HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140305 Ver 1_Application_20140408STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT L. MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
April 08, 2014
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ATTN: Mr. John Thomas
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Modification Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13 and 33 and
additional information for a Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the
replacement of Bridge No. 38 over Muddy Creek on SR 1493 (Frye Bridge
Road) in Davidson County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1493(2); Division 9;
TIP No. B-4741
Debit $240.00 from WBS Element 38514.1.1
Please see enclosed modified copies of the Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) form, stormwater
management plan and permit drawings for the above mentioned project. For impact totals,
please see the PCN. This requested modification is in response to needed causeways for the
construction of the new bridge and removal of existing bents from the current structure.
The proposed let date for the project is December 16, 2014 with a review date of October 28,
2014. However, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available.
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT website at
https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx, under Quick Links>
Permit Applications. A copy of the CE is also available at the above website address under Quick
Links> Environmental Documents.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Jason Dilday at jldilday(a�ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6111.
Sincerely,
Richard W.\Iancock, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TELEPHONE: 919-707-6000
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT FAX: 919-212-5785
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
WEBSITE:NCOOT. GOV
LOCATION:
CENTURY CENTER, BUILDING B
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
Section 10 Permit
�I Section 404 Permit ❑
lb. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 33 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
V Yes • No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check all that apply):
— Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
/1 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes I No
❑ Yes 0 No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes // No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes 0 No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Replacement of Bridge 38 over Muddy Creek on SR 1493 (Frye Bridge Road)
2b. County:
Davidson
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Clemmons
2d. Subdivision name:
not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
B-4741
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
not applicable
3d. Street address:
1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.:
(919) 707-6111
3g. Fax no.:
(919) 212-5785
3h. Email address:
jldilday@ncdot.gov
1
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent
❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
2
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
not applicable
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.976361 Longitude: 80.339033
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
6.6 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Muddy Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Residential and Developed Land
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
0.0 acre
property:
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
600 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a nine span, 270-foot bridge with a four span, 285-foot bridge on the existing alignment
with an off -site detour. The new bridge will be built downstream of the existing bridge which will allow traffic to be
maintained on the existing bridge until the new bridge and associated roadway approaches are completed. Causeways
will be used for construction of the new bridge and removal of bents from the current structure. Standard road building
equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
❑ No ❑Unknown
I Yes
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑Preliminary
/1 Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): James Pflaum (NCDOT)
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Approved JD by John Thomas (USACE) issued 12/20/2007, expired 12/20/2012.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes L No ❑Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes a No
6b. If yes, explain.
3
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections
❑ Wetlands
❑ Open Waters
were completed below
for your project (check all that apply):
Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
Pond Construction
0
❑
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404, other)
2f.
Area of impact
(acres)
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T
Utility Impacts
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact length
(linear feet)
Bank
Stabilization
Muddy Creek
�1 PER
❑Corps
100
60
Site 1 /1 P ❑ T
❑ INT
ka DWQ
Temp.
Dewatering
UT to Muddy
Creek
❑ PER
�/ Corps
1
10
Site 2 ❑ P II T
/1 INT
8DWQ
Causeway
(New Bridge)
Muddy Creek
►1 PER
II Corps
100
44
Site 3 ❑ P /1 T
❑ INT
/1 DWQ
Causeway
(Existing
Bridge)
Muddy Creek
100
26
PER
/1 Corps
Site 4 ❑ P I1 T
❑ INT
/1 DWQ
Site 5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
Site 6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
60 Perm
80 Temp
3i. Comments: Temporary stream impact to UT to Muddy Creek is for temporary dewatering where grading will occur to direct
stormwater.
4
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0 Permanent
0 Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavat
ed
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
5
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse
❑ Catawba
❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other: Jordan
❑ Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
B1 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
0
6i. Comments:
6
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts
See Stormwater Management Plan. The existing 9 span bridge will be replaced
will be constructed parallel to the existing bridge which will allow traffic to be
proposed bridge will have three piers that are aligned so as not to be placed
utilize existing outfalls and ditches when possible. Newly designed ditches
velocities. Rip rap pads and preformed scour holes were used at pipe outlets.
the creek. Deck drains were outleted to rip rap dissipator pads.
in designing project.
with a 4 span structure. The new bridge
maintained on the existing bridge. The
in the water. Drainage was designed to
were designed to produce non -erosive
Deck drains were not placed to outlet over
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts
Best Management Practices for Surface Waters will be used during all phases
through construction techniques.
of construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters
of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes
II No
❑ DWQ
■ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
7
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes II No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
Zone 2
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
8
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes I No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Project not within a buffered basin.
❑ Yes /1 No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
I Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
0 DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
not applicable
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Phase II
❑NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
• Coastal counties
• HQW
■ ORW
• Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No NA
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
I Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
/1 Yes ❑ No
9
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
�I Yes ❑ No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
/1 Yes ❑ No
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
Yes ❑ No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
❑ Yes I1 No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes /1 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
❑ Yes
1/ No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
No
Yes ❑
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
�1 Yes /1
No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
N.C. Natural Heritage Heritage Program database; USFWS-Raleigh Field Office website; biological surveys for protected
species listed for Davidson County, which include the bog turtle and Schweinitz's sunflower. All species received a
Biological Conclusion of "No Effect". No survey was required for bog turtle. Habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower exists, but
a survey conducted of the study area on 10/1/2012 resulted in no specimens being found.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ►1
No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS County Index
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes //
No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NEPA Documentation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
No
Yes ❑
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps
Richard W. Hancock, P.E.
py.
DateI/s
-�
"'Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Ap Ilcant/Agent s Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
11
H ighway North Carolina Department of Transportation
StOt t71wdtCP Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN °.:
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Project/TIP No.: B-4741 County(ies): Davidson Page 1 of 3
General Project Information
Project No.:
B-4741
Project Type: Bridge Replacement
Date: 1/25/2014
NCDOT Contact:
Bill Zerman, PE
Contractor / Designer:
Walter Roberts, PE
Address:
NCDOT Hydraulics Unit
1590 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Address:
The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
1001 Wade Avenue Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27605
Phone:
919-707-6700
Phone:
919-866-4400
Email:
bzerman@ncdot.gov
Email:
wroberts@louisberger.com
City/Town:
Clemmons
County(ies):
Davidson
River Basin(s):
Yadkin -Pee Dee
CAMA County?
No
Primary Receiving Water:
Muddy Creek
NCDWQ Stream Index No.:
12-94-(0.5)
NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water
Primary:
Class C
Supplemental:
Other Stream Classification:
None
303(d) Impairments:
None
Buffer Rules in Effect
N/A
Project Description
Project Length (lin. Miles or feet):
0.303 mi.
Surrounding Land Use:
rural, low residential, farmland
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area (ac.)
1.52 ac.
1.24 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
2-11' lanes with 6' shoulders having 4' paved and 2' earth.
2-12' lanes with 2' shoulders.
Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 5600
Existing: 2300
General Project Narrative:
Bridge #38 over Muddy Creek on SR 1493 (Frye Bridge Road) was deamed structurally deficient and is being replaced with a new structure. The existing 9 span concrete
bridge is being replaced with a 4 span 39" concrete box beam structure. The new bridge will be constructed parallel to the existing bridge on the dwonstream side which will
allow traffic to be maintained on the existing bridge until the new bridge and associated roadway approaches can be completed. The proposed bridge will have three piers and
will span the creek, eliminating the placement of a pier in the water thus greatly reducing scour potetial and debris potential as compared to the existing bridge. The existing
structure has eight piers with one pier residing in the center of the creek. The drainage was designed to utilize as many existing outfalls and existing ditches as possible.
Newly constructed lateral and cut ditches were designed to produce non -erosive velocities. Rip rap outlet pads and preformed scour holes were used at pipe outlet locations
to reduce velocity and promote sheet flow. Deck drains were placed on the proposed structure to control spread but were not outleted over the creek. The deck drains were
outleted onto rip rap dissipator pads away from the creek to avoid direct discharge into surface waters.
References
uui
Highway North Carolina Department of Transportation '°°x"
Stormwater
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN .`" °
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Project/TIP No.: B-4741 County(ies): Davidson Page 2 of 3
Project Environmental Summary
Surface Water Impacts
Sheet
No.
Station
(From / To)
Feature
Impacted
Water / Wetland /
Buffer Type
Receiving Surface
Water Name
NRTR Map
ID
NCDWQ Stream
Index
NCDWQ Surface
Water Classification
303(d)
Impairments
Type of
Impact
Existing
SCM
Proposed
SCM
4/5
L 20+76
Stream
Perennial
Muddy Creek
12-94-(0.5)
C
None
Stabilization
L 21+70
4/5
L 24+62
Stream
UT to Muddy Creek
Clearing
L 24+72
5
L 21+55
Stream
Perennial
Muddy Creek
12-94-(0.5)
C
None
Fill
L 21+68
5
L 21+43
Stream
Perennial
Muddy Creek
12-94-(0.5)
C
None
Fill
L 21+79 (Ex.)
"
List all stream and surface water impact locations regardless of urisdiction or size.
Equalizer Pipes to be noted as a minimization of impacts.
All proposed SCMs listed must also be listed under Swales, Preformed Sour Holes and other Energy Dissipators, or Other Stormwater Control Measures.
Description of Minimization of Impacts or Mitigation
The last two line items represent temporary impacts associated with temporary work pads.
References
c.iun
Highway North Carolina Department of Transportation
Stormwater Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
'`o,eoe
;.r
4F"''-
Project/TIP No.: B-4741 County(ies): Davidson Page 3 of 3
Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators
Sheet
No.
Station
Energy Dissipator
Type
Riprap Type
Drainage Area
(ac)
Conveyance Structure
Pipe/Structure
Dimensions
(in)
Q10
(cfs)
V10
(fps)
4
DRW1A 11+15 Lt
Riprap Apron / Pad
Class 'B'
0.20
Pipe
15
0.6
0.5
4
DRW2 11+10 Lt
Riprap Apron / Pad
Class 'B'
1.10
Pipe
18
3.0
1.7
4
L 19+20 Lt
PFSH
Class 'B'
0.20
Pipe
15
0.1
0.5
5
DRW5 10+65 Rt
Riprap Apron / Pad
Class 'B'
0.39
Pipe
15
1.1
0.9
71 YES [ NO Have minimum design criteria, as presented in the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2008), NCDOT Standard Detai
HEC-14 (July 2006), been met and verified, as applicable? If No, provide further explanantion of why design criteria was not met.
s, or FHWA
Additional Comments
Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox, Version 1 (March 2008), NCDOT Standard Details, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14),
JEFFREY L. TEAGUE, PE
TONY HOUSER, PE
DAVIDSON COUNTY
BRIDGE NO. 38 OVER MUDDY CREEK
ON SR 1493 (FRYE BRIDGE ROAD)
GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURE
25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 20 10
DHV
D
T
V
=
=
=
=
=
=
3,743 VPD
5,600 VPD
13
60
50
%
%
MPH
ADT
ADT
2015
2035
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
FUNC. CLASS. = RURAL
SUBREGIONAL TIER
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA Prepared in the Office of:
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
0
9
/
0
8
/
9
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
$
$
$
$
$
$
S
Y
S
T
IM
E
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
D
G
N
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
U
S
E
R
N
A
M
E
$
$
$
$
1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
T
I
P
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O
H
D
E
P
T
O
F TRA SPORT
T
IO
N
T
A TEOFN RT
CAR
O
LI
N
A
M
uddy
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4741 = 0.249 MILE
3
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4741 = 0.054 MILE
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4741 = 0.303 MILE
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4741
END TIP PROJECT B-4741
M
U
D
D
Y
C
R
E
E
K
SR 1493 FRYE BRIDGE ROAD
-Y1-
-DRW1--DRW1A-
-DRW2-
-DRW3-
-DRW4-
-DRW5-
W
I
N
D
F
I
E
L
D
S
T
.
%*
DUAL 2%)(TTST 1% +*
MINOR COLLECTOR
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
TO CLEMMONS
TO
N
C
150
-L- STA. 12+00.00
-L- STA. 28+00.00
-L-
-L-
M
U
D
D
Y
C
R
E
E
K
APPLEMOOR CT.
C
H
U
R
C
H
R
D
.
C
E
N
T
E
N
A
R
Y
See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Symbols
C
reek
Gus
Hill Rd.
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
R
d
.
Shady
Oak
Tr.
Pine
Hill Dr.D
o
g
w
o
o
d
L
n
.
Shady
Oak
Ct.
Centenary Church Rd
Frye
Brid
g
e
R
d
Frye Bridge Rd
PROJECT
BEGIN
PROJECT
END
VICINITY MAP
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
BRZ-1493(2)
38514.1.1 P.E.
DECEMBER 16, 2014
DECEMBER 18, 2013
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
38514.2.FD1 BRZ-1493(2)
B-4741
B
-
4
7
4
1
R/W & UTIL.
WETLAND & SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 1 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
END TIP PROJECT B-4741
-L- STA. 28+00.00
SITE 3
SITE 2
SITE 4
SITE 1
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SITE 1
SITE 1
SITE 2
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATERDENOTES TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATERDENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
TSTS
TS
TS
TS
SITE 4
SITE 3
4
5
1498
1490
1633
1634
1635
1493
1520
3233
1493
1493
N
AD
8
3/ 9
5
F
F C C
F
F
F
C
C
C
C
F
C
F F
F
C
C
F
C
C
C
F
F
F
F
C F
F F
F F
F
C
C
F
GATE
MTL
APPLEMOOR CT 20' BST
2"PVC(DATUR)
1"P
V
C
(D
A
T
U
R
)
BRIDGE #38 WD
&
STEEL
W
/CONC
.DECK
DI
DI
DI
WIN
D
F
IE
LD
S
T
2
0
'
B
S
T
FRYE BRIDGE ROAD SR 1493
22' BST
11
TO HAMPTON RD
WILLIE G SMITH
T
O
H
AMP
T
ON
R
D
CE
NT
E
NAR
Y
CH
UR
CH
R
D
S
R
14
9
0
2
0
'B
S
T
LANE
T
O P
LUMS
T
E
AD
MUDDY CRE
E
K
24" RCP
DI
W
W
W
C
6" PVC6" PVC
6" PVC
6
" P
V
C
DATUR
DATUR
DA
T
UR
MULTIPLE UTILITY LINES
ARE
MAPPED
BY
PLANS
ALL
LINES
IN
THIS
AREA
H H
TT
DAMAGED PEDISTAL
T
MISTY L VARNER
JASON E &
SHANNON HENDRICKS
MICHAEL S &
MARTINEZ
LAURIE R
RENE G &
BETTY P SEARS
RONDALL D &VICKY S PUCKETT
JAMES E FISH, JR
BRENDA S GRADY
PATRICK W &
WILLIE G SMITH
LINDA L LEINBACH
WILLIAM M &
AMANDA LEONARD
& JANICE B KING
BANNER C WILLIAMS
KIMBERLY J HAYES
JONOTHAN H &
AMANDA L BLALOCK
JOHN P &
JULIA R CRINITI
JAMES I &
VICKIE B BARKER
BUEL B &
SANTOS-RODRIGUEZ
JOSE & MICHELLE
VICKIE B BARKER
BUEL B &
WINSTON-SALEM
CITY OF
LUNSFORD
ROBERT E
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
+
0
0
10
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
RETAIN
REMOVE
REMOVEREMOVE
15"15"
REMOVE
15"
18"18"
18"
C
SP
15
"
18
"
G
TD
G
TD
15"
RETAIN
RETAIN
REMOVE
R
E
T
AI
N
TB 2GI
DETAIL D
PSH SEE
RETAIN
2 ELBOWS
15" CSP W/
18"
REMOVE
S
S
S
S
S
ITE
1
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
S S
R
EV
IS
IO
N
S
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
8
/
1
7
/
9
9
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
B-4741
N
A
D 83/ 95
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4741
-L- POT STA. 12+00.00
WETLAND/SURFACE WATER PERMIT DWG.
0'50'100'
M
A
TC
H
LIN
E
-
L-
S
TA
.2
1+
0
0
SHEET 2 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
1:
5
9
:
0
9
P
M
3
/
3
1/
2
0
14
G
:
\
O
R
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
O
R
1
0
9
6
-
N
C
D
O
T
O
n
-
C
a
l
l
H
y
d
r
o
\
B
-
4
7
4
1
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
4
7
4
1
_
h
y
d
_
p
s
h
_
0
2
.
d
g
n
1
0
9
6
_
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
.
t
b
l
2
F
F C C
F
F
F
C
C
F
C
F F
F
C
C
F
C
C
C
F
F
F
F
C F
F F
F F
F
C
C
F
C
C
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
7
0
6
7
0
6
7
0
6
7
0
6
7
5
6
7
5
675
6
7
5
675
6
7
5
6
7
5
6
8
0
680
6
8
0
6
8
0
6
8
5
6
8
5
6
8
5
685
6
8
5
685
6
9
0
690
6
9
0
690690
6 9 0
690
695
695
6
9
5
695
695
6
9
5
695
7
0
0
700
7
0
0
700
7
0
0
700
700
7
0
5
7
0
5
7
0
5
7
0
5
7
0
5
7
0
5
7
0
5
705
7
0
5
7
0
5
7
0
5
705710
7 1 0
7
1
0
710
710
7
10
710
715
7
1
5
7
1
5
715
715
715
7
15
7
2
0
7
2
0
7
2
0
720
7207207207
2
0
725
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
5 725
725
7 2 5
F
F C C
F
F
F
C
C
C
C
F
C
F F
F
C
C
F
C
C
C
F
F
F
F
C F
F F
F F
F
C
C
F
GATE
MTL
APPLEMOOR CT 20' BST
2"PVC(DATUR)
1"P
V
C
(D
A
T
U
R
)
BRIDGE #38 WD
&
STEEL
W
/CONC
.DECK
DI
DI
DI
WIN
D
F
IE
LD
S
T
2
0
'
B
S
T
FRYE BRIDGE ROAD SR 1493
22' BST
11
TO HAMPTON RD
WILLIE G SMITH
T
O
H
AMP
T
ON
R
D
CE
NT
E
NAR
Y
CH
UR
CH
R
D
S
R
14
9
0
2
0
'B
S
T
LANE
T
O P
LUMS
T
E
AD
MUDDY CRE
E
K
24" RCP
DI
W
W
W
C
6" PVC6" PVC
6" PVC
6
" P
V
C
DATUR
DATUR
DA
T
UR
MULTIPLE UTILITY LINES
ARE
MAPPED
BY
PLANS
ALL
LINES
IN
THIS
AREA
H H
TT
DAMAGED PEDISTAL
T
MISTY L VARNER
JASON E &
SHANNON HENDRICKS
MICHAEL S &
MARTINEZ
LAURIE R
RENE G &
BETTY P SEARS
RONDALL D &VICKY S PUCKETT
JAMES E FISH, JR
BRENDA S GRADY
PATRICK W &
WILLIE G SMITH
LINDA L LEINBACH
WILLIAM M &
AMANDA LEONARD
& JANICE B KING
BANNER C WILLIAMS
KIMBERLY J HAYES
JONOTHAN H &
AMANDA L BLALOCK
JOHN P &
JULIA R CRINITI
JAMES I &
VICKIE B BARKER
BUEL B &
SANTOS-RODRIGUEZ
JOSE & MICHELLE
VICKIE B BARKER
BUEL B &
WINSTON-SALEM
CITY OF
LUNSFORD
ROBERT E
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
+
0
0
10
+
0
0
15
+
0
0
2
0
+
0
0
RETAIN
REMOVE
REMOVEREMOVE
15"15"
REMOVE
15"
18"18"
18"
C
SP
15
"
18
"
G
TD
G
TD
15"
RETAIN
RETAIN
REMOVE
R
E
T
AI
N
TB 2GI
DETAIL D
PSH SEE
RETAIN
2 ELBOWS
15" CSP W/
18"
REMOVE
S
S
S
S
S
ITE
1
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
S S
R
EV
IS
IO
N
S
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
8
/
1
7
/
9
9
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
B-4741
N
A
D 83/ 95
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4741
-L- POT STA. 12+00.00
WETLAND/SURFACE WATER PERMIT DWG.
0'50'100'
M
A
TC
H
LIN
E
-
L-
S
TA
.2
1+
0
0
SHEET 3 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
3
1:
5
9
:
12
P
M
3
/
3
1/
2
0
14
G
:
\
O
R
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
O
R
1
0
9
6
-
N
C
D
O
T
O
n
-
C
a
l
l
H
y
d
r
o
\
B
-
4
7
4
1
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
4
7
4
1
_
h
y
d
_
p
s
h
_
0
3
.
d
g
n
1
0
9
6
_
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
.
t
b
l
F
F C C
F
F
F
C
C
F
C
F F
F
C
C
F
C
C
C
F
F
F
F
C F
F F
F F
F
C
C
F
C
C
F
F
F
C
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
EI
P
EI
P
A
X
LE
EIP
EIP
E
IP
E
IP
E
IP
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EX
IST
ING
R
/W
E
XIST
IN
G R
/W
36" STEEL OVERFLOW PIPE
(END)=675.66'
TOP PIPE
MA
ILBO
X
BK
15
"R
C
P
15"R
C
P
SOIL
VAR
VAR
S
OI
L
10'
C
ONC
1
2'
GR
10' CONC
12" RCP
84" SOIL 84" GR VAR SOIL
10'
G
R
12" RCP
10
' S
OIL
VAR
S
OIL & GR
FRYE BR ID
GE RO
A
D
SR 14 9 3
2 5' B ST
25' BST
FRYE BRIDGE ROAD
SR 1493
13
W/LT
T
O N
C
H
WY 150
MUD
D
Y
CR
E
E
K
MUDDY
CR
E
E
K
DI AT CREEK
6" PVC
6" PVC
6" PV
C
DATUR
T
NANCY K WALSER
ALBERT W &
NANCY K WALSER
ALBERT W &
TUCKER
ANDY W & CATHERINE
TUCKER
ANDY W & CATHERINE
W E & EVELYN H FISHEL
W E & EVELYN H FISHEL
W E & EVELYN H FISHEL
NANCY K WALSER
ALBERT W &
TUCKER
ANDY W & KATHY W
LINDA W HEDRICK
JIMMY D &
LINDA W HEDRICK
JIMMY D &
NOT FIELD LOCATED
9
9
11
11
10
2
5
+
0
0
15"
RETAIN
REMOVE
15"
EXISTING
TIE TO
S S
S
S
S
SITE 1
SITE 2
TS
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
S S
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
TSTS
TS
TS
TS
SITE 4
SITE 3
R
EV
IS
IO
N
S
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
8
/
1
7
/
9
9
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
B-4741
N
AD
8
3/
9
5
-L- STA. 28+00.00
END TIP PROJECT B-4741
WETLAND/SURFACE WATER PERMIT DWG.
0'50'100'
M
A
TC
H
LIN
E
-
L-
S
TA
.
2
1+
0
0
SHEET 4 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
1:
5
9
:
15
P
M
3
/
3
1/
2
0
14
G
:
\
O
R
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
O
R
1
0
9
6
-
N
C
D
O
T
O
n
-
C
a
l
l
H
y
d
r
o
\
B
-
4
7
4
1
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
4
7
4
1
_
h
y
d
_
p
s
h
_
0
4
.
d
g
n
1
0
9
6
_
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
.
t
b
l
4
F
F
F
C
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
6
6
5
665
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
5665
665
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
7
0
6
7
0
6
7
0
6
7
0
6
7
0
67
0
6
7
0
6
7
0
6
7
0
6
7
5
6
7
5
6
7
5
6
7
5
6
7
5
6
7
5
6
7
5
6
7
5
6
8
0
6
8
0
6
8
0
6
8
0
6
8
0
680
680
6
8
0
6
8
0
680
6
8
0
6
8
0
680
6
8
0
6
8
5
6
8
5
6
8
5
685
6
85
6
8
5
685
685
6
8
5685
6
8
5
685
6
9
0
6
9
0
6
9
0
6
9
0
690
690
6
9
0
6
9
0
690
690
6
9
5
695
695
6
9
5
6
9
5
695
7
0
0
700
7
0
0
7
00
700
700
7
0
5
7
0
5
705
705
705
7
0
5
7
0
5
7
0
5
7
10
710
710
710
710
710
7
10
7
10
710
710
7
15
7
15
715
715
715
715
7
15
7
1
5 715
715
715
715
7
2
0
720
720
720
7
2
0
7
2
0
7
2
0
7
2
0
720
720
7
2
0
720
725
7
2
5
7
2
5
725
725
725
7
2
5
7
2
5
7
2
5
725
725
725
7
2
5
725
7
3
0
730
730
7
3
0
7
3
0
730
730
730 730
730
730
7
3
0
7
3
0
735
7
3
5
7
3
5
7
3
5
735
7
3
5
735
7
3
5
7
3
5
735
7
4
0
7
4
0
740
740
7
4
5
F
F
F
C
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
EI
P
EI
P
A
X
LE
EIP
EIP
E
IP
E
IP
E
IP
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
E
XISTIN
G R
/W
EX
IST
IN
G
R
/W
36" STEEL OVERFLOW PIPE
(END)=675.66'
TOP PIPE
MA
ILBO
X
BK
15
"RCP
15"R
C
P
SOIL
VAR
VAR
S
OI
L
10'
C
ONC
12'
GR
10' CONC
12" RCP
84" SOIL 84" GR VAR SOIL
10'
G
R
12" RCP
10
' S
OIL
VAR S
OIL & GR
FRYE BR ID
G
E ROAD
SR 14 9 3
2 5' B ST
25' BST
FRYE BRIDGE ROAD
SR 1493
13
W/LT
T
O NC
H
WY 150
MUDDY
CR
E
E
K
MUDDY
CR
E
E
K
DI AT CREEK
6" PVC
6" PVC
6" PV
C
DATUR
T
NANCY K WALSER
ALBERT W &
NANCY K WALSER
ALBERT W &
TUCKER
ANDY W & CATHERINE
TUCKER
ANDY W & CATHERINE
W E & EVELYN H FISHEL
W E & EVELYN H FISHEL
W E & EVELYN H FISHEL
NANCY K WALSER
ALBERT W &
TUCKER
ANDY W & KATHY W
LINDA W HEDRICK
JIMMY D &
LINDA W HEDRICK
JIMMY D &
NOT FIELD LOCATED
9
9
11
11
10
2
5
+
0
0
15"
RETAIN
REMOVE
15"
EXISTING
TIE TO
S S
S
S
S
SITE 1
SITE 2
TS
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
S S
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
TSTS
TS
TS
TS
SITE 4
SITE 3
RE
VIS
IO
N
S
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
8
/
1
7
/
9
9
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
B-4741
N
AD
8
3/
9
5
-L- STA. 28+00.00
END TIP PROJECT B-4741
WETLAND/SURFACE WATER PERMIT DWG.
0'50'100'
M
A
TC
H
LIN
E
-
L-
S
TA
.
2
1+
0
0
SHEET 5 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
1:
5
9
:
19
P
M
3
/
3
1/
2
0
14
G
:
\
O
R
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
O
R
1
0
9
6
-
N
C
D
O
T
O
n
-
C
a
l
l
H
y
d
r
o
\
B
-
4
7
4
1
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
4
7
4
1
_
h
y
d
_
p
s
h
_
0
5
.
d
g
n
1
0
9
6
_
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
.
t
b
l
5
F
F
F
C
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
(+)4.4527%
PI = 25+75.00
EL = 712.00'
(+)4.4527%
(+)4.1411%
VC = 150'
K = 481
PI = 27+25.00
EL = 718.21'
(+)4.1411%
(+)4.9404%
VC = 150'
K = 188
NWS ELEV: 667.5'
APPROXIMATE
WS ELEV: 666.5'
7/31/2013
CLASS II RIP RAP
RIP RAP
CLASS II
RIP RAP
CLASS II
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00
660
670
680
690
700
710
720
730
740
750
660
670
680
690
700
710
24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00
660
670
680
690
700
710
720
730
740
750
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
5
/
2
8
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
B-4741
7
0
3
.6
9
7
0
3
.6
9
EL = 714.76'
-L- STA. 12+00.00
BEGIN GRADE
660
670
680
690
700
710
720
730
740
750
EL = 721.92'
-L- STA. 28+00.00
END GRADE
BM #2
-L- STA. 19+05.86
ELEV. = 686.46'
144.21' LT
OAK.
OF A 26" WILLOW
SOUTHERN BASE
R/R SPIKE IN
FOR -L- PLAN VIEW, SEE SHEET NO. 5
FOR -L- PLAN VIEW, SEE SHEET NO. 4 & 5
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-1 THRU S-??S
IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS S S
STABILIZATION
WATER DUE TO BANK
IMPACTS IN SURFACE
NOT TO SCALE
EL = 714.76'
-L- STA. 12+00.00
BEGIN GRADE
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY FT
= 18,000
= 50
= 685.3
= 20,000
= 100
= 686.08
= 49,300
= 500+
= 695.3
= 7/31/2013
= 666.55
PI = 23+50.00
EL = 701.98'
VC = 200'
K = 66
dV = 40 MPH
V = 40 MPHd
VC = 410'
K = 64
EL = 693.00'
PI = 17+15.00
EL = 707.32'
PI = 14+30.00
K = 90
VC = 160'
BRIDGE SKETCH ENLARGED FOR CLARITY
SHEET 6 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
6
1:
5
9
:
2
2
P
M
3
/
3
1/
2
0
14
G
:
\
O
R
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
O
R
1
0
9
6
-
N
C
D
O
T
O
n
-
C
a
l
l
H
y
d
r
o
\
B
-
4
7
4
1
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
B
4
7
4
1
_
h
y
d
_
p
s
h
_
0
6
.
d
g
n
1
0
9
6
_
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
.
t
b
l
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
TS
S
CAUSEWAY
TO ROCK
IMPACTS DUE
TEMPORARY
S
S
S
S
TS
TS
(-
)3
.2362%
(-)5
.0
2
3
4%
(-)5
.
0
2
3
4%
(+)1.4144%
(+)1.4144%
NWS ELEV: 667.5'
APPROXIMATE
WS ELEV: 666.5'
7/31/2013
CLASS II RIP RAP
RIP RAP
CLASS II
Ha
n
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
E
x
c
a
v
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
c
h
a
n
i
z
e
d
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
Si
t
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
F
i
l
l
I
n
F
i
l
l
I
n
i
n
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
i
n
S
W
S
W
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
S
t
r
e
a
m
No
.
(
F
r
o
m
/
T
o
)
S
i
z
e
/
T
y
p
e
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
n
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
(a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
1
L
2
0
+
7
6
-
L
2
1
+
7
0
B
a
n
k
S
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
0.
0
1
6
0
2
L
2
4
+
6
2
-
L
2
4
+
7
2
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
0.
0
1
1
0
3
L
2
1
+
5
5
-
L
2
1
+
6
8
Ca
u
s
e
w
a
y
-
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
B
r
i
d
g
e
0.
0
1
4
4
4
L
2
1
+
4
3
t
o
L
2
1
+
7
9
Ca
u
s
e
w
a
y
-
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Br
i
d
g
e
P
i
e
r
Re
m
o
v
a
l
0.
0
1
2
6
TO
T
A
L
S
:
0.
0
1
0
.
0
3
6
0
8
0
AT
N
R
e
v
i
s
e
d
3
/
3
1
/
0
5
SH
E
E
T
7
o
f
7
3
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
4
DA
V
I
D
S
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
NC
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
O
F
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
S
WB
S
-
3
8
5
1
4
.
1
.
1
(
B
-
4
7
4
1
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
P
E
R
M
I
T
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
SU
R
F
A
C
E
W
A
T
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
WE
T
L
A
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
S