20140191 Ver 1_401 Application_20140226

February 26, 2014
SEPI Project # EN14.002
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Sean Clark
SEPI Engineering & Construction
1025 Wade Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27605
N.C. Division of Water Resources
Transportation Permitting Unit
Attn: Rob Ridings
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Centennial Entrance at Trailwood Drive (Main Campus Drive widening)
Wake County, NC
On behalf of the owner, NC State University, Attn: Lynn Swank, please find attached a complet
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) that the activities
proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 14 and General Water Quality Certificati
3886. Please contact me at (919) 573 -9931 if you have any questions or require additional
information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
Centennial Entrance at Trailwood Drive
(Main Campus Dr. widening)
Project Type
Linear Transporation Project
Owner / Applicant
NC State University; Attn: Lynn Swank
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Raleigh
Waterbody Name
UT to Walnut Creek
Index Number
27- 34 -(4)
Class
C;NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201

IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.016
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.016
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
0
If you have any questions, please call me at (919) 573 -9931.
Sincerely,
SEPI Engineering & Construction
Slr.le�
Sean Clark
Environmental Division Manager
Attachments:
Pre - construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
USGS Topographic Quad Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Agent Authorization Form
DWQ Buffer Letter (NBRRO #14 -017)
Overall Impact Map /Impact Map Details
Erosion Control Plan (full size to DWQ; 11x17 to USACE)
Check for $240 Application Fee to DWQ

O�O�W AT! 9q
oNil�<
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Centennial Entrance at Trailwood Drive (Main Campus Drive widening)
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
State of North Carolina (NCSU)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
10522/0842
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Lynn Swank
3d.
Street address:
116 West Jones St. /Campus Box 7216
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27603 /Raleigh, NC 27695
3f.
Telephone no.:
919 - 513 -4637
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
Idswank @ncsu.edu
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Applicant is owner as specified on attached "Agent
Authorization" form; please include Agent on all correspondence
4b.
Name:
Lynn Swank
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
State of North Carolina (NCSU)
4d.
Street address:
116 West Jones St. /Campus Box 7216
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27603 /Raleigh, NC 27695
4f.
Telephone no.:
919 - 513 -4637
4g.
Fax no.:
N/A
4h.
Email address:
Idswank @ncsu.edu
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Sean Clark
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
SEPI Engineering & Construction
5c.
Street address:
1025 Wade Ave.
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
5e.
Telephone no.:
919 - 573 -9931
5f.
Fax no.:
919 - 789 -9591
5g.
Email address:
sclark @sepiengineering.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0793521758
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.7544 Longitude: - 78.6919
1c. Property size:
2.77 acres (within project area)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Walnut Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area contains the existing Main Campus Drive roadway infrastructure. The surrounding area is currently
forested.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.016 acres within the 2.77 acre project area.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to widen the existing Main Campus Drive (currently a single -lane roadway) from it's
intersection with Thistledown Dr. & Trailwood Dr. (both of which are currently two -lane roadways) to a point where the
road straightens from a low lying curve. Additionally, the project proposes to include a paved shoulder where there
currently isn't one.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proejct will involve the widening of Main Campus Dr. for the distance specified above, the addition of a median at the
intersection, the paving of currently unpaved shoulders and the addition of a dissipater at the outlet of an existing culvert.
Heavy equipment typically used for road widening projects will be utilized, e.g. dump trucks, back hoes, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments:
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: SEPI Engineering &
Construction
Name (if known): Sean Clark
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Mr. James Lastinger of the USACE confirmed the jurisdicational delineation on 1/31/14. Mr. James Graham of the NC
DWR confirmed the Riparian Buffer determination on 1/15/14. Buffer Determination letter attached.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Corps (404, 10) or
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Bottomland
W1 P
Fill
Hardwood
Yes
Corps
0.016
Forest
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.016
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average stream
Impact
number
(PER) or
width
length
Permanent (P) or
intermitte
(feet)
(linear
Temporary (T)
nt (I NT)?
feet)
S1 Choose one
Choose
Choose One
one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
0
3i. Comments: There are no streams within the project boundaries.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d,
4e.
Open water
Name of
impact number—
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
Temporary T
01 Choose one
Choose One
Choose
M. Total open water impacts
0
4g. Comments: There are no open waters within the project boundaries.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or
(acres)
number
purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5g. Comments: This project does not propose Pond or Lake construction
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer mitigation required?
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
61 Choose one
Yes /No
6h. Total buffer impacts
0
0
6i. Comments: There are no buffered streams within the project boundaries, therefore, there will be no riparian buffer impacts
for the proposed project.
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant requested a detailed delineation of the proposed project boundaries prior to project planning to insure the
limitation of impacts to the natural environment. There are no streams within the project boundaries and only a minimal
(0.016 acres) of wetland impact. Currently, there is an existing 36 -inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) under the
existing roadway. The applicant is proposing to install a new headwall rather than a flared end section to minimize the
amount of grading and disturbance to the wetland area. Additionally, a velocity dissipater will be installed (the existing
outlet does not have a dissipater pad) at the location of the current outlet to disperse the erosive energy from the
stormwater flows. The proposed side slopes of the roadway are 3:1 which is an industry standard (i.e. slopes will not
exceed that ratio and be any flatter). The applicant is also aware of the Regional Conditions (4.0 Additional Regional
Conditions for Specific Nationwide Permits) — there are no streams within the proposed project boundaries and thus, no
stream impacts are proposed, the project is widening an existing roadway (i.e. not creating an upland within waters of the
US) and this project does not occur within tidal waters or tidal wetlands.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The applicant proposes to conduct the activities during the drier times of the year. Additionally, the new headwall
(described above) will be installed from teh surface of the existing roadway in order to keep construction equipment out of
the wetland. Orange fabric fencing (or the like) will be utilized to insure that jurisdictional areas are not impacted unless
specifically authorized by the USACE and /or NC DWR authorizations.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
El Yes 0 N
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
'as confirmed during the USACE site meeting.
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one
Quantity
Type: Choose one
Quantity
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Quantity
Page 6 of 10

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed project does not include any direct discharges to a
❑ Yes ® No
protected riparian buffer; therefore, no diffuse flow plan is required.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
N/A %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Stormwater associated with the
proposed widening will be directed to the existing stromwater conveyance.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
__72e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered 'yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative Impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetland Programs" document prepared by NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The proposed
road widening does not meet any of the "growth stimulating" criteria. There is an existing road at this location, the
proposed widening does not provide access to previously inaccessible areas (i.e. it is not a road on a new location), the
project drains to Walnut Creek which is Class C; Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) (i.e. not HQW, ORW or 303(d) listed
waters) and does not increase traffic flow from present conditions. We anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or
quantitative cumulative impact analysis is required.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
It is not anticipated that this project will generate any waste water.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Database and onsite investigation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project takes place in Wake County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH
(i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb/ `Records check at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology
were not performed. No structures were noted during a field reconnaissance of the project location. Utilizing the
HPOWEB GIS mapping service, a 2 -mile radius search of the project center yielded one property, the Dr. Elmo N.
Lawrence House, on the National Register. It is important to note that this property is 1.5 miles from the proposed
roadway widening. The Dorothea Dix Hospital "Determination of Eligibility" (DOE) boundary is at the extreme northern
edge of the 2 -mile radius search around the proposed project (i.e. 2 miles from the project center). The Fairway Acres
Historic District which is currently listed under the "Study List" and the Fairway Acres Historic District Park are 2 miles to
the east of the proposed project center. There are also 5 properties that are listed as "surveyed only ": WA2483 House (2
miles from the project center), David Smith House & WA -R149 House (both 1.5 miles from the project center) and Inwood
Baptist Church & WA -R151 House (both 1.75 miles from the project center).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http: / /floodmaps .nc.gov /fmis /Map.aspx ?FIPS =183
Sean Clark
ZZ
02/26/2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
d�
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Trailwood Gateway / Centennial Entrance
PARCEL ID: 0793521758
PROPERTY OWNER c (l
(PRINTED):
PROPERTY OWNER
(SIGNATURE):
OWNER ADDRESS: r, ?gy\VUS cEC
TELEPHONE #: .9 19 - b1 ?,— j03-4--
THE ABOVE SIGNED, REGISTERED PROPERTY OWNER(S) OF THE ABOVE NOTED
PROPERTY, DO HEREBY AUTHORIZE SEAN CLARK, OF SEPI ENGINEERING
AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. (SEPI) TO ACT ON MY BEHALF AND TAKE ALL
ACTIONS NECESSARY FOR THE PROCESSING, ISSUANCE AND ACCEPTANCE
OF THE PERMIT OR CERTIFICATION AND ANY AND ALL STANDARD AND
SPECIAL CONDITIONS ATTACHED.
NOTICE: THIS AUTHORIZATION, FOR LIABILITY AND PROFESSIONAL COURTESY
REASONS, IS VALID ONLY FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO ENTER THE
PROPERTY WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY SEPI STAFF. PLEASE CONTACT THE
ABOVE SEPI AGENT TO ARRANGE A SITE MEETING PRIOR TO VISITING THE
SITE.
SEPI JOB #: SC13.011

NCDEENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder
Governor Director
January 231:2014
Lynn Swank
State,.of North Carolina (NCSU)
Administrative Services'lll•369J
Box 7216 NCSU Campus
Raleigh, NC 27695
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO# 14 -0.1.7
Wake, County
Determination Type
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B.0233)
Stop@
❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 213.0259)
Ephemeral /Intermittent/Perennial Determination
Jordan (15A NCAC 2B. 0267)
[:],Jordan
❑ Isolated Wetland. Determination
Project Name: Trailwood Gateway
Location/Directions: Property is a located at intersection of Trailwood and Main Campus Dr.
Raleigh, NC.
Subject:Stream: UT to Walnut Creek
Determination Date: January 15, 2014 Staff. James Graham
Feature/Flag
Not
,Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
S_urve"
USGS
To o
A
X
Buffer not within
X
50 feet -of project
boundaries
B
X
Buffer not within
X
50 feet of project
boundaries
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been - located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature-that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is! not present on the property. Features that are.checked
"Subject" have been located-on the. property and possess characteristics that qualify-it-to be a, stream. 'There may
other streams located on your property that do °not show upon the maps.referenced above but, still may be
• _ Dne a
1VaatuCara I'O ,
North'Carolma.Division'of WaterResources 1628.Mad.Service Center Raleigh, NC'27699 -1628 Phone [phone]
Internet www newaterquality cim Location ,3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Acton Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Trailwood Gateway
Wake,County
,January�23,2014
jNget2,of 2
considered jurisdictional.according fo the.US Army Corps:of Engineers and%orto the Division of Water. Resources
(D WR).
This on =site determination shall expire. five (5)�years from- the date of this letter. Landowners or!affected parties that•,
disputela determination made, by -the; DWR,or Delegated'Local Authority•may request a determinatiombythe
birector..An appeal.request mustibe made-within sixty, (60),days of date;o 'this.letfer,or, from the, datethe,affected.
party (including.downs'tream an&or adjacent'owners) is notified,of'this , letter. .A request for, a determination- by the
Directorshall berneferred'to'the Director'in_ writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit; 1650:Mail Service.
Center, Raleigh,'NC 27699.
This determination is fnpl'and binding unless', as detailed above, you ask for a hearing :or�appeal within sixty (60Y
days.
The owner /future)owners should notify the Division ofW,ater Resources,(including;any other Local,.State, and
Federal Agencies) of t9is decision concerning any future correspondences regarding,the,subject property (stated
above): This p"roje&may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any -inquiries :should . be
di'rected'to.the Division of Water Resources (Central Office),at (919 )-807 -6300, and the.,US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulafory Field Office) at (919) -554 -4884.
I•f you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Sara Knies ai (979.) 7914200.
esp (fully,
Danny'SnO ,&ipervi'sor
Water,Quality Section
Raleigh, Regio nal "Ofce.
cc: RR07SWP File Copy

R BRAD(crri \ %
LYON sr
It ONAPD ST Little
Wf 51CNC5(fl: r1 lWUD L Lake Hill - f GRANT AVL'Y 0/CNa
b
WELT f AVE
WAD( AYf
D �� JORERRY ST _
DARMETTLERI ST
gyJi t l MAYVI(W RD le
f w
5 f^ 4 ( � � t!,! RUffIN S ROSEDaIt AVC
� roE�s
:^ Dorton _ RVC'RD CHIod 4 Q
Arena
q 9 s K FVFFlT °
.St � r WOODS PL g. = TAV(.
over HUI IT S Fa Mon
It
?"w tern IiOON \S. 1�... _ Cam, / CLARK AVE
Park" • .\ ` ._ *OEr r/ c�O9m R,y�q 1 tr0 ■ West EM RK n
JACKSON ST fCgCf °1r ArgA -6q rq Raleigh Came
• < FgUCF � � "cN
°� qy i
PRE W'S TF/1 OR ` _. ^a i
WESTfNN BIVD _ j NCdrOltte �Ngyf Z.
�$f State '!7 ?
UnfY At RslelgA ReYnOld \.'v,\ C
i DRIrr -000 DR _ \ W V coo- M a l
o Kent 4 NLf LEr STp
• CREENI ' <i) MOPPIL \PA
Garden 1 i rAFJ G9
Hinton r
MAN( UM
pQ N T GOON�DRj a- I S\` �I •: o
�
0007',�,
�5`P�PCSPO i
BRE NT JCOrI/ETR OR pa + Wo
3T s P
ndian SWALIOW DR' ... RU Hunters Creek Nest
Hills
Pineview wR r4.f, , 1 Forest
p DRS �.
' 0
Hills BP ND - rFgnu
qr :'iCL a F %A
14, ST Nt fEP /�' 3 j 1
NieNS� (wf `, PONf
jlg Wynnewood ■ u,
elees De
N` n
� i o
OrcJurds %� 4
o y 1U
O C�
(pMPUS OR .j " (�l• _ \,1;1 \�..., ���..
TANA6fR -.
cTT I� TSB \[it
SI .L E
< a I
i
7HIf I(r f
Doty TA
J � S gRALeNO
TP CIR Q0. RO
Pp a°
Y„6 0p CARO1lNA
IINI bERPY UR 411RRA pq PM(T,,fc,
lit N5
Project #: Figure 1
Project ^
Project Mgr.: Centennial Entrance �■�
Sean Clark (Main Campus Drive widening)
Date: 01 -15 -2014 N C S U SEPI
USGSTopoMap ENGINEERING &
Scale: NTS CONSTRUCTION
Raleigh West, NC Quad Sheet 2013

A F _
Ivit
D
Mn E
ffD
�.
� Its
nIE cgs
c.�—LJ
Agf3 U Cn • ,
r Cgs? --�
ApC? 1,
i
i
Cep 1'+ CgH2
r A g V r ��
As82
at s -+ Cl •
Project #:
W4.002
Figure 2
Centennial Entrance
us Drive widening)
(Main Campus 9)
p Mgr.:
an Clark
an
: 01 -15 -2014
NCSU
USDA Wake County Soil Survey
NTS
Sheets 58 & 68
SEPI
CENGINEERING &
C O N S T R U C T I O N

holed r.
o�� Figure 2
sc�s.II cI& Trallwood Gateway
Proj*d Sean Clark NCSU
Date: 01•1S -2014 USDA Wake County Soil Survey
scale: NTS Sheets 58 L 68
L
C LNGIN9ERING i
C O N S T R U C T I O N

9$
i�
M n
® rn
o-� Z
_ z -i
z
Z
D D
C) r
D m
D
C-)
D
r
O
N
m
U)
A
D
m
0
A
D
r
m W
_ Cl
II
0
0
m�
n
mCo M j
z o m m
$ zC)
cn r1l
1 Z
F, m am
;RC 2 n.�
< o --I Z
- z
O
ee 2 f7o
�C
N �?
O <
b n n
V m
W � � _
r T7
o�m
y <D m O Q A -1 cfJ ?
z -o a. z m z
N Z O�
�o
co ° ` W'�
ID 11, A = cD
cC > > =ODAtoD
loo
8 �A A O, D ­1 Z
n W C) O Z7 v Q
m g o O
z
Z D D
D
I f
Or
o
cm
----------- _�'��•\x \ III M*
v, \ `
```� ` ♦ ,1I 111 1 _ I , ``` 1 I 'w'
0O--i
\\ ` ` �� \ 11 1 r^ ♦; 1 11 I I ZK>
00=1
♦ \ \ \ ``` I I 1 I _ __ T I 1\1 Kzo
'`y♦ \ \♦ �•` I i i i 1\ Jy,,`" Ill \ \���`\
\ � ``♦ IV I I I i i I 111 I \\ \\ `
' 1 II 11 I \
` . ` ���\ `` ``♦ I I it I� � - : i I IIII 11 � 1 `�� \\
1 1 \11 iil i i\
/ i \\
It
11\ `\C' -,� __ i I i `` _ `♦ `yam
zx
jz
- -_ ACS `, `� `11 11 \` i� i r ' `�♦ \ `� \�.
D� `.`` \\ \ \11
1111 1� \,
1 1 \ ♦ \
?
ln �`� \ \ \p` i \ `\ i
m ` 1 \\
� ` 1 \O 1 1 \ \ I -
---- `♦ \I � \ \\ I / ICI ` ♦♦♦
\ \ 11 \ ` `\ 11 \ \ `♦y - I � 1
\`♦
\ \\ \\
IN
zo
\ _
` ` I \\ -
c%
- ----' \\ X m 5 m
0
CID
\ \_ \ \\\ \�\ m z
N.
\\ v
/ m
\
� \ I
\
- - ---
o�
� D D
Z
m
m
rn
T
o D
o IM
IM
a, D
D
n
`
♦1
\ \\ \ `\ 1 \
of
E
X
\
\
\ 1
E E
`\
`\ \`
NO
1
r
f E \\ \\
1
i
`\" 1 1
1 1 1
m m
/ / 1 `\ `\ \ `I \ • I
\ 1\ \ ` 1 `\ \
\`
\`
\\ `�I
m
\
�
1
1