250039_Inspection 2021_20210722

Facility Nunther
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
1'ype of Visit: • ['nnrplianct: inspection 0 Operation Rev icw ❑ Structure h:vaIuaiiun 0 'Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit; • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Li-�2�2
Arrival Time;
Departure Time:
4
CountyRegion: R 0
Farm Name: 'Nr4113`0\ 5IeI()Ib5 k L..(_• Owner Email:
Owner Name: O V -Iva d Lt Phone:
Mailing Address: S 5 S Jc . ei i I N Q✓ ►'l
Physical Address: ll�
Facility Contact: c5C ▪ r cW� yl A ckili Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ▪ 1,--I— jy rkdel L(
Back-up Operator:
I.ocatirm of Farm:
l.alitutic:
Integrator:
r,
Sryti,A-�i;•Ll
Certification Number: S 4711 —1-7 (
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pup. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
'Wean to Feeder
FLcdcrto Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
!Other
Design Current Design Current
1.,3tirr
Rnu-[ ::ter
Design Current
Dr, Puuttry Capacity I'op.
I . aye rs
Ntin-Layers
Pullets
'Turkeys
Turkey Pauli,
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
[Inv Co
Nor, hairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
lied13rood ('ow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWl3)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? ( If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential advcrsc impacts to the waters
of -the State othcr than from a discharge?
❑ Yes LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
▪ yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
El Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yeti 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes li.C1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ +I ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of J 2/4/2015 Continued

lteilit} Number! 5 - 31
'Date of Inspection: ]-aid-'.2 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity {structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall} less than adequate?
a. II -yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 1
identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3(4
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ['No 0 N.\ ❑ NE
(i.c., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc,)
(6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes n No ❑ N;1 n NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify i)W R
7. Do any of the structures nccd maintenance or improvement? ❑ Ycs [i] No Q NA 0 NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Ycs "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry slacks. andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part unite waste management system other Than the waste structures require ElYes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or impravemcnr?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that nccd ❑ Yes 1"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
l I . Is there evidence of incorrect land application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Ycs E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ I Leavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc) -
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Arca
12. Crop Typc(s): ?i r ,5 G
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP'? ❑Yes "No ❑ NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site nccd improvernenl' ❑Ycs [3/No El NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure andior operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Ycs lENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres detenninatiori?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes/No ❑ NA El NE
18. Is there a lack ot'properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Ycs 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Domments
19, Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Ycs [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe CAWMI'readily available? ifyes,check ❑ Ycs No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Dods record keeping need improvement'? If yes. check the appropriate box below- [] Ycs [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
0 Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Sun•eti
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ til..
23. if selected. did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Ycs [ 1No ❑ NA 1-1 \I
Page 2 of 3 2/W2Uf5 Continued

Facilit4 Number; s e '
Illate of Inspection;1 --a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25- ]s the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? ]Fyes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of tirst survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Ycs %[� o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus Toss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Ycs 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andior document ❑ Ycs [7rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility post an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Ycs 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
]f yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (Le., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tilt drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33- Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discus.~ review/inspection with an on -site representative? [] Yes D' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #l; Explain any YES answers and/nr any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of faritity to better explain situations {use additional pages as necessary).
eu c 251
u.s -'. k i-11
i1n -idli
LT2_ - u .o'
a- s--21
ca:'15 i e at) r.
51
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
.SVA\..tx-
aszl
Phone; —141 —out
Date: 1-)a
Paige 3 of 3 2/412015