Construction Information and December 2011 Groundwater Elevations
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012/Injection Permit WI 0100102
Well Screened 12/30/11 Depth 12/30/11 Groundwater
Well Date Diameter Total Depth Interval Top of Casing Elevation to Water Elevation
Number Installed (inches) (feet BLS) (feet BLS) (feet,assumed datum) (feet) (feet,assumed datum)
MW-1 Nov-02 2 20 5-20 100.00 13.73 86.27
MW-2 Ma -03 2 18 8-18 102.64 9.90 92.74
MW-3 May-03 2 16 6-16 97.45 13.37 84.08
MW14 Jan-04 2 10 5-10 91.97 8.49 83.48
MW-5 Jan-04 2 18 3-18 97.84 11.82 86.02
MW-6 Jan-04 2 11 6-11 87.09 5.57 81.52
VMW-1 Ma -03 2 40 35-40 100.15 14.80 85.35
Notes: 1. BLS=below land surface
2. All monitoring wells are constructed of schedule 40 PVC and have 0.01-inch slotted screens.
3. MW-4 was originally installed to a depth of 7 feet in May 2003,and was deepened to a depth of 10 feet
in January 2004.
4. VMW-1 is a double-cased Type III monitoring well with 6-inch steel outer casing grouted in place to 30 feet.
5. All monitoring wells except MW-4 have flush-mount surface completions. MW-4 is an above-grade completion
with a 2.5-foot stickup.

- --J --J - _J =_ J J �- -- - J J A
Table 2
Historical Groundwater Elevations
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012/Injection Permit WI 0100102
Well Top of CasingMDTW
-02 _ 14-Jan-03 7-May-03 10-Sep-03 30-Jan-04 22-Apr-04 22-Jul-04
Number Elevation(ft) Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev DTW Elev. lev. DTW T Elev. DTWElev.
MW-1 100.00 85.52 14.99 85.01 11A8 88.52 14.46 85.54 14.68 85.32 14.38 85.62 15.20 84.80
MW-2 102.64 * * 8.74 93.90 9.43 93.21 10.12 92.52 9.91 92.73 10.13 92.51
MW-3 97.45 * 11.32 86.13 13.88 83.57 13.59 83.86 13.75 83.70 14.55 82.90
MW-4 91.97 5.68 86.29 DRY <82.73 8.96 83.01 8.99 82.98 9.71 82.26
MW-5 97.84 * * * * * 12.31 85.53 12.22 85.62 12.87 84.97
5.40 81.69 5.86 81.23 6.35 80.74
VMW-1 100.15 12.54 87.61 NM NM 15.15 85.00 15.22 84.93 15.86 84.29
Well Top of CasingM14.00
-04 5-Apr-05 2-Nov-05 20-Jul-06 8-Feb-07 15-Jan-08 25-Jul-08
Number Elevation(ft) Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev.
MW-1 100.00 85.41 13.47 86.53 15.42 84.58 14.80 85.20 14.68 85.32 14.78 85.22 16.31 83.69
MW-2 102.64 93.08 9.07 93.57 10.20 92.44 9.90 92.74 9.82 92.82 10.62 92.02 11.11 91.53
MW-3 _ 97.45 83.45 13.14 84.31 14.63 82.82 14.20 83.25 13.99 83.46 14.11 83.34 DRY <81.45
MW-4 91.97 82.90 8.50 83.47 9.59 82.38 9.57 82.40 9.11 82.86 9.05 82.92 10.53 81.44
MW-5 97.84 85.54 11.63 86.21 12.90 84.94 12.41 85.43 12.32 85.52 12.63 85.21 13.80 84.04
MW-6 87.09 5.86 81.23 5.57 81.52 6.29 80.80 6.21 80.88 5.04 82.05 5.86 81.23 7.46 79.63
VMW-1 100.15 15.25 84.90 14.64 85.51 15.88 84.27 1 15.53 84.62 15.31 84.84 15.56 84.59 16.71 83.44
Well Top of CasingNDE'ev.
9 31-Jul-09 15-Jan-11 30-Dec-11
Number Elevation(ft) DTW Elev. DTW Elev. DTW Elev.
MW-1 100.00 _ 4.5115.62 84.38 15.09 54.91 13.73 86.27
MW-2 102.64 1.23 10.65 91.99 10.40 92.24 9.90 92.74
MW-3 97.45 2.35 14.83 82.62 14.43 83.02 13.37 84.08
MW-4 91.97 2.50 9.80 82.17 9.37 82.60 8.49 83.48
MW-5 97.84 4.61 13.21 84.63 12.87 84.97 11.82 86.02
W--6F 87.09 6.37 80.72 6.48 80.61 6.25 80.84 5.57 81.52
VMW-1 100.15 16.07 84.08 F 16.13 1 84.02 1 15.78 1 84.37 1 14.80 1 85.35
Notes: 1. DTW=depth to water in feet
2. Elev.=groundwater elevation in feet,assumed datum
3. NM=Not Measured
4. *-Indicates that the well had not yet been installed as of the measurement date.

J _J _J j __J J -J __ _l -_J t __J __1 J
Table 3
December 2011 Groundwater Analytical Results
Enmark Station#251-Mountain Home,North Carolina
UST Incident No.28012/ Injection Permit WI 0100102
Constituent Units MW-1 I MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6 VMW-1 2L Standard GCL
Field Parameters
pH SU 6.15 5.80 5.49 5.76 4.99 5.31 6.41 - -
Conductivity AS 252 249 32 236 180 122 76 - -
Temperature °C 12.4 13.0 13.9 13.0 14.0 13.3 15.5 - -
Dissolved Oxygen mg/L 3.03 1.93 2.95 2.91 2.34 6.41 3.72 - -
Volatile Organic Compounds(EPA Method 602)
Benzene µg/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1 5,000
Toluene µg/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.9 <1.0 <1.0 600 260,000
Ethylbenzene µg/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 600 84,500
Total xylenes µg/L <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 <3.0 500 85,500
Isopropyl ether µ /L 2.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 70 70,000
Methyl tert-butyl ether µ /L 2.6 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 20 20,000
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (MADEP Method VPH)
C5-C8 Aliphatics µg/L <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 420 N/As
C9-C12 Aliphatics µ /L <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 4,200 N/A'
C9-C10 Aromatics µ /L <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 210 N/A'
Metals (EPA Method 200.7)
Arsenic µ /L <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 10 N/As
Notes: 1. All samples were collected on December 30,2011.
2. <-Indicates that the constituent was not detected. The number shown is the laboratory reporting limit.
3. 21,Standard refers to the groundwater standards and interim standards established by 15A NCAC 2L.0202.
4. GCL=Gross Contamination Levels as published in the most recent UST Section Guidelines for Corrective Action.
5. N/A=Not Applicable-no GCL is published for this constituent.
6. Bold values indicate concentrations that exceed the 21,standards.

m ae am � 9s �
z> n m 3rd$� c � 7E � � 6���'� � c u srk 9 b� Q7E 22 9
Z o a G m )
o
az � a ^ ^ aSaaa
nn N „ 88�b � om y o0
G r
d a
c i mGA L4 , ^ as aIr
s
� 6 Y
mv� vi
F'
�ZaZ ? u'S 5 ^„ a gi
Fzazg w ^ > ^ aaa �zgz � � z�� gz ^ aaaa
9 ;gaga C8 " g8bbb oaoae Hagg ., > obbbb
3 �
3
ato'>g> a >8 `° N ^ .+a = g> t3 > � oaooNaNa'000 a��
a^
P �
' (1
n wn n VZ " Z �'
> 8> N �8000a � a & i: a88 � aGbbbm s•. � �-
gz z ,23 z z
�aSa �^' NBua �a,gbbb ..aaa 8a888 » bbbbN ; x �
EL
�Z ^ze mna w ^ aao Nz z m> ^ S y�oaa zd
v> 8a ' o$ �8bb ' 8 bb � onn i
8 3 c
a
> 8> e '88° a goaab Ca8aCt o > 8ne > � bbba -
i
w8000 > 8 > � N>88 � a 'N- 'N'co `w^
1
2!z A A A nYS NAa z " zW $ � z A �i A A a A
$a$bba C8" a �$bbb X> 8> N � � a8ss '° �bbbb �
sz ^ A � � �oY � w ^ aaa azz " na
$z A n °On Y n S wz n n Z -
Yam ...A:+A ww4
e+ L
S> $o o a wol^ ' •N+$i�s o ' �ia o�$ N > $$ $ Nain in t" A
22z4aa $n ward wAaaa �zaaa � zaaawwcaaY
�Dri
>> zz zz I
of ai ' 3ob " uziy ' 39bb ' 9o�g V in ^'bbh' .'4'
1
szcaa wG s aa � zGaa $ znnnN Qaaa
8$ $ ak^ bbb
Y
r
1
t_

C
j
�1
i
i
I
i
FIGURES
I
i
f
i

J -J .-J -j __J -J __j J -_i _- -j I --1 - -1 --- ' I --- ' - -' _- --' -- 'j -j ----
LEGEND
0 Shallow Monitoring Well Location
SCALE: 0 Vertical Extent Monitoring Well Location
1 Inch=40 feet
4 NCO
�9
PmPoM�ine � �
_ �A
MW-0 0 Fenm �Q
Restrooms
��
Wootletl Area &office
.,p VenE
VO MW-e �y
e
0 MWa MW-1
0 2KK-i
\ VMWA 0 o Sh Rog.
Ga ollne
C P em.
s ;n Fueling Canopy
• u Plus
\ 0 MW-5
0 MW 2 Grass
\ Grass
ASHEVILLE HWY. (US 25)
FIGURE 1 I `�
SITE MAP
Enmark#251 - Mountain Home, NC Environmental,..

J _-- i --j -j -- J i ____
LEGEND
0 Uppermost Aquifer Monitoring Well Location
0 Saprolite Aquifer Monitoring Well Location
SCALE:
1 Inch=40 feet 8527 Groundwater Elevation In Uppermost Aquifer on 12/30/11
(in feet,assumed datum) ��
(85.35) Groundwater Elevation in Saprolite Aquifer on 12/30/11 O0,
(in feet,assumed datum) S
Q
—go— Groundwater Elevation Contour in the Uppermost Aquifer �O
_ ProPartY Une 'l;
Few �Q
/ 0� Restrooms MWA MW-4 &Office
1.52 a N 83AS Wooded � VBntling
0 �
/ 0y 0 Be 2K K-^
Be
MW-3
a4.08 0� 0 0 15 Rog.
\ VMW-1 ®Ga allro
(b5.
° " P
� „� / Fueling Canopy
0 Bw
MWS / �h
86.02 Gress
0 MW2
92.74
\ Grass
ASHEVILLE HWY. (US 25)
FIGURE 2 EC
DECEMBER 2011 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP •
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home, NC Environmental,..

Figure 3
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in MW-1
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home,NC
4,000
0 Benzene
---C]--MTBE
a C5-C8 Aliphatics
3,500 -----88.52--- - _ - - --- - - - . ------------------------------------ — .g— Groundwater elevation
9
It
II
II
3,000 1
- -------- - - - ---------------------- - -----
I I
1 1 86.53
I 2 pp 86.27
2,500 ----I-- - __F________________/'\\_ . _ ____________-__ _ - . _ _ ________�0__
t � \
? 85.521 84.54 85.62 /
/
a+ I 2/\ 85.3 Q
1 85.20 85.32 85.22
s Q
`0 86P1 �e \ d 0- o- ---- 84.91//
--------------------------------
u � i \ 84.51 84.38 —
1.500 )13.6ry/
___-
1,000 ------ _
500 - --- - _ _ _ _ - -- --- - .
0
Sep-02 Mar-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug-05 Mar-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Feb-09 Aug-09 Fen-10 Aug-10 Feb-11 Aug-11 Feb-12

Figure 4
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in MW-3
Enmark 9251-Mountain Home,NC
Goo
ter—MTBE
—i C5-C8 Aliphatics
— 6— Groundwater elevation
500 . . ----- _ - ----------------
Q
1
1
1
1
84.31
---------------------------
1 83. 6 /4 84.08
\ .0
8
S 57
B10 3. 0 83 4/5// \\ 83.46 83.34
0 \ 83.25 �6 /
0 9 \ /.0—
——@ 83.02//
300 --_ _ ______________ _ _ ____ __ 8�v C_____________________\_ ______�,r(_____________
8262
_
C \
� 82.35
0 \41,45,
-------V--
100 --- - - - - -----------------
0
Sep-02 Mar-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug-05 Mar-O6 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Feb-09 Aug-09 Feb-10 Aug-10 Feb-11 Aug-11 Feb-12

Figure 5
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs.Time in MWrt
Enmark#251-Mountain Norm,NC
300
—0 Benzene
MTBE
6 C5-C8 Aliphatics
—6— Groundwater elevation
250 -------- ——------ ------
- q
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 83.47 83.48
0 1 83.082.98 82.90// \� 82.86 82.92
c 150 _________Oa'_�p�____------ `\__________________________ 82.5 ----------82.6/ __ _ _____
-- /
9
.4y
100
50 --- - ----- _ _ _ -- - - -------- - - _ -- - --_--------- . _ ___ _ __________________
0
Sep-02 Mar-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug-05 Mar-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Feb-09 Aug-09 Feb-10 Aug-10 Feb-11 Aug-11 Feb-12

Figure 6
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in MW-6
Enmark N251-Mountain Nome,NC
160 — --—
3 MTBE
140 --- — e— Groundwater elevation --------------------- - - ---------- -- -----------------------------------
120 -- --------------- -- - - ------------------
82.05
81.69 \
81.52 81.52
Q fl1.23 81.23��4 \ \81.23
100 _________________$____
---------------- --- -----------
----------- ------
J X0 7 \80.80 0.8 80.72 80.84�01.
i
��
c � /
o /
80 - - ---------- ---- - - ----------------------
V
d
U
C
O
U
40 - __ . ___ _ ----------------------------- - _ __-_____--___-
20 _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _
0
Sep-02 Mar-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug-05 Mar-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Fab-09 Aug-09 Feb-10 Aug-10 Feb•11 Aug-11 Feb-12

Figure 7
Groundwater Concentrations and Elevations vs. Time in VMW-1
Enmark#251 -Mountain Home,NC
('00
—0--MTBE
A C5-C8 Aliphatics
— e— Groundwater elevation
sou
ni
4
\
400 --- -------V------ — --- -------
- - - --- - - - ------- - ------------------------
\
J \
\ R 85.35
c p
p `�.094.93 84,9(
/
B4.59
84.37//
=O 6 \\ 84.08 84.02 —�d
3.44 /
200 d
_ _ _ _ _____________________ _ ____ _ _ . _ . _ _ ______________________---------________________
100 __ _________ _ _ _ _ _ _ -----
0
Sep-02 Mar-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Aug-04 Mar-05 Aug-05 Mar-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Aug-07 Feb-08 Aug-08 Feb-09 Aug-09 Feb-10 Aug-10 Feb-11 Aug-11 Feb-12

m Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
_ al 'ical 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAn • Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
ww,epeicla8smm
[phone] [phone] [phone]
1
January 17, 2012
Mr. David Traylor
TEC Environmental
176 Ardenlee Dr.
Atlanta, GA 30369
RE: Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
-_ Dear Mr. Traylor:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on December 30, 2011.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Tom Williams
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
P
I �fo�r REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 1 of 16
-" This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
{
t eo irto

® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
Jejnqj�iq 205 East Meadow Road-SuiteA 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
imm
[phone] [phone] [phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
_ Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
Charlotte Certification IDs
9800 Kincey Ave.Ste 100,Huntersville,NC 28078 Connecticut Certification M PH-0104
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification M 37706 Florida/NELAP Certification M E87627
North Carolina Field Services Certification M 5342 Kentucky UST Certification#:84
North Carolina Wastewater Certification#:12 Louisiana DHH Drinking Water#LA 100031
South Carolina Certification M 99006001 West Virginia Certification#:357
South Carolina Drinking Water Cart.#:99006003 Virginla/VELAP Certification M 460144
Virginia Drinking Water Certification M 00213
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Dr.,Asheville,NC 28804 South Carolina Certification M 99030001
Florida/NELAP Certification M E87648 Virginia Certification M 00072
Massachusetts Certification M M-NC030 West Virginia Certification M 356
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification M 37712 Virgina/VELAP Certification#:460147
North Carolina Wastewater Certification M 40
i
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 2 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

-� ® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceAnalytical 205 East Meadow Road-Suite A 2226 Riverside Dr. 980010ncey Ave. Suite 100
_ wxx,p lytj mm Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
-- Analytes
Lab ID Sample ID Method Analysts Reported Laboratory
92109426001 MW-1 MADEPVPH AW 5 PASI-C
EPA 200.7 JMW 1 PASI-A
SM 6200B MCK 17 PASI-C
_ 92109426002 MW-2 MADEPVPH AW 5 PASI-C
EPA200.7 JMW 1 PASI-A
SM 6200B MCK 17 PASI-C
921094260D3 MW-3 MADEPVPH AW 5 PASI-C
EPA200.7 JMW 1 PASI-A
SM 6200B MCK 17 PASI-C
92109426004 MW-4 MADEPVPH AW 5 PASI-C
EPA 200.7 JMW 1 PASI-A
SM 6200E MCK 17 PASI-C
92109426005 MW-5 MADEPVPH AW 5 PASI-C
EPA200.7 JMW 1 PASI-A
SM 6200B MCK 17 PASI-C
92109426006 MW-6 MADEPVPH AW 5 PASI-C
EPA 200.7 JMW 1 PASI-A
SM 6200E MCK 17 PASI-C
- 92109426007 VMW-1 MADEPVPH AW 5 PASI-C
EPA200.7 JMW 1 PASI-A
SM 6200B TLS 17 PASI-C
I
I
1
I
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 3 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
_L without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
ace_Anal deal 205 East Meadow Road-Suite A 2225 Rivewide 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
- �' Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
www.jracela6scom
[phone] [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
- Sample: MWA Lab ID: 92109426001 Collected: 12130/11 09:45 Received: 12/30/11 15:30 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
_ Aliphatic(CO5-008) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/1011204:31 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) NO ug/L 50.0 1 0111011204:31 N2
Aromatic(C09-C1 0) NO ug/L 50.0 1 01/1011204:31 N2
Surrogates
25-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 92 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 04:31
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 113 % 70-130 1 01/10/1204:31
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Arsenic ND ug/L 6.0 1 01/04/12 10:20 01/06/12 15:18 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01106/12 19:13 7143-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:13 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1219:13 100414
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/0611219:13 179601-23-1
o-Xylene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1219:13 9547-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:13 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:13 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:13 10646-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:13 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether 2.5 ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:13 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:13 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 2.6 ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611219:13 1634-044
Naphthalene NO ug/L 2.0 1 01/0611219:13 91-20-3
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 103 % 70-130 1 0110611219:13 460-004
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 103 % 70-130 1 01106/1219:13 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 104 % 70-130 1 01106/1219:13 17060-07-0
^li Toluene-dB(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/06/12 19:13 2037-26-5
I
1
Date:01/17/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 4 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

i
I
-- a Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceAnalytical 205 East Meadow Road-Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
•' Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Hunlersville,NC 28078
I wmupacelabscom
` [phone] [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
Sample: MW-2 Lab ID: 92109426002 Collected: 12130/1111:30 Received: 12130/1115:30 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(CO5-CO8) ND ug/L 50.0 1 0111011204:55 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 50.0 1 0111011204:55 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/10/12 04:55 N2
Surrogates
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 84 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 04:55
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 105 % 70-130 1 01/10/1204:55
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
-� Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01104/1210:20 0110611215:34 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:38 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1219:38 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:38 100414
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/06/1219:38 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06112 19:38 95-47-6
1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06112 19:38 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611219:38 541-73-1
-- 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:38 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1219:38 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:38 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:38 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 19:38 1634-044
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/0611219:38 91-20-3
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 95 % 70-130 1 01/06/1219:38 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 107 % 70-130 1 0110611219:38 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 108 % 70-130 1 01/06/12 19:38 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/06/1219:38 2037-26-5
i
1
1
Date:01/17/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 5 of 16
} This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

-- - e Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
al 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kince
ace n! !Cy Ave. Suite 100
," Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
rimriele6smin
[phone] [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
_ Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
- - Sample: MW-3 Lab ID: 92109426003 Collected: 12/30/11 10:20 Received: 12/30/11 15:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
_ Aliphatic(C05-008) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/11/1215:01 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/11/12 15:01 N2
Aromatic(C09-C1 0) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/1111215:01 N2
Surrogates
_ 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 75 % 70-130 1 01/11/12 15:01
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 96 % 70-130 1 01111/12 15:01
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
- Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/04/12 10:20 01/06/12 15:37 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:02 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611220:02 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611220:02 100-41-4
- - m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 0110611220:02 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 0110611220:02 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:02 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:02 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 20:02 10646-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1220:02 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 20:02 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 0110611220:02 98-82-8
Methyl-lert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/12 20:02 1634-04-4
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/0611220:02 91-20-3
Surrogates
4-Bromoflucrobenzene(S) 98 % 70-130 1 01106/1220:02 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 101 % 70-130 1 01106/1220:02 1868-53-7
_ 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 105 % 70-130 1 01106/1220:02 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 102 % 70-130 1 01/06/1220:02 2037-26-5
Date:01/17/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 6 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

_ e �f /�gg e Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceAnal ICGI 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
-h - •' Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
' wrrvpaiela6sotm
[phone] [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
Sample: MW4 Lab ID: 92109426004 Collected: 12/30/11 12:50 Received: 12/30/11 15:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(C05-008) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/10/1205:43 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/10112 05:43 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/10/12 05:43 N2
Surrogates
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 80 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 05:43
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 05:43
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01/04/12 10:20 01/06/12 15:40 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene 9.4 ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611220:26 7143-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1220:26 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 0110611220:26 100414
- m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/06/1220:26 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1220:26 9547-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 20:26 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:26 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 0110611220:26 10646-7
_ Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611220:26 108-90-7
1 Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611220:26 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:26 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 20:26 1634-044
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 0110611220:26 91-20-3
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 98 % 70-130 1 01/0611220:26 460-004
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 104 % 70-130 1 01/06/1220:26 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 106 % 70-130 1 01/06/1220:26 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 102 % 70-130 1 01/06/1220:26 2037-26-5
�I
I
1
I
Date:01/17/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 7 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
wilhout the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

_ ® Pace Analytical services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
Ace 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
www.pscela6xwm Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] (828)254a176 [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
-- Sample: MW-5 Lab ID: 92109426005 Collected: 12I30111 10:55 Received: 12/30/11 15:30 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(C05-CO8) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/10/12 06:08 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/10/1206:08 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 50.0 1 0111011206:08 N2
Surrogates
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 73 % 70-130 1 01/10/1206:08
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 90 % 70-130 1 01/10/1206:08
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
- Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01104/1210:20 01106/1215:43 7440-38-2
602 Volatlles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611220:50 71-43-2
Toluene 1.9 ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:50 108-86-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1220:50 100-41-4
-� m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/06/1220:50 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:50 95-47-6
12-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:50 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611220:50 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1220:50 106-46-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:50 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 20:50 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/1220:50 98-82-8
-� Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611220:50 1634-044
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/06/12 20:50 91-20-3
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 98 % 70-130 1 01106/1220:50 460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 102 % 70-130 1 01106/1220:50 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 106 % 70-130 1 01106/1220:50 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/06/1220:50 2037-26-5
,
Date:01/17/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 8 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
(�Ia'ce!nq�ytiCal 205 East Meadow Road-SuiteA 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800KinceyAve. Suite 100
xpeselebsmm Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
_ Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
Sample: MW-6 Lab ID: 92109426006 Collected: 12/30/11 13:25 Received: 12/30/11 15:30 Matrix:Water
-- Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
i
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(C05-CO8) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/1011206:32 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 50.0 1 0111011206:32 N2
Ammalic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01110/1206:32 N2
Surrogates
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 79 % 70-130 1 01/10/1206:32
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 99 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 06:32
-- 200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
- Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01104/1210:20 01/06/1215:46 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 21:14 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1221:14 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 0110611221:14 10041-4
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01106/1221:14 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01106/1221:14 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 21:14 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 21:14 541-73-1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 21:14 10646-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 21:14 108-90-7
Diisopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 21:14 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/06/12 21:14 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/0611221:14 1634-044
Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/0611221:14 91-20-3
Surrogates
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) 97 % 70-130 1 01/0611221:14 460-004
Dibromofluoromethane(S) 107 % 70-130 1 01/0611221:14 1868-53-7
_ 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 108 % 70-130 1 Ot/06/1221:14 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 103 % 70-130 1 0110611221:14 2037-26-5
Date:01/1 712 01 2 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 9 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..
I

r+ee qq p �r++ ++® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
:C�Ue Ina jj a 205 East Meadow Road-Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
�,��ays� Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] (828)254a176 [phone]
^; ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
Sample: VMW-1 Lab ID: 92109426007 Collected: 12/30/1114:20 Received: 12/3011115:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua[
VPH NC Water Analytical Method:MADEP VPH
Aliphatic(C05-008) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/10M206:56 •N2 --
Aliphalic(C09-C12) ND ug/L 50.0 1 01/1011206:56 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ND ug/L 50.0 1 0111011206:56 N2
Surrogates
_ 2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) 81 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 06:56
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 06:56
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA200.7 Preparation Method:EPA200.7
-� Arsenic ND ug/L 5.0 1 01104112 10:20 01/06/12 15:49 7440-38-2
602 Volatiles by Method 6200 Analytical Method:SM 6200B
Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/10/12 22:09 71-43-2
Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/1011222:09 108-88-3
Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/1011222:09 100-41-4
m&p-Xylene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/10/12 22:09 179601-23-1
o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 1 0111011222:09 95-47-6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/1011222:09 95-50-1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/10/12 22:09 541-73-1
-- 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/10/12 22:09 10646-7
Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/10/12 22:09 108-90-7
�I D[isopropyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/10/12 22:09 108-20-3
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/10/12 22:09 98-82-8
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ND ug/L 1.0 1 01/10/12 22:09 1634.04-4
_ Naphthalene ND ug/L 2.0 1 01/1011222:09 91-20-3
Surrogates
4-BromoBuorobenzene(S) 100 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 22:09 460-004
Dibromolluoromethane(S) 88 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 22:09 1868-53-7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) 95 % 70-130 1 01/10/12 22:09 17060-07-0
Toluene-d8(S) 105 % 70-130 1 01/1011222:09 2037-26-5
t
Date:01117/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 10 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

t - ® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,lno.
- •,;aceAnalytical 205 East Meadow Road-SuiteA 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
ww4aceloscon Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
QC Batch: GCV15666 Analysis Method: MADEP VPH
QC Balch Method: MADEP VPH Analysis Description: VPH NO Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426001,92109426002,92109426004,92109426005,92109426006,92109426007
METHOD BLANK: 708089 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426001,92109426002,92109426004,92109426005,92109426006,92109426007
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Aliphatic(C05-008) ug/L ND 50.0 01/10/12 04:07 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ug/L NO 50.0 01/10/12 04:07 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ug/L NO 50.0 01/10/12 04:07 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) % 101 70-130 0111011204:07
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) % 82 70-130 01/10/12 04:07
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE&LCSD: 708090 708091
-� Spike LCS LCSD LCS LCSD %Rao Max
Parameter Units Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qualifiers
Aliphatic(C05-008) ug/L 300 264 254 88 85 70-130 4 25 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ug/L 300 287 281 96 94 30-130 2 25 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ug/L 100 103 100 103 100 70-130 3 25 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) % 102 100 70-130
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) % 103 100 70-130
I
i
I
1
Date:01/17/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 11 of 16
I
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

- 9 na O ® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
CBA� j!f�Cal 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
wwwpei+elzAscam Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
QC Batch: GCV/5667 Analysis Method: MADEP VPH
QC Batch Method: MADEP VPH Analysis Description: VPH NC Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426003
METHOD BLANK: 708844 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426003
Blank Reporting
-- Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Aliphatic(C05-008) ug/L NO 50.0 01111/1213:00 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ug/L NO 50.0 01/11/1213:00 N2
Aromatic(C09-C10) ug/L NO 50.0 01/11/1213:00 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) % 97 70-130 01/11/12 13:00
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) % 77 70-130 01/11/12 13:00
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE&LCSD: 708845 708846
Spike LCS LCSD LIDS LCSD %Rao Max
Parameter Units Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rao Limits RPD RPD Qualifiers
Aliphatic(C05-CO8) ug/L 300 284 274 95 91 70-130 4 25 N2
Aliphatic(C09-C12) ug/L 300 358 351 119 117 30-130 2 25 N2
Aromatic(1309-C10) ugfL 100 110 105 110 105 70-130 5 25 N2
2,5-Dibromotoluene(FID)(S) % 103 100 70-130
2,5-Dibromotoluene(PID)(S) % 103 101 70-130
1
I
�I
I
-1
i
_I
_i Date:01/17/201205:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 12 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

_ q ® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
- c7GEA!]c7( ICB� 205 East Meadow Road-Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
wxwpacela6scom Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
QC Batch: MPRP19679 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
i
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426001,92109426002,92109426003,92109426004,92109426005,92109426006,92109426007
METHOD BLANK: 706328 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426001,92109426002,92109426003,92109426004,92109426005,92109426006,92109426007
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L NO 5.0 01/05/1221:56
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 706329
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L 500 468 94 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 706330
92109310003 Spike MS MS %Rec
-, Parameter Units Result Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L 3.6.1 500 471 94 70-130
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE: 706332
92109406001 Spike MS MS %Rec
Parameter Units Result Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L ND 500 576 114 70-130
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 706331
92109310004 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L 5.9 5.8 1
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 706333
92109426001 Dup
-� Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Arsenic ug/L NO NO
�I
I
Date:01/17/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 13 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

- - g �1p n ® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
♦ 'aceAna�, Ical 205 East Meadow Road-Suite A 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite too
• Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
- wwwpacelabscom
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
QC Batch: MSW17850 Analysis Method: SM 6200B
QC Batch Method: SM 6200B Analysis Description: 602 by 6200E
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426001,92109426002,92109426003,92109426004,92109426005,92109426006
METHOD BLANK: 707481 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426001,92109426002,92109426003,92109426004,92109426005,92109426006
Blank Reporting
-- Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
�. 1,2-Dichlombenzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
Benzene ug/L NO 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
—� Chlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 01/06112 12:20
Diisopropyl ether ug/L NO 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
Ethylbenzene ug/L NO 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ug/L NO 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
-; m&p-Xyiene ug/L NO 2.0 01/06/12 12:20
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L ND 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
—I Naphthalene ug/L ND 2.0 01106/1212:20
o-Xylene ug/L ND 1.0 01106/1212:20
Toluene ug/L _ NO 1.0 01/06/12 12:20
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) % 107 70-130 01/06112 12:20
- 4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 95 70-130 01/06112 12:20 '
Dibromofluoromethane(S) % 107 70-130 01/06/12 12:20
Toluene-d8(S) % 103 70-130 01106/12 12:20
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 707482
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug1L 50 48.7 97 60-140
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 51.4 103 60-140
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 48.3 97 60-140
- Benzene ug/L 50 50.4 101 60-140
Chlorobenzene ug/L 50 52.4 105 60-140
1 Diisopropyl ether ug/L 50 41.8 84 60-140
Ethylbenzene ug/L 50 52.2 104 60-140
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ug/L 50 55.3 111 60-140
_ m&p-Xylene ug/L 100 106 106 60-140
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 50 43.3 87 60-140
Naphthalene ug/L 50 57.8 116 60-140
- o-Xylene ug/L 50 53.4 107 60-140
.� Toluene ug/L 50 51.9 104 60-140
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4(S) % 92 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 105 70-130
Dibromofluoromethane(S) % 95 70-130
Toluene-dB(S) % 100 70-130
C
I
I
Date:01/17/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 14 of 16
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
_ without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
-- aceAnaly ical 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
QC Batch: MSW17857 Analysis Method: SM 6200B
QC Batch Method: SM 6200B Analysis Description: 602 by 6200B
~I Associated Lab Samples: 92109426007
METHOD BLANK: 707801 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92109426007
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 01/10112 14:12
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 01/10/12 14:12
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO 1.0 01/10/12 14:12
Benzene ug/L NO 1.0 01110/12 14:12
-� Chlorobenzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/10/12 14:12
Diisopropyl ether ug/L NO 1.0 01/10/12 14:12
Ethylbenzene ug/L ND 1.0 01/10/12 14:12
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ug/L NO 1.0 01/10/12 14:12
m&p-Xylene ug/L NO 2.0 01/10/12 14:12
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L NO 1.0 01/10112 14:12
Naphthalene ug/L NO 2.0 01/10/12 14:12
c-Xylene ug/L ND 1.0 01/10/12 14:12
Toluene ug/L ND 1.0 0111011214:12
1,2-D)ohloroethane-d4(S) % 91 70-130 01/10/12 14:12
-- 4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 101 70-130 01/10/12 14:12
Dibromofluoromethane(S) % 84 70-130 01/10/12 14:12
Toluene-d8(S) % 108 70-130 01/10112 14:12
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 707802
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 47.5 95 60-140
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 47.2 94 60-140
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 50 46.1 92 60-140
Benzene ug/L 50 49.0 98 60-140
Chlorobenzene ug/L 50 48.1 96 60-140
�l Diisopropyl ether ug/L 50 46.0 92 60-140
Ethylbenzene ug/L 50 51.0 102 60-140
Isopropylbenzene(Cumene) ug/L 50 55.1 110 60-140
m&p-Xylene ug/L 100 109 109 60-140
i Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 50 43.0 86 60-140
Naphthalene ug/L 50 54.7 109 60-140
o-Xylene ug/L 50 55.3 111 60-140
Toluene ug(L 50 52.7 105 60-140
1,2-Dichloroethaned4(S) % 87 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene(S) % 104 70-130
Dibromofluoromethane(S) % 84 70-130
Toluene-d8(S) % 108 70-130
I'
Date:01/1712012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 15 of 16
This report shall not he reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceAnalytical 205 East Meadow Road-Suite 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
wwNpeEelabscom Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
QUALIFIERS
Project: Enmark#251
Pace Project No.: 92109426
DEFINITIONS
OF-Dilution Factor,if reported,represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation,dilution of
the sample aliquot,or moisture content.
NO-Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J-Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
�I. MDL-Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S-Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(8270 listed analyte)decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines,unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate%recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D)-Laboratory Control Sample(Duplicate)
MS(D)-Matrix Spike(Duplicate)
DUP-Sample Duplicate
RPD-Relative Percent Difference
NC-Not Calculable.
SG-Silica Gel-Clean-Up
U-Indicates the compound was analyzed for,but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether,Styrene,and Vinyl chloride.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited.Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
LABORATORIES
PASI-A Pace Analytical Services-Asheville
j PASI-C Pace Analytical Services-Charlotte
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
N2 The lab does not hold TNI accreditation for this parameter.
7
I
i
I
Date:01117/2012 05:56 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 16 of 16
I
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc..

J ,---J ,_—I ---) � ' ---' J I— —___J — - I I —J
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY I Analytical Request Document
The Chain-of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT.All relevant fields must be completed aocurstely.
aceAnalXical'
r .Pacelabs.com
Page: I' of I
Section A Section B Section C
Required Client Information: Required Project Information: Invoice Infartnadon: 1309132
C y. Repon To: 10� Attention:
c Envr (-any6V-1-al Q f �` Company Name: REGULATORY AGENCY
TVs?;
reay: covrrp:
7 IP ode r ry V t
Address: (" NPDES r GROUNDWATER r DRINKING WATER
Email
Email To: 1 ,y - Purchase Order No.: Porn Moto �(' UST (- RCRA (- OTHER
Ci �Q lO r�. ecr-Av, Reference:
Phan � Fax: Project Name: Pam Prgad Site Location
�'734- Y&7 �S Marege N L
Requested Due Dale/TA Proiad Number. Pecs Prome N: STATE:
4!
Requested Analysis Fllttired(YIN)
a
Section Matrix Codes I pl
Preservatives 9
Roquh*dClknt Informagon MATRIX I CODE a COLLECTED
Ddnklrg Water DW t4 p Lq
Water WT (S OOMP09mi COMPOSITE U o• Z
We
Product starWater W W 9 START ENMW w
SoiPSogd SL id a v� ~
SAMPLE ID oil OL , m H.
WP
(A-Z.0-91.-) Aires AR p d s U
Sample IDs MUST BE UNIQUE Tmsue TS 8 U - c v
Other OT O
x O d V w
TDATETIME DATE TIME at _ _ = Z Z S .� Q Pace elect NOJ Lab I.D.
t W - 1 C+ i2 0 -7 1 6 X
2 W - 2 113d -f 1 �
s w - 3 O:xC -T Y'
4 W - Le J�So i
s Y✓ - S ie 1
B W _ 6 13 'I 1 (fl
vd —
B
s
10
tt
121
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELINQUISHED BY(AFFILIATION DATE THE I I #AC 0 IAFFILIATON TE TIME SAMPLE CONDITIONS
I s
SAMPLER NAME AND SIGNATURE WiD
ORIGINAL PRINT Name of SAMPLER:SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: DATE Signe(MMIDDrYY):
'Important NMe:By signing Nis bIm youareeaepgng Foes.NET 30 day pay ntteme and agrcomg to lou,charass of 1.5%per monm foram,Invokes mtpa d W thn 30 dot's. F-ALL-Q-020rev.07,10-May-2007