Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310475_PC-2022-0009 CPA F&D_20220224DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C94ABOD-0B65-4FC2-96B3-8B95541A6BF8 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DUPLIN IN THE MATTER OF RUFUS E. ROUSE FOR VIOLATIONS OF SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000 PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTE 143-215.1 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY File No. PC-2022-0009 FINDINGS AND DECISION AND ASSESSMENTS OF CIVIL PENALTIES Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Depailnient of Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources (DWR), I, Jeff Poupart, Chief of the Water Quality Permitting Section of the Division of Water Resources (Division), make the following: I. FINDINGS OF FACT: A. Rufus E. Rouse owned and operated Reedy Meadows Farm 1&2, a swine animal feeding operation located at 1672 A Pasture Branch Road in Duplin County. B. Reedy Meadows Farm 1&2 was issued Certificate of Coverage (COC) AWS310475 under General Permit AWG100000 for Reedy Meadows Farm 1&2 on October 1, 2019, effective upon issuance, with an expiration date of September 30, 2024. C. Condition V.2 of General Permit AWG100000 states that "The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25-year, 24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at least one (1) foot of structural freeboard." — [15A NCAC 02T .1304(b)] D. On February 23, 2021, Division staff performed a structural evaluation site visit to the Reedy Meadows Farm 1&2 facility. It was documented with photographs that effluent levels in the two on -site lagoons had reached noncompliant levels. Freeboard levels in the lagoons were documented to be 14 inches and 10 inches. The designed freeboard for both lagoons is 19.5 inches. E. Condition No. III.17(e) of General Permit AWG100000 states that "The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office, as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events: (e) Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to that required in Condition V.2. of this General Permit." — [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)] 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C94ABOD-0B65-4FC2-96B3-8B95541A6BF8 F. On February 23, 2021, Division staff performed a structural evaluation site visit to the Reedy Meadows Farm 1&2 facility. It was documented with photographs that effluent levels in the two on -site lagoons had reached noncompliant levels. The Division has no record of receiving a notification of the noncompliant effluent levels in the lagoons. G. Rufus E. Rouse does not have a valid permit for the above -described activity. H. On February 26, 2021 the Division issued a Notice of Violation with Notice of Intent to Enforce (NOV/NOI) through the civil penalty assessment process to Rufus E. Rouse identifying violations of N.C.G.S. 143-215 et seq. and the General Permit AWG100000. I. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $455.20. Based upon the above Findings of Facts, I make the following: II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: A. Rufus E. Rouse is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G. S. 143- 212(4). B. The above -cited failure to maintain compliant waste levels in the lagoons as stated in Findings of Fact I.D violates Condition V.2 of General Permit AWG100000 which requires that waste levels in the lagoons do not exceed the levels specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). C. The above -cited failure to notify the Division of the noncompliant waste levels in the lagoons as stated in Findings of Fact I.F violates Condition III.17(e) of General Permit AWG100000 which requires that the Division is to be notified within twenty-four hours of first knowledge of noncompliant waste levels in the lagoons. D. Rufus E. Rouse may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143- 215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is required but fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1. E. General Statute 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8) provides that the reasonable costs of any investigation, inspection or monitoring survey may be assessed against a person who violates any regulations, standards, or limitations adopted by the Environmental Management Commission or violates any terms or conditions of any permit issued pursuant to NCGS 143- 215.1, or special order or other document issued pursuant to NCGS 143-215.2. F. The Chief of the Water Quality Permitting Section, Division of Water Resources, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter Based upon the above Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, I make the following: III. DECISION: Accordingly, Rufus E. Rouse, owner of Reedy Meadows Farm 1&2 at the time of noncompliance, is hereby assessed a civil penalty of: 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C94ABOD-0B65-4FC2-96B3-8B95541A6BF8 $1000.00 For violation of Condition V.2 of General Permit AWG100000 for failure to prevent noncompliant waste levels in the lagoons. $1000.00 $2000.00 $ 455.20 $2,455.20 For violation of Condition III.17(e) of General Permit AWG100000 for failure to notify the Division of noncompliant waste levels in the lagoons. TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY Enforcement costs TOTAL AMOUNT DUE Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are: (1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violation; (2) The duration and gravity of the violation; (3) The effect on ground or surface quantity or quality; (4) The cost of rectifying the damage; (5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; (6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentional; (7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; (8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures. IV. NOTICE: I reserve the right to assess civil penalties and investigative costs for any continuing violations occurring after the assessment period indicated above. Each day of a continuing violation may be considered a separate violation subject to a maximum $25,000.00 per day penalty. Civil penalties and investigative cost may be assessed for any other rules and statutes for which penalties have not yet been assessed. V TRANSMITTAL: These Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision shall be transmitted to Rufus E. Rouse in accordance with N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(A)(d). DocuSigned�by: 3/3/2022 cr' 111 8FTh-91364-9DD2478... (Date) Jeff Poupart, Chief Water Quality Permitting Section Division of Water Resources 3