The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140365 Ver 1_Application_20140409Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑X Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑x No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes 9 No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑ Yes ❑x No 19. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. Yes ❑ No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Pender County Bridge #45 2b. County: Pander 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Atkinson 2d. Subdivision name: n/a 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 17BP.3.R.33 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: n/a 3b. Deed Book and Page No. n/a 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): North Carolina Department of Transportation, Highway Division 3, Attn: Amanda Glynn 3d. Street address: 5501 Barbados Blvd 3e. City, state, zip: Castle Hayne, NC 28429 3f. Telephone no.: 910-341-2000 3g. Fax no.: 910-675-0143 3h. Email address: atglynn@ncdot.gov Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Robert Turnbull 5b. Business name (if applicable): Environmental Services, Inc. 5c. Street address: 524 South New Hope Road 5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 5e. Telephone no.: 919-212-1760 5f. Fax no.: 919-212-1707 5g. Email address: Turnbull@esinc.cc Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): n/a 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 34.57801 Longitude:-78.14836 1c. Property size: acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Tuckahoe Branch 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;Sw 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project study area and vicinity consist of rural agricultural areas, silvicultural areas, and undeveloped forested communities. The proposed project and associated impacts are within existing NCDOT rights -of -way. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.25 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 250 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed project is to replace the existing bridge over Tuckahoe Creek on Halfway Branch School Road (SR 1207). The project will improve driver safety by replacing the degrading bridge. 3e. See Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Attachment A. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project(including all priorphases) in thepast? ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑K Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Robert Turnbull Agency/Consultant Company: Environmental Services, Inc. Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. USACE and NCDWR visited the site on 911612013. No documentation has been received by NCDOT or Environmental Services, Inc. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? El Yes ❑ No 51 Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes 0 No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): QX Wetlands Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P Fill Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.01 W2 P Excavation Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.01 W3 P Hand Clearing Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.03 W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.05 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent(INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P Culvert Tuckahoe Creek PER Corps 30 84 S2 T Culvert Tuckahoe Creek PER Corps 30 20 S3 - Choose one S4 - Choose one - - S5 - Choose one - - S6 - Choose one - - 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 104 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 - Choose one Choose 02 - Choose one Choose 03 - Choose one Choose 04 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 51. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number— Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet B1 Yes/No B2 - Yes/No B3 - Yes/No B4 - Yes/No B5 - Yes/No B6 - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed culvert placement will occur as much as practicable within the footprint of the existing bridge and roadway. The placement of a reinforced concrete box culvert is proposed in order to meet MOA Criteria. Use of a bridge structure to meet the purpose and need of the project could also result in significantly more impacts to jurisdictional wetlands due to the need to redesign, move, and/or expand the approaches to this crossing. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. All in -stream work will be done "in the dry' or using a temporary coffer dam. All necessary sediment and erosion control BMPs will be installed and maintained through construction. Disturbed ground will be restored and stabilized with permanent vegetative cover. NCDOT Best Management Practices will be implemented during all phases of construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank ❑ pa ment to in -lieu fee y program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes X No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes X❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? 0 Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The proposed structure is a 2 @ 10'-0" x 5'-6' RCBC, 40'-0" in length. There are no existing or proposed ditches on this project. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? DWR Stormwater unit - Linda Lewis 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? n/a ❑ Phase II ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been El Yes ❑X No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑X No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑X Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑X Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/statelocal) funds or the ❑X Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑X No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered 'yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, El Yes Z No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? El Yes ❑X No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in []Yes No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The proposed project will result in little new impervious surface and will not result in downstream impacts or growth -stimulating effects. The existing use of Tuckahoe Branch (C;Sw) should not change as a result of this project. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. No wastewater will be produced as a result of this project. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or El Yes No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act El Yes ❑X No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Data (updated January 2014) and onsite evaluation by ESI Staff. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2009 List of EFH Species by Waterbody in North Carolina 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? A Historic Architecture review was conducted by NCDOT in March 2013. Documentation pertaining to this review is attached. The NCDOT Archaeological review is pending. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: No floodway revision is required since the project design meets MOA i criteria (maximum decrease of 0.06 feet). Tuckahoe Branch is a FEMA Detailed Study Stream. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com 614-1 Robert Turnbull (Agent) ApplicantfAgent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant isprovided.) Page 10 of 10 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 17BP.3.R.33--Pender45 Halfway Branch School Road SR 1207 over Tuckahoe Branch PARCELID: N LA STREET ADDRESS:.. Halfway Branch School Road {SR 12071_ PROPERTY OWNER (PLEASE PRINT): North Carolina Department of Transportation PROPERTY OWNER: The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize Robert Turnbull , of Environmental Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached. PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS (if different from above): 5501 Barbados Blvd., Castle Ha ne NC 28429 Telephone: (9101341-2000 We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true an accurate to the best of our knowledge. M11*6"t Authorized Si nature Date: Authorized Signature Date: WA WB WD WCSA Jurisdictional Areas Path: P:\GeoGra\Projects\2013\107\GIS\maps\fig_juris_pender01.mxd Date: 10/4/2013 2:31:10 PM E 0 10050 Feet Project Boundary* Jurisdictional Wetland * Jurisdictional Stream* Oct 2013 KT/RT Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is forinformational purposes only and was not prepared for, and isnot suitable for legal or engineering purposes. 1Figure: Project: Date: Drwn/Chkd: Source: High Resolution NC Statewide Imagery,CGIA, 2010; Project Boundary approximated byESI. *Location and Extent is approximate. ER13107.02 Pender 45 Pender County, North Carolina (V e r s i o n 1 . 2 ; R e l e a s e d J u l y 2 0 1 2 ) 17 B P . 3 . R . 3 3 Co u n t y ( i e s ) : Pe n d e r Page 1of 2 Pr o j e c t T y p e : Date: Ph o n e : Ph o n e : Em a i l : Em a i l : Co u n t y ( i e s ) : CA M A C o u n t y ? De s i g n / F u t u r e : Ex i s t i n g : Su r r o u n d i n g L a n d U s e : Re s i d e n t i a l , A g r i c u l t u r a l 32 5 f t . 80 0 ( 2 0 3 5 ) 0. 1 5 Pr o j e c t B u i l t - U p o n A r e a ( a c . ) Pr o p o s e d P r o j e c t Ex i s t i n g S i t e Pr o j e c t L e n g t h ( l i n . M i l e s o r f e e t ) : Bu f f e r R u l e s i n E f f e c t Pr o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n No n e Ye s No n e NC D W Q S u r f a c e W a t e r C l a s s i f i c a t i o n f o r P r i m a r y R e c e i v i n g W a t e r 30 3 ( d ) I m p a i r m e n t s : Ri v e r B a s i n ( s ) : Pr i m a r y R e c e i v i n g W a t e r : Cl a s s C Ot h e r S t r e a m C l a s s i f i c a t i o n : HN T B N o r t h C a r o l i n a , P . C . Ci t y / T o w n : (9 1 9 ) 4 2 4 - 0 4 2 4 52 4 S o u t h N e w H o p e R d Ad d r e s s : At k i n s o n (9 1 9 ) 2 1 2 - 1 7 6 0 Pe n d e r ac. Ge n e r a l P r o j e c t N a r r a t i v e : Th e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t i n v o l v e s t h e r e p l a c e m e n t o f P e n d e r C o u n t y B r i d g e N o . 7 0 0 0 4 5 o v e r T u c k a h o e C r e e k o n S R 1 2 0 7 ( H a l f w a y B r a n c h S c h o o l R d . ) . T h e p r o p o s e d st r u c t u r e i s a 2 @ 1 0 ' - 0 " x 5 ' - 6 " R C B C , 4 0 ' - 0 " i n l e n g t h . T h e r e a r e n o e x i s t i n g o r p r o p o s e d d i t c h e s o n t h i s p r o j e c t . Ty p i c a l C r o s s S e c t i o n D e s c r i p t i o n : Re f e r e n c e s 400 (2010) 0. 2 0 Av e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c ( v e h / h r / d a y ) : ac . No r t h C a r o l i n a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Hi g h w a y S t o r m w a t e r P r o g r a m S T O R M W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T P L A N FO R L I N E A R R O A D W A Y P R O J E C T S Ro b e r t T . T u r n b u l l Br i d g e R e p l a c e m e n t Ge n e r a l P r o j e c t I n f o r m a t i o n Ad d r e s s : 2/18/2014 34 3 E . S i x F o r k s R o a d Ra l e i g h , N C 2 7 6 1 0 Su i t e 2 0 0 Ra l e i g h , N C 2 7 6 0 9 Pr o j e c t / T I P N o . : NC D O T C o n t a c t : Pr o j e c t N o . : 17 B P . 3 . R . 3 3 Co n t r a c t o r / D e s i g n e r : rt u r n b u l l @ e s i n c . c c Ca p e F e a r 18 - 6 8 - 1 8 - 5 - 3 ja b y r d @ h n t b . c o m 2 - 1 0 ' a s p h a l t p a v e d l a n e s w i t h p a v e d s h o u l d e r s & g r a s s e d s h o u l d e r s . 2 - 1 0 ' a s p h a l t p a v e d l a n e s w i t h g r a s s e d s h o u l d e r s . N/ A NC D W Q S t r e a m I n d e x N o . : Su p p l e m e n t a l : Sw a m p W a t e r s ( S w ) Pr i m a r y : Tu c k a h o e B r a n c h (V e r s i o n 1 . 2 ; R e l e a s e d J u l y 2 0 1 2 ) 17 B P . 3 . R . 3 3 Co u n t y ( i e s ) : Pe n d e r Page 2of 2 Sh e e t No . St a t i o n (F r o m / T o ) Fe a t u r e Im p a c t e d Wa t e r / W e t l a n d / Bu f f e r T y p e Re c e i v i n g S u r f a c e Wa t e r N a m e NR T R M a p ID NC D W Q S t r e a m In d e x NC D W Q S u r f a c e Wa t e r C l a s s i f i c a t i o n 30 3 ( d ) Im p a i r m e n t s Ty p e o f Im p a c t Existing SCM 12 + 5 5 - L - 12 + 7 5 - L - 12 + 4 0 - L - 12 + 9 1 - L - 12 + 4 8 - L - 12 + 8 1 - L - 12 + 4 6 - L - 12 + 5 6 - L - S T O R M W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T P L A N FO R L I N E A R R O A D W A Y P R O J E C T S E q u a l i z e r P i p e s t o b e n o t e d a s a m i n i m i z a t i o n o f i m p a c t s . Re f e r e n c e s Pr o j e c t / T I P N o . : * L i s t a l l s t r e a m a n d s u r f a c e w a t e r i m p a c t l o c a t i o n s r e g a r d l e s s o f j u r i s d i c t i o n o r s i z e . Pr o j e c t E n v i r o n m e n t a l S u m m a r y St r e a m We t l a n d 4 Ex c a v a t i o n Fill No n e 18 - 6 8 - 1 8 - 5 - 3 Cu l v e r t No r t h C a r o l i n a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Hi g h w a y S t o r m w a t e r P r o g r a m Cl e a r i n g 18 - 6 8 - 1 8 - 5 - 3 18 - 6 8 - 1 8 - 5 - 3 18 - 6 8 - 1 8 - 5 - 3 Proposed SCM N/A N/AN/A N/AN/AN/A N/A Al l i m p a c t s a r e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h c u l v e r t c h a n n e l i m p r o v e m e n t s . De s c r i p t i o n o f M i n i m i z a t i o n o f I m p a c t s o r M i t i g a t i o n A l l p r o p o s e d S C M s l i s t e d m u s t a l s o b e l i s t e d u n d e r S w a l e s , P r e f o r m e d S o u r H o l e s a n d o t h e r E n e r g y D i s s i p a t o r s , o r O t h e r S t o r m w a t e r C o n t r o l M e a s u r e s . 4 We t l a n d 4 No n e No n e We t l a n d U n k n o w n 4 Pe r e n n i a l No n e N/A Su r f a c e W a t e r I m p a c t s Tu c k a h o e B r a n c h Tu c k a h o e B r a n c h Tu c k a h o e B r a n c h Tu c k a h o e B r a n c h Un k n o w n Un k n o w n C; S w C; S w C; S w C; S w RE VIS IO N S SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. . . . \ 17 B P 3 R 3 3 _ h y d _ p s h 0 1. d g n 9 : 4 1: 16 A M 2 / 19 / 2 0 14 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS PROFILE NC License No: C-1554 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 343 E. Six Forks Road, Suite 200 HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P.C. 17BP.3.R.33 EL. 55.14 -L- STA. 11+00.00 BEGIN GRADE EL. 56.41 -L- STA. 14+25.00 END GRADE PI = 11+50.00 EL = 55.25' (+)0.2200%(+)0.3556% VC = 100' K = 738 PI = 13+75.00 EL = 56.05' (+)0.3556%(+)0.7200% VC = 100' K = 274 DS = 60 DS = 60 SURVEY 10-22-13 WS EL.= 49.5 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA = 750 = 25 (-) = 55.14 = 1307 = 100 = 56.12 = 750 = 25 (-) = 55.14 -L- STA 12+65.50 2 @ 10' x 5.5' RCBC 4 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 30 40 30 40 17+00 50 50 18+00 19+00 DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "050-2" WITH NAD 83/NA 2011 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 424312.785(ft) EASTING: 2437972.510(ft) ELEVATION: 32.98(ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS: 1.0001052780 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "050-2" TO -L- STATION IS ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 NC GRID NAD 83 NA 2011 60 70 60 70 BL-1 BL-2 EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 6 0 . 0 0 ' EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BL-3 - N=302814.55, E=2255730.30, ELEV.=60.67 BL-2 - N=302450.83, E=2256316.41, ELEV.=54.44 BL-1 - N=302125.70, E=2256868.28, ELEV.=63.30 1 IN 24" MAPLE RAILROAD SPIKE ELEV.= 55.49 E= 2256236 N=302551 TBM-4 WA S A WB WD WC 3 THE HISTORICAL HIGH WATER MARK IS APPROXIMATELY = 53.0' SR 1207 HALFWAY BRANCH SCHOOL RD 19' BST LOW WIRE ELEV.= 77.6 SAG POINT POWER LINE T UCKAH OE B R ANCH T U C K A H O E B R A N C H 15 -L- .0 3 .0 2 .0 3 .0 2 .0 2 .0 2 L -L- STA. 12+65.50 C 2 @ 10'x 5.5' RCBC DETAIL A D= Varies (To Top of Bank) (UPSTREAM) CULVERT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS EST. 80 SY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EST. 20 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP EST. 20 CY EXCAVATION ( Not to Scale) (Variable) Channel Bed of Native Soils) (To be Excavated Out Step Channel 1.5' Min. Class I Riprap Class I Riprap Natural Ground Natural Ground D Variable 1' 1:1 D= Varies (To Top of Bank) DETAIL B (DOWNSTREAM) CULVERT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS EST. 85 SY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EST. 25 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP EST. 35 CY EXCAVATION ( Not to Scale) Class I Riprap (Variable) Channel Bed of Native Soils) (To be Excavated Out Step Channel 1.5' Min. Class I Riprap Class I Riprap Natural Ground Natural Ground D 1' 1:1 Class I Riprap Varia ble Varia ble Variable SEE DETAIL A IMPROVEMENTS CULVERT CHANNEL SEE DETAIL B IMPROVEMENTS CULVERT CHANNEL F F F F F F F F BL-2 S A F F F F WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS SCALE 1"=40' LEGEND S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN TS TS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY WETLAND DENOTES FILL INFF E E IN WETLAND DENOTES EXCAVATION HC HC CLEARING DENOTES HAND W1 W4 W3 W2 TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS = 0 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS = 0 LF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 360 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 1 SF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS = 10 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS = 42 LF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 222 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 42 SF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS = 0 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS = 0 LF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 364 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 171 SF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS = 10 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS = 42 LF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 187 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 7 SF 4 7 4 84 9 50 50 50 5 0 5 0 51 515151 51 51 51 51 51 5 1 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 52 52 52 5252 52 5 2 52 52 52 52 5 2 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 5 2 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 5 2 5 2 52 52 5252 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 5 2 52 5 2 5 2 52 52 5 2 5 2 52 52 52 52 52 53 53 53 53 53 5353 53 53 53 53 53 5 3 53 53 53 53 5 3 53 5354 54 5 4 54 54 54 54 5 4 54 54 5 4 54 5 4 54 54 5 4 5 5 55 55 55 5 5 55 55 55 5 55555 55 5 5 55 55 55 55 5 5 55 55 5 5 55 5555 55 5555 55 55 55 55 55 55 56 56 5 6 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 5 6 57 5 7 5 7 5 7 57 5 7 57 57 57 57 57 57 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 5 8 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 6060 60 60 6 0 60 60 60 60 60 60 6 0 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 61 6 1 6161 61 6 1 61 61 61 61 61616 2 62 6 2 62 62 62 6 262 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 6 3 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 4 7 4 84 9 5 0 5 0 5 0 51 51 51 52 525253 53 5 5 55 5 5 RE VIS IO N S SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. . . . \ 17 B P 3 R 3 3 _ h y d _ p s h 0 2 . d g n 9 : 4 3 : 3 7 A M 2 / 19 / 2 0 14 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS PROFILE NC License No: C-1554 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 343 E. Six Forks Road, Suite 200 HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P.C. 17BP.3.R.33 EL. 55.14 -L- STA. 11+00.00 BEGIN GRADE EL. 56.41 -L- STA. 14+25.00 END GRADE PI = 11+50.00 EL = 55.25' (+)0.2200%(+)0.3556% VC = 100' K = 738 PI = 13+75.00 EL = 56.05' (+)0.3556%(+)0.7200% VC = 100' K = 274 DS = 60 DS = 60 SURVEY 10-22-13 WS EL.= 49.5 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA = 750 = 25 (-) = 55.14 = 1307 = 100 = 56.12 = 750 = 25 (-) = 55.14 -L- STA 12+65.50 2 @ 10' x 5.5' RCBC 4 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 30 40 30 40 17+00 50 50 18+00 19+00 DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "050-2" WITH NAD 83/NA 2011 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 424312.785(ft) EASTING: 2437972.510(ft) ELEVATION: 32.98(ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS: 1.0001052780 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "050-2" TO -L- STATION IS ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 NC GRID NAD 83 NA 2011 60 70 60 70 BL-1 BL-2 EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 6 0 . 0 0 ' EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 6 0 . 0 0 ' BL-3 - N=302814.55, E=2255730.30, ELEV.=60.67 BL-2 - N=302450.83, E=2256316.41, ELEV.=54.44 BL-1 - N=302125.70, E=2256868.28, ELEV.=63.30 1 IN 24" MAPLE RAILROAD SPIKE ELEV.= 55.49 E= 2256236 N=302551 TBM-4 WA S A WB WD WC 3 THE HISTORICAL HIGH WATER MARK IS APPROXIMATELY = 53.0' SR 1207 HALFWAY BRANCH SCHOOL RD 19' BST LOW WIRE ELEV.= 77.6 SAG POINT POWER LINE T UCKAH OE B R ANCH T U C K A H O E B R A N C H 15 -L- .0 3 .0 2 .0 3 .0 2 .0 2 .0 2 L -L- STA. 12+65.50 C 2 @ 10'x 5.5' RCBC DETAIL A D= Varies (To Top of Bank) (UPSTREAM) CULVERT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS EST. 80 SY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EST. 20 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP EST. 20 CY EXCAVATION ( Not to Scale) (Variable) Channel Bed of Native Soils) (To be Excavated Out Step Channel 1.5' Min. Class I Riprap Class I Riprap Natural Ground Natural Ground D Variable 1' 1:1 D= Varies (To Top of Bank) DETAIL B (DOWNSTREAM) CULVERT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS EST. 85 SY GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EST. 25 TONS CLASS I RIPRAP EST. 35 CY EXCAVATION ( Not to Scale) Class I Riprap (Variable) Channel Bed of Native Soils) (To be Excavated Out Step Channel 1.5' Min. Class I Riprap Class I Riprap Natural Ground Natural Ground D 1' 1:1 Class I Riprap Varia ble Varia ble Variable SEE DETAIL A IMPROVEMENTS CULVERT CHANNEL SEE DETAIL B IMPROVEMENTS CULVERT CHANNEL F F F F F F F F BL-2 S A F F F F WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS SCALE 1"=40' LEGEND S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN TS TS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY WETLAND DENOTES FILL INFF E E IN WETLAND DENOTES EXCAVATION HC HC CLEARING DENOTES HAND W1 W4 W3 W2 TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS = 0 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS = 0 LF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 360 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 1 SF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS = 10 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS = 42 LF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 222 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 42 SF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS = 0 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS = 0 LF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 364 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 171 SF TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS = 10 LF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS = 42 LF TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 187 SF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS = <0.01 Ac / 7 SF Ha n d Ex i s t i n g Existing Pe r m a n e n t T e m p . E x c a v a t i o n M e c h a n i z e d C l e a r i n g P e r m a n e n t T e m p . C h a n n e l C h a n n e l N a t u r a l Si t e S t a t i o n St r u c t u r e F i l l I n F i l l I n i n C l e a r i n g i n S W S W I m p a c t s I m p a c t s S t r e a m No . ( F r o m / T o ) Si z e / T y p e W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s i n W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s i m p a c t s i m p a c t s P e r m a n e n t T e m p . D e s i g n (a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( f t ) ( f t ) ( f t ) 1 - L - 1 2 + 4 0 T O 1 2 + 9 1 2 @ 1 0 ' x 5 . 5 ' R C B C < 0 . 0 1 0. 0 0 < 0 . 0 1 0. 0 0 0. 0 3 0. 0 1 0 . 0 1 84200 TO T A L S : 0. 0 1 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 0. 0 0 0. 0 3 0. 0 1 0 . 0 1 84200 SH E E T OF 2/18/2014 PE N D E R C O U N T Y B R I D G E 0 4 5 NC D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N DI V I S I O N O F H I G H W A Y S 17BP.3.R.33 W E T L A N D P E R M I T I M P A C T S U M M A R Y SU R F A C E W A T E R I M P A C T S W E T L A N D I M P A C T S Project Tracking No. (Internal Use 14-03-0009 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES No A . , NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM 4 `' This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It `.; its not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: County: Pender WBS No.: 17BP.3.R.33 Document Type: Fed. Aid No: Funding: ® State ❑ Federal Federal Permits : ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type(s): Project Description: Replace Pender County Bridge NO.45 on SR 1207 (Halfway Branch School Road) over Tuckahoe Branch with a culvert. SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW Description of review activities, results, and conclusions. - Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on March 17, 2014. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 300' from each end of the bridge and 75' from the centerline each way. There are no structures in the APE and Bridge No. 45 is not eligible for National Register listing. There are no National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is required. If design plans change, additional review will be required. Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predictinz that there are no unidentified siganiricant historic architectural or landscape resources in the proiect area: HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LID, DE, and SS properties for the Pender County survey and Google Maps are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is required. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION 1Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED NCDOT Architectural Historian Date Historic Archilectnre and Landscapes NO SURVEY REOUIRED form for Mina• Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Progrannmtic Agreement. Page 1 of 1