20200712 Ver 1_FDMP_2022_20220307

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20200712 Version* 1
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 03/07/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/7/2022
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Jeremiah Dow [e-mail]
Project Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20200712 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Cool Run Stream and Riparian Wetland
Mitigation Site
County: Brunswick
Document Information
..........................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: CoolRun_100142_FDMP_2022.pdf 49.8MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature:*

DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN
Cool Run Stream and Riparian Wetland
Mitigation Site
Brunswick County, NC
Full Delivery Proposal to Provide Stream and Riparian Wetland
Mitigation Credits
for Cataloging Unit 03040207of the
Lumber River Basin
DMS Project ID No. 100142
Full Delivery Contract No. 20190201-01
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2020-01428
DWR Project No. 20200712
RFP#16-20190201 (Issued: 7/16/2019)
'.,...-- �,, r ,„ 44,
,,-,,_, .....„, _ ,
�a�.�1� fc.x�4 XS_ ( ,. y. <� .-y .a i ��+ y,� .I rr
2 4j ;e�£ �* �� R 5 Al S,..; `) , - -
�k 3�4-. '2 `.r � r� T1 .1`� _;PY y iZ-':
YR'I- ] f f U T-
I +` T
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
March 2022

*. CLEARWATER MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
February 21,2022
Mr. Jeremiah Dow
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 W.Jones Street, Suite 3000
Raleigh,NC 27603
Re: Cool Run—Mitigation Plan (DMS Project No. 100142)
Response to Comments
Dear Mr. Dow,
Please find below the response to comments on the Cool Run Mitigation Plan provided by DMS,
January 22,2022:
Report
1. Table of Contents
a. Please indicate that the groundwater gauge data is in Appendix F.
Re: The TOC has been updated.
b. Please include Table 10A.Only Table 10B and Table 10C are listed.
Re: The TOC has been updated.
2. Table 1 —Recommend removing"Reach A" from the Cool Run Upstream 1 reach name.
Re: "Reach A"has been removed from Table 1.
3. Table 4
a. Please specify whether the length of the reaches listed in the table are existing
or post-restoration, and include both.
Re: Table 4 has been updated to reflect existing and proposed
footages of each reach.
b. Please include both pre-project and post-project wetland acreages.
Re: Table 4 has been updated to reflect existing and proposed
wetland acreages.
c. Table indicates that 401/404 permitting is resolved. This should say"No".
Re: Table 4 has been updated to say that 401 and'404 permitting has not been
resolved.
4. Section 2.0—First paragraph states"The Site is located within USGS 14-digit
hydrologic unit03040207..." Recommend re-wording or deleting 8-digit HUC.
Re: The 8-digit HUC has been removed.

CLEARWATER MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
5. Section 3.3 —I could not locate the nutrient model input/output that is reported to be in
Appendix B.
Re: The nutrient model has been included in Appendix B.
6. Table 7
a. Was holding both the velocity and area constant intended?The change in sinuosity seems
significant enough to elicit a larger change in slope than indicated,and possibly velocity
as well.
Re: Values in Table 3 are tied to Design Discharge(Design Discharge and
Design Discharge Area),which does not change between the existing
channel and the proposed channel. The equation for velocity(Discharge in
ft3/Area in ft2)therefore will not change,even with a change in slope.
b. Please correct reference stream name.
Re: The reference stream name has been updated.
7. Section 3.5.1
a. Are the 15 GW gauges installed in 2020 the same as those mapped in Figure 9 —
Monitoring Plan? Assuming they are, a separate map indicating pre-construction
gauge attainment/non-attainment of proposed wetland success criteria (12%) would
be very useful.
Re: All gauges except gauge#6 will remain in the same locations
post-construction. Gauge#6 will be moved just south of the
existing Cool Run channel to avoid being located within the
proosed P2 bench.All gauges pre-construction (except Gauge
#14&#15) do not meet the proposed wetland success criteria of
12%. This has been updated in the text. Gauge#14& #15 occur
in current wetland areas.
b. Please include a more detailed discussion about the pre-construction gauges,i.e.,how
many gauges achieved the 12%hydroperiod proposed as project success criteria?Also
please includea more robust summary of the DrainMod results and how they indicate
14.11 acres are suitable for re-establishment. The GW gauge data can be presented in
tabular format.Based on post- contract site visit IRT comments,these gauges were to be
important in justifying functional uplift in re-establishment wetlands,and also the rehab
wetlands on the east and west sides of theproject.
Re: A summary of this data has been updated in the document text.
c. Please remove reference to"the Bank"in the 4th paragraph.
Re: "The Bank"has been edited to"the Site".
8. Table 10C—Objective/Treatment column says"Remove overburden to reconnect with
adjacent wetlands."Is this simply berm removal,or more extensive?The IRT typically
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901
clearwatermitigation©gmail.com

CLEARWATER MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
requests wetland grading plan showing grading depths if work involves more than plugs,
roughening,or ditch/channelbackfill.
Re: Text was changed to read"Remove side cast material from ditch
excavation and maintenance."
9. Table 15—Growing season is defined as Feb. 1 to Nov. 30 but the mit plan does not address
how those dates were determined. Please include a discussion regarding how the growing
season dates were determined. If they are based on soil temp and bud burst,that data must be
presented in an Appendix. IRT guidance states"...growing seasons that start earlier than
March 1st or end later thanNovember 20th may not be approved,depending on the project
location." This project's location may qualify it for a growing season earlier than March 1,but
Feb. 1st is very early.
Re: A discussion and methods have been updated in the report.
10. Please include the post-contract site visit meeting minutes in an Appendix.
Re: These are included in Appendix K.
11. Appendix A
a. Please provide a stream and wetland impact map per USACE's requirement.
Re: A site impact map has been created and is included in Appendix A.
b. Figure 2—The Cool Run Site does not appear on the map.
Re: Figure 2 has been updated to include the Cool Run Site.
c. Figure 9—Please consider moving at least one veg plot to a Planting Zone 2 area. It
would also be useful to add the wetland mitigation types to the legend.
Re: No credits are being generated in Planting Zone 2 but the Plot near gauge
12 has been move here.Wetland mitigation types have been added to the
legend.
12. Appendix E—The Categorical Exclusion package should include the signed checklist,all
agency correspondence,and the EDR report summary and maps.All other pages currently
included here canbe removed.
Re: The categorical Exclusion document has been updated.
13. Appendix F
a. Recommend showing beginning and end of growing season on the GW gauge
graphs. TheLegend item for-12"is not displayed in the graph for Wells 7, 8.
Re: This has been updated on the hydrographs.
b. Please consider a summary of the DrainMod model results instead of the detailed
model runresults to reduce the size of the document(by about 300 pages).
Re: A summary has been included in Appendix F.
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901
clearwatermitigation©gmail.com

CLEARWATER MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
14. Appendix L
a. While the plans are considered labeled a 60% submittal,plans should generally be
complete by the time we receive the draft mit plan barring changes based on DMS or IRT
comments,and any changes following IRT review would be required to be shown as red
lines on the as-built.
Re: We are calling the plan 60% as they do not have final approval from the
agencies to seal the plans. The design shown is final pending review
comments.
b. Comments were left in the plan sheets.
Re: An updated plan set will be created.
c. Sheet C05,C06—Show two lines for"limits of grading". Please address.
Re: There is now one line showing `limits of grading"for both sides of stream
work.
d. Sheet C06—Please call out end of Cool Run Upstream 1, Start of Cool Run Upstream 2,
and include stationing.
Re: Call outs have been added.
e. Sheet C07—Please call out end of Cool Run Upstream 2, Start of Cool Run Downstream,
and include stationing.Also,UT1 Structure Location table shows all 4 structures to be
located at the same elevation. Please clarify or correct.
Re: Call outs have been added and structure table updated.
f. Sheet C11 —Same comment as above regarding structure elevations being identical in the
table.
Re: Structure table has been updated.
g. What is the depth of grading proposed that is shown along the stream channels of UT1 and
the Priority I reaches of Cool Run?
Re: Labels have been added calling out the station and floodplain bench
elevation at random locations for the Priority I construction purposes.
Additional notes were also added to sheet CO2 for construction purposes.
Digital
15. Please include the feature that connects UT 1 to Cool Run.
Re: The feature that connects UT 1 to Col Run has been added to the
Shapefile.
16. Please review the included(as an email attachment) spatial data and address the small
wetland assetoverlaps.
Re: These have been adjusted added to the Mitigation Plan shapefiles.
17. Please submit the existing channel location and existing ditches features displayed in Fig. 6B.
Re: These have been added to the Mitigation Plan shapefiles.
18. Please submit data associated with the hydrology assessment.
Re: These have been included.
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901
clearwatermitigation©gmail.com

CLEARWATER MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions at 919-624-6901.
Sincerely,
Kevin Yates
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901
clearwatermitigation©gmail.com

DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN
Cool Run Stream and Riparian Wetland
Mitigation Site
Brunswick County, NC
Full Delivery Proposal to Provide Stream and Riparian Wetland
Mitigation Credits
for Cataloging Unit 03040207 of the
Lumber River Basin
DMS Project ID No. 100142
Full Delivery Contract No. 20190201-01
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2020-01428
DWR Project No. 20200712
RFP#16-20190201 (Issued: 7/16/2019)
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, North Carolina
Authorized Representative: Mr. Kevin Yates
Phone: [phone]
CLEARWATER MITIGATION
s o i. u T i o N s
March 2022
"This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33
Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section §332.8 paragraphs(c)(2)through(c)(14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In-Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance,June 2017
These documents govern NCDMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation."

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 DIRECTIONS TO SITE 1
1.2 USGS HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE AND NCDWR RIVER BASIN DESIGNATION 1
1.3 PHYSIOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY,AND LAND USE 1
1.4 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURE 2
2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION 6
3.0 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 7
3.1 SOILS AND LAND FORM 7
3.2 SEDIMENT MODEL 8
3.3 NUTRIENT MODEL 9
3.4 PROJECT SITE STREAMS 9
3.4.1 Existing Conditions Survey 11
3.4.2 Channel Classification and Morphology 13
3.4.3 Channel Evolution 13
3.4.4 Valley Classification 13
3.4.5 Discharge 13
3.5 PROJECT SITE WETLANDS 13
3.5.1 Hydrological Characterization 14
3.5.2 Soil Characterization 15
3.5.3 Plant Community Characterization 15
4.0 REFERENCE STUDIES 16
4.1 REFERENCE STREAM 16
4.1.1 Watershed Characterization 16
4.1.2 Channel Classification 16
4.1.3 Discharge 16
4.1.4 Channel Morphology 16
4.2 REFERENCE WETLAND 17
5.0 CHANNEL ASSESSMENTS 17
5.1 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT 17
5.2 BANKFULL VERIFICATION 19
6.0 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT AND PROJECT GOALS/OBJECTIVES 20
7.0 SITE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION CONSTRAINTS 24
7.1 THREATENED& ENDANGERED SPECIES 24
7.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES 25
7.3 FEMA 26
7.4 UTILITIES 26
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Table of Contents page i
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

7.5 AIR TRANSPORT FACILITIES 26
7.6 HYDROLOGIC TRESPASS 26
8.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN 26
8.1 STREAM DESIGN 26
8.1.1 Stream Restoration 26
8.2 INDIVIDUAL REACH DISCUSSIONS 27
8.3 WETLAND REESTABLISHMENT 28
8.4 WETLAND REHABILITATION 29
8.5 WETLAND ENHANCEMENT 29
8.6 WETLAND PRESERVATION 29
8.7 SOIL RESTORATION 29
8.8 NATURAL PLANT COMMUNITY RESTORATION 30
8.8.1 Planting Plan 30
8.8.2 Nuisance Species Management 30
9.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA 31
9.1 SUCCESS CRITERIA 34
9.1.1 Growing Season Methodology 354
9.2 CONTINGENCY 34
9.2.1 Stream Contingency 35
9.2.2 Wetland Contingency 36
9.2.3 Vegetation Contingency 37
9.3 COMPATIBILITY WITH PROJECT GOALS 37
10.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 39
11.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN 39
12.0 REFERENCES 40
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Table of Contents page ii
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

TABLES
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits 3
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History 4
Table 3. Project Contacts Table 4
Table 4. Project Attribute Table 4
Table 5. Summary of Mapped Soil Series 8
Table 6. BEHI and NBS Modeling Summary 9
Table 7. Essential Morphology Parameters 12
Table 8. Stream Power (S)) and Shear Stress (t)Values 18
Table 9. Reference Reach Bankfull Discharge Analysis 19
Table 10A. NC SAM Summary 22
Table 10B. NC WAM Summary 22
Table 10C. Targeted Functions, Goals, Objectives, and Uplift Evaluation 23
Table 11. Federally Protected Endangered and Threatened Species 23
Table 12. Individual Reach Descriptions and Functional Uplift 28
Table 13. Planting Plan 31
Table 14. Monitoring Schedule 32
Table 15. Monitoring Summary 33
Table 16. Success Criteria 34
Table 17. Compatibility of Performance Criteria to Project Goals and Objectives 38
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Table of Contents page iii
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

APPENDICES
Appendix A. Figures
Figure 1. Site Location
Figure 2. Hydrologic Unit Map
Figure 3. Topography and Drainage Area
Figure 4A. Existing Conditions
Figure 4B. Lidar DEM Map
Figure 5. Cool Run Reference Reach Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figure 6A. Stream Restoration Detail
Figure 6B. Proposed Mitigation Layout
Figure 7. Proposed Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figure 8. Planting Plan
Figure 9. Monitoring Plan
Figure 10A. NRCS Generalized Soils Map
Figure 10B. Soil Series Map
Figure 11. Reference Wetland Map
Figure 12. Impact map
Appendix B. Existing Stream & Wetland Data
- Soil Boring Logs
- Nutrient Model Output
- Figure B1. Cool Run Morphological Stream Characteristics
- Existing Stream Cross-section Data
- NC SAM Forms
- NC WAM Forms
- NCDWQ Stream Forms
- BEHI/NBS Data
Appendix C. Flood Frequency Analysis Data
Appendix D. Jurisdictional Determination Information
Appendix E. Categorical Exclusion Document
Appendix F. FEMA Coordination, HEC-RAS, DrainMod Analysis, Hydrographs/Precipitation Data
Appendix G. Financial Assurance
Appendix H. Site Protection Instrument
Appendix I. Credit Release Schedule
Appendix J. Maintenance Plan
Appendix K. IRT Site Visit Notes
Appendix L. Construction Plans
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Table of Contents page iv
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
The Cool Run Stream &Wetland Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site") encompasses
25.6 acres of disturbed forest and agricultural fields along Cool Run and Unnamed Tributaries
(UTs) to Cool Run. The project is located in Brunswick County, approximately five miles
southwest of the city limits of Shallotte, North Carolina and north of State Route 1316 (Old
Shallotte Rd NW (Figures 1 and 2, Appendix A).
1.1 Directions to Site
Directions to the Site from Raleigh, North Carolina.
➢ Head east on 1-40 for 137 miles
➢ Take the US 17 S exit to merge onto US 17 S toward Shallotte/Myrtle Beach
➢ Continue on US 17 S for 30 miles and then turn right onto Old Shallotte Rd NW
➢ Continue on Old Shallotte Rd NW for 3.7 miles and the Site will be on your right.
➢ The Site can be accessed from the dirt road that leads into the agricultural fields.
o Site Latitude, Longitude
33.970904, -78.472509
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWR River Basin Designation
The Site is located within a Targeted Local Watershed of the Upper Shallotte River 14-digit HUC
(03040207020060) of the Lumber River basin (Figure 2, Appendix A). Stream and wetland
mitigation areas are located along Cool Run and UTs to Cool Run (North Carolina Division of Water
Resources [NCDWR] subbasin number 03-07-59) [Figures 1 and 2, Appendix A]). Cool Run and
UTs to Cool Run have been assigned Best Usage Classifications of C; Sw (NCDWR 2013). Cool Run
is not listed on the final 2018 303d list (NCDEQ 2021).
1.3 Physiography, Geology, and Land Use
The Site is located within the Carolina Flatwoods of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Ecoregion
(63h). In general, this ecoregion is characterized by nearly level coastal plain with less relief and
larger areas of poorly drained soils than the adjacent, higher elevation Southeastern Plains to the
west. The Carolina Flatwoods were covered by shallow coastal waters during the Pleistocene,
and the resultant terraces tend to consist of fine-loamy and coarse-loamy soils, with periodically
high water tables. Other areas have clayey, sandy, or organic soils, contributing to the region's
plant diversity. The region is a significant center of endemic biota, with high biological diversity
and rare species compared to adjacent regions. Artificial drainage for forestry and agriculture is
common.
The Site is located within the Waccamaw Formation of the Coastal Plain (NCGS, 1985). The
Waccamaw Formation consists of fossiliferous sand with silt and clay. Onsite elevations range
from a high of 52 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) at the upper reaches to a low of
approximately 38 feet NGVD at the Site outfall (USGS Shallotte, North Carolina 7.5-minute
topographic quadrangle) (Figures 1 and 3, Appendix A).
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 1
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Based on historic aerial photography,the Site has been in use for agriculture and silviculture since
at least the 1950's. Cool Run appears to have been relocated and channelized in the late 1950's,
and UT 1 appears to have been channelized prior to 1956.
The Site provides water quality functions to an approximately 1.68-square mile (1,074-acre)
watershed at the outfall; UT 1's watershed is approximately 0.20-square mile (125 acres) (Figure
3,Appendix A). The watershed is dominated by silvicultural loblolly pine plantations. Impervious
surfaces account for less than 2 percent of the upstream watershed land surface.
Land use at the Site is characterized by silviculture and agriculture. The floodplain of Cool Run
has been historically modified and logged over the last several decades. The site was last logged
between 2016 and 2018. Riparian zones immediately adjacent to the channel (within 50 feet) are
primarily composed of sweetgum and red maple with understory species typical of drained sites
such as horse sugar, American beautyberry, dog fennel, and muscadine grape.
1.4 Project Components and Structure
The Site encompasses 25.6 acres of disturbed forest and agricultural fields along Cool Run and its
unnamed tributary (UT 1). In its current state, the Site includes 2,270 linear feet of channelized
and relocated stream channel (based on the approved PJD dated 02/025/2020), 2.89 acres of
degraded wetland, 17.46 acres of drained hydric soil (Figures 4A and 4B, Appendix A).
Proposed restoration activities include the construction of meandering, E/C-type stream channel
resulting in 2,028 linear feet of Priority I stream restoration, 592 linear feet of Priority II stream
restoration, 14.108 acres of riparian wetland re-establishment, 1.433 acres of riparian wetland
rehabilitation, 1.201 acre of riparian wetland enhancement, and 0.492 acre of riparian wetland
preservation (Table 1) (Figures 6A-6B, Appendix A).
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and
background information are summarized in Tables 1-4.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 2
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Cool Run Restoration Site
Existing Mitigation
Mitigation Restoration Mitigation Mitigation
Project Segment Footage/ Plan Footage/ Comment
Acreage Acreage Category Level Ratio Credits
Cool Run Upstream 1 591 592 Warm R* 1.500 394.667
Cool Run Upstream 2 567 427 Warm R 1.000 427.000
Cool Run Downstream 776 1000 Warm R 1.000 1000.000
UT 1 335 601 Warm R 1.000 601.000
Wetland Reestablish -- 14.108 NA Reestablishment 1.000 14.108
Wetland
Rehabilitation 1.433 1.433 NA Rehabilitation 1.500 0.955
Wetland
Enhancement 1.201 1.201 NA Enhancement 3.000 0.400
Wetland Preservation 0.492 0.492 NA Preservation 10.000 0.049
*Cool Run Upstream 1 is Restoration with an adjusted ratio(based on IRT comment and review).
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Coastal
Restoration Level
Warm Cool Cold Riverine Nonriverine wetland Marsh
Restoration 2422.667 -- -- -- -- -- --
Re-establishment -- -- -- 14.108 -- -- --
Rehabilitation -- -- -- 0.955 -- -- --
Enhancement -- -- -- 0.400 -- -- --
Enhancement I -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Enhancement II -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Enhancement II* -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Preservation -- -- -- 0.049 -- -- --
Totals 2422.667 -- -- 15.512 -- -- --
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 3
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Cool Run Restoration Site
Data Collection Completion
Activity or Deliverable Complete or Delivery
Technical Proposal (RFP No. 16-20190201) October 2019 October 15, 2019
Institution Date(NCDMS Contract No.20190201-01) -- November 13,2019
Mitigation Plan -- March 2022
Construction Plans -- March 2022
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Cool Run Restoration Site
Full Delivery Provider Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
Kevin Yates
919-624-6901
Stream Designer Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis
919-215-1693
Wetland Designer Land Management Group
3805 Wrightsville Avenue,Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
Wes Fryar
910-452-0001 x1927
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Cool Run Restoration Site
Project Information
Project Name Cool Run Mitigation Site
Project County Brunswick County, North Carolina
Project Area (acres) 25.6
Project Coordinates (latitude&latitude) 33.970904,-78.472509
Planted Area (acres) 22.71
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Coastal Plain
Project River Basin Lumber
USGS HUC for Project(14-digit) 03040207020060
NCDWR Sub-basin for Project 03-07-59
Project Drainage Area (acres) 1,074
Percentage of Project Drainage Area that is
Impervious <2%
Land Use Agriculture/Silviculture/Hardwood Forest
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 4
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Cool Run Restoration Site (continued)
Cool Run Upstream Cool Run Downstream UT 1
Parameters
of UT 1 confluence of UT 1 confluence
Length of reach (linear feet) 1158/1020 776/1000 335/601
Existing/Proposed
Valley Classification &
Confinement(A=Alluvial and A, UC A, UC A, UC
UC= Unconfined)
Drainage Area (acres) 911 1074 125
NCDWR Stream ID Score 27.5
Perennial, Intermittent,
Per Per Int
Ephemeral
NCDWR Water Quality
C,Sw C,Sw C,Sw
Classification
Stream Thermal Regime Warm Warm Warm
Existing Morphological E/G 5 Eg 5 Eg 5
Description (Rosgen 1996)
Proposed Stream C 5 C 5 C 5
Classification (Rosgen 1996)
Existing Evolutionary Stage II II II
(Simon and Hupp 1986)
Underlying Mapped Soils Muckalee Muckalee Lumbee(Goldsboro—NRCS)
Drainage Class Poorly Poorly Poorly(Moderately well)
Hydric Soil Status Hydric Hydric Hydric(Nonhydric with
hydric inclusions)
Valley Slope 0.0026 0.0031 0.0103
FEMA Classification NA NA NA
Native Vegetation Community Coastal Plain Small Stream Forest(Blackwater Subtype)/Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Watershed Land Use/Land
87%forest, 11%agricultural land,<2%low density residential/impervious surface
Cover(Site)
Watershed Land Use/Land
Cover(Cool Run Reference 100%forest
Channel)
Percent Composition of Exotic
<5
Invasive Vegetation
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 5
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Cool Run Restoration Site (continued)
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters Wetlands
Wetland acreage(existing) 3.33 acres
Wetland acreage(proposed) 17.2 acres
Wetland Type Riparian riverine
Mapped Soil Series Muckalee, Lynchburg, Baymeade, Goldsboro, Rains, Lumbee
Drainage Class Well drained to Poorly drained
Hydric Soil Status Non-hydric and Hydric
Source of Hydrology Groundwater, stream overbank
Hydrologic Impairment Incised streams and ditches
Native Vegetation Community Small Stream Swamp/Bottomland Hardwood Forest
%Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation <5%
Restoration Method Hydrologic and Vegetative
Enhancement Method Vegetative
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States-Section 401 Yes No Preliminary JD(App D)
Waters of the United States-Section 404 Yes No Preliminary JD(App D)
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes CE Document (App E)
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes CE Document (App E)
Coastal Zone Management Act Yes Yes CE Document (App E)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No N/A Correspondence with Floodplain
Manager(App F)
Essential Fisheries Habitat No -- N/A
2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The Site is located within USGS 14-digit hydrologic unit and Targeted Local Watershed
03040207020060 of the Lumber River basin. The following watershed planning documents were
reviewed to determine primary stressors and recommended management strategies within the
watershed:
• Lumber River Basinwide Water Quality Plan (2010)
• Lockwoods Folly Local Watershed Plan (2005)
• Lumber River Basin Restoration Priorities (2008)
Lockwoods Folly Watershed exhibits water quality impairments associated with low dissolved
oxygen (DO). In addition, surface waters in this area are susceptible to high nutrient
concentrations (N and P) that manifest from non-point source loading associated with intensive
agricultural and forestry land-use practices. Sediment loading (associated with silvicultural and
agricultural drainage) is prevalent throughout the watershed. These impairments tend to be
exacerbated by direct disturbances to streams and wetlands (such as prior channelization of
streams and historic drainage of wetlands). The cumulative effects of such practices result in
diminished nutrient uptake and nutrient/sediment loading to down-gradient waters. Cool Run is
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 6
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

located within an area subject to some of the highest rates of population growth in the country.
Rapid growth and development have presented a suite of additional stressors to water quality
within the watershed, including run-off associated with increased impervious cover. While forest
remains the dominant land cover at over 34%, the Long Bay Subbasin is the most impervious
subbasin in the Lumber River Basin (NC DENR 2010).
Management strategies suggested by the aforementioned planning documents include:
• encouraging low impact development
• developing strong stormwater BMP requirements
• restoring/stabilizing streams
• protecting and improving existing buffers
• restoring degraded wetlands
Available mapping was used to evaluate land within the watershed and locate properties that
exhibited stressors identified in the watershed planning documents. The Site was ultimately
selected because it provides an opportunity to protect and restore streams, wetlands, and
riparian buffers located on a property that has high potential for continued agricultural and
silvicultural use. On-site streams and wetlands are severely degraded due to past human
alterations associated with agricultural and silvicultural operations. The proposed mitigation
project supports goals and recommendations established in the planning documents by restoring
existing degraded streams and wetlands, stabilizing channel banks, and reducing point and non-
point source pollution.These actions will reduce pollutant inputs to project streams and wetlands
and increase high quality aquatic, semi-aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
Site specific mitigation goals and objectives have been developed through the use of North
Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) and North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method
(NC WAM) and are discussed further in Section 6.0 (Functional Uplift and Project
Goals/Objectives).
3.0 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Soils and Land Form
Onsite soils consist of very poorly drained loams in drainageways to moderately well-drained
loamy sands along convex stream terraces (refer to Figures 10A-10B). Mapped soil series
occurring on the site and their associated properties are summarized in Table 5. Areas proposed
for stream and riparian wetland mitigation occur within the poorly drained Muckalee loam and
Lumbee fine sandy loam soil series. These hydric soils have been effectively drained by stream
channel incision and ditching. Profile descriptions of on-site soil borings (prepared by a NC
Licensed Soil Scientist) are provided in Appendix A.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 7
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 5. Summary of Mapped Soil Series
Map Landscape Position and Hydric
Unit Series Name Drainage Class Soil
Landform
Symbol (Y/N)
Uplands of lower to upper
Bab Baymeade fine sand Well Drained Coastal Plain N
1 to 6%slopes
(1 to 12%slopes)
Goldsboro fine Moderately Marine terraces and uplands of
GoA lower to upper Coastal Plain N
sandy loam Well Drained
(0 to 2%slopes)
Lynchburg fine sandy Somewhat Marine terraces and uplands of
Ly lower to upper Coastal Plain N
loam Poorly Drained
(0 to 2%slopes)
Floodplains of streams
Mk Muckalee loam Poorly Drained in the Coastal Plain Y
(less than 2% slope)
Onslow loamy fine Moderately Convex interstream divides in
On sand Well Drained the lower Coastal Plain N
(0 to 3%slopes)
Stream terraces and flats in the
Lu Lumbee fine sandy Poorly Drained lower and middle coastal plain
loam river valleys
(0 to 2%slopes)
3.2 Sediment Model
Sediment load modeling was performed using methodologies outlined in A Practical Method of
Computing Streambank Erosion Rate (Rosgen 2009) along with Estimating Sediment Loads using
the Bank Assessment of Non-point Sources Consequences of Sediment (Rosgen 2011). These
models provide a quantitative prediction of streambank erosions by calculating Bank Erosion
Hazard Index (BEHI) and Near-Bank Stress (NBS) along each Site reach. The resulting BEHI and
NBS values are then compared to streambank erodibility graphs prepared for North Carolina by
the NC Stream Restoration Institute and NC Sea Grant.
Streambank characteristics involve measurements of bank height, angles, materials, presence of
layers, rooting depth, rooting density, and percent of the bank protected by rocks, logs, roots, or
vegetation. Site reaches have been measured for each BEHI and NBS characteristic and predicted
lateral erosion rate, height, and length to calculate a cubic volume of sediment contributed by
the reach each year. Data output is presented in Appendix B and results of the model are
presented in the following table.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 8
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 6. BEHI and NBS Modeling Summary
Stream Reach Proposed Mitigation Treatment Predicted Sediment
Contribution (tons/year)
Cool Run Restoration 7.2
UT 1 Restoration 23.6
Total Sediment Contribution (tons/year) 30.8
Based on this analysis, mitigation of Site streams will reduce streambank erosion and subsequent
pollution of receiving waters.
3.3 Nutrient Model
A preliminary land use nutrient model was developed for the Site. The model uses estimates of
nitrogen and phosphorus inputs from livestock (USDA 2015 and USDA 1992), nutrient
management for typical fields, pasture, and hay crops in North Carolina (NC State 2016), and
nutrient inputs for urban areas (SMRC 2016). Model inputs include Site area, percent land use,
rainfall, number and species of livestock, and row-crop type. Using published values of nitrogen
and phosphorus, the model predicts the nutrient input of fertilizer and/or waste generated by
livestock associated with land use.A copy of the model input and output is presented in Appendix
B.
Based on the land use nutrient model, cessation of land use activities at the Site may directly
reduce 31 pounds of nitrogen and 54 pounds of phosphorus per year.
3.4 Project Site Streams
Streams targeted for restoration include Cool Run and a UT to Cool Run,which have been cleared,
moved to the edge of the floodplain, dredged and straightened, and receive extensive sediment
and nutrient inputs from bank erosion and agriculture inputs. Although much of the Site is
characterized by dense, primary successional vegetation that provides for bank stabilization,
approximately 29 percent of the existing stream channel has been degraded contributing to
sediment export from the Site. In addition, streamside wetlands have been cleared and drained
by channel downcutting, ditch installation, and land uses. Current Site conditions have resulted
in degraded water quality, a loss of aquatic habitat, reduced nutrient and sediment retention,
and unstable channel characteristics (loss of horizontal flow vectors that maintain pools and an
increase in erosive forces to channel bed and banks). Site restoration activities will restore riffle-
pool morphology, aid in energy dissipation, increase aquatic habitat, stabilize channel banks, and
greatly reduce sediment loss from channel banks.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 9
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Reach Descriptions
Individual reach descriptions are as follows:
Cool Run Upstream from the UT 1 Confluence
The upstream reach of Cool Run has been dredged and straightened through a series of timber
tracts. As the dredged channel nears the Site, the ditch extends to approximately 8 feet in depth
and drains a relatively mature, but disturbed riparian forest. The
channel exits the forest and enters a timbered floodplain flat (last
ri` 'g� logged in late 2016 or early 2017)that is in the early successional
r. stages of regeneration. The ditched channel enters the Site on
_;;f " '' 'r `*: the left-hand margins of the floodplain, adjacent to a
` ;:. neighborhood, and then crosses the floodplain to the right-hand
margins of the floodplain adjacent to agriculture fields. The
f.
A ,„ ` , channel is approximately 3.5 to 4.0 feet in depth throughout the
-" i R upper reaches. Spoil from ditch excavation has been cast on the
left bank of the
ditched channel and ° • �`
currently supports a r . °.
dirt road in farthest S Y` R��/�.
upstream length. A narrow fringe of trees, primarily ' l
sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) was left .,_4.-',.,; T.
adjacent to the canal, presumably as best > -' 'x,�: -1...� : - v,
management practices by the foresters. r, "' w . t. ' +
f ':
Vegetation is primarily characterized by sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), loblolly pine (Pinus
taeda), ink berry (Ilex glabra), red bay (persea borbonia), blackberry (Rubus argutus), high bush
blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), red maple (Acer rubrum), American holly (Ilex opaca), and
magnolia bay (Magnolia virginiana).
Cool Run Downstream from the UT 1 Confluence
Like the upstream reach, Cool Run downstream from the UT 1 confluence has been dredged and
straightened. The valley is relatively wide and flat, and the channel has been pushed to the right
margins of the valley. A historic channel meanders down the valley and currently supports
jurisdictional wetland pockets within the
. T abandoned depressional feature. The entire
,4 floodplain is a dense thicket of successional
•
°�.' S� _ A14,;, ' _ vegetation that is largely composed of vegetation°` °z listed above. The dredged channel is currently 3 to
y.
, `d` 4 feet in depth and 17 to 20 feet in width at the top
! of bank. Spoil has been piled adjacent to the
- " ' dredged channel, isolating hydrology in agriculture
'- " � 's °--- " --41 fields from the large successional valley.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 10
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

UT . ---�UT 1 starts upstream from the Site as an
agriculture field ditch that is approximately 3 feet %^ i • ,
deep at the Site boundary and extends across the
Site, converging with Cool Run at the margins '� 7
between agriculture fields and successional
floodplain. The channel scores as intermittent
(NCDWQ Form Score of 27.5). As the channel ;
descends its valley towards its convergence with
Cool Run, the depth increases to 4 feet. Both
banks are characterized by row crops and are regularly plowed and treated with agriculture
chemicals/biosolids.
3.4.1 Existing Conditions Survey
Site stream dimension, pattern, and profile were measured to characterize existing channel
conditions. Locations of existing stream reaches are depicted in Figure 4A (Appendix A). Stream
geometry measurements under existing conditions are summarized in Table 7 (Essential
Morphology Parameters) and presented in detail in Table B1 (Appendix B).
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 11
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 7. Essential Morphology Parameters
Existing Reference Proposed
Parameter Cool Run Cool Run UT 1 Cool Cool Run Cool Run UT 1
Upstream Downstream Run Upstream Downstream
Valley Width(ft) 12 24 6 100 100 100 50
Contributing Drainage Area(sq. mi.) 1.42 1.68 0.20 1.23 1.42 1.68 0.20
Channel/Reach Classification E/G 5 Eg 5 Eg 5 C 5 C 5 C 5 C 5
Design Discharge Width(ft) 6.1-7.8 9.5-10.8 3.1-3.9 12.5-14.7 13.4-14.8 14.2-15.8 5.4-6.2
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 1.7-1.7 1.1-1.3 0.6-0.8 0.7 0.7-0.8 0.8 0.4
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 10.5 11.9 2.4 9.5 10.5 11.9 2.4
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
Design Discharge(cfs) 9.9 11.2 2.2 8.9 9.9 11.2 2.2
Water Surface Slope 0.0025 0.0030 0.0101 0.0016 0.0020 0.0024 0.0086
Sinuosity 1.04 1.02 1.02 1.32 1.30 1.30 1.20
Width/Depth Ratio 3.6-5.6 7.3-9.8 3.9-6.5 19.4 19 19 14.0
Bank Height Ratio 1.8-1.9 1.8-2.6 2.9-4.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Entrenchment Ratio 1.5-1.8 1.7-3.2 1.3-2.7 7.4 3.7-10.1 3.5-9.5 4.7-12.1
Substrate Sand Sand Sand Sand Sand Sand Sand
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 12
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

3.4.2 Channel Classification and Morphology
Stream geometry and substrate data have been evaluated to classify existing stream conditions
based on a classification utilizing fluvial geomorphic principles (Rosgen 1996). Existing Site
reaches are classified as unstable EG-, and Eg-type streams with very low sinuosity. Existing Site
reaches are characterized by sand substrate.
3.4.3 Channel Evolution
Site streams targeted for restoration have been ditched and dredged resulting primarily in
channels classified as constructed (Stage II) channels throughout the Site (Simon and Hupp 1986).
The natural progression of Stage II channels is to proceed through a degradation/downcutting
stage (Stage Ill) and then degradation and widening stage (Stage IV); however, the low slope
nature of the Site and dense, successional vegetation appears to have slowed or eliminated
further channel evolution.
3.4.4 Valley Classification
Site Streams are situated in Valley Type VIII (Rosgen 1996) which are identified by the presence
of multiple river terraces positioned laterally along broad valleys with gentle, down-valley
elevation relief. Alluvial terraces and floodplains are the predominant depositional landforms.
Site valley slopes are typical for the Coastal Plain region and range from 0.0026 on the upper
reaches of Cool Run and 0.0103 on the slopes of UT 1 as it enters the Cool Run floodplain. Typical
streams in this region include C- and E-type streams that are slightly entrenched, meandering
channels with a riffle-pool sequence.
Geologically, the Site is underlain by the Waccamaw Formation which is composed of
fossiliferous sand with loosely consolidated silt and clay. This geologic formation typically
promotes alluvial, unconfined valleys that comprised of deep sands.
3.4.5 Discharge
This hydrophysiographic region is characterized by moderate rainfall with precipitation averaging
approximately 54.8 inches per year (USDA 1986). Drainage basin sizes range from 0.20-square
mile on UT 1 and 1.68 at the Site outfall.
The Site's discharge is dominated by a combination of upstream basin catchment, groundwater
flow, and precipitation. Based on indicators of bankfull at reference reaches and on-Site, the
designed channel will equal the channel size indicated by Coastal Plain regional curves (Sweet et
al. 2003); this is discussed in Section 5.2 (Bankfull Verification). Based on bankfull studies, the
bankfull discharge ranges from 2.2 cubic feet per second for UT 1, and 11.2 cubic feet per second
for the Site outfall.
3.5 Project Site Wetlands
Jurisdictional wetlands/hydric soils within the Site were delineated in the field following
guidelines set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 13
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

subsequent2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0). A jurisdictional wetland delineation was
completed and approved by United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) representative
Jordan Jessup. Written confirmation of the determination is included in Appendix D. Existing
jurisdictional wetlands and drained hydric soils are depicted on Figure 4A (Appendix A).
3.5.1 Hydrological Characterization
Based upon mapped soil units and landscape position of the Site, it is likely that much of the Site
historically exhibited elevated groundwater levels at or near the surface, particularly in those
areas consisting of poorly drained soil series. Based upon field investigations, it is evident that
site hydrology has been significantly altered as a result of prior land use practices. Hydrological
impairment in drained soils has resulted from lateral draw-down of the water table adjacent to
existing, incised stream channels and ditches. The degree of hydrologic impacts varies with
location on the property. Portions of the floodplain east and slightly upgradient of Cool Run
continue to exhibit wetland hydrology; however, these areas exhibit altered vegetative structure
due to previous silvicultural practices. In addition, existing and drained wetlands are also
impacted by a toe-slope ditch which intercepts surface water runoff and disconnects wetlands
upslope from wetlands in the floodplain.
In addition to the identification and use of field indicators, site hydrologic investigations have
included installation and monitoring of 15 shallow groundwater monitoring gauges (Appendix F).
These gauges were installed November 4 and November 5 (2020) and have been collecting data
continuously since that time (daily intervals). In conjunction with field indicators, hydrologic data
from monitoring gauges has been utilized to assist with determining appropriate mitigation types
(i.e. preservation, enhancement, or restoration).All pre-construction gauges except for gauge#6
will remain in the same locations post-construction. Gauge#6 will be re-located just south of the
existing Cool Run channel to avoid being located within the bench of the post-construction
channel.
When analyzing recorded gauge data, a concurrent analysis of precipitation normalcy was
performed. This analysis was performed using the standardized methodology of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Antecedent Precipitation Tool (APT). The APT uses daily rainfall data and
calculates running totals for each of the 30-day periods preceding the observation date. For each
period, a weighted condition value is assigned by determining whether the 30-day total falls
within, above, or below the 30'to 70' percentiles of precipitation totals for the same date range
over the preceding 30-years. The APT was ran for each day of recorded gauge data to calculate a
final precipitation normalcy index score.
Based upon review of the final APT precipitation normalcy index scores,January 8 (2021)through
March 20 (2021) and July 20 (2021) through September 1 (2021) exhibited wetter than normal
conditions.Analysis of recorded gauge data from November 6 (2020)to October 4 (2021) indicate
that only two gauges(gauges#14&#15) exceeded the proposed wetland success criteria of 36.36
days (12%) during normal precipitation conditions, which equated to 43 days and 48 days,
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 14
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

respectively. Both gauges are installed in current wetland areas. Gauges #1, #2, #5, and #6
recorded groundwater data sufficient to meet the proposed wetland success criteria of 36.36
days (12%) but only during periods of wetter than normal APT index scores. During normal
precipitation conditions,these wells exhibited hydroperiods of 7-days, 17-days, 19-days, and 10-
days, respectively. Gauge #5 is installed within a current wetland area.
Site-specific soils information, current drainage conditions, and geomorphological data were
used to perform DrainMod computer modeling. DrainMod is a field-scale hydrologic model
originally developed for the design of subsurface drainage systems. Its application is now widely
used for the purposes of evaluating lateral drainage effects of existing ditches and modeling for
wetland restoration purposes. The model incorporates long-term climatological data in
conjunction with site-specific model inputs. DrainMod results indicate that approximately 14.11
acres within the Site have been effectively drained and are suitable for wetland reestablishment
(as depicted on Figure 6B, Appendix A). Out of the twelve (12) gauges that were modeled (three
occur in current wetland areas and were not modeled), none met the target wetland success
criteria (12% of the growing season) under current ditched conditions. DrainMod results post-
construction show all twelve (12) gauges meeting the target wetland success criteria in at least
16 out of 30 years. The DrainMod results support the current jurisdictional determination and
align with the proposed wetland credit areas. Refer to the monitoring gauge hydrographs and
DrainMod assessment provided in Appendix F for additional details. Complete DrainMod data is
available upon request.
Construction activities are expected to re-establish approximately 14.11 acres of wetlands within
drained riparian hydric soils, rehabilitate 1.40 acres of riparian wetlands, and enhance 1.20 acres
of cleared riparian wetlands. Areas of the Site targeted for riparian wetlands will receive
hydrological input from periodic overbank flooding of restored tributaries; groundwater
migration into wetlands; upland/stormwater runoff; and direct precipitation.
3.5.2 Soil Characterization
Soils were mapped on-site by a North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist as discussed in Section 3.1.
Hydric soils exhibited F13 (Umbric Surface), S7 (Dark Surface), F3 (Depleted Matrix), A2 (Histic
Epipedon), A9 (1 cm Muck), and Al2 (Thick Dark Surface) indicators. The majority of hydric soils
on-site are effectively drained due to incised streams and ditches.
3.5.3 Plant Community Characterization
Areas proposed for wetland restoration and enhancement are primarily located within an
agricultural field or dominated by early successional forest species such as sweetgum, red maple,
and loblolly pine. Loblolly pine was harvested from the forested areas most recently between
2016 and 2018.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 15
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

4.0 REFERENCE STUDIES
4.1 REFERENCE STREAM
A reach of the Cool Run channel upstream of the Site which remains intact was used as a
reference reach. Distinct bankfull indicators were present within the reference reach. In
addition, dimension, pattern, and profile variables were measurable in the channel, allowing for
assistance with the proposed restoration design parameters (Figure 5, Appendix A).
4.1.1 Watershed Characterization
The Cool Run reference reach is located immediately upstream of the Site in Brunswick County.
Alterations, development, and impervious surfaces within the watershed are minimal.
4.1.2 Channel Classification
Stream geometry and substrate data have been evaluated to classify the reference reach based
on a classification utilizing fluvial geomorphic principles (Rosgen 1996). This classification
stratifies streams into comparable groups based on pattern, dimension, profile, and substrate
characteristics. The reference reach is characterized as a C-type, highly sinuosity (1.32) channel
with sand-dominated substrate. C-type streams are characterized as slightly to moderately
entrenched, riffle-pool channels exhibiting a moderate to high width-depth ratio. C-type streams
often occur in wide valleys with moderately-developed alluvial floodplains.
4.1.3 Discharge
The reference stream has an approximately 1.23-square mile watershed and a bankfull discharge
of 8.9 cubic feet per second based on bankfull indicators.
4.1.4 Channel Morphology
Stream cross-sections and profiles were measured along the reference stream (Figure 5,
Appendix A). The stream reach was transporting its sediment supply while maintaining stable
dimension, pattern, and profile. Stream geometry measurements for the reference stream are
summarized in the Morphological Stream Characteristics Table (Table B1, Appendix B).
Dimension: Data collected at the reference reach indicates a bankfull cross-sectional area of 9.5
square feet, a bankfull width of 13.6 feet, a bankfull depth of 0.7 feet, and a width-to-depth ratio
of 19.4. Regional curves predict that the stream should exhibit a bankfull cross-sectional area of
approximately 11.0 square feet for the watershed (Sweet et al. 2003), slightly higher than the
9.5-square feet displayed by channel bankfull indicators identified in the field, but within the
range predicted by the curves. For a more detailed discussion on bankfull verification see Section
3.5 (Bankfull Verification).
The reference reach exhibits a bank-height ratio averaging 1.0, which is expected for a C-type
channel. In addition, the width of the floodprone area is approximately 100 feet giving the
channel an entrenchment ratio of 6.8 to 8.0.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 16
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Pattern: In-field measurements of the reference reach have yielded an average sinuosity of 1.32
(thalweg distance/straight-line distance). Other channel pattern attributes include an average
pool-to-pool spacing ratio (Lp_p/Wbkf) of 4.5, a meander wavelength ratio (Lm/Wbkf) of 7.5, and a
radius of curvature ratio (Rc/Wbkf)of 1.3. These variables were measured within a stable,forested
reach,which did not exhibit any indications of pattern instability such as shoot cutoffs or oxbows.
Profile: Based on elevational profile surveys,the reference reach is characterized by a valley slope
of 0.0021 (rise/run). Ratios of the reference reach riffle, run, pool, and glide slopes to average
water surface slope are 1.5, 0.2, 0.4, and 0, respectively.
Substrate:The channel is characterized by a channel substrate dominated by sand-sized particles.
4.2 Reference Wetland
Potential reference wetland sites were evaluated in an effort to identify relatively undisturbed
reference conditions for the targeted wetland community type. As indicated previously, the
Project Site consists predominantly of Bottomland Hardwood wetlands that transition upslope
to Headwater Forest'. These wetland types correlate to Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood and
Small Stream Swamp Forest (blackwater subtypes), respectively (Shafale and Weakley, 1990).
Suitable reference wetland sites should be located in similarly situated landscapes and soil types
and should exhibit target hydrologic regimes (i.e. unaltered by prior or current site manipulation
such as ditching or channelization). Based upon these screening parameters, a suitable reference
wetland was identified along Mill Creek, a second order tributary of Indian Creek.
The Mill Creek reference wetland is located just north of Cedar Hill Road in Navassa (Brunswick
County, NC). It is situated within poorly drained Muckalee loam soils (consistent with soils of the
Project Site). In addition, the hydrology of this area remains unaltered with physical indicators
of inundation (from overbank flooding of the adjacent stream channel) and groundwater
saturation. Two reference wetland gauges will be installed within this area to provide
comparative hydrologic data for monitoring purposes. The reference wetland is located at
coordinates: 34.281050 N /-78.281050 E.
5.0 CHANNEL ASSESSMENTS
5.1 Channel Stability Assessment
Channel degradation or aggradation occurs when hydraulic forces exceed or do not approach the
resisting forces in the channel. The amount of degradation or aggradation is a function of relative
magnitude of these forces over time. The interaction of flow within the boundary of open
channels is only imperfectly understood. Adequate analytical expressions describing this
interaction have yet to be developed for conditions in natural channels. Thus, means of
characterizing these processes rely heavily upon empirical formulas.
'The Bottomland Hardwood and Headwater Forest wetland types are classified using the NC Dichotomous Key to
General North Carolina Wetland Types(accompanying the NC WAM User Manual,Version 4.1).
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 17
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Traditional approaches for characterizing stability can be placed in one of two categories: 1)
maximum permissible velocity and 2) tractive force, or stream power and shear stress. The
former is advantageous in that velocity can be measured directly. Shear stress and stream power
cannot be measured directly and must be computed from various flow parameters. However,
stream power and shear stress are generally better measures of fluid force on the channel
boundary than velocity.
Stream power and shear stress were estimated for: 1) existing dredged and straightened
reaches, 2) the reference reaches, and 3) proposed Site conditions. Important input values and
output results (including stream power, shear stress, and per unit shear power and shear stress)
are presented in the following table. Average stream velocity and bankfull discharge values were
calculated for the existing Site stream reaches, the reference reach, and proposed conditions.
In order to maintain sediment transport functions of a stable stream system, the proposed
channel should exhibit stream power and shear stress values so the channel is neither aggrading
nor degrading. Results of the analysis indicate the proposed channel reaches are expected to
maintain stream power as a function of width values of approximately 0.09-0.20 and shear stress
values of approximately 0.08-0.20 (Table 8).
Table 8. Stream Power (SZ) and Shear Stress (i) Values
Water Total
Bankfull surface Stream Shear
Discharge Slope Power Hydraulic Stress Velocity
(ft3/s) (ft/ft) (S2) S2/W Radius (T) (v) I V tmax
Existing Conditions
Cool Run Upstream 9.9 0.0025 1.54 0.22 2.35 0.37 0.41 0.15 0.55
Cool Run
Downstream 11.2 0.003 2.10 0.21 3.53 0.66 0.25 0.17 0.99
UT 1 2.2 0.0101 1.39 0.43 5.63 3.55 0.08 0.29 5.32
Reference Conditions
Cool Run-Ref 8.9 0.0016 0.89 0.07 0.63 0.06 0.94 0.06 0.09
Proposed Conditions
Cool Run Upstream 9.9 0.002 1.24 0.09 0.68 0.08 0.94 0.08 0.13
Cool Run
Downstream 11.2 0.0024 1.68 0.11 0.72 0.11 0.94 0.10 0.16
UT 1 2.2 0.0086 1.18 0.20 0.36 0.20 0.92 0.18 0.29
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 18
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Cool Run reference reach values for stream power and shear stress are slightly lower than
proposed Cool Run values due to flatter water surface. Existing Site streams are characterized
by a wide range of water surface slopes and varying degrees of degradation. In general, stream
power values of existing streams are slightly elevated as compared to proposed values, and shear
stress values of existing streams are significantly elevated as compared to proposed and
reference reach values. Proposed stream power and shear stress values appear adequate to
mobilize and transport sediment through the Site, without aggradation or erosion on proposed
stream banks.
5.2 Bankfull Verification
Discharge estimates for the Site utilize an assumed definition of"bankfull" and the return interval
associated with that bankfull discharge. For this study, the bankfull channel is defined as the
channel dimensions designed to support the "channel forming" or"dominant" discharge (Gordon
et al. 1992).
Based on available Coastal Plain regional curves, the predicted bankfull discharge for the
reference reach averages approximately 10.3 cubic feet per second (cfs) (Sweet et al. 2003). The
USGS regional regression equation for the Coastal Plain region indicates that bankfull discharge
for the reference reaches at a 1.3-1.5 year return interval average approximately 7-11 cfs (USGS
2006).
Field indicators of bankfull, primarily topographic breaks identified on the banks, and riffle cross-
sections were utilized to obtain an average bankfull cross-sectional area for the reference reach.
The Coastal Plain regional curves were then utilized to plot the watershed area and discharge for
the reference reach cross-sectional area. Field indicators of bankfull approximate an average
discharge of 8.89 cfs for the reference reach,which is 86 percent of that predicted by the regional
curves. This is verified by the range approximated by the USGS regional regression equation.
Table 9 summarizes all methods analyzed for estimating bankfull discharge.
Table 9. Reference Reach Bankfull Discharge Analysis
Watershed Area Return Interval Discharge
Method (square miles) (years) (cfs)
Cool Run Reference Reach
Coastal Plain Regional Curves
(Sweet et al.2003) 1.23 1.3-1.5 10.3
Coastal Plain Regional Regression Model
(USGS 2006) 1.23 1.3-1.5 7-11
Field Indicators of Bankfull 1.23 1.3-1.5 8.89
After consideration of the above analysis, it was determined that the Coastal Plain regional curves
(Sweet et al. 2003) accurately represent discharge and bankfull cross sectional area of Site
streams. Therefore, Site discharge will be based on these regional curves. Specific design
discharges for each reach are depicted in Table B1, in Appendix B.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 19
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

6.0 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT AND PROJECT GOALS/OBJECTIVES
The goals of the proposed Cool Run Stream and Riparian Wetland Mitigation Site are to provide
high quality compensatory mitigation for authorized stream and wetland impacts credited
through the NC DMS in-lieu-fee program and occurring within the Lumber River Hydrologic Unit
Code (HUC) 03040208 and to address the watershed goals identified in the Lumber River Basin
Restoration Plan (RBRP) (NCEEP 2008) and Lockwoods Folly Local Watershed Plan (LWP) (NCEEP
2005). Specific HUC 03040208 watershed goals include:
• Promote low impact development.
• Improve and protect riparian buffers.
• Improve management of stormwater runoff to these waters and mitigate impacts
resulting from urbanization in the area.
• Prioritize restoration of streams in areas where pine plantations are transitioning to
residential development.
• Restore wetlands.
Site specific mitigation goals and objectives have been academically developed through the use
of North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) and North Carolina Wetland Assessment
Method (NC WAM) analyses of existing stream systems at the Site (NC SFAT 2015 and NC WFAT
2010). Site functional assessment data forms are available upon request; model output is
included in Appendix B and is summarized in the following table. Metrics academically targeted
to meet the Site's goals and objectives are depicted in bold, within Tables 10A and 10B, below.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 20
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 10A. NC SAM Summary
Cool Run Cool Run
NC SAM Function Class Rating Summary UT 1
Downstream Upstream*
(1)HYDROLOGY LOW MEDIUM LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH HIGH
(2)Flood Flow LOW MEDIUM LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW MEDIUM LOW
(4)Floodplain Access MEDIUM HIGH LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW MEDIUM
(4)Microtopography LOW LOW MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability HIGH HIGH HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport NA NA NA
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW LOW
(1)WATER QUALITY LOW LOW MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH HIGH
(2)Stream-side Area Vegetation LOW LOW HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW LOW LOW
(1)HABITAT LOW LOW HIGH
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW HIGH
(3) Baseflow HIGH HIGH HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW LOW HIGH
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)In-Stream Habitat MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW MEDIUM
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW HIGH
OVERALL LOW LOW MEDIUM
*Cool Run upstream is located in a wooded section of the Site, at the upper end of the restoration reach.
Based on NC SAM output, numerous primary stream functional metrics (Hydrology, Water
Quality and Habitat), as well as several sub-metrics are under-performing as exhibited by LOW
metric rating (see Figure 4A, Appendix A for NC SAM data reaches). Identified LOW performing
metrics are used to help identify functions targeted for uplift through mitigation activities, goals
and objectives. These are then used to develop appropriate monitoring parameters and success
criteria.
Mitigation Plan(Project No. 100142) page 21
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County,North Carolina March 2022

Table 10B. NC WAM Summary
NC WAM Sub-function Rating Summary WAM 1 WAM 2 WAM 3
Wetland Type Bottomland Bottomland Bottomland
Hardwood Forest Hardwood Forest Hardwood Forest
(1)HYDROLOGY HIGH LOW LOW
(2)Surface Storage&Retention HIGH LOW LOW
(2)Sub-surface Storage& Retention MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM
(1)WATER QUALITY HIGH LOW MEDIUM
(2)Pathogen change HIGH LOW LOW
(2)Particulate Change HIGH LOW MEDIUM
(2)Soluble change MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM
(2)Physical Change HIGH LOW MEDIUM
(1)HABITAT 11. LOW LOW LOW
(2)Physical Structure LOW LOW LOW
(2)Landscape Patch Structure LOW LOW LOW
(2)Vegetative Composition LOW LOW LOW
OVERALL HIGH LOW LOW
Based on NC WAM output, numerous primary wetland functional metrics (Hydrology, Water
Quality, and Habitat), as well as several sub-metrics are under-performing as exhibited by a LOW
metric rating.
Stream and wetland metrics targeted for functional uplift, tied to defined Site-specific project
goals and objectives are presented in Table 10C, below.
Mitigation Plan(Project No. 100142) page 22
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County,North Carolina March 2022

Table 10C. Targeted Functions, Goals, Objectives, and Uplift Evaluation
Goal Objective/Treatment Likely Functional Uplift Performance Criteria Measurement Cumulative Monitoring Results
Reconstruct stream channels with
Dispersion of high flows on the
appropriate bankfull dimensions and
Reconnect channels with floodplains floodplain, increase in
depth relative to the existing Four bankfull events and within 1 stream gauge (pressure transducer)
and riparian wetlands to allow a biogeochemical cycling within the To be determined
floodplain. Remove side cast material monitoring period. on Cool Run
natural flooding regime. system, and recharging of riparian
from ditch excavation and
wetlands.
maintenance.
Construct stream channels that will Reduction in sediment inputs from Bank height ratios remain below 1.2
bank erosion, reduction of shear over the monitoring period. Visual
Improve stability of stream channels. maintain stable cross-sections, 10 Cross section surveys To be determined
patterns, and profiles over time. stress, and improved overall assessments showing progression
hydraulic function. towards stability.
Reduction in floodplain sediment
Restore and enhance native Plant native tree and understory Survival rate of 320 stems per acre at
inputs from runoff, increased bank
floodplain and streambank species in riparian zones and plantMY3, 260 planted stems per acre at 14 veg plots To be determined
stability, increased LWD and organic
vegetation. appropriate species on streambanks. MY5, and 210 stems per acre at MY7.
material in streams, increased
Reduce channel depth in incised Particulate and pollution conversion, Groundwater saturation within 12
Restore and enhance groundwater stream reaches, remove drain tile, fill groundwater storage and reduced inches of the soil surface for 12 %of
hydrology to drained or impacted drainage ditches, and alleviate soil downstream flooding, habitat the growing season for 15 groundwater gauges To be determined
hydric soil areas. compaction from agriculture diversification, and vegetative reestablishment and improvement of
activities. composition conversion. hydrology in rehabilitation areas.
Note: Groundwater and rain data for each monitoring period.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 23
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

7.0 SITE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION CONSTRAINTS
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration
activities on the Site was evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of
hazardous materials, utilities and restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or
critical habitats, and the potential for hydrologic trespass. Existing information regarding Site
constraints was acquired and reviewed. In addition, any Site conditions that have the potential
to restrict the restoration design and implementation were documented during the field
investigation.
No known Site constraints,that may hinder proposed mitigation activities,were identified during
field surveys. Potential constraints reviewed include the following:
7.1 Threatened & Endangered Species
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Officially Proposed
(P) for such listing are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended,
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The US Fish and Wildlife Service's website was
reviewed to determine federally-protected species that are known to occur in Brunswick County
(Table 11). Overall, the proposed mitigation work would not have an adverse effect on any
federally-listed plant or animal species. Correspondence with the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) is provided in Appendix E.
Table 11. Federally protected endangered and threatened species known to occur near the project
area per the USFWS IPaC website, excluding coastal and marine species.
Habitat
Status Present in Effects
Common Name Scientific Name Habitat Description
US NC Project Determination
Area?
ANIMALS
Alligator Freshwater swamps,
(A
merican Alligator T S/A) T marshes, rivers, and No No Effect
mississippiensis
lakes
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus BGPA T Nests in large trees No No Effect
leucocephalus near open water
Orton Pond and pond
on Sand Hill Creek;
Magnificent Planorbella C E formerly Greenfield No No Effect
Ramshorn magnifica
Lake(endemic to
North Carolina)
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 24
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Hibernates in caves
and mines; roosts
underneath bark, in Not Likely to
Northern Long Myotis cavities or in crevices Adversely
T of both live trees and Yes Affect Per
Eared Bat septentrionalis snags. They are site Programmatic
generalists and can be BO
found in a range of
forested areas.
Red-Cockaded Picoides Open pine woodlands
Woodpecker borealis E E and savannas with No No Effect
large old pines
Freshwater and
estuarine wetlands;
nest in patches of
Mycteria medium to tall trees,
Wood Stork americana T E either in standing Yes No Effect
water or on islands
surrounded by open
water
PLANTS
Cooley's Thalictrum Moist to wet bogs and
Meadowrue cooleyi E E savannas with neutral No No Effect
soils
Ecotones between
pine savannas and
Rough-leaved Lysimachia E E pocosins,on moist to No No Effect
Loosestrife asperulaefolia seasonally saturated
sands,on organic soils
overlaying sand
TABLE KEY:
Status Definition
E Endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its
range."
T Threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T(S/A) Threatened due to similarity of appearance.
BGPA Protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
7.2 Cultural Resources
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or
artifact deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are those that are eligible or
potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site
significance are made with reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register(36 CFR 60)
and in consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Based on
coordination with SHPO on September 29, 2020, no historic resources would be affected by the
project (Appendix E).
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 25
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

7.3 FEMA
Inspection of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps 3720104800J, Panel 1048 and Rate Map
3720106800J, Panel 1068, effective June 2, 2006, indicates that the project is not located within
a flood area. Therefore, a "Conditional Letter of Map Revision" (CLOMR) is not necessary for this
Site.
7.4 Utilities
No utilities are located on the Site.
7.5 Air Transport Facilities
No air transport facility is located within 5 miles of the Site.
7.6 Hydrologic Trespass
Given the Priority 2 stream restoration approach at the upper reaches of the Site, the amount of
stream extending upstream of credit generating areas, and the landowner's possession of land
adjacent to and immediately upstream/downstream of the project boundary, the risk of
hydrologic trespass is not expected.A HEC-RAS study was performed and the results are included
in Appendix F.
8.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN
8.1 Stream Design
On-site streams targeted for restoration have endured significant disturbance from land use
activities such as land clearing, straightening and rerouting of channels, ditching within the
floodplain, and other anthropogenic maintenance. Site streams will be restored by returning
stream flow to the historic, abandoned channel and contouring the channel to as close to natural
conditions as possible. A section of intact channel upstream from the Site was utilized as a
reference stream (see Section 4.1 Reference Streams) to guide channel contouring on reaches
that have been impacted by timber clearing activities and equipment.
Primary activities designed to restore Site streams include 1) stream restoration, 2) wetland
reestablishment, 3) wetland rehabilitation, 4) wetland enhancement, 5) construction of marsh
treatment areas, and 6) vegetation planting (Figures 6A-6B, 8, Appendix A).
8.1.1 Stream Restoration
Stream restoration efforts are designed to restore a stable stream that approximates
hydrodynamics, stream geometry, and local microtopography relative to reference conditions.
Restoration at the Site will be primarily Priority I restoration with a short section of Priority 2
restoration at the upstream tie-in point. Restoration activities will entail tying into the upstream,
ditched portion of Cool Run and slowly bringing the channel up to an elevation where stream
flows can drain through the historic abandoned channel. At that point, the abandoned channel
will be cleared of debris, contoured in areas that have been impacted by Site ditching and timber
activities/equipment, and stabilized as necessary with coir matting, structures, temporary and
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 26
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

permanent seeding, and willow stakes. At the lower end of the channel, a drop structure will be
installed to tie the channel into the ditched, Cool Run channel as it exits the Site.
Similar to Cool Run, UT 1 will be elevated to the floodplain, and constructed using Priority 1
restoration techniques across the abandoned floodplain. The reach of UT 1 will be relatively
short and will tie to the restored channel of Cool Run.
In-stream Structures
In-stream structures will be used for grade control, habitat, and to elevate local water surface
profiles in the channel,flattening the water energy slope or gradient and directing stream energy
into the center of the channel and away from banks. The structures will consist of log cross-vanes
or log j-hook vanes; however, at the discretion of the Engineer, rock cross-vanes or rock j-hook
vanes may be substituted if dictated by field conditions.
Marsh Treatment Area
One shallow wetland marsh treatment area will be excavated in the bench at the upper end of
UT 1 to intercept surface waters draining through agricultural areas prior to discharging into Site
tributaries. Marsh treatment areas are intended to improve the mitigation project and are not
generating mitigation credit. The proposed marsh treatment area location is depicted on Figures
6A-6B (Appendix A) and will consist of shallow depressions that will provide treatment and
attenuation of initial stormwater pulses. The outfall will be constructed of hydraulically stable
rip-rap or other suitable material that will protect against headcut migration into the constructed
depression. It is expected that the treatment area will fill with sediment and organic matter and
will naturalize over time.
Drop Structure
A drop structure is proposed at the outfall of Cool Run as it discharges from the Site. The drop
structure will be constructed as per the construction plans exhibited in Appendix L. The structure
will be constructed to resist erosive forces associated with hydraulic drops proposed at the Site.
8.2 Individual Reach Discussions
Mitigation strategies proposed for each reach are presented in Table 12, below.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 27
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 12. Individual Reach Descriptions and Functional Uplift
Individual Functional Uplift Provided for Identified
Reach Mitigation Activities Stressors
Cool Run • Tie to the existing canal upstream from credit generating areas • Non-functioning riparian buffer/wetland
and initiate Priority 2 stream restoration. vegetation
• Once the channel is at the proper elevation, direct stream flow • Sediment
into the abandoned channel and reconnect overbank hydrology to • Nutrients
rehydrate drained hydric soils and improve hydrology of existing • Peak Flows
wetlands. • Ditching/Draining
• Clear debris jams or soil dams from the abandoned channel,install • Limited Bedform Diversity
grade control/habitat structures, and stabilize the stream banks, • Absence of Large Woody Debris
as necessary.
• Fill the adjacent ditch/drainage network to restore wetland
hydrology adjacent to the restored stream channel.
• Treat invasive species.
• Plant a vegetative buffer within the entire floodplain.
• Tie into existing downstream channel location with a drop
structure.
UT-1 • Tie to the existing canal ground surface upstream from credit • Non-functioning riparian buffer/wetland
generating areas and begin elevating the stream channel. vegetation
• Conduct P1 stream restoration along stream alignment • Sediment
• Install grade control/habitat structures. • Nutrients
• Reconnect overbank hydrology to rehydrate drained hydric soils • Fecal Coliform
and improve hydrology of existing wetlands. • Peak Flows
• Tie into Cool Run. • Artificial Barriers
• Treat invasive species. • Ditching/Draining
• Plant a vegetative buffer within the entire floodplain. • Habitat Fragmentation
• Limited Bedform Diversity
• Absence of Large Woody Debris
8.3 Wetland Reestablishment
Wetland reestablishment is designed to restore a fully functioning wetland system, which will
provide surface water storage, nutrient cycling, increased sediment retention, removal of
imported elements and compounds. In addition, restored wetland conditions will promote
increased wildlife utilization and diversity.
Portions of the Site proposed for reestablishment have been historically drained through
silvicultural and agricultural management activities over the past five decades. Wetland
hydrology will be restored by raising channel inverts and reestablishing the natural pattern and
profile of Cool Run and UT 1. Existing ditched channels will be abandoned and filled (Figure 12).
Restoration of Cool Run and UT 1 will also allow floodwaters to access the adjacent wetlands
more frequently, promoting storage and treatment of sediment and nutrients. Native vegetative
communities will be restored by removing existing vegetation and replanting with species typical
of a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp community. These activities will result in the
reestablishment of approximately 14.11 acres of jurisdictional riparian wetlands.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 28
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

8.4 Wetland Rehabilitation
Wetland rehabilitation will include enhancement of wetland hydrology and reestablishment of
an appropriate vegetative community. Existing wetlands adjacent to the ditched portions of Cool
Run have been impacted by agricultural and silvicultural practices. Groundwater and surface
water interaction within these wetlands has been altered through ditching of Cool Run and
installation of a toe-slope ditch through the floodplain. The toe-slope ditch intercepts surface
water runoff and disconnects wetlands upslope from wetlands in the floodplain. The toe-slope
ditch combined with ditching of Cool Run has shortened wetland hydroperiods and reduced
floodwater interaction with adjacent wetlands. Wetland hydrology will be enhanced by plugging
the toe-slope ditch, raising channel inverts, and reestablishing the natural pattern and profile of
Cool Run and UT 1. Restoration of Cool Run and UT 1 will also allow floodwaters to access the
adjacent wetlands more frequently, promoting storage and treatment of sediment and nutrients.
Plugging and filling the toe-slope ditch will allow surface runoff to reach wetlands in the
floodplain and provide for hydrologic connectivity between up-gradient riparian wetlands and
downslope bottomland wetlands. Native vegetative communities will be restored by removing
existing vegetation and replanting with species typical of a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp
community. These activities will result in the rehabilitation of approximately 1.4 acres of
jurisdictional riparian wetlands.
8.5 Wetland Enhancement
Wetland enhancement is proposed for areas delineated as jurisdictional that exhibit altered
vegetative structure and diversity due to prior silvicultural practices. In addition, wetlands
proposed for enhancement have been disconnected from wetlands in the floodplain due to a
toe-slope ditch that intercepts surface water and diverts it down valley. Wetland enhancement
will include filling the toe-slope ditch to reconnect up-gradient wetlands with wetlands in the
floodplain and planting with native forest vegetation. Project activities will result in the
enhancement of approximately 1.2 acre of jurisdictional wetland.
8.6 Wetland Preservation
Approximately 0.5 acre of jurisdictional wetland in the northern extents of the Site will be
preserved. Vegetation and hydrology within this portion of the Site will not be altered during
mitigation activities.
8.7 Soil Restoration
Soil grading will occur during stream restoration activities. Topsoil will be stockpiled during
construction activities and will be spread on the soil surface once critical subgrade has been
established. The replaced topsoil will serve as a viable growing medium for community
restoration to provide nutrients, aid in the survival of planted species, and promote rhizomal
growth of desired shrub species. Spoils piles will also be removed from wetland reestablishment
areas during restoration activities.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 29
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

8.8 Natural Plant Community Restoration
Restoration of wetlands, floodplain forest and stream-side habitat allows for development and
expansion of characteristic species across the landscape. Ecotonal changes between community
types contribute to diversity and provide secondary benefits, such as enhanced feeding and
nesting opportunities for mammals, birds, amphibians, and other wildlife. Reference wetland
data, onsite observations, and community descriptions from Classification of the Natural
Communities of North Carolina (Schafale and Weakley 1990) were used to develop the primary
plant community associations targeted for restoration activities.
8.8.1 Planting Plan
Wetlands and uplands on-site are proposed for vegetative restoration.The planting plan includes
restoration of stream side zones and the larger floodplain adjacent to Cool Run and UT 1. Stream-
side trees and shrubs include species with high value for sediment stabilization, rapid growth
rate, and the ability to withstand hydraulic forces associated with bankfull flow and overbank
flood events. Stream-side trees and shrubs will be planted within 15 feet of the channel top of
bank throughout the meander belt-width. Shrub species will be planted along the reconstructed
stream banks, concentrated along outer bends. Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (Blackwater
Subtype) is the target community for Site floodplains. This community has been divided into two
zones based on hydrologic regime. Zone 1 includes floodplain areas proposed as wetlands. Zone
1 will be planted with hydrophytic species such swamp tupelo and bald cypress. Zone 2 includes
upland areas within the Site and will be planted with species more often found in drier portions
of floodplains such as Atlantic white cedar, sycamore and water oak. Other species proposed for
planting within the floodplain are similar across both zones.
Bare-root seedlings within the Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp will be planted at a density of
approximately 680 stems per acre on 8-foot centers. Shrub and tree species in the stream-side
assemblage and Marsh Treatment Areas will be planted at a density of 1,210 stems per acre on
6-foot centers. Live stakes will also be planted along the stream bank approximately every 5-ft
in appropriate locations.
Table 13 depicts the total number of stems and species distribution within each vegetation
association (Figure 8, Appendix A). Planting will be performed between December 1 and March
15 to allow plants to stabilize during the dormant period and set root during the spring season.
8.8.2 Nuisance Species Management
Invasive plant species will be observed and controlled mechanically and/or chemically, as part of
this project. Prior to planting,the site will be mowed and sprayed with Roundup to treat invasive
species (i.e Chinese privet and honeysuckle) and early successional species (i.e. red maple, sweet
gum, and loblolly pine). Inspections for beaver and other potential nuisance species will occur
throughout the course of the monitoring period. Appropriate actions may be taken to ameliorate
any negative impacts regarding vegetation development and/or water management on an as-
needed basis.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 30
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 13. Planting Plan
Coastal Plain Coastal Plain
Small Stream Small Stream
Wetland Swamp* Swamp* Stream-side
Vegetation Association Indicator (Zone 1) (Zone 2) Assemblage** TOTAL
Area(acres) Status 15.48 5.10 2.13 22.71
# %of # %of # %of #
Species planted* total planted* total planted** total planted
Tag alder(Alnus serrulata) FACW -- -- 515 20 515
Black willow(Salix nigra)*** OBL -- -- 515 20 515
Ironwood (Carpinus FAC 526 5 --
260 10 786
caroliniana)
River birch (Betula nigra) FACW -- 350 10 260 10 610
Silky dogwood (Corpus FACW --
-- 515 20 515
amomum)***
Atlantic white cedar FACW 350 10-- -- 350
(Chamaecyparis thyoides)
Sycamore(Platanus FACW 695 20-- -- 695
occidentalis)
Bald cypress (Taxodium OBL 2,632 25 --
515 20 3,147
distichum)
Swamp chestnut oak(Quercus FACW 695 20
1,580 15 -- 2,275
michauxii)
Swamp tupelo(Nyssa biflora) OBL 2,105 20 -- -- 2,105
Laurel oak(Quercus laurifolia) FACW 2,105 20 695 20 -- 2,800
Overcup oak(Quercus lyrata) OBL 1,055 10 -- -- 1,055
American elm (U/mus FAC 350 10-- -- 350
americana)
Water oak(Quercus nigra) FACW 526 5 350 10 -- 876
TOTAL 10,529 100 3,485 100 2,580 100 16,594
*Planted at a density of 680 stems/acre.
**Planted at a density of 1210 stems/acre.
***Live Stake
Table 13A- Permanent Seed Mix
March 1 -October 31
lbs
Species Common Name Unit Stratum %of per
Type Total
Acre
Carex vulpinoidea Fox sedge S Herb 15 35
Andropogon gerardii Big bluestem S Herb 15 35
Elymus virgatum Virginia wildrye S Herb 15 35
Panicum virgatum Switchgrass S Herb 15 35
Juncus effusus Soft rush S Herb 20 35
Dichanthelium clandestinum Deertongue S Herb 20 35
Total 100
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 31
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 13A- Permanent Seed Mix
November 1—February 28
lbs
Species Common Name Unit Stratum /of per
Type Total
Acre
Elymus virgatum Virginia wildrye S Herb 10 35
Dichanthelium clandestinum Deertongue S Herb 10 35
Carex vulpinoidea Fox sedge S Herb 5 35
Agrostis hyemalis Ticklegrass S Herb 15 35
Agrostis perennans Autumn Bentgrass S Herb 10 35
Juncus effusus Soft rush S Herb 15 35
Tripsacum dactyloides Eastern Gamma Grass S Herb 15 35
Eragrostis curvula Weeping Lovegrass S Herb 10 35
Panicum amarum var. amarulum Atlantic Coastal S Herb 10 35
Panicgrass
Total 100
Table 13B-Temporary Herbaceous Seed Schedule
Common Name Application Rate Application Dates
Grain RyeA 130 lbs.per acre Year—Round
Brown Top MilletA 40 lbs.per acre May-September
German Millet' 25 lbs.per acre May-September
A Primarily utilized on disturbed or stockpiled areas.
B Primarily utilized near stream channels and streambanks.
9.0 MONITORING AND SUCCESS CRITERIA
Stream monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc., and wetland monitoring will
be conducted by Land Management Group based on the schedule in Table 14. A summary of
monitoring is outlined in Table 15 (Figure 9, Appendix A). Annual monitoring reports will be
submitted to the NCDMS by Clearwater Mitigation Solutions no later than December 31 of each
monitoring year that data is collected.
Table 14. Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Streams X Xl TX X X
Wetlands X X X X X X
Vegetation X X X X X
Visual Assessment X X X X X X
Report Submittal X X X X X X
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 32
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 15. Monitoring Summary
Stream Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Stream Profile Full longitudinal survey As built(unless otherwise All restored stream channels Graphic and tabular data.
required)
Stream Dimension Cross-sections Years 1,2,3,5,and 7 Total of 10 cross sections on Graphic and tabular data.
restored channels
Areas of concern will be depicted on a
Visual Assessments Yearly All restored stream channels plan view figure with a written
Channel Stability assessment and photograph of the area
included in the report.
Additional Cross-sections Yearly Only if instability is documented Graphic and tabular data.
during monitoring
Continuous monitoring surface water Continuous recording through Surface water data for each monitoring
1 stream gauge on Cool Run
Bankfull Events gauges and/or trail camera monitoring period period
Visual/Physical Evidence
Continuous through Periodic Site visits throughout the Visual evidence,photo documentation,
monitoring period year. and/or rain data.
Wetland Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Years 1,2,3,4,5,6,and 7
Wetland 15 gauges spread throughout Groundwater and rain data for each
Restoration Groundwater gauges throughout the year with the restored wetlands monitoring period
growing season2
Vegetation Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Permanent vegetation plots 0.0247
Vegetation acre(100 square meters)in size;CVS- As built,Years 1,2,3,5,and 7 11 plots spread across the Site Species,height,planted vs.volunteer,
EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, stems/acre
establishment and Version 4.2(Lee et al.2008)
vigor
Annual random vegetation plots, As-built,Years 1,2,3,5,and 7 3 plots randomly selected each year Species and height
0.0247 acre(100 square meters) in size
Note: Photo stations will be taken at all cross sections and at vegetation plot origin points. In addition, photos will be collected across
the Site to document a range of different areas.
2 Refer to discussion of growing season in Section 9.1.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 33
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

9.1 Success Criteria
Monitoring and success criteria for stream restoration should relate to project goals and
objectives identified from on-site NC SAM and NC WAM data collection. From a mitigation
perspective, several of the goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally elevated by
restoration activities without direct measurement. Other goals and objectives will be considered
successful upon achieving success criteria. The following summarizes the Site success criteria
developed for the project.
Table 16. Success Criteria
Streams
• All streams must maintain an Ordinary High-Water Mark(OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
• Continuous surface flow must be documented each year for at least 30 consecutive days.
• Bank height ratio(BHR)cannot exceed 1.2 at any measured cross-section.
• BHR at any measure riffle cross-section should not change by more than 10%from baseline condition during
any given monitoring period.
• The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance standards shall be met through four
separate bankfull events, occurring in separate years, during the monitoring years 1-7.
Wetland Hydrology
• Saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for, at a minimum, 12 percent of the
growing season (36 days)3, during normal climatic conditions.
Vegetation
• Within planted portions of the site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3; a minimum
of 260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at
year 7.
• Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7 in each plot.
• Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting list for the
site; natural recruits not on the planting list may be considered by the IRT on a case-by-case basis.
• Any volunteer species on the approved planting list must be established for at least 2 years to count towards
success and will be subject to the average height standard.
9.1.1 Growing Season Methodology
As indicated in the table above, hydrologic success criterion is premised on gauge data
demonstrating saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for a
minimum of 12% of the growing season. Given the location of the site in the southeastern
portion of the Outer Coastal Plain, it is recognized that growing seasons of this locale are often
longer than the generalized March 1 to November 20 growing season dates. Soil temperature
data for the Outer Coastal Plain often demonstrate growing seasons beginning in early February
and continuing into December. Such observations are consistent with the Regional Supplement
to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plan Region
(Version 2.0) which states, "there is evidence that soil temperatures are above 41° F and soil
microbial communities are active throughout the year in some portion of the coastal plain
region" (USACE 2010). As a result, the Provider will be collecting on-site soil temperature data
Refer to discussion of growing season dates in Section 9.1.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 34
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

(via soil probes installed at 12 inches below the soil surface) and will be collecting supplemental
data of above-ground growth and development of vascular plants (e.g. bud burst on woody
plants, appearance of new growth from vegetative crowns, or emergence of herbaceous plants
from the ground). The proposed start date of the growing season will be based upon the
presence of either soil temperatures (at 12 inches below the soil surface) above 41° F or evidence
of above-ground growth and development of vascular plants(via the indicators identified above).
The proposed end date of the growing season will be based upon the presence of either soil
temperatures(at 12 inches below the soil surface) below 41° F or the prevalence of vascular plant
autumnal senescence. For the purpose of this evaluation, autumnal senescence will be defined
as the prevalence (>50%) seasonal loss of leaves from three dominant deciduous trees (e.g. red
maple, tulip poplar, and sweet gum) occurring on the site. On-site monitoring will be performed
at the end of the 2022 growing season and the start of the 2023 growing season. These data will
be provided within the initial as-built report for the purpose of identifying an appropriate and
science-based growing season for concurrence by the IRT.
9.2 Contingency
In the event that stream success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be
implemented.
9.2.1 Stream Contingency
Stream contingency may include but may not be limited to: 1) structure repair and/or
installation; 2) repair of dimension, pattern, and/or profile variables; and 3) bank stabilization.
The method of contingency is expected to be dependent upon stream variables that are not in
compliance with success criteria. Primary concerns, which may jeopardize stream success,
include: 1) structure failure, 2) headcut migration through the Site, and/or 3) bank erosion.
Structure Failure
If structures are compromised the affected structure will be repaired, maintained, or replaced.
Once the structure is repaired or replaced, it must function to stabilize adjacent stream banks
and/or maintain grade control within the channel. Structures which remain intact, but exhibit
flow around, beneath, or through the header/footer will be repaired by excavating a trench on
the upstream side of the structure and reinstalling filter fabric in front of the pilings. Structures
which have been compromised, resulting in shifting or collapse of a header/footer, will be
removed and replaced with a structure suitable for Site flows.
Headcut Migration Through the Site
In the event that a headcut occurs within the Site (identified visually or through measurements
[i.e. bank-height ratios exceeding 1.4]), provisions for impeding headcut migration and repairing
damage caused by the headcut will be implemented. Headcut migration may be impeded
through the installation of in-stream grade control structures (rip-rap sill and/or log cross-vane
weir) and/or restoring stream geometry variables until channel stability is achieved. Channel
repairs to stream geometry may include channel backfill with coarse material and stabilizing the
material with erosion control matting, vegetative transplants, and/or willow stakes.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 35
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Bank Erosion
If severe bank erosion occurs within the Site, resulting in incision, lateral instability, and/or
elevated width-to-depth ratios locally or systemically, contingency measures to reduce bank
erosion and width-to-depth ratio will be implemented. Bank erosion contingency measures may
include the installation of log-vane weirs and/or other bank stabilization measures. If the
resultant bank erosion induces shoot cutoffs or channel abandonment, a channel may be
excavated to reduce shear stress to stable values.
Beaver and other Invasive Species
Indications of beaver establishment will be monitored throughout the 7-year monitoring period.
If beaver are identified in the Site,the location of the dam will be depicted on CCPV mapping and
the beaver will be trapped during the following fall/winter. Once beaver have been trapped, the
dam will be removed. Removal of the dam is expected to occur by hand to minimized disturbance
to the adjacent mitigation areas.
When invasive species controls are required by the IRT, species such as Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica) or Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) will be treated by foliar application
and/or cutting and directly treating the stump with Garlon 4A (or other similar product) to
minimize re-sprouting. Appropriate actions to ameliorate any negative impacts regarding
vegetation development and/or water management will occur on an as-needed basis. Additional
monitoring, or other contingency measures will be determined by consultation with the IRT.
Development/Logging
Topographic re-entrants discharging into the conservation easement typically are directed into
marsh treatment areas that treat the initial stormwater pulse to capture sediment and nutrients
from adjacent runoff. These areas will naturalize over time into small wetland depressions. If
the property adjacent to the Site is developed, or logged such that excessive sediment enters the
Site, the marsh treatment area may be re-excavated to capture additional drainage effluent.
Maintenance of the marsh treatment area is not expected to occur over an extended period of
time; however, short term maintenance may occur until stabilization of the adjacent landscape
features occurs.
9.2.2 Wetland Contingency
Hydrological contingency will require consultation with hydrologists and regulatory agencies if
wetland hydrology target criteria are not achieved. Floodplain surface modifications, including
construction of ephemeral pools within the filled ditches, represent a likely mechanism to
increase the floodplain area in support of jurisdictional wetlands. Approved contingency
measures to increase wetland hydrologic amplitude or duration will be implemented and
monitored until Hydrology Success Criteria are achieved.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 36
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

9.2.3 Vegetation Contingency
If vegetation success criteria are not achieved, supplemental planting may be performed with
tree species approved by regulatory agencies. Supplemental planting will be performed as
needed until achievement of vegetation success criteria.
9.3 Compatibility with Project Goals
The following table outlines the compatibility of Site performance criteria described above to Site
goals and objectives that will be utilized to evaluate if Site goals and objectives are achieved.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 37
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Table 17. Compatibility of Performance Criteria to Project Goals and Objectives
Goals Objectives Success Criteria
(1)HYDROLOGY
• Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore • BHR not to exceed 1.2
overbank flows • Document four overbank events in separate monitoring years
• Minimize downstream flooding to • Plant woody riparian buffer • Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
the maximum extent possible. • Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement • Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
• Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and • Conservation Easement recorded
longitudinal profile
• Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and
longitudinal profile • Cross-section measurements indicate a stable channel
• Increase stream stability within the • Cease row crop production within and immediately adjacent to • Visual documentation of stable channels and structures
Site so that channels are neither Site wetlands and streams • BHR not to exceed 1.2
aggrading nor degrading. • Construct stable channels • <10%change in BHR in any given year
• Stabilize stream banks • Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
• Plant woody riparian buffer
(1)WATER QUALITY
• Reduce agricultural land/inputs
• Install marsh treatment areas
• Remove direct nutrient and • Plant woody riparian buffer
pollutant inputs from the Site and • Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams • Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
reduce contributions to • Provide surface roughness and reduce compaction through deep • Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
downstream waters. ripping/plowing
• Restore overbank flooding by constructing channels at historic
floodplain elevation
(1)HABITAT
• Construct stable channels with appropriate substrate
• Plant woody riparian buffer to provide organic matter and shade • Cross-section measurement indicate a stable channel
• Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore • Visual documentation of stable channels and in-stream
• Improve instream and stream- overbank flows structures.
side habitat. • Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement • Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
• Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams • Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
• Stabilize stream banks • Conservation Easement recorded
• Install in-stream structures
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 38
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

10.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
In the event the Site or a specific component of the Site fails to achieve the necessary
performance standards as specified in the mitigation plan,the provider shall notify the members
of the IRT and work with the IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions. Problems
will be identified during Site monitoring and specified in the subsequent annual monitoring
reports. Over the course of the 7-year monitoring period, the recruitment of early successional
species such as red maple, sweet gum, and loblolly pine will be monitored. No single volunteer
species of red maple, loblolly pine, and sweet gum will comprise more than 50% of the total
composition at Year 3. If this occurs, remedial action, as approved by the IRT may be required.
During Year 5, no single volunteer species, comprising over 50% of the total composition, may be
more than twice the height of the planted trees. If this occurs, remedial action, as approved by
the IRT, may be required. The need to conduct additional volunteer sampling after Year 5 will be
determined by the IRT. Remedial action will include spot herbicide treatment (as needed) and in
extreme situations will involve hand removal of undesirable species by pre-commercial thinning
crews.
11.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Site will be transferred to the NCDEQ Stewardship Program. This party shall serve as
conservation easement holder and long-term steward for the property and will conduct periodic
inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are
upheld. Funding will be supplied by the responsible party on a yearly basis until such time an
endowment is established. The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is developing an endowment
system within the non-reverting, interest-bearing Conservation Lands Conservation Fund
Account. The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina
General Statute GS 113A-232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used for the
purpose of stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if
applicable.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 39
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

12.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical
Report Y-87-1. United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
Mississippi.
Gordon, N.D., T.A. McMahon, and B.L. Finlayson. 1992. Stream Hydrology: an Introduction for
Ecologists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. West Sussex, England.
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). 2019. 2018 NC Category 5
Assessment "303(d) List" Final (online). Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/TMDL/303d/2018/2018-NC-303-
d--List-Final.pdf(July 29, 2019).
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2016. Quantifying Benefits to Water
Quality from Livestock Exclusion and Riparian Buffer Establishment for Stream
Restoration. June 15, 2016. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2013. River Basin Classification Schedule:
Yadkin-Pee Dee (online). Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/CSU/Surface%20Water/River%20
Basin%20Water%20Quality%20Classifications%20as%20o1%20Dec%209%202013/Yad
kin Hydro order.pdf(July 29, 2019).
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2005. Local Watershed Plan for the
Upper Yadkin River Basin: Upper Uwharrie River Watershed (online). Available:
https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Yadkin_River_Basin/Upper_Uwharri
e/Upper_Uwharrie_PFR_aug%2705.pdf (July 30, 2019).
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Lower Yadkin Pee-Dee River
Basin Restoration Priorities (online). Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/WatershedPlanning/Yadkin River Basin/Lo
wer%20Yadkin Pee Dee RBRP2009Fina1092010.pdf(July 30, 2019).
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 40
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

North Carolina State University (NC State 2016). NC State University and A&T State University
Cooperative Extension Resources. 2016 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual.
Available: http://content.ces.ncsu.edu/north-carolina-agricultural-chemicals-manual
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment
Method (NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). N.C. Wetland
Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs,
Colorado
Rosgen, D. 2009. A Practical Method of Computing Streambank Erosion Rate (online). Available:
http://www.u-s-c.org/html/documents/Erosionrates.pdf.
Rosgen, D. 2011. Estimating Sediment Loads using the Bank Assessment of Non-point source
Consequences of Sediment (BANCS). Watershed Assessment of River Stability and
Sediment Supply (WARSSS). Hagerstown , Maryland.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina:Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks
and Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Fourth Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Simon A, Hupp CR. 1986. Geomorphic and Vegetative Recovery Processes Along Modified
Tennessee Streams: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Disturbed Fluvial Systems. Forest
Hydrology and Watershed Management. IAHS-AISH Pub1.167.
Stormwater Manager's Resource Center (SMRC). 2016. The Simple Method to Calculate Urban
Stormwater Loads. Available:
http://www.stormwatercenter.net/monitoring%20and%20assessment/simple%20meth
/simple.htm
Sweet, W.V. and J.W. Geratz. 2003. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships and Recurrence
Intervals for North Carolina's Coastal Plain. J. of the American Water Resources
Association (JAWRA) 39(4):861-871.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 41
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1992. Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Agricultural Waste Management Handbook. Available at
http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/technical/nra/dma/?cid=nrc
s143_014211.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2015. Animal Manure Management (NRCS)
available at http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/nhj/technical/cp/cta/?
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2019. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm [July 30, 2019]. United
States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1986. Soil Survey of Brunswick County, North
Carolina. Soil Conservation Service.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018. Endangered Species,Threatened Species,
Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species, Alamance County, North Carolina
(online). Available: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/alamance.html [April
10, 2019].
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2006. Estimating the Magnitude and Frequency of
Floods in Rural Basins of North Carolina — Recompiled. USGS Water-Resources
Investigations Report 01-4207. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) page 42
Cool Run Mitigation Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

APPENDICES
Mitigation Plan(Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County,North Carolina March 2022

APPENDIX A
FIGURES
Figure 1. Site Location
Figure 2. Hydrologic Unit Map
Figure 3. Topography and Drainage Area
Figure 4A. Existing Conditions and Soils
Figure 4B. Lidar DEM Map
Figure 5. Cool Run Reference Reach Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figure 6A. Stream Restoration Details
Figure 6B. Mitigation Layout
Figure 7. Proposed Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figures 8. Planting Plan
Figure 9. Monitoring Plan
Figure 10A. NRCS Soils Map
Figure 1013. Soil Series Map
Figure 11. Reference Well Location
Figure 12. Impact Map
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

N
. ,.$" 1 , _ 1� 5 fr �14 - _ - _
.I4.
0 _ _
- -.----- 1. • ..D. ".!.--...-.. -..--LK- :,-; 2!"......*T. - ' 1
..--.9. •' Or.a. III 1 P*110'‘i twj'' _ . .
+ ,_. , „..,-_---.- ---- , i — _ _ ... _ -41.
"f f III L. . _I i• 4 + AkiOrn SriviNnmeniBl.Inc.
JIB 41 r*A i r . 1 i ._
AMMO :airiii'..L . -
-_ ..... — � — —
•
•
Prepared for:- 'i:e4i Le.1? 1 01 I I 1 V I all 111, i . .-.-.- '' CLEARWATER
IP — = L"; MITIGATION
ij'' 1 ' "'` - SOLUTIONS
- - }r
. Li
A
Reference Stream
� , ti • —may=-�rTP
�. Location t Project.
`
, 1.itli Fr ' COOL RUN
T.Ff
'� '` N MITIGATION SITE
NIAlli.' '41.-No.) \-- ---:..- . - -
•
111:1111
1_ ..
"' et ik —, � I [..,'_'_''_''.--'--rr•.'-,..ri cOOMEMIN I I rAli I a,IP..„..,H,,,I.I.•P• . __._-,.
�� � � � � _' � _4
_ .
Brunswick County, NC
. L . ••_.•
,%% Title:
. _
.� , 13 •jijr - LOCATION•
Y.
e.
- F ,-- e' ii
_.--:
. bill111441..mit;;::: 7"
k ;,
. ,,, .• . ..:._ . .. ,
__,,,_-..... .
r.
, .
.......: '.---:4:-. -4-- -
• F k. . , - _ +L Legend Drawn by:
•-...._ ... 1:1):: tip.. .400.)
` 1 ', Shallotte ,. 0 }� AEK
(- \'''..N..
r f ' ' - ;* + Cool Run Site
F t i� + ' Frink Parcel Date:
+ Lint, -
DUNE 2021y� �,, 7. r t NCDOT Roads
el ' r17 �" 4t. iv. •- I — - Scale:
p � �`' " �`,� s 1:20,000
_ ' '" -• . . _ i _ ' . -, __. Project No.:
0 • Odk11 iiansorr - • , Y x ,5 • USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Shallote, NC 21-008
• Airport ate w I .: _ - - ;
ICat alma i1�#k_._ • . . _-- lk CI? tin .t Directions to the Site from Raleigh: FIGURE
Shores Sunset . .. 1 •0 is ; J' - - Merge onto 1-40 E towards Benson/Wilmington for 115 miles
111 r .' - Take exit 416A-416B to merge onto 1-40 W toward Myrtle Beach
- ... Beach � fa a�o tte a
". � }. * �. - Merge onto US-17 S toward NC-87 S/Shallotte/Myrtle Beach
`'• r a Sound • �.. p '■ . _ • Continue straight on US-17 S/Ocean Hwy W for 23.5 miles 1
_ _ ' ', + i - i - Turn Right onto Old Shallotte Rd NW
,4 7# '� F * { 1 _ fir' , -_ .: _ ..'--tN '. - Site Latitude, Longitude 33.973639, -78.471507(WGS84)
- — r
I .'—` sit /11-" _ " _ .1— -4r ..--.L ,. 1 •3

•
•
`fr• ■ 211 t --.' II 7-- t
+Winnahow
N 1 ..rii• 4, Livrti !
`„y -bd
lob alb 4. elk 'P.Ur .
iii
.441k
7_,. . . ...,.:
ni
ril
Si
,. A
iiii#� } _ .. 4 IN Axiom ErrolAr oenia Mc,
•*Sand NIP � *
f, y Prepared for:
ill. .1114. II
4111.it • CLEARWATER
. I_. MITIGATION
''.i.....l Ash
1E. SOLUTIONS
4 Location of Cool Run Mitigation '`
• Site within USGS Hydrologic ,.
cli. A i
.4 Unit and Targeted Local Project:
Watershed 03040207020060
p �/ ii ,
Aki_ COOL RUN
,gyawmil
MITIGATION SITE
-_- Longwood _
•
lot
71re L
Brunswick County, NC
/
Title:
- z ~ r�� HYDROLOGIC
UNIT MAP
•
•
• GAF PE
a. Drawn by:
Oak Island AEK
Date:
Or JUNE 2021
- +�- goo.,d I =_ Scale: 1:145,000
.00
. Project No.:
Little River � - 21-008
•00* Legend
.au, :-2.0 Cool Run Site FIGURE
USGS Hydrologic Unit 03040207
14 Digit Hydrologic Unit Boundaries 2
Targeted Local Watersheds
0 2.5 5 10
Miles Copyright:(c)2018 Garmin

I , 1 .. Al-_,. _ _4,1/4,7 -._ -.
It Legend — 11
"LitS'pf fi1d ± .
I• Cool Run Site 'ter# --'' '- v ��
• .0•17
Cool Run Upstream Drainage Area = 1.42 sq mi (911 ac) 4 �
Cool Run Downstream Drainage Area = 1.68 sq mi (1074 ac) ,_• '� Y
_ _ .......
� UT 1 Drainage Area = 0.20 sq mi (125 ac) .� • ! - - -
- !ma
Axiom is nwron+nenial.fnc.
_ -410 -•- _
1 : I/ - ,-. ,,..
1, • - I - `
sy ti Prepared for:
7W:
I.
-4741,- 'II- — .M.•
1 - � t CLEARWATER
— - _ MITIGATION
1 �. .`
•
- SOLUTIONS
, !., il.- ..,- -4,- - ib. -
� � —
-
. }-.'3 4 A W C A W U A rt # � a -
� a
Project:
•
• J COOL RUN
•
MITIGATION SITE
''# - - li
4�---- • y*
• ly',y
Y
•—" Brunswick County, NC
_ - Title:
•
• Wr - -- gr . \ __.... • ...„ , -r-
,. ..# - - 'F .- � _.-) TOPOGRAPHY
, 4 ., .. j- 3
11.111110AND
.., .
• •• •
- ....., i
t#. ;'" �x \ • r .. . DRAINAGE AREA
.. ,
. ... _ ,_ 1, . .
,,
. , . ,.. •".0%'4,..1!.‘ A .
•
7111.
it
. .." ( 1 "Alt-7-----.
-- i • • -
ia '- Drawn by:
/ AEK
• ff'Ilif . "I, iitikt ..
R ;" .... ' Date:
I. .4 —'*a-, . �� ,=, ' Ff''r •�' Imp '� - =�x=;` ~J, ~4 i " � MAR 2021
• ;x ,, ! ') , _ % ::::
t'l
ft
4 7 dr.zr
4 = f No.:
_ `4 -`' 21-008
• rF k -;- �__ FIGURE
1111144,5'001
4 I * "4ifi ` ti fit' .i.f 7 :i7;t = ;� i0750 1,500 3,000 6,000 _ F -�
Feet �� ti ' . 1 . 3

Z # \V . . _ f
a _- .
•
lir'
1 5
'L \
4 Morn ErimionmerHal,Inc.
0 y Prepared for:
./
♦♦♦♦♦��. CLEARWATER
•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ `• MITIGATION
i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i!ii♦i♦i♦ir
♦���������•
- �..• SOLUTIONS
`�� ♦ �� �♦���� :♦♦♦ t , Project:
� ,♦�%% �i♦ii♦ COOL RUN
� ,, �� � MITIGATION SITE
di ♦ �>♦♦♦ ♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
. !♦�♦♦ -�._�♦�♦�♦� „ - 141 -, Brunswick County, NC
�4 ' �� ` �`�i ♦�i ♦♦♦♦� Title:
ikop. KD
... A
EXISTING
-♦♦♦♦` 4. �'I 0� .*.���''�.i�i♦!♦i!�!:it CONDITION S
Legend \\\\ \\ sr
Drawn by:
Brunswick County Parcels WGL
Cool Run Site = 25.57 ac ~ Date:
ller—
JUNE 2021
O NCDWR Forms i� f ''* Scale:
\ NCSAM Forms i \ 1:1800
\ NCWAM Forms © Project No.:
\
21-008
�wf4
— — — Existing Streams
. it' e .
- Ditches U
0 r. FIGURE
Hlstorlc_Channel♦�♦�♦; Existing Wetlands = 3.38 ac s
4A
m Drained Hydric = 17.46 ac 0 100 200 400 600 800
iii.
0
Feet

i` w yam' _
Z ,
# vili ,...
1
. • r Axiom Erryw rnerHak Inc.
/ -. #! F Prepared for:
,. •♦ _
,♦'i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦ii�. - -t -
CLEARWATE R
i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i. I I F `
•
♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦:♦♦♦�♦:♦:♦:•�, 3, , MITIGATION
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•�♦ •��� .ti - ;, +I SOLUTIONS
•
������♦�i� •
#�♦��A. .i. Off♦ ���♦�♦�.♦� •�1♦�♦�♦� Project:
♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦�
.!i`. i♦i♦i♦i ,i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i i♦i♦i♦i♦i� ,�!•!'�! •
COOL RU N
'`•i� ���♦�♦�� ♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦� ��♦�♦�♦�♦�♦� #. MITIGATION SITE
0♦♦♦� ,♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦A
.� �i♦i♦i♦i♦�' `�♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i' ✓♦♦♦♦i♦i♦i♦♦`,.
•
! !♦�♦♦♦ ♦�♦♦♦♦�♦4 ,„ Brunswick County, NC
'`, -, 4� ` ��1�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�� _ - - Title:
4♦ ��♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� �,�♦ v
♦♦ .�♦♦ ♦ ♦• ♦ ��♦. '♦♦♦♦♦ /
V♦ �� ♦A♦< ►< . ♦♦♦1•
4.
^`♦♦�ii'i♦i` ..4' �P,fr♦ ••♦♦♦��♦♦��4!•,:!i♦i♦i♦ii♦i!iNAP ':T . 4 LIDAR
�,. �.♦♦ ♦�gip A
s Drawn by:
.. • ;.i„ .,; WGL
-t .- t 1 . �' :. Date:
�- • JUNE 2021
•
Scale:
1:1800
Legend l.. . }' Project No.:
* 21-008
Cool Run Site = 25.57 ac '
— — — Existing Streams 11 FIGURE
. �` 7Ditches
7
•
'♦�♦�♦� Existing Wetlands = 3.38 ac • , ' '' -� 4 B
M Drained Hydric = 17.46 ac _ _ - 0 100 200 400 600

Cross Section 1 - Pool AMR
Abkf = 13.9ft AbAillikd
Wbkf = 19.5ft
Cross Section 2 ~ \ Cross Sect on 3 ❑max = 1.6 ft NAA
100 J_ _
\... ...- , ---Y)
100
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
50 ' Battkfull _
/ `
Cross Section08 CLEARWATER
0 MITIGATION
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 SOLUTIONS
97.
Reference Pattern Pattern Legend 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Lp-p=62(31 -93)ft
Lm= 102(62-130)ft Top of Bank
Wbelt=60(46-74)ft
Rc= 18{9 28)ft Thalweg NOTES/REVISIONS
Lp-pfWbkf=4.5(2.3-6.9) Cross Section
Ln1/Wbkf=7.5(4.5-9.6)
Wbelt/Wbkf=4.4(3.4-5.4)
RclWbkf= 1.3(0.6-2.0)
SIN= 1.32
10o Section 2- Riffle 199
bkf= 4 ft --- -- Cross Section 3 -Riffle
,. Liav =0.7ft Abkf= 9.7ft
Wbk = 12,5 ft F�gnkfiiIi 'p� b - .7 ft
par�kfull Dm = 1.0 ft
Lan Height= 1.0 ft qma = .0 ft
k Height Ratio= 1.0 99 _an He ht= 1.0 ft
LWU/D = 16.7 �ght Ratio = 1.0
FPA= 100 W/D 7 22.5
ENT.= 8.0 FPA� 100
tream Type = C1. -- ENT r 6.-8
trelm Type =C Project:
98 .
o7 - 9 y� 0 10 7❑ 30 40
0 70 F1an►�uII 40
Cool Run
Mitigation Site
Brunswick County
North Carolina
Cool Run Reference Reach
Profile (Reference Reach)
Title:
Save = 0.0016 rise/run Cool Run Reference Reach
-Sw lley = 0.0021 rise/run Dimension, Pattern,
Srifkle = 0.0026 (0.0013- 0.0055) rise/run and Profile
Spmol = 0.0004 (0 - 0.0034} rise/run
Srun = 0.0006 (0.0004- 0.0034) rise/run
35 -_., Sgl de= 0 (0 -0.0039) rise/run Scale: FIGURE NO.
NA
Water Surface Date: 5
r }� Apr 2021
s0 100 150 200 250 300 350 C h a n n e l B e d
Project No.:
1
21-008

' '' ' - r M '
Tie into existingIli '" „ „
lar
channel elevation - y `
..,1,• Milk
[ \ ..
_ Upgrade existing ` �t ,-'
ItAil4
xpiped crossing .a:.. -. -, '' ti;
. r.
:,4 �' - Reach-Cool Run Upstream W`' - ,. it-1 Axiom Environmental, Inc
Mitigation Type-P2 Stream Restoration ~ Reach-Cool Run Upstream , , "
106
j .r •
�' Dotage-592 ftMitigation Tye-P1 Stream Restoration ,. .-
r\is,'
Activities aotage-427 ft
1 Cut floodplain bench Arti�ites ,�+
i 2)Excavate design channel 1}Direct flow into historic channel
} Install habitat structures 2}Clear sediment and debris jams CLEARWATER
,.�. -r •r 4)Bringchannel to historic flood lain elevation 3)Contour channel to appropriate dimension
='43'T• * p 4)Install habitat structures - MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
lr
1
vr; } a'.
tillill -
NOTESIREVISIONS
\, 19 .
. i . _ - ....,....\ ti.po
, 9
,ijr___411.4„,, „It?... . . , , . . , ,-....7„01. (-- --... .._. --- \
0 - ------------- r ''',1f.••-k:kt :il '''" I
: \ --,
t_ . ._ . . , : t
v ir 1 \
CIP-f.:
.-P4gr :
i :x_., . - . ,4 ----.-4 •
__,,, r ---._ .
\ t
_ _ ......
1---- �'
- ;-.,•:•,,if,,i •• ,�, `� Project:
N.
,!: , .,. ..: .. .
;T Cool Run
_ Reach-Cool Run Downstream Mitigation
LEGEND M iti ati o n Site
Mitigation Type-P1 Stream Restoration
Footage- 1000 ft Brunswick County
Boundary=-25.6 ac � Activities
1)Clear sediment and debris jams
Major Topography Line 2)Contour channel to appropriate dimension North Carolina
Minor Topography Line 3) Install habitat structures -
• — — Stream Restoration=2028 ft ' 4) Drop flow with an appropriate structure •
Stream Restoration (credit ratio 1.5 to 1)=592 ft r 4
Bankfull Bench41: Reach-UT 1 .
Mitigation Type- P1/P2 Stream Restoration Title:
Footage-601 ft -.
Activities ,� - Stream
A1)Tie to existing ground and step up the channel Restoration
2} Initiate stream restoration at the upper reaches
3)Tie adjacent ditch flow into UT 1 across a point bar Details
4)Once at grade begin P1 stream restoration s -
s t
Install Marsh 5)Install habitatructures
.,. Treatment Area 4)Tie into at Run Scale.
FIGURE NO.
As Shown
•
3
Date' 6■ ■
Tie into ditch bottom Tie into ditch bottom 0 150 l]D
and begin stepping and begin stepping
up the channel grade up the channel grade Project Apr 2021
I N❑":
SCALE IN FEET 21-008

\\\ ' .
y 699 7,•.',
?
yJ!*f ' r •` ` ; LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
r _ d a DAVEY company
f Z i
_ _ _ + � _ , , Prepared for:
iiiiili4
, : ;' : _- - : •CIS �. CLEARWATER
� '� 'S `` _ ,.. MITIGATION
� f-, ;'..*'h'h..• ,.?`\ \'-',7',,4.',,i,'-"2-•‘X,•.i.1...-41•
,,.,.4.4.4't1, -4.a-a \ \,,, N \ SOLUTIONS
•
j` .1. 4 t . ;.§ INS' t1 \ Project:
I♦ �1 _�
�� \` •
i, \''� ` ; COOL RUN
>°4 % "'—"'' MITIGATION SITE
i : I .11 ,a ritill.L.. t.„p '`, N. "'•
•..� n ��' t ! _ Brunswick County, NC
,� _ �� II
a r Title:
'•, n II �a�UOCC�'��'+�y 4p0�tid p�aooE7000E=000E�oo❑ c7000E7 =2,E 000E7000L__ op. .
u
•..,� o °°�✓°✓ Mitigation Layout
° OCCO° °°°✓ "a
•
Legend °O°° ,-CC) „�
1/4
Cool Run Mitigation Site Conservation Easement: 25.57 Acres , �, oo t t,F „ 4 , :'� _ Drawn by:
Stream Restoration (P1): 2,026 L.F. ° f "S'' 6••. `••, ` WAF
EE 7' Stream Restoration (P2): 593 L.F. k ,���1 ,� , ,' ! Date:
ChannelBanks oP ¢st�`,.i 4' 9/15/21
o° • w � = 1F
-��� Existing Ditches (Non Stream-To Be Filled in Restoration Areas) �,, Scale: 1:1800
EE7EE[ Existing Channel Location '� ; ` -0, 24 '
,,, Project No.:
Riparian Wetland Restoration (Reestablishment): -14.11 Acres „�,�.. _-- ' LMG20.248
. :..xi;; Riparian Wetland Restoration (Rehabilitation): -1.4 Acres ' ih� �*
Riparian Wetland Enhancement: -1.2 Acre j� ,i , , '' F C7 U RE
N' Riparian Wetland Preservation: -0.49 Acres ! , t'1. ++,. �'
1// Marsh Treatment Area (No Credit) Z =ems 41,
Bankfull Bench (No Credit) "-"'-"'-"'-` "
6B
,, 1 : 0 75 150 300 450 600
��� Non Restorable Areas (No Credit) �j"� i i — — Feet

AMR
AIM
POOL POOL 15'MIN W bid .
' " '• ' VALLEY r• t
SEDE SLOPE LIVE WILLOW
RAN GLIDE RIFFLE ! GLIDE RIFFLE I. STAKES
COIR FIBER
EROSION
,.Z+ _____WATER SURFACE CONTROL MATTING PROPOSED
-;;- �LEV�I�FI FLOODPLAIN
-- .-, -I" ClassAgnd Axiom Environmental, Inc.
`_ voaare sm a�
r
BANK SLOPE • r
, •• +a�74'i1rF+11 .
' EXTEND STONE c
BOTTOM OF I BED MATERIAL UP
CHANNEL ll CHANNEL SANK CLEARWATER
~ POOL-TO-POOL SPACING II[1 TO 113 D riff ,N for
IVORIES-SEE NOTE t MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
TYPICAL CHANNEL PROFILE TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
NOTES
NOTES/REVISIONS
1, POOL-TO-POOL SPACING IS MEASURED FROM 'Wilma
CENTER OF POOL BEND TO CENTER OF POOL BEND.
COW FIBER
EROSION LIVE WILLOW
CONTROL MATTING STAKES
SEE NOTE 4 PROPOSED
PROPOSED FL OODPLAIN7
FLpnnPLAIN
II-_=1-. -il 4 4
111=11 =I14; ARiES 2
POOL LENGTH
•
MAX-1:1 SLOPE
r HEAD OF
TAIL OF ,,e�. ''' HR7 i ftrFFiE TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION
RIFFLE 1 •- 1 TAIL OF IF R2
RIFFLE
CHANNELDESIGN—<. �,,1 QJ Gt+C1F-/ -_ ' Project:
w
2 R/c \. r
i. '�[F HR2 CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
4 ¢ FLOW / 1. MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM CHANNEL AND FLOODPLAIN SHALL BE Cool Run
USED TO BACKFILL EXISTING CHANNEL.
-------'---')\\
'RI Mitigation Site
2. BANK PROTECTION SHALL CONSIST OF NATURAL COIR FIBER MATTING.
Pr)OL LENGTH Brunswick County
TYPICAL CHANNEL PLAN VIEW 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY BED MATERIAL FOR THE ENTIRE BED
LENGTH OF EACH RIFFLE SECTION. THE BED MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF North Carolina
A MIX OF CLASS A AND SMALLER STONE.
CHANNEL PLAN VIEW NOTES'
I.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT THE CHANNEL ALIGNMENT BY LOCATING CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS Title:
THE RADII AND SCRIBING THE CENTER LINE FOR EACH POOL BEND. THE
CONNECTING TANGENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLETE THE LAYOUT OF THE CHANNEL REACH Wbkf(ft.) Wbot(ft.) Driff(ft.) Dthal(ft.) Dpool(ft.) Wpool(ft.) Wthal(ft.) PROPOSED DIMENSION,
2 FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF THE ALIGNMENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SAVE TREES Cool Run upstream 14.1 10.1 0.9 0.1 1.3 18.4 1.0 PATTERN, AND PROFILE
OR AVOID OBSTACLES. THE STAKE-OUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION Cool Run Downstream 15.0 11.0 0.9 0.1 1.3 19.5 1.0
MANAGER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL.
UT 1 5.8 3.8 0.4 0.1 0.7 7.5 1.0
Scale: FIGURE NO.
NA
Date:
Apr 2021
Project No.:
21-008

y ^'; .7F+yF - rl• r 1 ti -■ - 'rFF I'. _1- ,�` iy.' _.�.. ^ y 1 - .7r Ir t•-.` -s — .t .= s -_ '� --
,...„,jri,
{` - y C `��.1. � } .. r ;.,y. ley ,.t-- .r►'4 :,f,:7� '��� frtLMG�•,• :{-
ic...'IP
y#:
It, .
, id,
.. .
_ ...
., .
:s.... ;„4 -:• A
' ,:Y " ' '. tit "YK.:. '7 .i `*tiF .. c r . r. LAND MANAGEMENT'GROUP
4
-r ` e;Rf - /�} •r}.+ �.'..` ?� .S i' 1.r 'r ~ + i i• `i: i t -41er:.„sly�..• +' ,1:::
_ } company
it:L.
/Will"
^,. ' 3 k • .704 Vic: • s_ - Kvitt r3 r r,:j .� f 4 :4•" 4.'tl= Prepared for:
N.
�'i �.+u• ti - .a. N f . i, ?l+t� �! - l 1T } . r -'�,',fl s
i.
,rjf
•
,� - [ ,. ,. , .;fir "�r ;�. ,;,� �,;, A -_17 -. ' to:
" ' CLEARWATER
s* n ' (. .dfi'• •,.� ��' `.�.. " 4 - { �'i-. as,�, ar �, h ��. .'�-y yl .�'�4y' , .. y'A `.;, ` : ;.. _� > a�. s • , ' _ z • �: � w� MITIGATION
� ., ' �� • r� ;; . : ,r :. , • ' SOLUTIONS
x '' :17C1 F r- .-:r 4 . .011,
1144'' .. ; .it } '[". f ' 1.s �' .•; '`i�. ,
d ' `4+, r4 f y " }. �'t �-ay "lit*
'it t' �a ' +.s�. a' Is •
_ t,.� _ ail. r
. 4_ ,
�.. . i `.-Ar' `' ` Project:
ti 'V. 1 .i1 .r
t< r r n COOL RUN
�` , . ,, ,..\.: :1. j.. . ,:i . . :,. iff.�. MITIGATION SITE
\) , \ N . \\:
{ J +i
,..‘,.:::: . ,ir.,
, ., , , : . ',.
' \ AZ
Brunswick County, NC
` \\:\ ` Title:
r.
= \ - Planting Plan
_ \\\\‘‘\\\\\\\4_
. \
. . NI4k\ •i _,I-, , . ii,
�' Drawn by:
• P 0.;,,
WAF
f Date:
• 4` =ram'"''f1:: H. h 9/15/21
+ "
' ! .,� b 'r •64 Scale:
,. • 1 ,.' 41 1:1 800
Project No.:
? ,�
r r; ,*i • LMG20.248
4,''''g
` Legend ,'
FIGURE
Cool Run Mitigation Site Conservation Easement: 25.57 Acres \ ? I +T• '
1},i A
SG . x..
��� Planting Zone 1 (Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp): —15.48 Ac Alb 8
3 z =� _
7 j, Planting Zone 2 (Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp): —5.10 Ac
---____' 0 75 150 300 450 600
Streamside Assemblage Planting Zone: —2.13 Ac .' f Feet

I tr.C: '.��,.t1. 'j'�'+vr, :'.rw� � ;+�' i�i-3 c _'.".�R t.. ,..`�. r Y'� —' s "g :w.' • 3.. ..
2.
16
tb, ; +, •. Y ...: i(. .♦ fit. t y • ^ ^ �- '..-�''' ..•_41Y', I r• •+,1} : •J an t
'' .:':-.7.-.4,-,
,,,•� p �KM
1P � 4��h Ya , � ... :�• S"•
i+ iM1p At • c• ���' J• i 1 •',� .%� �t
4.':*00
+ i•
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
. 14,. t. ;.�? — . .1, ,; "��a a a �F • s 4"� c--
a DAVEY ny
co
it,
,gyp , $ayF' - '} _f. J �• • .' ? .+' 'w. � nF 4, / L G ' ' •
v^ ' company
\.,
At
iii 2
'�, �, • Prepared for:
1' •r.' ti� tr ;_�. ;%2*? ,J y��y r r ,..,,.�!'. .2�° 'Y�' ;'. �x, 1 i
�, a ...... ? ?. ... �r. >'"r` ' •
16, L ?�
71'Fi • • :11,• '� r i �v• .4 i.
7• -
z
�- �� �' ,�� • CLEARWATER
,r,,,i ?....: . ; ,
-0 �, ., ''' _ MITIGATION
v . ;; ` _ ., SOLUTIONS
4
�.a
< : . is \
9`«fix \! •`•;.'. ,, •
f
i. •itit4 A4,... . ",,,,,. -, , , .., ..,.,. ‘N, • , A% ..,„*It's,,‘ \ ;!; ::•.;•-•i
111
. M^ y `'°' ^may _. s �7- 4 ,k N • . ..\-$.0.0,:4444, ,, •, 'ora,..,,,„.
�.i.. ;;' - Y.I
*if .-.:
�,,` e.,'l • `rem ` ! ., �...�
:x ` ; k. , -.:.L.:.'".i •r!! :-' .N, i \\ . .
' h ' , i a�. ►? .
• '� COOL RUN
1� r . . , i. - MITIGATION SITE
A
. o ,-;:I' ' /,,, 2:: 1` : ,„ • Brunswick County, NC
"•, _ \ u N'IP - Title:
MP
` .} ❑ OoE000E0000000000000E70000000E�0000�000E
k \.. _
0 ^O°O
F �� .�, ❑
,„ VP ❑ A
or, ,;.'T ❑ --;;;-(DI �'= Monitoring Plan
° 5 :i 'f p„ j ;
F' •". C
2k. •` ' � � ,. •:'- r. ,w ' ' ' ".•' ' • ,i. A '� A' � � Drawn y
Q�' 7 y i, .. WAF
Legend ,
{ j Date:
Cool Run Mitigation Site Conservation Easement: 25.57 Acres �, „ s 9/15/21
CVS Monitoring Plots (11 Permanent; 3 Random TBD) ,• ,�' Scale:
Permanent Monumented Cross Sections f 1:1 800
Project No.:
O Groundwater Gauges LMG20.248
Stream Guage
* Rain Gauge 1 k, "r,
FIGURE
Riparian Wetland Restoration (Reestablishment): -14.11 Acres / t ,: ,
' ;'s•.'• Riparian Wetland Restoration (Rehabilitation): -1.4Acres - _� / �',
lamRiparian Wetland Enhancement: -1.2 Ac "'-"'-"'-"'-"'-"""'-' 9
i 0 75 150 300 450 600
.'''::: r Riparian Wetland Preservation: -0.49 Acres '. i I — — Feet
",

LE .. .
tLMG•
. . LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a D IEY company
A " #
"Moot ,
,4110 mill>
- ' . ' Prepared for:
F
v
CLEARWATER
i ' '_ MITIGATION
le, SOLUTIONS
air.MX oomillWaqiima
- i
111111114111111 fillikiiihk_ .
Project:
•111, !I 114.164101 . 111% ..
! 2 .
. _ .
V $ v-* COOL RUN
_ MITIGATION SITE
.- Z4
'= . . .. _ellirrillgrip 410 #e Z5 44 Brunswick County, NC
- "y# - p + Z6 Title:
- - - -•
lV .
. -1
py
•- - _ NRCS Soil Map
CI; imp
APP4 ! jel II .. i W
C. .
C},
T Y
ti
Drawn by:
,T CI R" ii WAF
' Date:
i 9/15/21
Scale:
C .
. i= 1:1800
Project No.:
-
LMG20.248
il IC9 :
FIGURE
Legend Ailliftliii
z —s'Min.
Cool Run Mitigation Site Conservation Easement: 25.57Acresft ..
""'^
10A
0 100 200 400 600 800
® Soil Borings — — Feet

_. _
\ :A7-.--A..,.,:. ., "q#� T 7.. r. _ -fir - .-....1.-s �+F x'•_ K.
. _ .
"TIPAP7W. .2,4,, ,,.,c,"0.- ,,, - 0..,,t.y.'6%;)•.:1- ': - .... -.141%it. " 4..+0. -
•... ''- ... ' - 1 '''. '4: : ' .•- ' •'47 - ' ''''. LMG
'1-4 N-:34 -7-L. .1)., '...'‘4 ' ' '.i. . ' . .Y 1, 1) - -..--".4-:,,,. ....-'. . -' ). L t'.. opzer . .. ..- .11...'.- A.'. :1.0 11\16
7 � { �7 \�� �`� "� - rr1 .I lit: . , if,'
r' = „ h ^'r - .=F� -� - - .: - 1_!'._•�• y►`'• .- ���y - .:u �4- .�• •..79 ' " - LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
iiri
•
>ti: e .. ,. y x; �. . . . ¢ Y �� :.h' x a Cli11IEY company
•
1%4
4A.. ---' ,. ' - - ' -'-. ' .
•
„' � .. 4.1.,. '•,� -. • a • ;, ‘i 'y . . a t y + Prepared for:
a .._ __ .. .
,..::*it ;,$'7. - .'
., fir. J R. y Y •.".�-' • `�•-.<<. ;%:,:-;I,'Afp, 7rt�- .:Ct .7! {. -'. - - �; j. 3*...ti --
, . = ` ' :� t'= ;f• � + :,�" � � i=rw� ., �, :; ' ,i r }. t • s. ,r ' CLEARWATER
r • 7100. .q'r� " '_— • . w f y. . i 4
MITIGATION
# ' f.J1t.�{ x '! • ', �., ` '• . 'ak - .'t ,: ,;� t . `� " �(�y.j'' 'c SOLUTIONS
AI
�� 1 r in y •F�i -�: _ }#•:+11,r••�'' '8'n -,'tea - r __ 11b�': ... • .]:ti - - •Ir• • r_ 1r .x. -.1( - .
•
•
41.
11%
;_. �r4 � ....
Project:
A
A6 ;,,
Al2 COOL RUN
,•:i - MITIGATION SITE
y i g) �V
. (I) 4k... _/ Iii:
wr # AIM
A y (43
Brunswick County, NC
,d
2 T
Cyr 4 ,�...,- ,
1�� f .e^1 i•4'•�� Title:
(13
-1
Soil Series Map
It Y2
\ nr fly. t
Drawn by:
;.; ' tr. k � F'a WAF
1f6C .. . • c . • + Date:
•1, 9/15/21
-' k '�: ';'- 1� T" Scale:
ti. ei
,
`••,�� •. , ' i X2 c 1 X A
Project No.: LMG20.248
X3
Le end I ,
g , � 1294 ;
M Cool Run Mitigation Site Conservation Easement: 25.57 Acres 1. ; FIGURE
Non Hydric Soils (Lynchburg, Onslow) '• ; Nicholas P. Howell NCLSS#1294
Muckalee Soil Series (A7,Al2, F6, and/or F13) _ �M�� . c .
Z ��� �,;. ;,�.�1��,; CPSS#328892
f"1 /••.1., `',• rj,++i t'.�,+ ;. SC Soil Classifer#113 1O g
Lumbee Soil Series (A7,A11, F3, F6, and/or F13) ^��� '' 'i"' �`t... JOB# LMG20.248
0 75 150 300 450 600 6•/
se Borings Feet Drawing by WAF
•;;• Printed on 11"x 17" Paper

VICINITY MAP fi
$fnceinrand
1±•
1` r 9 *'$• ++: as g=r "� .. y ; s -
,i ::::„.:‘, ,, , ,
Awiikr‘ le
till 4•..- e 4
If tz Coo Run Mitigation Bank
rat J^+'
oftit
ki t 'j1"
441 xtl�Y .
401w, ' , ^
e ,
, y r s
Po
°%y reference wetland
III''' ''''' '''' '}- , 1.,, ..:,,, 4:'..,;,-k: .1.' 41tir ' '
PIW
wT
�y- `- g$ _ / ,
si
'' 4` = r t o .,, �' a:r k
Y�' F d' ,y - as fi• - •. - -'.
wl S
•
f - x:.ram" C awk`_T . *,f
.� Ra
'1�ip X E� s
astio...
Y C
�, f it+ ` ,0 "� Cho KEPE,63,:3: h, 0)OP; StreetM.p o o
N
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. 0 140280 560 840 1,120
Map Source: 2020 Brunswick County Aerial Imagery Feet
Cool Run Mitigation Site CLEARWATER AliTIGATION
SClearwater Mitigation Solutions � � '� Figure 11
Brunswick County, NC g
LMG20.248
1LMG Reference Wetland Location
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY*.company

, —At • —No—:ir,/,=•1/4, .,„ -4"1.0•9? . ,....
:::':
J it. .sT a 7.:*--,:,:t.': ,1 iMt' w 4:, J, ti i' ,
F .A. ILMG
\ � �� : - w illib �1 p� i f 'i - _1
0.11
< - \ 4....A,_ ,`r s'` ,r a2_4,74 " 4. $ it LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
4 440 ..440,,,,44.... 4 . ,.r �, , !, `' >' x �� ' a DAVEYI. company
•
` �Y r r. .A , p 4 , + � N..
Prepared for:• ,a
•
.� IA: ',. Aft, -.,,`", r ,` ,w. ; • 4. it e r`yr *ti,r� • ,, Iv ' :' ' :�jl�u,9 �, 'a t v rfi '' 1 It� - ,
'1.k, .. '.'uy,, -`°. 7�� .. .. 'i' `� y.:.}. :-q a r 4y ' .,r • .'fit *•.�.o�•; .
n � �• � t ' CLEARWATER
\� '• MITIGATION
,. .\ '�'* t. y % _ SOLUTIONS
c r
,`:�' `` � . � ".0 ',X,,. � � � OW41m act:
'•tik': �* =�4 OW3Impact )1
:
0 *t ,, ,,\ 0.01 ac(203 LF) Project:
-- \` \�
"� •,,'. OW1 Impact:
tiw: 0.004 ac 89 LF) . `M I OW5 Impact:
�> "1` a , �' ' OW2 Impact: / 0.02 ac(423 LF)
;�� 0.01 ac(223 LF) .•. °►� COOL RUN
�; -�' MITIGATION SITE
1 � �,o� I ZZ .:. -
❑ .` OW6 Impact:
. • • \ \ Brunswick County, NC
k\i.
_
1 '� �� _ o _ .' .ice ��+ � Title:
W1 Impact:0.009 ac ���•� �� � _
.•,-.-_ =..�. _.. ._. ., _ �. - n 4� ��o ✓ ^^G,C)='''CooCCCICD��-=_=_T�_7o1.7777oo7 - =-17��:2,17=-L-3 '
i
::
: . . 1, �G�GGJ Proposed
i
•�,� Goo Impact Map
egend
�� ` ,.
./J AGO
M Cool Run Mitigation Site Conservation Easement: 25.57 Acres cccc c %``ice pit
W2 Impact:0.06 ac copcc��i‘ i' W4 Impact:0.349 ac
77777[ Proposed Stream Impacts: 2,269 LF • i
- - - • Proposed Jurisdictional Ditch Impacts: 0.05 ac ! ,'',4 , `q'' , Cool Run Impact: 1934 LF Drawn by:
i,'-. ��� ( ���1 Nfi� r i W3 Impact:0.14 ac r � � WAF
. Proposed Wetland Impacts: 0.558 ac I r ��k , ,,
Date:
Grading Boundary � ''' 1!<141 n ' ' ,i �;
(' � ,,,; ,I 1 ill , h 9/15/21
Stream Restoration (P1): 2,026 L.F. o �� Kai+,,�1 di't � i �J''1 �� i "� ��, •
7 i 11iII,�tjj � {� 1liS ., �� i, A .
4 � n Scale:
tr i t
77777� Stream Restoration (P2): 593 L.F. .I 1111 tlt 8'y II,'�� f i• �ti4.,'it ', „' iI , ,; `1 s , '
i�..) l 11,4 1S1S1SJ 1 1 'P I F� it p I I I 1 1, ' , , ' ,�'� <
❑ 7, f', �" ,J i1t,t .,;1{� 1�� iM1 1 ., 4 g" 14., 1:1800
Channel Banks UT1 Impact:335 LF Xt I ,, '��n + . { j
L% . pGradingBoundary ; , i F *, .1!• i., "�, ,., Project No.:
Proposed r � LMG20.248
_..._... ,� ' a
Existing Ditches (Non Stream) �,�, � }t 1
z
Riparian Wetland Restoration (Reestablishment): -14.11 Acres
Riparian Wetland Restoration (Rehabilitation): -1.4 Acres / ''N .
c` FIGURE
Riparian Wetland Enhancement: -1.2 Acre - . .r
Z — "
.._.. At
12
::;; Riparian Wetland Preservation: -0.49 Acres c;:' ' —� •'
W Marsh Treatment Area (No Credit) '
0 75 150 300 450 600
�� Non-Restorable Areas (No Credit) Feet

Appendix B
Existing Stream & Wetland Data
- Soil Boring Logs
- Nutrient Model Output
- Figure B1. Cool Run Morphological Stream Characteristics
- Existing Stream Cross-section Data
- NC SAM Forms
- NC WAM Forms
- NCDWQ Stream Forms
- BEHI/NBS Data
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-1
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 42" SHWT: <6" Slope: 2-3% Landscape: drainageway(filled/ditched)
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks, panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): F13
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Fill 0-10 10YR 3/3 SL gr fr, ns, np Colluvium from past farming
Ab 10-28 10YR 2/1 SL gr fr, ss, np High O.M. not Mucky
Cg1 28-44 10YR 4/1 10YR 3/6 SCL/LS MA fr, ss,sp 25% Distinct Concentrations
Thin CoLS strata
Cg2 44-54+ 2.5Y 5/2 2.5Y 5/6 CoLS/SL MA vfr, ns, np 10%distinct concentrations
2.5Y 6/1 15%distinct depleations
Thin SL strata
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
adjacent to agricultural ditch,fill from past farming
activities. Interbedded strata in deeper sediment
indicative of higher order stream sediment. "' °Kq �+.. `.,._
.'-i 4 ,— Sys ,"
w
r d
50,
j'�4\t\-4 F gyp■29 i 7
rRe- `1 Pis'''' ,-

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lynchburg Data Point: SB-2
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Aeric Paleaquults
OWT: >36" SHWT: 21" Slope: 2-3% Landscape: stream terrace
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Somewhat poorly Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks, panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): None
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Fill 0-5 10YR 4/3 LS gr vfr, ns, np Colluvium from past farming
A 5-12 10YR 5/2 10YR 6/1 LS gr vfr, ns, np 20%distinct depleations
Bw 12-16 10YR 4/4 LS gr vfr, ns, np
E 16-21 10YR 6/4 LS gr vfr, ns, np
Bt 21-36 10YR 6/4 10YR 5/8 SL/SCL sbk fr, ss, np 20%prominent concentration
10YR 6/2 20%distinct depleations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
edge of field above drainage ditch and stream
floodplain/valley
.�
i f , ,.7 '4r Sys ," �
i
w
r t
,iv.
j'�4� �4 F` gyp■.T}y� i 7r
41
rReF�� `1 P�rs:-^- �-
�F'aR:wu_c*ctTr.'

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-1
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 45" SHWT: <6" Slope: 2-3% Landscape: drainageway(filled/ditched)
Elevation: —43 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks, panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): S7
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Fill 0-9 10YR 3/3 SL gr fr, ns, np Colluvium from past farming
Ab 9-18 10YR 2/1 LS gr fr, ss, np High O.M. not Mucky
Cg1 18-28 10YR 4/2 10YR 5/6 LS/SL MA fr, ss,sp 20%prominent concentration
2.5Y 6/2 10%distinct depleations
Thin SL strata
Cg2 28-54+ 2.5Y 4/2 2.5Y 5/2 LS/SCL MA vfr, ns, np 15% Faint depleations
2.5Y 3/1 10%distinct om concentration
Thin SCL Strata
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
adjacent to agricultural ditch,fill from past farming
activities. Interbedded strata in deeper sediment
indicative of higher order stream sediment. "' °Kq �+.. `.,._
.'-i 4 ,— Sys ,"
w
r d
50,
j'�4\t\-4 F gyp■29 i 7
rRe- `1 Pis'''' ,-

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lynchburg Data Point: SB-4
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Aeric Paleaquults
OWT: >36" SHWT: 20" Slope: 2-3% Landscape: stream terrace
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Somewhat poorly Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks, panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): None
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-11 10YR 3/3 LS gr vfr, ns, np
E 11-20 10YR 6/4 LS gr vfr, ns, np
Bt 20-36 10YR 5/6 10YR 6/4 SCL/LS sbk fr, ss, np 20%distinct depleations
10YR 5/8 5%faint concentrations
10YR 6/2 15%prominent depleations
LS strata on ped faces
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
edge of field above topo break into old stream
floodplain
i
i 4 1 � Sys ," �
w
r t
t
j'�4� \. F` gyp■g9 t
rReF�� `1 P�rs:-^- �-
�F'aR:wu_c*ctTr.'

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lu : Lumbee Data Point: SB-5
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: 34" SHWT: <12" Slope: 2-3% Landscape: toe slope
Elevation: —48 MSL Drainage: poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks, panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): F3
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-6 2.5Y 3/1 SL gr vfr, ns, np
Btg1 6-26 2.5Y 5/2 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 25%prominent concentration
7.5YR 5/8 5%prominent concentrations
Btg2 26-42+ 2.5Y 6/2 5Y 6/2 SCL/LS sbk fr, ss,sp 10%distinct depleations
2.5Y 5/6 Thin LS strata 25%distinct concentrations
10YR 5/6 10%prominent concentration
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
Footslope above floodplain,quick transition into flood
plain soils
.�
i 4 � Sys ," �
i
w
r t
,iv.
41
rReF�� `1 P�rs:-^- �-
�F'aR:wu_c*ctTr.'

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-6
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 40" SHWT: <6" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: flood plain
Elevation: —43 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A7, F13, F3
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-8 10YR 3/1 MuL gr fr, ss, np
Cg1 8-23 10YR 4/2 10YR 3/6 SL MA fr, ns, np 20%distinct concentrations
Cg2 23-42+ 2.5Y 5/2 2.5Y 5/6 LS/SCL MA fr, ns, np 20%distinct concentrations
2.5Y 6/1 10%distinct depleations
Interbedded layers LS/SCL
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
Stressed drainage due to proximity to drainage dtich.
EV "„ej 4' .t
11 f ,._.Iv,.7 '!'..."a',,:q... -
,iv.
i i 4::-Z eZ,— : .::,,)• S4, ‘*: e .
,z. ._ �.,fie' ��`,�'4�7
'kert `1 Pis:_^- ,
�F'aR:wu_c*ctTr.'

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-7
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 17" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: flood plain
Elevation: —43 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate to slow
Vegetation: Dog fennel, loblolly pine, muscidine, bushy bluesteam, blackberry, beauty berry, panic grass
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A2,A9, F13,Al2
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oa 0-10 10YR 3/1 Muck MA fr, ss, np
Cg 10-13 2.5Y 5/2 SL sbk fr, ns, np
Oab 13-17 10YR 3/2 Muck MA fr, ss, np
Ab 17-28 10YR 3/1 MuSL sbk fr, ss, np
C'g 28-42+ 2.5Y 4/2 SCL Co sbk fr, ms,sp
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
upper flood plain topography,stressed FAC vegetation
present
'. %p
i
i 4 e � Sys ," �
w
r t
50,
rReF `1 Pis'''' ,-
*.resiwu_c*ctTr.'

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-8
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 18" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: flood plain
Elevation: —42 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate to slow
Vegetation: Dog fennel, loblolly pine, muscidine, bushy bluesteam, blackberry, beauty berry, panic grass
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A2,A9, F13,Al2
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oa 0-12 10YR 3/1 Muck MA Fr,ss, np
A 12-33 10YR 4/2 MuSL SBK fr, ss, np
Cg 33-42+ 2.5Y 4/2 10YR 5/6 SCL VCoSBK fr, ms,sp 10%prominent concentration
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
upper flood plain topography,stressed FAC vegetation
present
i
i 4 ,— Sys ," �
w
r t
50,
s'�Y ' '- `Pe cs''' ,
*.resiwu_c*ctTr.'

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-9
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 8" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: flood plain
Elevation: —42 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: gallberry, muscidine, loblolly pine,sweetgum, beauty berry, dog fennel, black berry, panic grass
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A2,A9, F13,Al2
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oa 0-13 10YR 3/1 Muck MA fr, ss, np
A 13-28 2.5Y 4/1 MuSL SBK fr, ss, np
Cg 28-42+ 2.5Y 5/2 2.5Y 6/1 SCL/LS MA fr, ss, np 15%faint depleations
2.5Y 4/1 Interbedded SCL/LS sediment 15%distinct om concentration
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
upper flood plain topography,stressed FAC vegetation
present
i
r .
i 4 ,— Sys ," �
w
r t
50,
s'�Y ' '- `Pe cs''' ,
*.resiwu_c*ctTr.'

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
O DAVEY company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lu: Lumbee Data Point: SB-Al
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: 36" SHWT: <15" Slope: 2-3% Landscape: concave, linear
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Dog fennel, loblolly pine, muscidine, bushy bluesteam, blackberry, beauty berry, panic grass
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): S7,A7
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-5 10YR 3/1 LS gr vfr, ns, np High O.M. not Mucky,75%coated
AE 5-8 10YR 4/2 S gr vfr, ns, np High O.M. not Mucky
Bw 8-15 10YR 3/2 LS sbk vfr, ns, np
Ebg 15-30 10YR 6/2 10YR 5/6 sl sbk vfr, ns, np
Btg 30-48+ 10YR 6/2 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 20%distinct concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
w0, Ra soil
or
: E Z.':e,. -d h
i 9 A �' `' a'ass: •
!i t. , . .
129 s

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lu: Lumbee Data Point: SB-A2
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: 24" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: depression,concave
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Dog fennel, loblolly pine, muscidine, bushy bluesteam, blackberry, beauty berry, panic grass
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A7, F13, F3
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-9 10YR 2/1 Mu SCL sbk fr, ss, np
EB 9-16 2.5Y 5/2 10YR 5/8 SCL sbk fr,ss,sp 20%concentrations
Btg/E 16-23 2.5Y 6/2 10YR 5/8 SCL/SL sbk fr,ss,sp 15%concentrations
10YR 5/4 20%depletions
Btg2/E 23-36+ 2.5Y 6/2 10YR 3/2 SCL/LS sbk fr, ss,sp 5%concentrations
2.5Y 6/1 25%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
C
k. 0 * err a Fes. +�
fir 4: - 'r
,+r '

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-A3
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 30" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: depression,concave
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): Al2, F13
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oa 0-7 10YR 3/1 Mu gr vfr, ss, np dry
A 7-12 10YR 3/6 Mu LS gr vfr, ss, np tanic staining
Btg 12-24 10YR 5/2 SL sbk fr, ns, np
Btg2 24-36 10YR 5/2 10YR 3/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 15%concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
r r! ! F NS Ft / :ems'
ii
„.%. -.,,,:-.,,,,,,,.,,, , ,41`
r .*
n

LMG
LAND MAN, , r\:;FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-A4
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: —12" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: old stream channel,concave
Elevation: -45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): Al2, F13
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Al 0-6 10YR 3/1 Mu SL gr fr, ss, np
A2 6-15 10YR 3/1 Mu SL gr fr, ss, np
Btg 15-24 10YR 4/2 10YR 5/3 SCL sbk fr, ss, np LS pockets strata
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
,�C
I1--;;f'if7 'isr '
1 294
fir. 4 - 'r
� ,+r" ,.

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a Dig/EY .company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-A5
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive,nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 12" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: drained floodplain
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum,Loblolly Pine,Blackberry,Panic grass,Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): All,F13
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oa 0-7 N 2/0 Mu gr fr,ss,np
AB 7-15 10YR 3/3 Mu SL gr fr,ss,np tanic staining
Btg1 15-28 10YR 4/2 SL sbk fr, ns,np
Btg2/Cg 28-36 2.5Y 5/2 10YR 6/1 SCL/LS sbk fr,ss,np 25%depletions
Cg 36-42+ 10YR 6/1 LS to fr, ns,np
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
4 - 4}.

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lu: Lumbee Data Point: SB-A6
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: >42" SHWT: 6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: linear
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-6 10YR 3/1 10YR 3/6 SL gr fr, ns, np 15%concentrations
Btg1 6-21 2.5Y 5/2 10YR 5/8 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 25%concentrations
Btg2 21-42 2.5Y 6/2 10YR 3/8 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 15%concentrations
10YR 5/6 20%concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
_ ",--1W4-7: ----ki:SI,-."-I''
i
Qi�Ck T
1 ey - s�S�t 1�.
_ ,f 3 -44. ,,i s,

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lu: Lumbee Data Point: SB-A7
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: >30" SHWT: 5" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: topographic low
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): F3
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-5 10YR 3/1 SL gr fr, ns, np
Btg1 5-16 10YR 6/2 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss, np 20%concentrations
I10YR 5/8 15%concentrations I
Btg2 16-30 10YR 3/3 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 25%concentrations
10YR 5/8 10%concentrations
I
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
C
k. 0 * err a Fes. +�
II i
fir 4: - 'r
,+r '

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lynchburg Data Point: SB-A8
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Aeric Paleaquults
OWT: >24" SHWT: 15" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: hillslope
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: somewhat poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-4 10YR 3/1 SL gr fr, ns, np
EB 4-15 10YR 5/4 SL sbk fr, ns, np
IBt 15-24+ 10YR 5/4 10YR 6/2 SCL sbk fr, ss, np I
10YR 5/8
I
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
j Fiba" -,''+.;..
C
k• * yMr!rye -q. ✓
c ;;i' 'isr 1'
\% .-:-.7'2ArZ,'',77,0e •.`; ' li
fir 4: - 'r
, ,,,
,+fir. .

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-A9
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: >21" SHWT: 8" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: low drain way
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A13, F3
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-8 10YR 2/1 SCL gr fr, ss,sp
Btg1 8-21 2.5Y 5/2 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 10%concentrations
Btg2 21-30+ 5Y 6/1 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr,ss,sp 25%concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
it---,-,,'.1...,r,cri
C'k.T
.5.. au '4 +4 lt'e-
-_ .E_f -per. ., ; s,
del"O�

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY .company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Onslow Data Point: SB-A10
Soil Classification:Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Spodic Paleudults
OWT: >30" SHWT: >30" Slope: 2-3% Landscape: onslow hilltop,convex,convex
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: somewhat poorly drained Permeability:Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum,Loblolly Pine,Blackberry,Panic grass,Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-6 10YR 5/1 S gr vfr,ns,np
E 6-11 10YR 6/1 S gr vfr,ns,np
Bw 11-13 10YR 3/4 LS gr vfr,ns,np
E' 13-18 10YR 5/3 2.5Y 5/6 S gr vfr,ns,np 25%concentrations
2Bt 18-30 7.5YR 5/4 10YR 6/3 CL sbk fi,ns,np 20%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
� x'y�,
q -%# "Z`,-;„.r.-4., .4
i k & j,'

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r\;FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Onslow Data Point: SB-All
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Spodic Paleudults
OWT: 28" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0% Landscape: concave floodplain
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-6 10YR 3/1 S gr vfr, ns, np 90%coated
Eg 6-9 10YR 5/1 S gr vfr, ns, np
Bw 9-13 10YR 3/2 10YR 6/2 LS gr vfr, ns, np 20%depletions
E'g 13-19 10YR 6/2 10YR 5/3 LS gr vfr, ns, np 25%depletions
B'tg 19-34+ 2.5Y 5/2 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 20%concentrations
10YR 5/8 10%concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
it---,-,,'.1...,r,cri
C'k.T
.5.. au '4 +4 lt'e-
-_ .E_f -per. ., ; s,
del"O�

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lumbee Data Point: SB-Al2
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: 12" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0% Landscape: concave drain
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A7
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-10 N 2/0 Mu SCL ma fr, ss,sp
EB 10-19 2.5Y 4/2 SL sbk fr, ss, np
Btg 19-26+ 2.5Y 5/2 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
."'FI . ;, ;of 4`b 4 =G-;
'I.I.
�raq=I.Pi ,'¢k_
rf

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-A13
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 28" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0% Landscape: floodplain,concave
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): F6,A7
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oa 0-9 N 2/0 Mu gr fr, ss, np
A 9-20 10YR 2/1 10YR 3/6 Mu L sbk fr, ss, np 10%concentrations
Cg 20-42+ 2.5Y 4/2 10YR 3/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 5%concentrations
2.5Y 6/2 20%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
,o.":.' f:'r;"—::;cam: (4b".... ..N--,'.:,
tea... .:
F ,1
,(1.,
j.
O.4'n

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAI/EY .company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lynchburg Data Point: SB-x1
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Aeric Paleaquults
OWT: >34" SHWT: 20" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: linear
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks,panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-7 10YR 3/1 LS gr vfr,ns,np
E 7-13 10YR 3/4 LS gr vfr,ns,np
Bt1 13-20 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr,ss,sp
Bt2 20-34+ 10YR 5/4 10YR 5/8 SCL sbk fr,ss,sp 25%concentrations
7.5YR 5/8 25%concentrations
10YR 6/2 15%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
i

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAI/EY .company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lumbee Data Point: SB-x2
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: >48" SHWT: 11" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: linear
Elevation: ">45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks,panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): F6,F3
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
fill 0-11 mixed sandy&loamy fill
A 11-18 10YR 2/1 10YR 3/6 SL sbk/gr fr, ns,np 15%concentrations
Bg1 18-37 10YR 6/2 10YR 3/6 SL sbk fr,ns,np 15%concentrations
10YR 3/1 15%concentrations
Btg2 37-48+ 10YR 4/2 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr,ss,sp 25%concentrations
10YR 5/8 15%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
_ Tyr '
�+y, ,
g
--Oil 1 C

LMG
LAND MAN,%. F.% F.N�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lumbee Data Point: SB-x3
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: 39" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: linear,filled zero order stream
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks, panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A7, F13
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
fill 0-13 mixed sandy&loamy fill
Al 13-31 N 2/0 Mu SL gr fr, ss, np
A2 31-37 10YR 2/1 10YR 3/6 SL gr fr, ss, np 35%weak concentrations
Btg 37-43 10YR 4/1 SCL sbk fr,ss, np
B/C 43-48+ 10YR 4/2 10YR 6/1 SL/LS sbk fr, ns, np 25%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
i(1/41\
Z.:.,nt 4, , t.o.. ,.§i.,
Y FPd k

LMG
LAND MAN,%. r% F.N�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lumbee Data Point: SB-x4
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: >48" SHWT: <6" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: filled zero order stream
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks, panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): All
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
fill 0-11 mixed sandy&loamy fill
A 11-15 10YR 2/1 SL gr fr, ns, np
Btg1 15-29 10YR 4/2 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss, np 25%concentrations
Btg2 29-40 2.5Y 6/1 10YR 5/4 SCL/SL sbk fr,ss, np 20%concentrations
10YR 5/6 10%concentrations
B/C 40-48+ 2.5Y 6/1 2.5Y 5/6 SL/LS sbk vfr, ns, np 20%concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
Y FPd k
(4\,,,
129 ; ,

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY .company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lynchburg Data Point: SB-y1
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Aeric Paleaquults
OWT: >30" SHWT: >30" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: footslope/toeslope
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: somewhat poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Corn stalks,panic grass,edge of field
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-7 10YR 3/3 LS gr vrf,ns,np
AE 7-12 10YR 4/4 LS gr vfr,ns,np
Bt 12-30+ 7.5YR 4/6 10YR 5/6 CL sbk fi,ns,np 15%concentrations
10YR 6/4 10%concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
;`.f _ 'Z` ,a +a, ice. kv, _
j , . zz ,oviso v.—• i ., t, ,,i e .,/,
`i„

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lumbee Data Point: SB-y2
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: >50" SHWT: 26" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: toeslope
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): S5
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
fill 0-20 sandy fill
A 20-26 10YR 3/1 LS gr vfr, ns, np uncoated, drained
ABg 26-30 10YR 3/3 10YR 3/6 LS gr vfr, ns, np 15%concentrations
Btg1 30-39 10YR 5/2 10YR 5/8 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 25%concentrations
10YR 3/4 35%depletions
Btg2 39-50+ 10YR 6/2 10YR 5/8 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 25%concentrations
10YR 6/4 35%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
y�F �4'r%tyryl "�niN}�
F. VV/ ''a'L�� � 14
i Z.:k.;.:-...-- '
n- .t

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-y3
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive,nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 36" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0% Landscape: floodplain
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum,Loblolly Pine,Blackberry,Panic grass,Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): A7,F6
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oat 0-8 N 2/0 Mu gr fr,ss,np
0a2 8-23 10YR 2/1 Mu ma fr,ss,np
A 23-33 10YR 3/1 10YR 3/6 Mu L sbk fr,ss,sp 10%concentrations
Btg 33-42+ 2.5Y 3/2 SCL sbk fr,ss,sp
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
R it �? > .� g' ,,2.,a
if
F 7 P.:- ' sir,"' s
FF !
i FtT +atwFr�

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-y4
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 30" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0% Landscape: floodplain
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): F6,A7
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oa 0-11 N 2/0 Mu gr fr, ss, np
A 11-26 10YR 2/1 10YR 3/6 Mu L sbk fr, ss, np 10%concentrations
Btg 26-42+ 2.5Y 4/2 10YR 3/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 5%concentrations
2.5Y 6/2 20%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
_ ",--1W4-7: ----ki:SI,-."-I''
i
Ck T
_ ,f 3 -44. ,,i s,

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Onslow Data Point: SB-y5
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Spodic Paleudults
OWT: >36" SHWT: 11" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: side slope
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-5 10YR 5/1 S gr vfr, ns, np
E 5-8 10YR 5/1 S gr vfr, ns, np
Bw 8-11 10YR 3/3 LS gr vfr, ns, np
E' 11-21 10YR 5/3 10YR 3/4 LS gr vfr, ns, np 25%concentrations
10YR 5/1 10%depletions
Btg 21-36+ 10YR 4/2 SL sbk vfr, ns, np
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
it---,-,,'.1...,r,cri
C'k.T
.5.. au '4 +4 lt'e-
-_ .E_f -per. ., ; s,
del"O�

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Lumbee Data Point: SB-z1
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,siliceous,subactive,thermic Typic Endoaquults
OWT: >30" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0-1% Landscape: footslope
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): F3
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-5 10YR 4/2 10YR 3/6 SL sbk fr, ss, np 10%concentrations
Btg1 5-13 10YR 5/2 10YR 5/6 CL sbk fi, ns, np 25%concentrations
Btg2 13-30 5Y 6/2 10YR 5/6 CL sbk fi,vs,vp 25%concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
C
F ✓k. ' 0 * erra es.
E - ft . .
/
c .:i' 'isr t'
:. . .
\% .-:-.7'24Z,'',77,0e •.`; ' li
fir 4: - 'r
,+r '

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Onslow Data Point: SB-z2
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Spodic Paleudults
OWT: >34" SHWT: >34" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: hillslope
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: somewhat poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-4 10YR 5/1 S gr vfr, ns, np
Bw 4-8 10YR 3/3 LS gr vfr, ns, np
IE 8-19 10YR 6/3 10YR 3/6 S gr vfr, ns, np 15%concentrations I
10YR 6/2 10%depletions
Bt 19-34+ 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
ts_
e E

LMG
LAND MAN,%., r% FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Onslow Data Point: SB-z3
Soil Classification: Fine-loamy,siliceous,semiactive,thermic Spodic Paleudults
OWT: >36" SHWT: 22" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: hilltop
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: somewhat poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s):
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-7 10YR5/2 S gr vfr, ns, np
E 7-12 10YR 5/1 S gr vfr, ns, np
Bw 12-22 10YR 3/2 LS gr vfr, ns, np
Eg 22-27 10YR 6/2 2.5Y 5/6 LS sbk fr, ns, np 20%concentrations
Btg 27-36+ 2.5Y 5/2 10YR 5/6 SCL sbk fr, ss,sp 30%concentrations
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
ti,-----•1:c.,y, aC k T
4 5 i
+5 '4 lt'e
_ . -p . s,- E_fer , a

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY . company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-z4
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive,nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: >36" SHWT: <6" Slope: 1-2% Landscape: footslope
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum,Loblolly Pine,Blackberry,Panic grass,Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): S7
Horizon Depth(in) I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-6 10YR 3/1 LS gr vfr,ns,np 90%coated grains
Eg 6-9 2.5Y 4/2 LS gr vfr,ns,np
Bh 9-21 10YR 3/1 LS sbk vfr,ns,np
Bg 21-34 2.5Y 4/2 LS sbk fr, ns,np
Btg 34-42+ 2.5Y 5/2 2.5Y 6/2 SCL/LS sbk fr, ns,np 20%depletions
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
drained
�, 4M i-NS p , NYC 0,7t,
a
te a
t' f
s ,..

LMG
LAND MAN,%. F.% F.N�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Muckalee Data Point: SB-z5
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 24" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0% Landscape: toe slope
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): F6, F13
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
A 0-15 2.5Y 3/1 10YR 3/6 Mu SL sbk fr, ss, np 25%concentrations
Cg 15-36 10YR 5/2 10YR 3/1 LS ma fr, ns, np interbedded depletions
10YR 4/2 interbedded depletions
I
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
drained
r_

LMG
LAND MAN, , r\:;FN�T GROUP
a DAVEY`y company
Project Site: Cool Run Stream Site Date: 8/7/2019
County: Brunswick Job#: LMG19.196
Location: Grissittown State: NC
Soil Series: Mu: Muckalee Data Point: SB-z6
Soil Classification: Coarse-loamy,siliceous,superactive, nonacid,thermic Typic Fluvaquents
OWT: 18" SHWT: <6" Slope: 0% Landscape: floodplain
Elevation: —45 MSL Drainage: Very poorly drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Sweetgum, Loblolly Pine, Blackberry, Panic grass, Dogfennel
Hydric Soil Indicator(s): f13
Horizon Depth(in)I Matrix Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Notes
Oa 0-8 N 2/0 Mu gr fr, ss, np
A 8-21 10YR 2/1 Mu LS sbk fr, ss, np
Cg 21-27+ 2.5Y 3/1 2.5Y 6/2 LS ma vfr, ns, np Stratified Layers
I
Comments: Described By: Nick Howell - LSS#1294
drained
,�C
k. 0 * err a Fes. ✓
I
.-,y7aa,,,,...iit,,,e ti' . i'
fir. 4:1;3 - 'r
� ,+r 6.

Land Use Nutrient Model
Land Use % Rainfall
Stream Length di Pasture Annual
Site Buffer Width _ _Ili. Woods 88
Site Area(Acres) 25.57 Row Crop 12
Site Area(ft sq) 1113829.2 Urban
must total 100 100
Number N inputs P inputs Total Total
Land Use Characteristics of Animals lbs/au/yr lbs/au/yr N(Ibs) P(Ibs)
Pasture Beef I 113 40 0 0
Dairy 164 26 0 0
Pig 153 58 0 0
Horse 102 40 0 0
fert/ac 60 45 0 0
0 I 0 Total Pasture N and P
N inputs P inputs Total Total
Row Crop Area lbs/ac/yr lbs/ac/yr N P
Row Crop(Acers) Corn 20 20 0 0
Cotton 50 20 20 31 31
Soybeans 50 0 15 0 23
Hay Fescue 50 45 0 0
Hay Bermuda 70 45 0 0
must total 100 100 31 I 54 Total Row Crop N and P
Woods Minimal Nutrients
Concentration Concentration Total Total
Area Runoff N(mg/I) P(mg/I) N(Ibs) P(Ibs)
Urban Residential 0 2.2 0.4 0 0
Commercial/Industrial I 0 2.3 0.3 0 0
Roadway 0 3.0 0.5 0 0
0.0 I 0.0 Total Urban N and P
P Notes: Residential Assumes 25%Impervious Surface
Commercial/Industrial Assumes 75%Impervious Surface
Roadway Assumes 100%Impervious Surface
Annual Load(Ibs)=0.226*Annual Runoff(inches)*Concentration(mg/I)*Acres
Total Nutrients Removed within Easement
Total N Removed(Ibs/yr) 31
Total P Removed(Ibs/yr) 54

AIM
Cool Run (Upstream) XS 4
Cool Run (Upstream) XS 3 , •
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
CLEARWATER
MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
UT1XS4
NOTES/REVISIONS
UT1XS3 =tea '
UT 1 XS 2
UT1XS1
Cool Run (Downstream) XS 2 Project:
Cool Run Downstream XS 1
(Downstream) Cool Run
Mitigation Site
Brunswick County
North Carolina
Title:
Existing
Conditions
Cross Sections
e:
Scale:
Dat
As Shown FIGURE NO.
I
Apr2021
0 150 300 B
Project No.:
21-008
SCALE IN FEET

Cross Section Cross Section II-
Cool Run(Cool Run Downstream-XS 1)Riffle--- Cool Run(Cool Run Downstream-XS 2)Riffle---
45 45
41
39 40
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Width from River Left to Right(ft) Width from River Left to Right(ft)
section:Cool Run(Cool Run Downstream-XS 1) .IIEIM Cool Run(Cool Run Downstream-XS 2)
Riffle Riffle
description:Cool Run Cool Run Downstream-XS 1) description:Cool Run'Cool Run Downstream-XS 2)
height of instrument(ft): 200.00 height of instrument(ft): 200.00
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's omit distance FS -- FS FS W fpa channel Manning's
notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank (ft) slope(%( "n" notes pt. (ft) (ft) bankfull top of bank (ft) slope(%(
• 0 158.8195 41.18049 .1 30.0 • 0 156.9824 43.01757
0 0699 159.7473 40.25269 I 39.52 40.89 0 .170342 156.8789 43.12112 40.32 43.12
0 498291 159.5695 40.43054 0 .677576 156.5295 43.4705
O 9.900473 159.1716 40.82836 dimensions 0 10.90592 157.7021 42.29787 dimensions Alt-
• .14413 159.1086 40.89137 11.9 x-section area 1-3 d mean • 12.72009 158.8136 41.18636 11.9 x-section area 1.1 d mean
0 5.035 160.2371 39.76286 9.5 width 10.5 wet P 0 13.9576 160.3803 39.6197 10.8 width 11.6 wet P
O 5.89612 161.1804 38.81959 1.7 d max 1.1 hyd radi 0 15.04989 160.6144 39.3856 1.7 d max 1.0 hyd radi
O 17.96452 162.1404 37.85962 3.0 bank ht 7-6 w/d ratio 0 16.66554 161.1548 38.84522 4.5 bank ht 9.8 w/d ratio
• 19.51122 162.0763 37.92373 30.0 W flood prone area 3-2 ent ratio • 18.11821 161.4226 38.57743 18.0 W flood prone area 1.7 ent ratio
• 21.62319 162.0891 37.9109 • 19.52223 161.3069 38.69307
• 23.46575 161.6466 38.35337 hydraulics • 21.14225 160.8401 39.15995 hydraulics
0 0483 160.8635 39.1365 0 0 velocity(ft/sec) 0 22.00125 160.5529 39.44708 0.0 velocity(ft/sec)
U .1436 160.0323 39.96775 0.0 discharge rate,Q(cfs) 0 23.28713 160.1166 39.88344 0.0 discharge rate,Q(cfs)
U 7.1815 160.0667 39.93335 0.00 shear stress((Ibs/ft sq) 0 24.30875 159.6404 40.35965 0.00 shear stress((Ibs/ft sq)
U 28.92036 160.2473 39.75272 0.00 shear velocity(ft/sec) 0 25.84551 159.0443 40.95574 0.00 shear velocity(ft/sec)
U 30.62707 158.6552 41.34479 0.000 unit stream power(Ibs/ft/sec) 0 28.30027 158.2013 41.79873 0.000 unit stream power(Ibs/ft/sec)
U 32.20206 157.9483 42.05167 0.00 Froude number o 30.65248 157.5415 42.45852 0.00 Froude number
U 33.77049 157.0471 42.95289 0.0 friction factor u/u* 0 33.08833 157.4588 42.54122 0.0 friction factor u/u*
• 35.82971 156.3388 43.66117 0,0 threshold grain size(mm) • 34.95869 156.4385 43.5615 0,0 threshold grain size(mm)
• •.90108 -5.823 44.17647 • 38.28694 155.9601 44.03988
U check from channel material • 41.88507 155.7872 44.21278 check from channel material
U 0 measured D84(mm) U I 0 measured D84(mm)
U 0.0 relative roughness I 0.0 I fric.factor U 0.0 relative roughness I 0.0 I fric.factor
U 0.000 Manning's n from channel material U 0.000 Manning's n from channel material
U U

Cross Section -Section
Cool Run(Cool Run Upstream-XS 3)Riffle--- Cool Run(Cool Run Upstream-XS 4)Riffle---
46 46
45 - _ie..» . 45 _
`
43 _ _ 43
w 42_ *
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 39 - - --
Width from River Left to Right(ft) 0 5 Widtflqrom River Left to Righti 55''tn) 20 25
section:Cool Run(Cool Run Upstream-XS 3) 11=11 Cool Run(Cool Run Upstream-XS 4)
Riffle Riffle
description:Cool Run ool Run Upstream-XS 3) description:Cool Run ool Run Upstream-XS 4)
height of instrument(ft): 200.00 height of instrument(ft): 200.00
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's
notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank (ft) slope(%) "n" notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank (ft) slope(%(
U 0 155.703 44.297 '6 156.36 11.0 • 0 154.677 45.323 158.07 156.37 12.0
• .1.79127 155.833 44.167 42.14 43.64 CI 906383 154.818 45.182 41.93 43.63
U 4.214711 155.574 44.426 0 .910561 155.03 44.97
• 5.37376 1155.592 44.408 dimensions In • 2.601486 155.593 44.407 dimensions
• 7.815293 1155.694 44.306 10.6 x-section area 1.7 d mean a 3.131967'156.205 43.795 10.6 x-section area 1.4 d` mean
O 9.648591 1156.065 43.935 6.1 width , 9.0 wet P • 4.1346341 156.738 43.262 7.8 width 9.3 wet P
O 10.55197 1156.36 43.64 2.0 d max 1.2 hyd radi • 5.0602581 157.131 42.869 1.8 d max 1.1 hyd radi
O 11.03987 57.768 42.232 3.5 bank ht 3.5 w/d ratio • 5.910917 157.933 42.067 3.5 bank ht 5.8 w/d ratio
l7 1.06797 57.765 42.235 11.0 W flood prone area 1.8 ent ratio U 6.519846 158.878 41.122 12.0 W flood prone area 1.5 ent ratio
U 92458 159.83 40.17 U 7.491872 159.406 40.594
U 02448 159.603 40.397 hydraulics U 8.41814 159.887 40.113 hydraulics lEr-
U 42665 159.876 40.124 0.0 velocity(ft/sec) • 9.8977081 159.675 40.325 0.0 velocity(ft/sec)
U .4529 159.893 i 40.107 0.0 discharge rate,Q(cfs) • 11.404141 159.709 40.291 0.0 discharge rate,Q(cfs)
o '16.26469 159.783 I 40.217 0.00 shear stress((Ibs/ft sq) • 12.312551 159.485 40.515 0.00 shear stress((Ibs/ft sq)
O _
16.79478 �159.762 I 40.238 0.00 shear velocity(ft/sec) • 13.270951 159.202 40.798 0.00 shear velocity(ft/sec)
O 17.26352 1157.767 42.233 0.000 unit stream power(Ibs/ft/sec) • 13.801241 158.121 41.879 0.000 unit stream power(Ibs/ft/sec)
O 18.12785 1157.053 42.947 0.00 Froude number • 14.25037■157.638 42.362 0.00 Froude number
O 19.22369 1156.528 43.472 0.0 friction factor u/u* l] 14.93803 156.367 43.633 0.0 friction factor u/u*
• 20.28054 1155.794 44.206 0,0 threshold grain size(mm) • 17.90122 156.16 43.84 B-0 threshold grain size(mm)
• 21.34852 1155.17 44.83 • 20.30168 155.475 44.525
• 22.16354 1155.278 44.722 check from channel material • 23.56721 155.374 44.626 check from channel material
O 23.16566 155.297 44.703 0 measured D84(mm) CI 0 measured D84(mm)
u 39744 155.23 44.77 0.0 relative roughness I 0.0 I fn.factor a 0.0 relative roughness I 0.0 I fn.factor
U 0.000 Manning's n from channel material CI 0.000 Manning's n from channel material
• CI

Cross Section Cross Section NI
Cool Run(UT 1-XS 1)Riffle--- Cool Run(UT 1-XS 2)Riffle---
46 46
45• `� __ _ 45 '
44
i _ 44 i"�y _
43 _ _ 43
w 42 _.. _ w 42 _
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Width from River Left to Right(ft) Width from River Left to Right(ft)
112E13 Cool Run(UT1-XS 1) . - •3 Cool Run(UT 1-XS 2)
Riffle Riffle
description:Cool Run(UT 1-XS 1) description:Cool Run(UT 1-XS 2) •
height of instrument(ft): 200.00 height of instrument(ft): 200.00
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's
notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank (ft) slope(%) "n" notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank (ft) slope(%)
` MILE`0 155.008 44.992 158.75 156.17 5.0 -`'M` 0 154.392 45.608 158.06 155.92 9.0
h_ uI '13338 154.913 45.087 -` i 43.83 �r1.436273 154.872 45.128 41.94 44.08
ii`lr9.616711 155.253 44.747 -`.1-8.026961 156.013 43.987
j 10.80394 1155.77 EZEIM dimensions -`. 11.55001 156.859 EERIE dimensions
-" 12.05929 1156.612 43.388 2.4 x-section area 0.6 d mean -`. 14.09456 157.737 MEER 2.4 x-section area 0.7 d mean
`E113.36162 1157.278 MEilfiEg. 3.9 width 4.6 wet P -`E 16.39696 157.734 42266 3.3 width 4.4 wet P
` 114.01447 1158.181 41.819 0.8 d max 0.5 hyd radi -`E 17.42903 158.201 41.799 1.1 d max 0.6 hyd radi
`E114.91929 1159.564 40.436 3.4 bank ht 6.4 w/d ratio -`E 18.05163 158.884 MIME 3.2 bank ht 4.5 w/d ratio
`E116.09734 1159.497 40.503 5.0 W flood prone area 1.3 ent ratio -`E 19.03922 159.157 40.843 9.0 W flood prone area 2.7 ent ratio
` 117.15818 1159.52 40.48 -`'E 19.68792 158.909 41.091
`E.1.07199 1158.976 41.024 hydraulics -`E 20.16495 158.954 41.046 hydraulics i
`Ei01556 1158.142 41.858 0.0 velocity(ft/sec) -`E 20.84719 156.587 maxim 0.0 velocity(ft/sec)
`Mi14826 1157.528 ERSE. 0.0 discharge rate,Q(cfs) -`. 21.97493 155.916 44.084 0.0 discharge rate,Q(cfs)
`.W22167 1157.363 ERIE. 0.00 shear stress((Ibs/ft sq) -`. 26.22647 155.683 EzEim 0.00 shear stress((Ibs/ft sq)
`.F320738 1156.169 43.831 0.00 shear velocity(ft/sec) -`.y11.5633 155.67111i1HE 0.00 shear velocity(ft/sec)
`.F6.46584 1155.842 44.158 0.000 unit stream power(Ibs/ff/sec) • 0.000 unit stream power(Ibs/ff/sec)
• •1.56524 55.735 44.265 0.00 Froude number U 0.00 Froude number
U 0.0 friction factor u/u* U 0.0 friction factor u/u*
U 0-9 threshold grain size(mm) U 8-9 threshold grain size(mm)
U U
U check from channel material U check from channel material
U 0 measured D84(mm) U 0 measured D84(mm)
U 0.0 relative roughness I 0.0 I fric.factor U 0.0 relative roughness I 0.0 I fric.factor
U 0.000 Manning's n from channel material U 0.000 Manning's n from channel material
U U

n Section
Cool Run(UT 1-XS 3)Riffle--- Cool Run(UT 1-XS 4)Riffle---
i!
45
_ 45
w w
42 42 -
41
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 40 - ' ' ' 2 ' ' ' '
Width from River Left to Right(ft) 0 5 10 to th from River2Left to Right(ft/5 30 35 40
section:Cool Run(UT 1-XS 3) Cool Run(UT 1-XS 4)
Riffle Riffle
description:Cool Run T 1-XS 3) description:Cool Run T 1-XS 4)
height of instrument(ft): 200.00 height of instrument(ft): 200.00
omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's omit distance FS FS FS W fpa channel Manning's
notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank (ft) slope(%) "n" notes pt. (ft) (ft) elevation bankfull top of bank (ft) slope(%)
irU 0 153.312 46.688 ,6 154.54 5.0 • 0 152.141 47.859 156.5 152.79 7.0
U .41733 153.247 46.753 42.54 45.46 17 .358142 152.18 47.82 43.5 47.21
0 9.057095 153.31 46.69 0 9.51815 152.412 47.588
O 9.083343 1153.344 46.656 dimensions • 12.47371 152.788 47.212 dimensions MI-
• 10.81706 1153.705 46.295 2.4 x-section area 0.8 d mean u 14.21296'153.483 46.517 2.4 x-section area 0.8 d mean
U 12.31836 1154.524 45.476 3.1 width 4.2 wet P • 16.442171 154.53 45.47 3.1 width 4.4 wet P
U 13.71616 1155.485 44.515 1.1 d max 0.6 hyd radi • 18.2107 I 155.748 44.252 1.2 d max 0.5 hyd radi
U 14.74294 1155.94 44.06 4.0 bank ht 4.0 w/d ratio • 19.30395 156.263 43.737 5.0 bank ht 4.1 w/d ratio
• 14.78106 1155.928 44.072 5.0 W flood prone area 1.6 ent ratio U 19.85441 156.746 43.254 7.0 W flood prone area 2.2 ent ratio
• 15.35838 1156.73 43.27 U 20.02833 157.747 42.253
• 16.10311 157.841 42.159 hydraulics U 20.67106 157.603 42.397 hydraulics
• •.8761 158.501 I 41.499 0.0 velocity(ft/sec) • 21.024581 157.613 42.387 0.0 velocity(ft/sec)
U .38466 158.547 I 41.453 0.0 discharge rate,Q(cfs) • 21.404151 157.514 42.486 0.0 discharge rate,Q(cfs)
U 17.92424 158.517 I 41.483 0.00 shear stress((Ibs/ft sq) • 21.7925 1 157.224 42.776 0.00 shear stress((Ibs/ft sq)
O 18.36406 158.468 I 41.532 0.00 shear velocity(ft/sec) • 22.46641 1 156.731 43.269 0.00 shear velocity(ft/sec)
U 18.74172 157.662 42.338 0.000 unit stream power(Ibs/ft/sec) • 23.382371 155.846 44.154 0.000 unit stream power(Ibs/ft/sec)
U 19.48689 157.021 42.979 0.00 Froude number • 24.207721 155.4 44.6 0.00 Froude number
U 20.23124 156.339 43.661 0.0 friction factor u/u* • 24.76289 154.986 45.014 0.0 friction factor u/u*
• 21.13837 155.745 44.255 0,0 threshold grain size(mm) u 25.18463 153.678 46.322 B-0 threshold grain size(mm)
• 21.78908 154.995 45.005 u 26.08881 152.676 47.324
• 22.65942 154.541 1 45.459 check from channel material u 28.42199 152.359 47.641 check from channel material
U 23.49241 154.25 I 45.75 0 measured D84(mm) • ;6.270121 152.281 47.719 0 measured D84(mm)
U 25.14604 154.072 I 45.928 0.0 relative roughness I 0.0 I fric.factor • I 0.0 relative roughness I 0.0 I fric.factor
•• 27.80998 153.916 46.084 0.000 Manning's n from channel material • I 0.000 Manning's n from channel material
• 37.3894 46.245 •

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Frink SAM#1 2. Date of evaluation: 9/30/19
3.Applicant/owner name: Clearwater Mitigation Solutions 4.Assessor name/organization: Jernigan/Axiom
5. County: Brunswick 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Lumber on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cool Run
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 33.969691,-78.472136
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
SAM#1, Cool Run
9. Site number(show on attached map): DS 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 9-10 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ® Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) ®Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
®A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction,etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
• Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
®A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
®C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C)= > 10-40%,Abundant(A) = >40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel(2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens,and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance,buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
®C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
®E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E EE EE < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ®A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Frink SAM#1 Date of Assessment 9/30/19
Stream Category 0a3 Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4)Microtopography LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport NA
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2)Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Frink SAM#2 2. Date of evaluation: 9/30/19
3.Applicant/owner name: Clearwater Mitigation Solutions 4.Assessor name/organization: Jernigan/Axiom
5. County: Brunswick 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Lumber on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cool Run
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 33.970878,-78.473142
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): SAM#2, UT-1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 12 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ® Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) ®Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B NotA
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
®A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction,etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
• Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
®A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. EYes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C)= > 10-40%,Abundant(A) = >40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel(2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens,and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance,buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E EE EE < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A ®A ®A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Frink SAM#2 Date of Assessment 9/30/19
Stream Category 0a2 Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2) Flood Flow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW
(4)Microtopography LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability HIGH HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport NA NA
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance OMITTED NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name(if any): Frink SAM#3 2. Date of evaluation: 9/30/19
3.Applicant/owner name: Clearwater Mitigation Solutions 4.Assessor name/organization: Lewis/Axiom
5. County: Brunswick 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Lumber on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cool Run
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 33.971934,-78.470697
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
SAM#3 Cool Run
9. Site number(show on attached map): US 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 4 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 15 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ® Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) ®Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) Size 4(>_5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (01 011 ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
▪Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
▪Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
▪Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
▪Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
®A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction,etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
• Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
®A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y r 01 Sand bottom
®C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) 8 E ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R) = present but< 10%, Common (C)= > 10-40%,Abundant(A) = >40-70%, Predominant(P) = >70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel(2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete,etc.)
11d. EYes No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ Adult frogs
❑ Aquatic reptiles
❑ Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens,and algal mats)
❑ Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ Mosquito fish (Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance,buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
®A ®A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
®E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and "wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ®B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E EE < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ®B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Frink SAM#3 Date of Assessment 9/30/19
Stream Category 0a3 Assessor Name/Organization Lewis/Axiom
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM
(4)Microtopography MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport NA
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat HIGH
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate HIGH
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2)Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cool Run Date of Evaluation 4/29/21
Applicant/Owner Name Clearwater Mitigation Solutions Wetland Site Name WAM 1
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Level III Ecoregion Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Nearest Named Water Body Cool Run
River Basin Lumber USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040207
County Brunswick NCDWR Region Wilmington
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 33.969308,-78.471051
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include,but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches,dams,beaver dams,dikes,berms,ponds,etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks,underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons,etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality,insect damage,disease,storm damage,salt intrusion,etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting,exotics,etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any?(check all that apply)
• Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks,excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance,herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate],exotic species,grazing,less
diversity[if appropriate],hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered,but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples:draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling,excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations,depletions, or rhizospheres)
®C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank,underground storage tank(UST),etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing,but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen,particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration,dead vegetation,excessive
sedimentation,odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >_20%coverage of pasture
®D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
®F ®F ®F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes No If Yes,continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the.water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed,combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
Z5 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
®B ®B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
OF OF From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation(<7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive,but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut,select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
®K ®K ®K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
®D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present,but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
®C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent(planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes,continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type (WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
• ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
T
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ®A ®A Dense shrub layer
_c ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
e ❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
• ®B ®B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
®A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
•
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms,beaver dams,and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B,C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Site is in clearcut pine plantation. Cut—5 years ago and repopulating with sweetgum and pine saplings.Standing water in skidder tracks.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM 1 Date of Assessment 4/29/21
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition HIGH
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition HIGH
Water Quality Condition HIGH
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cool Run Date of Evaluation 4/29/21
Applicant/Owner Name Clearwater Mitigation Solutions Wetland Site Name WAM 2
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Level III Ecoregion Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Nearest Named Water Body Cool Run
River Basin Lumber USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040207
County Brunswick NCDWR Region Wilmington
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 33.969436,-78.471638
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include,but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches,dams,beaver dams,dikes,berms,ponds,etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks,underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons,etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality,insect damage,disease,storm damage,salt intrusion,etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting,exotics,etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any?(check all that apply)
• Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks,excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance,herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate],exotic species,grazing,less
diversity[if appropriate],hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered,but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples:draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling,excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations,depletions, or rhizospheres)
®C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ❑A No peat or muck presence
®B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank,underground storage tank(UST),etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing,but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen,particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration,dead vegetation,excessive
sedimentation,odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >_20%coverage of pasture
®D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
®F ®F ®F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes No If Yes,continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the.water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed,combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
Z5 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ®A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
OF OF From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short-duration inundation(<7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive,but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut,select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
®K ®K ®K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
®D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present,but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
®C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent(planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes,continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type (WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
• ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
T
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ®A ®A Dense shrub layer
_c ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
CI) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
e ®A ®A Dense herb layer
• ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
) ) \ ,t)
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms,beaver dams,and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B,C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
®D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Site is not a jurisdictional wetland. Hydric soils were found,but hydrology has been removed by ditching the nearby stream. It is a clear cut pine
plantation that was cut—5 years ago and is repopulating with early successional saplings.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM 2 Date of Assessment 4/29/21
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Soluble Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Cool Run Date of Evaluation 4/29/21
Applicant/Owner Name Clearwater Mitigation Solutions Wetland Site Name WAM 3
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Level III Ecoregion Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Nearest Named Water Body Cool Run
River Basin Lumber USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03040207
County Brunswick NCDWR Region Wilmington
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 33.971623,-78.471913
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include,but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches,dams,beaver dams,dikes,berms,ponds,etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks,underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons,etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality,insect damage,disease,storm damage,salt intrusion,etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting,exotics,etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ❑Yes No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any?(check all that apply)
• Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks,excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance,herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate],exotic species,grazing,less
diversity[if appropriate],hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered,but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples:draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling,excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
®B ®B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations,depletions, or rhizospheres)
®C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ❑A No peat or muck presence
®B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank,underground storage tank(UST),etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing,but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen,particulate, or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration,dead vegetation,excessive
sedimentation,odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >_20%coverage of pasture
®D ❑D ❑D >_20%coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
®F ®F ®F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes No If Yes,continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the.water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
❑C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed,combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
Z5 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered—adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed—adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
®E ®E From 30 to<40 feet
OF OF From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short-duration inundation(<7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive,but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut,select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F OF OF From 5 to< 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑1 01 01 From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
®K ®K ®K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields(pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
®D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present,but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
®C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent(planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
EYes No If Yes,continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type (WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
• ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
T
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ®A ®A Dense shrub layer
_c ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
e ®A ®A Dense herb layer
• ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B NotA
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
)
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms,beaver dams,and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B,C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Site is in a clear cut pine plantation. It was cut—5 years ago and is repopulating with early successional saplings. A nearby ditched stream is
negatively affecting hydrology.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM 3 Date of Assessment 4/29/21
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 `t' 1
Date: e(130 1i Project/Site: ,,;,,,� or-I Latitude:
33./71606
�Evaluator:
et,
t.n A,r; ' County: 3r„,s0_�e. Longitude:
-n.97.5q Sl
Total Points: Stream Determ' a (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 1_1-. Ephemeral termitte Perennial e.g.Quad Name:if 2 19 or perennial if a 30* 51.�,Il k
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 13 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 /5)
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 '1) 2 _ 3
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 .11 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 .' r 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 (a) 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 . : 2 3_.?
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 12 3
8. Readouts 1 2 3
9.Grade control () 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
-4 artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = (1. )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 L
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria (0) 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter �(.5� 1 _ 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris _ 0 _ 0 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles _ 0 r .5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes{�
C. Biology (Subtotal= )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) r 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0) 1 2 3
22. Fish 0) 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0` 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians (0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0) 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
_Notes: t.], i', i.S r okku k.;
-
Sketch:

Site Cool Run Mitigation Site
Stream Cool Run Bank Length 4032
Observers WGL Date 30-Sep-19
Station Bank BEHI NBS Erosion Rate Length Bank Height Erosion
1 159 right Low Low 0 159 4.5 0.0
2 262 right High Mod 0.15 103 4.5 69.5
3 617 right Low Low 0 355 3.5 0.0
4 691 right Low Low 0 74 4 0.0
5 935 right Low Low 0 244 3.5 0.0
6 977 right High Mod 0.15 42 3.5 22.1
7 1205 right Mod Low 0.02 228 3.5 16.0
8 1503 right Low Low 0 298 4 0.0
9 2123 right Low Low 0 620 4.5 0.0
10
11 399 left Low Low 0 399 4.5 0.0
12 437 left High Mod 0.15 38 4 22.8
13 886 left Low Low 0 449 3.5 0.0
14 1188 left Low Low 0 302 4 0.0
15 1289 left Mod Mod 0.05 101 4 20.2
16 1909 left Low Low 0 620 4.5 0.0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Sum erosion sub-totals for each BEHI/NBS Total Erosion (ft3/yr) 150.5
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27 Total Erosion (yd/yr) 5.6
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3 Total Erosion (tons/yr) 7.2
Erosion per unit length Total Erosion (Tons/yr/ft) 0.002

Site Cool Run Mitigation Site
Stream UT 1 Bank Length 3210
Observers WGL Date 30-Sep-19
Station Bank BEHI NBS Erosion Rate Length Bank Height Erosion
1 175 right Low Low 0 175 3 0.0
2 405 right Mod Mod 0.05 230 5 57.5
3 470 right High Mod 0.15 65 5 48.8
4 545 right Mod Mod 0.05 75 5 18.8
5 580 right High Mod 0.15 35 5 26.3
6 955 right Mod Mod 0.05 375 5 93.8
7 1605 right Low Low 0 650 5 0.0
8
9 175 left Low Low 0 175 3 0.0
10 405 left Mod Mod 0.05 230 5 57.5
11 470 left High Mod 0.15 65 5 48.8
12 545 left Mod Mod 0.05 75 5 18.8
13 580 left High Mod 0.15 35 5 26.3
14 955 left Mod Mod 0.05 375 5 93.8
15 1605 left Low Low 0 650 5 0.0
16
17
18
19
20
Sum erosion sub-totals for each BEHI/NBS Total Erosion (ft3/yr) 490.0
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27 Total Erosion (yd/yr) 18.1
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3 Total Erosion (tons/yr) 23.6
Erosion per unit length Total Erosion (Tons/yr/ft) 0.007

BEHI/NBS Summary
Erosion Rate
Stream Reach (tons/year)
Cool Run 7.2
UT 1 23.6
Total 30.8

Appendix C
Flood Frequency Analysis Data
Mitigation Plan(Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County,North Carolina March 2022

Reference Reaches
Flood Frequency Analaysis-Regional Regression Equation (USGS 2004)
McRae Land Reference Reach
Return Cool Run Reference Reach
Interval Discharge 1000
(years) (cfs) 900
0.1 7 800
0.3 11 700
2 74.4 a 600
11° 500
5 147 5 400
10 214 0 300
25 318 200
—
50 414 100
—
100 526 0
200 657 0 100 200 300 400 500
500 864 Return Interval (years)
Note: Bold values are interpolated.

Appendix D
Jurisdictional Determination Info
Mitigation Plan(Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County,North Carolina March 2022

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id.SAW-2020-1799 County:Brunswick U.S.G.S.Quad:NC-S1141 tt;
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Kevin Yates
Address: 604 Macon Place
Raleigh,NC27609
Telephone Number: 919-624-6901
E-mail: Ilea rwa termitigati onCu)gmai I.eoni
Size(acres) —25.15 Nearest Town Shallotte
Nearest Waterway Shallntie River River Basin Lower Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040208 Coordinates Latitude:33.970753
Longitude:-78.471379
Location description:WestofStarboard Rd NW,Sha llotte.NC 28470
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
e There appear to be waters,including wetlands on the above described project area/property,thatmaybe subject to Section404
of the Clean WaterAct(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).The
waters,including wetlands have been delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable.The approximate boundaries ofthesewaters are shown on the enclosed delineation map,entitled,"Section404/401
Delineation Preliminary Sketch,Cool Run Mitigation Site,"dated 12/18/2020.Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction
determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,including determining camp ensatory m itigation.For purposes of
corn putation of im pacts,compensatory mitigation requirements,and other resource protect ion measures,a p errnit decision made
on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat allwaters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on
the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S.This prelim in a ry determination is not an appealable action under the
Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331).However,you may request an approved JD,
which is an appealable action,by contacting the Corps districtforfurther instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters,including wetlands on the above described project area/property,thatm ay be subject to Section404
of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§1344)and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).
However,since thewaters,includingwetlands have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of C WA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands atthe projectarea,which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision.We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated.As the Corps maynot beable to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified bythe Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters ofthe United States within the above described project area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 1 0 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403)and Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC§ I344). Unless there is a change in law a r our published regulations,this determination maybe relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from thedateof this notification.
❑ There are waters,includingwetlandsonthe above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean WaterAct(CWA)(3 3 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this
determination maybe relied upon fora periodnotto exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
LI We recommend you have the waters,including wetla nds on yourproject area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you maywish to obtain a consultantto conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑The waters,includingwetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps.The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE.We strongly
suggest you havethis delineationsurveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be rev iewedand verified by the Corps. Once

SAW-2020-1799
verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction ofall areas subjectto CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑The waters,includingwetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted onthe plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on.Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this determination
may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,presenton the above described project area/property which are subjectto the
perm it requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law orourpublished
regulations,this determination maybe relied upon fora period notto exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ The property is located in one ofthe 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA).
You should contactthe Division ofCoastalManagementin Morehead City,NC,at(252)808-2808 to determinetheir
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material with in waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department oftheArmy permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§1311). Placementof dredged or fill material,construction or
placementof structures,or work within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§401 andlor403),If you haveany questions
regard ingth is determination and/orthe Corps regulatory program,please contact Jordan E.Jessop at 910-251-4810 or
J o rdan.E.Jesso p[riiusace.a rm y.mil.
C. Basis For Determination:Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 2/5/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/d etermination has been cond ucted to identify the lim its o f Corps'Clean Water Act j u risd iction forth a particular site
identified in this request The delineation/determination may notbe valid fertile wet land conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you oryo ur tenant are USDAProgram participants,or anticipate participation in USDA programs,you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information(This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you objectto this
determination,you mayrequestan administrative appeal under Corps regulations at33 CFRPart331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification ofAppeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and request for appeal(RFA)form. Ifyou request to appeal th is determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Sh ann in,Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Room 10M 15
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5,andthat it has been received by the Division Officewithin 60 days ofthe date ofthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address byNot applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit anRFAform to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Digitally signed by
Corps Regulatory Official: "= JESSOPJORDAN.E.1515090548
- Datr-102 .02.OS 13:t0:tl3-vatic
Date of JD:2/5/2020 Expiration Date ofJD:Not applicable

SAW-2020-1799
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public.To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Land Management Group
Wes Fryar
Address: 3805 WrightsvilleAve.,Suite 15
Wilmington,NC 28403
Telephone Number: 910.452.0001
E-mail: wf rva r(a�lm group.net
Property Owner:
Pearl Frink
Address: 1758 Frink St.SW
Ocean Isle Beach,NC 28469
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail: torryfrink(aiatmc.net

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 2/5/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Clearwater Mitigation Solutions,Kevin
Yates, 604 Macon Place, Raleigh,NC 27609
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Cool Run Mitigation Site,
SAW-2020-1799
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: West of Starboard Rd NW,
Shallotte,NC 28470
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County:Brunswick City: Shallotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):Latitude:33.970753 Longitude:-78.471379
Universal Transverse Mercator:NAD8 3
Name of nearest waterbody:Shallotte River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑X Office (Desk) Determination. Date:02/05/2021
ElField Determination. Date(s): 12/18/2020
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE"SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number Latitude Longitude Estimated Type ofaquatic Geographic authority to
(decimal (decimal amount of resources(i.e., which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) aquatic wetland vs.non- resource"may be"
resources in wetland waters) subject(i.e.,Section 404
review area or Section 10/404)
(acreage and
linear feet,if
applicable
WG 33.973031 -78.470253 —0.485 ac wetland Section 404
WB 33.971811 -78.471224 -0.088 ac wetland Section 404
WA 33.971751 -78.471853 —0.196 ac wetland Section 404
WC 33.970985 -78.471160 —0.575 ac _ wetland Section 404
WD 33.970245 -78.471041 -0.474 ac wetland Section 404
WE _ 33.969015 -78.471352 —1.006 ac wetland Section 404 _
WF 33.968830 -78.470760 —0.141 ac wetland Section 404
NS1 33.970934 -78.473618 —100L.F. non-wetland Section404
NS2 33.972044 -78.471823 --776 L.F. non-wetland Section 404
_ NS3 33.969672 -78.471285 _ —1,137L.F. non-wetland Section404
NS4 33.968777 -78.471131 --107 L.F. non-wetland Section 404
NS5 33.96845 -78.47153 —180 L.F. non-wetland Section 404
S2 33.970870 -78.473072 —335 L.F. _ non-wetland Section 404
Cool Run 33.970784 -78.472464 —1,935 L.F. non-wetland Section 404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD(AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit,or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification"(PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD,which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3)the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4)the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;(5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit)or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action,or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and(7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further,an AJD, a proffered
individual permit(and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD(check all that apply)Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
❑x Maps,plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:"Section 404/401 Delineation Preliminary Sketch."post 12/18/20 USACE field visit
❑x Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.Datasheets:
❑x Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
▪Office does not concurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
ElData sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑X USGS NHD data:USGS TNM—National Hydrography Dataset.Data Refreshed January.2021
DUSGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:0304020802 Shallotte River
❑X U.S. Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name:1:24k Shallotte
ONatural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS SSURGO Data Layer:Mucka lee,
Lynchburg fine sandy loam,Goldsboro fine sandy loam
❑x Nationalwetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:USFWS NWI. PFO
❑State/localwetland inventory map(s):
❑FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑X Photographs: ❑x Aerial (Name & Date): (oogle Earth Aerial Imagery dated 6/14/2019
or❑x Other (Name& Date): Co ms photos 1-52.of 52, from Dec 18.2020 site visit.
❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑XOther information(please specify): Site visit on Dee 18,2020,NCOL2 LiDAR
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
• JRE E
Date:2021ESSOPJO 02.05DAN.132033151509054
-05'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting PJD
staff member completingPJD (REQUIRED, unless obtainingthesignature is
2/5/2020 impracticable)
I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to retum signed PJD forms.If the requester does not respondwithin the established
time frame,the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field
` notes. A survey of delineated areas is recommended prior to specific wg45 wg1
site planning. This delineation was reviewed in the field by Jordan
F Jessup of the USACE on 12/18/20.
•
s xi
'•.
-mot. •• _ . • :4 � S -
i
1r j4
,.t y1� wall =,, wbZs1 _ i 4
_ -- a•10 r
wa1 ''• va30 t. •, ,
....N.N.) Ai?' .
wa37`_ 0
C, \
WC
1
wc50 h f . . •
wc5G 4,' wc4.i
•
•
'' t _* /u NI �' we 3fr=
1 1 -..wc 10
..• -. ii . , \ i-•
-Iwi1-12 '"1\ o---. ': .-?•,.;-•—.,:•4.._-w.,--, . ". N .
draQ �' x
4A •
d40 . z, ` '`�
-_ • - -- — - _ �,_wh1-31 i`";wd30 ry �. ti.
s. wet
, 1 WE 1 Ya }.E i
L wg20 �500 i' _ t-_I
�.t : ?:,..?"•'.:.'fir
'gg-' -- - ,j,. wf1
Legend : _ ,.•.
.:jai}—- ��••-_ A�:,�
Project Area—25.15 Acres + •• wi.1;
Y t. _w�
Uplands—21.82 Acres(87%) 1 3,. `� '
,. •
I-7 Wetlands—3.33 Acres(13%) ;'•U=-• • I . *- -
T
Tributary(Stream)—2,270 L.F. ` r I• •tom `
Tributary(Non-Stream)-2,300 L F rT
Iik
Data PointSilt yy �`L
L:\ECOSYSTEM SERVICES\2020 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FILES\ N
LMG20.248--- Cool Run Mitigation Bank, CMS\MapsA 0 62.5125 250 375 500
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. Feet
Map Source: 2014 QL2 LiDAR
Cool Run Mitigation Site CLEARWATERMITIGA7ION
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions SOLUTIONS ® Section 404/401 Delineation
Brunswick County, NC416 Preliminary Sketch
'4.:LMG
LMG20.248 LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a14 Company

Appendix E
Categorical Exclusion Document
Mitigation Plan(Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County,North Carolina March 2022

Appendix E
Categorical Exclusion Form for Division of Mitigation Services Projects
Version 2
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation)as the environmental
document.
Part 1: General Project Information
Project Name: Cool Run Mitigation Project
County Name: Brunswick
DMS Number: 100142
Project Sponsor: Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Project Contact Name: Kevin Yates
Project Contact Address: 604 Macon Place; Raleigh, NC
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
DMS Pro'ect Mana:er: Mr. Jeremiah Dow
Project Description
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC plans to provide a full-delivery mitigation project known
as the Cool Run Mitigation Project for NC Division of Mitigation Services. The project site is
located in Brunswick County, approximately five miles west of the city limits of Shallotte, NC.
The project plans to restore a section of Cool Run by redirecting stream flow into the historic
abandoned channel. Additionally, an unnamed tributary will be restored by filling existing
ditched channels. Riparian wetlands will be restored by raising stream bed elevations and
removing spoil piles, planting areas lacking characteristic wetland tree and shrubs, and
connecting existing wetlands to the floodplain and stream.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
�
/2/o�/020 2t4014 1 Yz r=
Date DM:`.) Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
/2---3—11, 776,h..^ZW 0).
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
6

Part 2:All Projects
Regulation/Question Response
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? ®Yes
n No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of Environmental n Yes
Concern (AEC)? ® No
n N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? n Yes
n No
® N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management Program? ®Yes
n No
n N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ®Yes
n No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been n Yes
designated as commercial or industrial? ® No
n N/A
3.As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment,are there known or potential hazardous n Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ® No
n N/A
4.As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment,are there known or potential hazardous waste sites n Yes
within or adjacent to the project area? n No
® N/A
5.As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment,are there known or potential hazardous waste sites n Yes
within the project area? n No
® N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? n Yes
n No
® N/A
National Historic Preservation Act(Section 106)
1.Are there properties listed on,or eligible for listing on,the National Register of Historic Places n Yes
in the project area? ® No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? n Yes
n No
® N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? n Yes
n No
® N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act(Uniform Act)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ®Yes
n No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? ®Yes
n No
n N/A
3.Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? n Yes
® No
n N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed: ®Yes
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and n No
*what the fair market value is believed to be? n N/A
7

Part 3:Ground-Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act(AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of Cherokee n Yes
Indians? ® No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? n Yes
n No
® N/A
3. Is the project listed on,or eligible for listing on,the National Register of Historic Places? n Yes
n No
® N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? n Yes
n No
® N/A
Antiquities Act(AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? n Yes
® No
2.Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects of n Yes
antiquity? n No
® N/A
3.Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? n Yes
n No
® N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? n Yes
n No
® N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act(ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? n Yes
® No
2.Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? n Yes
n No
® N/A
3.Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? n Yes
n No
® N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? n Yes
n No
® N/A
Endangered Species Act(ESA)
1.Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat listed for ®Yes
the county? n No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? ®Yes
n No
n N/A
3.Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical Habitat? n Yes
® No
n N/A
4. Is the project"likely to adversely affect"the specie and/or"likely to adversely modify" n Yes
Designated Critical Habitat? n No
® N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? n Yes
n No
® N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy"determination? n Yes
n No
® N/A
8

Executive Order 13007(Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory" by the n Yes
EBCI? ® No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed project? n Yes
n No
® N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites? n Yes
n No
® N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA)
1.Will real estate be acquired? ®Yes
n No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique,statewide or locally important ®Yes
farmland? n No
n N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? ®Yes
n No
n N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(FWCA)
1.Will the project impound,divert,channel deepen,or otherwise control/modify any water ®Yes
body? n No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? ®Yes
n No
n N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act(Section 6(f))
1.Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,outdoor n Yes
recreation? ® No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? n Yes
n No
® N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act(Essential Fish Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? n Yes
® No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? n Yes
n No
® N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the project n Yes
on EFH? n No
® N/A
4.Will the project adversely affect EFH? n Yes
n No
® N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? n Yes
n No
® N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? n Yes
® No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? n Yes
n No
® N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? ❑Yes
® No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining federal agency? ❑Yes
❑ No
® N/A
9

ATTACHMENT 1
EDR REPORT

SUMMARY OF EDR REVIEW
The property is not listed within the EDR database environmental report. LMG also contacted
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) to inquire if there were any
known incidents for the property and none were identified. No "Orphan" sites were listed in the
EDR Report. One site that is located approximately one mile from project area is listed in the EDR
Report.
The only site listed in the EDR Report is the "Quarters Horse Lane Property" site located at 6450
Quarter Horse Lane and approximately 5,000 feet to the south of the property. This site is listed
as a State Hazardous Waste Site (SHWS) site in the EDR Report. LMG performed a North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) online file review for this site. According to the
NC DEQ files, a complaint of debris and concrete finishing chemicals were concentrated in one
area of this residential property was reported to the NC DEQ. The materials were eventually
cleaned up. The NC DEQ had the water supply well at this residence sampled and the only
chemical contaminant identified above the NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standards was Iron
(see attached memo). The NC DEQ is not requiring any further remedial actions at this site. Based
on this information and the fact that this site is located approximately 5,000 feet away, LMG
would not consider this site to represent an environmental concern to the property.
No other sites that were reviewed have current non-compliance issues that have resulted in
documented off-site contamination that has influenced the property. No sites were determined
by the database search that merited further environmental review pertaining to the property.

ICool Run Mitigation Bank
Highfield Court
Shallotte, NC 28470
Inquiry Number: 6247754.2s
October 30, 2020
e EDR Radius Map TM Report
6 Armstrong Road,4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
CE DR® Toll Free:800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBF-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _ ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary_ 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
GeoCheck - Not Requested
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property.Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format,in whole
or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.or its affiliates.All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6247754.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence:Transaction Screen Process(E 1528-14)or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
HIGHFIELD COURT
SHALLOTTE, NC 28470
COORDINATES
Latitude(North): 33.9709400-33° 58' 15.38"
Longitude(West): 78.4714960-78°28' 17.38"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X(Meters): 733615.3
UTM Y(Meters): 3761621.0
Elevation: 45 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5946123 SHALLOTTE, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140520
Source: USDA
TC6247754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
HIGHFIELD COURT
SHALLOTTE, NC 28470
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST(ft. &mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
1 QUARTER HORSE LANE P 6450 QUARTER HORSE L SHWS Higher 5011,0.949,SSW
6247754.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
TC6247754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID)Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST Regional UST Database
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
TC6247754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR RCRA- Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
TC6247754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO Enforcement&Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP .Animal Operation Permits Listing
MINES MRDS . Mineral Resources Data System
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB) Listing
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable(orphan)sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6247754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state
funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by
potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Environment& Natural Resources'
Inactive Hazardous Sites Program.
A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR,and dated 05/11/2020 has revealed that there is 1 SHWS
site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
QUARTER HORSE LANE P 6450 QUARTER HORSE L SSW 1/2- 1 (0.949 mi.) 1 8
Facility Id: NONCD0001556
TC6247754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6247754.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW MAP - 6247754.2S
fd ,J111111111)A --.
/ A
•so o e a e -e e e e -
0 0
a
a
_ _ ,
• . _ _
a
1
1
\iii ,-/ Allh,hiLl
a
a
a
a
a
a
( IIIIIIIIIPPP-
a I.
111111411111 lie
iiii
' 4* : I ' ..........„„i . . * $ $ -
4i I
Target Property o 1i4 1/2 1 naves
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property '- Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than Disposal Sites
the target property Power transmission lines
A Manufactured Gas Plants / Special Flood Hazard Area(1%)
VA0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Priority List Sites
National Wetland Inventory
Dept.Defense Sites
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Cool Run Mitigation Bank CLIENT: Land Management Group, Inc.
ADDRESS: Highfield Court CONTACT: Randy Brant
Shallotte NC 28470 INQUIRY#: 6247754.2s
LAT/LONG: 33.97094/78.471496 DATE: October 30, 2020 10:37 am
Copyright g 2020 EDR,Inc.(g)2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6247754.2S
iii
\
11 ,
I
G,
s
)II
Target Property 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property '- Indian Reservations BIA ,i Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than Disposal Sites
Power transmission lines
the target property
A Manufactured Gas Plants National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
i Sensitive Receptors
t National Priority List Sites
Dept.Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Cool Run Mitigation Bank CLIENT: Land Management Group, Inc.
ADDRESS: Highfield Court CONTACT: Randy Brant
Shallotte NC 28470 INQUIRY#: 6247754.2s
LAT/LONG: 33.97094/78.471496 DATE: October 30, 2020 10:38 am
Copyright g 2020 EDR,Inc.(g?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

ATTACHMENT 2
CORRESPONDENCE FROM
NC STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE

STATE
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H.Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
September 29,2020
Kim Williams [e-mail]
Land Management Group
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Cool Run wetland and stream mitigation, Old Shallotte Road NW, Cool Run, Brunswick County,
ER 20-1890
Dear Ms. Williams:
Thank you for your email of August 26, 2020, regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
am. s,c3k W@
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6598

ATTACHMENT 4
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE

Q� L a h. FISH&Wl.ra.Icc
Qp _-- 4 SILNv[C8
s United States Department of the Interior Er7,41
\ /
A
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICES '
�q�CFI 3,5$A
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date:
08/26/2020
Self-Certification Letter
Project Name Cool Run Mitigation Project
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended(Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
n "may affect, not likely to adversely affect"determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
n "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat(Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect"determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures -project review package

1.1J I1/ 0
Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Cool Run Mitigation Site
Date: 08/26/2020
Species/Resource Name Conclusion ESA Section 7/Eagle Act Determination Notes/Documentation
American Alligator(Alligator No suitable habitat present Habitat assessment performed by LMG
mississippiensis) within project area No Effect indicates that the site does not provide suitable
habitat for species.
•
Bald Eagle(Haliaeetus Unlikely to disturb nesting Per the NC NHP database review,there are no
leucocephalus) bald eagles No Effect known bald eagle nests within one mile of the
site.
Magnificent Ramshorn No suitable habitat present Habitat assessment performed by LMG
(Planorbella magnifica) within project area No Effect indicates that the site does not provide suitable
habitat for species.
Northern Long-Eared Bat Most of the site has been cleared and minimal
(Myotis septentrionalis) Suitable habitat present No Effect tree cutting or removal is proposed.
Red-Cockaded Woodpecker No suitable habitat present Habitat assessment performed by LMG
(Picoides borealis) within project area No Effect indicates that the site does not provide suitable
habitat for species.
Wood Stork(Mycteria No suitable habitat present Habitat assessment performed by LMG
americana) within project area No Effect indicates that the site does not provide suitable
habitat for species.
Cooley's Meadowrue No suitable habitat present Habitat assessment performed by LMG
(Thalictrum cooleyi) within project area No Effect indicates that the site does not provide suitable
habitat for species.
Rough-leaved Loosestrife No suitable habitat present Habitat assessment performed by LMG
(Lysimachia asperulaefolia) within project area No Effect indicates that the site does not provide suitable
habitat for species.
Critical Habitat No critical habitat present No Effect
within project area
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an informed decision about
impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Vr f .
— Ni J1i --� — & e V'11..-c w w Lit( C- 08/26/20
J
Signature/Title Date

9/2/2020 The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail-Re: Fw: DUE DATE:SEPTEMBER 24,2020 Fw: [EXTERNAL]Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswic...
DAVEY* Williams, Kimberlee<[e-mail]>
Re: Fw: DUE DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 Fw: [EXTERNAL] Cool Run Mitigation
Site; Brunswick County; Review Request
1 message
Matthews, Kathryn H <[e-mail]> Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:51 PM
To: "Williams, Kim" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Mann, Leigh" <[e-mail]>, "Brew, Donnie (FHWA)" <[e-mail]>
I don't have any comments.
I am copying FHWA (Donnie Brew) about this, because Federal agencies don't need to consult with us if
they have made a "no effect" determination (NLEB is covered by a programmatic BO). If you must have a
letter so early in the process, please look into printing your own letter from our online review process
before submitting to us. The Corps and FHWA are familiar with that process, and should accept those
letters, even though they are not signed by a human. We do review those packages that come in from the
online review process, and provide comments within 30 days if we do not agree with the determinations.
Thanks,
Kathy Matthews
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-856-4520, x. 27
From:Williams, Kim <[e-mail]>
Sent:Wednesday, September 2, 2020 1:01 PM
To: Matthews, Kathryn H <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mann, Leigh <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Fw: DUE DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 2020 Fw: [EXTERNAL] Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County; Review
Request
Hi Kathy
I spoke with the project team about whether you could wait to issue comments until the mitigation plan has been
developed. Unfortunately, we need to first complete and submit the CE so that we can continue to move forward with the
project. Then we will be able to complete the mitigation plan. Would you be able to issue an email with any comments you
may have under this preliminary review given the limited information provided in our letter and figures?We understand
that your office will be able to review the project again later on in the process once you have additional project details and
that you may have additional comments at that time.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks!
Kim
Kim Williams I Environmental Scientist
Land Management Group I Environmental Consultants
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5f499cdla 1&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1676658310105957492%7Cmsg-f%3A16767454823332... 1/3

ATTACHMENT 5
FORM AD-1006 &
CORRESPONDENCE WITH
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE

U.S. Department of Agriculture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request 08/20/2020
Name of Project Cool Run Mitigation Site Federal Agency Involved Federal Highway Administration
Proposed Land Use stream and wetland restoration County and State Brunswick County, North Carolina
PART II(To be completed by NRCS) Date Request Received By Person Com letin Form:
NRCS 08/20/2020 Milton Coles FRCS NC
Does the site contain Prime, Unique,Statewide or Local Important Farmland? YES NO Acres Irrigated Average Farm Size
(If no,the FPPA does not apply-do not complete additional parts of this form) I I I I none 193 acres
Major Crop(s) Farmable Land In Govt.Jurisdiction Amount of Farmland As Defined in FPPA
CORN Acres: 55.1 % 303,638 acres Acres: 44.6 % 245,728 acres
Name of Land Evaluation System Used Name of State or Local Site Assessment System Date Land Evaluation Returned by NRCS
Brunswick County, NC LESA N/A August 24, 2020 by eMail
PART III (To be completed by Federal Agency) Alternative Site Rating
Site A Site B Site C Site D
A.Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 25.15
B.Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly 0
C.Total Acres In Site 25.15
PART IV(To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information
A.Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland 5.90
B.Total Acres Statewide Important or Local Important Farmland 0.8
C. Percentage Of Farmland in County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted 0.0027
D. Percentage Of Farmland in Govt.Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value 55.1
PART V(To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Criterion 25
Relative Value of Farmland To Be Converted(Scale of 0 to 100 Points)
PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Site Assessment Criteria Maximum Site A Site B Site C Site D
(Criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5 b. For Corridor project use form NRCS-CPA-106) Points
1. Area In Non-urban Use (15) 15
2. Perimeter In Non-urban Use (10) 10
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed (20) 0
4. Protection Provided By State and Local Government (20) 2 0
5. Distance From Urban Built-up Area (15) 15
6. Distance To Urban Support Services (15) 10
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average (10) 0
8. Creation Of Non-farmable Farmland (10) 0
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services (5) 3
10. On-Farm Investments (20) 10
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services (10) 0
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use (10) 3
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 86 0 0 0
PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100 25 0 0 0
Total Site Assessment(From Part VI above or local site assessment) 160 86 0 0 0
TOTAL POINTS(Total of above 2 lines) 260 111 0 0 0
Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
Site Selected: Site A Date Of Selection 9/2/2020 YES NO X
Reason For Selection:
"Site A" is located within existing drainage ways within the farmland,and minimizes impacts to higher valued upland areas which
contain higher quality soils for growing agricultural crops.Additionally,"Site A" meets the goals and intent of the proposed project.
We believe"Site A"to be consistent with the Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA).
Name of Federal agency representative completing this form: Kevin Yates - Clearwater Mitigation Solutions Date: 9/2/2020
(See Instructions on reverse side) Form AD-1006(03-02)

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
733370 733450 733530 733610 733690 733770 733850
33°58'25"N •o I I 33°58'25"N
Wo
m
•
Ly
•
•
f
i zo
i
/ "' .ramp, ' •
co
OOP
, - - ' 4 , r
I r co
o
u
co
bit
16 tr
,•
GoAll , 9 i'
z.zit ' w ' k ,
co
Y 1
•
x i : n r t9
O
p + i
r
iNillit . .#''. ...,
m
`** Ball
. filt: ,.-
gr-
m goilD Gawp may woit P eaDo�l VI Rhilo amOQ° "gipI' �
33°58'3"N m 33°58'3"N
733370 733450 733530 733610 733690 733770 733850
Map Scale:1:3,250 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet. N
Meters N
N N 0 45 90 180 270
Feet
A
0 1y0 ?00 E00 900
Map projection:Web Mercator Comerwordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WGS84
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
n Area of Interest(AOI) Sy Y Sot 1:24,000.
p
Soils Very Stony Spot
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other misunderstandingof the detail of mapping and accuracyof soil
CI Soil Map Unit Points pp 9
.0- Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Lw Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
14 Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
• Clay Spot Rails measurements.
• Closed Depression Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
• Gravel Pit US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
Major Roads
• Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
A. Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
jda Marsh or swamp am Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
▪ Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Brunswick County, North Carolina
• Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 24,Jun 2,2020
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
• Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Dec 31,2009—Sep
Slide or Slip 30,2017
oa Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BaB Baymeade fine sand, 1 to 6 0.8 3.1%
percent slopes
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam,0 to 3.9 15.3%
2 percent slopes
Ly Lynchburg fine sandy loam,0 to 2.0 8.1%
2 percent slopes,Atlantic
Coast Flatwoods
Mk Muckalee loam 18.5 73.4%
Totals for Area of Interest 25.1 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
11

10/30/2020 The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail-RE:Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County; Form AD-1006
DAVEY* Williams, Kimberlee<[e-mail]>
RE: Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County; Form AD-1006
1 message
Cortes, Milton -NRCS, Raleigh, NC <[e-mail]> Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 7:07 AM
To: "Williams, Kim" <[e-mail]>, Kevin Yates <[e-mail]>, Wes Fryar<[e-mail]>
Good morning Kim;
Please find attached the FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING evaluation for the Cool Run Mitigation Site is located in Brunswick County, NC
If we can be of further assistance, please let us know.
Best Regards
Milton Cortes
State Soil Scientist
Raleigh, North Carolina State Office
Natural Resources Conservation Service
United States Department of Agriculture
Office: 919-873-2171
Cell: 984-365-2201
[e-mail]
USDA.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5f499cdla 1&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar7903846819807934649%7Cmsg-f%3A1675904668920390917&simpl=msg-f%3A1675904668920390917... 1/3

10/30/2020 The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail-RE:Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County; Form AD-1006
"If you always wait for the right time,you might never begin"
From: Williams, Kim<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 9:04 AM
To: Cortes, Milton -NRCS, Raleigh, NC<[e-mail]>; Kevin Yates <[e-mail]>; Wes Fryar<[e-mail]>
Subject: Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County; Form AD-1006
Hi Milton
We are working on a full-delivery mitigation site for DMS and need your assistance in filling out the AD-1006 form for the site. The Cool Run Mitigation Site is
located in Brunswick County.Attached is a vicinity map,AD-1006 form with sections I and III completed, the NRCS soils report, and the corresponding soils
shapefiles.
Let me know if you need anything else to determine if the site contains prime farmland and to complete relevant sections of the form.
Thanks so much!
Kim
Kim Williams I Environmental Scientist
Land Management Group I Environmental Consultants
Direct:910-452-0001 x 1908 I Cell: 910.471.5035 I Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15 I Wilmington, NC 28403
Email: [e-mail] I Website:www.lmgroup.net
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients.Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use
or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5f499cdla 1&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar7903846819807934649%7Cmsg-f%3A1675904668920390917&simpl=msg-f%3A1675904668920390917... 2/3

ATTACHMENT 6
CORRESPONDENCE FROM
NC WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION

11/25/2020 The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail-RE: [External] Fwd:Cool Run Mitigation Project; Brunswick County
DAVEY* Williams, Kimberlee<[e-mail]>
RE: [External] Fwd: Cool Run Mitigation Project; Brunswick County
1 message
Wilson,Travis W. <[e-mail]> Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:42 AM
To: "Williams, Kimberlee" <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kevin Yates<[e-mail]>, "Dunn, Maria T." <[e-mail]>
Kim, It sounds like Maria is in the field and I'm sure you are hoping to get this wrapped up before the holiday. I provided
comments at the onsite meeting as well as some follow up information with Kevin concerning a potential future NCDOT
highway project in the area. Further review of the project area did not identify any additional information or species
concerns; therefore we do not have any specific comments to add at this time.
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1718 Hwy 56 West
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
From: Williams, Kimberlee <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 9:30 AM
To: Wilson, Travis W. <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kevin Yates<[e-mail]>; Dunn, Maria T. <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] Fwd: Cool Run Mitigation Project; Brunswick County
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to report.spam©nc.gov
Hi Travis and Maria
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5f499cdla 1&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-138116077792317420%7Cmsg-f%3A1684347536775... 1/4

11/25/2020 The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail-RE: [External] Fwd:Cool Run Mitigation Project; Brunswick County
I wanted to check in on Cool Run. Can you tell me when you anticipate being able to provide comments?
Thanks so much and have a nice Thanksgiving!
Kim
Kim Williams I Environmental Scientist
Land Management Group I Environmental Consultants
Direct:910-452-0001 x 1908 I Cell: 910.471.5035 I Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15 I Wilmington, NC 28403
Email: [e-mail] I Website:www.lmgroup.net
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 2:35 PM Wilson, Travis W. <[e-mail]>wrote:
The project is in Maria Dunn's region so she will be the WRC POC for this project. The information was forwarded to
her Monday from our Raleigh office and she reached out to me to get my feedback since I was onsite during the
prospectus review. I apologize for the delay, projects that go through Raleigh can get caught in just the mass volume
of incoming items particularly mail with limited office staff these days. We will provide a response as soon as possible.
Travis
From: Williams, Kimberlee <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 12:26 PM
To: Wilson, Travis VV. <[e-mail]>; Kevin Yates <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Fwd: Cool Run Mitigation Project; Brunswick County
rAI ITinn' External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to report.spam©nc.gov
Hi Travis
We are working with Clearwater Mitigation Solutions on a full-delivery riparian wetland and stream mitigation project
known as the Cool Run Mitigation Site for NC Division of Mitigation Services. The 25.15-acre project site is located in
Brunswick County, approximately five miles southwest of the city limits of Shallotte, NC. The project involves the
restoration and enhancement of stream channels and wetlands within the site (see attached).As part of the
environmental documentation process, I reached out to Shannon Deaton at WRC a couple of times requesting
comment, but haven't heard back. Is she the right point of contact? If not, can you point me in the right direction? DMS
would like something in writing from WRC (even a quick email stating there are no comments).
Thanks so much for any assistance you can provide!
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5f499cdla 1&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-138116077792317420%7Cmsg-f%3A1684347536775... 2/4

ATTACHMENT 7
COASTAL CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION FROM
NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT

11/12/2020 The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail-RE: [External]Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County DCM20200040
DAVEY* Williams, Kimberlee<[e-mail]>
RE: [External] Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County DCM20200040
1 message
Govoni, Daniel <[e-mail]> Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:12 AM
To: "Williams, Kim" <[e-mail]>, Kevin Yates <[e-mail]>
Hello Kim,
North Carolina's coastal zone management program consists of, but is not limited to, the Coastal Area
Management Act, the State's Dredge and Fill Law, Chapter 7 of Title 15A of North Carolina's Administrative
Code, and the land use plan of the County and/or local municipality in which the proposed project is
located. It is the objective of the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) to manage the State's coastal
resources to ensure that proposed federal actions would be compatible with safeguarding and perpetuating
the biological, social, economic, and aesthetic values of the State's coastal waters.
DCM has reviewed the submitted information pursuant to the management objectives and enforceable
policies of Subchapters 7H and 7M of Chapter 7 in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code and
concurs that the proposed activity is consistent with North Carolina's approved coastal management
program.
Prior to the initiation of the activities described, the applicant should obtain any required State approvals or
authorizations, including any authorizations required by the N.C. Division of Water Resources. Should the
proposed action be modified further, a revised consistency determination could be necessary. This might
take the form of either a supplemental consistency determination pursuant to 15 CFR 930.46, or a new
consistency determination pursuant to 15 CFR 930.36. Likewise, if further project assessments reveal
environmental effects not previously considered, a supplemental consistency certification may be required.
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your consideration of the
North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
Daniel
From:Williams, Kim [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 1:45 PM
To: Govoni, Daniel <[e-mail]>; Kevin Yates<[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5f499cdla 1&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1683164085617859321%7Cmsg-f%3A1 6831 6408561 78... 1/3

11/12/2020 The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail-RE: [External]Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County DCM20200040
Hi Daniel
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC (CMS) and Land Management Group (LMG) plan to provide a full-delivery riparian
wetland and stream mitigation project, known as the Cool Run Mitigation Site, for NC Division of Mitigation Services. The
site is located in Shallotte, NC (Brunswick County). Because the project is located in a coastal county,we have prepared
a Coastal Consistency Determination for your review and concurrence.
Attached is the CCD narrative and site figures. Please review at your convenience and let me know if you have any
questions. We look forward to hearing from you.
Thanks!
Kim
Kim Williams I Environmental Scientist
Land Management Group I Environmental Consultants
Direct:910-452-0001 x 1908 I Cell: 910.471.5035 I Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15 I Wilmington, NC 28403
Email: [e-mail] I Website:www.lmgroup.net
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 11:26 AM Govoni, Daniel <[e-mail]>wrote:
f1CII J I\II I I,
Please submit the consistency determination to me and you may email it. Let me know if you have any other
questions. Thanks-Daniel
From:Williams, Kim [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 11:16 AM
To: Govoni, Daniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Cool Run Mitigation Site; Brunswick County
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to report.spam©nc.gov
Hi Daniel
I hope you are doing well. LMG is working on a stream and wetland restoration project for the NC Division of Mitigation
Services called the Cool Run Mitigation Site,which is located in Brunswick County. Because of federal funding, we are
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5f499cdla 1&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1683164085617859321%7Cmsg-f%3A1 6831 6408561 78... 2/3

Appendix F
- FEMA Coordination
- H EC-RAS
- DrainMod Analysis
- Hydrographs/Precipitation Data
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County,North Carolina March 2022

From: Grant Lewis
To: john.shirlObrunswickcountync.gov
Cc: Kevin Yates; Fryar,Wesley
Subject: Cool Run Stream Restoration Site FEMA Coordination
Date: Tuesday,July 6,2021 12:06:00 PM
Attachments: FEMA.Ddf
Hello Mr. Shirk;
I am in the early stages of a stream and wetland restoration project near the Town of Shallotte, in
Brunswick County. The project is intended to restore ditched and dredged streams along Cool Run
and an associated tributary, as well as, adjacent riparian wetlands.
This project is being conducted for the State of North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly known as the Ecosystem Enhancement Program [EEP]). As part of the project, we are
required to obtain confirmation from the local floodplain administrator confirming actions to be
conducted with FEMA. Our project is not located in any FEMA flood zones; therefore, I am not
expecting to complete a CLOMR or LOMR.
If you could please review the attached information and check/sign the last page of the EEP
Floodplain Requirements Checklist I would greatly appreciate it. If you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you.
Grant
Grant Lewis
Senior Project Manager
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
[e-mail]
[phone] (cell)

A
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue,Raleigh,North Carolina 27603 919-215-1693
Axiom Environmental,Inc.
July 6, 2021
John Shirk
Brunswick County Floodplain Administrator
75 Courthouse Drive (Building 1)
Bolivia,NC 28422
Re: Cool Run Stream and Wetland mitigation project
Brunswick County 21-008
FEMA Floodplain Requirements Checklist
Dear Mr. Shirk:
The purpose of this letter is to request concurrence from Brunswick County concerning a stream and
wetland restoration site located in near the Town of Shallotte. The Site encompasses approximately
25.6 acres of agriculture land used for row crops and cut over timberland along Cool Run and an
unnamed tributary. Proposed activities at the Site include the restoration of stream channels and
riparian wetlands.
FEMA mapping was reviewed to determine if the project is in a FEMA study area (DFIRM panel
numbers 1048, 1068, 1057, and 1067). Based on existing floodplain mapping, the Site is not
overlain by any FEMA mapped zones or floodways. We request guidance from your organization as
to how to move forward with the project.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me at
the above referenced phone number with any questions that you may have with this project.
Yours truly,
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL
U.) 4,64,1A1 juji)
W. Grant Lewis
Senior Project Manager

Attachments
Figure 1 Site Location
Figure 2 Hydrologic Unit Map
Figure 3 Topography and Drainage Area
Figure 4A Existing Conditions
Figure 4B LIDAR
Figure 5 Reference Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
Figure 6 Proposed Conditions
Figure 7 Proposed Dimension, Pattern, and Profile
EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist

#-
l-'`-x+'' f'' .. _ - _ J"� _ i - -
J _ —d_ +_ Aram Em ilionmenlaa,ins,
- 1 A A W - - - = + _ Prepared for:
. ,til
T - CLEARWATER
I. . c_____, .•
- L., MITIGATION
SOLUTIONS
,, .
L% L - Project:
, 4
.4,i.. ),
•
1---)1101, .c
( _.f
,-=, . ,
-.. I illigh ---'-' : k ___ ---- livok.. -. � • COOL RUN
. ....._______ _ ,.._____z
,,
%.„ _ ' \....--
. . - na MITIGATION SITE
RTHSr NNk ,.....e, .>
ePot,„\\ ,...:,,,,,..._,...„
,.... t
‘r " N'..4.. I CAROLINA •0011111111111111 .. hi%
w •
x - Rill
. a, •
Brunswick County, NC
-
•
Pli
w*_.i� 41
NIA Title:
4. - . �.,ry _
•
I
�- r _ 1
_' r1•' is # LI) i
' i' SITE
�. 4 ��. LOCATION
tit..'..-- .-••-e'r OIWCIIM - : -----.-.--. -\-.• . . -": .
. 1 .. ::.,..:: .67;.. r• ..,...j -s.). ,..,74z.z74.14111.\......t.., .1 .Va.:,....,,e.;. ..1•_••\-•.,...7z,.. J0-.:L..
•
:-•••---..).T.
:..:).:.----:.:)56.
6 .
�'+ - `
....-j
• - . Legend Drawn by:
I' 1 7_LI' !e--- 5"-\' lipThr--- •
_- _' • •
Cool Run Site
4 iiii, I -F- Date.
{ Frink Parcel JUNE 2021
' i litt7-1
;� iii r 6 • NCDOT Roads
IV . WY l+Y _ �r {! •_ . ti.( .# . y — Scale:___......i .• .-/. MIT Niii..0,.% ..,- \, . _______ ---,
•
rd-11
, x }* .� r Project No.:
C. Odell Will arnsor� - -, 79:k' USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Shallote, NC
21-008
. Municp: i�. # c-CI
cl Yin C4 .: --, .y w; � a: Directions to the Site from Raleigh: FIGURE
Shores Sunset ;r Merge onto 1-40 E towards Benson/wilmington for 115 miles
• Beach S,�aafotte - Y _ ll
f• Take exit 416A-416B to merge onto 1-40 W toward Myrtle Beach
.O . F • k ci
;. y , - Merge onto US-17 S toward NC-87 S/Shallotte/Myrtle Beach
•.J So find \4� '•.. . 4 i +. - Continue straight on US-17 S/Ocean Hwy W for 23.5 miles 1
d r 4�,.'. • 41* }. . .,.R ( I . ,-i: F - - Turn Right onto Old Shallotte Rd NW
# / ' ` ,--' ' - Site Latitude, Longitude 33.973639, -78.471507(WGS84)

f .`tr. I .Vlinraboww
einN 1H•f�t�
V _ me\71...01t5 I ill?".. 1k.7.4*. .. r 11
rut
ril
';„ ... . _ .-1‘
� } _ 4 Axiom Eflv rofl+ryefllS9,ink,
*Sbnd Hlf
itook
Prepared for:
•
. 1101 LEA chkIIIIIIIIPj
it 4 ' '‘ct, — =: _ --•
• CLEARWATER
( ;'---I
MITIGATION
''.i..... k j__/-'- •lAstiA w 'via SOLUTIONS
4 Location of Cool Run Mitigation
Site within USGS Hydrologic
• Unit and Targeted Local
.. I Watershed 03040207020060 Project.
•• p b - = COOL RUN
,qy UNw It - �' MITIGATION SITE
fir
11/ L°"m"°"a r 1 l—I .
I
/1 `
- / \\ Brunswick County, NC
_ Title:
/ ifilit •) air 4qv
F ..- , o
9�' HYDROLOGIC
n.
-
- = UNIT MAP
Sib, .
G4 PE
' 'x
Drawn by:
! _ — soak isiaRa AEK
00 •
Date:
JUNE 2021
.. -
.. Illh' ...i.
/ ooean I sir.= Scale:
X 1:145,000
Project No.:
4
. Little Rivfr 21-008
Legend
010110.-
Cool Run Site FIGURE
USGS Hydrologic Unit 03040207
14 Digit Hydrologic Unit Boundaries 2
Targeted Local Watersheds
0 2.5 5 10
Miles Copyright:(c)2018 Garmin

fy
Legend - - 1 ' ' — —
Q Cool Run Site 5 _ +t
���� on Rid }
� max+ -- + — +►..
= Cool Run Upstream Drainage Area = 1.42 sq mi (911 ac) 1 `
— — _
Q Cool Run Downstream Drainage Area = 1.68 sq mi (1074 ac) _
_ = UT 1 Drainage Area = 0.20 sq mi (125 ac) IA'i II. �_ «- ,.
pf
Il _ \ r �1 , - _—,y Prepared for:
i -OW -d.-
- . \ -m-
III - CLEARWATER
- ,-410 firJ.
if' \ MITIGATION
- - SOLUTIONS
L..} 5 - it I,'. ro _ .... _+� — , ,ti
i,
•
_ ....... -. -
, lr.
—
1 -
CAW AI /3 A •t
- - 14 Project:_Abri i 11 -..-
- - ` _ - -
- .�
. , \
- 7 ( % ._ ti - ..T COOL RUN
I J I� # _ s 0.0 MITIGATION SITE
Amia..___.. .4 ./
I
` , 'S - r
i _ Brunswick County, NC
•
f -
Title:
- —
•
-.:
- ` } , TOPOGRAPHY
.. : 7- air-. \ 1,\). ..... AND
_ DRAINAGE AREA
la
.t ::;#44.11c..,
� - --I - --_
• t• �.` \ W Drawn by.
f.� :�+. -- Illin r Y \ AEK
+ +:I. .'„ { :::
Firilli . MAR 2021
\ .... • •. .Eli i"."--
ri ,, ..
-: i, / :
R f • _ :. _ - . r J 1:20,001
} `.I'; r +:_ •
� Project No.:
•
l• lih- -
�-_ � , 1 j. f• •
FIGURE
. JAI' i. _ \. ..., . ii, ....,...\\. / . .
1 .......„.-7, k:. .' - L 3
.._. .
_ . .
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 =
Feet ti - _
5

ZWWWWWW"
.iit.i:l ll1mil. •*,0.•1-A; 1 *A' ,\4 S• 4i4_,
3,N%,s
4111.QIIn:III9rIc.
iY4
00 p
n1"
Prepared for:
• CLEARWATER
s ' _ MITIGATION
,�'���'�• � SOLUTIONS
�•ii�ii�ii�ii�i•, .1
s•,
,•�`. i s*, - .. ♦"� 1; ' 7 ' .' Project:
�.. * .O�i�i�i� i� \ ," COOL RUN
•����) �•� 0 ��0)` MITIGATION SITE
.- - . .. 104 ______.
I c \ -..
raillillgi" 0 .
1,0 • ��•���•��j��� 10 , ►���� �•��� Brunswick County, NC
\., -�• 0 c::!J• r
4 : \-* .t
CI
.`
N, 1 EXISTING
CONDITIONS
♦ ♦ I
J111-
i
Legend ,,
1 4i Drawn by:
Brunswick County Parcels n WGL
CCool Run Site = 25.57 ac 1 Date:
O — y JUNE 2021
NCDWR_Forms — 1liretitikiz.. '�' J' Scale:
tip` r 1:1800
\ Iiiii:
0 NCSAMForms
O NCWAMFormsiligt4t I . Project No.. 21-008
• -
- - Existing Streams
Ditches FIGURE
Historic_Channel I '
K Existing Wetlands = 3.37 ac 4 i. 4A
Drained_Hydric = 16.88 ac 0 135 270 540 810 1 ,080
' Feet

Iiik 5 •,r 5 • �..:y4 Y. y'
, Oit‘i •40)1/4..
•
•
.. M1, •5' •.tL• �55 I 4 4 '4i - L
{• • y .
4.
��,•�� M� Ax Om Eflv rofl+nefllS9,ink,
•
4
ti; _ •. ,:'-'. • M1 1.e• ; Prepared forli
♦♦♦♦♦♦�� t " '' li
CLEARWATER
��♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�•� . Ni ' - .- ` , :�`'"' 4 ' ;. ., MITIGATION
♦ice♦:♦�♦!.' ' � - ; . w • '�,e � ' SOLUTIONS
410 \ A 4) 1 ., .‘ ♦.���♦�♦ 1♦�♦,• ♦�♦�. '... �� ;fE[
4♦♦♦\ COOL RU N
�♦4O1'-4 '1.. .", • \ i♦i♦i♦i �i♦♦♦♦♦♦♦i4 4. i♦♦♦♦♦�. • � ' � . MITIGATION SITE
►� •i •
'i•♦i••
iiiiiiiice. `♦ ♦♦♦�i
/ lalk‘Vb"- \ , •
- • A,: -. Via- , • !♦i♦i�� '-•�♦!.!i �`�♦i♦i♦i`..
�♦♦♦♦♦�♦� Brunswick County, NC
µ :...: 1...t ♦♦�' I t ♦ _ •♦♦��♦�♦�♦�♦�� ..• Title:
A. . • - ,lilLyi,:fir 1.4- e* 4 ,
'ter. .
Drawn by:
-NA x!}':r- WGL
,
. Date:
•
•
JUNE 2021
}f Scale:
.1. • Y '
1:1800
.. )• .
Legend ' Project No.:
�� l r F 21-008
•
Easement . , _ {
— — — Existing Streams •
' '
. FIGURE
Ditches . , .-�
•
x a
♦♦♦ Wetlands POST USACE = 3.37 ac • : :s '' 4B
: ..,..„
Drained_Hydric = 16.88 ac .. 1,1x.1:}4. ,.\.- 0.c..........,' `"•
. .4�.};....... •k:.i..,.•:....
.•..,.r.'. '-,''y, ..•
•
i.
•
ice. _ ry SL -7: ~4'` . • 'i.t-\\-, ` ; moan

Cross Section 1 - Pool
Abkf= 13.9 ft
Wbkf= 19.5 ftitA I 0 la
Cross Section 2 - - Cross Section 3
Dmax = 1.6 ft
100 wAwk
/ 100
\ _ _ _ Axiom Environmental, Inc.
•50 Bankfull
Z99
Cross Section 1 98 CLEARWATER
0 MITIGATION
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 SOLUTIONS
Reference Pattern 97 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Lp-p =62 (31 -93)ft Pattern Legend
Lm = 102 (62- 130)ft Top of Bank
Wbelt= 60(46-74)ft Rc= 18 (9-28)ft - Thalweg NOTES/REVISIONS
Lp-p/Wbkf=4.5 (2.3-6.9) Cross Section
Lm/Wbkf= 7.5(4.5-9.6)
Wbelt/Wbkf=4.4 (3.4-5.4)
Rc/Wbkf= 1.3(0.6-2.0)
SIN = 1.32
100 CJMMSti Section 2- Riffle 100
Abkf- 9.4 ft Goss Section 3- Riffle
Dave =0.7 ft
Wbkf= 9.7ft
Wbkf= 12.5ft mave = 0.7ft
99 Bankfull Dmax = 1.0 ft r T•. - '.7 ft
Bank Height= 1.0 ft
m max= 1.0 ft
Bank Height Ratio = 1.0 ::ank Height = 1.0 ft
W/LF= 16.7 99 :.ank Height Ratio = 1.0
FPA= 100 /D = 22.5
98 - ENT= 8.0 'PA= 100
Stream Type = C :NT= 6.8
',tream Type = C Project:
98
97 0 10 20 30 40
o 10 Bankfull 30 40
Cool Run
Mitigation Site
Brunswick County
North Carolina
Cool Run Reference Reach
,00
Profile (Reference Reach)
Title:
Save = 0.0016 rise/run Cool Run Reference Reach
99 Svalley = 0.0021 rise/run Dimension, Pattern,
- Sriffle = 0.0026 (0.0013 - 0.0055) rise/run and Profile
Spool = 0.0004 (0 - 0.0034) rise/run
Srun = 0.0006 (0.0004 - 0.0034) rise/run
98
Sgl de = 0 (0 - 0.0039) rise/run Scale:
NA FIGURE NO.
Water Surface Date:97 5
Channel Bed
Apr 2021
0 50 00 150 200 250 300 350 Project No.:
21-008

' ' ." r �,,,,,
Tie into existing .e• . , „ „ AMR
channel elevation - y. ' r `
'• Milk
. p 4.1_., . 1111111Kik - • .4 IP-
/4441 ,
. 1,. - IPA*
Upgrade existing ` �t ,-'
piped crossing .��.. -. -, ti;
i 1
ft , .. Axiom Environmental, Inc.
:,4 '' Reach-Cool Run Upstream Sgt..~ Reach-Cool Run Upstream
Mitigation Type-P2 Stream Restoration p
'" , , Footage-592 ft Mitigation Tye-P1 Stream Restoration it
Activities Footage-427 ft la
'' 1 Cut flaodplain bench Activities
i 2)Excavate desi n channel 1)Direct flow into historic channel
mr-
". . � � 3) Install habitat structures2)Clear sediment and debris jams CLEARWATER
4)Bring channel to historic floodplain elevation 3)Contour channel to appropriate dimension MITIGATION
.. . : 'r. •* 4)Install habitat structures
. `l SOLUTIONS
46
_ .itivissy.
_ Y" .", NOTES/REVISIONS
i
• .. ‘111` 9 • 1
. .•_,
. N., .,
...,
, , ,.. ,i jr_. .7.rpori,,... .00,:v. :, . . : ;____;014,04.-t_ ' — " ' , : l 1 E
M1 i'•-• if° / :.
t . /..iidr-• - - . . . -
11144r '-•
-14,141%il
•
\ t
_ , , - • , \ „F.' ''...• ........ Agbajj .44,
eo-
,� i Project:
i:lloor
.,,, ,..,.
,,,e -
_ Cool Run
�= Reach-Cool Run Downstream
Mitigation Type-P1 Stream Restoration Mitigation Site
LEGEND Footage-998 ft
Easement Boundary=--25.6ac - Activities Brunswick County
1)Clear sediment and debris jams t�,
Major Topography Line 2)Contour channel to appropriate dimension ' N o rtI t Carolina
Minor Topography Line 3) Install habitat structures r L
4) Drop flow with an appropriate structure
• — — Stream Restoration =2026 ft
• w- Stream Restoration (credit rati❑ 1.5 to 1)=593 ft r - - - .
Reach-UT 1 } +
•
Wetland Reestablishment-##ac Mitigation Type- P1/P2 Stream Restoration -'. • ''► Title:
® Wetland Rehabilitation =###ac - 4. .
Footage-601 ft • •
Wetland Enhancement =##ac - Activities Restoration
1)Tie to existing ground and step up the channel
Bankfull Bench 2) Initiate P2 stream restoration at the upper reaches I
3)Tie adjacent ditch flow into UT 1 across a point bar
-' 4)Once at grade begin P1 stream restoration -
5)Install habitat structures
4)Tie into Cool Run i
14. Scale:
-. FIGURE NO.
- - As Shown
- - _ - Date'
Tie into ditch bottom Tie into ditch bottom 0 150 37 Apr 2021 6
and begin stepping � �
and begin stepping m m
up the channel grade up the channel grade = Project No.:
21-008
SCALE IN FEET

POOL POOL 15'MIN. W bkfirA
VALLEY
SIDE SLOPE LIVE WILLOW
RUN GLIDE RIFFLE RUN GLIDE RIFFLE
41-1.4 ►may •rn—o„4 S STAKES
- COIR FIBER
I I I- EROSION PROPOSED
_ WATER SURFACE it CONTROL MATTING
— _ — ELEVATION �I__�-= 3 FLOODPLAIN Axiom Environmental, Inc.
I I-1 ` LLW�--`1 Class A ton
rn
'1I—IIIII -1 I—
IIIIII I—I I Cobble Stone
I EI I II II II ` �iWITI i 1 - f FlI FI
I I EI I rm,;W-rlTEl" 2:1 0
111DI _• BANK SLOPE {
EXTEND STONE IMO o
BOTTOM OF BED MATERIAL UP
JCLEARWATER
CHANNEL . CHANNEL BANK MITIGATION
POOL-TO-POOL SE SPACING(ft.) SOLUTIONS
(VARIES
EP- NOTE 1)
TYPICAL CHANNEL PROFILE TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
NOTES:
NOTES/REVISIONS
1. POOL-TO-POOL SPACING IS MEASURED FROM W000l
CENTER OF POOL BEND TO CENTER OF POOL BEND.
COIR FIBER
EROSION LIVE WILLOW
CONTROL MATTING STAKES
SEE NOTE PROPOSED
PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN
FLOODPLAIN
-Hall=LLgW—W-1lt !�i i�T EI L I
I I III-I l I-III 11-11 EI1 Ili_. k,
511EllgilF-w---�11=111a11- ARIES 2 ,9
'111—III 11-11 11 III-111—III 1 4- o`
-LLIJWE11R11-LLWI 1E 1
' M--- -EI —I —IMT — — e,
�
'.I11 ,1T1 N1.1I�11 11=LTFII1_III=_IILa1 11-
POOL LENGTH
MAX.1:1 SLOPE
HEAD OF
RIFFLE
TAIL OF ` ' --�'' HR1 TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION
RIFFLE /. ` ' ` TAIL OF •R2
, RIFFLE
CHANNEL DESIGN
�•` �J� G<<OF '�. / kr Project:
• e
I5 44:4- HR2 CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
FLOW _ Cool Run
1. MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM CHANNEL AND FLOODPLAIN SHALL BE
USED TO BACKFILL EXISTING CHANNEL.R1
2. BANK PROTECTION SHALL CONSIST OF NATURAL COIR FIBER MATTING. Mitigation Site
TYPICAL CHANNEL PLAN VIEW POOL LENGTH 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY BED MATERIAL FOR THE ENTIRE BED Brunswick County
LENGTH OF EACH RIFFLE SECTION. THE BED MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF North Carolina
A MIX OF CLASS A AND SMALLER STONE.
CHANNEL PLAN VIEW NOTES:
1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT THE CHANNEL ALIGNMENT BY LOCATING CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS Title:
THE RADII AND SCRIBING THE CENTER LINE FOR EACH POOL BEND. THE
CONNECTING TANGENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLETE THE LAYOUT OF THE CHANNEL. REACH Wbkf(ft.) Wbot(ft.) Driff(ft.) Dthal(ft.) Dpool(ft.) Wpool(ft.) Wthal(ft.) PROPOSED DIMENSION,
2.FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF THE ALIGNMENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SAVE TREES Cool Run Upstream 14.1 10.1 0.9 0.1 1.3 18.4 1.0 PATTERN, AND PROFILE
OR AVOID OBSTACLES. THE STAKE-OUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION Cool Run Downstream 15.0 11.0 0.9 0.1 1.3 19.5 1.0
MANAGER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL.
UT 1 5.8 3.8 0.4 0.1 0.7 7.5 1.0
Scale: FIGURE NO.
NA
Date:
Apr 2021
Project No.:
21-008

Ecowstern .f
r ii
�i JaiPRORAM .�,Etl I, ,ItOF I\
EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist
This form was developed by the National Flood Insurance program, NC Floodplain
Mapping program and Ecosystem Enhancement Program to be filled for all EEP projects.
The form is intended to summarize the floodplain requirements during the design phase of
the projects. The form should be submitted to the Local Floodplain Administrator with
three copies submitted to NFIP (attn. State NFIP Engineer),NC Floodplain Mapping Unit
(attn. State NFIP Coordinator) and NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Project Location
Name of project: Cool Run Site
Name if stream or feature: Cool Run
County: Brunswick
Name of river basin: Lumber
Is project urban or rural? Rural
Name of Jurisdictional Shallotte
municipality/county:
DFIRM panel number for 1048, 1068, 1057, and 1067
entire site:
Consultant name: Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Phone number: 919-215-1693
Address: 218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh,NC 27603
FEMA Floodplain_Checklist.docx Page 1 of 3

Design Information
Provide a general description of project(one paragraph). Include project limits on a
reference orthophotograph at a scale of 1"= 500". (See Attached)
Summarize stream reaches or wetland areas according to their restoration priority.
(See Attached)
Example
Reach _ Length _ _ Priority
Example:Reach A 1000 One (Restoration)
Example:Reach B 2000 Three (Enhancement)
Floodplain Information
Is project located in a Special Flood Hazard Area(SFHA)?
r Yes a No The lower reaches
If project is located in a SFHA, check how it was determined:
r Redelineation
r Detailed Study
r Limited Detail Study
r Approximate Study
F Don't know
List flood zone designation:
Check if applies:
r AE Zone
r Floodway
C Non-Encroachment
a None
f A Zone
r Local Setbacks Required
C No Local Setbacks Required
If local setbacks are required,list how many feet:
Does proposed channel boundary encroach outside floodway/non-
encroachment/setbacks?
rYes allo
FEMA Floodplain_Checklist.docx Page 2 of 3

Land Acquisition(Check)
r State owned(fee simple)
r Conservation easment(Design Bid Build)
F Conservation Easement(Full Delivery Project)
Note: if the project property is state-owned,then all requirements should be addressed
to the Department of Administration, State Construction Office(attn: Herbert Neily,
[phone])
Is community/county participating in the NFIP program?
ryes allo
Note: if community is not participating, then all requirements should be addressed to
NFIP (attn: State NFIP Engineer, [phone]
Name of Local Floodplain Administrator: John Shirk
Phone Number: 910-253-2046
Floodplain Requirements
This section to be filled by designer/applicant following verification with the LFPA
✓No Action
ENoRise
r Letter of Map Revision
r Conditional Letter of Map Revision
//'1T/11 NT\
✓Other Requirements
List other requirements:
Comments:
Name: W. Grant Lewis _ Signature: 4)
Title: President Date: ? / '/2°z f
FEMA Floodplain_Checklist.docx Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID:558BA3AA-3A8F-4D0C-8DF9-946563FF8D65
HEC-RAS MODELING REPORT
Cool Run Mitigation Site
Brunswick County, NC
16, r. of,
`-9D8C14994�3�l..�+
_ =a SEALr=
26971 -
11;', 4 G.DP\,o`.•
10/13/2021
PREPARED BY:
ik
f
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Engineering Firm License No. C-0890

DocuSign Envelope ID:558BA3AA-3A8F-4D0C-8DF9-946563FF8D65
HEC-RAS Model Report
The Cool Run Mitigation Site is a stream and wetland restoration and enhancement project located
on one unnamed tributary to Cool Run in Brunswick County,NC.The site is located in the Lumber
River Basin and the project site is not located within a FEMA study area. All cross sections of CR
(Cool Run)were modeled and analyzed in HEC-RAS Version 5.0.7.
MicroStation and GEOPAK software was used to create a proposed TIN file based on the stream
restoration design. Cross sections were extracted from the TIN file using GEOPAK software and
imported in HEC-RAS. Cross Sections were taken from select riffle locations along the stream
reach with additional sections added upstream of the project to analyze the impact of the proposed
stream restoration project on water surface elevations beyond the project boundary. Existing
ground survey data was collected by K2 Design Group, PA and supplemented with QL2 LiDAR
data.
The 10,25, 50, and 100-year storm event discharges were calculated using USGS SIR 2009-5158.
Manning's n values were estimated to be 0.045 within the channel and 0.15 for overbank areas for
the existing and proposed conditions (after several growing seasons). Normal depth at the
downstream section was used as the boundary condition for the storm profiles based on existing
downstream channel slope.
Results
The model was run without errors. Water surface elevations (WSEs) were compared between the
existing and proposed conditions. See the attached WSE comparison table.
Section 2017 is located at the beginning (upper limit) of the stream restoration project. WSEs
decrease for each storm event in the proposed condition. Even though the bed profile is being
raised significantly (1.8 ft), the excavation in the floodplain increases the overbank area which
offsets any potential increases in WSEs.
Section 2383 is located beyond the stream restoration project limits, but still on the Stanley
property. Minor increases in WSEs were noted with a maximum of 0.04 ft in the 50-yr event.
However, as noted above, these increases are still located on the Stanley property.
Section 2533 is located at the upstream limit of the Stanley property. WSEs for all storm events
matched exactly at this section.
Section 2733, 2933, and 3050 also show no increases to WSEs.
Conclusions
Based on the model results, hydraulic trespass will not occur upstream of the Stanley property
limits during the 10, 25, 50, and 100-year storm events as a result of the proposed stream
restoration project.

DocuSign Envelope ID:558BA3AA-3A8F-4D0C-8DF9-946563FF8D65
HEC-RAS River: Cool Run Date: 10/13/2021
River Sta Profile Plan Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Project Impact
Prop. - Exist.
(cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft)
3050 100 YR Existing 499 43.8 51.35
3050 100 YR Proposed 499 43.8 51.35 0.00
3050 50 YR Existing 407 43.8 50.61
3050 50 YR Proposed 407 43.8 50.61 0.00
3050 25 YR Existing 324 43.8 49.86
3050 25 YR Proposed 324 43.8 49.86 0.00
3050 10 YR Existing 230 43.8 48.87
3050 10 YR Proposed 230 43.8 48.87 0.00
2933 100 YR Existing 499 42.9 50.83
2933 100 YR Proposed 499 42.9 50.83 0.00
2933 50 YR Existing 407 42.9 50.12
2933 50 YR Proposed 407 42.9 50.11 -0.01
2933 25 YR Existing 324 42.9 49.38
2933 25 YR Proposed 324 42.9 49.38 0.00
2933 10 YR Existing 230 42.9 48.44
2933 10 YR Proposed 230 42.9 48.44 0.00
2733 100 YR Existing 499 42.5 49.99
2733 100 YR Proposed 499 42.5 49.99 0.00
2733 50 YR Existing 407 42.5 49.29
2733 50 YR Proposed 407 42.5 49.28 -0.01
2733 25 YR Existing 324 42.5 48.56
2733 25 YR Proposed 324 42.5 48.56 0.00
2733 10 YR Existing 230 42.5 47.67
2733 10 YR Proposed 230 42.5 47.67 0.00
2533 100 YR Existing 499 41.1 49.25
2533 100 YR Proposed 499 41.1 49.25 0.00
2533 50 YR Existing 407 41.1 48.58
2533 50 YR Proposed 407 41.1 48.58 0.00
2533 25 YR Existing 324 41.1 47.89
2533 25 YR Proposed 324 41.1 47.89 0.00
2533 10 YR Existing 230 41.1 47.10
2533 10 YR Proposed 230 41.1 47.10 0.00
2383 100 YR Existing 499 42.1 46.70
2383 100 YR Proposed 499 42.1 46.72 0.02
2383 50 YR Existing 407 42.1 46.32
2383 50 YR Proposed 407 42.1 46.36 0.04
2383 25 YR Existing 324 42.1 46.25
2383 25 YR Proposed 324 42.1 46.27 0.02

DocuSign Envelope ID:558BA3AA-3A8F-4D0C-8DF9-946563FF8D65
2383 10 YR Existing 230 42.1 46.00
2383 10 YR Proposed 230 42.1 46.01 0.01
2153 100 YR Existing 499 41.3 46.41
2153 100 YR Proposed 499 41.3 46.36 -0.05
2153 50 YR Existing 407 41.3 46.17
2153 50 YR Proposed 407 41.3 46.11 -0.06
2153 25 YR Existing 324 41.3 45.92
2153 25 YR Proposed 324 41.3 45.87 -0.05
2153 10 YR Existing 230 41.3 45.59
2153 10 YR Proposed 230 41.3 45.54 -0.05
2017 100 YR Existing 499 41 46.08
2017 100 YR Proposed 499 42.76 46.04 -0.04
2017 50 YR Existing 407 41 45.85
2017 50 YR Proposed 407 42.76 45.80 -0.05
2017 25 YR Existing 324 41 45.61
2017 25 YR Proposed 324 42.76 45.56 -0.05
2017 10 YR Existing 230 41 45.30
2017 10 YR Proposed 230 42.76 45.26 -0.04

DocuSign Envelope ID: 558BA3AA-3A8F-4D0C-8DF9-946563FF8D65
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
212
15,
f
/� /5
( J 1 �l (
����"JIf 5�) I5-5 / 1 L 1 ss TI
S �� ��5�
(33
fl> �� � �r L J�� t
L��) z ' r�< C w c17
l■ ■fin �� �t ���� �) \j
3( s
r
2933�, JEFFORDS
D0B0 3 Go224
63,- ' ed2" , f L� 5, \- i-5 �.�. a�
,�' ✓\q$ �481, i J m M Y'3"3
✓ H
54_�8L 1 _^sb „sc.))1 -5�
—'-- - r �- 55-7
, ) l
1 r
i 24-5
`� i \ 5355 do
�F55 ��
///5/ ��� ���_� s �� }
;\ 3
1`s
s�)�
3, (, ,\, 7
r 9B/ - n� 'z '
h' i
Z % S �,„ 2 �% ,vim ��� �C �_
- -355
✓ h n5 ��
32-2
g-55f f L �� - i ✓
/ s r� / 2 3 5-
,� v
/ ��. /� s�� / 7 o�
�� ,2. 4 75 ti �-5a.� �.1 J'F' ✓ e /
rAi
5.54
/54
2533
5 \
)
c-D ojcb
20
/ 383 /
/
53-3
525
-70
Jor
/
it
11
-51
53,
COOL RUN BRANCH
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
�ro��, ,,,,,_. L r_r ro,,r-3 /
;, � %
✓ �♦ �v j r L As �„I A� t 9
4,2 4,475' : 4)24,A: 24' cli42):—.Sii
3 �C a LE s :255375-:55-32-:35-591-------------.2.-----5p-1111,
/ 7; cl/ 1/ ''''['
4s �L r ���;/\\j,k(1 VssC /(�) �'— v �53� J(JnS��r � /�`Cr —(' `l �1��5 22
~ - / /l i.jcv�! C V .,r- sl77' S 55✓ �' `J--1, ��I _ _�i� t�j�e /� --- 12
n �s
ii_, 2 41;::
:-,`-- "./ „ _y°' „ ,
/(/:
Ils-Z4
45)
_ ./ /� - -�,�. J�-ti�-� t� �/ /ems ��n, - �^ ( '
cc:\,,r,_,_,
r) /
35Z/4/ ('''' 5 )('r\ cc''s(t/:c,_)_„,_ '5„-4 )1- C.'''' 2 „r
) 0 \ 5 -� ✓ �-- s f —,r -1- ,.-a / ) l ' L 7 r
� � �� �� �� \ �ti � � r ����� ,� —�t r—' - // / �> z I 1 v5
k
1744
5-3
24,
, t) ,--- e`'/)'0,,. , 7
-
500
720 PRIVATE-)„
55,
13,
,31
351.
100' 50'
\ FRINK
D.13.\33489 PG.I120
)542
0 100' 200'
RAW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
INCOMPLE
DO NOT USE FOR
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
rE PLANS
W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
T R A C T 3 / i/ 4,1 i'.'/-/ ---/-:
---- \-)— __,,i,,,,-,;/___,„:::, ..„--i/1: \-j---. ),//1/?-1,7,)::::11/:,,I/J-141:/i,'J
, / / j,, ,_, r 7,7 .,,1 /• z_.' ,_\ii-- ' _I , , c(.\ _,'N.< (T ,,,,,L2 , : -7 , ): \,'..'''' ,,1 I .,' ,- ,"
o
37
55
127
,257
25
5.51
/5415
5.3
BENNETT
Lod
T--- —,_,_,(-f':-:,,,,-----5711_-2_9__\---,L."-''' '... 11---\5\-: I \„_Li, (u '-'-,_-'1„/_> „ '-„(211L--3.,'
sAcy
5-3
ib
722
3,2
.44

COOL RUN MITIGATION SITE
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
DRAINMOD ASSESSMENT
I. Introduction
On behalf of Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, Land Management Group (LMG) has prepared
the following DRAINMOD assessment for the Cool Run Mitigation Site (Site). The Site is
located north of Old Shallotte Rd (SR 1316), approximately 6.5 miles west of the Shallotte, NC.
The site has been historically managed for agriculture and silvicultural production since the
1950's. Intensive site management practices (including the ditching, grading, agricultural row
cropping and conversion to loblolly pine plantation) has resulted in the loss and/or
degradation of stream and wetland functions on the site.
Site -specific soils information, current drainage conditions, and geomorphological data were
used to perform DrainMod computer modeling. DRAINMOD is a field -scale hydrologic model
originally developed for the design of subsurface drainage systems. Its application is now
widely used for the purposes of evaluating lateral drainage effects of existing ditches and
modeling for wetland restoration purposes. The model incorporates long-term climatological
data in conjunction with site -specific model inputs. For the Site, the model has been run
utilizing field -estimated conductivity rates for the specific soil series identified by licensed soil
scientists of LMG. In order to determine the drainage response relative to existing ditch size,
multiple DRAINMOD analyses were conducted utilizing various input parameters. These
models incorporated typical channel geometry observed for the drainage ditches and
channelized streams onsite.
DRAINMOD utilizes Reference Wetland Simulation (RWS) in which typical reference soil and
drainage inputs are used to determine minimum hydrology requirements satisfying Section
404 wetland jurisdictional criteria. Separate model runs are then analyzed to determine both
current drainage alterations and post -restoration conditions. More detailed information
regarding site conditions, model inputs, and results (for both pre- and post -project conditions)
are provided below.
II. Site Conditions
The Site (approximately 25.6 acres) consists of degraded streams and riparian wetlands in the
Coastal Plain of North Carolina. These resources include Cool Run, UT 1, and adjacent existing
and drained wetlands. The western portion of the Site includes an upland buffer ranging from
100 to 200 feet in width. The floodplain and upland buffer were logged between 2016 and
2018 and are currently dominated by early successional species.
1

The majority of wetlands associated with the tributary of Cool Run were confirmed to consist
of the Muckalee loam series. These soils are poorly drained and formed in loamy and sandy
alluvium on floodplains of streams in the Coastal Plain. The outer edges of the floodplain
were identified to consist of Lumbee loam soils (fine -loamy soils over sands occurring along
stream terraces). Approximately 1,934 linear feet of Cool Run and 335 linear feet of UT 1
have been ditched and are currently incised 3 to 4 feet deep. Additional, shallow ditches are
also present on -site but were not used in the DRAINMOD analysis, as the incised stream
channel is the primary driver influencing groundwater hydrology within the project area.
III. Drainage Modeling
DRAINMOD software, an approved hydrologic modeling tool (USACE, 2008), was utilized to
determine the extent of drainage throughout the site (as well as post -restoration conditions).
This software models the cumulative effects of parallel drainage features using long-term
climate data and user -supplied inputs. The user -supplied inputs allow for site -specific
drainage spacings, ditch depths, and soil conductivity rates to be modeled over long-term data
sets (i.e. 30 years). This long-term approach provides information on the hydrology of the site
in a variety of climatic conditions, which can aid in the determination of the effective lateral
drainage distance of a ditch.
The calibration process consisted of adjusting soil property inputs so that model predictions
match, as closely as possible, the measured water table fluctuations in response to measured
rainfall and calculated evapotranspiration (ET). Soil properties vary between soil series, and
from point to point within a given soil series. Calibration provides a method of determining
the field effective soil property values for each observation well. The DRAINMOD model was
calibrated separately for each transect location. The calibration of the model utilized site -
specific data for soil horizon depths and conductivity rates. Based upon soil temperature and
observed bud burst data from other mitigation sites on the Outer Coastal Plain, the growing
season for modeling purposes was assumed to be from February 1 through November 30, and
the critical period was set at 15 days (approximately 5% of the growing season). Climate data
from Wilmington, N.C. were used for modeling input based upon proximity of this weather
station to the mitigation site. Threshold settings for each different configuration were based
on the number of consecutive days necessary to meet the wetland hydrology criteria. This
criteria states that a site must exhibit water table depths within 12 inches of the surface for 15
consecutive days during the growing season. When these conditions are met for >50% of the
years during a given study, the site is considered to be jurisdictional wetlands. For the
purpose of post -project modeling, a threshold of 36 consecutive days was used to determine
if drainage alterations would result in restoration of wetland hydrology (corresponding to the
restoration goal of a minimum 12% hydroperiod).
Summary results from the different configurations are presented in Table 1. Based upon
these results, a 3- to 5-ft ditch or incised stream effectively lowers the water table for a
distance between approximately 130 ft and 300 ft in the Muckalee soils of the site. For the
Lumbee series, a 3- to 5-ft ditch/incised stream effectively lowers the water table for a lateral
2

distance of approximately 150 ft to 390 ft. These results are consistent with drainage
conditions observed on -site.
Based on the combination of field observations, soil borings, and DRAINMOD results
approximately 14 acres of the Site appear to have been effectively drained and are considered
suitable for wetland restoration (see Figure 6B of the Wetland Mitigation Plan). Note that the
DRAINMOD results above reflect the lateral drainage effects sufficient to remove hydrology.
Although areas beyond the identified lateral drainage effect may still maintain water table
depths sufficient to meet the wetland hydrology criteria, the lateral drainage influence exerts
hydrologic modifications beyond these distances. As a result, areas beyond the identified
lateral drainage distances that exhibit field indicators of altered hydrology may be considered
suitable for wetland enhancement via stream restoration and removal of on -site ditches.
3

Table 1. Results from Cool Run DRAINMOD Study
Well
Ditch
Depth
Pre/Post
(ft)
Ditch
Spacing (ft)
Soil Unit
Depth to
Impermeable
Layer (cm)
Drainage
Coefficient
(cm/day)
Number of Years
Meeting Wetland
Hydrology
Length of
Study (years)
Percentage of
Years
(>50% = wet)
Status
1
3.5
344
Muckalee
310
0.3
9
30
30%
Drained
1.8
344
Muckalee
310
0.3
16
30
53%
Restorable
2
Gauge data could not be calibrated
3
3.1
131
Muckalee
310
0.3
6
30
20%
Drained
1.4
131
Muckalee
310
0.3
17
30
57%
Restorable
4
5.0
394
Lumbee
310
0.3
10
30
33%
Drained
1.0
394
Lumbee
310
0.3
26
30
87%
Restorable
5
Well located in existing wetland
6
2.7
98
Muckalee
310
0.3
11
30
37%
Drained
1.0
98
Muckalee
310
0.3
26
30
87%
Restorable
7
3.5
148
Lumbee
310
0.3
0
30
0%
Drained
1.0
148
Lumbee
310
0.3
17
30
57%
Restorable
8
4.5
180
Lumbee
310
0.3
0
30
0%
Drained
1.5
180
Lumbee
310
0.3
16
30
53%
Restorable
9
3.8
131
Lumbee
310
0.3
0
30
0%
Drained
1.0
131
Lumbee
310
0.3
21
30
70%
Restorable
10
5.0
164
Muckalee
310
0.3
0
30
0%
Drained
1.0
164
Muckalee
310
0.3
19
30
63%
Restorable
11
5.0
262
Muckalee
310
0.3
0
30
0%
Drained
1.0
262
Muckalee
310
0.3
19
30
63%
Restorable
12
4.6
197
Muckalee
310
0.3
1
30
3%
Drained
1.0
197
Muckalee
310
0.3
18
30
60%
Restorable
13
3.3
131
Muckalee
310
0.3
0
30
0%
Drained
1.0
131
Muckalee
310
0.3
20
30
67%
Restorable
14
Well located in existing wetland
15
Well located in existing wetland
4

December 2020
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
u _ 1_ ■_ -
30 day Precipitation Assessment
O�O�O�O� O�,t.f sY 4' 4' sV C.
C.
C.
C.
C.
,Cf ikf it: +c:c042.
p
�O +O +O +O Qe Qe Qe Qe Qe
`b N. ,L'L' ,L°1' N. 'y°1 ti� 3 ,y0 N. 4 13ti
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Onsite Raingauge KNCSHALL16 Raingauge —30 Day Onsite Total 30% —
1%
Precipitation Data Obtained from: Onsite Raingauge and Comparison Station KNCSHALL16 (weatherunderground PWS)
30% and 70% precipitation normals obtained from: WETS Station WILLARD 4 SW, NC9423 1971-2000 (wcc.nrcs.usda.gov)

March 2021
30 day Precipitation Assessment
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
54 ---- --_r-"
/`
3
2
1 L . _II _is__11 __I_ i._ _.__u` MI0
titi titi titi titi titi titi 1> 1> ;titi titi titi titi
N2' N2' N2'•2'•N?' pe•p •pep pep pep fat fat mat •fat
N. N. ,titi ti� titi ti°� ti� titi tiC5' ,yco
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Onsite Raingauge KNCSHALL16 Raingauge —30 Day Onsite Total - —30% — 7'
Precipitation Data Obtained from: Onsite Raingauge and Comparison Station KNCSHALL16 (weatherunderground PWS)
30% and 70% precipitation normals obtained from: WETS Station WILLARD 4 SW, NC9423 1971-2000 (wcc.nrcs.usda.gov)

June 2021
30 day Precipitation Assessment
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4 —
3
0
\--
r-L---L«<_ L - --
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
ti'V9 �b'V9 N.
'L�'V9 'L°'V9 04a� ��4a� ,Lp4a� ,L�4a� �Ns.
N.
y�N`)o 'L�`Ns"
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Onsite Raingauge KNCSHALL16 Raingauge -30 Day Onsite Total 30% 70%
L
Precipitation Data Obtained from: Onsite Raingauge and Comparison Station KNCSHALL16 (weatherunderground PWS)
30% and 70% precipitation normals obtained from: WETS Station WILLARD 4 SW, NC9423 1971-2000 (wcc.nrcs.usda.gov)

*Onsite raingauge malfunction - data replaced with KNCSHALL16
September 2021
7 _ 1
-.) [
5
._
4
3
2
1 Ili— _ g L _ _ _II _ _ __LI _ [I
� 0-
ti`1> `1> > `1> 1> titi 1> titi Q1> 1> 1> titi Q1>
N. NJNJPJ�QJ¢O Q�pO QQ `�45e4,eQ 4,�Q 40Q 4,2
.
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
1\ ---__/ \
30 day Precipitation Assessment
ILMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEV. company
KNCSHALL16 Raingauge KNCASH129 Raingauge -30 Day Total 30% 70%
Precipitation Data Obtained from: Onsite Raingauge and Comparison Station KNCASH129 (weatherunderground PWS)
30% and 70% precipitation normals obtained from: WETS Station WILLARD 4 SW, NC9423 1971-2000 (wcc.nrcs.usda.gov)

*Onsite raingauge malfunction - data replaced with KNCSHALL16 December 2021
30 day Precipitation Assessment
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 _1I
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
O`+ct O��' O`�' O�+c.' O`+c' J' J J J C C c,' c,'
Nf '6' , 1' ,L'L' ,L�' y�0 y��0 ,yo'�O ,LcO�O �O0 yOC ,y'`O0 ,LO`OP� �yOO
KNCSHALL16 Raingauge KNCASH129 Raingauge -30 Day Onsite Total
tLMG
Precipitation Data Obtained from: Onsite Raingauge and Comparison Station KNCASH129 (weatherunderground PWS)
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP 30% and 70% precipitation normals obtained from: WETS Station WILLARD 4 SW, NC9423 1971-2000 (wcc.nrcs.usda.gov)
a
a DAVEY. company

December 2020
12
6
0
ins
- -6
U
cu
a -12
J
w
4,
-18
w
CO
-24
N
C -30
-36
-42
-48
'
Hydrology Assessment
1
'1, '1ic.f, '1. '10 '1, '1,
ikfti ti '1,ti N.
Growing Season End
- November 30
I
+o� +0 0 O�' 0' Q0' O2"
N. 1,(:"3 'y0 N. '1,, ''),'y
Date
1. 1
.._
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 1 (768822) —0—Gauge 2 (768797) (Gauge 3 (766822) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
8
5
4
3
2
0
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 1, 2, 3 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

March 2021
12
6
0
ins
d
- -6
U
cu
a -12
J
w
4,
-18
w
CO
L
• -24
C • -30
,L^
V
- 36
-42
- 48 I ■ 1
titi
Growing Season Start
- February 1
1 .1 II_■I - ..II
titi titi titi titi
titi tip' 1,
Hydrology Assessment
,i it
Qe� <<el Qe� Qe� a� 2j at 0t
ti� ti� <1 yti� yC5'� 1043'
Date
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 1 (768822) —0—Gauge 2 (768797) (Gauge 3 (766822) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
9
8
7
5
4
3
2
1
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 1, 2, 3 - Rugged Trolls - January 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

June 2021
Ground / Surface Water Level (nches)
Hydrology Assessment
12.0
6.0 9
0.0 8
-6.0 - 7
- 12.0 6
- 18.0 5
- 24.0 4
- 30.0 � 1i� 3
- 36.0 2
- 42.0 1
T�p'r
- 48.0
.I - i -- - • . . I 1 _ I..I
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
V*9 V*9 V9 Pit V9 4aA aA �aA eV� ��<
ti w ti`' tip' ticy�, tio- tip- 3 do
Date
Onsite Raingauge +Gauge 1 (768822) +Gauge 2 (768797) (Gauge 3 (766822) —0" Ground Surface -12" Threshold
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
0
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 1, 2, 3 - Rugged Trolls - April 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

September 2021
12.0
6.0
0.0
Tns
d
u -6.0
d
ai -12.0
J
w
-18.0
w
cc
-24.0
TS
C -30.0
,L^
V
-36.0
-42.0
—01
1 .I
Hydrology Assessment
�1
titi titi titi titi ;vti titi ;vs' titi1> titi titi
s`�\ ��`� Q.¢O QJ�O QJ�O 41' ceQ �eQ
tiyes yet
°S ti�
Date
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 1 (768822) tGauge 2 (768797) (Gauge 3 (766822) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
9
8
7
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 1, 2, 3 - Rugged Trolls - July 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2021
Ground / Surface Water Level (nches)
12.0
6.0
0.0
-6.0
- 12.0
- 18.0
- 24.0
- 30.0
- 36.0
- 42.0
- 48.0
do
Hydrology Assessment
Growing Season End
- November 30
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
0& O`+c.' O`+c.' O`'c' ��J' ��J' +0J' +0 OeC
w ti`' tip' ti� �; titi' tip' tip'
Date
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Oe`,tiy Oe`,L'y Oe`,y'y Oe`,�'y
Onsite Raingauge —0—Gauge 1 (768822) —0—Gauge 2 (768797) (Gauge 3 (766822) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
:LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 1, 2, 3 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2020
24
18
12
6
a
s
U
0
G/
Gl
-6
L
CU
CO
-12
w
CO
L - -18
3
co)
C -24
3
0
L
W -30
- 36
- 42
- 48
vs",LO
Hydrology Assessment
1
,O`,kf O�,LO O`�,y0 ,O`�,y0 4' 4'
J,LO
+0 +0
N. 1, #1N.
i
Growing Season End1
- November 30
1 li .. 1 _ ■._I I. I _I
.1 J C C G G c
+0 +0 Qe Oe Qe Qe Qe
tic' ti� 3 yo. N.
. ''),ti.
Date
Onsite Raingauge —A—Gauge 4 (768853) Gauge 5 (768847) (Gauge 6 (768857) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 4, 5, 6 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

March 2021
24
18
12
6
ins
s
U
C o
Gl
al
-6
L
w
4,
CO
-12
O
_m
L -18
C -24
3
O
L
(7 -30
- 36
- 42
- 48 I 1.. 1 ■ I
,�.$ ,a.$
N.
Hydrology Assessment
t _ 1
/
Growing Season Start
- February 1
titi tii <1
21);vti titi ;�ti �0,p 0t 0� 2j `�‘
Date
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 4 (768853) - - Gauge 5 (768847) (Gauge 6 (768857) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 4, 5, 6 - Rugged Trolls - January 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

June 2021
Hydrology Assessment
24
18
12
6
w
s
U
.,
d
- -6
'CB
co
-12
O
_m
L • -18
'a -24
C
3
O
L
(7 -30
- 36
- 42
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
- 48 - I I 1 - - - ■ 1 I 10 _ j 0
1> titi titi titi titi ;, ;L, titi titi titi titiL, L,
`�4, �
o ,VN' V ybtiti ����y1o,Cs N.
N.
1,
Date
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 4 (768853) —r Gauge 5 (768847) —A—Gauge 6 (768857) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 4, 5, 6 - Rugged Trolls - April 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

September 2021
24
18
12
6
ins
s
V 0
G/
I
� -6
w
g -12
CU
3 -18
C -24
O
L
(7 -30
36
-42
-48 �� - -- --1_ ■1 - 1 li - -- _..I
'L, titi 'L, 1 ;L, titi titi titi 'L, 'L, 3 1>
` NJ` ,JY ,•Y ,°0 QJ¢o QJ¢o J¢o t70� GjQ+Q t70� t7e�
ti 0 tit ti"/)
Hydrology Assessment
ILZE
Precipitation (Inches)
Date
Onsite Raingauge —A—Gauge 4 (768853) 1 Gauge 5 (768847) }Gauge 6 (768857) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 4, 5, 6 - Rugged Trolls - July 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2021
24
18
12
6
N
t
0
N
N
-6
a)
-12
N
-18
12 -24
c
0
W -30
-36
-42
Hydrology Assessment
1
Growing Season End
- November 30
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi 1> titi titi titi titi
O(O`,�. O`,�, o`,�. �OJ. �aJ �o4 �OJ. Oe02' 02' 02#<11
Qe`.
titi 'L <1 ,L tic) ,L(o' 13) sbti
Date
Onsite Raingauge Gauge 4 (768853) Gauge 5 (768847) —A—Gauge 6 (768857) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
ILMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 4, 5, 6 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2020
12
6
0
ins
- -6
U
cu
a -12
J
w
-18
w
4-
-24
N
C -30
,L^
V
-36
-42
-48
,LO
_ 40
Hydrology Assessment
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
`�10 J'V
0
i.
Growing Season End
- November 30
nsite Raingauge —0—Gauge 7 (767055) Gauge 8 (768856) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
i
2
1
0
O
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 7, 8 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

March 2021
Ground / Surface Water Level (nches)
12
6
0
-6
- 12
- 18
- 24
- 30
- 36
Growing Season Start
- February 1
Hydrology Assessment
- 42
- 48
1.1 1 ■I 11_.I ..II -t --- -� iI I I I _ I I I - - I -I
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titititi titi titi c,
Nib Nb. ,b ,a,a4<e`Qei Qei Qe' Sbti�a� �b
ybtiti� h- ti-
titi� ti� �N.
y���
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Date
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 7 (767055) —1— Gauge 8 (768856) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
I
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 7, 8 - Rugged Trolls - January 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

June 2021
Ground / Surface Water Level (nches)
Hydrology Assessment
12 10
6 9
0 8
-6 7
- 12 6
- 18 5
- 24
4
- 30
- 36
- 42
- 48 -
ILMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
3
2
1
0
4\1>
A3ti 4‘2'
a3ti Al>
Date
titi titi
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 7 (767055) --Gauge 8 (768856) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 7, 8 - Rugged Trolls - April 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021- One reading per day at 7:00 am

September 2021
12
6
0
Tns
w
- -6
U
C
G/
cu -12
J
L
w
4,
-18
CU
V
CO
N -24
TS
C
C
-30
,^
V
-36
-42
Hydrology Assessment
11
1> by by
s titi ti°)
I
k
titi titi Ns titi titi Ns* titi titi
titi by ti� 1 ti� 1,' ,3o
Date
Onsite Raingauge —0—Gauge 7 (767055) Gauge 8 (768856) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 7, 8 - Rugged Trolls - July 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2021
12
6
0
w
(▪ 13
-18
(13
—
L
▪ -24
C • -30
,L^
V
- 36
- 42
- 48
Hydrology Assessment
by
O
fr
ILMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
Growing Season End
- November 30
by ti� by ti> ti� by by ti� by
Oc. Oc' Off, of C1�J• +0 �J, Qe�•
�. ,L, ti� �. ,�.
Date
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
titi titi titi titi
41'
N N.CY tip` N.
Onsite Raingauge Gauge 7 (767055) --Gauge 8 (768856) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 7, 8 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2020
12
6
0
ins
- -6
U
cu
ai -12
J
w
-18
w
-24
N
TS
C -30
,L^
V
-36
-42
-48
,y0
y,0
P .1O
y3'0`� 'L�''0`-
Hydrology Assessment
'6' J'O
0
'10
h'
Na
4'
4'
4,L0
ti0
Date
O
04,
3,
Growing Season End
- November 30
I. 1
.._I
,y0 1,
Onsite Raingauge +Gauge 9 (768861) --Gauge 10 (765507) (Gauge 11 (767706) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 9, 10, 11 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

March 2021
12
6
0
I
w
- -6
U
C
w
w -12
J
L
w
4,
-18
a)
V
CO
L
3 -24
N
C
C -30
0
- 36
- 42
- 48
1
Growing Season Startl
- February 1
)
.1 1 .1 I1 _I
Hydrology Assessment
I
N ,,
' a s r u v*...... p s ..
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
Nib Nib
,ac. ,a.$ ,a.$ NZ'.
�e� Qeso• Qeso• Qe�• .e �. �. .c•
ti c ti� titi ti� ti� titi y�, ti� yea titi�a ti��a ti��a
Date
Onsite Raingauge Gauge 9 (768861) --Gauge 10 (765507) (Gauge 11 (767706) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 9, 10, 11- Rugged Trolls - January 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

June 2021
Ground / Surface Water Level (nches)
Hydrology Assessment
12
6 9
0 8
-6 - 7
- 12 6
- 18 5
- 24 4
- 30 3
- 36 - 2
- 42 1
- 48 -
titi t'Ly t'Ly t'Ly
PQ PQ p' '
P9 P9
ti
titi titi
19(
Date
ti> ti>
N.
yA
Onsite Raingauge —A—Gauge 9 (768861) --Gauge 10 (765507) (Gauge 11 (767706) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
0
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 9, 10, 11 - Rugged Trolls - April 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

September 2021
12
6
0
N
-6
C
N
N -12
J
a)
g -18
a)
(13
—
L
▪ -24
13
-30
,L^
V
- 36
- 42
- 48
titi titi
tiro` 41,��`
titi titi
J
v)� s'
Hydrology Assessment
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
--,- I 1 I li _..I— o
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
�V P10 it
PJ¢o Pao �eQ GP' g�Q 452Q g�Q
ti� N. N. ti� ti' o' �o, 'V .o.
Date
Onsite Raingauge Gauge 9 (768861) • --Gauge 10 (765507) Gauge 11 (767706) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
Precipitation (Inches)
ILMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 9, 10, 11 - Rugged Trolls - July 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2021
12
6
0
ins
d
- -6
U
cu
ai • -12
J
w
4,
-18
w
CO
N • -24
C • -30
,L^
V
- 36
- 42
- 48
Hydrology Assessment
Growing Season End
- November 30
ti> tiN by 1> ti� 4' 1,
1,
titi ti°' ti N. NC 10 3
Date
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
1> 1> 1> 1>
N.•
y�cly ti�`Oe` 3ti�e`
Onsite Raingauge —0—Gauge 9 (768861) --Gauge 10 (765507) (Gauge 11 (767706) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 9, 10, 11 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2020
18
12
6
ins
as 0
s
ai -6
d
J
yam,, • -12
cu
U -18
f6
▪ -24
TS
C
2 • -30
- 36
- 42
- 48
0
Hydrology Assessment
1
O`er O&'' O�'' di +°J +°J
O' N. le le <1 N.
Growing Season End
- November 30
9
4`i-=-Ari ram, iir8
1 li .. I _ ■._I I. i
'LO 'LO 'ti0 ,y0 ,y0 'y0
+°J +°J 02' O2` Ate` 02'
c.
N° le 3 do N. '1,
Date
Onsite Raingauge +Gauge 12 (768854)tGauge 13 (765536)—_ Gauge 14 (768851)
—*—Gauge 15 (768845) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 12, 13, 14, 15 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

March 2021
18
12
6
3
U -18
f6
L
24 Growing Season Start
-0 - February 1
c
c
2 -30
0
-36
1:1.1
I 1 ■I 1I_■I_ ..II 1-
1> titi titi
N. % N.
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Hydrology Assessment
titi titi titi
� Nab «ea
1,' ti°Y 4,
II __EI1 1 I- 1 -I
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
<e# <e# «e' �`a�� �4. jai e
N. tic 1, 4, N. tip' tip'
Date
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 12 (768854)tGauge 13 (765536)fGauge 14 (768851)
—*—Gauge 15 (768845) 0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 12, 13, 14, 15 - Rugged Trolls - January 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

June 2021
Hydrology Assessment
18
12
6 9
ifl
w 0 • 8
s
U
C
a -6 7
9
d
J
L
a • -12 7 6
m
ig
(..) • -18 1 1 - 5
CO
L
VI
-24
TS
C
3
C -30 - — 3
,L^
V
- 36
- 42
- 48 -
1> titi titi
ti
titi titi
PQi PQAt
.
I__ -
3> titi titi titi
s. ,�, 1,
Date
N. N
Onsite Raingauge --Gauge 12 (768854)tGauge 13 (765536)—_ Gauge 14 (768851)
--Gauge 15 (768845) 0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
1
1
0
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY#. company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 12, 13, 14, 15 - Rugged Trolls - April 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

September 2021
Hydrology Assessment
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
titi titi titi titi
43
NP
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
N. N? tic 1:N. 1,�.
Date
Onsite Raingauge +Gauge 12 (768854)tGauge 13 (765536)—_ Gauge 14 (768851)
—*—Gauge 15 (768845) —0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
Precipitation (Inches)
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAIEY4 company
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 12, 13, 14, 15 - Rugged Trolls - July 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

December 2021
18
12
6
a • 0
t
C
a -6
N
J
c ▪ -12
R
U • -18
R
▪ -24
c
2 • -30
- 36
- 42
- 48
do
Hydrology Assessment
Growing Season End
- November 30
0
titi titi titi titi titi titi titi
+0 titi
�aJ' +0 OeC
w' '1?)'; titi' tip' tip'
ILMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
Date
1> l>. titi 1>
Oe� civ Oe` Pe(,
Onsite Raingauge +Gauge 12 (768854)+Gauge 13 (765536)--Gauge 14 (768851)
+Gauge 15 (768845)-0" Ground Surface --12" Threshold
Precipitation (Inches)
Cool Run Mitigation Site (LMG20.248 Ecosystem Services)
Gauges 12, 13, 14, 15 - Rugged Trolls - October 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 - One reading per day at 7:00 am

Appendix G
Financial Assurances
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Policy Number: TBD
Previous Policy Number:
NORTH CAROLINA FULL DELIVERY PROJECT INSURANCE
POLICY DECLARATIONS
INSURER
UNDERWRITING OFFICE
PRODUCER
Underwriters at Lloyds of
London
Alliant Americas — A Division
of Alliant Insurance Services
6550 Rock Spring Drive, Suite
610 Bethesda, MD 20817
Contact Person: Barry Peters
Robert S. Spoth, President
Ecosystems Insurance
Associates, LLC
11602 Mohican Road
Woodbridge, VA 22192
Phone Number: [phone]
CLAIMS
MADE
AND
REPORTED
COVERAGE
NOTICE: THIS IS A CLAIMS -MADE AND REPORTED POLICY. THIS POLICY HAS CERTAIN PROVISIONS
AND REQUIREMENTS UNIQUE TO IT AND MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM OTHER POLICIES A "NAMED
INSURED" MAY HAVE PURCHASED. FOR THERE TO BE COVERAGE UNDER THIS POLICY, A CLAIM
MUST FIRST BE MADE AGAINST THE NAMED INSURED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES (NC DEQ DMS) AND REPORTED TO
UNDERWRITERS DURING THE POLICY PERIOD. THIS POLICY INCLUDES NO DUTY TO DEFEND OR TO
PAY DEFENSE COSTS.
PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE POLICY CAREFULLY
ITEM 1
Named Insured:
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC
Mailing Address:
604 Macon Place —A
Raleigh, NC 27609
A.
Mitigation Project
Cool Run Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site.
B.
Insured Property
Cool Run Mitigation Site.
The Cool Run Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the
"Site") encompasses 25.6 acres of disturbed forest and agricultural fields
along Cool Run and Unnamed Tributaries (UTs) to Cool Run. The project is
located in Brunswick County, approximately five miles southwest of the city
limits of Shallotte, North Carolina and north of State Route 1316 (Old
Shallotte Rd NW (Figures 1 and 2, Appendix A). Site- Latitude / Longitude:
(33.970904, -78.472509).
DMS Project No. 100141
DMS Full Delivery Contract No. 20190201-01.
RFP No. 16-20190201
ITEM 2
Policy Period From: TBD/2022 To: OTBD/2023
At 12:01 A.M. both dates at your mailing address shown above.

THE INSURANCE COMPANY WITH WHICH THIS COVERAGE HAS BEEN
PLACED IS NOT LICENSED BY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AND IS NOT
SUBJECT TO ITS SUPERVISION. IN THE EVENT OF THE INSOLVENCY OF THE
INSURANCE COMPANY, LOSSES UNDER THIS POLICY WILL NOT BE PAID BY
ANY STATE INSURANCE GUARANTY OR SOLVENCY FUND.
Excess & Surplus Lines Broker
ITEM 3: LIMIT OF LIABILITY
Alliant ' 6550 Rock Spring Drive Suite 610
Bethesda, MD 20817
The Limit of Liability shown below is subject to possible reduction pursuant to Section IV. B. of this Policy.
AGGREGATE LIMIT FOR $ 889,879.10
ALL CLAIMS:
ITEM 4: DEDUCTIBLE $ 10,000 Per Claim
ITEM 5:
POLICY PREMIUM $ TBD / , 100% minimum and earned on the inception
date of the Policy
TRIA PREMIUM $ included
STATE TAX OR OTHER (IF
APPLICABLE):
TOTAL PREMIUM
$ TBD
TBD
Total Premium 100% minimum and earned on
the inception date of the Policy.
ITEM 6: North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NC DEQ DMS):
Name:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
(NC DEQ DMS)
Address
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
The name and address above will be used for all notices to NC DEQ DMS
ITEM 7: NOTICE TO UNDERWRITERS
Notices to Underwriters pursuant to Section V.B.1. of this Policy shall be sent to the following:
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP
150 E. 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017

Attn: Martin. M. Ween, Esq.
ITEM 8:
FORMS AND ENDORSEMENTS FORMING A PART OF THIS POLICY AS OF THE INCEPTION DATE:
See attached schedule of forms and endorsement:
THESE DECLARATIONS, TOGETHER WITH THE COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS AND COVERAGE
FORM(S) AND ANY ENDORSEMENT(S), COMPLETE THE ABOVE NUMBERED POLICY.
Countersigned:
By:
Date:
^
Authorized Representative:
0;<

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
SCHEDULE OF FORMS AND ENDORSEMENTS
Named Insured: Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC
Policy Number: TBD
Policy Period
From: TBD/2022
To: TBD/2023
Forms and Endorsements
Mitigation project Insurance Policy Declarations amended as agreed for NC
DMS FDP projects
Mitigation project Insurance Policy Wording amended as agreed for NC DMS
FDP projects. NYDOCS01 - #7566288, 7 7 2016 edition
Schedule of Forms and Endorsements
Nuclear Energy Exclusion Endorsement
Exclusion of Certified Nuclear, Biological, Chemical or Radiological Acts of
Terrorism and Exclusion of other Acts Terrorism Committed Outside the United
States; Cap on losses from Certifies Acts of Terrorism
US Treasury Dept office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC )
Several Liability Notice
Minimum Earned Premium Endorsement
I

Appendix H
Site Protection Instrument
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

This certifies that there are no delinquent ad
valorem taxes, fees, assessments or other
liens which the Brunswick County Tax
Collector is charged with collecting, that are a
lien on: Parcel Number /'4 /6
as notated by the Brunswick County
Assessor's Office. This is not a certification
that the parcel number matches the deed
description.
zgit/Af j�ld�(C /��
Date (Asst) Tax I. PDf 1. Tax Spec.
1111111111111111111111111111111 11111' B4548a P@@92 04 56-142001
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds Clemmons PROP'
page 1 of 13
Brenda M. Clemmons Register of Deeds
02-12-2021 14:56:14.001 Brunswick County, NC
NC REVENUE STAMP: $614.00 (#735873)
V
i �
Return to ' . ` . ! Type lit
ei(►:.
Total Rev Int. ?//IU
Ck $ Ck # ' # casn$
Refund Cash $ Finance
a Portions of document are illegible due io condition
of original.
Ci Document contains seals verified by original
instrument that cannot be reproduced or cooled.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AND RIGHT OF ACCESS PROVIDED
PURSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
�Is 101k,00
SPO File Number: 10-EV
DMS Project Number: 100142
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General ! Ric,. e
Property Control Section
Return to: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
THIS DEED Off+' CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS, made
this lei day of , 2V/ , by Pearl D. Frink ("Grantor"), whose mailing
address is 1758 Frink Street SW, an Isle Beach, NC 28669, to the State of North
Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of
Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The
designations of Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seq., the State of
North Carolina has established the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly known as the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring,
enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection
and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and
recreational opportunities; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 1 of 13

lilIlIlIlIlIlIl 1111 DiIUI III 1 IU @�?�?.��"'�.
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 2 of 13
WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between Clearwater Mitigation
Solutions, LLC, a North Carolina Limited Liability Company, 604 Macon Place, Raleigh, North
Carolina, 27609 and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, to
provide stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation pursuant to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Purchase and Services Contract Number 20190201-01.
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United States
Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Understanding,
(MOU) duly executed by all parties on November 4, 1998. This MOU recognized that the Wetlands
Restoration Program was to provide effective compensatory mitigation for authorized impacts to
wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources by restoring, enhancing and preserving the wetland
and riparian areas of the State; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in Greensboro, NC
on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem
Enhancement Program) is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the
land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem
functions; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, and the National Marine Fisheries Service
entered into an agreement to continue the In -Lieu Fee operations of the North Carolina Department
of Natural Resources' Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem Enhancement
Program) with an effective date of 28 July, 2010, which supersedes and replaces the previously
effective MOA and MOU referenced above; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8th day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Division of Mitigation Services in the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, which has been delegated the authority authorized by the Governor and Council
of State to the Department of Administration, has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 2 of 13

1111111111111111111cuiiiNim!iiu,
84548 P0094 02-12-2021:56:14
145614.001
Brenda M. Clemmons PROP
of Deeds page 3 of 13
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in
Shallotte Township, Brunswick County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being more
particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 135.12 acres Parcel
Identification Number (PIN) 105800915168 and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as
recorded in Deed Book 3348 at Page 1120 of the Brunswick County Registry, North Carolina;
and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement and Right of Access over
the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the areas of
the Property subject to the Conservation Easement to the terms and conditions and purposes
hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept said Easement and Access Rights. The
Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of Cool Run, a
tributary to the Shallotte River.,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement and Right of Access together with an access easement to and from the Conservation
Easement Area described below.
The Conservation Easement Area consists of the following:
Conservation Easement Area containing a total of 25.57 acres as shown on the plats
of survey entitled "Final Plat, Conservation Easement for North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services, Project Name: "Cool Run" SPO File No 10-EV , DMS Site No. 100142 ,
Property of Pearl D. Frink," dated f ei3 met t 2 - , 202,1 by K2 Design Group, PLS
Number L-4194 and recorded in the Brunswick County, North Carolina Register of Deeds at
Plat Book 0 1 & 6 Pages005-3.
See attached "Exhibit A", Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
"Conservation Easement Area"
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic
habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Conservation
Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of
the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these
purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 3 of 13

1111111111111111111111111111111111111 a454s P0095 04-56-?4?001
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page age 4 o PROP
4 of 13
II. ACCESS EASEMENT
Grantor hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its employees, agents, successors and assigns, a
perpetual, non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and upon the Property at all
reasonable times and at the location more particularly described on Exhibit B ("Access Easement")
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to access the Conservation Easement
Area for the purposes set forth herein. This grant of easement shall not vest any rights in the public
and shall not be construed as a public dedication of the Access Easement. Grantor covenants,
represents and warrants that it is the sole owner of and is seized of the Property in fee simple and
has the right to grant and convey this Access Easement.
III. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Conservation Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that
would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area by
the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any
rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Any
rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation credits,
including, but not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units, derived from
each site within the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong to the Grantee.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited,
restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses,
including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Conservation Easement
Area for the purposes thereof.
B. Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited except within a Crossing Area(s) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey plat.
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage
in educational uses in the Conservation Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, and the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area for such purposes including
organized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the property
shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 4 of 13

02 12 2021
II IIIII111111111111111184548I II IIIIII I IP0096mmons 14 PROP
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 5 of 13
D. Damage to Vegetation. Except within Crossing Area(s) as shown on the recorded survey
plat and as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, or vegetation
that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Conservation Easement Area to persons or natural habitat,
all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
E. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All industrial, residential and commercial
uses are prohibited in the Conservation Easement Area.
F. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Conservation Easement
Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland.
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility pole,
tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction or maintenance of new roads, trails,
walkways, or paving in the Conservation Easement.
All existing roads, trails and crossings within the Conservation Easement Area shall be shown on
the recorded survey plat.
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Conservation Easement Area except interpretive
signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Conservation Easement
Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement,
signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Conservation
Easement Area.
J. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned
vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, hydraulic fracturing; removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock,
peat, minerals, or other materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Conservation Easement Area. No altering or
tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage
of all other water sources, water from within the Conservation Easement Area may temporarily be
withdrawn for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock on the Property.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 5 of 13

@010456400
III I IIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111184548 Brenda P M . C9t l emmon--1?
s PROP1
ounty, NC Register of Deeds page 6 of 13
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no further subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the Conservation Easement Area portion of the Property owned by the
Grantor in fee simple ("fee") that is subject to this Conservation Easement is allowed. Any future
transfer of the Property shall be subject to this Conservation Easement and Right of Access and to the
Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the
Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Conservation Easement Area and are non-transferrable.
O. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any intentional introduction of nonnative
plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the Division of Mitigation
Services, 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652.
IV. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Right of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees, agents,
successors and assigns, shall have a perpetual Right of Access over and upon the Conservation
Easement Area to undertake or engage in any activities necessary to construct, maintain, manage,
enhance, repair, restore, protect, monitor and inspect the stream, wetland and any other riparian
resources in the Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein or any long-term
management plan for the Conservation Easement Area developed pursuant to this Conservation
Easement.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade
materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
C. Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted to
place signs and witness posts on the Property to include any or all of the following: describe the
project, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project boundaries
and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D. Fences. Conservation Easements are purchased to protect the investments by the State
(Grantee) in natural resources. Livestock within conservations easements damages the investment
and can result in reductions in natural resource value and mitigation credits which would cause
financial harm to the State. Therefore, Landowners (Grantor) with livestock are required to restrict
livestock access to the Conservation Easement area. Repeated failure to do so may result in the
State (Grantee) repairing or installing livestock exclusion devices (fences) within the conservation
area for the purpose of restricting livestock access. In such cases, the landowner (Grantor) must
provide access to the State (Grantee) to make repairs.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 6 of 13

IIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111111 02 12 2021
B4548 P0098 14 56 14.001
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 7 of 13ROP
E. Crossing Area(s). The Grantee is not responsible for maintenance of crossing area(s),
however, the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, reserve the right to repair
crossing area(s), at its sole discretion and to recover the cost of such repairs from the Grantor if
such repairs are needed as a result of activities of the Grantor, his successors or assigns.
V. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with the
purposes of this Conservation Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features in
the Conservation Easement Area that may have been damaged by such unauthorized activity or use.
Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the Grantee shall, except
as provided below, notify the Grantor in writing of such breach and the Grantor shall have ninety
(90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the damage caused by such breach. If the breach and
damage remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation
Easement by bringing appropriate legal proceedings including an action to recover damages, as well
as injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and authority, consistent with
its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Conservation Easement Area by acts
which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or
protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any appropriate person or entity.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain
a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief, if the breach is or would
irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that the damage would be irreparable and
remedies at law inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in
addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with
this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right,
with reasonable notice, to enter the Conservation Easement Area over the Property at reasonable
times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying with the terms,
conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall
be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's
control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent
action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate
significant injury to life or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 7 of 13

IIII I III111111I II1III1111IIIIIII III 02 12 2021
B4548 P0099 14:56:14.0@1
Brenda M. Clemmons PROP
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 8 of 13
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
VI. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property are
the sole responsibility of the Grantor. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to
comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the exercise of
the Reserved Rights.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the
Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor
further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in
the Property is conveyed is subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
signed by all parties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws,
and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. The owner of the Property shall
notify the State Property Office and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing sixty (60) days
prior to the initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property or of any request to void or
modify this Conservation Easement. Such notifications and modification requests shall be
addressed to:
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 8 of 13

II'lIIllIIIlIlII111111111111111111111 84548 P0100mm ris-?42PROP
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 9 of 13
Division of Mitigation Services Program Manager
NC State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
and
General Counsel
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross
and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event
it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a
qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code,
and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be
such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation
purposes described in this document.
VII. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Conservation
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment
of the Conservation Easement Area,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes,
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of the Property in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 9 of 13

02-12-2021
84548 11101 14:56:14.001
Brenda M. Clemmons PROP
of Deeds page 10 of 13
IN TESTIMONY, WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
9
Li
Pear D. Frink
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF a d ay!,
Seal)
I, [rapt Mt �t , a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid,
do hereby certify that r ') _ �- h k , Grantor, personally appeared before me this
day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITN SS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
day of , 2021.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 10 of 13
,L

1111 111 1 11 1 1 III I II I III 02 12 2021
B4548 P0102 14-56-14.001
Brenda M. Clemmons PROP
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 11 of 13
Exhibit A
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
COOL RUN MITIGATION SITE
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
All of the conservation easement of the Cool Run Site over a portion of the land of the
Brunswick Timber, LLC Tract (D.B. 1674, Pg. 325), lying and being situated in Shallotte
Township, Brunswick County, North Carolina and particularly described as follows (all
distances are ground distances unless otherwise noted):
Beginning at an iron stake (Point of Beginning) labeled as Point No. 3 and being the
Southwestern most corner of the Conservation Easement Area and being located South
81°26'19" East 1083.41 feet from an iron stake with a blue cap (Point No. 50) with N.C. Grid
Coordinates N=80,019.9283', E=2,158,905.3015' (NAD '83, 2011).
Thence from the Point of Beginning (Point No.3), North 03°33'44" West 293.99' to an iron stake;
thence North 06°20'25" East 187.99' to an iron stake; thence North 18°47'45" West 311.62' to an
iron stake; thence North 50°21'02" West 141.38' to an iron stake; thence North 72°44'57" West
217.67' to an iron stake; thence North 04°17'21" East 91.53' to an iron stake; thence North
73°57'36" East 92.76' to an iron stake; thence North 87°16'25" East 116.52' to an iron stake;
thence North 39°05'38" East 669.58' to an iron stake; thence North 80°31'26" East 273.39' to an
iron stake; thence North 00°29'50" East 192.87' to an iron stake; thence North 89°14'O1" East
324.46' to an iron stake; thence South 75°57'29" East 160.39' to an iron pipe; thence South
53°08'36" West 471.33' to an iron stake; thence South 00°41'28" West 556.12' to an iron pipe;
thence South 00°39'O1" West 81.16' to an iron stake; thence South 00°41'21" West 691.03' to an
iron stake; thence South 00°32'39" West 175.46' to an iron stake; thence North 88°20'18" West
12.00' to an iron stake; thence North 88°20'18" West 457.68' to an iron stake; thence South
88°34'33" West 107.15' to an iron stake, which is the Point of Beginning (Point No. 3), having an
area of 25.57 acres.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 11 of 13

IIIIIIIIIIIIl III IIIIII 1111111 II
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 12 of 13
Exhibit B
Access Easement
COOL RUN MITIGATION SITE
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
Access Easement 1
All of the Access Easement 1, described as New 12' Wide Non-exclusive Access Easement for ingress,
egress & regress to be conveyed to the State of North Carolina of the Cool Run Site over a portion of the
land of the Brunswick Timber, LLC Tract (D.B. 1674, Pg. 1326), lying and being situated in Shallotte
Township, Brunswick County, North Carolina and particularly described as follows (all distances are
ground distances unless otherwise noted):
Beginning at an iron stake (Point of Beginning) labeled as Point No. 56 and being located on the Northern
right of way of Old Shallotte Road (NCSR 1316) and being located South 63°33'11" East 6489.09 feet
from an iron stake with a blue cap (Point No. 50) with N.C. Grid Coordinates N=80,019.9283',
E=2,158,905.3015' (NAD '83, 2011).
Access Easement 1 being located adjacent to and North of the below described lines:
Thence from the Point of Beginning (Point No. 56) and along the Southern right of way of Starboard
Road (Private), the following bearings and distances: North 65°41'56" West 191.47' to an iron pipe
(Point No. 57); thence continuing along the Southern right of way of Starboard Road (Private) North
33°02'17" West 2908.40' to an iron stake (Point No. 58), the Point of Ending of said easement, having a
total area of 0.86 acres.
Access Easement 2
All of the Access Easement 2, described as New 12' Wide Non-exclusive Access Easement for ingress,
egress & regress to be conveyed to the State of North Carolina of the Cool Run Site, lying and being
situated in Shallotte Township, Brunswick County, North Carolina and particularly described as follows
(all distances are ground distances unless otherwise noted):
Beginning at an iron stake (Point of Beginning) labeled as Point No. 58 and being located on the
Southern right of way of Starboard Road (Private) and being and being located South 84°44' 11 " East
4066.99 feet from an iron stake with a blue cap (Point No. 50) with N.C. Grid Coordinates
N=80,019.9283', E=2,158,905.3015' (NAD '83, 2011).
Access Easement 2 being located adjacent to and North of the below described lines:
Thence from the Point of Beginning (Point No. 58) and along the Southern right of way of Starboard
Road (Private), the following bearings and distances: North 87°34'51" West 1200.40' to an iron stake
Page 12 of 13

I 1111 I II IIII I II I I I' II I IIII I IIIIII III 02 12 2021
B4548 P0104 14:56:14.001
Brenda M. Clemmons PROP
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 13 of 13
(Point No. 59); thence continuing along the Southern right of way of Starboard Road (Private) North
87°33'22" West 99.94' to an iron stake (Point No. 60), thence continuing along the Southern right of way
of Starboard Road (Private) North 45°02'17" West 480.51' to an iron stake (Point No. 61), thence leaving
the Southern right of way of Starboard Road (Private) North 45°02'17" West 32.15' to an iron stake (Point
No. 62), thence South 68°14'57" West 279.31' to an iron stake (Point No. 63), thence South 70°11'27"
West 511.39' iron stake (Point No. 64), located in the Frink property line (D.B. 3348, Pg. 1120) the Point
of Ending of said easement, having a total area of 0.72 acres.
Access Easement 3
All of the Access Easement 3, described as New 12' Wide Non-exclusive Access Easement for ingress,
egress & regress to be conveyed to the State of North Carolina of the Cool Run Site over a portion of the
land of the Frink Tract (D.B. 3348, Pg. 1120), lying and being situated in Shallotte Township, Brunswick
County, North Carolina and particularly described as follows (all distances are ground distances unless
otherwise noted):
Beginning at an iron stake (Point of Beginning) labeled as Point No. 64 and being and being located
South 81°57'34" East 1663.72 feet from an iron stake with a blue cap (Point No. 50) with N.C. Grid
Coordinates N=80,019.9283', E=2,158,905.3015' (NAD '83, 2011).
Access Easement 3 being located adjacent to, and Northeast of the below described lines:
Thence from the Point of Beginning (Point No. 64) the following bearings and distances: North 89°27'21"
West 12.00' to an iron stake (Point No. 65); thence North 00°32'39" East 60.71' to an iron stake (Point
No. 1) located in the Southern Boundary of a New Conservation Easement, the Point of Ending, said
easement, having a total area of 0.02 acres.
Page 13 of 13

Lr)
CAS
1
r
SITE
HIGHFIELD
CT
I
OLD SHALLOTTERD
.S. NNY 17
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
COORDINATES ALONG
CONSERVATION EASMENTS
CORNER
NORTHING
EASTING
1
79848.0348
2160541.2403
2
79861.3059
2160083.7499
3
79858.6426
2159976.6353
4
80152.0647
2159958.3686
5
80338.9000
2159979.1281
6
80633.9062
2159878.7233
7
80724.1165
2159769.8695
8
80788.6676
2159561.9931
9
80879.9364
2159568.8382
10
80905.5666
2159657.9868
11
80911.1088
2159774.3729
12
81430.7759
2160196.6049
13
81475.7869
2160466.2669
14
81668.6457
2160467.9411
15
81672.9860
2160792.3768
16
81634.0698
2160947.9751
17
81351.3573
2160570.8438
18
80795.2771
2160564.1358
19
80714.1256
2160563.2146
20
80023.1432
2160554.9043
21
79847.6868
2160553.2375
NOTE: ONLY CORNER # 50 IS A TRUE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATE. COORDINATES SHOWN
ARE BASED ON GROUND DISTANCES TO
MATCH PLAT. SEE DATUM DESCRIPTION,
SHEET 1 OF 1
so
ISS
FEMA FLOOD STATEMENT:
THE AREA REPRESENTED BY THIS
PLAT IS LOCATED IN A FLOOD
HAZARD BOUNDARY ACCORDING
TO FEMA MAP NUMBER(S)
3720106800J ZONE(S): X, DATED:
JUNE 2, 2006.
TEIP 51
S02°33'041W
364.22'
(TIE DOWN)
52
EIP_ N88°38'40"E
211.08' EIP
(TIE DOWN) 53
S51 °14'28"E
290.77' N88°34'33"E _
(TIE DOWN) 111.73'
(TIE DOWN)
(NC GRID COORDINATE'
N=80,019.9283'
E=2,158,905.3015'
ISS, REFERENCE POINT ONLY
(SUITABLE FOR GNSS OBSERVATION)
CURVE DATA
CURVE
ARC LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA ANGLE
CHORD BEARING
CHORD LENGTH
C1
35.68'
30.00'
68°08'08"
N34°3012"E
33.61'
C2
34.77'
30.00'
66°23'47"
S78°14'11"E
32.85'
DEED REFERENCE(S)
BEING A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY
RECORDED IN D.B. 3348, PG. 1120 OF THE
BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS.
MAP REFERENCE(S):
BEING A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY
RECORDED IN P.B. 12, PG. 25 OF THE
BRUNSWICK COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS.
M.C. M, PG. 124
M.C. 24, PG. 160
M.G. 21, PG. 526
M.C. R, PG. 357
M.C. 23, PG. 12
M.C. M, PG. 149
M.C. 26, PG. 129
M.C. 2, PG. 145
M..C. 81, PG. 75
M.C. 61, PG. 90
M.C. 0, PG. 34
M.C. 45, PG. 92
CI-1
FRINK
D.B. 549, PG. 1064
(CEMETERY)
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION(S)
t-9
(Ur )
0
FRINK
D.B. 3348, PG. 1120
P.B. 12, PG. 25
300°10'56"W
70.26'
(TIE DOWN)
N88°34'33"E
522.05'
(TIE DOWN)
BENNETT
D.B. 476, PG. 382
FRINK
D.B. 3348, PG. 1120
P.B. 12, PG. 25
r
COOL RUN
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
25.57 ACRES±
jT„„„
POND
i
ti CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF
ti NNORTH CAROLINA(AREA=
-0,02 ACRES± BY COORDINATE
\ COMPUTATION)
L12
Surveyor's disclaimer: No attempt was made to locate any cemeteries, wetlands, hazardous material
sites, underground utilities or any other features above, or below ground other than those shown.
However, no visible evidence of cemeteries or utilities, aboveground or otherwise, was observed by
the undersigned (other than those shown).
I certify that the survey is of another category such as the recombination of existing parcels, a
court -ordered survey, or other exception to the definition of subdivision (conservation easement).
I, JOHN A. RUDOLPH, certify that this plat was drawn under my supervision from an actual survey
made under my supervision (deed description recorded in Book SEE Page REFS , etc.) (other);
that the boundaries not surveyed are clearly indicated as drawn from information found in Book
page ; that the ratio of precision or positional accuracy as calculated is 1/10,000+; that this plat
was prepared in accordance with G.S. 47-30 as amended. Witness my original signature, license
number and seal this 15th day of January, A.D., 2021.
SM
0����d°
q 9
p00b82@.
SEAL
w�a L-4194
f Q
DRAWN BY: FGR
DATE: 01/15/21
DWG. NO.: CMC394MR19
`SURVEYED BY: J.A.R.
rofessional Land Surveyor
k2 design group
L-4194
License Number
774 S. Beston Road
La Grange, NC 28551
252.582.3097
www.k2designgroup.com
ACCESS EASEMENT 3
NEW 12' WIDE
NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS
EASEMENT FOR INGRESS,
EGRESS & REGRESS TO BE
FROM ISS 0 TO ISS
e EIS
TRACT 3
M.C. 61, PG. 90
BLYTHE
D.B. 2985, PG. 1138
FRINK
D.B. 3348, PG. 1120
P.B. 12, PG. 25
Lis
ro
STANLEY
D.B. 1463
PG. 739
/
/
EIP 1s
/
HINSON
D.B. 1427, PG. 270
TRACT 5
M.C. 61, PG. 90
BLYTHE
D.B. 2985, PG. 1138
YTRACT
M.C. 61,
or
w /
a¢w POND
/
3n.�-
-re \ /
Y v M.C. 61, PG. 90 \/ /
\ / /
STANLEY
D.B. 2098
PG. 1286
/
JEFFORDS
D.B. 3906, PG. 24
(-4
c9
0<
zz
cc
z
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BRUNSWICK
Filed for registration at
Office. Recorded in P.B.
M. , 2021 in the Register of Deeds
,PG
Register of Deeds
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BRUNSWICK
1,COflfl•€-NO.ktoWt.
By
, Review Officer of Brunswick County, certify that the map
or plat to which this certification is affixed meets all statutory requirements for recording.
I2feb2I
Date
Review Officer
CERTIFICATION OF EXEMPTION:
I (We) hereby certify that I am (We are) the Owner(s) of the properties shown and described hereon,
which was conveyed to me (us) by deeds recorded in Deed Book 3348, Page 1120, and that I (we)
hereby adopt the plan of conservation easement shown on this plat and that the conservation easement
shown is an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance of Brunswick County, North Carolina.
ACREAGE DATA
TRACT IS 25. ACRES± EXCLUDING ALL ROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAYAND EXCLUDING NEW 12' ACCESS
EASEMENT BY COORDIIV E COMPUTATION
PG. 90
TRACT 2
/HIGHFIELD COURT
/ (40' R/W-PAVED-PRIVATE)
EIS SMITH PER M.C. 0, PG. 34
D.B. 2279, PG. 1015
S70°11'27"W
N00°32'39"E 511.39'
39.59'
(TIE DOWN)
0 ISS
N89°27'21"W
12.00' ISS
0
FRINK
D.B. 3348, PG. 1120
P.B. 12, PG. 25
(121
" POND ~�
s
BARR
D.B. 1579, PG. 749
02-1-2021
llIllIIIIIIIIllIIIlIIIII 1 III Brend ?��53 mmons 14 PLAT
Brunswick County, NC Register of Deeds page 1 of 1
GENERAL NOTES:
NO HORIZONTAL CONTROL EXISTS
WITHIN 2000 FEET.
NOTE: NO ABSTRACT OF TITLE, NOR
TITLE COMMITMENT, OR RESULTS
OF TITLE SEARCH WERE FURNISHED
TO THE SURVEYOR. ALL
DOCUMENTS OF RECORD REVIEWED
ARE NOTED HEREON (SEE
REFERENCES). THERE MAY EXIST
OTHER DOCUMENTS OF RECORD
THAT MAY AFFECT THIS SURVEYED
PARCEL.
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE
HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
WETLANDS, TRIBUTARIES AND
PONDS WERE PROVIDED BY LAND
MANAGEMENT GROUP, NOT
SURVEYED.
•
ISS s2
S68°14'57"W ) N45°02'171W
279.31' 32.15'
ISS 53 !ISS `�► ISS 0
LINE DATA ALONG THE
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT AREA
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
N88°20'18"W
457.68'
L2
S88°34'33' W
107.15'
L3
NO3°33'44"W
293.99'
L4
N06°20'25"E
187.99'
L5
N18°47'45"W
311.62'
L6
N50°21'02"W
141.38'
L7
N72°44'57"W
217.67'
L8
N04°17'21"E
91.53'
L9
N73°57'36"E
92.76'
L10
N87°16'25"E
116.52'
L11
N39°05'38"E
669.58'
L12
N80°31'26"E
273.39'
L13
N00°29'S0"E
192.87'
L14
N89°14'01"E
324.46'
L15
575°5729"E
160.39'
L16
553°08'36"W
471.33'
L17
500°41'28"W
556.12'
L18
S00°39'01"W
81.16'
L19
500°41'21"W
691.03'
L20
500°32'391N
175.46'
L21
N88°20'18"W
12.00'
LINE DATA ALONG
TIE DOWN LINES
L50 N00°46'5T'E 60.00'
L51
N68°58`05"E
112.47'
L52
N69°02'53"E
209.99'
L53
N68°59111"E
140.11'
L54
N68°33'S5"E
139.91'
L55
N68°33'55"E
119.03'
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE COORDINATE SYSTEM USED FOR THIS PLAT IS BASED ON NORTH
CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY USING THE NORTH
CAROLINA REAL TIME NETWORK (VRS).
ISS 5o NC GRID COORDINATES NAD 83 (2011)
N = 80,019.9283'
E = 2,158,905.3015'
THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR IS 0.99987649 (GROUND TO GRID) OR
1.00012351 (GRID TO GROUND). THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND GRID
DISTANCE FROM
ISS 0 TO EIP ® IS S 51°14'28" E 290.77 FEET.
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE GRID DISTANCES.
GEOID-2012B CONUS
GNSS RECEIVER - TOPCON HIPER HR UVITH MINIMUM TIME OF
240 SECONDS COMPLETED DURING SEPTEMBER 2020.
S87 7'38"E
66.71'
(TIE DOWN)
STARBOARD ROAD
60' RIGHT OF WAY
(SOIL, PRIVATE)
M.C. 45, PG. 92
EIS
59
ACCESS EASEMENT 2
NEW 12' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS
EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS &
REGRESS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA (AREA = 0.72 ACRES±
BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION)
FROM EIS 0 TO ISS s4 S33°58'43"W
102.26'
(TIE DOWN)
IRON STAKE LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY N34°15'31"E 5.55'
FROM 60' ACCESS EASEMENT
N87°34'S1"W
1200.40'
N87°33'22"W
99.94'
TRACT #1
M.C. 81, PG. 75
FULWOOD
D.B. 000DC, PG. 2017
SHEET 1 OF 1
CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
OVER A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF PEARL D. FRINK
CURRENT OWNER PER D.B. 3348, PG. 1120
(PIN 105800915168)
DMS PROJECT ID# 100142
SPO NUMBERS 10-EV
COOL RUN
SHALLOTTE TOWNSHIP BRUNSWICK COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
(THE FIELD SURVEY TOOK PLACE DURING SEPTEMBER 2020)
200 100 0 200 400
600
GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 200'
EIS ®
S34° 15'31 "W
70.59'
\ (TIE DOWN)
ACCESS EASEMENT 1
NEW 12' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS
EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS &
REGRESS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA (AREA = 0.86 ACRES±
BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION)
FROM EIS 0 TO EIS 0
FULWOOD
D.B. 2724, PG. 519
TRACT #1
M.C. 81, PG. 75
FULWOOD
D.B. 000DC, PG. 2017
SUBDIVISION WAIVER
rtx„,:e,
Planning Director or Designee
I
(1,
LEGEND:
ISS - IRON STAKE SET
ECM - EXISTING CONCRETE MARKER
EIP - EXISTING IRON PIPE
ERRR - EXISTING RAILROAD RAIL
PTI - PINCHED TOP IRON
EA - EXISTING AXLE
EDS - EXISTING DRIVE SHAFT
EMN - EXISTING MAG NAIL
CMP - CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
O.D. - OUTSIDE DIAMETER
RPS - RANGE POLE SET
EMN - EXISTING MAG NAIL
MNS - MAG NAIL SET
EIS - EXISTING IRON STAKE
EPP - EXISTING PUMP PIPE
PPS - PUMP PIPE SET
NMC - NON-MONUMENTED CORNER
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
EOP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PB - PLAT BOOK
D.B. - DEED BOOK
PG. - PAGE
o - NON-MONUMENTED CORNER
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
No. 5 REBAR, 30" IN LENGTH FLUSH
WITH GRADE WITH AN ALUMINUM 31/4"
• CAP INSCRIBED: "STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA CONSERVATION EASEMENT"
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT LINE
-
TIEDOWNLINE
ADJOINER OR R/W LINE
- TRIBUTARY
TRIBUTARY (DITCH)
a
i
53
ACCESS EASEMENT
WETLANDS
CORNER
DESCRIPTIONS
CORNER
#
DESCRIPTION
0 THRU 0
No. 5 REBAR FLUSH WITH GRADE WITH AN
ALUMINUM 3 1/4" CAP INSCRIBED: "STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA CONSERVATION EASEMENT"
16
1.0" O.D. IRON PIPE 1.6' ABOVE GRADE
17
No. 3 REBAR 0.3' ABOVE GRADE
18
1.5" O.D. IRON PIPE 0.8'ABOVE GRADE
19
No. 3 REBAR 0.4' BELOW GRADE
20
No. 3 REBAR 0.5' ABOVE GRADE
21
No. 5 REBAR FLUSH WITH GRADE WITH AN
ALUMINUM 3 1/4" CAP INSCRIBED: "STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA CONSERVATION EASEMENT"
50
No. 5 REBAR FLUSH WITH GRADE GRADE
INSCRIBED WITH"K2 DESIGN CONTROL POINT"
SUITABLE FOR GNSS OBSERVATION
51
1.5" O.D. IRON PIPE 0.8' ABOVE GRADE
62
1.5" O.D. IRON PIPE 1.0' BELOW'GRADE
53
1.0" O.D. IRON PIPE, BENT FLUSH WITH GRADE
54
1.0" O.D. PINCHED -TOP IRON 0.4' BELOW GRADE
55
1.0" O.D. PINCHED -TOP IRON, BENT FLUSH WITH
GRADE
56
No. 3 REBAR 0.1' BELOW GRADE
57
1.0" O.D. IRON PIPE 0.4' ABOVE GRADE
58
No. 3 REBAR FLUSH WITH GRADE SET IN DITCH
BANK
59
No. 3 REBAR 0.4' BELOW GRADE
0
No. 3 REBAR 0.3' BELOW GRADE
0 THRU 0
No. 5 REBAR FLUSH WITH GRADE
66
No. 3 REBAR 0.4' BELOW GRADE
67
No. 3 REBAR 0.3' BELOW GRADE
68
No. 3 REBAR 0.5' BELOW GRADE
69
No. 3 REBAR 0.5' ABOVE GRADE
70
1.0" O.D. IRON PIPE 1.9' ABOVE GRADE
71
1.0" O.D. IRON PIPE 1.0' ABOVE GRADE
72
No. 3 REBAR 0.3' BELOW GRADE
78
No. 5 REBAR FLUSH WITH GRADE
74
No. 3 REBAR SET IN CONCRETE 0.2' ABOVE
GRADE
75
1.0" O.D. IRON PIPE, BENT FLUSH WITH GRADE
76
No. 3 REBAR 0.1' ABOVE GRADE
'
STARBOARD ROAD
60' ACCESS EASEMENT
(SOIL, PRIVATE)
M.C. 45, PG. 92
D.B. 365, PG. 315
N33°02'171W
2908.40'
0 EIP
N65'41'561W
191.47'
R/W
EOP
EOP
R/W
BRUNSWICK
TIMBER, LLC
D.B. 1674, PG. 1326
M.C. 2, PG. 145
Ev2.2IS R/W
EOP
N.C.S.R 31 T6 --- EOP
+
60 R/Wpug SHALLOTTE DD

Appendix I
Credit Release Schedule
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

The schedules below list the updated credit release schedules for stream and wetland mitigation projects
developed by bank and ILF sites in North Carolina:
Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Wetlands
Credit
Release
Milestone
Release Activity
Banks
ILF/NCDMS
Interim
Release
Total
Released
Interim
Release
Total
Released
1
Site Establishment (includes all required criteria
stated above)
15%
15%
0%
0%
2
Completion of all initial physical and biological
improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation
Plan
15%
30%
30%
30%
3
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that
interim performance standards have been met
10%
40%
10%
40%
4
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that
interim performance standards have been met
°
10 /°
°
50 /°
°
10 /°
°
50 /°
5
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that
interim performance standards have been met
15%
65%
15%
65%
6*Year
4 monitoring report demonstrates that
interim performance standards have been met
5%
70%
5%
70%
7
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that
interim performance standards have been met
°
15 /°
°
85 /°
°
15 /°
°
85 /°
8
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that
interim performance standards have been met
°
5 /°
°
90 /°
°
5 /°
°
90 /°
9
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that
performance standards have been met
10%
100%
10%
100%
*Please note that vegetation plot data may not be required with monitoring reports submitted during
these monitoring years unless otherwise required by the Mitigation Plan or directed by the NCIRT.
30

Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Streams
Credit
Release
Milestone
Release Activity
Banks
ILF/NCDMS
Interim
Release
Total
Released
Interim
Release
Total
Released
1
Site Establishment (includes all required criteria
stated above)
15%
15%
0%
0%
2
Completion of all initial physical and biological
improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation
Plan
15%
30%
30%
30%
3
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that
channels are stable and interim performance
standards have been met
10%
40%
10%
40%
4
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that
channels are stable and interim performance
standards have been met
10%
50%
10%
50%
5
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that
channels are stable and interim performance
standards have been met
10%
60%
10%
60%
6`
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that
channels are stable and interim performance
standards have been met
5%
(750�0 .)
5%
(750//°*)
7
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that
channels are stable and interim performance
standards have been met
10%
(850,0 *)
10%
(85°/0 *)
8`
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that
channels are stable and interim performance
standards have been met
5%
°
(90°�0 .)
5%
°
(90°/0 .)
9
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that
channels are stable, performance standards
have been met
10%
(100%")
10%
(100%")
*Please note that vegetation data may not be required with monitoring reports submitted during these monitoring
years unless otherwise required by the Mitigation Plan or directed by the NCIRT.
**10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
31

Appendix J
Maintenance Plan
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

Maintenance Plan
The Site shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the site shall be conducted a
minimum of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until performance
standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine
maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site
construction and may include the following:
Component/Feature
Maintenance through project close-out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include securing of loose
coir matting and supplemental installations of live stakes and other target
vegetation along the channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain flows
intercept the channel may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and
head -cutting.
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may
include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive
plant species shall be controlled by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any
vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be performed in
accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Beaver
Beaver and associated dams are to be removed as they colonize and until the
project is closed.
Site Boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between
the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by
fence, marker, bollard, post, tree- blazing, or other means as allowed by site
conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed,
damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis.

Appendix K
IRT Site Visit Notes
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

CLEAR WATER MITIGATION SOLUTIONS
May 28, 2020
MEETING MINUTES
COOL RUN - Post Contract IRT Site Visit
Brunswick County
Lumber 03040207
DMS Project No. 100142
RFP No. 16-20190201
Site Visit Date: 05/19/2020
On May 19, 2020 the regulatory agencies, NCDMS staff, and members of the Clearwater Mitigation
Solutions team convened, on -site, at 10:45am to review the 25.15- acre proposed Cool Run DMS
mitigation site. Below is a list of attendees and general site visit notes.
Attendees:
NC WRC Travis Wilson
USACE Todd Tugwell
NCDWR Mac Haupt
NCDWR Erin Davis
NC DMS Jeremiah Dow
Clearwater Kevin Yates
Axiom Grant Lewis
LMG Wes Fryar
Site Visit Notes:
During walk of west side of project, discussion was had regarding the rehabilitation wetlands and
how to justify the 1.5:1 credit ratio. Justification for rehab was improved hydroperiod and
planting desirable native canopy vegetation. IRT stressed that pre -construction groundwater
gauge data will be important to demonstrate an improved hydroperiod.
• At the north end of the project strategies were discussed to reduce the amount of P2
restoration on Cool Run as much as is feasible by raising the stream bed in the non-credit
generating north end of the project. IRT understood that the extent of P2 was a conservative
estimate in the technical proposal and would change moving forward. A topographic survey is
needed to more accurately assess the amount of P2 that will be required.
• On the east side of project, the IRT asked about how rehab was being achieved. Response
was that hydrology will be improved in part by filling hill slope toe ditch and directing drainage to
the floodplain. IRT again stressed the importance of demonstrating hydrologic improvement in
monitoring versus pre -construction data.
• Also, a discussion was had regarding filling of existing channel and remaining vernal pool
depths. The vernal pools need to be shallow enough so that they are seasonally dry and do not stay
inundated.
• Todd pointed out that UT1 could potentially be constructed as a single thread channel, rather
than a threaded channel.
Wrap up discussion:
Erin
• JD will be important for determining more precise wetland boundaries.
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
919-624-6901
[e-mail]
Page 1

CLEARWATER MITIGATION SOLUTIONS 6 Cool Run IRT Meeting Minutes
• Pre -construction groundwater gauge data will be important to justify uplift on
rehabilitation/re-establishment wetland areas.
• Requested a detailed soils report that contains a map of all soil pits and representative
profiles.
• Stressed need for detailed discussion in the mit plan for monitoring vegetation due to uplift
being heavily tied to vegetation.
• Given the amount of sweet gum/red maple/pine (undesirable species) incorporate an
active adaptive management plan for thinning/control into the mitigation plan.
• Inquired about adding a buffer on the wetland areas adjacent to agricultural fields,
specifically the NW part of the project.
Todd
• Echoed Erin that the JD will be important.
• Make sure we understand what the performance standards and monitoring requirements will
be and tie them to demonstrating uplift.
• Discussed the wetland enhancement areas and thought the 3:1 credit ratio was appropriate.
• Detail the functional uplift for enhancement areas and provide explanation for the ratios
proposed.
• Stressed that there will be strict veg monitoring requirements, i.e., no sweet gum counting
toward success.
• Requested a well -marked boundary adjacent to ag field to prevent encroachment.
• Wants to see a detailed target vegetation community discussion in the mit plan that is tailored
to this specific site. (i.e., no generic copy/paste language). Explain the vegetative uplift and how
that will enhance the site.
• Todd asked about what kind of bed habitat in the relic channel is proposed for the stream.
Grant responded that there would be a lot of brush and typical structures.
Travis
• Stressed that Brunswick County natural vegetation regeneration can come on extremely
strong and fast and be very difficult to control, affecting planted species. Because of this he
stressed the importance of the adaptive management plan in the mit plan.
Kevin
• Stated site prep will likely include hydroxing, controlled burning, and pre-
emergent/herbicidal treatment.
e.,„:-,. -":
Kevin Yates
Principal
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Pl.
Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901
Page 2

Appendix L
Construction Plans
Mitigation Plan (Project No. 100142) Appendices
Cool Run Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
Brunswick County, North Carolina March 2022

09/08/99
O
0
L
C- C
NI
C T
0 G CD
NEC>
— L
r1 oHt
O_c
NU•—i
W
L
VICINITY MAP
Not to Scale
START -CR-
STA 3+66
UTl
PSH
ST ART -UT I -
COOL RUN SITE
DWR Project # 20200712
Corps Action ID # SAW-2020-01428
DMS Project # 100142
DMS Contract # 20190201-01
Lumber Cataloging Unit # 03040207
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
LATITUDE: 33.970753
LONGITUDE: -78.471379 (WGS84)
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0
50
100
PLANS
50 25 0 50
100
11 PROFILE (VERTICAL)
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
COOL RUN SITE
LOCATION: BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TYPE OF WORK: STREAM RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT (CLEARING,
GRUBBING, GRADING, EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING)
DMS SUBMITTAL PLANS
END -CR-
STA 23+85
Cool
\\
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE: 22.13 AC
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -CR- = 2019
PROPOSED LENGTH OF -UT 1-= 601
—
TOTAL STREAM LENGTHS (LF) = 2620
RESTORATION LEVEL
STREAM (linear footage)
RIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)
NONRIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)
RESTORATION (Ratio 1:1)
2028
14.108(Reestablishment)
0.000
RESTORATION (Ratio 1.5:1)
592
1.433 (Rehabilitation)
0.000
ENHANCEMENT
0
1.201
0.000
PRESERVATION
0
0.492
CREATION
0
0.351
TOTALS
2620
17.234
0.000
MITIGATION UNITS
2422.667 ISMU
15.512 RIPARIAN WMUs
NONRIPARIAN WMUs
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27603
GRANT LEWIS
PROJECT DESIGNER
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
COOL RUN SITE
1
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NUMBER SHEET
CO1 Title Sheet
CO1A Symbology
CO2 Typicals
CO2A THRU CO2K Details
CO3 Control Points and Location Map
CO3A Easement
C04 THRU C17 Plan and Profile Sheets
E02 THRU E02C Erosion Control Notes
E03 THRU E03D Erosion Control Details
E03E Haul Roads
E04 THRU E06 Erosion Control Plans
P01 Planting Plan
'Pa
Prepared in the Office of:
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
■ 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
111 RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27606
TEL [phone]
�,��� ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. C-890
CLEARWA: ER MITIGATION
SOL DNS 1
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place
Raleigh, NC 27609
KEVIN YATES
SITE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
JOSHUA G. DALTON, P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER
Net
DATE:

BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY:
State Line
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Computed Property Corner
Property Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line
Proposed Fence Gate
0
EIP
ECM
X X X
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary
Proposed Wetland Boundary
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
Existing Historic Property Boundary
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
Sign
Well
Small Mine
Foundation
Area Outline
Cemetery
Building
School
Church
Dam
HYDROLOGY.-
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir 7
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
Spring
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
EAB
EPB
HPB
0
0
0
t
Js
BZ 1
BZ 2
» >>
G SON
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL:
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Primary Horiz Control Point
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
Exist Permanent Easment Pin and Cap
New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap
Vertical Benchmark
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
New Right of Way Line
New Right of Way Line with Pin and Cap
New Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite R/W Marker
New Control of Access Line with
Concrete C/A Marker
Existing Control of Access
New Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
New Conservation Easement
New Temporary Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
New Permanent Utility Easement
New Temporary Utility Easement
New Aerial Utility Easement
m
C) 0
® O
0
(A,,
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb —
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
Proposed Curb Ramp
Existing Metal Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Cable Guiderail
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION:
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
Orchard
Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
♦ Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
0 Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall —
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
E
CE
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
C
F
cR
TTTT
n n n
ED
CA CA CA 4
Vineyard
CONC
CONC WW
/ CONC HW \
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES:
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
>—
OO
CB
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H—Frame Pole
U/G Power Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Water Valve
SS Forced Main Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U,G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
b AG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U,G Test Hole LOS A (S.U.E.*)
© Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
Water Hydrant
U/G Water Line
U/G Water Line
U/G Water Line
LOS B (S.U.E*)
LOS C (S.U.E*)
LOS D (S.U.E*)
Above Ground Water Line
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
f
0
0
A/C water
U/G Gas Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Gas Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
A/G Gas
OO
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
A/G Sanitary Sewer
SS Forced Main Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
FSS
Riffle Rip Rap
Log Vane
Log Cross Vane
Step Pool Structure
Stream Plug
FSS
•
O
(us7 )
AATUR
E.O.I.
r.,001,p6A,B8S,0o C�oo
Yon�Yon°�on°Yo���
Floodplain Interceptor
Proposed Fence
Limits of Disturbance
Begin
End
9A����/ Ll /..
�ll �i�/Ti_�llll
— LOD —
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
o
,1;'
cD
CD
CO
w
0
w
Q
c_r
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
SYMBOLOGY
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH COIA
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
COLA

POOL
N
4 WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
BOTTOM OF
CHANNEL
GLIDE
RIFFLE
POOL
RUN
GLIDE
RIFFLE
POOL -TO -POOL SPACING (ft.)
(VARIES - SEE NOTE 1)
TYPICAL CHANNEL PROFILE
NOTES:
1. POOL -TO -POOL SPACING IS MEASURED FROM
CENTER OF POOL BEND TO CENTER OF POOL BEND.
TAIL OF
RIFFLE
DESIGN
CHANNEL
0
POOL LENGTH
0
R1
% - R 1
O4j�F
TYPICAL CHANNEL PLAN VIEW
CHANNEL PLAN VIEW NOTES:
HEAD OF
RIFFLE
TAIL OF + R2
RIFFLE
HR2
FLOW
POOL LENGTH
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT THE CHANNEL ALIGNMENT BY LOCATING
THE RADII AND SCRIBING THE CENTER LINE FOR EACH POOL BEND. THE
CONNECTING TANGENT SECTIONS SHALL COMPLETE THE LAYOUT OF THE CHANNEL.
2. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF THE ALIGNMENT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SAVE TREES
OR AVOID OBSTACLES. THE STAKE -OUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL.
15' MIN.
VALLEY
SIDE SLOPE
O ll11
I -I I II I
2:1
BANK SLOPE
PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN
-EllI=IIIFIIIIIIIIIII III -III
-11 E11111 111 11 E11111 11111111 F111=111111
IIIIIEIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIFIE111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II=
W bkf
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
MAX. 1:1 SLOPE
Wpm!
COIR FIBER
EROSION
CONTROL MATTING
SEE NOTE 4
VARIES 2
Wthal>
TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION
CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM CHANNEL AND FLOODPLAIN SHALL BE
USED TO BACKFILL EXISTING CHANNEL.
2. BANK PROTECTION SHALL CONSIST OF NATURAL COIR FIBER MATTING.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY BED MATERIAL FOR THE ENTIRE BED
LENGTH OF EACH RIFFLE SECTION.
LIVE WILLOW
STAKES
PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN
LIVE WILLOW
STAKES
PROPOSED
FLOODPLAIN
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Cross Section Dimensions
Stream Name Stationing W bkf (ft) W bot (ft) D riff (ft) D thal (ft) D pool (ft) W pool (ft) W thal (ft)
CR UP 1* 3+59 to 9+57 14.1 10.1 0.9 0.1 1.3 18.4 1.0
CR UP 2 9+57to 13+89.5 14.1 10.1 0.9 0.1 1.3 18.4 1.0
CR Down 13+89.5 to 23+85 15.0 11.0 0.9 0.1 1.3 19.5 1.0
UT1-1* 4+62 to 5+97 5.8 3.8 0.4 0.1 0.7 7.5 1.0
UT1-2 5+97 to 10+63 5.8 3.8 0.4 0.1 0.7 7.5 1.0
* CR UP 1 AND UT1-1:
- NO CHANGES IN THE CHANNEL DESIGNS.
- PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN WIDTHS VERY AND VALLEY SIDE SLOPES ARE 5:1.
- WIDTHS ARE BASED ON FLOODPLAIN BENCH DESIGN SHOWN ON PLANS (LIMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION), USING THE 5:1 SLOPE TO THE DESIGN Wbkf ELEVATION.
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
O
CO
L.LI
f=1
LIJ
•_
c
CO
O�
KO;'
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
TYPICALS
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CO2
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
CO2

EXISTING
GROUND—)
L
BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED
WITH #57 STONE AND
CLASS'A' RIP RAP / NATIVE
CHANNEL MATERIAL
PLAN VIEW
LOG CROSS VANE
SCALE:NTS
TOP OF BANK
HEADER LOG (BANKFULL)
COIR LOG
POOL
STREAMBED
ELEVATION
SECTION B-B
FILTER FABRIC
—LOG SILL
—FILTER FABRIC
NOTES:
1. HEADER AND FOOTER LOGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18"
DIAMETER AND SHALL BE A HARDWOOD SPECIES.
(FOOTER LOG MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH PINE)
2. A DOUBLE FOOTER LOG MAY BE REQUIRED IN SAND BED
STREAMS.
3. ALL STONES ARE TO BE STRUCTURE STONES.
4. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE
OF THE STRUCTURE TO PREVENT WASHOUT OF SEDIMENT
THROUGH LOG GAPS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND
FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTER TO THE FINISHED GRADE
ELEVATION AND SHALL BE PLACED THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE
STRUCTURE.
5. PERPENDICULAR ROOTWAD LOGS ARE REQUIRED IF THE LOG
VANE ARM DOES NOT HAVE A ROOTBALL TO TIE INTO THE BANK.
HEADER LOG
COIR LOG
CLASS 'A' RIP RAP /
NATIVE CHANNEL
MATERIAL
#57 STONE / NATIVE
EXISTING CHANNEL MATERIAL
rGROUND
FILTER FABRIC
FOOTER LOG
FILTER
FABRIC
FLOW
FOOTER LOG
SECTION A -A
REACH
ARM LENGTH (FT.)
CHANNEL DEPTH (FT.)
Cool Run
11
0.9 - 1.3
UT 1
6
0.5 - 0.7
SCOUR
POOL
TOP OF BANK
(BANKFULL)
STREAMBED
ELEVATION
A
CHANNEL
BANK
LARGE
STONE
SCOUR
HOLE
NOTE:
FILTER FABRIC TOED IN AND DRAPED
ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF LOG VANE
PRIOR TO BACKFILL.
TOP OF BANK
LARGE
STONE
Footer Log
TOP OF BANK
BANKFULL
Footer Log
PLAN VIEW
SCALE: N.T.S.
FILTER
FABRIC
CHANNEL
\ram BANK
LOG VANE
FILTER
FABRIC
- LARGE
STONE
LOG VANE
BANKFULL
LARGE
STONE
/I I-
-III—
BOTTOM OF
HWEll CHANNEL
CROSS-SECTION A -A
SCALE: N.T.S.
FLOW
BOTTOM OF CHANNEL
>
FILTER
FABRIC
PROFILE B-B
SCALE: N.T.S.
- - t
10-15'
LARGE
STONE
-J
HEADER LOG Footer Log
NOTE:
FILTER FABRIC TOED IN AND DRAPED
ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF LOG VANE
PRIOR TO BACKFILL.
TYPICAL LOG VANE
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
af
CD
C7
C/3
LJJ
0
LJJ
CD
U)
1
•
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PROJECT n
122-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CO2A
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY:
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
CO2A

- WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
LOG SILL -
10' (TYP)
SECTION A -A
4" DROP MAX.
DROP STRUCTURE
18" LOG CROSS VANE
(SEE LOG CROSS VANE DETAIL)
8" CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC -
TYPE 2
STRUCTURE NOTES:
1. FILL CLASS '1' RIP RAP VOIDS WITH CLASS 'A'
RIP RAP/ #57 STONE/ NATIVE CHANNEL MATERIAL MIXTURE.
STEP POOL ENLARGEMENT
HEADER LOG
COIR LOG
CLASS 'A' RIP RAP /
NATIVE CHANNEL
MATERIAL
#57 STONE / NATIVE
CHANNEL MATERIAL
FILTER
FABRIC
OVERLAP FILTER FABRIC
FOOTER LOG
FLOW
TOP OF BANK
(BANKFULL)
STREAMBED
ELEVATION
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
#57 STONE AND
CLASS 'A' RIP RAP/
NATIVE CHANNEL
MATERIAL
PLAN VIEW
Wbkf = SEE TABLE
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
4" DROP MAX.
•
ei
FILTER FABRIC
LOG SILL
-FILTER FABRIC
HEADER LOG
FLOW
z
tafirM
� v
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
CROSS-SECTION DIMENSIONS
REACH
Wbkf (ft.)
Distance
between Drops
COOL RUN
15.0
8.5'
STORMWATER
WETLAND
GRADE BASE OF
WETLAND AT 15 TO 1
SIDE SLOPE AT 8 TO 1
PROFILE
SECTION A -A
STORMWATER
WETLAND
CLASS 'A'
RIP RAP OUTLET
DEEP POOL
MAX DEPTH 12 INCHES
P
MARSH TREATMENT AREA
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE1-111-111
r
DITCH OR
-- — PIPE INLET
a Uco% oa
%Uo UolyUo
• oao8o 000�8goo %
7
CLASS 'B'
_ — — — — —— -- RIP RAP BASIN
(FOR PIPE OUTLET ONLY)
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
CD
co
LJJ
LJJ
Q
c
U)
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
J
H
W
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CO2B
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BYr
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
CO2B

0{y
BACKFILL
EXISTING
CHANNEL
EXTEND CHANNEL BLOCK
MIN. OF 2' BEYOND LIMITS
OF EXISTING CHANNEL
PLAN VIEW
NEW STREAMBANK SHALL
BE TREATED AS
SPECIFIED IN PLANS
EXTEND CHANNEL BLOCK
MIN. OF 2' BEYOND INVERT
OF EXISTING CHANNEL
CHANNEL
INVERT
15' MIN.
LENGTH UNCOMPACTED
BACKFILL
�V" COMPACTED
BACKFILL
FLOW
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
SECTION B-B
STREAM PLUG
NOT TO SCALE
UNCOMPACTED
BACKFILL
5' Min. 10'
SECTION A -A
1.5'
FINISH GRADE
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
IMPERVIOUS SELECT
MATERIAL (SEE PROJECT
SPECIAL PROVISIONS)
NOTES:
1) CHANNEL BLOCK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
2) BLOCK SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN EXISTING
CHANNEL AND PROPOSED CHANNEL.
3) BOTTOM OF BLOCK SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 2' BELOW THE INVERT
OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL.
4) BLOCK SHOULD EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 2' BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THE
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL.
5) INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND SEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING.
6) COMPACT BACKFILL TO EXTENT POSSIBLE OR AT THE DIRECTION OF
THE ENGINEER.
FLOODPLAIN
LIMITS
FLOODPLAIN
LIMITS
PLACEMENT OF
INTERCEPTOR AS
SHOWN ON PLANS
OR AT ENGINEER'S
DIRECTION
PLAN VIEW
6" MIN.
FLOW
3'
MINIMUM
GROUND
SURFACE
BANKFULL
SECTION A -A
WATER
ELEVATION
BANKFULL BENCH/
FLOODPLAIN
PERMANENT SOIL
REINFORCEMENT
MATTING (PSRM)
SECTION B-B
NORMAL
WATER SURFACE
EXTEND PSRM DOWN BANK
SLOPE TO EDGE OF WATER
/V/\V/\<
KEY IN PSRM
A MINIMUM OF 6"
FLOODPLAIN INTERCEPTOR DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
CD
Cr
CD
C7
co
W
0
LLJ
Q
CD
CJJ
�o w
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
u)
-J
a
1-
W
0
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CO2C
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
CO2C

Cool Run Control Points
Pt##
Northing
Easting
Elevation
Type
1
80451.93
2158925.84
52.32
ISS CAP
2
80019.93
2158905.30
55.87
ISS CAP
3
79757.56
2160438.85
48.76
ISS CAP
4
80041.47
2161249.26
57.67
ISS CAP
START -UTI-
SURVEY INFORMATION
EASEMENT PROVIDED BY:
K2 DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
5688 U.S. HIGHWAY 70 EAST
GOLDSBORO, NC 27534
STA 4f62 \
ISS CAP #I
ISS AP
#2
END -CR-
END -UTI- STA 237L85
250' 125' 0
L 1 1
250' 500'
SCALE: 1"=500'
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
O
c
CD
CD
w
0
w
Q
CD
co
1I
■
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
CONTROL POINTS
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN P5H CO3
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
CO3

START -UTI- u
STA 4f62
DT1
UT1
GE
END -CR-
END -UTI- STA 237L85
STA 107L63
\\Oj
N,�iej)
SURVEY INFORMATION
EASEMENT PROVIDED BY:
K2 DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
5688 U.S. HIGHWAY 70 EAST
GOLDSBORO, NC 27534
250' 125' 0
L 1 1
250' 500'
SCALE: 1"=500'
Qi
c3r-4o
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PE ACCESS EASEMENT
\gar r,J
w
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
cc
cD
CD
w
0
w
Q
CD
co
11
■
•
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CO3A
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
CO3A

7
-D
CC
o�
0
70
3D
UT1
START
STA 3 +66
CR
DT1
UT1
CE
CE
STA l0 +63
a
CE
CR
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Cool gun
END —CR—
-47":"3"1111111' IA \
STA 23+85
i
\ %
DENOTES WETLANDS
REESTABLISHMENT
DENOTES WETLAND
ENHANCEMENT
DENOTES WETLAND
REHABILITATION
DENOTES WETLAND
PRESERVATION
100' 50' 0
100'
200'
SCALE: 1"=200'
E THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SD(; IS NOT PE
0 21I22 SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, F.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF 1T:
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
WETLAND REESTABLISHMENT
PROJECT :
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CO3B
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY:
JGD
REV IS IONS:
SHEET NO.
CO3B

0
_(-
w
I
P I -_s5 4C-'
y IJEFF0RD '`
I , _I D.B. 3906, FIG, 24 5-5 s
5 _ s/ __
s 1,/
5 1
s-
____--,55'
53/) ' r /
-J I IDS, -(
-I I
<�'�_���
I
r�),
)
5 �7
1
-rS ANLEY
PG. 1286
,/, - yJ I
FRINK
D.B. 3348, PG. 1120 /
P.B. 12, PG 25 -2
_50
I.---
\c� 5 os
52; I
I 55' / �\\,
.>>J
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
SIGN GROUP. P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED.
0 2I22 SUNGATE
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH C04
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY:
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
C04

v - — y 5`T LEY -Z (mk:), m m� �`�
f' m L -•%\
9 so
\ o S�S��
--
g -\ '-
v
v v
o+oo/
=
.cc
W
501
/
/ EASEMENT LINE,' /e
/
/ / -
—wa /
I t J
, l J r
/ s/ / ,
3
LIMITS OF GRADING
- STA 4+81
BENCH
START RESTORATION LEVATION 43.60
�V A���� UPSTREAM
---- STA 3+59 -CR- PROP
I I
I
/ S JxdlAg���
+0 �1 1 9 _
0 96
/-CR_,_46 i 43.
�� / i
I i / _ -J , / FRINK
/
D.B. 3348, PG, 1120
�m / / e / P.B. 12, PG 25
�J m
i
r
IV I/ /S 1
SPECIALFLOODPLAIN BENCH/
;tSIDESLOPE_`
EASEMENT LINE
STANLEY
D,B. 1463, PG,
STA3+80'-
BENCH
E LEJA O N=43.66
- -PROPv BANK
SPECYAL FLOODPLAIN BEN
�� / � — — /LIMITS OF 44DING
PROP CROSS
VANE (TYP)
H
H
25' 12.5' 0
MW
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
-CR-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
CROSS VANE
81,219.57
2,160,510 60
42.70
50
AT
E
XST OR
PR
P
TH
OUND
ALWEG
45
110
rr
0
1-
rnw
O
45
i
40
�
ao
Qum
Lu
ea
on
ILL
..p
Lr
LJ
z
w
7
40
35
1
S
A
Rh
30
3
S
TA
OR
3
Al
6
E
6-
L=
O
C
4
N
R
2
PROP
TH
A
LWEG
U
LLJ
5
7
30
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
CD
w
0
w
Q
c_7
it o
•
*•
=;
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT n
1221-210
5
DRAWING NAME
COOL RUN P
5
H C05
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BYr
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
COS

ANLE—Y.
,D.B. 1463, PG. 7/39
EASEMENT LINE
STA 6+39
BENCH
ELEVATION=43.51
SPECIAL
FLOODPLAIN BENCH
:1 SIDESLOPE
LIMITS OF GRADING'
STREAM PLUG
PROP CROSS VANE (TYP)
STA 7+07
BENCH ELEVATION=43.47
PROP BANKFULL\
P,R6P BANKFULL
\ \
STA 7+35 \
BENCH
ELEVATION=43.41
LI
-CR-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
CROSS VANE
81,105.83
2,160,417.05
42.61
CROSS VANE
81,049.16
2,160,343.57
42.51
FILL IN EXISTING
CHANNEL
i
BENCH
i
i
FRINK
D.B. 3348, PC II-20
ITS OF GRADING
SP
NNBB NtH
5� SIDESLOPE
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C13
/
START RES/fORATION
UPSTREAM 2
/STA 9+57 -CR-
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET CI4
25' 12.5' 0
25' 50'
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
c°
STREAM
PLUG
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
50
5
9
EST
AT
F
CR UN
R P T HA WE
C
5
9
50
45
40
35
9
s
z
9
w
9
W
4.6
2
y
9
c
dn8
LL�w
,r u
p
9
1-
9
`8
a
w
w
r;
'F
els
J00
5
9
v
1
9
9
8
LL
a
a
—4
aw
rok
LL
9
9
9
PRO
P
T
AL
MEG
45
40
35
30
30
5+00
5+50 6+00
6+50 7+00
7+50
8+00 8+50
9+00
9+50 10+00
SENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CO
a
0
cD
CD
up
w
w
Q
cr
up
1I
■
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT
1221-21015
DRAW I NG NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CO6
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REV IEWED BY,
JGD
REV IS IONS:
SHEET NO.

-CR- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
CROSS VANE
80,902.84
2,160,112.59
41.85
LOG VANE
80,817.46
2,160,131.07
41.55
CROSS VANE
80,608.66
2,160,078.76
41.02
45
40
II
PROP LOG
VANE (TYP)
\ —
f
PROP BANKFULL
LIMITS OF GRADING
FILL IN EXISTING
CHANNEL
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C14
LIMITS OF G
-UTI- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
CROSS VANE
80,714.46
2,159,990.89
41.96
CROSS VANE
80,695.83
2,160,005.23
41.77
CROSS VANE
80,669.00
2,160,040.08
41.61
CROSS VANE
80,639.68
2,160,076.23
41.34
wt.
FRINK
D.B. 3348, PG. 1120
P.B. 12, PG 25
PROP BANKFULL
START RESTORATION
DOWNSTREAM
STA 13+61 -CR-
0d
—_�— PROP J�
BANKFULL
25' 12.5' 0
L 1
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
£8 OVN
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
q
PROPvGROSS
VAN(TYP) -
vv� v -
14,00 / /
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
00
C08 C
PR9P--
,B NKFUL .CJ<
�1WE (�iRESTORATION
Si- 0+63 -UT1-
ST 13+79 -CR-
FILL IN EXISTING 6,
CHANNEL
LIMITS OF GRADING ,
'PROP BANKFULL
/ STREAM PLUG
EXST GROUND
AT PROP THALWEG
f
51��5
EXIT GROUND
/ AT PR P THALWEG
PR F THAL'YEG
C,F,t
ISM
R
- M'
EMI
na "v
a F
i
i
U
51
LL
UT
PR• i
.11
ME
SIR
S
•1
ST 1
1
STA
gc
8 14
L41 1
19 20 86
-,v 1 -44.9 ST.41
E 4,, \ E 4 .
STA 10tZ3.'6 $1fP
EL 41.94 \ FL 1
E
L 21 11
+46
-9
4
4-
STA 1047 .9,
__4 .4
S Al +23.61
-L4 .I
1"+5
ND =cEQTCRATI N I
STA 1 +53 UT
EL=11 2
E
4
45
40
10+00
10+50
11+00 11+50
12+00 12+50
3+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00
SENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CO
a
0
CD
CD
C/3
w
a
w
Q
CD
11
: Ai
_''1
•
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH C07
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
CO/

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET CI5
LIMITS OF GRADING
PROP LOG
VANE (TYP)
FRINK\ 1.
D.B. 3348, PG. '20
P.B. I2, PG 25 \
PROP BANKFULL
25' 12.5' 0
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET CI6
----.� J
"S i -43f-
T
PROP CROSS
VANE (TYP)
1 ,
-C ,
°° \ = � A
---/ // �� \
CC
-72, / / / 1 m
17+90 v \ O
N -w
� k ����--- Zb i N wal
o _Ii �
25' 50'
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
-CR- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
LOG VAN E
80,505.55
2,160,154.69
40.76
CROSS VANE
80,248.91
2,160,253.62
40.30
w
' PROP BANKFULL
FILL IN, -EXISTING
LIMITS OF GRADING
CHANNEL
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C17
SCALE: 1"= 50'
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
50
45
40
35
LJ
uwd
EX
ST
AT
0
1-
R
I201
P
T
1
N
H
D
A
LW =
N
G
m
c5
0
o_p„,
LL
0
45
4
z
✓1
JJ
111
a
17)
P
ROP
T
H
A
LWE
5
w
ti
z
Lr
Li
0
5
30
30
15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
CD
CD
CO
w
0
w
Q
C_7
1*
• ?•ij
•
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT n
1221-210
5
DRAWING NAME
COOL RUN P
5
H C08
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
C08

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET CI6
25' 12.5' 0 25' 50'
_ �-
\ PRINK
N �� D.B. 3348, PG. 1120 /
42' P� `/ \ P.B. 12, PG 25 / /' /' /'
�� Q \ poi ' ' N\
1
PROP LOG �� �� II
VANE (TYP)
/ \ /
-�PROP BAN' fit-, ;'�� / (1
/ 0� '�� �// Nsi' I % END RESTO .40�1�
4 �� / / e STA 23+85 - /
2
3 I 1 /
/m / /
L \
�_ _- — LIMITS F RADIf�G
\ �1 1 �� / /
\`v / cpao \ �i i L —
/
\ \ ...(2}:„,,,,, .
/4/ / \ �' y 22rt0o 1 i / ��!
� � -CRC ---• ,° � ��
i t 1-' ' lb- 1 ' 1- 4--4.;;AP 44"*"'
I
_Afteepef
-- 1 - .03lye'
PROP �ANKFULL <�,��i`!`, DROP
/ BEGIN DROP STR CTURE '9 ®'
/ / , ®�,STRUCTURE
l a,40top
/4�-`•'' LIMITS OF GRADING f�
�'a>.6-�I.A:11051011, I
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
CHANNEL
ILL IN EXISTING
EASEMENT LINE
C- SRCUE LCTOS
TYE NRHNATNrp Eeain
OAE 8,8.0 21024500
OAE 8,2.8 21013698
OF DOTUTR9932,6,0.9 3.5 OTM ORP SRCU9956,6,8.5 3.1
EASEMENT LINE
SCALE: 1"= 50'
N
\
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C17
ETT o
6, PG. 3
F
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
50
45
35
EX
T
GRO
U
ND
AT
PRO
P
T
Irl
A
LWE
L
0
45
W
LJ
z
4
N
*1s
in
H
8
4
aJ
4
N a
MJS
oo
co
4
s-
LLI
L L J
co
4
m
PK
O
4
I HA
vas
1.10
4
k
END
RES
/ S
EL-3! BTA 24+
T
S
0
RA
_(; -
T
10
LWE
G
40
5
30
30
9+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
o✓
CD
w
0
w
Q
C_7
�o _w
4
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN P5H C09
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
CO9

t5
C�� r` 4
r 49 Tr'
F-
J
- 0
n
/ f j ` `YT�9
r S , < r--
49` r ra +��=.v
tlP
_UTI- -\:1
-47:127_11-1-12:_iL6� ��1-1,\::::'421 v�� A 1 �ti �� 'S
� �� \ 0 �-11r
, j voter _ PF:Of�, ANKFULL
SP�CI�L FLOODPLAII BENCH
49� ��T 8 � ,����.� � 1 �� /i t��z7
r /� i, / / 1 i >,
�>,, �'�'� 9r9� ����r r 1 �Y LIMITS, OFGRADIN�Sr
v• �� �� v1 48' 1 it
�� �� 1<SIDESLOP
j»)�`� ` b/ �� �, PROP ,CROSS
vY �� 1 1 VANE`�TYP)
6��,r<> 1 / l
1
T
G--,
//
r
//-6
rf
4
cv /(J /0/-7 c )
7f / o /
,,-\ I 7.--/Iii),-
f /
/ 1
1 /
1 /
1 1
/ 1
t
V-1
u u 5C . '1,"0L5
EASEMENTI4NE
LIMITS OF GRADI-No
v STA 4+91
BENCH ELEVATION' 44.0
_Ti
5:1 SIDESLOPE
SPECIAL FLOODPLAIN BENCH
PRO /BANKFULL
,J START RESTORATION
STA 4+62 -UT1-
9
3+p0 ,� 12'
•
•
\
25' 12.5' 0
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
-UT1-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
CROSS VANE
80,878.22
2,159,664.09
42.70
U
55
5
50
45
40
35
r
ti
\
ti
n
do
S
T
A
R
T
AT
P
E
LWLV
rtl-
•
43,
Si
1161
EST RA
11I�C 577G ��M�
X
RO
EL '3,6
T CR011 D
' THAL
Ju x
6
7
U
0
A5
40
5
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CIO
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BYr
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
CIO

-UTI- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Prop Elevation
CROSS VANE
80,832.33
2,159,696.58
43.56
CROSS VANE
80,822.53
2,159,715.69
43.55
CROSS VANE
80,807.29
2,159,727.89
43.53
CROSS VANE
80,803.67
2,159,804.84
43.29
CROSS VANE
80,806.11
2,159,824.72
43.16
CROSS VANE
80,807.00
2,159,855.86
43.09
CROSS VANE
80,791.95
2,159,868.49
42.94
CROSS VANE
80,786.47
2,159,889.13
42.69
CROSS VANE
80,770.82
2,159,923.61
42.40
LOG VANE
80,723.08
2,159,967.68
42.16
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
TA5+12
') BENCH
ELEVATION=43.98 ,-
-7 �.
c
C'� OO MARSH TREAT AREA
DT1
—
EASEMENTLINE li
1
1 14
LIMITS OF GR1\4DING
i
PROP CROSS I
VAN' (TYP)
O
7
i
144
II b�
114
144
0
MW
—PRQP—L36G
VANE (TYP)
STA 5+97 LIMITS OF GRADING
BENCH PROP BANKFULL MW O
3 -DT ELEVATION=433.93
3�FRINK STA 5+65— 9�
DAB, 3��89 PG. 1120BENIc H
B.B. 12, PG 25 ELEVATION=43.96
SPECIAL FLOODPLAIN BENCH
5:1 SIDESLOPE
STA 3+13
5+50 -UT1-
EASEMENT LINE
3J -
25' 12.5' 0
U i
25' 50'
FILL IN
EXISTING
CHANNEL
MARSH7tkEATMENT
AREA
PROP
BANKFULL
43—
4J
SCALE: 1"= 50'
4
0
1
5
I
HL
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
45
40
1-
1
1
1+
ks
G
RO
i
1
—5
3
3
5
0
5+00
5
E
s
S
5+50
N
D
h
A
3
5
5
13 U
150 U
11 .
T'
6+00
0
5
EX
!II
THA
Jap 11
o
LiJ
UND
WEG
6+50
7+00
7+50
8+00
8+50
•
9+00
45
0
35
SENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CO
cce
CD
CI
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT
1221-21015
DRAW I NG NAME:
COOL RUN 1.51-1 C11
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REV IEWED BY,
JGD
REV IS IONS:
SHEET NO.

1
/� l Al eA \ V AA \V A A\
Ate AAA(\4)1� A \\
f\ R.� A\
Av
�l VA
-, � FRINK
�> D.B. 3348, PG, 1120
J ;,);7„,\\ P,B. I2, PG 25
r
v
Voo
44 % /
"u l \ A /A 1 ) 4/ AV lA / i
�� A r� A/`'-,� -- 1,----/ 1�-, lV1 \4'—�� A Al q� i�
��/��i �A>�\ VAT q
� to '
r? �� / y /
25' 12.5' 0
i
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
Ass \ �Q
V 1 v
T
—A ,
h A
\
0,0
> 1 vA4
I—1
-
A A ry v�
v (v _DVv47,
v A v��� 0+00 _ \.
v t ov v _DV' ---- C -. >
<�l
cDY
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
fJ
T
50
EXS
T
G
RO
0
45
L
2
45
40
40
35
5
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
CD
co
W
0
W
Q
c
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLAN AND PROFILE
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH C12
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BYr
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
C12

/
(
<
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
SEE SHEETN C05
,9
V >
\ vv
I
� \\ / /A
/ I I \ v /
�� /
/ \
�_—<-
r' / 45' / / //
/ �' /
( N Sb /
1 ` \ — �� �
A5/ (1
/
/ ( �,)
1
L/ '\ L A
��e
/✓ L/ \ \I /
I
f ;
_I-
) 4 /1EASEMEI/VT INE
L—�
�-v
/ � / S / 1
I 1 I P 1 1 1
1 / 31E 1 1 B/N.
( f v_t��lIS*G'
�� �� �\ ��I �,�f
1 ,� C ( J A (' //`" - �" i�� �j TUB
I \ z�l 'V l J V — < / �ti -N
/ L�� J \ 2 / �/ \:��' �/
( 1
AYA ITS J k.D/'
N
N
A�
—
/
/ — J 1
�_/
\
E /� �/ 1
/ / //
FRINK
D.B. 3348, PG. 1120 _---- --
P_B, 12,b2 i --2)_—
/
/
25' 12.5' 0
L 1
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
r
B
«
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET CO6
- m
6 mn
v'-1
V-) = n
m=
37 � mni
/----- 1 --,
Z 1
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
cD
CD
up
w
0
w
Q
c_7
up
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
z
J
0
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH C13
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
C13

\
7
7
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET C06
/ � / ,
M IN
_@ ��
/� / ,���
9V--
� �,J�
3D
�33
09
ao
_-PREN�
6� - D.B. 3348, PG. 1120
P.B. 12, PG 25
3D
____0CEASE ENTLINE
l
7
7
-
7
7
LP
25' 12.5' 0
L 1
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
�L��oS�iJ -JYT. 2 cos
L " cn
Fri
Fri
)
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
CD
CD
C/)
w
0
w
Q
Cr
• I
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
z
J
0
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CN1
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
C14

/s\\ I▪ C vN.
/ I r P / / T
�/ HINSON ;L
<r Dlr. T427, PG. 270
1STANLEY �� I / — 0 i
11
/ /lam— _ /-617
ii
v o�
/
/ v / / v v
/ // / a— _ v
i / J/
V • / //
v v -
9/
/J
\/ I v v v v v
\� / `� —/ �/ ▪ /
/ / / \ / /� \ \ I
/ i /
2-y,I FRINK // / / / )
F D.B. 3348, P/C. 1120 /' �5' /_/ / \i rA
C0 \\\ P.EJ2TPG 25// / / /
6 i ` / /`\ \
co\ I / / / \ 4S
i \ 0 a Is
/ �A
_2� I A
--0 L
� �' \ v
l i A `� / 2 \
\ \ / i �\
N / \
/
V - A
I N v QS
I/ ▪ V 5
/
/ /
MATCHLINE v /45' / I c. ,
SEE SHEET C07
i
i /
25' 12.5' 0
L 1
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
� O £8OVN
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
/
A9TRACT 5 /
M.C. 61, PC,. 90
' BL<51525 '—
� -D,R. 29$75; vPG,4138
v_/0
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
af
cD
CD
CO
w
0
w
Q
c_7
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
Z
J
0
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH C15
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
CIS

5
48-4
C°S
\
v P0N1J
TRACT 5
M.C. 61, PG. 90
,
TRACT
fC61,P,yy,.9�/8
� p
I
v
N
055, ' t _ � 11)R 0 WAY 48 / -,-- ti
1 -v y (45' R7W PAVED/11
4 �PRIV7\TE) v 5,
\
co
N
N
44`
45_
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
5-5
r-
`TRACT/3
Lcy 1NLAv61, PG. 90
2D.B. 2985,.PG. 1138
8
EASEMENTL NA
iI
25' 12.5' 0
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
£8OVN
' / 'v % - i
— n
Ag' \ --4
5/ t -� "-�)1
/
I t
/
I/
I/4
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
D.B. 2279, PG. 1015- _ 1
,` v H16HFIELD COURT
j (40' R PAVED PRIVATE)
/ y PE �M.C.bPG-. 34-/
,
v 4 / v
r
/ FRINK
D.B. 3348, P 1120
P.B. 12, pc 25
c
\
v
,
yFF`T NF
c09
,
__ EASEMENT LINE _-48
4
n
o
m
—45
- - 44 -
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
(D
(D
CO
L.L_I
0
w
Q
C7
CO
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
Z
J
0
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH C16
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
C16

tv— —
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
25' 12.5' 0
L 1
25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
� O £8OVN
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AREAS DERIVED FROM
APPROVED PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
/ , HEFT NF
S��`N.
� MIN�v CO
- v
222_- \ 2
��, 3J 2 %2' - 3D �,
3
z� EASEMENT lAE /I r�
/
FP1NK / ' '
D.B 3 348, PG. 1120 / '
P.B.12, PG 25 / /' /'
/ __
/ / ��
/ z
z
/ z z' / V
/ ' C
/ / v a
/ 1 �,
/ /
/
/ / �' �' ¢v
/ // c— 2 r
�% /
C v
\) i / \-/ / 1 C_ h
/� 7��� ,' /' / ' / /� l-
i
�
�// �, � co
/ �/ z �s \ co
J
i r--'�cv
s // / ( ,- v7 ( 2
�� _fib .r". s C "-' ' _ 2 /� \
077
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
CC
cD
CD
CO
w
0
w
Q
c_7
CO
o
;'
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
z
J
0
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH CI7
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BYr
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
C17

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
Construction Notes:
1. Staging areas, stockpile areas, construction entrances and access roads will be identified and located
according to the Erosion Control Plans and landowner agreements. Variances will be allowed assuming both
the Contractor and Designer verbally agree.
2. A construction entrance (as shown on sheet E03E) from Secondary Road 1315 (Russtown Rd NW) will be
installed for access to CR and UT1 as shown on the Erosion Control Plans.
3. The Contractor will install silt fencing, as noted on the Erosion Control Plans, at applicable staging and
stockpile areas.
4. The proposed stream alignment and structure locations will be staked for each reach (CR and UT1). Staking
will be restricted to riffle elevations only in order to establish and maintain grade for the entire system.
Pools will be excavated once structures are installed.
5. The Contractor will begin stockpiling materials in a designated staging area. General details associated with
all sections include:
a. Sediment bags will be used to filter the groundwater and placed within areas of newly excavated
channel that are offline from the existing flow. These bags will be utilized as the contractor or
designer deem necessary.
b. Temporary and permanent seed mixes, including applicable mulching, will be applied to the
streambanks and disturbed areas at the end of each working day as definable sections are completed.
Erosion control matting will be installed on top of the seed and straw in accordance with the Erosion
Control Construction Sequence.
c. Excavated material that is stockpiled will follow erosion and sediment control guidelines as they
relate to material storage and stockpiling.
d. All remaining disturbed areas are to be seeded and covered according to the Erosion Control
Construction Sequence.
e. Riprap aprons will be constructed to impede any erosion of the channel and streambanks by the
water diverted from the pump -around procedure.
6. Boulders and materials used for stream structures will be delivered through the primary construction
entrance and stockpiled in the appropriate area.
7. This project will require pumping water around the channels during construction. Work will generally
proceed from upstream to downstream.
8. Adjust haul roads and associated silt fence as necessary when permanent stream crossings are installed.
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Construction Sequence
1. The Contractor will excavate the proposed channel and modify portions of the existing channel based on
riffle elevations in sections no greater than 300' in length at a time (except where longer sections are
necessary to maintain constructability) in an upstream to downstream fashion. Impervious dikes will be
installed upstream and downstream of the current work section before work on the section is initiated unless
noted otherwise (see Table 1.-Working Sections below for suggested work section stations and progression).
Water will be diverted around the current work section through the use of a pump and temporary flexible
hose. The current work section will be dewatered using an additional pump and a sediment bag. Work
sections that involve the construction of a confluence of two reaches may require the use of two pump -
around operations. Structures will be installed according to the details presented in the Construction Plans.
Excavate only a portion of the channel that can be completed and stabilized within the same day. All
excavated material will be placed in an appropriate stockpile area. Pools will be established once structures
and channel alignments have been completed locally. Permanent stream crossings will be installed while the
working section containing the crossing has been dewatered.
Grading of some portions of the proposed floodplain may need to be delayed until after work in subsequent
sections has been completed, especially near confluences. Haul roads and temporary silt fence may also
need to be removed before the proposed floodplain can be completed and/or unused existing channel can be
filled.
Table 1. - Working Sections
Order of
Progress
Pump
Station #
Reach
Begin
Station
End
Station
Construction Notes
1
P-1
CR
3+66
6+50
2
P-2
CR
6+50
9+50
3
P-3
CR
9+50
12+50
4
P-4
UT1
4+62
7+00
5
P-5
UT1
7+00
10+00
6
P-6
UT1
10+00
10+62
Operate pump stations P-6and P-7simultaneouslyto
build confluence of CR and UT1.
7
P-7
CR
12+50
14+00
8
P-8
CR
14+00
17+00
9
P-9
CR
17+00
20+00
10
P-10
CR
20+00
22+00
11
P-11
CR
22+00
23+83
Construct Drop Structure.
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
af
cD
CD
w
a
w
Q
C7
o
;'
•
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E02
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E02

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE (CONTINUED)
1. Ponds shall be dewatered prior to dam removal using the following methods:
a. For ponds with an outlet structure, open the outlet structure to dewater the pond at a rate that
does not cause excessive erosion downstream of the dam.
b. For ponds without an outlet structure or that require supplemental drawdown, use a pump and
temporary flexible hose to dewater the pond into the downstream channel A rip rap dissipation
pad shall be used at the outlet of the temporary flexible hose. Dewater at a rate that does not
cause excessive erosion downstream of the discharge point.
2. At the end of each working day, the Contractor will be responsible for the application of seed and straw, as
applicable, to newly established streambanks and disturbed areas. Erosion control matting will be installed
on top of the seed and straw in accordance with the Erosion Control Construction Sequence.
Post -Construction
After all channel work has been completed:
1. All remaining disturbed areas are to be seeded and mulched in accordance with the Erosion Control
Construction Sequence.
2. Live staking can begin on all completed sections of channel (CR and UT1) in accordance with the Planting
Plans.
3. Once channel construction and seeding has been complete, bare -rooted seedlings will be installed.
4. All haul road locations to be restored to pre -construction conditions.
SEEDING SCHEDULE
TEMPORARY HERBACEOUS SEED
Common Name
Scientific Name
Application Rate
Application Dates
Grain Rye A
Secale cereale
120 lbs. per acre
(2.75 lbs. per 1,000 ft2)
August - December
Brown Top Millet B
Panicum ramosum
40 lbs. per acre
(1.0 lbs. per 1,000 ft2)
May — September
German Millet B
Setaria italica
40 lbs. per acre
(0.92 lbs. per 1,000 ft2)
April - August
A Primarily utilized on disturbed or stockpiled areas.
B Primarily utilized near stream channels and streambanks_
SOIL AMENDMENTS
In lieu of a soil test:
Fertilizer
10 — 10 -10
1000 lb./acre
Mulch
Small grain mulch must be applied at a rate of 2 tons/acre to all seeded areas.
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE_
Common Name
Application Rate
Application Dates
Big Bluestem
6 lbs. per acre
December 1 to May 1
Little Bluestem
6 lbs. per acre
December 1 to April 1
Virginia Wild Rye
5 lbs. per acre
February 15 to March 20
September 1 to November 1
Switchgrass
2.5 lbs. per acre
December 1 to April 1
Indian Woodoats
2 lbs. per acre
February 15 to Apnl 1
August 15 to October 15
All rates are in pounds per acre.
March 1 - August 31 September 1 - February 28
18# Creeping Red Fescue 18# Creeping Red Fescue
6# Indiangrass 6# Indiangrass
8# Little Bluestem 8# Little Bluestem
4# Switchgrass 4# Switchgrass
25# Browntop Millet 35# Rye Grain
500# Fertilizer 500# Fertilizer
4000# Limestone 4000# Limestone
PERMANENT WETLAND SEEDING SCHEDULE
Common Name
Application Rate
Application Dates
Creeping Red Fescue
18 lbs. per acre
Little Bluestem
8 lbs. per acre
Indiangrass
6 lbs. per acre
March 1 — August 31
Switchgrass
4 lbs. per acre
Browntop Millet
25 lbs. per acre
Common Name
Application Rate
Application Dates
Creeping Red Fescue
18 lbs. per acre
Little Bluestem
8 lbs. per acre
Indiangrass
6 lbs. per acre
September 1 — February 28
Switchgrass
4 lbs. per acre
Rye Grain
35 lbs. per acre
Approved Creeping Red Fescue Cultivars:
Aberdeen Boreal Epic Cindy Lou
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
af
cD
CD
w
a
w
Q
CD
o
;'
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E02A
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E02A

GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING PRACTICES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE NCGO1 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT
Implementing the details and specifications on this plan sheet will result in the construction
activity being considered compliant with the Ground Stabilization and Materials Handling
sections of the NCGO1 Construction General Permit (Sections E and F, respectively). The
permittee shall comply with the Erosion and Sediment Control plan approved by the
delegated authority having jurisdiction. All details and specifications shown on this sheet
may not apply depending on site conditions and the delegated authority having jurisdiction.
SECTION E: GROUND STABILIZATION
Required Ground Stabilization Timeframes
Stabilize within this
Site Area Description
many calendar
Timeframe variations
days after ceasing
land disturbance
(a) Perimeter dikes,
swales, ditches, and
perimeter slopes
7
None
(b) High Quality Water
7
None
(HQW) Zones
(c) Slopes steeper than
If slopes are 10' or less in length and are
3:1
7
not steeper than 2:1, 14 days are
allowed
-7 days for slopes greater than 50' in
length and with slopes steeper than 4:1
(d) Slopes 3:1 to 4:1
14
-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,
ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW
Zones
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed
(e) Areas with slopes
-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,
ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW Zones
flatter than 4:1
14
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed unless
there is zero slope
Note: After the permanent cessation of construction activities, any areas with temporary
ground stabilization shall be converted to permanent ground stabilization as soon as
practicable but in no case onger than 90 calendar days after the last land disturbing
activity. Temporary ground stabilization shall be maintained in a manner to render the
surface stable against accelerated erosion until permanent ground stabilization is achieved.
GROUND STABILIZATION SPECIFICATION
Stabilize the ground sufficiently so that rain will not dislodge the soil. Use one of the
techniques in the table below:
Temporary Stabilization
Permanent Stabilization
• Temporary grass seed covered with straw or
• Permanent grass seed covered with straw or
other mulches and tackifiers
other mulches and tackifiers
• Hydroseeding
• Geotextile fabrics such as permanent soil
• Rolled erosion control products with or
reinforcement matting
without temporary grass seed
• Hydroseeding
• Appropriately applied straw or other mulch
• Shrubs or other permanent plantings covered
• Plastic sheeting
with mulch
• Uniform and evenly distributed ground cover
sufficient to restrain erosion
• Structural methods such as concrete, asphalt or
retaining walls
• Rolled erosion control products with grass seed
CRYLAMIDES (PAMS) AND FLOCCULANTS
1. Selec • culants that are appropriate for the soils being exposed dur
construction, - ing from the NC DWR List of Approved P - occulants.
2. Apply flocculants at or • e the inlets to Erosion . - • ediment Control Measures.
3. Apply flocculants at the concentr. '- •s s. - ied in the NC DWR List of Approved
PAMS/Flocculants and in accord. • - wit anufacturer's instructions.
4. Provide ponding area f• •ntainment of treated Stater before discharging
offsite.
5. Stor- •cculants in leak -proof containers that are kept under storm -re ' . nt cover
or surrounded by secondary containment structures.
EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1. Maintain vehicles and equipment to prevent discharge of fluids.
2. Provide drip pans under any stored equipment.
3. Identify leaks and repair as soon as feasible, or remove leaking equipment from the
project.
4. Collect all spent fluids, store in separate containers and properly dispose as
hazardous waste (recycle when possible).
5. Remove leaking vehicles and construction equipment from service until the problem
has been corrected.
6. Bring used fuels, lubricants, coolants, hydraulic fluids and other petroleum products
to a recycling or disposal center that handles these materials.
LITTER, BUILDING MATERIAL AND LAND CLEARING WASTE
1. Never bury or burn waste. Place litter and debris in approved waste containers.
2. Provide a sufficient number and size of waste containers (e.g dumpster, trash
receptacle) on site to contain construction and domestic wastes.
3. Locate waste containers at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface
waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.
4. Locate waste containers on areas that do not receive substantial amounts of runoff
from upland areas and does not drain directly to a storm drain, stream or wetland.
5. Cover waste containers at the end of each workday and before storm events or
provide secondary containment. Repair or replace damaged waste containers.
6. Anchor all lightweight items in waste containers during times of high winds.
7. Empty waste containers as needed to prevent overflow. Clean up immediately if
containers overflow.
8. Dispose waste off -site at an approved disposal facility.
9. On business days, clean up and dispose of waste in designated waste containers.
PAINT AND OTHER LIQUID WASTE
1. Do not dump paint and other liquid waste into storm drains, streams or wetlands.
2. Locate paint washouts at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface
waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.
3. Contain liquid wastes in a controlled area.
4. Containment must be labeled, sized and placed appropriately for the needs of site.
5. Prevent the discharge of soaps, solvents, detergents and other liquid wastes from
construction sites.
PORTABLE TOILETS
1. Install portable toilets on level ground, at least 50 feet away from storm drains,
streams or wetlands unless there is no alternative reasonably available. If 50 foot
offset is not attainable, provide relocation of portable toilet behind silt fence or place
on a gravel pad and surround with sand bags.
2. Provide staking or anchoring of portable toilets during periods of high winds or in high
foot traffic areas.
3. Monitor portable toilets for leaking and properly dispose of any leaked material.
Utilize a licensed sanitary waste hauler to remove leaking portable toilets and replace
with properly operating unit.
EARTHEN STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT
1. Show stockpile locations on plans. Locate earthen -material stockpile areas at least
50 feet away from storm drain inlets, sediment basins, perimeter sediment controls
and surface waters unless it can be shown no other alternatives are reasonably
available.
2. Protect stockpile with silt fence installed along toe of slope with a minimum offset of
five feet from the toe of stockpile.
3. Provide stable stone access point when feasible.
4. Stabilize stockpile within the timeframes provided on this sheet and in accordance
with the approved plan and any additional requirements. Soil stabilization is defined
as vegetative, physical or chemical coverage techniques that will restrain accelerated
erosion on disturbed soils for temporary or permanent control needs.
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
ONSITE CONCRETE WASHOUT
STRUCTURE WITH LINER
NCRETE WASHOUTS
1. Do not discharge concrete or cement slurry from the site.
2. � pose of, or recycle settled, hardened concrete residue in accordance wit, ocal
antate solid waste regulations and at an approved facility.
3. Mana:: washout from mortar mixers in accordance with the above it: and in
addition • .ce the mixer and associated materials on impervious b. rier and within
lot perimete silt fence.
4. Install tempora concrete washouts per local requirements, here applicable. If an
alternate method . product is to be used, contact your a. •roval authority for
review and approval. f local standard details are not a ilable, use one of the two
types of temporary con ete washouts provided on is detail.
5. Do not use concrete washois for dewatering or oring defective curb or sidewalk
sections. Stormwater accum .ted within the ashout may not be pumped into or
discharged to the storm drain sy em or re ving surface waters. Liquid waste must
be pumped out and removed from
6. Locate washouts at least 50 feet from -' orm drain inlets and surface waters unless it
can be shown that no other altern. ves . e reasonably available. At a minimum,
install protection of storm drain ' let(s) clos-,t to the washout which could receive
spills or overflow.
7. Locate washouts in an eas accessible area, on le, -I ground and install a stone
entrance pad in front o he washout. Additional conols may be required by the
approving authority
8. Install at least on sign directing concrete trucks to the wa 'out within the project
limits. Post si: - age on the washout itself to identify this loca"• n.
9. Remove le. ngs from the washout when at approximately 75% - .acity to limit
overflo -vents. Replace the tarp, sand bags or other temporary s ctural
comp.. ents when no longer functional. When utilizing alternative or . oprietary
pr•..ucts, follow manufacturer's instructions.
10. ° t the completion of the concrete work, remove remaining leavings and dis • se of
in an approved disposal facility. Fill pit, if applicable, and stabilize any disturba e
caused by removal of washout.
HERBICIDES, PESTICIDES AND RODENTICIDES
1.
Store and apply herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in accordance with label
restrictions.
2. Store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in their original containers with the
label, which lists directions for use, ingredients and first aid steps in case of
accidental poisoning.
3. Do not store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in areas where flooding is
possible or where they may spill or leak into wells, stormwater drains, ground water
or surface water. If a spill occurs, clean area immediately.
4. Do not stockpile these materials onsite.
HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE
1. Create designated hazardous waste collection areas on -site.
2. Place hazardous waste containers under cover or in secondary containment.
3. Do not store hazardous chemicals, drums or bagged materials directly on the ground.
NCGOI GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING
EFFECTIVE: 04/01 / 19
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
1
(D
CD
CO
w
0
LJJ
Q
C7
1I
■
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E0213
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E02B

PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION A: SELF -INSPECTION
Self -inspections are required during normal business hours in accordance with the table
below. When adverse weather or site conditions would cause the safety of the inspection
personnel to be in jeopardy, the inspection may be delayed until the next business day on
which it is safe to perform the inspection. In addition, when a storm event of equal to or
greater than 1.0 inch occurs outside of normal business hours, the self -inspection shall be
performed upon the commencement of the next business day. Any time when inspections
were delayed shall be noted in the Inspection Record.
Inspect
Frequency
(during normal
business hours)
Inspection records must include:
(1) Rain gauge
maintained in
good working
order
Daily
Daily rainfall amounts.
If no daily rain gauge observations are made during weekend o
holiday periods, and no individual -day rainfall information is
available, record the cumulative rain measurement for those un-
attended days (anc this will determine if a site inspection is
needed). Days on which no rainfall occurred shall be recorded as
zero." The permittee may use another rain -monitoring device
approved by the Division.
(2) E&SC
Measures
At least once per
7 calendar days
and within 24
hours of a rain
events 1.0 inch in
24 hours
1. Identification of the measures inspected,
2. Date and time of the inspection,
3. Name of the person performing the inspection,
4. Indication of whether the measures were operating
properly,
5. Description of maintenance needs for the measure,
6. Description, evidence, and date of corrective actions taken.
(3) Stormwater
discharge
outfalls (SDCs)
At least once per
7 calendar days
and within 24
hours of a rain
events 1.0 inch In
24 hours
1. Identification of the discharge outfalls inspected,
2. Date and time of the Inspection,
3. Name of the person performing the inspection,
4. Evidence of indicators of stormwater pollution such as oil
sheen, floating or suspended solids or discoloration,
5. Indication of visible sediment leaving the site,
6. Description, evidence, and date of corrective actions taken.
(4) Perimeter of
site
At least once per
7 calendar days
and within 24
hours of a rain
events 1.0 inch In
24 hours
If visible sedimentation Is found outside site limits, then a record
of the following shall be made:
1. Actions taken to clean up or stabilize the sediment that has left
the site limits,
2. Description, evidence, and date of corrective actions taken, and
3. An explanation as to the actions taken to control future
releases.
(5) Streams or
wetlands onsite
or offslte
(where
accessible)
At least once per
7 calendar days
and within 24
hours of a rain
event, 1.0 inch in
24 hours
Ifthe stream or wetland has increased visible sedimentation or a
stream has visible increased turbidity from the construction
activity, then a record of the following shall be made:
1. Description, evidence and date of corrective actions taken, and
2. Records of the required reports to the appropriate Division
Regional Office per Part III, Section C, Item (2)(a) of this permit.
(6) Ground
stabilization
measures
After each phase
of grading
1. The phase of grading (installation of perimeter E&SC
measures, clearing and grubbing, installation of storm
drainage facilities, completion of all land -disturbing
activity, construction or redevelopment, permanent
ground cover).
2. Documentation that the required ground stabilization
measures have been provided within the required
timeframe or an assurance that they will be provided as
soon as possible.
NOTE: The rain inspection resets the required 7 calendar day inspection requirement.
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING
SECTION B: RECORDKEEPING
PART III
AND REPORTING
deviation shall be kept on the site. The
throughout the coverage under this permit.
plan shall be kept on site and available for
hours.
1. E&SC Plan Documentation
The approved E&SC plan as well as any approved
approved E&SC plan must be kept up-to-date
The following items pertaining to the E&SC
inspection at all times during normal business
Item to Doeumem
Documentation Requirements
(a) Each E&SC measure has been installed
and does not significantly deviate from the
locations, dimensions and relative elevations
shown on the approved E&SC plan.
Initial and date each E&SC measure on a copy
of the approved E&SC plan or complete, date
and sign an inspection report that lists each
E&SC measure shown on the approved E&5C
plan. This documentation is required upon the
initial installation of the E&SC measures or if
the E&SC measures are modified after initial
installation.
(b) A phase of grading has been completed.
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
report to indicate completion of the
construction phase.
(c) Ground cover is located and installed
in accordance with the approved E&SC
plan.
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
report to Indicate compliance with approved
ground cover specifications.
(d) The maintenance and repair
requirements for all E&SC measures
have been performed.
Complete, date and sign an inspection report.
(e) Corrective actions have been taken
to E&SC measures.
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
report to indicate the completion of the
corrective action.
2. Additional Documentation to be Kept on Site
In addition to the E&SC plan documents above, the following items shall be kept on the
site and available for inspectors at all times during normal business hours, unless the
Division provides a site -specific exemption based on unique site conditions that make
this requirement not practical:
(a) This General Permit as well as the Certificate of Coverage, after it is received.
(b) Records of inspections made during the previous twelve months. The permittee shall
record the required observations on the Inspection Record Form provided by the
Division or a similar inspection form that includes all the required elements. Use of
electronically -available records in lieu of the required paper copies will be allowedif
shown to provide equal access and utility as the hard -copy records.
3. Documentation to be Retained for Three Years
All data used to complete the e-NOI and all inspection records shall be maintained for a period
of three years after project completion and made available upon request. [40 CFR 122.41]
PART II, SECTION G, ITEM (4)
DRAW DOWN OF SEDIMENT BASINS FOR MAINTENANCE OR CLOSE OUT
Sediment basins and traps that receive runoff from drainage areas of one acre or more shall use outlet structures that withdraw water from the surface when these devices need to be drawn down
for maintenance or close out unless this is infeasible. The circumstances in which it is not feasible to withdraw water from the surface shall be rare (for example, times with extended cold weather).
Non -surface withdrawals from sediment basins shall be allowed only when all of the following criteria have been met:
(a) The E&SC plan authority has been provided with documentation of the non -surface withdrawal and the specific time periods or conditions in which it will occur. The non -surface withdrawal
shall not commence until the E&SC plan authority has approved these items,
(b) The non -surface withdrawal has been reported as an anticipated bypass in accordance with Part III, Section C, Item (2)(c) and (d) of this permit,
(c) Dewatering discharges are treated with controls to minimize discharges of pollutants from stormwater that is removed from the sediment basin. Examples of appropriate controls include
properly sited, designed and maintained dewatering tanks, weir tanks, and filtration systems,
(d) Vegetated, upland areas of the sites or a properly designed stone pad is used to the extent feasible at the outlet of the dewatering treatment devices described in Item (c) above,
(e) Velocity dissipation devices such as check dams, sediment traps, and riprap are provided at the discharge points of all dewatering devices, and
(f) Sediment removed from the dewatering treatment devices described in Item (c) above is disposed of in a manner that does not cause deposition of sediment into waters of the United States.
PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION C: REPORTING
1. Occurrences that Must be Reported
Permittees shall report the following occurrences:
(a) Visible sediment deposition in a stream or wetland.
(b) Oil spills if:
• They are 25 gallons or more,
• They are less than 25 gallons but cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours,
• They cause sheen on surface waters (regardless of volume), or
• They are within 100 feet of surface waters (regardless of volume).
(c) Releases of hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under Section 311
of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.3 and 40 CFR 117.3) or Section 102 of CERCLA
(Ref: 40 CFR 302.4) or G.S. 143-215.85.
(d) Anticipated bypasses and unanticipated bypasses.
(e) Noncompliance with the conditions of this permit that may endanger health or the
environment.
2. Reporting Timeframes and Other Requirements
After a permittee becomes aware of an occurrence that must be reported, he shall contact
the appropriate Division regional office within the timeframes and in accordance with the
other requirements listed below. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be
reported to the Department's Environmental Emergency Center personnel at (800)
858-0368.
Occurrence
Reporting Timeframes [After Discovery) and Other Requirements
(a) Visible sediment
deposition in a
stream or wetland
• within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
• Within 7 calendar days, a report that contains a description of the
sediment and actions taken to address the cause of the deposition.
Division staff may waive the requirement for a written report on a
case -by -case basis.
• If the stream is named on the NC 303(d) list as impaired for sediment -
related causes, the permittee may be required to perform additional
monitoring, inspections or apply more stringent practices if staff
determine that additional requirements are needed to assure compliance
with the federal or state impaired -waters conditions.
(b) Oil spills and
release of
hazardous
substances per Item
1(b)-(c) above
• Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification. The notification
shall include information about the date, time, nature, volume and
location of the spill or release.
(c) Anticipated
bypasses [40 CFR
122.41(m)(3))
• A report at least ten days before the date of the bypass, if possible.
The report shall include an evaluation of the anticipated quality and
effect of the bypass.
(d) Unanticipated
bypasses [40 CFR
122.41(m)(3)1
• Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
• Within 7 calendar days, a report that includes an evaluation of the
quality and effect of the bypass.
(e) Noncompliance
with the conditions
of this permit that
may endanger
health or the
environment[40
CFR 122.41(I)(7)]
• Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
• Within 7 calendar days, a report that contains a description of the
noncompliance, and its causes; the period of noncompliance,
including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not
been corrected, the anticipated time noncompliance is expected to
continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and
prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. [40 CFR 122.41(1)(6).
• Division staff may waive the requirement for a written report on a
case -by -case basis.
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
NCGO1 SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
EFFECTIVE: 04/01/19
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
CD
CD
tip
LJJ
0
LJJ
•z
CD
1I
■
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
PROJECT
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E02C
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY:
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E02C

RIP RAP
DISSIPATION PAD
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE DETAIL)
TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE
EXISTING CHANNEL
NOTES:
PDA-1
(
)
SEDIMENT BAG
(SEE DETAIL)
DEW AIMING
PUMP
PUMP -AROUND PUMP
A<', AND MULCH.
09
LP 0
7 72-
i%F
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR TYPICAL PUMP -AROUND:
I. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
2. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE, DOWNSTREAM RIP RAP DISSIPATION PAD, AND
BEGIN PUMPING OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
3. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE.
4. INSTALL SEDIMENT BAG AND ASSOCIATED PUMP. DEWATER THE ENTRAPPED
AREA.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6.EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF
IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE,
AND DISSIPATION PAD (BEGIN WITH DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE FIRST).
7. ALL GRADING AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE PUMP
AROUND AREAS BETWEEN THE IMPERVIOUS DIKES. THE IMPERVIOUS LOCATIONS AS
SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ONLY REPRESENT THE UPPER AND LOWER EXTENT OF
WORK FOR EACH STREAM SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKES.
8. REMOVE SEDIMENT BAG(S) AND BACKFILL. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA WITH SEED
I. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATED
SECTIONS OF CHANNEL
2. IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM
STREAM FLOW WHEN NECESSARY
3. ALL GRADED STREAM BANKS SHALL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, AND
MATTED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. ALL OTHER GRADED
AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS.
4. MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL
TO THE WORK, THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE SHEETING,
DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS, AND HOSES.
5. PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF A SUFFICIENT SIZE AND NUMBER
TO DEWATER THE WORK AREA.
6. RIP RAP DISSIPATION PAD TO BE INSTALLED DOWNSTREAM OF LOWER
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
TYPICAL PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE DETAIL)
RIPRAP DISSIPATION PAD
4,0 FT
190,
0 0 0 0 0040 Go 00
CY ° 00 °8,0 0 0o °°0
0 o00oQOG000o0
ro0°00.°0�00°00°00°o coo
0.11z0 O�.,oO000Oo�
-III III III -III I O I 1 1 ,-1 1 1 1I
0
SECTION A -A
T=12"
FILTER
BLANKET
NOTES:
I. La IS THE LENGTH OF THE RIPRAP APRON.
2. T = THICKNESS
3. IN A WELL-DEFINED CHANNEL EXTEND THE APRON
UP THE CHANNEL BANKS TO THE TOP OF THE BANK.
4. A FILTER BLANKET OR FILTER FABRIC SHOULD BE
INSTALLED BETWEEN THE RIPRAP AND SOIL FOUNDATION,
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PLAN VIEW
)00u0 0
000000
oOo 000000 OOOOO ov
EXISTING 0 °o0000°00 0°0 00°00°0 000
PIPE JO O OooO o0000 °°0000
)00 c0°000 °00000 °00000o
0° °O°Oo 000000 000000 00000
0°00°0000°00°00 r
000000 0•0°0 00000
1
•
°1
a0o00 00o°0o00 oo0o00 °o4
000 0000 °0°o00°O°-A
0 000o0° °00o0 0O0o0
000 000 °00 °0° °00 °0°,
9000
�0 oo° o�oo° o0- -
0°8°0°00 0°00 o
°000 . ° 000
0 ° �
o °o °o °00° o °00°
T0O0000000 000000 oon
)000 0 00
0 °,r-
00
n0 000(c
n
RIP RAP DISIPATION PAD SPECIFICATIONS
ASSUMED
HOSE SIZE
(IN)
PERMANENT
(Y/N)
LENGTH
La (FT)
WIDTH
Wo (FT)
STONE SIZE
d50 (IN)
STONE CLASS
THICKNESS
(IN)
4"
N
4.0
1.0
3
A
12
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
of
C▪ D
CD
00
w
0
w
CD
o
;'
1•
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E03
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E03

1'
SEDIMENT
CONTROL STONE
I'- 6" MIN.
2
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
3'MAX
STRUCTURAL
STONE
CROSS SECTION VIEW
IMPERVIOUS
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
NOTES:
I. USE CLASS B STONE FOR
STRUCTURAL STONE.
2. USE NO. 5 OR NO. 57
STONE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL,
3. CONSTRUCT DAM A MAXIMUM
OF I FT, ABOVE NORMAL FLOW
DEPTH,
4. TOE IN IMPERVIOUS
MATERIAL
5, LINE BANKS WITH CLASS B
STONE 5' UPSTREAM AND 10'
DOWNSTREAM OF IMP. DIKE.
MUM PR..=
i oN.Ii00��Iii���Ii00��Ii•
111111111111
�b8c o`b8(ob8c5o`b80!7
o�t5: %000J%cx oCo��QQ�ot�o%oC oo
!I00, !1,O6,!11,00
I\ TOP OF
BANK
I� BASE OF STREAM
TOP VIEW
TOP OF BANK
0
.00
O° 000g0°
O 00000/
80 0000 O0oo° goo°0ci5c
0 ,000 0°c)000 0°0000 0°)000 0
�OOo OnOOo �O/�OOo O/ �OOo
STREAM BED
i
2' MIN,
FRONT VIEW
2
1 I-
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SEDIMENT BAG
EXISTING GROUND
PUMP HOSE
CLASS B STONE
(12" THICK)
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
15' MINIMUM
INSTALLATION:
SEDIMENT BAG
I, INSTALL SEDIMENT BAG ON A SLOPE SO INCOMING WATER FLOWS
DOWNHILL THROUGH BAG WITHOUT CREATING MORE EROSION. TO INCREASE
THE EFFICIENCY OF FILTRATION, PLACE THE BAG ON A GRAVEL BED IN
ORDER TO MAXIMIZE WATER FLOW THROUGH THE SURFACE AREA OF THE
BAG.
2. BAG IS FULL WHEN IT NO LONGER CAN EFFICIENTLY FILTER SEDIMENT
OR ALLOW WATER TO PASS AT A REASONABLE RATE. FLOW RATES WILL
VARY DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF SEDIMENT BAG, THE TYPE AND AMOUNT
OF SEDIMENT DISCHARGED INTO THE BAG, THE TYPE OF GROUND, ROCK OR
OTHER SUBSTANCE UNDER THE BAG AND THE DEGREE OF THE SLOPE ON
WHICH THE BAG LIES. UNDER MOST CIRCUMSTANCES THE SEDIMENT BAG
WILL ACCOMMODATE FLOW RATES OF 1100 GALLONS PER MINUTE,USE OF
EXCESSIVE FLOW RATES OR OVERFILLING WITH SEDIMENT WILL CAUSE THE
BAG TO RUPTURE OR FAILURE OF THE HOSE ATTACHMENT STRAPS.
3. DISPOSE OF SEDIMENT BAG AS DIRECTED BY THE SITE DESIGNER. IF
ALLOWED, BAG MAY BE CUT OPEN AND THE CONTENTS SEEDED AFTER
REMOVING VISIBLE FABRIC.
4. REFER TO DETAIL REGARDING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ATTRIBUTES.
STREAM
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
o
;'
1I
■ ,
•
Al
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E03A
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E03A

Date:
/
i
400
.400000
ti- 1 tiZ 404441 1,411
aygi`d •� 1.�.I.Ian6" Minl;1"4��n-:
S04414
nr
0.
Page:
2-3" Course Aggregate
Construction:
1. Clear the entrance and exit area of all vegetation, roots,
and other objectionable material and properly grade it.
2. Place the gravel to the specific grade and dimensions
shown on the plans, and smooth it.
3. Provide drainage to carry water to a sediment trap or
other suitable outlet.
4. Use geotextile fabrics in order to improve stability of the
foundation in locations subject to seepage or high water
table.
Maintenance:
1. Per NCG-01 inspect at least once a week and after each 1
inch or greater rainfall; make any required repairs
immediately.
2. Maintain the gravel pad in a condition to prevent mud or
sediment from leaving the construction site. This may
require periodic topdressing with 2 inch stone.
3. Immediately remove all objectionable materials spilled,
washed or tracked onto public roadways.
0
NORTH NA
Environmental 1Quality
EFFECTIVE DATE 1'1.'12.2020
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / EXIT
DATE:
36"
Plastic or
Wire ties
8 Max. Standard Strength fabric with wire fence
6' Max. Extra strength fabric without wire fence
Filter Fabric
1.33 IbsILF
Steel Post
Wire Fence
18-24"
Wire Fence
Steel Post
8"down &4"
forward along the
trench
cnnswctlani
1. Gongs the sedlnient harder of standard strength oreara strength synlhelli. fabrics.
z Ensure that the height of the sediment fence does not exceed 14 inches above the ground. (Higher fences may
impound volumes of water sufficient to cause colon of the structure)
3. Consimd the filter fabdc from a continuo.is roll cut to the length of the barrier to avoid joints. When joints are
necessary, securely fasten the Mier cloth only al a support past Wirt n feet minimum avedap to the next post.
4. Support standard strength Ter fabric by wire mash fastenedsecurely to the upslope side of the posts. Extend toe
feeImesh support to iha bottom of the bench. Fasten thew Are reinforcement, then fabric on the upslope side o`the
nce post. Wire or plastic dip ties should have a minimum 50 pound tensie strength.
5. When a vAre mesh support fence is used, space pasts a maximum of 8 feet apad.Suppons should be driven securely
Into the ground a minimum of 241nches.
8. Extra strength filler fabric. with foot past spatting does not require a wire mesh support fence. Securely fasten the
filler fabric directly to posts. Pike or plastic dip ties should have a minimum of 50 pound tensile strength.
7. Excavate the bench approximately 4 inches vide and 8 inches deep along the proposed line of the posts and undone
from the herder.
8. Place 12 inches of fabric along the bottom and side of the trench.
4. Backti the trench with soil placed aver the filter fah4c and compact. Thorough compacion of the backfill u crilhwl to
sin fence performance.
10. Do not attach filter fabric to existing trees.
24"
CROSS SECTION VIEW
Filter Fabric
Min.
Backfill trench
and Compact
thoroughly
PAGE:
-w'
Upslope
8" Min.
Maintenance:
Inspect sediment fences at least once a week and aF r each 1
Inch er greater rainfall. Make any required repairs Immediately.
2. Should the fable of a sediment fence collapse,tear,
decomposeor become ineffective. replace 0 promptly.
T. Remove sediment deposits as necessary to provide adequate
storage Volume for Be next rain and reduce pressure on the
(Bide. Take ®re to avoid undermining the (mice during
ciao outs.
4. Remove al fendne materials and unstable sediment deposits
and bring the area to grade and stabilize It aver the contributing
drainage area has been properly stabilized.
ji jl 000ree..480 a,
SILT FENCE
DATE:
TOP OF SILT FENCE
MUST BE AT LEAST 1'
ABOVE THE TOP OF
THE VVASHED STONE
4' IAIN.
SILT FENCE
/
PAGE:
WIRE FENCE
HARDWARE CLOTH
FILTER OF 457
WASHED STONE
36"
1.33 LBSILF
STEEL FENCE POST
3' FILTER FABRIC
ON GROUND 18"
24" BURY' WIRE FENCE AND HARDWARE CLOTH
BURY PA OF UPPER EDGE OF
FILTER FABRIC IN TRENCH
SECTION VIEW
FRONT VIEW
STEEL FENCE POST
y SET MAX 2 APART f
MIN. 18. INTO SOLID
GROUND
BURY WIRE FENCE,
FILTER FABRIC.
AND HARDWARE
CLOTH IN TRENCH
NOTES:
1. Hardware cloth and gravel should overlay the silt fence at least 12 inches.
2. Stone outlets should be placed on low elevation areas of silt fence and
based on field conditions.
MAINTENANCE:
1. Per NCG-01, inspect outlet at lest once a week and after each 1 inch
or greater rainfall event. Complete any required repairs immediately.
2. Freshen stone when sediment accumulation exceeds 6 inches.
3. Keep mesh free of debris to provide adequate Flow.
4. Remove sediment when half of stone outlet is covered.
5. Replace stone as needed to facilitate de -watering.
•v5J.i
nerrdOgrry
SILT FENCE OUTLET
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
0
0
O
CD
CO
w
0
LLJ
Q
c
CJJ
O�
KO;'
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E038
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
E03B

TEMPORARY CULVERTED
STREAM CROSSING
NOTE: FOR USE IN EXISTING CHANNELS ONLY.
NOT FOR USE IN RESTORED STREAMS.
NC DOT 45 OR 457
WASHED STONE
FLOW
000 o0oc0Cgo0oo0�•*•
�e o �80 o n �8G n �8e
o°
CLASS B
EROSION STONE
J J J
J CeseaJeaJ
g3.3.6.
J J
\\o0g ggoJg �oOg�
Og �o
o0g
�Og �oOg ggoOg ggoO
D C2.(O C2.(''O C2.(''OC
O
(OC2.(''
C2.(.oO
.o O(O O(OG
25 FT. MIN.
TOP OF BANK —
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
8080�008 �088°gov
OoO 0o0, ooOaJ�o
STREAM
CHANNEL
PLAN VIEW
/2 DIAMETER OF PIPE
OR 18 IN. WHICHEVER
IS GREATER
CORRUGATED
METAL PIPE
PROFILE VIEW
▪ 25 FT. MIN.
▪ TOP OF BANK
NC DOT 45 OR 457
WASHED STONE
CLASS B
EROSION STONE
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
TOP OF BANK�m
12"x12' +/-
ROUGH CUT TIMBER
LENGTH VARIES
LOG MAT BRIDGE
CO
TOP OF BANK
—.{ 5' MIN
PLAN VIEW
12 MAX
5' MIN
CROSS SECTION VIEW
F.
lG' +
ROUGH CUT TIMBER
LENGTH VARIES
NOTE:
DETAIL PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES. USE OF LOG MAT BRIDGE
IS AT CONTRACTORS DISCRETION.
BOLTED TOGETHER
AS APPROPRIATE
12'x12" +/-
ROUGH CUT TIMBER
LENGTH VARIES
+/ 108
SECTION THROUGH
LOG MAT BRIDGE
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
0
o
af
CD
CD
CO
w
0
w
Q
CD
O�
KO;'
•
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
PROJECT n
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E03C
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E03C

COIR FIBER MATTING — BANKFULL
ELEVATION
BED MATERIAL 6" MIN
OVERLAP
TYPICAL MATTING LOCATION
COIR FIBER MATTING
FROM TOE OF CHANNEL
TO MINIMUM I FT.
BEYOND BANKFULL
PROPOSED
WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
PROPOSED BANKFULL
ELEVATION
NOTES:
- MEDIUM WEIGHT WOVEN COIR FIBER MATTING SHALL BE
PLACED ALONG THE OUTSIDE BANK OF ALL BENDS
AND ALONG BOTH SIDES OFTHE CHANNEL IN TANGENT AREAS.
- FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO MATTING LOCATION MAY
BE MADE AT THE DESIGNERS OR CONTRACTORS DISCRETION
AS NECESSARY.
COIR MATTING CROSS SECTION
NORMAL WATER
I FT. MIN. 6" MIN
STRAW MULCH
NOTES:
I. SECURE TOE OF MATTING WITH 24" WOODEN STAKES
WITH GALVANIZED NAIL BENT TO PROHIBIT MATTING
FROM WORKING OFF OF STAKE.
2. USE 12" WOODEN STAKES ON 5' CENTERS OR AS
DIRECTED BY MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
3. MINIMUM 1' WIDE, 6" DEEP TRENCH OVER TOP OF BANK
WITH MATTING LAID FLAT AND STAKED. TRENCH TO BE
BACKFILLED WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL.
DATE:
FLOW��
12" Min.
Straw Wattle
Area to be
Protected
2" x 2"
Stakes
SECTION
Wood Mulch or Compost
To 12 height of log
UNTRENCHED INSTALLATION
ISOMETRIC VIEW
Mulch or Compost
for Untrenched Socks
FLOW
SECTION
Trench into
ground 4" Min.
ENTRENCHED INSTALLATION*
*THIS APPLICATION MAY NOT BE USED WITH STRAW
WATTLES SMALLER THAN 12".
STRAW W. TTLE INITIAL FLOW RATES
Straw Wattle Design
Diameter
8Inch
(200 nm)
12inch
(300 nm)
18Inch
(450 nm)
24inch
(600 nm)
32inch
(750 nm)
Maximum Sbpe
Length (.2.)
509 Feet
(183 m)
750 Feet
(229 m)
1,000 Feet
(305 n1)
1,300 Feet
(396 m)
1,650 Feet
.500 m)
Hydraulic Flow
Through Rate
7.5 gpmlfl
(941Imrm1
11.3 gpm.lt
(1411Im1m)
15.0 gpnn.t
(1881Imkm)
22.5 gpmlft
(281 Ihmlm)
30.O gpmlft
(3741Im1m)
PAGE:
NOTE:
1. Other materials providing equivalent protection
against erosive velocities may be substituted for
use in straw wattles.
Fill straw wattle netting uniformly with compost
to the desired length such that logs do not deform.
Straw wattle(s) should be installed parallel to
and a minimum of 10 feet beyond the toe of e
graded slope. Straw wattle(s) located below
flat areas should be located at the edge of the
land disturbance. The ends of the straw
wattle(s) should be turned slightly upslope to
prevent runoff from going around the end of the
straw wattle(s).
Oak or other durable hardwood stakes with a 2
Inch x 2 Inch cross section should be driven
vertically plumbthrough the center of the straw
wattle. Stakes should be placed at a maximum
interval of 4 feet or a maximum interval of 8 feet
if the straw wattle is placed in a 4 inch trench.
5. In the event staking is not possible (ie. when
straw wattles are used on pavement) heavy
concrete blocks shall be used behind the straw
wattle to hold it in place during runoff events.
MAINTENANCE:
1. Inspect straw wattle at least weekly and after
each 1 inch or greater rainfall. Remove
accumulated sediment and any debris as
needed to allow for adequate flow.
Straw wattle must be replaced If clogged or
torn.
3. If ponding becomes excessive, the straw
wattle may need to be replaced with a
larger diameter or a different measure.
4. Reinstall if damaged or dislodged.
5. Straw wattles shall be Inspected until land
disturbance is compete and the area above the
measure has been permanently stabilized.
STRAW WATTLE FOR PERIMETER AND INLET PROTECTION
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE
STRUCTURAL STONE
SHEET 1 OF 1
1633.01
A
FLOW
PLAN
SECTION A -A
A
NOTE
USE CLASS 'B' EROSION CONTROL STONE
FOR STRUCTURAL STONE.
USE NO. 5 OR NO. 57 STONE FOR SEDIMENT
CONTROL STONE.
SECTION B-B
*T = 12" MIN., 18" MAX.
SHEET 1 OF 1
1633.01
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
of
0
CD
CD
CO
LJJ
0
LJJ
•s
CD
o
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E03D
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BYr
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E03D

0
o >
▪ \ too
3D
PSH E04
0
O ° 0
CR
UT1
PSH E06
�o \
0
V
L am
DT1
ACCE
7 7
00�
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
N d
ENT
CC a l ref a l c
/ aol J
007
LOD
O s> �tbv3
UT1
PSH E05
100' 75' 0
100' 200'
SCALE: 1"=200'
£8 OVN
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAVEL
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
Cool Run
LIMITS OF
— LOD — DISTURBANCE
HAUL RD
0
E THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SD(; IS NOT PE
0 21I22 SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, F.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF 1T:
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
HAUL ROADS
PROJECT :
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E03E
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY:
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET NO.
E03E

— LOD —
W
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
yw\yVvvv �� Y v (ID/ J / r� , - v
ovvv� v R �� i I
as ,y\ J l
y ������ v^/ � � y< vvvv c - ti
VI AVAVA"A\ \l A 2 /V.,� V<V �/V 1 <—> f",It'<I
v�vvv � )���v l5 `" v /
�vey� v v A �� 4 �zr
(� i
s tip'
\I\\, \ z JJ
°ti ti
v
A \ '-a -' i /% S r. -
u ` ��\` % / / ( ,//, /
ss V i `� Fti
II
I 1 9�
I
I
1
I
I
\\
g ,--,1 ,r ,, , — e
G' S_ _ . N l L .+ S
-d ♦ v S% ( A
50' 25' 0
i
50' 100'
SCALE: 1"=100'
£8 OVN
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
y
/
r \ I
\r \ ti/ 1 4 1'
r•-50�
�l l �� 5
/ �V �A \ \\ .,.� / ( 4 \ �.) mz 1
/ sy `r v aT �> r �A� 1 I
2-7 <rsi ^-,v; 44,
I C
p� q �d 1
J \ / C rI \`/8<T s'2ydFy T`�i 9/ti `9041, z I \ `� ` \mil "r �✓ /� r < ` rl �ti �
�Ds > :�', �< �� �� r' vOAF ti0 �I 7 z ') �yv
� 2SP V I�� V ,o^rp/ so _ °3 � �-� S7 I/<A .n4 „ 1/ /iq IHINS,O
— / \\ \ \ \GC C 1 ) 9d /, � ) \ / Q.f8: 1427. PG. 270
1,— _/ 1 s \ :► ..� . — _ _ R 9 �� a ; ` ra' :;,R l
a4� m / V N �,�yoa�T,
w V♦•i� °O0o°ar s
il s
A
IMPERVIOL/S /'`w\
ti �s'LEASE SIN .
��
. DIKE d w <OI9'DFo ,psOti.9
a goo . a 9 • l
22'
<O / 6 A32/' • I
/
/\ —c i ~. / ` I L22"222-
°q `•�••�� / / \.\. 5 , 90 / O°�` / I N, \ FRINK / \ \
-` "-/ \ \ _ 9� C, ������� O ., 9 K� 2 O.B. 7348. P I120 / u5 • / J /
,11v v �F�o �i�i� �� /2v�2F �I AA P-e.u,PG / / ,— / / I
\ \ \ \ \ as— �jYss �I, �00 fff I \C.i \
G m—
/ v A / l p'/ ;7. 9evIv l da
V vV • aoi oA \ >— �
�\
` vv vsue V `�V v , v A A I l V� \ V / v / ali,- a-
`^ psi/4.� V v \ \ �,� '� 2Fy9�. _ _ v i ---
� ."�..
24. s
w
�✓�� Al.A vi-:, A A A / iA � >22 II LIMITS OF
T \ s, PfN LOG
\ ^S+ 7�`' L\ \ \ \ N T. E ! V N(TYP)FRINK /
,/2 o) / \ \ \ / 7Ji O-b ���' I' O.B. 3348. PC. 1120
\ \ / / ..�.• / P.B. 12, PC 25 — /
OS 3 ♦�` 4\�r t o �`jQ START RESTORATION
>4A \r \ vN
\2.
�L V—--
\ \ �3V PROP BANKFW.L oommisraegM
r \ v \ i l \-1ip� r)� \ V �m srn Iasi-crz-
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET E06
5.25
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Lf
W
W
W
W
W
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
CD
CO
CI
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL
PROJECT .
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E04
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REV IEWED BY,
JGD
REV IS IONS:
SHEET NO.

�-I- , ;IV A iIIACCEsS-49s1
\POTRACT /`1
V( N.cc1,PG. e° `-\ a4� EAJEMENT ',il_k/R' cs ),,1t/`
),sSs�V
t
c
v' / ‘ 7 6vy� IT_ ��v 7 JcTPl6A1.GPT(.39a l\ �'�
'3n4�r
\A i- \ LS _/ D.B. 2279, P1015\S NF1 o couR, �by I'(� r yr
-
\j�i_ /\ K1R0 WLAPYL48�CVI O�� I4N V -�� / 9o.e. �bG.1138 i ��i1 A iuf§
/\.�4t45'R PAVE6��/ V r 14Q PAVED PRIVATE•'''2 ^' 1r- V- /
, v`v
1.
vd
VA�A \pA W2IVATE) �' -0, •1, (ter-- 7Y_v �i":::, \ f`'�\ \/
oLL_
\ v
/° 's
Qs�am 1IX1MATe
FP r vknsEMar ,v / , _ / i 1eV- � 0 ' T� �J ., / l v▪ '�-y �A` �i
-�
�vw OAlP6 1 _�J : - ' h /
�/C�RUCN ENTC ✓ '-- I CROSSING ��
L_LJvOp- - - - ) \� .- 457 <
f fee*
:!:� _ASM•TE 4'�a i%::�!.4..•:�/ /\ \'1 -
�
�. 42 /
o Q /0 IMPERVIOUS- 4- i
Acz j - < V
—4s �110E
( .1
ERVI
- - - ,,L,...,_.,,._....'i —'Lj).---L-'-'1 ___,.,,i---
/O_ - 7 nn r1/9'--J �/' � j �`�a ^ `
,,::7,,
/ � 1 - / � j • � _ ��i-�".- . � x
�. �yyyyyl3..•np o•�•�OO�p�••••p0�.:'i�i0'p�. ���1� l
�FosR •.. a �� ! % ♦v.+..'.�i�i��:�.ii.e.o v/ • s�� r G "
--SA' I A � �w ,� i � Av 1
„�=1� �r S
+ -� _ % i
/1/<P :10> t) ,
/ cnnNeL 9 nEc / TURF 0 ? J %�
o
LLJ--SS 4F1. / \+ 4Q 40 _z4�)_-" _ 444 ql--!_�
�.=h.•..• 'n►� d0�� `w : - .�1�1� '. .��0.•.i%!.!.!�.� %y �'%�
wL_Li ��. �. ����..!.!.•���i��Ir1��r�v-=:i���f±-�����94®s!.!.�.��,•:. .....� Ate.... +A.a-:; ` / G 3 '
ti
.... aro „ Fq No ` /
sb— \ SFiy R I / \V
`sb—^� O ^? </^eiT STR� �V II\ \ ,r,L 1 -- Few
L ✓ D \ \ \ MW \ G/NF SOF CTU IJI�9 w�/
No w - - - \ GRq G RF / 4, \
w — LOD o fPPRO�I E LOCATIOIJv °� a/N �,v ��� �43
OF Al�PO ARYCR�SSIN __` — i� vip�r ,�.. ���_„ POD
LOD _ alp �n � 1 �11A�A < �Lu � as-
EASEMENT�FAIE / / / / / / / / / ) ',1 11)A
0.a� as"PG. 1120 / / / v V IVA 1'� v
_ --- /P.B. 12, PG 25 y / // /p2 // l\ \. A A
/ / /Z.
I
i� / `� �� /:_/:,./. /8✓� vv
\ S
// -s/ 1 �pv La. > C 4 �--q 4 v
J At
- A � h s/
MATCHLINE -
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
50' 25' 0 50' 100'
SCALE: 1"=100'
£8 4`v'N
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
— LOD —
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
a
0
(D
C7
up
L.L_I
0
w
Q
Cr
CJ)
■ /1
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL
PROJECT .
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH E05
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET No.
E05

<k
— LOD —
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
HAUL ROAD
SPECIAL SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
BREAK
SI
,
lr1\r
vv ne
s s r
'Art Ltc_r
\l
Iwrz
r.
IS/
J2,4
v
vv
\/
J <a 1
t,C
t-L
dl
\j
MATCHLINE — SEE SHEET E04
`� N IMPEk
4
,�v� a /o
x` \ \��
N ` `
v
\
\\
rr'tt"
/ "'PROP BANKFULL
LIMITS OF GRADING
FILL IN EXISTING
�IlLi�'i CHANNEL
X,IPROXIMATE LOCATION
<\ OR (TEMPORARY CROSSING
o\
cQ
2s G2
v
APPROXIM tE LOCATION
OF TEIWIPORA CROSSING v
Lt \
\ �� Il 47 _ /
v \_> \
,..__/r
/
�„ 1 v
/ - ,<)'' 6' 9
f' 1 11 0�,,, `- �J�J,�
5^ .,
el 4 o
��� �( :' FtQe-
y ,P
9 "l �y'a r
C\ r d \S c y J�L/,A ti)
ytv �s�(\v 1(
nr
u) 4 , > 4
`r_s
.4 -4Sr��'
47 �I
or
J z�y
I - s v
r t
0:1,2:1532
a;/1Qr's E \
\ 1
/ / / 1/ > 7 "4z i v
s \_1 \� DIKE
, /�/ / �� 6 / fd °\ w�I
Tr "www—
�� \ //! i -, c � � s\ \
"p5 AO( A ) \
r
j I n/
8/ (' � � t/i�
/ J \ \ C
rs
w i�`.,
iv-
0:1-
Do-rV' / z� i i�/
-
C"P
/k /IL W OQ' & '
/� ° of ok'
/// \ T S 4Qi , Q'OQ
;Vt Q Q ,\
y^� �rSS A IMPPIEkVIOUS
Ys'
50' 25' 0
L 1
50' 100'
SCALE: 1"=100'
£8 OVN
HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 (2011)
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1988
IMP-6>
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
a``OF TEMPORARY CROSSING
IMPERVIOUS
DIKE T
¢aes�
VANF�(T
IN EX
CHANNEL
ITS OF GRADIN
NKFULL
G O
DATE:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Lf]
LJ
LI
LJ
NKU
TaRATf6A LO LJ
LI
13a79-CR-
TING
0 21122 SL'NGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRODUCTIONS OF IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SDG IS NOT PERMITTED
Q
a
0
cD
CD
w
0
w
Q
cr
up
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
EROSION CONTROL
PROJECT +�
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN P5H 506
DATE:
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY,
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET N0.
E06

STREAMSIDE ASSEMBLAGE
o
w
V
3D
Vegetation Association
Wetland
Indicator
Status
Coastal Plain
Small Stream
Swamp*
(Zone 1)
Coastal Plain
Small Stream
Swamp* (Zone
2)
Stream -side
Assemblage**
TOTAL
Area (acres)
15.48
5.10
2.13
22.71
Species
#
planted*
% of
total
#
planted*
% of
total
#
planted**
% of
total
#
planted
Tag alder (Alnusserrulata)
FACW
--
--
515
20
515
Black willow (Solixnigra)***
OBL
--
--
515
20
515
Ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana)
FAC
526
5
260
10
786
River birch (Betula nigra)
FACW
--
350
10
260
10
610
Silky dogwood (Corpus
amomum)***
FACW
--
--
515
20
515
Atlantic white cedar
(Chamaecyparis thyoides)
FACW
350
10
350
Sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis)
FACW
695
20
--
695
Bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum)
OBL
2,632
25
515
20
3,147
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus
michauxii)
FACW
1,580
15
695
20
2,275
Swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora)
OBL
2,105
20
--
--
2,105
Laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia)
FACW
2,105
20
695
20
--
2,800
Overcup oak (Quercus Iyrata)
OBL
1,055
10
--
--
1,055
American elm (Ulmus
americana)
FAC
350
10
--
350
Water oak (Quercus nigra)
FACW
526
5
350
10
--
876
TOTAL
10,529
100
3,485
100
2,580
100
16,594
* Planted at a density of 680 stems/acre.
** Planted at a density of 1210 stems/acre.
*** Live Stake
PLANTING ZONE 1
COASTAL PLAIN SMALL STREAM SWAMP
PLANTING ZONE 2
COASTAL PLAIN SMALL STREAM SWAMP
STA /0 +62
STA 23 +85
100' 50' 0
/ ) ES a`dN
100' 200'
SCALE: 1"=200'
THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SDG. REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USES OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF SD(; IS NOT PE
0 21I22 SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, F.A. THIS DRAWING AND ALL REPRDDU(
COOL RUN
BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NC
PLANTING
PROJECT :
1221-21015
DRAWING NAME:
COOL RUN PSH P01
DATE,
2022
DRAWN BY:
JRH
REVIEWED BY:
JGD
REVISIONS:
SHEET I/O.
P01