HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140267 Ver 1_Application_20140319;%''`.y�, y ''.�,
� . *'.y,
� + 6�{
�
a` ,�,
t '�tr� ,� � � .. �,
,� j���jjj � ��'�: .;
�:, . ✓��.�� � R�Q , �+
F, �' �,,`�`\ • d.
5� 2�� ,:
�� � .�
p��V.�. {�'� � :f?.
STA,TE OF NC7RTH C.�ROLINA
DEPARTMENT QF TRANSPC?RTATI4N
PAT McCRfJRY P. (J. Box 252� 1, Raleigh, N� 27611-52Q2 TI�N� TATA
GOVERN(JR PH(JNE: 91 �-?33-2520 SECRETARY
March 19, 2014
Mr. Andy Williams
tJ. �. A�y Corps ofwEngineers
Raleigh Regulator� Field Of�c�
3 3 31 I-�eritage Trade I�rive, Su�te 1 Q 5
Wake Forest, NC 275 87
Subj ect: Nationwide Per�r�lt # 14
Repla�e Bridge #363 0� SR 1575 vvith 3-sided Bc�ttomless Culvert
Wil�es Caunt�r, North Carolina
Project Number: 17BP.11.R.54 (DWC) Permit Fee: �24d)
Dear Mr. Williams:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is scheduled �n replace Bridge #363 �v�th a
60'L x 14'VV x 4'�-I 3-sided bottomless �ulvert at th� same location. Rock floadplalns will be
constructed upstream, downstream and through the culver� �o main�ain channel width. The
exist�r�g bridge is a 1�'' long by 20' vvide all timber low water bridge. An c�ff-site detour pipe Is
proposed. Sinc� the new permanent structure is battomless, no mltigation has been pursued.
The streambed is bedrock cantrolled. Stream impacts are tabulated belovv.
Stream Impacts:
Proposed �'emporary R.ipr�p TotalImpact�
Statian E�isting Structure Dewatering Irnpacts �t �his �tation
1'�Tumber Structure Size �i�e /Detour feet fee�
60' long x 14' �' (beyond
Bridge #363 17'x 20' bridge wide x 4' high perm Impact 38 86
Crownspan limits
Perm. Fill/Ripr�p Impacts Tatal Proj ect Imp�cts =��S
= 78 feet feet
The replacement of the existing bridge vvith the proposed new bottomless culvert will �require
temporary dewatering during footer construction and riprap installation. An �m�erv�ous dike
�vill be constructed upstream of the exlsting structure to create a sma11 pool. �lean water will
temporarily be piped through the construction ar�a and v�ill be discharged dovvnstream. Any
P. (�e Box 250, N. WILI�ESBORC?, N� 28659
PxaNE (336} 667-9111 Fa:x (336) 667-4549
Mr. Andy Williams
Brldge #363 an �R 1575, Wilkes
Page 2
March 19, 2014
dirty water located inside the construction area will be pumped into a silt bag �f necessary. +C�nce
the ne�v structure is 1n place, the impervic�us dike will �e removed and preconstructic�n streambed
elevations will be restored.
�onstruction of this project will require lmpacts to waters o�` the �.Tnited �tates in the �Yadk�r�
River Basin. The existing bridge crosses Buckwheat �ranch �Class: WS-II; Traut; I-�QW). The
subj ect proj ect will have no effect on any federally listed endangered plar�t or animal specie�.
Cultural resaurce eompllance wor� has been compl�ted (see aitached).
The prc�j ect impacts are nat signi� cant in nature and should r�ot remo�e or degrade exisi���
vvater qualit� uses. Stormwater v�ill be rauted �hrough grass ar rock lir�ed ditches, depe�ding or�
the ditch line slope. Total land disturbance vvi11 be �ess than 1 acre. B� Ut111Z121� til� �'�'OS10�'1
control measures outlined in the attachments to this application, davvnstream �vat�r quali�y
standards w�ll be protected. A11 appropriate BMPs will b� used during cons�ruction.
By copy af thls electranic letter, i� is reques�ed th�.t IVIrs. Marla Chambers vvith the �Tc�rth
�arolina Wildlife Resaurces Commissi�n comment directly to �ou co�.cernlr�g the 404
Nationwide Per�nit application vvlth a copy sent to Ine.
By copy of this electronic letter, it Is requested that th� Divlsion of Water Quality, 4� 1/Wetla�.ds
Un1t, issue the appropriate permit for construction of this proj ect. It is requestec� that arly
comments related to the 401 certi�cation be forwaxded directly ta me v�1th a copy se�t to the �TS
Army Carps af Engineers.
We would like to begin constructlan as soon as poss�ble. If further infor�natic�r� 1s required,
please 1et me knovc�. Your early revlew and consld�ration will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
�
��� �
f �
fi
� Ynm
�I�a�h �laughter
Divi�ic�n Envlrc�nmen�al C�fficer
Enclosures
cc: Mar1a �hambers, NC��R.0
Amy �hapman, Division af Water Quality
Dave Wanucha, Division of Water +C�uality
Mik� Pettyjohn, PE, D1V1S1011 E21�111��r
Davld Wayne, PE, Brldge Malntenance Engineer
Jami +�-uynn, Dxvision Bridge Program Manager
I�eath Slaughter, Division Envircanrnental Offi�er
Neil Trivette, Roadside Environmental Field Operatlons En�lne�r
.�°� W`� T�'�c� C�ffice Use (Jnly:
,
� �`�� �� '� � Corp� action I a no. ���
� 1 ==� ,�r � -=,
� '��"� �� ' � � � � � DVUC� project nc�. �
� � � � � t .ht 1��2 ;� . �.
I': "
� ���� � ;' �,` ' � ��� �� Form Version 1.3 Dec 1 a 2U48 ���
Pre-Construction Notific�at�i�on (PCNj F�orm ����
� A. A �� � �l�c�.nt Information �
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s} of approval sought from the ���tion 404 Permit Section 1 Q Permit
cor s. Igl C�
p
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or �P number been verified by the Carps? [� Yes � No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply}:
� 4�1 Water Quality Certi�ication — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 4C11 Water Quality Gerkification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authc�rizatian
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only f�r DWQ 401 For the rec�rd only far Corps Permifi:
because written approval is not required? Certificatian:
[� Yes � Na ❑ Yes � No
1 f. Is payment into a mitigatian bank or in-Iieu fee program proposed for mitig�tion ��.�� ��o
afi impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter frorn mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty caastal counties. If y�s, answer 1 h � Yes � No
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? � Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name af project: Bridge #3�3 on SR 1575
2b. County: Wilkes
2c. Nearest municipality / town: McGrady
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCD4T only, T.I.P. or state �7BP.11.R.54
pr�ject na:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) an Recorded Deed: NCD(JT
3b. Deed Baok and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LL� if
appticable):
3d. Street address: 801 Statesville Raad
3e. City, state, zip: North Wilkesboro, NC 28659
3f. Telephone no.: 336-903-9202 �
3g. Fax nc�.: 336-667-4549
3h. Email address: hslaughter@ncdot.gov
Page 1 af �C�
PCN Form -- Version i.3 December 1C�, 20�8 Version
4. Applicant Information tif different from owner)
4a. A,pplicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, speci�y:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if �pplic�ble):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. TelephQne no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
{if applicable).
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 0� 14
P�N Form — Version 1.3 December 1U, 2C�48 �ler�ian
�
B. Project Informatian and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Praperky identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID}:
1 b. Site coordinates in decimal de rees : L�titude: 36.31804 L.ongitude: - 81.25778
C g )
(DD.D�DDDD) (-DD.DDDDDQj
1 c. Property size: � 1 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to g��kwh�at Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality CJassification of nearest receiving water: WS-II; Trout; HQW
2c. River basin: Y�dkin
3. Praject Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general Iand use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
�ubstandard bridge to be repiaced in a rural area
3b. List the tot�l estimated acreage of �II existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet af all existing streams (intermittenfi and perennial} an the property:
75 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Upgrade substandard stream crossing
3e. Describe the c�verail project in de�ail, including the type of equipm�nt ta be used:
See attached cover letter.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or �tate been requested or obtained for this property /
prc�ject (including all prior phases) in the past� ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps m�de the jurisdictional determinatian, what type
of determination was made? � Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictiona! ar�as? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentationo
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes j� No ❑ Unknc�wn
this pro�ect (includ�ng all pr�or phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
�a. Is this a ph�sed praject? � Yes � Na
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 c�f 1 C�
P�N Farm — Version 1.3 December 10, 20�8 Version
�
C. Praposed Impacts Inventory '
1. Imp�cts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check a!I that apply):
❑ Wetl�nds �j Streams - tribu#aries [� Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Gonstruction
2. VVetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed an the site, then complete this questian for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number -- Type of impact Type of wetland For�sted (Corps - 404, 1 t� Area c�f imp�ct
Permanent (P) ar (if known) DWQ — nan-4�4, other} (acres)
Tem orar T
[] Yes [] Gorps
W1 ❑P❑T No �W
❑ ❑ �
� Yes ❑ Carps
W2 �I P 0 T No DW
[� ❑ C2
❑ Yes ❑ Corps
W3 [] P❑ T No DWQ
i� ❑
❑ Yes ❑ Corps
W4 [� P[�] T No DWQ
❑ ❑
❑ Yes ❑ �orps
W5 C� P � T No aWQ
� ❑
0 Y�s [� Corps
W6 ❑ P ❑ T �o DWQ
❑ 0
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial c�r intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question fior all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Per�nnial Type of jurisdiction Av�rage ��p�ct
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 1� stre�m length
Permanent (P} or intermittent p�/(� -- non--404, W�d�h (��►���►r
TemporarY iT) (INT)? other) (feet) fieet)
Battomless
� PER � Gorps
�1 �) P� T Culvert, Riprap & Buckwheat Branch ��T p,�� 7 86
Dewate ri n � �
g
S2 ❑ P❑T
[� P�R � Corps
❑ 1 NT ❑ DWQ
❑ PER ❑ Corps
S3 ❑ P❑ T i NT DWQ
❑ ❑
❑ PER ❑ Carps
S4 ❑ P❑ T I NT DV1/Q
� 0
❑ PER ❑ Corps
S5 ❑ P❑ T � NT DWQ
❑ ❑
0 PER ❑ Corps
S6 ❑ P 0 T I NT DWQ
❑ ❑
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 86
3i. Comments. 8 feet dewater, 38 riprap, 4a bottomless culuert
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form -- Version 1,3 December 10, 2008 Ver�ion
�
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tribufiaries, sounds, the Atlantic CJcean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
CJpen water Name of waterbody
irnpact number -- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Are� of imp�ct (�cres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 �P❑T
C)2 [�] P ❑ T
CJ3 ❑P❑T
o� C�P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Canstruction
If ond or Iake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetfand Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Uplar�d
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (��r���
number of pond
Finoded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excav�ted Fic��ded
P1
P2
5f. Tc�tal
5g. Gomments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes � No If yes, permit i� no:
5i. Expected pond surFace area (acres}:
5j. Size af pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (f+�r DVUQ)
If praject will impact a protected riparian buffer, then cnmplete the chart below. If y�s, then individually list all bufFer imp�cts
belaw. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
� Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlicc� ❑ Other:
Project is ir� which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. �d. 6�. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 imp�ct �one 2 imp�ct
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) {square feet)
Tem orar T im act re uired?
❑ Yes
B1 ❑P❑T No
�
� Yes
B2 CJP❑T �Q
�
❑ Yes
B3 �P❑T No
❑
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 af �0�
P�N Form — Versian 1.3 December 10, 2408 Version
�
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to auoid or minimize th� proposed imp�cts in designing prc�ject.
The culvert is bottomless and the length is the minimum needed to improve safety at this location.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize th� prc�posed impacts thraugh construction techniques.
All appropriate BMPs will be used during cor�struction
2. Campensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Vllaters of the U.�. or Waters of the State
2a. Daes the project require C�mpensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. ar Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply}: [� DWQ ❑ Carps
[� Mitigatian bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option wil! be used for this
ro'ect? Q Payment to in-lieu fee program
p 1
❑ Permittee Resptansible Mitig�tion
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3�. Name of Mitigatian Bank:
3b. Credits F'urchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter fram in-Iieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: Iinear feet
4c. If using stream mitigatian, stream temperature. ❑ w�rm �] cool ❑cold
4d. BufiFer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wefiland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Nan-riparian wetland mitigation request�d: acres
4g. Coastal {tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide � descripfiion of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page6ofi14
P�RI Form -- Version 1.3 December 10, 20►�8 Versic�n
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regutated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Wiii the prajec� re�ult in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
bufifer mitigation?
6b. Ifi yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone af �he riparian bufiFer fihat requires mitig�tion. C�Iculate the
amount of mitigatic�n required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
��n� Reason for impact Totai impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) {square �eet)
Zone � 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zane 2 1.5
6f. Totai buffer mitigation req�uired:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type af mitigation is proposed {e.g., payment ta private mitig�tian bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment in�o an approved in-Iieu fee fund).
6h. Cammenfis:
Page `7 of 1Q
PCN Form -- Versian 1.3 December 1 �, 204� Version
�
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by C�WQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project inciude or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified �es Na
within one of the NC Ri arian BufFer Protection Rules? � �
P
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
[� Yes 0 No
�omments:
2. Stormwa�er Mana ement Plan
2a. Wh�t is the overall percent imperviousness of this prc�ject? °lo
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Disturbing less than 1 acre
2d. If this project DC�ES require a Stormwater Managemen� Plan, ther� provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified L�cal Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ �tormwater Pragram
❑ DWQ �01 lJnit
3. Certified Local Governmen�t Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
[� Phase II
3b. Which of the follawin locall -im lemented stormw�ter mana em�nt ra rams � N��
9 Y p � p g ❑ U�MP
apply (check all that apply):
[� Water Supply Watershed
� t�ther:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been [] Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pra ram Review
[� Coastal cc�unties
[� HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater managemer�t progr�ms apply 0��W
(check all that applY):
❑ Sessi�n Law 2006-246
❑ C�tner:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof af approval been
attached? ❑ ��� d N�
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate re�uirements? [� Yes � No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? 0 Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 1Q
PGN Farm — Version 1.3 December '�0, 2a08 V�rsion
�
F. Supplementary Information
1. Enviranmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/statellocal) funds or the �
use af ublic federal/state land? ��� ��O
p i �
1 b. If yau answered "yes" to the above, does the praject require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the Nati�nal or State [.� Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAl�EPA)?
1 c. If yau answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finafized by the
St�te C�earing Nouse? (If sa, attach a copy af the NEPA or �EPA finai approval
letter.) ❑ Yes 0 No
Comments:
Z. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A N�AC 2H .05�0}, Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, [] Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0204)?
2b. Is this an �fter-the-fact permit applicati�n? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to ane or both of the above questions, provide an expl�nation of the vialation(s).
3. Gumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement�
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticip�ted future impacts) result in � Yes (�j Nc�
additianal development, which could impact nearby downstream �vater quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact an�lysis in accord�nce with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short n�rrative descriptian.
4. Sewage Disposal {DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater gener�ted from
the proposed projecfi, ar available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 �f 1�
PGN Form -- Versian 1.3 December 1 Q, 20�8 Versian
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps �equ�rement)
5a. Wili this projec� occur in ar near an area with federally protected species ar yes Na
habitat? ❑ �
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act Yes No
i rn a cts'? � �
�
❑ Raleigh
�c. If yes, indicate the USFW� Field Office you have contacted.
[] Asheviile
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated �ritic�l
Habitat'?
�IS and visual abservation
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Carps Requirement)
6a. Will this projec# occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site wouid impact Essential Fish Habitat?
WRC will comment
?. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Carps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
gavernments have designated as h�ving historic or cultural preservation �,�� N�
status e. ., National Histaric Trust desi nation or ro erties si nificant in � �
i g 9 � p g
North Carolina histary and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site wc�uld impact historic or archeological resources?
Project was reviewed by the C)HE. Project was deterrnined to have no effect.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 14Q-year flc�odplain? ❑ Yes � No
$b. !f yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did yau use to make the floodplain determination? ncfloodmaps
J. I�eath Slaughter � 3/19/14
,
Applicant/Ag�nt's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's S� ature ����
(Agent's signature is vafid only if an authori tion letter from the applicant
is pravided.)
Pag� 1� of 1 �
P�N Farm — Versian i.3 December 1�, 2��8 Versi�►n
,
(V
e
r
s
i
o
n
1
.
2
;
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
J
u
l
y
2
0
1
2
)
17
B
P
.
1
1
.
R
.
5
4
(
B
R
I
D
G
E
#
9
6
0
3
6
3
)
Co
u
n
t
y
(
i
e
s
)
:
Wi
l
k
e
s
Page 1of 1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
y
p
e
:
D
a
t
e
:
Ph
o
n
e
:
Ph
o
n
e
:
Em
a
i
l
:
Em
a
i
l
:
Co
u
n
t
y
(
i
e
s
)
:
CA
M
A
C
o
u
n
t
y
?
De
s
i
g
n
/
F
u
t
u
r
e
:
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
:
Su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
:
Ru
r
a
l
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
0.
0
6
8
M
i
l
e
s
23
0
0.
1
5
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
i
l
t
-
U
p
o
n
A
r
e
a
(
a
c
.
)
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
i
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
l
i
n
.
M
i
l
e
s
o
r
f
e
e
t
)
:
Bu
f
f
e
r
R
u
l
e
s
i
n
E
f
f
e
c
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
No
n
e
No
No
n
e
NC
D
W
Q
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
W
a
t
e
r
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
R
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g
W
a
t
e
r
30
3
(
d
)
I
m
p
a
i
r
m
e
n
t
s
:
Ri
v
e
r
B
a
s
i
n
(
s
)
:
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
R
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g
W
a
t
e
r
:
Wa
t
e
r
S
u
p
p
l
y
I
I
(
W
S
-
I
I
)
Ot
h
e
r
S
t
r
e
a
m
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
Su
n
g
a
t
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
r
o
u
p
,
P
A
Ci
t
y
/
T
o
w
n
:
(9
1
9
)
8
5
9
-
2
2
4
3
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
U
n
i
t
Ad
d
r
e
s
s
:
No
r
t
h
W
i
l
k
e
s
b
o
r
o
(9
1
9
)
7
0
7
-
6
7
2
6
Wi
l
k
e
s
ac.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
r
r
a
t
i
v
e
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
s
t
h
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
B
r
i
d
g
e
N
o
.
9
6
0
3
6
3
o
v
e
r
B
u
c
k
w
h
e
a
t
C
r
e
e
k
o
n
S
R
1
5
7
5
(
B
u
c
k
w
h
e
a
t
R
d
.
)
i
n
W
i
l
k
e
s
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
N
C
. The existing bridge will be replaced
wi
t
h
a
1
@
1
4
'
x
4
'
C
r
o
w
n
s
p
a
n
B
o
t
t
o
m
l
e
s
s
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
o
t
t
o
m
l
e
s
s
c
u
l
v
e
r
t
a
n
d
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
designed in a manner to minimize the
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
a
r
e
a
t
o
t
h
e
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
e
x
t
e
n
t
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e.
T
o
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
s
o
i
l
r
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
m
a
t
t
i
n
g
h
as been proposed at two locations (station
11
+
2
0
t
o
1
1
+
8
5
l
e
f
t
a
n
d
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
2
+
5
0
t
o
1
3
+
5
0
r
i
g
h
t
)
.
T
h
e
t
o
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
ti
o
n
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
s
t
h
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
b
y
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
t
w
o
l
a
r
g
e
c
u
t
s
l
o
p
e
s
t
h
a
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
i
f
n
e
w
la
t
e
r
a
l
d
i
t
c
h
e
s
w
e
r
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
.
A
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
c
o
n
s
is
t
i
n
g
o
f
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
e
n
d
p
i
p
e
,
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
b
o
x
,
a
n
d
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
i
n
l
e
t
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
p
ro
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
v
e
y
t
h
e
r
u
n
o
f
f
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
t
o
e
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
r
e
a
s
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
.
T
h
i
s
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
w
a
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
i
n
g
a
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
l
o
p
e
.
Ty
p
i
c
a
l
C
r
o
s
s
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:
Re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
230
0.
1
5
Av
e
r
a
g
e
D
a
i
l
y
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
(
v
e
h
/
h
r
/
d
a
y
)
:
ac
.
No
r
t
h
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
FO
R
L
I
N
E
A
R
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
Ra
n
d
y
H
e
n
e
g
a
r
,
P
E
Br
i
d
g
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,
N
C
2
7
6
9
9
-
1
5
9
0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Ad
d
r
e
s
s
:
9/26/2013
91
5
J
o
n
e
s
F
r
a
n
k
l
i
n
R
o
a
d
15
9
0
M
a
i
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,
N
C
2
7
6
0
6
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
/
T
I
P
N
o
.
:
NC
D
O
T
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
:
17
B
P
.
1
1
.
R
.
5
4
(
B
R
I
D
G
E
#
9
6
0
3
6
3
)
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
/
D
e
s
i
g
n
e
r
:
rh
e
n
e
g
a
r
@
n
c
d
o
t
.
g
o
v
Ya
d
k
i
n
-
P
e
e
D
e
e
12
-
4
0
-
4
-
2
jd
a
l
t
o
n
@
s
u
n
g
a
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
c
o
m
18
'
W
i
d
e
P
a
v
e
d
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
1
8
'
W
i
d
e
P
a
v
e
d
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
N/
A
NC
D
W
Q
S
t
r
e
a
m
I
n
d
e
x
N
o
.
:
Su
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
:
Tr
o
u
t
W
a
t
e
r
s
(
T
r
)
Hi
g
h
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
W
a
t
e
r
s
(
H
Q
W
)
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
:
Bu
c
k
w
h
e
a
t
B
r
a
n
c
h
SHEET 1 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
VICINITY MAP
END PROJECT
BEGIN PROJECT
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
0
9
/
0
8
/
9
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINASee Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
3
/
17
/
2
0
14
L
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
i
s
t
\
117
9
\
1112
5
-
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
11
-
D
B
\
9
6
0
3
6
3
\
D
e
s
i
g
n
F
i
l
e
s
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
6
0
3
6
3
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
1.
d
g
n
j
d
a
l
t
o
n
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
C
2
0
2
9
7
7
10 20 4020
10 20 4020
2 4 84
V
=
=MPH
ADT
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
PROJECT LENGTHDESIGN DATA
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
0
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
O
F TRA N SPORTA
T
IO
N
S
T
A TEOFNORT
H
CAR
O
LI
N
A
NCDOT CONTACT:
Stantec Consulting Inc.
Raleigh, NC U.S.A.
27606
www.stantec.com
Tel. (919) 851-6866
Fax. (919) 851-7024
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
25
2012
MICHAEL B. LITTLEFIELD, PE
230
ROBERT A. WILLIAMS, PE
PE
ROW/ UTIL.
CONST.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
1
7
B
P
.
1
1
.
R
.
5
4
17BP.11.R.54
BRIDGE #363
WILKES COUNTY
17BP.11.R.54
0.068 MI.
0.068 MI=
=
-L-
NAD 83
SR 1575
BUCKWHEAT RD.
T
O
V
A
N
N
O
Y
R
D
TO SPARTA RD
V
a
n
n
o
y
R
d
LETTING DATE:
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
N.T.S.
2
5
%
P
L
A
N
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
FUNC CLASS = LOCAL
SUB-REGIONAL TIER
TRAFFIC CONTROL
GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURE AND
See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Plan Sheet Symbols
SR 1575Buckwheat Rd
-L- POT STA. 10+20.00
BEGIN PROJECT 17BP.11.R.54
-L- POC STA. 13+80.00
END PROJECT 17BP.11.R.54
OVER BUCKWHEAT BRANCH
BRIDGE NO. 960363 ON SR 1575 (BUCKWHEAT ROAD)
LENGTH OF ROADWAY
TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT
VIRGINIA MABRY
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UNIT
-L- STA. 11+98.64
END CULVERT
-L- STA. 11+79.76
BEGIN CULVERT
-CLEARING FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
-THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
OFF SITE DETOUR
APRIL 17, 2012
APRIL 17, 2012
WILKES CO. STRUCTURE NO. 960363
April 16, 2013
Preliminary Roadway / 100% Hydraulic Design Plans
-DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SUPERELEVATION & VERTICAL CURVE K.
1729
1727
1575
1501
1725
1757
1756
1575
1501
1728
BLUE
Pine Mountain
Dancy Mountain
Bumgardner Gap
Bumgarner Gap
Elevation 2524
Elevation 2430
Vannoy
McGrady
18
18
18
Taylor Cemetery
Roberts Cemetery
M
O
U
N
T
A
I N
Blue Ridge Tabernacle
F
O
R
K
Cr.
GRAVEL
12’ GRAVEL
8" GRAVEL
BUCKWHEAT BRANCH
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
SHEET 2 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
2:12:1
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(NTS)TYP CULV INTERNAL CHANNEL
14’
7’
1’
BENCHES ONLY
FLOODPLAIN
BANKS AND
W/ GEOTEXTILE ON
CL II RIP RAP
BRIDGE 363
4
1,530
1,526
1,522
1,518
1,514
1,510
1,506
1,530
1,526
1,522
1,518
1,514
1,510
1,506
-L-
NOTE:
TO THE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT.
TIE IN TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION
INCIDENTAL MILL APPROX. 25’ AT EACH
1,534
1,538 1,538
1,534
* MEETS SUBREGIONAL TIER DESIGN GUIDELINES.
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
** DESIGN EXCEPTION NEEDED.
1SFD
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
CONC
GRAVEL
4
8
" WD
15" CMP
S
TO SPARTA RD
4
8
"
C
H
L
S
W
TANK
U/G
48" CHL
48" CHL
12’ GRAVEL
WOODS
8" GRAVEL
BUCKWHEAT BRANCH
S
R
1
5
7
5 -
1
9’
BS
T
BU
CK
W
H
E
AT
RD
WOODS
50.00’
3
0
.
0
0
’
E
XI
S
TI
N
G
R/
WE
XIS
TI
N
G
R/
W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
2
5.
0
0’
12.
5
0’
WIRE=1538.03’
OF CROSSING
LOW POINT
ELEVATION OF
OF CROSSING WIRE=1561.27’
ELEVATION OF LOW POINT
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
O
V
E
R
H
E
A
D
15.00’
R
E
V
IS
I
O
N
S
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
3
/
17
/
2
0
14
L
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
i
s
t
\
1
1
7
9
\
1
1
1
2
5
-
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
1
-
D
B
\
9
6
0
3
6
3
\
D
e
s
i
g
n
F
i
l
e
s
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
6
0
3
6
3
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
4
.
d
g
n
j
d
a
l
t
o
n
17BP.11.R.54
WILKES CO. STRUCTURE NO. 960363
TB 2GI
SEE DETAIL #1
PSRM TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL #1
PSRM TOE PROTECTION
RETAIN
CHANNEL
TYP OUTLET
CHANNEL
TYP INLET
FLOODPLAIN BENCH
1@14’x4’ CROWN SPAN
2:12:1
2
:1
2
:
1 NG
N
G
N
G
NG
CL II RIP RAP
GEOTEXTILE
GEOTEXTILE
CL II RIP RAP
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(NTS)TYP INLET CHANNEL
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(NTS)TYP OUTLET CHANNEL
14’
1’
7’
14’
7’
1’
EST 40 TONS
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
CL II RIP RAP
EST 40 TONS
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
CL II RIP RAP
TB JB w/MH
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
FROM STA. 12+50 TO STA. 13+50 -L- RT
FROM STA. 11+20 TO STA. 11+85 -L- LT
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
d=1.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM
DETAIL #1
Ground
Natural
PSRM
O
18" RCP-IV
18" RCP-III 18" RCP-IV
FLOODPLAIN
BENCH
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
EL. 1517.51
-L- POT 11+63.00
BEGIN GRADE
EL. 1518.67
-L- POT 12+23.00
END GRADE
PI = 11+93.00
EL = 1,517.20’
(-)1.0333%(+)4.9000%
VC = 60’
K = 10
MIN RESURFACE (2.5") & WIDEN
MIN RESURFACE (2.5") & WIDEN
SKEW=132
14’x4’ CROWN SPAN
CL STA 11+89 -L-
NWS=1513.7
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
FT
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY FT
= 210
= 10
= 1517.2
= 480
= 100
= 1518.62
= 210
= 10
= 1517.2
=
= 08/29/12
= 1513.7
25’ MILLING
25’ MILLING
DS=15 MPH*
STA. 10+20.00
BEGIN RESURFACING
STA. 13+80.00
END RESURFACING
ROYAL, JERRY WADE
FRAZIER, R TOM
FRAZIER, R TOM
ROYAL, J W
JEANETTE FAYE
SHEPHERD,
JEANETTE FAYE
SHEPHERD,
DB 1050 PG 027
DB 1050 PG 027
DB 704 PG 607
DB 552 PG 544
DB 688 PG 150
DB 592 PG 318
DB 688 PG 122
DB 705 PG 127
2G
3G
SHEPHERD, JEANETTE FAYE
RITA OSBORNE
SHEPHERD,
4G
1G
****************************************
R/R SPIKE SET IN 15" MAPLE
N 942171. E 1334776.
BM#1 ELEVATION = 1516.27
****************************************
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
F
C F
F F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
SHEET 3 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
2:12:1
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(NTS)TYP CULV INTERNAL CHANNEL
14’
7’
1’
BENCHES ONLY
FLOODPLAIN
BANKS AND
W/ GEOTEXTILE ON
CL II RIP RAP
150315031504
1505 15
0
6
1506
1507
15071
5
0
8
1508
1
5
0
9
1509
1510
1510
1510
1
5
1
1
1511
1511
1511
1512
1
5
1
2
1
5
1
2
1513
1513
1513
1514
1514 1514
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1
5
1515
15 15
15
15
1515
1515
15
16
1
5
16
1516
1516
1516
1
5
1
7
1517
15171517
1517
1
5
1
8
1518
15
18
1518
1518
1
5
1
9
15
1
9
1
5
1
9
15
19
1
5
2
0
1
5
2
0
15 2 0
1520
1
5
2
0
1
5
2
0
1520
1520
15
2
0
1521
1
5
2
1
15
2
1
1521
1
5
2
2
1522
1
5
2
2
15
2
2
1
5
2
3
1523
1
5
2
3
1524
1524
1
5
2
4
1
5
2
5
1525
1525
1525
1
5
2
5
1
5
2
5
15
2
5
1526
1526
1
5
2
6
15261527
1
5
2
7
15271528
1528
1
5
2
8
1529
15
2
9
1
5
2
9
1530
1530
1530
1
5
3
0
1530
15
3
0
1531
1531
15
3
1
1532
15321532
1533
1533
1 5 3 3
1533
1534
1534
1535
1535
15
3
5
1535
1
5
3
5
1536
1536
1536
1537
1537
1537
1538
1538
1538
1539
1539
1540
1540
1541
1541
15
4
2
BRIDGE 363
4
1,530
1,526
1,522
1,518
1,514
1,510
1,506
1,530
1,526
1,522
1,518
1,514
1,510
1,506
-L-
NOTE:
TO THE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT.
TIE IN TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION
INCIDENTAL MILL APPROX. 25’ AT EACH
1,534
1,538 1,538
1,534
* MEETS SUBREGIONAL TIER DESIGN GUIDELINES.
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
** DESIGN EXCEPTION NEEDED.
1SFD
WOODS
WOODS
WOODS
CONC
GRAVEL
4
8
" WD
15" CMP
S
TO SPARTA RD
4
8
"
C
H
L
S
W
TANK
U/G
48" CHL
48" CHL
12’ GRAVEL
WOODS
8" GRAVEL
BUCKWHEAT BRANCH
S
R
1
5
7
5 -
1
9’
BS
T
BU
CK
W
H
E
AT
RD
WOODS
50.00’
3
0
.
0
0
’
E
XI
S
TI
N
G
R/
WE
XIS
TI
N
G
R/
W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
2
5.
0
0’
12.
5
0’
WIRE=1538.03’
OF CROSSING
LOW POINT
ELEVATION OF
OF CROSSING WIRE=1561.27’
ELEVATION OF LOW POINT
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
O
V
E
R
H
E
A
D
15.00’
R
E
V
IS
I
O
N
S
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
1
7
/
9
9
3
/
17
/
2
0
14
L
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
i
s
t
\
1
1
7
9
\
1
1
1
2
5
-
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
1
-
D
B
\
9
6
0
3
6
3
\
D
e
s
i
g
n
F
i
l
e
s
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
6
0
3
6
3
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
4
.
d
g
n
j
d
a
l
t
o
n
17BP.11.R.54
WILKES CO. STRUCTURE NO. 960363
TB 2GI
SEE DETAIL #1
PSRM TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL #1
PSRM TOE PROTECTION
RETAIN
CHANNEL
TYP OUTLET
CHANNEL
TYP INLET
FLOODPLAIN BENCH
1@14’x4’ CROWN SPAN
2:12:1
2
:1
2
:
1 NG
N
G
N
G
NG
CL II RIP RAP
GEOTEXTILE
GEOTEXTILE
CL II RIP RAP
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(NTS)TYP INLET CHANNEL
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(NTS)TYP OUTLET CHANNEL
14’
1’
7’
14’
7’
1’
EST 40 TONS
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
CL II RIP RAP
EST 40 TONS
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
CL II RIP RAP
TB JB w/MH
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
FROM STA. 12+50 TO STA. 13+50 -L- RT
FROM STA. 11+20 TO STA. 11+85 -L- LT
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
d=1.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= PSRM
DETAIL #1
Ground
Natural
PSRM
O
18" RCP-IV
18" RCP-III 18" RCP-IV
FLOODPLAIN
BENCH
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND
EL. 1517.51
-L- POT 11+63.00
BEGIN GRADE
EL. 1518.67
-L- POT 12+23.00
END GRADE
PI = 11+93.00
EL = 1,517.20’
(-)1.0333%(+)4.9000%
VC = 60’
K = 10
MIN RESURFACE (2.5") & WIDEN
MIN RESURFACE (2.5") & WIDEN
SKEW=132
14’x4’ CROWN SPAN
CL STA 11+89 -L-
NWS=1513.7
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
FT
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY FT
= 210
= 10
= 1517.2
= 480
= 100
= 1518.62
= 210
= 10
= 1517.2
=
= 08/29/12
= 1513.7
25’ MILLING
25’ MILLING
DS=15 MPH*
STA. 10+20.00
BEGIN RESURFACING
STA. 13+80.00
END RESURFACING
ROYAL, JERRY WADE
FRAZIER, R TOM
FRAZIER, R TOM
ROYAL, J W
JEANETTE FAYE
SHEPHERD,
JEANETTE FAYE
SHEPHERD,
DB 1050 PG 027
DB 1050 PG 027
DB 704 PG 607
DB 552 PG 544
DB 688 PG 150
DB 592 PG 318
DB 688 PG 122
DB 705 PG 127
2G
3G
SHEPHERD, JEANETTE FAYE
RITA OSBORNE
SHEPHERD,
4G
1G
****************************************
R/R SPIKE SET IN 15" MAPLE
N 942171. E 1334776.
BM#1 ELEVATION = 1516.27
****************************************
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
F
C F
F F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C
C
SHEET 4 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
12.5 25 50250
PLANS
R
E
V
IS
I
O
N
S
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
4a 17BP.11.R.54
9
/
2
5
/
2
0
13
9
6
0
3
6
3
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
4
a
_
c
u
l
v
j
h
a
r
v
e
y
8
/
1
7
/
9
9
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
1520
1510
1500
0 100 200100200
@ CRITICAL POINTS
2.69:1 SKEWED
2:1 NORMAL
TB RT
TB LT
TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING BRIDGE
ON 8-29-12=1513.7
NWSE AND WSE
PROP 10 YR=1517.2
PROP 100 YR=1518.62
-DEBRIS POTENTIAL: LOW
OBSERVED IN THE 100 YR FLOOD PLAIN
-THERE WERE DWELLINGS OR STRUCTURES
-BED MATERIALS: SAND, COBBLES, BOULDERS
SKEW=132
14’x4’ CROWN SPAN
CL GRADE ELEV=1517.58’
CL STA 11+89 -L-
BED PROFILE
ROCK LINE FROM BORING LOG
=511.6
TOP FOOTING
2.5 5 1050
PLANS
SHEET 5 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
R
E
V
IS
I
O
N
S
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
4b 17BP.11.R.54
3
/
17
/
2
0
1
4
L
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
i
s
t
\
1
1
7
9
\
1
1
1
2
5
-
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
1
-
D
B
\
9
6
0
3
6
3
\
D
e
s
i
g
n
F
i
l
e
s
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
6
0
3
6
3
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
4
b
_
v
i
e
w
-
i
n
.
d
g
n
j
d
a
l
t
o
n
8
/
1
7
/
9
9
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
TEMP DEWATERING
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
BOTTOMLESS CULVERT
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
BOTTOMLESS CULVERT
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
TEMP DEWATERING
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
SURFACE WATER
IMPACTS IN
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
BUCKWHEAT BRANCH
TB 2GI1@14’x4’ CROWN SPAN
TB JB w/MH
SO
O
18" RCP-III
Ha
n
d
Existing Existing
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
E
x
c
a
v
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
c
h
a
n
i
z
e
d
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
Si
t
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
F
i
l
l
I
n
F
i
l
l
I
n
i
n
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
i
n
S
W
S
W
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
S
t
r
e
a
m
No
.
(
F
r
o
m
/
T
o
)
S
i
z
e
/
T
y
p
e
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
n
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
1
1
+
8
0
-
1
1
+
9
9
-
L
-
B
o
t
t
o
m
l
e
s
s
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
<
0
.
0
1
4
0
1
4
'
x
4
'
x
6
0
'
(
W
x
H
x
L
)
S
t
r
e
a
m
b
a
n
k
S
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
<
0
.
0
1
3
8
T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
D
e
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
g
<
0
.
0
1
8
TO
T
A
L
S
*
:
0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
1
7
8
8
0
*R
o
u
n
d
e
d
t
o
t
a
l
s
a
r
e
s
u
m
o
f
a
c
t
u
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
NO
T
E
S
:
AT
N
R
e
v
i
s
e
d
3
/
1
2
/
1
3
SH
E
E
T
6OF 6
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
P
E
R
M
I
T
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
WE
T
L
A
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
W
A
T
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
WILKES COUNTY BRIDGE 363 ON SR 1575 OVER BUCKWHEAT BRANCH
NC
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 03-17-2014
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INI'ORMATION
P�°oject No: 960363
YVBS No: 17BP.11.R.39
County: Wilkes
DocurnenC: PCE
Prqjeci Ti-acl�ing No. (l��terrirr( U.ce)
11-08-0142
F.A. No: N/A Funcling: � State ❑ Federal
Fe�ler�al (USACE) PerrnitRequif°ed? � Yes ❑ No Permr�t Type: NW 3 or 14
Pr•oject Description: Replace Bridge #363 over Buckwheat Branch on SR 1575.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief c�escription �f�yeview cictivities, r-esz�lts of r�view, ar�id conclztsiorzs:
Review of HPO quad maps was undertaken on 8/30/1 1. Based on this review, there are no existing N�R
properties in the Area of Potential Effects. No properties are recorded with in the project APE.
Construction traf�c will be routed off-site.
BYief Expinnation of why the �vailable in%�oy�rnation provicles a relicrble hasis for recisonczblv predicting
thcrt there cire no unidentifiec� his'toric propertie.s in the APE: No archaeological sites are ciocutnented in
tfle proposed project's vicinity. The steep terrain on either side of the stream crossing lessens the
likelihood of cultural evidence. Impact faLls within the existing Right of Way. No fi�rther work is
warranted.
SUPPORT DOCUMEIYTA"TION
See attached: Map(s),
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED
ARCHAEOLOGY H[STORIC ARCHITECTURE (CIRCLE ONE)
NCDOT Ciiltural Res6urces Speci�st
..No S'�o��•er Reqr�ir<°d'" �orm /br iN6ior 7'rnnsporla�io�i Projcca' a.c Ou�di/ied in Ihe _'00? Pro,�rruninnlic_I,Uree�menl.
NC'UO"l�Arcliaenlo,�r & flistaric-lrclii�cchu�e C�i�o��p.�� -
' 1 �>
Date