20181349 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2021_20220221

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20181349 Version* 1
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 02/22/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 2/21/2022
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Matthew Reid [e-mail]
Project Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20181349 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Mill Dam
County: Yadkin
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Mill Dam Creek_97136_MY2_2021.pdf 24.86MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Print Name:* Matthew Reid
Signature:*

Annual Monitoring Report
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Yadkin River Basin- 03040101
Monitoring Year 02
DEQ Contract 6898
DMS Project Number 97136
DWR#: 18-1349
USACE Action ID: 2016-01335
Yadkin County,North Carolina
yyams�' r g 1 ; k
11/ s T"- r .r ..
aan
h � a -
. <.:
ayr'
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699
Data Collected: July 2021
Date Submitted: December 2021

Monitoring and Design Firm
Prepared by:
K C I
TECHNOLOGIES
s
K CI
E T C
NCI ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSOCIATES OF NC TECHNOLOGIES AND CONSTRUCTIONFNC.
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
[phone]
Project Contact: Tim Morris
Email: tim.morris(akci.com
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 MY02 Monitoring Report

KC I ENGINEERS • SCIENTISTS • SURVEYORS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
ASSOCIATES OF
NORTH CAROLINA, PI! 4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh,NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 28,2022
To: Matthew Reid,DMS Project Manager
From: Tim Morris,Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina,PA
Subject: Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site
MY-02 Monitoring Report Comments
Yadkin River Basin CU 03040101
NCDMS Project#97136
Contract#6898
Please find below our responses in italics to the MY-02 Monitoring Report comments from NCDMS
received on January 4,2022,for the Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site.
• Please ensure the Monitoring Phase Performance Bond has been updated and approved by Kristie
Corson before invoicing for Task 8.
KCI Response: The Performance Bond will be updated as necessary before Task 8 is invoiced.
• Table of contents page numbers are incorrect beginning in Appendix B -Problem Area Photos.
There are no Problem Area Photos included in the report. Please review and revise page numbers
after report comments are addressed.
KCI Response: This change has been made.
• Monitoring Results: A supplemental planting occurred in the wetland at the top of T3 in October
2021. Please add additional discussion regarding the species planted. Six of the seven species
planted were species approved in the Mitigation Plan. One species(Buttonbush(Cephalanthus
occidentalis)was not on the approved list.Also,please add a short discussion regarding the
current results of VP6 (currently 0 st/ac)in this replant area and how the supplemental planting
will count towards success in the future.
KCI Response:Although buttonbush was not on the approved planting plan it is native to Yadkin
County, according to the USDA.Additionally it is one of the few OBL, woody species that is
widely commercially available and native to this area. For this reason it was chosen for the
supplemental planting of the wetland at the top of T3.In the future, KCI will be sure to only use
species from the approved planting plan or submit a request to modem the planting plan before
planting additional species.A short discussion of this and VP6 has been added to the report.
• Monitoring Results: According to the CCPV,the repair consisted of 7 areas of bank erosion, 1
damaged boulder sill and 1 piping step pool structure. Please add additional information to this
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

discussion and include approximate length of bank repair and discuss the one piping structure on
UTHC3. The piping structure is not currently discussed.
KCI Response: This information has been added to the report.
• Table 2: Please add Supplemental Planting—October 2021 to the table.
KCI Response: This date has been added to the report.
• Table 5 and Table 6: Please add dates that field assessments occurred at the top of each table. The
IRT has requested this information be included at the 2021 Credit Release Meeting.
KCI Response: This date has been added to both table 5 and 6.
• Table 5: All tables currently show every stream reach performing at 100% Stable,Performing as
Intended. Please verify this to be the case or update the CCPV and tables as necessary.
KCI Response:All areas of concern were repaired during the 2021 repairs and so, as of
November 18, 2021, all stream reaches are performing at 100%Stable, Performing as Intended.
• Table 6: Table indicates that there are no vegetation or easement concerns on the site.Has KCI
performed any invasive treatments?Do any of these issues(bare areas,low stem density,
invasvives or encroachments)exist but fall below the threshold level?
KCI Response: The only significant area of low stem density was the wetland at the top of T3 that
received a supplemental planting this past October. Chinese privet is present in scattered patches
on site and was treated in December 2020. This treatment has been added to Table 2. KCI will
continue to monitor the Chinese privet on site and will treat again as necessary.
• Since no Problem Area Photos were included,DMS recommends including repair area photos in
this section.
KCI Response:Repair Area photos have been added to this section.
• Table 11: Recommend adding rows for Monitoring Years(MY1,MY2,etc.)to better
differentiate between bankfull events and what monitoring year they occurred.
KCI Response:A column for the monitoring year has been added to Table 11 to better
differentiate between bankfull events and what monitoring year they occurred.
Digital Deliverables
• Please submit the MY2 random plot features as polygons rather than points. If available,please
submit MY1 random plot features as polygons.
KCI Response: The shapefile labeled "MillDam veg_plots MY02"includes polygons of both
permanent and random vegetation plots.
• Please include a figure displaying the 30th and 70th percentiles of monthly precipitation relative
to observed precipitation and submit the data used to create the figure.
KCI Response: This has been added to the report and the digital submission.
• The vegetation spreadsheet currently being used does not track the position(x,y)for volunteers.
Volunteer position should be tracked in order to apply the 2 year in the ground standard so they
can be applied to success criteria. Please include x,y coordinates to volunteers so they can be
included in your plot map.
KCI Response: The x,y coordinates of volunteer species were not recorded during MY02. The
majority of the volunteers are small saplings or species that are not on the approved planting
plan. Because all of the plots with appropriate volunteer species are already well over the
success criteria, it does not seem efficient to track the x,y of every volunteer sapling that may or
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

may not survive to future monitoring years.As the site progresses, KCI will document the
coordinates of volunteers that display enough vigor to likely survive into future years.
Please contact me if you have any questions or would like clarification concerning these responses.
Sincerely,
Tim Morris
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY 1
SUCCESS CRITERIA 2
MONITORING RESULTS 3
REFERENCES 4
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map 5
Appendix A—Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits 7
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History 9
Table 3. Project Contacts 10
Table 4. Project Information 11
Appendix B —Visual Assessment Data
CCPV 13
Table 5.Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment 21
Table 6.Vegetation Condition Assessment. 37
Photo Reference Points 38
Vegetation Plot Photos 42
Repair Area Photos 50
Appendix C —Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Species and Quantity—2021 Supplemental Planting 52
Table 8. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species 53
Appendix D — Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 9.Baseline Stream Data Summary 59
Table 10. Cross-section Morphology Data Table 72
Cross-section Plots 76
Pebble Counts 108
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 11.Verification of Bankfull Events 133
Stream Level Hydrographs 134
Table 12.Verification of Stream Flow 136
Table 13. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment 136
Stream Flow Hydrographs 137
Table 14. Wetland Hydrology Verification 140
Wetland Hydrographs 141
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 MY02 Monitoring Report

PROJECT SUMMARY
The Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site(MDCRS)was completed in March 2020 and restored and enhanced
a total of 13,505 linear feet of stream.The MDCRS is a riparian system in the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River
Basin (3040101 8-digit cataloging unit) in Yadkin County,North Carolina. The site's natural hydrologic
regime had been substantially modified through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream
channels, livestock impacts, and clearing of riparian buffer. This completed project will restore streams
impacted by pasture and agriculture to a stable headwater ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer and
floodplain access.
The MDCRS is protected by a 40.2 acre permanent conservation easement, held by the State of North
Carolina. The site is located approximately 0.5 miles north of East Bend,NC. Specifically, the site is 0.2
mile north on Shady Grove Church Road(SR-1538)from its intersection with Shoals Road(SR-1546).
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) published the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee
River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) in 2009. The project's 14 digit CU (03040101110070, Grassy
Creek and Horne Creek)was identified as a Targeted Local Watershed(TLW)in the RBRP.The goals and
priorities for the MDCRS are based on the information presented in the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities: maintaining and enhancing water quality, restoring hydrology, and improving fish
and wildlife habitat(NCEEP,2009). The project will support the following basin priorities:
- Managing stormwater runoff
- Reducing fecal coliform inputs
- Improving/restoring riparian buffers
- Reducing sediment loading
- Improving stream stability
- Reducing nutrient loading
- Excluding livestock and implementing other agricultural BMP's
- Protecting high-resource value waters,including water supply watershed designated waters
The project is also located in the Ararat River Local Watershed Plan (LWP) study area. The Ararat River
was designated a LWP Study Area due to poor water quality and aquatic habitat degradation issues,as well
as the presence of good candidate sites for stream restoration in rural catchments (NCEEP, 2009). The
stressors within the Ararat River LWP are erosion and sedimentation,missing or degraded riparian buffers,
stormwater runoff,and nutrient and fecal coliform"hot spots"(NCEEP,2013).
The goals for the project are to:
- Restore channelized and livestock-impacted streams to stable C and B type channels.
- Restore a forested riparian buffer to provide bank stability,filtration,and shading.
The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives:
- Relocate or stabilize channelized and/or incised streams to connect to a floodplain or floodprone
area.
- Install a cross-section sized to the bankfull discharge.
- Create bedform diversity with pools,riffles,and habitat structures
- Fence out livestock to reduce nutrient,bacterial, and sediment impacts from adjacent grazing and
farming practices to the project tributaries
- Plant the site with native frees and shrubs and an herbaceous seed mix.
Project construction was completed in December 2019 and project planting was completed in March 2020.
The 13,505 linear feet of streams at MDCRS were enhanced and restored by re-meandering the stream and
by tying the bankfull elevation to the historic floodplain where feasible. The entire site was planted to
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 1 MY02 Monitoring Report

establish a forested riparian buffer. The site was constructed as designed with only minor modifications
from the design plan. These modifications generally consisted of slight adjustments in the alignment and
spacing of riffles/pools due to bedrock encountered during construction. Several areas of additional bank
stabilization were also installed. On February 6,2020,shortly after construction was completed and before
woody stems had been planted,the site received over 6 inches of rain in a 24 hour period.This storm caused
significant damage to portions of the site and required repairs to be completed in March 2020.These repairs
mainly involved repair of bank erosion through the installation of live lifts, removal of aggradation from
the stream channel,and regrading areas of floodplain scour.Approximately 500 cubic yards of topsoil were
also brought in and placed on the floodplain in areas of severe floodplain scour.
The monitoring components were installed in March/April 2020. Five automatically recording pressure
transducer stream gauges that take a reading every 10 minutes were installed: one each in the upper third
of T1A,T5A,and T8A to document flow within those reaches,and two on UTHC to record the occurrence
of bankfull events. Cameras were installed in the vicinity of each of the flow gauges and set to record a
short video once a day to provide additional verification of flow. Two automatically recording pressure
transducer groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within pre-existing wetlands on the site to
monitor wetland hydrology and ensure the existing wetlands on the site are not adversely affected by the
restoration project.One of these gauges is located in the vicinity of the pre-existing wetland on the left bank
of T7 and the other is located within the pre-existing wetland on the right bank of T8. To determine the
success of the planted mitigation areas,eighteen 10 m x 10 m permanent vegetation monitoring plots were
established.An additional twelve 10 m x 10 m random temporary vegetation monitoring plots are sampled
during each monitoring year as well.The locations of the planted stems relative to the origin were recorded
within the permanent plots and the species and height of each planted stem were recorded for all plots.Any
volunteers found within the plots were grouped into size categories by species,but separate from the planted
stems. Twelve permanent photo reference points were established and are taken annually. Thirty-two
permanent cross-sections (24 riffle cross-sections and 8 pool cross-sections) were also established and a
detailed longitudinal profile of the stream was taken. Wolman pebble counts were performed at all of the
riffle cross-sections.The cross-section measurements are repeated in monitoring years 1,2,3, 5,and 7,but
the longitudinal profile will only be repeated if there are concerns about bed elevation adjustments.Reports
will be submitted to DMS each year.
SUCCESS CRITERIA
Vegetative success criteria for the stream mitigation is 260 woody stems/acre after five years, and 210
woody stems/acre after seven years. Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5 and ten
feet in height at Year 7.Volunteer species must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons and must
be a species from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success. A single species may not
account for more than 50%of the required number of stems within any plot.
A minimum of four bankfull events must also be recorded during the monitoring period.All project streams
must show a minimum of 30 continuous days of flow within a calendar year (assuming normal
precipitation)A"normal"year is based on NRCS climatological data for Yadkin County with the 30th and
70th percentile thresholds as the range of normal, as documented in the USACE Technical Report
"Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology,April 2000."
Bank height ratios(BHR)should not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratios(ER)should be 2.2 or greater.
BHR and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not change more than 10% from the previous
condition during any given monitoring interval(e.g. no more than 10%between years 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3
and 5,or 5 and 7).Visual assessments will also be used to identify problem areas.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 2 MY02 Monitoring Report

MONITORING RESULTS
The MY02 vegetation monitoring was conducted between July 20 and 22, 2021. 28 of the 30 vegetation
monitoring plots had greater than 260 woody stems/acre. The average stem density across all the surveyed
plots is 858 planted stems/acre. Including volunteers, the site averaged 978 stems/acre. A supplemental
planting of the wetland located at the top of T3 was completed on October 25,2021. Due to the prolonged
periods of saturation in this area, as well as the rapid growth of the herbaceous vegetation in MY01, the
majority of the planted woody stems in this wetland did not survive (as seen in VP6). Thirty one-gallon
size containerized trees were planted within this area. Species were chosen that could best tolerate extended
periods of saturation, including buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis)which was not part of the original
planting plan,but which is native to Yadkin County and one of the few commercially available OBL,woody
stems that is native to this area. Please see Appendix C —Vegetation Plot Data for a complete list of the
species and quantities that were planted. It is believed that these larger stems that are more tolerant of
saturated conditions will ensure that this area has adequate woody vegetation to achieve the success criteria.
As documented in the MY01 report,additional heavy precipitation events took place in 2020 after the repair
work in March 2020.These events cause isolated areas of bank erosion,the movement of a boulder sill and
one step pool structure to begin piping. In July 2021, shortly after the 2021 monitoring fieldwork, these
areas,totaling approximately 400 linear feet were repaired by sloping back the eroding banks,reapplying
coir matting,and installing new live stakes.The piping step pool was repaired by re-grading the area around
the sill to prevent water from bypassing it and the damaged boulder sill was repaired by replacing the
boulder that had washed downstream.Please see the Current Conditions Plan View in Appendix B—Visual
Assessment Data for more information on where these repairs occurred. The cross-sections were surveyed
for MY02 between July 20 and 22,2021.None of the 32 cross-sections had a bank height ratio greater than
1.2 or an entrenchment ratio less than 2.2.Between MY00 and MY01, some of the pools widened slightly,
while a few of the riffles lowered slightly. These changes were a result of the normal settling that occurs
after construction, and after the unusually large number of high rainfall events that the site experienced in
2020.These cross-sections remained stable between MY01 and MY02 and did not show signs of continued
widening or down cutting. The one exception to this was XS8. This cross-section is in one of the outer
bends that was damaged during the heavy rains of 2020. It was repaired in 2021,just before the MY02
cross-section surveys. As part of these repairs, the outer bank was sloped back and so it appears in the
survey as if the pool has continued to widen. KCI will continue to monitor this cross-section closely for
signs of instability,but it is not anticipated that it will widen further.
During 2021,the stream gauge on UTHC-1 recorded 11 bankfull events,while the stream gauge on UTHC-
3 recorded 6 bankfull events.All three of the reaches being monitored for flow demonstrated more than 30
consecutive days of flow during 2021. The gauge on T1A recorded a maximum of 121 consecutive days.
The gauge on T5A recorded flow for 322 consecutive days (the entire period of record for 2021) and the
gauge on T8A recorded a maximum of 167 consecutive days. The gauge data was further verified by the
cameras on site. Based on the video recordings obtained from the cameras, T1A had a maximum of 97
consecutive days of flow,T5A had a maximum of 116 consecutive days of flow,and T8A had a maximum
of 180 consecutive days of flow. The differences between the number of days of flow documented by the
cameras versus the gauges is largely due to extended periods of time during which the cameras were
obscured by vegetation during the growing season and periods of time when the stream flow was at levels
too low for the gauges to record.
Overall the site is functioning as designed with no major problem areas or threats to project success
identified during MY02.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 3 MY02 Monitoring Report

REFERENCES
NCDENR,Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009.Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009. Raleigh,NC.
https://file s.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/W atershedPlanning/YadkinRiverB
asin/2009%20Upper%20Yadkin%2ORBRP Final%20Final%2C%2026feb%2709.pdf
NCDEQ,Division of Mitigation Services. June 2017. "As-built Baseline Monitoring Report
Format,Data and Content Requirement."
https://file s.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra
ry/Guidance%20and%20Template%20Documents/6_AB_Baseline Rep_Templ_June
%202017.pdf
NCIRT. October 24,2016. "Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update."https://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/PN/2016/Wilmington-District-Mitigation-
Update.pdf
USACE, Sprecher, S. W.;Warne,A. G. 2000. "Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to
Evaluate Wetland Hydrology."
https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/ADA378910.xhtml
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 4 MY02 Monitoring Report

y 1 Stony Ridge 'd
o
-. — G� eel
o
prarat Wet S°OR� ��°, �co �
Nuns Rd �a c
r U �a�
a, /---5
•
-. ..
`�°� Hauser
Ilk
o
a Yadkin Ri •r
c
co
o♦ 7 N
L
F e,* U
�a0 S� ' t:, Dr
a a
0
Scr' Miller Creek
41111111ftc f
Pride's Rd Main St 1 ��a� I
Q-, ;, 1 Sao 67 L
is EAST BEND \ ..'a°
H
SURRY COUNTY
Fir
I 'P'a
'="P---C--)1
YADKIN COUNTY
QS
ea
DAVIE COUNTY e'c d
,c m* at
U '
CD
' a) c
J CD
ROWAN COUNTY — I
Figure 1. Vicinity Map, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
= Project Easement Streams Roads N
Ilini V 0 0.5 1
CT Cities and Towns Major Rivers State Highway Miles

APPENDIX A
Background Tables
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 6 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 1.Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Mitigation Credits
Riparian Non-riparian Nitrogen Phosphorous
Stream Wetland Wetland Buffer Nutrient Nutrient
Offset Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE R RE
Linear 7,166 6,340
Feet/Acres
Credits 7,166.000 3,124.666
TOTAL 10,290.666
CREDITS
Project Components
Project Existing Restoration Creditable Mitigation
Component Stationing/ Restoration Approach
Footage/ Footage or Footage or Ratio Mitigation Credits Notes/Comments
-or- Location Acreage Acreage Acreage Level (PI,PH etc.) (X:1)
Reach ID
UTHC1 Top 10+00- 1,333 1,281 1,249 R P2 10+00- 1 1,249.000 Crossing Exception
22+81 11+50,then P1 STA 20+51—20+83
UTHC1 22+81- 541 457 438 R P1,then P2 1 438.000 Crossing Exception
Bottom 27+39 24+50-27+39 STA 25+72—25+91
UTHC2 27+39- 1,494 1,493 1,493 EI N/A 1.5 995.333
42+32
P1 except P2 Utility Exception
42+32- 42+32-44+00 STA54+07—54+49
UTHC3 55+57 1,411 1,325 1,240 R and 53+50- 1 1,240.000 Crossing Exception
55+57 STA 55+14—55+57
UTHC4-1 55+57- 297 297 EI N/A 1.5 198.000
58+53
UTHC4-2 58+53- 521 521 EII N/A 2.5 208.400
63+75 1,840
UTHC4-3 63+75- 481 419 EI N/A 1.5 279.333 Crossing Exception
68+55 STA 63+75-64+37
UTHC4-4 68+55- 542 497 EII N/A 2.5 199.800 Utility Exception STA
73+97 68+55—69+00
T1 100+00- 764 751 734 R P2 100+00- 1 734.000 Crossing Exception
107+51 101+80,then P1 STA 104+00-104+16
T1A 150+00- 746 795 795 R P2 1 795.000
157+95
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 7 MY02 Monitoring Report

Project Existing Restoration Creditable Mitigation
Component Stationing/ Restoration Approach
Footage/ Footage or Footage or Ratio Mitigation Credits Notes/Comments
-or- Location Acreage Acreage Acreage Level (PI,PR etc.) (X:1)
Reach ID
T2-1 200+00- 499 498 498 EII N/A 2.5 199.200
204+98
T2 2 204+98- 232 265 265 R P2 1 265.000
207+63
T3 300+00- 378 369 369 R P1/P2 1 369.000
303+69
T4 400+00- 151 151 151 R P1 1 151.000
401+51
1000+00- Crossing Exception
T5 1012+13 1,205 1,213 1,182 EII N/A 2.5 472.800 STA 1003+59-
1003+90
T5A 1200+00- 65 65 65 EII N/A 2.5 26.000
1200+65
T5B 1300+00- 438 438 438 EII N/A 2.5 175.200
1304+38
T6-1 600+00- 325 322 259 EH N/A 2.5 103.600 Crossing Exception
603+22 STA 602+59—603+22
T6-2 603+22- 621 658 658 R P1 1 658.000
609+80
T6A-1 650+00- 60 60 60 EII N/A 2.5 24.000
650+60
T6A-2 650+60- 97 101 101 R P1 1 101.000
651+61
T7-1 700+00- 165 165 165 EII N/A 2.5 66.000
701+65
T7 2 701+65- 335 348 348 R P1 1 348.000
705+13
T8-1 800+00- 445 445 445 EII N/A 2.5 178.000
804+45
T8-2 804+45- 486 448 426 R P1 1 426.000 Crossing Exception
808+94 STA 808+20—808+42
T8A 850+00- 258 263 263 R P1 1 263.000
852+63
T9 900+00- 133 129 129 R P1,then P2 1 129.000
901+29 900+71-901+29
TOTAL 14,024 13,882 13,505 10,290.666
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 8 MP02 Monitoring Report

Component Summation
Stream Riparian Wetlands Non-Riparian
Restoration Level (bear feet) (Acres) Wetlands Buffer(square feet)
(Acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine 1.
Restoration 7.166 1
Enhancement I
Enhancement I 2.209 I
Enhancement II 4,130 I
Creation MIMI
Preservation IMMI 1°11
High Quality II - 1
Preservation
Table 2. Project Activity&Reporting History
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or
Delive
Mitigation Plan Dec.7,2018
Final Design-Construction Plans Jan. 14,2019
Construction Grading Completed Dec. 12,2019
Repairs from Storm Damage March 26,2020
Planting Completed March 26,2020
Baseline Monitoring/Report April 2020 May 2020
Vegetation Monitoring April 24,2020
Stream Survey April 16, 2020 Milll
Invasive Species Treatment December 2,2020
Year 1 Monitoring December 2020 December 2020
Vegetation Monitoring October 28,2020
Stream Survey December 22, 2020
Repairs from Storm Damage July 23,2021
Supplemental Planting October 25,2021
Year 2 Monitoring November 2021 December 2021
Vegetation Monitoring July 22,2021
Stream Survey July 22,2021
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 9 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 3.Project Contacts
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact:Mr.Tim Morris
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Construction Contractor Carolina Environmental Contracting,Inc.
PO Box 1905
Mount Airy,NC 27030
Contact:Mr.Wayne Taylor
Phone:[phone]
Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats
1983 Jefferson Highway
Waynesboro,VA 22980
Contact:Mr.David Coleman
Phone:[phone]
Monitoring Performers
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact:Mr.Adam Spiller
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 10 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 4.Project Information
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Project Name Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
County Yadkin County
Project Area 40.2 acres
Project Coordinates(lat.and long.) 36.2390°N,80.5201°W
Planted Acreage(acres of woody
stems planted) 29.2 acres
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 030401014 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03010101110070
DWQ Sub-basin 03-07-02
Project Drainage Area(acres) 400 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of 3%
Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification Forest(45%),Pasture/Farmland(39%),Low-density Residential Development(15%),and
Roads(1%)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters All Reaches Combined
Length of reach(linear feet) 14,024
Valley confinement Partially confined to confined
Drainage area(acres) 400 acres
Perennial,Intermittent,Ephemeral Intermittent—Perennial
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification C(Aquatic Life,Secondary Recreation)
Rosgen Stream Classification(Existing/
Proposed) F4/G4/C4/B4
Evolutionary trend(Simon) Stage III
FEMA classification Zone AE at confluence of T8 and Hall Creek,otherwise none
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters WA,WB,WE,WG,WK WC WH,WI,WJ
Size of Wetland(acres) 0.23 0.10 0.10
Wetland Type Riparian Non-riverine Riparian Non-riverine Riparian Non-riverine
Mapped Soil Series Fairview Fairview Siloam
Drainage class Well drained Well drained Well drained
Soil Hydric Status Non-Hydric Non-Hydric Non-Hydric
Source of Hydrology Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater
Restoration or Enhancement Method N/A(Preservation) Areas of erosion to stabilize N/A(Preservation)
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States—Section 404 Yes NWP 27 Preliminary JD
Waters of the United States—Section 401 Yes NWP 27 Preliminary JD
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes USFWS
Historic Preservation Act No Yes NCSHPO
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act No N/A N/A
(CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No Yes N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 11 MY02 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX B
Visual Assessment Data
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 12 MY02 Monitoring Report

• Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
- I I Existing Wetlands Camera
■ — • — • — • ---' Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
S .' R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
1' urHca-a I Ve etation Monitorin Plots
El (2,209 If/1,472 SMC's) 9 9
*''' I Ell (4,130 If/1,653 SMC's)0 Success Criteria Met
Page 6 Photo Points =Success Criteria Not Met
. Cross-Sections /.I Supplemental Planting
■ • _ _ `�` a}-
x I UTH C�4-21' Page 5 V
Page 7- I w- . -I — . 4
'1: ''-°a� iUTHC 4-1 I ti{`• .
,..�'k • cue- 174
•
T8-2 r, I Page 4 /I fi rs-1 ��
14-' '' : -„ • ' - - ' # .
T8-i -s. 1 +T6-2�
L . _ . '_ _ � � • .
:* - * .I
Ilk
1UTHC3 -
- •„; T6A-2 I
•
T6A-1 Ib 4, l
edit
• . i__' EcITT5B.
i 1?------, '.7,Z.
` .1. n pI I TSA+
41,
y 1 i m
r a Y."II T ,
L t• "� Page 3 •
' 40, - ,
F :Y - UTHC2
+. - - — T2-2 _ -
lie_, T2-1
fl y •
1
fi +i. 14 1 y Q> • 7 1 .. r
. '14— - I ' if. i
_,
`$r'.. . :. , ... • 'Ar I \ - I _.
�--s1 1 Uga 1' j'' ''''''� y a UTHC1 Top
Current Conditions Plan View1 .41 N
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project#97136 + oi
00
��
500 1 01 Feet
n C I Yadkin County, NC
Overview Page Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,,2015.

2 +b o. n Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
• ,'' N ' Existing Wetlands Camera
- f_ •s. ` }k, Gauge
Flow
_� , Stream Mitigation
' '�'s `..''•. R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
Xs49' El (2,209 If/1,472 SMC's) Vegetation Monitoring Plots
23+00.
Ell (4,130 If/1,653 SMC's)r1 Success Criteria Met
106+00 LrLFY3 it:
• , .1o7a.O0 4 ' Photo Points =Success Criteria Not Met
UTHC1 Bottom• - - - Cross-Sections /.I Supplemental Planting
, ,s43* _ .,. ...., .
105+00 • • *.•
21+00
11. r
h, 20+00' ;
•
i'4 19+00
♦ ♦ .
•
•
X.
)8+00 'r;417 !L_ , :,-- ,,,.,.,r
•
tv 7+00
,
.. ..' . •:` ,,_00, ''..'• f r
.444
. '".4. 0
ivr ' j„‘'r, 4 k •1.
i ,.. ,•x , "5.• . 14+00
. ' \ 3+oo.
" 41.:-.t..,, A., _..-,4-,:,.
., . .
,i, ..:_.,,... ...
� 4 � � r� 11+0
._-_,. . ' 1 : n��
t. .ry ,, \ V U LJI A�I.I
Current Conditions Plan View N
�� Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
.6-., DMS Project#97136 0 100 2001 Feet
�K C I Yadkin County, NC
Page 1 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

n Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
•,. Existing Wetlands Camera
^" .. Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
r y..- -1 �- : - '3 - R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
a- y El (2,209 If/1,472 SMC's) Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Ell (4,130 If/1,653 SMC's) Success Criteria Met
* Photo Points =Success Criteria Not Met
- - - Cross-Sections /.I Supplemental Planting
104+00 Z ,
103+00 .- 105+00 ;„
• •/ 21+00 ...
102+00 % ft ••
p -
•, 64*'i. • 15;+00
`y " , 20+00•
101+O -
u.
^�+) Sit eV•
AL ' ...� • . ♦
ss
19+00
• .s,; ;',
• `\ ' 4.. •
. 100+00• .,`" 156 0. •• •
.: .N.'
F'• . _. ?
' .40
'•P +
: 1500 •
111
al Y '
YY 1
154+00": . •
1.C
. K' o.
153+00. , ..,;# .'• ,•:,o:
• _
152+00
• i.
151+00
150+00 fo
_ ' 1 1
i
• • OLZ,
149+00
Current Conditions Plan Viewflli N
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project#97136 + i
0 I I I
100 20Feet
C I Yadkin County, NC
Page 2 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

a� ''4;•. •'&,, iiit '' _y;1� ; • . •'5-'{� 0 Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
;k `,,V1 1 - q, ,-, Existing Wetlands Camera
k' ... ' ', � ‘'..vx'. '.` ,:� - Flow Gauge
;. Stream Mitigation g
` Q � ;+s. ? •- r'.,.- Y.' lti•j + • Wetland Gauge
• '.., .: .t . . 00 R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's)
:���. }:'a `' . Vegetation MonitoringPlots
�_,����,, � �: ;, ::. �. .Y�" , - El (2,209 If/1,472 SMC's) 9
., �:; • Ell (4,130 If/1,653 SMC's) Success Criteria Met
`,, :.: y,. * Photo Points Success Criteria Not Met
, 1, ,.:,: �y, ".�', ,, - - - Cross-Sections V.I Supplemental Planting
. .:
1'Sri i. •
. ;,..-.. lir .
1 4:n+x T4. - 0 e •33+00 t- ;,.` .
T. .
•
•32+00 - . _. - _ ,
. :, . �. 1002+00
.r' 44 �,pµ
1' 1 •• 1+00 w .,i,
'';j 4 -h '1. 7:57'.
Ys ' . -,4 ,5,..,ift.,.--4,,J._,,,, , 1 „,
_ .1
., .. ,•- . , .,v9+00 ..161' `......4.,. .-e.' t . . ,,,p . •
eT
,,. T3 ,. • _ _ • , y� I �• fir.y .r; x5
•,?,- . A .. 7* . .
_ y
,'Rr?`' 'S;. - -- - - y. '28+00 - .! ' .�
ti'
`�-- ..,: ''1 ....• ,/� ti ;, - "4 .• ti.
.;44 •
Y. 0'41. 4
.7 tltti .
r
:�
' -4-1;.,. ::""•- .: -r .• .?L 1,..1.4 . 1?_-.. 4,.,,,,7.:. , `,._ .--.8i.,_.,, \ ,..,., \\:,.,.. .
'. - . .1, .•.1•-.•:'•','"," .
• • •
....„..••7, VS' •- 1 T.•' ,,_! .
e llialikir :.l
II.-= Current Conditions Plan View N
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project#97136 0 I I I
100 20Feet
TZ I Yadkin County, NC
Page 3 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

eg"
*• •1 n Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
• Existing Wetlands Camera
e
_ -� . Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
El (2,209 If/1,472 SMC's) Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Repaired outer Ell (4,130 If/1,653 SMC's)I—I Success Criteria Met
0 bank erosion * Photo Points =Success Criteria Not Met
- - - Cross-Sections /.I Supplemental Planting
;r, -.fig 1. , T..
.50+00•
Repaired piping . '4.1
. pool
.
• 48+00
, ki..,:2.,,,ii.4„, p.,• V.:7 y 1 Y 'a A5
•
• ..A•.
Repaired arrkit"r , "•45+00 T6-2
•bank erosion ,
' . 44+00
603+,poi
l,a z/V• . 609+00 • •
Repaired outer 43+00 • �7� •
• • 604+00
bank erosion . �� . x • . �7�' 651+00
• 606+00 • •
42+00 , ••• cp . . . �3
• 607+00 •
•
650+00
41+oo T6A-2
• __'I = T6A-1
40+QO
•
.39+00 - f.= - •
�� O
n.
•
• 1010+00
38+00' • ..'
. •
Current Conditions Plan View N
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project#97136 + i
0 100 20Feet
K C i=I Yadkin County, NC
Page 4 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

UTHC4-2 +1. n Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
� T9 Existing Wetlands Camera
Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
\ k _ '` • r t :r ^t 'r R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
`•s • El (2,209 If/1,472 SMC's) Vegetation Monitoring Plots
59+00 • J1'"' Ell (4,130 If/1,653 SMC's) Success Criteria Met
LNrW `• * Photo Points =Success Criteria Not Met
58+00'. A 7 "y - - - Cross-Sections /.I Supplemental Planting
. •7+r., , - ti -
i
•
• 56+00 Repaired . - 11 -g- •
•
•55+00
. E
'.,k; ty , _ 54+00 ti 4j. "' r. .._
i x r y .'I ',i --. r. *- x
i 53+00 VL t�''
L
1 _ - n lY r_.,, - i- t,
Repaired outer �2+0O 4 ,,
bank erosion -
Repaired outer
�' S1+Oo bank erosion
•tiiit •
704+00 • •
4sP .50+00
• 703+00 • Repaired piping
i.
pool
.
.702+00 49+00' • :
•• • 48+00
* 0
701+00. . 0
x
• • • •UV .0i O
O•
♦�. coo
tO
700+00 Repaired oute •, •45+00
r, bank erosion
Current Conditions Plan View N
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site o 100 200
DMS Project#97136 I Feet
K C 1 7 Yadkin County, NC
Page 5 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

z,
M n Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
�`: • ` Existing Wetlands Camera
' Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
• ��' El (2,209 If/1,472 SMC's) Vegetation Monitoring Plots
�� +00
i •. Ell (4,130 If/1,653 SMC's)0 Success Criteria Met
'} +oo ' Photo Points =Success Criteria Not Met
- - - Cross-Sections /.I Supplemental Planting
w: sstt
'w
`i 1+l,1. _ T;1�, xq ...rtig4. ..
[ `
}
UTHC4-4
��7 w PP1O '� t
fit
WJ `
4 yy
4+0,
~� UTHC4-3 ;' r-
r
.t
•63+00
if . . .
. vt,_. �T , 1'� F • 162+00
. "4-' ., . . , -- ....04t... „.4-Sc_._):.,-.i.,...k....... .'--- --f..
111 ,
r - - ., , ,;�� r�' , .;_. •,'. *.; - 61+00'
�- •;` •' �yRepaired�left a,•
s
k ; �. - . - ._ . f: ,r !+bank_erosion _ ':
.i: '• \l• ,�' '�" ' tit . Y• ." '. ,, ' s -+ f'
.0k . --,.. • "k . .. . ',,,i ._..„ • .,ri, -':... 'h. ...1' ........'V.,''.•. ..._ of.,'if' lik \ .
ti �. r
Current Conditions Plan View N
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project#97136 _ 0 I I I 100 20Feet
iiir= Yadkin County, NC
KC I Page 6 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

,` ,'`*A. ,_ ,s' '1 _ „ n Project Easement • Bankfull Gauge
• ..,' — Existing Wetlands Camera
• s.
r • '-'' +� •-; ._ -t - _ ' ' ; Stream Mitigation Flow Gauge
•- - -ti,._ . - '' ;.,.V ' - R (7,165 If/7,165 SMC's) • Wetland Gauge
k.L. , . El (2,209 If/1,472 SMC's) Vegetation Monitoring Plots
- y �,, —. � Ell (4,130 If/1,653 SMC's) Success Criteria Met
' • -,.,,4 ;:' • ..s`r - ' ' r• .4 `y `.,: Y, 1 Photo Points =Success Criteria Not Met
1• •r -- °` f -.'-e'• - - Cross-Sections /.I Supplemental Planting
i f
y -'3
L
O o .�
. OOxO H .850+00itt hrt r t. •
GDga e • a
806+00;.*-9`- -
k
w
4 iv'4 ,. '. 805400 N.••
r4\ • l
• ; ,
•. T8 2 soa+oo '. . .
o
' 1. , i" • 803+00 '" ti
,., .. gait
Y
• ,802+00
1.` ;; ,v 801+00 • • 800+00
•. .
ti
to
1
lilt /Pk\
• •, .. N
�= Current Conditions Plan Viewfliii N
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project#97136 + i
0 100 20Feet
K C�=I Yadkin County, NC
Page 7 Image Source:NC OneMap Orthoimagery,2015.

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC1
Assessed Length 1,739
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 30 30 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 29 29 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 29 29 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 29 29 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 29 29 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 22 22 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 22 22 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 22 22 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 22 22 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 22 22 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 21 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC2
Assessed Length 1,494
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 8 8 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 8 8 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 8 8 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 8 8 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 8 8 100%
I I
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 0 0
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 0 0
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 0 0
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 0 0
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull
4.Habitat 0 0
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 22 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC3
Assessed Length 1,325
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 18 18 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 17 17 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 17 17 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 17 17 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 17 17 100%
I I
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 8 8 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 8 8 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 8 8 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 8 8 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 23 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC4-1
Assessed Length 297
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 3 3 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
3 3 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 3 3 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 3 3 100%
I I
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 2 2 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 2 2 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 2 2 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 2 2 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull
4.Habitat 2 2 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 24 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID UTHC4-3
Assessed Length 419
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 4 4 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 3 3 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
3 3 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 3 3 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 3 3 100%
I I
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 1 1 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 1 1 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 1 1 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 1 1 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4.Habitat 1 1 100o o
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 25 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T1
Assessed Length 751
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 16 16 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 16 16 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 16 16 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 16 16 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 16 16 100%
Illm .-
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 8 8 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 8 8 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 8 8 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 8 8 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 26 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T1A
Assessed Length 795
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 16 16 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 16 16 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 16 16 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 16 16 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 16 16 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 11 11 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 11 11 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 11 11 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 11 11 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 11 11 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 27 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T2-2
Assessed Length 265
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 8 8 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 7 7 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 7 7 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 7 7 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 7 7 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 5 5 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 5 5 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 5 5 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 5 5 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 5 5 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 28 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T3
Assessed Length 369
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 13 13 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 12 12 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 12 12 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 12 12 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 12 12 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 14 14 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 14 14 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 14 14 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 14 14 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 14 14 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 29 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T4
Assessed Length 151
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 7 7 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 7 7 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 7 7 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 7 7 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 7 7 100%
Illm .-
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 6 6 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 6 6 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 6 6 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 6 6 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 30 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T6-2
Assessed Length 658
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 15 15 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 15 15 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 15 15 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 15 15 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 15 15 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 16 16 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 16 16 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 16 16 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 16 16 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 16 16 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 31 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T6A-2
Assessed Length 101
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 3 3 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
3 3 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 3 3 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 3 3 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 6 6 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 6 6 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 6 6 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 6 6 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 32 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T7-2
Assessed Length 348
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 6 6 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 6 6 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 6 6 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 6 6 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 6 6 100%
Illm .-
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 4 4 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 4 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 4 4 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 4 4 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 33 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T8-2
Assessed Length 448
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 10 10 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 10 10 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 10 10 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 10 10 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 10 10 100%
Illm .-
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 12 12 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 12 12 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 12 12 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 12 12 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull
4.Habitat 12 12 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 34 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T8A
Assessed Length 262
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 7 7 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 7 7 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 7 7 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 7 7 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 7 7 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 7 7 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 7 7 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 7 7 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 7 7 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 7 7 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 35 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Reach ID T9
Assessed Length 129
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units) flow laterally(not to include point bars)
2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 4 4 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 3 3 100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of
3 3 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position 1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 3 3 100%
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 3 3 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 4 4 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 4 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 4 4 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull o
4.Habitat 4 4 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 36 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Assesment Date: 11/18/2021
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Planted Acreage 29.5
Mapping Number of Combined %of Planted
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold CCPV Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous °
1. Bare Areas 0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
material.
2. Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels 0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
based on MY3,4,or 5 stem count criteria.
3.Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are 0.25 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
obviously small given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total 0 0.00
Easement Acreage 20.6
Mapping Number of Combined %of Easement
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold CCPV Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons °
4.Invasive Areas of Concern 1000 SF Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
at ma s scale .
U
5.Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons none Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
at map scale).
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 37 MY02 Monitoring Report

Photo Reference Photos
1, . • *
,
--
•
•
y A �'t T
_.,,:,:*07. -
1 , � .yx .,
PP1 —MY00—4/17/20 PP1 —MY02—9/30/21
4:
V i - tic ,.wii
� ... Zvi};
r:e ,� J�+x - r�5 kx s +r '' It- '��i-°�'+ .1-:•;:10;:i4:-.,..2.414,4,,t1:-',..
'r , 19" q, °at �%.. ,
`�I b l �;�I n3 < v1...i s' ( `"'..t , [ a.` a4- i ; .
4w t
y
a �S' :*A" 'i •� ', P; `' '3w 2 y .,. r
g
l'-•'''°:'''''' .-V-';'1411:/:17/-54;ki.to*--- -:e.z- / - -- --,-,--'',';,,,,..-. , ..,,, . - i•
•
.,.. 7 ... $z r 'ail -, , r- .�. : +
PP2—MY00—4/17/20 PP2—MY02—9/30/21
rxi e a "S t
M f4 �s.fi r i` ` J� t •
" i" 4�{� f
4.
k- I� r kJ4-�.r .� °fr wn_ } 4,424„,.„,..,,..,...,,, . .. _ --_—,—.,-, rs a ,,_=d a �, �. -
-,.,
`. (5= JI y..- F I I .� P f ��n N - -.- } .dP •,_[ � .,, n, k„ -
,y k ,� e ti Q. '0 4 1
� r to �yar,; is '� � �`°8 € ae;{. r y +�''u' ?�� .a r�"�. F�' ,
n ° P--, d ,,G :�^+kE, -• - t -y+* dui--d?''• w. a °i f+5 �r�N 9 !al t '�
4d� ��r , s 'r ' .,t`'�. : ' ''i!!, ,+P: fir' , r�:_' �i ^ '7
���f��� � � ��E� '�; � y ! ,i b � o°-`,m 4 �'�-� (�,fd I;�� �At � ' .� �-.. .
"/, � z,f �' ra_ 's t Nr r @.:r s 'R ` ri IF a'� - "4
da y a v I x a ,- V. i c i •e m •r n ..
t n, t c 'rE .. b �f- _ �r i' 1' t q.;
4= ,., „ '� �P," - ....0.0.., - °' x � ti-9 -dr... ^r ���.' 7 '
r pr,P yam- - #^" y • sk!4�
PP3 —MY00—4/17/20 PP3 —MY02—9/30/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 38 MP02 Monitoring Report

4
,, .
,,, ,
,..
7
a. oaf.., fir.,.,,,,: $b 7 r
f 2� w' sp r l A X v,�
y` a ,t`v xi ''y -,.SFr" ` ,� ,
5
"ola
..t. ,,.• • _. ,,... .
- ' A k. ' iPP4—MY00—4/17/20 � T PP4—�MY0 2—9• /30/21
g1% 0' ss st ' - ?a iil'#l .t. Pv vitti\�Q '7' o �" " a . -e tl tyr. ..s`
•
4. 0.
�t t l(o ET 4 r rr �x � Y,...:H4fil....,:" ,:,
:,,:a:4:::.
"..".:."L,,,,,41'‘ ''.,.:
1014 a
... ,.., --'' ._,..iiii
,,,„ 4.tit -,i„.. ...... . _ ..iliti.:_ .,, ... iet...5/.__ '_,4f...110...,-;ortve-,._-...,4„...- .,7 ,-.,...-... .
4,.• ._, ._.,..i :::,...4-0,- •• . _ ..,.....,_z• . ,, _ „,,_ i,„:.
.. ,-.,',..;7, ..i,A`'.41.114° , '-
N' _ ^i� - 4. G' . j a .te r '
Ila
t.
•
PPS—MY00—4/17/20 PP5—MY02—9/30/21
ti:11 1 W 21^: `F I .3' 1 � Y �l .C..
r y r at' , '40- '-`'�. -'y!"$ ,"sew w .,.''s
11P:ti,.11:4'-11.-1)47,;,.....A;,:;-.1:4-:''' -. . ._-,..--.7 7.'''''3'- '''''''''''
7v, P : d
-. - vt +' .g
ay•t ye�_'. 1 F.f /VPr y Tr s ` L *
�r- 0 - S Y e }" ,, .sue. z ' � �' ' �:4 a' 1': _x , s ' t, 5 ••'z, ;,. +"a l at t 5 _ , v �+ 1 ya .,.:% . �• �m % •,4v ! ° i � C wC .'t4- v E � F �" . s.\ I& �� rR 3 '' lr A . a ,` " � � yr+ "� �"� , i , :;P e a i ., lk1 vl¢`tx� b . ?, V"f•f a .m V4ykph t �
•
r•tU
y' / F @ C '.t:- V` `Ul. F
PP6—MY00—4/16/20 PP6—MY02—9/30/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 39 MYO2 Monitoring Report

R •a. e ', i :• t
r -
{: v-
it k
•
1.
� '
(
, � !- a, tilt': w 1 ^yj s•.. - _.+„- 6
tk.'•-',...7:-' ';lit-'',-;;C:::r'','-•'-..•'-•:.''':':-:,:.'iP,..•1-.1':;.•-4-...-..• ,,,-i...1,....**. /:1.*>-*'" 40
• _.. . a4 � n 3„ 'r s f 1 .'C.�izv,r _ : '
PP7-MY00-4/16/20 PP7-MY02-9/30/21
Y i 5 _
-ter'.t'.,.S-.i'i4.*'.,r..••::'''".'.''i'.'.''.,-.=.''..-.i,i'..,.0',„!'1:,'.''.-_''_:''*..':Lr:*'.-%•.:.."4;'•.*'•".:_-'I.,,•,-,•.':.c•.7:'.:.•O%•',.'•:.;.'':._',:•1:,:'::.•-W:.,V.'.0-..•'.•.
y
/ r_ r
w�s; ya. t 0-
'5 lg.' - i t J ,, ..
„�� { r
f.'" ' . sue' is �A . r°� � :" F� + 4k tiqd .y .
PP8-MY00-4/16/20 PP8-MY02-9/30/21
Zi
II ypl �„ 5 y 4 t.
- ! '" pgs dy- Lax - _ }._
5 „', pdn 11 pe fix.
•
•
} ,hazy �'ay. 9 s 5 � .
#5*
. "Nz . x t 1 I• f �
• �_. F _ 'ST_'� '��i',6e�•ri i •tr e (y#„ {� i� iAe Y E '+ ,;.,---.14. 't x. SY029"y..:,
IMY00—4/ / 0PP9- PP
-9/30/21
NC,PA
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of
DMS Project#97136 40 MYO2 Monitoring Report

H if Fj�pt
. yl - r.S y � Pot t :` S _ lT , r -
�e� i ' k _� r. _ ,ITV-
y •�R Y
•
d �
V YYi.�: L ti.•..
3� '' C :
i�k
�7>4 ' itn fir ,.„..
4
•
.Arm ZW4 ti { r ^ ' W •
PP10-MY00-4/17/20 PP10-MY02-9/30/21
:r4.N11(911,4' 4ii 4g,„4 ..,„., r7 ,r'.::',...7"11:'..'-'- -:
a
I I ; 'tt 3 ir. '� ,. A r•
., yr _r..
x:J,r
�. "� - h { i �,+ ''`'� *T.�i r ��v. r
4.
r ". ,� i d y t �" r 4,� [V' L1A- $ �`�� _.....:' ,,,---.A,-..
a t ' _ i / • i " _ ''
i At�' � r t iP4` � y�� 7,6 r� �`-• 7 e r r7 �`• ' a } w �+ �/ l ff I �ii • ��� 1 I
3�i V I Imo' .5 6 1 F _ >r� i. W f. :4 c
i j� i s ,rj rs I r I hh �, Sad t
'�•
ti # a{F ��i, :. • r if
t 1 q 14. . Fyrt'. {{ ,;,f''h-R eta.-.. • _t *`��� �
•
PP 11 -MY00-4/16/20 PP 11 -MY02-9/3 0/21
ify
i - •_ t
fi �k ' 1 F 3'1 a -tic . . .:A :- ` ' r` . >.T �� ."y*:�,'"y� s H-s.�-''tom u
!•aF� • ms i
F aa i
I'3 y'Sf of - v
,� z ti
/� ram :,
r .•
yk 4+ rceR
�1 • q
+ 2 ` t:7fit' f u}:� 3 r'. f
..411 p + ,. l i {i t,:.! ` S fit',
•
-- "'•-•••-•!-::-. 7 .• ' '..A.,,r.... , _,„..-*-1,-...
,..
. ..-....:,.....„...,,,„,...'5'.'i".4'.'°K .•—•--.‘"!'s.A'.1.L".' •
7 •, .N �� Y''b i.i � ° v` ?i* _1 i 1�!wE �T • • J.r"'�. a
PP12-MY00-4/16/20 PP12-MY02-9/30/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 41 MY02 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
1.111111111111.1111
Y A
y wry yam, ..- , ' t p
Leh dt°' % to 9 . iq F
\ �.� yes.. 6i" V � i� .d }�' e� r� �\�
ex 'L7.:5 d 6s Rk .t,3�• - g'6yf. � "`, ' 8 e,A,,),,,.,....- ....--,.
4 -.
Ve elation Plot 1 —nMY00—4/17/20* Vegetation Plot 1 —MY
02—7/20/21
g g
• s.
•
•
•
•
9
; — ? °,. A. u,-° _ , . Ai \ i,./1. = r" ".
Vegetation Plot 2—MY00—4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 2—MY02—7/20/21
•
(.
h .. - - ;f�
Vegetation P•
lot 3 —MY00—4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 3 —MY02- 7/20/21
Mill DRm Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates ofNC,PA
DMS Project#97136 42 In02Monztoring Report

me
'f" V" d i • J
4
.e , r 1 f Y r
y
w.. y.
ti� r fl ' w y
$ g
�4 ". =,F:
- a '�. f A. :;-: I�....". l!` y^u "�'\mot .
Vegetation Plot 4—MY00—4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 4—MY02—7/20/21
:1
�as .. `,,. ; mac .
ti ._ .�' }_. fit: r- _
sk A ey °
fret
-.,. - �!+4'' . .. �}vi
r � - t
4.
%
'„ +"` ` n� a� zt .,,,7, . , ' }:i4 ., . � j�' :` " V fi + ?i.:i 3�` <f 4,,..",--....-...‹.-- . ��9$" '-'4' •*-7414.i.V.4,,,,..,A,.,, . .-.,'"''..,:' '''' '.:.• :. ...' l •', -fp � 0::- _z�' o pk : ..,t i ,� f't mw � f « s ',S\ �i,� ..Y 7r �4 �d �' i 1 � L 'SivY s 6 y i' a �#,I " ' . �ru m` a c',.-. .. . i ' ,.trs . .". ,.: J_
•
Vegetation Plot 5—MY00—4/17/20 Viege 'ttion
Plot 05—MY02—7/20/21
t
, T-,..--t-•4•:',--f, -4 .—. id
� ',
g • ►a
.'';.CL:'..:11''II'::77f:'::.n1:°''7:
..:
' 4:-...,,,
, . ..,,,2ire„,:.„..... ,,,--,
a �a�,
�k tr;n,r.� � � ��� � gr �, �,. � ^�,r�y � � ham.' �� �y f t � ..,,�. ..
Pc
" y ^x,x I - g"" ,:.� I rk., -?.. gig _ a rY,r • 'a..
�'`3. .a '' "i ;c,;.! V47.*- 4F q4 €� i Y4. J, - _yi1� -:, �^I 1_.+f' `t + of k
°� , £' 4. ,sa,,t,•4� f„t i,4, d a . 'y 3 4> f y,'S�!% F `��'�'g }�,r 4s 4 .'� i i. ` ..
r-a a .f .F^.. k. r, / �r�1 s J_�'{l .,Q .
Vegetation Plot 6—MY00—4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 6—MY02—7/20/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 43 MY02 Monitoring Report

i
8e
"�".� ,, °fay 4.3T *ram'` n ,:q ate- _ y.iR+:_ +� - - rYcrY'•` a 4: •,�, .f•..s net
•
�W.-. r F' � r� s 'd1i ��ti 'a9 1 F� r "• T `° s i y�
i Pr :�y >� 9 tY� ' a J
I+9f It,,I4b i . a 7s _C 4- � . Ni1S X r ' t� frF te ,. �
.. .i ,e; C;' r; 1 ae �1 I@ p, 7�N�:
.'R ` �•A sx.
:"Sr , �R•res -. ..Ai v., ,,, .off,
Vegetation Plot 7—MY00—4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 7—MY02—7/20/21
IF -.,IF,,...ikt i,::
ii
il,
3 S g 4a+tt * 3 ', F"e -5,- fit `. ��- �_
,yk. • .
n -a ! ,, -s I • r , w '7 f
ut rr -� :o .. 93
a °�
b
m3 pxf a r'-!:Ai ) bf r,• a a +ylLrj, 7�"� ��Y
Vegetation Plot 8—MY00—4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 8—MY02—7/20/21
tr 4 S -d �`': •e`a 5 Z"[' •may% a4
F
4
•
°".. k;
itsM _ C
' *x u Ad° •;; 1 •
It x + !
. / •� i, , F \ ,
Vegetation Plot 9—MY00—4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 9—MY02—7/20/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 44 MY02 Monitoring Report

E i
,L,4,4:-,,,,,-- -,,,,:._'-i--4,\03,..''''':'',t'.',:, —,-;.A.c,..'V:;:t:e;-.,„ ,...c..--
# . 1^,• - • `,,im x I + - s
kr i N 5.
4, ..,„ ' e` 1. °-h" z t. ''' i :, y, '-
_.-‘4,..4,'';',,'''''Srl•-••Irr.-Y-/- • i''/' ' ..' --1- -''-'0.\''''''''''-;• -,- ,.!4:7-''
..,,,,,•,0.,44,--7-fr f-/...... • ..-: //,.-..i.i.A,,p:‘. (l.ir,..• , . --• '-'..?"-‘2 s'''''','ii*.:
:c Y. ? .'r:f VL X '':r` - Vrt. ..,,'E ,,l�'ny1=••1�a +` '�V "L
Vegetation Plot 10—MY00—4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 10—MY02—7/20/21
Milli
'
•
:F � fir _ .: t
cif
Vegetation Plot 11 —MyyY00—4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 11 —rr MY02—7/21/21
•
e'� R
iIJ] ,, Fry5° -,--- - ',. .ffi i . ''tom 's B.z. ,y -Y sa.'9"�..,
r A
F �` ; ,.• �_ - -
�'ey Z F'_ !` G ? � !L.�'
ate � w• , �.�,'.,,�•,r. .
T r •
Ski
Vegetation Plot 12—MY00—4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 12—MY02—7/21/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 45 MP02 Monitoring Report

_
•
u1 rs
Wk
M 4;, r � r f T
•
g.. ° ,•,.tea' 4}+ ,tic.,---, es I .if -Se�. :� r
':' [-. °; h v, wa.�4 _ 'e q�'' ,�.I. I 1,_F'C 'Y. -'N A: �a?G:
Vegetation Plot 13 —MY00—4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 13 —MY02 —7/21/21
-,R
!
I
t g,I
i i 'y°t .r ,,;(,'.a.-• �tsb v�q y ,' .' a 4
�J t + e - 8E
r.
f Te r, ll �OxM P�4 r�tN e X .a `'
Vegetation Plot 14—MY00—4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 14—MY02—7/21/21
ls�
q :,. vim.
� F i 4?
- .- ,
�,,
"n '�Imo. �!; �: ��` Ls - - v -'i� r ;
Vegetation Plot 15 —MY00—4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 15—MY02—7/21/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 46 MY02 Monitoring Report

' x _ - •Y
•
} n � S s'1�- a ". `
L-SI
yy
,h,1„ r �;. ,i. ',4`',PF: " "k F ��7:; � `Lrl :. 1'l � S
Vegetation Plot 16-MY00-4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 16-MY02-7/21/21
,plit. ,-,
vwwlif,.711,,f'-'/„.146,-..
.., ? • irI
rat
•
. _.
i4 I .,�.fAeNF 'jbi,y`y iP! T:.;
-. f
:d ,ire - .-..
t
r F € z a -- q���� ke y s 7 $
c Y,i: h,+ r. . g 4 f � � '+klc i' ` .t '' -• �-*•'�1,-�,,.w 4r .'�4}`a 1 T(•
M
Vegetation Plot 17-MY00-4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 17-MYO21. —7/21/21
f.
i •
ry "
_
,,..'9 t 4 7� r%ah 4s, ' 1.{
a
•' '` s ;�• t Try' -•
fi -1.1., L--'' l'4"'•; •.' Y lam' 3�
+i S _./.. 4 .1 aid 'y � Ke
Vegetation Plot 18-MY00-4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 18-MYO2-7/21/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 47 MP02 Monitoring Report

.i " ! \ .j
•
4:1 skid f 1 °j' '1'I � Yf _ 1 1
,' :f;a
+,�- r ' 1 f r Ip` `b- fr P ti`-Y`. N r Z�; A7Q`w1T''r q �_rt i' ''
,e 1, *asQ�:' ��_�?�py � .j F�1 � Lhk ' • ry,
� �x fry ?�N•�qP �i r ' ' r ` c
',a r6 �,m.''i i[ _��11 J�/ - f{ t . ' - y ^ 3f Y ��A
•
{ �„.'"''' a t '; , _
Vegetation Plot R1 —MY02—7/22/21 Vegetation Plot R2—MY02—7/22/21
„ : ,,,,„yirii, 'Tr -..-ilf rt;tr • .
7 ..,.".`.: ,f-Try.,..' ',..A„;),,-, ' eij
E' lir „rr s
t \ p•� A
, , ) t
,
: ;:11*'''''''
S
t m �14; •'ref a 2 .w t
�y K8i 4 f 1 � i r` ' .
Vegetation Plot R3—MY02—7/22/21 Vegetation Plot R4—MY02—7/22/21
omploweviiimorl ..--
" •
1t a '
aka. 1
Vegetation Plot R5—MY02—7/22/21 Vegetation Plot R6—MY02—7/22/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 48 MY02 Monitoring Report

T
, !l t ' 1�' s ' 1 T„r.aSa' e1gilk' i' , I,.: �' .-
M a1 �l
lo.
'' ' i '' s+ g �S\Y`f , dryr-r-t b ! 6 + t
.,-
` ey -'em `+ f - l } • R" il..yc`-- - ? a ' 44 'y 1,4*4%,;*,.'
- .,.,;.„,,,-- , ,-- ' ' ,-.-:,','_,...,4.1..:-,-.- `,),,...,4‘..iN , ,_.,..--
` ' , :-.59,. �. as +� _ , ), 0 ° ' y
., '� '; t i '--�q -• - i,ti ,: � - y i
Vegetation Plot R7—MY02—7/22/21 Vegetation Plot R8—MY02—7/22/21
r L
1. '
,•
f
t '-:^..,'''•\ '- ' - -- -1 40-r.,,- A17'.. 4t,,, •- - ' 4r
'---=,7-14---
r .. ,-- ' 1 mx ,e-fo e ,-rt - • , .P s',, Q Air' Y s.�e , . T y , -,
0,o .-s •
vpr 74 CI , yam. _.
p L
r d� _lR , 0--..- ,44t1t q� si if \ --i=-C R.11 p'
f t I • c AO'
, i,r - .ffl1. + j, tl(' �'o- C i�v`�'r f-t.
k ¢ ,F 'i i\ 1 �r"(11 x
Vegetation Plot R9—MY02—7/22/21 Vegetation Plot R10—MY02— 7/22/21
. - ',":"Wil hi it. - -.•„_. 0.._ ..... _ .. . _ , ,. ...,„.., „,. -_-- ---
; _ _.
• ._._:‘,..„ ,. .,. ... rmig
r'
. / \
`�•: ', ry i t
_*\03.1
�iP ti-"
�� yam x
, r0 '
Vegetation Plot R11 —MY02— 7/22/21 Vegetation Plot R12—MY02—7/22/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 49 MY02 Monitoring Report

Repair Area Photos
I
..k. r 1 ems__
-:,„],i0.10
r f+.a"', ,/" ' YE -
Damaged boulder sill— 12/18/20 Repaired boulder sill—7/23/21
f -
r ( 'r3 f
i , - ,T'P
r ,. -
\ _-,.Av.. ._ ,K - f\ : 4 \ 174-1?;4:1%;::...:11-;'.:..g_,,i,iiii.,-
R1.tea--, y. -
n
/ ..
Tti, te' a a'* --'- ':4� .\ r
STA 46+25— 12/18/20 STA 46+25—7/23/21
ti.
a
•
STA 61+00— 12/18/20 STA 61+00 after repair—7/23/21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 50 MP02 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Plot Data
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 51 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 7. Species and Quantity—2021 Supplemental Planting
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Species Quantity Size
Eastern Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) 5 1 gallon
River Birch(Betula nigra) 5 1 gallon
Buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis) 5 1 gallon
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 5 1 gallon
Silky Dogwood (Corpus amommum) 5 1 gallon
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 3 1 gallon
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 2 1 gallon
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 52 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY02 2021)
Plot 01 Plot 02 Plot 03 Plot 04 Plot 05 Plot 06 Plot 07
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly(Ilex opaca)
American Hornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana)
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 2 2 5 5 2 2 6 6 2 2 1 1
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 2
Black Willow(Salix nigra)
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 1
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana)
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis)
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra)
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 2
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 11 11
Red Maple(Acer rubrum)
River Birch(Betula nigra) 6 6 5 5 2 2 5 5 4 4 5 5
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata)
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 1 1 4 5 2 2 4 4 2 2
White Oak(Quercus alba) 1 1
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 8 8 11 11 8 8 5 5 11 11 3 3
Unknown
Stem count 17 19 22 23 17 20 19 19 21 21 0 0 24 24
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 4 5 4 5 5 6 5 5 4 4 0 0 7 7
Stems per ACRE 688 769 890 931 688 809 769 769 850 850 0 0 971 971
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 53 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY02 2021)
Plot 08 Plot 09 Plot 10 Plot 11 Plot 12 Plot 13 Plot 14
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly(Ilex opaca)
American Hornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana)
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 2 7 2 6 8 1 2 1 1 5 5
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 1
Black Willow(Sally nigra) 1 3 3 3
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 1
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana)
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 1
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra) 1
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 1 1
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 2 2 1 1 5 5
Red Maple(Acer rubrum)
River Birch(Betula nigra) 1 1 5 5 7 7 1 1
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata)
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii)
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 7 7 1 1 3 3 8 10 4 5 6 6
White Oak(Quercus alba) 2 2 4 5 3 3
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 8 8 7 7 3 3 5 5 8 8 4 4 20 20
Unknown
Stem count 18 25 17 20 16 18 11 14 20 24 21 24 31 31
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 4 6 5 7 3 3 5 5 3 4 7 9 3 3
Stems per ACRE 728 1,012 688 809 647 728 445 567 809 971 850 971 1,255 1,255
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 54 MP02 Monitoring Report

Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY02 2021)
Plot 15 Plot 16 Plot 17 Plot 18 Plot R1 Plot R2 Plot R3
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly (Ilex opaca)
American Hornbeam(Carpinus car•oliniana)
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 9 9 5 7 11 25 5 5 6 6 11 11
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 1 2
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 2 12 12
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 3 3 1
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana)
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra)
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 5 5
Pin Oak(Quercus palustr•is)
Red Maple(Acer rubrum)
River Birch(Betula nigra) 8 8 9 9 1 1 1 1
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata)
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 2 2 1 1 2 2
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulip/era) 3 3 1 1 1 1 5 5 4 4 2 2 2 2
White Oak(Quercus alba)
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 10 10 10 10 4 4 14 14 3 3 3 3 2 2
Unknown
Stem count 32 33 21 21 10 14 30 49 20 23 23 24 16 16
size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 5 6 4 4 3 4 3 5 6 7 4 5 4 4
Stems per ACRE 1,295 1,335 850 850 405 567 1,214 1,983 809 931 931 971 647 647
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 J. MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY02 2021)
Plot R4 Plot R5 Plot R6 Plot R7 Plot R8 Plot R9 Plot R10
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly (Ilex opaca)
American Hornbeam(Carpinus car•oliniana)
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 3 3 2 2 14 14 57 57 2 2 24 24 1 1
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 2 3
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 16 16 6 6 1 1
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 4 1 1 1
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana)
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra)
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 1 1
Pin Oak(Quercus palustr•is) 1 1 2 2
Red Maple(Acer rubrum)
River Birch(Betula nigra) 1 1 4 4 5 5 4 4 2 2
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata) 1 1
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulip/era) 1 1 8 8 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 4 4
White Oak(Quercus alba) 1 1 1 1
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 2 2 5 5 2 2 4 4 9 9 1 1
Unknown
Stem count 6 8 17 21 39 40 73 74 13 16 41 41 9 10
size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size (ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 3 4 5 6 6 7 7 8 5 6 7 7 5 6
Stems per ACRE 243 324 688 850 1,578 1,619 2,954 2,995 526 647 1,659 1,659 364 405
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 56 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Current Plot Data(MY02 2021) Annual Means
Plot R11 Plot R12 MY02(2021) MY01(2020) MY00(2020)
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly (Ilex opaca) 1
American Hornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana) 2
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 4 4 18 18 204 232 159 207 88 88
Black Walnut(Juglans nigra) 2 13 6 4
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 39 43 14 14 5 5
Boxelder(Acer negundo) 17 4 37 20
Eastern Red Cedar(Juniperus virginiana) 1
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) 1 2
Northern Red Oak(Quercus rubra) 1 1 1
Oak(Quercus sp.) 206 206
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 1 1
Pin Oak(Quercus palustr•is) 22 22 20 20
Red Maple(Acer rubr•um) 8
River Birch(Betula nigra) 76 76 83 85 107 107
Southern Red Oak(Quercus falcata) 1 1 5
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 14 14 15 15 20 20
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifer•a) 3 3 4 4 88 92 99 109 172 172
White Oak(Quercus alba) 12 13 10 12
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 8 8 2 2 180 180 220 223 30 30
Unknown 89 89
Stem count 15 32 24 30 636 725 620 731 718 723
size (ares) 1 1 30 30 30
size (ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.741 0.741 0.741
Species count 3 4 3 5 9 13 8 17 9 11
Stems per ACRE 607 1,295 971 1,214 858 978 836 986 969 975
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 57 MY02 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX D
Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 58 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9a. UTHC-1 Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 5.8-10.6 9.0-10.0 6.5-9 6.0 7.6 8.9 3
Floodprone Width(ft) 9.0-27.3 13-21 50 59.1 64.6 68.3 3
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4-0.8 1.1-1.2 0.5-0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 3
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.4-1.2 1.3-1.5 0.8-1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 3
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.8-4.5 10.4-10.7 3.4-6.1 4.5 5.1 5.5 3
Width/Depth Ratio 7.6-28.2 8-10 12.4-13.4 8.2 11.6 14.4 3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2-2.6 1.3-2.3 5.6-7.7 6.6 8.7 11.0 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0-10.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 45 26-61 26-61
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 13-42 18-27 18-27
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 1.3-4.4 2.0-4.1 2.0-4.1
Meander Wavelength(ft) 93-136 54-125 54-125
Meander Width Ratio 4.5-5.0 4.0-7.5 4.0-7.5
Riffle Length(ft) * 4.2 27.2 40.9 30
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.024-0.033 0.013-0.028 0.018-0.046 0.011 0.024 0.059 30
Pool Length(ft) * 9.8 61.1 161.9 28
Pool Spacing(ft) * 30-59 48-70 31.3 59.3 118.6 27
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 2/18/51/28/0/0 1/19/51/26/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 1.3/18/37/97/130 Gravel Gravel 1.3/9.7/31/91/147
Channel length(ft) 1,874 1,739 1,739
Drainage Area(acres) 114 Variable 114 114
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.021 0.013 0.025 0.026
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 59 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9b. UTHC3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
r ) _
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 8.5-14.1 9.0-10.0 12 10.9 11.3 11.7 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 17.1 13-21 68 69.4 72.6 75.8 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8-1.6 1.1-1.2 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1-2.0 1.3-1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 8.5-12.5 10.4-10.7 11.4 10.6 12.0 13.3 2
Width/Depth Ratio 17 8-10 12.7 10.2 10.7 11.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 1.3-2.3 5.7 5.9 6.5 7.0 2
Bank Height Ratio 3.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 45 39-57 39-57
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 13-42 24-36 24-36
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 1.3-4.4 24-36 24-36
Meander Wavelength(ft) 93-136 111-173 111-173
Meander Width Ratio 4.5-5.0 3.3-4.8 3.3-4.8
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) ir w I 18.2 46.0 85.8 18
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.015 0.013-0.028 0.0007-0.032 0.003 0.015 0.040 18
Pool Length(ft) 15.9 26.6 49.1 17
Pool Spacing(ft) * 30-59 52-101 48.8 75.5 113.5 16
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 3/15/57/19/0/6 0/13/48/37/1/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 2.7/15/26/40/92 Gravel Gravel 2.5/23/48/125/165
Channel length(ft) 1,411 1,325 1,325
Drainage Area(acres) 297 Variable 297 297
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.014 0.013 0.015 0.015
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 60 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9c. T1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.1-7.5 6.5 6.5
Floodprone Width(ft) 6.0-32.8 35 48.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.5-0.7 0.5 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.8-1.0 0.8 1.2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.7-3.8 3.4 3.9
Width/Depth Ratio 6.2-14.9 12-18 12.4 10.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.5-4.4 2.2+ 5.4 7.5
Bank Height Ratio 1.0-4.5 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 23-41 23-41
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 15-22 15-22
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 2.2-3.4 2.2-3.4
Meander Wavelength(ft) 60-83 60-83
Meander Width Ratio 3.5-6.3 3.5-6.3
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 7.8 22.0 42.2 16
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.019-0.028 0.015-0.60 0.002 0.022 0.035 16
Pool Length(ft) 3.5 12.6 20.1 16
Pool Spacing(ft) * 25-63 24.4 41.3 58.4 15
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 31/21/44/4/1/0 2/15/66/17/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.13/0.37/3/38/66 Gravel Gravel 1.9/8.8/22/67/94
Channel length(ft) 764 751 751
Drainage Area(acres) 43 Variable 43 43
Rosgen Classification B4,C4,G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.026 N/A 0.026 0.025
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 61 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9d. T1A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 7.1 5.5 5.4 5.6 5.8 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 7.7 35 44.5 49.4 54.4 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.8 2.5 1.8 2.1 2.3 2
Width/Depth Ratio 18.2 12-18 12.1 14.1 15.0 15.9 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 6.4 7.7 8.9 10.1 2
Bank Height Ratio 19.6 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 20-28 20-28
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 15-22 15-22
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 2.3-3.4 2.3-3.4
Meander Wavelength(ft) 72-84 72-84
Meander Width Ratio 3.6-5.1 3.6-5.1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 1.4 20.7 51.8 16
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.025 0.020-0.062 0.000 0.025 0.046 16
Pool Length(ft) II 4.9 14.7 27.2 16
Pool Spacing(ft) * 32-58 32.8 44.7 65.8 15
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 31/51/12/6/0/0 5/19/62/14/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.062/0.072/0.13/2.9/71 Gravel Gravel 0.7/5.8/20/59/99
Channel length(ft) 746 795 795
Drainage Area(acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.022 N/A 0.030 0.030
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 62 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9e. T2-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.1 4.5 4.7
Floodprone Width(ft) 4 22 24.1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.5 0.4 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.8 0.6 0.9
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.5 1.7 2.3
-
Width/Depth Ratio 6.3 12-18 12.0 9.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 2.2+ 4.9 5.1
Bank Height Ratio 3.3 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) IIII- 1.6 13.2 40.9 8
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.04 0.024-0.063 0.023 0.049 0.099 8
Pool Length(ft) 1. 3.6 14.8 31.4 7
Pool Spacing(ft) * 21-34 24.1 37.8 55.6 6
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 11/14/63/13/0/0 14/30/27/30/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.26/13/21/58/84 Gravel Gravel 0.1/0.7/6/87/130
Channel length(ft) 232 265 265
Drainage Area(acres) 16 Variable 16 16
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.038 N/A 0.042 0.040
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 63 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9f. T3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.5 4.5 4.7
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.2 18 19.2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.4 0.6 0.7
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.1 1.7 1.9
Width/Depth Ratio 11.3 12-18 12.0 11.6
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 2.2+ 4.0 4.1
Bank Height Ratio 3.3 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) 2.2 13.3 25.7 13
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.058 0.051-0.074 0.032 0.058 0.125 13
Pool Length(ft) i 3.4 9.5 20.7 12
Pool Spacing(ft) * 20-30 22.8 28.2 46.7 11
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 28/5/38/27/4 - 6/11/71/13/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.062/3.1/25/130/240 Gravel Gravel 1.7/7.8/28/61/84
Channel length(ft) 378 369 369
Drainage Area(acres) 7 Variable 7 7
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.059 N/A 0.059 0.057
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 64 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9g. T4 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 2.5 4.5 4.0
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.7 16 18.7
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.6 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.4 0.6 0.8
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 0.7 1.7 1.9
-
Width/Depth Ratio 9.4 12-18 12.0 8.3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 2.2+ 3.6 4.7
Bank Height Ratio 6.9 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) Mil N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) IIII- 7.9 13.4 22.2 7
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.1 0.102-0.103 0.039 0.11 0.23 7
Pool Length(ft) 3.2 5.4 11.0 7
Pool Spacing(ft) * 24-27 9.5 19.5 26.5 6
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 12/65/13/8/2/0 0/15/77/8/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.11/0.16/0.21/4.3/120 Gravel Gravel 2.2/9.6/15/48/76
Channel length(ft) 151 151 151
Drainage Area(acres) 3 Variable 3 3
Rosgen Classification B4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1-1.3 1.0 1.0
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.089 N/A 0.113 0.109
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 65 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9h. T6-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.4 5.5 5.6
Floodprone Width(ft) 5.4 24 27.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.7 0.7 1.0
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.6 2.5 2.6
Width/Depth Ratio 7.5 12-18 12.1 11.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 4.9
Bank Height Ratio 4.4 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) 15.4 25.1 37.9 15
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.02 0.020-0.063 0.007 0.033 0.070 15
Pool Length(ft) M 5.9 14.1 22.7 15
Pool Spacing(ft) * 32-47 28.8 42.9 50.9 14
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 7/33/60/0/0/0 1/16/53/30/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.19/1.6/4.1/13/27 Gravel Gravel 1.7/16/38/93/140
Channel length(ft) 621 658 658
Drainage Area(acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.041 N/A 0.034 0.037
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 66 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9i. T6A-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) ' ' 4.5 4.4
Floodprone Width(ft) 24 25.3
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) ' ' 0.6 0.6
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) ' ' 1.7 1.7
Width/Depth Ratio 12-18 12.0 11.0
Entrenchment Ratio 2.2+ 5.3 5.8
Bank Height Ratio 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) ' ' N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) ' ' N/A N/A
Mil
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) ' ' N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) ' ' N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio ' ' N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) mIIII - 9.3 14.8 24.0 3
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.087-0.099 0.056 0.091 0.118 3
Pool Length(ft) 14.2 16.7 19.5 3
Pool Spacing(ft) 22-23 29.4 30.0 30.6 2
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% ' ' 0/14/70/16/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) ' ' Gravel Gravel 2.6/25/36/64/85
Channel length(ft) 97 101 101
Drainage Area(acres) 9 Variable 9 9
Rosgen Classification ' ' B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) ' ' N/A 0.091 0.095
**Existing conditions are ponded
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 67 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9j. T7-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.2 6.5 10.1
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.6 28 47.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8 0.5 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 0.8 1.0
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.4 3.4 4.3
Width/Depth Ratio 4.1 12-18 12.4 23.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.4 2.2+ 4.3 4.7
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) 20-24 20-24
Radius of Curvature(ft) 15-22 15-22
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) 2.3-3.4 2.3-3.4
Meander Wavelength(ft) 85-88 85-88
Meander Width Ratio 3.1-3.7 3.1-3.7
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) 4.5 32.4 68.1 6
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.032 0.017-0.043 0.015 0.025 0.029 6
Pool Length(ft) 4.9 12.5 19.7 6
Pool Spacing(ft) * 36-57 45.7 54.6 86.6 5
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 3/18/62/16/1/0 0/20/62/17/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 1.2/7.9/22/66/89 Gravel Gravel 0.8/8.5/17/67/110
Channel length(ft) 335 348 348
Drainage Area(acres) 41 Variable 41 41
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.033 N/A 0.024 0.022
:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 68 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9k. T8-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
i.
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.6 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.7 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.1 25 34.8 39.1 43.4 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.4 2.5 3.2 3.3 3.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 5.5 12-18 12.1 9.1 9.6 10.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 6.3 7.0 7.6 2
Bank Height Ratio 2.5 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 9.3 23.3 31.9 10
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.041 0.043-0.050 0.033 0.048 0.063 10
Pool Length(ft) 7.9 13.4 16.6 10
Pool Spacing(ft) * 32-45 34.1 42.2 53.6 9
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 18/27/40/14/0/0 4/17/52/27/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.13/2.2/8.5/81/140 Gravel Gravel 0.7/14/37/95/135
Channel length(ft) 486 448 448
Drainage Area(acres) 21 Variable 21 21
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.044 N/A 0.045 0.048
*:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 69 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 91. T8A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
-.-
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.1 4.5 4.7 5.7 6.6 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.1 20 21.6 44.7 67.9 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.0 1.7 2.6 2.7 2.9 2
Width/Depth Ratio 5.5 12-18 12.0 8.6 11.9 15.2 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 4.6 7.4 10.3 2
Bank Height Ratio 2.7 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
-
Channel Beltwidth(ft) N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 12.3 22.7 42.7 7
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.044 0.019-0.062 0.027 0.053 0.10 7
Pool Length(ft) 6.3 12.4 22.4 6
Pool Spacing(ft) * 28-38 27.7 40.3 66.1 5
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 100/0/0/0/0/0 4/17/54/25/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.062/0.062/0.062/0.062/0.062 Gravel Gravel 1.8/23/32/84/135
Channel length(ft) 258 262 262
Drainage Area(acres) 7 Variable 7 7
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.052 N/A 0.044 0.047
*:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 70 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 9m. T9 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 2.9 5.5 4.1
Floodprone Width(ft) 5.5 22 29.6
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.5 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 0.7 0.9
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 2.0 2.5 2.8
Width/Depth Ratio 4.3 12-18 12.1 6.0
Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 2.2+ 4.0 7.2
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 1.0-1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature(ft) N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength(ft) N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length(ft) 10.5 22.8 31.7 4
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.031 0.037 0.033 0.039 0.056 4
Pool Length(ft) ■ 3.9 6.2 7.7 3
Pool Spacing(ft) * 34-36 37.02 39.1 41.1 2
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 26/66/8/0/0/0 3/7/59/31/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.062/0.13/0.15/0.23/3.7 Gravel Gravel 12/32/42/90/150
Channel length(ft) 133 129 129
Drainage Area(acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification B4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1-1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.039 N/A 0.042 0.038
*:no data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 71 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 10. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Cross-Section 1 (Riffle) Cross-Section 2(Riffle) Cross-Section 3(Pool)
Dimension and Substrate Station 13+50,UTHC-1 Station 19+25,UTHC-1 Station 19+50,UTHC-1
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 948.8 948.8 948.9 I 931.0 930.9 930.7 930.3 930.1 930.0 WIN
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.0 6.6 6.1 8.0 7.0 7.8 8.4 7.8 8.2
Floodprone Width(ft) 66.3 66.6 67.4 68.3 70.7 69.6
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.3 5.3 5.3 7.4 7.4 7.4
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 4.5 4.4 3.8 5.3 6.1 8.3 7.4 9.5 10.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.2 9.6 8.3 12.1 9.2 11.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 11.0 10.1 11.0 8.6 10.1 8.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9
d50(mm) 48 48 37.0 • 24 40 22.0 1
Cross-Section 4(Pool) Cross-Section 5(Riffle) Cross-Section 6(Riffle)
Station 23+17,UTHC-1 Station 23+32,UTHC-1 Station 30+20,UTHC-2
_ MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 923.0 922.9 923.0 ' 922.8 922.9 922.9 908.7 908.7 908.7
Bankfull Width(ft) 13.1 12.1 12.0 8.9 8.6 9.6 22.6 22.8 23.0
Floodprone Width(ft) --- --- --- 59.1 57.6 57.9 43.0 43.0 41.1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.2 1.3 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.5 2.4 2.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.2 2.4 2.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 3.7 3.6 3.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 15.4 15.4 15.4 5.5 5.5 5.5 55.5 55.5 55.5
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 15.4 16.8 16.6 5.5 4.9 4.7 55.5 55.9 54.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio --- --- --- 14.4 13.2 16.5 9.2 9.3 9.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio --- --- --- 6.6 6.7 6.0 1.9 1.9 1.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio --- --- --- 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0
d50(mm) --- --- --- , 21 38 58 19 31 33.0 I
Cross-Section 7 (Riffle) Cross-Section 8(Pool) Cross-Section 9 (Riffle)
Station 38+52,UTHC-2 Station 46+20,UTHC-3 Station 46+48,UTHC-3
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 iMv MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 883.7 883.7 883.8 I 871.2 871.2 870.3 871.0 870.9 871.0 WEIN
Bankfull Width(ft) 12.9 11.8 11.6 10.4 10.4 10.9 10.9 11.2 11.9
Floodprone Width(ft) 37.6 38.4 37.6 75.8 76.1 76.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.3 1.4 1.4 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.0 1.0 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.0 2.2 2.1 3.8 3.8 2.8 1.4 1.6 1.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 16.7 16.7 16.7 20.8 20.8 20.8 10.6 10.6 10.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 16.7 16.6 15.8 20.8 20.8 31.9 10.6 11.4 10.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 9.9 8.3 8.0 --- --- --- 11.1 11.7 13.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 2.9 3.3 3.3 --- --- --- 7.0 6.8 6.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 --- --- --- 1.0 1.0 1.0
d50(mm) 19 55 66 --- --- --- 50 64 58
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 -_ MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 10. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Cross-Section 10 (Riffle) Cross-Section 11(Riffle) Cross-Section 12(Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate Station 53+10,UTHC-3 Station 57+40,UTHC-4 Station 65+80,UTHC-6
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 861.6 861.7 861.8 853.8 853.9 853.8 * 845.4 845.4 845.4
Bankfull Width(ft) 11.7 14.0 11.5 11.9 12.1 12.7 17.6 19.0 20.0
Floodprone Width(ft) 69.4 69.5 69.3 43.2 43.8 44.2 30.7 17.7 19.8
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.8 2.6 2.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 13.3 13.3 13.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 30.2 29.7 30.2
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 13.3 12.1 10.9 17.3 16.0 17.2 30.2 29.7 28.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.2 14.7 9.9 8.2 8.5 9.4 10.3 12.2 13.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 5.9 5.0 6.0 3.6 3.6 3.5 1.7 0.9 1.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 3.2 1.0 0.9
d50(mm) 45 51 47 19 72 52 20 65 39
Cross-Section 13(Riffle) Cross-Section 14(Riffle) Cross-Section 15(Riffle)
Station 67+20,UTHC-6 Station 155+00,T1A Station 156+20,T1A
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 847.4 847.2 847.2 943.6 943.6 943.6 938.9 939.1 939.0 111111
Bankfull Width(ft) 24.9 27.3 27.2 5.4 4.8 4.7 5.8 5.5 6.1
Floodprone Width(ft) 67.7 68.1 68.8 54.4 54.3 54.7 44.5 46.4 46.4
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.6 1.4 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 2.6 3.2 3.1 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 38.7 38.7 38.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.3
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 38.7 42.1 42.3 1.8 1.9 1.8 2.3 1.7 1.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 16.0 19.3 19.1 15.9 12.5 12.4 14.1 12.9 15.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 2.5 2.5 10.1 11.4 11.5 7.7 8.4 7.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.0
d50(mm) 21 37 47 j 24 29 32 16 19 48 1
Cross-Section 16 (Riffle) Cross-Section 17(Pool) Cross-Section 18 (Riffle)
Station 104+80,T1 Station 105+10,T1 Station 206+60,T2
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 I MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 929.2 929.2 929.2 928.4 928.4 928.4 923.4 923.4 923.4
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.5 8.6 7.0 8.7 7.8 8.4 4.7 5.8 5.9
Floodprone Width(ft) 48.4 49.6 47.7 --- --- --- 24.1 24.6 24.5
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2 1.3 1.0 2.3 2.1 2.0 0.9 0.9 0.9
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 3.9 3.9 3.9 8.3 8.3 8.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 3.9 3.7 3.4 8.3 8.4 7.7 2.3 1.9 1.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.9 19.3 12.6 --- --- --- 9.9 14.7 15.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.5 5.7 6.8 --- --- --- 5.1 4.3 4.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 0.9 --- --- --- 1.0 0.8 1.0
d50(mm) 22 27 9.4 --- --- --- _ 6.4 69 21
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 73 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 10. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Cross-Section 19 (Pool) Cross-Section 20(Riffle) Cross-Section 21(Pool)
Dimension and Substrate Station 206+80,T2 Station 302+80,T3 Station 303+30 T3
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 922.6 922.6 922.7 917.7 917.8 917.7 916.6 916.6 916.6
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.7 6.6 6.2 4.7 4.8 5.1 7.8 7.2 6.8
Floodprone Width(ft) --- --- --- 19.2 19.0 18.9 --- --- ---
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.7 1.9 1.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 1.9 1.8 1.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 5.6 5.6 5.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 7.7 7.7 7.3
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 5.6 5.2 5.2 1.9 1.3 2.0 7.7 8.1 7.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio --- --- --- 11.6 12.3 13.6 --- --- ---
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio --- --- --- 4.1 3.9 3.7 --- --- ---
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio --- --- --- 1.0 1.0 0.9 --- --- ---
d50(mm) --- --- --- 28 26 20 --- --- ---
Cross-Section 22(Riffle) Cross-Section 23(Riffle) Cross-Section 24(Riffle)
Station 400+90,T4 Station 651+25,T6A Station 608+15,T6
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 OM MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 906.2 906.2 906.3 894.3 894.3 894.6 877.9 878.4 878.4
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.0 4.4 8.7 4.4 3.5 3.2 5.6 3.8 3.5
Floodprone Width(ft) 18.7 19.2 19.3 25.3 29.8 32.0 27.4 43.8 46.5
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.6 2.6 2.6
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 1.9 1.9 0.9 1.7 1.8 1.1 2.6 0.8 0.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.3 10.0 38.7 11.0 7.1 5.9 11.9 5.5 4.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.7 4.4 2.2 5.8 8.5 10.0 4.9 11.6 13.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.5 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.7
d50(mm) 15 12 15 36 35 32 , 38 15 12
Cross-Section 25 (Pool) Cross-Section 26 (Pool) Cross-Section 27 (Riffle)
Station 608+40,T6 Station 703+40,T7 Station 703+70,T7
' MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 877.6 877.7 878.1 868.2 868.0 868.1 867.5 867.6 867.8
Bankfull Width(ft) 8.4 5.1 6.3 7.2 6.0 6.2 10.1 7.3 5.7
Floodprone Width(ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 47.4 47.0 44.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.8
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 1.6 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.2
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 5.1 5.1 5.1 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.3 4.3
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 5.1 4.4 2.6 4.6 5.8 5.1 4.3 3.5 2.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio --- --- --- --- --- --- 23.9 12.4 7.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio --- --- --- --- --- --- 4.7 6.5 7.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio --- --- --- --- --- --- 1.0 0.9 0.9
d50(mm) --- --- --- --- --- 17 22 28
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 74 MY02 Monitoring Report

Table 10. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Cross-Section 28(Riffle) Cross-Section 29(Riffle) Cross-Section 30(Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate Station 900+80,T9 Station 806+10,T8 Station 807+45,T8
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 ' MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 853.0 853.3 853.3 849.8 849.9 850.0 842.8 842.8 842.9
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.1 4.7 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.8 7.1
Floodprone Width(ft) 29.6 31.9 31.6 34.8 43.8 40.6 43.4 42.0 42.5
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.2
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 2.8 1.5 1.5 3.4 2.9 2.6 3.2 3.4 3.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 6.0 7.9 9.9 9.1 9.0 8.5 i 10.1 10.5 15.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.2 6.7 6.0 6.3 7.9 7.6 7.6 7.2 6.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0
d50(mm) 42 6.7 9.3 36 68 83 37 16 55
Cross-Section 31(Riffle) Cross-Section 32(Riffle)
Station 850+60,T8A Station 851+75,T8A
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 850.8 850.9 850.8 845.8 845.6 845.7
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.7 5.2 5.7 4.8 4.1 4.5
Floodprone Width(ft) 21.6 21.8 22.0 49.3 49.4 49.3
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.0
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.1 2.1 2.1
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 2.6 2.3 2.6 2.1 2.8 2.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.6 10.7 12.6 11.4 8.2 10.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.6 4.2 3.9 10.2 12.0 10.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0
d50(mm) 54 5 6.6 10 54 37
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 75 MY02 Monitoring Report

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River ; - . - -� �
Site: Mill Dam Creek ' \ ' `°� ' / '��'
XS ID XS1 \ �` .
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.18
Date: 7/20/2021
TS/AG Field Crew:
a
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 949.62 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 948.93 �` v �a<'i� , 'F_
0.1 948.48 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.5
5.5 948.41 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 3.8 *
11.4 948.10 Bankfull Width: 6.1 " ' t y� ; �' , „ :
a
18.7 948.24 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 950.25 • t r $ _� k"4
29.3 948.43 Flood Prone Width: 67.4 41/2:1 '� 4 I lspt f
36.9 948.58 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3i'' ', Y�' ''q6p�''��` ��` j'� "" -�,4 � ,
38.4 948.55 Mean De th at Bankfull: 0.7 ����`� I1 ,f '1F f�,�':�'yi�y „t �
39.8 947.94 W/D Ratio: 8.3 3 \ ,s:w 1, �,t ' +; f 1
40.3 947.33 Entrenchment Ratio: 11.0 y F . s
41.1 947.31 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 ' ti '''''\.. , � _ \.
41.8 947.51 Thalweg Elevation: 947.61 I a`r tl'`l "'"'' ' `' ` * - ' h .
42.6 947.92
43.9 948.24 Mill Dam Creek,XS1, Riffle,UTHC
44.6 948.58 955
46.1 948.58 =
50.6 948.53 954
56.0 948.65 _ I
61.3 948.51 953 /
63.3 948.73 952 /
66.3 949.53 =
70.4 951.09 . 951 _
73.2 952.11
76.8 952.45 0 950
‘ " "‘sc..,'"1 /'
76.9 953.44 949 �.,___
W 948
947
946 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek f. i
- -'NY -sue ,-N R
� -
,
XS ID XS2 �` , iicis� �• ��
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.18
Date: 7/20/2021 ;; r •
Field Crew: TS/AG
Station Elevation Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA q<' f"` ;, '%
0.0 935.87 85.7 933.89 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 930.70 -
0.1 935.32 89.3 933.99 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.3 'A ti -
4.5 935.03 92.0 934.41 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 8.3 4 may'-6 `;-, y
} ..R; ;.a
7.0 934.32 92.2 935.42 Bankfull Width: 7.8 .
10.1 933.01 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 932.01
14.0 931.59 Flood Prone Width: 69.6 ' ',.0. �). r �.k
15.9 931.17 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 1 •;', •n 4Z r, ; ' ;m a,," ,!per:
20.1 931.10 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 + . , 0
25.4 931.09 W/D Ratio: 11.6 �fi�.. , �''� ti � '
30.8 931.30 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.9 • 9 ,3
35.3 931.11 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 .4,4� p ` yam r ��
38.2 931.04 Thalweg Elevation: 929.39 r '' '"
38.2 931.04
38.2 931.03 Mill Dam Creek, XS2, Riffle, UTHC
39.2 930.90 937
43.0 930.72
44.1 930.62 936
45.0 930.22
45.1 930.14 935
45.7 929.79
46.7 929.39 934
46.9 929.57 7
48.2 929.43 933
48.1 929.42 0
48.8 929.69 '� 932 _
48.9 930.12
50.0 930.21 W 931 -
51.4 930.91 J
52.1 930.88 930 -_ i
55.2 930.63 929
59.9 930.29 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
65.1 930.43
72.7 930.43 Station(feet)
77.6 930.48 ---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02
80.0 930.93
83.0 932.30

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River _ s -,g:
} :
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS3 r `� '
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.18
Date: 7/20/2021
Field Crew: TS/AG } ,
y...,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ; N $� , 4 �s
, wt ° _ Arc` �3.
0.0 934.74 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 930.04FZIO
a _ r s� i,,,� ,, ,�. , :ti ' I r
0.4 934.07 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 7.4 `�'' 1_ t, , di. F . ,,, rl ` + . rra.
2.0 933.72 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 10.1
6.0 931.78 Bankfull Width: 8.2 y0 ti 4 4e. r , / .. _
9.0 931.13 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --
12.2 930.54 Flood Prone Width:
16.5 930.42 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 °
21.2 930.40 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9
+
22.8 930.24 W/D Ratio: --- �'''�,. r -t
24.1 930.23 Entrenchment Ratio: ___ r.-•: A . ' :
24.7 930.02 Bank Height Ratio: --- � ��
25.4 929.88 Thalweg Elevation: 928.37 ' i_ } i
26.1 929.28
26.6 929.02 Mill Dam Creek, XS3, Pool, UTHC
27.3 928.67
27.9 928.37 937
28.9 928.41 936 30.1 928.49
30.6 929.34 935 t
31.0 929.54 934 -\
31.7 929.70 933 _
33.0 930.10
34.4 930.13 932
37.7 930.15 0 931
41.4 929.94
45.7 929.95 930 _
51.6 929.98 W 929
57.8 930.14
64.1 930.15 928 -
68.7 930.15 927 J I I I I 1 I
71.5 931.06 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
73.5 931.71
76.8 933.87 Station(feet)
80.9 934.37 ---•Bankfull MY00 MYO1 MY02
81.0 935.36

Cross-Section Plots
, ,,
River Basin: Yadkin River 4_.� .� ,� .;
,•
'
Site: Mill Dam Creek ► ::
XS ID XS4 x '`
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.18 '
4{k
Date: 7/20/2021 ;„
Field Crew: TS/AG '�
ktf;:�
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA g • •
t >r
0.0 927.08 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 922.95
0.1 926.33 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 15.4
3.3 926.09 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 16.6 *+
5.0 926.05 Bankfull Width: 12.0
6.3 925.33 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- YA � Fs� " �
9.0 923.88 Flood Prone Width: --- g °' x s ; k�`'
10.2 923.41 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.3 pn 'r'd }rj ,p e $ y °,�*p A�i ,re��,�y, , _ 4irs, 1..E
15.3 923.15 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 ',; $�i,444 1 � � .,. ¢,+ �A r + , ' C
20.6 923.03 W/D Ratio: --- Kee ^ _e„_.,„, �' ! I �` ;�'
i`,
y�,
k � ^F' - 2e
22.0 923.04 Entrenchment Ratio: --- a.� �. .� -��'zr _ � ' '
23.1 922.93 Bank Height Ratio: --- N1. '��- `� � �a2�Y
23.8 922.78 Thalweg Elevation: 920.63 *h '
24.3 922.35
25.0 920.76
26.6 920.64 Mill Dam Creek, XS4, Pool, UTHC
28.4 920.63 929
29.6 920.83 928 -
30.8 921.55
31.6 922.53 927
33.0 922.59 926 - \
34.7 922.91
35.7 923.14 925 = \
38.1 923.22 g 924 -
45.9 923.20 0 923 - -
53.8 923.21 .ti =
58.9 923.39 922
62.4 923.50 W 921
64.0 923.94 =
67.2 925.52 920
70.3 926.93 919 -_
74.6 927.54 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
74.9 928.09
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River -. _
Site: Mill Dam Creek �� t ' . �t-4 i ,�. 11. y
XS ID XS5 -fib- 'i ., �; �•
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.18
Date: 7/20/2021
Field Crew: =TS/AG [
4 .
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ,, s', ��
0.0 926.29 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 922.94 +° 5 a
0.1 925.58 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.5
3.4 925.31 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 4.7 '"J' � �' . `p
tx4i 1 �i ,•hT r P 7 5 � ` 1! A^� 1 s` Y`:..
4.9 924.54 Bankfull Width: 9.6 E1 ,,.s *`�, f `,„ , ,, +� '': 7 '
8.5 922.91 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 923.87 � � i'� * r % > , CC,;° r� � -- .
10.2 922.69 Flood Prone Width: 57.9 ` % ' =,. ,' `." � F t-' ,
14.6 922.74 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 " 'ti" ��` 1; 4 r47 �r ,E/ , v+ '
18.7 922.74 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 lu � � - � ��
23.9 922.85 W/D Ratio: 16.5 �, ��
26.9 922.85 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.0
29.1 922.95 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 !`r
30.3 922.72 Thalweg Elevation: 922.01 1 , /'•-- +'` f ,-, )i
31.2 922.47
31.5 922.17 Mill Dam Creek,XS5, Riffle,UTHC
32.4 922.26
33.1 922.30 930 _
34.1 922.01 929
34.9 922.15
36.0 922.10 928 -
36.6 922.33 927
37.8 922.38 =
38.7 922.85 7 926
40.1 922.81
\u,
43.9 922.88 0 925 _
48.5 922.89 924 . /
52.6 922.96 _
59.6 922.91 w 923 --
62.8 923.43 = �
65.9 924.36 922
69.7 926.30 921 ,
71.6 927.17 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
75.1 927.67
75.1 928.48 Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS6
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.22
Date: 7/20/2021 �r: 'r �
Field Crew: TS/AG
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 910.77 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 908.74 i
3.6 910.26 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 55.5
6.3 909.77 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 54.9 ,
8.6 909.41 Bankfull Width: 23.0 4-:
9.8 908.28 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 912.41 f
12.0 906.73 Flood Prone Width: 41.1
14.1 906.25 Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.7
15.8 906.00 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 2.4
16.4 905.67 W/D Ratio: 9.5
17.3 905.23 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.8 '� - -w " ,_
17.9 905.30 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 - --- �� ,.- 4, 4 F
18.7 905.09 Thalweg Elevation: 905.06
19.9 905.06
21.3 905.78 Mill Dam Creek, XS6, Riffle, UTHC
22.2 905.94 914
23.6 905.73 =
26.7 905.72 913 --
28.1 906.31 • •
30.7 907.73 912
31.7 908.67 911 -�
32.9 908.80
910 =
36.9 909.02
39.2 909.51 909
41.1 910.51 0 908 7.'
Zi
of 907
Z. 906 -
905
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River *, � ,
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS7 '
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.22 ''; i
Date: 7/21/2021 ��
4 g
Field Crew: TS/AG
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ti•,,; ----- __:
_
889.04Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Basedon AB-Bankfull Area883.800.1 888.51BankfullCross-SectionalArea: 16.7 .
3.5 888.50Total Cross-Sectional Area: 15.8 ¢; •7.6 888.50Bankfull Width: 11.6 _ = 1 � .` • Oi-
0.0
10.0 888.04 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 885.91 r • w '
11.9 886.66 Flood Prone Width: 37.9 ^` I ,�
14.5 885.17 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.1 tf�i� _ ,� E �,� *�� r
16.9 884.95 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.4 i a i
17.6 884.91 W/DRatio: 8.0 b j- i,*41 , a . >; -' ,N
18.4 884.66 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.3 � �: � z '
18.9 884.15 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 A
19.3 882.30 Thalweg Elevation: 881.69 - r x
20.1 881.99
21.1 881.76 Mill Dam Creek, XS7, Riffle, UTHC
22.7 881.73
23.3 881.95 891 =
24.5 882.29 890 -_ /
21.8 881.69 892 --
25.9 882.25 889 J
27.9 882.72 888 -
30.5 883.41
32.9 883.87 887
37.7 883.99 g \NS,
886 = -
, V
43.9 884.69 0 $$5
49.7 885.21 ti 884 ---------------
52.1 886.69 883 F61.0
W
888.25 881 t=
64.2 889.13 880
67.6 889.89 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
70.6 890.62
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River +,. =
Site: Mill Dam Creek �� �-., ".. _ z-, 'E''� - a,x" • ,.
K i
XS ID XS8 �' ,
Drainage Area(sq mi): 1.07 ti, h .
ya
Date: 7/21/2021 �,.
Field Crew: TS/AG
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 873.10 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 870.28 s
0.0 872.46 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 20.8 `
3.1 872.28 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 31.9
7.5 872.23 Bankfull Width: 10.9 f • -
r1
9.5 871.47 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- ti _ ,`4 `.
11.4 871.21 Flood Prone Width: --- '
13.6 871.50 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.8 f
17.1 871.45 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.9 14� �F, ..
20.6 871.46 W/D Ratio: --- �� t � k bf
22.4 871.55 Entrenchment Ratio: --- , � ,, � � �'
23.6 871.54 Bank Height Ratio: --- E_ < �': ^
24.7 870.90 Thalweg Elevation: 867.46 '"'-
26.4 870.15
27.2 869.00 Mill Dam Creek, XS8, Pool,UTHC
28.1 868.48
29.3 867.62 874
30.4 867.60 873
31.7 867.46 i
33.6 867.97 872 -1------- -- - -
35.1 868.73
36.6 869.40 871
36.7 870.10 -
37.5 870.62 870
38.7 871.19 z _
o 869 1\‘ /
40.6 871.42 '- _
41.9 871.62 °' 868
44.4 871.71 W -
48.0 871.70 867 = _`
53.3 871.55 =
59.6 871.37 866 ,
65.8 871.62 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
72.7 871.56
78.5 871.48 Station(feet)
81.0 871.66 ---•Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek „ qa«+i �,
XS ID XS9
•Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46 �.,, ;• r..
Date: 7/21/2021 I # ,; ,r.,: '�' I<� ,
Field Crew: TS/AG
'
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 871.45 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 870.97
0.2 871.15 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.6
3.1 871.03 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 10.9 '
9.4 871.07 Bankfull Width: 11.9 s '1' ,•,k � ,
15.1 871.12 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 872.56 � 13� 1` ¢V ' °'}'
21.3 871.38 Flood Prone Width: 76.0 • ' X ;'; -1 fi ti ,°' - '� 44J r• w- s
24.9 871.20 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6 �`," =a f�'.4 .< < , _ M .'w ir +�, k A f
26.1 870.87 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 ;5>, ri�, a 2 ,s ;, f
27.0 870.60 W/D Ratio: 13.2 4, y l� ��� ¢` `� } `;`yt'A�
28.2 870.28 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.4 �'�¢ s '1°�' " -�� $'� Q ti +ii` � ' '
28.6 869.92 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 ''` '
29.0 869.70 Thalweg Elevation: 869.39
29.9 869.61
30.6 869.71 Mill Dam Creek,XS9, Riffle,UTHC
31.2 869.65 873
32.2 869.93 -
33.1 870.17 =
35.2 870.51
37.1 871.34 872 -
37.5 871.38 _ '
39.4 871.35
44.5 871.48 o�i _ I
_ _ -
-
871 -. 011pri
49.1 871.38 _
55.0 871.43 z
0
61.4 871.33 -
o
67.8 871.41 °.' 870
75.7 871.45 W
76.0 871.96
869 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek _
XS ID XS10 x
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46 y
ril ''1. T," ,-
Date: 7/21/2021
li•t '
Field Crew: TS/AG ��''I ,/ �i ° • E
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 861.95 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 861.80 +; �p r �
I. T jf. �� rc.. +-S -. 4
0.2 861.36 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 13.3 • r
4.4 861.25 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 10.9 �` x � �+
�R •' d Nab Y d y
v -- -
7.4 860.64 Bankfull Width: 11.5 � +� � 9 y` 8
8.9 860.93 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 863.59 F _ � = t `
11.2 861.31 Flood Prone Width: 69.3 �.• � � { `
16.4 861.59 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.8 Fa , F ` � ,
21.5 861.54 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.2 - r ,�� ,3
27.9 861.71 W/D Ratio: 9.9
C� a .. -,.� ,�
28.8 861.71 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.0 :s � + a �v
30.3 861.11 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 _-: 4 '-�q Fp
32.3 860.23 Thalweg Elevation: 860.01
33.4 860.15
34.6 860.10 Mill Dam Creek, XS10, Riffle, UTHC
35.2 860.01 865
36.2 860.03 -
37.3 860.32 -
38.4 860.98 864
40.3 861.77 -
42.0 861.77 863
46.3 861.83
______________A
52.1 861.927.„
862
58.0 862.10 -
_ _
68.8 861
862.27 0 /� ��
ti
69.3 862.09
w Alliri
860 -
859 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS11 w
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46
Date: 7/21/2021 r
Field Crew: TS/AG 4A ' _ i '
Mitt-• l , ,L. "- ` ivy.
Station Elevation Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 859.52 75.7 858.08 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 853.81 k; ,
0.2 859.19 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 17.3
1.5 858.92 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 17.2 �"�' �� r �,
5.0 858.29 Bankfull Width: 12.7 ' r'_
9.3 857.42 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 856.16 a f r- �y
12.8 856.51 Flood Prone Width: 44.2 k-s3 / '
15.4 855.68 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.4
20.4 855.29 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.4 ".; , ,, , ,4 v' -;
24.8 854.98 W/D Ratio: 9.4 , , �`/ s `'`
29.1 855.06 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.5 ,r� : .l. ��
�4 M'� J f l /A. � � p�
31.1 855.02 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 ' 1; < f g -�
X r�J � ��i` � i9n.' Svf,�R � ! s, .�
34.1 854.36 Thalweg Elevation: 851.45 - 4, �• a f. * .. - N
35.8 853.97
37.6 853.90 Mill Dam Creek,XS11, Riffle,UTHC
38.8 853.81 861 -_
39.8 853.48
41.4 852.81 860 _
42.3 852.04 859
42.9 851.65 858
43.5 851.52
44.2 851.62 857 _ \\
45.2 851.63 856 7 � __
46.0 851.60
46.5 851.45 0 855 _ �
Zi
46.9 851.56 . 854 _ ��
47.4 851.70 853 _
48.0 852.49 W = ��
49.7 852.80 852
E
50.6 853.52 851
52.2 853.99 850 - I I I I I
53.8 854.14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
56.1 854.72
58.5 856.48 Station(feet)
61.1 858.05 ---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02
64.7 858.05
71.9 858.04

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River �" -" e,„.,'
' ,
Site: Mill Dam Creeks , ,
XS ID XS 12 � �n �. ' €, W'' j �k . _
k R 1.034 1 .J S -fi, 1--- y at_: >.. 1 -
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.61 a, .. �$l' , ,R
Date: 7/21/2021 tee£ Y :.
Field Crew: TS/AG -
f
• �' ! �-,. ,fir � � -_
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA -. ,:, r ' s
0.0 844.44 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 845.45 s, . , ,_ <- K' ••
3.8 843.77 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 30.2 ` - =- ;.` =�, ,-, "a-
9.2 844.22 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 28.9 c- ` t.
14.1 844.48 Bankfull Width: 20.0 °* � � 1
"A. -+31 ', '.., ' tires R N F�
15.2 844.33 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 848.07 -
18.1 844.75 Flood Prone Width: 19.8 _ .
21.3 844.70 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.6 �'-
23.7 844.94 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.5 N '
25.8 844.63 W/D Ratio: 13.2 "" - " . --r` '- .a
26.6 843.30 Entrenchment Ratio: 1.0 �a
27.4 842.95 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 _- -
28.9 841.54 Thalweg Elevation: 842.83 - - '
29.8 840.81
32.9 840.53 Mill Dam Creek, XS12, Riffle, UTHC
35.3 840.45
36.1 840.37 850 _
36.8 839.89 849
38.0 839.68 =
39.1 839.48 848 _ _ _ � \ r
........_„_______
40.1 839.56
41.1 839.51 847
41.8 839.73
42.2 839.84 846 1
42.5 840.42 0
42.9 840.58 • 845 _
zi
43.5 841.36 °' 844 -
44.5 841.76 W - - +_
46.3 841.86 843
48.8 842.04 - -�
50.1 842.25 842 ,
52.5 842.91 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
53.3 843.86
54.4 844.58 Station(feet)
59.2 844.67 ---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 - MY02
67.2 844.68
67.3 844.79

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek ; tg -�
XS ID XS 13 r J-
'am- - - a . -
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.04 -
Date: 7/21/2021 _ - � f X
Field Crew: TS/AG '
Station Elevation Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ff.; ..
0.0 849.51 68.9 850.49 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 847.22
0.1 848.72 73.9 850.87 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 38.7 ry * t
3.1 848.68 80.9 851.09 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 42.3
7.8 848.50 90.5 851.20 Bankfull Width: 27.2
16.5 848.43 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 850.29 ` `''
19.3 847.82 Flood Prone Width: 68.8
20.2 847.55 Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.1 - _;,
22.9 847.51 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.4
24.7 847.38 W/D Ratio: 19.1 `,
25.4 846.54 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.5 c`
25.8 845.07 Bank Height Ratio: 1.1
26.3 844.85 Thalweg Elevation: 844.15 it "- -' -
26.8 844.50
27.2 844.50 Mill Dam Creek, XS13, Riffle, UTHC
27.8 844.38
29.0 844.26 852 =
29.7 844.20 851 -
30.5 844.15
•
31.6 844.92 850
32.8 845.38 849 ____________
34.7 845.47
36.9 845.82 848
39.8 846.23 •
_
-..0141:.
42.2 846.30 0 847
43.3 846.49 J
Ail --
845 _ L
�
46.8 846.30
48.9 846.28 844 -
52.1 847.20 843 - I I I I
55.2 847.27 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
58.6 846.73
61.5 847.11 Station(feet)
66.0 848.21 ---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 . - MY02
67.5 848.84

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS14 fi
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.04
Date: 7/20/2021 x
4
Field Crew: =TS/AG
E - '"'. aa3 ; /. f
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA „ ' ' ,�a.,gyp
0.0 948.33 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 943.60 f x, � ,
3.4 947.29 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.8 _ - �r `'
10.6 943.95 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.8
15.9 943.81 Bankfull Width: 4.7 y a ti � y
21.7 943.76 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 944.31 ,easy '��� � ' b
24.6 943.61 Flood Prone Width:
54.7 ,a„ '' 5
25.9 943.56 Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.7 �' �q ,t f;.' ', + '
, �i: a
27.1 943.21 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 �'. p� V• `v 7� r •"� ;6 � i ra
27.6 943.00 W/D Ratio: 12.4 ;_ A rry
28.3 942.89 Entrenchment Ratio: 11.5 � 11b `' ° .�'i ,
29.0 943.14 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 . • "� � ,▪ ,-sr 3 s fi 1 0
:r ..mac?' v7` .'\e `-,s4�.� - .s_':':y;/� 'I. c �,tip
29.9 943.33 Thalweg Elevation: 942.89
30.6 943.56
31.9 943.60 Mill Dam Creek, XS14, Riffle,TlA
35.1 943.65
40.4 943.71 950
46.9 943.57 949
53.2 943.44
58.1 943.05 948 \
61.4 943.22
62.8 943.81 947
63.8 944.04
65.4 944.61 g 946 _ f
66.5 945.82 z
•° 945
68.4 945.62 ti _
72.2 945.60 °?' 944
74.4 945.62 W _ ____
74.4 946.25 943
942 7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS15
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07
7/20/2021 Date: L,F
Field Crew: TS/AG , , `�
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - °�ti s` y ' �� ;
0.0 943.43 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 939.02 �. '� •
may..
0.1 942.73 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.3 ��@'y` yy ( ", _ -_��
3.4 942.58 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.9 + ,v�t 1 i� ti�s�?. y •
�� u a � �
,i r, k
7.1 942.42 Bankfull Width: 6.1 • �r, "
9.1 941.63 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 939.69 i' �:, F5• '' f a�
14.7 939.29 Flood Prone Width: 46.4 �
17.3 939.14 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 • ,6 ',: pa, ' x�1�;nf � "�' $;
23.5 939.10 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 � + H� �
29.6 939.10 W/D Ratio: 15.6 Is ii� �, / 1 `-
32.0 939.03 Entrenchment Ratio: 7.7 `�
32.7 938.86 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 f. ,. ti� 'sl '
33.0 938.64 Thalweg Elevation: 938.35
33.7 938.63
34.2 938.39 Mill Dam Creek,XS15, Riffle,T1
34.7 938.38 944
35.5 938.36 -
35.8 938.35
-
36.5 938.57 943 •
37.6 938.97 - \
38.3 939.03 942
40.8 938.91
45.7 938.66 941
49.2 938.62 g _ \
54.7 938.84 o0 940
57.0 938.69 ti \
65.2 941.25 939 68.3 941.74 W
72.7 941.88 938 -
72.8 942.69 -
937 - I I I I I 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
•Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS16
0.07 Drainage Area(sq mi):
Date: 7/20/2021 ,
Field Crew: TS/AG
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA "�' '` �d`" �' `
0.0 933.77 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 929.23 1 '?, ,; F f' t ",��,.
0.5 933.08 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.9 ��'A" � : ti /, ', r
3.5 932.55 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 3.4 � . ' m -
5.9 931.78 Bankfull Width: 7.0 '�� " " ` + ,'^ ° fi...z �, h. s' ¢
10.8 930.17 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 930.28 . « '1 ' ra ie �P.� ,,'f� tV� c \ +1 i
13.0 929.82 Flood Prone Width: 47.7 '�= t �_ /' �CV.
17.3 929.74 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 *�; ' 1. ,; r q'
21.7 929.68 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 � � ..� " �,`V����'
27.1 929.51 W/D Ratio: 12.6 i �; � , ,
32.5 929.16 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.8 a;
33.8 929.16 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 '..- ,,�>� \v �'1.k, _ -
,
35.3 928.79 Thalweg Elevation: 928.19
36.1 928.44
36.4 928.53 Mill Dam Creek, XS16, Riffle,T1
36.9 928.41 935
37.6 928.37
38.0 928.19 934
38.6 928.31
39.3 928.81 933
40.9 929.28
41.9 929.28 932 -
43.9 929.23 -el
47.2 928.99 931 -_
51.1 929.11 0
54.8 929.11 t, 930
58.6 930.41
61.8 931.73 W 929
66.9 932.10 928 =
67.0 932.85 =
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
Yadkin River
River Basin: -
Site: Mill Dam Creek -: , , .
XS ID XS17 _
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07
Date: 7/22/2021
Field Crew: TS/AG y;. aa
� .
ii.';.:,....: , ..',
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA " +_ r"f £ • 1
0.0 931.40 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 928.44 W+I r ,
02 930.70 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 8.3 , .,,A 4 '3 + _
3.5 930.60 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 7.7 �i,r n °`, s ,, P ��` � � ,. `,
6.1 929.18 Bankfull Width: 8 4 • •
F E :
7.8 928.68 Flood Prone Area Elevation: or,,,,
,v. r\- o ':
9.9 928.37 Flood Prone Width: 'y c ' ,< ""
13.2 92824 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2 0 # P �'r,l `
15.0 928.30 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 _ ' , ' r , :ty9 li ,, d ',At4 { ` J1�
^ r 4 31 i. y f `pike '� r
15.2 928.07 W/D Ratio: -- st�°�t���M ,�4 i' f'9`'� ��
15.4 927.31 Entrenchment Ratio: ` 4` ' a °�4•,,." ' ;'
16.3 926.70 Bank Height Ratio: -- t / '., t,- i_ •
�
17.3 926.48 Thalweg Elevation: 926.48
19.2 926.91
20.1 927.99
21.0 928.14 Mill Dam Creek, XS17, Pool, T1
21.7 928.21 934 _
23.4 928.35 933
27.4 928.48
32.9 928.58 932 _
39.5 928.61 931
42.8 929.10 -
46.6 930.78 930 N
48.5 931.81
52.2 932.15 z 929 - ____ wwwwwwsomml•noll
52.2 932.71 'c) - ----
Zi 928 1,
W 927 ` //
926
925 -
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
---•Bankfull MY00 MYO1 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River ., "4 4 T j > ?i -' : {
' N1/
Site: Mill Dam Creek ` r ay 'b
XS ID XS18
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.02
Date: 7/20/2021
Field Crew: TS/AG
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 927.12 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 923.43 4, --
0.1 926.40 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.3 i'
6.7 926.47 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.9 - r, r
8.9 925.41 Bankfull Width: 5.9 t -
11.2 924.09 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 924.35 `, ' /--
12.1 923.62 Flood Prone Width: 24.5 �: ^ f /`'
15.6 923.39 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 --
17.8 923.44 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 �� ,;
18.9 923.29 W/D Ratio: 15.6 �t , j -
19.6 923.14 Entrenchment Ratio: 4.1
19.9 922.88 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 +- , -r. `1 .•" N J N. ,.
20.5 922.63 Thalweg Elevation: 922.52
20.8 922.58
21.4 922.52 Mill Dam Creek, XS18, Riffle,T2
21.7 922.85 928
22.3 923.20 -
22.7 923.20 -
24.2 923.52 927
25.1 923.51
28.1 923.63 926
31.6 923.67 - 1
34.2 923.85 -
35.6 924.47 925
38.8 925.87 0 _
44.0 925.95 924 \ z�
50.7 925.70 _ -
50.8 926.32 W
923
922 , I I I I I
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS19
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.02
A;
Date: 7/20/2021 £
Field Crew: TS/AG
%.
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 925.70 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 922.66
ff 1 d
0.1 924.63 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.7 z r E :'..(:411. 1:;': � ►�
4.3 924.43 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 5.2 '` ' ' " :.' � � � , +�• � :
6.1 924.25 Bankfull Width: 6.2at�, ' '� � �
7.9 923.79 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- : �y-'� 3 .-
10.1 922.99 Flood Prone Width: -- 3 r� :'! _%,
12.0 922.55 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.8 j. �
15.7 922.62 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 1'f� =alit p . -•,
19.6 922.64 W/D Ratio: --- ril ,'OM �� ,I l . ti' Q f, 11 " `a.
21.4 922.52 Entrenchment Ratio: --- .Y . Tv* i-'•d G '` e4`` `4.,:'i t ° '+'" -w ~"` i -
22.5 921.97 Bank Height Ratio: --- .* a r., W J 41r �i� •A � '
23.1 921.37 Thalweg Elevation: 920.83 � $ °� � -' ��
23.9 920.83
24.6 920.85 Mill Dam Creek,XS19, Pool,T2
25.1 921.09 927
26.0 921.97
26.6 922.60
28.0 922.68 926
30.9 922.83
32.3 922.97 925
34.3 923.99 -
35.3 924.01 924ip, ��
41.1 924.06
48.6 924.06 z o 923
• - -` _�
48.6 924.46 = - -
oi 922 \ ' �
ti
W /
921 ��
920 '
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River ■
Site: Mill Dam Creek �1` l ��� �' f �
XS ID XS20 '
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01
� .., bra �aJ
Date: 7/20/2021 • . . �
Field Crew: TS/AG ` t ".` r k
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA x i
�J
0.0 921.08 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 917.67 ,� • '
0.0 920.27 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.9 �� 'A
- , ,i /ram :
5.9 920.09 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.0 `
14.0 919.44 Bankfull Width: 5.1 '; 1 r' �� • �,d
17.5 919.20 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 918.31 � �tf r„ +
20.2 918.06 Flood Prone Width: 18.9 t \, '�, '`
22.2 917.93 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 v , \° ' „ .4 • . `
24.8 917.78 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 • ``- `' ` % �` '' . . *\'
26.6 917.63 W/D Ratio: 13.6 •s � '��,/�� � " -�r`�'' Y + �'+t� '
28.0 917.09 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.7 ' .�,® _ �� ; '' ,= n°- 'Y�
28.4 917.03 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 \�- - 'y' i4, ,•, • t�
29.2 917.11 Thalweg Elevation: 917.03 `l - e�. - h ..� ,.1. _ _ �w
29.8 917.05
30.1 917.30 Mill Dam Creek, XS20, Riffle,T3
31.5 917.77
33.7 917.80 922 -
36.6 917.68 -
37.8 917.89 921 1
39.3 918.80 L
, .-e
41.6 919.60 920 -
45.7 920.08 - �
46.9 920.26 --\\IN _________ .
el
47.0 920.83 919
z
o
ti 918 -
W
917
916 r
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River , : y r
Site: Mill Dam Creek • / `
XS ID XS21 f f,
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01
Date: 7/20/2021
?i i ,'n',r
` fi
r � s� � ter! � ,. �
Field Crew: TS/AG ; �� � ' ,-. i d•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA , P ,=. I
, -k d 3 r 4 0 'S _a' 'i " r'
,e:. A �a 5 �;f 1... "':per '4 ace 5 'Zi ,,'� fit' di 'g" /4
0.0 921.25 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 916.64 .i" 1 2;' ' •ztv ��"
0.1 920.15 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 7.3 ip $ 1. k ram!
3.1 919.92 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 7.4 � ,� y '�,� �,
7.4 919.26 Bankfull Width: 6.8
12.4 918.72 Flood Prone Area Elevation: -, rl,, $ f. ° D 4 r,
16.7 918.27 FloodProne Width: �` �` � <, w"�' f
o e W dt . ---
19.2 917.56 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 k• N� .-/� ,11: ' . ,,' '�
d:
20.7 916.85 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 ' �` f j�.7,' i s 1 o• f
22.4 916.60 W/D Ratio: --- aaa .�' ,am - ` - _ ' '/ J, „ 1gs ,
23.8 916.58 Entrenchment Ratio: --- = >'-=-' 4 ` - ? ��
25.6 916.37 Bank Height Ratio: --- a ,,, _,.4is ;'' r e ti, , ;�'a•
26.5 916.11 Thalweg Elevation: 914.90 ----
26.8 915.06
27.6 914.98
28.4 914.90Mill Dam Creek, XS21, Pool,T3
29.8 915.09 922
30.6 915.31 921
30.9 916.22
32.2 916.63 920 -
35.4 916.76 - __ IJ36.9 917.08 919
38.4 917.85
40.1 918.50 g 918 -_
42.8 918.58 0
47.0 919.03 • 17
47.2 919.64 °' 916
W - V°tCr
915
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull MY00 MY01 - MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River w � �'�
Site: Mill Dam Creek �` - - �}
XS ID XS22
'W _.,„. r . - - , '
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01
Date: 7/20/2021 - Wr-7" r , " ;;
-,f 4
Field Crew: TS/AG _ � r
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
,..3t' ^-wa, i A ..A n �� '4 tit -0 - ,.
0.0 912.37 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 906.31 �'�' '"
0.2 911.65 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.9 `.
3.1 911.20 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 0.9
6.0 909.89 Bankfull Width: 8.7 a
9.0 907.98 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 907.09
11.1 906.86 Flood Prone Width: 19.3 "�
12.9 906.36 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.8
15.1 906.30 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.2
17.4 906.38 W/D Ratio: 38.7
18.0 906.18 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.2
18.4 906.30 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9
19.5 906.29 Thalweg Elevation: 905.53
19.8 905.80
20.1 905.75 Mill Dam Creek, XS22, Riffle,T4
20.5 905.69
20.8 905.53 914 -_
21.0 905.72 913 -
21.7 906.08 912
22.0 906.27
23.4 906.17 911
25.6 906.15 910
27.9 906.20 _
30.1 907.12 909
32.4 908.70 0 908
34.5 909.53
35.6 910.09 of 907
38.2 910.60 Z. 906 ----
42.1 911.15
44.4 911.66 905 _
904 - I l I I I I I I
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River ; },
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS23 )� ,
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01 w{ " � r ,, q,ni 4 I -_ '
Date: 7/21/2021 ' � ��
Field Crew: TS/AG 'i 4_1"x �1"k ' <- a _ ,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA $,4& r0'.0 ::,
may'
0.0 895.96 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 894.55 -.. w
0.1 895.66 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 1.7
2.7 895.24 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.1 -
7.6 895.04 Bankfull Width: 3.2 �; LL "
11.1 894.78 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 895.63 y` t .
14.7 894.76 Flood Prone Width: 32.0
17.0 894.80 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1
f _
17.6 894.81 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 -��' -
19.1 894.44 W/D Ratio: 5.9 .�//r ' ��` i ``t , '� _- .
19.6 894.18 Entrenchment Ratio: 10.0 A :4000i -,- �4 ,1�F t� �� /`b � '''`, ^ 't 4ite., ` k ���"
20.1 893.76 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 0 .A N * a .'; t v "• r* 1" `,.
20.6 893.61 Thalwe Elevation: 893.48 � ' �' ti '�
g
20.7 893.48
21.1 893.49 Mill Dam Creek, XS23, Riffle,T6A
21.2 893.75
-
21.7 894.42 897
21.9 894.52 -
22.7 894.53
24.2 894.43 896
26.9 894.15
30.3 894.05
32.3 893.87
32.4 894.13
895 -
Zi
e.)
w 894
ION
893 , I I I I '
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: millDam Creek � 3
XS ID XS24 , "
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07
Date: 7/21/2021 s l` r-` - -
Field Crew: TS/AG
X
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ��f., x' t.
�s 4,,,
0.0 879.73 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 878.43 • ,, x , � , =�l
0.1 879.23 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.6 � �`: s
4.1 879.12 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 0.9 E � � q '' - _ k ;
8.4 879.03 Bankfull Width: 3.5 �� �,
10.4 879.10 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 879.45a-V r
12.1 878.41 Flood Prone Width: 46.5 °� �N '•
: '' ` g ' , > .-
14.3 877.96 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 �, ,
17.3 877.96 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 � � ��
a ,4`J ,4 b r.
19.8 878.25 W/D Ratio: 4.6 �' �'-� r� "' e
21.9 878.14 Entrenchment Ratio: 13.44i.,...,,.„04_,E,-.-.0,„!*,..-*
`,i � ' �;a �� � ,
22.7 878.12 Bank Height Ratio: 0.7 1 r .. " ,
23.9 877.55 Thalweg Elevation: 877.40
24.4 877.40
25..1 877.45 Mill Dam Creek, XS24, Riffle,T6
-
2
25.6 877.45
25.8 878.07
26.2 878.16
27.6 878.10 880
30.3 878.28 --
877.44 881
32.7 878.26 879
37.0 878.65
39.6 878.98 _
45.4 879.22 0 878 -
47.5 879.65 '' �'
50.8 879.93
50.9 880.39 W 877 --
876 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS25
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07
Date: 7/21/2021 �i 4 �„, x
Field Crew: TS/AG
a. r.
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 879.18 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 878.07 ... ' • _< �, ;:
0.1 878.72 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.1
3.2 878.63 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.6 �' •
5.2 878.29 Bankfull Width: 6.3 I
9.5 877.79 Flood Prone Area Elevation: ___ i '
'�- .�,
s
13.1 877.54 Flood Prone Width: --- �� �' �
15.9 877.66 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 - ' m
17.9 877.69 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8
19.9 877.79 W/D Ratio: --- k.-
21.0 877.80 Entrenchment Ratio: ---
21.7 877.59 Bank Height Ratio: --- ,; f 60
21.8 877.45 Thalweg Elevation: 876.42
22.1 876.73
22.9 876.48 Mill Dam Creek,XS25, Pool,T6
23.9 876.42 _
24.3 876.79 880 -
24.7 877.41 -
25.0 877.77 -
26.2 877.83 879
28.9 877.72
33.8 878.00 ��
37.4 878.49 -
40.6 878.55 878 ---
48.1 878.97 z
0
54.7 879.23 •
ti
W :::
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull MY00 MYO1 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek rr�r
r J �,
4
XS ID XS26
�, i
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.07 %� f
Date: 7/21/2021 ...
Field Crew: TS/AG '
�µ ;s 4� Q r: , r
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA . = '$' �'- �
s gY w..
0.0 868.93 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 868.13 ! 1 � � %" �'
rfi j .
0.2 868.54 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.6 � f - .� °'r
5.4 868.52 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 5.1 \t. N i._'� " '' � " �� •
11.2 868.61 Bankfull Width: 6.2 �, • "' ; by �� L w r^
18.8 868.63 Flood Prone Area Elevation: -- -aA " n3 ��' �
23.1 868.46 Flood Prone Width: _• _ ' `� ( • r lt
26.0 868.28 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 r�4 " ` 1 t
t „ ,
27.3 868.27 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 fi W
28.9 867.55 W/D Ratio: --- ,�, ► � ,•-;r1 ;' ' z ,•� .-
29.8 866.96 Entrenchment Ratio: --- `, �' ,
` +�� Fri `` =w
30.3 866.87 Bank Height Ratio: --- � . " s �'' 11
30.4 866.86 ThalwegElevation: 866.83 Q l "� ` f,
30.8 866.83
31.5 866.87
31.9 867.01 Mill Dam Creek, XS26, Pool,T7
-
32.6 867.63 870
33.3 868.02 -
34.9 868.34
36.6 868.32 869
37.9 868.04 �
42.6 867.98 2
48.6 867.67 ��
48.7 867.93 868 - x a
\ r
o
Zi
W 867 - \Illp le
866
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
•Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek -1' ` 7 �'
XS ID XS27 ; . y." �• t "~ �;
Drainage Areas mi : 0.07 '
Date: 7/21/2021 -
Field Crew: TS/AG s
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
Y
0.0 868.04 Bankfull Elevation ft -Based on AB-Bankfull Area 867.81 s
0.1 867.52 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.3
y -.m..arc ,r +J�j
5.0 867.61 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.8 •..if, tat .3„ �°�'+ a: p:... �y
10.3 867.79 Bankfull Width: 5.7 �"" t ""4 +, �0 E, ' R;
17.5 867.72 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 868.99 ;�,+ ^� Rs ' , - " A s
24.2 867.73 Flood Prone Width: 44.0u �.Tt`�► F 4« '
27.5 867.75 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2 , ' ��� ��
29.0 867.70 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 r> x , '-
30.0 867.31 W/DRatio: 7.5 ~t4. e ,, - .
31.3 866.91 Entrenchment Ratio: 7.8 `ti!
31.7 866.80 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 O °' k . .., ! 0 �� r .\`�`` w,•
32.4 866.74 Thalweg Elevation: 866.63 -
33.4 866.63
33.7 866.88 Mill Dam Creek, XS27, Riffle,T7
34.2 867.36
34.6 867.54 870 -
35.4 867.60 -
37.4 867.68
40.9 867.52 869 - , - - _
44.0 867.50 -
868 -
z 'Imm\ Pf4-:
0
0
W 867 -
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek " '7
XS ID XS28
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.04
Date: 7/21/2021 ,,,
Field Crew: TS/AG
,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 857.51 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 853.29 -
0.1 857.31 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.8
4.7 856.98 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.5
8.7 856.83 Bankfull Width: 5.3 "=
11.2 855.52 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 854.34 ' • ,s�+.. _ 4"
15.5 853.61 Flood Prone Width: 31.6 .. r7.,`--A M 4 ;:.
19.0 853.25 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 t,, ' r , t
23.9 853.10 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 o�- ,. '
28.7 853.29 W/D Ratio: 9.9 -
30.6 853.17 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.0
31.9 852.89 Bank Height Ratio: 0.8 ^ '' "1
32.4 852.82 Thalweg Elevation: 852.24
32.6 852.41
32.9 852.25 Mill Dam Creek, XS28, Riffle,T9
33.3 852.24
33.6 852.24 859 =
34.0 852.44 858
34.5 852.77 =
35.4 853.11 857
35.9 853.28 -
---.\\N
37.1 853.35 856 f
39.6 853.25 7. -
el
40.5 853.60 855
41.7 853.73 -
o 854
42.6 853.44 'ti
43.6 853.48 o) 853
45.4 854.34 W
47.2 855.32 852
50.5 855.60 -
55.4 855.51 851 , I I I I I i
59.0 855.40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
59.1 856.09
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
fag ar ''
XS ID XS29 }. _ * `; 4 •\ ��
R'
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.03 a ,_.
Date: 7/22/2021 k y'
Field Crew: TS/AG ' 'a
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 851.00 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 849.98 +
-0.1 850.29 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.4 _ a► ,r 'y�. � '�,^``i' +y �"
0.6 850.14 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.6 ' " -�k =y �'▪ -itz �rpf, ta
5.0 849.45 Bankfull Width: 5.4 r. ;rft� :,,,...„-A;;;. ' 'a �▪�/
9.9 849.77 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 851.11
j
11.9 849.87 Flood Prone Width: 40.6 � s, �• `� ' x
13.6 849.89 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1e
14.2 849.91 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 ''` � ''- �� yP-.1 4C$�¢ -S.� �,.
14.6 849.89 W/D Ratio: 8.5
15.6 849.52 Entrenchment Ratio: 7.6 • 1,' y ti� " a: ipt _ .���
16.2 849.12 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 .= " •hrws` •'�° " �= >' a
16.6 848.98 Thalweg Elevation: 848.85
17.1 848.85
17.7 848.97 Mill Dam Creek, XS29, Riffle,T8
18.2 849.34
19.1 849.49 854
20.1 850.12 -
20.9 850.23 853 -
21.6 850.27
23.6 850.34 852
26.7 850.45
32.8 850.65
39.5 851.02 851
47.4 851.68 0
•51.3 851.98 850
51.5 852.76 ti - _
V.
W 849
848 130
�� �� ��
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS30 444'+tir
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.03
r
Date: 7/22/2021 iy:-l
Field Crew: TS/AG
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA - • "�
0.0 845.93 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 842.87
0.0 844.72 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.2 k: d 1 . '
.4 R r .r-'- - �
/.
6.3 844.40 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 3.0 �� t 'r '� ,4
8.0 844.12 Bankfull Width: 7.1 _
11.0 843.35 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 843.94 , i r i_:, ' ; _.
14.8 843.21 Flood Prone Width: 42.5 .1 + ,.
18.6 842.98 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 "', y` '�
4 6
21.3 842.84 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 y•t�
� a a 7t� ' '': f
21.9 842.85 W/D Ratio: 15.5 �� � • � � �
22.5 842.56 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.0N�` .. � � ' . y
23.3 842.51 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 ''y) • ,',1 tl- <.,. p' `, r 1, ", :
23.8 842.35 Thalweg Elevation: 841.81
24.1 841.91
24.5 841.92 Mill Dam Creek, XS30, Riffle,T8
25.1 841.81 847
25.2 841.82
25.7 842.02 -
26.4 842.38 846
28.0 842.95
28.9 843.01 845 -
31.4 843.06
40.1 842.96 -
J
48.2 842.99 844 -
49.6 843.16 z -
o -
51.4 844.07 843 -_ _ _
53.7 844.15 - N. -- --- •
53.9 844.47 W -
842 -
841 , I I I I I '
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 - MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek * k ` 'z � g . .
XS ID XS31 J# Ix g p� $ i �' ,.- �+t i �a
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01 .
Date: 7/22/2021 �.
Field Crew: TS/AG �` � ,� ass � * r '
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA rriF.' , ;�; -' <�� ,! �, a Y r rw �;
0.0 853.81 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Banl 'ull Area 850.81 �_. a. 41; �� �� a
0.0 853.16 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.6 , . �i ` `r} � . .„
� �
3.7 852.93 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.6 k 1 -�
7.0 852.89 Bankfull Width: 5.7 `' - • ` ` -: �� _
7.8 852.80 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 852.04 _ ! � = ��
8.9 852.46 Flood Prone Width: 22.0 `' .. q �
ins
10.9 851.56 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2 1 1 r 1 r --1
13.5 850.98 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 r��' , , r
16.7 850.92 W/D Ratio: 12.6 *� .: . 'f ti
17.7 850.93 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.9Jr ��'k !jA }
18.2 851.01 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 � ��.1 ,, ;�� �� �'� �C � .
19.0 850.78 Thalweg Elevation: 849.58
20.0 850.54
20.7 849.58 Mill Dam Creek,XS31, Riffle,T8A
21.0 849.84 855
21.5 849.87
21.8 849.90 -
22.3 850.24 854 -
22.7 850.48 _
23.3 850.58 853 [�
23.7 850.76 i
24.7 850.81
29.0 851.02 852 -
31.0 851.85 z
o -_
34.0 852.53 � 851
38.3 852.44 ---
38.3 853.37 W
850
849
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Station(feet)
•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin River
Site: Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS32 ,
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.01
•
Date: 7/22/2021
Field Crew: TS/AG &
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ,
i2`
0.0 846.92 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 845.67
0.1 846.41 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.1
5.9 846.41 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.5
9.6 846.30 Bankfull Width: 4.5
11.8 845.76 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 846.71 �
r
16.1 846.01 Flood Prone Width: 49.3
s
"18.2 845.93 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 �-
19.3 845.79 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 "' j`� ;, ti -,
20.8 845.71 W/D Ratio: 10.0 -.Y
21.9 845.71 Entrenchment Ratio: 10.9 ` ' N. - v
22.7 845.52 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 ,,. f 60 "Y; � i<
23.4 845.13 Thalweg Elevation: 844.64
23.6 844.77
23.8 844.64 Mill Dam Creek, XS32, Riffle,T8A
24.4 844.83 848
24.6 844.79 _
24.9 845.13 -
25.5 845.33
26.3 845.58 847 -
26.9 845.79 ,
27.3 845.82
28.7 845.78 -
32.1 845.67 g 846 \ - -�
36.4 845.81 0 `/ ��- ---- �� -
39.2 846.03 '- - ,
42.4 845.98 //
45.7 846.24 W 845 W
49.3 846.17
49.4 846.99
844 , I I I I I I I I I "
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 - MY02

Cross-Section 1 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 2 XS 1 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 6
Fine .125 -.25 A 3
Medium .25 -.50 N 4
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% - ■■ o o ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 7 ;,
Very Fine 2-4 5 80% -
Fine 4-5.7 G 3 1 _i
As Bush
Fine 5.7-8 R 111111
60% -
—MI—MYo1
Medium 8- 11.3 A 4 MY02
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 3 F
Coarse 16-22.6 E 5 �
40% - '
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 4
w .� wil
Very Coarse 32-45 S 11 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 17 _ i —
Small 64-90 C 12 0%
Small 90- 128 0 13 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 1.1 mean 9.9 silt/clay 2%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 14 dispersion 18.0 sand 20%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 37 skewness -0.41 gravel 51%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 55 cobble 25%
Total 102 D84 89 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 2 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 2 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A 5
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 l00% t o n n •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 5 r�
Very Fine 2-4 10 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 3
Fine 5.7-8 R 7 60% 7 - As Bush
Medium 8- 11.3 A 9 MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6 40% MYoz
Coarse 16-22.6 E 4 4 . ,..---• :7
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 5 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 4 20% ,V X
Very Coarse 45 -64 12 •�' '
Small 64-90 C 14 0% I ,
Small 90- 128 O 11 o.oi o.i 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B = Size(mm) Size Distribution T se
Small 362-512 L D16 2.8 mean 15.7 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 9.2 dispersion 5.9 sand 11%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 22 skewness -0.12 gravel 60%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 54 cobble 29%
Total 100 D84 88 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 5 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 5 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 - .25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% 11 1 1 >t
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4
Very Fine 2 -4 80%
Fine 4 -5.7 G 2 1
•
Fine 5.7-8 R L 60% • t As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 5 , • T MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6 E. • —•—•MY02
Coarse 16-22.6 E 6 5 4o°iB ✓, ■'
Coarse 22.6-32 L 8 0 .---.2
Very Coarse 32-45 S 4 20% '.,�
Very Coarse 45 -64 19
Small 64-90 C 18 o°% - I ,A-7 ,
Small 90- 128 0 17 0.01 o.t 1 to too moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 10 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 14 mean 39.2 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512 - 1024 D D35 40 dispersion 3.0 sand 6%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 58 skewness -0.18 gravel 49%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 78 cobble 45%
Total 102 D84 110 boulder 0%
Note: D95 160 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 6 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 6 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 - .25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% ,A •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 1
Very Fine 2 -4 4 80%
Fine 4 -5.7 G +
Fine 5.7-8 R N 60% S As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 6 / TMY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 9 E. ; —.—MY02
40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 12 5
Coarse 22.6-32 L 17 0 • /
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20%�0
Very Coarse 45 -64 22 f .—■
Small 64-90 C 7 0% >•
Small 90- 128 O 4 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B 2 Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L 1 D16 13 mean 32.2 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512 - 1024 D D35 23 dispersion 2.5 sand 3%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 33 skewness -0.01 gravel 77%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 4 D65 50 cobble 14%
Total 103 D84 80 boulder 3%
Note: D95 350 bedrock 4%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 7 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 7 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 1
Very Fine 2-4 6 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2 •
Fine 5.7-8 R 6 -- 60% �'• As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 4 MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 8 —MY02
, 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 5 w •` ■
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 7 0 •
Very Coarse 32-45 S 3 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 8
Small 64-90 C 18 0% A .•
Small 90- 128 0 13 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo moo
Large 128- 180 B 7 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 4
Small 256-362 B 1 Size(mm) Size Distribution fflit
Small 362-512 L 2 D16 7.8 mean 39.5 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 27 dispersion 5.7 sand 4%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 66 skewness -0.19 gravel 45%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 12 D65 91 cobble 35%
Total 110 D84 200 boulder 3%
Note: D95 3000 bedrock 11%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 9 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter I Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 9 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N 12
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% (Ann n n l
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4 •/
Very Fine 2-4 1 80% /
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R r 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 4 "4 :
MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2 MY02
•
Coarse 16-22.6 E 1 w 40% . N/
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 3
r
Very Coarse 32-45 S 14 20% •
Very Coarse 45 -64 11
Small 64-90 C 17 0% A ,♦ ,,
Small 90- 128 0 19 o.oi o.i 1 to i00 moo moo
Large 128- 180 B 8 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 3
Small 256-362 B = Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2 mean 15.5 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 38 dispersion 15.5 sand 16%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 58 skewness -0.43 gravel 37%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 81 cobble 44%
Total 100 D84 120 boulder 0%
Note: D95 170 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 10 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 11)Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% A-A-A n n n l
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4 /
Very Fine 2-4 4 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 2 '- 60% - As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 6 T MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 4 x MY02
Coarse 16-22.6 E 13
GL, 40% �
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 8 0 ''i
Very Coarse 32-45 S 11 20% '
Very Coarse 45 -64 9
Small 64-90 C 12 0% e ,A A
Small 90- 128 0 24 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 loon 10000
Large 128- 180 B 10 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 11 mean 36.3 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 26 dispersion 3.4 sand 5%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 47 skewness -0.11 gravel 52%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 81 cobble 42%
7 Total 110 D84 120 boulder 0%
Note: D95 150 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 11 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter I Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 11 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 10o% I I i—'
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 1
Very Fine 2-4 6 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G E
Fine 5.7-8 R 3 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 301
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5 —.—MYoz
Coarse 16-22.6 E 6 . /
4o°io
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 6 0 •
Very Coarse 32-45 S 12 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 19
Small 64-90 C 18 0% A ,liter • —
Small 90- 128 0 12 0.01 0.1 1 10 ioo moo moo
Large 128- 180 B 5 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B = Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 14 mean 37.4 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 37 dispersion 2.8 sand 1%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 52 skewness -0.15 gravel 60%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 2 D65 69 cobble 37%
Total 100 D84 100 boulder 0%
Note: D95 170 bedrock 2%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 12 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter I Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 12 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100%
Very Coarse 1 -2 S .
Very Fine 2-4 4 80% .9 a
Fine 4-5.7 G 3
e / ,
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 2 MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6 �� —.—MY°2
, 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 10 w ._.-•
.7
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 12 -�
Very Coarse 32-45 S 18 20% ,.
■
Very Coarse 45 -64 16 ._.�'
Small 64-90 C 16 o°% - ,A • I
Small 90- 128 O 5 o.oi o.i 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 4 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution
Small 362-512 L D16 15 mean 34.9 silt/clay 0% IIIII
Medium 512 - 1024 D D35 28 dispersion 2.3 sand 1%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 39 skewness -0.06 gravel 72%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 2 D65 54 cobble 25%
Total 100 D84 81 boulder 0%
Note: D95 140 bedrock 2%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 13 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 6 XS 13 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 5
Fine .125 -.25 A 4
Medium .25 -.50 N 3
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100%
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2
Very Fine 2-4 5 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G '� '
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 : . ; :
As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 Medium 11.3 - 16 V 3MY°z
Coarse 16-22.6 E 8
w .'
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 5 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 16
Small 64-90 C 15 o°% ■ .■ ■
Small 90- 128 0 14 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 7 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B = Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.44 mean 7.0 silt/clay 6%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 21 dispersion 54.6 sand 14%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 47 skewness -0.54 gravel 44%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 3 D65 67 cobble 34%
7 Total 109 D84 110 boulder 0%
Note: D95 170 bedrock 3%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 14 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 3 XS 14 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 3
Fine .125 -.25 A 1
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D t00% n n n •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2 ••
Very Fine 2-4 8 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G
e /
Fine 5.7-8 R 2 60% - As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 4 MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 4 MYoz
Coarse 16-22.6 E 9 °' 40°io
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 16 0 m
.
Very Coarse 32-45 S 16 20% - ,.
Very Coarse 45 -64 18
Small 64-90 C 10 o°% -
Small 90- 128 0 6 o.oi o.i 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution T se
Small 362-512 L D16 3.9 mean 16.2 silt/clay 3%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 22 dispersion 5.1 sand 6%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 32 skewness -0.27 gravel 74%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 45 cobble 17%
7 Total 104 D84 67 boulder 0%
Note: D95 110 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 15 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter I Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 5 XS 15 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 1
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D t00% n n n n •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S
Very Fine 2-4 I 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 ■ •
Fine 5.7-8 R min -- 60% , As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 2 To
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1 � —.—MY°2
Coarse 16-22.6 E 3 C 40%
w
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 14
Very Coarse 32-45 S 20 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 19
Small 64-90 C 23 o°%
Small 90- 128 0 10 o.oi o.i 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B I Size(mm) Size Distribution T se
Small 362-512 L D16 24 mean 45.4 silt/clay 5%
Medium 512 - 1024 D D35 37 dispersion 1.9 sand 1%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 48 skewness -0.03 gravel 59%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 64 cobble 35%
Total 102 D84 86 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 16 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 11 XS 16 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 9
Fine .125 -.25 A 9
Medium .25 -.50 N 1 '
Coarse .50- 1 D 4 100% k n n n n n •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 8 .' /
Very Fine 2-4 7 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 4 60% ' - As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 4 ' T MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5 400�� �, MY02
Coarse 16-22.6 E 4 4
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 12 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 6 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 5
Small 64-90 C 8 o°% -
Small 90- 128 O 11 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution
Small 362-512 L D16 0.11 mean 2.9 silt/clay 10%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 1.6 dispersion 46.8 sand 28%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 9.4 skewness -0.30 gravel 43%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 26 cobble 20%
7 Total 112 D84 76 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 18 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 18 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A 4
Medium .25 -.50 N 8
Coarse .50- 1 D 10 100% •13.t n n I
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 7
Very Fine 2-4 8 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 2 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 4 T MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1 r'" —.—MY°Z
, 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 w • •Coarse 22.6 -32 L I ■�■
Very o ■ ~Coarse 32-45 S 5 20�i°
Very Coarse 45 -64 14 ■ ■
Small 64-90 C 21 0% A ,
Small 90- 128 0 8 o.oi o.i 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 1 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.66 mean 7.3 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 3.4 dispersion 17.8 sand 29%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 21 skewness -0.32 gravel 41%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 56 cobble 30%
7 Total 100 D84 80 boulder 0%
Note: D95 110 bedrock 0%
I hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 20 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter I Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 25 XS 20 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% AEA 1 I
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 1
Very Fine 2-4 6 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 401
Medium 11.3 - 16 V —�MY02
Coarse 16-22.6 E 3 w 40%
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 6
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 19 •
Small 64-90 C 10 0%
Small 90- 128 0 13 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 1 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution T se
Small 362-512 L D16 0.062 mean 2.3 silt/clay 25%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8.2 dispersion 283.5 sand 2%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 35 skewness -0.66 gravel 49%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 1 D65 53 cobble 24%
Total 101 D84 87 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 1%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 22 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 2 XS 22 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A 8
Medium .25 -.50 N 7
Coarse .50- 1 D 5 100% 2. i il il• • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2 i
Very Fine 2-4 4 80% �,
Fine 4-5.7 G 3
e
Fine 5.7-8 R 4 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 13 MY°t
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 8 —.—MY°z
40% ,_� p�
Coarse 16-22.6 E 14 4
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 7 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 5 20%
Coarse 45 -64 7
Small 64-90 C 10 0%�°
Small 90- 128 O 9 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 l0000
Large 128- 180 B 1 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution T se
Small 362-512 L D16 0.53 mean 6.1 silt/clay 2%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8.6 dispersion 16.5 sand 20%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 15 skewness -0.27 gravel 60%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 23 cobble 18%
7 Total 109 D84 70 boulder 0%
Note: D95 110 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 23 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 5 XS 23 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 5
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% ., . ._Ann n n I
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 7 /A
Very Fine 2-4 5 80% A
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 9 i01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 7 —MY°z
40% a
Coarse 16-22.6 E 5 w ■'
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 4 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 10 20%
•
Very Coarse 45 -64 17
Small 64-90 C 8 0% ■ s—
Small 90- 128 0 12 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 4 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution T se
Small 362-512 L D16 1.4 mean 11.3 silt/clay 5%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 11 dispersion 12.9 sand 14%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 32 skewness -0.34 gravel 57%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 51 cobble 24%
7 Total 104 D84 91 boulder 0%
Note: D95 130 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 24 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 24 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A 7
Medium .25 -.50 N 22 '
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% k-n n n n n •
• f
Very Coarse 1-2 S 2
Very Fine 2-4 5 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 3 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 6 MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6 • —MY°z
, 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 8 w ��'
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 8 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 7 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 8 0111,111".—____•—•
Small 64-90 C 7 o°% ' ■�
Small 90- 128 0 6 o.oi o.i 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution T se
Small 362-512 L D16 0.33 mean 4.5 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 2.6 dispersion 20.7 sand 33%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 12 skewness -0.28 gravel 52%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 25 cobble 15%
7 Total 100 D84 61 boulder 0%
Note: D95 110 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 27 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 27 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A 2
Medium .25 -.50 N 3
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100%
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 6
Very Fine 2-4 7 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2 •
Fine 5.7-8 R 6 -- 60% . As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 7 • 01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6 —.—MY°z
, 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 4 4 ,
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 9 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 8 20% - .
Very Coarse 45 -64 12
Small 64-90 C 14 o°% - —
Small 90- 128 O 9 o.oi o.i 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 1 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.7 mean 15.0 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 11 dispersion 6.7 sand 13%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 28 skewness -0.22 gravel 60%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 1 D65 50 cobble 26%
7 Total 101 D84 83 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 1%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 28 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 28 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A 6
Medium .25 -.50 N 4
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% •• n n •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 14
Very Fine 2-4 12 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 5
Fine 5.7-8 R 4 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 12 —,MYot
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 9 —a— °2
40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 14 4
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 6 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 6 20% IN
��
Very Coarse 45 -64 2
Small 64-90 C I 0°%
Small 90- 128 O 7 o.oi o.i 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Mlil
Small 362-512 L D16 1.3 mean 6.4 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512 - 1024 D D35 3.7 dispersion 5.3 sand 25%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 9.3 skewness -0.13 gravel 67%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 16 cobble 9%
7 Total 105 D84 32 boulder 0%
Note: D95 110 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 29 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 29 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% -Ann n n l
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2
Very Fine 2-4 80% /
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 ,�
Fine 5.7-8 R 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 101
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2 . . —.—MY°z
40% ._.
Coarse 16-22.6 E 1
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 1 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 4 20% -
Very Coarse 45 -64 12 ■—'—'-•-•
Small 64-90 C 32 0°�°
Small 90- 128 0 36 0.01 0.1 1 10 too moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 6 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution T se
Small 362-512 L D16 48 mean 75.9 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 70 dispersion 1.6 sand 4%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 83 skewness -0.06 gravel 22%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 96 cobble 74%
7 Total 100 D84 120 boulder 0%
Note: D95 140 bedrock 0%
I hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 30 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 1 XS 30 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 4
Fine .125 -.25 A 4
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 3 100% •• n n •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 3 i'
Very Fine 2-4 7 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R 4 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 r. ./Ii. —.— 01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6 —MY°z
, 40% ■
Coarse 16-22.6 E 3 w — -.
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 2 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 1 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 16
Small 64-90 C 15 o°% - ,
Small 90- 128 0 16 0.01 o.t 1 to too moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 11 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.2 mean 16.2 silt/clay 1%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 16 dispersion 13.6 sand 14%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 55 skewness -0.40 gravel 42%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 77 cobble 43%
7 Total 100 D84 120 boulder 0%
Note: D95 160 bedrock 0%
I hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 31 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 16 XS 31 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 2
Fine .125 -.25 A 4
Medium .25 -.50 N 3 '
Coarse .50- 1 D 3 100% A A n n l
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 10 r' .
Very Fine 2-4 I 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 10 60% As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 MYot
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 3 •• —.—MY°z
40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 2 w
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 3 0 •
4jklic"1:
Very Coarse 32-45 S 11 20% :�.
Very Coarse 45 -64 8 .
Small 64-90 C 6 o°%
Small 90- 128 0 2 0.01 o.t 1 to too moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution
Small 362-512 L D16 0.062 mean 1.8 silt/clay 19%
Medium 512 - 1024 D D35 1.1 dispersion 57.0 sand 26%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 6.6 skewness -0.34 gravel 46%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 23 cobble 9%
7 Total 85 D84 50 boulder 0%
Note: D95 79 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 32 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 10 XS 32 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 14
Fine .125 - .25 A 8
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% k Ann n n l
Very Coarse 1 -2 S •
Very Fine 2 -4 10 80% V.
Fine 4 -5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R mil. -- 60% - As Built
•
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1 MY02
40% ■'
Coarse 16-22.6 E w A A
Coarse 22.6-32 L 2 0 ■
Very Coarse 32-45 S 7 20%
•
Very Coarse 45 -64 12
Small 64-90 C 25 o°% �-
Small 90- 128 O 9 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo l0000
Large 128- 180 B Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B 1 Size(mm) Size Distribution Mlil
Small 362-512 L D16 0.084 mean 2.6 silt/clay 10%
Medium 512 - 1024 D D35 2.5 dispersion 221.3 sand 22%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 37 skewness -0.66 gravel 34%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 62 cobble 34%
7 Total 100 D84 82 boulder 0%
Note: D95 110 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

APPENDIX E
Hydrologic Data
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 132 MY02 Monitoring Report

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
30-70 Percentile Graph
WETS Station Name: Yadkinville 6E
10.0 -
9.0 -
8.0 --
7.0 --
6.0 --
w 5.0 --
It I
4.0 — f
iiii
3.0
2.0 _
0.0
0 0
N N N N N Ni N N N N N N N N
U -6 bA Q UO W z Qz .
Date
2020 Rainfall 2021 Rainfall f 30%Less Than f 30%Greater Than

Table 11.Verification of Bankfull Events
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Monitoring Year Date of Occurrence Method Reach
January 24,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 6,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
February 11,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 13,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
March 24,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
MY01 April 13,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
April 25,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
April 29,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
May 21,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
May 27,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
December 16,2020 Photos taken on-site UTHC1,UTHC3,Ti,T2,T6,T8
December 16,2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
January 1,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
January 27,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 13,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 15,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
February 18,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
MY02 March 19,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
March 25,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
July 2,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
August 16,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
August 18,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
September 21,2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1,UTHC3
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97136 133 MY02 Monitoring Report

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
UTHC-1 Stream Gauge
924 - - 7.0
MIWI
I
- 6.0
- 5.0
923
- 4.0
E.
ct
- 3.0
1
5
ct
922 -
2.0
_ L
1.0
921 0.0
� N N � � NN NN � N � NW � N � NN NN � N � NW
� J - W1o � � � J - W - © I C WN — � J - W - o � CL WN �
d d w w 'a 'a c(o v 4 4 '-a a a b 4 4 4 a s .a coo coo 40, O O O o Z Z d d d d
n n N N cr cr 7 w w N 'd 'd `c N V V 'r va G G N N c c c " i° i° i°
vc vc
0 0
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Bankful Elevation Sensor Elevation

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
UTHC-3 Stream Gauge
872 - 7.0
- 6.0
- 5.0
871 - -
c
- 4.0
E.
- 3.0cs
ct
.�
870 - o 1401114Wilv)
i . .L.......__ .._�_ t ....
- 2.0
iwi `•wry' w-4 r .I,. ,,,,r .1,
- 1.0
869 I_ I , 0 J 4I � 11 J� 11 I . 11. J � � 1 , 0.0
CN [ILI N N � N � NN NNJ N � NW � N � NN � NNJ N � NW
J - w o Co 00 0o J - w � o Co o� v w N � oc J - w - o `o o� v, w N
d C ti - rn 'a G ti ti G ti ti ti i 2 K 0 0 0 0 Z Z 2 d d d
2 2 N N N 5r 5r N N .a '-a N N N N N N N N , 'u 'u N 7' 7' 7' N C C N n n n
o c
o c
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Bankfull Elevation Sensor Depth

Table 12.Verification of Stream Flow
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Gauge Camera
Maximum Maximum
Reach Dates Achieving Consecutive Dates Achieving Consecutive
Days Days
T IA January 1—May 1 121 March 22—April 29; 55
May 3—June 26
T5A January 1 —November 18 322 January 1 —April26 116
T8A January 1 —March 22; 167 January 1 —June 29 180
May 5—October 18
Table 13. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Greater than 30 Days of Flow/Max Consecutive Days
Reach MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05 MY-06 MY-07
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
T1A Yes/68 Yes/121
(Gauge)
T1A Yes/44 Yes/55
(Camera)
T5A Yes/152 Yes/322
(Gauge)
T5A Yes/70 Yes/116
(Camera)
T8A Yes/152 Yes/167
(Gauge)
T8A Yes/84 Yes/180
(Camera)
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC PA
DMS Project#97136 136 MY02 Monitoring Report

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T1A Stream Flow Gauge
i 7.0
January 1
942 - 6.0
5.0
w
941 I 4.0
w M i iL I IL I
121 Days ��\ \\I\
3i.n .0
5 \
an
ct
cii 940 - ,,;.d.:: r+:.+ rr !a_ ' . `r"*.--ww ii 2.0
1.0
.) t_:.I) 4-1 „IP,-7,.P..) „P,-,.P..) I„P,-I,.P..)
Ity y i-dIt I 'Ir
939 -,IlpT i,9t;I,-,i c5-D,-i c5-ID,-I Ic5-D,-I k Iat-;P.) 1 0.0
N N N N N NN N J NN W N N N N N J N N W
at-;iP.1) -I
°-t;Jt;iJ 4-,j K. Ktt(.) -, .<t=&).)A<t=&)
.) <t&-).) it;J t;J - t:J t:J 1t-
0o J - w 41 o Co 00 0o J 4- w — o `o o� v — N7 oo J - w - o `o o v w N
d ti ti rn '-a G ti ti G ti ti ti rn 0 0 0 0 o Z Z d d d
p, i° N N N N N .a '-a N N N N N N N N N g g 'u 'u N N C C n, i° p, p,
N N
. . - - - -
D ate
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera) Sensor Depth

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T5A Stream Flow Gauge
7.0
January 1
Camera obscured
6.0
- 5.0
921.5 -
w
- 4.0
a
N"IllittilMIftwooko - 3.0
322 Days
5 1 ►
2.0
1.0
920.5 I_� . �. �Ni.i
N I � I1 J� 1 � . ��� � ' 0.0
� N � N � NN N N N� t N W � �N NN N N � N � NW
d C w w '7.D '7.D '7.D 4 4 '-a a pt 4 4 4 6 a a coo coo O O O o Z d d d
c- c- c- 7 w w a N vc N a s i°vc vc
o c
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera)

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T8A Stream Flow Gauge
853 - 7.0
January 1 Camera obscured
r / i - 60
852 -
Gauge malfunction
- 5.0
w
/
o - 4.0
°I 851 �r 1104#�� w� E.
W ""�
6.4.\\41\„, p:
tc 4 81 Days , 167 Day ly„
e
ct
s,
2.0
850 -
1.0
849 I1 i I I I •.IIA. , 41, Ill IL-r 1 1 I -, • 11 11 0.0
N N N ,,o N N N N N J N N W
d C �o N N N N N Jo NC N W
ocJ -I. w rno Co oc c J - w � o Co o v w N � oc J - w 0 o `o o v, `I" N
ti ti Tr( ( '-a G G 2K 0 0 0 Z Z 2 d d d
2 2 N N N a -a N N N N , 'u 'u N 7' 7' 7' N C N ? ? ?
N N N N NN
o c
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera)

Table 14.Wetland Hydrology Verification
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#97136
Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season(Percentage)
Gauge# Location MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05 MY-06 MY-07
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Gauge 1 T7 45 57
(19.7%) (24.8%)
Gauge 2 T8 Gauge 370
malfunction (15.6/o)
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC PA
DMS Project#97136 140 MY02 Monitoring Report

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 1, T7
1 - 6.5
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
March 26 November 9 6.0
5.5
5.0
1. Y
1 4.5
= *111
kliii
I 4.0
0
57ct
Da s �Iiiillil 1 \� 3.5
CI?W -1 - Y
CI? i I 3.0
ct \gilt I .111\
2.5
o \I \II\
11\
2.0
-2 \\.,..j.' \\sw.
- �✓
1.5
ct
75
x \1 I .I III 11 II 1.0
ill0.5
IL
1
1
li J
-3 1 1dill 11 0.0
N N N ,o N N N N N N N W ,o N Li N N N N N N W
CJ - w o `o 00 0o J � w o `o o� v w N oo J � w - o `o o� v, w N 1—
d d w w g- c�'o c�'o c�'o P 4 4 '-a a s 4 4 4 6 r a a .a cc cc 0 0 0 O o Z Z d d d d
2 2 N �, 7 w w N '� N 7 7 7 va G G N .2 N c c c
7 7 - �, v. vc
Date
Rainfall 12"Below Ground Surface Groundwater Depth Ground Surface —Sensor-Depth

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 2, T8
1 - 6.5
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
March 26 November 9 6.0
5.5
0 - 5.0
I "4--�� I
4.5
w ‘\\A,\,,, I
c �.\4\ I i
4.0
ct
37 Days 'm .11111141INVAI L41‘kiN14,1\Irkikk\Q 3.5
E.
W -1 ~,
i. 0 \vilj3.0
ct
2.5
0
i. 2.0
-2 -
7:1, 1.5
ct
a I I it III i 1.0
0.5
N N N N N N N N J 1 i IL -N• I t 11-11,--••••--10
W N N N N N• I . 1.11. - i L
N N W
0o J - w 41 o Co 00 0o J - w � o `o o� v w N — oo J - w - o 0 o v w N
d 0 ti ti rn a > > G ti ti G ti ti ti 0 > rn 0 0 0 0 o Z Z 2 d d d
i° i° N N N c, c, c, N N a a N N N N N N N N N g g 'u 'u N N C C N n n n
o ot&J
0 0
D ate
Rainfall 12"Below Ground Surface Groundwater Depth Ground Surface —Sensor-Depth