HomeMy WebLinkAboutBeamons_RUN_24_MY8_2009BEAMON' S RUN BUFFER AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
(BARNHILL FARM)
MONITORING REPORT (2009)
Greene County, North Carolina
EEP Project No. 24
Prepared for:
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
®�1 O
440
En . a°nlement o
PROGRAM '!
Status of Plan: Final
Submission Date: December 2009
Monitoring Firm:
Stantec
Stantec Consulting Services Inc
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27606
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project site is located on the grounds of the Barnhill farm southeast of Wilson, NC. The site was
identified for its potential as a buffer site because of its proximity to several bordering streams, including
Beaman's Run and Contentnea Creek. The site was brought to the attention of the NC Wetlands
Restoration Program (WRP) because it had been cited for violations by the NC Division of the
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) due to the stockpiling of old tires which had been found
in the nearby streams.
The conservation easement is made up of two tracts: Tract A encompasses 47.53 acres along the right
bank of Beamon's Run (including a 2.11 acre open pit area); Tract B encompasses 32.38 acres along the
left bank of Contentnea Creek. Site investigation and design services were provided by PBS &J, Inc. The
records available at this time indicated that construction and the bulk of the planting at the site occurred
over the winter of 2000. Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the
planted species, were outside the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community
were excluded from the monitoring effort. Based on the revised areas, the project consists of 16.89 acres
of Neuse River riparian buffer restoration, 195 feet of streambank stabilization, and 0.34 acres of wetland
restoration.
No monitoring plan was originally prepared for this site and no monitoring program began at this site
when construction was completed. NCSU staff from the Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department and the Water Resources Research Institute made an initial monitoring visit on October 14,
2003. They compiled the first monitoring report submitted in March of 2004. In 2009, Stantec was
contracted to implement a revised monitoring procedure and report developed based on the document
"Content, Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports" provided by the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program in 11/16/06.
Monitoring revealed that 6 of the 12 plots (50 %) met the vegetative success criteria of 320 planted stems
or greater per acre. It is difficult to discern the exact reasons for poor planted species survival in the
vegetation plots and elsewhere on the site since it has been 9 years since vegetation installation. Seedlings
may have been shaded out, eaten by wildlife, affected by recent droughts, or in some cases affected by
mowing.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page i
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final November 2009
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary ......................................................................... ..............................i
1.0 Project Background ............ ...............................
1.1
Project Objectives ...... ...............................
1.2
Project Structure .......... ...............................
1.3
Location and Setting ... ...............................
1.4
Project History and Background ................
1.5
Monitoring Plan View . ...............................
2.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results.........
2.1
Vegetation Assessment ..............................
2.1.1
Vegetation Problem Areas .....................
2.1.2
Vegetation Current Condition Plan VieN
2.2
Stream Assessment ..... ...............................
2.3
Wetland Assessment ... ...............................
2.3.1
Current Condition Plan View .................
2.3.2
Wetland Criteria Attainment ..................
3.0 References ........................... ...............................
Figures
Figure 1 — Property Map
Figure 2 — As -Built Maps
Tables
Table I — Project Restoration Components
Table II — Project Activity and Reporting History
Table III — Contacts
Table IV — Project Background Table
Table V — Vegetative Success Criteria Attainment
Appendices
Appendix A. Vegetation Raw Data
Appendix B. Geomorphologic Raw Data
Appendix C. Wetland Hydrology Data
Appendix D. Current Condition Plan View
............................................... ..............................1
............................................... ..............................1
............................................... ..............................1
.............................................. ............................... 2
.............................................. ............................... 5
.............................................. ............................... 6
.............................................. .............................15
.............................................. .............................15
.............................................. .............................15
.............................................. .............................16
.............................................. .............................16
.............................................. .............................16
.............................................. .............................16
.............................................. .............................16
.............................................. .............................17
3
7
2
5
5
6
16
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page ii
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
1.0 Project Background
1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The purpose of riparian wetland and buffer restoration is to improve water quality by providing a more
ecologically effective and efficient riparian buffer. The establishment and protection of a vegetated
buffer along the floodplain of any stream provides a number of benefits, which include streambank
stability from mature root systems, in- stream shade from the overhanging leaf canopy, organic detritus
that fuels food chains, habitat and travel corridors for native wildlife species, and filtering of sediments
and other potential pollutants from surface and subsurface flow (NCSRI, 2003). The natural riparian
buffer along the project's section of Beamon's Run had been disturbed by past agricultural practices and
portions of it had been used as a tire dump. The tires and associated debris were removed and the buffer
was planted with native wetland species to restore functionality to the buffer. The primary objective of
the project was to protect and improve water quality by removing and transforming pollutants with
buffers and wetlands.
The goals as listed in the WW Project Summary were to:
1. Restore agricultural land to riparian buffer to increase removal of nutrients
2. Improve wildlife habitat
1.2 PROJECT STRUCTURE
The land was acquired in a settlement of a suit brought by the state against Frank Barnhill to recover costs
of cleaning up the tires he had been dumping on his land. According to the final settlement agreement, the
conservation easement was conveyed to the state in lieu of money spent from the NC Scrap Tire Disposal
Account "for the abatement of a nuisance tire collection site." The conservation easement is made up of
two tracts: Tract A encompasses 47.53 acres along the right bank of Beamon's Run (including a 2.11 acre
open pit area); Tract B encompasses 32.38 acres along the left bank of Contentnea Creek. The Wetland
Restoration Program (now NCEEP) hired PBS &J to provide investigation and design services for stream
enhancement, wetland restoration and Neuse River riparian buffer restoration. The as -built planset shows
24.45 acres of planting. The records available at this time indicated that construction and the bulk of the
planting at the site occurred over the winter of 2000.
Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside
the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community were excluded from the
monitoring effort. The 200' buffer was taken from the normal edge of the surface water. These areas are
shown on the maps in Appendix D. As per NCEEP, only the wetland area within the 200' buffer was
monitored for vegetative success. The stream stabilization areas were not formally assessed; however,
erosion was not observed onsite in those areas. Based on the revised areas, the project consists of 16.89
acres of Neuse River riparian buffer restoration, 195 feet of streambank stabilization, and 0.34 acres of
wetland restoration.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page I
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
Exhibit Table I. Project Restoration Components
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EE P Project No. 24
a
sy
`o
Reach ID
� j 44
Stationing
Comment
Riverine Wetland
Prepare and plant
Cypress community near
Restoration ac
0.34
R
wetland areas
0.34
Contentnea Creek
Neuse Riparian
Within 200' buffer along both
Buffer Restoration
Prepare and plant
I
Beamon's Run and Contentnea
1
16.89
R
buffers
16.89
Creek
Construction and
installation of
brush mattresses
In three areas along both
Streambank
for bank
Beamon's Run and Contentnea
Stabilization 1
195
S
stabilization
195
Creek
R = Restoration
S = Stabilization
P= Preservation
1.3 LOCATION AND SETTING
The restoration site is located approximately 7.3 miles southeast of Stantonsburg, in Greene County,
North Carolina. The site is located in a rural area, adjacent to Beamon's Run Creek, which is a major
tributary of Contentnea Creek, located in the Neuse River Basin.
Site directions: From Raleigh follow US 264 East toward Wilson. Take exit 49 and turn right onto NC 58
South toward Wilson/Kinston. Travel approximately 5.2 miles on NC 58. This will take you into
Stantonsburg. Continue through Stantonsburg, and after traveling 4 miles past Stantonsburg, turn left at
Speight's Bridge Road (NC 1225). Travel approximately 3.5 miles down NC 1225, and turn right on a
farm path before you approach Beamon's Farm Rd. The farm path is behind a brick ranch style house
close to NC 1225.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 2
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
1.0 Project Background
1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The purpose of riparian wetland and buffer restoration is to improve water quality by providing a more
ecologically effective and efficient riparian buffer. The establishment and protection of a vegetated
buffer along the floodplain of any stream provides a number of benefits, which include streambank
stability from mature root systems, in- stream shade from the overhanging leaf canopy, organic detritus
that fuels food chains, habitat and travel corridors for native wildlife species, and filtering of sediments
and other potential pollutants from surface and subsurface flow (NCSRI, 2003). The natural riparian
buffer along the project's section of Beamon's Run had been disturbed by past agricultural practices and
portions of it had been used as a tire dump. The tires and associated debris were removed and the buffer
was planted with native wetland species to restore functionality to the buffer. The primary objective of
the project was to protect and improve water quality by removing and transforming pollutants with
buffers and wetlands.
The goals as listed in the WRP Project Summary were to:
1. Restore agricultural land to riparian buffer to increase removal of nutrients
2. Improve wildlife habitat
1.2 PROJECT STRUCTURE
The land was acquired in a settlement of a suit brought by the state against Frank Barnhill to recover costs
of cleaning up the tires he had been dumping on his land. According to the final settlement agreement, the
conservation easement was conveyed to the state in lieu of money spent from the NC Scrap Tire Disposal
Account "for the abatement of a nuisance tire collection site." The conservation easement is made up of
two tracts: Tract A encompasses 47.53 acres along the right bank of Beamon's Run (including a 2.11 acre
open pit area); Tract B encompasses 32.38 acres along the left bank of Contentnea Creek. The Wetland
Restoration Program (now NCEEP) hired PBS &J to provide investigation and design services for stream
enhancement, wetland restoration and Neuse River riparian buffer restoration. The as -built planset shows
24.45 acres of planting. The records available at this time indicated that construction and the bulk of the
planting at the site occurred over the winter of 2000.
Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside
the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community were excluded from the
monitoring effort. The 200' buffer was taken from the normal edge of the surface water. These areas are
shown, on the maps in Appendix D. As per NCEEP, only the wetland area within the 200' buffer was
monitored for vegetative success. The stream stabilization areas were not formally assessed; however,
erosion was not observed onsite in those areas. Based on the revised areas, the project consists of 16.89
acres of Neuse River riparian buffer restoration, 195 feet of streambank stabilization, and 0.34 acres of
wetland restoration.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page I
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
Exhibit Table I. Project Restoration Components
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EE P Project No. 24
to
Reach ID
W ;To
H
Q
�°,
Stationing
Comment
Riverine Wetland
Prepare and plant
Cypress community near
Restoration ac
0.34
R
wetland areas
0.34
Contentnea Creek
Neuse Riparian
Within 200' buffer along both
Buffer Restoration
Prepare and plant
I
Beamon's Run and Contentnea
1
16.89
R
buffers
16.89
Creek
Construction and
installation of
brush mattresses
In three areas along both
Streambank
for bank
Beamon's Run and Contentnea
Stabilization 1
195
S
stabilization
195
Creek
R = Restoration
S = Stabilization
P= Preservation
1.3 LOCATION AND SETTING
The restoration site is located approximately 7.3 miles southeast of Stantonsburg, in Greene County,
North Carolina. The site is located in a rural area, adjacent to Beamon's Run Creek, which is a major
tributary of Contentnea Creek, located in the Neuse River Basin.
Site directions: From Raleigh follow US 264 East toward Wilson. Take exit 49 and turn right onto NC 58
South toward Wilson/Kinston. Travel approximately 5.2 miles on NC 58. This will take you into
Stantonsburg. Continue through Stantonsburg, and after traveling 4 miles past Stantonsburg, turn left at
Speight's Bridge Road (NC 1225). Travel approximately 3.5 miles down NC 1225, and turn right on a
farm path before you approach Beamon's Farm Rd. The farm path is behind a brick ranch style house
close to NC 1225.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 2
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
1 a
_Ls
/ o �
I
L '
Stantonsburg
6
A
as ,
oa
t_J
n
Q
�l
I N
I �
J
Pelleber Rd (SR W5)
�o
° D
0
r
1
Walstonsburg ].
I O Speight -s Bridge
Project Site ,.
` a 3
Eureka �'' \� ! - �' ���•�
If
I � N
I
I
Directions: From Raleigh, follow US 264 East toward Wilson. Figure 1 - Location Map
t Take exit 49 and turn right onto NC 58 South toward Wilson. Roads
Travel approximately 5.2 miles on NC 58. This will take you
into Stantonsburg. You will continue through Stantonsburg, '� Hydrography Beamon's Run Wetland and Buffer Restoration Project
and after traveling 4 miles past Stantonsburg, turn left onto EEP Project Number 24
Speight's Bridge Road (SR 1225). Travel approximately 3.5 Municipal Boundaries Greene County, NC
miles down SR 1225 and turn right on a farm path before you - Project Site
approach Beamon's Farm Rd. The farm path is behind a brick Monitoring Report
Greene Count ranch style house close to SR 1225. 05 0 December, 2009
1.4 PROJECT HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
Exhibit Table Il. Project Activity and Reporting History
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 24
Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
unknown
unknown
unknown
Final Design - 90%
unknown
unknown
unknown
Construction
2000
2000
2000
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
2000
2000
2000
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
2000
2000
2000
Bare Root Seedling Installation
2000
2000
2000
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring - baseline
May, 2000
May, 2000
May, 2000
Final Report
unknown
unknown
unknown
Monitoring Report CSU
Mar, 2004
Mar, 2004
Mar, 2004
Monitoring Report Stantec
Dec, 2009
Dec, 2009
Dec, 2009
Exhibit Table III. Contacts
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site /EEP Project No. 24
Designer
PBS &J
1616 East Millbrook Road
Suite 310
Raleigh, NC 27609
Construction Contractor
unknown
Planting Contractor
unknown
Seeding Contractor
unknown
Seed Mix Sources
unknown
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Denton's Nursury (longleaf)
3535 NC 42 West
Wilson, NC 27893
NC Division of Forest Resources (bare roots)
762 Claridge Nursery Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Monitoring Performers (2003)
NCSU BAE Dept & Water Quality Group
Campus Box 7637
Raleigh NC 27695
919 515 -8240
Monitoring Performers (2009)
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road, Ste 300
Raleigh, NC 27606
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Larry Hobbs (919)851 -6866
Amber Coleman (919)851-6866
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 5
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
Exhibit Table IV. Project Background Table
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 24
Project County
Greene
Drainage Area
8.5 s mi
Drainage impervious cover estimate %
< 1 percent
Stream Order
3rd order
Ph sio ra hic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Southeastern Flood plains and Low Terraces
Ros en Classification of As -built
N/A
Cowardin Classification
PFOIA - Palustrine, Forested, Broad - leaved
deciduous, temp. flooded dominant classification
Dominant soil types
Kenansville fine sand
Riverine Wetland Restoration
Riverine Buffer Restoration
Reference site ID
N/A
USGS HUC for Project
03020203050010
USGS HUC for Reference
N/A
NCDWQ Subbasin for Project
03 -04 -07
NCDWQ Subbasin for Reference
N/A
NCDWQ Classification for Project
C SW NSW
NCDWQ Classification for Reference
N/A
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed
segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
N/A
Percent of project easement fenced
N/A
1.5 MONITORING PLAN VIEW
The monitoring plan view map is integrated within the current condition plan view map in Appendix D.
The original as -built maps have been included here.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 6
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
JAMES D. GRANT, PLS
N
SHEET 2 OF 3
Greene County Subdivision I,_ Review Officer of _ -_- County, certify that the
Administrator, certify that Pursuant to the surveyor's mop or plot to which this Certification is affixed meets all statutory
certification, (approval) or (no approves) requirements for recording.
is required by the Greens County Subdivision Administrator.
Greene County Subdivision Administrator Data Ravi.. Officer
L -3752
WILTON COX PROPERTY
TRACT e
WILL BOOK 2, Pg. 281
/ /// MPZGH �1NE
!� �a ' ^S
\ \\ F�
Of 3 \ \hEAD PoWER UNES
J \ 0 `.
;NEB } pF '' f cotrraOL s \ ��k� c �,
rl ,7 / CORNER
NEW PIPE
/ BARNHILL PROPERTY
D.B. 270, Pg. 631 -
"," D.B. 309, Pg. 9.3
COX PROPERTY
LOT 4
D.B. 127, Pg. 70 & 71
D.B. 461, Pg. 175
t a ♦ -:
♦, ♦ ♦1, ♦� a A1, ♦4
1
N
N
0
w
N
u r^
N
. ♦i ♦ ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i�
"48"
BARNHILL PROPERTY
D.B. 270, Pg. 631
TRACT 5
WILL BOOK 2, Pg. 281
N <..
CC-
;1
'
00 " ♦��♦.
,•,♦ ♦� ♦♦, ♦ ♦ ♦, ♦. .� A, ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦,♦
�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ I I ��4eq� °. OPEN PIT
EASEMENT AREA
11 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦•►♦" 2.11 ccre�
AS -BUILT PLAINS
UDING OPEN P r AREA
2 by computer -21-
"1" THRU "59"
'6'
NPS
X23. '22' Q(iOQ
'24'
a �S
'27'
J
�a P
PLANTING LEGEND
_
4' WOODED
feFN"
BEARING
DISTANCE
COURSE
BEARING
DISTANCE
RIVER BIRCH .2.
'54'
WATER AND CHESTNUT OAK
"A"
1
S 65'40'36W
142.90'
s 5v30' +2W st
S 09'50'20 "E
Ooo
LONG LEAF PINE
S 51'03'29'W
101.63'
2
N 6253'59'W
WHITE OAK, WILLOW OAK,
WATER OAK
S 89'07 :25'W
29.65'
YELLOW POPLAR, CHESTNUT
OAK AND GREEN ASH
3
N 08'03'35 "E
CYPRESS
SHEET 2 OF 3
N ST17'35"W
65.85'
B6.4T
SURVEY FOR
4
N 26'39b2"W
CHESTNUT OAK
36
4p
0
U _
a
ll
- - q,��ERNEgp PoW 11
_ S 3730'00'E
�dwpO 05`d 04� ,0
0�e " 0 o O O O " O "O O VO O O O O 00 O O
O O O O O
O
O -•
O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O
0
0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .,' 7, 0000O 0 000 00 000 00000000000
0 40
D00 0
0
7
I H
BEAVER POND /
/
/ \ 5 1T40'S9Yl 99.76'
128 COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG BEARMN RUN
"A" TO 'B' THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
'49"
(CONSERVATION EASEMENT)
A PORTION OF THE FRANK D. BARNHILL PROPERTY RECORDED IN
D.B. 270, Pg. 681 & D.B. 309, Pg. 93 OF THE GREENE CO. REGISTRY.
SPEIGHTS BRIDGE TWSP. - GREENE CO., N.C.
SCALE: 1" = 200' - DATE: 05/16/00
200 100 200 400 600
GRAPHIC SCALE INCHES /FEET
DANNY GRANT
& ASSOCIATES
PLANTED ACREAGE = 19.00 acres +/- LAND SURVEYING SERVICES
CLEARED ACREAGE = 16.45 acres +/- P.O. sox 517
SNOW HILL, N.C. 28580
REVISED 07/21/00 TO SHOW WOODLINE (252) 747 -7777
DATF 05 /11/O0 0F" 11Y: JOG FD /Pp 58/2_F11-N n0362
"1" THRU "59"
NPS
50"
COURSE
BEARING
DISTANCE
COURSE
BEARING
DISTANCE
17'
'54'
.yy.
1
S 65'40'36W
142.90'
33
S 09'50'20 "E
92.58'
2
N 6253'59'W
43.45'
34
S 89'07 :25'W
29.65'
NPS
3
N 08'03'35 "E
51.75'
35
N ST17'35"W
65.85'
B6.4T
52"
'55'
4
N 26'39b2"W
158.46'
36
N 2511'47"W
63.46'
5
6
N 74'OS'51'W
N 04'48'4814
37.26'
62.88'
37
38
S 43'08'14°W
N 46'38'15W
85.34'
48.06'
N
7
N 45'19'2214
40.88'
39
S 56'40'57"W
95.18'
'56"
8
S 4627'56"W
92.14'
40
'S 27'47'51 "E
70.37'
9
S 7656'07"W
116.71'
41
S 21'30'59"W
41.29'
167.61'
10
N 47'51'3614
71.65'
42
N 59'11'4514
8347'
11
N 75'41'53W
85.32'
43
S 64'50'0414
28.60'
'57'
12
N 22'55'24"W
48.83'
44
S 33'46'28'E
184.16'
13
S 66'30'52W
45.28'
45
S 83'10'33'E
75.49'
14
S 21'29'2314
121.19'
46
' 1T3O'40"W
49.64'
"B"
59" "56'
15
S 30'40'13"W
67.59'
47
S 6523'26 "E
80.25'
16
S 15'54'17 "E
80-99'
48
S 70'52'33 "E
149.55'
0
17
N 87-10 :18 -W
43.48'
49
S 25'20'49'E
24.59'
O
18
S 30'00'53 W
98.58'
50
S 85'02'23'E
171.05'
Z
19
S 35'0036 -E
103.84'
51
5 37'54'14"W
55.74'
20
N 6642'04'E
59.76'
52
S 00'39'59 "E
102.41'
(TI
21
S 22'15'42 "E
96.05'
53
S 83'09'24 'W
304.19'
Z
22
S 44'49'l 9'W
60.93'
54
S 01'43'27'W
163.76'
-1
23
S 17'00'4414
65.39'
55
S 10'41'37 "E
142.63'
Z
24
S 11 *09'33W
91.56'
56
S 18'00'29 "E
118.60'
TTI
25
S 09'54'34W
113.58'
57
S 39'36'06'E
91.08'
D
26
S 5625'34W
244.18'
58
S 71'16'39W
85.26'
27
S 26.42'41
59
S 32'58'42W
124.42'
C7
28
S "E
118.43'
;0
29
S 22'18'10'14
97.60'
fT1
30
S 57*44'13W
86.37'
Fr1
31
S 13'22'54 "E
64.15'
32
S 47'40'27'W
36.02'
NO
PERMENANT MARKERS WERE 'LACED AT POINTS AS
PLOTTED ALONG THE BEAI AN RUN
(CONSERVATION EASEMENT)
A PORTION OF THE FRANK D. BARNHILL PROPERTY RECORDED IN
D.B. 270, Pg. 681 & D.B. 309, Pg. 93 OF THE GREENE CO. REGISTRY.
SPEIGHTS BRIDGE TWSP. - GREENE CO., N.C.
SCALE: 1" = 200' - DATE: 05/16/00
200 100 200 400 600
GRAPHIC SCALE INCHES /FEET
DANNY GRANT
& ASSOCIATES
PLANTED ACREAGE = 19.00 acres +/- LAND SURVEYING SERVICES
CLEARED ACREAGE = 16.45 acres +/- P.O. sox 517
SNOW HILL, N.C. 28580
REVISED 07/21/00 TO SHOW WOODLINE (252) 747 -7777
DATF 05 /11/O0 0F" 11Y: JOG FD /Pp 58/2_F11-N n0362
JAMES D
I , Greene County Subdivision I,- _, Review Officer of _ -_ County, certify that the AS--BUILT FLAN S
bminiatrator, car6fy that punuont to the surveyor a map or plat to which this cerlificolion a affixed meets all statutory
certlfica"' (approval) , or (no opprorW) requirement for record"inq.
is required by the Greene County Subdivision Administrator.
PLANTED ACREAGE = 5.45 acres +/-
CLEARED ACREAGE = 2.89 acres
REVISED 07/21/00 TO SHOW WOODLINE
SHEET 3 OF 3
DANNY
GRANT
&
ASSOCIATES
LAND SURVEYING SERVICES
P.O.
BOX 517
SNOW HILL,
N.C. 28580
(252)
747 -7777
DATE: 05/16/0012!AWN BY: .IDG 1 FB /Pq 58,/2 1 FILE No.- 99,362
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
(CONSERVATION EASEMENT)
A PORTION OF THE FRANK D. BARNHILL PROPERTY RECORDED IN
D.B. 270, Pg. 681 & D.B. 309, Pg. 93 OF THE GREENE CO. REGISTRY.
SPEIGHTS BRIDGE TWSP. - GREENE CO., N.C.
SCALE: 1" = 200' - DATE: 05/16/00
200 100 0 200 400 600
GRAPHIC SCALE INCHES /FEET
COURSE
BEARING
DISTANCE COURSE
BEARING
DISTANCE
1
N 51'00'S2"W
233.48'
37
N 55'47'32 "E
75.86"
2
N 43'50 37"W
199.58'
38
N 62'51'31 "E
104.20'
3
N 10'37' 17 "E
241.57'
39
N 5729'55 "E
114.94'
4
N 08'48'04 "E
213.89'
40
N 33'57'51 "E
181.24'
5
N 60'29'51 "E
59.70'
41
N 13'27'46 "E
148.35'
6
S 65'23'35 "E
91.56'
42
N 20'40'19°W
73.49'
7
S 5700'57 "E
78.74'
43
N 51'58'36"W
169.14"
8
S 79'42'02 "E
51.19'
44
N 6T49'32°W
82.88'
9
N 82'18'40 "E
49.22'
45
N 46.1152"W
75.24'
10
N 56'37'36 "E
84.13'
46
N 14'04'01 "E
76.00'
11
N 03.15 :03 -W
91.58'
47
N 44'58'18 "E
168.99'
12
N 25'29'44W
73.04'
48
N 64'50'06'E
37.04'
13
N 12'46'03 "E
35.60'
49
N 22'25'43 "E
88.62'
14
N 53'27'38 "E
64.61'
50
N 55'23'53 "E
63.40'
15
N 78'00'35 "E
163.14'
51
N 6927'52 "E
61.70'
16
N 63'26'55 'E
59.71'
52
N 8546'57 "E
82.52'
17
N 49'01'43 "E
72.12'
53
S 86'02'46' E
100.81'
18
N 28'21'26 "E
60.01'
54
S 64'33'37 "E
138.59'
19
N 41'30'^27 "E
101.30'
55
S 58'31'47"E
102.01'
20
N 21'33'59 "E
73.12'
56
S 67'42'15 "E
73.14'
21
N 05'20'3714
88.71'
57
N 74'34'33 "E
147.45'
22
N O722.1219
45.65'
58
N 08'01'12W
206.66'
23
N 16'40'21 "E
146.60'
59
N 13'53'39 "E
108.38'
24
N 34'04'OS'W
184.31'
60
N 12'20'52 °E
65.72'
25
S 68'31'l1'W
153.55'
61
N 10'02 '53 "E
64.32'
26
S 5713 :37 -W
100.76'
62
N 21'13'41 'E
155.17'
27
N 71'14'S7"W
124.88'
63
N 13'51'54 "E
94.99'
28
N 61'12'07'W
102.83'
64
N 4743'58 "E
43.05'
29
N 09'02'05'W
87.63'
65
S 31'14'26 "E
216.65'
30
N 22'42'32 °E
212.46'
66
S 07'34'21'E
52.13'
31
N 44'42'50 "E
66.92'
67
S 1013'44 °E
99.33'
32
S 76'5526 E
55.01'
68
S 10'01'51 "E
39.30'
33
S 50'28'32 °E
54.93'
69
S 51'37'15 "E
37.08'
34
S 60'58'32 E
77.95'
70
S 73'20'33 °E
58.86'
35
S 85'30'23 "E
82.25'
71
S 79'29'02 "E
85.97'
36
N 60'17'47 "E
200.00'
NO PERMANENT MARKERS WERE PLACED AT POINTS
AS PLOTTED ALONG THE BANK OF CONTE14TNEA CREEK
Ty
-9- 281
2.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results
2.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
Vegetation onsite was first visually assessed to determine the general areas of viable planted vegetation.
Using the 2000 as -built plan, areas that did not appear to contain any of the planted species, were outside
the 200' buffer limit, or exhibited a much older mature plant community were excluded from the
monitoring effort. These areas are shown on the maps in Appendix D. The 200' buffer was taken from the
normal edge of the surface water.
Twelve vegetative sample plots within the project easement were quantitatively monitored during the
2009 growing season on October 6`b and 7t', 2009. The plots were randomly chosen using GIS. Species
composition, density, and survival were observed during the site visit. The Carolina Vegetation Survey
(CVS, 2006) methodology was utilized for vegetative monitoring. Level 2 (planted and natural stems)
methodology was completed on all monitored plots. It must be noted that due to the age of the planted
species, in some plots, it was difficult to distinguish planted species from volunteers. However, best
professional judgment along with knowledge of project planting zones by species enabled vegetation data
to be collected. The planted vegetation zones included oak mix, longleaf pine, river birch, and cypress.
The vegetative success criteria are based on the North Carolina rule 15A NCAC 213 0242 Neuse River
Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Mitigation Program for Protection and
Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers (2000). The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival
of 320 5 -year old planted woody stems per acre at the end of the monitoring period. As per NCEEP, the
Cypress wetland area was only monitored for vegetation within the 200' riparian buffer, and not wetland
hydrology.
The 2009 stem counts within each of the twelve vegetative monitoring plots are included in Exhibit
Tables Al through A5 in Appendix Al. Photos of the vegetative monitoring plots are included in
Appendix A3. Stems per acre for each of the twelve plots are reported in Table A5 -A of Appendix Al.
2.1.1 Vegetation Problem Areas
Monitoring revealed that 6 of the 12 plots (50 %) met the vegetative success criteria of 320 planted stems
or greater per acre. The remaining 6 plots failed to meet the success criteria (plots 3, 4, 7, 9, 10 and I IA).
There are a number of issues causing the failure of these plots. Vegetation Plots 4 and 9 (VP -4, VP -9)
exhibited poor survival of planted longleaf likely resulting from high densities of volunteer loblolly
recruitment. This may be an issue related to a lack of forest management for longleaf pines after planting.
VP -7 was located in an area that appeared to have poor soil due to residual debris from the site's history
of being a tire dump. It could have been attributed to early mortality of oak species after planting. It is
difficult to discern the exact reasons for poor planted species survival in the vegetation plots and
elsewhere on the site since it has been 9 years since vegetation installation. Seedlings may have been
shaded out, eaten by wildlife, affected by recent droughts, or in some cases affected by mowing.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 11
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Exhibit Table V - Vegetative Success Criteria Attainment
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site / EEP Project No. 24
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation Density Met
320 stems /acre
Tract Mean
VP -1B
Y (688)
50%
VP -2
Y (405)
VP -3
N (202)
VP -4
N (40)
VP -5
Y (486)
VP -6
Y (567)
(344 stems /acre)
VP -7
N (81)
VP -8A
Y (567)
VP -9
N (121)
VP -10
N (162)
VP -11A
N (81)
VP -12A
Y (729)
2.1.2 Vegetation Current Condition Plan View
Vegetative problem areas are shown on the Current Condition Plan View in Appendix D.
2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT
As per EEP, no stream monitoring took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site.
2.3 WETLAND ASSESSMENT
2.3.1 Current Condition Plan View
As per EEP, no wetland monitoring took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site.
2.3.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment
No groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 12
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
3.0 References
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CPS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0 ( hqp :Hcvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
NCEEP. 2006. Content, Format and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports. North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC.
Version 1.2 November 16, 2006
NC Administrative Code: 15A NCAC 213 0242, Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Management Strategy: Mitigation Program for Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers,
Raleigh, NC. 2000.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project Page 13
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Appendix A. Vegetation Raw Data
A.l VEGETATION DATA TABLES
Report Prepared By Richard Andrews
Date Prepared 10/21/2009 13:48
database name cvs- eep- entrytool- v2.2.7.mdb
database location V: \1713 \resource \Library\Streams & Wetlands \Monitoring \cvs
computer name ANDREWSR
file size 35663872
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - - - --
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary
of project (s) and project data.
Pro', planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each
Vear. This excludes live stakes.
Pro', total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year.
This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems,
dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences
and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for
each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted
and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing
stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
24
project Name
Beamon's Run
Description
Barnhill Farm off of HWY 58 b/w Snow Hill and Wilson in Greene
Count
River Basin
Neuse
length(ft)
16,350
stream-to-edge width ft
200
areas m
68,350
Required Plots calculated
Sampled Plots
12
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page Al
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Exhibit Table A2 - Vegetation Vigor
By Species
S ecies
CommonName
4
3
2
1
OlMissing
Unknown
Betula ni ra
river birch
17
a
V
10
/0,
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
3
5
2
1
y
Pinus palustris
longleaf pine
4
4i
Uo
Betula ni ra
river birch
0
Quercus alba
white oak
13
6
1
Pinus palustris
longleaf pine
0
4
Quercus alba
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
1
2
3
0
6
Quercus ni ra
water oak
15
Quercus ni ra Iwater
oak
6
6
11
1
7
15
87 15
Quercus phellos 1willow
oak
18
2
TOT:
7 17
62
21
17
2
Exhibit Table A3 - Vegetation Damage By Species
�y
0
a
V
10
/0,
y
4i
Uo
Betula ni ra
river birch
0
17
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
0
11
Pinus palustris
longleaf pine
0
4
Quercus alba
white oak
0
20
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
0
6
Quercus ni ra
water oak
15
9 15
Quercus phellos
willow oak
0
20
TOT: 7
7
15
87 15
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A2
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Exhibit Table A4 - Vegetation
Damage By Plot
�y
y
Ot�
o°j ".° 0 -T Q Q
a
V
o� nn'
m
_POP �p
ti
pF�
2
Boa
c
F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
4.
w
Jew a�F
Q
Q�0 e
y ryP ryb ry�t ryP ry0� ,y0` ry4`
024 -AC /RA -0002
010
024 -AC /RA -0003
0
5
024 -AC /RA -0004
0
1
024 -AC /RA -0005
0
12
024 -AC /RA -0006
0
14
024 -AC /RA -0007
01
2
024 -AC /RA -0009
01
3
024 -AC /RA -0010
01
4
024-AC/RA-01B
0
17
024- AC /RA -08A
0
14
024-AC/RA-11A
0
2
024- AC /RA -12A
15
3 15
TOT: 12
15
87 15
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A3
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Exhibit Table AS-A - Planted Stems By Plot and Species
y
o`� (91 oa o`"
o°j ".° 0 -T Q Q
IQ o� 53' p� o���t Ip
o� nn'
_POP �p
ti
pF�
2
Boa
c
F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Q Q Q Q Q
2C dy
Or
Q�0 e
y ryP ryb ry�t ryP ry0� ,y0` ry4`
ry4' ryb ry0' ryP ryb'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
�o moo` X43, moo` �o �o moo* �o
Io �o �o �o
V y
V
•�
�'r a
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Q Q Q Q
Betula ni ra
river birch
17
11
171
1
1
1
1
1
1 17
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
11
4
2.75
2
1
1
7
Pinus palustris
longleaf pine
4
2
2
1
3
Quercus alba
white oak
20
7
2.86
2
8
4
2
1 1
2
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
6
1
6
6
Quercus ni ra
water oak
24
3
8
2
6
16
Quercus hellos
willow oak
20
7
2.86
8
3
3
3
1
1
1
TOT:
0
7
7
102
7
10
5
1
12
14
2
3
4
17
14
2
18
STEMS PER ACRE
405
202
40
486
567
81
121
162
688
567
81
729
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A3
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
A o
b8a /�b''riZp m M
AZp
-v^ -v
'fib:
O00. rie0
� 000, ZO
C pOp, be0 O
m
a �ppO.M bAZp 04
U) OOp, bZ0
be0
S
m NM
Q
Lo S/ N r-
OD Cl)
00 N
t�ut�M
�o�ll
-I-
� M N L T
N
CO t0 r �O N N r CO Ln I'-
rliM CO I� �
MINI
M LO
r ti
r LO
LO
N
a
4'�N4
E
cc
Y
o
°�z(/
(
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNI
Y
°�
L
U
C
L
3
L
•�
C
N
C
O
3
C
_N
O
-C
C
C
L
C
Q
E
N
-
C
N
Y
L
Y
Y
o
0
-p
m
E
`"
U
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINI
m
E
o
w�
O
E�To��Ea�o�°~�'
m
U
O
C
O
O
i
3
C
mE'�a�N�NCN+
X
m
>Em0oEE3��yoom�3is
-ommdt
N
'�.
Q
L
m■nr��n�'t■���
U
to
�-.
3
.n
3
fn
3
3
C
n
N
N
U
j
nma�ma�nu�m�a�wa
C
Sa
U
U
m
/J
as-a
E
t�ut�M
�o�ll
-I-
� M N L T
N
CO t0 r �O N N r CO Ln I'-
rliM CO I� �
MINI
M LO
r ti
r LO
LO
N
a
4'�N4
E
cc
Y
o
°�z(/
(
Y
°�
L
U
C
L
3
L
•�
C
N
C
O
3
C
_N
O
-C
C
C
L
C
Q
E
N
-
C
N
Y
L
Y
Y
o
0
-p
m
E
`"
U
O
m
E
o
w�
O
E�To��Ea�o�°~�'
m
U
O
C
O
O
i
3
C
mE'�a�N�NCN+
X
m
>Em0oEE3��yoom�3is
-ommdt
N
'�.
Q
L
Q
U
to
�-.
3
.n
3
fn
3
3
C
n
N
N
U
j
C
Sa
U
U
m
/J
as-a
E
c
—
c
m
N
-
y
c
o
-
M�
m
C
E
L
co
°
m
C
m
m
c
ca
o
`m
m
-
a
m
L
o
a
2
N
o
m
m
o
f
E
a
v
m
o
rn
5
w
E
rn
'E
rn
rn
�_
ca
c
o
W
C
i
U
m
C
N
'O (D
C
in
O
i
i
C
OU
�U
U
N
7
N
N
.0
x
N
x
O
X
:3
a
O
-E
N
O
tmn
5
O
�
C
O
C
C
N
N
N
N
O
.x
QQ[oco00L.L
m
°�
�JJ
�
i
7
7
7
7
7
a
o
co
0
0
bQ N
W p
N
Q
i �G
. C
Sw
I°
;t:
CIO
i�
b4
I �
j o
0
i
U
N
EXHIBIT TABLE A6. VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS
Feature /Issue
Station # / Range
Probable Cause
Photo #
Weak numbers of
VP -3, VP -7, VP -10, VP -11A
Competition from volunteers, poor
2
planted species
soil, early morality
Weak numbers of
No management for Longleaf /
1
planted Longleaf Pine
VP -4, VP -9
competition from Loblolly Pine
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A5
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
A.2 VEGETATION PROBLEM AREA PHOTOS
``
A ,
E � rTi
Photo 1— Dense loblolly pine recruitment in vicinity of Veg Plot 4 (10/7/09)
Photo 2 — Low planted species survival in vicinity of Veg Plot 7A (10/7/09)
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A6
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
A.3 VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS
it
Photo Station 1 - Vegetation Plot 1B (10/7/09)
Photo Station 2 - Vegetation Plot 2 (10/6/09)
Beamon's Ron Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A7
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Photo Station 3 - Vegetation Plot 3 (10/6/09)
Photo Station 4 - Vegetation Plot 4 (10/6/09)
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A8
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Photo Station 5 - Vegetation Plot 5 (10/6/09)
Photo Station 6 - Vegetation Plot 6 (10/6/09)
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A9
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Photo Station 7 - Vegetation Plot 7 (10/7/09)
Photo Station 8 - Vegetation Plot 8A (10/7/09)
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A10
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Photo Station 9 - Vegetation Plot 9 (10/7/09)
Photo Station 10 — Vegetation Plot 10 (10/7/09)
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page A11
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Photo Station 11— Vegetation Plot 11A (10/7/09)
/ tv
/, /
f
Photo Station 12 — Vegetation Plot 12A (10/6/09)
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page Al2
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) - Final December 2009
Appendix B. Geomorphologic Raw Data
No stream assessment took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects (EEP Project No. 24) Page B 1
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
Appendix C. Hydrology Data
No hydrologic monitoring took place at the Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Site.
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page C1
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
Appendix D. Current Condition Plan View
Beamon's Run Buffer and Wetland Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 24) Page D1
Stantec — Monitoring Report (2009) — Final December 2009
i
1
�y
F �S.
!k Plot
Plot 7
V
Plot 4`
j
Plot 6
6
�Rr
Figure 2 -Overview
Current Condition Plan View
Beamon's Run Wetland and
Buffer Restoration Project
EEP Project 24
Greene County, North Carolina
Monitoring Report
December, 2009
j - Plot'1B
11%..o Stream Edge
Streams
200ft Buffer
Plantings
Excluded
Pad Cypress
Long leaf pine
River birch
t
�.
Oak Mix
Mowed
Parcel Boundaries
Veg Plot Corners
"
` '
�°
• Failing <320 stems /ac
Successful >320 stems /ac
_
�
r
1.,
. -fir•
n
0 200 400 800
Feet
['31 lar Instem
01101 Stantec
PROGRII
i
1
�y
F �S.
!k Plot
Plot 7
V
Plot 4`
j
Plot 6
6
�Rr
Figure 2 -Overview
Current Condition Plan View
Beamon's Run Wetland and
Buffer Restoration Project
EEP Project 24
Greene County, North Carolina
Monitoring Report
December, 2009
j - Plot'1B
11%..o Stream Edge
Streams
200ft Buffer
Plantings
Excluded
Pad Cypress
Long leaf pine
River birch
t
�.
Oak Mix
Mowed
Parcel Boundaries
Veg Plot Corners
"
` '
�°
• Failing <320 stems /ac
Successful >320 stems /ac
_
�
r
1.,
. -fir•
n
0 200 400 800
Feet
['31 lar Instem
01101 Stantec
PROGRII
a
s •art► . " . ►���1
jab .il.♦
w`
,�• its, c .. r :,_ ' '•�" _
r.
sari �.
Plot 2 Lat Long : • .rid��a. '. `I `� `' , '
Origin 35.53992038 - 77.76278982
2 35.54000623 - 77.76280325
3 35.54000139 - 77.76268864
4 35.53991517 - 77.76268792
a - "� _ ti MKT i t � ��yi �`f` `•�
1
•7f.
4.
"� rte•.: � t:.
A } ...
PGot'2`
Ail. ..
�c.
r ` .ate
!if; 9
LIM
Figure 2 - Sheet 1
Current Condition Plan View
Beamon's Run Wetland and
Buffer Restoration Project
EEP Project # 24
Greene County, North Carolina
Monitoring Report
December, 2009
0 Parcel Boundaries
Stream Edge
200ft Buffer
Plantings
® Excluded
Cypress
Long leaf pine
River birch
Oak Mix
Mowed
Veg Plot Corners
• Failing <320 stems /ac
Successful >320 stems /ac
0 75 150 300
Feet
AnfiaoiMemeht tem
paocaars ^i - --
Plot 5 Lat Long Plot 12A Lat Long Plot 4 Lat Long Plot 3 Lat Long
.* +W Origin 35.540002 - 77.757186 Origin 35.538791 - 77.757472 Origin 35.538581 - 77.757753 Origin 35.537874 - 77.757014
2 35.540030 - 77.757093 2 35.538948 - 77.757575 2 35.538662 - 77.757808 2 35.537870 - 77.756921
.� 3 35.539946 - 77.757163 3 35.538920 - 77.757609 3 35.538628 - 77.757907 3 35.537956 - 77.756940
Y' 4 35.539950 - 77.757055 4 35.538766 - 77.757502 4 35.538533 - 77.757846 4 35.537961 - 77.757019
t Coordinates for Plots 6 -10 shown on sheet 3
[ Plot 10 • . . , ', - ",
pi
Plot 9 .w,° yy
t' J ;;+RBI }! �It, j,� •� ' 1�y"�w�� k
t -_ n_IP,:.st�'Ie. . +a .te��'.� 9� 5-t-[M ., �w�:�.k► -._ J �+:'��»f
Plot 8A
Plot 7
f
�41Si1
� I
's
qi#
- _ - PIOT-11 ZA;
Plot 5 h z
Plot 4 d�
�.._"
i - #
,j
4
}
Figure 2 - Sheet 2
Current Condition Plan View
Beamon's Run Wetland and
Buffer Restoration Project
EEP Project Number 24
Greene County, North Carolina
Monitoring Report
December, 2009
Stream Edge
200ft Buffer
Plantings
® Excluded
Cypress
Long leaf pine
River birch
Oak Mix
Mowed
Planted Parcels
Veg Plot Corners
• Failing <320 stems /ac
Successful >320 stems /ac
0 75 150 300
Feet
r�
F�o s
11,n� oiremtem ent
PROGRAM Stantec
Plot 6 Lat Long Plot 9 Lat Long Plot 16 Lat Long
Origin 35.541784 - 77.756530 Origin 35.543828 - 77.754738 Origin 35.544557 - 77.750951
2 35.541704 - 77.756575 2 35.543863 - 77.754653 2 35.544589 - 77.751036
3 35.541668 - 77.756479 3 35.543943 - 77.754707 3 35.544500 - 77.751071
4 35.541747 - 77.756438 4 35.543894 - 77.754791 4 35.544479 - 77.750975
Plot 7 Lat Long Plot 10 Lat Long
Origin 35.542795 - 77.756267 Origin 35.543836 - 77.753893
2 35.542784 - 77.756161 2 35.543916 - 77.753917
3 35.542870 - 77.756147 3 35.543896 - 77.754013
4 35.542877 - 77.756256 4 35.543814 - 77.753983
Plot 8A Lat Long Plot 11A Lat Long
Origin 35.543196 - 77.755950 Origin 35.544844 - 77.751455
2 35.543136 - 77.755883 2 35.544811 - 77.751551
3 35.543210 - 77.755814 3 35.544735 - 77.751502
4 35.543262 - 77.755894 4 35.544775 - 77.751400
f
r
r
�1
x
,.:. `.
►�i�i�i�i
/9
t LUX
S
IA
0 65 130 260
Feet
7
o stem
E ei ent Stantec
PR GRAM
y
Figure 2 - Sheet 3
Current Condition Plan View
Beamon's Run Wetland and
Buffer Restoration Site
EEP Project # 24
Greene County, North Carolina
Monitoring Report
December, 2009
Stream Edge
200ft Buffer
Plantings
Plot 1 B
® Excluded
Cypress
Long leaf pine
River birch
F7� Oak Mix
Mowed
Planted parcels
Veg Plot Corners
• Failing <320 stems /ac
Successful >320 stems /ac
0 65 130 260
Feet
7
o stem
E ei ent Stantec
PR GRAM