20080994 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20140327

Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
EEP Project #92552 DWQ 404 #08 -0994
Contract # D06002 USACE Action ID #SAW- 2006 -40970
Monitoring Year 05 /Closeout
Project Type: Stream and Wetland Restoration
Submitted: February 2014
Table la. Project Setting and Classifications
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
County
Harnett
General Location
Lillin ton
Basin
Cape Fear
Ph sio ra hic Region
Sandhills
USGS Hydro Unit
03030004110010
NCDWQ Sub -basin
03 -06 -14
Trout Water
No
Complete
Project Performers
2007
Source Agency
NCEEP
Provider
KCI Technologies
Designer
KCI Associates of NC
Monitoring Firm
KCI Associates of NC
Planting
Bruton Nurseries and
Landscapes
Property Interest
Holder
WEEP
Table lb. Project Activity and Reporting History
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Data
Completion
Activity or Report
Collection
or Delivery
Complete
Restoration Plan
2007
May 2008
Final Design
2007
May 2008
Permitted
N/A
July 2008
Construction
N/A
March 2009
Planting
N/A
Jan 2009
Mitigation Plan / As -Built (Year
May 2009
June 2009
0 Monitoring- Baseline)
Monitoring Year O1
Dec 2009
Dec 2009
Additional log sills were
Oct 2010
installed along T 1
Regrading and stabilizing small
areas of banks erosion and bed
Oct 2010
degradation on NPAC
Monitoring Year 02
Dec 2010
Dec 2010
Monitoring Year 03
Oct 2011
Dec 2011
Supplemental Planting
April 2011
Invasive plant treatment
Aug 201 1
Constructed riffles were
installed at Stations 57 +58,
May 2011
58 +47, 59 +13, 59 +84, and
60 +50
Bank grading and matting
installation occurred at Stations
May 2011
55 +30, 56 +80, 60 +60, and
Beaver Management USDA
2011
July -Aug
Monitoring Year 04
Dec2012
2012
Beaver Management USDA
2012
Supplemental Planting
March 2012
Invasive plant treatment
August 2012
July-Oct
Monitoring Year 05
Dec 2013
2013

1.0 PROJECT SETTING AND BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site is a full - delivery project that was developed for the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). The project restored, enhanced, and preserved
13,044 linear feet of the North Prong of Anderson Creek (NPAC) and its tributaries, and included 112.0
acres of Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland community.
The pre- restoration channel of NPAC had been moved and channelized to maximize the use of an
agricultural field adjacent to Powell Farm Road. The other significant hydrologic alterations to the site
included ditched wetlands and straightened tributaries. Due to the clearing of the riparian areas, the
streams were experiencing significant bank erosion prior to restoration. In addition to the ditching that
drained the historic wetlands, ponds were also built to attract migratory waterfowl.
Over the course of the project, following construction, supplemental planting and site maintenance has
been conducted. In October 2010, additional log sills were installed along TI to provide additional grade
control as preventive maintenance. Regrading and stabilization on small areas of banks erosion and bed
degradation was conducted on the upper end of NPAC. Stream and vegetation maintenance actions were
completed in 2011. The stream maintenance addressed areas of bed degradation and bank erosion as
discussed in the Monitoring Year 2 report. Constructed riffles were installed at Stations 57 +58, 58 +47,
59 +13, 59 +84, and 60 +50 and bank grading and matting installation occurred at Stations 55 +30, 56 +80,
60 +60, and 61 +60. These maintenance areas have exhibited stability since installation. The bank repairs
have not shown any signs of erosion, and the constructed riffles are holding grade and have washed -in
with native sediment. The repeated establishment of beaver dams has caused some localized aggradation
as sediment and debris has collected within the impounded stream. Where this has occurred the stream
has remained stable and this trend has not proven detrimental to the stream. In 2011 and 2012, the
vegetation maintenance included planting additional 5,900 and 8,500 bare -root trees, in various locations
throughout the site that were found to have low densities of planted trees (See Appendix E Additional
Data for the Supplemental Planting List). Invasive control was conducted with herbicide application
targeting denseflower knotweed (Polygonum densiflorum), curly doc (Rumex crispus), and cockle burs
(Xanthium strumarium). Throughout 2011 -2013 numerous beaver dams were removed from the site. In
June 2013 four additional wetland gauges were installed at the site and in August 2013, one additional
wetland gauge was installed near the start of NPAC. These gauges will provide supplemental wetland
hydrology data for the restored wetlands.
2.0 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives of the restoration project are as follows:
Restoration Goals:
• Protect aquatic resources from excess nutrients, sediment, and other pollutants coming from
the agricultural watershed.
• Reestablish a functional Coastal Plain Small Swamp Stream wetland complex that creates
terrestrial and aquatic habitat and connects to the existing floodplain corridor along the
NPAC.
Restoration Objectives:
• Restore 11,517 linear feet of stable stream channel with the appropriate pattern, profile, and
dimension that can support a sand transport system.
• Connect the streams to functioning floodplains.
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC1 Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Fill and plug ditches in the drained hydric soils to restore saturated hydrologic conditions to
the upper soil horizons.
Plant the NPAC, its tributaries, riparian corridors, floodplains and upland habitats with
herbaceous cover as well as trees and shrubs to create and restore appropriate habitats within
the landscape.
Eliminate existing nutrient source associated with land application of animal waste in
proximity to project streams.
3.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
Table 2. Success Criteria
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Feature
Success Criteria
Stream
Minimal changes to the measured stream characteristics, demonstrating system stability. At
least two bankfull events occurring in separate years over the course of the monitoring
period.
Wetland
Continual wetland hydrology for 5% of the growing season (12.5 of 251 days) within a
normal pre ci itation year.
Vegetation
Average of 260 stems /acre, as indicated by permanent vegetation plots after 5 years of
monitoring.
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Table 3a. Project Assets
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Project
Project Segment
Pre - Construction
(linear feet /acreage)
Mitigation
Approach
As -Built
(linear
feet /acreage)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation Units
(SMU/WMU)
NPAC
4,565
Restoration
6,746
1:1
6,714*
T 1.1
864
Restoration
825
1:1
825
T1.2
995
Restoration
980
1:1
980
T1
818
Restoration
884
1:1
853*
T2A
977
Restoration
500
1:1
500
T2B
Restoration
522
l:l
522
T3
1,335
Restoration
1,167
1:1
1,167
T4.1
180
Enhancement 11
180
2.5 : 1
72
T4.2
1,240
Preservation
1 1,240
1 5:1
248
TOTAL
1 13,044
11,881
* Easement exceptions for landowner ford crossings were excluded for these calculations.
Project Wetlands
Area 1
-
Preservation
45.93
5:1
9.18
Area 2
-
Enhancement
6.88
2:1
3.44
Area 3
-
Enhancement
2.57
2:1
1.29
Area 4
-
Enhancement
12.67
2:1
6.34
Area 5
-
Restoration
43.80
1:1
43.80
TOTAL
111.85
64.05
Table 3b. Mitigation Unit Totals
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stream
Riparian
Non-
Total
Mitigation
Wetland
Riparian
Wetland
Units SMU
Units
Units
(WMU)
11,881
64.05
64.05
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Harnett County, North Carolina
Spring
t
a 'm
z o
E rm`
4
o
Upper Little
b
HARNETT
COUNTY
CHZR`�et `tt�e MOE LAND I .
11L�7a►l,�C�7►1
SAMPSON
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
`( Project Site Location
Major Roads
KCI
K
C I
Other Roads
�� Major Rivers
E
1:126,720
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Municipalities
1 inch equals 2 miles
bmr
TECHNOLOGIESCounty
2
�]
Boundaries
I 0 2
Miles
ENVIRONMENTALTECHNOLOGIES
AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.

} _ I. fa r Y r y + -t - '' -iS ores •� ' ° ' I
i
Iue eg3oo2� may- `' ` - ; y
II-' � 1 1" _ 1 r tit ' � ,�' �' � rl S "�I J l ._� ° ... -
d 4 tt 'ff _ _ f ^S y ,L 1. yt '1 f,� /� F -. 8x'5". lv T,�vs'f" 15'j .(. ,f �, `rr'I,,,Ef dr .I ; ` `' 4�r .f-.' __
%' � I'. 1 �' 7 '�.i 1.
fr :-, r l ti i.1� nti IyII o'o�iGsbo4d Gyro Mfr
`� 1 tI Pte,, / - �Y �+r� t +�j / Is ,s �,' 1 `.' rl )�' Lr ^'` i .cr „„��tt ql` y.� ,r 11.”
,N �s lye L•r fir_ iJrr �� ��Sr, I{) 11r.�y� /.J {dL[ �'f i I.r f f",y,L r J -y,
' rrp' .� ate. ..1 1 rr +I I { - , - J'°"f- '� - 5 i �� .�; I.I �, ':, "t z,.- -
r �r �', ! 1 i .y >. �It u - ,l,+f -[ J A I 'f r ° y � �� - r;, I[�"? '�i,( 1 � ; +4 f•a. F
! .� s j 1
f+ z_ f �1 { �i Cr F �f�J s a,:, 1,
iY °: t .-, i ti II - I+ 1� {� } ' +�`+°' = i

Soils at Project Site
BnB AtA - Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 -3% slopes
Ro Ro CaB An - Augusta fine sandy loam
Ro Bb - Bibb loam
GaB BnD - Blaney loamy sand, 8 -15% slopes
GaD
W GaB - Gilead loamy sand, 2 -8% slopes
Ro - Roanoke loam
Ro -
GaB. VaD Val) - Vaucluse loamy sand, 8 -15% slopes
Wh - Wehadkee loam
Ro GaB
Ro '..BnB
GaB
Ro
GaB
BnB GaB
Au
VaB
Fa B
GaB Ro
Ro
GaB W
- AtA
AtA GaB GaD -
GaB
AtA
Sri•
GaB
dg� J AtA ^..
Wh
Ro
GaD AtA AtA
CaB Bb
AtA
BnB
Bb
WaC Au
BnD - GaB VaB
BnD
W
WaB
Bb
Go
'Bb ••GaB".
GaB
W _ : BnB.
Cab
BnB
Bb BnB GaB w
CaD �4
Figure 3. Project Site NRCS Soil Survey
...��
Soils
Project Easement Boundary w�E K C I
s ASSOCIATES OF NC
1:12,000
K C 1 1 inch equals 1,000 feet
1,000 500 0 1,000 IM
Source: SSURGO Dataset from NRCS based on Feet
TECHNOLOGIES Soil Sury o Harriett Cou North Carolina, USDA SCS 1994; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES
eJ' f nty, AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.
2005 Ortboimageryfrom Harnett County GIS /Land Records

E z
'rf ? T 3
�F
yy�
Ii}
A.
rf u
�g A N I,
Nrl� Al
^�41l�� ! - I ��•. to- �� 5
t'
rr ° t
t
Figure 4. Hydric Soil Map
'—\.o Project Streams Project Easement Boundary
- - - - Diffuse Flow Drained Hydric Soils
w�
K C I Other Streams Existing Wetlands (Hydric) i.i0"
1 inch = 900 feet
TECHNOLOGIES 900 450 0 900
mmmmmwa�
K I
ASSOCIATES OF »e
EwRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES
AND CONSTRUCTION. INC,

Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -2, Pool, NPAC -1
-- - -B-kh 11
196
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -1, Riffle, NPAC -1
___ -Flood PI.-A-
198
______________ ______
As Buih, 4123109
200
204
MY -01, 1027109
------------------- I ---__________-------------
196
MY -01, 10,27,09
20$
-- - - B -Mull
MY -02, 11123/10
MY -03, 1W911
AS-Built, 4123109
p'
MY-04.7/24V12
198
MY -01, 1028/09
MY-05, 1 I 5113
194
203
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MY -02, 11/23/10
MY -03, 10 +2611
MY -03, 10!24/11
MY -04, 8211 12
__________ ___ ______ --------------- - - - -_�
201
MY-05, 11,25:13
MY -05, 11125113
V
196
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
199
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
197
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -2, Pool, NPAC -1
202
196
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -3, Riffle, NPAC -1
198
______________ ______
- - - - Flan d W.-A-
200
204
As en 1t, 4.29109
------------------- I ---__________-------------
196
MY -01, 10,27,09
202
-- - - B -Mull
MY -02, 11/22/10
h3Y -03, 1024111
AS-Built, 4123109
p'
- - MY-04, 7!26112
198
MY -01, 1028/09
MY -01, 10127/09
194
w 200
_+
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MY -02, 11/23/10
MY -03, 10 +2611
MY -03, 10!24/11
MY -04, 8211 12
MY-04,71.16112
198
MY-05, 11,25:13
MY -05, 11125113
V
196
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -4, Pool, NPAC -1
- - - - Bankfiill
196
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -3, Riffle, NPAC -1
198
- - - - Flan d W.-A-
204
As en 1t, 4.29109
------------------- I ---__________-------------
196
MY -01, 10,27,09
202
- - - -Bu
MY -02, 11/22/10
h3Y -03, 1024111
As- Built, 518109
p'
- - MY-04, 7!26112
192
MY -01, 1028/09
MY -05, 1125.13
194
w 200
_+
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MY -02, t1 /19/10
MY -03, 10 +2611
0
MY -04, 8211 12
MY 04, 8113112
198
MY-05, 11,25:13
MY -05, 1213113
V
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station {feet)
196
194
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -4, Pool, NPAC -1
200
196
198
--------------- _ --------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
194
------------------- I ---__________-------------
196
_
0
- - - -Bu
As- Built, 518109
p'
Ae built. 426109
192
MY -01, 1028/09
194
MY-02, 11/17/10
MY -02, t1 /19/10
MY -03, 10 +2611
MY -03, 1015n 1
MY -04, 8211 12
MY 04, 8113112
MY-05, 11,25:13
MY -05, 1213113
192
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station {feet)
200
198
t 196
194
192
190
0
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -S, Riffle, NPAC -1
_ - _ - Bankftetl
- -- - Flaad FYOne Aru
As- Built, 4/28109
MY -01, 10.28109
MY-02,11117/10
MY -03, 10!26 111
MY-04, 8113/32
MY -05. 12/3/13
10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -6, Pool, NPAC -1
196
--------------- _ --------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
194
s
- - - -Bu
As- Built, 518109
p'
MY -01.1112109
192
MY -02, t1 /19/10
MY -03, 1015n 1
MY 04, 8113112
MY -05, 1213113
190
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY5 1Closeout

Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -9, Pool, NPAC -2
- - -- Bankfull
194
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -8, Riffle, NPAC -2
- __Flood ProneArea
196
AaBuilt, 518/09
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -7, Riffle, NPAC -1
194
MY -01, 12!7/09
MY -02, 11/18 /10
m
- - - - -- -- -= - - - - -- -------------------- - --
MY -01, 1114109
190
------------------ - - - - -- - - -__ -= ----_--_-___----
Flaod Prone Arm
MY -02, 11119!10
-
�' 188
---- Bankfiill
As -Built, 5!8/09
194
------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
MY -03.1015111
MY -05, 12/3/13
------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- MY- 05,1213/13
MY -01, 1172109
MY -04, 7/2612012
190
190
MY -05, 125113
MY-02, 11(19110
------------------ -- - --- - __-------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- --
MY -03, 1015111
199
t
188
MY-04, 8113112
184
MY-04, 8113112
190
186
188
MY -03, 1015111
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
184
186
0 10 20 30 40 50 40 70
Station {feet)
MY-04. 8113112
186
0 10 20 30 40 50
147
MY- 05,1213113
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ______ ___ ____ ___ ________ _________ ____
µ
J
195
vC
-
189
0
10 20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -9, Pool, NPAC -2
- - -- Bankfull
194
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -8, Riffle, NPAC -2
- __Flood ProneArea
196
AaBuilt, 518/09
192
194
MY -01, 12!7/09
MY -02, 11/18 /10
m
- - - - -- -- -= - - - - -- -------------------- - --
MY -01, 1114109
190
------------------ - - - - -- - - -__ -= ----_--_-___----
MY 43, 1014111
MY -02, 11119!10
-
�' 188
---- Bankfiill
}
-i t96
194
------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
MY -03.1015111
MY -05, 12/3/13
------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- MY- 05,1213/13
MY -01, 1217109
MY -04, 7/2612012
190
190
MY -05, 125113
192
------------------ -- - --- - __-------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- --
MY -03, 1015111
184
t
188
MY-04, 8113112
184
MY-04, 8113112
190
186
188
Station (feet)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
184
186
0 10 20 30 40 50 40 70
Station {feet)
186
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -9, Pool, NPAC -2
- -- - Bankfull
194
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -10, Riffle, NPAC -2
Flood Prone Area
a B iltx 515109
192
194
MY -01, 12!7/09
MY -02, 11/18 /10
m
- - - - -- -- -= - - - - -- -------------------- - --
MY -01, 11!4109
190
------------------ - - - - -- - - -__ -= ----_--_-___----
MY 43, 1014111
MY-02,11)23/10
-
�' 188
---- Bankfiill
}
-i t96
142
MY-04, 8113/12
AS- Built,. 5,8109
MY -05, 12/3/13
------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- MY- 05,1213/13
MY -01, 1217109
MY -01, 11!4109
190
190
MY -02, 11123/10
186
------------------ -- - --- - __-------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- --
MY -03, 1015111
184
188
MY-04, 8113112
184
MY-04, 8113112
MY -05, 1213113
186
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -12, Pool, NPAC -3
- -- - Bankfull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -10, Riffle, NPAC -2
Flood Prone Area
a B iltx 515109
190
194
MY -01, 12!7/09
MY -02, 11/18 /10
- - - - -- -- -= - - - - -- -------------------- - --
MY -01, 11!4109
188
MY 43, 1014111
MY-02,11)23/10
192
MY -04. 8113/12
MY 43, 1014!11
}
-i t96
142
MY-04, 8113/12
MY -05, 12/3/13
------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- MY- 05,1213/13
MY -01, 1217109
190
190
g
------------------ -- - --- - __-------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- --
184
188
188
MY-04, 8113112
186
MY-05,121313
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
184
186
0 10 20 30 40 50 40 70
Station {feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -12, Pool, NPAC -3
- - --B�u
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -11, Riffle, NPAC -3
Fl- dProneA-
AlRuilt, 5118/09
190
194
MY -01, 12!7/09
MY -02, 11/18 /10
- - - - -- -- -= - - - - -- -------------------- - --
188
MY 43, 1014111
192
MY -04. 8113/12
}
-i t96
As -BuOt, 5118109
MY -05, 12/3/13
MY -01, 1217109
190
ate!
184
188
MY-04, 8113112
186
MY-05,121313
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
184
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -12, Pool, NPAC -3
192
190
- - - - -- -- -= - - - - -- -------------------- - --
188
- -- - Bankfull
}
-i t96
As -BuOt, 5118109
MY -01, 1217109
MY -02, 11(1 8110
184
MY -03, 10+4!11
MY-04, 8113112
182
MY-05,121313
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY5 1Closeout

Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -13, Riffle, TM
218
223
217
- - -
-MY-01.
222
220
- - -_ - -- M
MY- ol.latzalo9
MY-02, 51115!t0
MY -
221
-03, 9
MY-04, 7!26112
MY -05, 12±2i13
215
— BankLoll
---- Banlsfirli
0 220
__ _ _- - - - - -- ------------------
----------------- _ ____ __ __
—_.- -Flood Prone Area
214
—
As_Buiit,. -0 +2909
219 -------------
MYA1, 10 28'09
-------
MY -02, 11'15'19
MY-02, 11!15.19
213
218
MY -03, 9119111
MY-03,9116111
217
MY-04, 7'26'12
MY-04, 7!26112
217
h4Y' -OS, 1_'3 l3
MY -04, 128113
212
0 10 20 30 40 50
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -16, Pool, T1.2
222
221
220
' 219 Bankfuil
As-Built. 009.109
\ r~ MYAB. 1919199
21$ MY-02, 11115ri0
MY-03, 9 15- it 1
MY-04, 726!2
217 MY -05, 11 2
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -15, Riffle, TLI
218
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -14, Pool, Tl.l
217
- - -
-MY-01.
220
- - -_ - -- M
MY- ol.latzalo9
MY-02, 51115!t0
MY -
219
-03, 9
MY-04, 7!26112
MY -05, 12±2i13
215
— BankLoll
218.
-- - _ As- Built, 409109
214
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
MY -01, 1Or23.09
MY -02, 11'15'19
213
MY -03, 9119111
s
217
MY-04, 7'26'12
h4Y' -OS, 1_'3 l3
212
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
216
215
214
0 10 20 30
40 50
Station (feet)
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -16, Pool, T1.2
222
221
220
' 219 Bankfuil
As-Built. 009.109
\ r~ MYAB. 1919199
21$ MY-02, 11115ri0
MY-03, 9 15- it 1
MY-04, 726!2
217 MY -05, 11 2
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -15, Riffle, TLI
218
217
- - -
-MY-01.
A.-Built 4!29109
- - -_ - -- M
MY- ol.latzalo9
MY-02, 51115!t0
MY -
216
-03, 9
MY-04, 7!26112
MY -05, 12±2i13
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -15, Riffle, TLI
218
217
216
215
— BankLoll
-------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ___ -Flood Roae Area
-- - _ As- Built, 409109
214
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
MY -01, 1Or23.09
MY -02, 11'15'19
213
MY -03, 9119111
MY-04, 7'26'12
h4Y' -OS, 1_'3 l3
212
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
S. ^13
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
— -- - Sankiull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -17, Riffle, T1.2 ___- FI�aPr4n�Ar�
220 - A. Built, 4129/09
MY -0 1, 3089/09
MY -02, 1111 910
219 —MY-03.915111
—MY-04.1126112
MYAS, i1h5 /13
218
217
316
215
0 YO 20 30 40
50
Station (feet)
— _ - Banld'un
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS-18, Riffle, T1.2 ___ -F1coa Prune Area i
218 —4—Built 412909
MY41, 1Oh9i09
217 MY-02, 7182110
MY -03, 9/16111
216
MY-04, T/26n2
r 215 MY -05.11r25113
214
.� 213
212 ______ __ ______ __— __ ___ ____ — - -_ _ __ __ _
211
310
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY51
Closeout
50
Station (feet)
— _ - Banld'un
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS-18, Riffle, T1.2 ___ -F1coa Prune Area i
218 —4—Built 412909
MY41, 1Oh9i09
217 MY-02, 7182110
MY -03, 9/16111
216
MY-04, T/26n2
r 215 MY -05.11r25113
214
.� 213
212 ______ __ ______ __— __ ___ ____ — - -_ _ __ __ _
211
310
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY51
Closeout
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY51
Closeout
Closeout

- - - - Bankfull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -23, Riffle, T2A Fl-a>}o>b{ �,a
202 its -Built, i18 /09
MY -01, 11l209
MY -42, 11/17110
261 MY-03,10/4,11
MY G4, V 1311
MY -05, 12 12 +13
240
199 --- ------------ - - - - -- _- - - - - -- --------------------------------
I98
197
0 5 10 13 20 25 30 35
Station (feet)
Gape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -24, fool, T2B
194
193 – _–____ -- – ti --------- --------- ------- ----- - - - ---
a�
c
•� ��.:: ---- Bankfuil
a �
A. Built. 518. ^09
192
MY -01, 11'2'09
MY -02, 11 1710
-
MY-03.10 4 11
ivlF -44, 87312
191 MY -05, 12!2113
0 10 20 30 44
Station (
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
feet)
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY51
Closeout
Baekfull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -19, Pool, Ti
as- Built, 4130M
205
MY -01, 10129?09
208
MY-02, 1I r22l10
MY lOa6 /11
207
-03,
MY-041 V13112
203
206
MY-05, 1213113
205
202
i
201
204
203
_---- - - - - -- ------- - -- - -_
202
z"
I�z
201
199
198
200
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
- - - - Bankfull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -23, Riffle, T2A Fl-a>}o>b{ �,a
202 its -Built, i18 /09
MY -01, 11l209
MY -42, 11/17110
261 MY-03,10/4,11
MY G4, V 1311
MY -05, 12 12 +13
240
199 --- ------------ - - - - -- _- - - - - -- --------------------------------
I98
197
0 5 10 13 20 25 30 35
Station (feet)
Gape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -24, fool, T2B
194
193 – _–____ -- – ti --------- --------- ------- ----- - - - ---
a�
c
•� ��.:: ---- Bankfuil
a �
A. Built. 518. ^09
192
MY -01, 11'2'09
MY -02, 11 1710
-
MY-03.10 4 11
ivlF -44, 87312
191 MY -05, 12!2113
0 10 20 30 44
Station (
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
feet)
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY51
Closeout
_ - Bauktull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -20, Riffle, T1
_ _ _ Fl-d R} 1-
205
204
203
202
i
201
200
199
198
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
- - - - Bankfull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -23, Riffle, T2A Fl-a>}o>b{ �,a
202 its -Built, i18 /09
MY -01, 11l209
MY -42, 11/17110
261 MY-03,10/4,11
MY G4, V 1311
MY -05, 12 12 +13
240
199 --- ------------ - - - - -- _- - - - - -- --------------------------------
I98
197
0 5 10 13 20 25 30 35
Station (feet)
Gape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -24, fool, T2B
194
193 – _–____ -- – ti --------- --------- ------- ----- - - - ---
a�
c
•� ��.:: ---- Bankfuil
a �
A. Built. 518. ^09
192
MY -01, 11'2'09
MY -02, 11 1710
-
MY-03.10 4 11
ivlF -44, 87312
191 MY -05, 12!2113
0 10 20 30 44
Station (
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
feet)
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY51
Closeout
As- Built, 430 09
MY -01, 10 ?291D9
MY -02, I1I22!10
MY-03, l0/2d111
MY 04, &�13l12
MY -05, [2,13f13
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
feet)
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY51
Closeout
Closeout

Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
- R —kfi o11
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Daisy, XS -28, Pool, T3
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -25, Riffle, T2B
____ F1nud Prone A-
192
196
As Built, 5"8109
____Fl— dPrune —
191
MY -01, 11/2!09
As Built, 5,8109
MY42, 11117110
194
195
MY -03, 1013114
—
MY-03.9+0111
190
MY-04, 8.113112
190
MY-04, 1126 +12
— MY -05, 1213113
MY -02, 1111sli0
MY -05.1213113
193
— _Bankfulk
194
¢a
MY-04, s +13 1 '-
190
192
MY-05, 12 3 13
3t 193
�__
l92
189
_—__—_____—____—__—_____ —__,
MY -0a,. l vslo9
3
'
MY-02, 1111 silo
191
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -27, Pool, T3
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Daisy, XS -28, Pool, T3
J`
r"
As- Built., 5!8109
192
192
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -26, Riffle, T3
____Fl— dPrune —
191
As Built, 5,8109
194
MY -02, 11!18110
191
—
MY-03.9+0111
190
MY -01, 11 +5,09
190
MY-04, 1126 +12
��.-__ ------------------- -- -------------------
MY -02, 1111sli0
MY -05.1213113
193
— _Bankfulk
MY -03, 1013/11
¢a
MY-04, s +13 1 '-
190
192
MY-05, 12 3 13
r
�__
189
_—__—_____—____—__—_____ —__,
MY -0a,. l vslo9
3
'
MY-02, 1111 silo
188
188
191
_— _— ___ —_ - -_ _,__ __________________
r
0 10 20 30
MY-04, 8./32
187
190
187
0 10 20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
186
189
0 10 20 30 40
50 60
188
Station (feet)
0 10 20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -27, Pool, T3
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Daisy, XS -28, Pool, T3
J`
r"
As- Built., 5!8109
192
192
As Built, 5!13109
MY 03, 9'1611
MY -04, 1126/12
MY -05, 1213113
191
MY -0 1, 11!5,09
MY -02, 11!18110
191
—
MY-03.9+0111
190
_ _
190
MY-04, 1126 +12
��.-__ ------------------- -- -------------------
_
MY -05.1213113
— _Bankfulk
¢a
189
190
As -Bunt, srsros
w
�__
189
_—__—_____—____—__—_____ —__,
MY -0a,. l vslo9
3
'
MY-02, 1111 silo
188
188
MY-03,91:6,?: 1
0 10 20 30
MY-04, 8./32
187
MY -0S, 12!3 +13
187
0 10 20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2013 -AM /Closeout
_ — - 3=kfull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Daisy, XS -28, Pool, T3
J`
r"
As- Built., 5!8109
192
MY -01, 11!5!09
MY-02, I111s/i0
As Built, 5!13109
MY 03, 9'1611
MY -04, 1126/12
MY -05, 1213113
MY -0 1, 11!5,09
MY -02, 11!18110
191
MY-03.9+0111
190
MY-04, 1126 +12
191
__________.._____._______________ _________________________._ - -__
MY -05.1213113
¢a
3
190
�__
189
_—__—_____—____—__—_____ —__,
3
'
188
188
187
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)
187
186
0 10 20 30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2013 -AM /Closeout
_ — - 3=kfull
J`
r"
As- Built., 5!8109
MY -01, 11!5!09
MY-02, I111s/i0
As Built, 5!13109
MY 03, 9'1611
MY -04, 1126/12
MY -05, 1213113
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2013 -AM /Closeout
_ — - 3=kfull
Cape Fear River Basin, Farrar Dairy, XS -29, Riffle, T3
___ -Flood Rona Area
193
As Built, 5!13109
MY -0 1, 11!5,09
MY -02, 11!18110
192
MY-03.9+0111
MY-04, 1126 +12
191
__________.._____._______________ _________________________._ - -__
MY -05.1213113
¢a
190
�__
_—__—_____—____—__—_____ —__,
188
187
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2013 -AM /Closeout

w
0
W
192
190
188
W 186
184
203
201
199
197
195
193
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
NPAC -1 MY -05
Stations 15 +75 - 31 +75
■ ■ ■ ■
■ ■ ■
■
1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200
Station (ft)
As- Built, 4/28/09 MY -01, 10/28/09 MY-02,11/23/10 MY-03,10/24/11 MY -04, 7/26/12 MY -05 ■ Bankfull — — — Water Surface
■ ' ■ ■ Beaver Dams
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
NPAC -2 MY -05
Stations 57 +55 - 63 +77
5750 5800 5850 5900 5950 6000 6050 6100 6150 6200 6250 6300 6350 6400
Station ft
As- Built, 5/8/09 MY -01, 11/4/09 MY -02, 11/19/10 MY- 03,10/25/11 MY-04,7/26/12 t MY -05 ■ Bankfull — — — Water Surface
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

w
0
W
222
220
218
216
a
0
214
W 212
210
224
222
220
218
216
214
212
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 1.1 MY -05
Stations 80 +25 - 85 +75
■
■
8000 8050 8100 8150 8200 8250 8300 8350 8400 8450 8500 8550
Station (ft)
As- Built, 4/29/09 MY -01, 10/27/09 MY-02,11/15/10 MY -03, 9/19/11 MY-04,8/13/12 t MY -05 ■ Bankfull - - - - Water Surface
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 1.2 MY -05
Stations 91 +45 - 96 +70
8600
■
■
Gam.— ���� _ � ■
_ t
9145
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
9195 9245 9295 9345 9395 9445 9495 9545 9595
Station (ft)
As- Built, 4/29/09 MY -01, 10/29/09 MY- 02,11/16/10 MY -03, 9/16/11 MY -04, 8/13/12 t MY -05 ■ Bankfull
9645
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY5 1Closeout

w
0
>
w
w
0
w
206
204
202
200
198
196
194
192
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 1 MY -05
Stations 103 +50 - 108 +77
Grade Control Structures installed in 2010
■
- -- __ ■
■
Tr �_ ■
�1�� - ------ - - - - --
10350 10400 10450 10500 105.50
As- Built, 4/30/09 MY -01, 10/29/09 MY -02, 11/22/10
202
200
198
196 -
194
192
190
10600 10650 10700 10750 10800 10850
Station (ft)
MY-03,10/26/11 MY -04, 8/13/12 - MY -05 ■ Bankfull - - - - Water Surface
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 2 MY -05
Stations 112 +80 - 118 +37
■
■
■ ■ ■
Survey Malfunction M' ■
■
11250
11300 11350 11400 11450 11500 11550 11600 11650 11700 11750
Station (ft)
As- Built, 5/8/09 MY- 01,11/2/09 MY -02, 11/17/10 MY -03, 10/4/11 MY -04, 8/13/12 — MY -05 ■ Bankfull
11800 11850
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

a
0
W
193
192
191
190
189
188
187
186
185
Farrar Dairy Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 3 MY -05
Stations 133 +85 - 139 +73
Beaver
Dams
13350 13400 13450 13500 13550 13600 13650 13700 13750 13800 13850 13900 13950 14000
Station (ft)
As- Built, 5/8/09 MY -01, 11/5/09 MY-02,11/18/10 MY-03,10/5/11 MY-04,11/26/12 t MY -05 ■ Bankfull — — — Water Surface
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 1Closeout

Table 4a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 1
Riffle
Cross - Section 2
Pool
Cross - Section 3
Pool
Reach
NPAC 1
NPAC 1
NPAC 1
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY41
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY31
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
19.6
20.0
18.5
19.2
18.5
18.1
20.9
23.9
24.8
22.3
21.1
23.1
19.6
16.0
16.0
18.9
19.2
17.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
-
-
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ftz)
31.0
31.7
31.6
32.4
31.0
30.2
29.2
28.8
32.9
31.1
31.6
32.9
26.6
19.9
19.9
23.4
24.0
15.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
2.7
2.9
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.5
3.6
2.5
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.3
1.8
Width/Depth Ratio
12.4
12.6
10.8
11.4
11.1
10.8
-
-
-
-
-
13.1
14.4
12.9
12.9
15.3
15.4
15.4
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
-
-
-
-
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
0.07
1 0.06
0.06
1 0.06
1 0.13
1 0.06
1 0.09
1 0.14
1 0.28
1 0.06
1 0.43
1 2.00
1 0.06
0.18
1 0.062
1 0.06
1 0.07
0.16
d84 mm
0.22
1 0.11
0.11
1 0.10
1 0.22
1 1.60
1 0.65
1 0.49
1 3.70
1 0.26
1 3.40
1 4.90
1 0.11
0.44
1 0.09
1 0.06
1 0.11
2.80
Table 4b. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 4
Riffle
Cross - Section 5
Riffle
Cross - Section 6
Riffle
Reach
NPAC 1
NPAC 1
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.9
18.5
18.6
18.3
19.0
16.1
18.4
18.0
18.0
17.9
19.1
17.2
20.4
18.6
20.4
21.1
20.8
18.7
Flood prone Width ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
24.7
26.7
28.7
24.5
21.3
22.0
26.5
24.6
24.6
26.7
31.5
21.5
26.6
25.1
28.1
27.2
27.8
25.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.3
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.8
3.2
3.0
2.7
2.5
3.1
2.3
2.3
2.9
2.7
2.9
2.5
3.0
3.1
3.5
3.3
3.5
1 3.3
Width/Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
12.8
13.1
13.1
12.0
11.6
13.8
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
-
-
-
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
0.54
1 0.11
1 0.10
1 0.11
1 0.11
1 0.11
1 0.09
1 0.09
1 0.21
1 0.20
1 0.09
1 0.09
1 0.12
1 0.07
10.073
1 0.06
1 0.13
1 0.08
d84 mm
0.82
1 0.40
1 0.34
1 0.36
1 0.33
1 0.33
1 0.37
1 0.38
1 0.38
1 0.37
1 0.23
1 0.23
1 0.29
1 0.26
1 0.14
1 0.06
1 0.27
1 0.21
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC[ Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Table 4c. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 7
Riffle
Cross - Section 8
Riffle
Cross - Section 9
Riffle
Reach
NPAC 2
NPAC 1
NPAC 2
NPAC 2 mmi
MYO
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
20.7
20.0
20.9
20.3
20.6
19.9
19.5
18.9
19.2
21.2
20.7
21.6
22.9
22.2
24.7
23.3
23.2
21.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
-
35.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (fe)
32.2
30.7
33.6
33.5
32.5
29.9
35.9
35.0
36.0
28.0
29.9
28.0
36.0
34.3
36.7
31.9
34.6
32.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.3
1.4
1 1.3
1.6
1 1.5
1.5
1 1.4
1.5
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.7
2.9
3.2
3.4
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.6
3.9
2.7
2.9
2.8
3.4
3.2
4.2
3.6
3.7
3.9
Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
13.0
13.0
12.3
13.1
13.7
10.6
10.2
10.2
16.1
14.3
16.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
-
-
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
Substrate
d50 (mm)j
Substrate
d50 (mm)j
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
57
35
1 27
1 0.11
1 0.29
0.17
1 1.20
0.19
0.22
d84 mm
0.10
1 0.10
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.07
1 0.10
1 0.09
1 110
1 69
1 53
1 0.66
1 0.69
1 0.23
1 1.80 1
0.44
0.45
* In 2011, a constructed riffle was installed at XS8 due to stream maintenance issues.
Table 4d. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 10
Pool
Cross - Section 11
Riffle
Cross - Section 12
Riffle
Reach
NPAC 2
NPAC 3
NPAC 3
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
22.6
21.0
20.2
19.7
19.3
19.3
24.2
21.6
23.9
23.9
24.3
20.8
22.3
21.0
22.8
22.7
22.6
23.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
35.8
34.0
31.3
28.0
29.9
26.9
55.8
53.1
59.8
54.9
60.4
56.7
42.0
38.0
50.9
49.0
49.9
55.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.6
1 1.5
1 1.4
1.6
1 1.4
2.3
1 2.2
2.5
1 2.3
2.5
2.7
1.9
1.8
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.7
2.2
3.6
3.5
4.0
3.6
4.2
4.2
3.2
3.5
4.5
4.4
4.6
5.8
Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
13.0
13.0
13.9
12.4
12.4
10.5
8.7
9.6
10.4
9.8
7.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
-
-
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
Substrate
d50 (mm)j
0.06
1 0.49
1 0.35
1 0.32
1 0.22
1 0.20
1 0.71
1 0.29
1 0.15
1 0.07
1 0.06
1 0.15
1 1.40
1 0.23
1 0.09
1 0.08
1 0.35
1 0.32
d84 mm
3.10
1 9.60
1 18.0
1 8.90
1 0.39
1 0.39
1 0.90
1 0.44
1 0.21
1 0.12
1 0.62
1 3.00
1 3.00
1 0.40
1 0.11
1 0.11
1 0.45
1 0.43
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 1Closeout

Table 4e. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 13
Riffle
Cross - Section 14
Riffle
Cross - Section 15
Pool
Reach
T1.1
1.2
T1.1
T1.1
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.9
8.0
7.2
7.4
7.7
6.5
7.1
6.9
7.3
7.6
7.6
7.5
5.9
5.8
6.5
6.0
6.5
5.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
16
16
16
16
16
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
29
30
30
30
30
30
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft )
2.4
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
1.7
5.1
5.2
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.5
2.3
2.5
2.2
2.1
2.8
2.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.5
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.2
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
Width /Depth Ratio
19.8
22.9
18.5
19.6
21.9
24.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
15.1
13.2
13.2
17.1
15.2
15.7
Entrenchment Ratio
2.3
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.3
5.5
5.4
5.4
-
5.7
5.2
4.9
5.2
5.2
5.1
4.6
3.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1 1.0
1.0
Substrate
d50 (mm)j
0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.21
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1.50
d84 mm
0.07
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.50
1 0.87
1 0.06
137.00
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.09
1 11.00
1 0.48
1 0.50
1 13.00
6.50
Table 4f. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 16
Riffle
Cross - Section 17
Riffle
Cross - Section 18
Pool
Reach
T
1.2
T1.2
T 1.2
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY41
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
9.2
9.3
9.0
8.8
8
8.3
8.5
8.5
8.2
8.7
7.5
6.9
6.9
7.0
6.9
6.7
6.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
46
46
46
46
46
46
26
26
26
26
26
26
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
6.4
6.8
6.8
6.4
6.4
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.7
5.4
5.7
4.9
5.2
5.1
5.6
5.1
4.6
5.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
1 0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.3
1 1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.5
Width /Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
12.1
12.5
12.7
12.5
11.6
11.5
9.2
9.3
8.8
9.3
9.8
8.5
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.6
5.7
5.2
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.8
3.5
4.7
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Substrate
d50 (mm)j
0.31
1 0.12
1 0.30
1 0.31
1 0.13
1 0.10
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.25
1 0.28
1 0.26
1 0.79
1 0.30
d84 mm
0.48
0.35
0.42
0.43
2.00
0.23
0.08
44.00
0.42
0.37
1.40
0.69
0.10
0.65
0.42
0.41
3.40
1.30
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Table 4e. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 19
Riffle
Cross- Section 20
Riffle
Cross - Section 21
Pool
Reach
T1
T1
T1
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.5
10.5
9.3
10.6
10.6
10.9
10.3
9.1
8.9
8.9
12.1
9.4
8.6
10.1
10.1
13.5
14.1
11.8
Floodprone Width(ft)
fl9.5
-
-
-
-
-
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft )
5.1
12.0
10.8
11.7
10.3
12.5
9.7
8.3
8.5
8.1
10.2
10.1
8.2
9.9
10.3
11.3
11.1
7.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.2
0.9
1.0
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
1 0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 0.8
0.8
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
2.5
2.3
2.1
1.8
2.3
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.8
2.0
2
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.8
1.7
Width /Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
10.9
10.1
12.0
9.8
15.1
11.8
9.0
10.3
9.9
16.1
17.9
18.6
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
0.06
1 0.06
1 0.33
1 0.33
1 0.26
1 0.36
1 0.062
0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.16
1 1.20
1 0.53
1 0.06
1 0.3
1 0.06
1 0.062
0.52
d84 mm
0.12
1 0.06
1 0.44
1 0.44
1 0.44
1 1.20
1 0.10
1 0.06
1 0.33
1 0.06
1 2.40
1 5.40
1 2.0
1 7.3
1 0.44
1 0.21
1 1.10
1 1.10
Table 4f. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 22
Riffle
Cross - Section 23
Riffle
Cross - Section 24
Pool
Reach
T2
T2
T2
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.5
7.5
8.9
8.5
8.4
8.1
5.7
5.9
6.0
6.8
6.8
6.5
7.1
6.5
7.7
6.9
9.0
6.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
30
31
31
31
30
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
5.1
5.0
5.5
5.6
5.8
5.5
2.8
2.8
2.9
3.4
2.5
2.5
4.2
3.9
4.5
4.1
4.7
3.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
Width /Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
11.6
12.8
13.2
13.6
18.4
16.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
5.3
5.2
4.0
4.4
4.4
4.2
-
-
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.16
0.15
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.82
11
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
d84 mm
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.22
0.21
16
52
0.19
17.0
25.0
49
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 10oseout

Table 4e. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 25
Riffle
Cross - Section 26
Riffle
Cross - Section 27
Pool
Reach
T3
T2
T3,
MYI
MY2
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.2
5.6
6.7
5.9
8.4
6.4
18.4
17.6
17.6
17.9
17.9
8.3
19.2
18.9
21.2
19.1
20.1
19.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
2.5
2.7
2.9
2.7
3.2
2.7
21.4
20.1
15.8
14.7
15.8
1.5
24.2
22.1
18.3
17.9
20.5
19.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.4
1.3
1.2
0.9
0.9
1.0
1 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.8
1.9
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.5
0.2
2.5
2.3
1.6
1.6
2.0
2.0
Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
11.7
15.5
12.9
22.1
15.2
15.8
15.5
19.6
21.8
20.3
45.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
0.06
0.06
-
-
1 0.19
1 5.7
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.4
-
-
Substrate
d50 (mm)l
0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.09
1 0.14
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.37
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.07
1 0.06 1
0.30
0.16
d84 mm
0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.06
1 0.09
1 0.18
1 0.21
1 0.10
1 0.10
1 0.82
1 0.10
1 0.08
1 0.10
1 0.09 1
1.00
1 0.23
Table 4f. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary continued
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Parameter
Cross - Section 28
Riffle
Cross - Section 29
Riffle
Reach
T3
T3
Dimension
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Width (ft)
23.3
23.3
23.5
23.8
23.8
23.2
14.9
15.4
15.3
14.8
15.5
17.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
29.1
29.4
22.5
21.9
24.7
21.6
18.4
19.4
18.2
15.9
17.6
16.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.3
1 1.0
1 0.9
1.0
1 0.5
1.2
1 1.3
1.2
1 1.1
1.1
1 1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.6
2.7
1.4
1.4
1.7
0.9
1.9
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.9
1.9
Width/Depth Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
12.1
12.2
12.9
13.8
13.7
17.6
Entrenchment Ratio
-
-
-
-
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio
-
-
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Substrate
-
d50 (mm)
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.09
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
1 0.06
1 2.3
d84 mm
0.06
0.06
0.11
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.06
0.06
0.46
0.08
1 0.19
1 5.7
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC[ Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 1Closeout

Table 5. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Success Criteria Achieved / Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Gauge
Year 1 (2009)
Year 2 (2010)
Year 3 (2011)
Year 4 (2012)
Year 5 (2013)
Yes /41
Yes /33
Yes /60
Yes /59
Yes /45
Well I
16.3%
13.1%
23.9%
23.5%
17.9%
Yes /28
Yes /10
Yes /148
Yes /41
Yes /32
Well 2
11.2%
4.0%
59.0%
16.3%
12.7%
Yes /25
Yes /28
Yes /14
Yes /20
Yes /31
Well 3
10.0%
11.2%
5.6%
8.0%
12.4%
Yes /25
No /8
Yes /15
Yes /19
Yes /44
Well
(10.0% )
(3.2 %)
6.0%
7.6%
(17.3%
Yes /30
Yes /33
Yes /52
Yes /100
Yes /64
Well
12.0%
13.1%
20.7%
39.8%
25.5%
Yes /20
Yes /39
No /0
No /0
Yes /57
Well 6
8.8%
15.5%
0%
0%
22.5%
Yes /44
Yes /39
Yes /19
Yes /16
Yes /17
Well ?
(17.5 %)
(15.5 %)
(7.6% )
(6.4 %)
(6.8 %)
Well 8
Yes /31
Installed 6 -4 -13
Well 9
Yes /47
Installed 6 -4 -13
(18.7 %)
Well 10
Yes /13
Installed 6 -4 -13
5.0%
Well 11
No /4
Installed 6 -4 -13
(1.4 %)
Well 12
No /0
Installed 8 -20 -13
(4.3 %)
Yes /111
Yes /63
Yes /251
Yes /46
Yes /105
Well Reference
42.2%
25.1%
100.0%
18.3%
41.8%
12
10
,6
w
94
Farrar 30 -70 Percentile Graph
Lillington 2.0 W, NC Weather Station
201TIlonthly Rainfall
9 W-A a N qh L VE Z I a N-MV01h, U��
M IN k I - V, V N 0 U �
rm " 0 0 0 0 V" M
M M M M M M M M
Date LID O
2013 Rainfall +30% Less Than
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC[ Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Table 6. Hydrological (Bankfull) Verifications
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo Number
Rainfall Event
Collection
automated
3/5/2010
1/21/2010
N/A
1.84"
stream gauge
automated
3/5/2010
2/6/2010
N/A
1.79"
stream gauge
3/21/2012
3/21/2012
N/A
N/A
2.10"
8/28/2012
8/28/2012
N/A
N/A
2.52"
automated
8/20/2013
6/7/2013
N/A
1.83"
stream gauge
automated
8/20/2013
6/8/2013
N/A
2.78"
stream gauge
automated
8/20/2013
7/11/2013
N/A
2.33"
stream gauge
automated
8/20/2013
7/12/2013
N/A
2.38"
stream gauge
Due to the frequent beaver activity throughout the site, many parts of the site have had extended periods
of backwater. Combined with large precipitation events, there have been instances (at least two in 2012)
where flows have gone out of the bankfull channel in 2012, but it is difficult to determine if these events
are true bankfull events. From examining precipitation data in 2010 and the corresponding bankfull
events, it is likely that the 2.10" rain event on March 21, 2012 and 2.52" rain event on August 28, 2012
produced bankfull events.
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KC[ Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Table 7a. Riparian Buffer Vegetation History (stems /acre)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Plot Number
MY -00
Planted
MY -01
Planted
MY -02
Planted Total
MY -03
Planted Total
MY -04
Planted Total
MY -05
Planted Total
1
880
840
840
840
720
1,578
648
2,065
728
2,064
2
720
560
520
1000
486
1,133
486
1,134
486
931
3
320
400*
440
5,720
243
2,226
202
3,117
202
7,608
4
840
400
520
3,960
445
1,983
405
2,024
324
2,590
5
760
640
680
2,240
567
1 890
567
1,457
526
1,295
6
560
440
440
480
445
445
445
972
769
1,255
7
840
720
680
840
688
1,174
688
1,296
688
1,255
8
560
560
560
560
526
607
526
688
647
1,052
9
600
600
600
600
567
647
324
324
324
567
10
520
520
480
560
486
567
486
931
486
931
11
680
360
240
440
202
1,214
202
1,012
202
1,740
12
520
240
320
320
324
364
324
445
324
445
13
720
480
480
600
486
1,295
486
1,660
486
1,942
14
520
480
480
680
486
769
445
1,498
445
2,630
15
560
520
520
520
526
607
526
850
647
850
*Uncounted stems from previous year added to total
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 1Closeout

Table 7b. Wetland Vegetation History (stems /acre)
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Plot Number
MY -00
Planted
MY -01
Planted
MY -02
Planted Total
MY -03
Planted Total
MY -04
Planted Total
MY -05
Planted Total
16
400
400
360
400
364
890
364
1,134
364
1,214
17
560
520
520
520
526
809
486
1,215
486
1,052
18
400
400
400
480
405
890
405
1,174
405
1,214
19
1,000
960
920
1,040
971
1,012
931
1,053
931
1,052
20
520
520
480
480
526
1,012
526
1,377
526
1,700
21
520
480
480
6,080
486
4,168
324
2,996
162
3,521
22
840
840
880
6,280
850
8,134
769
8,016
567
9,105
23
920
800
760
3,320
769
5,949
688
5,466
647
5,261
24
520
480
400
480
405
567
324
850
324
1,133
25
440
440
440
680
445
890
364
850
364
1,012
26
520
520
520
560
526
668
526
1,255
486
688
27
480
480
480
920
405
647
202
486
202
688
28
480
400
400
800
364
688
364
1,296
567
971
29
520
560
440
920
405
850
405
1,215
567
1,497
30
440
440
440
480
445
931
445
1,093
445
971
31
440
400
360
480
364
526
364
688
243
364
32
400
400
400
400
243
364
243
607
243
647
33
440
400
400
400
405
486
405
688
445
1,538
34
480
360
320
360
283
324
283
405
283
364
35
400
360
280
320
283
324
283
405
243
526
36
640
640
640
640
607
607
648
729
647
728
37
480
440
400
560
405
567
405
1,296
324
850
38
520
280
280
280
162
283
162
526
121
486
39
520
440
440
440
364
486
364
729
445
850
40
600
600
560
600
567
607
567
607
526
607
41
600
440
440
440
445
526
445
526
567
1,052
42
680
560
560
560
567
567
567
1255
607
2,307
43
480
400
400
400
405
688
324
607
283
607
44
560
400
480
480
445
445
405
972
647
931
45
480
320
120
160
81
81
81
648
405
769
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 1Closeout

4.0 EEP RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
The stream is functioning as designed and has not developed any significant problems. The monitored
cross - sections and profiles indicate some changes over the course of monitoring, but the stream in these
areas is not trending towards instability.
During the fifth year of monitoring wetland hydrology was achieved at ten of the twelve monitoring wells
on the site. The two gauges (Gauges 11 and 12) that did not demonstrate wetland hydrology in 2013 were
installed in June and August 2013, which is after the time period that most of the gauges meet the
hydrology success criteria, in the early part of the growing season. The precipitation data show that 2013
was an average year for rainfall. The months of February, April, May, and November experienced
average rainfall. Rainfall was less than average in January, March, May, August, September, October, and
December, while June and July experienced above average rainfall.
With multiple bankfull events since construction, the stream has met the success criterion of at least two
bankfull events occurring in separate years over the course of the monitoring period. The two stream
gauges recorded four bankfull events for 2013.
The monitored vegetation plots within the stream buffer and wetland revealed that the planted vegetation
is growing well with 486 and 436 stems /acre, respectively. The planted vegetation has been doing well,
with some plots experiencing more mortality than others. This mortality can be attributed to normal losses
after the initial planting as well as aggressive growth from the site's herbaceous vegetation. The site also
has vigorous volunteers, which will increase the overall vegetation success of the site.
Overall the stream and the site's vegetation condition indicate that it is on a path to success. The EEP
recommends that this site be closed out with 11,881 SMUs and 64.05 Riparian WMUs.
5.0 CONTINGENCIES
None
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCIAssoeiates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Pre - Construction Photos
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Tributary 2
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Post - Construction Photos MY -05
PP2 MY05 - 12/11/13
PP4 - MY05 - 12/11/13
PP22 - MY05 - 12/11/13
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
PP3 - MY05 - 12/11/13
PP20 - MY05 - 12/11/13
PP8 - MY05 - 1/9/14
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY5 /Closeout

PP 13 - MY05 - 1/9/14
PP27 - MY05 - 1/9/14
PP32 - MY05 - 1/9/14
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
PP 18 - MY05 - 1/9/14
PP30 - MY05 - 1/9/14
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013 -MY5 /Closeout

Appendix A
Watershed Planning Summary
The Farrar Dairy Project is not in a watershed planning area.
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 1Closeout

Appendix B - Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes a
portion of the following parcel:
The conservation easement is available at the county register of deeds office or at the link below:
http: // www.nceep.net /GIS_DATA/PROPERTY /92552 FarrarDairypdf
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout
Site Protection
Deed Book &
Acreage
Grantor
County
Instrument
Page Number
protected
James M. Farrar wife,
Harnett
Conservation
2402/ 149
99.860
Angela B. Dietrich Farrar
Easement
Brigham B. Wilson and
Conservation
Harnett
2402/161
54.100
wife Kathleen S. Wilson
Easement
Sandra Pait Blackmon and
Conservation
Husband, Robert C.
Harnett
2402/171
12.960
Blackmon
Easement
The conservation easement is available at the county register of deeds office or at the link below:
http: // www.nceep.net /GIS_DATA/PROPERTY /92552 FarrarDairypdf
Farrar Dairy Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013 -MY5 /Closeout

C - Jurisdictional Determination & Permits Michael F. 13asley, Governor
William G. Ross .lr., Secretary
North Carolina Deparlmeal. of Environment and Natural Resources
July 23, 2008
Mr. Alex French
ICCI Technologies, Inc.
4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject Property: Farrar Dairy
North Prong of Anderson Creek (030614, 18- 23 -32, C]
Approval of 401 'Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. French:
Coleen 1 -1. Sullins, Director
Division o €'Water Qualify
DWQ Project 4 08 -0994
Harnett County
You have our approval, in accordanee with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 28.65 acres of 404 /wetland, 10,545 linear feet of perennial stream, and 0.62
acres of open water (pond) as described in your application dated June 20, 2008, and received by the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on June 20, 2008, to conduct a wetland and stream restoration at the
site. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number(s) 3689 (GC3689). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide
Permits) 27 (NW27) when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). In addition, you
Should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go
ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non - discharge
regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to
waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the properly is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2I-I ,0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved Units
Plan Location or Reference
404 /Worland
28,65 (acres) _
PCN page of 13
Stream - perennial
10,545 (linear feet)
PCN page 9 of 13
Open Water (pondl—
0.62 (acres)
PCN page.9 of 13
401 Oversight /Ex press Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Servicc Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
2321 Crabtree 13001evatd, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone, 919-733-1796 1 FAX [phone] ]nternct: litlp_//h2o cnr.statc.ne,11s/pcwalands
An Equal Oppottun ily/Mil irmalive Action Employer — 50% Recycled /] 0% Post Consumer Paper
011C
Noj-tllcnrolin;a
ARf111VIlf

KCt Technologies, [tic.
Page 2 of 3
July 23, 2008
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Frosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
&mliment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal; or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor -owned or [cased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and /or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities;
6. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27694 -1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall expire upOt3
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that

KCI Technologies, Inc.
Page 3 of 3
July 23, 2008
You receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the can Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan at 919 - 7311786,
CHSlijrn
Enclosures: GC3689
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
DLR Fayetteville Regional Office
l- i le Copy
Central Files
ely, f'
u� Coleen H. Sullins
F' le name: 080994i,arrarDaisy(iiarnett)401

Action Id. 2006 -40970
t-- . ARMY COMPS OF ENGINE z,j S
WILMlNGTQN DISTRICT
County: Harnett
U.S.G.S. Quad: Anderson Creels
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Applicant /Property Owner:
Address:
Phone Number:
Property description:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
Mr. Steve Stokes
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Building 11, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
919- 783 -9214
176 Nearest Town Lillington
North Prong Anderson Creels River Basin Cape Fear
030300040513 Coordinates N 35.29891 W — 78.93111
Location description: Tire l2roperty is adjacent to North Prona Anderson Creek and is located south of Farrar Dairy
Road east of Powell Farm Road north of Lernuel Black Road west of NC Highway 210 southwest of Lillin ton
!-Harnett North Carolina.
Indicate Which, of the Following Alpply.
_ Based on preliminary information, there play be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described lgoyertv subject to the pernnit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act CWA 33 USC 1344. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination May be relied upon fora eriod not to exceed five ytgLs from the date
of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S, on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or
our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely nnarnier. For a nnore
tinily delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the
Corps.
The waters of the U.S. on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the
Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surve ed and are accuratel depicted on the
slat signed by the Corps Regulatory, Official ideutified below on Au ust 26 2007. Unless there is a chin 7e in tine
law or our aublislred re 7ulations this determination may be relied upon fora period not to exceed five ears from
the date of this notification.
there are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
Page 1 of 2

Action ID: SAW - 2007 -- 0172:
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastai Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC at (910) 796 -7215 to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and /or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Ronnie Smith at L2L01 251 -4829
Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the :1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual
and is adjacent to North Prong Anderson Creels a tributary of Anderson Creels a tributary of the Little River, a
tributary of the Care Fear River which is a navigable water of the U.S.
Remarks: This determination is based on information provided, by KCI Associates of NC and a site visit conducted on
September 27 2006 bV Ronnie Smith,
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: August 20 2007
Corps Regulatory Official (Initial): RDS
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Expiration Date: August 20 2012
0 A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this fOTM.
A copy of the "Notification Of Administrative Appeal Options And Process And Request For Appeal" form must be
transmitted with the property owner /agent copy of this form.
If the property contains isolated wetlands /waters, please indicate in "Remarks" section and attach the
"Isolated Determination Information Sheet" to the file copy of this form.
/'age 2 of 2

A licant: KCI Associates of NC
Pp �
File Number: 2006
40970
Date. A...
txgust 27, 2007
Attached is: signed plat
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
X
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
SECIONX T1?e011og i3entiies youx,ixgts.arid ot>�ois reafin'admuistrafe
E
anat of t1� ,ltTP
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
® OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section TI of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
Permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the pernut to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the perrnit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered pernut for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
* ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptauce of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the pernut.
m APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terrrrs and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C. PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer, This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved. TD or
provide new information.
® ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD, Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
® APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD tender the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer, This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTIONII REOUEST FOR APPEAL or 0�3JECTIONS TU AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has detennined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
PONT,OF CO�ITACT,FQIt;QUES 1IC?I�S.,ORNFORIVIATION ..
If you have questions regarding this decision acrd /or If you only have questions regarding the appeal process
the appeal process you may contact: you may also contact:
Ronnie Smith Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
PO Box 1890 CESAD- ET -CO-R
Wilmington, NC 28402 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this
forma to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Divisions, Attn. Ronnie Smith, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, PO Box 1890, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to-
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, C'11'SAD -FT -C O -R, 60 Forsyth Street, Rooms 9M] 5, Atlanta,
Georgia 303038801

"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY
DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404
OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN
THE LAW OR OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED
UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS
DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987
CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL"
NAME: ry
lz
TITLE: 'i f ' l or
r i 4
DATE: S 1 2 a ® �
or
AID. '5 eD (,- L40'i ;3F /
ex
WETLAND AREA TABLE
WETLAND STREAM
ACREAGE
W1
1.70 AC
W2
60.60 AC
W3 +W4
13.15 AC
W6
0.06 AC
W7
0.07 AC
W8
0.10 AC
W9
1.56 AC
W10
0.62 AC
Wi l
2.28 AC
Tl
0.15 AC
T2
0.02 AC
S2
0.21 AC
S3
0.16 AC
S4
0.32 AC
S5
0.04 AC
S6
0.13 AC
P1
1.11 AC
P2
7.09 AC
I, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS MAP WAS
r.
DRAY&4 MY SUPERVISION,RTHAT STHE BOUNDARIESM NOT SURVEYEDDARENCLEARLY
JURISDICTIDNAL INDICATED THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS
STREAM I GREATER THAN 1:10,000, THAT THIS MAP DO i%Wdl{ RERfjg ENT -
AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND HA rjJt3T AREJ
IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47--31) AS
f ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NL £�r�fi�r� ,<
r - - - - -- -- -- ----- - --1 20TH DAY -17F DECEMBER, 21)05.
WETLAND`d
SEE LEET ^yN6° I WETLAND I g
14• QF 14 "T2" L SEAL SITE
3
I ! m
N �RTH CAROLINA' R GISTRATI� ' t"o
-
I I JAMES M. GELLE,+I IrhpU;R�.��pb,�
STREAM STREAM I WETLAND`'
„Ti„ i "W7,.
_ --------------- � - -�
GENERAL NOTES:
THE BASIS OF THE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON IS THE NORTH
CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH AMERICAN
DATUM 1983.
ALL WETLAND FLAGS AND DATA POINTS WERE LOCATED IN THE
FIELD BY CONVENTIONAL SURVEY METHODS BETWEEN JULY AND
OCTOBER 2006.
OSANDRA WOMACK PAIT
PIN 0516 -86 -5081
DB 794 -970
JAMES FARRAR
PIN 0516 -94 -3941, PIN 0516 -96 -8380,
2 PIN 0526 -05 -0461, PIN 0526 -03 -4936
DB 471 -27, DB 1055 -324,
DB 1088 -933
OBRIGHAM & KATHLEEN WILSON
PIN 0526 -22 -5697
DB 903 -983
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF
NORTH CAROLINA
12065438
PROPERTY LINE
WETLAND DELINEATION PLAT
KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C. FOR
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS SITE
® STATE ROADS 1126 AND 1127
ANDERSON CREEK TOWNSHIP
4501 SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 220 HARNETT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PHONE [phone] * FAX [phone] DATE: SCALE: SH
OCT 31 2006 1" = 806 i Of
WETLANDS
®
STREAM
•
SURVEY BOUNDARY LIMITS
PROPERTY LINE
WETLAND DELINEATION PLAT
KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C. FOR
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS SITE
® STATE ROADS 1126 AND 1127
ANDERSON CREEK TOWNSHIP
4501 SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 220 HARNETT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PHONE [phone] * FAX [phone] DATE: SCALE: SH
OCT 31 2006 1" = 806 i Of

APPENDIX - D Debit Ledger
Mitigation Project Name Farra Dairy
EEP IMS ID 92552
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030004
Annlied Credit Ratios: 1.1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5'1 1 1 3.1 2 1 5:1 1:1 3:1 21 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
*NOTE: This debit is associated with a Small Impact Policy request to provide riparian wetland mitigation credits in Cape Fear 03030004 for a non - riparian wetland mitigation requirement in Cape Fear 03030003.
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014
C
O
E
E
E
C
C '
„
C
m
O
T
C
E
C
2
2
o
C
O
E
N C
E
m
m
E
w °
n
.
a �
a u
a Z
L
u
2
y N
N O
L
W
N N
d
N
C y
U
O
N
O C 0
O C U
OC A
O C 2!
N N
M U
N O
rn N `
W
`
zo
z
z
z
� :
v
0 C
L) LU
0w
L)ia
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
11,561.00
180.00
1,240.00
43.80
22.12
45.93
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
11,561.00
72.00
248.00
43.80
11.06
9.19
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2002 -00650
B -4152
0.04
2004 -0806
1997 -04287
U -0620
2.47
NCDOT TIP U -2912 - Owen Drive
2004 -1244
2000 -00913
Extension
1
1
1.66
NCDOT TIP U -3311 B - SR 1141
1998 -01418
Improvements
0.19
NCDOT TIP R -2417C - Sanford
2000 -1432
2002 -20899
Bypass
259.00
0.75
NCDOT TIP R -2417C - Sanford
2000 -1432
2002 -20899
Bypass
0.04
NCDOT TIP U-281 OA - SR 1003
2008 -1731
2008 -02927
Widening
273.00
0.90
NCDOT TIP U -3849 - SR 1363
2008 -1716
2008 -03314
Improvements
554.00
0.13
0.04
2008 - 02788 -043
SR 2196 - Division 6
0.02
NCDOT TIP U -4444A - NC 210
2009 -0372
2009 -00654
Improvements
991.00
7.33
NCDOT TIP B -4492 - Bridge 212 on
2009 -1227
2009 -01705 -026
SR 1838
133.00
340.00
NCDOT TIP B -4138 - Bridge 46 on 1-
2009 -1321
2003 -00357
40 / NC 210
197.001
1 425.00
0.481
1
NCDOT TIP R -2635 - Western Wake
2007 -1450
2007 -02903
Expressway (NC 540)
4,550.00
180.00
325.00
5.24
0.05
NCDOT TIP U -2810 B / C - SR
2008 -1731
2008 -02927
1003 Widening
0.20
NCDOT TIP R -2812 - NC 211
2011 -0136
1998 -02180
Widening
1.90
NCDOT TIP R -0210 -US 1 (Vass
1993 -00570
Bypass)
0.03
' NCDOT TIP R -2610 - US 421
2004 -0158
1997 -00360
Widening
0.17
NCDOT TIP R -0609 IA / IB / R-
2006 -0331
2004 -00340
2606 - US 311 Bypass
3.17
Statewide ILF Credit Purchase
4,604.00
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
1 0.001
0.001
150.00
19.091
1 22.08
45.88
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
1 0.001
0.001
60.00119.091
1 11.04
9.18
*NOTE: This debit is associated with a Small Impact Policy request to provide riparian wetland mitigation credits in Cape Fear 03030004 for a non - riparian wetland mitigation requirement in Cape Fear 03030003.
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014

Mitigation Project Name Farrar Dairy (Intra- program Purchase)
EEP IMS ID 92552
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030004
Comment: This ledger shows the debits for the amount of mitigation that the Statewide ILF Program purchased from the NCDOT ILF Program.
The beginning balance represents the amount purchased and not the total mitigation credits available on the site.
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014
o
E
c
E d
=
c
E E
o
E
' o
c o
c E m
R o
m
m
A
E
m m
m
r
o
r
.o
r
N
E
v
r
o
M
a
o
a ;o �
a
u c
v c
@ d
A
d
O 0
O
c@
O t
N
O
R
Nm A � d
W
`
z
z
z
z
0 C
W
`
v aL
w
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
4,604.00
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
4,604.00
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
NCDOT TIP R -2417 -
2000 -1432
2002 -20899
Sanford Bypass
2,560.33
Apex Parkway at Bradley
2001 -0385
2003 -20338
Terrace
85.00
2005 -0150
2003 -20080 / 2005 -20778
Ballentine Street Extension
214.00
NCDOT TIP U -2911 - Lake
2003 -0890
2000 -00537 / 2003 -01297
Valley Drive
365.00
Harnett /Fuquay Regional
2003 -1159
2003 -01310
Wastewater Plant
84.00
2006 -20616 / 2006 -20615 /
2005 -1876
2006 -20614
Weldon Ridge, Phase II B
450.00
2006 - 40201 -043
Laurel Valley Subdivision
20.00
2007 -0125
2006 -41055
Cliffs at Waterford
128.00
Green Oaks Parkway Second
2005 -0150
2003 -20080
request
10.00
Green Oaks Parkway Second
2005 -0150
2008 -00129
Request
237.40
NCDOT TIP R -2562A - NC
1999 -0339
1993 -02820
87 Widening
310.00
2008 -0946
2008 - 02404 -292
Duncan's Ridge Phase 4
140.00
2008 -1465
2008 -02781
Phillip's Place
0.27
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.00
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014