Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0068365_Staff Report_19940210NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET NC0068365 Pilot Mountain WTP NPDES Permit: Document Type: Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Engineering Alternatives (EAA) Staff Report Instream Assessment (67b) Speculative Limits Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: February 10, 1994 This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore any content on the resrerse side cc: Permits and Engineering Technical Support Branch County Health Dept. Central Files WSRO SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X If Yes, SOC No. To: Permits and Engineering Unit Water Quality Section Attention: (Susan Wilson) Date: February 10, 1994 1 o r�S NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION County Surry Permit No. NC0068365 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION, 1. Facility and Address: Pilot Mountain Water Treatment Plant P.O. Drawer AA Pilot Mountain, NC 27041 2. Date of Investigation: February 8, 1994 3. Report Prepared by: Lee G. Spencer 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Terry Timmons (910)368-4592 5. Directions to Site: From WSRO, take US 52 North to Pilot Mtn. exit. Turn right and go to first traffic light and turn left. Proceed 1.5 miles to Water Filtration Plant on your right just before intersection with U.S. 52. 6. Discharge Points(s), List for all discharge points: Latitude: 36°23'57" Longitude: 80°29'18" U.S.G.S. Quad No. B17-NW U.S.G.S. Quad Name Pilot Mountain 7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application ? X Yes No If No, explain: 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Gently rolling terrain. Settling lagoon could be subject to flooding. 9. Location of nearest dwelling: One dwelling -1000' from Water Plant. 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Toms Creek a. Classification: C b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-07-03 c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Stream flows through very rural, agricultural areas on its way toward the Ararat River. Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: N/A (Ultimate Design Capacity) b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste Water Treatment facility? No flow limit in permit. c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)? It is estimated by the ORC that between 35,000 gal. and 50,000 gal. are discharged to the receiving stream every 2 - 3 days, from the settling lagoon. d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years: None. e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Sandfilter backwash water is drained to the 1/4 acre lagoon and allowed to settle. Influent enters on one end of the lagoon and exits on the other end via an outlet structure with sluice valved pipes at three different levels. f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A g• Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Sandfilter backwash water has been treated with chlorine and aluminum sulfate (alum). h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N\A 2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: The lagoon is drained and cleaned approximately one time per year. Alum type sludge is removed and spread onto a level field which is adjacent to the plant, in order for it to dry out so it can be hauled. It is then taken to the Surry County landfill. NPDES Permit Staff Report Version 10/92 Page 2 3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Class I 4. SIC Code(s): 4941 Primary 21 Secondary Main Treatment Unit Code: 5 0 0 1 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? 2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None 3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: None 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated. Spray Irrigation:. Impractical Connection to Regional Sewer System: Impractical Subsurface: N/A Other disposal options: Supernatant from lagoon used to be recycled back through the Water Plant. Now, due to concerns over the possible formation of THMs, this practice has been discontinued. 5. Other Special Items: PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS This office has no objection to the reissuance of this permit. The facility appears reasonably well operated and maintained. It was pointed out to the ORC that only the upper discharge valve should be open, and that alum sludge levels must be kept well below this discharge level. Signature of report preparer Water Quality RegiOhal Supervisor NPDES Permit Staff Report Version 10/92 Z -io - 94- Date Date Page 3