20200458 Ver 2_401 Application_20220223

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver 4.1
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk - below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN % 20Help % 20File % 202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Pender
Is this a NCDMS Project*
Yes No
Click Yes, only if NCDMS is the applicant or co -applicant.
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.*
4/2/2020
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? *
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 18 - Minor Discharges
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: *
check al? that apply
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
Before submitting this form please ensure you have submitted the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form as we will not be able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre -Filing Meeting
Request Form is used in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying
agency" and in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5) all certification requests shall include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority at
least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Click here to read more information on when this form is needed prior to application submission or here to view the form.
Is this a courtesy copy notification? *
Yes No

ID#
2020-0458
Version
1
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
5/22/2020
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
EMAIL_USACE Email Requesting Site Visit_2020-05-20.pdf
File type must be PDF
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
Yes No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
Yes No
li. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?*
Yes
Yes No
Yes • No
No Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? *
Yes No
98.83KB
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Troy Beasley
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Id. Who is applying for the permit?*
Owner
(Check all that apply)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: *
Hilltop Management, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
4654,1913
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
Andrew Furr
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
Applicant (other than owner)
2d. Address*
Street Address
1730 Scotts Hill Loop Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Wilmington NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28411 USA

2e. Telephone Number: *
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
nax)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: *
Hilltop Management, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
4630; 1960
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
Andrew Furr
2d. Address*
Street Address
1730 Scotts Hill Loop Road
Address Line 2
City
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28411
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:*
Troy Beasley
4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
WithersRavenel
4c. Address*
Street Address
219 Station Road
Address Line 2
Suite 101
City
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28405
4d. Telephone Number:*
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
la. Name of project: *
Hilltop Business Park and Storage
lb. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
lc. Nearest municipality / town: *
Hampstead

2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
(tax PIN or parcel ID)
4215-23-1857-0000,4215-33-0904-0000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
302 Old Whitfield Rd
Address Line 2
City
Hampstead
Postal / Zip Code
28443
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
2b. Property size:
(in acres)
23.32
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude:* Longitude:*
34.440261
ex: 34.208504
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Trumpeters Swamp (Stream Index: 17-74-49-2-1-1)
-77.631068
-77.796371
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C;SW
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.*
030300070803
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The northern ±18.5 acre parcel consists of undeveloped woodlands with very sparse trees. The southern ±5.71 acre parcel is currently under construction as a boat/self storage facility.
The project site has been partially cleared historically, and has been mowed/maintained to keep vegetation heights very low. The general land use in the vicinity of the project consists of a
mixture of residential and commercial/retail uses.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
3.6
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a mixed -use business park and boat/self-storage facility to meet the growing demand for these types of facilities in eastern Pender
County.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The proposed project consists of construction of 12 flex -space commercial/retail buildings, a boat/self-storage facility, access roads, parking and associated infrastructure (water, sewer,
stormwater management, electrical, etc).
Traditional commercial construction equipment and techniques will be used to construct the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:

5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
Example: SAW-2017-99999
SAW-2015-01338
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Land Management Group
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR.
The USACE issued a Final JD for the northern parcel (PIN: 4215-33-0904-000) on 4/22/2016 (AID: SAW-2015-01338), which has been provided as an Appendix.
WithersRavenel conducted a wetland delineation for the southern parcel (PIN: 4215-23-1857-0000) in July 2017 and determined that the parcel consisted entirely of uplands as
documented in the WithersRavenel report dated 8/10/2017, which has been provided as an Appendix.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other
separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
Buffers
)
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason * (?)
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland C
No
Both
0.058
(acres)
W2
Road Construction
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland C
No
Both
0.070
(acres)
W3
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.028
(acres)
W4
Road Construction
T
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.015
(acres)
W5
SCM Outfall
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
W6
SCM Outfall
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.002
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.085
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.089
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.174
2i. Comments:
See PCN Cover Letter for information on proposed impacts
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization

la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and "waters' could be
minimized.
Wetland impacts have been minimized to those necessary to construct internal roads to access the developable uplands within the project and meet the
Pender County requirements for two points of access for emergency services and construction of the western SCM outfall (existing). There are no
proposed impacts associated with construction of the proposed office buildings or parking.
Wetland impacts have been minimized by crossing Wetland C (Impacts W1 & W2) perpendicularly. A culvert beneath the road will maintain hydrologic
connectivity between the wetland on each side of the road. These impacts are existing.
The access road within the business park has been designed for minimize impacts to Wetland B (Impacts W2 & W3) by encroaching only into the outer
edge of the wetland. A retaining wall has been designed to stabilize road fill to minimize wetland impacts from traditional backslopes that would have
encroached farther into the wetlands.
Wetland impacts for the western SCM outfall have been minimized to 0.003 acres (Impacts W5 & W6) for construction of the riprap dissipator and high
flow bypass to prevent erosion within the wetlands. These impacts are existing.
The site design has minimized wetland impacts to the greatest extent practicable and has minimized permanent wetland impacts to less than 0.10 acres.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: *
Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas to prevent sediment from escaping into undisturbed wetlands, and access during construction will
be within uplands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Proposed permanent wetland impacts are less than 0.10 acres and therefore the applicant does not propose mitigation.
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section ..***
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
If no, explain why:
The proposed project is not located in a basin subject to state riparian buffer rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?*
Yes No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program? *
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
Hint: projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of community in -lieu programs should answer
no to this question.
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply (check all that apply): *
Local Government State
If you have a local government approval please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
State Stormwater Programs*
Phase II Coastal Counties
HWQ or ORW Other
Comments:
The stormwater management plan consists of three wet detention ponds. NC DEMLR issued a State Stormwater Management Permit No. SW8 180607) for the proposed project, which
has been provided as an attachment.
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
The boat/self-storage facility on the southern parcel (PIN: 4215-23-1857-0000) is currently under construction. Construction of the business park on the
northern parcel (PIN: 4215-33-0904-0000) has not begun.
The construction of the boat/self-storage facility within the southern parcel (PIN: 4215-23-1857-0000) resulted in unauthorized 0.003 acres of wetland
impacts (Impact W5 — 0.001 ac & W6-0.002 ac) within Wetland C for construction of the outfall for the western SCM which were not permitted prior to
construction. These impacts resulted from an error in the installation of the silt fencing that was supposed to run along the upland edge of the wetlands
to avoid encroachment into the wetlands.
The road connection between the storage facility and business park within the northern parcel (PIN: 4215-33-0904-0000) was not intended to be
constructed until the necessary permits had been received and was supposed to be stubbed short of Wetland C. The contractor partially constructed the
crossing through Wetland C (Impact W1 — 0.058 ac & Impact W2 — 0.07 ac) to access the outfall of the western stormwater pond outfall, as well as
stockpile materials, which resulted in 0.128 acres of unauthorized wetland impact.
This application will bring the project into compliance and permit all unauthorized wetland impacts for the entire project.
After the original application was submitted on 4/2/2020, the USAGE conducted a site visit and determined that the property was in violation of the CWA
due to ditching within the wetlands completed by the property owner in an effort to improve drainage on the site. A site meeting was conducted with
Emily Greer (USACE), Robb Mairs (NCDWR), Holley Snider (NCDWR), Troy Beasley (WR) and Andrew Furr (property owner) on 5/22/2020 to review
the violation and discuss the necessary steps to resolve the violation. It was during this meeting that the unauthorized impacts for the SCM outfall
(Impacts W5 & W6) were discovered. At the meeting, the property owner was instructed to survey all the constructed ditches and limits of the
unauthorized wetland impacts, and then backfill the ditches with native soils and stabilize the disturbed areas. In an email dated 2/14/2021,
WithersRavenel notified the USACE and NCDWR that the property owner had backfilled the ditches and seeded with rye grass and provided a copy of
the Wetland -Ditch Impact Survey, Photo Documentation of the restored ditches and updated wetland impact maps that showed the existing and
proposed impacts to be permitted to bring the site into compliance. Tom Charles (USACE) and Holley Snider (NCDWR) conducted a site meeting to
review the restored ditches on 8/2/2021, where they determined that the ditches had been sufficiently restored and the violation had been resolved. Tom
Charles (USACE) confirmed that the violation was considered resolved in an email dated 8/20/21, which has been provided as an attachment. Since the
violation has been resolved, permitting of the unauthorized wetland impacts and proposed wetland impacts could move forward, and have been
addressed in this application.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
There are no future phases planned and the proposed project is not anticipated to be a catalyst for future construction that could impact nearby
downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Onsite septic
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? *
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?*
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
Yes No

Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?**
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? *
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?*
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home to identify if there were any known
occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data did not identify any occurrences of federally listed
threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter.
Additionally, a species list was generated using USFWS' Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), located at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/, on
11/07/2021. This species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and designated critical habitat,
that may occur within the vicinity of the project and may be affected by the project. The IPaC list has been provided as an attachment. Site reviews did
not identify any potential habitat for any federally protected species known to occur in Pender County, except for the Northern Long Eared Bat.
Potential habitat for the northern Long-eared bat (NLEB) is listed as mature forest with trees over 3" dbh, which is used for roosting during the day. The
proposed project area contains sparse trees over 3" DBH, and therefore is considered potential northern long eared bat habitat. The proposed project is
located outside of a red HUC and there is no pile driving, blasting or percussive activities proposed. Therefore, WR concludes that the project "may
affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the northern long-eared bat and the SLOPES ALP Situation 1 is applicable to this project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
WR reviewed the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat online mapper, located at: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html. The EFH
mapper classifies Virginia Creek, located approximately 4,000 If east of the proposed project, as Essential Fish Habitat. However, the project does not
drain to Virginia Creek, but actually drains west to Trumpeters Branch, which is not EFH. Therefore, the proposed project will not result in adverse
impacts to Essential Fish Habitat within Virginia Creek.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust
designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html
to determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The database review did not identify
any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
www.ncfloodmaps.com
Miscellaneous
Comments
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PCN Cover Letter -Attachments -Impact Exhibits.pdf 16.14MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");

I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Troy Beasley - WithersRavenel - Authorized Agent
Signature *
Date
11/7/2021

I. WithersRavenel
NI.Our Peopte. Your Success.
November 7, 2021
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Tom Charles
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Mr. Paul Wojoski
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Hilltop Business Park & Storage
Hampstead, Pender County
NWP 18 & 39 PCN Submittal - After the Fact - Revised PCN
USACE AID: SAW-2015-01338
NCDWR Proj #: 2020-0458
WR Project #03200325.00
Dear Mr. Charles and Mr. Wojoski,
On behalf of Hilltop Management, LLC., we are requesting "after the fact" authorization from the
USACE to use NWP 39 for 0.09 acres of permanent wetland impacts for construction of two road
crossings necessary for construction of the Hilltop Business Park and Storage project. Please refer
to the Project History section of this letter for more information on the "after the fact" status of
this application. We are also requesting a 401 WQC for the above referenced impacts.
Please note that an onsite meeting was conducted with Emily Greer (USACE), Robb Mairs
(NCDWR) and Holley Snider (NCDWR) on 5/22/2021, and therefore the pre -filing meeting
request requirements of the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule have been satisfied
for this project. A copy of the email from Emily Greer (USACE) requesting the site meeting has
been provided as an attachment.
The project is 23.32 acres and is located in the Cape Fear River basin (HUC: 030300070803) and
drains to Trumpeters Swamp. The Water Quality Classification for Trumpeters Swamp is C;SW,
and the Stream Index Number is: 17-74-49-2-1-1.
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a mixed -use business park and boat/self-
storage facility to meet the demand for these type of facilities in eastern Pender County. The
proposed project consists of construction of twelve flex -space commercial/retail buildings, a
boat/self-storage facility, access roads, parking, and associated infrastructure (water, sewer,
stormwater management, electrical, etc.).
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and
techniques.
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.256.9277 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Hilltop Business Park & Storage, Hampstead, Pender Co.
NWP 18 & 39 PCN
Li. WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Project History
The USACE issued an AJD (SAW-2015-01338) for the northern ±18.5-acre parcel (PIN: 4215-33-
0904-0000) on 4/22/2016. A copy of the AJD has been provided as an attachment.
The southern ±5.71-acre parcel (PIN: 4215-23-1857-0000) was reviewed by WithersRavenel in
July 2017 and was determined to consist entirely of uplands as documented in the "Wetland
Assessment Report" dated 8/10/2017, which has been provided as an attachment.
The boat/self-storage facility on the southern parcel (PIN: 4215-23-1857-0000) is currently under
construction. Construction of the business park on the northern parcel (PIN: 4215-33-0904-
0000) has not begun.
The construction of the outfall for the SCM for boat/self-storage facility within the southern parcel
(PIN: 4215-23-1857-0000) resulted in unauthorized 0.003 acres of wetland impacts (Impact W5
- 0.001 ac & W6-0.002 ac) within Wetland C which were not permitted prior to construction.
These impacts resulted from an error in the installation of the silt fencing that was supposed to
run along the upland edge of the wetlands to avoid encroachment into the wetlands.
The road connection between the storage facility and business park within the northern parcel
(PIN: 4215-33-0904-0000) was not intended to be constructed until the necessary permits had
been received and was supposed to be stubbed short of Wetland C. The contractor partially
constructed the crossing through Wetland C (Impact W1 - 0.058 ac & Impact W2 - 0.07 ac) to
access the outfall of the western stormwater pond outfall, as well as stockpile materials, which
resulted in 0.128 acres of unauthorized wetland impact.
This application will bring the project into compliance and permit all unauthorized wetland impacts
for the entire project.
After the original application was submitted on 4/2/2020, the USACE conducted a site visit and
determined that the property was in violation of the CWA due to ditching within the wetlands
completed by the property owner in an effort to improve drainage on the site. A site meeting was
conducted with Emily Greer (USACE), Robb Mairs (NCDWR), Holley Snider (NCDWR), Troy
Beasley (WR) and Andrew Furr (property owner) on 5/22/2020 to review the violation and discuss
the necessary steps to resolve the violation. It was during this meeting that the unauthorized
impacts for the SCM outfall (Impacts W5 & W6) were discovered. At the meeting, the property
owner was instructed to survey all the constructed ditches and limits of the unauthorized wetland
impacts, and then backfill the ditches with native soils and stabilize the disturbed areas. In an email
dated 2/14/2021, WithersRavenel notified the USACE and NCDWR that the property owner had
backfilled the ditches and seeded with rye grass. In the email, WithersRavenel included a copy of
the Wetland -Ditch Impact Survey, Photo Documentation of the restored ditches and updated
wetland impact maps that showed the existing and proposed impacts to be permitted to bring the
site into compliance. A copy of the 2/14/2021 has been attached to this application. Tom Charles
(USACE) and Holley Snider (NCDWR) conducted a site meeting to review the restored ditches on
8/2/2021, where they determined that the ditches had been sufficiently restored and the violation
had been resolved. Tom Charles (USACE) confirmed that the violation was considered resolved in
an email dated 8/20/21, which has been provided as an attachment. Since the violation has been
resolved, permitting of the unauthorized wetland impacts and proposed wetland impacts could
move forward, and have been addressed in this application.
Page 2 of 4

Hilltop Business Park & Storage, Hampstead, Pender Co.
NWP 18 & 39 PCN
:WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.089 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 0.085 acres of
temporary wetland impacts for construction of road crossings for internal access within the project
and provide two points of access as required for emergency services and construction of the
western SCM outfall.
The impacts consist of the following:
NWP 39 - 0.089 acres of permanent wetland impact; 0.085 acres of temporary wetland impact
• Impact W1 (0.058 acres - existing) - construction of a perpendicular road crossing through
Wetland C in order to provide interconnectivity between the boat/self-storage facility and
business park. This crossing also provides a second point of access to Machine Gun Road
as required by Pender County for emergency services access. A culvert will be installed
within the road crossing to provide hydrologic connectivity between the undisturbed
portions of Wetland C remaining on each side of the road.
• Impact W2 (0.07 acres - existing) - temporary wetland impacts for construction of the road
crossing from the storage facility to the business park.
• Impact W3 (0.028 acres) - permanent wetland impact to Wetland A for construction of
the main access to the business park from Hwy 17. A retaining wall will be used to stabilize
road fill.
• Impact W4 (0.015 acres) - temporary wetland impacts for construction of the retaining
wall.
NWP 18 - 0.003 acres of permanent wetland impact
• Impact W5 (0.001 acres - existing) - permanent wetland impacts within Wetland C from
construction of SCM outfall.
• Impact W6 (0.002 acres - existing) - permanent wetland impact within Wetland C from
construction of SCM outfall.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Wetland impacts have been minimized to those necessary to construct internal roads to access
the developable uplands within the project and meet the Pender County requirements for two
points of access for emergency services and construction of the western SCM outfall (existing).
There are no proposed impacts associated with construction of the proposed office buildings or
parking.
Wetland impacts have been minimized by crossing Wetland C (Impacts W1 & W2) perpendicularly.
A culvert beneath the road will maintain hydrologic connectivity between the wetland on each
side of the road. These impacts are existing.
The access road within the business park has been designed for minimize impacts to Wetland B
(Impacts W2 & W3) by encroaching only into the outer edge of the wetland. A retaining wall has
been designed to stabilize road fill to minimize wetland impacts from traditional backslopes that
would have encroached farther into the wetlands.
Page 3 of 4

Hilltop Business Park & Storage, Hampstead, Pender Co.
NWP 18 & 39 PCN
:WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Wetland impacts for the western SCM outfall have been minimized to 0.003 acres (Impacts W5 &
W6) for construction of the riprap dissipator and high flow bypass to prevent erosion within the
wetlands. These impacts are existing.
The site design has minimized wetland impacts to the greatest extent practicable and has
minimized permanent wetland impacts to less than 0.10 acres.
Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas to prevent sediment from escaping into
undisturbed wetlands, and access during construction will be within uplands.
Mitigation
The proposed permanent wetland impacts are less than 0.10 acres, and therefore mitigation is not
proposed.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• USACE Email Requesting Site Visit (5/20/20) for Pre -Filing Meeting Documentation
• Agent Authorization
• Parcel/Owner Information
• Aerial Photo Exhibit
• Wetland Location Exhibit
• USGS Quads
• Pender County Soil Survey
• USACE AJD for Northern Parcel (SAW-2015-01338)
• WithersRavenel Wetland Assessment Report for Southern Parcel
• WithersRavenel Email Notification of Completion of Ditch Restoration (2/14/2021)
• USACE Email Confirming Resolution of Violation from Wetland Ditching (8/20/2021)
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• USFWS IPaC List
• State Stormwater Permit (No. SW8 180607)
• Impact Exhibits
Page 4 of 4

■■ WithersRavenel
IM.Our People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION

WithersRavenel
- Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Hilltop Management, LLC (Client) does hereby appoint
WithersRavenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas
(wetlands, surface waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of
appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for the Hilltop Business Park &
Storage project, consisting of ±24.21 acres (PINs: 4215-33-0904-0000; 4215-23-1857-
0000) located at east of Machine Gun Road in Topsail, Pender County, North Carolina.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
219 Station Rd, Suite 101
Wilmington, NC 28405
Tel. [phone]
Date:
3-20-20
Signature of Client:
Andrew Furr
(Manager)
(Na- Print) (Title)
(Signature)
1730 Scotts Hill Loop Road
Mailing Address
Wilmington, NC 28411
City State Zip
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 I f: 919.467.6008 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PRE -FILING MEETING REQUES DOCUMENTATION
USACE EMAIL REQUESTING SITE VISIT (5/20/20)

Beasley, Troy
From: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:36 PM
To: Beasley, Troy
Cc: Mairs, Robb L
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Troy -
Would you be available to meet with Robb and I onsite this Friday? We were out there today and have some concerns
that need to be addressed. We will need the surveyed project and wetland delineation overlaid on an aerial to assist in
the investigation. In addition to your availability, the site visit is contingent on the weather. Robb and I can meet you any
time after 1030AM.
Thank you -
Emily Greer, Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington District - Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
910.251.4567 (o)
Original Message
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:24 AM
To: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Good morning Emily. I hope you're doing well.
I wanted to check on the status on the issuance of the permit for this project. The application was logged into your
system on April 2nd. The applicant needs the permit by 5/29 if at all possible.
Thanks for you help! Let me know if you have any questions.
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
1

Original Message
From: WilmingtonNCREG <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 6:06 AM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: 2015-01338: [Non-DoD Source] PCN - Pender - Non -DOT
Good Morning Troy,
I hope you are doing well! On 4/2/2020 we received your Pre -Construction Notification form for Hilltop Business Park.
We have assigned this project Action ID# SAW-2015-01338 and forwarded it to Ms. Emily Greer for further processing.
Thanks, Christy
Original Message
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 3:58 PM
To: WilmingtonNCREG <[e-mail]>
Cc: SAW-PCN-RG <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] PCN - Pender - Non -DOT
A new project has been received on 4/2/2020 3:54 PM for Hilltop Business Park and Storage. The link below will take you
to the project folder.
BlockedBlockedhttps://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Laserfiche/index.aspx?db=WaterResources#id=1135828;view=browse
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as
responses aren't monitored.
2

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PARCEL/OWNER INFORMATION

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
wic
ovember 7. 2021 9:
allOW
•
PIN: 4215-23-1857-0000 - ±5.71 AC
HILLTOP MANAGEMENT, LLC
1730 SCOTTS HILL LOOP RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
BOOK: 4654; PAGE: 1913
HILLTOP BUSINESS PARK & STORAGE
• -
PIN: 4215-33-0904-0000 - ±18.5 AC
HILLTOP MANAGEMENT, LLC
1730 SCOTTS HILL LOOP RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
BOOK: 4630; PAGE: 1960
/4
AERIAL FROM GOOGLE EARTH (5/16/2019)
PARCEL/PROPERTY OWNER EXHIBIT
'417.1,Nio
�r <
I!WithersRavenel
Engineers Planners Surveyors
HAMPSTEAD
PENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

PIN: 4215-23-1857-0000
Owner: HILLTOP MANAGEMENT LLC,
1730 SCOTTS HILL LOOP RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
Deed Ref: 4654/1913
Property
Address:
Description: PT TR 1 PB 26/63 SNIFF SURVEY
Sale Price: $0
Sale Date: LAST_SALE_DATE
Plat: 00520104
Account No: 972154
Township: TOPSAIL
Subdivision: OAK GROVE
Tax Codes: G01 F22 R40
Acres: 5.71
Land Value: $47,870
Building Value: $0
Total value: $47,870
Deferred Value: $0
PIN: 4215-23-1857-000
1:3,913
0 0.0275 0.055
0.11 mi
Exempt Amount: 0 0 0.045 0.09
PCL Class: R
Heated Sq Feet:
1 inch = 326 feet
April 1, 2020
1
0.18 km
N

PIN: 4215-33-0904-0000
Owner: HILLTOP MANAGEMENT LLC
1730 SCOTTS HILL LOOP RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
Deed Ref: 4630/1960
Property
Address: 17 HWY
Description: TRACT 2 ON N/S US HWY 17
Sale Price: $0
Sale Date: LAST_SALE_DATE
Plat: 00260063
Account No: 972819
Township: TOPSAIL
Subdivision:
Tax Codes: G01 F22 R40
Acres: 18.5
Land Value: $346,500
Building Value: $0
Total value: $346,500
Deferred Value: $0
Exempt Amount: 0
PCL Class: R
Heated Sq Feet:
PIN: 4215-33-0904-000
1:3,913
0 0.0275 0.055
0.11 mi
0 0.045 0.09
1 inch = 326 feet
April 1, 2020
1
0.18 km
N

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

nds—Streams\CAD \Wetlands Base.dwa
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
HILLTOP BUSINESS PARK & STORAGE
HAMPSTEAD
PENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
AERIAL FROM GOOGLE EARTH (5/16/2019)
AERIAL PHOTO - 2019
1! WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 ft.
HILLTOP BUSINESS PARK & STORAGE
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR ±18.5 ACRE
PARCEL APPROVED BY USACE JD ISSUED
ON 04/22/2016 (SAW-2015-01338)
WITHERSRAVENEL DETERMINED THERE
WERE NO WETLANDS PRESENT WITHIN
±5.71 ACRE PARCEL AS DOCUMENTED IN
REPORT DATED 08/10/2017.
AERIAL FROM GOOGLE EARTH (5/16/2019)
44V1
WETLAND LOCATION EXHIBIT
1.44- 4'
IiWithersRavenel
Engineers Planners Surveyors
HAMPSTEAD
PENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUADS

W:\20\20-0320\200325-Xim00
HILLTOP BUSINESS PARK & STORAGE
HAMPSTEAD
PENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD — TOPSAIL (2013)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 2000 4000
1 inch = 4000 ft.
e
408
a FLANii C OCEA P
y 1 °
rri,.. rn
IYnfcrc,ay rhlmai:
ti-
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

2020 9:57:30 PM — BEASLEY. TROY
Storage \ Wetlands —Streams \ CAD \Wetlonds
HILLTOP BUSINESS PARK & STORAGE
HAMPSTEAD
PENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD - TOPSAIL (2013)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
1IWithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PENDER CO. SOIL SURVEY

Streoms\CAD\Wetlands
HILLTOP BUSINESS PARK & STORAGE
H AMPSTFAD
PENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT
BOUNDARY
PENDER CO. SOIL SURVEY (1990)
SHEET 14
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
1!WithersRavenel
Engineers Planners Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USACE AJD FOR NORTHERN PARCEL
(AID: SAW-2015-01338)

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2015-01338 County: Pender
Property Owner:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
Location description:
U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -TOPSAIL
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Emmett Sniff
2067 Watts Landing Road
Hampstead, NC, 28443
910.452.0001
18.5 Nearest Town Hampstead
Onslow Bay River Basin New River
03020302 Coordinates Latitude: 34.4399934347253
Longitude: -77.6306983365411
The undeveloped property is located on the west side of Highway 17, south of Wind Ridge Road,
in Hampstead, Pender County, NC. The site contains three jurisdictional wetlands totaling approximately 3.6 acres.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area
. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area delineated. Due to the
size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any
delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. Unless there is
a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five
years from the date of this notification.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Emily Greer at 910-251-4567 or
Emily.C.GreerAusace. army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: This site exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland
Delineation Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation
Manual and appears to be a part of a broad continuum of wetlands connected to Trumpeter Swamp and the Cape
Fear River, a Section 10 water of the US.
D. Remarks: Topographic elevations indicate connection toward Cape Fear and not directly toward Virginia
Creek, which is across Highway 17.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 21 June 2016.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. * * Digitally signed by GREER.EMILY.C.1385325300
GREER.EMILY.C.1385325300 Dn=.GREER.=US.Go13853253nt u=DoD,ou=PKI,ou=USA,
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2016.04.2117:34:29-04'00'
Date: 22 April 2016 Expiration Date: 22 April 2021
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://regulatory.usacesurvey.com/.

L-7
•
Areas considered to be uplands - 14.9 ac or 81%
Flagged wetlands (pending review and approval
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - 3.6 ac or 19%
Rf\
NOTE: This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered approximate.
This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from field notes. A survey of delineated
areas and review and approval by the US Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior
to specific site planning.
Map Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX,
Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
4); • ';,11
R /J
SCALE 1" = 250'
Confederate Ridge S/D
Pender County, NC
April 2015
LMG # 40-15-086
IZLAND Af ANAGEPI Nr GROUP UV-
Fn+r.nnme�ro0 Co ns u I roots
LMG
www.lmgroup.net
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Figure 7.
Preliminary
Upland/Wetland Sketch

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WITHERSRAVENEL WETLAND ASSESSMENT
REPORT FOR SOUTHERN PARCEL

4■ WithersRavenel
ii Our People. Your Success.
August 10, 2017
Mr. Andy Furr
Hilltop Management, LLC
1730 Scotts Hill Loop Road
Wilmington, NC 28411
Re: Hilltop Storage Property - Hampstead, Pender County
Wetlands Assessment Report
WR Project # 03170417.00
Mr. Furr:
On June 7, 2017, WithersRavenel conducted a site review of the ±5.53 acre property, located on
Machine Gun Road, for the purpose of evaluating the presence of wetlands and streams within the
project. The project consists of one parcel (Parcel ID: 4215-23-1857-0000), located
approximately 1500 feet northwest of the intersection of Old Whiteville Road and US Highway 17
in Hampstead, Pender County (Lat: 34.4396631°N; Long:-77.6329106°W). The project is located
in the White Oak basin (HUC 03020302), and the site drains to the Virginia Creek (Stream Index:
18-87; Surface Water Classification: SA;HQW).
Proposed Activities
The proposed activities consist of development of the property, including all associated
infrastructure including utilities, access and stormwater management.
Site Conditions
The entire site is undeveloped, and has been historically timbered and cleared and the vegetation
is periodically mowed which has prevented reforestation. The vegetative composition was
consistent throughout the site, and consisted of a mixture of loblolly pine saplings (Pinus taeda),
immature long leaf pine saplings (Pinus palustris), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), bushy blue
stem (Andropoogon glomeratus), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), horsetail (Equisetum arvense),
gallberry (Ilex coriacea), red bay (Persea borbonia), horse sugar (Symplocos tinctoria), creeping
blueberry (Vaccinium crassifolium), and trumpet honeysuckle (Lonicera sempervirens).
The Pender County Soil Survey classified the soils within this area as Kureb Fine Sand (KuB) and
Leon Fine Sand (LnA). Kureb soils are classified as "excessively drained" soils. Leon Fine Sand is
classified as "poorly drained". Leon Fine Sand soils are found in broad flats throughout Pender
County and contain both upland and wetland components.
Wetland/Stream Determination
Prior to conducting the site visit, WR reviewed aerial photographs, the USDA Soil Survey for
Pender County (1990), the 2013 USGS Quadrangle Map (Topsail and Holly Ridge) and Pender
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 I f: 919.467.6008 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

■■ WithersRavenel
�Our People. Your Success.
County GIS data (i.e. topography, streams, etc.). WR reviewed the project for the presence of
wetlands and surface waters jurisdictional to the Corps of Engineers (Corps) and/or NC Division
of Water Resources (DWR) based on protocols set forth in the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation
Manual and 2010 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplement (Version 2.0).
The site review did not identify any wetlands or surface waters within the subject property. The
soils within the review area were consistent with Leon Fine Soils as mapped. The onsite soils
exhibited greater than 70% uncoated sand grains, which indicates an absence of wetland
hydrology, and does not meet hydric soil criteria. There were no hydrologic indicators observed in
the upper 12 inches of the soil surface, and saturation was not observed within 16 inches of the
soil surface, and therefore the site did not meet wetland hydrology criteria. Additionally, the
vegetation does not meet hydrophytic critera based on the prevalence index.
Summary
In conclusion, the subject property consists entirely of uplands and coordination with the Corps of
Engineers or NC Division of Water Resources is not necessary for development of the property.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the contents of this report.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
'7---5-
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
1) Aerial Photograph (2016)
2) USGS Wilmington Quadrangle (2013)
3) Pender Co. Soil Survey (1990)
Page 2of2

W:\17\17-D410\17D417-Hilitop Stologe\Wetio-ds-St,��s\CAD\Wetlo�dsBose-03170417-20170612.d*g- Fliday, J-e 16. 2017 1 51,47 PM - FAY, CHRISTOPHER
GRAPHIC SCALE
o /00 om
� l inch ~ 200h. l inch
/2) THERE ARE NO WETLANDS WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
1
~200�
HAMPSTEAD
NOTES:
1) PRELIMINARY WETLAND DETERMINATION COMPLETED BY
W|THERSBAVENELONOG07
7.
HILLTOP STORAGE
PLNDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
AERIAL 2016
VA 0 Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
WiLhe[5R@VeOe|

g1
e
w:\17\17-O410\1
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
HAMPSTEAD
1 inch = 2000 ft.
->�- •- -a f-
........ -+e- —Mi.
—t
- ..• . .
HILLTOP STOARGE
PENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD (2013) -TOPSAIL AND HOLLY RIDGE
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

W \O\17-a1o\1
S, GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
HAMPSTEAD
HILLTOP STORAGE
FENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD (2013) - TOPSAIL AND HOLLY RIDGE
WithersRavenel
.141. Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

Hop Stooge\Weliones-SI eoo s\CAD\WeIonesBose_03170,117_30170613.Cwg- F .doy, Joe 16, 2017
W:\17\17-0e10\l
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400
1 inch = 400 ft.
HAMPSTEAD
HILLTOP STORAGE
PENDER COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
41064114 411610
M u ( 1
PENDER CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 14 AND15
i '#
+44b.akiro...v/
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
2/14/2021
WITH ERSRAVEN EL EMAIL NOTIFICAITON OF
COMPLETION OF DITCH RESTORATION

Beasley, Troy
From: Beasley, Troy
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 9:57 PM
To: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Cc: Snider, Holley; Andy Furr ([e-mail])
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Attachments: Hilltop Wetland -Ditch Impact Survey_2021-02-14_scanned.pdf; Photo Documentation.pdf; HILLTOP
WETLAND IMPACTS SURVEY MAPS 9.3.20.pdf
Emily/Holley,
I wanted to follow up on the violation resolution for this project. The ditches were filled/restored and seeded with rye
grass in October 2020.
You had brought up at the site meeting that you thought that there may have been some wetland impacts for
construction of the storage facility and stormwater pond. It turns out that you were correct, as the rip -rap outfall for
the stormwater pond impacted 81 sf of Wetland C. Also, the silt fencing was installed incorrectly within the edge of the
wetlands in another spot, resulting in 117 sf of wetland fill. These impacts, along with the impacts from the road that
was already graded through Wetland C and some revisions to the impacts for the road design will require a revision to
the PCN.
I have attached the following information for your review:
• Hilltop Wetland -Ditch Impact Survey with notes regarding the restoration of the ditches and wetland impacts to
be permitted (after -the -fact) in the NWP 39 PCN to be submitted upon resolution of the violation.
• Photo Documentation of restoration of the ditches, taken on 10/29/2020.
• Wetland Impact Maps with the existing and proposed wetland impacts to be submitted with the future NWP 39
PCN which will bring the project into compliance.
We believe that the filling/restoration of the ditches to resolve the violation should be sufficient to move forward with
the permitting of the existing and proposed wetland impacts. Once you have reviewed the attached information, please
let us know if the existing violation is considered resolved and if we can move forward with submittal of the NWP 39
PCN to permit the existing and proposed wetland impacts to bring the project into compliance. I understand that the
original application dated 4/2/2020 was withdrawn due to the open violation and that a new application (ePCN) must be
submitted.
Holley — the original application was submitted in April 2020, which was before the requirement of the Pre -Filing
Meeting Request. Is the site meeting with Robb Mairs on 5/22/2020 sufficient to satisfy the Pre -Filing Meeting Request,
or do we need to submit a formal Pre -Filing Meeting Request and wait 30-days before submittal of the 401 WQC
application?
Thanks for your help with this project.
Troy Beasley
WithersRavenei
pm not Peale. sect Seems.
219 Station Road, Suite 101 1 Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 1 Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
1

[e-mail]
U
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
Original Message
From: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 4:44 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Troy -
Thank you for your inquiry. The first step is to deal with the violation. The violation must be restored to the Corps'
satisfaction before we can entertain a permit. However, to answer your question, you will have to resubmit through the
ePCN process because the permit has been withdrawn to become an enforcement action.
Rachel told me she made you aware that I have an extremely heavy workload right now. I appreciate your patience, and
I will get back to you as soon as I can. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
FYI, I believe Holley with DWR will be handling this from the state's side.
Emily Greer, Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington District - Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
910.251.4567 (o)
Original Message
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 12:19 PM
To: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Emily/Rob,
We have finally gotten the survey of the ditches and revised wetland impact maps from the project engineer. I am
working on both the revised PCN for the impacts for the roads, as well as the wetland restoration plan to backfill the
ditches.
You had brought up at the site meeting that you thought that there may have been some wetland impacts for
construction of the storage facility and stormwater pond. It turns out that you were correct, as the rip -rap outfall for
the stormwater pond impacted 81 sf of Wetland C. Also, the silt fencing was installed incorrectly within the edge of the
wetlands in another spot, resulting in 117 sf of wetland fill. These impacts, along with the impacts from the road that
was already graded through Wetland C and some revisions to the impacts for the road design will require a revision to
the PCN.
2

The original PCN was submitted electronically through the online 404/401 ePCN. What's the best way to submit a
revised PCN? Should I just submit a new ePCN, or fill out the old PCN and email it to you both?
I will email the Wetland Restoration Plan later today that deals with the backfilling of the ditches.
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
Original Message
From: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:36 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Troy -
Would you be available to meet with Robb and I onsite this Friday? We were out there today and have some concerns
that need to be addressed. We will need the surveyed project and wetland delineation overlaid on an aerial to assist in
the investigation. In addition to your availability, the site visit is contingent on the weather. Robb and I can meet you any
time after 1030AM.
Thank you -
Emily Greer, Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington District - Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
910.251.4567 (o)
Original Message
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:24 AM
To: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
3

Good morning Emily. I hope you're doing well.
I wanted to check on the status on the issuance of the permit for this project. The application was logged into your
system on April 2nd. The applicant needs the permit by 5/29 if at all possible.
Thanks for you help! Let me know if you have any questions.
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
Original Message
From: WilmingtonNCREG <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 6:06 AM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: 2015-01338: [Non-DoD Source] PCN - Pender - Non -DOT
Good Morning Troy,
I hope you are doing well! On 4/2/2020 we received your Pre -Construction Notification form for Hilltop Business Park.
We have assigned this project Action ID# SAW-2015-01338 and forwarded it to Ms. Emily Greer for further processing.
Thanks, Christy
Original Message
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 3:58 PM
To: WilmingtonNCREG <[e-mail]>
Cc: SAW-PCN-RG <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] PCN - Pender - Non -DOT
A new project has been received on 4/2/2020 3:54 PM for Hilltop Business Park and Storage. The link below will take you
to the project folder.
BlockedBlockedBlockedhttps://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Laserfiche/index.aspx?db=WaterResources#id=1135828;view=browse
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as
responses aren't monitored.
4

IMPACT 3 - EXISTING - TO BE PERMITTED
PERM WETLAND IMPACT
0.002 AC (117 SF)
r][[xlT4 MAP
IMPACT 4 - EXISTING - TO BE PERMITTED
PERM WETLAND IMPACT
0.001 AC (87 SF)
DITCH 3 - 283 LF
DITCH FILLED PER SITE MEETING WITH
EMILY GREEN (USAGE) AND ROBB MAIRS
(NCDWR) ON 5/22/2020
DITCH 2 - 53 LF
DITCH FILLED PER SITE MEETING
WITH EMILY GREEN (USAGE) AND
ROBB MAIRS (NCDWR) ON 5/22/2020
1
RLD E00[M+ V! ELL
ii 1N MEwE.
RMi 9W«xC: i5M
..NME1 : 4215 0a K1 d000
DIMS: x144 itv mrxIVM. liC
PARCEL EXAIEIT
•
43.
DITCH 4 - 328 LF
DITCH FILLED PER SITE MEETING WITH
EMILY GREEN (USACE) AND ROBB
MAIRS (NCDWR) ON 5/22/2020
I9'Y6'ze
512.93'
IMPACT 1A - EXISTING - TO BE PERMITTED
PERM WETLAND IMPACT
0.058 AC (2,651 SF)
101 1E11 MR
IMPACT 2B - PROPOSED - TO BE PERMITTED
TEMP WETLAND IMPACT
0.015 AC (678 SF)
IMPACT 1B - EXISTING - TO BE PERMITTED
TEMP WETLAND IMPACT
0.07 AC (2,988 SF)
DITCH 1A - 30 LF
DITCH FILLED PER SITE MEETING
WITH EMILY GREEN (USACE) AND
ROBB MAIRS (NCDWR) ON 5/22/2020
�S 19.01'33- E
u•00'
5H'%'1'1
23.00"
5 W' 1I' 1!' T
10.93'
5011E ELP.A
CAAPxIC 5C4EI 1.. ea
IMPACT 2A - PROPOSED - TO BE PERMITTED
PERM WETLAND IMPACT
0.028 AC (1,225 SF)
DITCH 1B - 25 LF
DITCH FILLED PER SITE MEETING
WITH EMILY GREEN (USAGE) AND
ROBB MAIRS (NCDWR) ON 5/22/2020
LEGEND
AETL
MOO
310 1EMCL
41411LT PAVEMENT /AEA
Hilltop Business Park & Storage
DEVELOPER...W..41K, LLE
ADDRESS' ;Meras kui n9w
PIIONM. 110-5]9111[
DEs 1 uiEO=
s STR0119 ENGINEERING. P.A.
1P111OVEI,M :111
OAIE:
SCM.L1 ,' • F.T
S.M. 1 a 1

■. WithersRavenel
- Our People. Your Success.
Hilltop Business Park & Storage - Hampstead, Pender County
Violation Resolution
Photographic Documentation (10/29/2020)
Photo 1: View of restored temporary impact in Wetland B on east side of access road, facing south.
Photo 2: View of upper section of restored Ditch 3 within Wetland C, facing west.
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 I f: 919.467.6008 I www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

ei WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Photo 3: View of central section of restored Ditch 3 in Wetland C, facing west.
Photo 4: View of lower section of restored Ditch 3 within Wetland C, facing east.
Page 2 of 5

• WithersRavenel
0 Our People. Your Success.
Photo 5: View of upper section of restored Ditch 4 within Wetland C, facing west.
Photo 6: View of lower section of restored Ditch 4 within Wetland C, facing west.
Page 3 of 5

ei WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Photo 7: View of restored Ditch 1A within Wetland B, facing west.
Photo 8: View of restored Ditch 1B in Wetland B, facing south.
Page 4 of 5

111011 WithersRavenel
�Our People. Your Success.
Photo 9: View restored Ditch 2, facing south.
Page 5 of 5

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
8/20/2021
USACE EMAIL CONFIRMING RESOLUTION OF
VIOLATION FROM WETLAND DITCHING

Beasley, Troy
From: Charles, Thomas P CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 6:30 AM
To: Beasley, Troy; Holley Snider ([e-mail])
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - Violation Resolution (AID: SAW-2015-01338;
NCDWR Proj #20200458)
Good on my end..
Tom Charles
[e-mail]
Regulatory Specialist
910-251-4101 cell 910-465-7602
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. E-PCN
[e-mail]
PJDs' & JD's. http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/JD/FINALSAW-JD-REQUEST-FORM-20170508.pdf
To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at:
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 12:47 PM
To: Charles, Thomas P CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Holley Snider
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - Violation Resolution (AID: SAW-2015-
01338; NCDWR Proj #20200458)
Good afternoon. Just following up to see how the site visit to Hilltop went on 8/2.
Thanks!
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
1

From: Beasley, Troy
Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 1:56 PM
To: Charles, Thomas P CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Holley Snider
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - Violation Resolution (AID: SAW-2015-01338; NCDWR
Proj #20200458)
Good afternoon! I wanted to follow up and see how the site visit to Hilltop went last Monday (8/2). Is the violation
considered sufficiently resolved so that we can move forward with permitting of the proposed impacts, as well as the
previously unauthorized impacts to bring the site into compliance?
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 1 Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 1 Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
x❑
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
From: Beasley, Troy
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 3:13 PM
To: Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
From: Beasley, Troy
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 9:57 PM
To: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>; Andy Furr ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Emily/Holley,
I wanted to follow up on the violation resolution for this project. The ditches were filled/restored and seeded with rye
grass in October 2020.
You had brought up at the site meeting that you thought that there may have been some wetland impacts for
construction of the storage facility and stormwater pond. It turns out that you were correct, as the rip -rap outfall for
the stormwater pond impacted 81 sf of Wetland C. Also, the silt fencing was installed incorrectly within the edge of the
wetlands in another spot, resulting in 117 sf of wetland fill. These impacts, along with the impacts from the road that
was already graded through Wetland C and some revisions to the impacts for the road design will require a revision to
the PCN.
2

I have attached the following information for your review:
• Hilltop Wetland -Ditch Impact Survey with notes regarding the restoration of the ditches and wetland impacts to
be permitted (after -the -fact) in the NWP 39 PCN to be submitted upon resolution of the violation.
• Photo Documentation of restoration of the ditches, taken on 10/29/2020.
• Wetland Impact Maps with the existing and proposed wetland impacts to be submitted with the future NWP 39
PCN which will bring the project into compliance.
We believe that the filling/restoration of the ditches to resolve the violation should be sufficient to move forward with
the permitting of the existing and proposed wetland impacts. Once you have reviewed the attached information, please
let us know if the existing violation is considered resolved and if we can move forward with submittal of the NWP 39
PCN to permit the existing and proposed wetland impacts to bring the project into compliance. I understand that the
original application dated 4/2/2020 was withdrawn due to the open violation and that a new application (ePCN) must be
submitted.
Holley — the original application was submitted in April 2020, which was before the requirement of the Pre -Filing
Meeting Request. Is the site meeting with Robb Mairs on 5/22/2020 sufficient to satisfy the Pre -Filing Meeting Request,
or do we need to submit a formal Pre -Filing Meeting Request and wait 30-days before submittal of the 401 WQC
application?
Thanks for your help with this project.
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
LI
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
Original Message
From: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 4:44 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Troy -
Thank you for your inquiry. The first step is to deal with the violation. The violation must be restored to the Corps'
satisfaction before we can entertain a permit. However, to answer your question, you will have to resubmit through the
ePCN process because the permit has been withdrawn to become an enforcement action.
3

Rachel told me she made you aware that I have an extremely heavy workload right now. I appreciate your patience, and
I will get back to you as soon as I can. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
FYI, I believe Holley with DWR will be handling this from the state's side.
Emily Greer, Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington District - Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
910.251.4567 (o)
Original Message
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 12:19 PM
To: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Emily/Rob,
We have finally gotten the survey of the ditches and revised wetland impact maps from the project engineer. I am
working on both the revised PCN for the impacts for the roads, as well as the wetland restoration plan to backfill the
ditches.
You had brought up at the site meeting that you thought that there may have been some wetland impacts for
construction of the storage facility and stormwater pond. It turns out that you were correct, as the rip -rap outfall for
the stormwater pond impacted 81 sf of Wetland C. Also, the silt fencing was installed incorrectly within the edge of the
wetlands in another spot, resulting in 117 sf of wetland fill. These impacts, along with the impacts from the road that
was already graded through Wetland C and some revisions to the impacts for the road design will require a revision to
the PCN.
The original PCN was submitted electronically through the online 404/401 ePCN. What's the best way to submit a
revised PCN? Should I just submit a new ePCN, or fill out the old PCN and email it to you both?
I will email the Wetland Restoration Plan later today that deals with the backfilling of the ditches.
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
4

Original Message
From: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:36 PM
To: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Mairs, Robb L <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Troy -
Would you be available to meet with Robb and I onsite this Friday? We were out there today and have some concerns
that need to be addressed. We will need the surveyed project and wetland delineation overlaid on an aerial to assist in
the investigation. In addition to your availability, the site visit is contingent on the weather. Robb and I can meet you any
time after 1030AM.
Thank you -
Emily Greer, Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington District - Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
910.251.4567 (o)
Original Message
From: Beasley, Troy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:24 AM
To: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Hilltop Business Park - Hampstead, Pender County - NWP 39 PCN - AID: SAW-2015-01338
Good morning Emily. I hope you're doing well.
I wanted to check on the status on the issuance of the permit for this project. The application was logged into your
system on April 2nd. The applicant needs the permit by 5/29 if at all possible.
Thanks for you help! Let me know if you have any questions.
Troy Beasley
219 Station Road, Suite 101 I Wilmington, NC 28405
Office: 910.256.9277 I Direct: 910.509.6512
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
5

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCNHP PROJECT REVIEW LETTER

Roy Cooper, Governor
al ■■■
■■ R NC DEPARTMENT OF
■
■ ■k■A NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
November 7, 2021
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE: Hilltop Office Park & Storage; 03200325.00
Dear Troy Beasley:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Dire ttrr, Natural Heritage Program
NCN H DE-16266
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/officesLDirectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
j 1:1 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGI NC 27603 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699
OFC 015 707.9120 • FA x 919.707.9121

Taxonomic
Group
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Hilltop Office Park & Storage
Project No. 03200325.00
November 7, 2021
NCNHDE-16266
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
r
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Last
Observation
Date
Element Accuracy
Occurrence
Rank
Federal
Status
•
State
Status
Global State
Rank Rank
J
Amphibian
37452 Anaxyrus quercicus Oak Toad 1950-08-12
H 4-Low Significantly G5 S2
Rare
Dragonfly or 33765
Damselfly
Somatochlora
georgiana
Coppery Emerald
2004-Pre
H? 5-Very
Low
Significantly G3G4 S1?
Rare
Natural
Community
12287 Low Pocosin (Titi 2010
Subtype)
A 5-Very
Low
G2G3 S2S3
Natural
Community
30442
Vascular Plant 21384
Vascular Plant 41199
Pocosin Opening
(Pitcher Plant
Subtype)
Dionaea muscipula
Dionaea muscipula
2010
Venus Flytrap 2005-04-26
Venus Flytrap 2021-05-21
A 5-Very
Low
CD
D
3-Medium
2-High
G1 Sl?
Threatened G2 S2
Threatened G2 S2
Vascular Plant 16390
Lechea torreyi var.
congesta
Torrey's Pinweed
1997-07-29 H?
4-Low Endangered G4TN S1
R
Vascular Plant 5860
Rhynchospora alba
Northern White 1946-03
Beaksedge
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
Holly Shelter Game Land and Vicinity R1 (Exceptional)
H 5-Very
Low
Collective Rating
C1 (Exceptional)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Nam711111 Owner
Holly Shelter Game Land NC Wildlife Resources Commission State
Significantly G5 S2
Rare
Peripheral
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on November 7, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q3 October 2021.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

November 7, 2021
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
111 NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
❑ Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-16266: Hilltop Office Park & Storage
1:22,682
9 0.175 0.35
1 ti ti
0 0.3 0
9.7 mi
I
1.2 km
Sdurces: Esn. HERE, Garrrtin, Inlermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAQ, NP$, NRCAN, Geoease. IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Ead japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Npng). [c] Open51reetMap canatmEors, and the GIG
User Community
Page 3 of 3

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USFWS IPaC LIST

IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Pender County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
la [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
\yiu
00\4s
PHYSICAL ADDRESS

551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
4)°

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and dick CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Login (if directed to do so),
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species' and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National ❑ceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries-').
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS

Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Threatened
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
Wherever found Marine mammal
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Birds
NAME STATUS
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https:l/ecos.fws.govlecp/species16039 \C)\\
°EC =
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa \ 'Threatened
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available. t%
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/spec ies/ 1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gQv/ej p/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
STATUS
SAT
Threatened

Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/spec ies/ 1110
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https:/leco s.fws.gov/ecp/spec i es/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/spec i e s/3281
Golden Sedge Carex lutea
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6025
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Endangered
Endangered
Threatened
ndidate
STATUS
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered

Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Critical habitats
Threatened
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratorybirds
,\0\4
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.'a and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below,
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
0‘
2_ The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
b irds-of-conservation-concern. php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.ph p
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
rttp://www.fws.gov/m igrato rybi rds/ p df/management/n at i o n wi d e sta n da rd co n se rvati o n m ea s u res. pd f
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.

For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAM E
American Kestrel
%S
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalisBreeds May 1 to Sep 30
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos. fws.govlecp/spec ies16177
BREEDING SEASON (IFA
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES -
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECTAREA.)
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird \se tift
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.govlecp/species19587
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres morinella
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31

Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A
taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. ❑ne can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability ❑f presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability ❑f presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all passible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability ❑f
presence score.
Joit
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate ❑f the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.

probability of presence breeding season survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel —_ — 1111 1111 "I` ----
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) only
in particular Bird
Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in
the continental
USA)
Bachman's
Sparrow
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
......... .
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
-11 11 111I 1111 1111 1111
\0\
I ill liva
oo
1111 MI 1111
--1 1111 1111 1111 1111 11--------------- --

RuddyTurnstone _
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) only
in particular Bird
Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in
the continental
USA)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
.......................
range in the
continental USA
........................
and Alaska.)
-- m 1111 1111 1111----------------
n\N\
Tell
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.

How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in
your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere"
is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting

point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
o�
ohs
G

Varine mammals
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected
under the Endangered Species Act1 and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are
shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears, manatees,
and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins, and
porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list;
for additional information on those species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the NOAA
Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take (to harass, hunt, capture, kill, or attempt to
harass, hunt, capture or kill) of marine mammals and further coordination may be necessary for
project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office shown.
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973.
‘t
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is
a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not threaten their survival
in the wild.
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are
potentially affected by activities in this location:
NAME
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
https://e co s. fws, gov/ecp/spec res14469
,‘,144i
Facilities
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.

For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND
PEM1 Bd
FRESHWATER POND
PUSH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
STATE STORMWATER PERMIT
(NO. SW8 180607)

IC
Energy, Mineral &
Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
August 28, 2018
Hilltop Management, LLC
Attn: Andrew M. Furr, Sr., Manager
1730 Scotts Hill Loop Road
Wilmington, NC 284I 1
Subject: State StormwaterManagement Permit No_ SW8 180607
Hilltop Business Park and Storage
High Density Project
Pender County
Dear Mr. Furr:
TROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. RECAN
Secretary
WILLIAM E. (TOBY) VINSON, JR.
interim Director
The Wilmington Regional Offce received a complete State Stormwater Management Permit Application for the subject
project on June 8, 2018 with additional information received on August 14, 2018. Staff review of the plans and
specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in
Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000 effective January 1, 2017. We are forwarding Permit No. SW8 180607 dated August 28,
2018, for the construction, operation and maintenance of the stonnwater control measures (SCMs), built -upon areas, as
well as the stormwater collection system and/or vegetated conveyance system associated with the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until August 28, 2026 and shall be subject to the conditions and
limitations as specified therein, and does not supersede any other agency permit that may be required. Please pay special
attention to the permit conditions regarding the operation and maintenance of the SCMs, stormwater collection system,
and/or vegetated conveyances; the limitation of built -upon area, modification of the project; the procedures for changing
ownership of and/or transferring the peunit; and the need to renew the permit. Please also pay attention to the permit
conditions that requires the recordation of deed restrictions and protective covenants, easements, and the maintenance
agreement, which must all be provided along with certification upon completion of the project. Failure to comply with
these requirements will result in future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to request an
adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative llearings (OAH). The written petition
must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30)
days of receipt of this permit. You should contact the OAH with aII questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee is
required) and/or the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-67I4, or via telephone
at 919-431-3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com_ Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final
and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Steve Pusey in the
Wilmington Regional Office, at [phone].
Sines ely,
William E Toby) Vinson, Jr., PE, CPESC, CPM, Interim Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Enclosures:
GDS/sgp:
cc:
Attachment A — Certification Forms
I11StormwaterlPermits & Projects120181180607 FID12018 08 permit 080607
David L. Menius, PE Stroud Engineering, PA
Pender County Building Inspections
Pender County Planning Department
NCDOT District Engineer
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
St %' ofwr;rrliCx•nitr_ . cnviroriRFc•,WQt.t3rhy = Lricivy.i, ner-siandlaudkcsour
tOrHnt_ifon Ret?acn i t3f(ia'a i E?7 Cardinal Drnvc-Extensinn 1Nilm3r�g{r�ra, N C 1h fi5
lti fir 71

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 180607
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143; General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Hilltop Management, LLC
Hilltop Business Park and Storage
16458 Hwy 17 North, Hampstead, Pender County
FOR THE
construction. operation and maintenance of three (3) wet detention ponds ('stormwater control
measures" or "SCMs") discharging to SA-HQW waters (but not within % mile) in compliance with the
provisions of Title 15A NCAC 2H .1000 effective January 1, 2017 (the "stormwater rules") and the
approved stormwater management plans; application, supplement(s), specifications, and other
supporting data (the "approved plans and specifications") as attached and/or on file with and
approved by the Division of Energy; Mineral and Land Resources (the `Division" or "DEMLR") and
considered an enforceable part of this permit
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until August 28, 2026 and shall be subject to
the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the management and volume of stormwater
described in the approved plans and specifications. The maximum amount of built -upon area
(BUA) allowed for the entire project is 436,600 square feet.
2. The drainage area(s) for the on -site stormwater system(s) will be limited to the amount(s) of
built -upon area indicated in this permit and the approved plans and specifications. The runoff
from all built -upon area within the permitted drainage area(s) of this project must be directed into
the permitted stormwater control measure(s). The stormwater control measures labeled DA1,
DA2. and DA3 have been designed using the runoff treatment method to handle the runoff from
120,550 square feet, 35,800 square feet, and 280,250 square feet of built -upon area.
respectively. The built -upon area for future development within the drainage areas labeled DA1.
DA2, and DA3 is limited to 3,000 square feet, 2,000 square feet. and 15,000 square feet.
respectively.
3. A 50-foot wide vegetative setback must be provided and maintained adjacent to all surface
waters; measured horizontally from the normal pool elevation of impounded structures, from the
top of bank of each side of streams or rivers; and from the mean high waterline of tidal waters,
perpendicular to the shoreline in accordance with the stormwater rules and the approved plans
and specifications_
The stormwater control measure(s) is(are) permitted based on the design criteria presented in
the sealed; signed and dated supplement(s) and as shown in the approved plans and
specifications. This (These) stormwater control measure(s) must be provided and maintained at
the design condition. The approved supplement(s) is(are) incorporated by reference into this
permit_
Page 1 of 4

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 180607
5 The peak flaw from the 10-year storm event shall not cause erosion downslope of the
stormwater outlet discharge point.
6, Decorative spray fountains will be allowed in the stormwater treatment system if documentation
is provided demonstrating that the proposed fountain will not cause resuspension of sediment
within the pond or cause erosion of the pond side slopes.
7. When using a wet pond for irrigation, it is recommended that some water be maintained in the
permanent pool; the vegetated shelf is planted with appropriate species that can handle
fluctuating conditions; and human health issues are addressed.
8. The SCM landscape planting plan shown in the approved plans shall be followed in its entirety
during construction. After the plants are established; the operation and maintenance agreement
must be followed_
9. Pretreatment devices have been provided to prevent clogging. This project uses forebays for
pretreatment.
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1 The project and SCM(s) shall be constructed; operated and maintained in accordance with the
conditions of this permit and the approved plans and specifications.
The on -site stormwater system shall be entirely constructed; vegetated, and operational prior to
the construction of any development within the drainage area, per the approved plans and
specifications.
3. During construction: erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of the on -site
stormwater system will be repaired immediately. If the stormwater system is used as an Erosion
Control device, it must be restored to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater
treatment device, and prior to occupancy of the facility.
4. All stormwater control measures, stormwater collection systems; vegetated conveyance
systems, and/or maintenance accesses must be located in public rights -of -way, dedicated
common areas that extend to the nearest public right-of-way, and/or permanent recorded
easements that extend to the nearest public right-of-way for the purpose of inspection,
operation; maintenance; and repair.
5. The permittee shall provide and perform the operation and maintenance necessary, as listed in
the signed Operation and Maintenance Agreement. to assure that all components of the
permitted on -site stormwater system functions at the approved design condition. The approved
Operation and Maintenance Agreement is incorporated by reference into this permit and must
be followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals.
6. The operation and maintenance agreement must be recorded with the Office of the Register of
Deeds.
7, Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made available upon request to authorized
personnel of the Division. The records will indicate the date, activity, name of person performing
the work and what actions were taken.
8. The final plats for the project must be recorded with the Office of the Register of Deeds. The
recorded plat must reference the Operation and Maintenance Agreement and must also show all
public rights -of -way, dedicated common areas. and/or permanent drainage easements; in
accordance with the approved plans.
9. The permittee is responsible for verifying that the proposed built -upon area for the entire project
does not exceed the maximum allowed by this permit.
Page 2 of 4

State Stormwater Management
Permit No 5W8 180607
10. Upon completion of the project, the permittee shall determine whether or not the project is in
compliance with the permitted plans and take the necessary following actions:
a. If the permittee determines that the project is in compliance with the permitted plans, then
within 45 days of completion, the permittee shall submit to the Division one hard copy and
one electronic copy of the following:
i. The completed and signed Designer's Certification provided in Attachment A
noting any deviations from the approved plans and specifications. Deviations
may require approval from the Division;
ii. A copy of the recorded maintenance agreement;
iii. A copy of the recorded plat delineating the public rights -of -way; dedicated
common areas and/or permanent recorded easements, when applicable.
b. If the permittee determines that the project is not in compliance with the permitted plans,
the permittee shall submit an application to modify the permit within 30 days of completion
of the project or provide a plan of action; with a timeline, to bring the site into compliance.
11. No person or entity, including the permittee, shall alter any component shown in the approved
plans and specifications. Prior to the construction of any modification to the approved plans, the
permittee shall submit to the Director; and shall have received approval for modified plans;
specifications, and calculations including, but not limited to. those listed below:
a. Any modification to the approved plans and specifications. regardless of size including the
stormwater control measures, built -upon area; details, etc.
b. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area or to the drainage area.
c. Further development; subdivision, acquisition; lease or sale of any; ail or part of the project
area as reported in the approved plans and specifications_
d. Altering, modifying; removing; relocating. redirecting; regrading or resizing of any
component of the approved stormwater control measure, stormwater collection system
and/or vegetative conveyance system shown on the approved plan.
e. The construction of any allocated future BUA.
f_ The construction of any permeable pavement for BUA credit that was not included in the
approved plans and specifications.
g. The construction of any #57 stone area; public trails, or landscaping material to be
considered a permeable surface that were not included in the approved plans and
specifications.
h. Other modifications as determined by the Director.
12. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or more of the
minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified in the notice, the permittee
shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for modifying the site to meet minimum
requirements. The permittee shall provide copies of modified plans and certification in writing to
the Director that the changes have been made.
13. Prior to transfer of the permit; a file review and site inspection will be conducted by Division
personnel to ensure the permit conditions have been met and that the project and the on -site
stormwater system complies with the permit conditions. Any items not in compliance must be
repaired; replaced restored, or resolved prior to the transfer. Records of maintenance activities
performed to date may be requested.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Any individual or entity found to be in noncompliance with the provisions of a stormwater
management permit or the requirements of the stormwater rules is subject to enforcement
procedures as set forth in NCGS 143 Article 21.
The issuance of this permit does not preclude the permittee from complying with and obtaining
any other permits or approvals that are required far this development to take place, as required
by any statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by any other Local.
State or Federal government agency having jurisdiction. Any activities undertaken at this site
that cause a water quality violation or undertaken prior to receipt of the necessary permits or
approvals to do so are considered violations of NCGS 143-215.1, and subject to enforcement
procedures pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
Page 3 of 4

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 180607
3 If the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily; the permittee shall take immediate corrective actions
This includes actions required by this Division and the stormwater rules such as the construction
of additional or replacement on -site stormwater systems. These additional or replacement
measures shall receive a permit from the Division prior to construction.
4. This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and approval by the
Director. The permittee shall submit a completed and signed State Stormwater Request Form
for Permit Transfer or Permit Information Update. accompanied by the supporting
documentation as listed on the form. to the Division at least 60 days prior to any one or more of
the following events:
a. Any ownership change including:
i. The sale or conveyance of the project area in whole or in part. except in the case of
an individual lot sale that is made subject to the recorded deed restrictions and
protective covenants;
ii. Dissolution of the partnership. corporate; or LLC entity. subject to NCGS 55-14-05 or
NCGS 57D-6-07;
b_ Bankruptcy:
c. Foreclosure. subject to the requirements of Session Law 2013-121:
d. A name change of the current permittee:
e. A name change of the project,
f. A mailing address change of the permittee;
5. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all terms and conditions of this permit until the
Division approves the transfer request_ Neither the sale of the project, in whole or in part, nor
the conveyance of common area to a third party constitutes an approved transfer of the permit.
6. The permittee grants Division Staff permission to enter the property during normal business
hours to inspect all components of the permitted project.
7. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until the permittee files a request with the
Division for a permit modification, transfer, renewal, or rescission; however, these actions do not
stay any permit conditions.
8. Approved plans, application documents, supplements, calculations, operation and maintenance
agreement; and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference and are enforceable
parts of the permit. A copy of this permit, application, supplements, operation and maintenance
agreement, and approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the permittee.
9. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the on -site stormwater system
must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control
Planning and Design Manual.
10. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and modifying the
permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit for cause as allowed by the
laws, rules; and regulations contained in Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and NCGS 143-215.1 et.al.
11 A permit renewal request must be submitted at least 180 days prior to the expiration date of this
permit. The renewal request must include the appropriate application; documentation and the
processing fee as outlined in Title 15A NCAC 02H.1045(3).
Permit issued this the 28th day of August 2018.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
„Willie E. (Toby) 1on,r., PE, CPESC; CPM_ Interim Director
Division f Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW8 180607
Page 4 of 4

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
IMPACT EXHIBITS

BOUNDARY 137 OTHERS.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS HOT LOCATED 1H
THE 100 TEAR EL000 ZONE.
404 NETLARDS ARE EOM ON THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY, AS DELINEATED RI OTHERS.
WATER SERVICE PROVIOEO Co' FENDER COUNTY.
SEVER SERVICE PROVIDED Co' OSITE SEPTIC.
SOLID WASTE REMOVAL BY PRIVATE CONTRACTOR.
ALL RUNOFF FROM 11PERV1WS SURFACES SHALL N.
DIRECTED TO THE COLLECT IDHITREATIENT SYSTEM.
NO SURFACE rATERS. PROTECTED vECEIATED SETBACKS.
DR PROTECTED RIPARIAN BUFFERS ARE PRESENT C8N51TE.
PROJECT DATA
PROPERTY AREA
TOTAL BOA
•
•
•
•
23-32 AC
1,016,019 SP
10-02 AC
436,60E SF
2 OF PROPERTY 42.117 7
BUILDING 146,70E SF
14LKWAY3 8.600 SF
PABKINGIORIVB AISLES 260,10E SF
RESERVE 20.00E SF
DISTUBANCE LIMITS 17,7 AC
RECIE4INC STREAM - • - 'VIRGINIA CREEK
CLASSIFICATION SA:HQ*
STREAM [HGEN 16.67.9
PROPOSED use OFFICE AHD M[HISTORAGE
PARCEL ID 4215-33-0804-0000
OWNER: HILLTOP MANAGEMENT, LLC
DEED 00DKIPAC6:4690119G0
PLAT BOOKIPAGE:26163
PARCEL ID: 4215.2E 1857.0000
OWH0R HILLTOP MAHACBMMNT.LLC
-DEED B00RIPAGE: 465411213
PLAT BOOR/PAGE: S21104
PARCEL EXHIBIT
,• • 9M0
NOTE:
PARCELS TO BE RECOMBINED AND
PERMITTED AS AS MIDDLE PROJECT
IMPACT W6
PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT
0.002AC (1II7SF)
5 4,26'24' E 1512.53'
IMPACT W2
TEMP WETLAND
IMPACTS
0.07AC (2,988SF)
EX. SOIL ROAD
TO BE REMOVED
O't\
\\411110:
` AS 84•56'39• 6
25"00'
$419.01'36•E
l9.00'
S WWII' r
40.93'
•
•
•
130
19•26'24' 6
1006.11'
IMPACT W1
PERM WETLAND IMPACT
0.058AC (2,651SF)
130
un
IMPACT W4
TEMP WETLAND IMPACT
0.015AC (678SF)
IMPACT W3
PERM WETLAND IMPACT
0.028AC (1,225SF)
TOTAL
WETLAND IMPACT :
4,080SF / 0.09 AC.
2$0
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" .130'
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STOMATA IN -
FESIAPRON
WEILAHO.• .
EX CONTOURS ='=-
POHD DRAINAGE BOUNDARY — —
INLET DRAINAGE BOUNDARY —
SILT FENCE - —
DISTURBED AREA
Hilltop Business Park & Storage
10545 HIGHI/JAY l7 NORTH HAMPSTEAD, NC 28443
-4w5411. TOVMAH..
FEHOEA L17WIY NCHTELGABOUNA
DEVELOPER: aUW ' �
y �R•
ADDRESS: 11 w E["#91Er II"
PHONE 9N-RIP414
OESIGIEOI JHF
Mims MR
$S'TROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
,02-8 CI80 (MIK
NIL1010101. g91TN Cn9M.Ira 910a7
s14I a1s-81n
alccgc 10.c-ow
APPRO11E0A JHF
DATE: 3/T7/2020
SCALE: 1. 130'
:BEET: 1 or 4

I M PACT W2
TEMP WETLAND
IMPACT
0.07AC (3,128SF)
vi wit ,r444
4,,,.
14}
• 44 t+
•
61.5FE X
PROPOSED
PARKING
IMPACTW1
PERM WETLAND IMPACT
0.058AC."(2 651SF)
IMPACT MAP A
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
5TORI4RAIN {
FES/APRON L
WE IL AND
EX CONTOURS -'-
POND DRAINAGE BOUNDARY — —
INLET DRAINAGE BOUNDARY —
SILT FENCE — —
DISTURBED AREA
MILANO IMPACT k5P -A"
Hilltop Business Park & Storage
' 7 0RTH HA IPSTEAa, NC 25443
_GPI t 1.0 1 PENDE4 COIISY NORTFJ_5INA
DEVELOPER: RILAhr 1K • AAC OESIGIE01 JRF
ADDRESS: rat!.
:Ma 101
PHONE:
!N-iiM1illi
DRAIN: OLII
APPROVED: JHF
30 75 0 30
GO
GRAPHIC SLUE: 1"= 30'
JAAE�H FE' fffs iA PF
STROUD ENGINEERING. P.A.
DATE: 3/11/2020
10Q-0 CIKr ORIY[ SCALEI 1' - 30'
RIINIROIp1. 1 M 0. jl 31 0)
11101 S15 14S SIIEEr:2 ._

1
IMPACT W3
PERM WETLAND
IMPACT
0.028AC (1,225SF)
6
ter, 4
• , ii-Tarow
.�i
30 15 0
30
130
IMPACT MAP B
IMPACT W4
TEMP WETLAND
IMPACT
0.015AC (678SF)
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STORFDRAIH L
FES/APRON Cy
WETLAND
EX CONTOURS
POND DRAINAGE BOUHDART —
INLET DRAINAGE BOUNDARY — —
SILT FENCE — •
DISTURBED AREA
wETU D WMF tT wP
Hilltop Business Park & Storage
10545 HIGHWAY 17 NORM FWAPSTEAU, NC 28443
1: L Tc8N55HP PENCFR LWNTT
DEVELOPER: .Pi "1.1"1.11• Rt
ADDRESS:
PHONE'
f I +INI% . ,.11
410
11FpF711i
NORTH C.N101. L3
DES IGIFEOL JHF
DRANK: DLM
STROUD ENGINEERING. P.A.
■PPROVEO[ J11F
D*TEL 3/17/2020
GRAPHIC SCALES 1"= 30'
JA1(-cN. FRAAC-5S. N. Ti
Lair
102-0 Cl..1r a 10C
MIL e..fts NA% Witt Iw 31w]
als
L IOLIGL 10.0-01641
SCALE1" = 30'
S4CET13 C+ 4

IMPACT W5
PERM WETLAND IMPACT
0.001AC (87SF)
IMPACT W6
PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT
0.002AC (117SF)
IMPACT MAP C
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STORFDRAIH L
FES/APRON Cy
WETLAND
EX CONTOURS .A
POND DRAINAGE BOUNDARY —
INLET DRAINAGE BOUNDARY — —
SILT FENCE — •
DISTURBED AREA
wETLNc iMPALT .6A -c-
Hilltop Business Park & Storage
16545 HIGHWAY 17 NORTH HAMPSTEAI]. NC 28443
I TPSNL T4YRY,.HP REMORA COUNTY
DEVELOPER: .Pi "1.1 .nR
ADDRESS: zing, • A 11 U
PHONE' l,F PHISIG
NORTH Cji53LVL3
DESIC,10E02 JHF
MIAMI OLM
APPROVER I J11F
30 15 0
30 60
GRAPHIC SCALEI T"= 30'
JAI( H.FFWTAT;S5•
STROUD ENGINEERING. P.A.
DATE= 3517/2020
1p}-0 [Polar OW SCALEI 1" = 30'
•HILT I Ns3 . ?n tAAollw 67
L I00I L Hc.t-0cAe SHOE T:2 �+ 4