20140367 Ver 1_Application_20140411

O`�O� W AT �9QG
y
1 1 0 �
r��rr
T(AA,pF �S 0 4
20 1 40 367
Office use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) D=orm
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
© Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes © No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes Q No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Pitt 208
2b. County:
Pitt
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Griffon
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
17BP.2.R.60
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
WA
3d. Street address:
105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.:
252 -439 -2800
3g. Fax no.:
252 -830 -3341
3h. Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent © Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name:
Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d. Street address:
P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.:
252 -439 -2800
4g. Fax no.:
252 - 830 -3341
4h. Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
S. AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Pitt 208 Bridge to Pipe Replacement
1b . Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.411111 Longitude: - 77.395024
1c. Property size:
acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Swift Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Swift Creek C; Sw, NSW
2c. River basin:
j Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1907 Marvin Taylor Rd is a paved secondary road. Woodlands and agriculture dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 70
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge to pipe replacement; the existing bridge has deteriorated and needs replacement
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing 31' long concrete bridge will be replaced with a 30'-6"x 6' -10" aluminum box culvert with headwalls and sills.
4. Jurisdictional Detenninations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
[]Yes X❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
S. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands © Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a_
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary m
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Ditch
PER
Corps
10
44
S2 T
Culvert
Ditch
PER
Corps
10
26
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
70
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g'. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction Proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
FIII
Ditch
No
315
105
B2 P
Fill
Ditch
No
315
210
B3 P
RII
Ditch
No
275
130
B4 P
Fill
Ditch
No
145
135
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
1,050
580
6i. Comments: Zone 1 Impacts 0.0241 Acres, Zone 2 Impacts 0.0133 Acres
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are 70 linear feet of stream impacts along with 1050 sq.ft. of buffer zone 1 Impacts and 580 sq.ft. of buffer zone 2 Impacts due to the Installation
of a 301-6" x 6' -10" aluminum box culvert with headwalls and sills.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes Q No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
11 Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In4leu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Pennittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes pX No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7of10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
See Stormwater Management Plan
® Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Z Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed roadway typical consists of 2 -10' wide lanes with 5' grassed shoulders. Proposed structure #208 Is a 30' -6" long X 6110" ABC wf
headwall and sills. Sills are to be located 1' inside both the Inlet and outlet of the structure to preserve the normal flow stream width through the
structure. Floodplain benches will be constructed outside of the sills, which are to be backfllled with native material` to sill height. Floodplain benches
assist In transitioning the stream into and out of the culvert during normal flow conditions. There will be no direct discharge into the stream. Runoff is
to be treated by grass shoulders.
Roadside ditches on the outlet side are to be undisturbed. Endwall section in the northwest quadrant is bent to avoid impact on ditch.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
DvvR 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
NIA
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
B Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
©Other: NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
© Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
[]Yes
Q No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
©No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after- the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
©No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
E] Yes
®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC - See attached document
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU Historic Architecture and Archaeology - See attached letter
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson
03 -27 -2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
11iC
Jt/A g; Signature
(Agent gna is va only if an authorization
er from the a icant is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

3
o
d
t
N
2
° — °
� N
O
C O aI
4D 75
a) -°
O
-
N
N U O
tf
m
0 3 > m
M
N
O
S)
3 U p
E
p)
°—
°�
L N a)
3tL aUi
as
IL
00
Lo U o
a)
°1
w
00
N
Q :03 N
M N
r
N
N
N
H
p C 'p
N N
O
C
w
Q
<O Q w
`
w
N
Ni
O X �O O O @
c c° E
U)
W
a`
3 c� a)
O N
y
Q
U >
m
j
U
O°
N
y
O i0 O- U (a
U N E N Z
m
@
a3
O
a) M ` N
p
N
p
N
_
U N O O
c
m
0
0
j
Q
C
N
y m m
a) a O r- U
L_ W w p N `
O
V)
c
a)
E
a,
O
L O
0
O p N N
3 N C C
>
.
0 c
d n
pcN Oo
0
O
O
N
Z
LL
C
- 7 L� .z N N C
> a)
"
cc
OL
Z
O
_
w
Cl) 3 N 5
"
N
U)
C
=
a
W
..
X
N W
U
V)
N O U
3 N @ CA
N
d
Z
3
w
CN
3 N
W
050 C
N N O
_0
x
io
O N a) 7
C
O
m
a)
C
y
-0
c
U
N
a`�
C
N a)
a) O -c p) a) j N
O N U O .-.
-o
C'
N
z
•y
)
E
y
m
f6
-0 NG=L"O O N O U
Np
O J
N a H
C
of
••
U
—
N
rn a) c c p N
C Fa (6 a) O- O_ 0
of
H U
O
'm
O
N
1
C
7
O
E
'D
O O.
V) 7 E p (u r 2 S.
O'
` O z'
H W O
F
U
C7
3
U
. C
7
rn
W N C p a) C O L
N 0� c « w
o a W a
O
N
c
Q
n0
N w LL O O
O
O
Q
U
_
•�
•C
.° N O t y N a) a E
m
()
aci 3 Z
a
U
U
U
z
y
3
a N N m
rn a
c
Q¢
o
a°i
p
a`)
.0
L 0)i c '3 N
N In 3 W W
�'
OE
N 0)� z
d
,d
G7
0
N L- O CO C NF
W
o Twa
o
h
3� °E TN E
c ; Q z
m
O
v
U
a°i
V ._
o
m c = m a) 0 CD
N
>O
c a) _ O >
'n a)LY aa)
V O
o
-p a
N m@ m
t
U)
O
3
m (D
y
X >
j
0
IL
y
co
g o C N C W
C
Z )
N
z
L0
O
o
r
N
a) a1
; o0w' ° °o
Y
a)
E
N
°°
0
Y o 3 0
Ll
U
d
N
N
•@
0
O— N C N a3 'O a) O
a
N
y
N C @— 0 U r-
16 N U
° L C
Y
3
Q
°
a) a) N S] Co
U U IF E 0
p
r
a)
()
E@
N
N U a) a p
N .n w N C
E
C 7
(0
>
(a
p�
C >1 O N m
O a)
U 0 O0 .
U
o
9 )w N
3
3 c od
Cl)
W
�
O O a) N
V
r
a
IT O
U r
°
O
L°..
U
al
Z
Z
N
N
m
N p N (6
p C C L L L a3 (6
N
o
.0
0'
o
m
°
>
-° 3 F— w m a) (D N
R
N
L z
C
V
of
d
N
C
U O. a) N C a) N O £ a
N
C
m O)
Or
a)
a)
E
£
a)
3 N
co
a)
X
a) n o a) ? E
LL
J
° a)
W
N
-C
7 co
M C
l'L
7
O 7
U
Q
.N. O� .p @ w w
L O Z C
om
N
M
La
d'
O)
-
a)
Z
C
w
m
Z
N
O L a) O O O
2'
F- O F-0 O U LL LL * a)
c
C)
M
r
C
O
C)
d
v
a
E
w
%
c
°
N
v
Q
U)
W
m
N
d
N
C
00
ca
m
N
L
t
a
(� 2
m
L
:;
U
N
yr
G)
a)
a)
>
ci
>
-
..
r
o
R
z
°
c
a)
w
N
F
3 c
c
c
y
0
Lo
La
a_Ni
c
-
p
Lo
0
S
3
C7
E
m
�
i 00 o
'o
0
C
m
E
�
L
y
y
c�i
m
da
A
v
?
c
U
r�'
°
o
oa
m
e
Z
z
Una
z
Omm

� �
�
�■
\
0
.
I
.
w
..
.,
..
,
:
~
cn
IL
2�)
f
C(
k
§ L
.
E
4, $
k2
k{
Jig
f@
� m
k
§
C)
_
/§22
��
}
0
&z§
[
®$
E
§
a
IL
2
C
�
E C
% m R
1kk
f
ax
/
��
-
E z k
c
E
k
Ca
/
o0
a
§
§ 2
^
15
-
m !
a_tvw
, §
■
,z
S
m�
«,
•
%
0m��
0 � «
>0
c
_
3
{
CL
f /kk
�\m
§S
kf�0
u o
_
«
E
CL
§
f
§
\
a
z
/
\ §
t
k
k
f
k
,
§
JPo
\E
§amp
.\)\
p
<
J
0
-
_}
�E�
\§
'0c
([f\
2i
,
)E\
$
E
I
46
) k
-
A':
c099
.].! ;°
g —ate
\' k�
k§7D
tee(
�a )`
Q£)
/ -
_ (§
0
_.
/ \
\
21 ��
\

PITT 208
SR 1907, MARVIN TAYLOR ROAD
OVER DITCH
AYDEN USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 73 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
- � OF PITT COUNTY
y MIDDLE NEUSE 03020202
Pitt 208 NEUSE RIVER BASIN
r WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.60
JULY 17, 2013
Edrr
SR�108
o°
�o
y�
os,
z
SR1105
S 1945
PITT 208
V N 608416.5093
z
E 2478195.8532
N 35 -24-40
W 77 -23 -42
N 35.411111
W 77.395024 �
� h A
0
�O 0)
8Ryjjj
� ob`
U °
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet vj�

PITT 208
SR 1907, MARVIN TAYLOR ROAD
OVER DITCH
AYDEN USGS QUAD MAP
14
A ND SHEET 73 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF PITT COUNTY
MIDDLE NEUSE 03020202
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BR2.R.60
JULY 17, 2013
_lz
SRi-,10,5
sAO e, 7
PITT 208
�z N 608416.5093
E 2478195.8532
N 35-24-40
W 77-23-42
N 35.411111
W 77.395024
tca
110
!am )RAI
46
ch,
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet �r,_r� c �} ' I ?�, '- Gj ��

Project Tracking No. (Interval Use)
13 -10 -0008
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
¢, T, NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
n x This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Pitt
WBS No.:
1713P.2.R.60
Document
Type:
Fed Aid No:
Funding:
X State ❑ Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
X Yes ❑ No
I
Permit
Typ e (s):
NWP 14
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 208 on SR 1907 (Marvin Taylor Road) over ditch (off -site
detour planned; no easements or ROW acquisition).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTION OFREVIEWACTIVITIES, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 4 November
2013 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Pitt County
current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated an APE of woodland and
cultivated fields with resources dating mostly to the 1990s (viewed 4 November 2013). The APE
intersects a parcel to the northeast of the existing bridge on which stands a circa 1920 resource, the SS
Joseph C. Rasberry, Sr. Log Cabin (PT0219), located approximately 400 feet east of SR 1907 (Marvin
Taylor Road), outside the APE and well beyond likely project impact. Constructed in 1963, Bridge No. 208
is neither included in the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey, nor representative of any distinctive engineering
or aesthetic type. Google Maps "Street View" confirmed absence of critical historic structures /landscapes
in APE (viewed 4 November 2013).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THEAVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDESA RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLY PREDICTING THAT
THEREARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORICARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THEPROJECTAREA: APE extends 600 feet from each end of the existing bridge (S -N) and 100 feet to
either side of the existing SR 1907 (Marvin Taylor Road) center line (W -E) to encompass proposed
construction. The county comprehensive architectural survey and related publication, as well as later
studies, include no properties in the APE (Scott Power, TheHisWc Architecture ofRttCounty, NathCarolina, Greenville:
Pitt County Historical Society, 1991; the Joseph C. Rasberry Log Cabin (P1170219) is discussed on page 285). County GIS /tax
materials and other visuals support the absence of significant architectural resources. No National
Register - listed properties are located within the APE or along the proposed off -site detour route.
Should any design elements of the project change, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture
as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
-- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
Hcsronc• Archilec ure and Lm bcapes NO S[ /ItVh3' RF.O[ /IRISD form Jor rl /inm• T ran spa lalion pmjeds as Qualified a do 2007 Pragmnunaric Agreentenl

I
if
4
(""°°- j02 �f44j � ".'..�. )l � �R T f`�� I` JJC . .j,,.,. -- �•,
.r,,i �,N �a� •r i t j y } 0 l
cR' I # •yi yj
)8f: -y 5 `r.J NC•}112 r l c� — —° rv�
Aiten Mllar
0 °- t s f E
"nr'f 'tea i` '�C`r, r,,,:•,r�-- }� �i, _- -,_ j t
r 7 "
y
Jnuk p nj` ylf t
Al
Y ; +t '4� _? -, ^."� *;+�• ,,,,_, mnin•c:nnnon ltd•
�_' I f', � ` 1 ti . f 'I _o�, "off i
j -�.ti :Pro; ect Area.4.:T
Gd
T, rte" t � ��_�, � f "� � '" 1 - --r� --,r•� _._ �NC =1. g � �'° �'�..� :4`• �,.. .-?�.'
..�'"�3 �,-'4• .. 7j \_1) • i ••fir,.: -.. ,�' ("= 5 s e �'`� I { %'^- ; "-�. f" �
Bridge No. 208 Replacement Pitt County
WBS No. 17BP.2.R.60 Base map: HPO Web, nts
NCDOT — Historic Architecture
November 2013
Tracking No. 13 -10 -0008

(� is- ia000s
-oats NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
s This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not t*
t`-,W. r valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Pitt 208
County: Pitt
WBSNo: 17BP.2.R.60 Document: Minimum Criteria Sheet
F.A. No: Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NW 14
Project Description: Replace Bridge 208 over ditch on SR 1907.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A review of the map files at the Office of State Archaeology yielded no results in the vicinity of the
proposed project. The project description labels the water course as a ditch, a man -made channel. While
the topography suggests a stream, if only intermittent, channeling such a stream is evidence of destruction
of the natural water course. Plans call for replacement of the existing bridge with a concrete structure in
the same location. There will be no impact beyond the current ROW.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: Two items serve to argue against further
investigation of this proposed project. First, the current bridge spans a ditch, a man -made waterway,
apparently dug into the intermittent stream ,course. Thus, the surrounding terrain has been disturbed from
the ditch's excavation. Second, design plans call for replacement in place of the existing bridge and thus
no impact to any new location. No further investigation is warranted.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ® Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED
"No ARCHAF.OI.OGY SURVEY RI:OUIRL•U "form for Mh$or 7rwlsportarmn Projects as Qualifie t in the 1007 Progrommraec Agreement.
I of2

t 1* 5
ftDV
! i —.._„_ .t r....�...— ....._.
`k.•" ' S !� � CTJy .`.iia,�Q'�i�? �JB�Fk�x�'� x]r �`:�es'•.wJa;a!r~ �� ..
Figure 1. Bridge 208 over ditch [encircled]. Ayden Quad.
Figure 2. Aerial photograph of Bridge 208 [encircled]. A close examination of the bridge
shows a wide man -made channel to the east.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SUR VI, REQUIRED "form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified to the 2007 Programmatic Agreement
2of2

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Maria Rogerson, P.E.
Division Bridge program Manager, NCDOT
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: August 29, 2013
SUBJECT: Division 2 Bridge Replacements
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661- 667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699 -1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Bridge Memo Page 2 August 29, 2013
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist should be
notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be required. /
NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for information on
requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
11. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long -term erosion control.
12. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
13. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
14. Only clean, sediment -free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
15. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be

Bridge Memo Page 3 August 29, 2013
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40 -50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100 -year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
• Pitt County, replace bridge No. 208 on SR 1907 over Ditch: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County, replace bridge No. 119 on SR 1538 over Hunting Run: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Craven County, replace bridge No. 124 on SR 1433 over Mills Branch: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 150 on SR 1530 over Fork Swamp: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.

Bridge Memo Page 4 August 29, 2013
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 105 on SR 1326 over Broad Creek: Anadromous
species are found in this portion of Broad Creek. NCDOT should follow all stream
crossing guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including an in -water work moratorium
from February 15 to June 30. We recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge.
Standard recommendations apply.
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 249 on SR 1336 over Duck Creek: Duck Creek is
designated as a Primary Nursery Area. NCDOT should follow all stream crossing
guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including an in -water work moratorium from
February 15 to September 30. We recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge.
Standard recommendations apply.
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 119 on SR 1520 over Beaverdam Swamp: We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at (919) 707 -0370. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on this project.

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
3S ]0' 1
\
.T
1'
� 1
1
27' 37
\
ws•\ C,
\\ 1 \
VT
J5717P. _._._._.i.[a llodK _ "___a •. "__ ^___ "_.
m Eo
du Produced by rbR Un11ed Srate Geological Survey
Ff
Crn of W L75GS. /
"b UAA and USLE
C—vdrd Lv phM,M„Anannrh waMOdr bom —.I pMro9reph. r, u
raker 1977. FwW ab.rkd IWIL MW JR d 198E 1,
prrdsrllon and 8100 $m W,d lkka Nw11, C dhrr wwdnu. r12'MII'Illlw
ryrvn�. II endw•�, .,nd,rnval nw � Nu
1000 -mrlrr U-1 r—'. M — 9r10, — I k
1917 Nrnh Amerlrxr Dnt.,n
In pl.tr w, Iba pl , Nanh Amnk-an Um, 1984
—8a. prgecaen 11— IE aMa —11, ad lne I:Rm ANn Iw wN:NVI n: rRHtTir
27nww..na1 -v—IN Aesbdr— W . IRCLNAnuh AI -l—
F— rrd dash d Una. k.. and R M Nnw Riau
WmrdlY rbAk• �, r•nAl plr�hyra,A,c. fMa nknnurmn b �nrN lad
(rrV rNl vnJlrAerr near In Vrhrh wdy L.rdmwk h.".p aM rb-
f �
1
,� „
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCLS
AND C:OMMUNrrV DEVELOPMENT
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROI.INA
/C ..
.. 25 11
12
I E
ERrllmol
� / I
d
AYDEN QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SUITES (TOPOGRAPHIC)�d'.a1'+'
NR. Avlry o a�N+.ASas
17 in.A rat r -:r bd
7r'27'90'
1 7670'
. 6dC NY1
f'Et
1
41
�^ , — —"•' - •r1,i ..f � 1 C1 1
1 / I
I E
ERrllmol
� / I
\ y
y-f
e
j� r %
r
AV s
see• nm
/ i
i \
T r�
+ t
„' L
Le
• u
u yen � !
!
ieN
21RR
\r /
� -4
'♦ r ^ �
��p
s '
m10 n 1• Au ..••.,.........., _ ..............• ..., 7rn•7r
'iN• -e 1r
SCALE 1:24 000 ROAD CLA%WFCATNIN 'p?
RIONOW _ -... hMry NMha'es LyMdnY rorA. h.,dnr
IT T— _ "- iYTITd -- b.rd..an -- — I,o,r�rvN nnLr -v
I..- "..�..._ I
aTlY,..- .,- "_-- ._.}..... b� BrO w.fe. - UN�noror,d rod .. -
COMTOUR INIVRVAL 2 METERS IRkerre R—, U. S. Rnw• Slar IWar
SUPfiHLNTARY CONIOUR NTMAL I NEIEA
OA'4W SURLEMENTARV C[RIfC" ARC ApIRORPNTE -
NAiIOtNL Gtm llc VERTICAL DA7UM tM 198 AYDEN, N. C.
raM1.w ry nnve MrnOw n, ne MAIl.T nI laelT. tNMANNWt L.MwiR1N a Qurn.MOI
rNIIYN YllVrnuvs ew+w lu IN: NIAq:Yi al NmR xau
N 5
JS22 E2.4 rW77E8517.5
TNq rAr coun2cs VAIb nanoAM NAP KCU.KY STANWFUi CONTOURS AND ELEVATIONS
FOR SALE RY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IN METERS 1982
DENVER. COLORADO 00225. OR RESTON. VIRGINIA 72M
A VOIDER OElLRgNiU IOPOGRA— MART AND SYklUL9 % AYAII.ARIE ON ACOVLOT nMA eSSa M1' NM SEINES —2

d
z
G
i
zz
G
0
NC GRID
NAD 83 /NSRS 2007
�>a
ti
W
:`PI aY
�N�
w
°o
O -ilaz
J S§
,aN9 W�
Q:
O �
N
tp
zt rn N
vN
LU W
NuHuu
N
J�
cc Ncc tn Q,CA
� $ S$i
W
L
LL,�
J
ti
W
V
Q
�N�
�Y Y
Wisn
2N
Q
W�
�UU�
NnNu
N
Lu
vN
LU W
Z) �� R
OO
N N
cii o °
3
LL,�
Lij
LL
�c��
b_
a�l
m
Uj��o
cc o00
WO�
ct
Wmx
V) oz 3
LL
j II II
�O
CO
z�Lw
p�OV
=2Q:cc
Q o
VOV =�ILNLWL41�
`M
�NCt d
zz"
it
V�2gZWjccp¢_�
O
N �
CZNzz2�oQb
00 Z
Np0_jZ�12Ww
U-j�
~oz Q)
= :IOV1C>
�Ul I-QV)
223cn
L
1�
1�
\ JS
Js,
9.
0 0
� ac,
NuHu ?u
�(n�N 2(n
�si�s �w
a5M% ia%
0
w
0
O
O
�I
D
W
C)
O
O
60 00'
Ln
X
N
Q
I�
I�
I�
I�
I
I
SNOISIAH
3
U-
?8
ti
J _
O
< V \
\� 28 mtio�
O�OM
NnNu
U-
m�
0
w
0
O
O
�II
•
ti
W
V
Q
�N�
�Y Y
Wisn
�Ln
W�
�UU�
NnNu
N
Lu
vN
LU W
NM
?8
ti
J _
O
< V \
\� 28 mtio�
O�OM
NnNu
U-
m�
0
w
0
O
O
�II
•
u6py,w.4d-4.d-Z'PP-B0Zl4
ti
W
V
Q
N
U-
W�
�UU�
Lu
ZLL,
N
QM
vN
LU W
NM
OO
N N
cii o °
Ji
LL,�
Lij
LL
�c��
Q- �
LL
N m
cc o00
WO�
`O
\T /
LL
j II II
LiJ �I
�W
u6py,w.4d-4.d-Z'PP-B0Zl4

04!
,nl
'Zi
41,
Z z -CA
0 it
0�2 Ln
..Kt- 4-
25: 03
N:cc
T:
I
.. sl . . y. 4 Ji
'01
W I
GD; 0i ji
Quo .��� .
. ... ... ... .. .. . .....
Lo6i his HO 1 10 VOZOU-'JS,-E,l,OZ-,9-O-Z,OfL vr-�67�'
C4 t
C'�
coo
A c
FX
Cl 0
1 Cl L: I
LM! 0-
It
Ze
cr
Z j
dJ
ILO' O' �'
0 z
vg
I F : 0
=x E.
—12
cli I
I L