20220330 Ver 1_PJD Request-2 Brighton MtPleasant_20220301

MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC.
. www.MogMit.com
MMI -Charlotte ΛАЉЍΜ ЎАЏΏЊЊЊЊ
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
MMI -Raleigh ΛВЊВΜ ЎЎЏΏББЍЎ

29 July 2021

Steve Kichefsky
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006

Subject: Revised PJD Request package for Brighton Park Subdivision site, Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus Co NC

Dear Steve,

Thank you for meeting with MMI staff at the above-referenced site on July 15. I have revised the PJD
Request package (previously submitted on May 19) to reflect the revisions that you approved during our
field verification visit. MMI environmental scientists first delineated, flagged, and mapped the streams and
wetlands on the property on April 13-14.

Brighton Park is an 85 acre property at the corner of NC-49 and NC-73 in Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus County,
NC. The project site comprises an undeveloped 78 acre parcel (fallow fields and woodland) plus three
single-family parcels to the northeast totaling 7 acres. Cabarrus County parcel numbers are # 566-056-4096,
# 566-056-6785, # 566-056-8647, and # 566-056-9681. It is in the Dutch Buffalo Creek sub-basin of the
Yadkin-PeeDee River basin, USGS HUC # 03040105-0304. The easiest access is from a short gravel driveway
along NC-49 on the north side of the property across from the intersection with Moose Rd (35.4093, -
80.4601).

Features Potentially Subject to Clean Water Act Regulation

McAllister Creek (Stream E) is a perennial stream 10 to 20 ft wide flowing southward for approximately
2,874 feet along the western edge of the property.

Stream D is an unnamed intermittent tributary originating in a seep on the west-central portion of the site
and flowing westward for approximately 475 feet into McAllister Creek.

Wetland B is a 0.35 acre forested headwater seep originating on the south-central portion of the site and
flowing southward. It drains into an off-site intermittent channel (Stream F), which in turn flows southward
into Wetland C, a 0.31 acre forested floodplain depression. Most of Wetland C is also off site;
approximately 0.05 acre of wetland C is on the subject property. The attached Preliminary JD map includes
these off-site stream and wetland reaches to demonstrate hydrologic connectivity.

Other Features Determined Not Subject to Clean Water Act Regulation

There are two drainageways on the northwest portion of the site draining westward to McAllister Creek
and two additional drainageways on the east side of the site draining eastward to an unnamed tributary of

Environmental Field Studies Wetland & Stream Delineation 404-401 Permits Mitigation Plans & Banking

MOGENSEN MITIGATION INC.

Adams Creek. Based on the July field verification visit you agreed that these drainageways are ephemeral
and not subject to Section 404 regulation. They have been removed from the attached figures.

The following attachments are included in support of this PJD Request:

1) Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields Form
2) JD Request Form and Appendix 2 PJD Form
3) Agent authorization form signed by the landowner, ECB., LLC (Emmitt and Clint Black)
4) USGS Topographic Quadrangle map: Mount Pleasant. NC
5) USDA Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, Sheet 3 (1988)
6) Parcel Map (from Cabarrus County GIS)
7) Detailed topographic map of property (from Latham-Walters Engineering)
8) PJD Map: Potential Waters of the US
9) Wetland, Upland and Stream sample points map
10) DWR stream determination ID forms
11) Wetland and upland delineation data forms

The project design team will revise their preliminary site plan to minimize stream and wetland impacts
based on these revised maps. If impacts are unavoidable, we will submit a PCN at the appropriate time.

Sincerely,

Gerald Pottern, Senior Biologist
Mogensen Mitigation Inc.
104 East Chestnut Ave
Wake Forest NC 27587
------------------------------------
919-556-8845 office
919-649-6506 mobile
[e-mail]

cc: Ken Foster, Ridgeline Corporation
Mitch Latham, Latham-Walters Engineering
William Niblock, Niblock Development
www.MogMit.com
Page | 2

Qsfmjnjobsz!PSN!Ebub!Fousz!Gjfmet!gps!Ofx!Bdujpot!
TBX!†!CFHJO!EBUF!\\Sfdfjwfe!Ebuf^;!
!
Qspkfdu!Obnf
!Csjhiupo!QbslTvcejwjtjpo-NpvouQmfbtbou-OD
Xpsl!Uzqf;!!!QsjwbufJotujuvujpobm!Hpwfsonfou!Dpnnfsdjbm!
Qspkfdu!Eftdsjqujpo!0!Qvsqptf
Ipvtjohtvcejwjtjpopo96bdsft-xftupgOD.84boeOD.5:joufstfdujpo/
Qspqfsuz!Pxofs!0!Bqqmjdbou
pxofs;FDC-MMD)Fnnjuu'DmjouCmbdl*/bqqmjdbou;OjcmpdlEfwfmpqnfou
Bhfou!0!Dpotvmubo
HfsbmeQpuufso-NphfotfoNjujhbujpoJod-215FDiftuovuBwf-XblfGpsftuOD
38698
Sfmbufe!Bdujpo!JE!Ovncfs)t*
Qspkfdu!Mpdbujpo!.!Dppsejobuft
7:28OD.84-NpvouQmfbtbou-OD39235/Mbu0Mpo>46/51:4-.91/5712)qbsljohbudpsofspg
NpptfSpbeboeOD.84*/
Qspkfdu!Mpdbujpo!.!Uby!Qbsdfm!JE
677.167.51:7-677.167.7896-677.167.9758-677.167.:792/
Qspkfdu!Mpdbujpo!†!Dpvouz
Dbcbssvt
Qspkfdu!Mpdbujpo!†!Ofbsftu!Nvojdjqbmjuz!ps!Upxo!;
NpvouQmfbtou
Qspkfdu!Jogpsnbujpo!†!Ofbsftu!Xbufscpez
NdBmmjtufsDsffl
14151216.1415)EvudiCvggbmpDsffl*
Bvuipsj{bujpo;!!Tfdujpo!21!Tfdujpo!515!Tfdujpo!21!'!515!
Sfhvmbupsz!Bdujpo!Uzqf;!
Tuboebse!Qfsnju!!Qsf.Bqqmjdbujpo!Sfrvftu!
Obujpoxjef!Qfsnju!$!!Vobvuipsj{fe!
Sfhjpobm!Hfofsbm!Qfsnju!$!!Dpnqmjbodf
Kvsjtejdujpobm!Efufsnjobujpo!Sfrvftu!!!
Sfwjtfe31321539

Thisformis intended for use byanyone requesting a jurisdictionaldetermination (JD)from the
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,WilmingtonDistrict(Corps).Please include all supporting
information, asdescribedwithineachcategory,withyourrequest.Youmay submit your request
via mail,electronic mail,or facsimile.Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of thecounty in which the propertyis located. A currentlist ofproject managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or bycontactingany of the fieldofficeslistedbelow. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by aCorps project manager.
ASHEVILLE& CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
WASHINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
FIELDOFFICES
USArmyCorpsof Engineers
USArmyCorpsofEngineers
2407WestFifthStreet
151PattonAvenue,Room208
Washington,NorthCarolina27889
Asheville,NorthCarolina28801-5006
GeneralNumber:[phone]
GeneralNumber:[phone]
FaxNumber:[phone]
FaxNumber:[phone]
WILMINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
RALEIGHREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
USArmyCorpsofEngineers
USArmyCorpsofEngineers
69DarlingtonAvenue
3331HeritageTradeDrive,Suite105
Wilmington,NorthCarolina28403
WakeForest,NorthCarolina27587
GeneralNumber:910-251-4633
GeneralNumber:[phone]
FaxNumber:[phone]
FaxNumber:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
Allrequestorsmustcomplete PartsA, B,C,D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTSANDAGENCIES:Ifyouare requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or youragency, please note the specific submittal requirementsinPart H.
NOTE ONPART D – PROPERTYOWNERAUTHORIZATION:Please be awarethat
allJD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceedwiththedetermination,whichmayinclude inspection of the property when
necessary.Thisformmust be signedby the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ONPART D - NCDOTREQUESTS:Propertyownerauthorization/notificationfor
JDrequestsassociatedwithNorthCarolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projectswill beconducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDAPROGRAMPARTICIPANTS:A Corps approved or preliminaryJD
may not be validfor the wetland conservation provisions of the FoodSecurityAct of
1985.Ifyou or your tenant areUSDA Programparticipants, or anticipate participationin
USDA programs,you should alsorequest a certifiedwetlanddeterminationfrom the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Page 1
Version:May2017

A.PARCELINFORMATION
6917NC-73plus3parcelseast
Street Address: _______________________________________________
Mt.Pleasant,NC28124
City,State: _______________________________________________
Cabarrus
County:
566056-4096,-6785,-8647,-9681
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B.REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name:GeraldPottern,MogensenMitigationInc
104EChestnutAve
MailingAddress:
WakeForestNC27587
_________________________________________
919-556-8845,919-649-6506cell
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
[e-mail]
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
1
I aman Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
InterestedBuyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other,pleaseexplain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
2
C.PROPERTYOWNERINFORMATION
ECB,LLC.Emmitt&ClintBlack
Name:
12416KluttzRoad
MailingAddress:
GoldHill,NC28071
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1
MustprovidecompletedAgentAuthorizationForm/Letter.
2
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Page 2
Version:May2017

3,4
D.PROPERTYACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the WilmingtonDistrict,U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers(Corps) to enter upon the property hereindescribedfor the purpose of conducting on-
siteinvestigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the CleanWater Act and/or Section 10 of the RiversandHarborsAct of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the propertyidentifiedherein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
GeraldPottern
Print Name
5
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent
17May2021
Date
GeraldPottern(agentauthorizationletterattached)
Signature
E.REASON FOR JD REQUEST:(Check as manyas applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid alljurisdictionalaquaticresourcesunderCorpsauthority.
Iintendtoconstruct/develop a projectorperformactivitiesonthisparcelwhichmay
requireauthorizationfromtheCorps,andtheJDwould beusedtoavoidandminimize
impactstojurisdictionalaquaticresourcesandasaninitialstepin a futurepermitting
process.
I intendtoconstruct/develop a projectorperformactivitiesonthisparcelwhichmay
requireauthorizationfromtheCorps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
Iintendtoconstruct/develop a projectorperformactivities in a navigable water of the
U.S.which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5
Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Page 3
Version:May2017

F.JURISDICTIONALDETERMINATION(JD) TYPE (SelectOne)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminaryJDfor the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDsare sufficient as thebasis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requestedat any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide anapprovedJDfor the property identifiedherein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination(AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the UnitedStates” or “navigable waters of the United
States”are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDsare sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable(33 C.F.R. 331.2).The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website.A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G.ALLREQUESTS
Map of PropertyorProjectArea.ThisMapmust clearlydepict the boundaries of the
review area.
85
Size of Property or ReviewArea acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) isclearly physically marked on the site.
Page 4
Version:May2017

H.REQUESTSFROMCONSULTANTS
35.4093
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
-80.4601
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
6
reviewed and approved).
North Arrow
Graphical Scale
Boundary of Review Area
Date
Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Formor tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed WetlandDetermination Data Formsfor appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6
Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Page 5
Version:May2017

Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determinationform
7
PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Formand include the
Aquatic Resource Table
8
AJDs,please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGSTopographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. NationalWetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previousdelineationmaps,LIDARmaps,FEMA floodplainmaps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7
www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8
Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
PrincipalPurpose:Theinformationthatyouprovide will beusedinevaluatingyourrequestto determine
whetherthereareany aquatic resources within the projectareasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referencedabove.
RoutineUses:Thisinformationmaybeshared with theDepartmentof Justice andotherfederal,state,andlocal
governmentagencies,and the public,andmaybemade available aspartof a public notice asrequiredbyfederal
law.Yournameandproperty location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded inthe
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website
andontheHeadquartersUSAGEwebsite.
Disclosure:Submissionofrequestedinformation is voluntary;however,ifinformation is notprovided, the
requestforanAJDcannotbeevaluatednorcananAJDbeissued.
Page 6
Version:May2017

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONALDETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
A.REPORTCOMPLETIONDATE FORPJD:
GeraldPottern,104EChestnutAve,WakeForestNC27587
B.NAMEANDADDRESSOFPERSONREQUESTINGPJD:
C.DISTRICTOFFICE,FILENAME,ANDNUMBER:
D.PROJECTLOCATION(S)ANDBACKGROUNDINFORMATION:
(USETHETABLEBELOW TODOCUMENTMULTIPLEAQUATIC RESOURCESAND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENTSITES)
State: County/parish/borough:City:
NCCabarrusMountPleasant
Center coordinates of site (lat/longindegreedecimalformat):
Lat.: 35.4093 -80.4601 Long.:
UniversalTransverseMercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
McAllisterCreek
E.REVIEWPERFORMEDFORSITEEVALUATION(CHECKALLTHATAPPLY):
Office (Desk)Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount TypeofaquaticGeographic authority
number(decimal (decimal of aquaticresourceresource (i.e., wetland to which the aquatic
degrees)degrees)inreviewarea vs. non-wetland
resource ͻ may be ͼ
(acreage and linear waters)
subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable)
404 or Section 10/404)
35.4037-80.4607
B0.35acwetland404
-80.4598
35.4052
C0.05acwetland404
35.4064-80.4621
D475ftstream404
-80.4622
35.4091
E2874ftstream404

1)TheCorpsofEngineersbelievesthattheremaybejurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD isherebyadvisedofhisorheroption
torequestandobtainanapproved JD (AJD)for that review areabased on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2)Inany circumstance whereapermitapplicantobtainsanindividualpermit,ora
Nationwide General Permit (NWP)or othergeneralpermitverificationrequiring“pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requestsverificationfora non-reportingNWPor
othergeneralpermit,andthe permitapplicanthasnotrequestedan AJD for the
activity, the permitapplicantisherebymadeawarethat: (1)thepermitapplicanthas
electedto seek a permit authorizationbasedonaPJD,whichdoesnot makean
officialdeterminationofjurisdictionalaquatic resources; (2)theapplicanthasthe
optiontorequestan AJD beforeacceptingthetermsandconditionsofthepermit
authorization,and thatbasinga permitauthorizationonan AJD couldpossiblyresult
inlesscompensatorymitigationbeingrequiredordifferentspecialconditions;(3)the
applicanthastherighttorequestanindividualpermitratherthanacceptingtheterms
andconditionsoftheNWPorother general permitauthorization;(4)theapplicantcan
acceptapermitauthorizationandtherebyagreetocomplywithallthetermsand
conditionsofthatpermit,includingwhatevermitigationrequirementstheCorpshas
determinedtobenecessary;(5)undertaking anyactivityinrelianceuponthesubject
permitauthorizationwithoutrequesting an AJD constitutestheapplicant’sacceptance
oftheuseofthe PJD;(6)acceptinga permitauthorization(e.g.,signinga proffered
individualpermit)orundertakinganyactivityinrelianceonanyformofCorps permit
authorizationbasedonaPJD constitutesagreementthatall aquatic resourcesin the
review areaaffectedinanywaybythatactivity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waivesanychallengeto suchjurisdictioninanyadministrativeor judicial compliance
or enforcement action,orinanyadministrativeappealor in any Federal court;and (7)
whethertheapplicantelectstouseeitheran AJDoraPJD,theJD willbeprocessed
assoonaspracticable. Further,an AJD,aprofferedindividualpermit(andallterms
andconditionscontained therein), or individualpermitdenialcanbeadministratively
appealedpursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,duringanadministrativeappeal,it
becomesappropriateto make anofficial determinationwhethergeographic
jurisdictionexistsoveraquatic resources in the review area, ortoprovideanofficial
delineationofjurisdictional aquatic resources in thereview area, theCorpswill
providean AJD toaccomplishthat result, as soon as is practicable. ThisPJD finds
that there “maybe” watersoftheU.S.and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. onthesubjectreview area, andidentifiesallaquaticfeatures in thereview
areathatcouldbeaffectedbytheproposedactivity,basedonthefollowing
information:

SUPPORTINGDATA.Datareviewedfor PJD (check all that apply)
Checkeditemsshouldbeincludedinsubjectfile. Appropriately reference sources
belowwhereindicated for all checkeditems:
Maps,plans,plotsorplatsubmittedbyoronbehalfofthePJD requestor:
Topographicmap,existingsiteconditions
Map:________________.
Datasheetsprepared/submittedby or on behalf of thePJD requestor.
Officeconcurswithdata sheets/delineationreport.
Officedoesnotconcurwithdatasheets/delineationreport.Rationale: _______.
DatasheetspreparedbytheCorps:________.
Corpsnavigablewaters’study:____________.
03040105-0304LowerDutchBuffaloCr
U.S.GeologicalSurveyHydrologicAtlas:________.
USGS NHD data.
USGS8and12digitHUCmaps.
Mount Pleasant,NC
U.S.GeologicalSurveymap(s).Citescale&quadname:_________.
CabarrusCo1988
NaturalResourcesConservationServiceSoilSurvey.Citation: __________.
Nationalwetlandsinventorymap(s).Citename:________.
State/localwetlandinventory map(s):____________.
FEMA/FIRM maps:________________.
598(S)to604(N)
100-yearFloodplainElevationis:____.(NationalGeodeticVerticalDatumof 1929)
GoogleEarth-April2013
Photographs:Aerial(Name&Date):______.
Other(Name&Date):______.
or
Previous determination(s).Fileno.anddateofresponseletter:__________.
Otherinformation(pleasespecify): ______________.
IMPORTANTNOTE:Theinformationrecordedonthisformhasnotnecessarily
beenverifiedbytheCorpsandshouldnotberelieduponforlater jurisdictional
determinations.
Digitally signed by Gerald Pottern
Gerald Pottern
Date: 2021.05.18 09:11:40 -04'00'
SignatureanddateofSignatureanddateof
Regulatory staff memberpersonrequesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED,unlessobtaining
1
thesignatureisimpracticable)
1
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestordoes not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

USGS TOPOGRAHIC QUADRANGLE -- Brighton Park Subdivision Site, Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus County NC

D = Vance sandy loam.
-
D = Enon sandy loam; MeD = Mecklenburg loam; VaB
-
Brighton Park Subdivision Site, Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus County NC
= Cecil sandy clay loam; CuB = Cullen clay loam; EnB

SOIL MAPPING CODES:
USDA Ch = Chewacla loam; CcD

Brighton Park Subdivision Site, Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus County NC

--
PARCEL MAP

Walters Engineering, Huntersville NC.
-
m Latham
EXISTNG CONDITIONS: fro

-
SITE TOPOGRAPHY

Steve
verified by
field

Features
.
, Cabarrus County NC
13 maps (adjacent to stream D) is removed.
bdivision
April
Su
the
shown
Brighton Park
etland A
W
.
Waters of the US:
15, 2021
, on July
Jurisdictional
JD Map of Potential
Army Corps of Engineers
Preliminary Kichefsky,

.

, 13 April 2021
, Cabarrus County NC
ubdivision
S
Brighton Park
jurisdictional:
-
Other drainage features examined and determined to be non

Wetland, Upland, and Stream Sample Points -- 13 April 2021
Stream G (Ephem): 35.4092, -80.4619 wetland A (flag GB-36): 35.4064, -80.4627
Stream H (Ephem): 35.4080, -80.4630 upland A (flag GB-36): 35.4063, -80.4624
Stream D (Intermit): 35.4063, -80.4618 wetland B (flag GF-5-16): 35.4052, -80.4598
Stream F (Intermit): 35.4042, -80.4601 upland B (flag GF-5-16): 35.4053, -80.4599
Stream E: Perennial; no data form wetland C (flag GD-3): 35.4037, -80.4607

NC Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form version 4.1 August 2010
Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins
Project & County: Brighton Park subdiv
Soil Survey: Cabarrus, 1988
Date: 13 April 2021
Topo Quad: Mount Pleasant
Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus Co
Evaluator: Gerald Pottern Stream/ Site: Ephem-G, 40 ft S of NC-73 Latitude: 35.4092
Mogensen Mitigation \\ RJGA UT McAllister Cr flags GB-2-7 Longitude: -80.4619
Total Points: 17.75
Soil map stream: No
Stream Determination (circle one):
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Topo quad stream: No

Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Score
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =____12_____)
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
2
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
2
5. Active/ relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual

B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _____5____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
0

C. Biology (Subtotal = ___0.75______)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
.75
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.

Notes / Sketch:

Begins as roadside ditch along south edge of NC-73, flowing west. Lowermost 200 ft becomes stream-
like before joining McAllister Creek. Rainfall in preceding 10 days (4/04 to 4/13) = 0.2 inch. Rainfall
in preceding 20 days (3/25 to 4/13) = 2.9 inches, based on average of 3 nearest CoCoRaHs gauges.

NC Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form version 4.1 August 2010
Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins
Project & County: Brighton Park subdiv
Soil Survey: Cabarrus, 1988
Date: 13 April 2021
Topo Quad: Mount Pleasant
Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus Co
Evaluator: Gerald Pottern Stream/ Site: Ephem-H, 500 ft S of NC-73 Latitude: 35.4080
Mogensen Mitigation \\ RJGA UT McAllister flags GB 19-20 Longitude: -80.4630
Total Points: 13.75
Soil map stream: No
Stream Determination (circle one):
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Topo quad stream: No

Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Score
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =____8.0_____)
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
1
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
1
5. Active/ relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual

B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _____3.0____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
0

C. Biology (Subtotal = ___2.75______)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
0.75
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.

Notes / Sketch:

Channelized ravine on northwest portion of site, flows west from middle of project site to McAllister
Creek. Isolated pools of standing water and minimal flow in lowermost 50 ft; dry channel bed above.
Rainfall in preceding 10 days (4/04 to 4/13) = 0.2 inch. Rainfall in preceding 20 days (3/25 to 4/13) =
2.9 inches, based on average of 3 nearest CoCoRaHs gauges.

NC Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form version 4.1 August 2010
Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins
Project & County: Brighton Park subdiv
Soil Survey: Cabarrus, 1988
Date: 13 April 2021
Topo Quad: Mount Pleasant
Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus Co
Evaluator: Gerald Pottern Stream/ Site: Stream-D, 1100 ft S of NC-73 Latitude: 35.4063
Mogensen Mitigation \\ RJGA UT McAllister flags GC-1-5 Longitude: -80.4618
Total Points: 25.75
Soil map stream: No
Stream Determination (circle one):
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Topo quad stream: No

Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Score
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =____14.5_____)
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
1
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
1
5. Active/ relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
2
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual

B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _____6.5____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
2
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
0

C. Biology (Subtotal = ___4.75______)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
0.75
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.

Notes / Sketch:

Natural ravine flows west into wetland between flags GB-43 and GB-44, then to McAllister Creek.
Flowing or standing water in most of bed until it enters wetland. Rainfall in preceding 10 days (4/04 to
4/13) = 0.2 inch. Rainfall in preceding 20 days (3/25 to 4/13) = 2.9 inches, based on average of 3
nearest CoCoRaHs gauges.

NC Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form version 4.1 August 2010
Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins
Project & County: Brighton Park subdiv
Soil Survey: Cabarrus, 1988
Date: 13 April 2021
Topo Quad: Mount Pleasant
Mount Pleasant, Cabarrus Co
Evaluator: Gerald Pottern Stream/ Site: Stream-F, 200 ft N of NC-49 Latitude: 35.4042
Mogensen Mitigation \\ RJGA UT McAllister flags GE 1-10 Longitude: -80.4601
Total Points: 26.25
Soil map stream: No
Stream Determination (circle one):
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Topo quad stream: No

Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Score
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =____13.0_____)
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
1
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
1
5. Active/ relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
2
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual

B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _____8.5____)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
3

C. Biology (Subtotal = ___5.25______)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
0.75
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.

Notes / Sketch:

Natural ravine on south-central portion of site, flows southwest from wetland GF down to wetland GD
between flags GD-9 and GD-10, then to roadside ditch along NC-49 and then west to McAllister
Creek. Flowing or standing water in approximately 50% of bed between the upstream and downstream
wetlands. Rainfall in preceding 10 days (4/04 to 4/13) = 0.2 inch. Rainfall in preceding 20 days (3/25
to 4/13) = 2.9 inches, based on average of 3 nearest CoCoRaHs gauges.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Project/Site:Brighton Park subdivision, Mount PleasantCity/County: CabarrusSampling Date:13 Apr 21
Applicant/Owner: ECB, LLC & Niblock DevelopmentState:NCSampling Point:GB-36-U
tpvuipgtusfbnE
Investigator(s): Gerald Pottern, Mogensen Mitigation Inc.Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplainLocal relief (concave, convex, none): concaveSlope (%):< 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):LRR P, MLRA 136Lat: 35.4063Long: -80.4624Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA = Chewacla + EnD = EnonNWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?YesXNo(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed?YesXNo
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologynaturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?YesXNoIs the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesxNowithin a Wetland?YesNoX
Wetland Hydrology Present?YesNoX

Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Thin Muck Surface (C7)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Other (Explain in Remarks)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?YesNoXDepth (inches):
Water Table Present?YesNoXDepth (inches):
Saturation Present?YesXNoDepth (inches):12Wetland Hydrology Present?YesNoX
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

VEGETATION (Four Strata)Sampling Point:GB-36-U
Absolute Dominant Indicator
41gffu
Tree Stratum(Plot size:)% CoverSpecies?StatusDominance Test worksheet:
1.Liquidambar styraciflua15YesFAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.Acer rubrum15YesFACThat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:8(A)
3.Fraxinus pennsylvanica10NoFACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.Carpinus caroliniana10NoFACSpecies Across All Strata:13(B)
5.Pinus taeda15YesFAC
Percent of Dominant Species
6.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:61.5%(A/B)
7.Prevalence Index worksheet:
65=Total CoverTotal % Cover of:Multiply by:
50% of total cover:3320% of total cover:13OBL species10x 1 =10
41gffu
Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:)FACW species15x 2 =30
1.Carpinus caroliniana10YesFACFAC species110x 3 =330
2.Ligustrum sinense15YesFACUFACU species80x 4 =320
3.Rosa multiflora10YesFACUUPL species0x 5 =0
4.Acer rubrum10YesFACColumn Totals:215(A)690(B)
5.Ulmus americana5NoFACWPrevalence Index = B/A =3.21
6.Ilex opaca5NoFACUHydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.X2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
9.
1
4 - Morphological Adaptations(Provide supporting
55=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
50% of total cover:2820% of total cover:11
1
41gffu
Herb Stratum(Plot size:)Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1
1.Carex crinita10NoOBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.Lonicera japonica20YesFACUpresent, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.Claytonia virginica5NoFACDefinitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.Podophyllum peltatum10NoFACU
Tree
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.Parthenocissus quinquefolia10NoFACU
height.
6.Microstegium vimineum20YesFAC
7.
Sapling/Shrub
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
8.
(1 m) tall.
9.
10.Herb
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
75=Total CoverWoody Vine
height.
50% of total cover:3820% of total cover:15
41gffu
Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:)
1.Toxicodendron radicans5YesFAC
2.Parthenocissus quinquefolia5YesFACU
3.Lonicera japonica5YesFACU
4.Vitis rotundifolia5YesFAC
5.
Hydrophytic
20=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:1020% of total cover:4Present?YesXNo
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

SOIL Sampling Point:GB-36-U
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
DepthMatrixRedox Features
12
(inches)Color (moist)%Color (moist)%TypeLocTextureRemarks
0-47.5YR 4/3100Loamy/Clayey
4-87.5YR 3/39010YR 4/410CPL/MLoamy/Clayey
8-1610YR 4/49510YR 4/25CMLoamy/ClayeyDistinct redox concentrations
12
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
3
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histosol (A1)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
3
Sandy Redox (S5)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present?YesxNo
Remarks:
Fe/Mn masses
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Project/Site:Brighton Park subdivision, Mount PleasantCity/County: CabarrusSampling Date:13 Apr 21
Applicant/Owner: ECB, LLC & Niblock DevelopmentState:NCSampling Point:GF-16-W
xjuijoxfumboeC
Investigator(s): Gerald Pottern, Mogensen Mitigation Inc.Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): headwater seepLocal relief (concave, convex, none): concaveSlope (%):2-4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):LRR P, MLRA 136Lat: 35.4052Long: -80.4598Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: VaD = Vance sandy loamNWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?YesXNo(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed?YesXNo
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologynaturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?YesXNoIs the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesxNowithin a Wetland?YesXNo
Wetland Hydrology Present?YesXNo

Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)True Aquatic Plants (B14)XSparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
XHigh Water Table (A2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)XDrainage Patterns (B10)
XSaturation (A3)XOxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)XCrayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Thin Muck Surface (C7)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Other (Explain in Remarks)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?YesNoXDepth (inches):
Water Table Present?YesXNoDepth (inches):6
Saturation Present?YesXNoDepth (inches):2Wetland Hydrology Present?YesXNo
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

VEGETATION (Four Strata)Sampling Point:GF-16-W
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum(Plot size:30 ft)% CoverSpecies?StatusDominance Test worksheet:
1.Liquidambar styraciflua10YesFAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.Acer rubrum10YesFACThat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:12(A)
3.Fraxinus pennsylvanica10YesFACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.Carpinus caroliniana10YesFACSpecies Across All Strata:19(B)
5.Carya cordiformis15YesFACU
Percent of Dominant Species
6.Nyssa sylvatica10YesFACThat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:63.2%(A/B)
7.Prevalence Index worksheet:
65=Total CoverTotal % Cover of:Multiply by:
50% of total cover:3320% of total cover:13OBL species10x 1 =10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:30 ft)FACW species40x 2 =80
1.Carpinus caroliniana10YesFACFAC species75x 3 =225
2.Fraxinus pennsylvanica10YesFACWFACU species80x 4 =320
3.Carya cordiformis20YesFACUUPL species10x 5 =50
4.Acer rubrum10YesFACColumn Totals:215(A)685(B)
5.Ulmus americana10YesFACWPrevalence Index = B/A =3.19
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.X2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
9.
1
4 - Morphological Adaptations(Provide supporting
60=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
50% of total cover:3020% of total cover:12
1
Herb Stratum(Plot size:30 ft)Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1
1.Carex crinita10YesOBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.Lonicera japonica20YesFACUpresent, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.Parthenocissus quinquefolia15YesFACUDefinitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.Ranunculus abortivus5NoFACW
Tree
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.Impatiens capensis5NoFACW
height.
6.Microstegium vimineum5NoFAC
7.Stellaria media10YesUPL
Sapling/Shrub
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
8.
(1 m) tall.
9.
10.Herb
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
70=Total CoverWoody Vine
height.
50% of total cover:3520% of total cover:14
Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:30 ft)
1.Toxicodendron radicans5YesFAC
2.Parthenocissus quinquefolia5YesFACU
3.Lonicera japonica5YesFACU
4.Campsis radicans5YesFAC
5.
Hydrophytic
20=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:1020% of total cover:4Present?YesXNo
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

SOIL Sampling Point:GF-16-W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
DepthMatrixRedox Features
12
(inches)Color (moist)%Color (moist)%TypeLocTextureRemarks
0-210YR 3/1100Loamy/Clayey
2-410YR 4/2100Loamy/ClayeyFe-Mn masses
4-710YR 5/19510YR 4/45CPL/MLoamy/ClayeyDistinct redox concentrations
7-1610YR 5/29510YR 4/45CPL/MLoamy/ClayeyDistinct redox concentrations
12
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
3
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histosol (A1)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)XDepleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
3
Sandy Redox (S5)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present?YesxNo
Remarks:
Fe/Mn masses
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Project/Site:Brighton Park subdivision, Mount PleasantCity/County: CabarrusSampling Date:13 Apr 21
Applicant/Owner: ECB, LLC & Niblock DevelopmentState:NCSampling Point:GF-16-U
xftupgxfumboeC
Investigator(s): Gerald Pottern, Mogensen Mitigation Inc.Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): headwater seepLocal relief (concave, convex, none): concaveSlope (%):2-4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):LRR P, MLRA 136Lat: 35.4053Long: -80.4599Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: VaD = Vance sandy loamNWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?YesXNo(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed?YesXNo
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologynaturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?YesNoXIs the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesNoXwithin a Wetland?YesNoX
Wetland Hydrology Present?YesXNo

Remarks:
Water Table Present at <12 inches, but early in growing season, and veg and soils indicators suggest non-wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Drainage Patterns (B10)
XSaturation (A3)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Thin Muck Surface (C7)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Other (Explain in Remarks)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?YesNoXDepth (inches):
Water Table Present?YesNoXDepth (inches):
Saturation Present?YesXNoDepth (inches):10Wetland Hydrology Present?YesNo
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Water Table Present at <12 inches, but early in growing season.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

VEGETATION (Four Strata)Sampling Point:GF-16-U
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum(Plot size:30 ft)% CoverSpecies?StatusDominance Test worksheet:
1.Liquidambar styraciflua15YesFAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.Acer rubrum10NoFACThat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:4(A)
3.Fraxinus pennsylvanica10NoFACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.Carpinus caroliniana10NoFACSpecies Across All Strata:10(B)
5.Carya cordiformis20YesFACU
Percent of Dominant Species
6.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:40.0%(A/B)
7.Prevalence Index worksheet:
65=Total CoverTotal % Cover of:Multiply by:
50% of total cover:3320% of total cover:13OBL species0x 1 =0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:30 ft)FACW species30x 2 =60
1.Carpinus caroliniana10NoFACFAC species80x 3 =240
2.Fraxinus pennsylvanica10NoFACWFACU species85x 4 =340
3.Carya cordiformis20YesFACUUPL species10x 5 =50
4.Acer rubrum20YesFACColumn Totals:205(A)690(B)
5.Prevalence Index = B/A =3.37
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
9.
1
4 - Morphological Adaptations(Provide supporting
60=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
50% of total cover:3020% of total cover:12
1
Herb Stratum(Plot size:30 ft)Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1
1.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.Lonicera japonica20YesFACUpresent, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.Parthenocissus quinquefolia15YesFACUDefinitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.Ranunculus abortivus5NoFACW
Tree
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.Carex lupuliformis5NoFACW
height.
6.Microstegium vimineum5NoFAC
7.Stellaria media10NoUPL
Sapling/Shrub
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
8.
(1 m) tall.
9.
10.Herb
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
60=Total CoverWoody Vine
height.
50% of total cover:3020% of total cover:12
Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:30 ft)
1.Toxicodendron radicans5YesFAC
2.Parthenocissus quinquefolia5YesFACU
3.Lonicera japonica5YesFACU
4.Campsis radicans5YesFAC
5.
Hydrophytic
20=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:1020% of total cover:4Present?YesNoX
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

SOIL Sampling Point:GF-16-U
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
DepthMatrixRedox Features
12
(inches)Color (moist)%Color (moist)%TypeLocTextureRemarks
0-210YR 3/1100Loamy/Clayey
2-610YR 4/2100Loamy/Clayey
6-1610YR 5/2100Loamy/Clayey
12
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
3
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histosol (A1)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
3
Sandy Redox (S5)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present?YesNoX
Remarks:
Fe/Mn masses
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
Project/Site:Brighton Park subdivision, Mount PleasantCity/County: CabarrusSampling Date:13 Apr 21
Applicant/Owner: ECB, LLC & Niblock DevelopmentState:NCSampling Point:GD-3-W
xjuijoxfumboeD
Investigator(s): Gerald Pottern, Mogensen Mitigation Inc.Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain depressionLocal relief (concave, convex, none): concaveSlope (%):< 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):LRR P, MLRA 136Lat: 35.4037Long: -80.4607Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: VaB = Vance sandy loamNWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?YesXNo(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed?YesXNo
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrologynaturally problematic?(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?YesXNoIs the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesxNowithin a Wetland?YesXNo
Wetland Hydrology Present?YesXNo

Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
XHigh Water Table (A2)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Drainage Patterns (B10)
XSaturation (A3)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)Thin Muck Surface (C7)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Other (Explain in Remarks)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?YesNoXDepth (inches):
Water Table Present?YesXNoDepth (inches):6
Saturation Present?YesXNoDepth (inches):2Wetland Hydrology Present?YesXNo
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

VEGETATION (Four Strata)Sampling Point:GD-3-W
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum(Plot size:30)% CoverSpecies?StatusDominance Test worksheet:
1.Liquidambar styraciflua15YesFAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.Acer rubrum20YesFACThat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:6(A)
3.Fraxinus pennsylvanica10NoFACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.Carpinus caroliniana10NoFACSpecies Across All Strata:10(B)
5.Nyssa sylvatica10NoFAC
Percent of Dominant Species
6.That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:60.0%(A/B)
7.Prevalence Index worksheet:
65=Total CoverTotal % Cover of:Multiply by:
50% of total cover:3320% of total cover:13OBL species30x 1 =30
Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:30)FACW species30x 2 =60
1.Carpinus caroliniana10YesFACFAC species95x 3 =285
2.Ligustrum sinense15YesFACUFACU species45x 4 =180
3.Carya ovata5NoFACUUPL species0x 5 =0
4.Acer rubrum10YesFACColumn Totals:200(A)555(B)
5.Ulmus americana5NoFACWPrevalence Index = B/A =2.78
6.Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.X2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
9.X
1
4 - Morphological Adaptations(Provide supporting
45=Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
50% of total cover:2320% of total cover:9
1
Herb Stratum(Plot size:30)Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1
1.Carex crinita30YesOBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.Lonicera japonica15YesFACUpresent, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.Claytonia virginica5NoFACDefinitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.Ranunculus abortivus5NoFACW
Tree
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.Impatiens capensis10NoFACW
height.
6.Microstegium vimineum10NoFAC
7.
Sapling/Shrub
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
8.
(1 m) tall.
9.
10.Herb
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
75=Total CoverWoody Vine
height.
50% of total cover:3820% of total cover:15
Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:30)
1.Toxicodendron radicans5YesFAC
2.Parthenocissus quinquefolia5YesFACU
3.Lonicera japonica5YesFACU
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:820% of total cover:3Present?YesXNo
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

SOIL Sampling Point:GD-3-W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
DepthMatrixRedox Features
12
(inches)Color (moist)%Color (moist)%TypeLocTextureRemarks
0-25YR 3/1100Loamy/Clayey
2-37.5YR 4/2907.5YR 6/410CPL/MLoamy/ClayeyFe-Mn masses
3-67.5YR 5/2707.5YR 3/430CMLoamy/ClayeyDistinct redox concentrations
6-127.5YR 5/28010YR 4/620CMLoamy/ClayeyProminent redox concentrations
12
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
3
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histosol (A1)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)xPiedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)XDepleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Red Parent Material (F21)
XDepleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Redox Depressions (F8)Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
3
Sandy Redox (S5)Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6)Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present?YesxNo
Remarks:
Fe/Mn masses
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018