WQ0002638_Staff Report_20211208

;s State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: WQ0002638
Attn: Erick Saunders Facility name: Town of Angier
From: Tony Honeycutt)
Fayetteville Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facilily staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 11/18/2021
b. Site visit conducted by: Tony Honeycutt
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Brandon Johnson and their contact information: 919) 520 - 3267
e. Driving directions: Take Hwy 210 east from downtown Angier, approx. 1 mile and turn right onto S. Wilma
Street. Go south of S. Wilma approx. 1 mile and turn left onto Campbell Street. Drive approx..75 miles to the
end of Campbell Street; the WWTP and operations building will be on the right and the road leadingto o the
spray fields will be at the terminus of Campbell St.
2.
a.
b.
Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: 35.492003 N
Latitude: 35.492058 N
Longitude: 78.725131 W(Field #I-Sycamore/Gum-Norfolk A-6.21ac-113.88")
Longitude: 78.723206 W (Field 92-Sycamore/pine-Norfolk A-6.89ac-113.88")
c.
Latitude: 35.492350 N
Longitude: 78.720739 W
(Field 93A-Bermuda-Norfolk B-6.30ac-65.52")
d.
Latitude: 35.492658 N
Longitude: 78.721694 W
(Field 93B-Bermuda-Norfolk B-1.80ac-65.22")
e.
Latitude: 35.492181 N
Longitude: 78.721694 W
(Field #4A-Bermuda-Norfolk B-1.92-ac-65.52")
f.
Latitude: 35.490197 N
Longitude: 78.721325 W
(Field #4B-Bermuda-Norfolk B-3.92ac-65.22")
g.
Latitude: 35.488994 N
Longitude: 78.721608 W
(Field 94C-Bermuda-Norfolk B-2.88ac-52.00")
h.
Latitude: 35.490872 N
Longitude: 78.724072 W
(Field 95A-Bermuda-Norfolk B-0.71ac-65.22")
i.
Latitude: 35.490764 N
Longitude: 78.722881 W
(Field #5B-Bermuda-Norfolk B-1.02ac-65.22")
j.
Latitude: 35.489417 N
Longitude: 78.723753 W
(Field 45C-Bermuda-Norfolk B-1.06ac-52.00" )
k.
Latitude: 35.489647 N
Longitude: 78.725019 W
(Field #5D-Bermuda-Norfolk B-1.51ac-65.22")
1.
m.
Latitude: 35.490442 N
Latitude: 35.492839 N
Longitude: 78.726353 W
Longitude: 78.718989 W
(Field 95E-Fescue-Norfolk B-5.77ac-65.22" )
(Field 95F-Bermuda-Norfolk B-3.60ac-52.00")
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 6

3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification: N/A
River Basin and Subbasin No. N/A
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: N/A
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Brandon Johnson Certificate 9:998516 Backup ORC: Jimmy Certificate 9:18548
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: Wastewater Spray Irrigation System serving the Town of Angier
Proposed flow: 199357 GPD
Current permitted flow: 199357 GPD
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.) N/A
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 6

4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Are monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 6

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
U I II
C I II
O I II
C I II
O I II
C I II
O I II
C I II
O I II
C I II
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes® No ❑ N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 6

IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ De}Y-(d6de91SQd%gate reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date: 11/29/2021
5189C2D3DD5C42B...
12/8/2021
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 6

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
A site visit was conducted on 11/18/2021. All spray irrigation fields were in good shape and well maintained. The tree
crop appeared healthy with minimal undergrowth and free of debris. The pasture fields had a thick crop of winter rye
approximately 4 inches high coming U.
The spray irrigation system is now being used primarily f�goon freeboard maintenance. The Town's wastewater is
sent to Harnett County for treatment. Water can be directed to the lagoon during events of high influent flow and/or
extreme weather events.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 6 of 6