20220294 Ver 1_401 Application_20220222

C/, (9) 09y `
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions p a t ck
SAW— 201 - 202102092 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Hwy 73 Industrial
2. Work Type: Private ri Institutional Government Commercial n
3. Project Description/Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The project consists of approximately 55.24 acres. The preliminary site plans are for the
construction of two industrial buildings.
4. Property Owner/Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Applicant: Robinson Weeks Partners, Kyle Cunningham
5. Agent/Consultant [PCN Form A5—or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: None Known
7. Project Location-Coordinates,Street Address,and/or Location Description [PCN Form Bib]:
4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
35.433820, -80.647246
8. Project Location-Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 61a]: 5601877425, 5601888181, 5601778447, and 5601879077
9. Project Location—County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Concord
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Irish Buffalo Creek, Class C, Index #: 13-17-9-2
12.Watershed/8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Rocky, 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 ✓ Section 10&404 n
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit _ Pre-Application Request
✓ Nationwide Permit# 39 Unauthorized Activity
IT Regional General Permit# n Compliance
n Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required RECEIVED
FEB 222022
Fiee-WATEWRESOURCES
401.&BUFFER PERMITTING
Revised 20150602

'44111111111
TLAS
VIRONMENTAL
January 17, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Asheville Regulatory Field Office 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Krysta Stygar Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 1617 Mail Service Center
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: Hwy 73 Industrial— +/- 55.24 acres
4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
Nationwide Permit 39 Application
Corps Action ID: SAW-2021-02092 / DWR Project#: unknown
Krysta and Paul:
Atlas Environmental is submitting the enclosed package on behalf of Robinson Weeks Partners,
Mr. Kyle Cunningham for approval of a Nationwide Permit 39 application. The four stream
channels consist of CH 100, CH 200 Per, CH 200 Int, CH 300 and CH 400 and six wetlands WL
1000, WL 1100, WL 1200, WL 1300, WL 2000, and WL 2100. The streams on site are
unnamed tributaries to Irish Buffalo Creek which is classified as a "Class C"water by the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources. The Corps approved the Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination request on November 24, 2021.
The enclosed permit application request is for 481 linear feet of stream permanent impacts in
order to facilitate construction of an industrial distribution /warehouse logistics center (two
buildings), truck courts, employee parking, road access around the building, a sewer line
extension, and two storm water SCM. Permanent impacts to stream CH 100 of 93 linear feet
(0.011 acre), and intermittent stream CH 300 of 388 linear feet (0.025 acre) are requested to
facilitate construction of one of the buildings and a secondary fire access road. Impact S1 will
be 388 linear feet (0.025 acre)of fill for construction of one industrial building and parking area.
S2 will be 93 linear feet (0.011 acre)for a culvert to provide a secondary emergency entrance.
The emergency access road is being required locally for plan approval.
This area is very attractive for industrial development due to the existing development already
present in the vicinity as well as its close proximity to highways and interstates. The project is in
very close proximity to Interstates 85 and 485. The planned industrial distribution /warehouse
buildings logistics buildings are being constructed with features and flexibility to attract a wide
array of tenants that are interested in occupying this product type in this location.
A variety of businesses across multiple industries will be able to utilize this development in this
location depending on their warehouse space needs. Business activities among these tenants
may include freight forwarding, third party logistics, food/beverage distribution, light assembly/
manufacturing, wholesalers, and others. Businesses that benefit from logistical efficiencies
associated with proximity to population centers, intermodal hubs, and interstate highways will be
especially interested in this development due to its location to the Charlotte/Rock
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S.Sharon Amity Road#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206(o)/828-712-9205(m)
www.atlasenvi.com/Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

Al
Q c
VIRONMENTAL
Hill/Concord/Gastonia urban core, Interstates 85, 77, and 485, Charlotte Intermodal, and
Charlotte Douglas International Airport.
The proposed industrial use of the property is consistent with the City of Concord's adopted land
use plan. Users of such buildings often require anywhere from 100,000 square feet to 2.5
million square feet. While the property's location has certain logistical advantages for industrial
warehouse users, these tenants will require competitive market rents to operate out of these
proposed facilities. Rental rates are directly related to the cost of the land and improvements,
much of which is fixed regardless of the size of the building being developed. These fixed
costs, which this development also will incur, include the land itself, utility infrastructure
improvements, offsite roadway improvements, legal and financing costs, marketing, construction
costs, and other costs. In the current market tenants need larger buildings to account for the
increase in on-line shopping and quick delivery deadlines.
Stream mitigation will be required for project impacts. Atlas proposes to mitigate for the
perennial stream impacts at a 2:1 ratio. CH 100 is perennial and medium quality, see the
enclosed SAM form. Atlas proposes to mitigate for the intermittent stream impacts at a 1:1
ratio. CH 300 is intermittent and low quality, see the enclosed SAM form. A copy of the NC
Division of Mitigation Services acceptance letter is enclosed.
Enclosed is a copy of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Section 7 comment letter.
Section 7 consultation with the Service has been satisfied. Enclosed is a copy of the NC
Historic Preservation Office (HPO) Section 106 comment letter. The HPO office had no
comment related to project impacts. Section 106 consultation with the Service has been
satisfied.
Enclosed are the necessary permit application documents and additional information. Thank
you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please contact me if you need any additional
information.
Best regards,
geA4 R014- v.
Jennifer L Robertson
irobertsonatlasenvi.com
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S.Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206(o)/828-712-9205(m)
www.atlasenvi.com/Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

OF W A T F9
o`' oG Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
a.i ' o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s)of approval sought from the
Corps: ® Section 404 Permit ElSection 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP)number: 39 or General Permit(GP)number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ®Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ(check all that apply):
®401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑401 Water Quality Certification—Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑Yes ® No ❑Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ®Yes ❑ No
or in-lieu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer lh ❑Yes ® No
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Hwy 73 Industrial
2b. County: Cabarrus
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Concord
2d. Subdivision name: not a subdivision
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P.or state not a DOT project
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: Robinson Weeks Partners
3b. Deed Book and Page No. see the attached recorded deed reports
3c. Responsible Party(for LLC if Mr. Kyle Cunningham
applicable):
3d. Street address: 3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 700
3e. City, state,zip: Atlanta, GA 30339
3f. Telephone no.: 678-303-0167
3g. Fax no.: n/a
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information(if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑Agent [' Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City,state,zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information(if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer L Robertson
5b. Business name Atlas Environmental, Inc.
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 338 S.Sharon Amity Road#411
5d. City,state,zip: Charlotte, NC 28211
5e. Telephone no.: 704-512-1206
5f. Fax no.: no fax
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 5601877425, 5601888181,5601778447,and
5601879077
lb. Site coordinates(in decimal degrees): Latitude:35.433820 Longitude: -80.647246
lc. Property size: 55.24 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Irish Buffalo Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Lower Catawba,03050103
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:A single family residence, agricultural fields,and forested areas/forested,single family, institutional facility,
commercial,and industrial
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:0.352 acre wetland
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams(intermittent and perennial)on the property:4155'
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:The purpose is to develop an industrial distribution/warehouse logistics
center that consists of two buildings that provides features and flexibility for the tenant.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:The project involves development of the
parcels into two industrial warehouses with associated infrastructure including trailer parking,employee parking,truck
courts,access roads,and two storm water SCM. Typical construction equipment will be used such as dump trucks,track
hoes, motor graders, bulldozers,etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ®Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project(including all prior phases)in the past? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination,what type
of determination was made? ® Preliminary Final
4c. If yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:Atlas Environmental Inc
Name(if known):Atlas staff Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW-2021-02092 11/24/2021
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project(including all prior phases)in the past?
5b. If yes,explain in detail according to"help file"instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑Yes ® No
6b. If yes,explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
0 Wetlands ® Streams-tributaries 0 Buffers 0 Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site,then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Corps(404, 10)or impact
Permanent(P)or (if known) DWQ(401,other) (acres)
Temporary(T)
W1 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g.Total wetland impacts:
2h.Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts(including temporary impacts)proposed on the site,then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number- (PER)or (Corps-404, 10 stream length
Permanent(P)or intermittent DWQ—non-404, width (linear
Temporary(T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 P Fill CH 300 INT Corps 3 388(0.025
_ ac)
S2 P Culvert CH 100 PER Corps 6 93(0.011
ac)
S3 P Choose one - -
S4 T Choose one - -
S5 - Choose one - -
S6 - Choose one - -
481'
3h.Total stream and tributary impacts: permanent
(0.036 ac)
3i. Comments:these permanent stream impacts account for all construction related impacts
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds,estuaries,tributaries,sounds,the Atlantic Ocean,or any other open water of
the U.S.then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact(acres)
Permanent(P)or type
Temporary(T)
01 - Choose one Choose
02 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f.Total open water
impacts:
4g. Comments: no ponds are present on site
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed,then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts(acres) Stream Impacts(feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f.
Total:
5g. Comments: no pond contruction proposed
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area(acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed(acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts(for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer,then complete the chart below. If yes,then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation,then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑Tar-Pamlico ❑Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
Permanent(P)or Stream name mitigation impact impact
Temporary(T) required? (square (square
feet) feet)
B1 - Yes/No
B2 - Yes/No
B3 - Yes/No
B4 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
B6 - Yes/No
6h.Total buffer impacts:
6i.Comments:there are no state regulated stream buffers on site
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form-Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
no wetland impacts are proposed,0.352 acre of wetlands are avoided,over 88%of the streams are avoided (3,674 linear feet)
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
headwalls are being used at the road crossing to avoid additional stream impacts,a steep reinforced slope is proposed
adjacent to the impacts at the building/parking lot to avoid additional stream impacts,a retaining wall is being installed to
avoid impacts to CH 400 and additional impacts to CH 100,the entrance road for the building adjacent to Interstate 85 is
located at a previously existing culvert
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ®Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by(check all that apply): ® DWQ ®Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes,which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ® Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type:Choose one Quantity none
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity none
Type: Choose one Quantity none
3c.Comments: none
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ®Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 481 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation,stream temperature: Warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested(DWQ only): none square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: none acres
4g. Coastal(tidal)wetland mitigation requested: none acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
not applicable
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation(State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a.Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes,then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 none none 3(2 for Catawba) none
Zone 2 none none 1.5 none
6f.Total buffer mitigation required: none
6g. If buffer mitigation is required,discuss what type of mitigation is proposed(e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
not applicable
6h.Comments: no comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan(required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified 0 Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes,then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? >24%%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Z Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan,explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan,then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Two SCM(water quality pond)will be constructed. The plan is being approved locally. Storm runoff from the buildings
and impervious surfaces will be directed to the SCM.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? City of Concord
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Concord
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply(check all that apply): 0 Water Supply Watershed
❑Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been 0 Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
O Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW
(check all that apply): 0 Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? 0 Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ®Yes 0 No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ®Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation(DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the ❑Yes ® No
use of public(federal/state)land?
1 b. If you answered"yes"to the above,does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina)Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
•
1c. If you answered"yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so,attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations(DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes ® No
2c. If you answered"yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts(DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts)result in ❑Yes ® No
additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered"yes"to the above,submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge)of wastewater generated from
the proposed project,or available capacity of the subject facility.
the project will connect to an existing sanitary sewer service through a forcemain located on site that will extend out to
Hwy 73
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or El Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ®Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDENR Natural Heritage Program Map Viewer, GIS Layer, and IPaC;see enclosed FWS comment letter
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources(Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑Yes ® No
status(e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC HPO comment letter enclosed
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑Yes ® No
8b. If yes,explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA NFHL Map
Jennifer L Robertson1/17/2022
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name US��u�tyU�• Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

'44111111
V�/ W
IIRONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams—Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name: Concord Commerce Center
Property Owner of Record: Shoffner Dev, LLC
Contact Name: Kyle Cunningham
Address: 3350 Riverwood Parkway- Suite 700, Atlanta GA
Address:
Phone/Fax Number: 404.368.0760
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Address: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord NC
Project Address:
Tax PIN:
Signature:
Date: 9/9/2021
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
338 S.Sharon Amity Road,#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206(o)/828-712-9205(m)
jrobertson©atlasenvi.com
www.atlasenvi.com

/ - Sketch Map provided for illustrative purposes and
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map preliminary planning only. Not intended to be relied upon
9h15' for exact location,dimension,or orientation. All findings
and assessments are subject to verification from the
Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources, and/or other appropriate local authorities.
Do not reproduce map set except in its entirety.
1
J
Detail 2: Page 4 1 '
1-8s 1 ;
Detail 3: Page 5 1 1
1. Iii
4000.
1
1
ii
II
1 1
0 I 1
' ' ' _ �_ _ _
I ' Detail 1: Page 31
1 • -
_ _I 1 I .
H
1
AirAsa 1 .
1 �� 1• 1 .
I I 1
1 1 1 1
1 I 1 1
Legend a as
I , I o
O Review Area
1 s
NI
Streets
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels all
Contours: 2Ft S
Delineation
1 OS LIPP
all
IF
N
m Perennial st . fl_____.--::::ws,tate.Hwy_?3,D
av�dson Hwy ��Intermittent Illi—er:111111
®� miimm
Wetland 0 200 400 600 800 Ft
I. Culvert im
illkilla `�•
- < Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial e$
,1
J/� (� Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
IIII
�, 1a►� IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham awm,+°
Page 1 of 5 Figure 1A Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: November 05, 2021

3 Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
o . .
,T
i r=
�B5 cps; �'
of F
i r
1 4 t A` .. +, •_ t 'r Ice' 1 R 1 3 t,, i ) i
— / 3a
FFF���
di ,
it I. , ,,,,er
Legend __. m.
O Review Area v z i _ a
Streets _---- g ,
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels �'— _
Delineation `' ',
M : nt
� a"d c I fa - ' .�,° z
Wetland _, - _� � � � 0
`� r 8 200 400 600 800 Ft
INN Culvert �f� .' . y x
-_ Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
IPONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham
Page 2 of 5 Figure 1 B Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 i Date: November 05, 2021

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
1-85
Potential Wetland
WL 1000: -0.194 Ac
Potential Non Wetland /
1-85 CH 200 Per: -73 LF,0.006 Ac
Potential Wetland
WL 2000: -0.042 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 200 Int: 344 LF,0.025 Ac \-- Potential Wetland
Potential Wetland WL 1100: -0.0005 Ac
WL 2100: -0.108 Ac
Potential Wetland
WL 1200: -0.003 Ac
Legend
Review Area Potential Non Wetland
Streets CH 100: -2668 LF,0.349 Ac
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels
Contours: 2Ft
Delineation
N
M Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
MI Culvert
- - A -- Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
i_ al,A ,.rri As
Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
j, IRON MENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham
Page 3 of 5 Figure 1C Detail 1 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: November 05, 2021

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
CH 100 Continued'
Potential Wetland
WL 1300:- 0.004 Ac
'See Detail 3, Pa.e 5
_.,. 1111
Le end _ A2:TRIBINT
9 CH 300: -492 LF, 0.030 Ac
O Review Area
Streets
I Cabarrus Co. Parcels
Contours: 2Ft
Delineation
Perennial —
N
Intermittent
Wetland 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
NM Culvert
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
ritAs
Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham
Pa e 4 of 5 Figure 1 D Detail 2 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: November 05, 2021
9

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
41111111111111%"4llik CH 100 Continued
® _
Legend
Potential Non Wetland
O Review Area CH 400: -578 LF,0.031 Ac
Streets
I 1 Cabarrus Co. Parcels
Contours: 2Ft
Delineation
N
1=1 Perennial AIntermittent
Wetland E 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
Culvert Note:Stream length and area includes culvert lil MIN
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
w4Ti
As Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham
'
Pa e 5 of 5 Figure 1 E Detail 3 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: November 05, 2021
9
�-

VI ''r MAP .. �/ars=!:
f i z�� _ `` ii
T so
awayea
' - ir____:_____:iri
:0_\_
_-1I 71-\0--
---c\--_‘°_{,.,------'-°----
\ \ X --. S2 Impact:CH 100,93 linear feet,0.011 J
/ s\\ acre,permanent,culvert Q
1•i i•,-0-
_r‘---\--.-.-eVVP c\----1\---_-I:1-Ir-\1\'-1--\-,-1-t''':\-,t----
-7 \
7
i /z : ET'A
ALE:1"=50' 1
sammarms„:-----", ii \ ). 9 r:1-
/
Air
. -..T
� �
f
1 1 0 I / / ini1111111, 1 , Pr \ ' _l__ Ii_L_rl_ 4,1-1,---11 4 ,, ,
s/ __ -1--t- -1- iiii I-1 , _ - 1 P-n 4.-as.
ir
111 1I1
ep *•.,., `__ \__ ez (w). ;0l7 II �-rrr • Tri
_ 41 REIyLOPME OM lP /
_ ° -' � � .'� -. +1 a"';,'""
St Impact:CH 300,388 linear feet, o'er. _ ���ru ,°' l ,,
0.025 acre,permanent,trench drain ° `_ ti�, .��
p 1
-: -"7 i 1 i t I 1

.------ ___.---:„...........--,-
_,.._.._.._.\..„,\,..2.,_-'-4•eni".i--4"'
'./-(
C1
0
/ \ �� ac Impact: ne t,c ve linear feet,0.011
�� acre,permanent,culvert
...... .4"::—r-----\--1- \ 1-
-....,--2.-._, c.; Vs::::;,.::,.. 1, wry w," ,... !.:2.1
i `......,:._,..,----__________ . / Y- 1 .Y
_.
, HI........................„.....,,
11 \
r I 0 , „, 6 i il 2
/ r_
„,, , 1/ MPJIMIIIIIMMIIII
, V 1 4 ,,^^
T �i / I � ' ! :. K t.. .
0
1 , CD/ OR 75 r
�`-- rtIl
;'; r r ����i r ' 11111111��1111
0 ■ 11111111
--_: 4 uorurrr
e— - p. ' t, ,oO 1�!!!!:!rrrrrrrar
rrr
11
. -"'t . / \ ir.„ ir
S1 Impact:CH 300,388 linear feet, yid —`�_, • � — —
0.025 acre,permanent,french drain a - •—• - \— --- — : -*::-`—_.kilk c••t rim"
tOr
-\
, ITT I •

I
A L -
li ` \..,„ D z.
r v, a
INSET'A' i
o W �u
L-— SCALE: 1"=50' \ Z S a V
I
65 LF OF 60-RCP CULVERT 0 1.00% M O m
ic;
42(
,�--�_— __ _ DS IE = 641.00(1'BELOW STREAM BED)' `-' W CC
'- —ftd --— \ US IE = 641.65(1'BELOW STREAM BED) N. ,3 C
PERMANENT IMPACT (FILL) AREA p2:
1111111111111�1111111111/1 C.." o Z o I
93 LF OF PERRENIAL STREAM, Z m Z
orrurorrrurrrrrrrrprrrrrrr J an sF(oon) ACRES \ p o2e
7 11
v
II w _
. _
p
LIIT'
•x� \
•
± iuII\1I 1 �� .
1 I ' 1
— .�— J ``—
■ as z iiilllnhi'iiiii'i'igiM'iii
. on
i t 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
1
fl MC------me
, ri
�\ tl
._ ` / /
z evAAut.0 nrwwee ' � // ' I
I — I I AS FNEO NF(T0 I.N0IMTE2P5RA)MCAITT CTE(RFENILSTL S TARREEAAM 1 Nt:` _ —
— -\-------
_
1lilt I
—
0 0 0 TP66LF
0O I 1 _
L
I — ---1' _ -I \ li1_ 1L - -
Wo6 i W

8072
0065
FILED
CABARRUS COUNTY NC
LINDA F. McABEE
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED Feb 22, 2008
AT 10:46 am
BOOK 08072
START PAGE 0065
END PAGE 0067
INSTRUMENT# 05436
EXCISE TAX $0.00
Tax Lot No.: 5601879065 and 5601778421 Parcel Identifier Number:
Excise Tax: $0.00
Mail after recording to: Grantee
This instrument was prepared by: American Asset Corporation
3700 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 350
Charlotte, NC 28273
Brief description for the Index: 5.084 acres on NC Highway 73
NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made this 18th day of February, 2008, by and between
GRANTOR GRANTEE
AAC Concord I Limited Partnership, AAC/Shoffner Development Limited
North Carolina limited partnership Partnership,a NC limited partnership
Address:
3700 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 350
Charlotte, NC 28273
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey
unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Concord,
Number 4 Township, Cabarrus County, North Carolina and more particularly described as
follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof

8072
0065
FILED
CABARRUS COUNTY NC
LINDA F. McABEE
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED Feb 22, 2008
AT 10:46 am
BOOK 08072
START PAGE 0065
END PAGE 0067
INSTRUMENT# 05436
EXCISE TAX $0.00
Tax Lot No.: 5601879065 and 5601778421 Parcel Identifier Number:
Excise Tax: $0.00
Mail after recording to: Grantee
This instrument was prepared by: American Asset Corporation
3700 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 350
Charlotte, NC 28273
Brief description for the Index: 5.084 acres on NC Highway 73
NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made this 18th day of February, 2008, by and between
GRANTOR GRANTEE
AAC Concord I Limited Partnership, AAC/Shoffner Development Limited
North Carolina limited partnership Partnership,a NC limited partnership
Address:
3700 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 350
Charlotte, NC 28273
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant,bargain, sell and convey
unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Concord,
Number 4 Township, Cabarrus County, North Carolina and more particularly described as
follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof

-- 8072
0066
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in
Book7805, Page 165 and Book 7794, Page 271.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple,
has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all
encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all
persons claiming by, under or through Grantor, except for the exceptions hereinafter stated. Title
to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
Excepting restrictions, easements of record and ad valorem taxes for 2008 and subsequent years,
not yet due and payable.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has hereunto set its hand the day and year first above
written.
AAC CONCORD I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a North Carolina limited partnership
By: AAC Concord Development GP, LLC, its sole general partner
Paul L. Herndon, Manager
STATE OF 0,04 ',.e s , COUNTY OF
I certify that the following person personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged to me
that he voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity
indicated: Paul L. Herndon, Manager of AAC Concord Development GP, LLC, sole general partner
of AAC Concord I Limited Partnership
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp this iliac,- ay of February, 2008.
ANGEL&A'
(STA*> of ry Public
Cabarrus'Co moo Print name ,.. , eer&
My commission expires:4
�� o?A4'

8072
0067
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That certain parcel of land, situated, lying and being in the City of Concord; Cabarrus County
North Carolina, and being more particularly described as follows:
TRACT 1
Beginning at an existing iron pin on the northern right of way line of Davidson Highway (NC
Highway 73), said point being N 76° 54' 11" W for a ground distance of 1748.31 feet from
"NCGS" Monument "Hanover" (having grid coordinates of N: 616,525.22 ft. E: 1,510,788.86
ft.), thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING; S 13° 30' 20" W for a distance of 30.63 feet to
a point in the centerline of Davidson Highway (NC Highway 73), thence with the centerline of
the aforesaid highway N 78° 27' 55" W for a distance of 318.48 feet to a point in the centerline
of the aforesaid street, thence leaving the centerline and running with the property line of Carrot
M. Shoffner as recorded in DB. 3327, Pg. 86 at the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds the
following three (3) courses: 1)N 21° 56' 37" E crossing an iron at 32.37 feet for a total distance
of 241.50 feet to an existing iron rod, 2) S 78° 27' 06" E for a distance of 283.02 feet to an
existing iron rod, 3) S 13° 30' 20" W a distance of 206.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Containing 71,426.89 square feet or 1.640 acres as shown on survey prepared by R.B. Pharr and
Associates, dated: June 26, 2006 (File#XX-3101).
TRACT 2
COMMENCING at an N.C.G.S. Monument Hanover, having coordinates of N:616,525.2195,
E:1,510,788.8611; 1)thence N 66°22'25" W a distance of 2,935.29 feet to an existing iron pin
which is the POINT OF BEGINNING; having coordinates of N:617,701.5958,
E:1,508,099.6110,said point also being located on the northwesterly corner of Carroll M.
Shoffner as recorded in Deed Book 3691,Page 288, thence with said property one (1) course and
distance; 1) S 24°31'51" W a distance of 591.16 feet to an existing iron pin said point being
located on the northerly right of way of Davidson Highway (North Carolina Highway 73) a
dedicated variable public right of way thence with the line of said right of way four(4) courses
and distances; 1) N 79°11'54"W a distance of 63.88 feet to a new iron rod thence; 2) N
76°07'05" W a distance of 204.19 feet to a new iron rod thence; 3) N 79°04'06" W a distance of
53.68 feet to a new iron rod thence; 4) N 31°49'43" E a distance of 11.10 feet to a n existing iron
rod said point being located on the southeasterly corner of Catawba Oil Company, Inc. as
recorded in Deed Book 2937, Page 240, thence with the line of said property one (1) course and
distance; 1)thence N 31°49'43" E a distance of 572.11 feet to a n existing iron pin said point
being located along the southerly line of Carroll M. Shoffner as recorded in Deed Book 369I,
Page 288, thence with said property one (1) course and distance; 1) S 83°27'28" E a distance of
253.17 feet back to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Containing 159,898 square feet or 3.6707 acres as shown on a survey by R.B. Pharr and
Associates P.A. dated October 12, 2006,(Map File XX-3101A).

8007 FILED
0364 CABARRUS COUNTY NC
LINDA F. McABEE
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED Jan 11, 2008
AT 10:56 am
BOOK 08007
START PAGE 0364
END PAGE 0364
INSTRUMENT# 01065
$0.0EXCISE TAX
NORTH CAROLINA REQUEST FOR COPY OF NOTICE OF
DEFAULT AND SALE
CABARRUS County
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 45-21.17®, request is hereby made that a copy of
any notice of sale under the deed of trust(mortgage) recorded on 12/2 2/2 0 0 6 ,in Book
7235 ,page 293 ,records of CABARRUS County, North Carolina,
executed by
BURHAN ALSHAIKH \ ALIA ALSHAIKH HUSBAND AND WIFE
AHMED ALSHAIKH as trustor(mortgagor) in which
SUNTRUST
is named as beneficiary (mortgagee) and
as trustee, be mailed to
0CITIFINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Ci at the following address:
1096 13 CONCORD PKWY N CONCORD,NC 28027 ,
with a copy to P. O. Box 17170, Baltimore, MD 21203.
CITIFINANCIAL SERVICES. IINNC.
By: / 0-�:ik-
NORTH CAROLINA
C AlbfiNU S County
I, U3 4144 • i)Je. 5 ,a Notary Public of
said County and State, do hereby certify that 6.16;e. Pe G!
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing
Request.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this 10 day of &,.

8072
0060
FILED
CABARRUS COUNTY NC
LINDA F. McABEE
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED Feb 22, 2008
AT 10:45 am
BOOK 08072
START PAGE 0060
END PAGE 0064
INSTRUMENT# 05435
EXCISE TAX $0.00
Tax Lot No.: Most of parcel#s: 5601871412, Parcel Identifier Number:
5601874348 and 5601971449
Excise Tax: $0.00
Mail after recording to: Grantee
This instrument was prepared by: Wishart,Norris, Henninger&Pittman,P.A.(BHL)
6832 Morrison Blvd., Charlotte,NC 28211
Brief description for the Index: 25.7912 acres on NC Highway 73 near I-85,No 4 Township
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made this 29th day of January, 2008,by and between
GRANTOR GRANTEE
Shoffner Development, LLC, a AAC/Shoffner Development Limited
North Carolina limited liability company Partnership,a NC limited partnership
Address:
3700 Arco Corporate Drive
Suite 350
Charlotte,NC 28273
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged,has and by these presents does grant,bargain, sell and convey
unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Concord,
Number 4 Township, Cabarrus County,North Carolina and more particularly described as
follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
See also Exhibit B for description of retained easements appurtenant and conditions thereto.

.8072
0061
•
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book
3327,Page 86, Book 3691, Page 288,Book 3614,Page 16, CCPR.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee,that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple,
has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all
encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all
persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated. Title to the property
hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
Excepting restrictions, easements of record and ad valorem taxes for 2008 and subsequent years,
not yet due and payable.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand the day and year first above
written.
Shoffner Development,LLC,a North Carolina limited liability company
By: 0`1"4‘1.. �
Carroll M. Shoffner, ager
STATE OF 0 jC latiovv.� , COUNTY OF 0 { ete,
I certify that the following person personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged to me
that he voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity
indicated: Carroll M. Shoffner, Manager
Witness my hazel, , cal seal or stamp this the r day of ,�jY?rv� ,2008.
(SE!L) H# 5��` Notary Public
-Ei'/14i';, = (.411o/y/1 2reQfde
v-
r Print name
S" F J
• i�Kt P `�� My commission expires: g - /9�-/o
The foregoing Certificate(s)of is/are
certified to be correct. This instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and
in the Book and Page shown on the first page hereof.

.8072
0062
Exhibit A
Legal Description for Shoffner Contribution Parcel
25.7912 acres adjoining Davidson Highway,near US I-85 Exit#55
That certain parcel of land, situated, lying and being in the City of Concord, Cabarrus County,North
Carolina, and being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at an N.C.G.S.Monument Hanover,having NC grid coordinates of
N:616,525.22,E:1,510,788.86,thence N76°28'15"W a ground distance of 1,363.69' to an
existing iron rod, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING having NC grid coordinates
N:616,844.20, E:1,509,463.21, said point also being the intersection of the southwesterly corner of
Cambridge Commons Subdivision as shown on map thereof recorded in Plat Book 28,Page 68,
recorded in the Cabarrus County Public Registry("CCPR"),with the southeasterly corner of lands
of Carroll M. Shoffner,as described in Deed Book 3327,Page 86, CCPR,also with the northerly
margin of the right-of-way of Davidson Highway(North Carolina Highway 73)(a 60' right-of-
way),thence along and with the aforesaid northerly right-of-way margin N 78°25'19" W 384.83
feet to an existing iron rod, said point being located at the southeasterly corner of lands of Joe M.
Calloway as described in Deed Book 1872,Page 219, CCPR;thence along and with the easterly,
northerly and westerly line of the aforesaid lands of Joe M. Calloway for the following three(3)
courses and distances: 1)N 13°31'02" E 206.90 feet to an existing iron rod, 2)N 78°27'10" W
283.00 feet to an existing iron rod, and 3)S 21°58'26" W 209.15 feet to an existing iron rod, said
point being located on the aforesaid northerly margin of the right-of-way of Davidson Highway;
thence along and with the aforesaid margin for the following three(3) courses and distances: 1)N
79°11'29" W 240.48 feet to an existing iron rod with a nail at the base, 2)N 78°50'51" W
402.05 feet to an existing iron pipe, and 3)N 79°15'14" W 299.16 feet to an existing iron pipe,
said point being the intersection of the southwesterly corner of lands of Carroll M. Shoffner, as
described in Deed Book 3691,Page 288,CCPR,with the southeasterly corner of lands of James L.
Coleman,as described in Deed Book 3459,Page 29, CCPR;thence along and with a common line
between the last two (2) aforesaid lands N 24°32'44" E 591.12 feet to an existing iron pipe; thence
over,across and through the lands of Carroll M. Shoffner as described in Deed Book 3691,Page
288; Deed Book 3614, Page 16; and Deed Book 3327, Page 86, CCPR, the following twenty-five
(25) courses and distances which are new lines: 1) S 87°52'47" E 88.90 feet to a calculated point,
said point lying in the centerline of an existing creek, 2) S 65°44'52" E 17.95 feet to a calculated
point, 3)N 83°05'04" E 60.88 feet to a calculated point, 4)N 63°48'58" E 29.57 feet to
a calculated point, 5) S 53°32'01" E 47.53 feet to a calculated point, 6)N 63°48'41" E 21.35 feet
to a calculated point, 7) S 57°11'42" E 63.63 feet to a calculated point, 8) N 41°07'25" E 29.73
feet to a calculated point, 9) S 72°59'30" E 26.65 feet to a calculated point, 10)S 54°45'18" E
27.58 feet to a calculated point, 11)N 81°37'47" E 47.81 feet to a calculated point, 12)N
89°08'36" E 52.83 feet to a calculated point, 13)N 08°37'23" E 23.57 feet to a calculated point,
14)S 72°28'14" E 33.49 feet to a calculated point, 15)N 77°46'15" E 25.63 feet to a calculated
point, 16)N 16°05'04" E 18.56 feet to a calculated point, 17)N 38°26'02" W 19.53 feet to
a calculated point, 18) N 19°12'24" E 62.20 feet to a calculated point, 19) N 03°31'15" E 28.43
feet to a calculated point, 20) S 54°39'37" E 32.25 feet to a calculated point, 21) N 69°40'54" E
14.77 feet to a calculated point, 22) N 48°07'48" E 68.55 feet to a calculated point, 23)S
70°26'53" E 42.12 feet to a calculated point, 24) S 89°17'27" E 52.60 feet to a calculated point,
and 25)S 88°54'09" E 287.60 feet to an existing iron rod, said point lying on a common Iine
between the aforesaid lands of Carroll M. Shoffner and lands as shown on the aforesaid Cambridge
Commons Subdivision map,recorded in Plat Book 28,Page 68;thence along the aforesaid
Cambridge Commons map line for the following eleven(11)courses and distances: 1)N
85°11'24" E 132.51 feet to an existing iron rod, 2)with the arc of a circular curve turning to the
right with a radius of 130.00 feet, and an arc length of 47.16, (chord: N 57°10'02" E 46.90 feet), to
an existing iron rod_ 31 with the arc of a circular curve turninu to the rioht with a rarliiic of 1 Q7 77

• .8072
0063
distance of 469.18 feet to an existing iron rod, which is the POINT AND PLACE OF
BEGINNING.
Containing 1,123,466 square feet or 25.7912 acres as shown on a survey by R.B. Pharr and Associates
P.A. dated May 1,2007,last revised September 20,2007,(Map File W-3466)
(This property comes out of tax parcels#5601871412; #5601874348;and#5601971449. This is most but not all of
the property described in Book 3691,Page 288 and Book 3327,Page86,CCPR.)

• . $072
- 0064
Exhibit B
Retained Easements Appurtenant and Conditions Thereto
Subject to the provisions of paragraph A below, the Grantor herein, Shoffner
Development, LLC, hereby reserves for the benefit of Grantor's retained property(the"Shoffner
Retained Property") lying to the north of the real property described in this deed from Shoffner
Development, LLC to AAC/Shoffner Limited Partnership (the "AAC/Shoffner Property") non-
exclusive easements appurtenant for the purposes of providing means of ingress, egress and
access from the Shoffner Retained Property to and from NC Highway #73 (a/k/a "Davidson
Highway") over, upon and through the areas designated as public or private streets on the
AAC/Shoffner Property (including any streets which may be constructed in such areas)pursuant
to the Master Plan (the "Master Plan") submitted to the City of Concord (re-zoning application
#07-1791), for the AAC/Shoffner Property (approved by the City of Concord on 08-21-2007),
which reserved easements appurtenant shall also include temporary rights to come upon that
portion of the AAC/Shoffner Property as reasonably necessary to construct extensions of the
public streets or private roads constructed on the AAC/Shoffner Property from their points of
terminus on the AAC/Shoffner Property to the property lines of the Shoffner Retained Property,
which temporary construction easements shall expire and terminate upon the completion of such
road construction to the Shoffner Retained Property boundary.
In addition to the reserved easements appurtenant providing means of access for the
benefit of the Shoffner Retained Property, Grantor, Shoffner Development, LLC, its successors
and assigns, subject to the provisions of paragraph A below, also reserves the right to be able to
go on the AAC/Shoffner Property now or in the future for the purposes of creating, constructing
or maintaining any and all necessary connections to any public or private utility service lines
located thereon, to the extent of the then-existing capacity thereof, for the purpose of bringing
such utility services to the Shoffner Retained Property, whether or not such utility lines are
located within the public or private street rights-of-way, it being the intention that the Shoffner
Retained Property receive the same benefit of direct vehicular and pedestrian access to Davidson
Highway and the same benefit of access to all public or private utility services which may serve
the AAC/Shoffner Property now or in the future.
A. The location, construction and connection of any streets or roads or utility
services shall be in a location approved by Grantee, its successors and assigns, done in a good
and workmanlike manner and such that will cause the least amount of interference with the
operation of any businesses being conducted on the AAC/Shoffner Property and, in any event,
shall not interfere with any then-existing buildings or those shown on the Master Plan. Grantor's
connection to any utility on the AAC/Shoffner Property shall not interfere with or diminish the
utility services to AAC/Shoffner Property. Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall pay all costs
and expenses with respect to any such construction or connection and shall cause all work in
connection therewith (including general clean-up and property surface and subsurface
restoration) to be completed as quickly as possible. Grantor shall have the obligation to restore
the AAC/Shoffner Property to its condition immediately preceding Grantor's construction or
connection, as the case may be.
Grantor, its successors and/or assigns, hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless
Grantee AAC/Shoffner Development Limited Partnership, its successors and assigns, from and
against any and all claims, demands and actions arising from the exercise of the above-described
easement and any activities on or relating to the construction of roads, bridges or access ways or
connection to any utility on the AAC/Shoffner Property by Grantor,its successors and/or assigns,
and contractors, and from any and all losses, costs, damages, reasonable attorneys' fees and

8072
0066
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in
Book7805, Page 165 and Book 7794, Page 271.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple,
has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all
encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all
persons claiming by, under or through Grantor, except for the exceptions hereinafter stated. Title
to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
Excepting restrictions, easements of record and ad valorem taxes for 2008 and subsequent years,
not yet due and payable.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has hereunto set its hand the day and year first above
written.
AAC CONCORD I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,a North Carolina limited partnership
By: AAC Concord Development GP, LLC, its sole general partner
: ......de 7C
Paul L. Herndon, Manager
STATE OF Or ',.s _ , COUNTY OF
I certify that the following person personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged to me
that he voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity
indicated: Paul L. Herndon, Manager of AAC Concord Development GP, LLC, sole general partner
of AAC Concord I Limited Partnership
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp this thg4 ay of February, 2008.
ANGELA A
Fri A r2
($ new of ry Public
Caberrue.Counly,NOrin 01001111 Print name ` , eew&
14 Combo ;..Ifin
My commission expires:4
caa .=.2-44//

8072
0067
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That certain parcel of land, situated, lying and being in the City of Concord; Cabarrus County
North Carolina, and being more particularly described as follows:
TRACT 1
Beginning at an existing iron pin on the northern right of way line of Davidson Highway (NC
Highway 73), said point being N 76° 54' 11" W for a ground distance of 1748.31 feet from
"NCGS" Monument "Hanover" (having grid coordinates of N: 616,525.22 ft. E: 1,510,788.86
ft.), thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING; S 13° 30' 20" W for a distance of 30.63 feet to
a point in the centerline of Davidson Highway (NC Highway 73), thence with the centerline of
the aforesaid highway N 78° 27' 55" W for a distance of 318.48 feet to a point in the centerline
of the aforesaid street, thence leaving the centerline and running with the property line of Carrol
M. Shoffner as recorded in DB. 3327, Pg. 86 at the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds the
following three (3) courses: 1)N 21° 56' 37" E crossing an iron at 32.37 feet for a total distance
of 241.50 feet to an existing iron rod, 2) S 78° 27' 06" E for a distance of 283.02 feet to an
existing iron rod, 3) S 13° 30' 20" W a distance of 206.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Containing 71,426.89 square feet or 1.640 acres as shown on survey prepared by R.B. Pharr and
Associates, dated: June 26, 2006 (File# XX-3101).
TRACT 2
COMMENCING at an N.C.G.S. Monument Hanover, having coordinates of N:616,525.2195,
E:1,510,788.8611; 1)thence N 66°22'25" W a distance of 2,935.29 feet to an existing iron pin
which is the POINT OF BEGINNING; having coordinates of N:617,701.5958,
E:1,508,099.6110,said point also being located on the northwesterly corner of Carroll M.
Shoffner as recorded in Deed Book 3691, Page 288,thence with said property one (1) course and
distance; 1) S 24°31'51" W a distance of 591.16 feet to an existing iron pin said point being
located on the northerly right of way of Davidson Highway (North Carolina Highway 73) a
dedicated variable public right of way thence with the line of said right of way four(4) courses
and distances; 1) N 79°11'54" W a distance of 63.88 feet to a new iron rod thence; 2) N
76°07'05" W a distance of 204.19 feet to a new iron rod thence; 3)N 79°04'06"W a distance of
53.68 feet to a new iron rod thence; 4)N 31°49'43" E a distance of 11.10 feet to a n existing iron
rod said point being located on the southeasterly corner of Catawba Oil Company, Inc. as
recorded in Deed Book 2937, Page 240, thence with the line of said property one (1) course and
distance; 1)thence N 31°49'43" E a distance of 572.11 feet to a n existing iron pin said point
being located along the southerly line of Carroll M. Shoffner as recorded in Deed Book 369I,
Page 288, thence with said property one(1)course and distance; 1) S 83°27'28" E a distance of
253.17 feet back to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Containing 159,898 square feet or 3.6707 acres as shown on a survey by R.B. Pharr and
Associates P.A. dated October 12, 2006,(Map File XX-3101A).

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id.SAW-2021-02092 County:Cabarrus U.S.G.S.Quad:NC-Kannapolis
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Robinson Weeks Partners
Kyle Cunningham
Address: 3350 Riverwood Parkway suite 700
Atlanta.GA 30339
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail: kcunningham robinsonweeks.com
Size(acres) 55.24 Nearest Town Concord
Nearest Waterway Irish Buffalo Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude:35.433820
Longitude:-80.647246
Location description:Project is located at 4122 Davidson Highway.Concord.Cabarrus County.North Carolina.PIN(s):
5601877425.5601888181.5601778447.5601879077
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property,that maybe subject to Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).The waters have been
delineated,and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable.The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 11/5/2021.Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may be used in the permit evaluation process,including determining compensatory mitigation.Forpurposes of computation of
impacts,compensatory mitigation requirements,and other resource protection measures,a permit decision made on the basis of a
preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands thatwould be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they
are jurisdictional waters of the U.S.This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331).However,you may request an approved JD,which is an appealable
action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
El There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property,that may be subjectto Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344)and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403).However,since the waters
have not been properly delineated,this prelim inary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA
jurisdiction overall of the waters at the project area,which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable
permit decision.We recommend that you have the waters on your project area/property delineated.As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC§403)and Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
0 There are waterson the above describedproject area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 ofthe Clean
Water Act(CWA)(33 USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or ourpublished regulations,this determination maybe
relied upon fora period not to exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑We recommend you have the waters on yourproject area/property delineated. As the Corps maynotbe able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
❑The waters on yourproject area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps.The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE.We strongly suggest you have
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified,this survey

SAW-2021-02092
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations,maybe relied upon fora periodnotto exceed five years.
❑The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE.Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described project area/property which are subj ectto the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations,this determination maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ The property is located in one ofthe 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC,at(252)808-2808 to determine their
requirements.
Pla cement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department oftheArmy permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC§ 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,construction or
placement of structures,or work within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC§401 and/or403).If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact Krystynka B Stygar at252-545-0507or
kry sty [e-mail].
C. Basis For Determination:Based on information submitted by the applicant and available to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers the project area exhibits criteria for waters of the U.S.as defined in 33 CFR
328,Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-05,the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual,and/or the Regional
Supplement to the 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0: See the preliminary
jurisdictional determination form dated 11/24/2021.
D. Remarks:See approximate Wetland boundaries depicted on map, "HWY73 Industrial— 11-05-2021 "
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determinationhas been conducted to identify the limits of Corps'Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants,or anticipate participation in USDA programs,you should request
a certified wetlanddetermination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information(This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification ofAppeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and Request for Appeal(RFA)form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PH ILIP.A.SHANNIN@,USACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must determine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days ofthe date ofthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form,it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: /�
Date of JD:11/24/2021 Expiration Date ofJD:Not applicable

SAW-2021-02092
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so,please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Atlas Environmental
Jennifer Robertson
Address: 338 S.Sharon amity Road#411
Charlotte.NC 28211
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail: jobertson@,atlasenvi.com
Property Owner: Shoffner Development LLC
Paul Herndon
Address: 5950 Fairview Road.Suite 800
Charlotte,NC 28210

N OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PR! Av a,am ,�. ex . ,
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant:Robinson Weeks Partners,Kyle Cunningham File Number:SAW-2021-02092 Date:11/24/2021
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
® PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I-The following identifies yourrights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at orhttp://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgra man dPerm its.a spx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all
rights to appeal the permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit(Standard orLOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly.You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will
forfeit your right to appealthe permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may:(a)modify the permit to address all of your concerns,(b)modify the permit to address some of your
objections,or(c)not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluatingyour objections,the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for yourreconsideration,as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit,you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety,and waive all
rights to appealthe permit,including its terms and conditions,and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard orLOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appealthe declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appealthe denialof a permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept orappealthe approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice,means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety,and waive all rights to appealthe approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appealthe approved JDunderthe Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved JD(which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II-REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe yourreasons forappealingthe decision or yourobjectionsto an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where yourreasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference ormeeting,and any supplemental information that the review officerhas determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However,you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appealprocess you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division MR.PHILIP A.SHANNIN
Attn: Krystynka B Stygar ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Charlotte Regulatory Office CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers 60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST,FLOOR M9
8430 University Executive Park Drive,Suite 615 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303-8803
Charlotte,North Carolina 28262
PHONE:[phone];FAX[phone]
EMAIL:[e-mail]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,and any government
consultants,to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation,and will have the opportunit to participate in all site investi tions.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn:Krystynka B Stygar,8430 University Executive Park Drive,suite
615,Charlotte,North Carolina,28262
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn:Mr.Philip Shannin,Administrative
Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone:[phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 09/28/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Robinson Weeks Partners, Kyle
Cunningham, 3350 Riverwood Parkway suite 700, Atlanta,GA 30339
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District,Highway 73-Industrial,
SAW-2021-02092
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Project is located at 4122 Davidson
Highway, Concord, Cabarrus County,North Carolina.PIN(s): 5601877425, 5601888181,5601778447,
5601879077
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County:Cabarrus City: Concord
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimalformat):Latitude:35.433820 Longitude:-80.647246
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:Irish Buffalo Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑Office(Desk) Determination. Date:
❑Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE"SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number Latitude Longitude Estimated Type of aquatic Geographic authority
(decimal (decimal amount of resources(i.e., to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) aquatic wetland vs.non- resource"may be"
resources in wetland waters) subject(i.e.,Section
review area 404 or Section
(acreage and 10/404)
linear feet,if
applicable
CH 100 35.436950 -80.648480 2668 LF Non-wetland Section 404
waters
CH 200 P 35.437690 -80.64780 73 LF Non-wetland Section 404
waters
CH 200 I 35.43780 -80.648490 344 LF Non-wetland Section 404
waters
CH 300 35.435770 -80.649090 492 LF Non-wetland Section 404
waters
CH 400 35.435030 -80.650970 578 LF Non-wetland Section 404
waters
WL 1000 35.438130 -80.647440 0.194 acres Wetland Section 404
WL 1100 35.437890 -80.647310 0.001 acres Wetland Section 404
WL 1200 35.437550 -80.647790 0.003 acres Wetland Section 404
WL 1300 35.436280 -80.649750 0.004 acres Wetland Section 404
W L 2000 35.437880 -80.648240 0.042 acres Wetland Section 404
W L 2100 35.43771 -80.648240 0.108 acres Wetland Section 404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD(AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit,or a Nationwide
General Permit(NWP) or other general permit verification requiring"pre- construction
notification"(PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD,which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2)the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3)the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit,including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;(5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,signing a proffered individual permit)or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action,or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and(7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further,an AJD, a proffered
individual permit(and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result,as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)Checked items are included in the administrative

record and are appropriately cited:
®Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:AtlasEnvironmentalforRobinson Weeks Partners
®Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.Data sheets:
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
®U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
®USGS NHD data:Figure 14(10/23/2020)
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:Figure 12
®U.S. Geological Survey map(s).Cite scale&quad name:Kannapolis Quad Figure 3 10/23/2020
®Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:USDA Web Soil Survey(pp1-3 Figure 13)
®National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:USFWS NWIMapper (10/23/2020)
❑State/local wetland inventory map(s):
®FEMA/FIRM maps: Figure 8(10/23/2020)-NFHL
❑100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: Z Aerial (Name & Date): Parcel Map Figure 2(10/23/2020),Figure7(10/23/2020)
or® Other(Name& Date):
❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
IZ1 Other information(please specify): Delineation Map dated 08/30/2021:Figure 1A/ I B .LiDAr (10/23/2020),
APT tool run 08/26/2021-Normal Conditions
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
14146 *fr
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person requesting PJD
staff member completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
11/24/2021 impracticable)i
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms.If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame,the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Aquatic Resource Sketch MapSketch Map provided for illustrative purposes and
9h�n preliminary planning only. Not intended to be relied upon
for exact location,dimension,or orientation. All findings
and assessments are subject to verification from the
w Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources, and/or other appropriate local authorities.
Do not reproduce map set except in its entirety.
a
s
Detail 2: Page 4
Detail 3: Page 5 t o /)1� J I i
AP ''''''...-
ii
I 1
4 r I
r r
' ' ' 4 I I I 0 I IA ' Detail 1: Page 31
i411110111444
1 1 1 I II, '--'-,-'t-'-,!-'.—.Z-.'-4-!--1--_0_
i,, - LW----Mg CD1 5,2_V.
- ,,s: 1 1 a
Legend 1 1.'.1' ' ' a i
a
i
i i . 1 O Review Area 1�l,l`, ,ii, ' -1:
� '°
5
Streets u
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels
-- - - - - -
Contours: 2Ft Delineation -
S . 3 =�te'HWy-73 pavidson HWY 11
Perennial Q 0NIntermittent �; ill
/�`
Wetland e
/I 0 200 400 600 800 Ft
NM Culvert `�� `�� 1111111.1211111
mmiim
, Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
/Q C Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027 L ,:�
tt W .,� 01
SIN rws
1a IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham ,,,,,,,,0
Page 1 of 5 Figure 1A Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: November 05, 2021

1.
rAgp,o ,owl
�'1. • __ Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
, a it
s , f
st-----44.4. , _ , '. ,
.a.
•c4,.....g
.
b 6
'4',. '''''i.'.;'''.1";11—''' 4 • , ,,:47.'.,'41;i,a,,,,,ir,4* 4:--,F,4' : ',,,-,:k wt!,' „,,,4 . ,,
/ 7,
dill
Legend _ ; ' ,, f. , � ',,w `
O Review Area — sy.. , '•
Streets = = �-,-�- - ,. • g
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels , �, , , ,-
Delineation F, , ',
gM Perennial 6 �Dandson t
Intermittent \�re a -A,- _
Wetland - - 8
Culvert \fc� ' A �`k 0 200 400 600 800 Ft
MO S . ' . 1 miimm ii
-..0. : - Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
�i` — 11 ( AS Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
11`t`
-.2.!!�?"YA''ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham
Page 2 of 5 Figure 1 B Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: November 05, 2021

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Potential Wetland
WL 1000: -0.194 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
1-85 CH 200 Per: -73 LF, 0.006 Ac
Potential Wetland
WL 2000: -0.042 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 200 Int: - 344 LF,0.025 Ac Potential Wetland
Potential Wetland WL 1100: -0.0005 Ac
WL 2100: - 0.108 Ac
Potential Wetland
WL 1200: -0.003 Ac
Legend
1 Review Area Potential Non Wetland
Streets CH 100: - 2668 LF,0.349 Ac
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels
Contours: 2Ft
Delineation
N
M Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
1 Culvert 1
. = Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
A
CLocation: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
t� J
..u. 44 IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham
Page 3 of 5 Figure 1C Detail 1 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: November 05, 2021

7-
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
CH 100 Continued)
Potential Wetland
WL 1300:-0.004 Ac
ISee Detail 3, Pa.e 5
likk , 41111.6_, ill lir
Legend - A2:TRIBINT
9 / CH 300: -492 LF,0.030 Ac
O Review Area
Streets
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels
Contours: 2Ft
Delineation
N
I= Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
MI Culvert 1
- -- Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
Q C Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham
Page 4 of 5 Figure 1D Detail 2 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: November 05, 2021

/ 1
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
CH 100 Continued
Legend
Potential Non Wetland
O Review Area CH 400: -578 LF,0.031 Ac
Streets
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels
Contours: 2Ft
Delineation
Perennial
N
Intermittent
Wetland 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
EN Culvert Note:Stream length and area includes culvert EMM
1 Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
Q C Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
IRON MENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Kyle Cunningham
Pa e 5 of 5 Figure 1 E Detail 3 1-Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date:November 05, 2021
9

,air,
...„?„,
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D.Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary,Darin J.Waters,Ph.D.
January 11, 2022
Austin Baggarley [e-mail]
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 South Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte,NC 28211
Re: Construct Hwy 73 industrial facility,4122 Davidson Highway, Concord, Cabarrus County,
ER 21-3086
Dear Mr. Baggarley:
Thank you for your letter of November 24,2021,regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore,we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
ke,r Ramona Bartos, Deputy
0 State Historic Preservation Officer
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6599

Pit FISFI&WILDLIFE
SERVICE
United States Department of the Interior
a bi• FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
,acH 3, Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite B
Asheville,North Carolina 28801
December 6,2021
Mr. Austin Baggarley
Atlas Environmental
338 S. Sharon Amity Road,#411
Charlotte,North Carolina 28211
Subject: Proposed Highway 73 Industrial Site in Concord,Cabarrus County,North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Baggarley:
On November 24,2021,we received(via email)your information requesting our review of the subject
project. We have reviewed the information that you presented for this request and the following
comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act(42
U.S.C.§4321 et seq.);the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act,as amended(16 U.S.C. 661 -667e); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 - 1543)(Act).
Proiect Description
According to the information provided,Robinson Weeks Partners proposes to construct two industrial
warehouses and associated infrastructure on approximately 55.2 acres at 4122 Davidson Highway in
Concord,Cabarrus County,North Carolina. A preliminary site plan was included with the review
request.
Federally Listed Species
An assessment of suitable habitat and presence/absence species surveys for three species were conducted
by environmental specialist with Atlas Environmental(Atlas)on August 22 and 31,2021. The findings
were compiled and included in the review request submitted to our office on November 24,2021. The
following species and their associated habitats were evaluated.
Species Status'
Carolina heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata E
Northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis T
Schweinitz's sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii E
IE=endangered and T=threatened.
The review request states that no suitable habitat is present for Carolina heelsplitter. Based on the
information provided,we agree with the assessment that no suitable habitat is present for this species. As
such,section 7 consultation is not required for this species.
Based on the information provided, suitable summer roosting habitat for northern long-eared bat(NLEB)
may be present on the site. However,the final 4(d)rule(effective as of February 16,2016),exempts
incidental take of NLEB associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known
hibernation site,and greater than 150 feet from a known,occupied maternity roost during the pup season

Mr.Baggarley—Atlas 2
(June 1 —July 31). The proposed development would occur at a location where any incidental take that
may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d)rule. Although not required,we encourage
the project proponent to avoid any associated tree clearing activities during the NLEB active season from
April 1 —October 15.
The review request states that suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present on site;however,the
species was not observed during surveys. Based on negative results of visual surveys conducted on
August 22 and 31,2021,and given the information provided,we would concur with a"may affect,not
likely to adversely affect"from the lead federal action agency for this species.
The proposed project is in a county that has potential or known occurrence records of at-risk(ARS),
candidate(CAN),and/or proposed species. Below is a list of these species known from Cabarrus County
and for which we have concerns.
Species Status'
Little brown bat Myotis lucifugus ARS
Monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus CAN
Tricolored bat Perimyotis subflavus ARS
'ARS=at-risk species and CAN=candidate species.
Little brown bat and tricolored bat are ARS and monarch butterfly is a CAN. ARS and CAN are not
legally protected under the Act and are not subject to any of its provisions,including section 7,unless
they are formally proposed or listed as endangered or threatened. While lead federal agencies are not
prohibited from jeopardizing the continued existence of an ARS,CAN,or proposed species until the
species becomes listed,the prohibition against jeopardy and taking a listed species under section 9 of the
Act applies as soon as the listing becomes effective,regardless of the stage of completion of the proposed
action. We are including these species in our response to give you advance notification and request your
assistance in protecting them. Although not required,we recommend that the presence/absence of these
species be addressed in future biological assessments and biological evaluations prepared for similar
projects. Additionally,we encourage you to coordinate projects with the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission on behalf of these species.
We believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled for the federally listed species
discussed above. However,obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1)new
information reveals impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a
manner not previously considered,(2)the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was
not considered in this review,or(3)a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be
affected by the identified action.
Fish and Wildlife Resource Recommendations
We are also concerned about the potential effects the proposed project could have on other natural
resources. We offer the following general recommendations for the benefit of fish and wildlife resources:
• Equipment Use in Riparian Areas and In-Stream. Equipment should be operated from the
streambank. If in-stream work is necessary, stone causeways,work bridges, or mats(designed
for the specific location and type of equipment)should be used. Work pads on streambanks or
approaches to in-stream work areas should minimize disturbance to woody vegetation.
Equipment operated in riparian areas and in/near aquatic resources should be inspected daily and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids,or other toxic materials. Construction staging,toxic material storage, and

Mr.Baggarley—Atlas 3
equipment maintenance,including refueling, should occur outside of the riparian area. The
project proponent should report any toxic material spills in riparian areas and/or aquatic resources
to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(Service)within 24 hours.
• Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Construction activities near aquatic resources, streams,
and wetlands have the potential to cause bank destabilization,water pollution,and water quality
degradation if measures to control site runoff are not properly installed and maintained. In order
to effectively reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts,best management practices specific to
the extent and type of construction should be designed and installed prior to land-disturbing
activities and should be maintained throughout construction. Natural fiber matting(coir)should
be used for erosion control as synthetic netting can trap animals and persists in the environment
beyond its intended purpose. Land disturbance should be limited to what can be stabilized
quickly,preferably by the end of the workday. Once construction is complete,disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native riparian grass and tree species as soon as possible. For
maximum benefits to water quality and bank stabilization,riparian areas should be forested;
however, if the areas are maintained in grass,they should not be mowed. The Service can
provide information on potential sources of plant material upon request.
A complete design manual that is consistent with the requirements of the North Carolina
Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act and Administrative Rules,can be found at the following
website: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources.
• Impervious Surfaces/Stormwater/Low Impact Development(LID). Increased development
contributes to the increased quantity and decreased quality of stormwater entering project area
waterways. Additionally,increased development outside the floodplain increases stormwater
flows already caused by the lack of or loss of riparian buffers and floodplain development.
Recent studies' have shown that areas of 10 percent to 20 percent impervious surface(such as
roofs,roads,and parking lots)double the amount of stormwater runoff compared to natural cover
and decrease deep infiltration(groundwater recharge)by 16 percent. At 35—50 percent
impervious surface,runoff triples,and deep infiltration is decreased by 40 percent. Above 75
percent impervious surface,runoff is 5.5 times higher than natural cover, and deep infiltration is
decreased by 80 percent. Additionally,the adequate treatment of stormwater at project sites is
essential for the protection of water quality and aquatic habitat. Impervious surfaces also collect
pathogens,metals,sediment, and chemical pollutants and quickly transmit them(via stormwater
runoff)to receiving waters. According to the Environmental Protection Agency,this
nonpoint-source pollution is one of the major threats to water quality in the United States,posing
one of the greatest threats to aquatic life,and is also linked to chronic and acute illnesses in
human populations from exposure through drinking water and contact recreational.
Increased stormwater runoff also directly damages aquatic and riparian habitat,causing
streambank and stream channel scouring. Additionally,impervious surfaces reduce groundwater
recharge,resulting in even lower than expected stream flows during drought periods,which can
induce potentially catastrophic effects for fish,mussels,and other aquatic life. To avoid any
additional impacts to habitat quality within the watershed,we recommend that all new
developments,regardless of the percentage of impervious surface area created,implement
stormwater retention and treatment measures designed to replicate and maintain the hydrograph at
the preconstruction condition.
'Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group(15 federal agencies of the United States Government).
Published October 1998,Revised August 2001. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles,Processes,and Practices.
GPO Item No.0120-A;SuDocs No.A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN-0-934213-59-3.

Mr.Baggarley—Atlas 4
We recommend the use of low impact development techniques,2 such as reduced road widths,
grassed swales in place of curb and gutter,rain gardens,and wetland retention areas,for retaining
and treating stormwater runoff rather than the more traditional measures,such as large retention
ponds,etc. These designs often cost less to install and significantly reduce environmental
impacts from development.
Where detention ponds are used,stormwater outlets should drain through a vegetated area prior to
reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should be designed to allow for
the slow discharge of stormwater,attenuating the potential adverse effects of stormwater surges;
thermal spikes;and sediment,nutrient,and chemical discharges. Also,because the purpose of
stormwater control measures is to protect streams and wetlands,no stormwater control measures
or best management practices should be installed within any stream(perennial or intermittent)or
wetland.
We also recommend that consideration be given to the use of pervious materials(i.e.,pervious
concrete,interlocking/open paving blocks,etc.)for the construction of roads,driveways,
sidewalks,etc. Pervious surfaces minimize changes to the hydrology of the watershed and can be
used to facilitate groundwater recharge. Pervious materials are also less likely to absorb and store
heat and allow the cooler soil below to cool the pavement. Additionally,pervious concrete
requires less maintenance and is less susceptible to freeze/thaw cracking due to large voids within
the concrete.
Use of any of the proposed stormwater collection devices described above will dramatically
decrease the quantity and increase the quality of stormwater runoff.
• Pollinators. Pollinators, such as most bees,some birds and bats,and other insects,including
moths and butterflies,play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and production of
most fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about 75 percent of crops are
pollinated by these types of fauna. A recent study of the status of pollinators in North America
by the National Academy of Sciences found that populations of honey bees(which are not native
to North America)and many wild pollinators are declining. Declines in wild pollinators are a
result of disease and the loss,degradation,and fragmentation of habitat. Because loss of habitat
and diminished native food sources have decreased the populations and diversity of pollinators
throughout the country,we recommend that development projects be sited in areas that are
previously disturbed(fallow fields,closed industrial sites,etc.)or sites that do not impact mature
forests,streams,or wetlands.
We have records of rare species in the area,including monarch butterfly,a federal candidate for
listing.3 Monarch butterflies east of the Rocky Mountains used to number in the hundreds of
millions but the population has declined by approximately 80 percent. Loss of habitat due to
genetically modified crops,overuse of herbicides and insecticides,urban,suburban and
2We recommend visiting the Environmental Protection Agency's Web site(http://www.epa.gov/polluted-runoff=
nonpoint-source pollution/urban-runoff low-impact-development)for additional information and fact sheets
regarding the implementation of low-impact-development techniques.
3"Taxa for which the[Fish and Wildlife] Service has on file enough substantial information on biological
vulnerability and threat(s)to support proposals to list them as endangered or threatened. Proposed rules have not yet
been issued because this action is precluded at present by other listing activity. Development and publication of
proposed rules on these taxa are anticipated. The Service encourages State and other Federal agencies as well as
other affected parties to give consideration to these taxa in environmental planning"(Federal Register,February 28,
1996). Taxa formerly considered as"Category 1"are now considered as"candidates."

Mr.Baggarley—Atlas 5
agricultural development,disease,climate change,and overwintering site degradation are the
leading causes of monarch decline. Adults use a wide variety of flowering plants throughout
migration for nectar and breeding. However,milkweed plants(Asclepias spp.)are essential to
monarch breeding as these are the only genus of plants that can host monarchs in their larval
form. For a regional and seasonal list of plants important to monarch butterflies,please visit the
Xerces Society website at: http://www.xerces.org/monarch-nectar-plants/.
Although the provisions of section 7 of the Act do not currently apply to candidate species or
other non-listed pollinators,we would greatly appreciate your assistance in determining if
monarch butterflies or suitable habitat for the species is present on the proposed project site. If
individuals or suitable habitat is present, impacts should be avoided. More specific information
about monarch butterfly can be found at the Service website dedicated to the species at:
https://www.fws.gov/savethemonarcht
To reduce development impacts to monarch butterflies and other pollinators and/or to increase the
habitat and species diversity within the project area,we recommend the following measures be
incorporated into project designs:
1. Throughout the site,avoid non-native seed mixes and plants. Instead,sow native seed mixes
and plant species that are beneficial to pollinators.
a. Avoid seed mixes and plants that have been pre-treated with insecticides,such as
neonictinoids.
b. Taller-growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the periphery of the
site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the summer
months. Taller plants,not mowed during the summer,would provide benefits to
pollinators,habitat for ground-nesting/feeding birds,and cover for small mammals.
c. Native low-growing/groundcover species should be planted in areas that need to be
maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the
amount of maintenance,such as mowing and herbicide treatment.
d. Using a seed mix that includes milkweed species is especially beneficial for monarch
butterflies. The following website provides additional information and a
comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators:
http://www.xerces.org/pollinator-resource-center/mid-atlantic. We also offer our
assistance with developing seed mixes that can be used in conjunction with fast
growing erosion control seed mixes for overall soil stability and pollinator benefits.
e. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes,and pollinator habitat
requirements can be provided upon request.
2. Mowing and grounds maintenance,including pesticide use,should be scheduled to not
interfere with monarch breeding or nectaring at project sites that occur along the migration
route. To reduce harm,we advise mowing in the fall or winter when flowers are not in bloom.
3. Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different needs for
nesting sites. Therefore,we recommend project designs include a diverse array of habitats to
accommodate varied pollinators. For example:
a. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or shrubs.
b. Many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants.
c. Most bees nest in the ground and in wood or dry plant stems.
d. For additional information and actions that can be taken to benefit pollinators,please
visit the following website: https://www.fws.gov/pollinators/.
4. Minimize effects of outdoor light pollution. Recent studies indicate that artificial lighting
disrupts the natural reproduction and feeding patterns of nocturnal pollinators such as beetles
and moths. This disruption results in a decrease of pollination rates in plants and a decrease in

Mr.Baggarley—Atlas 6
the health and diversity of nocturnal pollinators. When developing an outdoor lighting plan or
installing any outdoor lighting devices,we recommend the following measures be considered
to minimize potential adverse effects of outdoor lighting:
a. Decrease the number of light fixtures,as practicable,to meet lighting objectives.
b. Install lighting only in areas that need illumination for safety(e.g.paths,roads,etc.).
Avoid lighting landscape features such as trees,shrubs,or building facades.
c. Install fully shielded lights that direct light downward.
d. Use only low-pressure sodium(LPS),high-pressure sodium(HPS),or light emitting
diode(LED)light sources that emit"warm"light. "Warm"light sources are those
that contain low amounts of blue light in their spectrum.Choosing light sources with a
color temperature of no more than 3,000 Kelvins will minimize the effects of blue
light exposure.
e. For additional information and actions that can be taken to reduce outdoor light
pollution,please visit the following website: https://www.darksky.org/our-
work/lighting/lighting for-citizens/lighting-basics/.
• Stream Buffers. Natural, forested riparian buffers are critical to the health of aquatic
ecosystems. They accomplish the following:
o Catch and filter runoff,thereby helping to prevent nonpoint-source pollutants from
reaching streams.
o Enhance the in-stream processing of both point-and nonpoint-source pollutants.
o Act as"sponges"by absorbing runoff(which reduces the severity of floods)and by
allowing runoff to infiltrate and recharge groundwater levels(which maintains stream
flows during dry periods).
o Catch and help prevent excess woody debris from entering the stream and creating
logjams.
o Stabilize stream banks and maintain natural channel morphology.
o Provide coarse woody debris for habitat structure and most of the dissolved organic
carbon and other nutrients necessary for the aquatic food web.
o Maintain air and water temperatures around the stream.
Forested riparian buffers(a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent streams and 100 feet wide
along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain,whichever is greater])
should be created and/or maintained adjacent to all aquatic areas. Within the watersheds
supporting federally listed aquatic species,we recommend undisturbed, forested buffers that are
naturally vegetated with trees,shrubs,and herbaceous vegetation. These buffers should extend a
minimum of 200 feet from the banks of all perennial streams and a minimum of 100 feet from
the banks of all intermittent streams(or the full extent of the 100-year floodplain,whichever is
greater.) Impervious surfaces,ditches,pipes,roads,utility lines(sewer,water,gas,transmission,
etc.),and other infrastructure that requires maintenance,cleared rights-of-way and/or compromise
the functions and values of the forested buffers should not occur within these riparian areas.
• Stream Crossings. Bridges or spanning structures should be used for all permanent roadway
crossings of streams and associated wetlands. Structures should span the channel and the
floodplain in order to minimize impacts to aquatic resources,allow for the movement of aquatic
and terrestrial organisms,and eliminate the need to place fill in streams,wetlands,and
floodplains.
Bridges should be designed and constructed so that no piers or bents are placed in the stream,
approaches and abutments do not constrict the stream channel,and the crossing is perpendicular
to the stream. Spanning some or all of the floodplain allows stream access to the floodplain,

Mr. Baggarley—Atlas 7
dissipates energy during high flows,and provides terrestrial wildlife passage. When bank
stabilization is necessary,we recommend that the use of riprap be minimized and that a
riprap-free buffer zone be maintained under the bridge to allow for wildlife movement. If fill in
the floodplain is necessary, floodplain culverts should be added through the fill to allow the
stream access to the floodplain during high flows.
If bridges are not possible and culverts are the only option,we suggest using bottomless culverts.
Bottomless culverts preserve the natural stream substrate,create less disturbance during
construction,and provide a more natural post-construction channel. Culverts should be of
sufficient size to leave natural stream functions and habitats at the crossing site unimpeded.
Culvert installation and presence should not change water depth,volume(flow),or velocity levels
that permit aquatic organism passage;and accommodate the movement of debris and bed material
during bankfull events. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
• Utility Line Crossings. In the interest of reducing impacts to natural resources,utility crossings
(i.e.,sewer,gas,and water lines)should be kept to a minimum,and all utility infrastructure
(including manholes)should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. If a utility crossing is necessary,
we recommend that you first consider the use of directional boring. Directional boring under
streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources and riparian buffers.
If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable method,
every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in-stream features are minimized and
stabilized upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with open-trench crossings
indicate that this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral movement of the stream
(which could undercut or erode around the utility line),and the correction of such problems could
result in costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore,as
much work as possible should be accomplished in the dry,and the amount of disturbance should
not exceed what can be successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In-stream work should
avoid the spring fish spawning season and should consider forecasted high flow events.
Regardless of the crossing method,all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly. We
strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the work is complete in
order to identify any additional impact-minimization measures. The Service may be available to
assist you in this effort.
To determine if any maintenance is required,the work site should be monitored at least every 3
months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover,we recommend the
development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that would outline procedures for
the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility crossing(should any streambank erosion
or destabilization occur)throughout the life of this project.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Ms.Rebekah Reid of
our staff at [e-mail],if you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning
this project,please reference Log Number 4-2-22-315.
Sincerely,
--original signed--
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

as o
ROY COOPER . _
Governor
ELIZABETH S.BISER
Secretary wM**
MARC RECKTENWALD NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
January 20, 2022
Kyle Cunningham
Robinson Weeks Partners
3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 7000
Atlanta, GA 30339 Expiration of Acceptance: 7/20/2022
Project: Highway 73 Industrial County: Cabarrus
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state,federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame,this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s)an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8-digit HUC)
Yadkin 03040105 Warm Stream 481
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kellv.Williams(a�ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Jennifer Robertson, agent
w-� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
DE
`O0) 217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
" i a � /01.1 919.707.8976

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1.Project name(if any): Hwy 73 Industrial 2.Date of evaluation: 08/26/2021
3.Applicant/owner name: Robinson Weeks Partners 4.Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental
5.County: Cabarrus 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Rocky on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Irish Buffalo Creek
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.43660,-80.64881
STREAM INFORMATION:(depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): CH 100 10.Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 93
11.Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12.Channel width at top of bank(feet): 5 13.Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Oyes ❑No
14.Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15.NC SAM Zone: 0 Mountains(M) ®Piedmont(P) 0 Inner Coastal Plain(I) ❑Outer Coastal Plain(0)
16.Estimated geomorphic
valley shape(skip for ❑B
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size:(skip ['Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) ®Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) ❑Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) ❑Size 4(z 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? EYes ❑No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (01 ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area 0 High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
['Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Water throughout assessment reach.
DB No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening,modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
• Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion,rip-rap).
❑A <10%of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms,levees,down-cutting,aggradation,dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction,minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction(little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching])or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue,unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
OF Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning,regular mowing,destruction,etc)
❑I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams,D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams,D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
lob. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses „ OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats) "ciE ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent 4 as OH Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation Y t o ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) § 1 ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 2 OK Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********m*********************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent,Rare
(R)=present but< 10%, Common(C)=> 10-40%,Abundant(A)=>40-70%, Predominant(P)=>70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® 0 0 ❑ 0 Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ 0 0 Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ 0 ❑ ® 0 Gravel(2—64 mm)
O 0 0 ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ONo Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ZYes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools,then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats)
® ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ❑Asian clam(Corbicula)
® OCrustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ODipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
• OMegaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
® ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ®Other fish
® ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ®Snails
❑ OStonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance,buildings,man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
• ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
ZA Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
OB Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam,leaky dam,bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach(ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
• None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
ZA Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ®A >_100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ®B ❑B From 50 to<100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C DC From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E <10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Mature forest
®B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
DC ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees<10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
DE ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
DB ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
DC DC DC DC ❑C DC Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded"Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ®B Low stem density
DC ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation>10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B DB The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C DC The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
DC ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 DB 46 to<67 DC 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E >_230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Hwy 73 Industrial Date of Assessment 08/26/2021
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACEI NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2)Flood Flow MEDIUM
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM
(4)Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM
(4)Microtopography LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4)Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality HIGH
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance MEDIUM
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1)Habitat LOW
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3)In-stream Habitat LOW
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2)Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the"Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1.Project name(if any): Hwy 73 Industrial 2.Date of evaluation: 08/26/2021
3.Applicant/owner name: Robinson Weeks Partners 4.Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental
5.County: Cabarrus 6.Nearest named water body
7.River basin: Rocky on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Irish Buffalo Creek
8.Site coordinates(decimal degrees,at lower end of assessment reach): 35.43660,-80.64881
STREAM INFORMATION:(depth and width can be approximations)
9.Site number(show on attached map): CH 300 10.Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 388
11.Channel depth from bed(in riffle,if present)to top of bank(feet): 1 ['Unable to assess channel depth.
12.Channel width at top of bank(feet): 2 13.Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ['Yes ❑No
14.Feature type: [Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow OTidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15.NC SAM Zone: 0 Mountains(M) ®Piedmont(P) 0 Inner Coastal Plain(I) ❑Outer Coastal Plain(0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size:(skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mi2) ❑Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mi2) ['Size 3(0.5 to<5 mi2) OSize 4(z 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
['Section 10 water ['Classified Trout Waters ['Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II DIII ❑IV ❑V)
['Essential Fish Habitat [Primary Nursery Area 0 High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
['Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ['Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d)List OCAMA Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)
['Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ['Yes ®No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
®B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10%of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B NotA
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern(examples:straightening,modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting,existing damming,over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure,active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion,rip-rap).
❑A <10%of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
O B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions(examples: berms,levees,down-cutting,aggradation,dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction,minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
®C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction(little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white,blue,unnatural water discoloration,oil sheen,stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
OG Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
OH Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal,burning,regular mowing,destruction,etc)
01 Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
• Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams,D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams,D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
OA Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
O B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. Oyes ONo Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses , OF 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats) F E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
OB Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent t m OH Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation t 01 Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) . co ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
OD 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 0 2 OK Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
• Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent,Rare
(R)=present but< 10%, Common (C)_> 10-40%,Abundant(A)=>40-70%, Predominant(P)=>70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
• 0 0 0 0 Bedrock/saprolite
® 0 0 0 0 Boulder(256—4096 mm)
❑ ® 0 0 ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ® 0 0 ❑ Gravel(2—64 mm)
❑ 0 0 ® ❑ Sand(.062—2 mm)
❑ 0 0 ® ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
O ® 0 ❑ ❑ Detritus
® 0 0 0 ❑ Artificial(rip-rap,concrete,etc.)
11d. Oyes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water DOther:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools,then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No,skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ['Adult frogs
❑ ['Aquatic reptiles
❑ DAquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts,lichens,and algal mats)
❑ ❑Bee tles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ['Asian clam(Corbicula)
❑ DCrustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ['Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ DDipterans
❑ DMayfly larvae(E)
❑ DMegaloptera(alderfly,fishfly,dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ DMosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ElSalamanders/tadpoles
❑ ['Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
DC ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance,buildings,man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
DA DA Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>_6 inches deep
DB DB Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y DY Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam,leaky dam,bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced(dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
DB Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach(ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
DC Urban stream(z 24%impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
DE Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded(example: scattered trees)
DC Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to<100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E <10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated"Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees<10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet),or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream(30-50 feet).
if none of the-following stressers occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B OB ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded"Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream(parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation>10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 ❑B 46 to<67 ❑C 67to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 ❑E z230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Hwy 73 Industrial Date of Assessment 08/26/2021
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form(Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included(YIN) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial,intermittent,Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1)Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW
(4)Floodplain Access LOW LOW
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH HIGH
(4)Microtopography MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)WaterQuality MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH
(3)Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2)Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1)Habitat LOW LOW
(2)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(3)Substrate LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)In-stream Habitat LOW LOW
(2)Stream-side Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation HIGH HIGH
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology _ NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2)Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

CABARRUS COUNTY,NC 9/14/2021 1:54:44 PM
AAC/SHOFFNER DEVELOPMENT LP Return/Appeal Notes: parcel:5601 87 7425 0000
1403 WESTGATE CIR NW Concord NC 28027 PLAT:00000/00000 UNIQ ID 10025 SPLIT FROM ID 1723
60640 ID NO:04 104 0014.10 0000
CONCORD CITY TAX(100),COUNTY TAX(100) CARD NO.I of 1
Reval Year:2020 Tax Year:2021 NORTH SIDE HWY 73 23.3200 AC SRC=Estimated
Appraised by 24 on 09/05/2017 50013 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARK TW-04 CI-02 FR-00 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20191212
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL MARKET VALUE DEPRECIATION CORRELATION OF VALUE
TOTAL POINT VALUE I Eff. BASE
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTS USE MOD Area DUAL RATE RCN EYBAYB CREDENCE TO
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT 10 00 %GOOD I DEPR.BUILDING VALUE-CARD 0
FACTOR TYPE:COMMERCIAL-RETAIL DEPR.OB/XF VALUE-CARD 0
TOTAL QUALITY INDEX MARKET LAND VALUE-CARD 2,193,950
STYLE: TOTAL MARKET VALUE-CARD 2,193,950
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE-CARD 2,193,950
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE-PARCEL 2,193,950
TOTAL PRESENT USE VALUE-PARCEL 0
TOTAL VALUE DEFERRED-PARCEL 0
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE-PARCEL$ 2,193,950
PRIOR
BUILDING VALUE 0
OBXF VALUE 0
LAND VALUE 2,102,530
PRESENT USE VALUE 0
DEFERRED VALUE 0
TOTAL VALUE 2,102,530
PERMIT
CODE I DATE I NOTE I NUMBER I AMOUNT
ROUT:WTRSHD:
SALES DATA
OFF.
RECORD DATE DEED INDICATE SALES
BOOK PAGE MOYR TYPE Q/UV/I PRICE
8072 0060 2 2008 GW E V 0
HEATED AREA
NOTES
FS 2015$90,000/AC DOM 120
SUBAREA I UNIT ORIG"/o SIZE ANN DEP % OB/XF DEPR.
GS RPL CODE QUALITY1DESCRIPTION COUNT LTH WTH UNITS PRICE COND BLDG# FACT AYB EYB RATE OVRCOND VALUE
TYPE AREA % CS TOTAL OB/XF VALUE 0
FIREPLACE
SUBAREA
TOTALS
BUILDING DIMENSIONS
LAND INFORMATION
OTHER
HIGHEST ADJUSTMENTS AND LAND TOTAL
AND BEST USE LOCAL FRON DEPTH LND COND NOTES ROAD UNIT LAND UNT TOTAL ADJUSTED LAND OVERRIDE LAND
USE CODE ZONING TAGE DEPTH /SIZE MOD FACT RF AC LC TO OT TYPE PRICE UNITS TYP ADJST UNIT PRICE VALUE VALUE NOTES
COMMERCIAL 0700 MX-CC2 1567 0 1.0050 7 0.3900+04+00+00-65+00 PS 240,000.00 23.320 AC 0.392 94,080.002193946 0
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA 23.320 2,193,950
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA

CABARRUS COUNTY,NC 9/14/2021 1:55:31 PM
SHOFFNER DEVELOPMENT LLC A NC LLC Return/Appeal Notes: Parcel:5601 88 8181 0000
HWY 73 NC PLAT:00000/00000 UNIQ ID 1413
60639 ID NO:04 104 0014.00 0000
CONCORD CITY TAX(100),COUNTY TAX(100) CARD NO.1 of 1
Revel Year:2020 Tax Year:2021 S/S INTERSTATE 85 27.6600 AC SRC= Estimated
Appraised by 24 on 01/25/2016 50013 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARK TW-04 CI-02 FR-00 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20191212
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL MARKET VALUE DEPRECIATION CORRELATION OF VALUE
TOTAL POINT VALUE I Eff. BASE
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTS USE MOD Area QUAL RATE RCNEYBAYB CREDENCE TO
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT 10 00 %GOOD I DEPR.BUILDING VALUE-CARD 0
FACTOR TYPE:COMMERCIAL-RETAIL DEPR.OB/XF VALUE-CARD 0
TOTAL QUALITY INDEX MARKET LAND VALUE-CARD 1,872,030
STYLE: TOTAL MARKET VALUE-CARD 1,872,030
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE-CARD 1,872,030
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE-PARCEL 1,872,030
TOTAL PRESENT USE VALUE-PARCEL 0
TOTAL VALUE DEFERRED-PARCEL 0
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE-PARCEL$ 1,872,030
PRIOR
BUILDING VALUE 0
OBXF VALUE 0
LAND VALUE 1,572,470
PRESENT USE VALUE 0
DEFERRED VALUE 0
TOTAL VALUE 1,572,470
PERMIT
CODE I DATE I NOTE I NUMBER I AMOUNT
ROUT:WTRSHD:
SALES DATA
OFF.
RECORD DATE DEED INDICATE SALES
BOOK PAGE MOYR TYPE Q/UV/I PRICE
8007 2005 2 2008 GW E V 0
3327 0086 7 2001 TD* P I 1778500
2281 0036 8 1998 WC)* U I 1250000
HEATED AREA
NOTES
FS 2015$70,000/AC DOM 120
SUBAREA I UNIT ORIG% SIZE ANN DEP % OB/XF DEPR.
GS RPL CODE QUALIrnDESCRIPTION COUNT LTHWTHUNITS PRICE COND BLDG# FACT AYB EYB RATE OVRCOND VALUE
TYPE AREA % CS TOTAL OB/XF VALUE 0
FIREPLACE
SUBAREA
TOTALS
BUILDING DIMENSIONS
LAND INFORMATION
OTHER
HIGHEST ADJUSTMENTS AND LAND TOTAL
AND BEST USE LOCAL FRON DEPTH LND COND NOTES ROAD UNIT LAND UNT TOTAL ADJUSTED LAND OVERRIDE LAND
USE CODE ZONING TAGE DEPTH /SIZE MOD FACT RF AC LC TO OT TYPE PRICE UNITS TYP ADJST UNIT PRICE VALUE VALUE NOTES
COMMERCIAL 0700 MX-CC2 60 0 0.9710 7 0.2900-11+00+10-50-20 PS 240,000.00 27.660 AC 0.282 67,680.00 1872029 0
SH
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA 27.660 1,872,030
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA

CABARRUS COUNTY,NC 9/14/2021 1:55:50 PM
AAC/SHOFFNER DEVELOPMENT LP Return/Appeal Notes: Parcel:5601 87 9077 0000
4208 DAVIDSON HWY CONCORD NC 28027 PLAT:00000/00000 UNIQ ID 1722
60640 ID NO:04 104 0010.00 0000
CONCORD CITY TAX(100),COUNTY TAX(100) CARD NO.1 of 1
Revel Year:2020 Tax Year:2021 4208 DAVIDSON HWY 1.0500 AC SRC=Estimated
Appraised by 24 on 11/20/2018 50013 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARK TW-04 CI-02 FR-00 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20210604
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL MARKET VALUE DEPRECIATION CORRELATION OF VALUE
Foundation-3 FOBS Functional 0.30000
Continuous Footing 5.00 Eff. BASE Obsolescence
Sub Floor System-4 USE MOD Area QUAL RATE RCN EYB AYB J Standardj 0.49000 CREDENCE TO MARKET
Plywood 8.0U 01 01 1,619 108 86.40 142982 19711956 %GOOD 121.0 DEPR.BUILDING VALUE-CARD 30,030
Exterior Walls-21 DEPR.OB/XF VALUE-CARD 5,800
Face Brick 35.00 TYPE:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY HOME
MARKET LAND VALUE-CARD 739,870
Roofing Structure-03 STYLE: 1-1.0 Story TOTAL MARKET VALUE-CARD 775,700
Gable 7.00
Roofing Cover-03
Asphalt or Composition 3.00 TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE-CARD 775,700
Shingle TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE-PARCEL 775,700
Interior Wall Construction-5
Drywall/Sheetrock 20.00 TOTAL PRESENT USE VALUE-PARCEL 0
Interior Floor Cover-08 TOTAL VALUE DEFERRED-PARCEL 0
Sheet Vinyl 6.00 TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE-PARCEL$ 775,700
Interior Floor Cover-14
Carpet 0.00 PRIOR
Heating Fuel-04 BUILDING VALUE 12,130
Electric 1.00 OBXF VALUE 3,710
Heating Type-04 LAND VALUE 386,640
Forced Air-Ducted 4.00 PRESENT USE VALUE 0
Air Conditioning Type-03 DEFERRED VALUE 0
Central 4.00 TOTAL VALUE 402,480
Bedrooms/Bathrooms/Half-
Bathrooms
2/1/0 7.000
Bedrooms +- - 2 0 - - -+
BAS-2 FUS-OLL-0 I PTO I PERMIT
I I CODE I DATE I NOTE I NUMBER I AMOUNT
Bathrooms
2 2
BAS-IFUS-OLL-O
— O 0
Half-Bathrooms I I ROUT:WTRSHD:
BAS-0 FUS-0 LL-0 — I I SALES DATA
Office ++- - 2 0 - - -+5+ + - - - - 2 8- - - - + OFF.
BAS-0 FUS-0 LL-0 0 I I I I RECORD DATE DEED INDICATE
TOTAL POINT VALUE 1100.000 I I I I BOOK PAGE MOYR TYPE Q/UV/I SALES PRICE
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTS I 1 I I 7805 0165 9 2007 SW Q I 552000
Quality 3 Average 1.0000 2 9 2 2 8072 0065 2 2008 SW E I 0
Shape/Design 1 MF1 0.9200 4 I 4 4 505 0685 5 1979 WD U I 5000
Size Size Size 1.1700 I +4+ I I
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.080 I 5 F O P I I
TOTAL QUALITY INDEX 108 +-9-+ +4+ +- 9 - + +4+
IBAS L IUBM I
1 1 1 1 HEATED AREA 1,299
5 5 5 5
I I I I NOTES
+6+- 1 2-++- - - 2 2 - - -+ +6+ - 1 2- + - - - 2 3 - - - - + *SEE NOTES*PMT 32819 10/89 PMT 16057 9
6 STP 6 /95 ENCLS CRPT*SEE NOTES
+- - - 2 2 - - -+
SUBAREA OB/XF
TYPE GS AREA % RPL CS UNIT ORIG Wo SIZE ANN DEP % DEPR.
BAS 1,299 100 112234.CODE DESCRIPTION COUNT LTHWTHUNITS PRICE COND BLDG# FACT AYB EYB RATE OVRCOND VALUE
FOP 20 035 609 02 GARAGE FR 28 28 784 26.50 100 1 0.93 19891989 S3 30 5797
PTO 400 005 1728"TOTAL OB/XF VALUE 5,797
STP 132 025 2851
UBM 1,299 020 22464
FIREPLACE 4-2 Story Single/1 Story 3,100
Double
SUBAREA 3,150 142,982
TOTALS
BUILDING DIMENSIONS BAS=W5 PTO=N20W20S20E20$W23S24W9S15E6S1E12N1E1 STP=S6E22N6W22$E22N15 FOP=N5W4S5E4$W4N24$PTR=E25
UBM=E28524E4515W2351W12N1W6N15E9N24$W25$.
LAND INFORMATION
OTHER
ADJUSTMENTS AND LAND TOTAL
HIGHEST AND USE LOCAL FRON DEPTH LND COND NOTES ROAD UNIT LAND UNT TOTAL ADJUSTED LAND OVERRIDE LAND
BEST USE CODE ZONING TAGE DEPTH /SIZE_MOD FACT RF AC LC TO OT TYPE PRICE UNITS TYP ADJST UNIT PRICE VALUE VALUE NOTES
COMMERCIAL 0700 MX-CC2 318 208 2.6690 7 1.1000+10+00+00+00+00 PS 240,000.00 1.050 AC 2.936 704,640.00 739872 0
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA 1.050 739,870
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA

CABARRUS COUNTY,NC 9/14/2021 1:56:12 PM
AAC/SHOFFNER DEVELOPMENT LP Return/Appeal Notes: Parcel:5601 77 8447 0000
4518 DAVIDSON HWY CONCORD NC 28027 PLAT:00000/00000 UNIQ ID 1721
60640 ID NO:04 104 0006.00 0000
CONCORD CITY TAX(100),COUNTY TAX(100) CARD NO.1 of 1
Revel Year:2020 Tax Year:2021 N/S HWY 73 3.2100 AC SRC= Estimated
Appraised by 24 on 01/25/2016 50013 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PARK TW-04 CI-02 FR-00 EX- AT- LAST ACTION 20210604
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL MARKET VALUE DEPRECIATION CORRELATION OF VALUE
TOTAL POINT VALUE I Eff. BASE
BUILDING ADJUSTMENTS USE MOD Area DUAL RATE RCNEYBAYB` CREDENCE TO
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT 10 00 %GOOD I DEPR.BUILDING VALUE-CARD 0
FACTOR TYPE:COMMERCIAL-RETAIL DEPR.OB/XF VALUE-CARD 0
TOTAL QUALITY INDEX MARKET LAND VALUE-CARD 1,022,320
STYLE: TOTAL MARKET VALUE-CARD 1,022,320
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE-CARD 1,022,320
TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE-PARCEL 1,022,320
TOTAL PRESENT USE VALUE-PARCEL 0
TOTAL VALUE DEFERRED-PARCEL 0
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE-PARCEL$ 1,022,320
PRIOR
BUILDING VALUE 0
OBXF VALUE 0
LAND VALUE 559,630
PRESENT USE VALUE 0
DEFERRED VALUE 0
TOTAL VALUE 559,630
PERMIT
CODE I DATE I NOTE I NUMBER I AMOUNT
ROUT:WTRSHD:
SALES DATA
OFF.
RECORD DATE DEED INDICATE SALES
BOOK PAGE MOYR TYPE Q/UV/I, PRICE
7794 0271 9 2007 OF. Q V 1250000
8072 0065 2 2008 GW C V 0
3459 0029 10 2001 RW* I V 0
HEATED AREA
NOTES
VAC BUILDABLE
SUBAREA UNIT ORIG%l SIZE ANN DEP % OB/XF DEPR.
GS RPL CODE QUA DESCRIPTIONCOUNT,LTHWTHUNITS PRICE COND IBLDG# FACT AYB EYB RATE OVRCOND VALUE
TYPE AREA % CS TOTAL OB/XF VALUE 0
FIREPLACE
SUBAREA
TOTALS
BUILDING DIMENSIONS
LAND INFORMATION
OTHER
ADJUSTMENTS AND LAND TOTAL
HIGHEST AND USE LOCAL FRON DEPTH LND COND NOTES ROAD UNIT LAND UNT TOTAL ADJUSTED LAND OVERRIDE LAND
BEST USE CODE_ZONING_TAGE DEPTH /SIZE MOD_FACT RF AC LC TO OT TYPE PRICE _ UNITS TYP ADJST UNIT PRICE VALUE VALUE NOTES
COMMERCIAL 0700 MX-CC2 322 582 1.5800 7 0.8400+04+00+00-20+00 PS 240,000.00 3.210 AC 1.327 318,480.001022321 0
TOTAL MARKET LAND DATA 3.210 1,022,320
TOTAL PRESENT USE DATA

Cowardin_Code 1IGM_Cod WPR_Determine_Cod: :I_Waterway
CH 100 NORTH CAROLINA R3 Linear 2668 FOOT PJD404 35.43695000 -80.64848000
CH 200 Per NORTH CAROLINA R3 Linear 73 FOOT PJD404 35.43769000 -80.64780000
CH 200 Int NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 344 FOOT PJD404 35.43786000 -80.64849000
CH 300 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 492 FOOT PJD404 35.43577000 -80.64909000
CH 400 NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 578 FOOT PJD404 35.43503000 -80.65097000
WL 1000 NORTH CAROLINA PFO Area 0.208 ACRE PJD404 35.43813000 -80.64744000
WL 1100 NORTH CAROLINA PSS Area 0.001 ACRE PJD404 35.43789000 -80.64731000
WL 1200 NORTH CAROLINA PSS Area 0.003 ACRE PJD404 35.43755000 -80.64790000
WL 1300 NORTH CAROLINA PSS Area 0.004 ACRE PJD404 35.43628000 -80.64975000
WL 2000 NORTH CAROLINA PSS Area 0.042 ACRE PJD404 35.43788000 -80.64824000
WL 2100 NORTH CAROLINA PSS Area 0.043 ACRE PJD404 35.43771000 -80.64824000

01
3 Parcel Map
-0 _ ,ezevIciwi
0 \ ?0 ,
a'
I
.1.-
I-85
--,,,,,,„ \ \ \
56018881810000
/''-'-'---..--------
limo
r U
/ ailli
Q= a
m g�
- \c,;
L
/ -I.' .601778447000a 56018774250000
__
I
AIIIIIIIIIn� Iz
Legend Davidson 601879077000 a u n
y 2 Ilik as
O Boundaries 4 State Hh,�,73 la
Cabarrus County Parcels 76"m c .a, 0 200 400 600 800 Ft
Streets c �� iimim
4 Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
~— � Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
V1RONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 2 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

iij�,,.JV Topographic VI
s
s �-n W NW
Ao rArC ‘00 •.,_-4 it _.,.... --i‘e ,.______-r--._.,.,___._____A yaelkr*vAl I 11 tr-alrd K: I I*I:
,�
/ _ 4441 I I LOOW (ts° V'-' -' - iii r IV
5 t _ . •
.4**'
\ \
4° .a,,, I
..... .__. ---,4\_ ,)
/ ___,i.,,,:,,i, ._,_ ...,-- -, Q
L-L-------- _____ _ -..N,.
) ......7t i r& ,_
, f -i,44
It 1
le „A i ) 4 ...... .
7.-'\\ Aix,
iNirrr, ,.w...
._„a,_v)61
,1a„.l•
•
Legend �-•�:., �J
= Review Area -
et (
Contos \ I ��/;�r— _ 0 20_#410 _ 60_i_. 0 Ft
Contours 2Ft �_
-•ter` Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
A'"- ..d \ s
lit , A,.1) Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
,,— _G?►'Y4''ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Figure 3 Date: October 23, 2020

i
\_
i '+ �` USGS Topographic Map t,. - .-�r
tj/P7 ,i } 1::',,Ns. ,y 1„s\i",' _.." /i il ) f*
!..), ( I I 1 Ne ,,, ..,)ii. r it .,...-' .."- '''''' --,,,,,/ ..ur f ,'''' .../i. 1/27:..... ' - -
I I
-.,.,4 *•
k\c,1 ii,p.4 '\..."ft:ii il .''.6.de...'1' iCe'Y /II- - - -..appoollg
....\\„...0.--t .......... nomigw,*------
ii \,,‘
,4 0 r / 4 ... ti 1 1 ''
i % at I \ /4 .. -, }F,+41r �'" I fir'' rje---��+� f I��. t iJ2 J5/i
ii
1 4.44-.410,01;4:000110
1 il 1 i
!f,
r
'� - i ` ,#4 . .a. - iJf '
iii \ ' r ' .,' {
lipR�, J's .\\c
- - r—. ,i.�_ ate — ,�*�S. , kl
. { , - �.,—sue .. f . r 4//'er a
T., - ej/j 1
- . .,-."'"''''it,..,‘ -• _� . iC 44 io° - tI r
j1 c")) 1,
,
'1(1_, , ,,,,-) • I A- . --.... . c,
rr w rk
f
( . i .
el' / I 1 1 1-Iii,s'`J. \ ..if 1 pi 14411° . . 1 11 FE\ T' .
r--., ii, y C 4
ty es,-.....0 fa II \-5, .'\
`. J Rom— , `— •—" ,. ,.... '" `'-.—
W -_...-, of �+ rf {Ji i • . �_ •- , - -..�.dr5. , '`t'-�_
7■ � r
Legend ' -�
4 . ti A
® Review Area III I J ,; ) 14'1--
'�. ..t-1 �� - ° �' . ` .r,__=.---......_..... \ t r `'; °' '`. ° s.,.
•USGS Topo Imagery1. 4 is ( OEM
_ 7 \\ `� 0 200 400 600 800 Ft
•
..�,. _ Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
_1 .. t
`� 1 A Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
vi�az. ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 4 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

// t y -1 .-�� L /j-r ✓ < r 1, n\'t,sifino f• +`.�
��l = �'. ✓ '` 'I.
' ^r( �� USGS Topographic Map w . I r! i , n - t
+ 1 "- % \ • `� / J 3 A <••T_fi`t VL '` J� I f( /Z h.3'srrb N"i 1'•'1:
J� � / � 1 /-' ' V f_ {` J l T✓( 1 • / � , 11 ,•^_, , V ,`J' �t t�` -- r:
, /��' !.J jf/ ,\ \, ��-' �/ i, ! 1 L f ~ •� ' fi r �4 , tom'-i� wP ..:.
f1r /i--•, II ���l-.-� ` t 1�: r p0 � �!"r-�!.' L._^ `I t�; / � ' 1, b t� �� r� ,.
CC a`
l' � ''J �Jf 1!11 fir,/(° ` `'�:l f-�111.1---k : l f... t(f"----iC t `/i f� ,/ / �(C. '-` •,•}3. -4c7s 1
, ; lr -z�•-.' % • u!y �l -e JP ' .t } -.. 1- % (•'1 -_.:__.-----i-„?,-,-_,
.. 1? •1i, ch•�..
ri ,�k 111 / , '�t i -- \,_.,.'t i--- ,}I / ` i , -,--i------,1"-.,4)' �J: /4 cy �� %_., i,i it i //1 \'„ ,
I ' '---• --,Si---il
o `J C � ! t C, J � ��• 'f..... ..".
% -J; :✓ p'r I � ) ) ' 1/l , -i` ''n" �l �f r i t
} , ..., . is., ,
,,„ • , •
!ll f -
-' t -- v,';N s, s, ,,,, . _, „,„.„__.,..,,,,.,,,
r'ik f7 i r ` '<'�'; . tl ,' ..h r' ,( i• r ) J f / ''' ' -/ f� `�y 'S -
..-� `.�,✓\I_,)2. V! '�% p /��) �.� )\?_ '- leii,,,\ �' i IA\ /l 1,';`a• _ i` 1 ?`7 1 \\ .. . .a !�1•
-may ,-,(-..---,1r,)\,,,,i,ti. .� > 5- i t }, ;�_
d., I 1 I ?(,--�' /-,�-` ._ `_-\ ' i �' -.(' , �i��%��_- F -1-� ---�' � 7, 'l' /.,sty �qa�
y tom\.-'` I 1 _�'650 .h' 't
J. 1 ./ �'di—- j 1'r:� ..I,1( l(. ,: -gym' f , , , c - „ "'�`' ;�-../ C) �'/i,/ ram` tA'1 may/ .:P r i_' ) .�. 2 li��t ,._..! \, �. \ ��;t\ 2 •i / < I• ` ,\t '-`,.�E' ,4
1' I ( y' !--, ;; r+,.•r 'i + J I r Li,- i /9r&r+9r -,.' '
✓, e k';` 9 F + i t ( •1 ,1�� 1 .ark t 16a_rk':: .'7 i ` ..
v r J � U C
1 %% ) l .1., rt • r i + ( (i
/ ,may Vt �. ...� � r �...�� �� -R :: n��/ t1 �� �i
1� ) 1 J �`, 7 't l ); ff ( Jl/ a 'a . _ itSh Thal` f 1, •.t y
t .\
,\. _ \,:,,,,..,....„,::, ,,,,,-F [Q f h \f _ r-J/f ,,' I t f .„._,_,.,.\,,,,,__., },_ , !r,\} '`.. _ I•�l�.��► 1 ./ l i
s `'' .I I n J{/ - l i n —'. ` .yi-- l+ 1 1u.Cz ` I C(� (I
-� t -tom•''C`. 1 % ,(I y f 1{ / !)�, }/: t i _ iI , + .. y \\\\ r ._(2)/ \ ., -s, t, -,r i• .\��I ^N._, �•�
�, , - ..tc,l' 1 N .\ >?t' 11.^. `(l. „/ �f �_-/ I lr4i i ii�;,� x� , r,\\ , r'ks„_ L_, \ ..t ,°, ,�' y -�,---;7. •11
Y 1 ci00 i l ��t -J J' /�. \/ r i �r--- �••�� •,C -`1''� �k ,�il,. -ti\ � ~\,�i�• �`�� �. t'\ ' �� ' r `.
,. •..
�` l ✓ '�. vaktsW) (� // - i'� \ \ i / ( ��. �~� . i l (,ram •o ry- .'y7�� '` ,t.'th
--�. ) `•! V l� ( ) '..� � / '-'t \ i) l'"�'%' \)•tp '-` ...i ..✓�:.._.rl 1 `/ I I .;f .. ay ,4.A t ;1�_ , \�
i. ,, ,` t, , ._. i. f'�J1a l..- _/J .1/ 1 ''�i��...ii} ` +"mil •' ," C 1)" , '.\ "/<. ly Iwe .• • .
'. .r_l�l!'r I,J 7 � (� f'•-f-.�_ \>r' \� `-•-\ _...�` .i \+.) f/,f�� �{tj fi^� r`�..if ..‹.„ ,/4' ( ' ) Pik _r
C •�/„r'1 \ � ; �• �_ '_�' �.Y,r� '=� __'•1 j r 65 -���� -� \ !i � 7 1 �/r�V
ll t, • ,-) •_ / ..1 \ \1 i r, �- t _ r \ �/ , ,•;� i_ ��1 y, \} UA \ t
��\ ' ,' '\`(-� v�l' .. '' (1---1 \',\��-\`yam•".-�,. 1 F - - ,\;;:;'\``)2-- \ r '„(--.` ,' �" - `O_-/U ..v i �. r s„,,
`)�St a--,\•.) .�-j)i , rl '�/.��r - %' r'y� -f': l/^� I i +- \1{ ;-'- __J F `-' '1 I. I `� •.,-',\` 'e\ (k .� `,
oc
., > �� _ ° ,AI ,J i.,�/ i ,-.moo, g1fg. rv.
.� 1 \���� 1,
Legend a s. --�I ,, ?,r 1. , a v ; -, , ke\.
�_�r k�;Lam----!l�..� _�/-- I - 4.`f! `r-zNdi /� ,, -,� l/�„ !i _ _ II' �._\ -. \ � \,\� +I'-
O Review Area '\.\� / i,,�'�� • '�'.-� —J �) (, /_ ,-,�i 1 ( . '. '.
USGS Topo Imagery = - �� 0 Ft
l .� „_ �� C•I - '. � , ter., I, i lNf 1 0 3
1 �� j�
'`' .tn'ti,``�S ""1�, _.-- : 7--':.%.'� '1 S I .- •.;' .. ....) �'_..,-,,, irl_i c, ' .,.- _,
0 000 200 000 400
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
,y I JA C Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 11111111111Lb ,311 'l�J
„•- _re, 7)''ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 5 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

USGS Quadrangles
Mooresville Enochville China Grove
Cornelius Kannapolis
Concord
Legend
Harrisburg Concord SE
CI Review Area
0 1 2 3 4 Miles
1 USGS Quadrangles
: _ Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
AA
rl'i.� As Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
vwe40 "ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 6 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

4
.1. Aerial Map
ti. "1"'-:- - - ';'—**-- ' , ; , ,,,-. ,,,— --,4,,,,,--,04,„
f
-a
tea°. ,
.04
it - if, ;
kiV
p 4
v �, ...- ..%. 1.
z ,
1:1"411.7.14,177":":14:6111arl
\*4; ti' '---- '4r
:1 ..
/ 11r
" tti 14, 4;.,),
R
Fig k f, - Y t « . ' 1� I
r
' F r�
rt
Legend 9 r� ,
O Review Area .,.i ._aJ-w .� ,
Aerial 2016 3` x _ `" 1 0 200 400 600 800 Ft
t wr, . .�,
..,ot" --.-::_ Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
4111116, ,
�
`7 11111( AS Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
�St w
&
mirsw/''ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 7 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

C....-'—� _ .
IV cr FEMA NFHL ' � `�' � •
s,/. 1 -4.
. 4414, 1 i)
i .
1 T
3 I AlNl
. 1 i 1 v
, i . .
l it
.; i
i
( • , REFERENCE LOVERS
r e e` -•�- i NF
-iLDalaAmiable
l' Q FIRM Panel Boundary.
f ` 11°Ifi LOslR Boundary
,,et 1 € 1
re it SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS
11 \+.},. i%Annual Chance Flocd Hazarc!
?IIr . ;.t f '. ZareF.AEABQ AO,At dl LIE
I I >. Re�uletoryFloodway
4 OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD
03@n fin nusIChanae RoacH mad
),,
FuiareConditions 196 Annual
1 Chance Ficod Hazard Dare x
1/4,.....S, ..,....:\
Zoo*X
" ` Aria wih Redu:ed;lox!Risk
due to_sues lase Y.
'- • Areas outside 02%P irrual
ik rr 110 Miq[ENj Chance Flcod:lein�asxX
aAreas of Urdetermined Flood
11•
Ile fJ IS
°t cosRS SECTIONS&BEES
1111 1.I, • r- 11 ,-,,",',' 4 Chance Water Surface E euatior
:� -
ram i m--..Coastal Trnse t
�Ile to1—t — Coastal Transed Baseline �
_ -° -_- Profile 3aseline
k\ 7
—II.—Base F ood Ele'alion
Go Earth ` 'fait y
t SUPPORTING PIFORNATION W
W .� _ _ LinitofSbady
_i i ti r.= cI di`{ ----- .,utisdidioral Boundary
...,' Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
.£ \
,`i` ' \�_ Q Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
t`L` lV
. ��sa►�..'-ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 8 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

i
�; Pine:• Digital Elevation Model
L..," --- .
a 1.85
185
o.
co
-v
0101...
°` Gussie
00
/
v
i.
:1 m -.
c
z
Legend
lz
9
O Review Area 6- i ? crate y1114
LiDAR j! �'Y73David�n ywY v[ 1642.9 ` =
,- 1667 I\`°
I 1691 0
A
' _ 1 715 \ ,..
m
® 739.1 m 0 200 400 600 800 Miles
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
.OW_ .i,
AS
.,.tJr—,
Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
AJ 4 °'ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 9 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 TO-ate: October 23, 2020

3F% /CV National Hydrographic Dataset
Tc.oi/r___
-..\.,.\11. ,... ...ij,,.....,..i. ...j,—
r---------)1 0 r___________ ....o ��aEt4
���� _
--)-- %-_-))) di rd 0 ri I ilre ,--,------'71,,,,,, --:------,- -------—---.U
// 0 0 rdie l,,,,,,,,,,,.......,i i,I,„,
jA44:00:2‘
• L..... 1
103)�i7 y
---iz,...__::pry .. _ __ __ , . ,--... , 0
--"Ill'%'...-- 1----- _1------------- /ri..4 --,
, _.. (
41416,
ia• 3 -?
. ..,--.1
...„,„
ri.--, ., ,
, a
Legend jllllJJ�����'� � .is„.0,„ ,,, -7, -,-_,„.. <:,?,.....4.,
�,, ilL
® Review Area '= V ,
A
Streets = a Scat
e
Contours 2Ftfy
re‘ � 2 4Streams ' e 1/ jJ_ 004 0 6008 0 Ft
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
Ai s
1111111` ( LI Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
tit` / �J
mr.04 Y ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 10 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

National Wetland Inventory
40,9 V-----'
i.
cr =3L
u FD Q,
U
.e 185
i=
N W
`.y 1-° g5
cr
a)
SS) NIP
.F z Gussi NW
9rr
6.g
CD
73,
7151r1J°
coi411C
Z ZL
;31
I.i G
Davidso
6
n Hwy
� '�' State HwY 73 �
Legend
O Review Area 0A
•
NWI z �°�� IN%�C l
i A
4
IMI Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland 2 �1 Deerfield Dr N (,)
I I Freshwater Pond 7 Greenfield v r NW 0 200 400 600 800 Ft
MIll Riverine t\ ( �----
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
-- ThAs
Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
�` N.,, IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 11 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

71_ --\
rigt; NC Surface Water Classifications Click 0 stream for more information NC Cla33itications Website
IIII 1 4179 linvifisnn 4 lwy Cnnrr X Ck
Casr,,- .e,e,--c,,etutzt ...-.‘r 4122 D
la Ii
.-,.
-3.'7. ''..,
=.\..
)
X.,.
Clerolort..
Munilu.4
•,, P.O.
,-,I-r.'
11B1 ...,..
Cooks
.se - Crossing
Xl- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIga .-.
2-
"...:;.,..e.
cfs Surface Water Claseeficetiona: 1-
,-,
-,. -.1,
, , 13-17-942) /
i
, -
'.."'"„t.,..,.. \,,,, -- - - Ir sh Buffalo Creek
-gji ‘
•-•%)...., in - From Konncoo 3 Wctcr •'
_
P. ..') Supply Dam to Redo/R yor , ' -
.s, orpnanaoe'01 $ _ _ •_2,;;'-:--:r I: -,A. gurt 31 '974
w nOvnoc.'7,' ti
More info C
*
- ,
-F .1r
- r^ee-Dee -
L00,1 1.•C ••• i Fn ,0 !..,‘
...'...' .
c.:
'F. .11 -. .e. -• 41‘ it'
E-,
T ,
. Cs
Suuttuno,
.0".....,.. -
..----- Poplar Tent
-3
_
y........„..........._......................,..............._jstr,..dor,.4
3'
•;-' North Concord
/.0.5) r I 12....i.. '.:1 .4‘
4 r.',
Cul[rt.YAI Ave.MN 7 '- 41- __,.., .$ 73 aavi„,„
F
-,,,,.,14,5,
,- -3
_
Droymw,'"'
Approx. Review Area '7
7 c 3 '3. .
4
V6 u. -
rt one.A.,..t.KV.1. .-...•
••-'11 -V, -•
.."...-
.i: 4" ..... .
-I-.
1
d 2mi •- -541 1.1 9 35 472 fhporraou "4;
il
ciltf•trir,',n, 14,
t '.' t MEM r:t)Of Cner,Ztte NC,Catinty ofc.:9T,2,,,.,; Ste
.....--,ader-...,. .-.,....._ Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
Ai WM.
116.71116" %la
AS Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
111.1110
N.... loci •I'Y ON MENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 12 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

Soil Map—Cabarrus County,North Carolina
to (Review Area)
531400 531500 531600 5317w 53183D 531900 532000 532100 532200 532330
35°26'20"N ., - ,,, ..,,, 35°26'20'N
_ ' 85
r
a. .... �, '� Pow F �.,
t EnDI'
EnB
r rr
• w :. °' - A `,'/ / )..-
Frill §
;0 / ChA ...
4EnDJ s
PoF
4 / PoF ' '
/ 4s"
•'" EnD o
6
9
4
„ , / . ,1,0,
..o
CuB2 / CuB2 ,T,-
0, PoF ttc`
V _
Da'wdsonHwyEnB EnB ' Z ; §
7� N .
0 1I. . •' tu: .),. ''T:,',Ar
0
,T,000 ©p E2681v auk, 6 WOK r.1 fa Pft 1,-35°2559'N 35°25'59'N
531100 531500 531000 531700 531800 511930 532000 532101i 5322C0 55303
3 3
Map Scale:1:4,690 if printed cc A pndsape(11"x 8.5')sheet N
Me'em
§ N 0 50 103 2E0 300Feet 8
A
0 200 400 800 1200
Map projection:web Mercator Corner oradinat s:WGS84 Edge tics:UfM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/23/2020
i� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
„Ail. A n Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
Location:4122 Davidson Hwy,Concord,NC 28027
IF#ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr.Tyler Jones
Figure 13A Coordinates:35.43545,-80.65011 Date:August 30,2021

Soil Map—Cabarrus County,North Carolina
(Review Area)
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Iti Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
0 Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot 1:24,000.
Soils ta Very Stony Spot Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Q Soil Map Unit Polygons
tir Wet Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
,y Soil Map Unit Lines misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Other line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
• Soil Map Unit Points contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Special Line Features
Special Point Features scale.
w Blowout Water Features
Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Borrow Pit measurements.
Transportation
Wit Clay Spot Rails Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
1 1 i Web Soil Survey URL:
Q Closed Depression .w_ Interstate Highways Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
• Gravel Pit rws US Routes Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
•+ Gravelly Spot Major Roads projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
p Landfill distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
�/ Local Roads Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Lava Flow accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
IL Background
a Marsh or swamp I. Aerial Photography This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s)listed below.
est Mine or Quarry
Soil Survey Area: Cabarrus County,North Carolina
B Miscellaneous Water Survey Area Data: Version 19,Jun 2,2020
O Perennial Water Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Rock Outcrop 1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Nov 6,2019—Nov
A., Saline Spot 20,2019
Sandy Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Severely Eroded Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
• Sinkhole shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Slide or Slip
jgc Sonic Spot
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/23/2020
211111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
f— — ... ,\_. (�
�_ limi \__i 1 �1 Location:4122 Davidson Hwy,Concord, NC 28027
�Ii m IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr.Tyler Jones
Figure 13B Coordinates: 35.43545, -80,65011 Date:August 30,2021

Soil Map—Cabarrus County,North Carolina Review Area
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI
ChA Chewacia sandy loam,0 to 2 10.2' 18.4%
percent slopes,frequently
flooded
CuB2 Cullen clay loam,2 to 8 8.8 15.9%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
EnB lEnon sandy loam,2 to 8 5.6 10.2%
percent slopes
EnD Enon sandy loam,8 to 15 23.7 42.9%
percent slopes
PoF Poindexter loam,15 to 45 7.0 12.6%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 55.3 100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/23/2020
Iiilli Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
ow Ail a,, 1 Location:4122 Davidson Hwy,Concord,NC 28027
` ., 1144 . IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn:Mr.Tyler Jones
Figure 13C Coordinates: 35.43545,-80.65011 Date:August 30,2021

HUC 12 Watersheds
\.
Upper Coddle Creek
Cold Water Creek
N7
I
4Cf. Irish Buffalo Creek
Lower Coddle Creek
Legend
O Review Area r\___
I 1 HUC 12 0 0.250 5 0.75Miles
...111,-.. _ Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
... ..Al,1.
M`;- MI( /.%, 5 Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
J
lljrs bvP'ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 14 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

HUC 08 Watersheds
Lower Yadkin03040103
Rocky03040105
Legend
O Review Area 0 1 2 3 4 Miles
HUC 8
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
ThAs Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
RONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Figure 15 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: October 23, 2020

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
— Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30-Year Normal Range
7-
/-- 2021-08-26
6- 1
2021-)7-27
v s_C — r &I r
^Ur
v
� 4 1
-—
il' 1-J6-27
1
(33 i
CC
2 VI
1
1
-
-
rIf
1r (� n
0 o f IJ p �� l J �f II 1111 ��L_
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2022
Coordinates 35.433820,-80.647246 30 Days Ending 30th%ile (in) 70th%ile (in) Observed(in) Wetness Condition Condition Value Month Weight Product
Observation Date 2021-08-26 2021-08-26 2.890945 5.512992 5.885827 Wet 3 3 9
Elevation(ft) 699.82 2021-07-27 3.709449 5.920473 5.204725 Normal 2 2 4
Drought Index(PDSI) Mild droU t 2O2-07) 2021-06-27 3.099606 4.792126 2.905512 Dry 1 1 1
WebWIMP H2O Balance Dry Season Result
C
gros rw..;,� Figure and tables made by the
Antacadont Pr.nipitatinn Tool
_� Version 1.0 Weather Station Name Coordinates Elevation(ft) Distance(mi) Elevation A Weighted A Days(Normal) Days(Antecedent)
se' CONCORD 35.4111,-80.5833 700.131 3.928 0.311 1.769 11347 90
AL;;, CONCORD 1.0 SW 35.3955,-80.6059 745.079 3.526 45.259 1.746 2 0
Alitz �+/" Written by Jason Deters CONCORD 4.5SW 35.3647,-80.655 636.155 4.796 63.665 2.463 4 0
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers .__

r a ,.
Site Photographs:August 26, 2021
tl
,»
_ r ♦ n _
.,.,f?,.'.,,4 -:,-:-.1. ...." ° ,, ..,,,,' - ,
X.... q
a
s -
r
1: CH 100 at flag CH 102 4: CH 100 at flag CH 171
"" r 3,&+ -.� .4.+Asa
' t.s
4 i
'' t.." —
3E w.,,7, 4
r
2: CH 100 at flag CH 129 5: CH 200 Per at flag CH 201
°S
y.
. /
{
,
3: CH 100 at flag CH 156 6: CH 200 at perennial to intermittent point

Site Photographs:August 26, 2021
'
it
.".
v� +ri
Jam- .. ...
, , " - : ,), ,, - ' '.- , :._i?, -:,-/:
i+$ '•�. - ' d" .`tiff;;,• e ! .4,1* a�n J 4• 0,.' , �.
ct..,,k4f10- •
•
J -.• .« t le
ihte h,*41t, -s
7: CH 200 Intermittent 10: CH 300 at flag CH 304
. tl
Iti, NI
1 ' ;y thy;„
7
,
t04-
jjgT� * l hG�,
8: CH 200 Intermittent 11: CH 300 at flag CH 305
4 yI: rj.
�' I .ae‘, • _
v
F
.,. 1 ;. ..
.` -
�-+� ,0� ate- "�� � _ ,�.
+ice 3' ,,rw=, ,
.gyp R .
9: CH 300 at flag CH 300 12: CH 400 at flag CH 400

Site Photographs:August 26, 2021
.. '
• ,.,:, .
N't,
k s'. , --
-
.. • ' r, ",' ,,p `,,,-. ,_,..,--,', : •
. \-::\:.,. .....y....',..,1„,!..'', :'-':,:-.4,''';'
_ ... ,
,..,"'' illf`'i.,.....-__.',.. ,_ 1,,,,,..,1".,,,,_.„;;,,,,,, ..-•,•,•:.
006%st.
_ -- , x•-"0„ s' , -1 ' i 1,,„, , ik -•
...- - ' "r_ . , ,.",,,P* "=-*%ii. -'''.. ;,--..f:4--.'„.,- • .,, Iv•r.:-, - -. \- k.v;.-- r --
„dh
A ..... ,/8- ; • s s.....-,7,4„ .-,4.4*,$-..,,,,;e-,r, k P..' 11'1',,,,,;;:it." Ir•_....4.t.--.i..-4 x ..,..- .,.. ,i;-'^'-;-,1 •16,",-- r - t;i, ',S'.' '/- - '-r- '
- : 4.1,,'-'._74:',4.44.-4=1..'w-"'-.,,.4..-,C "'"'''t - ?„,' '''''.,4,e-',44k.;_,,, ',',;: • -* 't. i . ,- ',. ,°' . , ,t,.
. 1 ',. -,-,/,,,,,,,,A, ,.':,,,- ,•- ..z.,-.4.
t
1-9 , l'Itc , -.; .,,- - ,, )--. It
, .
f5
'11.---
• 4_ ' -
13: CH 400 at flag CH 401 16: WL 1000
,... .„'i v,•
/441,-• ,A. • . *4
--•?:, i'''.144.,' :' 4.,,,,,,,,. 1, 4.-',ariX #.tk.4...t,,..; , ..,, , , 1'4, 40.
' :4 Allts.,- I
If
-.tt,
ismoifr
,. ,,t1/ - •• ,
--
-....46._,
., .,-,k io .•'... .4.( -,N,...,-.- --,.--r.
,....., -, ,40 -,•,. --..- 461.
4 • 4`- ;i4
. _ .
$.
o'
4 *
14: CH 400 at flag CH 402 17: WL 1000
, .:' 47.1P.„s.,•:;.7 ;4%'- .1,,,,, 1.0 , ,,, 'A...4 4" ) '
:, t f. ., .. 4• .'..'°''..q.4r,. ' .,... 44
• i,O, ......‘"---,,7.to...,, . ' 1''' •
--e—
.144/111.1"* ' -'44•We'''''-
. - Piv` • ,
'•
-.
..
''..."4'-.-„„'0,1 •,',. 4.• ,
,
"" . - - ,
. , -
r TY" ' 'T. r 4' ' , • 1'"
18: WL 1000 15: CH 400 at flag CH 406

Site Photographs:August 26, 2021
w
pip
")pv
—_ . .,. `r "<•ate'!-n a• ` `' ', ..
':,
yyp� v'r.
"� yam.".. S'- � 'A "°'",..° .. ; 'x•r Y:
*;:/
,4{
19:WL 1000 22: WL 1200
. . :14- t. ,"" •
x ,- 11, ,' � arc Y,►�
r. �. .:
P
a 1 a
i
1T
f
w y r
20: WL 1100 23:WL 1300
,
yoke;. :.
+ 1
21: WL 1100 24: WL 1300

Site Photographs:August 26, 2021
_- nWF , •
i 47.
F ~; 1is
r
.. ,
r,� 1 4.„, .„ i
. 4.,
„:„..,
f : t .• '�
. '
_ f r
a
25: WL 2000 28:WL 2100
*7.4(,..1" 7,:iiil',1:1,..c ;;,,,,,.. — 4it„:.,,, ,I,
f vx
.4,,,t,,, y., \,0,,,...- -- 1 .. , 0 tf
/4.)
,R . •174/400
'� r"'�� i1f„"" .yam .,.,: ,...�
ir
-,-. '
" 2021 03.26
26: WL 2000
y `\
'
27: WL 2100

/ , Pine Bough
® Lo
Photograph and Data Form Location Map
g
s
, an
: Detail 1: P.. 3
. Detail 2: P. 4
N. , Detail 3: P.. 5 , �'% ii
,
Y
All\....iim, 1
iioeIPI_PA4io••. i.ggl .°I.4 , ,
fr
i... ..... . • I.:
aillif BM
,_--.---- ------------L.-1,w Agglirl:1111111:1114111r1711111'
Legend a>> �\ ■
O Review Area [1:�% %/�j
Streets
I � CR
jMI
Contours: 2Ft III `�! _
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels _ MS
Delineation S, as
�avidsoo -
Hsip m Perennial c KYStateH�yY73 . ,
Intermittent g �° [iiEphemeral Z � 11 a .
Wetland ,) Form Locations A.,
C iiiCulvert Photo Lo ation and Orientation S. y 0 150 300 450 600 Ft
NMI Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
�;�` , Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
�lF� 1� AONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: August 30, 2021

I-g5 Photograph and Data Form Location Map
I-85
CH 200 Int WL 2000 CH 200 Per WL 1000
/ 1
Y 16 `
Wetland Data Form
18, 19 ' h U•land Data Form
(>
26
V ► 17
25 t 20,21
4 8
IWL 21001
7 6 WL 11001
28 ► i,' 4--5
9
Le end 27
O Review Area WL 1200
Streets 22
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels Stream ID Form
Contours: 2Ft Stream ID Form CH 200 Perennial
Perennial g►
Delineation •
Perennial
Intermittent N
CH 100
IIIII Ephemeral . -2
Wetland (I' Form Locations
Culvert Photo Loon and Orientation 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
1
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
tlii TLAS Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
\ LA AONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Detail 1
Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: August 30, 2021

Photograph and Data Form Location Map
WL 1300 `- CH 100 Continued)
23,24 ,
9
4 10
_ ■`
f
3
Stream ID Form
Legend Intermittent 11 CH 300
O Review Area
Streets
I I Cabarrus Co. Parcels
Contours: 2Ft
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent N
MEI Ephemeral
Wetland Form Locations
Culvert Photo Lo ation and Orientation 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
1iMmim
Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
AA limo-
ASLocation: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
T ONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Detail 2 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: August 30, 2021

pr Photograph and Data Form Location Map
CH 100 Continued
13 `4 12
14
r15
1 —.moll
re
Legend
O Review Area
Streets CH 400
O Cabarrus Co. Parcels
Contours: 2Ft
Delineation
M Perennial
Intermittent N
NM Ephemeral 0 Form Locations
Wetland Photo Location and Orientation
1 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
M Culvert Note:Stream len.th and area includes culvert
-:444 _ _ rn Project Name: Hwy 73 Industrial
As
Location: 4122 Davidson Hwy, Concord, NC 28027
IRONMENTAL For: Robinson Weeks Partners Attn: Mr. Tyler Jones
Detail 3 Coordinates: 35.43545, -80.65011 Date: August 30, 2021

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: 09/14/2021 Evaluator: Atlas Environmental,Inc. Easting: 35.436950
Project: Highway 73 Industrial Northing: -80.645480
, CH 100
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if> 19 or perennial if> 30* 39.0
(right-click the purple number and left-click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-/step-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes= 3 3
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
iii
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based Evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes = 3 3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 _ 1
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0 0
Biology Subtotal
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification Jennifer L Robertson
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form#PC039 1

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: 09/14/2021 Evaluator: Atlas Environmental,Inc. Easting: 35.437690
Project: Highway 73 Industrial Northing: -80.647800
Channel CH 200 Per
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if> 19 or perennial if> 30*
(right-click the purple number and left-click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: riffle-/step- pool sequence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 2
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes = 3 2
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 .5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 _ 0.5 1 1.5 .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles(Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based Evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes= 3 3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 _ .5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0 0
Biology Subtotal
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification Jennifer L Robertson
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form#PC039 1

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: 09/14/2021 Evaluator: Atlas Environmental,Inc. Easting: _ 35.435770
Project: Highway 73 Industrial Northing: -80.649090
Channels CH 200 Upper, CH 300 and CH 400
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if> 19 or perennial if> 30* 23.5
(right-click the purple number and left-click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: riffle-/step- pool sequence 0 1 2 3 1
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No =0 Yes = 3 0
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 .5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based Evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes = 3 3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 _ 2 1 0 1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks _ 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0 0
Biology Subtotal
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification Jennifer L Robertson
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form#PC039 1

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET-Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Hwy 73 Industrial City/County: Concord/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 08/26/21
Applicant/Owner: Robinson Weeks Partners State: NC Sampling Point: WL 1000
Investigator(s): J Robertson,J Sinclair,A Baggarley Section,Township,Range: Kannapolis Quadrangle
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): Flat Slope(%): —2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P,MLRA 136 Lat: 35.43806 Long:-80.64744 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla Sandy Loam NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
—
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
See attached climate report
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
X High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
X Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
X Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WL 1000
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 No FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 9 (A)
3. Platanus occidentalis 20 Yes FACW Total Number of Dominant
4. Comus amomum 2 No FACW Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 90.0% (NB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
42 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 21 20%of total cover: 9 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 32 x 2= 64
1. Ligustrum sinense 10 Yes FACU FAC species 77 x 3= 231
2. Acer rubrum 5 Yes FAC FACU species 10 x 4= 40
3. Asimina triloba 5 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Liquidambarstyraciflua 5 Yes FAC Column Totals: 119 (A) 335 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.82
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is.3.0'
25 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 5 No FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex sp. _ 30 Yes FAC be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Microstegium vimineum 10 Yes FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
45 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 23 20%of total cover: 9 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 2 Yes FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
7 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 4 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WL 1000
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 5/1 70 5YR 5/4 30 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
6-16 2.5Y 4/2 75 7.5YR 4/6 25 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_ _
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
X Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET-Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24;the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Hwy 73 Industrial City/County: Concord/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 8/26/21
Applicant/Owner: Robinson Weeks Partners,Mr.Cunningham State: NC Sampling Point: Upland
Investigator(s): J Robertson,J Sinclair,A Baggarley Section,Township,Range: Kannapolis Quad
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none): Convex Slope(%): —3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P,MLRA 136 Lat: 35.43803 Long:-80.64742 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla Sandy Loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
—
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Climate conditions are wetter than normal. See attached climate data report(NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network). Uplands
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(62) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
—Iron Deposits(B5) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Upland
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 No FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Quercus phellos 5 No FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Quercus alba 2 No FACW Total Number of Dominant
4. Liriodendron tulipifera 20 Yes FACU Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
5. Quercus rubra 10 Yes FACU Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 36.4% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
42 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 21 20%of total cover: 9 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 2 x 2= 4
1. Ligustrum sinense 10 No FAC FAC species 97 x 3= 291
2. Elaeagnus umbe/lata 20 Yes UPL FACU species 44 x 4= 176
3. Asimina triloba 50 Yes FAC UPL species 25 x 5= 125
4. Lindera benzoin 5 No FAC Column Totals: 168 (A) 596 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.55
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
85 =Total Cover _4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 43 20%of total cover: 17 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum 15 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Oxalis comiculata 2 No FACU present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Fragaria vesca 5 Yes FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Allium cepa 5 Yes UPL Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Yes FACU more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9. (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
32 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 16 20%of total cover: 7 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 2 Yes FACU
2. Toxicodendron radicans 2 Yes FAC
3. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
9 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes No X
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-16 7.5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
Depleted Below Dark
k Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0