The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140344 Ver 1_Application_20140407,.s1wE �� °Tw..vs°� STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 'I'RANSPORTATION PaT L. McCxoxv GOVEANOR Apri17, 2014 Mr. Steven Kichefski Asheville Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers I51 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 ANTHONYJ.TATA SECRETARY SUBJECT: Pipe Replacement, SR 1146 (Bethlehem Church Road), Alexander County Dear Mr. Kichefski: The North Carolina Department of Transportation requesYS authorizarion to replace a failing pipe on SR 1146 (Bethlehem Church Road) in Alexander County. NCDOT proposes to replace the existing 57—foot, 84" CMP with double 80-foot, CMP's (the main flow pipe is 84" and the floodflow pipe is 72"). A shallow scourhole has formed at the existing pipe outlet the stream channe] is overwidened at that locarion as well (see attached photos). The new pipe will be buried per regulation at the pipe inleY; however, due to the shallow scourhole, the new pipe outlet invert will be placed at the `normaP streambed elevalion immediately downstream of the scourhole. The scourhole (� 13 fr long) will be armored with Class II riprap in an effor[ Yo prevent further stream destabilizafion. Rive feeT of riprap will be used around the pipe inlet and outlet for structure sTabilization. At the floodflow pipe, the upstream bank will be excavated to bankfull elevation and due to The overwidened downstream, a 25-foot riprap faced floodplain bench will be constructed at the new pipe outlet. (Armored scourhole impacts and ouTiet riprap stabilizarion impacts will be within the floodplain bench construction impacts). Temporary cofferdam/bypass pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the conshucTion site, as needed. Any areas affected by the Yemporary cofferdam will be restored To pre-project conditions. The scope of the work will result in 53 feet of permanent impacts (23 foot increase in pipe lengTh + 25 feeY outlet floodplain bench construcrion + 5 feet inlet riprap bank stabilizarion) to Isaac Creek, which is classified as a WS-IV & B Watershed by The N.C. Division of Water Resources. The project is not located within %z mile of any criTical waYershed area nor is SR 1146 a rural or tirban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill basin checklist. This office has conducted a GIS and field survey far the project for historical sites and threatened/endangered species sites. No siTes listed on the National Register of Historic Places are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project threatened/endangered species. The federally listed species for Alexander CotiinYy (USFWS listed date September 22, 2010) include dwazf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nan�ora) and the bog turtle (Glyptemys SR 1146,Bethlehem Church Road Page 2 April 7, 2014 muhlenbergii)-(T/SA- Threatened due to similarity of appearance). National Heritage Program records document the nearesY heartleaf location 3.5 miles south (in Catawba County) of the proposed project area. The heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes (usually north facing and of the oak-hickary-pine forest type) and in boggy areas near springheads. Thexe is no suitable habitat in the proposed project area and no heartleaf species were observed within the project footprint. No impact on this species is anticipated. Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest bog turtle location 1A.5 miles northeast of the proposed project area. Bog turtles are typically found in bogs, inarshes, and wet pastures. T/SA species are not subjecY to Section 7 consultation; however, there is no suitable habitat located wiYhin the project area and no impact on this species is anficipated. 1 have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW#3, sketches of planned activities and location maps relafive to the project. Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows: • Warkordernumber: 150A65-55120005-12B.2002ll-3300 • TIP#: NA • Project Category: $240.00 Fee If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to conYact me at (704) 480-90A4. Thank you for your rime and consideration on this matter. Respectfixlly yours, Reuben Chandler,P.E. Division Engineer Twelfth Division BY: �f /P�� G?,'-�--... ! '' � � Trish Beam Division 12 Environmental Supervisor Enclosures CF W Fl r�R � �� o �� > i O T Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification PC Form A. A licant Information 1. Processing t a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps; � Sedion 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 3 or General Permit (GP) number. 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. '1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Pipe Replacement, SR 1146 (Bethlehem Church Road) 2b. County: Alexa�der 2c. Nearest mu�icipality / town: Bethlehem 2d. Subdivision name: NA 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state NA project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Right of Way 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone �o.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 11 „�.� �.....,. ��.....:.._ , � �,...�...�,._,� ��o.,__°:__ 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: Reuben Chandler 4c. Busines s name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12 (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street 4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020 4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 4h. Email address: rchandler@ncdot.gov 5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applieable) 5a. Name: Trish Beam 5b. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12 (if applicable): Sc. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street 5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044 5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 Sg. Email address: pdbeam@ncdot.gov Page 2 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 90, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.8345 Longitude: - 81.3211 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1c. Property size: <0.10 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Isaac Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS IV & B 2c. River basin: Catawba 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Existing pipe on paved secondary road. Landuse in vicinity of bridge is mostly residential 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3a List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 100 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a deteriorating pipe for the safety of the traveling public. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: NCDOT proposes to replace an existing 57 -foot 84" CMP with a double 80-foot long, 72" CMP with associated riprap for structure stabilization. A scourhole has formed at the exising pipe outlet and the channel width is overwidened. The main flow pipe will be buried per regulation. The outlet invert will be buried based upon the normal channel elevation immediately downstream of the scourhole. Additionally, the existing 13-foot scourhole will be armored in an effort to prevent further stream destabilization. The upstream bank will be excavated to bankfull elevation and due to the overwidened downstream, a 25-foot riprap faced floodplain bench will be constructed at the new pipe outlet. Five feet of Class II riprap will be utilized at the culvert inlet and outlet for structure stabilization. The project will be constructed using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.).. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by Division 12 DEO. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? AgencylConsultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type ofjurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. ToYal wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3 a. 3 b. 3 c. 3 d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number- (PER)or (Corps-404,10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 � P 0 T �ncrease in pipe Isaac Creek � PER � Corps 5 *23 length ❑ INT � DWQ Outlet floodplain bench & armoured � PER � Corps S2 � P � T scourhole/Riprap �saac Creek � INT � DWQ 5 "30 Stabilization S3 ❑ P� T Bypass pumping Isaac Creek � PER ❑ Corps 5 �Q ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ SS ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tribuYary impacts *53 3i. Comments: *Permanent Impacts: Increase in pipe length = 23 feet (Existing pipe = 57 feet, Proposed Pipe = 80 feet), Floodplain bench = 25 feet, Riprap at Inlet = 5 feet. (The 13 feet of armored scourhole impacts and 5 feet riprap bank stabilization impacts at outlet in the same area as the outlet floodplain bench construction impacts). Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem orar 01 ❑POT 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑POT 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. Sc. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pand Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 Sf. Total Sg. Camments: Sh. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID na 5i. Expected pond surtace area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fll out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T im act re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifcally describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Existing scourhole to be armored to prevent further stream destabilization. 1 b. Specifcally describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. Ifyes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ COrps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Complies with NCDOT's individual NPDES permit NCS000250. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA ❑ Phasell 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 A200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project is classified as a minimum criteria checklist project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not result in additional development which could impact water quality. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. No wastewater generated from project. Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program database and onsite field survey. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Culturel Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The National Register of Historic Places were reviewed for historic sites in the vicinity of the project; however, the pipe replacement project occurs within a previously impacted area (NC DOT Right of Way). 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number: 3710370600K � � , �' <� ,4 h/i�� v- �� 'i`� ' � ��J / "� ° /y ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name ApplicanUAgenYs Signature Date (AgenPs signature is valid only'rf an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version � � � A Z�� 0 10 03� ��3 ��R srts O ry � 3 W � ° � Aa+ 0 0 3 O N ry 3 = N K a� � o < � +m rv � A W =nm='C �ln k �= 3 �� m � �aH� o aooP aN. o �'m+. v m N o 3 �� N��M (�lV 0 a S p � a o m H m � �a � d� p O C O �' = O S� N 2 � � ' �-� c� � �, Q 0 � o= o� ��m�� W�Pt]I O`V W�D O�' N W �I��I� C 4 N �30 Fe v �'o VUI P K �j I<N 3 0 ^i_ O O e wa P \r pA T W � m pp N ' W ? a n s� � �� SN N> p'um co> 3 ... 3 v p � � cn o zrn�n 3. (l 0 3 � Z o p rt 3 � °- � O � � .Ni asY � m 3 n < 2 N o i o � 3 o + -' a -' o �� m�O N H' 0 Q �. � S 3 (i O_ y u�, � 3 C ��O y S 3 P m ti P m � � 0 3 0 w o � 3 o ry 22� 2 4 S � O o�F�m ry o�k N X fl p � µ � k o � -'m 3 m ��04P ao�.mx o � � µ 3 y 3 r � 5' -� Ob 10 �^ 0 6 X O io O � n O � l� p S � '-�'n � �- d j � P 3 O O�O N O � � � p 4 F b � �� % �� I sa �SV H� 6 L x 00 l� �I _0 0 O V O �� P N � ' o m � m O d m �p m A 'o yao o S3 �T inmCp° � V � O N d0 P 2 P z X N T n o c °< °o 5 V O i d so_m W I S �x o I � 1 ' k � T � � I � � � III � �x � 111 �" a= I� ��T�'Om — IIII II I I �i P2f I°0�1�S waNa��a8 0� � � I, I , �I LZi �N °1 � � � � � � � � �II III� ry X 2� o _. _� K� F o m o A O O p � �. � K %X �' � � ln ��%O PJ � j N � N p (l N � � rt N � dt�+NX � o�a'� Y °-F � µ 3 " 3 s c -I �`� m��ov v Ko�no� + oiems o�oo a a'� 10 � 3 / 030�°00 io ox`O o _ io I i� 1 I ll ! 9btiti 21S sa N A O - \ d% V � m y O N � � J( O z rt Q.o � � � 3 � dV � 3 �°n o- O � � N � P S � � 3 � H (n -fi x7 O � � -� A �ov 0 3 '� ° � � s N V� �o s so � ° -* o �O n F � 0 p m A 0 P � A / (� W I P r _� m �� A w � � �«�. O P P W O n � � C W Z � o � w � N ❑ Q d N j y� O X � ry �� o 0 3 n = � � S � v T �. F F s W � i.w A � w 0 i--� pp N W Z Q a s-o � �' � �S�o N A p � l� � 3 .-• 3 � Q a ^' . � rns� � c� 0 3 � Z � � � 3 n .TI � j � a ^ Q N ,� o N Qa m � N A � o � s N ao N an 3 N o'� n H i A O p OO a � n �� P � P A d W P � A w � GI W�w+ p -P A m O n � � G pp � � o � � �o i ' In � � d d � � � � X � � w�o 0 3 n � v � 0 Z � 3 O � � M O � � � h S � w a � � b �3� I o � vY m � A �� F d0 N � an 3 O O N H O H o p �y o p O0 � I I I � r �AUPV �J w J 8S1 V e 8b W b b 0 a p 67' °w 8$3 • P _w p �. W � w �� 863, � P A m � l O �' I I � I I I � � I I � { I I z � � °- 3 I I C � � I � n � �� O+___—_�_. Q.� -�F O -�fi I I 3 � � I I x � - � � � S � I I I I 86�� — I � w w � � w 0 a O � � N � Fl Pipe Replacement Bethlehem Church Road, SR 1146 Alexander County � �— s N � N �� P N � �_ S�� SR t2js �� _—_�i � — � � � 1 M � i R �82s S � -- � G � � o � �" ��e�� \ � � SR 81 _ o � i �� . � � �� — � \l : (J�� . C�j��c �� .._... ' l `� K ' � I �p.... ) SR11 aC2fil@flt � � �� SR11gq � �'as � Pi e Re �/ � ��6 � � �, N \ � p p l s� � � � � � � ._... .. . . N � SR 1263 °� . SR%a�� - ! ^^ � Q-. �SR 1228- SR� � �-------/ � I _ _ \ , �2� -� --�_ �e � V � b� � ._. � N:\.�:�i_ � _� � �J �___ ' SR 1195 -�R 1�147 . i L.. _-- %`'�. o �— � SR 1�22 ��.1----� h-_'� M — �R 1181 . � ^ � ?9 ~f l i sR �� , �; ---- -- ^ SR�29a � �� , i � �.�' � � m � N <°+� ,_.N � ��. �`y .. .., a ...SR713> �j��_. 'w �..< �, , �� ,� SR 1242 m N . Z , � o cn � ti � �-� � 0 ,...�y 1.\ �n tn... `s� �R12� N � i ' ^ry _ �� 5 .T1... ? . � I v!� V .. '� �. ' a N,: A I °v SR 1139 � .. �� N �.�� w N SR �20� � N `� . ...._... � -gC'' � � �\ \� � � / �.,. . . o S \ `,�- , � l f_ r ° .� � Vicinity Map �o nonrn � 9�4p N o � � �p,`}'S�P �OFTRA�"' � I 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles � I I I � I I I � NCDOT HA7.ARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST Division: 1 � County: A1Pxa„r1Pr Project ID: 12B.2002ll River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: NA Route: Pipe Replacement on SR 1146 (Bethlehem Church Road) Stream: Isaac Creek (WS-IV - B) Water Quality Criteria: Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS C�3�i�.�/ WSI WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area Roadway C`riteria: Route Designation- Arterial Urban Arterial Rura1 Additional Site Information: Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? Yes No �� Yes No r�` � Criteria Based Upon NCDOT `Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 199'7). Yes No � � � � �` � � �