NC0000752_Wasteload Allocation_19931011

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0000752
Roanoke Rapids Mill WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
October 11, 1993
This document is printed on renne paper - ignore any
content on tiie reinertia e side

NPDES WAS'Ib LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0000752
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Champion International Corp.
Champion International WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Minor
Design Capacity: 28.0 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 0 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
See attached effluent guideline limitations
RECEIVING STREAM: Roanoke River
Class: C
Sub -Basin:
03-02-08
Reference USGS Quad: B 28 NW
County: Halifax
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
(please attach)
Previous Exp. Date: 1/31/94 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Greg Nizich
61Lbu,k___
7'4" n
Date: 6/21/93
Datcri $/q 3
Date: /A/73
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
ck
6%3/93
75D/ A
Drainage Area (mi2 )
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): Qegy)i t
7Q10 (cfs) I sop Winter 7Q10 (cfs) o 00 30Q2 (cfs)
y . 2- % Acut
Toxicity Limits: IWC
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream
t \ G y$ Location
Downstream C I S g Location
Effluent
Characteristics
I.1 o ,,,-t f 4
A�. 0,Auq
n;f ; I
PA- (, xl
BOD5 (ri/4,-0
61 8S"2..
13,1o'1I
,,,� / A
NH 3-N (mg/1)
vt i o,
D.O. (mg/1)
1-lo'n1{ Cclait )
Mottsio,t1 Ccic.,;.1ti1
TSS(1Jy), dal 1
t (,goo
33, 4o0
F. Col. (/100 m// 1)
,,,N f c.
"I t c.
pH (SU)
G — q
G _
Tetmh
VAo(co)
M0t (au;I))
*1-1) y 0)
Movt; 4- (etiv,#111)
Mo,,; Ln (v.,a..,41,
cryIR)
a,ac0.A_,LA(tea..
Mo.,;Ic ,�,)
M •
1. G 3
.--u
I Q Al 4\0✓0 p N Q IA
b) ( (d 1)
I . 9 C1
Ivkci,lbvart,klAt l (-4/d0.,)
Co , UCA 1'J Al
1
Comments: Cs2,x,�Al..t ,,A,,,ovt;ks\,►1c of Gel C„ nl P, /11Z
C�lnv�c�c s 14e) . T)x, c s �,,,t can; #o�1Gto sto, cl Lt GoN clu,,tai 1-4
sa' e - 1' -*4 i0 L w 1,01 t gi. 40 x • -f-41.�4 . 1
We21�2 E L

s-, , \AA C..)." -, p l o - e a � � Z- t 5 - a1 S o1i
c-A,-NA-o. t ,n \ -kC3 t o G d.-k G 1 ) M t a tM --\-ovt `4 (- 1 rkA4'
Ck-A - -H1 a CIA C *c-
2 �luG rJ SE.„ 1,1.4 l 0„, C7 ` 'T t U
c_A PQ,6.o of less -1 nN• 0u s ds thv1-1,-.1 u-Lz f

June 21, 1993
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP, NC0000752
Effluent Guideline Limitations
Effluent Characteristics
Monthly
Average (lb/day)
Daily
Maximum (lb/day)
Comments
BOD5
9,240
18,480
BCT=BPT
TSS
19,800
39,600
BCT=BPT
Pentachlorophenol
-
1.91
BCT=BPT
Trichlorophenol
-
1.75
BAT
pH
6 to 9
6 to 9
BAT
Type of Product Produced
1000 Lbs/Day Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference
Peak average production of bag paper and liner
board
3,300
40 CFR 430.13 (Subpart A, unbleached kraft)

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Champion International Corporation
NC0000752-QO1
Industrial - 1 %
Existing
Renewal
Roanoke River
C
030208
Halifax
Raleigh
Nizich
062893
B28NW
RECEIVED
S Ep 301993
EI VED
3Ep 2 31993
QEHNR RAL
RO
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date
Draige Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Regulated
1500
1000
4
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
We are renewing this permit with existing limitations, except that APAM's have shown the
presence of certain toxics which merit monitoring at this time, so that a thourogh evaluation
(considering interaction of toxics with Weldon and Roanoke Rapids WWTP's) could be made
prior to the basinwide permitting strategy of 1997. At next renewal, limits may change due to
upcoming Basin Plan and QUAL2E model
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
P(1(JJd 1�ALT) tV�(1v: t...c cvepcco.4, n40
G � c7oZ )- 003 ,e /-
Recommended by: Q c e 3i4)
Reviewed by
Date: - '1 `1 3
Instream Assessmen J -- Cc-0 Ai Date: 1'Z t 143
Regional Supervi or: / <4 i, . 7U Date: `i 12/ )43
Permits & Engineering: ei� !� �. Date:24153_
cr /
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: i4 sil P

2
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit:
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
Flow (MGD)
BOD5 (#/day):
TSS (#/day):
pH (SU):
DO (mg/1)
Temp
TP (mg/1)
TN (mg/1)
Penta chlorophenol (#/day)
TridOrophenol (#/day)
J commended Am its
BOD5 (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
pH (SU):
DO (mg/1)
Temp
TP (mg/I)
TN (mg/1)
Penta chlorophenol (#/day)
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Chronic
4.2%
4.2%
Mar, Jun, Sep and Dec
Tridiorophenol (#/day)
Chromium (14/1):
Copper (µg/1):
Aluminum (µg/1):
Lead (µg/l):
Arsenic (µg/1):
Chloride (4/1):
Mercury (µg/1):
Toxics monitoring should be
conductedf at same time of whole
efflent tox test
Monthly Average
28
6,852
16,800
6-9
Monit (daily)
Monit (daily)
Monit (monthly)
Monit (monthly)
Monthly Average
6,852
16,800
6-9
Monit (daily)
Monit (daily)
Monit (monthly)
Monit (monthly)
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Daily Max
13,704
33,600
6-9
1.63
1.49
Daily MaX
13,704
33,600
6-9
1.63
1.49
(see special
condition)
(see special
condition)
WQ or EL
WQ
WQ
EL
(see special
condition)
(see special
condition)
Parametcr(s) Affected
APAMs 1989. 1990 & 1992

0
2_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: NC 48
Downstream Location: NC 158
Parameters: DO, temp, fecal-eerliform, & pH
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Monitoring for pentachlorophenol and for trichlorophenol is not required as per letter from Champion dated 12-15-1988. If
chlorophenolic containing biocides are used at the facility, monitoring for pentachlorophenols and trichlorophenols shall co
immediately on a weekly basis at the effluent by grab samples for the duration of the use of the biocides and for a period of
less than two months after discountinuing use of the biocides.
Julia Storm of Pretreatment agreed with metals monitoring. The metal monitoring requirement will be used to determine n
interaction with Weldon and Roanoke Rapids WWTP. We recommend that the RRO notify Champion of this new requirer
and discuss with TSB recomendations concerning this monitoring requirement.

Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, to)dcs spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)

Facility Name (Vaw\ %Qv% \-toma Permit # IJC..0:00 7S'2 Pipe # 00 I
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is `l- - % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
*1l an , Le , A — . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 t s o o cfs
Permitted Flow ' - MGD
IWC y .'L %
Basin & Sub -basin 0 3 0 z o 9
Receiving Stream 1 oam o Icc r2%
County 14-01t x Date t o - to - 3
Recommended by:
4
QCL PIF Version 9/91

i( ' U a CIA, (s1V,4
GLAis,,,„' it oaJto A.01.)11-)
5 a-ct ICY -AS
apw,v1 127)( 7 )
43
A 2 3 b 0
(, a2 \) ',a-,
La O1Q 21OO'
r AAAQ
cSj t. - E l ore ) <rso) G t 11 2 . (.e
()Lt.., ik
3 - t2►.3 _ !2,
Qq 85r 2
Ct0'3) ( cp •o r2) _ 0, 2ci I 's_(2. ,
(ko (3i) _ (Q
y c.2
dS fr.4 3 t ,,
C
gaci) � ,1
�,_0�3 ) _t; 230) . 5� u/Q
b S 5p.4. 1 , 24 to,o,u r�
4eiteA 2-2 )130 •Pk o , 0
vA n ✓
0U, t I
ci
( �`o)
./k, I)(9
s1 ( ! qua )
o m c ovl
t 2 12
0! v 3 (q$ �)
'-'7)091
12 . �3
ioo
_ s 2
w
P o({G4 0)

Le h
Clo �c3� ()) 1 LG . g
YY -7.0 1 i a ct•a )
6b.6
° g9.%
O w_ � 3�l < <
101 C t (Igo)
to ,k; C-87) _ l3j ,O
pro a
'>,
WL4 t a� "Q
x a-ss
6, 0 6
. M'ltQvs
zt 3 ,5 — '21,3j

•
c
RECEIVED
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
•
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Champion International Corporation -✓
NC0000752 ✓
Industrial - 100% ✓
Existing ✓
Renewal ✓
Roanoke Rj.ver
030208 ✓✓
Halifax
Raleigh ✓
Nizich
062893
B28NW ✓
C
3E? iJ 1 199:;
e�
744:e `�'-RALRO
Stream Characteristic:
USGS # Regulated
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 1500
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 1000
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%): 4
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
We are renewing this permit with existing limitations, except that APAM's have shown the
presence of certain toxics which merit moniotoring at this time, so that a thourogh evaluation .
(considering interaction of toxics with Weldon and Roanoke Rapids WWTP'4could be made prior
14404 to the basinwide permitting strategy of 1997.
f7►� cu am oP
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from_Reviewers:
re_f O�,r {TkS C.vs s, ova Ple_�jSe - '(‹-AA 1" Yes
\ i
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
ment:
13 negional Supervis , r:
K1.� �
Permits & n ineering
: !
Date: g / 2l / 3
Date: 7 Z--)
q3
e Date:
Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: SEP 2 8 1993
-711

V
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
GODS (#/day):
TSS ( (dcu-1)
pH (SU):
COD (mg/1):
Cadmium (µfill):
Chromium (µg/1):
Copper (µgm):
Nickel (14/1):
Lead (tom):
Zinc (µg/1):
Cyanide (14/1):
Phenols (14/1):
Mercury (µg/1):
Silver (14/1):
Chlorine (µg/1):
Recommended Limits
BOD5 (#�
TSS (Icti&
pH (SU):
COD (mg/1):
flow •.
Chromium (14/1):
Copper (4/1):
Aluminum (14/1):
Lead (µg/1):
Arsenic (14/1):
Chloride (µg/i):
Mercury (14/1):
2
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Chronic
4.2%
4.2%
Mar, Jun, Sep and Dec
Txiocs monitoring should be
conductedf at same time of whole
efflent tox test
Monthly Average Daily Max
6,852 / J13,704
16,800 ✓33,600
6-9 6-9
J6'5e)
6,852
16,800
6-9 •�
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Monitor QRTRLY
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
1 ,704
33,600
6-9 •-
2�✓
dva'
cedJ(
ic)
WQ or EL
WQ
WQ
EL
L iL
a
Paramgter(s) Affected
APAMs 1989. 1990 & 1992
_2_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immddia
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional (t'd
dischargers within this portion of the watershed. N.D� r^°
�r�,Ar�5
1'^ %ETOA C
oar,°Y
� A

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: NC 48
Downstream Location: NC 158
Parameters: DO, temp, fecal coliform, & pH
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility de onstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes V No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions Qr Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement
Reporting Form A
(Revised June 1990)
I. Facility Information:
NPDES Permit No: NC00Q0752 Discharge (Pipe) No: 001 Year: 1992
Facility Name: Champion Laternational Class: County.
Person(s) Collecting Samples: Paul Ki nni n
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical: Yes No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory:. WEBB TECHNICAL GROUP, IBC_ (Fork order 92-11-557)
Page 1 of 9
I1. Sampling:
24 hr composite for main sample / grab sample for purgeable fraction
Date Sampled: (composite sample) Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing: _ r ;:
Sampling begun (date, time): 11 /18/9? 9.40 AM Yes ; ,
Sampling finished (date, time): 11 /19/9? , 5.42 AM No - ,
Date and time sampled (grab sample): 11/1 q/9? , 4130 AM
Instructions
The purpose of this document and the accompanying memo is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described in the permit.
Sampling
1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volatile
organic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample is completed. Follow any other sampling instructions provided by the laboratory
performing the analysis.
2 - Indicate in the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space provided on the form.
Analysis
4 - Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form. including those to be identified and approximately quantified under the 10
significant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA -approved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods can be substituted
only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM). Read and distribute to the laboratory
performing the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
5 - Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described in item 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis
Monitoring Requirement in the permit) using a GC/MS library search. Tentative identification is all that is required; confirmation by standard
injection is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an intemal standard having the closest retention time.
Reporting
6 - Quantitation Limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantita-
tion limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting
a quantitation limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical
to within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitation limit differtent (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided
for this purpose.
7 - if a chemical is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or < ') the quantitation limit
in the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected In concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
than the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected In concentrations above the quan-
titation limits must be quantified. Quantitation limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder. October 1990). Enter
the total number of peaks detected in each analytic fraction in the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations
in units of micrograms per liter (ug/1) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be identified under the 10 significant peaks rule
are observed, enter "none" in the space provided for "other" compounds in each appropriate analytic fraction section. Provide the concentra-
tion estimate and retention time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made.
8 - If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight. library match probability, retention time, identification basis, and
MS scan number for each. In addition, list internal standards and their retention times.
9 - In the section labeled "Organic Analytical Information" (p. 9), include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GC/MS library being utilized in the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory
representative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
11 - Mail two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report. if submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTN: Central Files,
Division of Environmental Management, NC DEHNR, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh. NC 27611. Mail the APAM form separately from Discharge Monitoring
Reports.

A. Purgeabie (Volatile Organic) Fraction,
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 84085
EPA Method
0
n?a
Page 2 of 9
Compound
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit'
Concentration
Detected
GC/MS
Confirmation?
STORET
Number
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ugl1)
(ugll)
(ug/1)
Yes
No
34210
Acrolein
100
<OLT
X
34215
Acrylonitrile
100
<QLT
X
,
34030
Benzene
_
5
<QLT
X
32101
Bromodichloromethane
_
5
<QLT
X
32104
Bromoform
5
<QLT
X
34413
Brornomethane10
<QLT
X
,
32102 1
Carbon tetrachloride
5
<QLT
X
34301
Chlorobenzene
6
<QLT
X
34311
Chloroethane
10
<OLT
X
34576
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
10
<QLT
X
~ Chloroform
5 1
<QLT
X
32106
34418
Chloromethane
10
<OLT
X
r 32105 '
Dibromochloromethane
5
<QLT
X
,
34496
1,1-Dichloroethane
5
<QLT
X
34531
1,2-Dichloroethane
5
<QLT
X
34501
1,1-Dichloroethylene
5
<QLT
X
r 34546
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
5
<OLT
34541
,
1,2-Dichloropropane
6
<QLT
X
34704
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
5
<QLT
X
,
34699
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
5
<QLT
X
34371
Ethylbenzene
8
<QLT
X
34423
Methylene chloride
5
_
<QLT
X
,
34516
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
7
<QLT
X
34475 +
Tetrachloroethylene
5
<OLT
X
34010
Toluene
6
<QLT
X
34506
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
5
<QLT
X
,
34511
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
5
<QLT
X
39180
Trichloroethylene
5 _
<QLT
X
34488
' Trichlorofluromethane
10
<OLT
X
39175
Vinyl chloride
10
<QLT
X .
• If different from quantitation limit target

Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Estimated
Concentration
(ugh)
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Retention
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Time (RT)
(Min)
Library
Match
Manual
Interpretation
RT
,
Complete only If non -targeted compqunds are present:
Internal Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)
2. Other purgeables (up to 10 highest peaks)
v
a)
co
ca
CO
0
CD

B. Acid Extractable Fraction, EPA Method
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45582
62F
Page 4 of 9
3
STORET Compound
Number_
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit'
Concentration
Detected
GC/MS
Confirmation?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ugll)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Yes
No
34452
4-Chloro•3•methylphenol
10
_ 20 ,
<20
X
34586
2•Chlorophenol
10
<QLT
X
.
34601
2,4-Dichlorophenol
10
_
<QLT
X
34606
2,4•Dimethyiphenol
10
<QLT
X
34616
2,4•Dinitrophenol
50
<OLT
X
34657
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
50
<QLT
X
34591
2•N itrophenol
10
<QLT
X
34646
4-Nitrophenol
50
<QLT
X
,
39032
Pentachlorophenol
50
<QLT
X
34694
Phenol
10
<QLT
X
34621
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
10
<QLT
X
,
' If different
from quantitation limit target

Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Estimated
Concentration
(ug11)
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Hexadecanoic acid
0ctadecanoic acid
256
284
36
26
94
96
24.05
26.10
Phenanthrenecarboxylic
acid
(CAS #001740-19-8)
300
220
97
28.71
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Library
Match
Manual
Interpretation
RT
X
X
2836
X
X
3114
X
X
3463
Complete only If non -targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)
Phenanthrene-d10
Chrysene-dl2_
22.27
28.80
N
0
A
n
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
c0
m
N
OJ
CD
01
0
(D

C. Base/Neutral Fraction, EPA Method
Number of chemicals detected In Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45583
625
Page 6 of 9
1
STORET Compound
Number
Quantitatlon
Limit Target
Quantitatlon
Limit'
Concentration
Detected
GCIMS
Confirmation?
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Yes
No
3405
Acenaphthene
10
'QLT
X
34200
Acenaphthylene
10
<OLT
X
34220
Anthracene
10
<QLT
X
39120
Benzidine
50
<OLT
X
34526
Benzo (a) anthracene
10
<OLT
X
34247
Benzo (a) pyrene
10
<QLT
X
34230
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
10
<QLT
X
34521
Benzo (ghi) perylene
10
<OLT
X
34242
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
10
<QLT
X
34278
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
10
<OLT
X
34273
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
10
<OLT
X
34283
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
10
<OLT
X
39100
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
10
27
X
34636
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
10
<al T
X
34292
Butyl benzyi phthalate
10
<OLT
X
34581
2-Chloronaphthalene
10
<OLT
X
34641
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
10
<QLT
X
34320
Chrysene
10
<OLT
X
34556
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene
10
<QLT
X
34536
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10
<QLT
X
34566
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
<OLT
X
34571
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10
<OLT
X
34631
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
20
<QLT
X
34336
Diethyl phthalate
10
<QLT
X
34341
Dimethvi phthalate
10
<OLT
X
39110
Di-n-butyl phthalate
10
<OLT
X
34611
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10
<0LT
X
34626
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
10
<QLT
X
34596
Di-n-octyl phthalate
10
<QLT
X
34346
1,2-Diohenylhydrazine
10
59
< z
X
34376
Fluoranthene
10
<Q i
X
34381
Fiuorene
10
<OLT
X
39700
Hexachlorobenzene
10
<OLT
X
34391
Hexachlorobutadiene
10
<OLT
X
34386
Hexachlorocyclopentadlene
10
<OLT
X
34396
Hexachloroethane
10
<OLT
X
34403
Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene
10
<OLT
X
34408
Isophorone
10
<OLT
X
34696
Naphthalene
10
<OLT
X
34447
Nitrobenzene
10
<QLT
X
34438
N-nitrosodimethvlamine
10
<OLT
X
34428
N-nitroso-dl-n-prooylamine
10
<OLT
X
34433
N-nitrosodiphenvlamine
10
<QLT
X
34461
Fhenanthrene
10
<OLT
X
34469
Pyrene
10
<OLT
X
34551
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10 _
<QLT
X
• If different from quantitation target

Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Library
Match
Manual
Interpretation
RT
Z,i,4-irimethyl-Z-
cyrlop.enten-l-one
124
21
64
11.68
X
X
1133
1-(3-Thienyl)-Ethanone
126
20
94
12.28
X
X
1217
4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyben-
zaldehyde
152
24
97
1Z 19
X
X
1895
Unknown
280
145
25.94
3092
Unknown
302
26
27.57
3312
Unknown
302
59
27-90
3355
Unknown
304
102
,
28.35
3415
Unknown
302
65
29.07
3511
Stigmasterol
412
16
97
36.44
X
4520
qamma-Sitosterol
414
98
95
37.61
X
4682
Complete only If non -targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
Retention
Time
(Min)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4
10.82
Acenaphthene-d10
18.46
rhrysene-d12
28.80
Pervlene-d12
32.20
2. Other baselneutrals (up to 10 highest peaks)
0

D. OrganochlorinelOrganophosphorus Pesticides and PCB's Page 8 of 9
detected in Fraction 0 -
Number of chemicals _-
Fraction STORET Number 00188
STORET Compound
Number
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantltatlon
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Confirmation?
Dual Column
GC/MS
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for: (u5g11)
Organochlorino Pesticides/PCB's: EPA Method O
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Yes
No
Yes
No
39330
Aldrin
0.05
<OLT
X
39337
alpha-BHC
0.05
<QLT
X
39338
Beta-BHC
0.05
<Q1 T
.
34259
Delta-8HC
0.1
QLT
X
39340
Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.05
<QLT
39350
Chlordane
0.2
<QLT
X
39310
4,4'•DDD
0.1
<QLT
X
39320
4,4'•ODE
0.1
<QLT
X
39300
4,4'-DDT
0.1
<QLT
X
,
39380
Dieldrin
_
0.02
<OLT
_
X
_
34361
Endosulfan 1 (alpha)
0.1
<QLT
X
34356
Endosulfan 11 (beta)
_ 0.1
<QLT
_
_
X
34351
Endosulfan sulfate
0.7
< LT
X
39390
Endrin
0.06
<QLT
,
X
• 34366
Endrin aldehyde
0.2
<QLT
X
39410
Heptachlor
0.05
<QLT
X
39420
Heptachlor epoxide
0.8
<OLT
X
39480
Methoxychlor
0.5
<QLT
X
39755
Mirex
0.2
<QLT
X
39400
Toxaphene
2.4
<QLT
_
X
34671
PCB 1016
0.5
<QLT
X
39488
PCB 1221
0.5
<QLT
X
39492
PCB 1232
0.5
<QLT
X
39496
PCB 1242
0.5
<QLT
X
39500
PCB 1248
0.5
<QLT
-
X
39504
PCB 1254
1.0
<QLT
X
39508
PCB 1260
1.0
<QLT
1
X
Pesticides: EPA Method 8140
Organophosphorus
39560
Demeton
2.5
<n i j
X
39540
Parathion (ethyl)
0.6
<OLT
X
E. Herbicides,
Number
Fraction
EPA Method 8150
of chemicals detected in Fraction
STORET Number 00148
0
STORET Compound
Number
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Confirmation?
Dual Column
_1. Pollutants to be analyzed for.
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Yes _
No
r 39730
2,4•D
12
<QLT
39045
Silvex
2
<QLT
39740
2,4,5-T
2
<QLT y
• If riifforent from auantitation limit target

Organic Analytical Information: Page 9 of 9
Organic Fraction
Method
Extraction
GC Operating Conditions
Column Description
Surrogates (Spikes;
Compound
Recovery
Batch
Continuous
Length X ID, Film Thickness,
Column Type, Carrier Gas & Flow
Rate, Temperature Program
Purgeable
624
X
75 m x 0.53 mm, 3.0 pm
1,2-Q1cn •ro-r
ethane-d4
96
DB-624, He, 8 ml/min.
Toluene-d8
97
10°C(1 min),180°C.6°C/milltal
u°-
96
Acid Extractable
625
X
30 m x 0.25 mm, 0.25 pm
2-Fluorophenc,
53
DB-5 ms, He, 1 ml/min.
Phenol-d5
48
35°C(4 min),260°C,10°C/mi�br�
j
no
Base/Neutral Extractable
625
X
(same as Acid)
T ro z
75
PL YQrobi-
79
Terphenyl-d14
93
Example: Acid Extractable
625
X
30m x 0.25mm, 0.25um, DB-5,
He, 30 cm/sec, 40°C (4 min) •
270°C, 10°/min
d5 • phenol
50
GC/MS Library size (number
of reference spectra): 54,000
F. Metals and Other Chemicals
Number of Metals and Other Chemicals (as listed below) detected
Fraction STORET Number 78240
in Sample 6
STORET Compound
Number
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit'
Concentration
Detected
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for.
(ugll)
(ug/l)
(ug/1)
01104
Aluminum
50
2360
01097
Antimony
50
<QLT
01002
Arsenic
10
48
01012
Beryllium
25
<QLT
01027
Cadmium
2
5
<5
01034
Chromium
5
10
<10
01042
Copper
2
10
<10
01051
Lead
10
50
<50
71900
Mercury
0.2
0.22
01067
Nickel
10
20
<20
01147
Selenium
5
<QLT
01077
Silver
5
10
<10
01092
Zinc
10
31
2. Other inorganics:
01007
Barium
500
<OLT
00940
Chloride
1000
24,100
00720
Cyanide
20
<QLT
00951
Fluoride
100
500
* If different from quantitation limit target
Analytical Laboratory Representative*
(-••",--",___-4;.--p
Tom— ��'^`�T w`� ? -'D
4� 3
Date* /— 6 '-
Z2
Signed*
Facility Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)•
I certify that this report is accurate and complete
to the best of my knowledge.
Date:
Signed:

L
RE: N. C. Annual Pollutant Analysis Concerning Some Chemicals
and Metals Having Quantitation Limit Higher Than Quantita-
tion Limit Target
In B. Acid Extractable Fraction
"4-Chloro-3-methylphenol" is subject to erratic chromato-
graphic behavior. The quantitation limit outlined in EPA
Method 8270 is used.
In C. Base/Neutral Fraction
"1,2-Diphenyl hydrazine" is subject to decomposition in
the chromatographic inlet; therefore, it frequently exhib-
its poor chromatography. A higher quantitation limit is
used for this compound.
In F. Metals and Other Chemicals
Due to matrix interferences and subsequent instrumental
limitations, the quantitation limits for selected metals
are higher than the quantitation limit targets.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT Na: NC0000752
PERNITITEE NAME: Champion International Corp.
FACILITY NAME: Champion International WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major ' 1 Minor
Pipe No.: 004
Design Capacity: * MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 0 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
* 0.010 MGD avg. Car wash water - rinse only, no detergents added.
RRO recommends 0 & G monitoring.
002 & 003 are non -contact condenser water.
RECEIVING STREAM: Roanoke River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-02-08
Reference USGS Quad: B 28 NW
County: Halifax
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 1/31/94 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by:
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
(please attach)
Greg Nizich J-' N Date: 9/15/93
8.0/4 Date: io/6-93
Date: /0 /S 15�
„'
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
's LNG
q7,3/93
—7S0 1 B
Drainage Area (mi2 ) Avg. Streamflow (cfs): e
7Q10 (cfs) i soo Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 000 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: TWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters / FF
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Mos-,-N19
A v QraqC
O.,_Iti
M ok X
BOD5 (mg/1)
^1 (c.N.
^'i / c,
NH 3-N (mg/1)
M l
"n i A
D.O. (mg/1)
,,,t (
^^ �^
TSS (mg/1)
3 0
y S
F. Col. (/100 ml)
m / A.
"^ % Co‘
pH (SU)
G - `1
6 — q
SQ k\LUROA Alt;
0 .1
0.2
0,t GY.tn o (6,..,y
tk) 3 0
6 0
PLOTTED
Comments: I`' o r� e� ev'e� ane gust -
wctoARw r nC
Dt M
to
l(
3

June 21, 1993 •
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP, NC0000752
Effluent Guideline Limitations
Effluent Characteristics
Monthly
Average (lb/day)
Daily
Maximum (lb/day)
Comments
BOD5
9,240
18,480
BCT=BPT
,
TSS
19,800
39,600
BCT=BPT
,:
I
Pentachlorophenol
-
1.91
BCT=BPT
Trichlorophenol
-
1.75
BAT
PH
6 to 9
6 to 9
BAT
r
Type of Product Produced
Peak average production of bag paper and linei
board
1000 Lbs/Day Produced
3,300
Effluent Guideline Reference
40 CFR 430.13 (Subpart A, unbleached kraft)

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 7501 e
Champion International Corporation
NC0000752-004
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Roanoke River
C
030208
Halifax
Raleigh
Nizich
062893
B28NW
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
We are renewing this permit with existing limitations
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 1500
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 1000
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Special hedule Re uirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
-';Ice_ J0
Regulated
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instre. Assessment:
Reg onal Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
Date: ail Zl of 3
r Date: Q
Date: q,),
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: d S ig P

2
TOXICS/METALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Type of Toxicity Test:
Existing Limit:
Recommended Limit
Monitoring Schedule:
Existing Limits
Monthly Average Daily Max
Flow (MGD) Monitoring Monitoring
Setteable Matter (ml/1) 0.1 0.2
TSS (mg/1) 30 45
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9
Oil & Grease (mg/1) 30 60
Recommended Limits
Monthly Average Daily MaX WQ or EL
Flow (MGD) Monitoring Monitoring
Setteable Matter (m1/1) 0.1 0.2 EL
TSS (mg/1) 30 45 EL
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 EL
Oil & Grease (mg/1) 30 60 EL
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Parameter(s) Affected
0_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:

,
• Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: n/a
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No n p r,"w
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
No detergents are to be used in the wastewater without the written approval of the Division of
Environmental Management
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes
If Yes, SOC No.`'`'s2
To: Permits and Engineering Unit/►
Water Quality Section
Attention: (Greg Nizich)
Date July 14, 1993
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County Halifax
JUL ` 2 0 199.7
Permit No. NC 0000752_
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Champion International Corp.
TECHTCC Sur,-0 T E;,�ANCH
WWTP
NC Hwy 48 East
Roanoke Rapids , NC 27870
2. Date of Investigation: 7/14/93
3. Report Prepared by: Michael C. Wicker
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Thomas C. Puryear
919-535-6237
5. Directions to Site: Hwy I-95 north to Roanoke Rapids , exit
on Hwy 158 west, go to Hwy 48 East , facility is on the right
prior to the Roanoke River
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
001
Latitude: 36°28'17" Longitude:77°38'12"
002
36 28'19" 77 38'21"
003
36 28'37" 77 38'29"
004
36 27'59" 77 38'13"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility
site and discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. B28NW U.S.G.S. Quad Name Roanoke
Rapids,NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application ?
X Yes No If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
facility located on graded flat area next to river above 100
yr. floodplain
9. Location of nearest dwelling: none within 1000 ft.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Roanoke River

'SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No
If Yes, SOC No.
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 030208
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Roanoke River well developed, 60
ft wide ,10 ft deep, summer 7Q10 1013 cfs ,
downstream dischargers are Roanoke Rapids Sanitary
District WWTP and Town of Weldon WWTP
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: Total 28.0
MGD(Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? 28.0 MGD Total
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? 28.0 MGD Total
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorization to Construct issued in the previous two years:
N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities:
001 discharge (process water)
fresh water is recycled, chemicals are recovered and
regenerated, wastes, drippings, spills ,etc. go to process
sewer, fuel leaks and drippings go to oil/water separator
then to process sewer. Emergency pond used for
neutralization of spills. Acid and caustic feed available.
Separators and traps used to capture components. Process
sewer discharges to mechanical barscreen, primary clarifier,
aeration lagoon, and 3 stabilization lagoons, final bar
screen and discharge to river. Sludge is chemically
coagulated, thickened in a rotary screen thickener,
compressed by a screw press, and taken to permitted
landfill.(WQ0000436)
002 Band C evaporator non contact condenser water discharge
to river
003 Turpentine non contact condenser water discharge to
river
004 Car wash water discharge to on -site drainage ditch to
river.

'SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No
If Yes, SOC No.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities: same
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
001 Spills of black liquor, acids or caustics have
occurred. Most are contained or neutralized. Kraft pulping
effluents common offenders are sulfides, mercaptans, resin
acids, and terpines. Chemical recovery, recycling, and the
biological waste treatment control most of these. Arsenic,
Zinc, Chlorides, and Fluoride have been detected in the
effluent but below stream standards. Toxicity testing has
passed each quarter over the last year.
002 No biocides or chromium , zinc, or copper are added.
003
004 Car wash is rinse only, no detergents are added.
Oils and grease monitoring compliant with permit limits.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development_ approved
should be required not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
permit no. W00000436
Residual Contractor Champion
Telephone No. same
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP
PFRP Other not required
c. Landfill: onsite permitted sludge landfill operated by
Champion
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet): Class IV
4. SIC Code(s): 26
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular
facilities i.e.., non -contact cooling water discharge from a
metal plating company would be 14, not 56.
Primary 18 Secondary 14 61
Main Treatment Unit Code: 31 05 00 02
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? N/A

'SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No
If Yes, SOC No.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests:
existing toxicity monitoring should remain in the permit,
the annual pollutant analysis should remain in effect,
a review of this analysis indicates chlorobenzes and 2,4,5-T are
below the quantitation limit therefore dioxins appear controlled.
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate)
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: N/A
Connection to Regional Sewer System: separate sanitary sewer
connected to Roanoke Rapids
Date
Subsurface: N/A
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The RRO has reviewed the request for NPDES renewal and made
a site evaluation.
A review of self monitoring data submitted for the facility
from June 1992 to May 1993 indicates compliance with all
monitoring requirements and effluent limitations.
A review of the chronic toxicity test results submitted
quarterly for the facility during 92-93 indicates that the
parameter was monitored as required and all results were "Pass".
The existing treatment facilities were observed in operation
and are in accordance with the permit information.
Discharge 001 ( process water from unbleached kraft pulp and
paper operations ) averaged 17.8 mgd with a range of 5-26.5 mgd
in 92-93.
Discharge 002 ( B & C evaporator condenser water discharge )
averaged 7.6 mgd in 92-93.
Discharge 003 ( Turpentine Condenser Cooling Water Discharge
averaged 1.6 Mgd in 92-93.
Discharge 004 ( Car Wash ) averaged .01 mgd in 92-93.
As part of the January 6, 1986 ATC for a woodyard stormwater
collection basin Champion was requested to monitor the run-off
collected for phenols. The submitted data reflected no problems
as such and in February of 1993 the RRO advised Champion

o
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes_ No
If Yes, SOC No.
submittals of this monitoring were no longer needalonged. The
wthe
stormwater run-off is treated in the existing WWTP
process water and discharged through pipe 001. The permit should
reflect the inclusion of stormwater in the permit description for
001.
The car wash discharges to an on -site drainage
of ditch
tch which
also receives stormwater from the periphery area
This stormwater is separate from that combined in the process
drains. This drainage ditch discharges directly to the river and
currently is the 004 discharge. Champion has applied for an
individual permit for stormwater discharge which includes this
discharge. Since this discharge is already permitted Permits and
Engineering should address whether this should be removed from
the stormwater monitoring requirements or thisexig should NPDES
permit. The permit description for this discharge
g
also
include stormwater where applicable.
The RRO recommends renewal of existing NPDES permit
NC0000752 to Champion International Corporation for a 28.0 mgd
discharge to the Roanoke River ( class C ) at Roanoke Rapids, NC.
Permit conditions , limits , and monitoring should remain the
same unless the waste load allocation review reveals any water
quality limited parameters. The permit expiration date should
occur in accord with the Roanoke River Basinwide Permitting
Schedule of January 1997.
Signature of report preparer
;747Y
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
(-7 %II;
Date

RCES
i
471
•
.•
40'
VCJLTARE 6 MI
263
ROANOKE RAPIDS QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
6 MI. To U.S 30I: 2 400 000 FEET
•\ V. • - • -• •••
-7�1
042
1 000 000
FEET
z
0
CHAMPION IN T L-
a
-040
4039
•n38
003
27'30"
4°36
00
02.
Co21

•
I
RATING SCALE FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES
•
ITEM
Name of Plant:
Owner or -Contact Person:
Mailing Address: • 1J c-- l.�wy_�49, 4._ a- -
o./�,. �. C.. ? k r - o� T C
County: «mot c Telephone: Rkk
NPDES Permit No. NCOOoo"ts- - Nondisc. Per. No.
lssueDa'le: Z` i 7-4 (QC‘ . Expiration Date: (/3k (Sy
Existing_ -Facility New FaciJity
- S35. - (0z3 `7
Rated By: L ,.sz - Date:
Reviewed (Train. & Cert.) Reg. Office
Reviewed (Train. & Cert.) Central Office
ORC c. t?1/4&*.. e,e.—e- Grade �T
POINTS ITEM
1) Industrial Pretreatment Units and/or
Industrial Pretreatment Program
(see' e5nition No. 32)
2) PSS1G: FLOW OF PLANT IN GPD
Ulm "aoj!icable to non -contaminated cooling
waters, sludge handling facilities lc: water
ourification plants, totally closed cycle
_y_ a (del. No. 11). and facilities
consisting only of Item (4) (d) or Items (4) (d)
and (11) (d))
0 -- 20,000
20,001 -- 50,000
-- 100,000
100,0:: -- 250,000
250,0r, . -• 500,000
500,0C 1 -- i ,000,000
1,000,001 -- 2,000,000
2,000,001 (and up) -
rale 1 point additional for each
200,000 gpd c acity up to a
maximum 30
POINT.
(4) PRIMARY T SEATMENT UNITS
(a). Septi: Tan+•. (see definition no. 43) • 2
4 (b) Irnhc• -: Tani 5
2
3
5
8
10
Design Flow (gpd) : Zg M Gc
(3) PRELIMINARY UNITS (see definition no. 32)
(a) Bar Screens
Of
(b) Mechanical Screens, Static Screens or
Comminuting Devices
(c) Grit Removal
Of
(d) Mechanical or Aerated Grit Removal
(e) Flow Measuring Device
Of
(I) Instrumented Flow Measurement
(g) Preaeration
(h) Influent Flow Equalization
(i) Grease or Oil Separators - Gravity
Mechanical
Dissolved Air Flotation.
(j) Prechlorination
2
2
2
3
8
5
(c) Primary Clarifiers
(d) Settling Ponds or Settling Tanks for Inorganic
Non -toxic Materials (sludge handling facilities
for v:ater purification plants, sand, grave:,
stone, and other mining operations except
recreational activities such as gem or gold
mining) 2
(5) SECONDARY TREATMENT UNITS
(a) Carbonaceous Stage
(i)Aeration - High Purity Oxygen System 20
Diffused Air System Z
t -
Mechanical Air System (fix
floating or rotor) E
Separate Sludge Reaeration 3
(i i) Trickling Filter
High Rate
Standard Rale
Packed Tower
(i i i) Biological Aerated Filler or Aerated
Biological Filter
Aerated Lagoons
Rolatino Biological Contactors
(iv)
(v)
(vi) Sand Filters -
intermittent biological
recirculating biological
(vii) Stabilization Lagoons S�
(viii)Clarifier
(ix) Single stage system for combined
carbonaceous removal of BOO and
nitrogenous removal by nitrification
(see def. No. 12) (Points for this item
have to be in addition to items (5) (a)
(i) through (5) (a) (viii) 8
Nutrient additions to enhance BOD
removal 5
(xi) Biological Culture ('Super Bugs') addition
to enhance organic compound removal 5
7
5
(x)
C.
3
5

(ii) Trickling Filter -
High Rate
Standard Rate
Packed Tower
(i i i) Biological Aerated Filter or Aerated
Biological Filter
(iv) Rotating Biological Contactors
(v) Sand Filter -
intermittent biological
recirculating biological
(vi) Clarifier
7
5
5
10
10
2
3
5
(6) TERTIARY OR ADVANCED TREATMENT UNIT
(a) Activated Carbons Beds -
without carton regeneration 5
with carbon regeneration 1 5
(b) Powdered or Granular Activated Carbon Feed -
without carbon regeneration 5
with carbon regeneration 1 5
(c) Air Stripping 5
(d) Denitrification Process (separate process) 10
(e) Electrodialysis 5
(1) Foam Separation 5
(g) ton Exchange 5
(h) Land Application of Treated Effluent
(see definition no. 22b) (not applicable for
sand, gravel, stone and other similar mining
operations)
.(i) on agriculturally managed sites (See def.
No. 4) 1 0
(ii) by high rale infiltration on non -agriculturally
managed sites (includes rotary distributors
and similar fixed nozzle systems) 4
(iii) by subsurface disposal (includes low pressure
pipe systems and gravity systems except at
plants consisting of septic lank and nitrifica-
tion lines only) 4
(i) Microscreens 5
(j) Phosphorus Removal by Biological Processes
(See def. No. 26) 2 0
(k) Polishing Ponds - without aeration 2
with aeration 5
(I) Post Aeration - cascade 0
diffused or mechanical . 5
(m) Reverse Osmosis 5
(n) Sand or Mixed -Media Filters - low rate 2
high rate 5
(o) Treatment processes for removal of metal or
(8)
v'i • , L.enultuge. or voter tress or otrier
similar dewalering devices
SLUDGE DISPOSAL (including incinerated ash)
(a) Lagoons 2
(b) Land Application (surface and subsurface)
(see definition 22a)
-where the facility holds the land app. permit .
-by contracting to a land application operator
holds the land application permit 2
-land application of sludge by a contractor who does
not hold the permit for the wastewater treatment
facility where the sludge is generated
(c) Landiilled (burial)
(9) DISINFECTION
(a) Chlorination 5
(b) Dechlorination 5
(c) Ozone 5
(d) radiation 5
(10) CHEMICAL ADDITION SYSTEM (S) (See definition No. 9)
(not applicable to chemical. additions rated as item
(3) (j), (5) (a) (xi), (6) (a), (6) (b), (7) (b), (7) (e),
(9) (a), (9) (b), or (9) (c) 5 points each: List:
who
(11)
5
5
5
5
5
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS
(a) Holding Ponds, Holding Tanks or Settling Ponds
for Organic or Toxic Materials including wastes
from mining operations containing nitrogen and/or
phosphorous compounds in amounts significantly
greater than is common for domestic wastewater 4
(b) Effluent Flow Equalization (not applicable to storage
basins which are inherent in land application systems). 2
(c) Stage Discharge (not applicable to storage basins
inherent in land application systems
(d) Pumps
(e) Stand -By Power Supply
(1) Thermal Pollution Control Device 3
TOTAL POINTS
CLASSIFICATION
cyanide 1 5 Class I
(p) Treatment processes for removal of toxic Class II
materials other than metal or cyanide 1 5
(7) SLUDGE TREATMENT
(a) Sludge Digestion Tank - Heated
Aerobic
Unheated
(b) Sludge Stabilization (chemical or thermal)
(c) Sludge Dryir:w Beds - Gravity
10
5
3
5
2
C.)
5 - 25 Points
26- 50 Points
51- 65 Points
66- Up Points
Facilities having a rating of one through four points, inclusive,
do not require a certified operator. Classification of all other
facilities requires a comparable grade operator in responsible
charge.
Facilities having an activated sludge process will be assigned