HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0004944_Permit Issuance_20000117NPDES DOCYHENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0004944
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Compliance
Instream Assessment
(67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
January 17, 2000
This document is printed on reuse paper - i$izore any
content on the resTerse side
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
January 17, 2000
Mr. Tony Branecky, Plant Manager
Arteva Specialties, d/b/a KOSA
Post Office Box 4
Salisbury, North Carolina 28145-0004
Dear Mr. Branecky:
rA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit Number NC0004944
KOSA — Salisbury Plant
Rowan County
In accordance with the application for discharge permit received on June 1, 1998, the Division is
fonvarding herewith the subject state - NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
The following are responses to the comments received on December 13, 1999 from Stephen Lamb of
your office.
• All references to HNA Holdings, Inc., have been changed to Arteva Specialties, S.a.r.l. d/b/a
KOSA (KOSA).
• The total suspended solids (TSS) allocations have been recalculated by applying 40 CFR 414
subpart D to the process stormwater and adding the result to the figures present in the draft
permit. The exclusion of process stormwater from the determination of process wastewater was
an oversight. No TSS allocation has been given for water treatment plant blowdown or
wastewaters from boilers and chillers.
• Given the facility's historically low effluent ammonia levels. the monitoring frequency for ammonia
has been reduced from three times per week to weekly.
• Given the consistent presence of copper in the effluent, monthly monitoring remains appropriate.
Monitoring for zinc has been reduced from monthly to annually given the non -detect nature of the
analytical data.
• The monitoring frequency for benzene and bis (2-ethylhexyl) pthalate (BEHP) has been reduced
from quarterly to annually. Additionally, you requested mass limits for all OCPSF parameters.
Parameters that are listed as concentrations are actually based on more stringent state standards
or federal criteria. Where these standards and/or criteria exist, and they are more stringent than
the levels indicated in the OCPSF rules, effluent limitations must be developed using these
standards and reported as concentrations in the NPDES permit.
• The sample type for stormwater samples has been changed from composite to grab.
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RRLEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 - TELEPHONE 919-733-5083/FAX 919-733-0719
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - S0% RECYCLED/ 10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
• Additional language has been added to the effluent limitations page. The language indicates that
analytical data which is less than the detection level shall be reported as such and that it shall be
averaged as zero for reporting of both concentration and mass. The comment letter requested
that the below detection level data be reported as zero. Below detection level data must be
reported as Tess than the detection level for the analysis.
• The comment letter presented a method for judging compliance with pH during months when
algae could potentially grow on the polishing ponds. The polishing ponds are considered part of
the treatment system. As such, compliance with the pH limits established by the federal
guidelines must be applied at the polishing pond effluent. Although there are other facilities with
a compliance method similar to the one proposed in your comment letter, the Division is moving
away from such methods as they do not adequately judge what is seen by the receiving stream.
Additionally, such a system makes compliance judgement logistically difficult.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made. this permit shall be
final and binding.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by
the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act, or any other Federal or Local governmental permits which may be required.
If you have any questions or comments regarding these speculative limitations. please do not hesitate
to contact Mark Mclntire at telephone number (919) 733-5083, extension 553.
Sincerely
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens
Cc: Central Files
NPDES Permit File
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
EPA, Roosevelt Childress
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Permit No. NC0004944
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. as amended,
Arteva Specialties S.a.r.l. d/b/a KOSA
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
KOSA - Salisbury Facility
Highway 70 at Highway 801
West of Salisbury
Rowan County
to receiving waters designated as North Second Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective March 1, 2000.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on March 51, 2004.
Signed this day January 17, 2000.
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. NC0004944
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Arteva Specialties S.a.r.l. d/b/a KOSA
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 2.305 MGD activated sludge wastewater treatment facility
consisting of a bar screen and grit chamber. UV/peroxide. equalization tanks. mechanical
aeration basins, anaerobic groundwater treatment unit. secondary clarifiers, three (3) aerated
polishing ponds with portable aerators and chemical addition facilities, aerobic digestion.
sludge dewatering, sludge holding. and instrumented flow measurement located at KOSA's
Salisbury facility at the intersection of Highway 70 and Highway 801, west of Salisbury in
Rowan County;
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into North
Second Creek. a class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin; and
3. Continue to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity through the five outfalls
(outfalls A. B. C. D. and 5) as shown on the attached map. Modifications to the stormwater
conveyance system are authorized by this permit in accordance with documentation to be
included in the facility's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (construction activities must
be authorized under General Permit No. NCG010000).
Latitude:
Longitude:
Ouad #:
Stream Class:
Receiving Stream:
Permitted Flow:
35°42'34" Sub -Basin:
80°34'31"
E16NE, Rowan Mills
C
North Second Creek
2.305 MGD
03-07-06
Arteva SpeciNCalties00049 S.a.r.l. d/b/a KOSA
- . Salisbury Facility - Rowan County
A (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
Permit No. NC0004944
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration. the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001-
Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
U T C ARACTE STICS
EFFL Eli_ H RI :,..:,
S,
, DTS�C i�AT�IO �� S
x xh ....:
Y.
.% � ..,
»�`,.:g �:
-'E
.; .....
� . T
C� N
RI1 w :�3I�t h�E S
... , .
... �...
- .� - ........�.
r. .. i9p,t
„ :. } gI.
, e.. !°� i:,�n
.�A#. r: ii:arS....
...,....,->•F.'.�!., �... J._ .i
.. .. .. � :, .i+S..1 xw., ..,, �'
ver. e..,=
� . _..
. .rv. r, k, , , ,
. � . { .y a';s ,+�r„ �
- '.. ,.... n.•' ..�� j.,.. gg
1. � ',y.. r.� _ .!? i�
...,«.. ... ��,kk..�...:.'�. �
.. . ,..� ;.�";r':
.i, • •,...,: r._r...•_. yT.. 1.:..
-Dail Y.,'�`a`�nni�tun•
r,. *pt ci'f �a�ix .._rAk� r
K T 'i'�'k�e..
. '4,
�, :Ld w.
Wa�
-,•.n._y,.• �!y .r ..;r+, �
,c � .7.l. .:v��a'i�v, �y
.-�, ��.��r��em!a�� .x
>, . ys,,� F .��;,; , , , ,;
y'.'+'ai �ys'�' . Y,. ,s�`• X+? { .�'.
.,(tt.. 4r .t. •:i :..,°F .:.5:
t ...t, p �:.: " p..xe
:��1. .t• �47� -..s44_
a_ :�,:� � o. t .r.
i <t 2 .:r:,.<,
��t �� . le 'e
_ .. .. a�� �`? . _
i,• JJS.�L�► le
cY 1
%o anon
Flow (MGD)
I 2.305
Continuous
Recording
E
BOD. 5-day. 20°C (April 1 - October 31)
150.0 lbs/day
300.0 lbs/day
Daily
Composite
E
BOD. 5-day, 20°C (November 1 - March 31)
278.0 lbs/day
600.0 lbs/day
Daily
Composite
E
NH,, as N
23.0 lbs/day
46.0 lbs/day
Weekly
Composite
E
Total Suspended Residue
435.0 lbs/day
1382.0 lbs/day
Daily
Composite
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Weekly
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen'
Daily
Grab
E
Dissolved Oxygen'
1
Grab
U, D
Total Copper
Monthly
Composite
E
Iron
Monthly
Composite
_
E
Manganese
Monthly
Composite
E
Conductivity
1
Grab
U, D
Temperature
1
Grab
U. D
Chronic Toxicity'
Quarterly
Composite
E
NOTES:
Sample Locations: E — Effluent, U — Upstream at least 100 feet above the outfall. D — Downstream approximately eight miles from the outfall or at Highway 601. Upstream and
downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three times per week during June, July. August and September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year. instream sampling requirements are provisionally waived in light of the permittee's participation in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin Association. All
instream sampling requirements are immediately reinstated should the permittee cease participation in the Association.
2 The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L.
3 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F @ 34%; February, May, August. November; See condition A(3) of the Supplement to Effluent Limitations and Monitoring page.
4 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample.
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE AMOUNTS.
ANALYTICAL DATA WHICH 1S LESS THAN THE DETECTION LEVEL SHALL BE REPORTED AS SUCH AND AVERAGED AS ZERO FOR REPORTING OF BOTH CONCENTRATION AND MASS.
A(2). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL NC0004944
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration. the Permittee is authorized to
discharge OCPSF related process wastewater from outfall serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristic
Daily Maximum
lbs/day
Monthly Average
lbs/day
Daily Maximum
µg/L
Measurement
Frequency
Ace naphthe ne
Acenaphthylene
Acrylonitrile
Anthracene
Benzene
Be nzo(a)anthracene
3.4-Benzofluoranthene
Benzo(k) f luoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
2-Chlorophenol
Chtysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.3-Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
l.1-Dichloroethane
1.2-Dichloroethane
1.1-Dichloroethylene
I ,2-trans-Dichloroethylene
2.4-Dichlorophenol
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
1,5-Dichloropropylene
Diethyl phthalate
2.4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl'phthalate
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol'
2.4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
fluorene
I-lexachlorobenzene
l-le xach lorob u tad ie ne
Hexachloroethane
Methyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pltenanthrene
Phenol
Pyre ne
Tetrachloroe thylene
Toluene
0.650
0.630
0.630
1.452
0.651
0.299
2.861
0.491
1.046
0.608
1.740
0.470
0.299
0.630
2.252
0.576
1.196
0.470
2.167
0.384
0.502
2.957
1.313
6.843
1.153
0.726
0.630
0.523
2.028
0.950
0.630
0.726
0.737
1.324
0.630
0.278
0.715
0.235
0.235
0.235
0.395
0.246
0.192
0.160
1.110
0.224
0.331
0.288
0.822
0.331
0.160
0.235
0.726
0.I71
0.224
0.416.. _...
1.633
0.310
0.865.......
0.192
0.203
0.833
0.758
2.722
0.342
0.267
0.235
0.214
0.224
0.918
0.427
0.235
0.288
0.438
0.769
0.235
0.160
0.267
0.235
0.278
0.09
0.09
0.09
17
13
0.09
114
27
0.0023
26.0884
26
32
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
.Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Sample
Type
Sample
Location'
Composite E
Composite F_
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite . E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
. Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
Composite E
A(2). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
NC0004944
Effluent Characteristic
Daily Maximum
lbs/day
Monthly Average
lbs/day
Daily Maximum
ug/L
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location[
Total Chromium
Total Copper
Total Cyanide
Total Lead
Total Nickel
Total Zinc
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 ,1,2-Trichloroe thane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
1.495
0.576
0.576
0.576
2.861
0.726
0.224
0.224
0.224
1.110
Annually
Monthly
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Permit No. NC0004944
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A.(3) QUARTERLY PASS/FAIL CHRONIC TOXICITY TESTING - OUTFALL 001
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 34%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, auarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure." Revised February 1998. or subsequent
versions or "North Carolina Phase 1I Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February
1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of February. May, August. and
November. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent
discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the
permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following
months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that
does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment."
collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina
Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for
the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent
to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete. accurate. include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is
employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Permit No. NC0004944
SUPPLEMENT TO EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Continued)
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating
the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of
"No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences
Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will
be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream. this permit may be re -opened and modified to
include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document. such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls. shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day
of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Permit No. NC0004944
PART I CONTINUED
A.(4) FINAL LIMITATIONS AND CONTROLS FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration. the permittee is
authorized to discharge stormwater from outfalls A, B. C, D. and 5. Such discharges shall be controlled.
limited and monitored as specified below.
1. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
The permittee shall develop and continue to update a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, herein after
referred to as the Plan. The Plan shall be considered public information and shall include, at a minimum. the
following items:
a. Site Plan: The site plan shall provide a description of the physical facility and the potential pollutant
sources which may be expected to contribute to contamination of regulated stormwater discharges.
The site plan shall contain the following:
(1)
A general location map (USGS quadrangle map. or appropriately drafted equivalent map).
showing the facility's location in relation to transportation routes and surface waters. and the
name of the receiving water(s) to which the stormwater outfall(s) discharges. If the discharge
is to a municipal separate storm sewer system. the name of the municipality and the ultimate
receiving waters. and accurate latitude and longitude of the point(s) of discharge must be
shown.
(2) A narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities, outdoor process
areas, dust or particulate generating or control processes. and waste disposal practices.
(3)
A site map (or series of maps) drawn to scale with the distance legend indicating location of
industrial activities (including storage of materials, disposal areas. process areas. and loading
and unloading areas), drainage structures. drainage areas for each outfall and activities
occurring in the drainage area. building locations and impervious surfaces. the percentage of
each drainage area that is impervious. For each outfall. a narrative description of the potential
pollutants which could be expected to be present in the regulated stormwater discharge.
(4) A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility during the 3
previous years and any corrective actions taken to mitigate spill impacts.
(5)
Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-
stormwater discharges.
b. Stormwater Management Plan: The stormwater management plan shall contain a narrative
description of the materials management practices employed which control or minimize the exposure
of significant materials to stormwater. including structural and non-structural measures. The
stormwater management plan, at a minimum, shall incorporate the following:
(1)
A study addressing the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of
operations and/or storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and
processes to stormwater. Wherever practicable the permittee should consider covering
storage areas, material handling operations. manufacturing or fueling operations to prevent
materials exposure to stormwater. In areas where elimination of exposure is not practicable.
the stormwater management plan shall document the feasibility of diverting the stormwater
runoff away from areas of potential contamination.
(2) A schedule to provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials, storage of
Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
water priority chemicals. or storage of hazardous materials to prevent leaks and spills from
contaminating stormwater runoff. If the secondary containment devices are connected directly
to stormwater conveyance systems. the connection shall be controlled by manually activated
valves or other similar devices [which shall be secured with a locking mechanism] and any
stormwater that accumulates in the containment area shall be at a minimum visually observed
prior to release of the accumulated stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be released if
found to be uncontaminated. Records documenting the individual making the observation, the
description of the accumulated stormwater and the date and time of the release shall be kept
for a period of five years.
(3)
A narrative description of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be considered such as, but
not limited to. oil and grease separation, debris control. vegetative filter strips, infiltration
and stormwater detention or retention. where necessary. The need for structural BMPs shall
be based on the assessment of potential of sources contributing significant quantities of
pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater
discharges.
(4) Inspection schedules of stormwater conveyances and controls and measures to be taken to
limit or prevent erosion associated with the stormwater systems.
c. Spill Prevention and Response Plan: The Spill Prevention and Response Plan shall incorporate a risk
assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials inventory of the facility. Facility
personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the plan shall be identified in the plan. A
responsible person shall be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to
contaminate stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility
ope rations.
d. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program: A preventative maintenance program
shall be developed. The program shall document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of
stormwater control systems. plant equipment and systems. Inspection of material handling areas and
regular cleaning schedules of these areas shall be incorporated into the program.
e. Training schedules shall be developed and training provided at a minimum on an annual basis on
proper spill response and cleanup procedures and preventative maintenance activities for all personnel
involved in any of the facility's operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff.
Facility personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the training shall be identified in the plan.
f. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall identify a specific position(s) responsible for the
overall coordination. development, implementation, and revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for all
components of the Plan shall be documented and position.(s) assignments provided.
g.
Plan Amendment: The permittee shall amend the Plan whenever there is a change in design.
construction. operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the potential for the
discharge of pollutants via a point source to surface waters. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis.
The Director may notify the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the minimum
requirements of the permit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall submit a time schedule
to the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide
certification in writing to the Director that the changes have been made.
h. Facility Inspections: Inspections of the facility and all stormwater systems shall occur at a minimum on
a semiannual schedule. once in the fall (September - November) and once during the spring (April -
June). The inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented.
recording date and time of inspection, individual(s) making the inspection and a narrative description
of the facility's stormwater control systems. plant equipment and systems. Records of these
inspections shall be incorporated into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
i. Implementation: Implementation of the Plan shall include documentation of all monitoring.
measurements, inspections. maintenance activities and training provided to employees. including the
log of the sampling data. Activities taken to implement BMPs associated with the industrial activities.
including vehicle maintenance activities, must also be recorded. All required documentation shall be
kept on -site for a period of five years and made available to the Director or his authorized
representative immediately upon request.
A.(5) MINIMUM MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis.
Implementation of the plan shall include documentation of all sampling, measurements. inspections
and maintenance activities, and training provided to employees. including the log of the sampling data
and of activities taken to implement BMPs associated with the industrial activities. including vehicle
maintenance activities. Such documentation shall be kept on -site for a period of five years and made
available to the Director or his authorized representative immediately upon request.
2. The Director may notify the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the minimum
requirements of the permit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall submit a time schedule
to the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide
certification in writing to the Director that the changes have been made.
3. Inspections of the facility and all stormwater systems shall occur at a minimum on a semi-annual
schedule, once in the fall (September — November) and once during the spring (April — June). The
inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented, recording date
and time of inspection. individual(s) making the inspection and a narrative description of the facility's
stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Records of these inspections shall be
incorporated into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
4. Sample collection and visual monitoring for color. foam, outfall staining, visible sheens and dry
weather flow, shall be performed at all stormwater discharge outfall locations. If a facility has multiple
discharge locations that are required to be sampled, the permittee may petition the Director to sample
at a reduced number of outfalls if it is established that the stormwater discharges are substantially
identical. Visual observations shall be recorded for all outfall locations.
5. For purposes of the stormwater sampling required in this permit. all samples shall be collected from a
discharge resulting from a representative storm event. Failure to monitor storm events in accordance
with the specified frequency shall constitute a violation of this permit. If the stormwater runoff is
controlled by a detention pond. the following sampling shall apply:
a. If the detention pond detains the runoff generated by one inch of rainfall for 24 hours. a grab
sample of the discharge from the pond shall be collected during the storm event.
b. If the detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding a 10-year design
storm. visual observations for color, foam. outfall staining. visible sheens, and dry weather
flow are required. but analytical sampling shall not be required.
c. If the detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding a 25-year. 24-
hour storm, the pond shall be considered a non -discharging stormwater control system and not
subject to NPDES requirements, unless the discharge causes a violation of water quality
standards.
6. Samples analyzed in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be submitted on forms provided by
the Director no later than January 31 following the year in which sampling was required.
7. Specific Monitoring Requirements
a. Stormwater from KOSA — Salisbury. Monitoring applies to all of the stormwater discharges.
Monitoring is not required for stormwater which does not discharge to the surface waters of
the state.
b.
Story Pr IVO,DISC " e
t ,t L s . _ is%
Cbs� ( a i!'.i
"
.. _...... . k; _,. y,�;y„ r%,rf;. e.. _.,�'
•Total
£
! S
' ..
}Units
; , , anaiio .ec u�em�n ,
br= P�ric}.r +ti ,�
` SAY 1 � .`
�.�" Y
_ � : L R€ 4
�r�
a >t Y.ib.a� , spa t
,[�yi. W. ria+A�
_.. `S`i
i `` a A
,-L {(jfir'
'iS�• }II
t
6 ��
_ v>><<
`It ie
( �'
Flow2
pH
MG i Annually
Standard i Annually _
mg/L , Annually
i
i _ Grab
Grab
__ i
SDO
_ SDO
SDOT
Oil and Grease
Total Suspended Solids
mg/L i Annually
Grab
SDO
BOD. 5-day. 20°C
mg/L . Annuallynn-
Grab
SDO
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
_.._._._..._._._.__
TTO
,
mg/L i Annually _
Grab
i
1
SDO
SDO
SDO
Grab
Grab
Sample Locations: SDO — Stormwater Discharge Outfall
2 Total flow shall be measured continuously or calculated based on the amount of area draining to
the outfall. the amount of built -upon area. and the total amount of rainfall or estimated by the
measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event. Total precipitation and
duration of the event measured shall be a representative storm event.
Storm Event Characteristic Units Monitoring Requirements
Total Event Precipitation inches Annually
Event Duration hours Annually
For facilities that develop a solvent management plant to be incorporated into the stormwater pollution
prevention plan may make a request to DWQ that monitoring of total toxic organics be waived. The
solvent management plan shall include. as a minimum. lists of the total toxic organic compounds used;
the method of disposal used instead of dumping such as reclamation. contract hauling, or incineration:
and the procedures for assuring that toxic organics do not routinely spill or leak into the stormwater.
For those facilities allowed such a waiver. the discharger shall include a signed certification statement
on the discharge monitoring reports.
Stormwater discharges from any vehicle maintenance activity occurring on -site which uses more than 55
gallons of new motor oil per month when averaged over the calendar year shall be monitored by the
permittee as specified below:
e
cinitortn Requilei '
easurentent
regency,
2
5
4
5
Total Flows MG
Oil and Grease
3/Term
mg/L ' 3/Term Grab .
Lead, Total Recoverable4 L 3/Term Grab
Detergents (MBAS)s r mg/L 3/Term Grab
pH Standard 3/Term Grab I SDO
New motor oil usage I Gal/month 3/Term I Estimate
SDO
SDO
SDO
SDO
Measurement Frequency — 3/Term shall mean stormwater runoff associated with vehicle
maintenance activity on -site. Existing facilities shall be sampled once within six months of the
effective date of the permit and, where possible. prior to implementing BMPs and development of
the BMP plan at existing operations. Thereafter. sampling shall be conducted two times during the
remaining permit term at intervals of greater than eighteen months apart and collected during the
months of April through November.
Sample Locations: SDO — Stormwater Discharge Outfall
Total flow shall be measured continuously or calculated based on the amount of area draining to
the outfall, the amount of built -upon area, and the total amount of rainfall or estimated by the
measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event. Total precipitation and
duration of the event measured shall be a representative storm event.
Applies only for facilities at which fueling occurs.
Detergent monitoring is required only at facilities which conduct vehicle cleaning.
Storm Event Characteristic Unit Monitoring Requirements
Total Event Precipitation inches Annually
Event Duration hours Annually
A.(6) STORMWATER DEFINITIONS
1. Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Schedules of activities. prohibitions of practices. maintenance procedures. and other management
practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the United States. BMPs also include
treatment requirements, operation procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or
leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage.
2. Bulk Storage of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above
ground storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground
storage containers having a total storage capacity of greater than 1,320 gallons.
3. Point Source Discharge
Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance. including but specifically not limited to, any pipe,
ditch. channel, tunnel, conduit. well, discrete fissure. container, rolling stock. or concentrated animal
feeding operation from which pollutants are or may be discharged to waters of the state.
4. Runoff Coefficient
The fraction of total rainfall that is not infiltrated into or otherwise retained by the soil. concrete.
asphalt or other surface upon which it falls that will appear at the conveyance as runoff.
5. Secondary Containment
Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment structure plus
sufficient freeboard to allow for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event.
6. Section 313 Water Priority Chemical
A chemical or chemical category which:
a. Is listed in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning
and Community Right -to -Know Act of 1986;
b. Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title III. Section 313
reporting requirements; and
c. That meet at least one of the following criteria:
(1)
Is listed in appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on either Table II (organic priority
pollutants). Table III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols) or Table IV (certain
toxic pollutants and hazardous substances);
(2) Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40
CFR 116.4; or
(5) Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria.
7. Sittnificant Materials
Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic
pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or
production; hazardous substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCLA; any chemical the
facility is required to report pursuant to section 313 of Tide III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and
waste products such as ashes, slag and sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater
discharges.
8. Sisnificant Spills
Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities
under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.10 and CFR 117.21) or section 102 of
CERCLA (Ref: 40 CFR 302.4).
9. Stormwater Runoff
The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or
as a result of snowmelt.
10. Total Flow
The flow corresponding to the time period over which the sample collection occurs. The total flow
calculated based on the size of the area draining to the outfall. the amount of the built -upon
(impervious) surfaces within the drainage area, and the total amount of rainfall occurring during the
sampling period.
1 1. Visible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water. air,
gravity, or ice from its site of origin which can be seen with the unaided eye.
October 20
19
99
NCD.NR/DWQ/Budget Office
P.O.Box 29535, Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
�,o
20 E
C a,
oa
O` d O cc G- y 25
Lr,ZO7'Oaj C.�CN-En CTO
Fn z �o�o.-c a, �yma
oa
�'o�oO-mmo
Z ,5,11 E rcZ
x-ZaEo�•_�UmavoL=c
mZ3o> asD—C¢=mo3
uZQE. 'di 3' cNw tn ,
7 o u) o w - Q•O o - N O Z U m N ?.-. 01 N
v�moaoonQ�`?oc_�omcy 3~dry
o co,2 �N'�orova�
m->a
Z v>Z�cvc��-3�ciro�rYc`E�aciar
#f44835 1x
NORTH CAROLINA
ROWAN COUNTY
}
Salisburyillbst
P.O. Box 4639
Salisbury, NC 28145
(704) 633-8950
FAX (704) 633-7373
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
$20
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer
oaths, personally appeared STEVE JOHNSON, who being first duly swom, deposes and says that he is Advertising Director of POST
PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., engaged in the publication of a newspaper known as THE POST, published, issued and entered as
second class mail in the City of Salisbury. in said County and State, that he is authorized to make this affidavit and swom statement,
that the notice or other legal advertisement a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in THE POST, on the following
dates:
October 18, 1999
and that the said newspaper is which such notice. paper document or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and
every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of
North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This 20th day of October 19 99
Swom and subscribed before me
this 20th day of October 19 99
1 •
1 NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires ;q ' Doo T
63
Koh
December 3, 1999
Mr. Mark McIntire
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27626
Phone (919) 733-5083
Fax (919) 733-0719
Subject: Arteva Specialties S.a.r.l. d/b/a Kosa (formerly HNA Holdings, Inc.)
Salisbury, North Carolina
NPDES Draft Permit Comments (Permit Number NC0004944)
Dear Mr. McIntire:
Arteva Specialties S.a.r.l. d/b/a Kosa (Kosa), formerly HNA Holdings, Inc. received a draft
NPDES permit on October 26,1999. As discussed with Kristen Jenkins/CH2M HILL, a
meeting had been scheduled with you on December 3, 1999, to discuss the draft permit, and
comments were going to be submitted within a week of that meeting. Since the meeting has
been postponed, Kosa is providing comments on the draft permit in this letter.
Name Change
The facility has changed names since the permit application was submitted. The facility
name should be Arteva Specialties S.a.r.l. d/b/a Kosa. An official name change request was
submitted one year ago and the agency told us that the company name would be changed
when the permit was issued.
pH
The facility has maintained compliance with effluent pH limitations for the previous three
years. However, pH values increase to the upper limit of 9 during the summer months. The
polishing ponds typically have algae blooms during the summer which are causing the
elevated pH values. KOSA would like permission to monitor for pH at both the clarifier
overflow and polishing pond effluent. If the polishing pond effluent pH exceeds the upper
permit limit of 9, the clarifier overflow pH values for the previous 30 days would be
reviewed, and if no values exceed the upper limit of 9, then clarifier effluent pH values would
be used for compliance purposes. The retention time in the polishing pond system is
approximately 30 days assuming polishing pond volumes of 5.6,18.2, and 20 million gallons
for Ponds 2, 3, and 4, and an average flow rate of 1.5 MGD. KOSA is aware of at least one
other facility in North Carolina with the pH monitoring conditions discussed above.
P.O. Box 4 7401 Statesville Ave. (704) 636-6000
Salisbury, NC 28145-0004 Salisbury, NC 28147 www.kosa.com
/'S'
PAA
TSS r ;a ¢o
TSS
Based on the DWQ fact sheet, TSS limitations for the draft permit were calculated based on
Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers (OCPSF) guidelines and secondary
treatment regulation. There was no TSS allocation for wastewater from boilers and chillers,
water treatment plant blowdown, and process storm water. For the TSS limit in the current
r ( v permit, an allocation was given to these sources based on intake water quality (NPDES
S I' "v' `�� ' Renewal Correspondence, Davis and Floyd, Inc. to Division of Environmental Management
rt c ° dated February 15, 1991). As a result, the TSS limit in the draft permit is significantly lower
than the current permit. Therefore, Kosa is requesting that the basis for the TSS limit
remain the same with the revised permit and a TSS allocation based on intake water quality
be given to wastewater from boilers and chillers, water treatment plant blowdown, and
' process storm water. Using the same intake water quality with a monthly average and daily
�� maximum TSS value of 53 mg/L and 79.5 mg/L, respectively, Kosa has estimated a TSS
monthly average and daily maximum limit of 454 lb/d and 1369 lb/d, respectively.
Ammonia Nitrogen
The facility is currently required to monitor for ammonia nitrogen three times per week with
limits of 23 lb/d monthly average and 461b/day daily maximum. The frequency is the same
in the draft permit. Since the facility has relatively low levels of ammonia nitrogen in the
effluent (average of 5 lb/day for the previous three years), a monitoring frequency of once
per week is requested.
Metals
Metals monitoring is annual in the draft permit for all metals except copper and zinc. Zinc
has only been detected four times since the beginning of 1998 as presented in Attachment A.
Therefore, Kosa is requesting annual monitoring for zinc.
OCPSF Priority Pollutants
As discussed in the permit application, the facility researched the presence of bis (2-
ethylhexyl) phthalate (BEHP) in the effluent and discovered that the source was the
submersible composite sampling pump. This pump was replaced with a typical composite
sampler with a peristaltic pump in April 1998. Since the pump was replaced, BEHP has not
been detected in the effluent as presented in Attachment A. Therefore, Kosa is requesting
annual monitoring for BEHP.
s not been detected in the effluent since January 1998. Therefore,
Kosa is re . . - • g annual monitoring for benzene'e sed
limits for nine OCPSF ammeters in the draft permit. We are not aware of an OCPSF or
Q require . - tfor concentration limits for these parameters. Therefore, we would like
°vt-S k to h - - concentration limits removed and have only mass based limits for the OCPSF
pollutis which are based on the actual process flow rate.
t ,r�''`0 pLf 5 Storm Water Discharges
The facility received DWQ approval in a letter dated November 22,1996, to collect grab
U� storm water samples samples instead of composite due to the number of outfalls. Therefore,
P P
we are requesting that the permit state that storm water sampling be conducted with grab
samples.
h Additional Permit Verbiage
The current NPDES permit includes limits for several pollutants which are below acceptable
detection levels. Therefore, the facility is requesting that the following verbiage is included
et- ( g� in the renewed permit: 4s ti mil,
el Analytical data which is less than the detection level shall be reported and averaged as
zero for reporting of both concentration and mass
s.ainment.
Marked up Permit
A marked up copy of the draft NPDES permit is attached. This should help in
communicating the areas discussed in this memo.
Please feel free to contact me at (704) 636 — 6000 (extension 4862) or our consultant,
Kristen Jenkins, CH2M HILL, at (770) 604 — 9182, extension 546 if you have any questions
or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Kosa
Stephen C. Lamb
Senior Environmental Engineer
Enclosures: Marked -up Draft Permit
C: Kristen Jenkins/CH2M HILL
Bill Kreutzberger/CH2M HILL Bryson Woodlief/KoSaDavid Casner/KoSa
TABLE A-1
Summary of Select Effluent Data
Benzene Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Total Zinc
(Ib/d) (ug/L) (mg/L)
Daily limit (past) 39.83 ug/l 60.2 ug/l none
Jan-98 <.065 45.6 <.02
<.067 147 <.02
Feb-98 <.077 74.7 <.02
<.02
Mar-98 <.055 51.6 <.02
<.02
Apr-98 <.06 <10.0 0.027
<.02
May-98 <.062 <10.0 <.02
0.021
Jun-98 <.060 <10.0 <.02
<.02
JuI-98 <.060 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Aug-98 <.060 <10.0 0.07
<.02
Sep-98 <.061 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Oct-98 <.51 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Nov-98 <.48 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Dec-98 <.048 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Jan-99 <.055 <10.0 0.021
<.02
Feb-99 <.042 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Mar-99 <.045 <10.0 <.02
<.02
TABLE A-1
Summary of Select Effluent Data
Benzene Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Total Zinc
(Ib/d) (ug/L) (mglL)
Apr-99 <.052 <10.0 <.02
<.02
May-99 <.057 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Jun-99 <.044 <10.0 <.02
<.02
JuI-99 <.055 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Aug-99 <.054 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Sep-99 <.058 <10.0 <.02
<.02
Permit No. NC0004944
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. as amended,
HNA Holdings, Izcer rated
f/k/a Hoe st-Cinese Corporation
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
xoSA - Salisbury Facility
Highway 70 at Highway 801
West of Salisbury
Rowan County
ARrEvA SPEC. /AL r, E$
C, a . r. , d /RosA
to receiving waters designated as North Second Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements. and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on March 31, 2004
Signed this day
DRAFT
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
liy Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
is hereby authorized to:
1.
Permit No. NC0004944
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Incted
As R TF✓v SPr c, 1 � s sum 1. C%b%
Continue to operate an existing2.305 MGD activated sludge wastewater
consisting of a bar screen and grit chamber. gr rap, equalization
aeration basins, anaerobic groundwater treatment unit secondary clarifiers, t
polishing ponds with portable aerators and chemica
sludge dewatering, sludge holding, and instrumente
Salisbury facility at the intersection of Highway 70
Rowan County (See Part 1I1, A of this permit);
7ANxs
atment facility
mechanical
ree (3) aerated
addition facilities, aerobic digestion,
flow measurement located a
and Highway 801, west of Salisbury in
TiSFRT Le I//Pc"RoxpL
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into North
Second Creek, a class C water in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin; and
3. Continue to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity through the five outfalls.
(outfalls A. B, C, D, and 5) as shown on the attached map. Modifications to the stormwater
conveyance system are authorized by this permit in accordance with documentation to be
included in the facility's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (construction activities must
be authorized under General Permit No. NCG010000).
Jam_
DNA LYT(G/6,L PATA
wr-jiGH /3
L e VET sitfrt-L- 8E g«PoiTED ,kr.iD
Ko .CA
RodsS
c r= -Ten-Ai rite DCTecTioit/
✓Fg EP s Z E7 O 1 or2
leEPoRi7' ' of BoT' GONLENTKPrVod✓ Ail() MASS , 77tE
PFTEcr(ord Noic:p ,S-S A c,,elfr
Latitude:
Lon¢itude:
Quad #:
Stream Class:
Receiving Stream:
Permitted Flow:
SCALE 1:24000
35°42'34" Sub -Basin: 03-0706
80°34'31"
E16NE
C
North Second Creek
2.305 MGD
A (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
Permit No. NC0004944
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration. the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001-
Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
CHARACTERISTICS
DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
EFFLUENT
Monthly Average
Daily Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample
Location'
Flow (MGD)
2.305
Continuous
Recording
I:
BOD, 5-day, 20°C (April 1 — October 31)
150.0 Ibs/day
300.0 lbs/day
Daily
Composite
I.
BO ,
"' ° ‘,, ovember 1 — MarcE
1)
i= /day
600.0 Ibs/da ;
; ,
Daily 1.:-.posite
-� `�
NH3 a r '`'
23.0
46.0 Ibs/d'r .
3/Week
Co osite
E \
Total nisi
• nded Residue
333.0 is/da
58.0 bs/ av
Daily
e. Composite
E
Fecal Cold
trm (geometric m an)
200 / 100
400 / 10 till
Weekly
^�� Grab
E
Dissolved I
xygen2
Daily
Grab
E
Dissolved I
xygenl
I
Grab
U, D
-
Total Cop $
• r /
onthly
Composite
E
Tota r
i
�p�hly
Composite
E
Iron
�,��
Monthly
Composite
E
Manganese
Monthly
Composite
E
Conductivity I
1
Grab
U, D
Temperature S,
I
Grab
U, 1)
Chronic Toxicity; \
Quarterly
Composite
E
NOTES:
2
/36y LiS/DAr
Sample Locations: E — Effluent. U — Upstream at least 100 feet above the outfall. D — Downstream approximately eight miles from the outfall or at Highway 601. Upstream and
downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three times per week during June. July, August and September and once per week during the
remaining months of the year. lnstream sampling requirements are provisionally waived in light of the permittee's participation in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin Association. All
instream sampling requirements are immediately reinstated should the permittee cease participation in the Association.
The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be Tess than 5.0 mg/L.
Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F @ 34%: February. May. August. November: See condition A(3) of the Supplement to Effluent Limitations and Monitoring page.
3/141 EEIC
4 The pH shall not be Tess than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitore daily at the effluent by grab sample. .EF TOE poc-ISH pc -'P
E:'GCL!EN? p 14 ExcerEP5 %t1EU/'PX PQZNs.T WMtTePT.O I % HeCt"PriP Ofe7FLo4l p$ t/f4Lt4ES Fag 77j exC-/40c4S 30 Dn .s
TI ILRE SHALL BE NO l IILSCHARG€-on LoA-TING s S OR Vrs1stcTOAMiN-OTHEtUrHAN TRACE AMOUNTS.
tl/Du tr D 13 E ge—Vi Ets/EDJ /rriP i F po t/Psc. u ES Ex c-FED %N"E
5 CoN'i9oSrre Shrf12"71 itle-ArWS .Rt 2`f Houti conrPesrl-C-
06.4/h .Tr, .9�;
tlppel2 wns T of 9,oJ %!tcN cldr►trPre-/. EFrLtsFivr /3
vA1,Ke5 i'h'wLP BC USED Fort Coyrspt,m,-'GE- puApaScs.
14tS 5 co,✓Oroti p, "lout-7 e,✓ /S 7b r3c C1sEP [vrtc,✓
P14GPre $c00,45 /t t ac CA-444EP et..E✓A-rev p H.
A(2). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL NC0004944
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration. the Permittee is authorized to
discharge OCPSF related process wastewater from outfall serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristic
Daily Maximum
lbs/day
Monthly Average
lbs/day
Daily Maximum
ug/I-
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location'
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acrylonitrile
Anthracene
Benzene
Benzo(a)anthracene
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
2-Chlorophenol
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.3-Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1.2-Dichloroethane
1.1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1.2-Dichloropropane
1.3-Dichloropropylene
Diethyl phthalate
2.4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl phthalate
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2.4-Dinitrotoluene
2.6-Dinitrotoluene
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Methyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Phenanthrene
0.482
0.482
0.482
1.110
0.498
0.180
0.180
0.180
0.302
0.188
0.147
0.229 0.122
2.188 0.849
0.375 0.171
0.800 0.253
0.465 0.220
1.331 0.629
0.359 0.253
0.229 0.122
0.482 0.180
1.722 0.555
0.131
0.441 0.171
0.914 0.318
1.877 1.249
0.359 0.237
1.657 0.661
0.294 0.147
0.384 0.155
2.261 0.637
1.004 0.580
5.232 2.082
0.882 0.261
0.555 0.204
0.482 0.180
0.400 0.163
0.441 0.171
1.551 0.702
0.727 0.327
0.482 0.180
0.555 0.220
0.563 0.335
1.012 0.588
0.482 0.180
2
0.09
0.09
0.09
17
13
0.09
A,jNuAL-L-t
9
27
0.0023
Annually
Annually
Annually
nnually
Quarterly
y
Annually
Annually
ally
Quarterly
nua y
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
A(2). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
NC0004944
Effluent Characteristic
Daily Maximum
lbs/day
Monthly Average
Ibs/day
Daily Maximum
µa-
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Locations
Phenol
Pyrene
Tetrachloroe thylene
Toluene
Total Chromium
Total Copper
Total Cyanide
Total Lead
Total Nickel
Total Zinc
1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.12-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
0.212
0.547
0.457
1.143
0.441
0.441
0.441
2.188
0.192
0.204
0.180
0.212
0.555
0.171
0.171
0.171
0.849
32
psr/Nu��-t'r
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annual)
Annua y
Annually
Annuall
Monthly
nua y
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Composite
Composi te
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
b. IF the detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding a 10-year design
storm, visual observations for color. foam. outfall staining, visible sheens, and dry weather
flow are required, but analytical sampling shall not be required.
c. If the detention pond discharges only in response to a storm event exceeding a 25-year. 24-
hour storm. the pond shall be considered a non -discharging stormwater control system and not
subject to NPDES requirements, unless the discharge causes a violation of water quality
standards.
6. Samples analyzed in accordance with the terms of this permit shall be submitted on forms provided by
the Director no later than January 31 following the year in which sampling was required.
7 Specific Monitoring Requirements
a. Stormwater from HNA Holdings Inc. — Salisbury. Monitoring applies to all of the
stormwater discharges. Monitoring is not required for stormwater which does not discharge
to the surface waters of the state.
6t./NIk'n2C
Stormwater Discharge
Characteristics
Units
Monitoring Requirements
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type t
Sample
Location'
Total Flow' MG Annually SDO
pH Standard Annually Grab SDO
Oil and Grease mg/L
Annually Grab SDO
Total Suspended Solids mg/L
Annually omp� SDO
BOD. 5-day, 20°C mg/L Annually : Composite
SDO
Total Nitrogen mg/L
Annually Composite
SDO
Total Phosphorus mg/L
Annually Composite
SDO
TTO
mg/L i Annually Composite ,,
SDO
Composite sam les all be time -weighted composites
2 sample Locations: SDO — Stormwater isc arge 0utfall
Total flow shall be measured continuously or calculated based on the amount of area draining to
the outfall, the amount of built -upon area. and the total amount of rainfall or estimated by the
measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event. Total precipitation and
duration of the event measured shall be a representative storm event.
Storm Event Characteristic Units
Total Event Precipitation inches
Event Duration hours
6-XP3.8
Monitoring Requirements
Annually
Annually
For facilities that develop a solvent management plant to be incorporated into the stormwater pollution
prevention plan may make a request to DWQ that monitoring of total toxic organics be waived. The
solvent management plan shall include, as a minimum, lists of the total toxic organic compounds used;
the method of disposal used instead of dumping such as reclamation. contract hauling. or incineration:
and the procedures for assuring that toxic organics do not routinely spill or leak into the stormwater.
For those facilities allowed such a waiver, the discharger shall include a signed certification statement
on the discharge monitoring reports.
b. Stormwater discharges from any vehicle maintenance activity occurring on -site which uses more than 55
gallons of new motor oil per month when averaged over the calendar year shall be monitored by the
permittee as specified below:
Re: Hf'1A & Buck SS...
Subject: Re: HNA & Buck SS...
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:34:28 -0400
From: Michael Parker <Michael.Parker@ncmail.net>
Organization: NC DENR - Mooresville Regional Office
To: Mark Mcintire <mark.mcintire@ncmail.net>
The problem I have had with these drafts is getting these documents to all
the people that need to see them and then giving them enough time to review
them. Fortunately, I believe everyone has finally seen/reviewed them, and we
have no additional comments to offer at this time. A signed copy of the Fact
Sheet should be back to you soon. Sorry for the delay.
Mark Mcintire wrote:
> Did you get a chance to take a look at the HNA Salisbury draft? Also, I
> think I sent you a copy of the Buck Steam Station draft a while back. I
> seem to remember you calling about it, though I may be going crazy. Let
> me know if you have comments on that one as well. EPA is barking at us
> to issue as many majors as we can before the end of the year.
> Thanks,
> Mark
> --
> Mark D. McIntire
> Environmental Engineer
> NPDES Unit - Division of Water Quality
> 1617 Mail Service Center
> Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
> (919) 733-5083, extension 553
> mailto:mark.mcintire@ncmail.net
Michael Parker - Michael.Parker@ncmail.net
Environmental Engineer II
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
919 N. Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: 704.663.6040
Michael Parker <Michael.Parker@ncmail.net>
Environmental Engineer II
NC DENR - Mooresville
Division of Water Quality
1 of 1 10/19/1999 10:58 AM
DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0004944
Facility, Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Arteva Specialties, S.a.r.l. d/b/a KOSA (f/k/a HNA Holdings)
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 4, Salisbury, NC 28145-0004
Facility Address:
At the intersection of Hwy 70 and Hwy 801
Permitted Flow
2.305 MGD
Type of Waste:
97% industrial
3% domestic
Facility/Permit Status:
Existing renewal w/o expansion
County:
Rowan
't Stream Ch`aracteristi�cs.
Receiving Stream
North Second Creek
Stream Classification
C
Subbasin
03-07-06
Drainage Area (mi2):
116
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
6.9
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
23
Average Flow (cfs):
116
IWC (%) @ 2.305 MGD:
34%
4 F sz, + -' Y. d
4. .•-/t. f_..: ._.._ .....'Y%.1. _ v E, .....:Y.. fx_ . `i. t..... .
• Qa/�a *+ y'Q t 4I t .. it......
'.:
iscellano�is..t u,!.i � .. _F �, I',' 3 � xefc%.. ... �, f .
Regional Office:
Mooresville
USGS Topo Quad:
E16NE
Permit Writer:
Mark McIntire
Date:
Updated January 12, 2000
Summary
Arteva Specialties, S_a.r.l. d/b/a KOSA, formerly known as HNA Holdings, Inc., has applied for a
renewal of the NPDES permit for its Salisbury facility. The facility manufactures polyester in chip
and fiber form. As such, 40 CFR 414.30 and 414.40 (OCPSF federal guidelines) are applicable.
Primary raw materials include terephthalic acid, ethylene glycol, and fiber finish oils.
The facility was originally permitted in 1980 at a flow of 1.2 MGD. A modification request
accompanied the permit renewal request received in 1992. At that time, Hoechst Celanese requested
an increase in total flow from 1.2 MGD to 2.305 MGD to accommodate the discharge of remediated
groundwater associated with a RCRA site stabilization plan. At the same time, new stream flows
were requested from USGS. The flows provided by USGS were half what they had been when the
permit was developed at 1.2 MGD. BOD5 was, and remains, water quality limited. Ammonia
limitations are present as well to keep a check on NBOD.
According to the NPDES permit application, approximately 1.6 MGD of wastewater is expected to be
generated on any given day. Wastewater is broken down into the following components:
Finish: 0.114 MGD
Bandcaster: 0.08 MGD
Cooling towers: 0.148 MGD
Process: 0.082 MGD
Groundwater: 0.616 MGD
Domestic: 0.05 MGD
Boilers d? Chillers:
WTP Backwash:
Process Stormwater:
0.116 MGD
0.09 MGD
0.304 MGD
1.6 MGD Total
In accordance with EPA guidance, an actual average wasteflow was determined using data from
January 1995 — August 1998. The actual average flow has been determined to be 1.5058 MGD. Of
that 1.5058, approximately 0.979 MGD is considered process with an additional 300,000 gpd from
process stormwater. Finish and Bandcaster wastewaters, making up approximately 19.8% of the
process wastewater, are produced from fiber manufacturing and are regulated by 40 CFR 414.
Subpart C. The remaining 80.2% of process wastewater comes from the contact cooling towers,
resin processing, remediated groundwater, and process stormwater is regulated by 40 CFR 414,
Subpart D. The attached spreadsheet summarizes the guideline calculations and actual average flow
determination.
The wastewater treatment facility is a biological process consisting of screening. equalization,
aeration basins, clarification, polishing ponds, aerobic sludge digestion and sludge dewatering.
Recovered groundwater is anaerobically pretreated prior to discharge to the equalization basin
referenced above. The primary contaminant found in the groundwater is ethylene glycol, however
1,4-dioxane has also been detected. Groundwater pretreatment consists of ultraviolet treatment and
addition of peroxide. As this is an end -of -pipe biological treatment system, 40 CFR 414, Subpart 1
applies. The second attached spreadsheet calculates Subpart I allocations. For water quality limited
parameters, concentration -based limitations have been installed on permit page A(2) in accordance
with state standards and/or EPA criteria. As there are no clearly defined metal -bearing or cyanide -
bearing wastestreams, limits for total chromium, total copper, total cyanide, total lead, total nickel
and total zinc do not apply.
This permit also authorizes the discharge of stormwater. Stormwater requirements are outlined in
Part I, A(4) and A(5).
Proposed Changes
• Permittee name: Per permittee request, the owner name of this facility has been
changed from Hoechst Celanese Corporation to HNA Holdings, Incorporated.
• BOD5 and TSS allocations: Allocations for BOD5 remain unchanged as they are water quality
limited. Allocations for TSS were previously based on a process wasteflow of 1.2 MGD. These
allocations have been revised using the past 3.5 years worth of daily flow data to compute an
average. Allocations were computed in accordance with the attached spreadsheet.
• Biocide Condition: The biocide condition, formerly condition F. has been deleted.
This condition is not necessary as the biocide laden waste streams are subject to chronic toxicity
testing at outfall 001.
• Subpart I Monitoring: Subpart I requirements have been updated on page A(2) of the
draft permit. These parameters have changed slightly since the permit was issued last.
Additionally, the monitoring frequency for Subpart I requirements has been changed from
quarterly to annually due to continued non -detection of these parameters. Total copper, iron,
manganese and total zinc have been included on effluent page A(1) due to their common
presence in the effluent from outfall 001. Monthly monitoring has been installed for these
parameters. Of the other subpart I parameters, only benzene and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (an
organic vacuum pump lubricant) have been detected during the previous 3.5 years, therefore
monitoring for these parameters remains quarterly.
Toxici :
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Chronic P/F
001: Chronic P/F @ 34%
001: Chronic P/F @ 34%
February, May, August, November
This facility has been in compliance with its toxicity testing requirement for at least the past 3 years.
Metals:
Total copper, total zinc, iron and manganese remain on effluent page A(1). All other metals are
monitored annually in conjunction with subpart I requirements.
Instream Monitoring:
Conductivity, temperature, and dissolved oxygen are monitored upstream and downstream. The HNA
discharge does not appear to be affecting dissolved oxygen but is having an impact on downstream
conductivity and temperature. The HNA discharge appears to be elevating instream conductivity by
about 10 µmhos/cm on average, with an average downstream value of about 100. The HNA
discharge also appears to be elevating instream temperature by about 1°C.
Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: August 11, 1999
Permit Scheduled to Issue: September 27, 1999
State Contact:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached draft permit, please
contact Mark McIntire at (919) 735-5038 ext. 553.
•
Arfeva Specialites, S.a.r.1. d/b/a KOSA - Salisbury Plant
NC0004944
Month
I Flow
Jan-95
0.987
Feb-95
1.067
Mar-95
1.519
Apr-95
1.425
May-95
1.428
Jun-95
1.916
Jul-95
1.494
Aug-95
1.495
Sep-95
1.568
Oct-95
1.535
Nov-95
1.542
Dec-95
1.542
Jan-96
1.514
Feb-96
1.478
Mar-96
1.519
Apr-96
1.465
May-96
1.517
Jun-96
1.532
Jul-96
1.508
Aug-96
1.577
Sep-96
1.63
Oct-96
1.574
Nov-96
1.589
Dec-96
1.571
Jan-97
1.601
Feb-97
1.655
Mar-97
1.696
Apr-97
1.643
May-97
1.544
Jun-97
1.531
Jul-97
1.62
Aug-97
1.445
Sep-97
1.446
Oct-97
1.594
Nov-97
1.508
Dec-97
1.538
Jan-98
1.601
Feb-98
1.525
Mar-98
1.464
Apr-98
1.518
May-98
1.392
Jun-98
1.485
Jul-98
1.252
Aug-98
1.205
Average Flow from 1/95 - 8/98: 1.5058 MGD
Information provided by KOSA with this permit renewal indicates that outfall 001 is designed to discharge
1.6 MGD. Of that, approximately 65% can be considered process wastewater on any given day.
Applying this 65% to the average flow computed above yields an actual average process flow for the
investigation period of: 0.978767 MGD.
Actual average process flow:
0.97877 MGD plus 0.304 MGD of process stormwater =>
The process wastewater flow at this facility is split between two 40 CFR 414 subparts, subparts C and D.
Approximately 19.8% is subpart C process wastewater with the difference being subpart D process WW.
The subparts are summarized below:
40 CFR 414.31 (Subpart C - All units are mg/L)
Daily Maxi Mon. Avg.
GODS
TSS
48
115
18
36
40 CFR 414.41 (Subpart D - All units are mg/L)
I Daily Maxi Mon. Avg.
GODS
TSS
64
130
24
40
Process Flow applicable to subpart C: 0.25399 MGD
Process Flow applicable to subpart D: 1.02878 MGD
Subpart C Allocation - lbs/day
(Daily Maxi Mon. Avg.
BODE
TSS
101.67643
243.59977
38.12866
76.25732
Subpart D Allocation - lbs/day
Daily Maxi Mon. Avg.
BODS
TSS
549.12117
1115.4024
205.92044
343.20073
Domestic Allocation (Q = 60,500 gpd) - Assuming secondary limits - lbs/day
Daily Maxi Mon. Avg.
SODS
TSS
22.70565
22.70565
15.1371
15.1371
Total Allocation (Sum of C, D, and Domestic) - lbs/day
I Daily Maxi Mon. Avg.
BODS
TSS
674
1382
259
435
BODS
TSS
Existing Allocation
I Daily Max I Mon. Avg.
300
1349
150
505
1.28277
Mark McIntire
4
0.136 MGD
HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
WATER FLOW SCHEMATIC
SANITARY
f
GROUNDWATER
.531 MGD
EVAP
0.100 MGD
0
WASTE
TREATMENT
PLANT
OUTFALL
N. SECOND CREEK
1.601 MGD
STORM WATER
0.304 MGD
FINISH
0.136 MGD 0.214 MGD
A
0
BOILERS
AND
CHILLERS
0
EVAP
0,284 MGD
CO
0
0\
O
EVAP
COOLING
TOWERS
0.50 MGD
D
BANCASTERS
A
0.274 MGD
to
r
cD
c-3
cu
co
0
co
0
0
PROCESS
0.394 MGD
0.090 MGD BLOWDOWN
CITY WATER
0.350 MGD
INTAKE
N. SECOND CREEK
1.23 MGD
WATER
TREATMENT
PLANT
0.070 MGD
REACTION
BYPRODUCT
OCPSF Subpart I Calculations
FACILITY =>
NPDES Permit # _>
OCPSF now =>
7Q10s =>
QP =>
Dilution =>
11NA Holdings - Salisbury
\C0004944
1.28 MGD
6.9 cfs
2.305 MGD
2.9312854
Parameter
OCPSF
Daily
Maximum
pg/L
OCPSF
Monthly
Average
ltg/L
OCPSF
Daily
Maximum
lbs/day
OCPSF
Monthly
Average
lbs/day
Federal
Criteria or
State
Standard
Standard
Aquatic
Life
Pg/L
Human
Health
Standard
µg/L
Allowable
Aquatic
Life
µg/L
Allowable
Human
Health
ltg/L
Allowable
Aquatic
Life
lbs/day
Allowable
Human
Health
Ibs/day
Limit
Based On:
Monthly
Daily Average
Maximum Limit
Limit lbs/day
\,r„ , i1,1hvnc 59 22 0.630 0.235 PC
Acenaphth*lenc 59 22 0.630 0.235 PC
Acrylonitrile 242 96 2.583 1.025 PC
Anthracene 59 22 0.630 0.235 PC
Benzene 136 37 1.452 0.395 SS
Benzo(a)anthracene 59 22 0.630 0.235 FC
3,4-Benzofluoranthene 61 23 0.651 0.246 FC
Benzo(Idlluoranthene 59 22 0.630 0.235 FC
Bcnzo(a)pyrene 61 23 0.651 0.246 PC
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 279 103 2.978 1.100 PC
Carbon Tetrachloride 38 18 0.406 0.192 SS
Chlorobenzene 28 15 0.299 0.160 PC
Chloroethane 268 104 2.861 1.110 PC
Chloroform 46 21 0.491 0.224 5S
2-Chlorophenol 98 31 1.046 0.331 PC
Cltrysene 59 22 0.630 0.235 PC
Dim -butyl phthalate 57 27 0.608 0.288 PC
1.2•Dichlorobenzene 163 77 1.740 0.822 PC
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 44 31 0.470 0.331 PC
1.4-Dichlorobenzenc 28 15 0.299 0.160 PC
1.1-Dichloroethane 59 22 0.630 0.235 FC
1.2-Dichloroethane 211 68 2.252 0.726 FC
I.1-Dichloroethylene 25 16 0.267 0.171 PC
1.2-trans-Dichlorocthylenc 54 21 0.576 0.224 PC
2,4-Dichlorophenol 112 39 1.196 0.416 PC
I,2•Dichloropropane 230 153 2.455 1.633 PC
I,3-Dichloropropylene 44 29 0.470 0.310 PC
Diethyl phthalate 203 81 2.167 0.865 PC
2.4-Dimethylphenol 36 18 0.384 0.192 PC
Dimethyl phthalate 47 19 0.502 0.203 PC
4.6-Dinitro-o-cresol 277 78 2.957 0.833 PC
2,4-Dinitrophenol 123 71 1.313 0.758 PC
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 285 113 3.042 1.206 FC
2,6•Dinitrotoluene 641 255 6.843 2.722 PC
Ethylbenzene 108 32 1.153 0.342. FC
Fluoranthene 68 25 0.726 0.267 PC
Fluorene 59 22 0.630 0.235 FC
Iiexachlorobenzene 28 15 0.299 0.160 PC
Iiexachlorobutadiene 49 20 0.523 0.214 SS
Ilexachloroethane 54 21 0.576 0.224 PC
Methyl Chloride 190 86 2.028 0.918 FC
Methylene Chloride 89 40 0.950 0.427 FC
none 2700 none 791-1.-17 none
none none none none none
none 0.66 none 1.93 none
none 110000 none 322441.40 none
none 71.4 none 209.29 none
none 0.031 none 0.09 none
none none none none none
none 0.031 none 0.09 none
none 0.031 none 0.09 none
none 5.9 none 17.29 none
none 4.42 none 12.96 none
none 21000 none 61556.99 none
none none none none none
none 470 none 1377.70 none
none 400 none 1172.51 none
none 0.031 none 0.09 none
none none none none none
none 17000 none 49831.85 none
none 2600 none 7621.34 none
none 2600 none 7621.34 none
none none none none none
none 99 none 290.20 none
none 3.2 none 9.38 none
none none none none none
none 790 none 2315.72 none
none 39 none 114.32 none
none 1700 none 4983.19 none
none 120000 none 351754.25 none
none 2300 none 6741.96 none
none 2900000 none 8500727.73 none
none none none none none
none 14000 none 41038.00 none
none 9.1 none 26.67 none
none none none none none
none 29000 none 85007.28 none
none 370 none 1084.58 none
none 14000 none 41038.00 none
none 0.00077 none 0.00 none
none 49.7 none 145.68 none
none 8.9 none 26.09 none
none none none none none
none 1600 none 4600.06 none
152.15 OCPSF
none OCPSF
0.04 CHRONIC
6198.52 OCPSF
4.02 OCPSF
0.00 CHRONIC
none OCPSF
0.00 CHRONIC
0.00 CHRONIC
0.33 CHRONIC
0.25 CHRONIC
1183.35 OCPSP
none OCPSF
26.48 OCPSF
22.54 OCPSF
0.00 CI IRONIC
none OCPSP
957.95 OCPSF
146.51 OCPSF
146.51 OCPSF
none OCPSF
5.58 OCPSF
0.18 CHRONIC
none OCPSF
44.52 OCPSF
2.20 CHRONIC
95.80 OCPSF
6762.02 OCPSF
129.61 OCPSF
163415.44 OCPSP
none OCPSF
788.90 OCPSF
0.51 CHRONIC
none OCPSF
1634.15 OCPSF
20.85 OCPSF
788.90 OCPSF
0.00 CHRONIC
2.80 OCPSF
0.50 CHRONIC
none OCPSF
90.16 OCPSF
0.630 lbs/day 0.235
0.630 lbs/day 0.235
1.935 ug/L
0.630 lbs/day 0.235
1.452 lbs/day 0.395
0.091 ug/L
0.651 lbs/day 0.246
0.091 ug/L
0.091 ug/L
17.295 ug/L
12.956 ug/L 0.192
0.299 Ibs/day 0.160
2.861 lbs/day 1.110
0.491 lbs/day 0.224
1.046 lbs/day 0.331
0.091 ug/L
0.608 lbs/day 0.288
1.740 lbs/day 0.822
0.470 lbs/day 0.331
0.299 lbs/day 0.180
0.630 lbs/day 0.235
2252 Ibs/day 0.726
9.380 ug/L 0.171
0.576 lbs/day 0.224
1.196 Ibs/day 0.416
114.320 ug/L 1.633
0.470 lbs/day 0.310
2.167 lbs/day 0.865
0.384 lbs/day 0.192
0.502 lbs/day 0.203
2.957 lbs/day 0.833
1.313 Ibs/day 0.758
26.675 ug/L
6.843 lbs/day 2.722
1.153 lbs/day 0.342
0.726 lbs/day 0.267
0.630 lbs/day 0.235
0.002 ug/L
0.523 lbs/day 0.214
26.088 ug/L 0.224
2.028 Ibs/day 0.918
0,950 lbs/day 0.427
01/12/2000
OCPSF Subpart I Calculations
Parameter
OCPSF
Daily
Maximum
itg/L
OCPSF
Monthly
Average
ltg/L
OCPSF
Daily
Maxiutum
lbs/day
OCPSF
Monthly
Average
lbs/day
Federal
Criteria or
State
Standard
Standard
Aquatic
Life
pg/L
Human
Health
Standard
Ng/L
Allowable
Aquatic
Life
it6/L
Allowable
Human
Health
ug/L
Allowable
Aquatic
Life
lbs/day
Allowable
Human
Health
lbs/day
Limit
Based On:
Daily
Maximum
Limit
Monthly
Average
Limit
lbs/day
Naphthalene 59 22 0.650 0.235 PC none none none none none none OCPSF 0.630 lbs/day 0.235
Nitrobenzene 68 27 0.726 0.288 PC none 1900 none 5569.44 none 107.07 OCPSF 0.726 Ibs/day 0.288
2-Nit•ophenol 69 91 0.737 0.438 PC none none none none none none OCPSF 0.737 lbs/day 0.438
4.Nitrophenol 124 72 1.324 0.769 PC none none none none none none OCPSF 1.324 lbs/day 0.769
Phenanthrene 59 22 0.630 0.235 FC none none none none none none OCPSF 0.630 lbs/day 0.235
Phenol 26 15 0.278 0.160 PC none 4600000 none 13983912.95 none 259210.70 OCPSF 0.278 Ibs/day 0.160
Pyrene 67 25 0.715 0.267 PC none 11000 none 32294.19 none 619.85 OCPSF 0.715 lbs/day 0.267
Tetrachloroethylene 56 22 0.598 0.235 55 none 8.85 none 25.94 none 0.50 CI IRONIC 25.942 ug/L 0.235
Toluene 80 26 0.854 0.278 SS 11 200000 52.24 586257.08 0.62 11270.05 CHRONIC 32.244 ug/L 0.278
Total Chromium 2770 1 110 29.570 11.899 SS 50 none 196.56 none 2.82 none CI IRONIC 196.564 ug/L
Total Copper 3380 1450 36.082 15.479 SS•AL 7 none 20.52 none 0.39 none CI IRONIC 20.519 ug/L
Total Cyanide 1200 420 12.810 4.484 SS 5 220000 14.66 694882.79 0.28 12397.03 CHRONIC 14.656 ug/L
Total Lead 690 320 7.366 3.416 55 25 none 73.28 none 1.41 none CHRONIC 73.282 ug/L
Total Nickel 3980 1690 42.487 18.011 SS 88 4600 257.95 13483.91 4.96 259.21 CHRONIC 257.953 ug/L
Total Zinc 2610 1050 27.862 11.209 SS•AL 50 50 196.56 146.56 2.82 2.82 CHRONIC 196.569 ug/L
1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene 140 68 1.495 0.726 PC none none none none none none OCPSF 1.495 lbs/day 0.726
I.I,I•Frichloroethane 54 21 0.576 0.224 PC none none none none none none OCPSF 0.576 lbs/day 0.224
1,1.2=1-richloroethane 54 21 0.576 0.224 FC none 42 none 123.11 none 2.37 OCPSF 0.576 lbs/day 0.224
Trichloroethylene 54 21 0.576 0.224 FC none 81 none 237.93 none 4.56 OCPSF 0.576 Ihs/day 0.224
Vinyl Chloride 268 104 2.861 1.110 SS none 525 none 1538.92 none 29.58 OCPSF 2.861 lbs/day 1.110
01/12/2000
HNA Holdings, Inc. Water Quality Limited OCPSF Data NC0004944
Jan-95 [ Feb-95 I Mar-95 I Apr-95
May-95j Jun-951 Jul-95
Aug-95I Sep-95
Oct-951 Nov-951 Dec-95
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroe thane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropylene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Nitrobenzene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Tetrachloroethylene
toluene
Vinyl Chloride
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
30 15 32 120 43 24 < 99 9.8 18 5.8 60
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
Jan-961 Feb-96I Mar-961 Apr-96I May--96I Jun-961 Jul-961 Aug-961 Sep-961 Oct-96j Nov 96I Dec-96
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropylene
2.4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachlorobutad ie ne
Nitrobenzene
4,6-D initro-o-cresol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Tetrachloroethylene
:toluene
Vinyl Chloride
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< 23 < 36 82 86
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
94 55 12 10 38 9.6
< < < < <
< < < < < <
< < < < < <
10/20/98
HNA Holdings, Inc. Water Quality Limited OCPSF Data NC0004944
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1 3-Dichlorop ropyle ne
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Nitrobenzene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Tetrachloroethylene
toluene
Vinyl Chloride
Jan-971 Feb-97
Mar-971 Apr-971May-97
Jun-971 Jul-97
Aug-97I Sep-97
Oct-971 Nov-971 Dec-97
< < < < < < < < < < < <
0.072 < 0.077 0.063 < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < <. < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < C < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< 10.8 < 19.5 19 < < 23.6 13.2 66.3 13 37.5
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
Jan-981 Feb-981 Mar-981 Apr-981 May-981 Jun-981 Jul-98I Aug-98I Sep-981 Oct-981 Nov-981:Dec-98
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
,Carbon :Tetrachloride
iexachlorobenzene
12-Dchloroethane
11,2-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropylene
2,4=Dinitrotoluene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Nitrobenzene
4,6-Dinitro=o-cresol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Tetrachloroethylene
toluene
Vinyl Chloride
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < <
< < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
147 74.7 51.6 < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < <
10/20/98
Hoechst Celanese
October 23, 1998
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Reference: NPDES Permit No.: NC0004944
Notice of Ownership Change
Dear Sir / Madam:
Technical Fibers Group
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Highway 70 West, PO Box 4
Salisbury, NC 28144
704 636 6000
HNA Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Hoechst Celanese Corporation) has sold the
assets of its polyester business to ARTEVA Specialties Sarl. This sale of assets includes
the Salisbury facility and the business operations that are conducted there. The sale will
be effective on November 23, 1998.
HNA Holdings, Inc. request that the NPDES permit referenced above be transferred to
the ARTEVA Specialties Sarl Corporation. The parties hereby request that the permit be
transferred effective November 23, 1998 to the ARTEVA Specialties Sarl Corporation to
reflect the change in ownership.
Enclosed is a check for $100.00 to pay the fee for this change. We have also enclosed a
copy of the "Permit Transfer Agreement" signed by both parties, a partial copy of the
October 12, 1998 "Asset Transfer Agreement", and a copy of the "Permit
Name/Ownership Change Form".
If you have any questions, please call Stephen Lamb at 704-636-6000 (extension 4862) or
Bryson Woodlief at 704-636-6000 (extension 4253).
Sincerely,
A. J. 3ranecky
Plant Manager
File: npdes.DOC
:C Nd 9Z 130 8
to
Hoechst El
.ACTION COUPON
v��MARKETING DEPARTMENT
P.O. BOX 36502
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28236-6502
RONVIEW SERVICES YOU NEED AND MAIL THIS COUPON TO US TODAY!
..ncI.n i rI SHA
OTHER SERVICES AVAILABLE
SAVINGS
LOANS
AT S ARONV1EW: —
0 MasterCard
■ Financial Counseling
■ Share (Savings) Account
0 TimeSaver Open Line of Credit
■ Travelers Cheques
• ShareChek (Checking) Account
0 Relay Card
■ New Car/Truck Loan
■ Notary Public Services
❑ Christmas Club
• Used Car/Truck Loan
0 Official Checks
0 RV, Motorcycle, Boat Loan
■ Wire Transfers
• Vacation Club
• IRA
■ First or Second Mortgage Loan
0 AIS New Car Guide
■ Certificate of Deposit
■ Home Equity Line of Credit
■ NADA Used Car Guide
0 Home Improvement Loan
■ Payroll Deduction
• Money Market Account
0 Other Savings Account
■ Mobile Home Loan
■ Other
• Direct Deposit
0 Share Secured Loan
NAME
MEMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER
ADDFIESS
CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE CASHING
•Sharonview Federal Credit Union
13504-A SOUTH POINT BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
PAY
TO THE ORDER OF SEQ.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. "41962 Li 31
OF ENVIROMENT & NATURAL 000206861
RESOURCES
PERMIT# NC0004944
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST
CHARLOTTE, N.C.
III 20686LIN 1:053LOLL2LI: 5216433698n'�
0
/tiC
)09/tj
ACCOUNT
66-112
631
CHECK NO.
206_861
DATE AMOUNT
,�e
•
.� �*******100.00
j2 /9 $*
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE CASHING
37136-03 311745000 10/21/98
ACCOUNT TYPE 100.00
CHECK AMOUNT $ 100.00
0019592 22 000206861
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Ai-4X
NI FR
WATER QUALITY SECTION
FER11T NAME/OWNERS131P CHANGE JOIM
I. CURRENT PERMIT INFO) MATIQN:
Permit Number: 1 N l G Iol o IQI q1 91# [91
1. Permit holder's name: /WA NoL.D/NiS /A%d.
2. Permit's signing official's name and title; AN mom' 5RANY
(Person leggy responsible for permit)
Sire- MMA/A6R
(Tide)
3. Mailing address; %7 D. Box 7 City; SAL! s gag)/
State; N L Zip Code; a VHS Phone: f 70 V) 6 3 6 —good
II. NEW OWNER/NAME INFORMATION
1. This request for a name change is a nrsult of:
Change in ownership of property/company
_b. Name change only
_c. Other (please explain);
2. New owner's name (name to be put on permit): ART6vA SPEWeet-T1 E'S Se r/
3. New owner's or signing official's name and title: AM7» oJI Y BRA4/E(XY
(Person leggy responsible for permit)
S �T� ,litwAGFR
('Pule)
4. Mailing address; f� o. Sox q may; S A `. f Rug f •
State; 4/C• Tip Code; 2 V1 45 Phone: (70cf ‘36 —boo 0
OT BE
ED BY THE DIVISION
THIS APPLICATION PACKAGE WILL N UNLESS ALLCOFPTHE APPLICABLE I EMSOF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LISTED BELOW ARE INCLUDED WITH THE SUBMITTAL.
REQUIRED ITEMS:
1. This completed application
2. passing
fee of $ 100.00 (Checks to be made payable to DEHNR)
3. If an ownership change, legal documentation of the transfer of ownership (such as a contract, deed,
articles of incorporation)
CERTIFICATION MUST BE COMPLETED AND SIGNED BYE
THE CURRENT
PERMIT HOLDER AND THE NEW APPLICANTLY, COMPLETE AND EO F CHANGE OF
OWNERSHIP. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION. CHANGE
Current Permittee's Certification: changebeen
NTF+o,NY BRAil ruc Y , attest that this application for name/ownership
I and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required Parts
reviewed and is accurateinformation and attachments are not
of this application are not completed and that if all required
supporting
included, this app cation package will be returned p i G ? I
Date
Signature-
Applicant's Certification: change has been
, 1 1c
74"/CZ(` � attest that this application for a name/ownership
reviewed and
d that
all required
is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Iinfor�niation and auxhments arepnot
of this application are not completed and that if all
wcromm�le��g
included, application package 'Ube returned l
Signature. A Ai
jFGK y Date'
APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION
THE MATERIAL SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
AND MATERIALS,
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
TeleFpax:hone:919)1733-0719083
uL.1 rG 7v 1U . ex rR num.n.71 UMW WR- MICMN
OCT-22-1998 13:04
7004aleGn7 I u 71(1114b37d101 f
Jt /, outN•- . ♦r t• •... v, -. ♦P.0• •41••I.A PO0..
4 This Agreement is entered into this date by HNA► Holdings, Inc. and AR.TEVA
Spicia}hies Sari in order to effect t transfer of permits issued by NCDENR and the
responsblli'ty, coverage, and liability thereunder from RNA Holdings, Inc. to ARTEVA
S•'- "yes Sari.
tab . certifies that there will be no operational changes that .
ARTEVA Speaaraes Sari
warrant a permit modification.
1 On the date such transfer becomes effecdve, ARTEVA S Sari agrees to
assume the responsibility, coverage, and liabTty of the permit and MA Holdings, Inc.
agiiees to relinquish all rights which it may have under said permit.
This fitment is entered into by both parties this 21st day of October 1998. Said
Wilier is targeted to become effective on the 23rd day of Nove;nber 1998,
HNA Holdings, Inc.
P.O. Box 4915
Warren, N,J. 07060
908-231-4058
At2201444.01,
Witness
ARTEVA Specialities Sari
BY:
James B. Flint
Attorney in Fact for ARTEVA
International B.V. as &wang party
for ARTEVA Specialipes Sari
(under formation) W
TOTAL P.03
i* TOTAL PAGE.02