20140196 Ver 1_Scoping Comments_20140401

Pat McCrory
Governor
March 25, 2014 -
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
David Wainwright
Division of Water Resources
Steve Sollod
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
NCDOT- Bridge No. 144
Project Location: Pender County, at Bridge No. 144 on SR 1102 over Colly Creek.
Proposed Project: Proposes to replace the existing 151 %Jong bridge with a new 150' long "
concrete bridge and associated infrastructure.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
April 14, 2014. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Stephen Lane,
Permit officer at (252) 808 -2808. Ext. 208. When appropriate, in -depth comments with supporting data is
requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
SIGNED
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
DATE
Braxton C. Davis, Director
N.C. Division of Coastal Management, NCDENR
400 Commerce Avenue, Morehead City, N.C. 28557
Phone: [phone]\Internet: www.nccoastalmanaiement.net
An Eq,.al Opportun y 1 Affirmative Act on Employer — Made in part by recycled paper
i

Permit Fee ScheduRe
Circle One
Check # W 7 0', 3.
Amount $ L{ 06,00
Project Name:
SeM
maim
I! I v
I. Private, non-commercial
$250
100%($250)
0%($0)
development that does not
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or 0 en water areas
1 krh
Ill. For Development
involves t - he filling and/or
excavation of up to I acre
of wetlands, and/or open
water, areas, determine if
A'B,C,.or,D, bellow applies
011 M
El MM
$400
111(b). Publicb'r,
100%($400) 0% ($0)
commercial development,
if General Water duality
Cer tification,No 3490 (See
attached) can be ag lied
_
"a
111(d). -IUG666ral Water
Quality 'Certification No.
$400
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6d% ($240) ($160)
--3490 (See''a - ttached)
I cafi'n6t,be,a 'lied
Check # W 7 0', 3.
Amount $ L{ 06,00
Project Name:

v
DWISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT,
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: The project is located at Bridge No. 144 on SR 1102 over Colly
Creek in Pender County.
Photo Index — 2006: 206 -6082 (V, 14) 2000: 206 -199 (B -C, 12)
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,254,911 Y: 687,297
Latitude: 34 °26'09" Longitude: 78'09'16"
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Date of Site Visit— March 14, 2014
Was Applicant Present — No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received Complete: February 28,2014'
(A) Open Water
Office —
Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(B) Section 404 Wetlands
(A)
Local Land Use Plans— Pender County
Mech. clearing 2,614,sf
Land Classification From LUPs —
Rural Growth/Conservation
(B)
AEC(s) Involved: PTA, PTS
(C)
Water Dependent: Yes
(D)
Intended Use: Public
(E)
Wastewater Treatment: Existing
— N/A
Planned
- N/A
(F)
Type of Structures: Existing
— Bridge for public use
Planned
- Bridge for public use
(G)
Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source — N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
[AREA]
EXCAVATED
FILLED 0TT4F.R
(A) Open Water
Existing Shading 2080 sf
Additional Shading ;320 sf
(B) Section 404 Wetlands
242 sf
6,200 sf
Mech. clearing 2,614,sf
(C) High-Ground _
Disturbed by project 25,792 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 37,248 sq. -ft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C; Sw Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace the existing 151' "long bridge on SR1102 over
Colly Creek with a new 150' long concrete bridge and associated infrastructure.

i
FIELD iNvEST1GATION REPORT:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE NO. 144 OVER COLEY CREEK
PAGE #2
--------------------- - - - - --
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
Project Setting
Bridge No. 144 is located over Colly Creek on SR1102. The bridge is approximately 0.9 miles by
water from the Black River and approximately 600 feet north of the intersection of SR 1102 with NC
210, near Currie, Pender County. SR1102 connects NC 210 and NC 11/53 and allows access to the
lands along the Black River between the roads.
The bridge and road are elevated on "a fill causeway 12' —14' above the adjacent normal water
level of Colly Creek. The sides of the causeway to the bridge are maintained and well vegetated with
sod grasses. The adjacent lands around the bridge project are wooded swamps with the nearest
residential housing located adjacent to NC 210. A small unnamed tributary flows to Colly Creek
along the toe of the causeway fill in the southwest quadrant of the bridge.
The existing bridge is a two_ lane bridge that is 151' long and 26' wide out to out, with two 9'
wide travel lanes and 3' wide shoulders. The bridge is a fixed bridge consisting of five spans, with
approximately 30' of horizontal distance between spans and 11' of vertical clearance underneath the
bridge. The bridge superstructure consists of a concrete deck on concrete channel girders and is
supported with 4 bents consisting of concrete caps on timber piles. All four of the existing bents
have been supplemented with H -pile helper bents and concrete collars have been placed around some
of the existing bridge bent pilings to strengthen them due to deterioration. Stormwater from the
bridge currently drains into Colly Creek via deck drains located along each side of the bridge. An
underground telephone line parallels the east side of the bridge and causeway.
Colly Creek is classified C; Sw by the Environmental Management Commission in the area of the
proposed construction and is classified by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources. Commission as
Inland Waters (NCWRC). The NCWRC has not classified Colly Creek as an Anadromous Fish
Spawning Area or a Primary Nursery Area. The waters are closed to shellfishing by the Shellfish
Sanitation Section of the Division of Marine Fisheries. Colly Creek is approximately 80' wide and
8' deep in the area of the bridge. There were no SAV's observed in the project area during the site
visit:
Project Proposal
. NCDOT proposes to replace the existing Bridge No. 144 over Colly Creek. The project involves
replacement of the existing bridge with a concrete cored slab bridge and new approaches. 'To initiate
the project, the existing bridge would be closed and traffic re- routed to an off -site detour route along
NC 11/53 and NC 210, - approximately seven miles in length. The existing bridge would be
completely demolished and removed from the project site utilizing Best Management Practices for
Bridge Demolition and Removal, such that any component of the bridge dropped into the water
would be immediately removed.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE NO. 144 OVER COLD' CREEK
PAGE #3
The new bridge as proposed would be 150' long and 30' wide out to out, which would be
approximately 4' wider than the existing bridge. The new bridge would consist of three 50' long
spans, including two bents in the water. The new bridge has been designed to allow 11' of vertical
clearance underneath the bridge, which would be the same as the existing clearance height. The new
bridge would have two 10' wide travel lanes, with a 4' offset on each side. Concrete barrier rails
would be constructed along each side of the bridge for safety purposes.
NCDOT would construct the bridge utilizing top down construction methods and build the bridge
with no deck drains over surface waters, however, 4" x 8" deck drains would be required near the
ends of the bridge and would discharge onto concrete dissipater pads on high ground areas below the
bridge to prevent the spread of any stormwater into the travel lanes. Anyremaining stormwater from
the bridge deck would drain to grated inlets on the north end of the bridge and be discharged into
wetlands before draining to the creek.
The applicant has also proposed to raise and widen the approach structures to the bridge. The
asphalt on the north and south'ends of the bridge would be raised by 1 foot, for 150' and 174' from
the ends of the bridge, respectively. The causeway on the north end of the bridge would be widened
to 108', while the causeway on the south end of the bridge would be widened up to 101'. The road
would then be striped with two 10' wide travel lanes with eight foot_ shoulders, five feet of which
would be paved. New guardrails would also be constructed along the road for 80' from the ends of
the bridge.
The bases of the bridge are to be stabilized with Class 11 rip rap. The rip rap as proposed would
be up to 15' in width and 140' in length on the southern end of the bridge. The rip rap under the
northern end of the bridge would be 20' in width and 160' in length. The rip rap would be placed
entirely above the NWL elevation of Colly Creek.
The raising of the causeway would require filling in a 203 linear foot section of the unnamed
tributary in the southwest quadrant of the, proj ect. The applicant has proposed to relocate the stream
using natural stream design to just beyond the toe of the proposed causeway slope. An additional 10
linear feet of stream would be impacted during the temporary dewatering of the stream and
approximately 30 linear feet of the new stream channel would be stabilized with Class I rip rap. The
replacement of the bridge would also require that the existing telephone line on the east side of the
bridge be repositioned for 420' by directionally boring under the creek. The proposal indicates the
telephone line would be a minimum of 15' under the creek. No other utility line work is anticipated
with the project.
Anticipated Impacts
The proposed bridge would permanently shade 2,400 sq. ft. of the Public Trust Area of Colly
Creek, which would be an increase of 320 sq. ft. beyond that which exists with the current bridge.
The horizontal clearance under the bridge would increase from approximately 30' to approximately
48', while the vertical clearance would remain unchanged.
The project would require 6,200 sq. ft. of fill in Section 404 Wetlands to allow widening of the
causeway as a result of raising the grade of the road. Another 2,614 sq. ft: of Section 404 Wetlands
Would be mechanically cleared to allow equipment access to construct the bridge. _Approximately
242 sq. ft. of Section 404 Wetlands would be excavated to create the tie in for the relocated stream to
Colly Creek.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE NO. 144 OVER COLLV CREED
PAGE #4
--------------------- - - - - --
The relocated stream would permanently impact 203 linear feet of stream and temporarily 10
additional feet of stream. The construction of the project would also disturb'25,792 sq. A. of high
ground for the construction of the bridge approaches and the raising of the bridge approaches.
The applicant has proposed to mitigate for the impacts to the Section 404 Wetlands by contracting
with the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and has proposed to mitigate the stream impacts
by relocation of the stream utilizing natural stream design. A localized increase in turbidity can be
expected during the in -water portions of the project for the demolition of the'existing bridge-and
construction of the new bridge. - No additional closures of shellfishing waters are expected in
association with the proposed project.
- Traffic along SR1102 would be re- routed during the - construction of the project, which would
result in increased travel times and distances for those currently utilizing SR1102; however, the
public Js expected to benefit upon completion of the project by the increase in the safety and
efficiency of the new bridge and approach structures.
Submitted by: Stephen Lane —,Morehead City District — March 21, 2014

M
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
February 26, 2014
Stephen Lane
Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave.
Morehead City, NC 28557
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA Major Permit for Replacement of Pender County Bridge #144 &
associated Utility Line Relocation and On -site Stream Relocation Mitigation on
SR 1102 Morgan Road approximately 0.1 miles North of NC 210
Currie, Pender County, WBS # 17BP.3.R-26
Dear Mr. Lane:
i
The North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) is requesting issuance of a CAMA Major
Permit to replace Pender County Bridge #144 on SR 1102 Morgan Road in Pender County. The proposal is
to replace the existing 151 feet long by approximate 26 feet wide 5 span concrete bridge on concrete caps
and timber piles with a 150 feet long by 30 feet wide 3 span 21 inch cored slab bridge on existing
alignment as described in this package. The existing navigable vertical clearance would be maintained
while the horizontal navigable clearance would be significantly improved. The proposed bridge
replacement project would require utility work of relocating an underground telecommunications line.
Onsite stream relocation mitigation is proposed for this project as further described herein.
Please find enclosed the following:
1) CAMA Permit application forms MP -1 and MP -5
2) Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist (unsigned as I usually await return of permits to sign)
3) EEP Mitigation Request Letter and EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter
4) NCDOT Mitigation Plan dated February 25, 2014 (six pages)
5) Notification letters to adjacent riparian property owners and returned green cards from said owners
6) Supporting environmental documentation including:
a) Stream Forms
b) Wetland and Upland Forms
c) Letter from the NC Wildlife Resources Commission
d) Letter from US Fish and Wildlife Service
e) Architectural and Archaeological Clearances from NCDOT Cultural Resources staff
7) US Coast Guard Permit Exemption Letter dated 17 Jan 2014
8) Vicinity map, Aerial Photo map, and USGS topographic map
9) Permit Drawings (10 total labeled as 1 through 8, EC -4A, and SRF -1)
10) Stream Relocation Information Sheet
11) Bridge Survey Report (please,note that the Bridge Survey Report is being included primarily for
information purposes and therefore has not been labelled as a permit drawing)
r FE B 2 ZOf4
5501 BARBADOS BLVD. CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
CM -TUMID CITY
16

•
v
Pender 144 Bridge Replacement _
CAMA Permit Application Cover Letter
February 26, 2014
Page Two
The water body at the location of Pender County Bridge #144 is Colly Creek and is classified as C Sw. It
appears that Colly Creek is not classified as Primary Nursery Area nor as Anadromous Fish Spawning Area
per map review. There is also an unnamed tributary to Colly Creek in the SW quadrant as well as
surrounding riparian wetlands in all four quadrants. ,
The several various impacts are described as follows. The wetland fill impacts are needed for the safer
standard fill slope sections proposed as well as a small portion of fill in the NE quadrant for a rip rap pad at
the outlet of a storm drainage pipe. The permanent stream impacts are for impacting an unnamed tributary
to Colly Creek in the SW quadrant in order to accommodate the safer standard fill section in the SW
quadrant; much of the unnamed tributary in its existing location is at the immediate toe of the existing
roadway fill. An excavation in wetland impact is necessary to make a smooth transition for a proposed
stream relocation mitigation effort into wetlands as described at length in the attached mitigation plan
referencing the SW quadrant unnamed tributary. Mechanized clearing impacts are necessary to
accommodate the nearby operations of filling and excavation as well as for the installation of erosion
control measures.
Please note that rip rap toe protection/bank stabilization is proposed in the SW quadrant -from Station
10 +65 to 10+95 LT for stabilization of a portion of the unnamed tributary relocation as further described
herein. Please also note that I have not completed the MP -2 form as my reasoning is that the described
bank stabilization effort is not for Colly Creek which I believe to be the predominant consideration for the
NCDCM jurisdiction at this location. Nonetheless, please advise if the MP -2 form is needed for the
described bank stabilization effort of the unnamed tributary.
Additionally, NCDOT by copy of this package is making application to the US Army Corps of Engineers
and to the NC Division of Water Resources for the appropriate permits for this project.
NCDOT acknowledges that the appropriate fee will be debited against the WBS element provided above
for processing this CAMA Major Permit application.
Thank you for all your help working through this process. If you have any'questions or need additional
information in this regard please contact me at (910) 341 -2036.
Enclosures
Cc: Mr. Brad Shaver, USAGE, Wilmington District
Mr. Mason Hemdon, NCDWR, Fayetteville
Ms. Sonia Carrillo, NCDWR, Raleigh
4sql ,
Stonewall Mathis
Division 3 Environmental Officer

No UP4
I
to
(last revised 12/27/06)
,r
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
- _e: �t. -� := y�at',t S.:c'-= e't::' - - s5j�ri --•• _ iJ +< - F-
:.1. Prima A° `licant%Lanalowner:lnforma @i n:. =: ,• j.:, :': }�:, -; ^''- ..:.'. x
,•x,,,
- M^'�'•s' :.}4' :•. - - giac'- :,4- w..- '•a.,_ _ 'a'a! - - - - - , ?' x. -A.., . -...,r r f• 'T:' =_
Business Name
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
Ncdot
MI
Pender 144 Bridge Replacement (17BP.3.R.26)
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
MI
Last Name
Stonewall
Mailing Address
Mathis
Applicant 2: First Name
State
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with•names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
5501 Barbados Blvd.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
Castle Hayne
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No. -
FAX No.
28429
Pender
910 - 341 - 2000 ext.
910 - 675 - 0143
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
smathis @ncdot.gov
. `••� ..�u r4�.cGF ;' ti','.. `"' ` -: E`'':C- -E :+es :;.,c'z•* _ _ _ _ _
att
-�.• A ent/ n r r -liif r A
Co t
.act
_ fix' - ':'.1
. • -
Business Name
N/A
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
- - ext.
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back> FEB 2 ?01
DC- M-MHD CIS Y
252- 808 -2868 .. 1- 888- 4RCOAST ., www.nccoastaimanagement.net

V Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5) APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
jec -oca tio
,r
-4,
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Pender
Morgan Road
SIR 1102
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
n/a
Canetuck Community, Currie
NC
28435 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
n/a - ext.
n/a,- I I I
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
'Cape Fear
Colly Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
ONatural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Colly Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ONo
work falls within.
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ZYes ❑No ❑NA
Unincorporated Areas of Pender County
�Ml
<Form continues on next page>
252-808-2808 -: 1-888-4RCOAST :: vvvvvv.nccoastaImartaqement. net
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
— VO
—65,000
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
n/a, I I
NW L (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
—8 to 10 feet S NHW or ❑ NW
e. Vegetation on tract
The tract has existing roadside grasses on the road shoulders and fill slope areas. There are forested wetland and forested
upland areas immediately at the toe of fill for the most part for this project; most of the abutting areas to the existing road fill
are forested wetland areaas within the project limits. There are several cypress and wetland hardwood species present.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
The existing man-made features are the existing two lane two way paved road SIR 1102 Morgan Road and the existing
Pender Bridge #144 over Colly Creek. The existing bridge was built in 1966 is 151 feet in length and approximately 26 feet
in width. The existing bridge is made of prestressed concrete channels overlayed with asphalt supported by concrete caps
on timber piles. Some repair crutch bents constructed from steel piles have been added in the past and also some concrete
collars to strengthen existing timber piles have been added in the past.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses ad*acent to the proposed project site.
The adjacent land uses are largely agriculture and forest with the most usage going to forested area. There are some
scattered residences nearby on NC 210 primarily.
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
assumed Rural Agricultural; attempted to confirm via
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Pender County website, but could not confirm.
Oyes EINo ENA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ONo
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ZYes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, by whom? NCDOT Cultural Resources Staff
I. Is the proposed project'located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ONo ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
�Ml
<Form continues on next page>
252-808-2808 -: 1-888-4RCOAST :: vvvvvv.nccoastaImartaqement. net

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
n/a
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
n/a
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
The existing bridge deck drainage is drained via a combination of bridge deck drains and flow off of the bridge and down the
bridge approach fill slopes. The existing bridge deck drains appear to be routinely clogged with debris, sediment, and
vegetative material and so likely do not function as intended in large part. The bridge deck drainage that does not discharge
through the deck drain system would make its way off of either end of the bridge (with a majority going to the north end
apparently based on the existing linear slope of the bridge) and discharge down the existing vegetated shoulders prior to
discharging into wetland areas. Note that there is some existing asphalt on the fill slopes on the north end of bridge. The
existing roadway drainage travels over vegetated shoulder areas and down vegetated slopes prior to discharging to wetland
and upland areas; a majority of the roadway drainage within the project area would drain to wetlands areas. Some of the
roadway drainage in the SW quadrant discharges directly into an unnamed tributary to Colly Creek. Some of the roadway
drainage in the SE quadrant discharges to upland areas prior to flowing into the wetlands. The north side of the creek
roadway drainage discharges into wetland areas after coming off of the vegetated fill slopes. There is a good bit of asphalt
coating a large portion of the fill slopes in the NE quadrant. This asphalt runs from toward the bottom of the fill slope about
half way up the fill slope.
+ -
C..
5. ct n
tesadma _
TRH:
,...- .,<',a >'h +,c,. =.. -._•t .r. - .tee- ..;t_�.,..."r,.r -.... •..,,.,x �r, .�.n r.�1ST- .i..'^ �:.�.,,..w- - -a-.y. ;.a... _�., ._;:. ,n,.: > --•. -< .:. ... .. � ,c ,•'� '"n'
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public /Government <
❑ Private /Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purpose of the project is to preserve the mobility and safety of the traveling public by replacing the existing deteriorated
bridge structure. The existing 151' long and 25.6' wide 5 -span prestressed concrete bridge on concrete caps and timber piles
will be replaced with a 3 -span 150' long (3 spans at 50' each) by 30' wide out to out, 21" cored slab bridge.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
The existing bridge would be removed from high ground. An offsite detour would be utilized. 18" steel pipe piles would be
driven with a hammer on a 110 ton crane. A 20 ton excavator,rubber tire loader /backhoe, D5 dozer, and roller compactor
would be used during construction. Flatbed and pick -up trucks would also be utilized. Wattle Barriers would be utilized under
the bridge to prevent turbity and sediment from entering into the wetlands and the JS as well as other sedimentation and
erosion control measures as necessary.
d. List all development activities you propose.
NCDOT proposes the construction of the described concrete bridge to replace the existing bridge and roadway
improvements to the bridge approaches for safety of the traveling public. This would include construction of associated
drainage infrastructure including shoulder berm gutter, drop inlets and piping to a rip rap pad, and deck drains with dissipator
pads below. Also, the approach fill ends at the abutments would be protected with rip rap. ar r tributary to
Colly Creek in the SW quadrant would be relocated as shown on attached drawings to provi a site mitiga ion for stream
impacts to the unnamed tributary due to the necessary widening of the fill slopes; appropriate, egetative stablization
including coir fiber matting, seeding, and reforestation would be part of this onsite mitigation ffFEEG ar�drailj tl uld be
installed. The project area roadway and new bridge would be surfaced with asphalt; there vlt uld be s ig�t widening of the
pavement area in the project vicinity primarily for tying in the asphalt to the front of the! uar r it areas. An underground
telecommunications line would be relocated by boring. Rip rap toe and bank protection wo ( ��;;gg�,II tt� ,d ,,,,,,at the juncture of
the new unnamed tributary tie in with the existing unnamed tributary portion at approximate statiON V` 1 "d�`d +95 LT.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? New work to replace an existing
bridge.
252 -808 -2808 .. 1- 888- 4RCOAST .. www.nccoasta[management.net

�V
0 Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 0.8 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes []No IZINA
.that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Please see section 4.p. above for an in depth description of the existing stormwater situation. Proposed bridge deck runoff
would be discharged with portions discharging through deck drains outside of open water areas; the deck drain locations are
shown on the attached Bridge Survey Report. Rock dissipator pads below the deck drains would be utilized to disperse the
associated energy. The deck drains are necessary to prevent,unsafe spread of the stormwater on the bridge deck which
would otherwise compromise the safety of the traveling public. - Other portions of the bridge deck drainage would be
collected at the low end - (north end) of the proposed bridge in drainage structures and discharged onto a rip rap pad to
reduce velocities to less than 2fps before entering the wetlands in the NE quadrant. The wetlands would provide treatment
of the stormwater prior to its entering Colly Creek. The roadway drainage would primarily drain over vegetated shoulder and
vegetated fill slope areas prior to discharging to wetland areas in the northern quadrants. The roadway drainage in the SW
quadrant'would drain to the relocated unnamed tributary much as the existing situation is now although the proposed
situation is better in that the roadway drainage would be draining over proposed 3:1 fill slopes rather than the existing
steeper than 3:1 slopes. The roadway drainage in the SE quadrant would also drain over vegetated shoulder and fill slope
areas prior to discharging to wetland and upland areas. All quadrants would benefit from the proposed discussed 3:1 slopes
as compared with the existing steeper slopes. In all quadrants except the SW quadrant (as already discussed), the roadway
drainage would be treated via uplands and /or wetlands as described prior to entering Colly Creek.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ®No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
S '4�
.r'
o
d to _ -
s':
Ali
y�v. -
i
c' In• "adontto'this`com'lefe`d a' lication for`i»= MF1 - the''followin itemsbelow, -�f "a" licatile- mustbe;` §ub`niitted.in orde o t e app "cato
package
to be c'omplete:,' Ifem "s (a).- (t) are ahvays applicable to any major developmgnt ;application.1?leaserconsult the "application `:`;;..; tµ ' ;
.;.,c• . {�.- . :.au - - .v:. • -.5ro _.:ar _;,w< -,:s, _.54 .a:, :.1- .z�' -' +,:r` �5r.
h w x'r �" "r re'the re wired items below:« - ::
mstruchon'bookleton. o to o` a -
- 4t
dh'
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross - sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the•names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name:TC Br`o'wri`Jr`. et al'` Pone o
`?<
';:
r.:. at',
210 `iri 'N-r'i643'5'
`'AY r` ' 2 N' H 0 Cu e C
dd ess 3 668 C _
wy - -
Name Evanna Willie Heirs et al Phone No.
Address 501 N Winona Drive Hampton, VA 23661
Name _ Phone No.:
-•Address-
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, per'. tfee,40r g dates.
Unknown
FEB 2 � ?014
T-)C em,
252- 808-2808 -. 1- 888- 4RCO€tST .. www.nccoastalmanagement.net

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 5 of 5)
APPLICATION for I
Major Development Permit
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
I. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
J. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1 -10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow -up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 2 1-i-6 J/ 4 Print Name Stonewall Mathis
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information
252- 808 -2808 .. 1- 888- 4RCOAST .. wrrrwr.nccoastaImanageme nt. net

J
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
a. 'Is the proposed bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public /Government ❑Private /Community
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
21" cored slab with 18" steel pipe piles.
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 151'
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 25.6'
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: —11'
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) The existing bridge would be removed.
Concrete sloped abutments would remain. Also,
existing remnant bridge abutments near the water's
edge which are helping to stabilize the existing
banks would remain as identified and discussed in a
scoping meeting with the agencies whereby this was
requested by the agencies. These existing remnant
abutments locations are labeled on the included
Bridge Survey Report.
g. Length of proposed bridge: -150'
L Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow. ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: There would be increased water flow by
increasing interior span length.
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 11'
m. -Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
Colly Creek classified as C Sw
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at N LW or NW L:
8'
f. (i)Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NW L:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 30'
j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes []No
If yes, explain: The USCG has issued a permit exemption
for this Pender Bridge 144 location. Please see attached.
n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: —10 feet
252 -868 -2808 :: 1- 888- 4RCOAST :: www,ncconstaimanaagement.net revised: 10/26/06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 5)
2. CULVERTS ® This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>
❑Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: _
(v) Will at, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? Yes []No
If yes, explain:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
❑Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culverts)
(Iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will.all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
g. Width of proposed culvert:
1. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
[]Yes []No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑ This section not applicable
a. (1) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? []Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
b. (1) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands /marsh (CW ), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell battom (SB), or other wetlands
(W L)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV OSB
OWL ❑None
2-47, --V -1 W)7//4
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
This excavation in wetlands is to make a smooth
transitional be in of the relocated unnamed tributary to
Golly r" reek with the wetland area leading up to Golly
E.G>~IV;wj Creek,
MAR 17 ?0114
}
252 - 808 -2808 :: 1- 888- 4RCOAST :: www.ncceastalmanagament.net revised: 10126/06
4

VOM DCM P -5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 5)
ti c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high - ground excavation? ®Yes []No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 115' for stream
relocation: 102' for deck drain dissipator pads
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: -30' for stream
relocation: -4' for deck drain dissipator pads
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: -2.5' for stream
relocation: approximately 1' for deck drain dissipator pads
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 320 for
the stream relocation: 15 for the deck drain dissipator
'Lads .
If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: Under the foot print of the roadway embankment.
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area: - -200' Long by 50' wide by 5' deep -
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ®Yes ❑No (lf no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ®Yes ❑No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands /marsh (CW ), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (W L), or shell
bottom (SB)?
❑m ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ❑None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. Some of this excavated material may be used as fill in upland
and wetland areas as requested for the permitted impacts for this project. This would be difficult to put a dimension on the
specific wetland areas as any such use of this excavated material may be scattered throughout the requested proposed fill
areas.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ®Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. Not for Colly Creek, some of the material might be used for filling in the old
unnamed tributary channel upon moving the unnamed tributary to new location. Again, it would be difficult to name what
portion of the fill may fall to this excavated material and what portion may be brought in from offsite. -
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes MNo
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: -210'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: -5'
(iv) Purpose of fill: Again the answer to this question is no
with respect to Colly Creek, however, the answer is yes
with respect to the unnamed tributary which dimensions
are provided above for that portion to be impacted.
Again, it would be hard to distinguish between the
excavated material usage and the fill brought to the site
in regard to which or what combination would be used to
fill in this old unnamed tributary channel upon moving the
unnamed tributary to new location'. -
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high - ground? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: -200'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: -50'
(iv) Purpose of fill: The purpose of the fill is to make safer
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands /marsh (CW ), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SIB), or other wetlands
(W L)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL -6.200 ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Placement of roadway fill. Again, it would be hard to
distinguish between the excavated material usage and
the fill brought to the site in regard to which or what
combination would be used to fill in the requested fill
impact area.
252 -808 -2808 :: 1- 888- 4RCOAST :: www.necoastaimanagement.net revised: 10 /26/06

Forums, DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 5)
roadway fill sections of 3:1 for the traveling public. The
current fill sections in the project area are steeper than
3:1.
- 5`""•1•',;,•;1 <. -.#i� �
. fit•.- •= s�'�?�
ri K i':C`' �'•)., •is,c is
Q 3" _
R.4La=-
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: An underground telephone cable would
need to be relocated as its current location conflicts with
the bridge proposal. The relocated section would be
bored and would not create any 401/404 impacts. The
location of the existing line and the proposed line are
shown on the permit drawing(s).
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
b. Will the proposed project require the construction of an temporary
detour structures? Li es ®No
If yes, explain:
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
El Yes ®No controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM -MP -2.
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
The existing bridge would be removed from high ground.
An offsite detour would be utilized. 18" steel pipe piles
would be driven with a hammer on a 110 ton crane. A 20
ton excavator, rubber tire loader /backhoe, D5 dozer, and
roller compactor would be used during constructoin.
Flatbed and pick -up trucks would also be utilized.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ❑Yes ®No
/f yes, complete form MP -2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
NCDOT approved erosion control measures such as Silt
Fence and Coir Fiber Wattle Barriers and stone Inlet
Protection to prevent sediment from entering the
wetlands and streams would be utilized.
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
El Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
High visibility fencing will be placed around the
environmentally sensative areas to prevent
unauthorized disturbance of those areas.
FEB 2 9 2014
o�
252-808-2808 :: 1- 888- 4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised :'IOi26106
t

9''Olrgn DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 5 of 5)
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST : www.necoastalmanagement.net
FEB 2 8 2014
IDCM.MMCffV
revised: 10126106

MINIMUM CRI'T'ERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
The following questions provide direction in determining when the Department is
required to prepare environmental documents for state - funded construction and
maintenance activities. Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either
"Yes" or "No ". Complete Part D of the checklist when Minimum Criteria Rule
categories #8, 12(i) or #15 are used.
TIP Project No.:
State Project No.:17BP.3.&26
Project Location: On SR 1102 Morgan Road at 0.1 miles north of NC 210 in Pender
County
Project Description: Replace Pender County Bridge 144 with a bridge
Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements:
Special Project Information:
Permits from NCDCM, USAGE, and NCDWQ are anticipated.
02/26/14 1 of

PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
lteinIdtobecompleteilby1t _...,h"etEngineer�_�k.Y r YES
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed under
the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental documentation is not
required?
If the answer to number 1 is "no", then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required.
If yes, under which category? 9
If either category #8, #12(i) or #15 is used complete Part D of this checklist.
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
ems 2 4Rto b co»aplete�iJby'h, -d Engi Fe7r.W
YES
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
❑
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?
3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative
❑
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact to human health
or the environment?
4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed
❑
activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern
for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department?
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands; ❑
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or
unique agricultural lands; or areas. of recognized scenic, recreational,
archaeological, or historical value?
6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the ❑
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use ❑
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
ground water impacts?
a .
FEB 2 8 2014
02/26/14 2 of DCM- CS'
NO

YES NO
8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on ❑
long -term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their
natural habitats
If any questions 2 through 8 are answered "yes ", the proposed project may not qualify as a
Minimum Criteria project. A state environmental assessment (EA) may be required. For
assistance, contact:
Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
(919) 73,3 —3141
Fax: [phone]
PART C: COMMPL ANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
[ tems9l2to becomp' 1_ etedliy `l)ivsonEnvironinent�alOffcer�
YES NO
9.
Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
❑
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action?
10.
Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
® ❑
fill in waters of the United States?
11.
Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
❑
fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savannahs?
12.
Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
® ❑
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act?
Iteri s 13 1 S to be ` " �` - `5 4-'
completedbythe,,Engineer:°
13.
Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?
® ❑
Cultural Resources
14.
Will the project have an "effect" on a property or site listed on the
❑
National Register of Historic Places?
15.
Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
❑
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
Questions in Part "C" are designed to assist the Engineer and the Division Environmental
Officer in determining whether a permit or consultation with a state or federal resource
agency may be required. If any questions in Part "C" are answered* "yes", follow the
appropriate permitting procedures prior to beginning project, construction.
FEB 2 8 2014
02/26/14 3 of4 DC,44nmFI)Cl -1?

il
v
PART D:( To be completed when either cate2ory #8. 12(i) or #15 of the rules are
used.
Items 1:6 1 twiliNworiip ",leted liy l)i i onVL, r ff "
s
v si vi onrrmentaly0 aces: �=���
16. Project length: 0.090 miles
17. Right of Way width: varies
18. Project completion date: uncertain
19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground uncertain
surface:
20. Total acres of wetland impacts: 0.21
21. Total linear feet of stream impacts:,
22. Project purpose:
213
Preserve the safety and
mobility of the traveling
public
If Part D of the checklist is completed, send a copy of the entire checklist document,to:
Don G. Lee
State Roadside Environmental Engineer
Mail Service Center 1557
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1557
(919) 733 -2920
Fax - (919) 733 -9810
Email: dlee @dot.state.nc.us
Reviewed by:
Lead Engineer
Division Environmental Officer
02/26/14 4 of
FEB 2 8 2014
Date:
Date:
DCM4AHD CITY

' OMSU�p
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ;
iV
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAMN =
PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA'' '
GOVERNOR' SECRETARY '
February i 1, 2014
Beth' Hannon
' NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program .
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh; NC 276994652
SUBJECT : - Pender County Bridge 144 Replacement Project
Mitigation Request.
WBS # 17BP.3.R26.
bear -r Ms: Harmon:
NCDOT is "requesting,an acceptance letter to authorize mitigation payment f_o'r impacts for, the Pender"
County Bridge 144 Replacement,Project.
The'site is located on SR 1102 Morgan"Road in Pender County over Colly,Creek in the Capa:Feai River
Basin near thePeri der and Blades County Hine:• The Cataloging`Unit number is 03036006. A DWR ID '
numbe i, W h fiw::, Te`project proposes to repl ace _Pender
County Bridge'1;44;witk "a bridge:: Th'erewould be'permanerit'stream and.wetlands toss as a result of'this . • ""
5. �_ .,
p'rq�ect,• Suff'cient onsite mitigation is` propose&L-- ; ddress the permanent streatri impacts. However; the
USACE is requiring mitigation for - the 0.20 acre lo's's'of.wedands 'at a 2: l `raflo,(0.40 acres tofal'rieeded).'
NCDWR is;not re airing mitigation: Tliewetlands proposed•to be
q nnpacfed appear to be, Riverme. Swamp
Forest., Please'see th'e'attacliments ^for''•your review,m,uiis °regard. : ' _
: Thank you for considering this proposal. If you have any questions or need additional informatioii please ;-
contact me at`(910) 341=2036: '
ere
Stonew
vi All Mathis
'.,
Dision 3 Enviromriental Officer
_ Attachments -
inc
FEB 2
A-47�
4
DCAWHD My
5501 BARBADOS BLVD. CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Mr. Stonewall Mathis
NCDOT Division 3 Environmental Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
5501 Barbados Boulevard
Castle Hayne, North Carolina 28429
Dear Mr. Mathis:
PROGRAM
February 11, 2014
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 3 Project, Replace Bridge 144 over Colly Creek on SR 1102 (Morgan Road),
Pender County; WBS Element 17BP.3.R.26
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
compensatory riparian wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information received on February
11, 2014, the impacts are located in CU 03030006 of the Cape Fear River basin in the Southern Outer Coastal Plain
(SOCP) Eco- Region, and are as follows:
Cape Fear
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03030006
SOCP
Cold
Cool
Wann
Riparian
Non-
Coastal
Zone 1
Zone 2
Riparian
Marsh
Impacts -
(feet/acres)
0
0
0
0.20
0
0
0
0
This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2014 impact data.
EEP will commit to implement sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project as detennined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section
F.3.c.iii of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu
Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation
acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
8420.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919 -707-
cerely, C�
Jai e B. Stanfill
EEP Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Mr. Brad Shaver, USACE -- Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands /401 Unit
Mr. Steve Sollod, Division of Coastal Management
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA € FEB 2 $ 7-014
File: SR 1102 — Bridge 144 — Division 3
Prot", Sta t& Dcu Mm c
• NC®ENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 / 919 - 707 -8976 / http: / /portal.ncdenr.orgweb /eep

Mitigation Plan
Pender Bridge 144 Replacement Project
Currie, Pender County, NC
WBS No. 17BP.3.R.26
February 25, 2014
1.0 Baseline Information
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes mitigation for the unavoidable impacts to
jurisdictional features associated with the Pender Bridge 144 replacement project on SR 1102 Morgan
Road approximately 0.1 miles north of NC 210 in the Currie area of Pender County. NCDOT proposes to
perform on -site mitigation for unavoidable permanent stream impacts. Also, NCDOT proposes off -site
mitigation through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) for unavoidable wetland impacts. The
onsite mitigation would provide for 202 linear feet of stream relocation at a 1:1(mitigated:impacted)
ratio as further described herein. The offsite mitigation would provide for a 2:1(mitigated:impacted)
ratio for the 0.20 acres of permanent wetland impact losses associated with the project. The
acceptance letter from the EEP for the offsite wetland mitigation is included with the permit application
documentation. Please note that most of the discussion of this mitigation plan document is devoted to
the proposed onsite stream mitigation although there is more discussion in regard to the offsite
mitigation as it pertains to the associated impacts. Please note that references herein to the mitigation
site are in reference to the onsite mitigation should it not otherwise be reiterated as onsite mitigation
throughout this document.
This project is located on Colly Creek, an unnamed tributary to Colly Creek, and abutting riparian
wetlands within USGS Hydrologic Cataloging Unit 03030006, and NC Division of Water Resources sub -
basin 03 -06 -20 of the Cape Fear River Basin. The site is located on SR 1102 Morgan Road approximately
0.1 miles north of NC 210 in the Currie area of Pender County. The onsite mitigation area is entirely
within the NCDOT right of way. The adjacent land uses to the mitigation site are the roadway of SR 1102
to the east and upland and riparian forest systems otherwise. There is evidence of some past clearing
activities to the west of the upper reaches of the mitigation site judging from the lack of mature canopy
in that area, however, it is not thought that this would be detrimental to the success of the onsite
mitigation proposal.
Three jurisdictional features are associated with the roadway project area those being Colly Creek, an
unnamed tributary to Colly Creek, and the abutting Cypress -Gum Swamp community located within the
floodplain and abutting areas of Colly Creek. Colly Creek has been assigned Stream Index Number 18-
68-17 with classification of C Sw. Colly Creek scored a perennial score of 41.5 on the NCDWQ Stream
Identification Form. The unnamed tributary to Colly Creek scored 28 on the NCDWQ Stream
Identification Form, however, the unnamed tributary was ultimately rated as perennial based on the
best professional judgment of the reviewer; see the NCDWQ Stream Identification Form for more
information in this regard. The wetlands associated with this project are classified as riverine swamp
forest according to the NC Wetland Assessment Method.

2.0 Site Selection
The mitigation site is immediately adjacent to the west side of SR 1102 Morgan Road and runs from
approximate Station 10 +65 LT to 12 +67 LT (12 +67 LT being the point of discharge to Colly Creek). The
mitigation site currently consists of wooded areas part upland and part wetland. The new stream
channel would be constructed as shown on the attached plans including a smooth tie in of the
constructed channel portion to the down gradient wetlands to ensure a successful transition between
the constructed channel and naturally cut channel as further described. Approximately 135 feet of the
proposed stream relocation of 202 feet would be constructed while the remaining 67 feet would occur
by the forces of nature cutting the new channel through the down gradient wetland area upon turning
water into the newly constructed channel portion. The stream relocation would be stabilized by means
of appropriate vegetation as described herein.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The mitigation site would be managed to prohibit all use inconsistent with its use as mitigation property,
including any activity that would materially alter the biological integrity or functional and educational
value of the site, consistent with the mitigation plan as described herein. Please note that the road fill
side of the mitigation effort would be routinely mowed to near water's edge much as the existing
situation and as conceptually depicted on Permit Drawing SRF -1. The side of the stream opposite the
road fill, however, would be planted as further described herein and allowed to grow to maturity. Also,
the site would be signed appropriately near the road side edge of water of the UT to indicate the
mitigation-site to help deter inadvertent impacts.
The site is designated on the plan sheets as a mitigation area and will be placed on the Natural
Environment Section's Mitigation GeoDatabase. This database is provided to all NCDOT personnel as a
record of mitigation sites and their attributes, including prohibited activities. NCDOT is held by virtue of
the permits associated with this mitigation site and the associated roadway impacts to protect the site
in perpetuity.
4.0 Objectives
The goal of the proposed mitigation is to offset permanent impacts due to construction of the Pender
Bridge 144 replacement project.
The Pender Bridge 144 replacement project proposes to permanently impact 0.21 acres of wetlands by
filling of 0.14 acres, mechanized clearing of 0.06 acres, and excavation of 0.01 acres. It should be noted
that the 0.01 acres of excavation is for making a smooth transition of the constructed portion of the
stream relocation to the down gradient wetlands to facilitate the natural stream channel cutting
through said wetlands. Thereby, the referenced 0.01 acres of excavation, while a permanent impact,
should not be considered a loss of wetlands but rather an enhancement to the successful mitigation
effort as described. So, the remaining 0.20 acres (0.14 acres of fill and 0.06 acres of mechanized
clearing) have been accepted by EEP to be mitigated offsite at a 2:1 ratio.
Z FEB 2 8 2094
�eurcl�

The Pender Bridge 144 replacement project proposes to permanently impact 213 linear feet of the
unnamed tributary to Colly Creek. This impact is due to the necessity of creating a safer standard road
fill section. Options were investigated to avoid said stream impacts. Piping the UT under the road was
investigated but was determined to not be practical due to resultant impacts and economics as such
considered pipe would likely have to be bored and jacked. Also, the use of 1.5:1 roadway fill slopes was
investigated but the toe of the fill would still intercept the middle of the existing stream resulting in
permanent impacts to the stream. So, it was determined to relocate the stream and provide a natural
design to hopefully achieve the safer standard roadway section and attain a stream that will ultimately
be as good as that being impacted. Please note that the first 10 feet of the proposed 213 feet of
permanent stream impacts should not be considered a loss of waters but rather are for dewatering
measures as well as tie in of the new stream channel portion to the existing channel portion at around
station 10 +55 to 10 +65. The referenced 10 feet is shown as permanent impact on the plan sheets and
impact table (the 10 feet is included as part of the 213 feet) due to the potential nature of this area to
be permanently changed with the tie in, but again this section should not be considered permanent loss
of stream as that same channel bottom section would more or less be retained. So we have 203 feet
(213 feet permanently impacted minus the 10 feet not a permanent loss) of permanent stream loss
resultant. The mitigation effort proposes to relocate the stream and provide 202 feet of stream in
return. As previously discussed, 135 feet of the relocated stream would be constructed while the
remaining.67 feet would be cut out by the forces of nature upon turning the water into the newly
constructed channel portion. Please note that the first 30 feet (approximate station 10 +65 to 10 +95) of
the relocated stream portion would have rip rap toe protection /bank stabilization to protect that bend
area and likely sensitive area considering the historic flow in that location. So, the mitigation effort
proposes to relocate 202 feet of stream to offset the 203 feet of permanent stream loss. NCDOT
proposes that this onsite mitigation serve as full and complete mitigation for the unavoidable
permanent stream impacts associated with the Pender 144 Bridge replacement project.
5.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The.mitigation site would be constructed in conjunction with the construction of the Pender Bridge 144
replacement project. The stream relocation would be accomplished by excavating the existing uplands
as well as the wetland tie in area both as previously described and also depicted on the attached permit
drawings. Target channel bottom elevations, channel bottom widths, and floodplain widths for the
constructed stream relocation portion have been established based on field observations and survey
information. There is a document entitled Stream Relocation Information Sheet included in the permit
application package which provides information in regard to the referenced targets. Also, this target
information can be seen on the permit drawings; please see detail B on Permit Drawings 2, 3, and EC -4A
as well as the cross section permit drawings for more info. These targets would be achieved as part of
the construction process of the Pender 144 Bridge replacement project. The 135 foot long constructed
stream section as previously described would be matted with coir fiber matting and seeded with a
native riparian seed mixture to provide short term as well as long term stabilization of the constructed
stream section. Also the disturbed wetland area in the near vicinity of the down gradient tie in point
would also be seeded with this native riparian seed mixture. Seed of a temporary nature such as rye

grain or millet may be incorporated into the seed mixture to help ensure quick stabilization of the area.
Please note that the road fill area even in the vicinity of this relocated stream section would be seeded
with a typical road shoulder mixture to near the water's edge on the road side of the unnamed
tributary. Upon achievement of stabilization via the coir fiber matting and successful vegetative cover,
and with agency approval, the stream would be turned into the newly constructed channel portion. The
anticipation is that the water would naturally cut through the wetlands area from approximately station
12 +00 LT to Station 12 +67 LT to the discharge point with Colly Creek thereby creating the final 67 feet of
the relocated stream. At the appropriate, planting season, the stream bank opposite the road fill as well
as the floodplain bench area would be stabilized by use of live staking depicted as TYPE 1 on the Permit
Drawing SRF -1; this would consist of live stakes of black willow (Salix nigra) and silky dogwood (Cornus
amomum). The remaining slope from the floodplain bench up to the slope stake line and far top of bank
area would be planted with the TYPE 2 planting as shown on Permit Drawing SRF -1; this planting would
consist of a near equal mix of laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and
tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). Please note that the Permit Drawing SRF -1 does not show a
floodplain bench area, however, the floodplain bench area would be treated with the TYPE 1 planting
while the slope from flood plain bench to slope stake line and beyond would be treated with TYPE 2
planting as described above.
The NCDOT Division 3 Environmental Office shall be contacted to provide construction assistance to
ensure that the mitigation areas are constructed appropriately. An as -built report will be submitted
within 60 days of completion of the project.
6.0 Performance Standards
The NCDOT Division 3 Environmental Office shall be contacted prior to and during construction to
provide oversight and ensure that the site is graded to match the target channel bottom elevations,
channel bottom widths, and floodplain widths. Be that as it may, considerable design effort supported
by field observations and surveyed data has already been invested in said targets as shown on the
permit drawings. Achievement of these targets shall suffice for success for the structure of the stream
channel and floodplain areas. Also, the NCDOT Division 3 Environmental Office shall ensure that the site
is planted as per the plan discussed herein.
Success for vegetation monitoring within the stream relocation area is based on the survival of planted
woody vegetation and coverage of seeded herbaceous vegetation.
Upon successful completion of construction, the following monitoring strategies are proposed for the
mitigation site. NCDOT will document monitoring activities on the site in an annual report distributed to
the regulatory agencies.
FEB 2 8 2014
• DCM MHDCT%"I<I

7.0 Monitoring Requirements
The target elevations, channel widths, and .floodplain widths will be verified as part of the construction
process. The vegetation shall be planted as proposed.
NCDOT shall monitor the relocation area by visual observation and photo points for vegetation survival.
NCDOT shall monitor the site for a minimum of three years or until the site is deemed successful.
Monitoring will be initiated upon completion of the site planting.
8.0 Other Information
None
9.0 Determination of Credits
Based on discussions with the agencies and per the NCDOT plans and per the NCDCM and 401/404
permit applications for the Pender Bridge 144 replacement project, NCDOT proposes to relocate on site
202 linear feet of the unnamed tributary to Colly Creek. This represents an onsite ratio of 1:1
(mitigated:impacted) for the perennial UT. NCDOT proposes that this onsite mitigation serve as full and
complete mitigation for the unavoidable permanent stream impacts of 213 linear feet (of which 203 feet
are permanent stream loss as previously described).
An as -built report would be submitted within 60 days of completion of the mitigation site to verify
actual mitigation areas constructed and planted. The success of the mitigation areas and determination
of final credits would be based upon successful completion and closeout of the monitoring period.
9.1 Credit Release Schedule
NCDOT proposes immediate, full release of the proposed mitigation as on -site mitigation for
unavoidable permanent stream impacts associated with the Pender Bridge 144 replacement project.
10.0 Geographic Service Area
The proposed Geographic Service Area (GSA) for the mitigation area is composed of the 8 -digit
Hydrologic Cataloging Unit (HUC) 03030006.
11.0 Maintenance Plan
The site as described herein will be held by NCDOT and placed on the NES mitigation geodatabase.
Once monitoring is completed and the site is-closed out, it would be placed in the NCDOT Stewardship
Program for long term maintenance and protection.
If an appropriate third party recipient is identified in the future, then the transfer of the property will
include a conservation easement or other measure to protect the natural features and mitigation value
of the site in perpetuity.
S FEB 2 8 2014
DcM -mim efty

12.0 Long Term Adaptive Management Plan
The site will be managed by the NCDOT according to the mitigation plan. Encroachments into the area
will be investigated and appropriate measures taken to minimize any negative effects. In the event that
unforeseen issues arise that affect the management of the site, any remediation will be addressed by
NCDOT in coordination with the appropriate regulatory agencies.
13.0 Financial Assurances
NCDOT is held by permit conditions associated with the Pender 144 Bridge Replacement Project to
preserve the mitigation site. NCDOT has established funds for each project and within each Division to
monitor the'-mitigation site and to protect it in perpetuity.
FFS 2 8 2014
Dem-r MY

F�
`°e aw+voa`
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GovERNoR
February 5, 2014
Evanna Willie Heirs et al
501 N Winona Drive
Hampton, VA 23661
Dear Riparian Neighbor,
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECRETARY
The NC Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) proposes to replace Pender County Bridge # 144 on SR
1102 Morgan Road over Colly Creek located approximately 0.1 miles north of NC 210. NCDOT is
applying for permits to perform the proposed work. You are being notified of this proposal because of
Coastal Area Management Act requirements to notify adjacent riparian property owners of proposed
development.
Included in the work proposal are plans to replace the bridge with a new bridge and associated
infrastructure, realign a section of stream in the southwest quadrant that parallels the roadway, and to
relocate utilities necessary for the replacement of the bridge. Please see the enclosed plan sheets which
show the proposed work.
If you have any questions regarding the work proposal, please contact me.
If you wish to comment on the proposed project to the regulatory agency of the NC Division of Coastal
Management, please contact Mr. Stephen Lane at phone number 252- 808 -2808 ext. 208, email
stephen.lanep,ncdenr.gov, or write to him at:
NC Division of Coastal Management
Attn: Mr. Stephen Lane
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
You have 30 days in which to submit comments to the NC Division of Coastal Management.
Thank you for your consideration.
Enclosures
S' cerely,
Stonewall Mathis
NCDOT- DOH - Division 3
Division Environmental Officer
SSOl BARBADOS BLVD. CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429
FEB 2 8 2014
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

ST
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GovERNoR
February 5, 2014
TC Brown Jr. et al
32668 NC Hwy 210
Currie, NC 28435
Dear Riparian Neighbor,
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECRETARY
The NC Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) proposes to replace Pender County Bridge # 144 on SR
1102 Morgan Road over Colly Creek located approximately 0:1 miles north of NC 210. NCDOT is
applying for permits to perform the proposed work. You are being notified of this proposal because of
Coastal Area Management Act requirements to notify adjacent riparian property owners of proposed
development.
Included in the work proposal are plans to replace the bridge with a new bridge and associated
infrastructure, realign a section of stream in the southwest quadrant that parallels the roadway, and to
relocate utilities necessary for the replacement of the bridge. Please see the enclosed plan sheets which
show the proposed work.
If you have any questions regarding the work proposal, please contact me.
If you wish to comment on the proposed project to the regulatory agency of the NC Division of Coastal
Management, please contact Mr. Stephen Lane at phone number 252- 808 -2808 ext. 208, email
stephen.laneA cn den..gov, or write to him at:
NC Division of Coastal Management
Attn: Mr. Stephen Lane
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
You have 30 days in which to submit comments to the NC Division of Coastal Management.
Thank you for your consideration.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Onewall Ma this
NCDOT -DOH- Division 3
Division Environmental Officer
5501 BARBADOS BLVD. CASTLE HAYNE, NC 28429 EB 2 8 N14
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
r

- ` � - - . - - _ _ - . _ - lac =� - _'e,�''_�_
-_ _ y
- -- - . - - ., - - - 11 -8 - C 0 0 O 0 y .. :
- - _ - 1, - - _ s �� -'
- = - = late`- Ign u�` -
�' ®:.Com lefe`iteinsa2,larid3.Also comP-
P i `,17 Agent j ;
>ifem 4 -if Restricted Deliveryis desired. '', - - C _ 1
= ., ,"_'-7"­" . r .;
.` -...
Ad
dressee .
„ . °' : = ' . � , e reverse -,, -
® "Print your naine_,and,address on tFi - : - �' 1 -
the °card to ou: '. _ _ d'b �Printed Nam C: Dat' of D ivery t.
so'that give sari_return Y ' e `ee've y -(_ )
- thernail iece,
® Attach tfiis card to the tiackof P,„ - - /y'
.- , r v ;
- - _ ,,,or- o'K the front if space parrtlI Ss.' " ' _ _ - Vie§
D::Is delive address different fiorii itein,l2; ❑ . -
;.; :�,.
- _ , _ ry ;. =�, '
°�.;�. -. - - - . No'
1:'. Article "Addressed to::� �If YES; enter deliv_ ery address below:'; >
" : -
e
-
s
�.
1-1 r -
y
1
-_ -a - - -
_ _ _ _ �,) -
-a1
h
�/
b
f
V�
on
�5
Nf
-
3.
Service T
pe
;' Y
�j .� -
Tess
Mal
'i
O`
a�
M
2
r Ce
rtlfied gyp_,
,lse - -
�'� t m R
ace
i '�t
for M
nan
- eu
_ /-['III - ':�, Registered: P,
�- ,
_
_ _
;�`
O.
D.'�
- sured
AAa
p ,�;,
_- _.
In
i, '',
ee es -
F Y
li e�
0
est
rlcfed
De v ):'"
M
_ -
- — - : _..-. _ - _'_ "_ -. - . -
- .__ - - — - - ------ 5, - _
�IeNuin -
�2. "
�ic
i;
_ o0
01'.:
y
78
9
8
51
9
7
8:
�13
e lab -
servic
sfei from - - - -
-f"`'-
- ran � - - - - - --
p
�5 ^� 025 5
2 -M
-154
'ece
1
- � •rn R -
"rriest c
etu
Do -
P
- 2
004' � - -
'riia'
orrri' -3
1�
Feb
�; - _ 'S F
rY-
- - - -�
- - - - -
v - - - -
'`
.�
��-'
j,:.-
v
e; _
.f - - - - - - - - - -
_ - - - - - - _ - - - - - _ _ _ - __ _ _ - "J ^ - - - - - _
__
_ - _ _ - - : 4 - - _ - - _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - - . .
N{
4 ;r.
S " -• - - - - - - _ '•i
. -1• - - - - -_ _ - - - - - _ LL -- _ - _ f. - -t - -
`-5-' -- - _ - _ _ -
t.
_.
_ - - 4I_V,� - -
- - - _ �.`i.� _ - _ - _ _
�:; i - - : (- - _
ry,.� ?� „, . _ o e
11�.- 11
H _*
- 1. , -h B B0 ”, � ,�o - - - _
,�l ' ,. °, - - - - - - - � -
_ �'z
®.
Com
le
r.
to ii
e�
rris 1
2'
ari`'
R tl°3�'� �'A:
. Als � SI � n
o co atu
;. ri1 i re `-
ete
9 - -
-it' -
�..
tn'4
f'R
estr' `
icte
d D
eliv�
e
is
desi'
rad >
►Y _
- - erit- -
®a.
-g
Pr _ X'"
ur'n
arii
e�ari
- da�
ddre
s's o"
- Y- ri�t�
he`r � - `r - -
eve
.i' rse���r•'
'�f Y'
_ z�4�
:S
Ot
ha'
d
dressee��
t wa'
ca
n 'rat
ur
n tFi `.
e c' -
arcJ
to= o`
- - Y -
��"
B'
ed
- b�
- - Pri .t..
n eii'
ain
C.=' D�'
- ate ��f
�Att �� o De'`
acfi � ); li
#his" ve��
- c "r"
a d �t
0th
e�
6ac� r
K
of'the
rriaiif'�'
- �ece
P ,�
-
;o:. J
ro':
ri th`
efr`
ont''
s `c-
a e`
rrrii %'
P.
.P
Is
delive
a
ddre
ssdi
ffere t
n o
tr m d
ry em= Yes°
`�1 ' A}t'•� 1 ?'
i 1�
- c e' -
AddPe
ss''
ed to' �"
= - - If -
YES
erifer
deli `
very - - a�
address ss be
to �N"
ry
w' o
R- - - - _ - _ - _ -
V..
1
,
4. '.
�''
_ _ _ _ _ - - -t�. - - _ , �, _ - - : - - _ - {. _ - _ - - _ _ 3 :
Vii'
Z
�.
3:' �rvice T
e
,�
Y
P
_ Ceit' -
ifled'
M
ail
Tess
ExP
Mail T
R
ei
ste`
red
O
Ref
9 um
Race`
yy it
1`� �" for
Me���
�(,lr
rcha
e-
'� I7 Insured Mail,. _� CA.D. - -1 I
t- - - -
4.
Restricte D z
d alive Extra Fee
! i
❑. — -
- .- ,- -.
Yes
- - _ = Article Num -: - - - --- -- -- -
be
rensfer from`seivice is 7 0 0 8- 13 0 0 -� 0 001' 1-
R bed, 789 -'8526 ( -
- �'-
- • - P$ Form 3811, Fetirua ` 2004 . - -
ry , Domesfio Return Receipf «;102595 o2 -M -1540 ! 11 I
- - , .- - - -- -- - -- - - - -
- _.p _ _'
,' --. � -
-- - -
- Dcn cry

" 1
Go fy creek
NC DWQ,•Stream Identi icatnoai'F6rm ,Versionn'4,.II,
Date: 1
.tie 1.ecr
Project%Site: 1µq:
Latitude:
Evaluator: i
Couri
Lon etude• ' 2
,Total Points:•,"
S ;reamisijtleast,6terinittent (; s' ,.' ...
Stream Determination (circl' a
;.E' hemeral Intermittent`; e�ennia
Other_:
e.g Y 1
Q,uadName:
if >' 19 "or erennia! if? 30" -
p9•
Cam';; ie
A. Geomor h`olo < (Subtotal = /�� :') -: ''
Absent
Weak
Mddecate1.
�,1:,�' _'
1a _Cont'inuity of channel bed`arid bank';
`'0
:' 19 Rooted' upland Oa` nts_in str',eambed,1;
2;'
2:'
2.,Si66- osity of ctiannef ,along thalweg
0. -
1 _
.2 '
0
3:' In- channel structure: ez: riffle= pool ;'step- pool,°
ri le' pool "se sequence
0
1
2
3,
4: Particle.size 'of stream' substrate'
0
Ix- <i
.,
5' Active /relict flootlplain ; :..�
,; : 0
1 '
` 2 `'•
;, 3
6:- Depositional bars.or�tienches': +' "'
0
1'
2` `'
3-
,7,k allu'vial,d epos its
0
8 % Headcuts;
0
:. :,
2`."
9: G +rade.confrol °:,_:: =�
0.5'
0
;;10 .'Natural valley ''
0: "'-
0.5
1-
1:
11' Seco 'ndor- greater:'order'channel; '''' ••.- „`
No= :O. ° -._:•,
es =.3
z:
a,artifidal ditches are not'rated; see_ discussions in manual =
'Bi H dto Io
JS to al =
12: Presence'of Baseflo ,
3 +� + -.` °:'. -
� 2�,�;
�,1:,�' _'
13:�Iton oXidiz ng;bacteria,` '',
`'0
:' 19 Rooted' upland Oa` nts_in str',eambed,1;
3
2:'
�14: Leaf litter::
5'
-0
0
;15. Sediment on :plants or debris0+
-`
_ .0.
91i:'Organic debris lin'es.or piles:'
0
Ix- <i
.,
�
: T,_Soil =based evidence; of hidhi water table ?; :
No =
Biolo (Subtotal =
• 16. ibrous roots ih,siegmbed --
3 +� + -.` °:'. -
� 2�,�;
�,1:,�' _'
�
0;
:' 19 Rooted' upland Oa` nts_in str',eambed,1;
3
2:'
; ,1
-0
20:MacrotieHthos( note' diversity,endabuntlance),,,;`, „”
0'
12A 'uatq i c Mollus ks,
22 Fish x - �0'`
0.5
23:`.Crayfsh0:.
0:5
�;5 •-
24:A _hibians _ -
25: Algae”
0
1"
1.5
26: ,Wetland plants in strearribed::r ='.
"' C1N, =.0.
; O = 1- ::Other = 0,
-
;; perennial st'reams.may also be identified using other'methods. Seep. 35 of manual. -; ;,,"
•..:•, °;,•,.';; -- •:; , .- - +,',..`;:...
Notes:: Y -40' ..
oi• �'.' C deck' s .. f- lam`.,.,
oi�id_' .becQ�1� ei a e( ";�'i,` ct4` `el� teu:;;'`flt:,� {; a;'s?;'b're�k s% `i%► '.-
Sketch: ° ` . .+ J'epQ
Al C 11 B
:i
ri
-'r
FEB 2 8 2014 :
DcM -MxD CITy

NC bWQ Stream ldentilncatimi Form Version,4.11 , , �Y �� C��� C � tc�
Date:
ProjectlSiie: �tr�h/ �t�
Latitude:
Evaluator: �;S
h�lu i
County: �Cho;eY
Longitude: 79Z_W
-Totah;Pointis:.,
Stream'is,atleastinfermittent SeebelOt�)•
>' or erennial ? 30" 2- t
Stream Determination {circl ne
E hemeral Intermittent erennia
p
Other )°o �► +_ .
e. "Quad Name:
g• C as W� 11
if 19 if ,
2:.Sinuosity,of channel, along_thalwe9
Oz
j.3
A. ,Geomor holo (Subtotal `_ )
AbserDt.' :._
_ Wi k�-
� Wloderate
„
;_-
la. Continuity of channel tied and bank -
_..
� � 0
1'�Z.;,
-
_3
2:.Sinuosity,of channel, along_thalwe9
Oz
'.1.
,; 0.5
3
'3 In= channel structure: ex. riffle =pool; step - pool,:
ri ` le = "ool se uence°
0.
1
2
3
•'4:' Particle size:'of stream substrate'_
0 %= •' ..
1
: 2 �;
�• 3
S: Active /relict floodplain _' . �
� : 0';, ':
1;; •`':;
2
_ -3
l "i;Depo__tional_barsorben_ches'
23 Crayfish:;k
7: Recent alluvia_I deposits ,`-
0.
1
'• 2.'
3
"8 "'Headcuts
p ,'
"; 1'
- r2 `_
g
9: Grade control
1:5
0.5. ; _ _'
1:;, :, '
1:5
-10. Natural valley_
1
C-;
1.5'
;11. Second 6 "greater order channel ', "` �:=
o= 0
- _ Yes = s.r
artific "ial ditches are, not rated; see discussions in'manual•
Ogy (Subt t b ).�
�I2 Presence of Base flow" ,
0
1
U_
3
13. -Iron oxidizing bacteria`
� � 0
1'�Z.;,
-
_3
14. Leaf litter; -
1.5'
'.1.
,; 0.5
01 '
15 Seclirrienton- plants or debris =-
�' 0'� _
16::,Orga hid_ db6ps lines'orpiles' _'
0:',
Q
1 T- Soil =based evidence'of high'Water table? ��;.
11 -
No' =, Q,- ;' -. ` ,
@s :: 3
.0 Biolo(Subtotal' =':
'_ 18..Fibi6us rwoots in strearnbed_� -_ °' ,,,
::; , ,�
� �:..:'.3:,: ,.
2.,
1
�
� � 0
''19:

UVETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
•- Project/Site: BLIB - Bridoe 700144 , "dity /County: Pender' -. Sampling Date: 23 aua'2011
,
Applic'ant/Owner NCDOT� State: NC Sampling Point "Uolantl
pejr }'wet.
Investigator'(s): `, 'L: Fontaine, T. Stanton. J. Merritt, S: Mathis � � ' , Section, Township, Range: 7 '
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local 'relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope ( %):
' Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T Lat 34.435775 Long:' - 78:154565, , = Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Muckalee loam, free flooded'
flooded NWI classification: :
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions •on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑ No,'•-, ® (if no, explain in Remark's.),"
Are Vegetation ,, . ❑;, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are, "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No, ❑ '•
-Are Vegetation ` ❑; Soil. ❑,: or Hydrology , .D, naturally, problematic? ` (If needed,- xplain any answers in Remarks.)", _
SUIMMARY,,OF FINDINGS = Attach`site, map'sliowing sampling'point locations, transects „important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? \ ' Yes ®'r No '.; ❑, -
Is,the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes • [I No;? ® YO ❑ . No.,
within a Wetland ?,
Wetland Hydrology Present? - Yes; , ❑' No. '®
Remarks:: Pender county under severe,drought`conditions ;, Upland point taken up=slope of floodpla ri and outside limits.
of Riv(jrine SWamp Fores't:� _
HYDROLOGY:
r:
Vlletla'nd Hydrology Indicators: ' _
-.: ' `
,, Secondary Ihdicators (min666 of tab'reduired) ,
-
Pnma`' Indicators riiinirmum of one is required; check all that�apply)':..
[Y (.
❑ Surface SoiLCracks(66) '
❑`„ 'Surface Water (Al) .. . -
❑`,.'',- Aquatic Fauna`(B13) . ' ”
❑ ,Sparsely Vegetafed Concave Surface (68)
❑ : High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits•(B15) (LRR U)
_ ..
❑ Drainage Paflerns (610) .'
❑ _; :.Saturation (A3) `
❑,;,- Hydrogen sulfide Odor•(C1)-
❑.' Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ :,Water Marks (61):"
❑, Ox idiied�Rh6spheres,along Living Roots',(C3)'
❑; Dry - Season WatecTable (C2)„ '
❑ : Sedimentbeposits (B'2)
❑ - "Presence of Reducedl'ron (C4) _„
0' Crayfish Burrows (08)
❑ ;t ' Drift Deposits (63) `.
❑ , . Recent Iron Reduction in Tiiled Soils (C6)
❑ _' Saturation Visible'on "Aerial Imagery (Cg) .,
E3,, Algal Mat orCrust (64) -
[I.'- , Thin'Muck Surface'(C7)r -`'
❑ ' . Geomorphic Position (D2)',
❑ Iron D'e osits l35
p (, )_r`
❑ ','Other (Explain iri�Rema`rks
( p )_' _
t
❑ -',' ShallowAquitard(D3)'
❑ '. Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
�> FAC- Neutral Test (35) '
❑. Water' Leaves,(Bg) . ;
,
❑ ;, •` Sphagnum moss -(D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Obs'e'rvations:
,
Surface IN 'ter Present? Yes , ' No"
Water Table Present? 'Yes . . ❑' No ,_
® Depth (inch'es):�
SaturetionPresent ?: ;`,'„ Yes ❑ No
®' `Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present ?. Yes ❑ No N
includes ca iila Erin a
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial `photos, previous Inspections), •rf available:
Remarks'r
,
MUM
FEB 2 9 2014
,
.. �j�/qq'R�R�.
•
, .
TyY.�.�(Y
H ` ncM.MRp err
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VtUr I A I IUN - use SGentlTic names OT piants
50% of total cover:, 30 20% of total cover: -12 `
FACW 'species '• =' x2 - ,' -? -'
5amplinl
Tree Stratum (Plotsize: Q)
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Dominance Test Worksheet:
1. , Quercus niora
30
y FAC '
Number'of Dominant Species
2. Pinus taeda
30
y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 "
FACU •
Column Totals: "( A) (B)`
Total Number of Dominant
q•
y FACW ,
I
Prevalence Iniiex =, B/A =
Species Across All Strata:
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation, Indicators: •
Percent`of Dominant - Species
S
❑ 1,- Rapid. Test for Hydroph`ytic Vegetation '
That Are OBL, FACK or FAC: '
7.
®' 2 - Dominance Test is' >50%
Prevalence Iridex'workshe•et:
8.
3'- Prevalence Index is <3.01-,
Total % Cover of,:
=Total Coyer
Total Cover
OBL species .
Point: Upland
7 (A) .
7 (B)•
100 (A/B)
FEB, ,2 8 2014
DI MO CITY
US Army' Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
50% of total cover:, 30 20% of total cover: -12 `
FACW 'species '• =' x2 - ,' -? -'
Sapling /Shrub Stratum'(Plot size :30' )
FAC species " x3 ='
1. 'Pious taeda `
y' FAC'.
FACU species x4= " •
2.1
15
y: FAC `
UPL species x5 =
3. Sassafras'albidum
_5
FACU •
Column Totals: "( A) (B)`
' "4. Gordonia la§ianthus
15
y FACW ,
I
Prevalence Iniiex =, B/A =
. 5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation, Indicators: •
6. ,
❑ 1,- Rapid. Test for Hydroph`ytic Vegetation '
7:;
.
®' 2 - Dominance Test is' >50%
8..• •�❑
3'- Prevalence Index is <3.01-,
=Total Coyer
❑,. Problematio Hydrophytic Ve6eiaii,riijEx plain)
5000 of total cover: 220% of total cover. 4:,) b ;
'Indicators of hydric'soil a•nd'wetland hydrology must
'
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
be present unless disturbed or protileniatic.` = ''
Definitions of Vegetation Strata: _
Tree,- Woody'plant's, excluding, vines; 3 in: (7.6- cm) 'or more in • ,"
3
diameter ' breast height,(DBH),,regardless of height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plan4s; ezcWingwines, less'thari 3 in. DBH
5•_ -
and greater than 3.28 ft tall. ",
• _
•
Herb -,All herbaceous (non - woody) plants,'regardless of=size, and ,
woo dy'plants less than 3.28 ft tall `
Woodybine = Allwoody vines greater than 3.28 ft inheight.
10
= Total Cover_' '
50% of total cover:•'
26%0'f total cover:
,
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:30'
�
.1. Smilax rotundifolia "'
" 40
. Y FAC
2. Vitis rotundlfolia
­40 40 - _
y , - , ' FAC,
3
q
Hydrophytic - .'
6:
Vegetation Yes ® No ❑
$4 ,
=Total Cover,
Present?
60 %o'6f total cover: 20% of total cover:" 10:
Remarks': (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
WhIMED
FEB, ,2 8 2014
DI MO CITY
US Army' Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Y
SOIL
Sampling Point: Uutattd
Profile Description: (Describe to the'depth needed to document'the indicator or confirm the absence `of indicators.)
Depth - ' Matrix-
Redox Features
(inches),. Color (moist) % `
Color (moist) % ` Type', `. ', . Loc2
Texture Remarks
' '0_2 -� 2.5Y-3/2'- ' , ' `100,.
Sand
2 -'16 2:5Y 6/4 " -100
• ...
Sand -
'T e: C= Concentration; D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix; CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Bore Linng,_M= Matrix,.: ,'.: •,
YP, P
Hydric Soil lnd'icators: (Applicable to;alt LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)•;
Indicators for Problematic,Hydric,Soils':
,® " Histosol (A1)',. ; , ;
❑
Polyvalue Below- Surface (S8) (LRR S; T, M)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR b)
❑ Hisfic Epipedori (A2)
❑
,•Thin Dark Surface'(S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10j (LRR S),'
m
❑ ; BlackHistic (A3) ' '
❑ '
Loamy MuckyMineral (F1) (LRR U) „•
❑ Reduced _Vertic (F18) (outside -MLRA 156A,6)
❑ , ' Hydrogen Sulfide (A' .
❑
LoamyGleyed Matrix (F2)'
❑ • Piedmont Floodplain Soils ,(F19) (LRR P,
❑ • `Stratified Layers (A5) `,'
❑''
- Depleted'Matrix (F3)
❑ Anorrialous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) , '
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P; T; U)
❑ -;
:Redox Dark Surface (F6) ; '
(MLRA 153B),;; `• " -;
❑ 5 cm'Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR, P, T; U) ,
', ❑
Depleted Dark•Surface (F7)"
❑ Red Parent Material'(TF2)
❑ ' Muck Presence, (A8) (LRR.U)';', `
❑ :
`
Redox Depressions (F8) ;',
❑ , , Very'Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ - 9 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P; T)
❑'
"r Marl (F10)'(LRR U)
Othgr Ex lain in Remarks
❑ P )
• ❑ • 'Deplefed Below Dark'Surface (A11)
❑
-1 Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑' ,' Thick Dark Surface (Al2); ' - -
-
❑ "'
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P,, T)
;.. i , , - ,•_, ; ., _ ,
a'
Indicators of hydrophytic, vegetation and
L] ' . Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
Umbric,Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) '•
wetland hydrology must be present, -
❑ Sandy, Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) "
❑ •`
• Delta Ochrio(F17) (MLRA 151).;_;
unless'disturbed or problematic. , " ,-
❑ • Sandy Gleyed,Matrix•(S4)
❑ ',
fReduced Vertic (171.8) (MLRA 150A; 1506)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)_
❑
, Piedmont Floodplain Soils (019) "(MLRA 149A)
❑ ' Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous 6right Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) '
❑ ,; Dark Surface (S7)• (LRR P; S; T, U) ;
Restrictive Layer (if present);
Type: „
,
•
Depth (inchesp ' =- "
Hydric Soils Present? • Yes .• . ❑' No
Remarks -'
,.
DEB 2.8 2014 _
US Army Corps of Engineers,• .
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain `Region,, Verslon 2, 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: BLIB -'Bridge 700144 City /County: ' Pender Sampling Date: 23 and 2011
'Applicant/Ovir er. NCDOT State:. NC Sampling Point: Wetland RSF
Investigator(s): L: Fontaine, T: Stanton. J. Merritt, S. Mathis Section, Township, Range: C:�'rri P r Qe; .} Ciuwt11
Landforrn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): fl I a in Local relief (concave, convex; none).:: concave Slope (
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):; T<" ` Lat: 34.435775 Long: - 78.154565• ` ' - Datum: _
Soil Map Unit Name: Muckalee loam: freauently flooded - NWI classification: ,
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions ori'the site typical for this time of year? Yes •„ ❑ No , ®, (If no, explain in Remarks.) -
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil or Hydrology ❑; "significantly disturbed ?. Are "Normal Circumstances" present ?• Yes ® N' ' ❑ .
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil . ; ❑, or Hydrology �: •naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUNWARY OF FINDINGS':- Attachsite maps howing'smpling point locations, transects, important features, etc.;
'Hydrophytic Vegetation Present. Yes'" ® - No" ❑ - ' _
Is the.Sarnpled'Area
Hydric Soil Present?, •Yes ":' ®',No ❑ Yes' ® No ❑
within'a W_ etland? ' ,
Wetland Hydrology,Present? Yes` ' ®' No,' • ❑ „
Remarks: Pender County under.seVerd- drOUght COnditionS.
HYDROLOGY;
' Wetland, Hydrology,lndicators:,." ;' .'
..' '
Secondary
Indicat6rs (minimumofiworea6ired) -'..',
YSUrface
Primary Indicators (minimum of one fs required; check all that.apply) .,_
❑ •
Soil Cracks (B6) ' `
-❑ Surf ace W ate r(A1).•,: ", "..
®.'AquaticFaiina(B13),.'
®',�
1Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
❑' • ,Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U).
❑ ,
' Diainag6'P6ttemi (1310)
®. Saturation (A3),
❑ Hydrogen Sulflde Odor (C1),
❑
`. Moss Trim Lines (B1,6)
❑ ` Water Marks,(B1)
❑ . "'. Oxidized Rhiiospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ �,Sed'i`rnent Deposits (B2)' "•
❑„ Presence-6f Reduced Iron (C4)'::' ., ° , '
❑ '
• Crayiish•Burrows'(C8) '
❑ Drift Deposit (B3) - -
❑� .' Recent IronReductionin Tilled Soils (C6) •
❑
Saturation Visible, Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algai Mat or Crust (64).
C1 ' ,`Thin Muck Surface''(C7) '
• ®
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ ., Other,(Explain in "Remarks),• "
❑'
Shallow Aquitard (D3)';
ED , Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery'(B7)
" - "' •
®
FAC- Neutral ,Test'(D5)
®; Water- Stained Leaves (69) _•
❑
Sphagnum: moss (D8) (LRR T, U) '
' Field Observations: ,
Surface Water'Present? Yes. ❑ No
ED '. Depth (inches):
Water _Table Present? Yes'' ® No
❑ Depth (inches):'' '
-
Saturation Present ?' . ""
(includes'capillary(singe) " - Yes, ®. No
" ❑ . Depth (inches); - , , 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑•
Descri e'Recorded Data (stream gauge,, monitoring well,'aerial photos, previous inspections), -if available:
Remarks: -
FEB .2 8 2014
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of Olants
Sampling Point: Wetland RSE
" ~Absolute
Tree Stratum (P[ot'size: Q)
Dominant Indicator '.
'
Dominance Test Worksheet:
° v r
Species ?' .Status _
1. Taxodlum disticharn 25 •,
y OBL' "
Number of Dominant Species
Z (A) '
2. Liriode'ndron tulio!fera . • 2's, -56
y,. "OEE FAG
That Are OBL, FACW, or` FAC:
3. -- Querc'us laurifolia . 4�.
Y . ` FACW ..
Total Number of Dominant -
7 (B)
4. , Liauidambar stvraclflua 2
/JQ , .- FAC +•',
Species Across AI( Strata:.
5:
SoYV%
• 0ercent of Dominant Species, ,
,That Are OBL, FACW, or FACT, 100
Prevalence index worksheet:''
-7.
8.
Total % Cover of _ Multiply bv:'
.Q Z :a ' ,
—.y6
= Total Cover:- `"
!�
6131L species x1 =
.,
50% of total cover. 6&.-6-200 of total cover. *&.4- ,,
FACW'spec'ies,: z2
Saol'iria /Shrub Stratum, (Plot size:30'
FAC,species z3 =
1. Ouercus laurifolia �7Q.,
y FACW
FACUspecies' x4,=
'2.. Clethra aln,&Iia 5
�D - , FACW'
UPL species x5
3.' - Vaccinium corvinbosum 20 ' •
y' FACW
Column Totals: ' (A) ' (B)'
4.
Prevalence Index= B /A`= '
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: '
6... '
-.
❑ _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydroph'ytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is' >50%
8:
❑ , 3 - Prevail erice ln'dez is <3.0'
='Toid Cover ` °
❑ " Problematic Hydrophytic Ve9etation1 (Explain) ,
50% of total cover: 7 -20% of'total'cover.`, 7...
;'I 'dicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must,';
Herb Stratum (Plot size:" ' 1
be present; unless'disturbed or problernatic:,„
- Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
77 .•
tree -Woody plants; excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more iri
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
,,Sapling1Shrub`-Woody plarits; excluding vines, less'than 3 i_n. DBH�'
5.
reateithan 3.28 ft'tall:
and gr'eate'r.
Herb -All herbaceous'(non,woody) plants, regardless,of'size, and
7
woody plants less than 3; `ft talc
8'' '
"
v. -... -
Woody vine -' All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in height
9r,
.
10. .
12.
,'50% of total cover: - 20% of total cover:.
Wo64' Vine Strsturn . (Plot size:30' :'
:
777
,
-'
Smilaxrotuniiifolia' 5;'
y ' AC
.5 ,'•Y
2.' = , Smilax laurifolia:•• , ,
;• FACW+
3.
4
5:.
Hydrophytic.
Vegetation No
..
= T6W Cover`
Present?
• 50% oft 1 cover: X204 of total cover: ` 2 ,'
Remarks: (If observed,1ist morphological adaptation's below):.
FEB 2' 2'014 `
oil I
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SID �^^
y,
SOIL
Sampling Point: Wetland iS
Profile Description: (Describe'to'the depth needed
to document the indicator or confirm,the'absence of indicators.)
Depth, Matrix -
Redox Feat'ure's
(inches), Color (moist) . % -
Color (moist) % ;' ." Type' Loc? .
Texture '' Remarrks
0 -16 ` 10 YR 2/1 100
Sandy Muck
pe: C =.,Co_ricent�ation, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, C3 =Covered or Coated Sand Grains; , 2Location": PL =Pore Lining; M =Matrix • • - '
Hydrlc Soil lndicators:, (Applicable to 'all LRRs, unless otheewise.noted.) :, ; .
, : •:,
indicator's,fo'i :Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1) , _
❑
Polyvalue, Below Surface (S8) (LRR S; T, U)
❑ ,1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ _- Histic; pipedon (A2)
(
Thin Dark;Surface (S9) (LRR S; T, U)
❑ 2 cm "Muck (A'10) (LRR S) ,'•, " _
,❑ ; Black Histic (A3) '
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR U)
❑ . -', Reduced Ve' (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrog''en Sulf de (A4)
; ❑
"
Loamy Gleyetl Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) S, T)'
❑ - Stratified Layers (A5) `
0'1
Depleted
d
.Anomalous, Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
,
❑ • OrganicBodies(A6) (LRR P; T, U)'
x Dark Surface (F6) . ,
(MLRA 1536)',,
'5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T; U)„
❑
Depleted'Dark Surface -(F7)
❑ . _Red Parent Material (TF2)" '
❑ ' Muck .Pr`esence (A8) (LRR U) '.
❑ . •
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) '
❑ 1 cm Muck' (A9) (LRR P; T)
❑
Marl (F1 O) (LRR U) r,,' I
❑ , Other (Explair in Remarks) '
❑ '' Depleted Below -Dark Surface (X11)
❑
Deipleted'0666 ,(F11) (MLRA 151), '
❑` ,'.Thick Dark Surface "(Al2),, '• "; > _
,•.wr•'= •, °,. • ,, . ••�� ...
❑
lrori- Manganese Masses`(F12) (LRR O, P, T)
- 4 _„ ,,, • , . „ , �
s`
Indicators 'ofhydrophytic.vegetation,and: ' -
❑ : Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA' 150A)
❑, . ',:
Urribric Surface (F13) (LRRP, T, U)
{vetlanii hydrology must tie present;
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRft O; S) ,,` -"
❑ ' "
-Delta Ocfiric (F17) (MLRA 151) ,'
"(MLRA
unless'disturbed or problematic, ,:
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) „
❑ "
Reduced Vertic (F18) 150A; 1 506 ,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)';
❑'
Piedmont Floodplairi Soils (F19)'(MLRA 149A)
3•
"
,
❑, Strip'ped Matrix (S6) ,
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
�! Dark-Surface (S7), (LRR P, S', T,,U)
Restrictive" Layer (if present)— , ." =;
TYPe::
Depth (inches):;
Hydric Soils Present? Yes'; ®, , No, . ❑
Remarks: .
FE 9 �d9�
US Anny Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

4+
w
l�Tortl Cap ®line Wldle Resources: o `ssi®n 16
Gordon Myers. Executive` Director ;
,
MEMORAN DUM
D ,1V1
_
,
,
,
TO: Amanda T: ' Glynn, P:E:�,
Dvi "sion Bridge Program Manager, NCDOT
" FROM: Travis Wilson's Hgliway,Project Coordinator'
Habitat Conservation Prograrii
DATE: August 3 ;201 I'
SUBJECT: Division 3 Bridge Replacements `
" Biolo fists withthe N: ;C. Wildlife`Resources Commission (NCWRC) have:reviewedthe '
g, _
information rovided`and Have thefollowing,preliminary; comments`on tl b subject project. `Our
P,,.
coinmerits are "rovded' in•accordance with'provisions'oftbe National Enviroririental Policy Pict.
;.
p,. e-
42 4332 2 c aril the Fish -and Wildlife .Coordination Act (48' Stat. `4;01; as amen ed; J 6 ' ,
�)( )
( )
U:S.G. 661_667d
,r ' 1 m ri r 'ects'ofthis scope are as
Our, standard recommendations.for,bridge ep ace e t p o� , ,p , ,
fol
L ` We •gen&ally; prefer sp'afthirig: §tructures. Spanning structures usually do "not require
work witfim,tlie stream and "do n6frp quire stream channel ,realigninerit:,,The Horizontal ,
and vertical,clearaices`provided by bridges allows for, human; and wildlife passage. :,
berieatli'the sfruefure;` does. not,block'fish passage; and does not lilock nayigatiori,by, .
c'anoeist"sarid`boaters.
2:'' Bridge'deck.drains'should•not discharge diiectivinto thestream:
3.. 'Lille concrete.should-n'ot be allowed to contact the.water in or entering into'the stream. ;
4: If'possible,_bridge supports (bents), should not be placed in the strearii.
' 5 -. 'If,temporary, access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to • '
original ground' elevations immediately ;upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulcled.to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not,more tkan to'xio,. If possible, ,wh r
`M4jfing` Add ress :`'DivisionofInlandFislf6ries - "1721 Mail`Service' Center -,-Raleigh, V6094721,
721"
Telephone: [phone]. Fax: [phone]:

Bridge Memo Page 2 August 3, 2011
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed., Clearing the area with chain .
saws, .mowers,_ bush -hogs; or other, mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root,mat intact;, allows the area to'revegetate; naturally and minimizes disturbed' soil:
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least, l0 "feet should 'remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
In'trout'waters; the N.C., -Wildlife Resources .Co,in,mission reviews all U.S. Army,
Corps;of Engineers nationwide and_ general `404', peTmits: We have the option of
requesting additional measures'to protect- t'r'•out''and trout habitat and we can .
recommend;that'the project require an individual `404' permit.: "
8. In stzeams -that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT "biologist 1Mr.-
Logah Williams should, b-e notified:„ Speeial.measures to protect these sensitive species
maybe.`r`equired.- NCDOT should also contact "the U.S. Fish acid Wildlife Service for.. -
,iriformation on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it, relates to the project:
9. In, °streams that are used by anadroniou §.fish; the NCDQT;offcial policy. entitled.
Strearri Crossing Guidelmes for Anadromous Fish Passage (1VIay 12, 1997) should
be fohowed:
10. Sedimentation acid erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
,,.must be implemented prior to''any ground,disfurbing' activities.. Structures slould,be
� maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events
1 l : Terriporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be, planted on all bare soil
withni' 15 days of ground disturbing activities to 'provide long -term erosion control:
12. All work in or,adjacenftb'; stream waters shbuId'b6 conducted it a dry,work area::
Sandbags; rock " berms; cofferdanis,;or`otl'et diversion structures should be used where
possible to" prevent excavation" iri''flowing water:
13: Heavy equipment'should'beoperated from thebank ratherthan irk "stream channe_is in
order to= minimize.sedimentatiori and reduce _ "the likelihood of introducing other'; .
pollutants into, streams: _
14: Only clean; sediment -free rock should.be used as temporary fill (causeways); and
sliould,be removed wit hout`excessive.disturbaiice of the natural streaiii bottom when
construction is completed:
15, During subsurface investigations, equip ment'should be inspected_
daily and
maintained to ptevent,contaminatiori ofsurface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic-fluids. or-other toxic materials. "
If corrugated metal pipe arches; reinforced concrete'pipes, or concrete -box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should-be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural ihalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the "base flow barrels) should be "placed on or near stream bankfull or "
floodplaR` bench elevation (similar to Lyorisfield design). These should be
FEB 2 8 2014
trFHiE' 6 osem r —_ _

Bridge Memo Page 3 August 3, 2011 -
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
I utilizing sills on the upstream and. downstream ends to "restrict. or divert, flow to the
base,flow: barrel( "s).'Silled barrels; "should be.filledwith sediment so as not to cause
noxious or "mosquito breeding conditions:: Suffrcientwater depth should be:provided
m the,base flow barrel(s) ,during low flows to accommod ate "fish movement: If, .
culverts are, longer than 40 -5,0 linear feet,; alternating or notched baffles should be
irisfalled.'iri a,maiuierthat mimics existing'st'ream;patterh.- This.should:enhance
aquatic life passage: 1),by depositing -sediments, in the barrel, 2) by ivaintairiing
clianriel depth`and flow regimes `'and_3)' byproviding resting places for is and other
aquatic organisms.= Iri'essence,,hasd'fo* barrels) 'should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel-width without substantial modifications of velocity: ` ,
2. iIf multiple pipes or ;cells. are• used- 'at least one pipe or box should be d'esigried to
rerriain dry during'normal flows "'to" allow "for wrldlife passage. -
.3. Culverts" or pipe's should be situated; aI ' - g tlie• existing channel alighment,;whenever
possible to avoid clianrieliealign =Went, °;Widening;the strearri'charinel tnustbe'avoided.
Sfrearn'chanrielwideriirigat the inlet.o rout let`end of structures typically decreases
water,velo;city'caiisin , :sediriient,depositiou that:requires increasedinaintenance an_d
- disru r, ePas`sag 'e; ts. aquaticlif, .
,
4:' -Ri it sh uld not.be �laced-,in.the active•thalw"e`- channel of p Laced in the'streambedr
ui.a manner that "precludes :a,q atic:life passage. Bioengineering,boulder's;or structures
should,beprofessoiially designed;- sized, and installed. ,
In most cases; we, prefer,the `replacement ofthe:existing structuie "at;the,same location
Wit h r adcl' If r'l iri f '' 1;'a't "ein`orar: detour should' edei ned�and _ . .
o ur' o`ad,c osure s ot..eas b, s g
located to avo!a',wetland iin acts ` niiiiniizethe need',for'clearin and to,'avoid'destabilizin
P , g:_... , , g
stream banks ',If the" structure, Will be on iiew alit ` erif ;tS ld'structizre;should'be reri owed
.,: .,
and tlie, approach, fills removed fro'in ti1e -,100, year •flo.o,dplain: ; "Approach fills should be removed.:
down to t natural ground elevation. `` The-area' should be stabilized' with, grass' and" planted- -with
>; nat'ive. tree`s eces ,.If,the'areareclaimed, "was reviousl wetlands, NCD;OT sliould•'res'tore the
p., pr y..
areato:wetlands ..'_Ifsuccessful; the site °may_bO tuti_lized' as I'm wtiori for the subject project or, -
other, projects, itithewatershed:
P=roject specific "comments:
Bridge Numbef300051 Duplin County SR-1137 over Taylors Creek: We,recommend replacing
this;bridge'with a bridge.. Standard recommendations apply.
Bridge.Number- 300352,Duplin County, SR 1004,over, Outlaws Pond Spillway: We recommend
replacing this bridgdwith abridge. Standard recomineridations apply. .
Bridge Number 300133•,Duplin County SR 1531 over Great Branch: We 'recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard, recommendations apply:
Bridge Number 3003.51 Duplin County SR 1554 over Maxwell Mill Overflow: We recommend
replacing this bridge with abridge. Standard recommendations apply..,
EE8 2 9'2014

Bridge Memo
Page 4' August 3, 2011
Bridge Number 660026 Onslow County NC 50 over Shelter Swainp: We recommend replacing
this. bridge with`a.bridge. ,Standard recommendations apply:
Bridge Number 660209 Onslow, County ,SR -1316 "over Branch of the New River: •This portion of
the -New River is designated as an inland Primary Nursery Area. NCDOT'should follow all •" .
stream `cro "ssing-guideliiies.for anadro`mous fish passage, mp ding an in- wafer: work moratorium
from February. l5-to` September 30. We recomm_ eiid,replacing this bridge with abridge;
,Standard recommendafioris apply:"
Bridge Number 660193 0ns1oW County 9k,13.3l over UT: We recommend,replacing'this bridge
with' a bridge. Standard recomrneridations' apply:
Bridge Number 700215 Pender, County SR 1µ1.04 'over - Buckle Creek: We recommend replacing
this bridge with abridge: Standard recomineridations a' "
pp 1 y', , _
Bridge; Number,700144 Perider County SR 11,02 over Colly:- Creek: ' We recomriierid replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations a> 1"
pP• Y'
' BridgeNumber 810384 Saa ipson' County SR 1475 Oyer Little Coharie Creek:: We recommend
replacing s bridge with a bridge: Standard reconiiiiendations apply.
`Bridge Number 810129 Sampson "County SR 1445 over -Jones Creek:" We recommend r`eplacirig,
this bridge with a bridge:- Standard reco" mmendations:a T' ;
Ppy.'
Bridge Number- 810254 Sainpsor County.SR 1909 "over Turkey Creek: We recommend replacing. "
this bridge With "a bridge. "Stan dard`recommendations apply: ;
Bridge Numb' "e % "810080 Sainpsori County SRS "1'214 over Soiith River: We recommend replacing,'.
this liridgeWit- abridge: Standard recomrriend'ations apply.
Bridge Number 81003,0, Sampson County_SR,19 -43 `over, Stewart Creek: We recommend
replacing this bridge'witfi'abridge. 'Standard recomineridations apply:
Bridge Number 810189 Sampson County" SR' 1636 'over, Coharie Creek: This project area is,
located within an Ecosystem EiiharicementPrograiri (EEP) mitigation °site DOT should
coordinate closely With EEP during:tlie design'aiid'coristruction ofthis project to avoid and `
minimize impacts to, this" conservation' area: , We recomiimrid replacing this bridge with a bridge.
Standard recommendations apply::
If�you,need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
rep. a&m6iIts, please contact me at (919) 528- 9886." Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comindiat on this project.
Mu
FHB, 2 8 2014
I)CM•MMC"

o riW-11HIvIu w1LLJL1t h JrKVI(:�
" Raleigh Field Office'
Post Office ox 33726, .
►+ Raleigh; North 6r61'ina'27636 =3726 „
September 15; 2011
.Patnela R. Williams• • :
North Carolina Department of -Transportation `
Transportation Program M' agement Unit
1595:1VIail ServiceCenter._
;t, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699 -159.5 ,
D "ear Ms. Williams:, '
This letter, is-in res onse to our re' iestfor.coininents from- the U.S.�Fisli and:Wildlife Service
on`the oteiitiai �environinental °effects of the -ro `osed re laceirierit`of several b'rid' es
(. ) p r. p lio p, g.
in ivision`s',i =8;- =These bridgb re`•laceri ents` are art`of the' state= fiirided Year:I IVlaster List seep.'
g p P. , (
attached'truricated'�Iis't The- foliowinig,coimnents j �rovide inf
• ).,• g_ _ _ p, or'niatiori:iri,accordarice;wi%ith
,rovisio is of the Nationai Envi on nentalPolic'� ,.A6t 42 U:S.C..'4332 2 c and�Section 7 of the
�Endarigered Species Actof1973; �asatrierided '(16:IJ;S.C:'.`1,531' =1543
Specific Commenfs'> .
Division 1
Approziiiiately.,1 O; oiit.of the X12 bridges' in.Divisiori 1'occurtivithin`the lioundaries of either:.'
.�: ..
A1ligatoT River I��ational,Wildlife.Refuge''or 1Vlattainuskeet NatioiialNildlif&'P, e . Possible'
g
co:6d& i"
s `with .these brid es� nciude .wildlife ''alori ``riparian areas ,boafer access and the"--", ;
g._. _ passage,, g ..P
use of Refukdja ids. �'; �Tlie' Service - "' laps to'�atterid the November 14 =15 "2011 field sco� in
g , p.. p g
meetings'for the`pi;ojects withiu'Refiige boiztidar es...We request that you schedulethe' `pro ec'ts'
'!
P ., j
that :'are oufside Refuge boundaries last;`as it`iiot necessary for: us to attend those meetings:
Division 2 ..
T1ie,Service does riot have any specific concern`s for any of these projects:. We, do not, plari to
attend'any'of the field scopiiig meetings: ,
Division 3
Tlie- Service does not Have any specific concerns for any of these ptojects: We do not plan to
attend any of the field.scoping,meetings. � .
Division'4�� 2� ;
The- Service agrees with the,NCD_ _ QT,assessment that mussel surveys, are needed for Structure
Numbers 500070 Buse River 500071 Buffalo'Creek 500072 S 00236 (I;ittle f Pr
River); 500240 (Buffalo Creek); 'arid 500282 (Buffalo Creek) in Johns on ounty: "T,
The federally
endangered dwarf wedgeiiiissel (Alasrizidonta heferodon) has either :receiitiy or liistorically_been
fouiid in each of tYe._streams for these.sik'sites: Also, the federally eridangered"Tar River

spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansdna) has recently-been observed in the Little River. At a
minimum, informal'Section 7 consultation. will likelybe.necessary for these'six sites. Depending
upon survey data, and other information to be,obtained; formal Section 7 consultation mayor
may not be necessary. Tlie Service would lke.to'atterd the scheduled ,field scoping meetings' for"
Structure Numbers 500070, 500071, 500072; 500236;, 500240, and 500282 6niY oA ever,'
Jordan.of mystaffis only available on Octoher 13. , We request that you schedule the meetings
for: these_ six project's; on that date only.: We do "not, have any `specific concerns for the other.
projects within Division 4.
Division 5'
,The Service does'not have any ''specific concerns for any of these projects. We do not plan to
attend any of the field scoping meetings.
Division 6
The.Service doesnot have any specific concerns for an y of these projects.We do not plan to
attend an of the field scoping meeting's.
% Division,7.,
The�Servlce a"
grees.with the NCDO.T.assessmentA atmussel surveys are 'needed for Structure, ,
, . ,
"Nigh bers780037 ( Jacob ''sCreek);780071:(RockCreek );780129- (ProngJacob's�Creek) and,'
780218'(Qiiaqua:Creek), n Rocking$am Comity. _These' `ro ects'fall within" the' otential range of
,,. _ P J
` fed erally'endangered Jain es spiriymusse_ f ('leuYOberiau collina)� We u— nderstarid "that a mussel
the:
survey was conducted on'Au� iist25 � 201'1. fo "r °780153' o'ar's Creek), butvve have': t yet
been provided the results:- The',Service' also" agrees that s' eys.should be conducted for"the "
' federally endan angered Roanoke to etch` Percina'Y
,g- , gp" ( ex)'for'Structure Numb , s780037 (Jacob's .
Creek); 780071' (Rocl{ Creek); 780129 (Prong• Jacob's Creek) ,and 780218 Qua "ua Creek in
( . q... ) .
Rockingham County. �, We understaudthat'nsh' surveys were. conducted, in August 2011 for'
780073 (Tb'wn Creek) and 780153: (Hogan's Creek} OJJ gckingliam C,oun , and that informal "
�'
Section 7 consultation is likely needed ,;The- Service-wouM -like to attend the field,'sco in'
meetings scheduled for September`28= 30;.2011,for Structb""Numbers 780037 780071 :780073
780129;1780153 and 780218''only.'� However, Jordan of m sfaff is'unayailable, -for t '
Gary,; . y. hese
dates, .. Tlie S ervice requests that NCDOT pr" ` i' � for= an`alternative meeting date `six
projects; preferably on the same stay. At a ininiiriui ; irifori ial Section 7, consultation is likely,
for `'some, or all, of these 'six projects: We do not have' any 'specific co encotlier projects "
% within Division 7.� . .
Division 8. FAR
The Service agrees with theNCDOT,assessinent that surveys should be conducted for the -
federally endangered.Cape.Fear shiner '(1Votropis;;fn'ekistoch.'olas) at- Struuerturb° 18,0141
(Rocky River) in Chatham County and Structure Numbers 620059 (McLendons Creek) and
620090 (Gavin Creels) " "in Moore,County. Structure Number.18'014i is of particular - concern"
since itis located,a`few miles upstream of designatedcritical habitat for the Cape Fear shiner.
There are tentative plans to au"gmentthe Cape Fear shiner population in the RockyRiver in order
to aid the recovery of the species: - Although this, augmentation would occur downstream in the
designated critical habitat, it is expected that Cabe Fear shiners would utilize available habitat
upstream at and near the location of Structure Number 180141. As another effort at recoverin
the species, there isthe potential that'a dam removal upstream of Structure Number 180141 may'
occur in the future;�thus opening up add "itiorial habitat;for Cape Fear shiners. The Service would

like to attend the scheduled field scoping ineetings for Structure Numbers 180141 and,620059
only. However, Gary Jordan of my- staff is available 'ohly on the October '6, 2011 date:, We
requestthat you schedule these two field meetings consecutivel" on that date onl Y At a
Y .. •
;minimum; informal Section 7 consultation is likely: for: orie'or more of these projects.
The'following Structure Numbers in Randolph County fall within the potential "range `of the
federally ,endangered Scliweinitz's sunflower (H61ianthus schweinitzii): 750002,,750029i
750067;- 750075 and',750400: The Service recommends that surveys for.this species lie=
"completed during the optimal`survey "window`of late "August'= October for these. five b"ridges.• ;
Please note, that due. to. the tiiiie sensitive nature o f these bridge projects; it'i`s'imperafive that.'
Schweinitz's suriflower:'surveys happen very soon` :, Otherwisei the projects`may be delayed due
to having to wait• until the next survey season in 2012.
Ge'neral Comm nts
The Service "recommends the following general conservation measures to avoid or minimize: .
environmental - impacts, to fish and wildlife'resources:
etland;',forest and designated npari_ an'bufPei impacts should be avoided'and minimized
to the -am extent practical '
2. If unavoida$le'wetland or stream impact s'are,proposed,,a plan for. compensatory
rimiti'gation' to offset unavoidable impacts; should bye provided -early in the`plariiimg
process; ;
3: ,Off-,M6 detours`should be used"rather:than construction-of temporary;'on -site bridges.
For projectsre 'uiriri ` `an on =site detoiir,in' wetlands or o 'eri water such detours should be
q g.. P
aligned along;the side`'of tHe`existirig'struc_ture,whieli has the least arid/or.least, quality 'of.
q.. Y
As and.wildlife,haliitat.` Af the completion =of construction; the detour`area should be
entirely removed and the 'iriipacted`areas be' planted with appropriate vegetatiori'
including; trees i lecessary,
4. W1lerever appropriate; construction in, sensitive- are!
's`should occur outside fish spawning
and iiiigratory bird nesting seasons:; Iri waterways that may serve as.travel corridors for
F sh in= waterwork should -bye avoided during moratorium periods associated With, ,
' migration,, 'spawning and'sensitive preadult life stages. The general moratorium period
foranadronious fish is February 15 = June,30;_; .
5. New bridge_ s should•be long enough to allow for sufficient wildlife passage along'str' eam
corridors; -
Best Managei`rieint Practices (BMP) for Construction and Maintenance Activities'' hould
be implemented; .
7: .Bridge designs" should, include provisions for'- roadbed and deck drainage to flow through
a vegetated buffer prior to reaching the affected stream. This buffer should be large
enough to alleviate any potential,effects from run -off of storm water and pollutants;,
FEB 2 2014

8. The bridge desi ns should not alter the natural stream and stream -bank ni prp h lo
gy,o
r
miliedd fish Passage. To the eitefii possible; piers' and bents should be plic6d outside the
banl� -full width'
0 f the stream; and
9 Bridges and approaches should be designed to avoid any fill that will result in damming
or constriction ofthe "c"h'ahn6l6i hood-A' If 'feasible"
p q4i. , spannifig'the flood plain is not
d'plahiportion of t'6 a�pfoddh tdres q
ins -led in &'A`6_q
culverts should. be, rq,pprpe of
Tuncfi6n floodwaters'
's'o'�f't�-efl"-Ood"-'-b'la'inaiidiedii66hi' f
9kyeld cities 0
Withi n the affected arm"
'e§ ih�i all Sec,tioti-,,7(a)(2)-6fthe Endangered Sp'eF-1es`A't­ uir'
Act .�pq action ion agencies (or their
designated non-fed&ral repreiefiiaiives)Jh c'6nsuhaiioii"','(�i`t1i the
SeNice, i
fqd6i__ ly or,�aqiq ou t,by ,
such agencies is not e y,tp jeopardize the''
continued �exls_iei,60- 61 any specie , s.- To assist; you,; a coutity- •
by-66uiAy'li§t of &4erdl,ly " protected Ch ficrth Caro'lin;ia"d inf`6 n'n'atio'li
species known
on their life - Histories d �bitafs c ouhd ort,our wet) page',at
an can b 6` ti
aff6d (i.66 -lik6lyto ddveis6l�'aff&i�br not ikely''
If dete'rn�`ifie that fhq,proposed 'act' - * -' _ , I .
YOU
to advets,61V affect) ;a ii i"' "�',`should' notify (in the
,steO, pqc�O� y ihig office th' pterrni ati.
O,wi, , your
ur,s!47PYs,su�qy-,Oqtiip,d,o,l-o",glesahcl,an')a'nalysi§'ofih6eff6'c'ts"'�'o'-ft'h'6'Abtionon
results, of y6
.jrqlu ' ing consideratio
n of direct;' indirect -and "
-cumulative l C4'pil`
ts, b6f6re
conducting any activities that fnight -af ec yo u d ennin6-
t at thd"propos6d action
a"
wiii"h-""ve-'ii,66f�lect.(i,ei,�pq eqeicla,�q'T,Adydtg6,,dii�ci-�riiid'ir66i,6f�6i)�'n istd'
e species, then
yo _j,.,
U �,,r6,n,ot'i�qplf6d,i6l,66niacilolu'r' offi'&fot, c6neutrened—­1
96rvi 'D appreciates
The, c -the o rium.1y', to cbhirrient"on- ih
PPO is i9ject. If you have any questions ,
j le' ai s-'e' -66 ni
9gur response,, -Mr.- Gary Jordan'at (919) -45 '32
ext.'
SincerelY;
'Pete1836
e amin
!et6
"Field
prvisor,
Attacliniellt'. - ,Truncated Master, List - Divisi ons 1 =8
Electi6iiic, cc:' Bill Biddlec'om'e, US'ACE, Washingf-o'4", NC'
to'ni St'eff6iis, USAC*E;, NC
Brad Shaver; S�k' E­,­ W­ iiininlgtloh',''NG
Eric­Afsm&y6r, b§Aifft Wakd _ ' !­ .'
Forest, NC
Ronnie l',S� ' niih lj
, SA(t,"Wi6fngiofi, NC
Aiidy Wiliiatis'; iJ§AC-
E, Wake Foiestj NC
Travis Wilson, NCV'VRC .-Cre I 6dh I io6 . r, NC
Chris, Militscher, USEPA; Raleigh, NC
FEB 2 8 2014
DCM-mHDcrry

• Design Build
Master List Year 1 -
1'•
; ;:Dare: -. 270003 Bridge #3 over Dee Creek on - US 264 -
Dare:_
270010
Bridge #10 over Pains Bay Canal on'US 264'• `
34
1 '
> ` Dare':`
270013
Bridge #13 over Stumpy Point Bay on US 264
100
"_ :160' :
asquotanF
1',
: , Dare-`
270015
Bridge #15 over Stumpy Point Bay on US 264'
34
118011 " *
lascildotan P
Dare.,.
270016
Bridge #16 over canal'on US 264' '
53
100;• >.
a ' uotanF
k -1.;
;:: H de
470002
Bridge #2 "over Lake Mattamuskeet on'NC 94
29
Hyde
470003
Bridge #3 over Lake Mattamuskeefon NC 94
29
"
1_;
'.-'H de ,-
470005
Brid0#5 over canal u.s. from Rutman Cr. on SR 13
12
>- 165',"
ar- Pamlicc
`; -ti de' -�
470016
Bridge #16 over Lake Mattamuskeetbn NC 94
291"
Hyde,-':
470017
Bridge #17 over Lake MaftamUskeet`on NC 94 '
29
470018
Midge #18 over Lake Matta'muskeet on NC 94, : •.
29
<, :, '; ..: • . ''
s1 "a
'':H 'de..'
470025
Bridge#25-over Burrus Canal on SR 1305- ,.,•.; . ; ...,
52
: ; �> ":100'!:`: ":';:... '`� � =,
ar- Pamlia
2.;'
7-e
080053
Bridge #53;over Pungo River Canalon' =: NC451NC 9
60
:':, '. °" _ "120' /:. "'.* `�` ''';,;
ar- Pamiicr
'=•2:
060182
Bridge #182 over Chicod Creek on SR 1158,
53
110' °:
ar- Pamlia
2;,
060255
Bridge #255 over "Broad Creek Canal'on - SR 1120
160'.
ar- Pamlia
730061
Bridge #61 over Tranters Creek on NC 903
12
185'_:•
ar Pamlia
2•
'• :',,Pitt' '_ -
730067
Bridge #67 "over Fk Little Contentnea Creek on SR 12
87.
160'• `
;Neuse,
2
; ° Pitt: • =' 1730068
Bridge #68 over PINE LOG CREEK on SR 1217 ' ",
53
; 10511
Neuse.'
,•2'..;
°..P.itt'.'
730080
Bridge #80 over, Black Swamp on '. • SR1200" : ' -
52
.. 105' -'
Neuse.
Pitt,", 1730081
Bridge #81,over Little Contentnea Creek on SR 1200
52
',' 90',;
" `Neuse'
730125
Bridge #125'over UT Hunting Run on SR,1565,:
121
'.:. 180'." . ..
6r-'Pairili&
�2 ::
,',Pitt`,;`
730157
Bridge #157 over UT to Tyson Creek ,�on SR 1255 °
36
100, •,
ar= Pamlia
2 ,
J. "Rift`11-
730171
Brid a #171 over Johnson Mill Run on SR 1418.
53
; " " ,•.' ; =., .105' :.
ar= Pamlici
4',
.:`Pltt:a,,•
730176
Bridge' #176 over Swift Creek on,, SR 1122-'
70
,'• 110'- :, :, •; ;;•, -`;
', Neuse"=
ifT
`�_•�`'- ,°�^�, ,��s.'`'� c 1111• F
11''11 , -
<.�
,_3'
runswic
090003
Bridge #3•over Banton Branch on SR,1455 :' a: 37
; "30' -9" X'6;c9; -' °AL ARCH"
Cape Fear -
3:=
r66sMcl
090016
Bridge #16 over Honey Island Swamp-on•NC 211 °'
•53
'r ,';100',_'; .,'
Cumber
' �3?
'hswlcl
090020
Bridge #20 over Honey Island Swamp -on NC 211, _. _•
52
.• 105:• ;:
Lumber'•
',3
h§Wicl
090025
Bridge #25 over Midway Branch/River Swamp on -SR
81
,, 136' -. •'
Lumber.
3',
Bruh6wlcl
Bridge #54 over Hood Creek on;- NC 87. ;• '•'• - _..;:.
'61.
` 110' ,
Ca e'•Eear.
3 _
IBrUhsWlcl
090101
Bridge #101 over Branch Pinch Gut Creek on 5R 140
52
901 ", •• •. "•
Lumber
Bfdrisrivic
090102
Bridge #102 over Pinch Gut Creek on SR` 1401 =' ;
35
, : ,,' 80; '-
Lumber
13
rurisvOcli
090142
Bridge #142 over Hickman Branch on SR 1301.•'.• =;.•
20
,. ". "50'185 ","x54""," ...:,`
`= Lumber,
=•3-
runswic
090169
Bridge #169 over Branch Lockwood Folly -River on S
21
70': ',
Lumber`
3
fungWicli
090200
Bridge #200 over Branch'Junipee Creek on SR;1340
19
_ "50'!22' -3 " xT -3"" AI Box"
L6mber-
,_3 =``
,- Pender
700144
Bridge #144 over Colly, Creek on'•, SR, 1102 `' " ": , '. .
151
' • - ' - 225 : = : <,
Cape' Fear
3 ^;',Pender•
7j�00¢2¢15
Bridge #215 over Buckle. Swamp,Creek.on SR 1104°
92
• '; °; ;; =, :140' -:: - ,'
Ca 'e fear
+
9b"CQU�n1':P
? Uy a ''� My'� _ T -JJ ' C•XrW.,. n33"
- i Pn a. .� .
Johnston
500043
Bridge #43 over Mill Creek 6h,—, SR 1122"•= -, ;
4,,.
Johnston
500056
Bridge #56 over Black Creek on' • US 3011NC 96 ::
210
,.'. 230'.= - ',
Neuse`
4'`
Johnston
500070
Bridge #70 over Neuse River on US 301 . ':
315
; , 325'
: Neuse'
4 :
Johnston
500071
Bridge #71 over Buffalo Creek on NC 96•-
98
•• 130'
Neuse
:'4?•
Johnston
500072
Bridge #72 over Swift Creek on. :,• NC 210
186:
190" '
:.Neuse
4' 'Johnston
500080
Bridge #80 over - Hannah Creek on SR 1159
87
120'
Neuse
:4;
Johnston
500088
Bridge #88 Over East Mingo Creek on SR 1303
151
90'
Cape Fear
"4
Johnston
500129
Bridge #129 over'Little Black Creek -on SR 1006
76
85'_. :•
Neuse
4,�
Johnston
500236
Bridge #236 over Litle River on . SR 1934
160
180'.
Neuse
: °4
Johnston
500240
Bridge #240 over Buffalo Creek on SR 2127
53
100'•
Neuse
4-,
Johnston
500241
Bridge #241 over Long Branch on SR 2127
53
75'.
Neuse '
4a
'Johnston
500282
Bridge #282 over Buffalo Creek on SR 2130
120
145'•
Neuse
4d
Johnston
500327
over i n ree,X k o'y+n'• ,SR 2> 1, 4 1
MJ oc.. caes:f.�
93277ii.
r' d
6
.
1,,Neuur3sF e"^:
1006,[1
.
' `iL .
.�C .: . " I -v
YBdl.• ,'•'.g. i i xe ,C;. .
,3Y
.. ,,,
.
S
, Wake" 910067
Bridge #67 over Bachelor Branch White Oak Creek o
52
'= 85' -
Cape Fear
,5-`
; Wake'
910237
Brid a #237 over Neuse River on SR 2555
35
360'-,
5;
; Wake
910285
Bridge #285 over Terrible, Creek on SR 2751.
70
105'
'5-
° Wake -
910338
Bridge #338 over Kenneth Creek on SR 1100
41
80'
ZCa�6aFear
5
Wake
910363
Bridge #363 over Reedy Br Prong Beaver Creek on
41
85'
5',
Wake
910410
Bridge #410 over Dutchman's Creek on SR 1386
81
80'.
5,
Wake.;
910467
Bridge #467 over Walnut Creek on SR 1348
90
100'
Neuse -
' Wake. ,
910485
Bridge #485 over Echo Creek on SR 2782
31
- 65'
Neuse
yy�5
n *ygr
.�- �`µ.4i01'1�lt
'b
.nYy�•�f::mrci;,��2a•C > "` ",'�i ws$'4}+a: .. ieq�Y,`i w"�h.�gf'
.. -A,t�> F*.C•.d`t'•f�f YM'* =d, k •. +G:�aa�= .1j.•inF2::. . •h -,��•
-
•`'a
.� �"sE,�" '"tar �� �:u.
I`J��•�+.i1:is . .�� �e?�.i��4� •;.
. �r� '7�
.b... :�.Rti'
DICM -1vtRD ` r S '

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use) ,
11- W-0084
- NO PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC PROPERTIES
PRES9&T /AVFkTED, ORM • .•
PROJECT INFORMATI ®N
ProjectN0.- • Str.700144, County: Pender
WBS No: ' . 17BP:3.R.20 Docuirient: PCE or Min. Criteria Checklist
FA,•No:, : ` N/A Funding: ®State' 0, Federal '
Federal (USAGE) Permit Required? ®Yes ' No Permit Type: NWP3 or N WP14
Project Description :, Bridge No. 144,on SR 1102 (Morgan Road)" over Golly Creek is to be ,-replaced in -
kind while malang use of an off site detour. There will be'minor ditch -line impact' ..The "Area of
,P,otential Effects (APE) should be 75'•eithei way frorri`the centerline of the bridge, and 300' from either,
end of the bridge.; Thebridge was originally built, iii' 19 -45, and is in poor condition so it has been •selected
to'be replaced under the, State Funded Bridge Replac'em6& Program = Design =Build Year 1.
SU11lIVIA�2I' OF Fl 1%NwGS. -
The North' Carolina Department of Transportdtiorc (NCDOT) re'viewe`d the subject project and determined:
Historic- Architecture/Land'scapes -
0 Th re are" o National Register- listed or Study;L'isted properties within the project -'s area of potential
effects:
Q =
There, properties less than fifty :year old, which considered to meet Criteria Consideration,G •
within h area of potential effects:-= :
E! 'There are no properties within the project's area_ 'of potential effects: "
0 There•are properties over fifty years,old`withi'ii the area of potential °effects; but they do not meet the
criteria, for�listiiig on the, N ' i Thal Register
lAll properties greater than 50 years, of,age "located' in the• APE have been considered and -all, coinplia_ nce
for: historic architectureJwitli SectionA 06, of the- National Historic Preservatio 2
• - _ _ n Act °and GS 121 =1_ _(a) has• � �
been completed for this "project: "
There, are'no historic 'properties present or affected bythis project. (Attach any notes or docuients as
needed)
Archaeology, .
There: are; no National Register- listed or Study Listed properties within the proj•ect's area of potential .
effects.
El No-, subsurface ardhaeolo% investigations are required, for this project:
®: Subsurface investigatons'did riot'reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
Q Subsurface'iiivestigations'did not reveal'the presence of any'archaeological resources considered eligible
for the National Register.
0, All identified Arcfiaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for-
archaeological resources -with Section 106, of•the National,Historic Preservation Act and GS 121 12(a)
has been completed for -this project.
® There are no historic properties present or affected by this project'. (Attach any notes or documents as
needed)
`7do Histonc Properties Present "form forMinor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Progr �a a n[+ q q
NCDOTArcliaeo logy &HistoricArchitechu•e Groups ! .S 2014
DCM MM Crry

S>1T1 MARY OF CULT'>IT1tA1L RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A map review and site file search was conducted at the ,Office of State Archaeology;(OSA) on Thursday, September,
1, and Friday, September -2, 2611. A comprehensive archaeological survey at this particular bridge location has
never been conducted; however, Ave (5) archaeological sites have been recorded with- in;one (1) "mile °of the 'proposed ;
project although four (4),of those sites are "submerged resources along banks of the Black River..Th6'other•'
remaimng,'archaeological site is located directly north of the proposed project on th'e upland terrace above Colly
Creek: Digital copies- of HPO's inaps_(Point Caswell Quadrangle) 'as .well as the BPOWEB GIS Service
(http: / /gis.ncdcr:gov/hpowebn were reviewed on ThWr d4,' September. l5; 201,1. ,There are no known historic
architectural 'resources located within the `pr'oject area;thaf'may have intact archaeolo'gical'deposits within the "
footprint of the "proposed' project: In addition, topographic- maps, hi sioiic�maps,(&&I ps,website) ITSDA'soil
survey maps; and aerialpfiotographs were'utilized and inspected to'gauge environmental factor's thaf may have
contributed to historic or prehistoric, settleinenf within the project limits, ,and• to assess the.level of modern; slope,
agricultural; hydrological, and other erosive-type disturbances within' and surrounding the archaeological APE.'
Asstaied in the Survey Required Form for this project, "Based, on soils information;, contours; and,tTie presence, of an
a`rchaeological'site on the terrace overlooking Colly Creek on the North side'the south ern` terrace 'of Colly, Creek ;
may have the potent tial for containing intact archaeological materials.. Alth61igh th r ;. y' g" r this
ere currentl` is no desi n fo
wt - particular p`roject,' areas `within the APE can lie written "off based.on the presence of wetlands and inhospitable soils
conditions:' th these area's - removed from the APE, what remains to be surveyed is`the terrace,al -ng the southern •
ed 'e `of Coll 'Creek; whicli', `ears to be relatively level, and wooded at thistime:, It sfiould be``noted.that north of, '
g Y.. PP,
and resunabl outside theAPE; maybe' structures 'associated -with ,Colly 1vlill as'depicted'on the 1912 Pen der
p
- Coun' .Sou Y,. , _ . , ... -,.., . .- . ,
ry, 1 Map..It should also be noted that M6ores ;Creek National Military Park- commemorating the battle site
of a 1776 American- victory over Tory Highland' Scots; is located approximately 3 miles 'Northeast ofthe proposed
project; ';Therefore; an archaeological survey is recommended •for this project.. A;visual inspection of the entire
corridor'sliould be coriducted,first, followed then by archaeological investigations along the soutii'err terrace,
S
overlooking Colly Creek paralleling - SR •1102:, Should the'description oft , s project or, design plans change prior to
co "nstruction; then additional consultation regarding arcnaeology'may be required:"
>. .
Field investigations of the APE were'comppsse _ of a pedestrian survey and subsurface'testing'to locate and assess
potentiahy significant archaeological 'remains that could be`damaged,or d'e'stroyed by the'proposed bri dge '
re lace'ment "ro'ect.; •The 'edestrian surve `;and;sub'surface',testing were.coriducted on the;terraces'adjacent to Bridge' '
1? . P J. P Y
No remains of riiill structure "s or other associated' mill.deposits'were'ob'served North of the projectarea: '
Siibsurfacetestiiig in th"ese'•alluvial settirigs'was acco`inplished through',tlie placement of four.(4) shovel tests; two (2)
in'the,SW'quadrant and two "(2) in the SE-quadrAht; with`a 30= m`intervaL ,Testing did not'occur within the NW, or "the
-:
NE'quadiants,based on the presence of standing watefd id Hverine; swamp' forest: - The subsurface tests were placed
aloe ` the outer ROW for SR 1102 ory an Road on "the fi'rsf terrace overlooking Colly Creek.' W
thin the ROW,
there, is'a buried fiber optic line located aboutnirie+feet off the edge of pavement within both the NE' and SE
quadrants: There is a small unnariied tributary of Colly Creekiinn;ng parallel to SR 1 "iii the, SW quadrant; the
:.
puadrant is sub ected to a eat deal of floodmwithin that parti -c ar;quadrant and further;sugg"ests that the SW
resence of which ex lams the`soil condihoii
qL j gr g.; There is,a difference of at least 10' in'elevatiori between the levels
of the road; surface and both'southern'quadrants. Overall; no,archae'ological deposits were identified within the
proposed APE: Thus, no, archaeological -sites were identified; and'no fiurtler archaeological work- is,recommended
prior to`construction.' A_findirlg of "no historic properties" is; considered appropriate in association with, this bridge
replacement'p'oject: Shoul' 6 description of this project';or design plans change prior to consduction;�then
additional consultation regarding archaeology'niay be',required.
Shovel Test Pit Discussion (see map, for spatial" reference):'
STP,1: '0- 27cmbs, 10YR ­2'A SA SI, loose root inat;`27- 366nnbs, 2.5YR 2.5%4 SA; 36- 53cmbs, 7�.5YR 5/,6 SA; 53- 766nibs,
10YR 6/3' Coarse SA: Edge of terrace; 'sparsely Wooded.. Moisture increased with depth. No cultural material.
STP 2i 0'- 90cmbs, 10YR 2/1. Loose root mat at top, with the amount of sand and moisture increasing with depth. Unnamed
tributary located very close, which may explain'the mucky nature, of the soils through outthe 'shovel test, No cultural material.
STP,3: 0= 11cmbs, 10YR 2/1 SA, loose root mat; 11- 32cmbs, 2.5YR 2.5/4 SA; 32- 85cmbs, 10YR 6/3 Coarse SA. Edge' of -
terrace; sparsely wooded. Moisture increased with depth. No cultural material.
`YJo Historic Properties Present" form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Prograrimigtic gne rye� ry d
NCDOTArchaeology & Historic Architecture Groups
i�F MM NIRD MY

STP 4: 0-26cmbs, 10YR 2/1 SA, loose root mat; 26-40cmbs, 2.5YR 2.5/4 SA; 40-58cmbs, 10YR 6/3 SA. No cultural
material.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Figures, Photos
Signed:
J )Vd-z�
Cultural Resources
NCDOT
Novernber'I 7. 2011
Date
IV
R>_',., W
&W vs
05,
L
-1— qv2 zl.
-�YL . ? 3= :' A� -- I OW
C/
Z�
�4 tar
Q-
RuS?
pk4
Q
14M
I-- WIM"
W
f
A
z�p
17-;- pwg' f,
NEW
MR, P-
NINE W�
--W
0
R;M
-.R
Vs 3
v, q
gg
-gg
F*-' -5 -7
011M, 41ZVI�
- Z��" �'
BM A.,
F 15•M
:JN-
al
Figure 1: Point Caswell, N.C. (USGS 1983).
FEB 2 8 2014
DC1MHDCr1v-
'?Vo Historic Properties Present " form forMinor Transpoilation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOTArchaeology & Historic Architectui-e Groups

Photo 1: Southeast Quadrant, looking North.
Photo 2: Southwest Quadrant, looking North.
FEB 2 8 2094
T6
iu'V >•� d�a�aa+ Yxw n
'?Jo Historic Properties Present "form forMinor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 ProgrmnruuaticAgi•eement.
NCDOTArchaeologv & Historic Architecture Gi oups

rhoto 3: Northwest yuadrant, looking North.
rnoto +:iNoruieasi yuaarant, iooxtng Norm.
FEB 2 8 20144
DCM -Mff DCITY
'No Histonc Properties Present "form forMinorTransportahon Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Pi-ogi-anunaticAgreen:erit.
NCDOTArchaeologv & Historic Architecture Groups

e.+n^ .. 1 �. �:�x�'

Replace Bridge, No. 144 over Colly< iCreek oi,SR 1102,
SUMMARY, OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Briefd2SCrlpllOn,'Of YeVlell? aCt 4V es, resuitS',Of review; 6 7d cohc,hisibns ;
Review'of HPO'giiad, maps, relevant background repoi=ts; historic''designations roster; and inde'x6s%was
. {, ..;
Uri' ertaken on September 8; 2011: Based on this review; there ` w e r e no`exsting NR,SL, LD,;DE; ar SS
properties in the Area of,Potential'Effects (APE). Aerial " }ioto ra "hs aiid HP GIS iidicates'tfiere are'no
P - gt P ,
structures in'tlie'APE of tfi'e bridge replacement project ; Survey' Site number PD.126 Bethlehem Baptist .
z Church`is located more'than-2000 noitliwest of_the "tiridge'on "NC 210; well outside the: roject:APE:
p.
Brief Ezplanatio�z of why °the `av "ailable ilifor»catio_npr'ov des;a reliable b "asis for reasoiiably pr, edreting
that there are ho, unidentified historic properties, in e,APE :
Using HPO GI&website'and. Google, Street viewpro 'ide_ reliable, information regarding the st'iucfures in
g
the AP.E: ,These combined utilities -are considered val�d'for the purposes'of determining the likeGli'ood of .
historic iesources lie n- g present: _
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attaclied� Mans
�B 2 2014
"No Sunny Required "form for,, Minor Transporlairn'n- P,rryecta'us Qualified m the 2007programmauc Agreemeni.
NCDDT Archueology,c4 Hrrror ic irchirech r e Groups
�c 3 1D On?
Date "

Commander 431 Crawford Street
U.S. Departmeht of United States Coast Guard Portsffiduth, Va, 23704-5004
St6ff �S�mbol:r'
Ho'mi' eil'a"n4S66uriiy Fifth, Coast Guard'District J8pb
P�666:`(757)'�39EA58�
Fa
'k: (757)--398-6334
unitdd Stbti?,§ Email: Terrance.KKnow1es@uscg:mi1
Cmw Guard
16593
17 JAN 2014
Ms. Christy fjuff, P.1 '.,
,Klofth Carolina Department 'of Transportation
Tra-fispor'-fa-ti-o-ri - Program ManageiW it
ei
1595-Mail Service C16ritOr''
Ralcih, NC 2 7699 =1595
Dear Ms, Hu'ff
T I his , is I in response to your letterdated ApH1,22-, 201 requesting approva 1, for thy,or9ppsed
-6d brid across Q61.1 �t l6n PeiWr.C,*ty NC.
cotistiuctior�ret)laddiiieiif,,6 -theWrkdrr R, _y� �Tml,111­,-
Th e Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1982 exempts- bridge' projects from Coast Guard Bridge
p e-hiiii'sWhen,die bridge project crosses 'non -tidal waters which are not used, susceptible to' use III
their 6- to use by, reasonable improver oveni I ent as a rne�aiis to transport
naf0fail'&ohdition, or s0keptib]
e- n firmed such condiii6h§, for this site.
tate,cbri-ifriere', Your letter ah'd later co up. to
inters
this, this project is exempt and will,i io( reqp ire a Cqast Guard Bridge Permit;
This,detekiiiinati6r is for this location and brbbo , sed c'o 'n'strti6tibii/'replaceiii"etit',of the above,
n i 6 n't, 6 ned bridge dAh,di, sYA1id or­f
five
his left
ee. if the
d 6 es iiot coinirience withi6,tnis time penod, yqqmust witact this office for re Affifn4idd of this
s
adtlibrizatiori. Fuitll'er bridge projects along flid-samd'W6terways will have to be independently-
evaluated before they may ,b6, considered f'6r t1iis deteri
Tl' Bridge P6ipit is not required does not relieve you of U16
ie fact that a Coast Guard g_ _q
responsibility- f c with the require ients of any other, Federal- State, or local agency
Of coinplian e n
who may have jurisdiction over any d_§p&i of project.
Sincerely,
WAVERLY W. REG.OAY, J ti
Bridge Program ir , 'r
a i i a_tVj
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
Copy: CG Sector North Carolina, Waterways Managen'lent
FEB 2 9 2014
DCM.MFfDCrrY

ISO,
!�s�����'����1�����•� �� fir? ff
Express Design - Build Bridge Program
Division 3
VICINITY MAP
an,�
Bridge 144
h Ibtq w Kur. Be.cD
FEB 2 2014 ".'�" " "" Fender County
henBeah,O.MIIa�M GspellBe.ch Q North Carolina
SHEET 1
DCMMHD CITY
NC DOT
;:.,,'?�;n�..�Da•�:
Division of Highways
Express Design - Build Bridge Program
Division 3
VICINITY MAP
an,�
Bridge 144
h Ibtq w Kur. Be.cD
FEB 2 2014 ".'�" " "" Fender County
henBeah,O.MIIa�M GspellBe.ch Q North Carolina
SHEET 1
DCMMHD CITY

Pender Bridge 144 Replacement Project
Aerial Photo Map
Pender County
• Z b Z Ul
375 750 1,500 3,000
Feet
DCM MHD crf

Pender Bridge 144 Replacement Project
Topo Map
Pender Co6nty
isms,
env
awe,
-.7N
Mum
k
MR - '1
..
0
-2
Eli q
kk
AP f
NNW
ills
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
r
375 750 1,511 2,251 3,111
0
o

- � -
-•, . - - ' - tea.,.
O
O
LL
.z
cl) , O
V "nyo
Leo
a
00
e �- -.
0 LL
`SUS '��,< - N'•_ __ ..
OO�OJ,
Id
of W-
a
a
�
z ,
QH
'
:w �` "mac
LU
N'' L�
7 r
!7 A,
Lu-
:m
-
_
y
l
-
9
w
I =
F
•'COLLY, CREEK
s-
- � -
-•, . - - ' - tea.,.
O
O
LL
.z
cl) , O
V "nyo
D.
00
e �- -.
0 LL
`SUS '��,< - N'•_ __ ..
OO�OJ,
LL
of W-
a
z ,
QH
'
:w �` "mac
LU
N'' L�
7 r
a
114 A
COO
U x
w
Eq
LU
F ^.
0-
y.
O, cr
W¢1Y2
Q.�
h - 3ami
„o o m
. d�s0°•, zVz •�i .O h
'YLLOV° �1 A •�
��Z�7 ^I '� o. � �•�, 4
, h
o W 'o
�M �: �J�1 0, pl
a,0
O O'O •
O W W
t e }
iA-
1/1 W
x x-'
� r
r . S cn nC �
' p w.
o
O
O
LL
.z
cl) , O
V "nyo
D.
00
e �- -.
0 LL
`SUS '��,< - N'•_ __ ..
OO�OJ,
LL
of W-
a
z ,
QH
'
:w �` "mac
LU
N'' L�
7 r
!7 A,
Lu-
-
_
y
l
, ^ - -
I =
F
•'COLLY, CREEK
M'
a
uj
//ti
-
•�
_ -1 - _
w
Eq
LU
F ^.
0-
y.
O, cr
W¢1Y2
Q.�
h - 3ami
„o o m
. d�s0°•, zVz •�i .O h
'YLLOV° �1 A •�
��Z�7 ^I '� o. � �•�, 4
, h
o W 'o
�M �: �J�1 0, pl
a,0
O O'O •
O W W
t e }
iA-
1/1 W
x x-'
� r
r . S cn nC �
' p w.
O
o
O
O
LL
.z
cl) , O
V "nyo
D.
00
e �- -.
0 LL
`SUS '��,< - N'•_ __ ..
OO�OJ,
LL
of W-
a
z ,
O
O
O
V "nyo
W co N
e �- -.
o
`SUS '��,< - N'•_ __ ..
Z
LL
of W-
z ,
QH
'
:w �` "mac
LU
O
O
O
Z
IQ
LU
Lu-
J

E5 Ln >
c)
>
Z M.,
-0 -JD lip
Z P;P.-
tE z' Z '7). �-.'32. m
m. C .0
Ev
T, 11
A �- , 11! i't -
z P,
<D 4
:<
A.
(A 0
o
c 'z *Z '2 mz;
A, :6
gg 7-
:0
a
2't m
in o< F=
­Z:
Z
Arg 10:
0
-I -1_. :Z n: :
> 0
cm
E-Eld
I �:. :;
>
z T
Ll
J.;
zpb ­Lt
:o z
z
C
f 'o
:0
0�4
0 ;:4
J_ ­J
S LO
T
t
Z 21 R
L
0�
's :80
o -o F, 6,
.,-j— tl'tk
8R p
0 _9 :9 1? : _� :_� , E;
j8 i2
TF
.;m d -F1
`z
2 �J
F7
12,
> :Z :�' 2 ill . ,-1 1 " j I ' ! 1-j"I" '. 4 1-1
S
.0 01
:0 Z
0
x z
OM ^ G
.w N A�'
A
ji
>: .0 F
-m . R
:g" : �f j
p :0 :p
I_" T,
d
o
F,
7—i
!T T
ti
00��­N V V :N
z . . . . .
A.
- -
�4+
- — --
----------
-7
C)
IT-All —1-i-
St—M P!r%y AM$— Str­ 1- NO...OA. w. N.. 5F.-.700144 P-i-t mo.. �WtNR'?A.POF
to q p
. . . . .
.... . ...
K
'o
F
A� - ------ -----
j,
-M
1): 0 E5
�;' yl ,i:'— ;- >_�.V1 ,_'.I -'', Vii:.
Hi
■
IS
t 1:
q 10.
tit +1-
tR
.. •
zo
z.. ZN mw" 70D
>
:> �7-
-c >z
1_ -4
o
2t
c;
R
o ip
--z
o.o
0
N;
5
Z!; -'r_t
U
0
c o
N
Z- os
R —No- L IJEE =R
ry
Tt
t

W,
I
'0-
M,
Ln- Ln. -Ln. U-) Ln: Ln Ln, Ln- Ln, 7
C�
M
fa
to
0
0 tA
-T -1
-.Zzr" 77, Ln In c -E
fu a
-0 CL
V.0' -AD -Ln 0
4a
41 L)
10
0' 0
41
0
0-
0�
0 c
%
0 m
3:
-.7
W 4 in
Ict %t tt- _C
0 0--
CL a)
a) cL
C- fu 'fu
41
M rte'_. M, U :,
J--
CL
w-"'
V) _Ln -I, Tn oo, 7 0:-,. LA, 0, '.2
. .. .. too 41
OOL
M_ 11 -r-
" 0�
0) ?:. I r 4,,
4 C_.
14-
Ln
0,
0'
C,
C:
_0 -0�
Af a)
Ai 'fu
'41 >
W
4�
41
0
(V
0,
O 41
-V 'Ln tW'
. 4 — -1 c a)
u 01'
0
o -0 "0
"DO "M Ln
41
tn - =_ _, a __ C: : -
Ln :r4
:0
-::r in Ln 0
-0 0
CL_
fu 0
0, 0'
'0,
0,
_
-Lq 77; m- :Ln of TF r*- 0
0'_ 0*,
0
41-
Ln C
fu tto 4"
cn
0
-0
0 0
Q_,o fu
0 0
X_
L_ 11 CD .r
4 >
r> r- r-�', AD, Lr) U') Lf) _r-I Ln 0 , 'L_ _(D 70,
0'
,- 41
_0 0, 0
.0
I 0--,, -fu 41
-0 7a),
a) t10 __U 4a
d)
-0 41- 41
U,
X_ _C
4-
0
0 "0
7@
CL o. 0
4-, �,(J), 4a: 0 01
(A 0
m 0
'LU 4-,' L)
41 (U
fu -0, -0
Ln (3), La -�:T 0) tA _ - - - I
_0
41
(D tLo
C: 4-J
-cr) _0
V)_ r u
o V m , _
b4o 0
z 0
41 -0
0­1
41
v _CL
cn
AR O�'
`4� -Ln' 0) 0: 0'- '41 - 0 CL
4, " C: r4
o ,E A)-, I - _01�
aL - - _0� 41, � � ; , = - I , >,- i I"- - -"1 0) ",
0 o
'tA
tn —0, , :, (1)
tA
E' In - 0
:_Ol 0 0 4�
0" C 0-
LL Ca;_�IIQ) l_ In Q_ CL 41
01"
_CL 41
0
0
- 4
,CL -C in
0 En
tn
_0
Ln, Ln Ln W" LC, - -m
,Ln tA (A
;rl 1p, IN - E'- -c +j 0
0 r7:, -J FA,
"CL
41. - (n -CU "
>
, -- o--: -: . E-.
yi:
L-:,- CL 0
CL, 0
4� '0
4-j-
0.-
a 0,
41 A)
0' ='"70
ui- tA
_C 10
VY
CL
m o,
0
'S
r
a-
LU r
(A 0 CL
Ln,
"o
Vy oof �'O, (14 LI) (A -M
+ + (D_ �l 1.
�w
O. 'o
O' 44,:rq+ N. _a 0,- ,
-LM,
0
C"i 9
CA:
C9 ) I
cm lli�
LLJ
E
ac
m
E
m
0
E
E
0
E 0
C 41
0
E
(U
41
An
V)
0
'41 .0
41 (L) S_
CL
M
_-a 0
0 4�
E -0
ra
.E 0
0
0
fu
0
0.
E
0
41-
O
0
41 fa
0
-0.
41'
-0
0'
__j
V)
0
0-
CL:
c
fu,
4�
Ln
0
4— 0
0
r: m
0 V)
N.
4� -C
0-
0
CC
CIC,
v.
0—
-41 -

64 -J
,poft,
cr
r �
y� o '
H
O
�d-
z
b'
o -
;-3
o
z
C
0
m
Q
co

I lllr
K.\ W,d,'..lt..\CAOD\PSH\700144-EC-p.h04A.dgn
Fkol- 8%17/99
M
;u
<
hj — — — — m 0 z
to 0 0 > 0"
�4 Ln K) 0 + C
z)- o
000,
0 Vi 0 Ui 0 Lrl z =".a-
C) a
r) z
co
c
M,
r CU
0 00 000 C)
(D zr) M
/x <
4,
0 0 CD 0
> >
o
�j -1�- 0 -Pk� v,) cj
=M
m ca
3:0 (A --
r- m I- >
c) 10, > -n m co Z
IM Z M r-
K3 Jj W
m 220 >
o 0, �j Lrl%,O Z
m C, 0000000 C)
Eel
J, >
0-0 m z 0
m
>
C::E
r) Ln
m
m
I V)
--P-ZO
m (7)
m
%
20 C iii
M z
it
7m z a
m
m
y
o
X 0
S�-CdoC/)
7
-n
m
r
----- --------- -0
'I - -- -,
J-
--- -- - - ------ -- -------
CA
X
. .......
-I, W
W,
0�1 Ul
moom-no=- a--I MMOZ-oz
mo>z U) U)
z --j L 0
(on 1w,
> 03 r—
z ;DOMZM ;;o > -0 Z 70 Z -V OD
c Z
m M
m m V)
=00 x +
Omcoz >--Io
- a < > o
M 00O3:zmmmzn--oLn(n M
> a Z I > C
7q ()
ZC m Ln > -7 Ln
c -1
MG) i>Nx 0
> >
U) V) 0 o P= z --1 (.0 —1 z
0 z
Cn m 0 r-
U
m �Zoz 0 M
V; Z 0
z>x m > C)
-I > M z
>
<
-Zmzo
4- Z
MH m -n
z
M, 0 5, A
Z� 0 -1 m
> z z
>mn dIlx mm In > --I o p
.z > r ZM A- 25
7. m 0 z
- r
r Z
O m >
m -n
gZr

i
r? I
ksD
C/)
C)" 0
-4
Er
CM
+
0
ol
I
F,
V
t
2�
0'
N
CD'CZ:l
4
CD
CD
0
-'(D CD
=
CR,
-CD
cr
M,
m
CD
CD
Z
C)
M,
0
r
CD
0
0
CD:
C�
0)
N. (D'
-3
CL-
CL
0
CD
0
(D'
C=)
(D'
=3
J
CD
C
(D' m
00 'm
X.
>
t4
z
0
0
CD-5, 0), cn,
0
>
ID
"o

a
m
,
to
:L,
tj
tj
CA
cn,
p\pq-�y/y -
-
- -
- - - - - - - '- Fes+'% , ' per+ ' . �. '
'_ ♦♦`nJ
tom'
r - r- -C�:7. 'z
r
-
• �� a o;,
".ci
vj.:
rA
m
,

u■ ■
oo■
o
■
■
ou
■ ■
a
a ___
:e6 ?o93�e9eB
e:e5
=9�
?�e9eM101
IM MIl-Im9EIl9C
.Cge
gill AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAA AA - A aAAA