20220241 Ver 1_Public Notice_20220225

Strickland, Bev
From: Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 5:43 PM
To: Homewood, Sue
Subject: RE: [External] US Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice
Importance: High
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Hi Sue,
You are absolutely correct, it would be 120 days. I apologize for causing confusion!
Sincerely,
Emily
Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
From: "Homewood, Sue" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Feb 25, 2022 1:39 PM
To: "Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] FW: [External] US Army Corps of Engineers Public
Notice
Hey Emily,
This PN indicates that DWR only has 60 days to make a cert determination. The other PNs I've seen from the USACE
over the last couple years have used 120 days RPOT which Scott/Ronnie agreed to for all IPs a while ago. I'm wondering
if something has recently changed or maybe this was just an older version of your template? I need to be sure that DWR
knows exactly what date to go by.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources,Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
[e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
1

Y... e.x.',.. ..}. }.' .... ..W.:x..}x..s. £:u x.s'i.{... '.i .n. .}..t x£.. ...:,
From: CESAW-PublicNoticeList<[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, February 24, 2022 2:25 PM
Subject: [External] US Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice
Importance: High
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
As you requested, you are hereby notified that Wilmington District, United States Army Corps of Engineers has
issued a Public Notice. The text of this document can be found on the Public Notices portion of the Regulatory
Division Home Page. Each Public Notice is available in ADOBE ACROBAT (.pdf) format for viewing, printing or
download at https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Public-Notices/
As with anything you download from the internet, be sure to check for viruses prior to opening. The current
notice involves:
Corps Action ID#: SAW-2019-00233
Applicant: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Mr. Ron Kopplin (Jones County)
Issue Date: February 24, 2022
Expiration Date: 5:00 p.m., March 26, 2022
Point of Contact Ms. Emily Thompson, Regulatory Specialist
Project Description:
MMM is currently mining the northern portion of the existing North Pit, and they propose to expand it
approximately 8 acres. MMM is proposing to move a previously modified stream north, around the proposed
mining area containing limestone reserves. Impacts associated with moving this segment of stream would be
793 linear feet.
For the proposed Bender Pit, MMM proposes two new road crossings, expanding an existing road crossing,
and mining within wetlands. A new haul road is proposed in the southeast corner of the current pit limits and
would be in alignment with an existing road that travels to the plant area. This haul road would cross two
wetland areas with a total of 0.45 acres of wetland impacts. MMM proposes to expand and upgrade an
existing crossing, located at the north-eastern tip of the proposed pit, which would be used as a product haul
road. This expansion would result in 0.18 acres of wetland impacts. A second proposed haul road would
impact 0.90 acres of wetlands and 106 linear feet of stream. The applicant has stated it is proposed in the
narrowest area of the wetland system that divides the two pits and would allow for the safest and most direct
travel for hauling overburden material to the existing mined out southern end of the current pit. MMM
proposes to mine 7.43 acres of wetlands for the Bender Pit.
2

In the process of open pit mining of limestone, overburden removal is a continuous process. Unlike a hard rock
quarry, which has a smaller footprint and much deeper mine, the entire pit is not stripped of overburden at
one time. Instead, as soon as overburden is removed from enough area, mining will begin, and the two
processes will commence simultaneously moving across the pit area. The applicant has stated this separation
of two different roadways for overburden trucks and product haul trucks is necessary for operation efficiency
and safety under the circumstances. Furthermore, having a direct path for overburden trucks would reduce
each trip from the proposed pit to the old pit where material is to be deposited by nearly 1 mile. This would
result in a substantial savings in efficiency, fuel costs, equipment wear and diesel emissions.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: This email was sent out as a result of subscribing to the Wilmington District
regulatory program public notices. Please reply to this email with the subject or message "unsubscribe" to
remove your address from future mailings.
3

1 ' ill
US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: February 24, 2022
Comment Deadline: March 26, 2022
Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2019-00233
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps)received an application from
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MMM) seeking Depaitiiient of the Army authorization to
discharge fill material in 8.96 acres of wetlands and 899 linear feet of stream, associated
with the expansion of the existing Belgrade Quarry in Jones County,North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached
plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington
District Web Site at:
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Public-Notices/
Applicant: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Mr. Ron Kopplin
2235 Gateway Access Point
Raleigh,North Carolina, 27607
AGENT (if applicable): Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Mr. Thomas Brown
2235 Gateway Access Point
Raleigh,North Carolina, 27607
Authority
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or
deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory
Authorities:
Ff Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
n Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
[' Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972
(33 U.S.C. 1413)
Version 6.15.2017 Page 1

Location
Location Description:
Belgrade Quarry
Vicinity Map AOlk, f' 111
GawibF:-1a-s�sBram ` f ICttw
A6'1a,:r=1
FOr Den 7n3 DLATJ 8efi CA).
Lar2tcr a hre, pro ir'Lae
.ay
111.01
Quarry Entrance
.
0/1
•
•
Legend
Approximate Current Pit Limits
Proposed Mitigation Property
Proposed Northern Expansion Stares:Es.- HERE aeLKrne,USGS,Irrterrrop,INCREMENT P,NRCan,
Esri Japan,METI,Esr'}Chna{Haag Karg).Esri Korea,Esi 1T ailanc),
Proposed Bender Pit Mt33prrvylnda NGCC ©CpenS1 eelMapcerlrbuters.and the GS User
Carrrrunity
7,000 3,500 0 7,000 Feet
Project Area(acres): 100 Nearest Town: Maysville
Nearest Waterway: White Oak River River Basin: White Oak River
Latitude and Longitude: 34.8674N, -77.2095W
Version 6.15.2017 Page 2

Existing Site Conditions
The 1,605-acre site, known as the Belgrade Quarry(Quarry), is located at 5678 Highway
58 South in Maysville,North Carolina. The Quarry is located within the White Oak River
Basin (03020301) and includes: the old mine pit, the current mine pit, the facility
infrastructure, and the proposed project area. The Quarry first opened in 1938 under the
name of Superior Stone, a predecessor to Martin Marietta, and the mine pits during that
time are inactive and appear in aerial photographs as small lakes or large ponds west of
the current pit. The original plant site and quarry entrance were on the west side of the
White Oak River, near the intersection of US Hwy 17 and Belgrade-Swansboro Road.
The Quarry operation has been active in its current pit configuration since 1988 after a
bridge was constructed over the White Oak River. The plant operation, scale house,
office, and entrance moved to its current location in 2013. The main infrastructure for the
existing pit operations would be used to continue mining in the proposed new pit areas.
The area of proposed mine expansion is comprised of an approximately 8-acre site north
of the existing mine pit("Project Area—North Pit") and an approximately 92-acre area
south of the existing mine pit("Project Area—Bender Pit").
The North Pit is the proposed expansion north of the existing pit currently being mined
(Figure 6). The North Pit area is cleared. The proposed project area was previously used
for agriculture and contains a modified stream. No wetlands are present in this area. Soils
in this area consist of Craven sandy loam, Lenoir loam, and Lynchburg sandy loam.
The proposed Bender Pit is located south of the existing pit on the east side of the White
Oak River(Figure 2). The proposed pit is separated from the current pit and plant area by
a wetland system, which encircles the proposed pit. The Bender Pit area is comprised of
active farm fields and mixed pine forestland with some hardwoods such as sweetgum and
red maple. While the entire proposed Bender Pit area is located within the floodplain of
the White Oak River,preliminary hydraulic analysis conducted by the applicant indicates
the proposed project would not increase base flood levels. Soils on the site consist of fine
sands, such as Pactolus, Johns, and Autryville in the upland marine terraces and soils
such as Muckalee loam in the wetland and floodplain areas.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The basic purpose of this project is to cost-effectively mine construction grade aggregate
reserves at the existing Belgrade Quarry facility.
The overall project purpose is to cost-effectively continue operation of the limestone
aggregate quarry facility at Belgrade by expanding the existing quarry area to mine
suitable stone reserves in a systematic and economically viable fashion for supply to the
market during the short and medium term.
Version 6.15.2017 Page 3

Project Description
MMM is currently mining the northern portion of the existing North Pit, and they
propose to expand it approximately 8 acres (Figure 6). MMM is proposing to move a
previously modified stream north, around the proposed mining area containing limestone
reserves. Impacts associated with moving this segment of stream would be 793 linear
feet.
For the proposed Bender Pit, MMM proposes two new road crossings, expanding an
existing road crossing, and mining within wetlands (Figure 5). A new haul road is
proposed in the southeast corner of the current pit limits and would be in alignment with
an existing road that travels to the plant area. This haul road would cross two wetland
areas with a total of 0.45 acres of wetland impacts. MMM proposes to expand and
upgrade an existing crossing, located at the north-eastern tip of the proposed pit, which
would be used as a product haul road. This expansion would result in 0.18 acres of
wetland impacts. A second proposed haul road would impact 0.90 acres of wetlands and
106 linear feet of stream. The applicant has stated it is proposed in the narrowest area of
the wetland system that divides the two pits and would allow for the safest and most
direct travel for hauling overburden material to the existing mined out southern end of the
current pit. MMM proposes to mine 7.43 acres of wetlands for the Bender Pit.
Table 1. Impacts proposed for the Belgrade Quarry expansion.
Impact type Wetlands (acres) Streams (linear feet)
Road crossings 1.53 106
Mining 7.43 793
Total 8.96 899
In the process of open pit mining of limestone, overburden removal is a continuous
process. Unlike a hard rock quarry, which has a smaller footprint and much deeper mine,
the entire pit is not stripped of overburden at one time. Instead, as soon as overburden is
removed from enough area, mining will begin, and the two processes will commence
simultaneously moving across the pit area. The applicant has stated this separation of two
different roadways for overburden trucks and product haul trucks is necessary for
operation efficiency and safety under the circumstances. Furthermore, having a direct
path for overburden trucks would reduce each trip from the proposed pit to the old pit
where material is to be deposited by nearly 1 mile. This would result in a substantial
savings in efficiency, fuel costs, equipment wear and diesel emissions.
Avoidance and Minimization
The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or
minimize impacts to the aquatic environment: To avoid wetland impacts, MMM
conducted careful investigations of the property. The location of available reserves has
been established to the extent practicable. MMM has not proposed mining in certain
wetland areas, although mining these areas would be cost effective and economically
Version 6.15.2017 Page 4

viable. The proposed Bender Pit would avoid approximately 18 acres of wetlands (Figure
10).
To minimize impacts to wetlands and other waters, MMM will use stormwater
management and erosion control techniques that preserve downstream water quality.
MMM will use stripping techniques that will not allow the loss of material downstream
or into adjacent wetlands. As the overburden is removed or stripped from the site, all run-
off will be directed to the pit or other erosion control structures. A minimum 50-foot
wooded buffer will be maintained around all wetlands and waters not directly impacted.
Proposed roads have been strategically positioned to cross wetlands in the narrowest
place possible to minimize impacts while still allowing safe and direct travel. Impacts
have also been minimized by placing one of the crossings in the location of an existing
farm road.
Compensatory Mitigation
The applicant offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable
functional loss to the aquatic environment: MMM proposes to mitigate for impacts to
8.96 acres of wetland at a 11.6:1 ratio by preserving approximately 94 acres of wetland
and 10 acres of non-wetland floodplain, located within a 104-acre property owned by
MMM. The 104-acre property is located adjacent to the Croatan National Forest and is
comprised of high-quality Riverine Swamp Forest wetland, located in the floodplain of
the White Oak River,just downstream of the proposed Bender Pit(Figure 11).
Essential Fish Habitat
The Corps' determination is that the proposed project would not effect EFH or
associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
n This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act. Implementation of the proposed project would impact(CHOOSE ALL
THAT APPLY- marine substrate, estuarine substrate, water columns, emergent
wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, artificial reefs, hardbottoms) (see project
description)utilized by various life stages of the following species: (CHOOSE
ALL THAT APPLY—coastal migratory pelagics, corals, golden crab, shrimp,
snapper grouper, spiny lobster, Atlantic highly migratory species). Our initial
determination is that the proposed action would not have a substantial individual
or cumulative adverse impact on EFH or fisheries managed by Fishery
Management Councils and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Our
final determination relative to project impacts and the need for mitigation
measures is subject to review by and coordination with the NMFS.
N The Corps will consult under the Magnuson-Stevens Act and will not make a
permit decision until the consultation process is complete.
Version 6.15.2017 Page 5

❑ The Corps has initiated consultation the Magnuson-Stevens Act and will not
make a permit decision until the consultation process is complete.
Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of
33 CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C,
the District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version
of the National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:
❑ Should historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National
Register,be present within the Corps' permit area; the proposed activity requiring
the DA permit(the undertaking) is a type of activity that will have no potential to
cause an effect to an historic property.
❑ No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National
Register, are present within the Corps' permit area; therefore, there will be no
historic properties affected. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from
the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Properties ineligible for inclusion in the National Register are present within the
Corps' permit area; there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed
work. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register,
are present within the Corps' permit area; however, the undertaking will have no
adverse effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently requests
concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register,
are present within the Corps' permit area; moreover, the undertaking may have an
adverse effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently initiates
consultation with the SHPO (or THPO).
® The proposed work takes place in an area known to have the potential for the
presence of prehistoric and historic cultural resources; however, the area has not
been formally surveyed for the presence of cultural resources. No sites eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places are known to be present
in the vicinity of the proposed work. Additional work may be necessary to
identify and assess any historic or prehistoric resources that may be present.
The District Engineer's final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon
coordination with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full
consideration given to the proposed undertaking's potential direct and indirect effects on
historic properties within the Corps-indentified permit area.
Version 6.15.2017 Page 6

Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area,
examined all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North
Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information:
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project would not affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
® The Corps determines that the proposed project
may affect, not likely to adversely affect federally listed endangered or threatened
species or their formally designated critical habitat.
❑ By copy of this public notice, the Corps initiates consultation under Section 7
of the ESA and will not make a permit decision until the consultation process is
complete.
® The Corps will consult under Section 7 of the ESA and will not make a permit
decision until the consultation process is complete.
❑ The Corps has initiated consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and will not
make a permit decision until the consultation process is complete.
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project
may affect, not likely to adversely affect federally listed endangered or threatened
species or their formally designated critical habitat. Consultation has been
completed for this type of activity and the effects of the proposed activity have
been evaluated and/or authorized by the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) in the South Atlantic Regional Biological Opinion or its associated
documents, including 7(a)(2) & 7(d) analyses and Critical Habitat assessments. A
copy of this public notice will be sent to the NMFS.
❑ The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or
endangered or their critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA)within the project area. The Corps will
make a final determination on the effects of the proposed project upon additional
review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment
and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National
Marine Fisheries Service.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate
State agencies for review.
Version 6.15.2017 Page 7

North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not
make a final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state
Certification as required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt
of the application and this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at
the NCDWR Central Office in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a
401 Certification. Unless NCDWR is granted a time review extension, a waiver will be
deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty
days of receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401
Certification may be reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, 401 and Buffer Permitting
Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh,North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons
desiring to make comments regarding the application for a 401 Certification should do so,
in writing,by April 25, 2022, to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Mr. Paul Wojoski, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
Or,
(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management(NCDCM):
❑ The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies
with and would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved
North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2
(b)(2)the Corps cannot issue a Department of Army(DA)permit for the
proposed work until the applicant submits such a certification to the Corps and
the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the
applicant's consistency certification. As the application did not include the
consistency certification,the Corps will request, upon receipt„ concurrence or
objection from the NCDCM.
® Based upon all available information, the Corps determines that this application
for a Department of Army(DA)permit does not involve an activity which would
affect the coastal zone,which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM)
Act(16 U.S.C. § 1453).
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest.
That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of
important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects
Version 6.15.2017 Page 8

thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental
concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain
values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline
erosion and accretion,recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property
ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of
the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the
Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of
the Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the
Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for
this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered
species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other
public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment(EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA). Comments are also used to
determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the
proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice,
that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a
public hearing will be granted,unless the District Engineer determines that the issues
raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to
the proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, March 26, 2022. Comments should be
submitted to Ms. Emily Thompson, Washington Regulatory Field Office,
2407 West Fifth Street, Washington,North Carolina 27889, at
[e-mail].
Version 6.15.2017 Page 9

Figure 3
Belgrade Quarry ' ' r_
USGS Map ;_ Ak Martin
Drawn by:Thomas Brown r Morietta 4/13/2021 ►-
For Permitting Purposes Only 0..... .....
Locations Are Approximate I'.• - L
'• +' i.d
.. -- -
s:
4 .. -fir
P' •
„_,..":2--- f•
,„L., ..... (
Z 77
4;4
f
+ I Quarry Entrance
J r r .
/ e"-
r •yQ. r
•
"An Ch i r ;-
4 r,"- i.
. - fiNe I
.tf.:
,x,
f___,,,. ._.
... tr__
� rce, .? No _ /a
r.
,. ,ii-Q
Zil
} Bt`iks8ra
.,.., ;
.., ,,,,,, _...________,...„
„.......
r .
voN FELL) PI-)
N
Legend A
Approximate Current Pit Limits
Proposed Mitigation Property
Proposed Northern Expansion USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset,National Elevation
p p Dataset,Geographic Names Information System,National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset,and
Proposed Bender Pit National Transportation Dataset; U.S.Census Bureau-TIGER/Line; HERE
Road Data
3,750 1,875 0 3,750 Feet
3

Figure 2
Belgrade Quarry
Overall Map . -- - - Martin
lir
Drawn by:Thomas Brown MaI 1etta
4/13/2021 I
For Permitting Purposes Only 4 +
Locations Are Approximate
e '�1* , Yge -
- it
t . 4
-, , ') -li.• '.F. . i
r - - : ' ',..m. . . *416- *4 L. ,..
.. ,. .
OP ' a* Quarry Entrance it -
- -. • - 110\4444K• - ' '
frif
400.illiso
A., . . ,. .,..
,,,, .„_ _,,:„
. 6 .IlAL6 ' ' c '
) ' - --,,-, -....,.
} mot. ;
,.k r. h ,
4r
•
-4, ,
'- .ice ......,
al f, t + `1
jitt'. '. _ ''- It.
I Ili ..Kliess i'---_ ...i. . ..ipsi
•
II
N r
LegendAI_ V- ; j
L Approximate Current Pit Limits
et 10:01'4
C Proposed Mitigation Property + f. '`•
CProposed Northern Expansion
EProposed Bender Pit Digital'lebe,GeoEyG, ?Geographies,Cc nu[M io
ago USDA, Aero'RlD9 OEo aG eikt MGT Communit,
3,750 1,875 0 3,750 Feet
2

Figure 6
Belgrade Quarry • .44•"
Proposed Northern Expansion . `,n\ I hk Martin
—14C. .�� Marietta
Drawn by:Thomas Brown 1. S*. --- -
4/13/2021 J
For Permitting Purposes Only
Locations Are Approximate ,,l
... Iii s .. P i
`441 4.ki' 1 .
iprf .
Pit
14
111!"
, 6 .
• . .4,Nit 1,
. . -1.,
.
j1• '► a
74.
A7r ,
Proposed Stream - `� ''
`- Impacts 793LF
Legend
I Ill"
Approximate Current Pit Limits
, miii
Proposed Northern Expansion
' ' Stream Impacts
p� Stream
•_ Rerouted Flow N
Jones County Parcels A
aprow IE§A DGeo
graphies,G'eoEye,Earthstar CNESA E
USDA,Imo AereGRID,PRI9 and the GIS User Community
500 250 0 500 Feet
9

Figure 5
Belgrade Quarry
Proposed Bender Pit lir Martin
Drawn by:Thomas Brown �`
,,� Marietta
2/23/2022
For Permitting Purposes Only
Locations Are Approximatei la
1 • Haul Road to Plant i
•
4 Wetland Impact ' •lir .
R ! 0.45 Acre 1
. P.I
a'
I/ ••••
;y� ✓ • �, Haul Road to Plant
r " Wetland Impact
�, . 0.18 Acre
I Proposed Pit
Overburden Road Wetland Impact Total
Wetland Impacts 7.43 Acres `. -}1
0.90 Acre
Stream Impacts
106 LF
Legend
Proposed Bender Pit
Road Crossings
- Stream Impacts
- Stream
Wetland_Impacts
."-"" Wetland Boundary
Approximate Current Pit Limits
amina ENti,Digital'lobe,GWEN,lEagikkv Geographies,OINEffiAtibig
USDA, ,AerogRID,RK EfeaGamuCornmunit,
850 425 0 850 Feet

Belgrade Quarry 6" -
Culvert Locations ; '
Drawn by:Thomas Brown +;; , • "4 -• " anetta
5/13/2021
For Permitting Purposes Only -'; N `&4.A. —
Locations Are Approximate
I. _ .'P''„\N Culvert 'f
_ Detail B ,_ .• i
Y ' ► . ` `+ Culvert
.'- > . ,,.- Detail A JINN
,14e► • �. . _�
- f
I• -rti
i
iiiir
T -,, -p.:141r 41.7. :r. t...4...*".:.'r 1...` "...-.. . ..:,5 '''..,,.. . ." p _,..
Culvert r.,. - " .4:4 a•
.1-7 t: ,
Detail C ), .. .� '`�"
:.
e...;6 i 0 ii:7., ,.. 474)1.i
. Culvert
#. Detail B •
4.
liff
/... ,r 4 1
rid":
Culvert ''
'4 i '? t Detail A , .., `,'' ._ '.1
N :.
Legend A :� f:. fi'
L Approximate Current Pit Limits4411.
,�.4 '� €; r •r. r r
Road Crossings ` ^` r'�•4 •
EProposed Bender Pit L. �•-- . • ;•':4 ' • -I 411 '
• Wetland_Impacts tr: '
Wetland Boundary gcxtew. Eg3IA Digital@ DOM eiGdErg,Earthsl PGeographKC ICga6GbM
k ago USDA,Imo Aero@Rll O t and the C-MGT Communit,
600 300 0 600 Feet
21

NOTES:
DETAIL A 1. ENSURE MINIMUM PIPE COVER MEETS
MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS
.;..;�.;..;..�."w�=.=.=.=.'�.'_.�.'j.�.�.�.� eadr " 2. CULVERTS TO BE FIELD LOCATED
• • • • • •` " " " " " " " ' " TWO96 CULVERTS
��������;� ��������������. 3. NUMBER OF PIPES AND DIAMETER MAY
sfpaijij a�I `�ai�.�,,..AC••••�•04 � ... BE ADJUSTED DURING INSTALLATION.
•�'•�• • � Pls •.•� •—'•�'•—'•—'•—• NTS HOWEVER, INSTALLED PIPES WILL BE
0i#iVL' i �i'" 08' ��. � .i�L�'
AI_,•_•_ e fix _,•_,•_•_, FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT.
•
ky
t t r; r; t� ti ti ti • , D E TA I L
-.=•=.=.:-.=• ._,=.=.=..-•.=-.74,., =.00i ONE 48 CULVERT
. t � .r Pl4' N....��������% NTS
�.i.i.i�i � � i.i.i.i1 pi.i.i.i�'
411,4 kt,
..: : . . . .
DETAIL C
.� . ONE 60" CULVERT
. .
41
. .. .. . . . . . . : : . NTS
. • • • • • � • • • • • • • • AManetta
•
' 8 BY9 BY
e. 401/404 PERMIT APPLICATION
5 BY
3 BY
BY PROPOSED WETLAND CROSSINGS
2 BY
1 BY CULVERT DETAILS
0 BY QUARRY: BELGRADE
©2021 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS,INC.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION IS PROHIBITED. I FILE NAME:BELGRADE.PROP.CROSSINGY D 'oeuo
I PNP MAY 2021 HEET uo.
DESIGN FIRM. PNP MID 1 IHo:`1
20

Exhibit B
10'clear distance between
vehicles
Typical haul truck profile
approx.20.0'wide
10'clear distance
/between vehicles&barrier
Safety Berm
G. J a.
O O
Approx.80ft top width
Fill(Exceeding Pipe Crush Depth)
Culvert Pipe
E 100'
,a BY
hk Martin
Marietta
BY
BY
e. TYPICAL HAUL ROAD CROSSING
BY
BY
BY
ROAD CROSS SECTION
BY
DATEaE sIoH B°. a. QUARRY: Belgradeo
DWN BY DATE JOB No.
©2020 BY MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS,INC.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION IS PROHIBITED. I FILE NAME:Belgrade I PNP JAN 2021
SHEET uo.
DESIGN ream. ' TIN a NTS "oo 1
19

UNDISTURBED UNEXCAVATED
BUFFER BUFFER
(e.g.,ROAD)
_ —III=III=III III III III
11-111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111=111—III_
—1 11—I I E I I—I I I—I I I—I I I—I 11=1 11=1 I E 11=1 11111-
11EIII=I I I—III=I I I—I I I=III—III=III=I I I=III=III=I
=III-111=III-111111111111111111=111E111=111-111-1
:111-111E111-111E III-III-III-III-III-11
OVERBURDEN =____—
1=1 I I-I 11=1 I I-I I , I I III III III III III I I I-
-111-111=1 11-III=111111111 111111=111E111E111=111=111=III111—
1=1 1-111=1 I I-111—III-11 EWE 1E EWE 11=111=111=IIIIII=1 1 I—
=111E111111E111111111111111111111111111=111-1''
1 I 1=111,;III,;,I I I,l l I 1=„I I II l 1I I II 1 II I II 1 II I II 1 II I II I II 11--,I 11-'
ROCK
,a /�'Martin
Marietta
V 401/404 PERMIT APPLICATION
PIT CROSS SECTION
QUARRY: Belgrade
DATE REVISION a. DWN BY: DATE: JOB NO.
®2020 BV MARTIN MARIE11A MATERIALS,INC.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.UNAUTHORIZED DUPLICATION IS PROHIBITED. I FILE NAME: I PNP APR 2021 a uo.
5
DESIGN FIRM. PNP NTS 1 luo:G1
18

Figure 11
Belgrade Quarry '
Preservation Area Map ►� - Martin
li
Drawn by:Thomas Brown
12/14/2020 rvf Marietta
For Permitting Purposes Only
XI
Nillairin
Alt
zoo
ti
s
� .
. .r. . .x
N
Legend
Proposed Preservation Property (104 ac)
Final_Pit_Shape
4111110110
Jones County Parcels 1E4
WigitalGl.be, GeoEye, •OR ION,and the GIS User'ommunity
1,900 950 0 1,900 Feet
14

Figure 10
Belgrade Quarry
Avoided Wetlands
Marietta
Drawn by:Thomas Brown .. Ak
I�lriet �
4/13/2021
For Permitting Purposes Only - 1
Locations Are Approximate
• r- �^�wr% •'L�• ref l�T'• r •f' ` ,}
•
li ',
i
•
7
40.' n • \ tit 1 r .r
F. r 'Y 1"
- - - 'I
•
4 -r "4": "." • er, -,11j1;ir?, .r 4: ,-"-/.1,4/J fio,
\fr:s 'It 'it 7 'et 043 v - . ,
I -44141ir ..44' - . . -'"-;
i' .r )� t M►R »a
d . J'• •
`y ', u 7S
-, r i, . ,,,,,,, .. ,.. : . „ ,.._ .
r _ - -. __
• •,.... _,. ..„ •-_,:.,_ • ,
. , . _.
L. ' a d ...,. 7.'y
4 .. 7 _ -.:ir /.1 -
rt 1. ° }• �•. '
4 '•1 .
i _ . • mot•. - - - .�•• ,.i •-.;• . f'Y
..,, .., .,„,.• ::4
. . .
_. '. -_ 1, . .. • ...) . . • .-., : ..,4.S. ).,.;:,-,f44
•
-• 11 --� -; a. ,., 4 .,.. =i Legend A
1
a •'r--_.'• - .• I Avoided_Wetlands —18 Acres
1� 'E r II Approximate Current Pit Limits
. -' ' -444 ► Proposed Bender Pit
R _11$•- -
`s y 'j- . y 1 _ Wetland Boundary
- o Ch o oo DigitalG ,eiGrAyG,C P ft3 GeographW,CRCEOG- r o
`•' ' ;_ _• r @,USDA,11M3§9 AeroGRii MA EC fRiG ag U§GI'Communit,
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
13