20061925 Ver 1_401 Application_20061206

••.
'N.
;'W E~~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 - Italeiah, North Carolina 27609
Telephone (919 j 841-9977 -Fax [phone]
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL RECEIVED
To: Mr. Jamie Shern Date: December 15, 2006
US Army Corps of Engineers Project #: 60044
6508 Falls of Neuse Rd, Ste 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
RE: Mill Ridge Subdivision
Phase 5 & 6
We are sending the following items attached to this transmittal:
Co ies Date Descri tion
1 PCN A lication
Remarks:
Signed: Jennifer Burdette
!~~c ~ ~ zaas
c: NC Division of Water Quality
(7 copies of PCN, 1 full-sized elan, & $200 check)
Wayne Mauldin -Mauldin-Watkins
~'Y~TtANQ~ ~F~O S7r~R~W.AT~R BRAidCH

Office USe Orily: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 6 1 9 2 5
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing ~' "'^ ~ ` ~ ~'!
i , :~
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: RFC~~vEd
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information ~`'=~'~ ~`~ f~ ~,!"
- l.~
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~~'~=~ ~ ~ Z000
Name: Mill Rid e Develo ers LLC
~~irl~ugs~~vDSroaa~-va F~rcD~a~
Mailing Address: 6600 Brookshire Drive
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Contact: J Wayne Massengill
Telephone Number: 919/427-2360 Fax Number: 919/557-5333
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer A. Burdette
Company Affiliation: Burdette Land Consulting, Inc.
Mailing Address: 308D W Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919/841-9977 Fax Number: 919/841-9909
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Updated 11 /1 /2005
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Mill Ridge Subdivision Phase 5 & 6
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0668-03-2072
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Fuquay-Varina
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Mill Ridge Phase 5 & 6
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located on the
northwest and southeast sides of Herbert Akins Road (SR 1397) approximately 900 feet west
of Herbert Akins Road's intersection with Bass Lake Road (SR 1393) north of Fuqua
Varina, Wake County, North Carolina. Figure 1 depicts the location of the property on the
US Geological Survey (USGS) Apex and Fuquay-Varina, NC 7.5-minute quadrangle
topographic maps.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.6266742 °N 78.7987129 °W
6. Property size (acres): 73
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UTs to Bass Lake/Basil Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Agricultural fields, asingle-family residence, and a barn
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9

currentl~py the site. Land use in the vicinity of the site consists primarily of residential
subdivisions with a few agricultural fields.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project is a residential subdivision in which access roads, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer
will be constructed to provide access and infrastructure for individual lots. Heavy equipment
typical for road construction will be used to complete the project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to develop lots
suitable for single-family dwellings.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. In July 2006, Jennifer Burdette of Burdette Land Consulting, Inc.
conducted a riparian buffer and preliminary wetlands and surface waters evaluation for the
proposed project area. Wetlands located within open space areas were not delineated as impacts
to these areas are not anticipated. On December 6, 2006, BLC returned to the site to conduct a
detailed wetland delineation of the proposed impact areas. Upland and wetland data forms and
Figure 2 are attached in support of the wetland delineation. Fi ug re 2 provides the location of the
site on the applicable Wake County Soil Survey map.
BLC reviewed topographic information to determine that earlier phases of this subdivision did
not involve impacts to jurisdictional stream channels or wetlands.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Future permit requests are not anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9

should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts consist
of one road crossing of a buffered stream channel and filling of a small amount of linear
wetland located within an agricultural ditch on one of the proposed lots.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
( es/no) (linear feet)
1 (inset B) fill herbaceous no 50 0.009

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.009
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.50
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
1 (inset A) UT to Bass Lake culvert/rip-rap Intermittent 4 90 0.008
(Basal Creek)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 90 0.008
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dredging. flooding. drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
NA
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.008
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.009
Open Water Im act (acres): NA
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.017
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 90
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant retained
Burdette Land Consultine. Inc. to conduct a preliminary investigation of surface waters and
wetlands on the subject property during the preliminar~gn stages of the project to avoid
impacts to the maximum extent practicable. It is important to note that the Herbert Akins Road
re-alignment across the property will be completed by the Town of Fuquay-Varina. The
applicant has dedicated an easement for this future re-alignment, but will only construct the
portion of the alignment outside of the riparian buffer and will not impact jurisdictional areas as
part of this project. The Town of Fuquay-Varina has explained that the proposed alignment is
necessary to eventually brim Herbert Akins Road up to current safety standards. The proposed
perpendicular road crossing (Inset A) is necessary to access high ground separated from the rest
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9

of the site by a stream channel. The proposed wetland fill is required to make the lot suitable for
a residential home site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htt~://h2o. enr.state.nc. us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant avoided impacts to streams and wetlands where possible and minimized
stream channel impacts that were unavoidable to the maximum extent practicable. A 50-
foot-wide riparian buffer will be maintained around stream channels present within the
development in accordance with Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules and will serve as a
permanent, vegetative buffer to the stream channels and ponds on the site. BLC believes that
stream channel mitigation should not be required for the project because the applicant has
avoided and minimized impacts to wetlands and stream channels to the maximum extent
practicable. Further, the proposed stream channel impact of 90 linear feet (Inset A) and
0.009 acre of wetland impact are well below the 1501inear foot stream channel and 0.10 acre
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9

wetland impact thresholds established for written approval and/or miti at~y the NCDWQ
and the USAGE in most cases.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9

2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(s uare feet) Miti ation
1 4,846 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 3,004 1.5 NA
Total 7,850 NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Because the proposed road crossing is
perpendicular and does not exceed 150 linear feet of stream channel or one-third acre of
riparian buffer impacts, BLC does not believe riparian buffer mitigation should be required
for the project.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The site currently contains a small amount of
impervious acreage in the form of one single-family residence with associated out buildinl?s.
Alan Keith, PE of Diehl & Phillips, PA estimates the amount of impervious acreage for Phase 5
of the proposed project to be 28%. Mr. Keith's calculations for Phase 5 of the proposed project
are attached. He also estimates that the amount of impervious acreage for Phase 6 would be
slightly less than Phase 5 because it would not include a pump station or pool facility.
Maintenance of riparian buffers and three proposed level spreaders are anticipated to protect
surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. Level spreader worksheets for each
proposed level spreader are attached.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated from the proposed project will be disposed of through the Town of
Fuquay-Varina's sanitary sewer system.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: The
proposed infrastructure serves only the proposed residential subdivision; therefore, it is not
anticipated to result in additional development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Ap~f ca Agent's ignature Date
(Agent's signature i i only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

/ ~
~~
b
rao 11~ I',

//
~\

LEGEND
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNELS /PONDS THAT ARE ALSO SUBJECT
- _ - TO THE NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER RULES
50' NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFERS
`~L~~~~////] JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
WETLAND IMPACT
NOTES:
1.) SITE PLAN AND POND LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY MAULDIN-WATKINS
SURVEYING, PA.
2.) WETLAND BOUNDARIES WERE LOCATED USING A TRIMBLE SUBMETER GPS UNIT
3.) STREAM CHANNELS SUBJECT TO NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFERS WERE
GENERATED USING WAKE COUNTY GIS TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND START
POINTS LOCATED USING A TRIMBLE SUBMETER GPS UNIT.
.N~
;'W E~~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]
S
~~
CROSSING DETAIL AND IMPACT
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DIEHL &
PHILLIPS P.A.

\...
ti~\
~lJ
SURFACE WATERS & WETLANDS OVERALL IMPACT MAP
MILL RIDGE SUBDIVISION PHASE 5 & 6
MILL RIDGE DEVELOPERS, LLC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
GRAPHIC SCALE DATE: 11/21/06
1" = 240' SCALE: 1" = 240'
DRAWN BY: TMB
240' 0 240' 480' CHK'D BY: JAB
PROJECT #: 60044
FIGURE # 3

LEVEL SPREADER
F' -- 1 7
-- P-11 ---
'" PAC WATERLINE
~/
U)q
J~
~ ~I
i\Sf
1~
1
~\Sf

0
CO UNTR
MILL
--~---
r-1 ~
0
~~' ~)I `~~AIVlTARti' `EWER
i
~ 7 ~,~
ZONE 1 :.IMPACT 1
4, 84F -~SQ. FT.
ZONE 2 IMPACT
3, 004 SQ. F-T.
CHANNEL I MPAC7
IMPACT 89.6 L. F,
50'
RP
76

R~~ER
NE~SEBVFFER
p,R`PN
\~CROSSIN D~ AIL AND IMPACT
INFORM TION~ROVIDED BY DIEHL &
PHILLIP P.A.
GRAPHIC SCALE IMPACT MAP N
1"=40'
ao' o ao' MILL RIDGE SUBDIVISION PHASE 5 & 6
MILL RIDGE DEVELOPERS, LLC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
'~~~N~~'' DATE: 11/21/06 CHK'D BY: JAB
w E=~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 INSET A
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60044
S

.0. 23 21

P S D RA E

E 1ST G GR DE

-1 H too = 20. 2

.~
P 9 E IN

u

IN 1 41 .6
1 V. N 16. 0
1 IN. CL R NC

RI E . 4 4.0

Y EW R 50

li u u u u u
N ~ N ~ > N
W N W N lj N W N lJil N W N
C3~ C~ C3~ C~ C~ C~ ~
26+00 27+00 28+00

'i a~~oucA KILL RIDG6DMSION DIEHL & PHILLIPS, P.A. '~'
1 OOUMRY lOlt IAY FUQUAY-VARWA, NORTH CAROLGU GRY. NOONB~. SIIIfi Yl D~ ~~ rer

c4
4~

-,
375

BEVEL `~ REAUER /\~~-- - ~ ``
®'
S~
~^~
~~
~ S~ S~
CROSSING DETAIL A ACT
INFORMATION D BY DIEHL &
PHILLIPS P _r

i~
~~
T=
GRAPHIC SCALE IMPACT MAP N
1"=40'
ao' o ao' MILL RIDGE SUBDIVISION PHASE 5 & 6
MILL RIDGE DEVELOPERS, LLC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
•''~N•'•• DATE: 11/21/06 CI-IK'D BY: JAB
'w e ~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
308 D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 INS., T B
Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60044
S

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Mill Ridge Subdivision Phase 5 & 6
Applicant /Owner: Mill Ridge Developers, LLC
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette Date: 12/7/06
County: Wake
State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ves X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? ves No X Community ID:
emergent
Is the area a potential problem area? ves No X
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID:
Plot ID:WL btwn #113
& 114

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Polygonur~i pennsylvanicum Herb FACW 9.
2. Juncus ef~sus FACW+ 10.
3. Poly~onu~7i sagittatuni OBL 11.
4. Puerarin lobate Not listed 12.
5. Sambucus cafiadensis Shr/Sap FACW- 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: Although not listed on the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Southeast (Region
2), this investigator has observed kudzu growing in wetlands often enough to assume that it would warrant a FAC
status. Therefore, more than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that
the hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other x Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 2 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is met.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wag_ram loamy sand, 6 to 10 % slopes Drainage Class: somewhat excess. drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Arenic Paleudults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 A lOYR 4/2 lOYR 4/6 few/distinct sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of hydric soil indicators confirms that the hydric soils criterion is met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This location meets the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the presence of hydrophytic
vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Mill Ridge Subdivision Phase 5 & 6 _
Applicant /Owner: Mill Ridge Developers, LLC
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette Date: 12/7/06
County: Wakc
State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ves X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? ves No X Community ID:
e,nergent
Is the area a potential problem area? ves No X
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID:
Plot ID:UP btwn #113
& 114

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Pueraria lobata Herb Not listed 9.
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: Although not listed on the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Southeast (Region
2), this investigator has observed kudzu growing in wetlands often enough to assume that it would warrant a FAC
status. Therefore, more than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that
the hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: NA (iu.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 14 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The absence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is not mcl.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wagram loamy sand 6 to 10 % sloaes Drainage Class: somewhat excess. drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Arenic Paleudults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-14 A IOYR 4/4 NA NA loamy sand
14-16 E lOYR 3/2 NA NA loamy sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The absence of hydric soil indicators confirms that the hydric soils criterion is not met.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks: This location does not meet the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the absence of wetland
hydrology and hydric soils.

Received 12 13 2006 14;58
12/1'3/2006 13.:54 •919-467-5327 DIEHL & PHILLIPS
DIEHL & PHILLIPS, P.A.
PAGE 02
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
219 Bast Chatham Street
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
MEMORANDUM
To: Whom it May Concern
I~zom: Alan Keith, P.Et'-~^~'
WIL.4IAM C. DIEHL, P.E.
roHly ~. PH11,L1PS, P.E.
Re: Impervious Surface Estirlaate foz Mill Ridge Subdivision Phase 5
Fuquay-Varina, NC
Date; 12/13/06
The following is an estimate of the impervious surface coverage for Mill Ridge
Subdivision Phase 5
Total Area Phase 5 2,152,081 sq. ft.
Impervious Surfaces
Streets 171,869 sq. ft.
Sidewalk 19.790 sq. ft.
Pump Station 3,000 sq. ft.
Pool 12,000 sq. ft.
Subtotal for infrastructuze 206,659 sq. ft.
Individual Lots
House 3,000 sq. ft.
19zive, parl~ing pad, and walks 1,950 sq.ft.
Subtotal for Individual lot 4,950 sq.ft_
Total lr~apexvious Suxlace I'oz lots
79 X 4,950= 391,050 sq. ft.

Received 12 13 2006 14;58
12/13/2006 13:54 '919-467-5327 DIEHL & PHILLIPS PAGE 03
Total Estimated Impervious Surface for Phase 5 -- 597,709 sq, ft.
Percent 1mpe~'vious 597,709 / 2,152,081 = 27.77

Received 12 14 2006 15:29
~~12~14/2©D6 14: Z6 919-467-5327 DIEHL ~ PHILLIPS
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information);
Project Name : ~ SJ9/',
Contact Person: .J Phone Number.
Level SpreaderlD;
L~.Uct.-- ~Pt~vAF~ ~"on. P - cl
PAGE ©2
Level Spreader Length ~ ft. (perpendicular to flow}
Drainage Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area ac.
(,~.,'7S (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope 4.4 % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm ~~. O cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader ~~, P cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation 7'~~, ~,~,y/'~,,~.y~ (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method /V~
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. !f a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete sutxnlttal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Llit.~t.. Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
__ ~i/,~a Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
~,~, . No structures are located in protected buffers"
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15°k in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.

Received 12 14 2006 15:30
'•12/14/2©D6 14:26 _ 919-467-5327
DWQ Project
DIEHL & PHILLIPS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION {please
Project Name : ~. {..._
Contact Person: r..qi./
Level SpreaderlD:_

Level Spreader Length ~7_~ ft.
Drainage Area 4 S ac.
Impervious Area J, t ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope .~~d„
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Stomt f ~~ 3 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader ~ cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation ~' to
PAGE 03
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(ti% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method /y~i+y
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to Indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached, If a
requirement has not been mef, affach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
~z.,t Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
i+-//•a Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
~~~ No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge,
No stnrctures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
" Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15°k in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25~ In areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. (n any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zane 1 of a protected buffer area.
LGtJt;+..- ~P~A/~/i- tv,.. PIPa` P ,t-.~

Received 12 14 2006 15:31
'12f7.412©D6 14:26 919-467-532? DIEHL ~ PHILLIPS PAGE ©4
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY -LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
t. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : A S
Contact Person: Phone Number: (9A 1 467 ~.
Level Spreader ID: _ ~~~~ ` ~~~ A.,~„ l~cvi- ~ _.~-~
Level Spreader Length t3~ ft. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area~_ ac, (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area y.l~ ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter StriplBuffer Slope ~j-,S % (&°~ for (ores#ed, leaf littler cover, 8°~ for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm ~ . ~ cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreaders cfs
Filter StriplBuffer Vegetation TH L ~ _., ,e, r
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method ,~1/A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached, If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
~A/L,~._ Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
n/ ~,q Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
,~~,.. No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculaiions are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
• Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document, This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. fn any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.

- .
N
:•v~- E~~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone [phone] -Fax [phone]
S
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
US Army Corps of Engineers North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Central Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 Mail Service Center 1650
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
To Whom It May Concern:
By signing below, the current property owner gives representatives of Burdette Land
Consulting, Inc. permission to act as their authorized agent for jurisdictional and isolated waters
and riparian buffer determinations, delineation, and permitting for the subject project. This
authorization includes permission to enter the site to conduct site meetings with US Army Corps
of Engineers and NC Division of Water Quality personnel, as necessary.
Project Name: Mill Ridge Subdivision Phase 5 & 6
BLC Project #: 60044
Current Property Owner or Easement Holder:
Name: Mill Ridge Developers, LLC
(include contact person if a corporation, partnership, or government)
Mailing Address: 6600 Brookshire Drive
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Telephone: `7~ / "~~6 Q Fax: ~s / ` s~.3
T 1~~~~~~ASSe~~~
tgnatu e Print l~me (include title, cf appropriate)
1l•Zo-off
Date

• T VY 1
~ i ( )
`y ! /
- ~ .. --
~ t `~~
. a
i Tpwer „ ..
~3
f
-. . ,
} ..~ , ~~ - Lake # ~ ;. =-
y
t' ~~
,_ .
d
._ . ~ ~ , i
,_-- ,.
_ i (~ S
`` ,I~
ii
k,\ _._.,~/. '~ 4 <~\\~ ~ ' ' t ~ E 1 act,." `
~.~ ' ~ ..S`~:~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ : ITE ~ .~
V~ 4
1 , , ~~~,,~ :~:.
_ E
,~_
_~
•
-_ , .._ ~.~ ~ ~. ,- ~. , -~ ~- _~~;c-= ~_ ~ - -~
~' 7 ~.
~~ ~~
~: J
~ 'r~ _r
~~: ~ ~~~
,~ ~ ~ r [m
442 ' 1 1 ~ ~ ~~• , --_ - - ' ( (, ~I?~9 ~! ! - Bali Cotrse
r _.
~ e.; .
.. _
* ~
n
t r , , ;_„
~t
i
• ~ - -
%~~~~\+~ / f~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rxt ? . ``' f~ I 149 i _ '1 iV 1,•• ~~IIUI)
t
w
'- , (
• l _
J ;f '~"'.
-. flM 3,55, ," . ~ r,->,. i ' ""~~~ti ~ ,• ~. (~ ~~ 'x a ~ t • r-~
~.
;,
°. , a ~ ~< ~ .. ,1~~~ ~
,,
l t 1
1
,,
., ; ~ ~ _
r ~') ~ ~. `. ~.. 1 ~ ' ' ~ ' ~ i It>> .- 4.,~. art
(f .?'--
{r~~ ) l
`. `
( •
.//
i ~ ._
t • ~/
~ 1
., `_ ~,~
..
( ..
_ ~ i ~ i ~mg; ~r _ l ~~. i~~ I
~` r`~i ~ r,a~ -=~=°r - ~~ ~ ~ ~,- ~ ~ ~~ ~ ` ~ L ~
`W)
1 ~ ~ ~ 1 .\ r (lJf1) r kI i ', - y , f'~'`~ ~ i tfnlP.t; ~~j` ~ „,\.~
~ ~. ~ 1~ ...) t ~~ ~. _ ~~~~
L. ...
1
.-
`Ij` • ~ ~,_ ` Memo is '6 Cn~.',~ ~ ~ ~l ' - C~ m i ~~
G ~-`~l
1 c ,- ~ ,-
/"
. •
--
~ ~' i r ~ I ' ,~~~;~ ..-~~ (, ~~, ,,, .~ country) dlub ~. ~... .:- . r,..~ ~ , ~.
i
GRAPHIC SCALE USGS LOCATION MAP N
r~ =zooo' MILL RIDGE SUBDIVISION PHASE 5&6
zooo' o zooo'
MILL RIDGE DEVELOPERS, LLC
FUQUAY-VARINA, WAKE COUNTY, NC
.•N..
DATE: > >i2iio6 uses 7.s' ToPO QUAD:
APEX &
:•W E'~ BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB FUQUAY-VARINA
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, Norih Carolina 27609 CHK'D BY: JAB
•.•• Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #:60044 FIGURE #: 1
s

r~ctne '9 -~~
t+ _
~ ~ (~ \
~
~
~
.
.
n
C2
Me~ ... ~~ ~, `~~a~. _ ~~~,1/l r
%,. ~~ CgB2 CeC2 Ld132 ~ . CuU ~~ ~- ~ ~ 1 ~ ~/ ~ 1~~~ ~''~~ ''~/,_"~~~
1 CI63 ~ AEry ~~ ~ tBL~ ~ ~ ~ v ;:
~ ~ ~ ~ o- Q
G`LI V~o o° C~13;_ ~ _
~
°°
~
_
~ i [•~
: ~ ` ~ Nt>Lf ~ .(_17 ~'~
AgC7 ~ tC,. sv / °~~],,
~ ( r ~ ~ Wal
~~ . ~ V, n ~~ ~ CC~Hc ` ~~ .CgC ~ /w •~ i bC
Ckf.2.
~' ~^
\.,~
,
-~/~
el, n i ~\~ G' 9Z ' W Cgt~2 v VvaC ~
- ~~O~~y~~r ~rl '~ Apd ~cl~ `~ ~ 6 2 ~:;~APC2 ~ (~//
,~; ' ~ ~J Vin `.~ {~ CgC2 ~;0 \
~ ~ t" n
~
~
~ ~, ~i a~/
~ n~;ez ~
r, ~ ' ,n Cgc , ~~, ~ ~ (\
\ /~" CNI ~
i ~"
S 2 A B ~ ~ _ ~"~ \~ ~.~~
UrB A. ,~ ~
)
.. __
~
~ ~
C~
~~ ~!~
~, ~ ~~ C Nof3 ~~
Mp ~~
v° ~ \
~
/
kC2
vVnla
C'~1 ` t ApL
... '
=
~
~
~
~
~

,~ ~ ~
~
,~~~.~~• ;. ~ _ ~
~->
~
~~ SITE ~ WaA ,, ~
~
\ ~ r ~ ~/ \~ ' \ /'CIA
~ t- A - P g2 ~, MP WaB ~ \~~~
C
h~
n
i;
..CgC. ~ kP 1, .~ ~I•-~
AvC?
~
~~
~ ~ Wa[3
'~lY, CgdL
T"' ~ C,eU~~~ ~NoC WO~~ ~ Nol3
~
_ ~
' -
~. \~~~
/~F qgC ~ ~' C ~eU ~Vu~ ~I ~" ~ j; AKC _ ~ V Wa
/ ~ NcL Orr;'~~,, W~'= ~f Z
19~ ~
~,~ ~ v ~ APCI~'~i 1 §r,~ aG. ,
/;
CgC2 i \ ~WaB ~ ~ I E
CcL7
WaB
C
C
, ~
~
It
e
~
,.I 1 h\\_~ ~ ~ 1 aC~ ~ ~ NoB "r~ ~. No
..
\ _ \_~y ) \ ~~~ ~ a. :, ~~~J~\ ~;VaC WgA I • ~/ ~ ~~ Oy:_
W
B ~'^
~ ~ ~
~
of a
~
Wa6 ~ i;
mE~~ ~ ~€: L+ ~ A C ~ Wa8
} ~
APB2 Q" ~ FlPC2 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~~i ' ~ C ~ ~ ~ . o aC ', ,~~
- ~ ~ ~=-~ ~`d ~ W a t3 . '
Wq
_ - i WaB ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ NoE3 ;~ N~_[
l
~
~
~ ~
~
~ i,
_
'~ '~ o
~ ~ ~
. ':A
GEC' ..lti o A ~ ~ WgA WgA
' ` ~ />~ C't,~ '
.
I
.' ~ ~ r~ f Ra:: WaC ~ ~ Nof3 / ~ ~-~-~` _
~WaB ~
r-
4~ a i ~ ~ r l -
/ 3. ~ - j 1 I
^ ~ dd. ~n1 ;~o„ ~ tio~ w~r~ ,
.,, ~
~ r,
NoB ~~ ~> v
(
0 ~ .pfd
~ WaB ~ N
`
-
~
~
~
^~C
}
~
, ~
s,
,
a
~
s '~ --
`
'
~
~
NaB
'i! '` `d; NoC .. ,~~~
\~ o`t ~ ~ I ~~ r ~
-~
~ni.rC~~~ WP.A

GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 1320' WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP N
1320' 0 1320' MILL RIDGE SUBDIVISION PHASE 5 & 6
MILL RIDGE DEVELOPERS, LLC
FUQUAY-VARINA
WAKE COUNTY
NC
,
,
''~~N~~'•
'
~ DATE: I U21/OG SHEET(S): 90
i BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN Br: TMB CIIK'D Br: JAB
W E
308 D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
S Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60044 FIGURE #: 2