20220281 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220217

DWR
mwsiaa of Water Resaurces
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
• Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes • No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20220281 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
® Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
What amout is owed? *
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
John Perry:eads\jmperry2
la. Name of project:
NOAA Labs Pilot Study
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
B.I. Mansour - TD Eure Marine Construction
1 b. Primary Contact Email: * lc. Primary Contact Phone: *
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
2/17/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Beafort Harbor
Basin
White Oak
Water Classification
SA;HQW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
34.719766 -76.671741
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Carteret
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes • No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes • No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
• Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
• Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)

Has this PCN previously been submitted? *
Yes
• No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
• Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 54 - Living Shorelines
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
N/A
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes • No
• 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
• Riparian Buffer Authorization
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes • No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
® Yes No
1 i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
• Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes • No
B. Applicant Information
Unknown
Yes ® No
Yes • No
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? *
• Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
United States of America
2b. Deed book and page no.:
310-93
2c. Contact Person:
Greg Piniak - NCCOS NOAA Beaufort Laboratory
2d. Address
Street Address
101 Pivers Island Rd.
Address Line 2
City
Beaufort
Postal / Zip Code
28516
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:

2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Greg Piniak
3b. Business Name:
NCCOS NOAA Beaufort Laboratory
3c. Address
Street Address
101 Pivers Island Rd
Address Line 2
City
Beaufort
Postal / Zip Code
28516
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
B.I. Mansour
4b. Business Name:
TD Eure Marine Construction
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
United States
3e. Fax Number:
4c. Address
Street Address
PO Box 650
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Beaufort NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28516 United States
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
N/A
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Beaufort, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
639620903752000
2b. Property size:
9.8
2c. Project Address
Street Address
101 Pivers Island Rd
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Beaufort NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
28516 United States

3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Beafort Harbor
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
SA;HQW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
White Oak
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030203010704
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The NOAA Beaufort Laboratory, opened in 1899, is the second oldest federal marine laboratory and home to scientists from NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service and National Ocean
Service.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes • No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
50
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to pilot alternative methods of shoreline stabilization, utilizing materials that will promote habitat and wildlife growth, including but not limited to wetlands and
shellfish.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
NOAA Labs has designated +/- 50LF of shoreline and an area of roughly 2500SF at 101 Pivers Island Road in Beaufort, NC for a Pilot Study. Within this area NOAA proposes a habitat
trade-off to test the effects of alternative shoreline stabilization materials and methods.
As part of the study TD Eure Marine Construction will construct a tiered retention system, using an excavator and/or crane. Each tier will be built to a specific elevation based on analysis
that NOAA Labs has conducted in the area. NOAA's analysis has shown prevalence of low marsh (Spartina alterniflora) around the 1.0 — 1.5' elevation, and high ground marsh (Spartina
patens) around the 3.0- 3.5' elevations.
To construct the wall, TD Eure will provide and install a connected series of QuickReef living shoreline blocks. Manufactured by RS Shorelines in Carteret County, the blocks will serve as
shoreline protection and soil retention. By using native coastal materials such as oyster These blocks are also designed to encourage oyster growth.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
Aerial and Top Maps Provided
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified • Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Unknown
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes • No
• Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
This project will require a Federal Consistency Permit, per the approval of NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary

1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Buffers
2a. Site #* (7)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1
Mitigation
P
Salt/Brackish Marsh
Spartina Alterniflora
No
Both
0.020
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.020
2i. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.020
The existing wetlands in this area is approximately 785 SF. While this project proposed the removal of this wetlands, it proposes a wetlands exchange in
the same location, while increasing the total wetlands for this location to approximately 1200 SF.
4. Open Water Impacts
4a. Site #
4a1. Impact Reason
4b. Impact type
4c. Name of waterbody
4d. Activity type
4e. Waterbody type
4f. Impact area
1
Wetland Mitigation
P
Beaufort Habor
Stabilization
Other
0.01
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.01
4h. Comments:
The proposed structure will occupy approximately 475SF of existing open water.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check MI that apply.
Neuse
Catawba
Goose Creek
Other White Oak
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.01
Tar -Pamlico
Randleman
Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Allowable w/mitigation
P
White -Oak River Basin
Yes
785
0
Alllowable
T
White -Oak River Basin
No
0
1,200
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
785.00
Zone 2
1,200.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
785.00 1,200.00
6i. Comments:
The existing wetlands in this area is approximately 785 SF. While this project proposed the removal of this wetlands, it proposes a wetlands exchange in
the same location, while increasing the total wetlands for this location to approximately 1200 SF. In addition to the increase in wetlands area, the
proposed building materials are designed to promote shellfish habitat. The net effect of these changes will have a positive, not adverse, effect of the
environment.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation

1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
To construct the wall, TD Eure will provide and install a connected series of QuickReef living shoreline blocks. Manufactured by RS Shorelines in
Carteret County, the blocks will serve as shoreline protection and soil retention. By using native coastal materials such as oyster These blocks are also
designed to encourage oyster growth.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
To avoid or minimize proposed impacts, the contractor will limit the use of heavy equipment to aspects of the project that are totally neccessary
(exvavation, heavy material placement, etc). Silt fence will be installed to prevent run-off. Quickreef blocks will be placed by hand to limit the use of
heavy equipment in the project area.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes • No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The purpose of this project is to enhance the wetland habitat on -site. The only wetlands to be disturbed, are being replaced with a larger area. Increasing the total wetlands area form
+/-785SF to +/-1200SF.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
• Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
• Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes • No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
• Yes No
Comments:
The proposed project is deigned to increase wetland and shellfish habitat. While it does meet low density project requirements, project density should not be a negative factor here.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
• Yes No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes • No
Comments: *
NEPA/SEPA is not required.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes • No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes • No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No future development of this area is anticipated.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
Are there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around the project vicinity?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Unknown
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
This is a living shoreline project, and should not be subject to any FEMA requirements. The design intentionally places the structure within tidal areas
subject to flooding and wave action.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center
https://msc.fema.gov/portal
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
NOAA Pilot Study PCN Support Package.pdf 5.52MB
File must be PDF or KMZ

Comments
As stated in other areas of this application, the purpose of this project is to create additional wetlands and shellfish habitat. While there will be some initial disturbance/removal of existing
habitat, the end result will be an increase in square footage of these habitats.
Project maps, aerials, to
Signature �"-
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
B.I. Mansour
Signature
Date
2/17/2022

T D EURE MARINE CONSTRUCTION, LLC
PO BOX 650
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
February 17, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attention: Thomas (Tom) Charles
Re: NOAA Labs Pilot Study
Preconstruction Notification Nationwide Permit NWP 54
Dear Mr. Charles:
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Beaufort Laboratory is planning to install a living
shoreline as part of a pilot study project. The project will take place at 101 Pivers Island Rd. in Beaufort, NC
Coordinates: (34.719766, -76.671741).
This letter serves as a request for review and approval of the PCN package for this project. Included for your
review are the following items:
■ PCN Application
■ Project Description, Construction Methods and Materials
■ Topographic and Aerial Maps
■ Existing Site Photos
If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to call me at 252.571.4505. Thank
you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
B.I. Mansour
TD Eure Marine Construction, LLC.

NOAA Labs Pilot Study
P ONS ON NO A ON
S PPO N 0 N A ON
0 a d P o tSit
N OS NOAA a o t Labo ato y
Pi s sla d d
auot N
P a d y
u a i o st u do LL
PO o
o ad ity N

A L O ON N S
P o t s i do Pa s
A ial a Pa s
0 o a Pa s
isti Sit P otos Pa s

P O S P ON

T D EURE MARINE CONSTRUCTION, LLC
PO BOX 650
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROSPECTIVE PERMITEE:
NOAA Labs
101 Pivers Island Rd.
Beaufort, NC 28516
252.728.8746
LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY:
101 Pivers Island Rd.
Beaufort, NC 28516
PROPOSED NWP:
Nationwide Permit 54: Living Shorelines
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY:
THE ACITIVITY'S PURPOSE
The purpose of this project is to pilot alternative methods of shoreline stabilization, utilizing materials that will promote
habitat and wildlife growth, including but not limited to wetlands and shellfish.
ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The existing wetlands in this area is approximately 785 SF. While this project proposed the removal of this wetlands, it
proposes a wetlands exchange in the same location, while increasing the total wetlands for this location to approximately
1200 SF. In addition to the increase in wetlands area, the proposed building materials are designed to promote shellfish
habitat. The net effect of these changes will have a positive, not adverse, effect of the environment.
OPEN WATER IMPACT
The proposed structure will occupy approximately 475SF of existing open water.
PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
During construction, the contractor will implement mitigation measures, including the use of silt fence, to help prevent any
unnecessary erosion of fill into the open water.
ADDITIONAL PERMITTING
This project will require a Federal Consistency Permit, per the approval of NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management.
CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY
The construction will take place in 3 steps.
1. Pallets of the quickreef blocks will be set in the water and/or wetlands for installation
a. From there, each block will be placed, by hand, in the appropriate alignment
b. Some excavation may be required to obtain the proper elevations
2. Once the first row of blocks are in place, the respective tier will be backfilled to the proper grade and elevation
3. Once all blocks and fill are in place, the tiers will be planted, by hand, with their respective marsh grasses.

T D EURE MARINE CONSTRUCTION, LLC
PO BOX 650
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NOAA Labs has designated +/- 5OLF of shoreline and an area of roughly 2500SF at 101 Pivers Island Road in Beaufort, NC for a Pilot
Study. Within this area NOAA proposes a habitat trade-off to test the effects of alternative shoreline stabilization materials and
methods.
As part of the study TD Eure Marine Construction will construct a tiered retention system. (see plan attached). Each tier will be built
to a specific elevation based on analysis that NOAA Labs has conducted in the area. NOAA's analysis has shown prevalence of low
marsh (Spartina alterniflora) around the 1.0 — 1.5' elevation, and high ground marsh (Spartina patens) around the 3.0- 3.5'
elevations.
40
20
S. alterniflora Percent Cover
1
1
I
f
1
0- • • •
23
10
�51 ,
3. patens Percent Cover
• • • • • • •
I
o1oa5llo:ky10210;2'1 .6\0541 A5 "11 r, r.,;A n511ns, A541 r.,7)§ 95 s,!• 3 t335
Elevation Bin (feet NAVD88)
1Graphic Summary of Vegetation Distributions provided by NOAA Labs
To construct the wall, TD Eure will provide and install a connected series of QuickReef living shoreline blocks. Manufactured by RS
Shorelines in Carteret County, the blocks will serve as shoreline protection and soil retention. By using native coastal materials such
as oyster These blocks are also designed to encourage oyster growth. (See excerpt from rsshorelines.com)
Expected Outcome
While the QuickReef material will encourage oyster growth at each tier, the sloped design and gradual elevation change should
allow for the marsh grass to migrate up the tiers.

T D EURE MARINE CONSTRUCTION, LLC
PO BOX 650
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
UICKREEF
QuickReef living shorelines are made from a proprietary mixture of natural calcium carbonate materials cemented together.
There are a variety of materials on the market for living shoreline
construction. Very few, however, are conducive to shallow -water installation.
Even fewer resemble natural shorelines immediately upon installation.
QuickReef living shorelines solve both of these issues and more.
Comprised primarily of native coastal materials such as limestone marl and
oyster shells, QuickReef living shorelines provide an ideal substrate for oyster
recruitment and aquatic environment enhancement.
QuickReef units are arranged in the shallow waters of the intertidal zone in a
configuration that attenuates wave energy, encourages marsh accretion
behind the structure, and creates aquatic habitat within the structure. In
higher energy settings, the structure can also be bound together to create an
articulating system.
With its ability to attract and grow native oysters in brackish waters, over time
QuickReef living shorelines can naturally grow with sea level rise, providing
resilient protection for your shoreline.
QuickReef living shorelines create habitat for fish, blue crabs, oysters and
more, while absorbing and reducing the energy from waves and boat wakes
that erodes coastal shorelines. When designed as an offshore sill slightly
submerged at high tide, waves and wake roll over the top of the structure at
high tide with reduced energy and deposit carried sediment behind the sill.
This sediment gradually allows the marsh behind the structure to grow,
providing a larger buffer for coastal storms.
QuickReef is currently available for low to moderate energy sites. However,
custom configurations are also available. While QuickReef units provide an
excellent base for native oyster recruitment, they do not rely on oysters for
stability or longevity. This makes QuickReef an excellent living shoreline
option for brackish coastal areas without native oyster populations as well as
traditional living shoreline sites in saltier water.
Oyster Spat Recruitment & Growth Over time
2Excerpt from rsshorelines.com

PO A A AP A AL

NEW STEEL
SHEETPILE
SEAWALL
(PHASE 1)
BULKHEA
NEW STEEL
SHEETPILE
SEAWALL
(PHASE 2)Lei
EXISTING
CONCRETE
SEAWALL
(REMAIN IN PLACE)
NEW STEEL SHEET PILE SEAWALL
PHASE 2 TOTAL LINEAR FT. = 139.6 FT
REMOVE
OLD BOAT RAMP
ANU LLUAIINU UULKV
NEW STEEL
SHEETPILE
SEAWALL (PHASE 2)
4
W , 59. a.
. COAST
NORTH SECTION— 360.9 FT.
NEW STEEL SHEET PILE SEAWALL
PHASE 1 TOTAL LINEAR FT. = 581.9 FT
PHASE 2 PHASE 1
69 7l_
• 28.Tlot
WC1
i�l��
l; Wa
EXISTING' / TAL�.M R91
4 u CONCRETE—
SEAWALL
• (REMAIN IN F' E) \
Pilot Study Location
480'��
ARSH y * *
B'ULKHE D SEC•
NEW STEEL
SHEETPILE
SEAWALL (PHASE 1)
• R BOAT
IL LAUNCH
EXISTING CONCRETE —
SEAWALL (REMOVE)
BREAKWA
EW STEEL
HEETPILE
EAWALL
HASE 1)
00D FIXED DOCK
SCALE 1" = 40'
0 10 20 40
REMOVE EX. FLOATING
DOCK
V
NEW FLOATING DOCK
SEE SHT. P-004)
EW BOAT RAMP
AND FIXED DOCK
(SEE SHT. P-004)
EXISTING
CONCRETE
SEAWALL
(REMOVE)
EW STEEL
ETPILE
EA LL
HAS' 1)
EXISTING 1}00 \
CONCRE
SEAWALL
(REMAIN IN PLAC 1
Scenic
Consulting
Group
2011 CORPORATE DRIVE
UNIT#1
WILMINGTON, NC28905
[phone]
FOR PERMITTING
REVIEW ONLY
2/5/2021
SCALE 1"= 40'
PROJECT NO.
#20NOAAF03901
SHEET 4 OF 17
SEAL
CHK
RAB
Z
0
U
w
0
Z
Z
a_
Lu
1-

PO A A AP OPO

Pilot Study Location
Scenic
Consulting
Group
ex�noxxeuc NSENO P 1105 ENGINEERING
zml caaPauTE oalvE
UNIT#1
WILMINGTON, NC28Nb
��', _.„, 2- -ti �,,.,,,., ..., ..ro,,...,.,. ,.
P 1 =_- _-- � — � _�
®
ti
G2C� _ � j= \��_ .. i � .� �_ ®
L (7 � 1 Ap ,,._-i 7 _ �,��� ,- _ Z�. -- ro tI�
r `*
ro.roacue
0-0�5ev_te
:::///""�/ _ — _ �__ __ _ ___
_- - - _
I I,
---�r��f\�
/�-� /n \®
FOR PERMITTING
REVIEW ONLY
2/5/2021
SEAL
%
[ `
• �/ 11
C }r. e
_
\
�'.-, —` '
\ 1
- -___ __
\
�...
i
�i _ \�
r y `
,.. �i� ;.. ., \�`•`� `�\
Ns 1)
� � ` �ll�
~� _a � E��r�,
.,�
.a .�,.3s+. MEW.
DES
DRW
CHK
MEC
RAB
' . \ \
Q n ,
NATIONAL OCEANIC ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA)
NATIONAL OCEAN CENTER (NOS)
NATIONAL CENTER FOR COASTAL OCEAN SCIENCE (NCCOS) BEAUFORT LABORATORY
SEAWALL RETROFIT, BOAT RAMP, FLOATING DOCKS, AND FIXED DOCKS
101 FIVERS ISLAND RD. BEAUFORT, NC 28516
SITE SURVEY - NORTH SECTION
Approximate High Water Line ,\
�� v� 1 (%\
'' '
•
Proposed Pilot Study Structure A \ L
NOTED•
—\IP
)\1
'
VERTICAL DATUM DIAGRAM
SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION
."""`" 4;`
'-� `�
PRELIMINARY
l( \
ISSUED FOR REVIEW
MEAN HIGH WATER (MHW) = ELEV 21'
1 y\o (�I�(,
°M•,• �, \
2.1'
'�
..-,.
Y/
7.7.
RehSIONS
V
MEAN SEA LEVEL (MSL) = ELEV +0.0
4.6'R
�y 2
- --CAPE
FEAR,
______
ENGINEERING
2.5'
oQ
L \
/
- ---
T Poole. Suns 100. 9NrYle. NC. 38n5,
L (9101383-1041 FOX [phone]
N C LCENCE�a.1021 con
.,,
o�oE����
PS VOWED
.
DATE MMM
DECMEAN
SCALE 1" = 50'
LOWWATER(MLW)= ELEV-2.5'
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
TIDAL STATION USED:
BEAUFORT, DUKE MARINE LAB, NC 8656483
BODY OF WATER: BACK SOUND, NEWPORT RIVER
CLASSIFICATION: SA, HWQ
RIVER BASIN: WHITE OAK RIVER (WOK)
BULKHEADS
NOAA FACWTIES
, AT FIVERS ISLAND
PROJECT N0.
#20NOAAF03901
SHEET 2 OF 17
TIDAL DATA AND RELATIONSHIPS TO NAVD88 VERTICAL
DATUM OBTAINED FROM NOAA:
HTTPSU/TIDESANDCURRENTS.NOAA.GOV
DATA OBTAINED FROM NC DEQ - DWR SURFACE WATER
CLASSIFICATIONS WEBSITE:
HTTPS:IINCDENR.MAPSARCGIS.COM
)
�f
TOWN OF BEAUFORT
CARTERET COUNTY
`
P_002
%
175RT 3CAR0'NAOF 7

P O S
S N ON ONPOOS

A o i at Layout o ui
St u tu
isti
asi
.141511141141*
isti asi