The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090751 Ver 1_2009 Monitoring Report_20140414BEAMON' S RUN BUFFER AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE (BARNHILL FARM) MONITORING REPORT (2009) Greene County, North Carolina EEP Project No. 24 Prepared for: North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 ®�1 O 440 En . a°nlement o PROGRAM '! Status of Plan: Final Submission Date: December 2009 Monitoring Firm: Stantec Stantec Consulting Services Inc 801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project site is located on the grounds of the Barnhill farm southeast of Wilson, NC. The site was identified for its potential as a buffer site because of its proximity to several bordering streams, including Beaman's Run and Contentnea Creek. The site was brought to the attention of the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) because it had been cited for violations by the NC Division of the Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) due to the stockpiling of old tires which had been found in the nearby streams. The conservation easement is made up of two tracts: Tract A encompasses 47.53 acres along the right bank of Beamon's Run (including a 2.11 acre open pit area); Tract B encompasses 32.38 acres along the left bank of Contentnea Creek. Site investigation and design services were provided by PBS &J, Inc. The records available at this time indicated that construction and the bulk of the planting at the site occurred over the winter of 2000. Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community were excluded from the monitoring effort. Based on the revised areas, the project consists of 16.89 acres of Neuse River riparian buffer restoration, 195 feet of streambank stabilization, and 0.34 acres of wetland restoration. No monitoring plan was originally prepared for this site and no monitoring program began at this site when construction was completed. NCSU staff from the Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department and the Water Resources Research Institute made an initial monitoring visit on October 14, 2003. They compiled the first monitoring report submitted in March of 2004. In 2009, Stantec was contracted to implement a revised monitoring procedure and report developed based on the document "Content, Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports" provided by the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program in 11/16/06. Monitoring revealed that 6 of the 12 plots (50 %) met the vegetative success criteria of 320 planted stems or greater per acre. It is difficult to discern the exact reasons for poor planted species survival in the vegetation plots and elsewhere on the site since it has been 9 years since vegetation installation. Seedlings may have been shaded out, eaten by wildlife, affected by recent droughts, or in some cases affected by mowing. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page i Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final November 2009 Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary ......................................................................... ..............................i 1.0 Project Background ............ ............................... 1.1 Project Objectives ...... ............................... 1.2 Project Structure .......... ............................... 1.3 Location and Setting ... ............................... 1.4 Project History and Background ................ 1.5 Monitoring Plan View . ............................... 2.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results......... 2.1 Vegetation Assessment .............................. 2.1.1 Vegetation Problem Areas ..................... 2.1.2 Vegetation Current Condition Plan VieN 2.2 Stream Assessment ..... ............................... 2.3 Wetland Assessment ... ............................... 2.3.1 Current Condition Plan View ................. 2.3.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment .................. 3.0 References ........................... ............................... Figures Figure 1 — Property Map Figure 2 — As -Built Maps Tables Table I — Project Restoration Components Table II — Project Activity and Reporting History Table III — Contacts Table IV — Project Background Table Table V — Vegetative Success Criteria Attainment Appendices Appendix A. Vegetation Raw Data Appendix B. Geomorphologic Raw Data Appendix C. Wetland Hydrology Data Appendix D. Current Condition Plan View ............................................... ..............................1 ............................................... ..............................1 ............................................... ..............................1 .............................................. ............................... 2 .............................................. ............................... 5 .............................................. ............................... 6 .............................................. .............................15 .............................................. .............................15 .............................................. .............................15 .............................................. .............................16 .............................................. .............................16 .............................................. .............................16 .............................................. .............................16 .............................................. .............................16 .............................................. .............................17 3 7 2 5 5 6 16 Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page ii Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 1.0 Project Background 1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The purpose of riparian wetland and buffer restoration is to improve water quality by providing a more ecologically effective and efficient riparian buffer. The establishment and protection of a vegetated buffer along the floodplain of any stream provides a number of benefits, which include streambank stability from mature root systems, in- stream shade from the overhanging leaf canopy, organic detritus that fuels food chains, habitat and travel corridors for native wildlife species, and filtering of sediments and other potential pollutants from surface and subsurface flow (NCSRI, 2003). The natural riparian buffer along the project's section of Beamon's Run had been disturbed by past agricultural practices and portions of it had been used as a tire dump. The tires and associated debris were removed and the buffer was planted with native wetland species to restore functionality to the buffer. The primary objective of the project was to protect and improve water quality by removing and transforming pollutants with buffers and wetlands. The goals as listed in the WW Project Summary were to: 1. Restore agricultural land to riparian buffer to increase removal of nutrients 2. Improve wildlife habitat 1.2 PROJECT STRUCTURE The land was acquired in a settlement of a suit brought by the state against Frank Barnhill to recover costs of cleaning up the tires he had been dumping on his land. According to the final settlement agreement, the conservation easement was conveyed to the state in lieu of money spent from the NC Scrap Tire Disposal Account "for the abatement of a nuisance tire collection site." The conservation easement is made up of two tracts: Tract A encompasses 47.53 acres along the right bank of Beamon's Run (including a 2.11 acre open pit area); Tract B encompasses 32.38 acres along the left bank of Contentnea Creek. The Wetland Restoration Program (now NCEEP) hired PBS &J to provide investigation and design services for stream enhancement, wetland restoration and Neuse River riparian buffer restoration. The as -built planset shows 24.45 acres of planting. The records available at this time indicated that construction and the bulk of the planting at the site occurred over the winter of 2000. Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community were excluded from the monitoring effort. The 200' buffer was taken from the normal edge of the surface water. These areas are shown on the maps in Appendix D. As per NCEEP, only the wetland area within the 200' buffer was monitored for vegetative success. The stream stabilization areas were not formally assessed; however, erosion was not observed onsite in those areas. Based on the revised areas, the project consists of 16.89 acres of Neuse River riparian buffer restoration, 195 feet of streambank stabilization, and 0.34 acres of wetland restoration. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page I Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 Exhibit Table I. Project Restoration Components Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EE P Project No. 24 a sy `o Reach ID � j 44 Stationing Comment Riverine Wetland Prepare and plant Cypress community near Restoration ac 0.34 R wetland areas 0.34 Contentnea Creek Neuse Riparian Within 200' buffer along both Buffer Restoration Prepare and plant I Beamon's Run and Contentnea 1 16.89 R buffers 16.89 Creek Construction and installation of brush mattresses In three areas along both Streambank for bank Beamon's Run and Contentnea Stabilization 1 195 S stabilization 195 Creek R = Restoration S = Stabilization P= Preservation 1.3 LOCATION AND SETTING The restoration site is located approximately 7.3 miles southeast of Stantonsburg, in Greene County, North Carolina. The site is located in a rural area, adjacent to Beamon's Run Creek, which is a major tributary of Contentnea Creek, located in the Neuse River Basin. Site directions: From Raleigh follow US 264 East toward Wilson. Take exit 49 and turn right onto NC 58 South toward Wilson/Kinston. Travel approximately 5.2 miles on NC 58. This will take you into Stantonsburg. Continue through Stantonsburg, and after traveling 4 miles past Stantonsburg, turn left at Speight's Bridge Road (NC 1225). Travel approximately 3.5 miles down NC 1225, and turn right on a farm path before you approach Beamon's Farm Rd. The farm path is behind a brick ranch style house close to NC 1225. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 2 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 1.0 Project Background 1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The purpose of riparian wetland and buffer restoration is to improve water quality by providing a more ecologically effective and efficient riparian buffer. The establishment and protection of a vegetated buffer along the floodplain of any stream provides a number of benefits, which include streambank stability from mature root systems, in- stream shade from the overhanging leaf canopy, organic detritus that fuels food chains, habitat and travel corridors for native wildlife species, and filtering of sediments and other potential pollutants from surface and subsurface flow (NCSRI, 2003). The natural riparian buffer along the project's section of Beamon's Run had been disturbed by past agricultural practices and portions of it had been used as a tire dump. The tires and associated debris were removed and the buffer was planted with native wetland species to restore functionality to the buffer. The primary objective of the project was to protect and improve water quality by removing and transforming pollutants with buffers and wetlands. The goals as listed in the WRP Project Summary were to: 1. Restore agricultural land to riparian buffer to increase removal of nutrients 2. Improve wildlife habitat 1.2 PROJECT STRUCTURE The land was acquired in a settlement of a suit brought by the state against Frank Barnhill to recover costs of cleaning up the tires he had been dumping on his land. According to the final settlement agreement, the conservation easement was conveyed to the state in lieu of money spent from the NC Scrap Tire Disposal Account "for the abatement of a nuisance tire collection site." The conservation easement is made up of two tracts: Tract A encompasses 47.53 acres along the right bank of Beamon's Run (including a 2.11 acre open pit area); Tract B encompasses 32.38 acres along the left bank of Contentnea Creek. The Wetland Restoration Program (now NCEEP) hired PBS &J to provide investigation and design services for stream enhancement, wetland restoration and Neuse River riparian buffer restoration. The as -built planset shows 24.45 acres of planting. The records available at this time indicated that construction and the bulk of the planting at the site occurred over the winter of 2000. Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community were excluded from the monitoring effort. The 200' buffer was taken from the normal edge of the surface water. These areas are shown, on the maps in Appendix D. As per NCEEP, only the wetland area within the 200' buffer was monitored for vegetative success. The stream stabilization areas were not formally assessed; however, erosion was not observed onsite in those areas. Based on the revised areas, the project consists of 16.89 acres of Neuse River riparian buffer restoration, 195 feet of streambank stabilization, and 0.34 acres of wetland restoration. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page I Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 Exhibit Table I. Project Restoration Components Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EE P Project No. 24 to Reach ID W ;To H Q �°, Stationing Comment Riverine Wetland Prepare and plant Cypress community near Restoration ac 0.34 R wetland areas 0.34 Contentnea Creek Neuse Riparian Within 200' buffer along both Buffer Restoration Prepare and plant I Beamon's Run and Contentnea 1 16.89 R buffers 16.89 Creek Construction and installation of brush mattresses In three areas along both Streambank for bank Beamon's Run and Contentnea Stabilization 1 195 S stabilization 195 Creek R = Restoration S = Stabilization P= Preservation 1.3 LOCATION AND SETTING The restoration site is located approximately 7.3 miles southeast of Stantonsburg, in Greene County, North Carolina. The site is located in a rural area, adjacent to Beamon's Run Creek, which is a major tributary of Contentnea Creek, located in the Neuse River Basin. Site directions: From Raleigh follow US 264 East toward Wilson. Take exit 49 and turn right onto NC 58 South toward Wilson/Kinston. Travel approximately 5.2 miles on NC 58. This will take you into Stantonsburg. Continue through Stantonsburg, and after traveling 4 miles past Stantonsburg, turn left at Speight's Bridge Road (NC 1225). Travel approximately 3.5 miles down NC 1225, and turn right on a farm path before you approach Beamon's Farm Rd. The farm path is behind a brick ranch style house close to NC 1225. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 2 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 1 a _Ls / o � I L ' Stantonsburg 6 A as , oa t_J n Q �l I N I � J Pelleber Rd (SR W5) �o ° D 0 r 1 Walstonsburg ]. I O Speight -s Bridge Project Site ,. ` a 3 Eureka �'' \� ! - �' ��•� If I � N I I Directions: From Raleigh, follow US 264 East toward Wilson. Figure 1 - Location Map t Take exit 49 and turn right onto NC 58 South toward Wilson. Roads Travel approximately 5.2 miles on NC 58. This will take you into Stantonsburg. You will continue through Stantonsburg, '� Hydrography Beamon's Run Wetland and Buffer Restoration Project and after traveling 4 miles past Stantonsburg, turn left onto EEP Project Number 24 Speight's Bridge Road (SR 1225). Travel approximately 3.5 Municipal Boundaries Greene County, NC miles down SR 1225 and turn right on a farm path before you - Project Site approach Beamon's Farm Rd. The farm path is behind a brick Monitoring Report Greene Count ranch style house close to SR 1225. 05 0 December, 2009 1.4 PROJECT HISTORY AND BACKGROUND Exhibit Table Il. Project Activity and Reporting History Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 24 Activity or Report Scheduled Completion Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or Delivery Restoration Plan unknown unknown unknown Final Design - 90% unknown unknown unknown Construction 2000 2000 2000 Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area 2000 2000 2000 Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area 2000 2000 2000 Bare Root Seedling Installation 2000 2000 2000 Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring - baseline May, 2000 May, 2000 May, 2000 Final Report unknown unknown unknown Monitoring Report CSU Mar, 2004 Mar, 2004 Mar, 2004 Monitoring Report Stantec Dec, 2009 Dec, 2009 Dec, 2009 Exhibit Table III. Contacts Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site /EEP Project No. 24 Designer PBS &J 1616 East Millbrook Road Suite 310 Raleigh, NC 27609 Construction Contractor unknown Planting Contractor unknown Seeding Contractor unknown Seed Mix Sources unknown Nursery Stock Suppliers Denton's Nursury (longleaf) 3535 NC 42 West Wilson, NC 27893 NC Division of Forest Resources (bare roots) 762 Claridge Nursery Road Goldsboro, NC 27530 Monitoring Performers (2003) NCSU BAE Dept & Water Quality Group Campus Box 7637 Raleigh NC 27695 919 515 -8240 Monitoring Performers (2009) Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 801 Jones Franklin Road, Ste 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Vegetation Monitoring POC Larry Hobbs (919)851 -6866 Amber Coleman (919)851-6866 Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 5 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 Exhibit Table IV. Project Background Table Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 24 Project County Greene Drainage Area 8.5 s mi Drainage impervious cover estimate % < 1 percent Stream Order 3rd order Ph sio ra hic Region Coastal Plain Ecore ion Southeastern Flood plains and Low Terraces Ros en Classification of As -built N/A Cowardin Classification PFOIA - Palustrine, Forested, Broad - leaved deciduous, temp. flooded dominant classification Dominant soil types Kenansville fine sand Riverine Wetland Restoration Riverine Buffer Restoration Reference site ID N/A USGS HUC for Project 03020203050010 USGS HUC for Reference N/A NCDWQ Subbasin for Project 03 -04 -07 NCDWQ Subbasin for Reference N/A NCDWQ Classification for Project C SW NSW NCDWQ Classification for Reference N/A Any portion of any project segment 303d listed? No Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed segment? No Reasons for 303d listing or stressor N/A Percent of project easement fenced N/A 1.5 MONITORING PLAN VIEW The monitoring plan view map is integrated within the current condition plan view map in Appendix D. The original as -built maps have been included here. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 6 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 JAMES D. GRANT, PLS N SHEET 2 OF 3 Greene County Subdivision I,_ Review Officer of _ -_- County, certify that the Administrator, certify that Pursuant to the surveyor's mop or plot to which this Certification is affixed meets all statutory certification, (approval) or (no approves) requirements for recording. is required by the Greens County Subdivision Administrator. Greene County Subdivision Administrator Data Ravi.. Officer L -3752 WILTON COX PROPERTY TRACT e WILL BOOK 2, Pg. 281 / /// MPZGH �1NE !� �a ' ^S \ \\ F� Of 3 \ \hEAD PoWER UNES J \ 0 `. ;NEB } pF '' f cotrraOL s \ ��k� c �, rl ,7 / CORNER NEW PIPE / BARNHILL PROPERTY D.B. 270, Pg. 631 - "," D.B. 309, Pg. 9.3 COX PROPERTY LOT 4 D.B. 127, Pg. 70 & 71 D.B. 461, Pg. 175 t a ♦ -: ♦, ♦ ♦1, ♦� a A1, ♦4 1 N N 0 w N u r^ N . ♦i ♦ ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i� "48" BARNHILL PROPERTY D.B. 270, Pg. 631 TRACT 5 WILL BOOK 2, Pg. 281 N <.. CC- ;1 ' 00 " ♦��♦. ,•,♦ ♦� ♦♦, ♦ ♦ ♦, ♦. .� A, ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦,♦ �♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ I I ��4eq� °. OPEN PIT EASEMENT AREA 11 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦•►♦" 2.11 ccre� AS -BUILT PLAINS UDING OPEN P r AREA 2 by computer -21- "1" THRU "59" '6' NPS X23. '22' Q(iOQ '24' a �S '27' J �a P PLANTING LEGEND _ 4' WOODED feFN" BEARING DISTANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE RIVER BIRCH .2. '54' WATER AND CHESTNUT OAK "A" 1 S 65'40'36W 142.90' s 5v30' +2W st S 09'50'20 "E Ooo LONG LEAF PINE S 51'03'29'W 101.63' 2 N 6253'59'W WHITE OAK, WILLOW OAK, WATER OAK S 89'07 :25'W 29.65' YELLOW POPLAR, CHESTNUT OAK AND GREEN ASH 3 N 08'03'35 "E CYPRESS SHEET 2 OF 3 N ST17'35"W 65.85' B6.4T SURVEY FOR 4 N 26'39b2"W CHESTNUT OAK 36 4p 0 U _ a ll - - q,��ERNEgp PoW 11 _ S 3730'00'E �dwpO 05`d 04� ,0 0�e " 0 o O O O " O "O O VO O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O -• O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .,' 7, 0000O 0 000 00 000 00000000000 0 40 D00 0 0 7 I H BEAVER POND / / / \ 5 1T40'S9Yl 99.76' 128 COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG BEARMN RUN "A" TO 'B' THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA '49" (CONSERVATION EASEMENT) A PORTION OF THE FRANK D. BARNHILL PROPERTY RECORDED IN D.B. 270, Pg. 681 & D.B. 309, Pg. 93 OF THE GREENE CO. REGISTRY. SPEIGHTS BRIDGE TWSP. - GREENE CO., N.C. SCALE: 1" = 200' - DATE: 05/16/00 200 100 200 400 600 GRAPHIC SCALE INCHES /FEET DANNY GRANT & ASSOCIATES PLANTED ACREAGE = 19.00 acres +/- LAND SURVEYING SERVICES CLEARED ACREAGE = 16.45 acres +/- P.O. sox 517 SNOW HILL, N.C. 28580 REVISED 07/21/00 TO SHOW WOODLINE (252) 747 -7777 DATF 05 /11/O0 0F" 11Y: JOG FD /Pp 58/2_F11-N n0362 "1" THRU "59" NPS 50" COURSE BEARING DISTANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE 17' '54' .yy. 1 S 65'40'36W 142.90' 33 S 09'50'20 "E 92.58' 2 N 6253'59'W 43.45' 34 S 89'07 :25'W 29.65' NPS 3 N 08'03'35 "E 51.75' 35 N ST17'35"W 65.85' B6.4T 52" '55' 4 N 26'39b2"W 158.46' 36 N 2511'47"W 63.46' 5 6 N 74'OS'51'W N 04'48'4814 37.26' 62.88' 37 38 S 43'08'14°W N 46'38'15W 85.34' 48.06' N 7 N 45'19'2214 40.88' 39 S 56'40'57"W 95.18' '56" 8 S 4627'56"W 92.14' 40 'S 27'47'51 "E 70.37' 9 S 7656'07"W 116.71' 41 S 21'30'59"W 41.29' 167.61' 10 N 47'51'3614 71.65' 42 N 59'11'4514 8347' 11 N 75'41'53W 85.32' 43 S 64'50'0414 28.60' '57' 12 N 22'55'24"W 48.83' 44 S 33'46'28'E 184.16' 13 S 66'30'52W 45.28' 45 S 83'10'33'E 75.49' 14 S 21'29'2314 121.19' 46 ' 1T3O'40"W 49.64' "B" 59" "56' 15 S 30'40'13"W 67.59' 47 S 6523'26 "E 80.25' 16 S 15'54'17 "E 80-99' 48 S 70'52'33 "E 149.55' 0 17 N 87-10 :18 -W 43.48' 49 S 25'20'49'E 24.59' O 18 S 30'00'53 W 98.58' 50 S 85'02'23'E 171.05' Z 19 S 35'0036 -E 103.84' 51 5 37'54'14"W 55.74' 20 N 6642'04'E 59.76' 52 S 00'39'59 "E 102.41' (TI 21 S 22'15'42 "E 96.05' 53 S 83'09'24 'W 304.19' Z 22 S 44'49'l 9'W 60.93' 54 S 01'43'27'W 163.76' -1 23 S 17'00'4414 65.39' 55 S 10'41'37 "E 142.63' Z 24 S 11 *09'33W 91.56' 56 S 18'00'29 "E 118.60' TTI 25 S 09'54'34W 113.58' 57 S 39'36'06'E 91.08' D 26 S 5625'34W 244.18' 58 S 71'16'39W 85.26' 27 S 26.42'41 59 S 32'58'42W 124.42' C7 28 S "E 118.43' ;0 29 S 22'18'10'14 97.60' fT1 30 S 57*44'13W 86.37' Fr1 31 S 13'22'54 "E 64.15' 32 S 47'40'27'W 36.02' NO PERMENANT MARKERS WERE 'LACED AT POINTS AS PLOTTED ALONG THE BEAI AN RUN (CONSERVATION EASEMENT) A PORTION OF THE FRANK D. BARNHILL PROPERTY RECORDED IN D.B. 270, Pg. 681 & D.B. 309, Pg. 93 OF THE GREENE CO. REGISTRY. SPEIGHTS BRIDGE TWSP. - GREENE CO., N.C. SCALE: 1" = 200' - DATE: 05/16/00 200 100 200 400 600 GRAPHIC SCALE INCHES /FEET DANNY GRANT & ASSOCIATES PLANTED ACREAGE = 19.00 acres +/- LAND SURVEYING SERVICES CLEARED ACREAGE = 16.45 acres +/- P.O. sox 517 SNOW HILL, N.C. 28580 REVISED 07/21/00 TO SHOW WOODLINE (252) 747 -7777 DATF 05 /11/O0 0F" 11Y: JOG FD /Pp 58/2_F11-N n0362 JAMES D I , Greene County Subdivision I,- _, Review Officer of _ -_ County, certify that the AS--BUILT FLAN S bminiatrator, car6fy that punuont to the surveyor a map or plat to which this cerlificolion a affixed meets all statutory certlfica"' (approval) , or (no opprorW) requirement for record"inq. is required by the Greene County Subdivision Administrator. PLANTED ACREAGE = 5.45 acres +/- CLEARED ACREAGE = 2.89 acres REVISED 07/21/00 TO SHOW WOODLINE SHEET 3 OF 3 DANNY GRANT & ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYING SERVICES P.O. BOX 517 SNOW HILL, N.C. 28580 (252) 747 -7777 DATE: 05/16/0012!AWN BY: .IDG 1 FB /Pq 58,/2 1 FILE No.- 99,362 THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA (CONSERVATION EASEMENT) A PORTION OF THE FRANK D. BARNHILL PROPERTY RECORDED IN D.B. 270, Pg. 681 & D.B. 309, Pg. 93 OF THE GREENE CO. REGISTRY. SPEIGHTS BRIDGE TWSP. - GREENE CO., N.C. SCALE: 1" = 200' - DATE: 05/16/00 200 100 0 200 400 600 GRAPHIC SCALE INCHES /FEET COURSE BEARING DISTANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE 1 N 51'00'S2"W 233.48' 37 N 55'47'32 "E 75.86" 2 N 43'50 37"W 199.58' 38 N 62'51'31 "E 104.20' 3 N 10'37' 17 "E 241.57' 39 N 5729'55 "E 114.94' 4 N 08'48'04 "E 213.89' 40 N 33'57'51 "E 181.24' 5 N 60'29'51 "E 59.70' 41 N 13'27'46 "E 148.35' 6 S 65'23'35 "E 91.56' 42 N 20'40'19°W 73.49' 7 S 5700'57 "E 78.74' 43 N 51'58'36"W 169.14" 8 S 79'42'02 "E 51.19' 44 N 6T49'32°W 82.88' 9 N 82'18'40 "E 49.22' 45 N 46.1152"W 75.24' 10 N 56'37'36 "E 84.13' 46 N 14'04'01 "E 76.00' 11 N 03.15 :03 -W 91.58' 47 N 44'58'18 "E 168.99' 12 N 25'29'44W 73.04' 48 N 64'50'06'E 37.04' 13 N 12'46'03 "E 35.60' 49 N 22'25'43 "E 88.62' 14 N 53'27'38 "E 64.61' 50 N 55'23'53 "E 63.40' 15 N 78'00'35 "E 163.14' 51 N 6927'52 "E 61.70' 16 N 63'26'55 'E 59.71' 52 N 8546'57 "E 82.52' 17 N 49'01'43 "E 72.12' 53 S 86'02'46' E 100.81' 18 N 28'21'26 "E 60.01' 54 S 64'33'37 "E 138.59' 19 N 41'30'^27 "E 101.30' 55 S 58'31'47"E 102.01' 20 N 21'33'59 "E 73.12' 56 S 67'42'15 "E 73.14' 21 N 05'20'3714 88.71' 57 N 74'34'33 "E 147.45' 22 N O722.1219 45.65' 58 N 08'01'12W 206.66' 23 N 16'40'21 "E 146.60' 59 N 13'53'39 "E 108.38' 24 N 34'04'OS'W 184.31' 60 N 12'20'52 °E 65.72' 25 S 68'31'l1'W 153.55' 61 N 10'02 '53 "E 64.32' 26 S 5713 :37 -W 100.76' 62 N 21'13'41 'E 155.17' 27 N 71'14'S7"W 124.88' 63 N 13'51'54 "E 94.99' 28 N 61'12'07'W 102.83' 64 N 4743'58 "E 43.05' 29 N 09'02'05'W 87.63' 65 S 31'14'26 "E 216.65' 30 N 22'42'32 °E 212.46' 66 S 07'34'21'E 52.13' 31 N 44'42'50 "E 66.92' 67 S 1013'44 °E 99.33' 32 S 76'5526 E 55.01' 68 S 10'01'51 "E 39.30' 33 S 50'28'32 °E 54.93' 69 S 51'37'15 "E 37.08' 34 S 60'58'32 E 77.95' 70 S 73'20'33 °E 58.86' 35 S 85'30'23 "E 82.25' 71 S 79'29'02 "E 85.97' 36 N 60'17'47 "E 200.00' NO PERMANENT MARKERS WERE PLACED AT POINTS AS PLOTTED ALONG THE BANK OF CONTE14TNEA CREEK Ty -9- 281 2.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results 2.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT Vegetation onsite was first visually assessed to determine the general areas of viable planted vegetation. Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community were excluded from the monitoring effort. These areas are shown on the maps in Appendix D. The 200' buffer was taken from the normal edge of the surface water. Twelve vegetative sample plots within the project easement were quantitatively monitored during the 2009 growing season on October 6`b and 7t', 2009. The plots were randomly chosen using GIS. Species composition, density, and survival were observed during the site visit. The Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS, 2006) methodology was utilized for vegetative monitoring. Level 2 (planted and natural stems) methodology was completed on all monitored plots. It must be noted that due to the age of the planted species, in some plots, it was difficult to distinguish planted species from volunteers. However, best professional judgment along with knowledge of project planting zones by species enabled vegetation data to be collected. The planted vegetation zones included oak mix, longleaf pine, river birch, and cypress. The vegetative success criteria are based on the North Carolina rule 15A NCAC 213 0242 Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Mitigation Program for Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers (2000). The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 320 5 -year old planted woody stems per acre at the end of the monitoring period. As per NCEEP, the Cypress wetland area was only monitored for vegetation within the 200' riparian buffer, and not wetland hydrology. The 2009 stem counts within each of the twelve vegetative monitoring plots are included in Exhibit Tables Al through A5 in Appendix Al. Photos of the vegetative monitoring plots are included in Appendix A3. Stems per acre for each of the twelve plots are reported in Table A5 -A of Appendix Al. 2.1.1 Vegetation Problem Areas Monitoring revealed that 6 of the 12 plots (50 %) met the vegetative success criteria of 320 planted stems or greater per acre. The remaining 6 plots failed to meet the success criteria (plots 3, 4, 7, 9, 10 and I IA). There are a number of issues causing the failure of these plots. Vegetation Plots 4 and 9 (VP -4, VP -9) exhibited poor survival of planted longleaf likely resulting from high densities of volunteer loblolly recruitment. This may be an issue related to a lack of forest management for longleaf pines after planting. VP -7 was located in an area that appeared to have poor soil due to residual debris from the site's history of being a tire dump. It could have been attributed to early mortality of oak species after planting. It is difficult to discern the exact reasons for poor planted species survival in the vegetation plots and elsewhere on the site since it has been 9 years since vegetation installation. Seedlings may have been shaded out, eaten by wildlife, affected by recent droughts, or in some cases affected by mowing. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 11 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Exhibit Table V - Vegetative Success Criteria Attainment Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site / EEP Project No. 24 Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Density Met 320 stems /acre Tract Mean VP -1B Y (688) 50% VP -2 Y (405) VP -3 N (202) VP -4 N (40) VP -5 Y (486) VP -6 Y (567) (344 stems /acre) VP -7 N (81) VP -8A Y (567) VP -9 N (121) VP -10 N (162) VP -11A N (81) VP -12A Y (729) 2.1.2 Vegetation Current Condition Plan View Vegetative problem areas are shown on the Current Condition Plan View in Appendix D. 2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT As per EEP, no stream monitoring took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site. 2.3 WETLAND ASSESSMENT 2.3.1 Current Condition Plan View As per EEP, no wetland monitoring took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site. 2.3.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment No groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 12 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 3.0 References Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CPS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0 ( hqp :Hcvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) NCEEP. 2006. Content, Format and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC. Version 1.2 November 16, 2006 NC Administrative Code: 15A NCAC 213 0242, Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Mitigation Program for Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers, Raleigh, NC. 2000. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 13 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Appendix A. Vegetation Raw Data A.l VEGETATION DATA TABLES Report Prepared By Richard Andrews Date Prepared 10/21/2009 13:48 database name cvs- eep- entrytool- v2.2.7.mdb database location V: \1713 \resource \Library\Streams & Wetlands \Monitoring \cvs computer name ANDREWSR file size 35663872 DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - - - -- Metadata Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project (s) and project data. Pro', planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each Vear. This excludes live stakes. Pro', total stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems. Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.). Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots. Vigor b Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species. Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each. Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species. Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot. Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded. ALL Stems by Plot and spp A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded. PROJECT SUMMARY ------------------------------------- Project Code 24 project Name Beamon's Run Description Barnhill Farm off of HWY 58 b/w Snow Hill and Wilson in Greene Count River Basin Neuse length(ft) 16,350 stream-to-edge width ft 200 areas m 68,350 Required Plots calculated Sampled Plots 12 Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page Al Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Exhibit Table A2 - Vegetation Vigor By Species S ecies CommonName 4 3 2 1 OlMissing Unknown Betula ni ra river birch 17 a V 10 /0, Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash 3 5 2 1 y Pinus palustris longleaf pine 4 4i Uo Betula ni ra river birch 0 Quercus alba white oak 13 6 1 Pinus palustris longleaf pine 0 4 Quercus alba Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak 1 2 3 0 6 Quercus ni ra water oak 15 Quercus ni ra Iwater oak 6 6 11 1 7 15 87 15 Quercus phellos 1willow oak 18 2 TOT: 7 17 62 21 17 2 Exhibit Table A3 - Vegetation Damage By Species �y 0 a V 10 /0, y 4i Uo Betula ni ra river birch 0 17 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash 0 11 Pinus palustris longleaf pine 0 4 Quercus alba white oak 0 20 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak 0 6 Quercus ni ra water oak 15 9 15 Quercus phellos willow oak 0 20 TOT: 7 7 15 87 15 Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A2 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Exhibit Table A4 - Vegetation Damage By Plot �y y Ot� o°j ".° 0 -T Q Q a V o� nn' m _POP �p ti pF� 2 Boa c F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 4. w Jew a�F Q Q�0 e y ryP ryb ry�t ryP ry0� ,y0` ry4` 024 -AC /RA -0002 010 024 -AC /RA -0003 0 5 024 -AC /RA -0004 0 1 024 -AC /RA -0005 0 12 024 -AC /RA -0006 0 14 024 -AC /RA -0007 01 2 024 -AC /RA -0009 01 3 024 -AC /RA -0010 01 4 024-AC/RA-01B 0 17 024- AC /RA -08A 0 14 024-AC/RA-11A 0 2 024- AC /RA -12A 15 3 15 TOT: 12 15 87 15 Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A3 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Exhibit Table AS-A - Planted Stems By Plot and Species y o`� (91 oa o`" o°j ".° 0 -T Q Q IQ o� 53' p� o��t Ip o� nn' _POP �p ti pF� 2 Boa c F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 2C dy Or Q�0 e y ryP ryb ry�t ryP ry0� ,y0` ry4` ry4' ryb ry0' ryP ryb' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o moo` X43, moo` �o �o moo* �o Io �o �o �o V y V •� �'r a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Betula ni ra river birch 17 11 171 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash 11 4 2.75 2 1 1 7 Pinus palustris longleaf pine 4 2 2 1 3 Quercus alba white oak 20 7 2.86 2 8 4 2 1 1 2 1 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak 6 1 6 6 Quercus ni ra water oak 24 3 8 2 6 16 Quercus hellos willow oak 20 7 2.86 8 3 3 3 1 1 1 TOT: 0 7 7 102 7 10 5 1 12 14 2 3 4 17 14 2 18 STEMS PER ACRE 405 202 40 486 567 81 121 162 688 567 81 729 Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A3 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 A o b8a /�b''riZp m M AZp -v^ -v 'fib: O00. rie0 � 000, ZO C pOp, be0 O m a �ppO.M bAZp 04 U) OOp, bZ0 be0 S m NM Q Lo S/ N r- OD Cl) 00 N t�ut�M �o�ll -I- � M N L T N CO t0 r �O N N r CO Ln I'- rliM CO I� � MINI M LO r ti r LO LO N a 4'�N4 E cc Y o °�z(/ ( IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNI Y °� L U C L 3 L •� C N C O 3 C _N O -C C C L C Q E N - C N Y L Y Y o 0 -p m E `" U IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINI m E o w� O E�To��Ea�o�°~�' m U O C O O i 3 C mE'�a�N�NCN+ X m >Em0oEE3��yoom�3is -ommdt N '�. Q L m■nr��n�'t■�� U to �-. 3 .n 3 fn 3 3 C n N N U j nma�ma�nu�m�a�wa C Sa U U m /J as-a E t�ut�M �o�ll -I- � M N L T N CO t0 r �O N N r CO Ln I'- rliM CO I� � MINI M LO r ti r LO LO N a 4'�N4 E cc Y o °�z(/ ( Y °� L U C L 3 L •� C N C O 3 C _N O -C C C L C Q E N - C N Y L Y Y o 0 -p m E `" U O m E o w� O E�To��Ea�o�°~�' m U O C O O i 3 C mE'�a�N�NCN+ X m >Em0oEE3��yoom�3is -ommdt N '�. Q L Q U to �-. 3 .n 3 fn 3 3 C n N N U j C Sa U U m /J as-a E c — c m N - y c o - M� m C E L co ° m C m m c ca o `m m - a m L o a 2 N o m m o f E a v m o rn 5 w E rn 'E rn rn �_ ca c o W C i U m C N 'O (D C in O i i C OU �U U N 7 N N .0 x N x O X :3 a O -E N O tmn 5 O � C O C C N N N N O .x QQ[oco00L.L m °� �JJ � i 7 7 7 7 7 a o co 0 0 bQ N W p N Q i �G . C Sw I° ;t: CIO i� b4 I � j o 0 i U N EXHIBIT TABLE A6. VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS Feature /Issue Station # / Range Probable Cause Photo # Weak numbers of VP -3, VP -7, VP -10, VP -11A Competition from volunteers, poor 2 planted species soil, early morality Weak numbers of No management for Longleaf / 1 planted Longleaf Pine VP -4, VP -9 competition from Loblolly Pine Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A5 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 A.2 VEGETATION PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS `` A , E � rTi Photo 1— Dense loblolly pine recruitment in vicinity of Veg Plot 4 (10/7/09) Photo 2 — Low planted species survival in vicinity of Veg Plot 7A (10/7/09) Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A6 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 A.3 VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS it Photo Station 1 - Vegetation Plot 1B (10/7/09) Photo Station 2 - Vegetation Plot 2 (10/6/09) Beamon's Ron Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A7 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Photo Station 3 - Vegetation Plot 3 (10/6/09) Photo Station 4 - Vegetation Plot 4 (10/6/09) Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A8 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Photo Station 5 - Vegetation Plot 5 (10/6/09) Photo Station 6 - Vegetation Plot 6 (10/6/09) Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A9 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Photo Station 7 - Vegetation Plot 7 (10/7/09) Photo Station 8 - Vegetation Plot 8A (10/7/09) Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A10 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Photo Station 9 - Vegetation Plot 9 (10/7/09) Photo Station 10 — Vegetation Plot 10 (10/7/09) Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A11 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Photo Station 11— Vegetation Plot 11A (10/7/09) / tv /, / f Photo Station 12 — Vegetation Plot 12A (10/6/09) Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page Al2 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009 Appendix B. Geomorphologic Raw Data No stream assessment took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page B 1 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 Appendix C. Hydrology Data No hydrologic monitoring took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site. Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page C1 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 Appendix D. Current Condition Plan View Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page D1 Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009 i 1 �y F �S. !k Plot Plot 7 V Plot 4` j Plot 6 6 �Rr Figure 2 -Overview Current Condition Plan View Beamon's Run Wetland and Buffer Restoration Project EEP Project 24 Greene County, North Carolina Monitoring Report December, 2009 j - Plot'1B 11%..o Stream Edge Streams 200ft Buffer Plantings Excluded Pad Cypress Long leaf pine River birch t �. Oak Mix Mowed Parcel Boundaries Veg Plot Corners " ` ' �° • Failing <320 stems /ac Successful >320 stems /ac _ � r 1., . -fir• n 0 200 400 800 Feet ['31 lar Instem 01101 Stantec PROGRII i 1 �y F �S. !k Plot Plot 7 V Plot 4` j Plot 6 6 �Rr Figure 2 -Overview Current Condition Plan View Beamon's Run Wetland and Buffer Restoration Project EEP Project 24 Greene County, North Carolina Monitoring Report December, 2009 j - Plot'1B 11%..o Stream Edge Streams 200ft Buffer Plantings Excluded Pad Cypress Long leaf pine River birch t �. Oak Mix Mowed Parcel Boundaries Veg Plot Corners " ` ' �° • Failing <320 stems /ac Successful >320 stems /ac _ � r 1., . -fir• n 0 200 400 800 Feet ['31 lar Instem 01101 Stantec PROGRII a s •art► . " . ►��1 jab .il.♦ w` ,�• its, c .. r :,_ ' '•�" _ r. sari �. Plot 2 Lat Long : • .rid��a. '. `I `� `' , ' Origin 35.53992038 - 77.76278982 2 35.54000623 - 77.76280325 3 35.54000139 - 77.76268864 4 35.53991517 - 77.76268792 a - "� _ ti MKT i t � ��yi �`f` `•� 1 •7f. 4. "� rte•.: � t:. A } ... PGot'2` Ail. .. �c. r ` .ate !if; 9 LIM Figure 2 - Sheet 1 Current Condition Plan View Beamon's Run Wetland and Buffer Restoration Project EEP Project # 24 Greene County, North Carolina Monitoring Report December, 2009 0 Parcel Boundaries Stream Edge 200ft Buffer Plantings ® Excluded Cypress Long leaf pine River birch Oak Mix Mowed Veg Plot Corners • Failing <320 stems /ac Successful >320 stems /ac 0 75 150 300 Feet AnfiaoiMemeht tem paocaars ^i - -- Plot 5 Lat Long Plot 12A Lat Long Plot 4 Lat Long Plot 3 Lat Long .* +W Origin 35.540002 - 77.757186 Origin 35.538791 - 77.757472 Origin 35.538581 - 77.757753 Origin 35.537874 - 77.757014 2 35.540030 - 77.757093 2 35.538948 - 77.757575 2 35.538662 - 77.757808 2 35.537870 - 77.756921 .� 3 35.539946 - 77.757163 3 35.538920 - 77.757609 3 35.538628 - 77.757907 3 35.537956 - 77.756940 Y' 4 35.539950 - 77.757055 4 35.538766 - 77.757502 4 35.538533 - 77.757846 4 35.537961 - 77.757019 t Coordinates for Plots 6 -10 shown on sheet 3 [ Plot 10 • . . , ', - ", pi Plot 9 .w,° yy t' J ;;+RBI }! �It, j,� •� ' 1�y"�w�� k t -_ n_IP,:.st�'Ie. . +a .te��'.� 9� 5-t-[M ., �w�:�.k► -._ J �+:'��»f Plot 8A Plot 7 f �41Si1 � I 's qi# - _ - PIOT-11 ZA; Plot 5 h z Plot 4 d� �.._" i - # ,j 4 } Figure 2 - Sheet 2 Current Condition Plan View Beamon's Run Wetland and Buffer Restoration Project EEP Project Number 24 Greene County, North Carolina Monitoring Report December, 2009 Stream Edge 200ft Buffer Plantings ® Excluded Cypress Long leaf pine River birch Oak Mix Mowed Planted Parcels Veg Plot Corners • Failing <320 stems /ac Successful >320 stems /ac 0 75 150 300 Feet r� F�o s 11,n� oiremtem ent PROGRAM Stantec Plot 6 Lat Long Plot 9 Lat Long Plot 16 Lat Long Origin 35.541784 - 77.756530 Origin 35.543828 - 77.754738 Origin 35.544557 - 77.750951 2 35.541704 - 77.756575 2 35.543863 - 77.754653 2 35.544589 - 77.751036 3 35.541668 - 77.756479 3 35.543943 - 77.754707 3 35.544500 - 77.751071 4 35.541747 - 77.756438 4 35.543894 - 77.754791 4 35.544479 - 77.750975 Plot 7 Lat Long Plot 10 Lat Long Origin 35.542795 - 77.756267 Origin 35.543836 - 77.753893 2 35.542784 - 77.756161 2 35.543916 - 77.753917 3 35.542870 - 77.756147 3 35.543896 - 77.754013 4 35.542877 - 77.756256 4 35.543814 - 77.753983 Plot 8A Lat Long Plot 11A Lat Long Origin 35.543196 - 77.755950 Origin 35.544844 - 77.751455 2 35.543136 - 77.755883 2 35.544811 - 77.751551 3 35.543210 - 77.755814 3 35.544735 - 77.751502 4 35.543262 - 77.755894 4 35.544775 - 77.751400 f r r �1 x ,.:. `. ►�i�i�i�i /9 t LUX S IA 0 65 130 260 Feet 7 o stem E ei ent Stantec PR GRAM y Figure 2 - Sheet 3 Current Condition Plan View Beamon's Run Wetland and Buffer Restoration Site EEP Project # 24 Greene County, North Carolina Monitoring Report December, 2009 Stream Edge 200ft Buffer Plantings Plot 1 B ® Excluded Cypress Long leaf pine River birch F7� Oak Mix Mowed Planted parcels Veg Plot Corners • Failing <320 stems /ac Successful >320 stems /ac 0 65 130 260 Feet 7 o stem E ei ent Stantec PR GRAM