740105_Inspection 2021_20210730

Facility Number
Jj
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agenev
Type of Visit: Compliant:l
e ntiltecliun [}llc°ration Retircri tJ Structure Evaluation Q 1 cchnical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergent► 0 t iher 0 Denied Access
-
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time; ` Departure Time: +' .� ; ',. County; Region;
Owner Name: `5\-C r , Pock)
Owner Email:
Phone:
1]ailing Address; i \ c ]Vlr_i.S1DVcb 12.A } q r M L)1 { l9. j C )- 6d
Physical Address;
Facility Contact:
h. F A , L);)1
Onsite Representative: Ck s-ft 4- 1
Title:
Certified Operator: C tuz ;fq r Nar 0 ,
Raek-up Operator:
Location of r- arm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number;
('ertiIR LI1ion N timber:
Longitude:
/L ; 7
Stine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
)(Feeder
to Finish
574 a
3 (-. i
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
trips
Boars
Other
lOthee
Design Current
Wei Poultr} (rapacity Pop.
C
tinril al rr
Design' Current
Dry Poultry ('a acit Po
Cattle
Design Current
C ipacits Pop.
Dairy t ow'
Dairy Calf
[)airy Iletter
I try Cow
Nun -Dairy
Reef Stocker
_
Beef Feeder
Beef tinlilti t rill'
1]isca and Si ream Impacts
I . Is Si:ischargc observed front any pan of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a, Was the conveyance ntaa-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes. notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of'the State: (eallons):r
d, Does the discharge bypass the ...t.1e management system? {If yes. notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable tulvcrsc impacts or potential adve : impacts to tiic waters
of the Stale other than from a discharge''
❑ Yes E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes ❑ No D NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes r -rk) ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes Flu ❑ NA ❑ NE
242015 Continued
Page ! 43

Facility Number. �1 }Q.3
►Paste Collection & Treatment
•l. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) Tess than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
5ttucturc 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
'pate of Inspection: ' ( -
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Arc there any inuncdiate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion. seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0 Na 0 NA 0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 ►►ore answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or en►ironrncntal threat notify WAR
❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits. dry stacks, and/or wed stacks)
❑ Yes EtNo 0 NA 0 NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I_'J "lo ❑ NA D NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EI.4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altcmativcs that need ❑ Yes UNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
II. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Daft ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Typc(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
1 4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15, f)ucs the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
1 fie Did the facility fail to secure audror operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
L 7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
s. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records d� JIii iimcnls
19. Did the facility tail lu have the Certificate of Covcragc & Pemiil readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the CAWMP readily available'? byes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑ D�6sign ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? lfyes. cheek the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ElWeekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking Q Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rai
22. Did the facility Lail to install and maintain a rain gauge'}
23, If rlcicetcd, did the facility fail to install and maintain rtinbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2n43
❑ YLi 0 o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes LJNo ❑NA NE
❑ Yes ❑'No [] tiA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Qo ElNA ElNE
❑ Ycs No El NA El NE
❑ Yes b No 0 NA El NE
O Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑Other:
O Yes [J'No 0 NA 0 NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
nfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes [r No 0 NA 0 NE
❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
214F2015 Continued

acifit Number: 1 Li - I C 57 1
[Date of Inspection: ?— 3' - .
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. 1s the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate boxes) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0 Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
Lisi structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
2&. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andior document [ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal'?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'? ❑ Yes ['No 0 NA ❑ NE
If yes. contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ No [] NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tilt drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate hox below. ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAW MP? ❑ Ycs 13/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewen7nspector fail to discuss revicwlinspeetion with anon -site representative? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question tt): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations nr any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
501 j c-A- \ 30 - 2 0 5 (,} I out ) ,1 � 1, N--r.
- but uetS LJ/ t
Q>. v:, Pad
�} cl 2 0
iZ t
Review rrinspectur Manic:
1 5-; ILL
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L/
Page 3 of 3 ((„jj
L -ov t c fr
❑ Yeti N NA ❑ NE
El Yes n []NA ❑NE
LJQ ❑
❑ Yes [ No ❑NA
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
Phone:
Date: 7 O 2. f
2/4/20fs