Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160787_Meeting Minutes_20140325 Interagency 4C Concurrence Meeting Subject: Minutes from the for Hydraulic Design R-3826 in Martin County March 13, 2014 for Other Participants: Team Members: Bill Zerman – Hydraulics Ron Lucas - FHWA Vincent Rivers – Hydraulics David Wainwright - NCDWQ Susan Lancaster – Roadway Chris Militscher – EPA Gary Lovering – Roadway Tracy Wheeler – USACE Shawn Mebane – Division 1 Gary Jordan – USFWS Mark Staley - REU Travis Wilson–NCWRC Jay McInnis – PDEA Keith Paschal – Structures John Merritt – NES Highlighted - Not present Chris Rivenbark – NES Jonathan Henderson – HDR James Rice – HDR General introduction of the project was initiated by Bill Zerman. Introductions were made by all in attendance. James Rice, HDR hydraulic design engineer initiated the review by describing the overall project. James then discussed the action items from 4B including the side slopes and expired JD. The side slopes for the permit sites will be 3:1 with guardrail and the JD will be updated at a later date once the ROW date has been determined. Each plan sheet of the permit set was then reviewed. Stormwater Management Plan:  No comments. Title Sheet:  No comments.  After the meeting, it was determined that that there was a revised title sheet. The revised title sheet will be added to the final permit set. Sheet 7 (Site 1):  James inquired if impacts should be taken to the limits of the easement or if the impacts should only extend 10 feet beyond the limits of construction. Consensus was that the impacts should only extend 10 feet beyond the limits of construction. 12 Page of Sheet 12 (Site 2):  Mark Staley asked if the culvert construction sequence was included in the impacts. James Rice replied that they had been included.  Temporary impacts lead to a discussion about mechanized clearing impacts taken to the end of the rip rap. Consensus was that the mechanized clearing should extend 10 feet past the limits of construction, temporary excavation in wetlands for the temporary diversion channel, and hand clearing along the limits of the rip rap.  It was also decided that impacts should be extended to the right of way on both sides of the stream on the east side of the alignment. Summary Table:  The temporary fill in wetland column should have an asterisk to show that temporary excavation will be utilized for the temporary diversion channel. Meeting Adjourned 22 Page of