20220360 Ver 1_Riparian Buffer Authorization Request_20220304

Water Resources
ENTAL QUALITY
Original Submittal 3/4/2022
A. Owner/Applicant Information
General Information
Primary Contact Email: * [e-mail]
Please list the contact person's email for questions or payment on this project if needed.
Who is submitting the application?* Owner
Applicant other than Owner
Agent
Is there an agent working on this application but Yes
not submitting it? No
1. Property Owner Information:
...................................................................................................................................
1a. Name on Recorded Deed:*
Joseph & Kathleen Bisson
1b. Responsible Party:
(for Corporations)
1c. Mailing Address:*
Street Address
5016 Kiser Island Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Terrell
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28682
United States
1 d. Telephone:* 5409072019
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
le. Email Address:* [e-mail]
1. Project Information A
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1a. Name of Project:* Bisson Deck Rebuild
(Subdivision, facility, or establishment name)
1b. Is this a publicly -funded transportation project?*
Yes
No
1d. Subdivision Name: Kiser Island
le. Nearest Municipality:
1f. Property Size: acres
1g. County (or Counties) where the project is located: *

Catawba
1h. Property ID#
461604723648
Tax PIN or Parcel id
1 i. Deed Information
Date of Purchase
7/2/2021
Type of Book Book#11 Page#
Deed F
1755
I Map -11- 1
1 j. Attach a copy of the recorded map that indicates when the lot was last platted.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
5016 Kiser Island Road Survey.pdf 95.62KB
PDF only
1k. How would you like to provide the Latitude and Longitude information?*
• Address Lookup
Manually
Address Lookup Street Address
5016 Kiser Island Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Lake Norman of Catawba
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28682
United States
Longitude*
-80.9590863999999
Latitude * 35.5549483
9
11. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties?*
Yes
• No
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Lake Norman
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Lake
2c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:*
25
(linear feet only)
3. Project Description:
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:
Residential Use. Both neighboring lots are also residential. Dilapidated 14ft x 5ft deck
structure exist on the current property. Deck framing has failed and resulted in
sloped/uneven deck boards.
A

3b. Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the site.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Bisson_NC_Lake_Norman_North_20190727_TM.pdf 71.83MB
PDF only
3c. Attach an 8'/2 x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map depicting the project site.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Bisson_20220225_19185707429_8_Soil_Report.pdf 449.67KB
PDF only
4. Proposed Activity
Provide a detailed description of the proposed activity including its purpose and include the type of equipment to be used:
Proposed to rebuild & expand the current deck structure. Replace all framing &
deckboards. Expand deck from 14ftx5ft to 18ftx6ft. No heavy equipment will be
required. Footers will be placed by hand.
Attach a site plan as applicable to the project:
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Bisson Site Map.pdf 282.21KB
PDF only
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have jurisdictional wetlands or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/project
(including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes
• No
6. Project History
6a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes
• No
7. Future Project Plans
7a. Is this project a phased project?* Yes
• No
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Buffer Impacts
Project is in which protected Basin?*
Neuse River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0233)
• Catawba River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0243)
Randleman Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0250)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin (15A NCAC 0213.0259)
Jordan Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0267)
Goose Creek Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0606 & 15A NCAC 02B.0607)
Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
Site# - Reason Stream Name Buffer Impact* Impact Type Zone 1 Zone 2

Map label (e.g. Road Permanent Allowable 106.00 0.00
Crossing 1) (P) Square Square
Perm or Temp Feet Feet
Total Zone 1 Impacts: 106.00
Total Zone 2 Impacts: 0.00
Total Buffer Impacts: 106.00
Comments:
Proposed 106sgft slatted deck in zone1
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project.
Deck footprint will only be expanded 36sgft from current structure. It is not necessary
to remove any vegetation to expand the deck.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
No heavy equipment necessary. Deck boards will be slatted to allow for water runoffs
beneath the structure.
E. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. What type of SCM are you providing?*
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Other SCM that removed minimum of 30% nitrogen
1 c. Diffuse Flow Documentation Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Bisson Diffuse Flow.pdf 41.47KB
PDF only
F. Supplementary Information
Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
Yes
No
Violations
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface
Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
Yes
No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact buffer authorization application?
Yes
• No
G. Additional Information

Please upload any additional information you would like the Division to consider during application review.
Additional Attachments: Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PDF only
Additional Comments:
H. Sign and Submit
By digitally signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions
Act')
o I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act');
o I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
o I intend to electronically sign and submit the application form."
Print Name:* Joseph Bisson
Signature
C% WM
Submission Date: 3/4/2022
(Auto populated field)

Initial Review
Is this accepted into the review process?*
Is this project a public transportation project?*
ID#*
Version:
Select Reviewer:
Select Reviewing Office*
Has payment been received?*
• Yes No
Yes
• No
20220360
1
Doug Perez:eads\djperez
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
• No Payment Needed
Fee Received
Need Fee - send electronic notification

LAKE NORMAN NORTH QUADRANGLE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
7.5-MINUTE SERIES
-81.0000°NV-80.8750°
5000m
01E1011
0203040506070809 35.6250°
35.6250°
ISLAN
D POINT RD
Sherrills
42
39000m
n
42N
Ford
E
850
8
50
&
850
8
50
Gold
Mine
Lake
Norman Island
Airpark
41
41
n
n
150
¬
«
40
40
Doolie
85
0
LAKE NORMAN
LDA
OF CATAWBA
150
¬
«
800
0
80
n
0
0
8
GR
END
WOODR
00
8
39
39
R
DONS
R
Terrell
MOORESVILLE
00
8
&
38
38
rC
ar
150
¬
«
800
DG
AT
n
n
FA
RMS
n TEA
D L
N
0 37
5
37 8
Auto Storage
Lake Number Two
O
NS
800
Auto Storage
INVERN
ESS
L
O
O
P
Lake Number One
RE
GE
NC
Y
RD
I
EER
TD
Lake
Norman
n
A
36
36 K
E
BL
W
O
O
D
D
UC
KL
OOP
8
5
0
Mayhew
N
8
0
0
35
35 S

F
O
R
K

DRR
W D
VIE
TA
VIS
W
O
O
ANTIC
LW
ATA
Y
Lake
OOD
WRD
UC
H
UNTA
O Norman
EATPO
RIN
GT
34
34 R
D
R
RK
PA
OD
WO
TH
OU
S
CE
OOR
MMOD
K
REA
R
8
0
0
80
0
TEMPLETON RD
S
33
33
O
I
M
C
R
HAR
R
ED
!
I
"
Rockwell
AS
Cem
80
0
00
8
REEKD
CR
Webbs
32
32
LEBOR
TP
ATL
Williamson
!
"
Lake
Cem
OR
F
Norman
8
00
L
RD
31
31
W
AD
E
BAY
YL
N
RINE DR
KATHE
BLA
DES TRL
EL
S
I
R
ED
E
L
L
C
O
30
M
30 E
C
K
L
E
N
BU
R
G
C
O
Westport
O
S
EDR
D
39000m
S
29
29N
n
16
¬«
CORNELIUS
5000m
0102030405060708091011E
35.5000°NV
35.5000°
-81.0000°-80.8750°
×
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
SCALE 1:24 000
7
2
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
8
ExpresswayLocal Connector 0
10.50KILOMETERS12
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and
NORTH
5
GN
9
CAROLINALocal Road
1 000-meter grid:Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17SSecondary Hwy
4
10005000METERS10002000
7°50´
8
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be 2
Ramp4WD
139 MILS
10.501
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government K
7
0°2´
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before 4
Interstate RouteState Route
MILES X US Route
1 MILS
3
.
W H
/
2
entering private lands.QUADRANGLE LOCATION
1000010002000300040005000600070008000900010000
6
X
Imagery.....................................................NAIP, May 2016 - November 2016
1
S
FEET
Roads......................................... U.S. Census Bureau, 2016
UTM GRID AND 2019 MAGNETIC NORTH G
0
1 Catawba
Names............................................................................GNIS, 1980 - 2018
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
S
3
Hydrography...............................National Hydrography Dataset, 1899 - 2018
2 Troutman
123
U
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
Contours............................................National Elevation Dataset, 2008
3 Shepherds 4
U.S. National Grid
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
Boundaries..............Multiple sources; see metadata file 2017 - 2018
4 Denver
6
45
5 Mooresville
7
This map was produced to conform with the
Wetlands.................FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1983 - 1984
6 Lowesville
National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.
NV
7 Lake Norman South
678
A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.18
LAKE NORMAN NORTH, NC
8 Cornelius
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES
NSN.NGA REF NO.
2019
17S

1, 011,11
pill
ro
SO
'c
x 551,
LID
14e 5
AT
Z
Rig
I
I =10C(Inn 170MC-fl I r'64-CAM4-710-1-7 'fIIAdnIAAIIM ii8jonnnn

9ǣźƭƷźƓŭ
5ĻĭƉ
tƩƚƦƚƭĻķ
5ĻĭƉ
9ǣźƭƷźƓŭ ķĻĭƉ ƭƷƩǒĭƷǒƩĻ ķĻƦźĭƷĻķ źƓ ƷŷĻ ƭǒƩǝĻƩǤ

tƩƚƦƚƭĻķ ƦƩƚƆĻĭƷ Ǟźƌƌ ƓƚƷ ĭƩĻğƷĻ ĭƚƓĭĻƓƷƩğƷĻķ ƭƷƚƩƒǞğƷĻƩ ŅƌƚǞ ƷŷƩƚǒŭŷ ƷŷĻ ĬǒŅŅĻƩ

USDA United States
= Department of
Agriculture
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Catawba County,
North Carolina
February 25, 2022

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Catawba County, North Carolina....................................................................
13
LcB—Lloyd loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes......................................................13
LcC—Lloyd loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes....................................................14
W—Water....................................................................................................15
References............................................................................................................16

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
•
,i/i
,�✓i�
/�
/
/ � /�///Ike f 1IN
f
�JJ,
Illlll�
,
�II111
f /
�,, i /, % �i,
wo
i�
Y /
if/
Ali
M IMMIX. u . .. .

0
Q
N
N
U
L
0
NN�
L.L
'0
VJ
E
0
(n
7
U
U)
U
O
N
y
(n (n
�
O
i
m
O
N
7
m 0 a)
a)
y Oy
N N
(n
a)
0)
0 0
m
C V O _0O
N U O
U
U)
p
N
a) 0.—
a)
m O O
E
a)
U)
O)
Z
(6 O
O
C
O
N `) N a
(n
O
O
E
>
U) -0 O
O
E
a)
O
O_ m N
a)
if
N W
m
Q 7
U
m
O
O
z
y
a) .j C
a)
N
m 0 0
E m 3
L
U)
L
a) CJ
OO M a) N
>
af
Z
U N
L O
Utl)
" a)
E y 6
Q
O C: ==
m
O d
a) N D m
Q
�O N
O
N
L 2 `) N
O
N
3
E
U W
m Q�
Z N
m
Q
3 m 0
O
Q O
U m a)
L
y
C y m
D
>+ C
a)
m
p a) Q
O
0
=
y E U)
a)
m
N
U (6
(6 .0 mm-� O O
a)
O
j Am
m
O
O_ �6 uj m
E
LL
>+
a)
m
N
D O a)
— C N
7 U
O
>, O� U
O U O
"�-'
E a)
O (V
U N
U)
0
>, m
� y
Z
N
C�- L
N
O
O
fOA
a) 2
O
6 m m
7 w U O N
O
w 'O
m O
-0 O
U)
m
O-
N
N m E
-0 m m
E
c
a) a) Q0
U
O
U a) .O O_
N N
.y
a)
(U
E Q N o
Q
U
m
y "�"' E U
y
3 J
U N O O
N—
O>
U
y
L 0 0
(6
E
O_ 6 O O
(°
-0
m
z E
Q Q (Oj C
Q
a) Utl)
m
a)
0 a) O-0
'E
U)
O
E C (p
>+
a) ns m O
a) a) (U
ac) °'
O) (U
ns
m 6
a)
m a)
E
O O N
>'
0 'O
O y
O_ a) U)
a) U N (6 7
,U) 'O
N Q
y
T
O
C m N w
a) N E rn
O a)
m 3 U
U °?
.J 3 C m 2
U .O
5
Q m
—�
O
Q m
y
O
C
E a) .�
a) '6 y
N E
0— m
O C
E m U
O a
O p U a) ""
'6 w
O>
W
O O
a)
m
O '6
a)
O
U) 00
E
(U
C (6
a) 7
y y
O
i U
y U O N
O_ a)
7 >,
(n a)
E 0
y 0
N
O)
O a) C
a) N
�o
m v�i a�i m
C O U
0
m m
a) a)
_ o
a)
Q .a? a) c3i
m 0 U) �_
Q�
w�
= L
= 0
N
°?
W
a) E m s
L O L
H
S
W E— U
a E
u) U
Q m
H o
U) U)
U)
H U .9 y
Q
y
d y
R O
(i U
R
L
L
Q
Q
>,
00
2 y a
0
-yo 0
L
d
Q
0 J N
CL E
U)CL
a) .0. O
m o M
O
� a
0 O
U) (n
Z
>
N L_ y
O (n (n
�
O
°
a)
S Z) :E
R m
U
3 a Q
0
R
N
R
0
O
C
p
O
Z
LU
ppyy��yy
IOf 0�ir
w C
W
J
1
OI
U
R
R
F
m
LU
J
y
a
Q
pCL
y
o
o
)
w
o
a
o
a
N
y
Q
E
Q
a
a
O`
U
C
>
C C a)
> >
CL
Q Q
a w U)3
3 R
y
O >
>
°
w
° LU
Q
_
0
0
a R
R
R R a)
— 3
3
O T
a
N > >
= lL O
a R N a)
O
O d
O
U
a)
o >
>
O O
Y N
U)
a
y
Q
o
(n
0 0 o
(n (n o m
o R
m U
O
U c7 c7
> R
J J
y N
a
O m
m U)
R
U) U)
a
in U)
o
U)
w
a
O .,,
R
w
"" :
" >! :�. "";
W,��� p��mv
1 alu', A � c
,
R
y
® Q
y
Q
y
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
LcB
Lloyd loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes
1.4
59.6%
LcC
Lloyd loam, 6 to 10 percent
slopes
0.8
34.6%
W
Water
0.1
5.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
2.4
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Catawba County, North Carolina
LcB—Lloyd loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mml y
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Lloyd and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lloyd
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase
and/or gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loam
Btl - 8 to 38 inches: clay
Bt2 - 38 to 49 inches: clay loam
BC - 49 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
LcC—Lloyd loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mml z
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Lloyd and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lloyd
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase
and/or gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loam
Btl - 8 to 38 inches: clay
Bt2 - 38 to 49 inches: clay loam
BC - 49 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
15

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
17