The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutField Scoping Meeting Worksheet_Rob 369NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET Design-Bid-Build Process TIP No.: N/A WBS No.: BP6.R007 Field Scoping Meeting Date: 02/17/2022 Division: 6 Location: Virtual with individual site visits prior to FSM Route (US/NC/SR):SR 1515 (Union Chapel Rd) County: Robeson Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 369 over Richland Swamp on SR 1515 Tier: Sub-Regional Funding: State Municipality: N/A Attendees Name Phone No. Email Division Project Development Engineer Steve Kendall 910-364-0603 sdkendall@ncdot.gov Div 6 Team Lead Scott Pridgen 910-364-0603 gspridgen@ncdot.gov Div 6 Project Manager Christy Huff 910-364-0603 chuff@ncdot.gov Div. Bridge Program Manager Adam Britt 910-364-0603 atbritt@ncdot.gov Assistant Div Bridge Program Manager Jason Hatfield 910-360-0603 jthatfield@ncdot.gov Division Construction Engineer Rusty Marsh 910-364-0600 rmarsh@ncdot.gov Division Construction Jason Salisbury 910-364-0600 jsalisbury@ncdot.gov Assistant Resident Engineer Joseph Bailey 910-618-5689 Jwbailey1@ncdot.gov Division Bridge Maintenance Mike Fisher 910-364-0670 mdfisher@ncdot.gov Division Bridge Maintenance Steven Blanton 910-618-5542 seblanton@ncdot.gov District Engineer Brice Bell 910-618-5543 bricebell@ncdot.gov Robeson County Maintenance Engineer Phillip Pittman 910-702-6060 ppittman@ncdot.gov Division Maintenance Engineer Chuck Miller 910-364-0600 csmiller@ncdot.gov Division Maintenance Staff Engineer Matthew Edwards 910-364-0600 mdedwards@ncdot.gov Division Environmental Officer Greg Price 910-364-0835 gwprice2@ncdot.gov Div Project Dev. & Env. Analysis Engineer Jim Rerko 910-364-0834 jjrerko@ncdot.gov Div Environmental Specialist Chris Underwood 910-364-0603 csunderwood@ncdot.gov Water Resources Hannah Sprinkle 910-796-7306 Hannah.sprinkle@ncdener.gov Div Utilities Rick Handlin 910-364-0834 rhandlin@ncdot.gov Division Utility Coordinator Rick Bounds 910-639-7345 rbounds@ncdot.gov NCDOT Hydraulics Galen Cail 919-707-6711 gcail@ncdot.gov NCDOT Hydraulics Craig Lee 919-707-6708 cjlee@ncdot.gov Location and Surveys Chad Blackmon 910-486-1338 cmblackmon@ncdot.gov Central Construction Unit John Partin 336-847-1226 jpartin@ncdot.gov Division Right of Way Agent John Tate 910-364-0605 jtate@ncdot.gov Division Traffic Engineering Frank West/James Flowers 910-364-0606 fdwest@ncdot.gov/jvflowers@ncdot.gov LJB, Inc. Hydraulics Rick Coffman 919-594-6738 rcoffman@ljbinc.com LJB, Inc. Michael Mastroluca 919-594-6735 mmastroluca@ljbinc.com Existing Features Feature Bridged: Richland Swamp Bridge Clear Deck Width: 24.33 (Ft.) Approach Roadway width: 21 (Ft.) Bridge Length: 91 (Ft.) Deck Width (Out To Out): 25.6 (Ft.) Water Depth: 5 (Ft.) Height Bed-To-Crown: 10 (Ft.) Year Built: 1966 Posted: SV - 20 TTST - 23 Superstructure: Prestressed Concrete Channel Beam Substructure: EBs & IBs: PPC Caps with Timber piles Pier Type: 3 @ 30’ Temp. Shored: Historic High Water (Elev. to the Exist. Structure): Status: Functionally Obsolete PRI: 42.17 DP: 0 SR: 21.8 School Bussing crossings per day: TBD Posted Speed Limit Vicinity: 55 mph Detour Off-Site Stage Construction New Alignment On-site If Off-Site, Description Of Detour Route: SR 1521 (Oakgrove Church Rd) to SR 1318 (Buie-Philadelphus Rd) to SR 1522 (Huggins Rd) Approximate Length Of Detour? 3.5 miles; (2.5 additional miles) Improvements Needed To Road(s) On Detour? No improvements needed. Div. Traffic Eng. Recommend Off-site detour signing? Trailblazing with Street/Road names Improvements Needed To Bridges On Detour? No Are future plans for upgrading this roadway either at or in the vicinity of this project? No Are Bridges On Detour Currently Programmed? No Are There EMS Or Business Access Issues? TBD Are There Any Railroad Crossings On Detour? No Should Work Zone Pedestrian Access Be Maintained During Construction? No Utilities Overhead Utility Lines In Conflict Power Transmission Lines In Conflict 17’ from edge of bridge Telephone In Conflict Cable Lines In Conflict Fiber Optic In Conflict Water In Conflict 5’ from edge of bridge Sewer In Conflict Natural Gas In Conflict Other In Conflict Based on the past history near this project site, what is the Estimated Time Required to complete Utility Adjustments? TBD Months Is There Any Future Utility Construction Anticipated In The Project Area: No Is A FEMA Buy-Out Property Being Impacted: No Environmental Wetlands At Site: Yes, all quadrants Comments: Endangered Species from IPAC: RCW, Wood stork, Am. alligator, Michaux’s sumac T&E species effect: TBD by ECAPS Trout Watershed: No Natural Heritage Area: No CAMA County: No Primary Nursery Area: No Moratoria: No Which species: Duration: Permits discussion: Water Quality Classification: WS-IV; Sw 303d: No Coast Guard Permit? No Drainage Basin: Lumber Riparian Buffer Rules: No Is The Project Site In Or Near Any Of The Following: National Forest: No Wildlife Refuge: No State, County, Or Local Park: No Wild And Scenic River: No Airport: No Recreation or Power Generation: No Water Supply Reservoir: No Nutrient Sensitive Waters: No Public Use Boat Ramp: No Cemeteries: No VAD/Farmland Protection: No Game Lands: No Known Or Potential Historic Properties In The Area: No Architecture: No Survey Required Archaeology: No Survey Required Is the Bridge Structure Itself, or any part thereof, considered Historic: No Impacts to a Church, Community Center, Or Other Public Facility? No Is this a Statewide Bicycle Route or a Local Non-Marked Bicycle Route: No Comments: Geotechnical Are There Any Historical and/or Vibration Sensitive Structures Near By? Comments: Are There Any Known Landfills and/or Geo-environmental Hazard Sites at/or Within Close Proximity To The Project Site? No Comments: Are Any Impacts Anticipated To Natural Springs Or Artesian Wells? Comments: Possible Foundation Type: End Bents: Interior Bents: Hydraulics FEMA Approval? FSC Limited Detail Study Is There Unusual Scour Potential? No Is Protection Needed? Standard Are Banks Stable? Yes Is Protection Needed? Standard Appreciable Amount Of Large Debris? No Placement Of Bents In The Water Be Allowed: Yes Where: 5’ from existing bents Structure Type: Bridge Superstructure Type: CS, 21” If girder; why? N/A Length Of Structure: 100 ft Min. Number Of Spans: 2 Span Arrangement: 2 @ 50’ Waive offset: Yes EB Cap: 2’ 6” Skewed: 90 Add’l Comments: Can we use top down construction? Are insurable STRs in the 100 year floodplain? Review for 500 year event. Items To Be Discussed / Resolved At FSM By Attendees Off-Site Stage Construction New Alignment On-site Environmental Document Prepared by: LJB (Reviewed & Submitted by DEO) Federal CE Checklist State Minimum Criteria Checklist prepared by LJB ADT: 1,300 vpd NHS: No Tier: Sub-Regional Func. Class: Rural Local Bridge Min. Clear Deck Width Recommended by Div.: 30’-10” ft CRW (Out to Out dimension 33 ft) Roadway lane width: 11’ with 3’ shoulders, including 2’ paved shoulders Extension of Paved shoulders: Carry from each end of the bridge to project limits (Blunt end) Pave to face of guardrail and taper 8:1 to travel lane/paved shoulder? Yes Min. Pavement Surface Course: 3” S9.5B (2 lifts) Existing Roadway: 21 (ft) Pavement Marking: Paint Pavement Markers: Raised Will Railroad Involvement Be Required: No Method of Clearing: II Modified Truck Percentage: 6% per BIR Reasonable Safe Speed per SIR: 55 mph R/W by? NCDOT/On-Call R/W monuments? Pin & Cap Salvageable materials: No Contact Person/number: Removal of previous structure remnant abutments/piers: Remove all remnant/piers completely or 1’ below the mud line. Sequencing priority in construction? N/A Let Date: December 6, 2023 Comments: Action Items: Can we use top down construction? Joe Bailey will follow up. Follow up on School and EMS coordination