20061483 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20140327

UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
EEP Project #283 Contract # 004475
USACE Action ID #SAW- 2006 - 41095 -121
DWR 401 Permit Deemed Issued
Closeout Report
Submitted: February 2014
Table la. Project Setting and Classifications
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
County
Chowan
General Location
Edenton
Basin
Pasquotank River Basin
Ph sio ra hic Region
Outer Coastal Plain
USGS Hydro Unit
03010205120010
NCDWQ Sub -basin
03 -01 -04
Trout Water
No
Nov 08
Year 1 Monitoring
Project Performers
Source Agency
NCEEP
Designer
Eco Engineering, A Division
of the John R. McAdams
Company Inc.
Construction
Backwater Environmental
Planting
Carolina Silvics, Inc.
Property Interest Holder
NCEEP
Site Maintenance
Designer
KCI Associates of NC
Construction
Land Mechanics Designs
Monitoring Firm
KCI Associates of NC
Planting
Bruton Natural Systems
Performers
—Monitoring
Mitigation Plan and MY -01
Eco Engineering, A Division
of the John R. McAdams
Company Inc.
MY -02, 03, 04, 05, 06
KCI Associates of NC
Table lb. Project Activity and Reporting History
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
Milestone
Month/Year
Restoration Plan
Sep 06
Final Design - 90%
Mar 07
Construction
Nov 07
Bare -Root Planting
Dec 07
Baseline Monitoring
(Mitigation Plan)
Feb 08
As -Built Survey
Nov 08
Year 1 Monitoring
Mar 09
Year 2 Monitoring
Dec 09
Year 3 Monitoring
Dec 10
Year 4 Monitoring
Dec 11
Site Maintenance and
Supplemental Planting
Dec 11
Year 5 Monitoring
Dec 12
Year 6 Monitoring
Dec 13

1.0 PROJECT SETTING AND BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) restored, enhanced, and preserved wetlands
and restored a headwater wetland valley, which is analogous to a stream in this setting, at the UT
Pembroke Site in Chowan County, North Carolina.
Prior to restoration, the site was planted in row crops and UT to Pembroke Creek had been channelized to
maximize the use of farmland on the property. The restoration project, completed in the fall of 2007,
restored and enhanced the wetland by filling the ditches and focusing the hydrology into headwater
wetland valleys. The project also preserved a large forested wetland and decommissioned an animal waste
lagoon adjacent to the project.
The restoration installed road crossings on each road so that water can flow over the roads to provide
hydrologic connection throughout the site. Even with the installation of the crossings, these two roads
were still impeding the flow of water through the wetland. There is also a structure at the bottom of the
site that transitions the flow to a single thread channel. The elevation of this structure was impeding the
natural flow of water through the site. These issues mentioned above caused long durations of standing
water that negatively affected the planted stem survivability. A maintenance plan was implemented in the
fall of 2011 to enhance the movement of water through the headwater stream. This maintenance included
adding a new road crossing and the removal of the top level of the drop down structure. Supplemental
planting also occurred in December 2011. The assets and their acreage totals were revised by the EEP
during the summer of 2009 and spring of 2012, with the revised totals reflected in Table 1 of this report.
These changes to the assets were based on the monitoring data, the maintenance activities, and detailed
wetland/soils delineation. For further details, please see the UT Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream
Restoration Site Repair Baseline Report (KCI, 2012).
2.0 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives of the restoration project are as follows:
Goal: Modify the channelized water features, based on reference conditions, with the intent to restore the
site's primary wetland functions such as nutrient cycling, flood storage, and wildlife habitat.
Objectives:
• Improve water quality in the basin by filtering nutrients through on -site wetlands.
• Buffer flood flows downstream by increasing infiltration and storage areas.
• Design a waterway through the wetland complex with appropriate cross - section, slope, and
pattern as to provide nutrient filtering, flood storage, and wildlife habitat while meeting the
appropriate success criteria for the wetland.
• Improve terrestrial and aquatic habitat diversity.
• Establish a contiguous buffer along the project that can serve as a migration corridor for local
fauna.
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013- Closeout

3.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
Table 2. Success Criteria
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Feature
Success Criteria
Wetland
Continual wetland hydrology for 5% of the growing season (13 of 263 days) within
Project Streams j
a normal reci itation year.
Headwater
Overland flow component will be deemed successful if conditions become stable
Stream
over time. Evaluation annually and documented through measurement of the
317
established cross - sections.
Vegetation
Average of 260 stems /acre, as indicated by permanent vegetation plots after 5 years
4,051
of monitoring.
Table 3a. Project Assets
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Project Component
Type
Project
Acreage /
Linear Feet
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation Units
(SMU/WMU)
Project Streams j
Headwater Stream Restoration
3,734
1:1
3,734
Single Thread Stream Restoration
317
1:1
317
TOTAL RESTORATION
4,051
4 051
Project Wetlands
Riparian Wetlands
Restoration
12.10
1:1
12.10
Riparian Wooded
Wetlands
Preservation
8.35
5:1
1.67
Non - Riparian Wetlands
Restoration
2.96
1:1
2.96
Non - Riparian Wetlands
Enhancement
1.29
2:1
0.65
Non-Riparian Wooded
Preservation
16.97
5:1
3.39
TOTAL RESTORATION
15.06
1 1
15.06
TOTAL PRESERVATION
25.32
5.06
TOTAL ENHANCEMENT
1 1.29
0.65
Table 3b. Mitigation Unit Totals
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stream Mitigation
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian (Ac)
Units (SMU)
U
Units
4,051
13.77
7.0
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013- Closeout

Directions to the Project Site:
From Raleigh, travel on US -64 E.
Stay straight on US -17 N. Take
exit 224 and take a left at the top of
the ramp. Then take a left onto
Emperor's Landing Rd. Then take a
right onto Tip Toe Rd. Then take a
right onto Macedonia Rd. The site
will be on your right.
r�
E1elsstem
En Ia o emend
PROGRAM
Chowan River
L[' R�
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
UT Pembroke Creek, Chowan Co
Project Easement Boundary
0.5 0.25 0 0.5 1
Miles
ton
Albemarle Sound
EEP Project # 283
N
WEE KCI
S ASSOCIATES OF NC

a
I
Mg
Figure 2. Site Asset Map
UT Pembroke Creek Chowan County, EEP Project # 283
Headwater Stream Valley (8.56 ac) Streams
(� py�-�y� ® Riparian Wetland Restoration (12.10 ac) - Headwater Stream Restoration (3,734 If)
OSStl.11l © Riparian Wooded Wetland Preservation (8.35 ac) Single- thread Stream Restoration (3171f)
E Iq ement ® Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration (2.96 ac) Easement Exceptions
PROGRAM ® Non - Riparian Wetland Enhancement (1.29 ac) N KC I
© Non - Riparian Wooded Wetland Preservation (16.97 ac) 200 100 0 200 400 ASSOCIATES OF NC
Non - wetland Feet

s
hp„
NW Drainage
Area at Road
27.0 acres 1'
4A <
NW Drainage
Axrea at Road
36.3 acres
r^
NE Drainage Area at
Beginning of
Project Strea
67.1 acres
It
NE Drainage Area at Road
98.4 —acres
Figure 3. Project Watersheds
~" UT Pembroke Creek Chowan County, EEP Project # 283
Q Project Drainages
�C' Project Streams
,Ill l�lllelll zso izs o zso soo
PawM Easement Feet K I
0.5 -ft contours image Source: NC Statewide Orthoimagery, 2010. MSOC1AIIS OF NC
® Contour Data Source: NC Floodmaps Lidar Data for Chowan County.

V
1
Pk,
50.
F'—A
NRCS Soil Types
AaA - Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
At - Augusta fine sandy loam
Cf - Cape Fear loam
CO - Chowan silt loam
CtB - Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
DgA - Dogue fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
DgB - Dogue fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Ds - Dragston loamy fine sand
Pt - Portsmouth loam
Ro - Roanoke silt loam
Se - Seabrook fine sand
StA - State loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
StB - State loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
To - Tomotley fine sandy loam
UD - Udorthents, loamy
W - Water
Figure 4. NRCS Soils Map
UT Pembroke Creek Chowan County, EEP Project # 283
Easement's
h em 350 175 0 350 700
E YaOrVe I Q Chowan County NRCS Soils Fee`
P Image Source: NC Statewide Orthoimagery, 2010. I
NRCS SSURGO Soils, USDA Geospatial Data Gateway. ASSOCIATES OF NC

�. !ice � • o /���
' ;k
fr
YC
Ll�
1
t
■
s
s
r
Iwo
4C� s f
_­N11111I1
_ _ rte' --!' - '• ± �•L' �
1 -'' -- Lo
i
� �`•• •mot•••'.
`M'�4�{��'. ._ .' /.fie(• +.: +�`: ••••. "
s
.. . • r . • . • • ".
`� : ': '• : •;i - - 1 1111 �� .+ _ �
LEGEND Z
0
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
J
ILI HEADWATER STREAM W a
~ +� �f ++ • `_� RESTORATION 3
( 734 L F) W m W .,U
R ; +�i� *��� +�����; s�� +ii*►�� +��+ ~► SINGLE- THREAD STREAM U It
. �.'� °1_�!�� +�M +�i��i►!�a��.��!j RESTORATION (317 LF) Y V 0
W Z
EASEMENT EXCEPTIONS O
m W a Z
®HEADWATER STREAM VALLEY W C3 a =O
(8.56 A C) (L ZQ L w u Z
t, RIPARIAN WETLAND ❑ ❑ Q
RESTORATION (11.91 AC) Z 0
- _ RIPARIAN WOODED WETLAND 0
PRESERVA HON (8.35 AC)
NON - RIPARIAN WETLAND
C RESTORATION (2.96 AC)
aye: JM 2014
+ - roue GRAPHIC
NON - RIPARIAN WETLAND
ENHANCEMENT (1.29 AC)
^ - CURRENT
NON - RIPARIAN WOODED WETLAND CONDITION
PRESERVATION (16.97 AC) PLAN VIEW
Aw � ti �~ -. ,•!� NON- WETLAND
•-s _ = FIGURE 5

j
AN
c= p I
- a f
` Wiz OX /
ADDITIONAL LOW WATER - ,
FORD INSTALLED CONVEY
FLOW THROUGH WETLAND
' {2017) M la
- ELEVATION OF WATER CONTROL •
STRUCTURE LOWERED TO PROMOTE
r r NATURAL DRAWDOWN THROUGH
WETLAND (2011) zi
LL
Lu 01)o
Lu
r
'
j 120 -60 0 120
r (3) CULVERTS = / - •
�Z�SIAALLED
f / '� l GRAPHIC SCALE •
i .1. J
LEGEND
Air -�- � CONSERVATION
SUPPLEMENTAL
4L BORDER TREES
.

NV
y J'.
�el %.�-
op
' ,IV 11 ,
� r
i yf v� V y'
F, t
rf• I _. . � � _.
m
Z
v
z
0
z
O
z
+n
z -
O
n
m Ijl
M
n
z
z
5
Z
z
C
a
°
r
o
z
X
Iz
2
m
m-
z
UT PEMBROKE CREEK
KC I .r
r
WETLAND AND STREAM RESTORATION
EmaAMCIATEB OF NG
C
ENGINEERS- PLANNERS- SCIENTISTS
M
m
EEP PROJECT #283
Ecosystem
N zi
Q
CHOWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NA 27009 �
RALEIGH, NORTH I�
1'R4}i::NAM REVISIONS

LIDAR- Figure 8
Streams
0 150 300 600 Feet Conservation Easement

Cross - Section 1
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
22
21
a
20
>
19
W
18
17 1 + I i
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Station (ft)
MY -00 MY -01, 10/11/08 MY-02,10/21/09 -MY-03,10/27/10 - MY -04, 10/19/11
Cross - Section 2
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
21
19
c
0
W 17
15 1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Station (ft)
MY -00 MY -01, 10/11/08 MY -02, 10/21/09 -MY-03,10/27/10 tMY-04, 10/19/11
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
Cross - Section 3
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
20
IMI
w 16
G
0
14
a�
W
12
10
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Station (ft)
MY -00 MY -01, 10/11/08 MY -02, 10/21/09 MY -03, 10/27/10 tMY-04, 10/19/11
Cross - Section 4
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
20
18
w 16
a
0
c�
14
W
12
10 ! i i '
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Station (ft)
MY -00 MY -01, 10/11/08 MY -02, 10/21/09 —MY-03,10/27/10 — MY -04, 10/19/11
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2013- Closeout

Table 4. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Table
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Success Criteria Achieved / Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 2008
Year 2 2009
Year 3 2010
Year 4 2011
Year 5 2012
Year 6 2013
No /0
No /4
No /4
No /4
No /0
No /3
Well
0%
2%
2%
2%
0%
1%
No /0
No /4
No /5
Yes /13
No /3
No /4
Well
0%
2%
2%
5%
1%
2%
No /0
No /4
No /6
No /10
Yes /141
Yes /263
Well
0%
2%
2%
4%
53%
100%
No /11
Yes /49
Yes /54
Yes /23
No /10
No /11
Well
4%
19%
21%
9%
4%
4%
No /12
Yes /46
Yes /50
Yes /17
No /10
Yes /25
Well
5%
18%
19%
6%
4%
10%
Well?
Yes /87
Yes /108
Yes /104
Yes /95
Yes /102
Yes /96
33%
41%
40%
36%
39%
36%
No /11
Yes /45
Yes /42
Yes /47
Yes /13
Yes /38
Well
5%
17%
16%
1800
5%
14%
Yes /51
Yes /49
Yes /57
Yes /94
Yes /34
Yes /65
Well
19%
19%
22%
36%
13%
25%
Yes /207
Yes /110
Yes /103
Yes /101
Yes /114
Yes /184
Well 10
78%
42%
39%
38%
43%
70%
Yes /107
Yes /263
Yes /138
Yes /147
Yes /194
Yes /204
Well I 1
41%
100%
53%
56%
74%
77%
Well 12
Yes /77
Yes /53
Yes /55
Yes /59
Yes /25
Yes /20
Reference
29%
20%
21%
22%
10%
8%
No /10
Yes /31
Yes /39
Yes /37
No /10
Yes /13
Well 13
4%
12%
15%
14%
4%
5%
Yes /174
Yes /107
Yes /133
Yes /146
Yes /83
Yes /119
Well 15
66%
41%
51%
55%
31%
45%
Well 16
Yes /112
Yes /87
Yes /120
Yes /101
Yes /114
Yes /182
Reference
43%
33%
46%
38%
43%
69%
Yes /140
Yes /101
Yes /116
Yes /184
Well 17
N/A
N/A
53%
38%
44%
70%
Well 18
Yes /63
Yes /59
Yes /119
Yes /191
Located in the wetland
N/A
N/A
(24 %)
(22 %)
(45 %)
(72 %)
depression area
Well 19
Yes /61
Yes /99
Yes /58
Yes /67
Located in the wetland
N/A
N/A
(23 %)
(38 %)
(22 %)
(25 %)
humtnock area
Well 20
Yes /63
Yes /99
Yes /122
Yes /120
Located in the wetland
N/A
N/A
(24 %)
(38 %)
(46 %)
(45 %)
depression area
Well 21
Yes /25
Yes /99
Yes /20
Yes /13
Located in the wetland
N/A
N/A
( 10 /0 °)
( 38 /o o)
(8 %)
(5 %)
hummock area
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site

16
14
12
In 10
a
s
U
C
- 8
f0
C
f0
°C 6
4
2
0
Rainfall Data 2008 -2013
UT Pembroke 30 -70 Percentile Graph
Oo�o��`
P eQ� o
� 2008 2009 2010 �' 2011
� 2012 2013 30% Less Than 30% Greater Than
Table 5. Wetland Vegetation History (stems /acre)
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Plot
Number
MY -00
Total
MY -01
Total
MY -02
MY -03
MY -04
MY -05
MY -06
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
1
566
364
202
3,360
202
1,659
162
1,821
121
1,416
162
4,775
2
445
121
40
648
0
121
0
890
0
1,700
243
3,116
3
687
607
486
2,591
405
2,307
405
2,388
405
2,226
405
3,318
4
566
242
486
1,700
405
647
405
405
405
445
405
1,578
5
607
526
486
648
445
526
445
526
364
647
364
1,335
6
485
80
0
243
0
0
0
0
0
121
0
162
7
526
404
445
445
405
445
405
486
405
526
405
769
8
566
404
405
567
405
445
405
445
405
647
405
769
9
728
0
0
0
0
81
0
0
0
0
81
1,335
10
485
323
364
1,781
324
1,862
324
2,104
324
2,104
324
3,116
11
607
202
162
2,794
162
2,023
162
2,104
162
3,804
162
5,423
12
566
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
121
121
40
40
13
607
40
40
486
0
0
0
0
162
2,104
162
2,873
14
566
80
81
688
81
728
87
931
81
1,376
81
2,954
15
485
364
445
2,996
405
4,047
364
14,168
324
14,4921
445
4,856
16
607
283
202
243
162
1,133
162
12,7521
162
12,2261
162
4,613
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2013- Closeout

4.0 EEP RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
During the sixth year of monitoring, the restored headwater wetland valley is stable. In the parts of the
site where there are large areas of standing water, the feature becomes less visually defined, but there is
still active flow of water across the site.
During the site's sixth growing season, 14 of the 17 wells in the restoration and enhancement areas met
the success criterion of having saturated soil conditions occurring within 12 inches of the ground surface
for a minimum continuous period of 5% (13 days) of the 263 day growing season (March 10 to
November 28) during average climatic conditions. The daily rainfall data obtained from a local weather
station shows that the area experienced average to above average rainfall during the 2013 growing season.
The wells that did not meet the success criteria are 2, 3, and 4. These gauges are in parts of the site that
have been removed from the creditable assets based on the gauge data over the monitoring period and
detailed wetland/soils delineation during the maintenance activities.
The sixth year of vegetation monitoring found a site average of 240 planted stems /acre, with nine of the
sixteen vegetation monitoring plots having planted stem densities less than the six -year success criteria of
260 stems /acre. The site's average total stem density including volunteers is 2,565 stems /acre. Although
the average planted stem density is less than the success criterion, there are vigorous populations of
volunteers throughout the site, which suggests the long term viability of the vegetative community.
Volunteer trees that are present throughout the site are; black willow (Salix nigra), sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and loblolly pine (Pious taeda). The only exotic
species identified at the site are parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum), which is present in areas of
open standing water, honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), which is scattered throughout the site, a few
Chinaberry trees (Melia azedarach), and privet (Ligustrum sinense), which is predominantly found in the
non - wetland areas. There are some areas of open water where cattail (Typha latifolia) populations have
become established.
Overall the project wetlands and stream indicate that it is on a path to success. This is a large and diverse
wetland site with multiple project components that demonstrate the success of this site. These include the
fact that there is a large preservation portion of the site that is contiguous with the restored part of the site,
an animal waste lagoon was decommissioned as a part of this project, and an additional year of
monitoring has been performed. The EEP recommends that this site be closed out with 4,051 SMUs,
13.77 Riparian WMUs and 7.0 Non - riparian WMUs
5.0 Contingencies
None
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013- Closeout

Pre- Construction Photos (2006)
I
1998 pre - construction aerial of the project
i
.Pf
rl�y
!� 1
r- d,
a 3W0
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland
Restoration Site
(USGS DOQQ, 1998).
71
KCZAssociates of North Carolina
2013- Closeout

Post - Construction Photos MY -06
PP2 - MY06 - 9/17/13
PP5 - MY06- 9/17/13
PP9 - MY06 - 9/17/13
PP3 - MY06 - 9/17/13
PP6 - MY06 - 9/17/13
PP 10 - MY06 - 9/17/13
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013- Closeout
".
3 .r
s,
PP5 - MY06- 9/17/13
PP9 - MY06 - 9/17/13
PP3 - MY06 - 9/17/13
PP6 - MY06 - 9/17/13
PP 10 - MY06 - 9/17/13
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013- Closeout

Appendix A
Watershed Planning Summary
The UT to Pembroke Project is not in a planning area.
UT to Pembroke Stream and Wetland KCI Associates of North Carolina
Restoration Site 2013- Closeout

APPENDIX B- Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes a
portion of the following parcels:
The conservation easement is available at the county register of deeds office or at the link below:
hqp: / /www.ncepp. net /GIS_ DATA/ Ut %20Pembroke(Perry%2OProperty) %20 %23283 %20( DOT) /Property_ Documents /283_Pemr Property(UTWPe
mbroke).pdf
Site Protection
Deed Book &
Acreage
Grantor
County
Instrument
Page Number
protected
Carlton N. Perry and wife, Alice
Pasquotank
Conservation
59.42
White Perry
Easement
363/556
The conservation easement is available at the county register of deeds office or at the link below:
hqp: / /www.ncepp. net /GIS_ DATA/ Ut %20Pembroke(Perry%2OProperty) %20 %23283 %20( DOT) /Property_ Documents /283_Pemr Property(UTWPe
mbroke).pdf

Action ID No. SAW - 2006 - 41095 -121 / Nationwide Permit No. 27 (Wetland Restoration)
Mr. Lin Xu
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Dear Mr. Xu:
This correspondence confirms our receipt of your notification dated September 13, 2006,
requesting Department of the Army (DA) authorization to implement the restoration plan
entitled, Unnamed Tributary to Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream Restoration. This work
will be undertaken on a 59.4 -acre site located east of NC SR 1200 (Macedonia Road) just south
of NCSR 1208 (Wildcat Road), northwest the city of Edenton, adjacent to the headwaters of an
unnamed tributary to Pembroke Creek, in Chowan County, North Carolina.
Accordingly, for the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, lists nationwide
permits. Authorization, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, was provided for activities in waters of the United States associated with
the restoration of former waters, the enhancement of degraded tidal and non -tidal wetlands and
riparian areas, the creation of tidal and non -tidal wetlands and riparian areas and the restoration
and enhancement of non -tidal streams and non -tidal open water areas on private lands.
Your work is authorized by this nationwide permit provided it is accomplished in strict
accordance with the attached General Conditions and the following Special Conditions:
a. This authorization in no way obligates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to recognize this
work as a stream or riparian wetland restoration project.
b. This authorization in no way obligates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to accept this
project for use as compensatory mitigation proposed by the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP), or any other person, program, or entity.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing
NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is

incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a public notice
when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence
this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will
have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP to complete
the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
You should contact Ms. Cyndi Karoly, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, telephone
(919) 733 -9721, regarding Section 401 Water Quality Certification. This nationwide permit does
not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain other required State or local approval.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments may be addressed to me at
the Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 26.
Sincerely,
William J. Biddlecome
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Ronald J. Mikulak, Chief
Wetlands Regulatory Section
Water Management Division
United States Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh North Carolina 27636 -3726
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island -n_
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516

APPENDIX - D Debit Ledger
Mitigation Project Name
EEP IMS ID
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Perry Property (UT to Pembroke)
283
PASQUOTANK
03010205
AoDlled Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014
C
O-
m
a
E
m
N
C
E (D
m E
c
M
y t
w
=
C
y
m E
C
s
W
O
-
E
m m
d a
�
O
C O
o. °
o
m
�
r
o
K
G1
C
m E
m
a c
m
O
C .-
m m
a a�
C C
m 0
m is
O a)
z
C
m r
m o
O
z
C
m
E
m y
a c
Z W
C
m .-
m m
° v
C Vl
O i
z
V! C
O
m'
m
°
yan N o
d
N
m o
:o N m ° U L
W
m E
2 y
0 W r c m
N 0
_
6-
2 m
o
U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
4,051.001
12.10
8.35
2.96
1.29
16.97
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
4,051.001
12.10
1.67
2.96
0.65
3.39
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2005 -10608
SR 1347 - Division 1
18.00
2005 -11687
SR 1306 - Division 1
28.00
2006 -10394
NC 343 - Division 1
160.00
2006 - 41007 -121
SR 1110 - Division 1
50.00
2006 - 41824 -127
SR 1222 - Division 1
64.00
2007 - 00367 -128
SR 1207 - Division 1
30.00
2004 -11683
SR 1346 - Division 1
20.00
2008 -0797
2008 -01437
Ferry Quarters - Division 1
0.14
0.70
2008 -1602
1994 - 02124 -115
NCDOT TIP R -2414 - US 158 /
NC 34 Widening
492.00
4.35
8.35
2012 -01820
NC 94 - Bridge 29 - Division 1
0.10
Statewide ILF Credit Purchase
297.00
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
12,892.00
7.65
0.00
2.82
1.29
16.27
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
12,892.00
7.65
0.00
2.82
0.65
3.25
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014

Mitigation Project Name
EEP IMS ID
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Perry Property (UT to Pembroke) (Intra- program credit purchase)
283
PASQUOTANK
03010205
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3.1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1.1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014
G
O
C
ME
=
C
y
E
O
2
R°
=
C O
m m
O
jp
y
C
`m E
O
C ._
m m
C C
m O
@ .�
C
16 C
`m °
C
W
m aE
C r
M ._
`m
N C
O
.2
N
C
N
N Q
°
d
m C
N
m
C
m
W
`m `o
a
=
`m
O' m
O' N
C
C
C IC
C N
y o
N
«° A
i
y c
R
t°
E
L
w
N L
`
N
K d
n
o
K L
w
Q' d
N
O d
z
O U
z
O L
z W
O d
z
y)
IC 'D
o a
N
fp U
o
N
ry L
o W
N
fp tiV
o
L
=
W
a
ly
o
a
U
U
U
a
U
N
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
297.00
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
297.00
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
NCDOT TIP R -2551 -
1997 -0856
1995 -02334
Manteo Bypass
297.00
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.00
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 3/12/2014