20140248 Ver 1_401 Application_20140314

CECS CAROLINAS, L L P S ettin. g tt7e Standard for Sen ice.
{ j ° ! s ° p , s N'l .' ;= ,i ,*gyred 51 _pn_arnc, Fu m
�—_ -- �-- - -�_.� Ge�1te��,lnir -a, Cc���strut� ?ialo tlaieriai� Er��rriro.7�rtenta[ Facilities
March 13, 2014
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401/Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street, Archdale Building — 9T" Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Subject: Pre - Construction Notification Application
Courtesy Copy NWP 3
Project Foresight
Highway 66 South
Forsyth County, North Carolina
ECS Project 09- 22668 -B
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Please find the attached Courtesy Copy of the Pre - Construction Notification Application for the
for the approximate 130 acre tract located east of Highway 66 South in Forsyth County, North
Carolina. The purpose of the project is to develop the site with an approximate 800,000 square
foot manufacturing /distribution facility, loading docks, parking areas and associated access
roads.
On behalf of Carolina Income Properties XV, LLC, I am providing a Courtesy Copy of the NWP
3 to authorize the impact of 0.04 acres of wetlands, associated with the replacement of an
existing culvert. It is our understanding that written authorization of the 401 Water Quality
Certification is not required. The stormwater management plan is being submitted to the City of
High Point, separate of this application.
Please feel free to contact me at (336) 856 -7150 if you have any questions concerning this
project or if additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely
consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
'-
Bradley S. Luckey Michael T. Brame, PWS
Environmental Project Manager Environmental Principal
Attachment: Pre - Construction Notification Application
cc: !fills. Sue Hcrnevfocdl — N0 DVVR1401 VVstlandls Unit- yllins+or. Salem �L5
email) � ��
MARi42014
-:R �i� c. v ce n- 27607 1i ?
:F• - -8 ;, -7 .l �i.r c• }n,

004 `ti' A rF9OG
6,
13 O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification PCN) For
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit E3 Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Project Foresight
2b. County:
Forsyth
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
High Point
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3- 0wrroer-inforrnation - - - -- -- —_ —�_
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See Attachment)
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Aqr���_
3d. Street address:
MAR
I
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
ukNR
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page I of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
p pplicant is: ❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner
ame: Mr. Robin Team
usiness name
f aoolicable): Carolina Income Properties XV, LLC
4d.
Street address:
PO Box 1066
4e.
City, state, zip:
Lexington, NC 27292
4f.
Telephone no.:
336- 243 -2600
4g. Fax no.:
336- 243 -2680
4h.
Email address:
rteam @cipnc.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b. 'Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
ECS Carolinas, LLP
4811 Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
(336) 856 -7150
(336) 856 -7160
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See Attachment
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.03501 Longitude: - 80.0485
(DD.DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
129.61 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Rich Fork
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is an approximate 130 acre tract located east of Highway 66 in Forsyth County, NC. The site consists of wooded
land and fields. The site is located in a rural /residential area of Forsyth County.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
5.25
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,019
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to develop the site with an approximate 800,000 square foot manufacturing /distribution
building, truck dock area, parking areas and access roads.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of developing the site with a manufacturing /distribution facility. In order to develop the site,
the northern portion of the site will be utilized as a soil stockpile /berm area. A 30 foot wide haul road will provide access
to the northern portion of the site by replacement of twin 12" RCP culverts with twin 24" CMP culverts. The proposed
culverts have been designed based on the calculated up- gradient drainage area and anticipated heavy equipment travel
necessary to utilize the northern portion of the site as a soil stockpile /berm area. Silt fencing will be installed on the sides
of the access road and the disturbance limits of the site. The culvert replacement is necessary due to safety concerns
assoicated with heavy equipment travel across the exisitng dilapidated culverts. Replacement of the existing culvert will
unavoidably impact 0.04 acres. of wetlands.
Graders, haulers, excavators, cranes and other heavy equipment will be uilized during site development activities.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ® No ® Unknown
Comments: John Thomas (USAGE). Sue Homewood (DWR)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: ECS Carolinas, LLP
Name (if known): Bradley Luckey, Michael Brame and David
Other:
Brame
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
John Thomas (USACE) visited an approximate 90 acre portion of the site on 8/8/13 and issued a final JD(attached). John
Thomas (USACE) and Sue Homewood (DWR) visited the remainder of the site (approximately 40 acres) on 3/5/14. A
USACE JD has not been issued for the approximate 40 acre portion of the site. DWR issed a Site Determination Letter
for the approximate 40 acre portion on 3/12/14 (attached). DWR has not verified the apprioximate 90 acre portion of the
site.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
El Yes ® No Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The site plan has incorporated a possible future 300,000 square foot addition to the proposed 800,000 sgaure foot
building. Plans for the potential expansion are not finalized and the current design will not impact additional
stream /wetlands. Impacts to streams /wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not anticipated at this
time.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Suffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ® P ❑ T
Fil /Culvertl
Headwater
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.04
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts,
0.04
2h. Comments: A total of 0.04 acres of wetlands will need to filled during the culvert replacement. Mitigation for wetland
impacts should not be required due to total wetland impacts being less than 0.10 acres.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 F] P ❑ T
- ®- PEIZ --
-®- Corps - - --
-
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Impacts to streams are not being proposed.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If'there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open water impacts are proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Stormwater
2.5
P2
5f. Total
2.5
5g. Comments: The stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater and to remove at least 90% TSS. The
stormwater management plan is being submitted to the City of High Point separate of this application.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
2.5
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
45.5
5k. Method of construction:
Excavated in upland.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Protected riparian buffers will not be impacted by the proposed project. The site is located in the Yadkin River
Basin.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
To access the northern portion of the site, an access road must cross a linear wetland. The crossing location has been
designed at an existing crossing and at the narrowest part of the linear wetland. The existing crossing must be upgraded to
safely allow heavy equipment to cross the wetland. The site plan has been designed such that construction of the proposed
building, potential building expansion, parking areas and the remainder of the access roads will not result in impacts to
jurisdictional streams, wetlands and /or ponds.
There are 5.25 acres of wetlands, 1,019 linear feet of stream channel and 5.29 acres of jurisidictional ponds that exist on the
site. Development of the site has been designed to avoid impacts to streams and jurisdictional ponds. The remaining 5.21
acres of wetlands are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
In order for the project to occur, the impacts to the 0.04 acre linear wetland is unavoidable. The wetlands in the vicinity of the
wetland crossing location (culvert replacement area) and soil stockpile /berm area will be marked in the field prior to beginning
clearing, grading or construction activities. These areas will be further protected using silt fencing on both sides of the haul
road. Additionally, Best Management Practices and /or temporary erosion /sediment control structures will be utilized to
- prevent exposed - soils- from- entering jurisdictional- streams - ponds- and - wetlands —BMRs- and /or- temporary-erosion /sediment
control structures are not proposed to be located in jurisdictional features that exist on the site. As soon as areas that will not
contain buildings or asphalt surfaces are graded, they will be seeded to stabilize exposed soil on the site
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: The site is located in the Yadkin River Basin.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Stormwater run -off will be discharged directly into stormwater retention
❑ Yes ® No
pond.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
33%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A 2.5 acre stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater runoff. The stormwater pond has been designed to
treat at least 90% total suspended solids. The stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater based on the site
being 33% impervious. The stormwater plan is being mailed to the City of High Point for review and is not included in this
permit application.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Clemmons
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
-3c- Has-the-approved- Stormwater - Management- Plan -with-proof-of-approval-been—
-E]-Yes—[]-No -
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
® Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby down - gradient water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the proposed facility will be disposed of by municipal sewer service provided by the City of High Point. It
is our understanding that existing sewer lines will be extended to the site and that existing water lines will be extended past
the site, thus providing municipal water /sewer services to the site and existing /proposed structures located in the vicinity of
the utility line extensions.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ECS consulted the Natural Heritage Program Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened
species inhabit the Kernersville, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle that contains the site). There are no federally listed
protected endangered or threatened species that have been identified on this quadrangle.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. We did
not observe fish inhabiting the streams during our site visits. Best management practices and the construction of stormwater
devices will prevent sediment from entering down gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /) to identify historic and /or archaeological resources of the site.
The SHPO map did not identify historic and /or cultural resources on the site or in the vicinity of the site. A copy of the map
is included as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Map Number 3710668300J, dated
January 2, 2009 (attached) and FEMA FIRM Map Number 3710689300K, dated January 2, 2009 (attached)
Bradley S. Luckey
3 -13 -14
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applica'�r#/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid p ly if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page l 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

woo'sJappnUewpuel— I OOOZ'OBL'9EE'd
LULZ ON 'wa1eg- uo}suiM I pnoo peal OZ9E I ejapline NjewpuLq
•aauapguoD ppng aM Im
NYU'WTATdT N,TV7r6
lAL. v -Y "A1vt v A Ell
�tioii>r �,."4'
lug
MIS 99ON /-V/—I
An T LLHUl SLYOd LLOLVT OYd
NOd ONISS02i0 ONV-113M a3SOdONd
m m ® m
A
\. Z
\ \ \ \\
.0
X a-
\\ \\ 0
z 0 �:
Q
\ � v
0 LL.
0
�0
0
a-Lie
n
Fen vny riu .ea
it
of �y•
J
IN
n
to
c m m
0
O
d 0
0
�� I
I I
o
i i o
j 0
Q
o
Ig I 0
4
0
II
1t1
�
�j 0
II
L- o
-
\ 4 +
X
W
4
m
!b qob
t�
0
i

woo'sjapj!riq)p8wPuBl'mmm I 000Z'V8L9EC'd
LULZ ON 'Wales-uqsu!m I pnoo pepi OZge I siappEpilewpue-1
•oouap!juoo ppe 9M m
AT%JWATfTPLTV7rF m
ALLI V -Y "%Ji"L V I Ell
3
K AN
? b %) -
rI
�u
W LLI
I
311S 990NI-VL-1 04
J-) I C 0 Y rLu T m
LLH L/ Y Od 103T 02YOT N IDNISSON::) 5
z
Li
�:JOA ONISSO�10 GNV-113M 03SOdO8d R Ir ( )
toy
W LU
LL
LU _j U,
N uj
< z
Lu
LL
LL
LU
96e
(D
z
O
Z I.
Oz
7113��'
�19�
mmillillill
R41
1111111M
I
<
LU

Id6l's Property
Nighwayr66 South
Kernersville, North Carotin&
ECS`Pro0sal No. 0820446 -P
April 30, 2013
ECS Carolinas, LLP
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Scope of Work: Wetland Determination/Wetlartd Delineation
Location: idol's Property
- Highway 66 South
Kernersvllle, North Carolina
This form authorizes ECS to act.as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U,S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality field verification and permit
application. -
Property Address: �_ GL 11
-Owner Information: dot t� aeiprtl;�
Name:
Address r7 5,10k
T0100one NuiTiber:
Fax Number-
E -mall' Address:
Signature: — .- ..._..... -_ -_ (7a +,e'- t4'•�,3

DQ
LANDOWNERS
Project Foresight
Highway, 66 South, Forsyth, County
Parcel Identification
Owner
Deed Book-
Number
Page Number
6883 -71 =8712
Gary Walter Idol
1.730 -1561
Pamela B. Idols
6881.62 -1000
Sandra Idol Portaro-
3031 -1575
6883 -92 -0085
Michael' Wayne Dull
3031 -1579
Karen Idol Dull
6883 -92 -3597
Richard Edward Idol
3116 -2321
Toni, Rae Idol
6883 -71 -8712
Gary Walter Idol
1730 -1561
Pam_ ela B. Idola
6893 -03 -3544
Arny W. Dawkins
2913 -2783
6893 -02 -8681
Carroll P. Welborn
2258 -664
6885 -93 -5015
Ain" W. ,Dawkins
2913 -2783
The parcel and owner information shown in the above table was obtained
from'the Forsyth County GIS Website. Irodividual land owners should
not be contacted concerning regulatory issues. All comments,
conversations and correspondence concerning regulatory information
should be directed to ECS Carolinas, LLP.

q
-.3
q
Li -
V
-
Li
J
cry

`r�• F i . - ( - - \\ - - t i ' � � � �. 1. •
.-, _ _ ... �a •1 -tip _. ` ' ,; N, (,- '-g • J'
subst
�' i ► - �i�; �u1l.r` -� -jam j; ( /,: / r �k\
u R C9� /,_ S5; `` / �� ti• SITE
kA
Ij
93u 1-
RLX
MIS
l _ -.r S_;..• -- �L� per _ �� ' • . : t•' � , r `'
( \ \ • � � ' `L �?� /\ ems, � �• \ I, f _ ' -� •r, � ��� ''
r- �'/�J' � i17 /'' --'•� \� •„ ,, �! � ■- �� ■ ■�... � fug. -.; �:,. = �d -.
�-i , %i% lip, ,� -' , � � irkr�'! �r� �� ;' � _ ;-•� '� {�•�.a ?
f��r /. °�-. -t '�� � ' . '••-�• .: i; 'S. �'A i ^ � it _•f � `\ �`/ } /' //( �- �l t _
" SOURCE, FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAR
s USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP: IDOL'S PROPERTY
KERNERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA n TRACTS A & B
QUADRANGLE DATED 1969, REVISED 1994 1� HIGHWAY 66 SOUTH
FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Scale: 1 " = 2,000' CAROLINAS ECS PROJECT NO. 09-22668-B

iCr
+■111
N
SOURCE.
S
USDA -NRCS On -line Web Soil Survey
Scale: 1 " 0 800'
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Approximate Tract A/B Boundary
FIGURE 2
USDA SOIL MAP
IDOL'S PROPERTY
TRACTS A & B
HIGHWAY 66 SOUTH
1=ORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 09- 22668 -B

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FARM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region.
Project/Site. _ P�o)ect_Foresight City /County Forsyth Sampling Date: %3/14/13
ApplicanUOwner Carolina Investment'.Properties; Inc. State- NC 'Sampling, Point. DP -1
Investigator(s). 'Luckey /Brame,•ECS Carolinas Section, Township, Range:
• i
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Swale- upgradient "of Pond Local relief (concave, convex, none): _ Slope,( %)_ 3%
Subregion (LRR or WRAY Lat. Long: Datum:
SoiLMap Unit Name. Nathalie sandy loam NWDclassification-
Are climatic /,tiydroiogic conditions .omth'e'site,typical'for this timetof year? Yes 0 No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks:)
Are Vegetation ,El, Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Ciecumstances "•present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation F—]-,.Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain'any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map-,showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
HydrophyticMegetation Present? _ Yes No
IpI I--I Is•the Sampled Area
HydncSoil,Present ?'Wetland Yes Jlppll No withima-Wetland? Yes, _� No
Hydrology'Ptesent? , Yes No
Remarks: The'4hree.samplmg criteria are,present. The,sampling point is located,within a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland, Hydrology:lndicators:
Primary lndicators'(minimum of one is required-, check -all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (mini mum rofdwoJreourdd)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks,(B6)•
❑ Surface ; Water (A1)
f Water- Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface'(58)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation.(A3)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (614)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
'Living
I--I
Ll Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑Sediment Deposits B2
' p ( )
❑ Oxidized'Rh¢ospheres on ving Roots •(C3)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Algal;Mat or Crust,(B4)
❑ Presence of Reduced'Iron (C4)
❑, Recent Iron Reduction,in TilledrSods (C6)
I—I
*Saturation ---111 Visible,on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Iron!Deposits,(B5),
❑, Thin Muck Surface „(C7)
Ll Stunted or, Stressed Plants, (DI),
❑ Indundation Visibleon Aerial Imagery,(B7) ❑ Other (Explain imRe_marks)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑_MicrotopographicRelief_(D4))
❑. FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
-
Surface Water Present? Yes F1
M Depth (inches).
Water'Table Present? Yes _t
No Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland,Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary,,fringe)
Describe Recorded� Data; (stream : gauge, monitoring well,, aerial+ photos, iprevious'inspections), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology mdicators,are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interi m Version
t
I
I
i
i

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names <of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -1-
US Anny Corps of Engineers EastemlMountains °and Piedmont - Intenrh,Ve_sion
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Domi_nance'Test worksheet:
Tree,Stratum (Plotsize-, 30 feet )
% Cover Species?
��
Status
1. Acer rUbrum
20-
FAC
Number, of Dommant}Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 5 (A)
2
❑
'3.
II
Total Number of Dominant
4
❑
SpeciesAcrossAll Strata: 5 (B)
5.
❑
Percent.of'Dominant Species 100-
That Are OBL, FACW, or-FAC:_ (A/B)
6
7
❑
Prevalence'Indez worksheet:
8
- J
Total %,Cover of: Multiolv by:
20
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species 2l=
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size- 30 feet
)
_x
FAC species xi3 =
1. Acer rubrum
5'
�',
FAC
FACU ?species x'4 =;
2 'L'tquidambar sytraciflua
5.
JOL
FAC
-
IJPL,species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals (A) (B)
4
-
5
II
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
7
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8
-❑
2- Dominance Test is >50%
10
= Total Cover,
❑ 3= Prevalence Index is • 3.0'
4- Morphological. Adaptations " (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size:. - 30 feet )'
T data in Remarks orlon aiseparate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain]
1 Festuca sp.
30
FAC.
2. Juncus sp:,
10
FACW
g Carex sp
10
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil'and'wetland'hydrology must +be
4'.
❑
present, uniess,disturbed or problematic,
-
❑
DefinRions�of Four'Vegetation Strata:
5.
;6.
❑
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
7
❑
more•in diameter at breast height (DBH), °regardless of
8.
height.
g -
❑
.10. -
❑.
Sapling /Shrub,- Woody plants, excluding, vine "s, less
11.
El
than 3 in. DBH'an-d greater tham3'.28 ftj(1 m),tall.
,12.,
❑.
50'
_ Total Cover
He (non- woody) plants -tall. less
of size,: and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. -
Woody vine - AII'woody vinesgreater than.3.28,ft.in
Woodv.VineStratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
height.
1- None Observed a
2 - --
n
3
II�1
4_ -
LL
,5
II
= Total Cover
Hydrophytie
Vegetation
Yes No
Present?
- 'Remarks. (Include photoinumbers ,,here or'on a separate! sheet.)
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic
US Anny Corps of Engineers EastemlMountains °and Piedmont - Intenrh,Ve_sion

JVIL
Profile Description: (Describe -to the depth needed to document;the indicator or confirm the absence of; indicators.),
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color'(rnoist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
0 -10 10YRr5 /4 100 SL.
10 -12 10YR 5/2; 100 L
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced, Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. kocahon- PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Remarks
romt
Hydric, Soil, Indicators:,
Indicators for Problematic Hydric;Soils3
II Histosol (Al)
II Stripped Matrix (S6)
2.cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Q IHistic Epipedon (A2),
1l'. ;Dark�Surface (S7)
I1__L
L1 Coast!PrairieRedox (A16) (ML'RA 147;
148)
Black, Histic, (A3)
�-I
LL ,Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA
147, 148))
136, 147)
II Hydrogen Sulfide ;(A4)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
II 2cm Muck (A10) (I-RR N))
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
a Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Depleted Dark`Surface (F7)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (
Q S1) (LRR N,
I--I
II Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydroptiytievegetation, and
MLRA 147, 148)
II Iron - Manganese Masses (F12),(LRR,N,
wetland,hydrology'must be'present, unless
disturbed or problematic,
II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
IVILRA,136)
Q 'Sandy,Redox (S5)
'Umbric Surfac&(F13)1(MLRA,136,'122)
II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19),(MRLA 148)
Restrictive Layer (if-observed):
Type-
Depth.(inches) Hydric Soil Present? iR Yes n No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
I
y

WETLAND DETERIViINAT„ION DATA,FORM —Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site, Project Foresight City /County: Forsyth Sampling Date 3714/13
Applicant/Owner- Carolina, Investment Properties Inc, State NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigatbr(s): Luckey /Brame „EC&Carolmas Section, Township, Range:
Landform.(hillslope, terrace, etc.)- Swalet Local relief'(concave „conve.c,,none). Slope (P /o)” 3%
Subregion (LRR o-r MLRA): Let Long Datum_
Soil`Map Unit Name: Nathalie sandy loam NWI.classification
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this,time of year? Yes • No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, ❑ ,,,Sod ❑ ; or,Hydrology, ❑ significantly disturbed? Are,'Normal-Circum stances ” present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Sod ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed; explain any'answersJh,Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point.locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation* Present? Yes No
I-1 IpI .Is the Sampled Area
S
Hydricoil Present ?, Wetland Yes - i i No �IpOIt within a'wetland? Yes F-1 No M
'Hydrology, Present? Yes, -__0 No
Remarks: Welland hydrology'and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling,point is not'located.within a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology'Indicators:
Secondary Indicators+(minimum of'two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all'that apply)
❑ Surface Sbil�Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (A1)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface'(B8)
❑, High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquabc,Fauna.(613) -
' Drainage'Pattems (B10)
❑•;Saturation (A3)
❑, True Aquatic,Plants•(614)
❑ Moss Tnm,Gnes (616)
❑ ,Water Marks (61)
I-� Sediment Deposits 82
LL P (_ )
❑ Hydrogen, Sulfide' +Odor (C1)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots;(C3)
I--I
1_l 'Dr - SeasgwWater Table (C2)
❑ Drift Deposits•(B3)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
I--I
,Crayfish Burrows (C8),
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
IL-1L
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Iron, Deposits (65)
❑ Thin Muck, (C7)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
❑ Indundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
III
II. Geomorphic Posdron (D2).
StiallowAqurtard,(153).
-
-
❑- MrcrotopographrcRelief;(D4))
❑ FAC- Neutral Test`(1)5)
Field. observattons:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _� Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes F—
No M Depth (inches).
Saturation Present? Yes f'1
No M Depth (inches)*
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No,
,(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring. well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks-'Wetland hydrology'indicators are not present
US AnnyCorps of Engineers EastemWountains {and `Piedmont; = Interim Version
f
j
F�
i
i
I

'VEGETATION (Four. Strata)- Usescientific names ^of plants.
Sampling Point', DP -2
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance 'Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )
_Absolute
% Cover Species?
Status
1. Acer rubrum
35
—FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2 Quercussalba
15
FACU
That•Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 4 (A)
3: Lirodendron °tulipifera
15
a
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4
a
Species Across All Strata 5 (B)
5
a
-
Percent,of Dominant Species 80.0
6
FT
That Are OBL; FACW, or FAC- (A/B)
'7
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:,
8 -
1
Total %.Cover of: Multiply by,.
65
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size.; 30 feet_
)
FAC species X3=
1 Fraxinus,pennsylyvanica
20
FACW
FACU species x4=
2 Liquidambarsytracifliia
10
r-I
a
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
,3 Acer rubriun
5
❑
FACW
Column Totals: (A) - (B)
4
5
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6 a
7
❑
F-1 1 - Rapid Test,for Hydrophytic .-Vegetation
2­ Dominance, Test, is >50%
35
=Total Cover
3­ Prevalence Index is.- 3:0'
4 - 1NoYPhological Adaptations' (Provide'supporUng
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet 1
data.in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1 Fraxinus,pennsylyvanica,
10
FACW
2 Lonicera japonica
10
FAC
3 Quercus sp.
5
a
FAC
'Indicators of hyoc,soil, and wetland,hydrology'must be
4:,Juniperus virginiana
5
a
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic:
Definitions of Four'Vegetation Strata:
5 a
6
a
Tiee- Woody plants, excluding wnes,.3'in. (7.6 cm) or
7.
a
more in diameter at breast height (DBH);,regardless of
8
—i—i
height.
9.
II
10.
❑
_
Sapling /Shrub- Woody plants „excludingavines, less,
1'1
❑
than,3 in. DBH ^arid greater than 3.28 t(1 m) tall.
_
12”
❑
30
= Total Cover
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
-
of size, and woody_plants, less than_3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - AII•woody vines greater than 3'.28 ft'in
Woody, Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet 1
height
1 ,;None Observed
a
2
a
3:
-
a
4
a
5
a
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes _� No
Remarks: (Include photo'numbers,here or on a separate sheet)
Thezdominant vegetatiomis;hydrophytic.
US,Army Corps'&fEngmeers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

Description: (Describe;to the,depth,neededito document the,indicator onconfirmAhe absence off indicators.),
Depth ,MatnxE Redox,Features.
(ihches) Color,(moist) % �Color;(moistj °/p Type' Loc? Texture Remarks
0 -9 7.5YR 4/3 100 SL
944 10YRI /4' 100 CL
- - — —
'Type: C =Concentration; D =Depletion „RM= Reduced'Matrix, MS= Wasked,Sand,Graihs: ZLocation'PL= P.oreLining, M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
;lndicators,•for Problematic•Hydric Soils''
Q 'Histosol'(A7)
t—1 Stripped Matrix'.(S6)
1[3', 2•cm iMuck,(A10) (MLRA 147,)'
II Histic Epipeiion, (AZ)
Ll DarkSurface,,(S7)
II; Coast Prairie'IReiiox'(A16) (MLRA,147,
148)
II Black;Histic (A3)
I--I
II PolvvaluefBelow.Surfdce (S8) (MLRA
Q, (Piedmont Floodplain Soils.(F.19) (MLRA
!-L Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
147; 148)),
II Thin; Dark Surface (S9)' (MLRA _1'47, 148)
1136,,_47p
Red Parent Material (3F2)
1—L Sirafified. Layers ;(A5)
0, Loamy Gleyed Math)QU)
r' i, Very Shallow Dafk {Surface (TF12)
Q '2,cm Muck;(A10),(LRR N))
II Depleted Matrix (F3)
_l—1 Other;(Explain'in Remarks).
II i Depleted ,Below�Dark.Surface;(A1.1)
❑ ReddkDafk{Sdrface.(F6)
II Thick,Dark,Surface�(Al2)
II Depleted'.DarkiSurfa_c_e�(F7)
L1 Sandy, Mudry�MiheraC(S1) (L "RR N;
IULRA 147;;1'48)
Redox,D_e ressions F8
R ( )
3Indicatomof. hyd- rophytic'vegetation and
wetland,hydrology.must be present ;,,unless
II Sandy�Gleyed;Mathx'(S4)
Iron -Man anese,Masses<(F12 LRRiN;
g ) (
disturbed or problematic.,
MLRAA36)
Sandy'Redoxj,(SS)
Umbric Surface (F13)j(MLRA,136; 122).
Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19)j(MRL4^148)
Restrictive 'Layer (if'observed):
Tvno• -
11S Army Corps of iindineers. Eastern Mountams,and.Piedmorit.– Interim Version
1
i
I
j I
i

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
- Project/Site. Project Foresight City /County. forsyth Sampling Date: 1!20/14
ApphcanttOwner: Carolina, Investment, Properties; Inc. State. NC Sampling Point: DP -3
Investigator(s). BSLMITB,,ECS Carolinas Section, Township,*, Range:
L'•andform,(hillslope,;terrace, etc), Swale- upgradient.of Pond Local relief, (concave, convex, none): Slope.( %), 3 0/d
Subregion (LRR,or,MLRA): Lat _ Long: Datum,
Sod Map Unit Name. Nathalie, sandy, loam NWI'classrfi cation,
Are,clunatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for thistime of Year Yes 0 N ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0-,Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ❑
Are Vegetation. ❑ ,Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ ,naturally problematic? (If needed, explain,any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes M No
IpI Is the Sampled Area
HydricSoi1,Present? Wetland Yes No within'a•Vlletiand? Yes _M No _]
Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks. The,three sampling-critena are present. The sampling,poiht' is located`within a wetland.,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland:Hydrology Indicators:
Secondarvandicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one'is required. check all thafaoply)
❑. Surface Soil,Cracks (66) -
Surface Water (A1)
❑ Water- Sta,ned;Leaves (Bg)
❑ Sparsely. Vegetated,Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Tabler(A2)
❑ •Aquatic"Fauna.(B13)
O 'Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturati6n,(A3),
❑ 'True'Aquatic Plants (B14)
E
❑ Water Marks (B,1)
0 ,Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
II- --Ii Dry -Se son'Water Tab
❑. Dry Season'llVater Table (C2)
Sediment De osits, 62
❑ • p ( )
El Rhizospheres- on,Living Roots (C3)
I—I
Crayfish BVisibl
II ,Drift,Deposit&(B3)
❑ ,Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)'
,(C8)
IL-lI
Saturation visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
-IIt
❑ Iron Deposits (BS)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
ILI---
D� 'Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Indundation Visible'omAerialamagery (B7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
]_t Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aqubrd (D3)
II Microtopographic- Relief_(D4))
❑ FAC- NeuV_a_I Test.(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _❑ 'Depth (inches) Surface
WaterTable,Present ?' Yes
No, Depth (inches)_ 1"
IpI
Saturation Present? Yes, Jpt
No �� Depth (in ches). 1"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No „�.
(includes capillary_fnnge)
Describe, Recorded Data (stream gauge, ?mondonng well, aerial; photos,• previous ;inspections),,ifavailable -
Remarks Wetland tiydrology indicators are present
US Army,Corps`of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - GiterimVersion

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP =3
US Arrmly Corps of Engineers
Eestem Mountains and'Piedmont — Intenm Version
r
4E
I
I
— _
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
�Domiriance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum '(Plot size 30 feet 1
% Cover Species'?
—�
Status
1. None Observed
Number of Dominant Species
ThatAre'OBL, FACW, or'FAC: 2 (A)
2.
Q
3.
Q
Total' Number of Dominant
4
Q
Species Across AII'Strata: 2 (B)
5
Q
Percent of'Dominant.Species 100
That Are•OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
II
7.
❑
Pie"valencelndex'worksheet:
8
F1
Total %. Cover of- Multioly by
= Total Cover
OBL species x,1 =
FACWSpecies x,2 =
Sapling /Shrub'Stratum (Plot size: 30'feet
)
FAC'species x,3 =
1. None Observed
IpI
1pt
FACU species x4=
2•
Q
UPL-,species x;5 =
3.
Q
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
5.
Q
;Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic'Vegetation Indicators:
Q -
6
7
;❑
-1 1 - Rapid Test for Hy drophytic'Vegetatiom
.8
2.- Dominance Testis >50%
=- Total,Cover
3- Rrevalence Index is • 3.0'
4,= Morphological Adaptations' (Provideisupportmg
Herb +Stratum. (Plot size:, 3016et )
_ data "in Remarks or on a separate;sheet)
1. Festucasp.
30 �
FAC
ProblematicJHydrophytic Vegetation (6iplain)
_ -
2,Juncus sp.
30
FACW
$ ,Carex sp.
2 Q
FACW
',lndicators�of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology'must be
4
Q
presentiwnless disturbed or problematic.
Diniti
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
'
5 Q
6
Q
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
7
Q
more in diameter at breast height•(DBH), regardless of
8
Q
-
height.
9.
Q
10.
Q
. -
41.
❑
Sapling /Shrub= Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in.,DBH and'greater than 3128 ft'(1 m) tall.
,12__
❑
.
62 =Total Cover
Herb — All herbaceous,(non- woody) plants, regardless
of.size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft.tall.
Woody vine­ All woody vines greater than 3:28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30'feet )
height.
1 None Observed Q
2.
Q
3
Q
4.
Q
5
II
Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes _�, 'No
Remarks ;(Include ^photo numbers here or on a separate,sheet.).
The)dominant vegetation,is hydrophytic
US Arrmly Corps of Engineers
Eestem Mountains and'Piedmont — Intenm Version
r
4E
I
I
— _

50IL Sampling Point: DP -3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed tadocument the indicator or confirm,the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc, Texture Remarks,
0 -12 10YR'4/1 90 5YR 4/6 10 C RM L
'Type' C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced.Matroc, MS= , Masked. Sand Grains. ZLocation PL =Pore Lining„ M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for'Problematic Hydric,SoiIS3
II Histosolr(A1)
II Sthpped_Math*,,(S6)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histi&Epipedon -(A2)
II Dark, Surface, (S7)
I1 -_-I1
1 Coast Prairie:Redox (A16) (MLRA ,147,
148)
I--I
1 _L Black Histic (AS)
I--I
+13 Polyvalue "Below.'Surfaoe (S8)' (ML'-RA
II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA
'
147,148)p
136, 147)
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4),
II Thin'Dark,Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)'
ReTParent,Material, (TF2)
Stretified Layers,(A5)
II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1.2)
a 2 cm Muck'(A10) (LRR N))
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_0 Other (Ex p lain. imRemarks) -
Depleted Below'Dark Surface (A11)
D Redox bark,Surface,(FB)
Thick Dark Surface, (Al 2),
II Deplgted,Dark Surface (F7)
sandy
sandy ucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
II S Muc
II Redox, Depressions (F8)'
3Indicators "of hydrophydc vegetation and
wetland hydrology'must be present, unless
MLRA 1 148j
II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
II Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
disturbed or problematic.
MLRA 136)
II Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13),(MLRA,136, 122)
II hedmont,Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MRLA 148)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches). Hydric Soil Present? M Yes EL No
US Army,Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim'Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont,Region
Project/Site. Project Foresight City /County: Forsyth Sampling0ate' 1/20/14
Applicant/Owner: Carolina Investment Properties, Inc. - State: NC Sampling,Pornt DP-4
Investigator(s) BSL/MTB, ECS Carolinas Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,): Swale- upgradient,of Pond LocaLrelief (concave, convex, none). Slope ( %) 3%
'Subregion (L'RR or MLRA)- Lat„ Long: Datum
Soil Map Unit Name: Nathahe sandy loam NWI'classificatlon
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical •forthis time6f year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks:)
Are-Vegetation . ❑ , Sod ❑ , or Hydrology ,❑ ° significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances °'present? Yes ® No ❑
AreNegetation ❑„ Sod ❑ , „or "Hydrology,- „❑ ,,naturally;problematic? (Ifneeded,;explain :any answers in Remarks) i
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site mapahowing sampling point' locations, transects„ importantfeatures, etc. I
'Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes M No
1 Ip� Is the Sampled Area
El Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes _i No M within,a Wetland? Yes F�j No
Hydrology Presents Yes = No
Remarks: Wetland.'Hydrology,and Hydnc,Soil Indicatorsare not present, The sampling point is not located within a Wetland:
HYDROLOGY
`Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary - Indicators - (minimum of two required),
Primary Indicators, (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
❑ Surface•Water (Al)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Aquatic Fauna,(B13)
❑ Drainage Patteins„(B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ True Aquatic,Plants,(614)
❑ Moss Trim Lines
❑ Water Maiks (B1)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor,(C1)
(816)
Ll Dry-Season Water-Table (C2)
Sediment ( B2 )
❑ Deposits
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
❑ Crayfish'Bumows,(C8)
"❑ Dnit Deposits (B3)
❑, Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ AlgaIIMat,or Crust,(134)
El Recent Iron'Reduction'in Tilled'Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible omAerial Imagery (0)
❑ Iron,Deposits (B5)
❑, ThmrMuck;Surface (C7),
I�-I
Stunted,orStressed Plantsi(D1)
❑ Indundation.Visible on Aerial lmageryl(B7)
❑ Other "(Explain, in, Remarks)
IL--1I
❑' Geomorphid,Po "sition (D2)
''Shallow Agwtaed (D3)
❑_ Microt6pographic2Relief_(D4))' —
❑ 'FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field. Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes =II
No _� Depth (inches): -
' Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth:(inches)- >12"
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): >12"
Wetland
Hydrology, Present? Yes _LL No Jpl
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream,gauge, monitoring Well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks. Wetland hydrology indicators are'not present.
US'Army Corps of,Engmeers EastemMountams and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION ,(Four Strata), Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:' DP-4•
USArmy Corps,of'Engineers Eastern Mountains and:Piedmont – Interim Version
E
3I
I
�i
i
S
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet
% Cover Species?
�L1
Status
1 None Observed
Number'of;Dominant Species
T C hat Are, FACW, or, 2 (A)
2'
3
❑
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species, Across All Strata, 2 (B)
5
II
Percent•of Dominant:Speaes 100
'(A/B)
That'Are OBL, FACW,'or FAC.
6.
7
❑
Prevalence, lndex:worksheet:
8
F1
Total % Cover of Multiply by.
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW'species x2=
Sapling /Shrub Stratum' (Plot size. 30 feet
1
FAC,species x3=
1 None Observed
❑I
FACU species x 4-
2.
I
L.1
UPL species x5=
3
0
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
❑
5
a
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation, Indicators:
6 ❑
7
❑
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g.
2- Dominance,Test is >50%
= Total Cover
3- Prevalence Index is,- 3.0' •
4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide:supporting
Herb,Stratum =(Plot size 30 feet 1
- data'in Remarks,or on a separate sheet)
1 Festuca sp.
50
FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation ,(Explain)
2: Puo�annua
30�
FAC
3, U rnwalata
2
❑
FACU
'',Indicators of,hydnc'soil and:wetland hydrologymusfbe
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
2
❑
FAC
present „unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of,Four Vegetation Strata:
5 0-
6.
❑
Tree ­Woody plants ,.excluding;vines, 3 in (7:6jcm)�or
7,.
❑
more in diameter,at'breas_t height'(DBH), regardless of
8
❑
height.
9.
❑
10.
❑.
11
❑
Sapling /Shrub – Woody plants;, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft'(1m) tall.
12.
❑
84
= Total:COver
Herb –All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of,size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft'tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. 30.feet 1
height.
1 None Observed
❑
2.
❑
3
❑
4.
_ ❑
5
❑-
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes No I—I
Present?
Remarks.'(Include photo numbers here or on a separate,sheet ).
The•dommant,vegetatlon Is hydrophytic.
USArmy Corps,of'Engineers Eastern Mountains and:Piedmont – Interim Version
E
3I
I
�i
i
S

enu
5ampnng volnt: P-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the.absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc? Texture Remarks
0 -12, 7:5Y,R'4/4 1W JCL
'Type. C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked; Sand�Grains. 2Location: PL--Pore Lining,, M= Matriz-
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators,for,P_roblematic Hydric,Soils'
II Histosol,(A1)
a Stepped Matriz.(S6)
❑� 2,cmWuck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
I
II Coast Prairie'Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,
II Black Histic (A3)
I--I
II Polyvalue.Below Surface (S8) (MLRA
148)
II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
147, 148))
❑ Thin, Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA -147, 148)
136,147)
Red Parent Material (T172)
Stratified Layers.(A5)
II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface &F12)
II Zcm "Muck (A10) (LRR N))
❑, Depleted,Matrix (F3)
- _O:Other (Explain;in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A'11)
II, RedoxfDark1,Surface (F6)
Thick:Dark Surface (Al2)
II Depleted'Dark'Surface (F7)
II Sandy Mucky Mineral,($1) (LRR'N,
MLRA 147; 148)
I�I
n Redox Depressions (F8)
'3Indicators of hydropfiytic,vegetation 'and
d
wetland hydrology, be present; unless
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
II Iron=Manganese Masses (F12),(LRR N,
disturbed, or problematic.
0 Sandy Redox (S5)
MLRA 136)
II Umbric Surface (F13),(MLRA 136, 122)
II Piedmont Floodplain Soils, (F1 9),(MRLA 148)
Restrictive:Layer(if observed):
Type
Depth (inches)•; Hydric Soil Present? ❑ Yes EL No,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and'Piedmont — Interim Version

pAj
1�
a Q7
, uj
vii i
Li V)
rr
LO
0)
(n C�
LLJ
C.) LZ
<
(n cz,
0 zo
fl
LL 1
ELI 0
>
LY
<
co ;K
E� 0 Ct
Qo Q �E
(T)
z
< - U
jr � T-
5 E.0
1-4-
con
cv
C?
)- N. lij
rn
Z
0
0 0 Gr.
I
-4
aY LL
2 co
5
.
Vo
vNj 51 6-
(D 0
tit
Li V)
rr
LO
0)
(n C�
LLJ
C.) LZ
<
(n cz,
0 zo
fl
LL 1
ELI 0
>
LY
<
co ;K
E� 0 Ct
Qo Q �E
(T)
z
< - U
jr � T-
5 E.0
1-4-
con
cv
C?
)- N. lij
rn
Z
0
0 0 Gr.
I
2 co
5
.
Vo
vNj 51 6-
(D 0
tit
a c rO- :03 -,t
Z�l
U Ln 0 00 0
:E
30
46 :
c
C: c
L4
:ro" zc
q,
o
(D
47
Ll
W 0 ID
co:
0
0
LLJ
LLJ
fl -2 Z U)
co a) :3 CL
:5
O 7E 0? 1 :E 0
1�- 1-5 '9.7 `L-0
(n
D
Li V)
rr
LO
0)
(n C�
LLJ
C.) LZ
<
(n cz,
0 zo
fl
LL 1
ELI 0
>
LY
<
co ;K
E� 0 Ct
Qo Q �E
(T)
z
< - U
jr � T-
5 E.0
1-4-
con
cv
C?
)- N. lij
rn
Z
0
0 0 Gr.
I
vNj 51 6-
Tj Xj
V
9 E
L4
q,
47
Ll
(D
0,0
E
:5
day
a) 0 1=
0 (on

G lozXq CIVN 508000 Gido ON
-VLZ6666'0 'A*S'D
Iii
z
0 0
0 0
L.L
0;Vg
0
mnI
-j llu
z
0
Lo 0
_j 0 04
<
z 00 LLI� NBC) 0
9Q C
0 (L 3� �,j z
LO 0
Lij fi
rl) 2 co
C14 -i
to LU
Z L) Irr In
C6
oo 0 n
co z 0
xr),
LD A•
N,
XX
­4
6j7
110
00
!K.
N\-
ED
if)
ON
LU
%V
N%
U P6:-
yi
31!
O
N
"'X
2?1
(n
%
0
OL OIL
os
CL
z
0 0
0 0
L.L
0;Vg
0
mnI
-j llu
z
0
Lo 0
_j 0 04
<
z 00 LLI� NBC) 0
9Q C
0 (L 3� �,j z
LO 0
Lij fi
rl) 2 co
C14 -i
to LU
Z L) Irr In
C6
oo 0 n
co z 0
xr),
LD A•
N,
XX
­4
6j7
110
00
!K.
N\-
ED
if)
ON
LU
%V
N%
U P6:-
yi
31!
O
N
"'X
2?1
1?
W 0
cn
co
LL
C)
< �, T Q
—1
qD
ri
LD CO
m cs f
C-) Z
U-1 i r
0
cr
1 al
M
LO fiJ
Ry
L)
Maj
%
os
O 0
J r4)
Z Z
<
FL U) n
1?
W 0
cn
co
LL
C)
< �, T Q
—1
qD
ri
LD CO
m cs f
C-) Z
U-1 i r
0
cr
1 al
M
LO fiJ
Ry
L)
Maj

(L LOZ)s@ GVN SOJOOO ONO :;IV
- VL36666'0 'J'S'O
J �
J 0)
GM1
LO
N 0 0 :
r7 OZp
00 �iZQ"
Em Q a I
lb
Lli> 1 '4x?*,``'n +iii �.��'�.. r,•�`. �' •a ,yb,0 xF �h'+R *h }�, _ {
Ola
,,v'a X e W
` ``''i.s" ;`La; 4.ry�•ytr. .'�';�i�'t."\_e �". e�.., Yv 55�.'.'` °w fit.' '!' ;�, 9
LL
LLj
r
CN O
LIJ
{ ry.
�! '. w3�i
tjif.'s�
i.. W �{ .
0 Ile
`�. ° to
LU
r�
_ aim tl11 '^.r CNA
CK
�R��X ,I
� ri Ct �' [ f
LLJ
s �, C'� ` z
\ ED z L
LO
0
Q) �—°
t 00 o cx F m
�u ODa
pffi —• Q- � 'icy -� 1 f i
co M j
rn
Lu
u� o
�? 71) O
LLI

(L I-OZ)C2 QVN S08000 0180
-6LZ6666'0 *J'S'O
W
Li
C)
Ld
U-)
0
of Lo
0
C'j
01
ai
W�
t ti 7
4
4
LO
I�v
in
m In I
a. tn
CL
0
"S
'o
mo I
V) I
Co
-S
LLI
—0
to
N
C-4
< U)
0 Cj
tp
to
LLJ
�- 0 z
V)
F-
C:)
3P w
CL
III
II
Ili
II
rI
I
z
< Lij
CA
LIJ co
(D
> LU 7; co
nL > —
< L-
m co �
G3 T-�, 5
LJ fr-, a-
1—Y '
z
Z
Ld > Z:
II 0 LLJ >- C)
<
L,LJ
LLJ
O=ZZO,>-
M
< m
<
cl
V)
!J
C.
<
Of
Q,�
Lci C7
W
G.
Lj
iF
ME
L
(D
0
0
L)
C")
0
0
0
ce) CD
LO
00
Ljj 7)
ozoc
04
00 >-
z EL
CO
co (D
LO ui
00
00
Z Lu
_j
10 uj:� C)
LLJ
D
jz
<
'41
0
to
4�1
3-
W
Li
C)
Ld
U-)
0
of Lo
0
C'j
01
ai
W�
t ti 7
4
4
LO
I�v
in
m In I
a. tn
CL
0
"S
'o
mo I
V) I
Co
-S
LLI
—0
to
N
C-4
< U)
0 Cj
tp
to
LLJ
�- 0 z
V)
F-
C:)
3P w
CL
III
II
Ili
II
rI
I
z
< Lij
CA
LIJ co
(D
> LU 7; co
nL > —
< L-
m co �
G3 T-�, 5
LJ fr-, a-
1—Y '
z
Z
Ld > Z:
II 0 LLJ >- C)
<
L,LJ
LLJ
O=ZZO,>-
M
< m
<
cl
V)
!J
C.
<
Of
Q,�
Lci C7
W
G.
Lj
iF
ME
L

(1,10z)Cg UVN SC6000 (1160 ON
Z
i,LZ6666*0
<
I
V )
LLJ
Cf.)
15-
I-
Cl)
LLJ
0
LL
EL
0—
>
z
- >
:D Z 65
>—
CL
(f) 5 9
LLJ
Z
iE 0 uo
LLI
>
z z
Z
T
z
LLJ 0)
M
W
i�
Z
LLI L)
�lq
LLJ
0
>
z
�-
LLJ
tr
z
O Ca co i
cn
Li i ;> I
Q
-� 2 I
>
C 0
0
0
0
V5
W
(Din
9D
L) u
z w
V—
cq *99 ggzz ' (1(1 *n NHOE113M 'd 1106WO
F,
<
LN 1999ZOC629 #Nld
<
"J,
40
Lo
9
PP
cop
(N
Ki

LLJ C)
0
at
LLJ
C) EL LU
U
Z LL > Lz >
< of <
C,,) z
(wo � 5 T
LLJ z V
% K-
tv
z
LLJ >- 0
Z)
(Div?
0
(f) <
z cn UJ 0
, >
0 z
LLj — M
m
< 0
z
=
0
Lai-
UJ
AS is
-
!, i�
t -di
lags
MEN, pool
An 6 i
19 —Pz i� TO
WIN
AR M-1-
1w wile,
�15
! f�O!
2 affin t NO 0�! ft M! M M9
—Smith i 0" i Ali
Lm ............ ...........
A
at lz w 5116 w S td 3; l .� 4
LL

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
March 12, 2014
Mr. Brad Luckey
ECS Carolinas, LLP
4811 Koger Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
Subject Property: Idol's Property, Forsyth County
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500)
Dear Mr. Luckey:
On March 5, 2014, at your request and in your attendance, Sue Homewood conducted an on -site
determination to review features located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to
the above noted state regulations. John Thomas with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) was also
present at the site visit. The site visit was for the additional northern /eastern tract only as shown on the
attached topographic map.
The Division acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the USACE. The
attached map accurately depicts all stream determinations conducted during the site visit.
Please note that at the time of this letter, all intermittent and perennial stream channels and jurisdictional
wetlands found on the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. These regulations are subject
to change in the future.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any
future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from
the date of this letter.
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location 585 Wauahtown St 'Wriston- Salem, North Carolina 27197
Phone [phone] F,, 336- 771 -46301 Customer Service 1-877 -623.67A8
Internet vwvw ncwaterauaLty -orc
An Equal Opportunity 1A`rrmativeAction EmPloyei
One ina
Naturallil

Brad Luckey
Idol's Property
March 12, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by
the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o
Wetlands and Buffers Permitting and Compliance Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650.
Individuals that dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface
water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start
until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve
any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you have
any additional questions or require additional information please contact me at 336 - 771 -4964 or
sue.homewood @ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
ECS Map
cc: Robin Team, Carolina Investment Properties Inc, PO Box 1066, Lexington NC 27293
John Thomas, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
DWR, Winston -Salem Regional Office

1 �• �c�1^ •�y ,. /J': ' '-' ` 55;r�} ,f 11 /,i� %��. . \„ SITE
�' • c '� j 1,
if
ki
/�� . � • r . �,� �il� \` ! , . n i �, fir. �' • , :;9�5 ��� "�- � • �` le�.. l ` `�� -�( �,
��/!+J �, _`�� � � >" �'�- •= mss" �` ���,;.:�1' �. \
;P]� 4� •�, 'Y Ge]i
tq
ih
��' ( / `ir • y "�/(]/ \fib
• �j�.• �' i I
a.- z � • c ��'�p � rf �Z �:. �.\ \ �` � . %� "J �' �V ..!' ! r/ I ;. = � rB ^ .i .�: - /i'• 'air . � � •�
v. • ' t ', fli lei, - :r {: ;�' �'1 •!��.�
FIGURE 1
s USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP: IDOL'S PROPERTY
KERNERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA TRACTS A & B
QUADRANGLE DATED 1969, REVISED 1994 UP HIGHWAY 66 SOUTH
COUNT',', j -)
rill \J i I I I I'�1'�JR 1fH L•AR\JI —III `.
Scala: 111 - 2,0001 ECS PROJECT NO. 09- 2266E -B