20211422 Ver 1_Buffer Mitigation Plan_20220131

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20211422 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 02/15/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/31/2022
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Company/Owner:* Davey Mitigation
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Ben Furr [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Dutch Farms
County: Guilford
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Dutch Farms Buffer Mitigation Plan DWR 2021-
9.71 MB
1422.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ben Furr
Signature:*

DRAFT BUFFER MITIGATION & NUTRIENT OFFSET PLAN
DUTCH FARMS SITE
Guilford County, North Carolina
DWR Project Number: 2021-1422 vl
Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake
8-Digit HUC 03030002 / 14-Digit HUC 03030002040010
V+3(
•
� e
Mitigation Bank Sponsor:
Davey Mitigation, A Division of Davey Resource Group, Inc.
(attn. T.J. Mascia, Director)
Prepared by:
Davey Resource Group, Inc. dba Land Management Group
Raleigh, NC
January 2022

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Parcel Location 1
1.2 Parcel Overview 1
1.2.1 Parcel Ownership 3
2.0 PROJECT AREA 3
2.1 Physiography and Geology 3
2.2 Soils 3
2.3 Existing Riparian Condition 3
2.3.1 Existing Condition Photos 6
2.4 Wetlands 7
2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species 8
2.6 Cultural Resources 8
2.7 Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) Floodplain/Floodway Mapping 8
3.0 RIPARIAN RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND PRESERVATION PLAN 9
3.1 Parcel Preparation 9
3.2 Riparian Restoration Activities 10
3.3 Riparian Enhancement Activities 10
3.4 Riparian Preservation Activities 10
3.5 Planting Plan 11
3.6 Easement Boundaries and Fencing 13
4.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 13
4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria 13
4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Parcel Maintenance 14
4.3 Long Term Management Plan 14
5.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 14
6.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL 14
7.0 REFERENCES 15
Page ii

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
Figures
Figure 1. Service Area
Figure 2. Project Vicinity
Figure 3. Existing Conditions
Figure 4. Conceptual Design Plan
Figure 5.USGS Drainage Area Map
Figure 6.NRCS Soils Map
Figure 7.National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 8.National Flood Hazard Layer
Figure 9. Planting and Monitoring Plan
Tables
Table 1. Parcel and Landowner Information 3
Table 2. Existing and Relic Wetland Summary 8
Table 3. Planting Plan 12
Appendices
Appendix AA—Buffer MBI
Appendix AB—Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter
Appendix AC—Supplementary Information
Appendix AD—Project Credits Table
Page iii

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Davey Mitigation (DM), A Division of Davey Resource Group, Inc., is pleased to provide this Buffer
Mitigation Plan (Plan) for the Dutch Farms Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank
(Project). This Project is designed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset credits for unavoidable
impacts due to development within the Haw River Subwatershed of the Jordan Lake Watershed (Figure
1). This Plan is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295, 15A
NCAC 02B.0703 and the Dutch Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and
Nutrient Offset Credits (MET), Appendix AA, made and entered into by DM acting as the Bank Sponsor
(Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality-Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
The Plan has also been designed in concurrence with the DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank — Dutch
Farms Mitigation Site (SAW-2021-01071). The Dutch Farms Mitigation Site (Site)is proposed to provide
5,402.1 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 2.23 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs) within the
conservation easement through a separate mitigation banking instrument with the IRT.
1.1 Parcel Location
The Parcel is located in Guilford County approximately 2 miles northeast of Climax,North Carolina east
of Fields Farm Rd. (Figure 2). The Parcel is located within Haw River Subwatershed within the Jordan
Lake Watershed, USGS 14-digit HUC 03030002040010, a Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR
Subbasin Number 03-06-03.
To access the Parcel, take Exit 190 off of US-421 N onto NC-62 S. Follow NC-62 S for 3.4 miles and
turn right onto Fields Farm Road. The parcel is on the right side of the road. The coordinates of the site
are 35.931951°N,-79.693365°W.
1.2 Parcel Overview
This Parcel is being proposed to restore and preserve stream and wetland complexes with adjacent
riparian areas, to compensate for unavoidable riparian buffer impacts and nutrient load reduction
requirements. The conservation easement will total approximately 16.57 acres and will include nine
unnamed tributaries (UT 1 —UT 9) that drain directly into Big Alamance Creek. Tributaries on-site are
primarily sand bed streams with significant inputs of fine sediments due to actively eroding banks, hoof
shear and sheet flow from unstabilized soils in adjacent cattle pastures.
Existing wetlands (W1, W4. W6A, and W7) and drained hydric soils (W2, W3, W5, W6B, and W8) are
present in the floodplain and headwaters of Site tributaries. The parcel has been in agriculture since at
least 1955 and is currently being managed for livestock (Figure 3). The majority of the easement is in
active cattle pasture, with the exception of wooded areas at the upstream extents of UT 1,UT 5, and UT
6. Cattle are excluded from the easement area adjacent to UT 4 and W4;however,this area is maintained
as pasture (i.e. regular mowing). Anthropogenic disturbances associated with agricultural practices have
resulted in a severely altered vegetative community, interception of surface water, lateral drawdown of
groundwater, and the reduction/removal of overbank flooding in relic and existing wetland areas. Despite
these disturbances, W1, W4, W6A, and W7 still exhibit indicators for hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation, and wetland hydrology. W2, W3, W5, W6, and W8 are located immediately adjacent to
incised tributaries, lack primary indicators of wetland hydrology, and are considered drained (i.e. relic)
wetlands(Figure 3).A preliminary jurisdictional determination(PJD)request was submitted to the United
States Army Corps of Engineers in October 2021. Stream identifications and buffer viability
Page 1

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
determinations were verified by the North Carolina Depailnient of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) in
letters dated June 1 and August 27,2021. Agency correspondence is provided in Appendix AB.
Significant fecal and nutrient loads are entering Site tributaries as a result of direct cattle access to streams
and overland sheetflow from adjacent pastures. Evidence of this includes visual observation of cattle in
the stream channel during site visits and fecal matter along stream banks and within the stream channel.
LMG used equations and guidance developed by DMS in the document titled "Quantifying Benefits to
Water Quality from Livestock Exclusion and Riparian Buffer Establishment for Stream Restoration"
(June 15, 2016) to estimate potential fecal load reductions that may result from proposed restoration
activities at the Site. It is estimated that cattle exclusion and establishment of a riparian buffer would
decrease the fecal load of the Site by approximately 2.88 trillion col/year. LMG also used equations set
forth in the North Carolina Depaitnient of Environmental Quality (DEQ) memorandum titled "Approval
of Cattle Exclusion Nutrient Reduction Practices" (April 5, 2017) as well as the document titled "NC
Division of Water Quality — Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions
associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment" to determine potential nitrogen and phosphorous
reduction loads for the Site. Cattle exclusion and establishment of a riparian buffer is estimated to reduce
the nitrogen load to the Site by approximately 1,169 lb/yr and reduce phosphorous load to the Site by
approximately 120 lb/yr.
The proposed conservation easement will be one contiguous area; however, maintenance breaks will be
allowed within the easement at crossing locations depicted on Figure 4. Crossings were discussed with
the landowner and strategically located to minimize impacts to aquatic features and surrounding riparian
habitat. Crossings depicted on Figure 4 will be gated and culverted to minimize cattle access to the
streams.
The goal of the Project is to restore, enhance, and preserve ecological function to existing streams,
wetlands, and riparian areas by establishing appropriate plant communities while minimizing temporal
and land disturbing impacts. Restoration activities will include Priority I restoration of Site tributaries to
reconnect streams to the historic floodplain and adjacent wetlands. Riparian areas will be replanted with
native vegetation which will aid in filtering sediments and nutrients on-site. Under the Dutch Farms
Nutrient Offset and Buffer Bank specifically, proposed activities involve restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of riparian areas adjacent to restored streams and wetlands. Restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of the Jordan Lake riparian buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0267) is anticipated to
result in a reduction of water quality stressors currently affecting the Project area.
The Project will generate Riparian Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset credit within two dedicated zones from
top of bank: the top of bank to 100 foot-wide zone of buffer; and the 101-200 foot-wide zone of buffer.
Both zones are measured perpendicular from top of bank. Total drainage area of the project is 167 acres
(0.26 square miles)(Figure 5).
Of the total 16.57-acre permanent conservation easement, the Project presents the opportunity to restore
11.66 acres of riparian areas, enhance 0.66 acres of riparian areas, and preserve 0.34 acres of riparian
areas with a minimum width of 30 feet and a maximum width of 200 feet adjacent to mitigated streams
onsite. The Project is intended to be utilized to generate both Riparian Buffer Credit and Nutrient Offset
Credit for the Haw River Subwatershed. According to 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(4) and (5), "the area of
preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of
buffer mitigation". As the total area of buffer mitigation accounts for 12.66 acres, the total area of
preservation credit that could be generated from the Site will not exceed 3.16 acres. Appendix AD
provides an overall summary of the total buffer mitigation credits.
Page 2

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
1.2.1 Parcel Ownership
Land required for construction, management, and stewardship of this Project includes three parcels in
Guilford County with the following ownership listed in Table 1. DM will obtain conservation easements
from the current landowners. The Wilmington District Conservation Easement model template was
utilized to draft the site protection instrument. Once recorded, the secured easements will allow DM to
proceed with Project development and protect mitigation assets in perpetuity. Once finalized, a copy of
the land protection instrument(s)will be included in Appendix B.
Table 1. Parcel and Landowner Information
Landowners Parcel Identification Agreement Type County
Number
Randy Steve Fields and 7799452144 Easement Guilford
Cynthia Fields
Beverly Fields 7799349572 Easement Guilford
Larry Dean Fields and 7799543254 Easement Guilford
Patricia A.Hauser,as
Trustees of the Hauser-
Fields Living Trust
2.0 PROJECT AREA
2.1 Physiography and Geology
The Project is located in the Piedmont Level III Eco-region, Southern Outer Piedmont Level IV Eco-
region (Griffith, 2002) and Charlotte and Milton Belts (i.e. Carolina Slate Belt)/Metamorphosed Granitic
Rock (CZg) geologic formation (NCGS, 1985). The Carolina Slate Belt consists mostly of rocks
originally deposited by volcanic eruption and sedimentation. The name Carolina Slate is derived from the
low-grade metamorphism that gives the rocks their slaty cleavage (Rogers, 2010). The physiography of
the ecoregion is mostly characterized by hills,ridges,and irregular plains.
2.2 Soils
Soil series depicted in the Guilford County Soil Survey are shown on Figure 6. The majority of lands
within floodplains on-site and associated riparian wetlands are mapped as Congaree soils. Congaree soils
are well drained but are known to contain minor components of Chewacla and Wehadkee soils. Soil
profiles were collected in representative wetland/relic wetland areas and sealed by Nicholas Howell (NC
License #1294), a licensed soil scientist with LMG. Mr. Howell confirmed that the soil profiles he
collected were consistent with the Wehadkee soil series. Soil profile logs are provided in Appendix F of
the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan.
Wehadkee soils are poorly drained with moderate permeability and moderate water capacity. Wehadkee
soils are often found in association with Chewacla soils. Chewacla soil is formed on slightly higher ridges
on floodplains while Wehadkee is formed in the lower swales of floodplains.
2.3 Existing Riparian Condition
Agriculture has been the primary land use at the Site since at least 1937, based on historic aerial
photographs. The majority of buffers along Site streams and wetlands are currently utilized as active
cattle pasture or hay production. Woody vegetation is limited to scattered trees located along the stream
banks. Vegetation along streams consists of species such as red maple, sweetgum, tag alder, American
Page 3

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
elm, green ash, and privet (Ligustrum sinense). Herbaceous vegetation is dominated by common rush,
sedges and fescue. The only mature, forested areas within riparian buffers on-site occur at the upstream
extents of UT 5, UT 6 and UT 9. The Site Viability Letter from DWR in Appendix AB provides details
on land-uses within the riparian areas on-site.
Streams within the Parcel limits (UT 1 —UT 9) are described below. The Stream Origin Determination
Letter is provided in Appendix AB.
UT 1 - UT 1 is the Site's dominant hydrologic feature. UT 1 flows through a well-defined floodplain.
UT 1 begins on-site as a first order, perennial stream, flowing from west to east approximately 1,921 feet
prior to exiting the Site. UT 1's drainage area is approximately 167 acres (0.26 square miles) at the
downstream extent of the Site(Figure 5).
For purposes of describing existing conditions,UT 1 has been divided into two reaches. UT 1 is stable as
it flows through W1, however the riparian buffer is substantially altered and cattle have unrestricted
access to the channel. This section of UT 1 is referred to as Reach 1. Reach 2 begins just downstream of
W1, where a headcut forms and UT 1 becomes incised with eroding banks throughout the remainder of
the Site.
The large majority of UT 1 contains channel banks experiencing active erosion. UT 1 has been
manipulated through channelization and straightening throughout the Site. Anthropogenic manipulations
result in a system that lacks natural channel geometry(i.e. little to no meandering),is easily accessible for
cattle and void of a natural buffer.
UT 2 and UT 3 - UT 2 and UT 3 are short reaches within the Site that flow through well-defined
floodplains. Both streams enter the Site as first order, perennial streams (USGS Climax Quadrangle),
flowing from south to north. UT 2's drainage area is approximately 50 acres (0.08 square miles) at it's
convergence with UT 1. UT 3's drainage area is approximately 22 acres (0.035 square miles) at it's
convergence with UT 1 (Figure 5).
UT 2 and UT 3 are primarily a gravel bed streams that have unrestricted cattle access within the Site.
Both streams are incised in the landscape with bank height ratios of 2.0 or greater. UT 2 and UT 3 are
experiencing substantial bank erosion due to lack of deeply rooted vegetation and cattle access.
UT 4 - UT 4 flows through a well-defined floodplain and originates on-site as a first order, intermittent
stream,flowing from southeast to northwest. UT 4 begins as an intermittent stream on-site (Reach 1)and
transitions to a perennial stream downstream of a large headcut (Reach 2). UT 4's drainage area is
approximately 20 acres(0.03 square miles)at it's convergence with UT 1 (Figure 5).
UT 4 - Reach 1 is slightly incised and lacks a natural, wooded buffer. Stream banks along Reach 1 are
stable due to dense herbaceous vegetation. Cattle do not currently access Reach 1; however, the area
adjacent to UT 4 and W4 is maintained as pasture (i.e. regular mowing). UT 4 —Reach 2 is primarily a
sand bed stream that has unrestricted cattle access within the Site. UT4—Reach 2 classifies as an E type
channel but is incised in the landscape as indicated by a bank height ratio of 2.17. The majority of UT 4's
channel banks through this reach exhibit moderate to substantial bank erosion due to lack of deeply rooted
vegetation and cattle access.
UT 5 - UT 5 flows through a well-defined floodplain. Elevations range between approximately 730 ft
MSL at the point at which UT 5 enters the Site and approximately 710 ft MSL at the convergence with
UT 6. UT 5 originates on-site as a first order, perennial stream, flowing from north to south. UT 5 is a
Page 4

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
spring-fed system with a drainage area of approximately 5 acres (0.001 square miles) at its convergence
with UT 6(Figure 5).
UT 5 was divided into two reaches based on stream condition (Figure 3). Reach 1 consists of the
upstream most portion of UT 5 as it flows through a wooded area. Reach 1 is a stable, sand bed stream
with a mature,wooded buffer. The property owner currently grazes a horse in the area adjacent to Reach
1 but there is no evidence of livestock access in the channel. Reach 2 consists of the portion of UT 5 that
flows through active cattle pasture prior to converging with UT 6. Reach 2 is primarily a sand bed stream
that has unrestricted cattle access and severely eroding banks. Reach 2 classifies as a B type channel and
is incised in the landscape as indicated by a bank height ratio of 3.05. Hoof shear has created over
widened banks throughout Reach 2 of UT 5.
UT 6 - UT 6 flows through a well-defined floodplain. Elevations range between approximately 730 ft
MSL at the point at which UT 6 enters the Site and approximately 692 ft MSL at the convergence with
UT 1. UT 6 is contained entirely on Site as a first order,perennial stream,flowing from west to east. UT
6 is a spring-fed system with a drainage area of approximately 22 acres (0.034 square miles) at its
convergence with UT 7.
UT 6 is primarily a sand bed stream that has unrestricted cattle access within the Site. UT 6 displays two
separate stream types depending upon which landscape position the stream is assessed. Therefore,
geomorphic data was collected in both landscapes and separated into reaches (Figure 3). The upstream
reach(Reach 1)has a one tree buffer and is significantly incised through a steeper valley. Vertical stream
banks are actively eroding through most of this reach. Reach 1 classifies as a G type channel with a bank
height ratio of 5.07
UT 6 -Reach 2 appears to have been straightened and channelized within the downstream portions of the
valley (i.e. the lower slope portion of the valley). The straightened section of UT 6 now converges with
UT 7, outside of its natural valley. UT 6 classifies as an E type channel in Reach 2 with a bank height
ratio of 1.7. While this section classifies as a typically stable stream type, the channel has been
straightened, lacks a wooded riparian buffer, and is impacted by unrestricted cattle access. Streambanks
are covered with herbaceous vegetation through Reach 2 but are undercutting below the rooting depth. In
addition, rock and fill material used to stabilize a ford crossing at the beginning of Reach 2 is creating a
backwater effect for approximately 50' upstream.
UT 7 - UT 7 originates on-site as a first order, intermittent stream and flows through W7 prior to
converging with UT 6. Elevations range between approximately 710 ft MSL at the point at which UT 7
originates and approximately 694 ft MSL at the convergence with UT 6. UT 7 has a drainage area of
approximately 8 acres (0.005 square miles) at its convergence with UT 6. UT 7 was divided into two
reaches based on stream condition (Figure 3). Reach 1 consists of the upstream most portion of UT 7 as it
flows through W7. UT 7 has been straightened through Reach 1 and an at-grade equipment crossing has
impacted approximately 50 feet of bed and banks through this Reach. Reach 2 begins at a headcut just
upstream of the confluence with UT 6. UT 7 becomes incised and exhibits eroding banks from the
headcut to its confluence with UT 6. UT 7 classifies a G type channel and is incised in the landscaped as
indicated by a bank height ratio of 2.8. Reach 1 and Reach 2 of UT 7 lack a wooded riparian buffer.
UT 8 - UT 8 flows through a well-defined floodplain. Elevations range between approximately 732 ft
MSL at the point at which UT 8 enters the Site and approximately 694 ft MSL at the convergence with
UT 1. UT 8 originates out of a headwater wetland immediately upstream of the Site and enters the Site as
a first order, perennial stream, flowing from southeast to northwest. UT 8's drainage area is
approximately 18 acres(0.03 square miles)at it's convergence with UT 1 (Figure 5).
Page 5

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
UT 8 is primarily a sand bed stream that has unrestricted cattle access and lacks a wooded riparian buffer.
UT 8 classifies as an E type channel but is incised in the landscape as indicated by a bank height ratio of
1.86. Additionally, UT 8 has abandoned typical stream form in multiple areas due to cattle impacts that
have created variable bank configurations. A ford crossing on UT 8 is creating backwater effects for
approximately 40 feet upstream of the crossing.
UT 9 - UT 9 originates within the Site as a first order,perennial stream flowing out of a hillside near the
headwaters of UT 6. UT 9 is spring fed and has consistent bed and banks. UT 9's drainage area is
approximately 3 acres at its convergence with UT 6 (Figure 5). Approximately 50 feet of UT 9 is lightly
incised as it converges with UT 6. UT 9 has a mature, narrow wooded buffer on both sides, but cattle
have unrestricted access to the stream.
2.3.1 Existing Condition Photos
b r
'`
Looking down valley at UT 4—Reach 1 Looking down valley at UT 8
rw
t w
YAK -
� sy �- -,, - ..,ot
M � �.=�' �, Aso, �r•
ik ."'i0, .-t. 6 -F ,-
�»''� '�',��+ ? , 4'�?�.� �ti. .tom'-.
Looking up valley at confluence of UT 1,UT 6,UT 7, Looking up valley at confluence of UT 1 and UT 4
and UT 8
Page 6

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
i z :7,-''
'11‘11 ((t
. .I.P11 ' ' 3-,''41411 1 iii: .:
'•.! Illike ' ' '14-'471 e3Prt'':-*
y a.
i
Looking down valley at Site Looking down valley at confluence of UT 1 and UT 4
- . ., ,__ T. rr7"r"-
r ---r-3 5--
Cattle accessing UT 8 Looking up valley at confluence of UT 6 and UT 7
2.4 Wetlands
The Site contains existing and relic wetland areas. Several site wetlands have experienced loss and/or
degradation of characteristic function due to prior site manipulation. Alteration of natural hydrology,
vegetative structure and land use of wetlands at the Site has resulted in diminished nutrient
uptake/transformation and sediment retention. Table 2 provides a summary of existing and relic wetland
areas at the Site. Relic wetlands areas are proposed to be restored as part of Site mitigation activities. A
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request was submitted to the USACE on October 21,
2021. The PJD request is included in Appendix E of the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Plan.
Page 7

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
Table 2. Existing and Relic Wetland Summary
ID Type Hydrology Existing Acres
W 1 Riparian Wetland Existing Wetland 0.07
W 2 Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.64
W 3 Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.01
W 4 Riparian Wetland Existing Wetlands 0.46
W 5 Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.25
W 6A Riparian Wetland Existing Wetlands 0.12
W 6B Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.31
W 7 Riparian Wetland Existing Wetland 0.22
W 8 Relic Riparian Wetland Drained Hydric Soils 0.58
TOTAL 2.66
2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists five species as threatened, endangered, or at
risk in Guilford County: Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Roanoke logperch (Percina rex),
Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Schweinitz's sunflower(Helianthus schweinitzii),and small whorled
pogonia (Isotria medeoloides). Records at the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) do not
indicate an occurrence of a federally threatened or endangered species at the Site. Based on preliminary
site assessments, habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is provided in maintained areas throughout the Site;
however,occurrence of this species on-site is unlikely given the historical agricultural landuse. Records at
the NHP do not indicate that any federally protected species elemental occurrences are located within one
mile of Dutch Farms. USFWS responded to the Public Notice in a letter dated August 25, 2021,
indicating that the project is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species or their critical habitat.
Correspondence is provided in Appendix D of the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan.
2.6 Cultural Resources
There are no properties listed on the National Register within a one-mile radius of Dutch Farms
(NCSHPO, 2021). The Lilian Coble House is located approximately 0.9 mile northwest of Dutch Farms
and has been surveyed only(Site ID GF1944). Survey of the home was likely done to identify and gather
data on the community's historic resources. A survey does not guarantee that the site is eligible for listing
on the National Register and State law does not provide protection for properties that are determined
eligible but not listed in the National Register. SHPO responded to the Public Notice in a letter dated
September 17, 2021, indicating that they are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Correspondence is provided in Appendix D of the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Plan.
2.7 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplain/Floodway Mapping
Review of the Floodplain Mapping Program website and the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
Map Number 3710779900J Effective Date June 18, 2007 indicates streams on-site are not part of FEMA
study. Brent Gatlin of Guilford County specified in a meeting on February 24, 2021 that no floodplain
development permit is required for Dutch Farms because no streams on the property are part of a FEMA
designated 100 year floodplain.
Page 8

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
3.0 RIPARIAN RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND
PRESERVATION PLAN
The goal of the Project is to restore ecological function to the streams, wetlands, and riparian areas by
establishing appropriate plant communities where absent, as well as to protect these streams, wetlands,
and riparian areas into perpetuity. Restored streams, wetlands, and buffers will provide water quality and
habitat functions within the Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake, such as nutrient and sediment
removal, filtration of runoff from nearby agricultural fields, and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
Lands adjacent to streams proposed for buffer restoration, enhancement, and preservation are currently
being used for livestock grazing or hay production.
Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation proposed under this Plan are shown in Figure 4, and
were determined viable mitigation approaches by DWR in their letter dated August 27, 2021 attached in
Appendix AB. All riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation buffer mitigation activities along
channels will occur within two dedicated zones from the edge of the bank: the top of bank to 100 foot-
wide zone of buffer perpendicular from the top of bank; and the 101 to 200 foot-wide zone of buffer
perpendicular from the top of the bank.
Before beginning construction, DM will ensure that permitting scenarios are completed. DM plans to
obtain Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 permit approval and will submit applications for a CWA
Section 401, and a North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Erosion and Sediment Control
permit.
3.1 Parcel Preparation
Preparation within the Parcel will involve treatment for invasive species (where present), ripping, and
seeding and planting. Any topsoil that is removed during construction will be stockpiled and placed back
over the Project during final soil preparation.Any areas that are compacted will be ripped or tilled before
the topsoil is placed back over the Project. Once the soil is prepared, it will be seeded and planted with
native riparian species. This process should provide favorable soil conditions for plant growth. A
combination of silt fencing, erosion control wattles, temporary seeding, and erosion control matting will
be used to reduce erosion and stabilize soil in riparian areas during any land disturbance activities. These
erosion control measures shall be inspected and properly maintained at the end of each working day to
ensure measures are functioning properly until permanent vegetation is established. Disturbed areas shall
be temporarily seeded within ten working days and upon completion of final grading, permanent
vegetation shall be established for all disturbed areas. Any topsoil that is removed during construction
will be stockpiled and reserved for final site soil preparation. Temporary and permanent riparian seeding
shall be done in accordance with the erosion control plan. A list of species used in the seed mix can be
found in the plan set, Appendix G, Sheet PL2 of the Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan. Bare root
plantings and live stakes shall be planted according to the planting plan found in the plan set, Appendix
G, Sheet PL2A of the Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan. Invasive species may require different and
multiple treatment methods, depending on plant phenology and location of the species being treated.
Treatment methods may include mechanical (cutting with loppers, clippers, or chain saw) and chemical
(foliar spray, cut stump,and hack and squirt techniques). Fescue and other grasses in pasture areas will be
treated prior to construction. Plants containing mature viable seeds will be removed from the Project and
properly disposed. Management records will be kept on plant species treated,type of treatment employed,
type of herbicide used, application technique, and herbicide concentration and quantities used. These
records will be included in the annual monitoring reports.
Page 9

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation activities will commence in concurrence with the
stream and wetland mitigation activities and not before. Therefore, the mitigation area where riparian
restoration is being performed may be altered slightly depending on the approval of the Stream Mitigation
Plan. The riparian restoration areas will be surveyed, and information will be provided in the As-Built
report.
3.2 Riparian Restoration Activities
Buffer restoration is proposed along both right and left banks of restored and enhanced tributaries on-site
as depicted on Figure 4 and in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC
02B.0295(n). Buffer restoration areas are convertible to nutrient offset credits along both right and left
banks of restored and enhanced tributaries on-site with the exception of UT 5 and the forested area at the
upstream extents of UT 6 and UT 9. Stream restoration will address existing impairments including
floodplain dislocation, bank erosion, nutrient input, and buffer degradation. The stream design approach
will include restoring existing degraded and incised tributaries on-site as primarily Priority I restored
streams so bankfull and larger flows can access the currently abandoned (from bankfull flows) floodplain
and associated riparian wetlands. The proposed mitigation strategy will promote settling, uptake, and
removal of pathogens, nutrients, sedimentation, and debris from watershed runoff/floodwaters. Restoring
a stable dimension, pattern, and profile will ensure the channels will transport and attenuate watershed
flows and sediment loads without aggrading or degrading. Priority I restoration should increase
floodplain interaction and groundwater storage within riparian wetlands,in-turn increasing the capacity of
the Site to uptake nutrients from upstream waters. Within the easement, riparian restoration areas will be
planted from top of bank to a minimum of 30 feet and a maximum of 200 feet from the stream with bare
root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of at least 680 trees per acre.
Planting will consist of a composition of native bare-root tree species specified in Section 3.5. Restoring
native vegetation to the stream channel banks, wetlands, and adjacent riparian corridor (currently
dominated by herbaceous species) will diversify flora and create a protected habitat corridor that will
provide an abundance of available foraging and cover habitat for a multitude of amphibians, reptiles,
mammals and birds. Restoring buffers adjacent to streams and wetlands will also assist in attenuating
floodwaters,in turn reducing stressors from upstream impacts.
3.3 Riparian Enhancement Activities
Buffer enhancement is proposed along both right and left banks of UT 6 (forested area only) and UT 9 as
shown on Figure 4 and in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC
02B.0295(n). Enhancement activities will consist of supplemental planting following site construction
and installation of fencing to exclude cattle. Areas disturbed during construction will be seeded with a
native seed mix and bare root seedlings will be planted on 8 by 8-foot spacing to achieve an initial density
of at least 680 trees per acre. Excluding cattle from buffer enhancement areas will reduce nutrient inputs
to adjacent streams and aid in stabilizing stream banks. Buffer enhancement can only generate Riparian
Buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable to nutrient offset credits.
3.4 Riparian Preservation Activities
Buffer preservation is proposed along the upstream extents of UT 5 as depicted on Figure 4 and in
accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5). However,
preservation activities along the left and right banks of UT 5 will be non-subject preservation on non-
subject streams in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 0295(0)(4).
Documentation of the site meeting requirements of 15A NCAC 02R .0403(c )(7)(8) and(11) is provided
in Appendix AB. Preservation activities will consist of permanently protecting the buffer from cutting,
clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer through a
Page 10

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
conservation easement that will have clearly visible easement markers and signs (see Section 3.6 for
further descriptions of the easement boundaries). No more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer
mitigation will be used for preservation credit pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5) and 15A NCAC
0295(0)(4) and the rest of the area will be protected in the conservation easement and not applied for
credit. Furthermore, buffer preservation can only generate Riparian Buffer mitigation credit and is not
transferrable to nutrient offset credits.
3.5 Planting Plan
Revegetation of the Project where riparian restoration is being performed will meet the performance
standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295. This includes treating invasive species growth and
planting at least 4 native hardwood bare root trees at a density to ensure 260 stems per acre at completion
of monitoring. No one tree species will be greater than 50% of established stems. Vegetation within
riparian areas can vary depending on disturbance regime and adjacent community types, so the protected
buffer easement will be planted with appropriate native species observed in the surrounding forest and
species known to occur in similar environments. Target vegetation communities for the Site will be
Piedmont Alluvial Forest in the floodplain and lower slopes transitioning to Dry Oak-Hickory Forests on
upper slopes and ridgetops(Schafale and Weakley, 1990). Stream banks of restored and enhanced stream
reaches will be planted with a streamside assemblage consisting of black willow, tag alder, and other
common streamside species. Table 3 below identifies the proposed species composition for each planting
zone. A plan view of the planting zones is depicted on Figure 9. Bare root seedlings in Zones 2 and 3
will be planted on approximately eight (8) foot spacing, corresponding to approximately 680 stems per
acre. The stream bank(Zone 1)will be planted with a combination of live stakes and bare root seedlings
on approximately four (4) foot spacing. It is expected that other characteristic species will recruit
naturally into these areas subsequent to completion of construction. The herbaceous layer will be restored
by seeding disturbed areas with a native seed mix.
Page 11

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
Table 3. Planting Plan
Feet of Stream Bank Plant Spacing
Zone 1:Streamside Assemblage
11,325 ft 3 ft
Common Name Scientific Name %Composition #Planted
Black willow Salix nigra 20 755
Tag alder Alnusserrulata 15 567
Cottonwood Populus deltoides 10 378
Elderberry Sambucuscanadensis 10 378
Silky dogwood Corn us amomum 15 567
Button bush Cephalanthus occidentalis 10 378
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 20 755
TOTAL 3,778
Area Plant Spacing
Zone 2:Piedmont Alluvial Forest
10.1ac 9x6ft
Common Name Scientific Name %Composition #Planted
Tulip tree Liriodendron tulipifera 10 816
River birch Betula nigra 10 816
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 10 816
Shagbark hickory Carya ovata 5 408
American elm U/mus Americana 5 408
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagoda 10 816
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 5 408
Water oak Quercus nigra 10 816
Bitternut hickory Carya cordiformis 5 408
Hackberry Celtis laevigata 5 408
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana 5 408
Willow oak Quercus phellos 5 408
American holly Ilex opaca 5 408
Spicebush Lindera benzoin 5 408
Silky dogwood Corn us amomum 5 408
TOTAL 8,160
Area Plant Spacing
Zone 3:Dry Oak-Hickory Forest
4.3ac 9x6ft
Common Name Scientific Name %Composition #Planted
White oak Quercus alba 10 348
Southern red oak Quercus falcata 10 348
Post oak Quercus stellata 10 348
Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea 10 348
Pignut hickory Carya glabra 10 348
Mockernut hickory Carya tomentosa 10 348
Mountain oak Quercusprinus 10 348
Black oak Quercus velutina 5 174
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 5 174
Red Bud Cerciscanadensis 5 174
Sourwood Oxydendrum arboreum 5 174
Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica 5 174
Flowering dogwood Corn us florida 5 174
TOTAL 3,480
Page 12

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
3.6 Easement Boundaries and Fencing
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Easement boundaries and fencing will be completed prior to the As-Built onsite visit
by DWR. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundaries will be marked with signs
identifying the property as a mitigation site that will include the name of the long-term steward and a
contact number. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on
an as needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities and
the conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
DWR.
4.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria
Riparian vegetation monitoring will be based on the "CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level
2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.2." Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of
five (5) years and will be conducted between July Pt and leaf drop. First year vegetation monitoring will
occur at least 6 months from initial planting. The total planted area of the stream, wetland, and
buffer/nutrient project is 14.4 acres(11.7 acres are applicable to buffer credit and 2.7 acres are wetlands).
A mix of 10 fixed and random 100 square meter vegetation plots will be monitored in the planted area
applicable to buffer credit (2 additional plots will be placed in wetlands), and will cover at least two
percent of the planted mitigation area. Of those 10 plots, seven will be fixed plots, while three will be
randomly placed each monitoring year to comply with the Stream and Wetland Mitigation Guidelines and
IRT recommendations (Figure 9). The following data will be recorded for all planted and volunteer trees
in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots will be
flagged with flagging tape. Photographs will be taken at established monitoring stations each monitoring
year. Visual inspection reports and photographs will be provided in the annual reports to ensure that
restoration areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the Parcel
will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species,where no one species is greater than 50
percent of stems, at a density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Desirable native
volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards as determined by DWR. Invasive
and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant or alter the desired
community structure of the Project.
A visual assessment of the conservation easement will also be performed each year to confirm:
1)Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
2)no cattle access within the conservation easement area;
3)no encroachment has occurred;
4)diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and
5) there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect buffer function.
Page 13

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Parcel Maintenance
Adaptive measures will be developed, or appropriate remedial actions taken in the event that the Project,
or a specific component of the Project, fails to achieve the defined success criteria. Remedial actions will
be designed to achieve the success criteria specified in this Plan, and will include identification of the
causes of failure, remedial design approach, work schedule, and monitoring criteria that will take into
account physical and climatic conditions.
Initial plant maintenance may include a one-time mowing,prior to initial planting to remove undesirable
species. If mowing is deemed necessary by DM during the monitoring period, DM must receive approval
by DWR prior to any mowing activities to ensure that no buffer violations have been performed. Failure
to receive approval to mow within the Jordan Lake buffer, as defined in 15A NCAC 02B.0267,by DWR
could result in Jordan Lake buffer violations and violations of the conservation easement. If necessary,
DM will develop a species-specific control plan.
4.3 Long Term Management Plan
DM acting as the Bank Sponsor,will record a Conservation Easement with the Guilford County Register
of Deeds' Office for this site. The Conservation Easement will be assigned to Broad Water Innovations
(BWI). All monitoring activities, including periodic inspections of the site to ensure that restrictions
required in the Conservation Easement are upheld, are the responsibility of DM until the Bank Parcel is
transferred to BWI. Endowment funds required to uphold the Dutch Farms Bank Parcel conservation
easement in perpetuity shall be negotiated prior to site transfer to BWI.
The Bank Sponsor will ensure that the Conservation Easement has allowed for the implementation of an
initial monitoring phase, which will be developed during the design phase and conducted by the Bank
Sponsor. The Conservation Easement will allow for yearly monitoring and, if necessary, maintenance of
the Parcel during the initial monitoring phase. These activities will be conducted in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the DM Dutch Farms Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset MBI made and entered
into by DM and DWR.
5.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of Performance Bonds sufficient to assure one
hundred percent(I 00%)completion of all mitigation work,required reporting and monitoring,and any
remedial work required.Financial assurances will be payable at the direction of DWR to its designee or to
a standby trust.Financial assurances structured to provide funds to DWR in the event of default by the
Bank Sponsor are not acceptable. The initial performance bond will be in the amount of at least$150,000
and shall be able to cover 100%of the costs associated with construction of riparian restoration areas. The
monitoring bond shall be in the amount of at least$100,000 and shall be able to cover 100%of costs
associated with monitoring and maintenance of riparian restoration areas for five years.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed to cover each year's monitoring period,with
confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when applicable. DWR
reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of
bond renewals when applicable.
6.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The project presents 16.57 acres of permanent conservation easement in Guilford County,North Carolina.
While this easement also encompasses areas for the Dutch Farms Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank,
Page 14

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
the purpose of the Project is to generate Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits to mitigate authorized
buffer impacts and offset nutrient loads respectively,in the Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake.
There are two dedicated Riparian Buffer and Nutrient credit generation zones within the overall buffer
area: the first will begin at the most landward limit of the top of bank or the rooted herbaceous vegetation
and extend outward to a distance of 100 feet. The second zone begins at 101 feet and extends landward to
200 feet from the top of bank. Currently, all areas are dedicated to Riparian Buffer credit generation. In
the event Riparian Buffer credits are converted to Nutrient Offset credits, there will be no overlap in the
Riparian Buffer and/or Nutrient Offset credit areas. Areas proposed for wetland mitigation have been
excluded from areas available for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits.
This Bank has the potential to generate approximately 516,674.653 riparian buffer restoration and
enhancement credits, and 2,965.000 buffer preservation credits. Approximately 481,628.153 ft2 of
Nutrient Offset credits could be generated from riparian restoration activities in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02B.0703 that would result in 7,547.841 lbs of Delivered Nitrogen credits and 225.195 lbs of
Delivered Phosphorus credits,if converted. Riparian Buffer credits generated within forested areas are not
convertible to Nutrient Offset. Riparian Buffer mitigation credits generated will service authorized
riparian buffer impacts within the Haw River Subwatershed of Jordan Lake. Nutrient Offsets generated
will service nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are authorized in 15A NCAC 02B.0703
within the Haw River Subwatershed. The Sponsor will maintain four credit ledgers. One ledger will
account for Riparian Buffer Restoration credits, one ledger will account for buffer Preservation credits,
one ledger will account for Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, and one will account for Phosphorus nutrient
offset credits. All credit assets shall be shown on these credit ledgers. Project credits were determined
utilizing the DWR "Project Credit Table Template (updated October 2020)," which is provided in
Appendix AD.
7.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. (1987). "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,"
Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
MS
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2007. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map:
Panel 3710779900J. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search. (December 2021).
Griffith, G.E., et al. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis,
OR (map scale 1:1,500,000).
Lee, M. T. et al. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, All Levels of Plot
Sampling. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm. (December 2021).
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDNR). 2005. "Cape
Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality.
https://deq.nc.gov/media/3866/download. (January 2022).
NCDNR. 2016. "N.C. Wetland Assessment Method User Manual Version 5." N.C. Wetland
Functional Assessment Team https://deq.nc.gov/media/10187/download. (January 2022)
Page 15

Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan
Dutch Farms Mitigation Site
Guilford County,North Carolina
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. NCDNCR. 2018. North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service.
https://nc.ma ps.arcgis.com/home/item.htm I?id=79ea671ebdcc45639f0860257d5f5ed7.
Updated May 28, 2021.
North Carolina Geological Survey(NCGS), 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina.
North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings (NCOAH). 2010. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0703
- Nutrient Offset Credit Trading. http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20envi ro nmenta l%20qua l ity/cha pter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%2Oncac%2002b%20.0703.pdf
(January 2022).
NCOAH. 2015. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0267-Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy:
Protection of Existing Riparian Buffers. http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20envi ro nmenta l%20q ua l ity/cha pter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%2Oncac%2002b%20.0267.pdf
(January 2022).
NCOAH. 2015. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295- Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection
and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers. http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20envi ro nmenta l%20qua l ity/cha pter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%2Oncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
(January 2022).
NCOAH. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02R.0403 - Donation of Property.
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20envi ro nmenta l%20qua l ity/cha pter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20r/15a%2Oncac%2002r%20.0403.pdf.
(November 2019).
Rogers,John J.W. 2010.The Carolina Slate Belt. http://rla.unc.edu/publications/pdf/resrep25/Ch2.pdf.
Accessed December 2021.
Schafale, Michael P., Weakley, Alan S. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina.
1990. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC.
Page 16

2 •t5
RPORT 14
mangy Mayodan.
F•p Yanceyville
rBGm .Madison :15 'Roxboro
66 '
65 / ..eidsville 49
62
'z r }":., oxford'
"1 yr e"r
h's 4'.J.'
t 246 m s,
Rural Hall- 7 .-
St.
d 57 ss
c�sMpBurNER
86 A TRAINING p.m! •
I SITE 85 j'
Oa ■ . . 07i.
smifi-iREYNOLDSAIaoOR `
S Butner' _
yisville Winston-%41emJ= - — — — _ '�- ,N- • AD _ e Creedmoor
- _ --- -_- ii _� ' Al' ■' - - _- - B ri n t n" - FALLSLAti
.Hillsborough QESERVO
�� ',I - , -. ! _ Falls
� _ _-y - _ `_. r_, , ■�_Q trip. -1 sT. - ~�-..=•�`J Reservoir
' ' L I� alls. Alf
?� servoir
Ciemmons1-
'311 ! �4 Y FAiLsLAKE
�. LL- k D u r h arri*., ►rESERvaur
HORACE
) / e 2 I , ..
r. High Point � -. ,- wuL!-� s
-f� AIRPORT} I).\\ 40
!
r - d /* Chapel Hill, '/ r`_=
r� e 1 f
Thoriiasville ` _ L eH
-_ - �� D M JML 70 l l
'Liberty Ate.•-'r - _ li
yp B.EYERETT
Lexini�tor� � JORDANLAKE 1771. 1
•
Card'
ssg�.- ('�Ralel
{
_ - 1_ 'iIi Siler City- I = -- �_ �� 4 V Apex' - Ga},lner
�:, 4Astel vro Pit b. , s Everett
-- Il _ 'SILER L .rdan L ire ..
ASHEBORO — CITY MUNI '` 44) '
HUNI AIRPORT
bury AIRFORr}
Holly Springs'
Legend a ��r�.,
`� srris
...•-•" Reservor.-
Project Location '11 NORTH CAROLINA Fuquay-Varinf
Service Area - HUC 0303002
MHaw River Subwatershed of 42 __ -Angier
the Jordan Lake Watershed , wsanford
N i I G aphic, Esri, Garmi%,tom' Gco ,, U A�METI, NRCAN, BG� ; iricrement P Corp.•
khrIrt •
1LMG N Dutch Farms Figure: 1
Miles Mitigation Site Service Area
LAND MANACFMENT GROUP A 0 5 10 20
3101 Po a DooEY#. co oany. Map Date: November 23, 2021 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27604

�y4' ',Aver,On...
b•My lane M.,0 8 w
E
t G4%
4`3
Lark Land Rosy y
Dora Rfl.1 I
'�i
t
Laud,.D.rS Je .....">
F 0,0.0 Lane
i --.. \,..•
N, I •
0
US42i! e
Wrren Farm Lan.
t
Crowley Road
SR 3549
„r.
E
Reynolds Lake Dam 4
4*1)tNNIIT *
p Ra(+,rg Hdn wren.x
I
l\
I
4.6
Me.` 1
I
•��,l.. usizi I aRar.KkCourt
' g a
S.
1 \ ,t, ‘
Legend
Proposed Easement c`'`
©OpenStreetMap(and)contributors, CC-BY-SA
1LMG N Dutch Farms Figure: 2
Miles
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Mitigation Site Project Vicinity
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
3101 Foplarwoo Y*ute,1 oany. Map Date: November 23, 2021 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27604

- . R -'.. 1.-- • •-,..4'.r'LL..t, • 1,:i
'-i _). i 4. -•,..-.-'-i,.. _.. Ir-,jYr Mt TV g 0_,.....„...,.. . , ,„ -., .-- ,r.„.. . .... , . _ ..... - ..______
, , icgC;F::...•7'-• . . _ : .,• ,. , , ‘ -.,,- - . • -• . - - - . -- ' 'Jim- - 41`;-'71i".• ...'7.1-••;:nr-477.173 7r. -li'ir'rAir. 1-' • Fr41.1. ii,..1,--"1.4'.- • - ..4. „-* : „4/6,:,--N. Mr::: .''' 41E-4'....;%;,'-11•-o- - •"rk, ••'it 1
11/,--'.- ' .e'-'' j:•-• '.'"r"--..'4-,- .1.;• , I.-,_',..- - - --.-.; ' ... ••• 'fr. :.!. '.!'!"„ , .. -, .. ,- ' ' ---f.?c,,y--.,. ,I.,-;,••,:-.A..:,..t•-•:..A. '-'....7%4. i-
.-."- .Vi . . 41.,--,, 1 . .- ,. -•- '',,. '41' ...-.-'• -i - .''n'-!Ati•L . .11''!-'.4 -_Nkf.. " ,.' -__.__,44 4,..'..'i.,',7-4---:.:,. ...: ......, • _, .. --- _. 2. -= , -40. - . - - ... ...--t-s-0 . •t•---. ---, -.; •.-.- '''... -- -.'I •-•' ,- L .-',...411Pik-
''Wilk yr. , ' • -.C...- -C••'''. '. --' '(' --..:it'.VI-1.'..-:-..,,•7•:-_:tc.,'-7-A-_,:. , 11.-.,
• -.• r ,, .r. ., i ,,,a-,, ••-•.. .' .,•'1' ,-; --...,r, wa;_,,,,,i„,,,..-., _L.-4;c. -4.,,,_ --... ..•-_;..,-, h .., .. ity ' ,,' • .'-• - •--'4-"fli
.i, , . 1 _ii 142 ''` 1.-. • ,J.-.
1 -1' 0..-1' •. - ,• 44:,".4.:kik it.4.......i--,_. ...,.c.._ ...- .-.. iiii,e.-.,.,- . -,•-k.:=.2.- -.---,:Et-..-7.:i-,z4-,"-..-- .,..v,• '
..f.t,iizz-, :..m...-,...:-.1-4.6‘ -ki-e/A4 . -e!4 '. T.. -,L,7----- '/-'4".'4,•-•,'-,. -•r..:LV't s,,,,i-, :_`vc, ;I:., :.1 .] : . I. ...i.,.._.. .. 7,4.
L. - .j. hi.% -.- .:r,-..-4..=- -= '. , .s? ,., :„Aar" ::;74,(4. ,--. f. '. ' I.°..••71.I. ' •..:`' '''If..11 -4...,7....17,147-t-..-s.40-7,7---.7-I'.--•- ..N.-
-4..Z.P.q-y.--.. .0 ,'....... 7-- ir ...u..4 . ..kt ". '..-., - . --- ":. 1-116A-f-itili4e.:- .4,p,, ..,- ...,L. 4-...f,.--.,„ ..-..-. 1. -.. , - .---: ,,„,-, , ••.. 'r•- A 7 1 • 4- - '. •. ' •• ,;it -Id- f.%•,-...,_, .,:.ateht.:.4,7 t,-,,,4..!=-...:%,-•....„..to-z-T, e ., • • '' 4.: ,' ;‘..1-, .' ., . ,.. J. ar, r v.:Y.In9, . '. list. ; 7-4 111;.'•-fc-:,.-; . *._ ,-..-•t•-__:.-.1,a-1- --.--
--r '..';', -.74k;'" ---' ,4--- .- •Zir.....?-if: ..--.1--,17_,,-.V t.." .':Z-. ('" .. k 1.14L0' --P'''-, 7.' °• V. • 41,v::-i 4--t-.-Pr-e, •. L. •P'...- ..- '1 1.• ';•'7 ' • 4' '-'•••••-•'• '''' -. .4-',":41#-.r-'•-.'. -=-L','''-` •
. . 4.. -. .1.4 .
'iii.d. .4,ii144.,,,. •
, ._ _ _. .. ,-,7. ....O.' * • - -9...-6 1#1.. - . ... , :!"„4.,-..-.0. ._Nit4''. , •• -'41'...-,.':' .- '''' 'r -: ''' '','.'..-.1:-7''-- :1,,'',4•A 7:'- A.• .s *.:1,4.1: ..ft__,„ ... ...4,,-. .. 1.-- . ....VC. ' -' .--j'
• '- i--- ' '. . .4., . , ..4_711,70-,.. Ygiu....ik-. ,..•.:",,I.1.44.91.Ni.' .,S . ' :, ..4. - ,,,,, ,., ..=.1.Alr,t .441,. 4....,,f -4.' , , ••••:. ,- • , -"VW:,-' ''440,.. - .n "-I' .. -
! -•,si,1 7.4' ,-.4'"•. . A •. 't.- ,-0 ..- •-• A...".•• • .• .:- - - ..• % ,.. 1 i
-: - ..ea ' ',..• ' ••: ..i. ' ...-..;•,. ..--- `.7w.• ,Is 'It - • Wow v•14 •."‘";471+;4 •..;'- i.•'1.,•N- t•.'",11'.Z•/'-' • ..-
1,,,,, 4. • .6. •
, ..
- .'-' '-. ."\- ssr'•
. 0.1.1.1\ .4k*. 41/#4.'". 'ilt• • 140114 !'' ' ..tf` :4:'.. -1,,,,,4:, , .
• , -••;,-, .. .• z ,..------ .- • r• , gilt i ' '-----AftiAt • •,,t• .4'. -''- ,
T.-•'. t- ...t , viLio• . ,4 ,-
• - . • 1.-...rvi ft.) - .. . _..r. ...N1°...._ ,.. ..F., .... ,._
-... ,
..-1- \77.1 .. 1. ...r. -' ' . :,N V:•-ft_f _.:-IF4Z1,,9_....e.., .,..,::L.s.•_-_,1 4 ....:_,,.. ,„ ‘ , -„,-%;`714L ,i • - ,-.A••. AA ' .44.--. 4"-. :4. '..-' .-. ",-I•-4,,, '
1 ._ . • ..
...--. 4.1%,.. ... '‘'.4 •.3....„,.'.44 t - ,
? . ili .e.:- -,,,-..., :•., -_. _.. - , t..,,, f .,,,,.•.-.7,-„._-_ ...„ .,, •, ..* - •,IC ' -..--....._- ..... , _ . ,. • - . _ .
•-- - . __ _
4 • .., ..
- 11-tr,'11/17•74, • / e.7.4r ' _!..141.••....... -41!' -
- - . -.1` Xtt laii"-",. .- - _. Vt.,. _.P.--.-•''VQ:i1.1 Legend
\ ''' -14• i-r. . , ' . , .,,
-- . •..-• 't.....0" ' A.... -4
. ` . -
Property Boundary
•••-•-s., . . - - ., • • - .... .,. 0,•,-... ..,.. , . .i 1-•Pip. "--. •
4: ..J - I • *-
, -. _ - . .- • _ ._
- . -• . -. • ' .. -, .. .
Proposed Easement
1 11: . -:'.'4:3., ' t/J-"'' 0 - -4P`' - ...Alm. 4/1. *.• ._ _N •1 lip Alval 4',r - - --•‘ .•--- .4. . f.- ..-..?... - m- ). 4., . - - _ ._
, ..• 1%. ..,_, . ,,,- ... -„,•--.N.i.is:-11. . . ..k,-.. 4. . ,....-._ ._..., .
_ ,.. ,
.....,
---....- -. ,- • 4* ikr,,.k. Randy Steve Fields, A ,. •-....-: • •' 0 Existing Fords
''. r'r -. . , :2--, 'I -; ' ' -•
. C '-it- -'PIN: 779945214, , , .i
. -A Jo. • -
-:-,.._ .. •- W8 , A Bedrock
go,
E.
- •.. -- 4 .4-,..- - * ...0 .,,, ili _ a . ._ .
. . •.
.'• .4'" Reach and JD Status
' ••..:--4 z-- ,-..sli...-e, . ., . + .. .. ..., -
,.,
,- -..,-.# .. •-
- .
r• --, : . --4.-..- -- -...-...pipe # •
4; . *.4-. 4,-. -' -:- ,,___•.,11V6B ,......f '..--Aroreo..-4- •..„_ • ., • .. _. ..:. ..- - - . _ ,• 1
, it8 • .-: -6 . - REACH 1, Intermittent
Pe iiik - '-' "'•--',' .'4 - ' - 41c-0. ••-• . - '. - , W• .4- - ---- - -
•:0
• -.. ,, -,•.-4 4- c•- . ,.. k..- r.451r. • - -• . •-, 4 . P' ,0 'r le - 11 e,,,k_, ',,,
y '.. _ '. • -, .. • ' - .4 - ....4 - "Iir - 00W- ..--i..-. • _.
. .1:44. - •- 4._414.4. •-• .., . .,
. '1.,_',Pi ••- /7_ , ... , er -,.j.i.. . •, • •.1.• . -ire& :,.'•,... - 2 .,...- . _mp.- 4"
- °- .4 / REACH 1, Perennial
a •p,i .,-,ii*i. . jaw , . .,.. ' -4 ' ".,-• ‘, W5 • tr• - - _-• _- ,-. C -
. . - .
,
. .. • ..
,cp, - F.," • . c....- -,,. . - . . _.
_ , __ • REACH 2, Intermittent
- ---- . - - ---- ._. ,
_ _. 3i •-$.
...n4- •-•,-i-z ..4 f -
• .4,. ,. Vil.,,:,,,. .
-, ' PP-,-.., J.f...„. i -.....,..0- •
. 1 •. . ..iv•
400
I ,_ . _ Beverly Fields . . -
. .„ „.... REACH 2, Perennial --
••= *
• of•f - - PIN: 7799349572 - .
t
Hydrology
.- •
- .,-
tit W2 A ..,
• _,
- - '
_ _ ,- . ____
.. . -
... 4 . ,, ,. 4- .. , • 6 The Hauserfields Living Trus Drained Hydric Soils‘-' -
, .: .
(c/o Larry Fields) .
• . --f 4 - . 1. Existing Wetlands
• -.. '411gc---, , .- -
.,.....-..- ,• ill** - ;f• '1.' , .
1 , .c.‘1'1 ) ir PIN: 7799543254 , .
. ,
. ,
. ...-....,-11 ' 4,i-g, ,; ,.4-r alistimitz---; :rio. . .. -- •-•• -..1k - • - '''-lg
.: .._.. . ' •-A -
I • , • . .•%•
- 2,' :•''' 7'1 -..-- -•,-1. ---"a_ -, -- .:••,• /
.:: •-:
. .4-'- -.r. ,6 .... ' -11.- ;- • -•...t.-'. ' - -. :-.0 - .- ' . :- g4-'• -- iivr .
-.-P. Al ^ - , . ,..... ' ..,.„. iti* 4.-. .- -.4.1-..... --r-. • _.--- ' 4 - -_ ._. . _
. --..___
' - ,,',• kIP ' 7. Itii. .0' r'!. . f-'4P-'', --,' "' .!.' -....i'llF-P44),I' . -11 ' ).1 ..PLO,-0.T,'. :"-A. - . 47,-. :-..,: • W4 .
• - - • .. 1-. ----f . . or--* " 11 ''•
•- - . ' -. ..-*11C-•-1N-- '-4.--*•-.7f t ' ley.,,4s,'
.,•
. . ...4.
_... , 1r . , .--7----.''--4 A' -7 -•- .--.... e . ,:iji3O . m. -. .,, .. 5.%' AV ..I. i:-.7_..-.•-,:7 ' :/ Yr. 5.
.ii • A. '. i"-a•, -,
- - . . -' .-4? 4. ' .. , •' -'' -. - „ .
4,4,riro 40,OM -4+ . ti'-',.,i,'. ' '.- ' . 114-. 5.g,., .61‘5.• , - •..' Al, '' - -=- 1 7- - ' -* 1-• --. "•:;.N11
-.--:' ''' ,* • ':'-' -44 ' -,„..,--d• •,50'1'^' j'-'1.t. - ,.... p-'ir.,... - ._ - 4,, ,,,,,,,, .,..,:s, ' , .42;
rr- - _ . ,
. .+
0 ilk
- . -••-• .•• -
,
.V• ,- . ., -77 v ' ,-.. -. : ..,,-',..-.,-z-,,i 'Ai•-'- i- !.., ,,N :-' -,..„.., • •
-tit*,“1,.0. - :- -.,' - ' . .;:. ' ;•• • - IP „ ,-.• ,-45,-.,i.1, ,,, . • • .,: ,. .. .40110.-- -, iv ..
1-..-4. - - . --
t.-,,,,..../. . . ,.... -.-! ,1,,•,•..),,•- 6)... .WV: . ,, .40 ' ' 7' '* .--"!i•T At: ,--:- - ' :I' - '•'. CiRov:"!-.' -.
...t 1 r. 1.. - . . t,-• --.. !, . :„,, . -,•0_, ,;,i, 4.- 0.,L , .. . .,.,... . • - -sr-..i .v. - -,-,•_, .--.1: 'my., - r 4 lir'-,-.:-: -,..1.74,- _ ---,.....;,-....'',,.-,:i-4;".7.L!s-.• 4:" L. '-,,',4,- •• ..-,•,". - ,'• , • , :4 . ' _:- c _ - ..•-_, .,.$'-4,11- - - ' ...-- c A ,_..#11,,‘ ,.
ft.: 1; '-
-,4t
-It' 0 1F---11- ' •' "" #•-•- '
4 .._..
• • .. 41 4. ,-.3%-, ....e.,•,.k.;-,.• •,..,,v,h- ,i,. -.. , ...t,.._,,,. ,.. r.„,,,,- _.,„,„.,,,,. . .,_..,. „,,,.. 5-1 ,, - .t.c. -,r_lar•- ..1":0. .
7 it -' , .. 14ittioaititt. .. •. a..,,
....'2 070 -Li'41114t. ... I.'';'4.-:-.1.141 .:. ... .'r ''.' „-':if:' ;: 4.4e447'A I ''''•-•, ''''. ;- -1- 7•4:'' Etc:V.' '-iteit,*- •-.:. ;-44.'„, ' ilik• ....,. -- iik . .. -..,
- .;.;- -•-_, .:,,,t-Alf - ..,I.,,,.1.F‘ .',..,2 _ .f.*--...0 . ! - 1 t. -°.ti„r.-1 ..1,1r,t_i
*1_
rileou s 1,0-• ..4,. ... - Lip,.
- "
. .-I --•• .--•- '‘..-.1r-
.. „..• ....._.-.__ .. . ? . •law!,
\;r1..,.t--• : ._. „ jOr- ., 7 .)1 , - i..P.
'-- t.•i-n. .. re'', 44;:.'''z••• .•.' ,.. :2111 '• ' '1;-'I'4-11'-1-" -'•.'. -.- -"!,.:'t-..?--i•:...,....',;- --..- . ,4'.4':-.‘'•4.°$...-`41P' ;r. ,
- . -,'..,. 1_ . ;.- " ,..., ,..-- -i-: . , ., .-o ... t.t. - '-1- .P.:i li-`--..i. '• !•••r.,•414*.!..-,..*.r.,_ - .1. : 'f..
.'-• ''•040001k - t'-t .1' '-;A..".- ,..... 1
- 41. 4 ,,-, .1 i,...._ ..1- , •- •. ,.:
0.)
- • -gJ 4- r-•.,t. -_. .'....* - - :41 1
•.- •PV4.,-. f! .4 . ..,
' . - +'-: 7.:4,,_ • ' 4 . .1 1,...; 4.! ... t.,,- ir" . .1'%i!r•••%'7,pf- , el., 1 .. .,.•
T--!1'..1; '...-!,--0'-'-:% _2:, ! -! ,'
At.
-1-.. 4.. .V'• ' '''.. 'itt + '‘1•'.+'4''. ' "''''--:'- . ... qi'lle
OR,. •-.-,18rn 1 . .„.
pl ..-.. '•:e 4 l' t. ''' y iii 4'Al.'..4 44''3'.:..': r '-' i
4
' 41, ...0
. •. 'Y,,t • ._eijdon, ,• •••,- .- ,....... , .. .... ,• .1i.,*....,' , .5
i , )
f :.,..- , *,_ „.4:r.. .,.. 4,••• '-„,b • -•' -..- .. -;: i• . r., • - ,/,1. - 0- 1 --, t - _• •'. ,-,--' .. • •.. .', ..-.40.,... ._-,4 ,- - •:-,_, .-rf...,
K- • -.T -• '....-5.•."--.1 -.- ff' ' ' ' I ..q • • • . i ),! : . ...2.:74,
' '. 'I
• - f- 1 ' ' - 1.-- l'41.-• - " iiii...- . 4 ,,.. - _ , ...
1'-- h•' ,1/21. •- • p ! 4 .. r - , „- - . . • , - , ..•,, . •,;,-.
• • 1
...r. ...- 4. itiVe f -
...0'•' --'i-;-' :411AI'4r-1 •.::'7' '% . 1 44.-:r.;•: •
.' $,' '". '';' •.4:" '''.'--`'.-:: .'--*r- it.'' -4r-- '. . .7 ' - Pt ' •I- .4 . .,.• -, .40......,,.. #,. , . . RcoaRA,mot]I:c)...,,d,
.. .
1
-• -. ie. ..r.-- .. ...: •,;I-..,.. t, 0 . .. , Y;.-P11, „47. #%! -: v. -,,,- „, ,.. ,, . e,
eliero.. ,; •„,..,, , . , . _ .
-:• - r'- ' -.11-V1.1.--1P,IFIV' ''--- Tii--.; f--. - ..: . L. htiz•-- *. • •1. ,-k -4,-•,.. ,..r..-, .' „. - --
,...,,i - •...r...- , . ,p , .1 . -
Dutch Farms Figure: 3 L M G N
A Feet Mitigation Site Existing Conditions
LAND MANAGFMENT GROUP 0 200 400 800
a DAVEY#. company Map Date: January 26, 2022 Guilford County, North Carolina
3101 Poplarwood Ct,Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27604

•
•
i r' • _ F ,-.}- .4,;4.7t }•tir•,' ,+y(' ri •1r J: } G .i� .• �-. •.� .. '�f.+. \ . 17-. h..; . ,'/ 'ti f7-• "C IA
:,# v, �. -
-. ± - - ,� '� +'�r.w M'_ 1 •i!o •' :�1 ti, f 1•�.L e ,F I .F �' f _ •i.., r� .1'L _`;-•: 'r.: rv#{, _
` - _ 1 "£4E r• w T
1 ?_ f" + ,u.' �i y `ti i r _ F� 4 3ti" y'1.
-Tt Yv M19 VV .r ,�,! 1y '. ,! + '. - •`!1 a. a„.-, r �. ie r+i M
- _'}•.t r�w-- �;1:• .• .:S �t -. J• ''! :f .` il �' � ri•+�' S i ,^ •SA :�'
k.h� i > �r` may, t' { 1 1 • 1" -
A\5f •tj'P.'- :di .. i. +.. Art, ;' 7. 4t• r � W.' " tfs i dF;., '' 4i Rr 1C'�r1
. kM.• - {A-- ti .,Y'IA- ... •�iF-w... .14 ��Y ii •ei, r f� f!,.•T•'P;no.+• 4 ,}`' '. h• 4 * *t. t' .J•' {1.
n 7 �3� y .` 41Mit l da 4' •' A 4ciior, A 1 A
10
. #4,i loii . . ,-_ 1 ,- ....,. , 11 „ - . . -
//‘ — • -- = - -/ .
.imispir.-"`' - ' . ' 04
. .. ._ \ / i lit
# . ,-.. .-r,c-!.::' ' .: i .4) . 4 ,. - 14
�. �;i f ems". -400.1rrl,�.• { .� -. �D/�
Q l8 rt t
t '.,,, ,., . 9 -- PTI_-_ -• 0 y W ✓ o ' Legend
* ,. . - -
lit
-"..
RR WSi--- Jam :' , n :.: . x x x Proposed Fence
.� � _ ,
— `' -
• .� Proposed Easement (16.57 ac)
.r — — -
_ Proposed Stream Topof Bank
. _ � / � opo
w
i -
Al • I - ' 100ft Buffer Width
�.
:. ' •` 200ft Buffer Width
` Proposed Culvert Crossings
O.
} T �, G e
,444 _3 ____ 1.g Wetland Mitigation Approach
\:.- __ ,, Enhancement (2:1) 0.88 ac
E f: \''.
a ♦ ir- _ Restoration (1:1) - 1.80 ac
• ✓ • `" W4 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Approach
N �''�� — Riparian Buffer Enhancement (0-100') - 0.66 ac
7 f �.•; ", Riparian Buffer Non Subject Preservation (0 100') 0.34 ac
P.
;r$: ;,�. . , , ;;.. • r f.. . '• "' . - ✓ Riparian Buffer Restoration (0 100') 11.49 ac
v"' ' .1 ''y- ■ .'.}-^` .11 Riparian Buffer Restoration (101-200') 0.19 ac
' ' .•' A•l:: a '¢-f,
�__ :ill.�'"'
IlMvArlJU LYNX-�Ulgi
1LMGNA Dutch Farms Figure: 4
FLAND MAA?AC;r1I�:NT C;r r71-?F 0 16-0 660eet Mitigation Site Conceptual Design Plan
3101 Po a D VEYood#S. come pany Map Date: January 26, 2022 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27604

4 �
1
UT 7 7C
)UT5
u u �. U
f T8 111
UT 6
I
= J f
Legend
Property Boundary
Downstream Extent
Project Streams
UT1 - 167Ac
UT2 - 50 Ac
UT3 - 22 Ac
UT4 - 20 Ac
UT5 - 5Ac
UT7 - 8Ac
UT8 - 18 Ac
UT9 - 3Ac
—� UT6 -22 Ac
Copyright:©2013 National Geographic Society,i-cubed
L1MG N Dutch Farms Figure: 5
lAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Feet Mitigation Site USGS Drainage Area Map
a DAVEY .company 0 325 650 1,300
3101 Poplarwood Ct,Suite 120 Map Date: December 7, 2021 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27604

ti_ f en
EnC ti 3 �, ,_ �__ . ..
/ /' r ..-• ..,,,,,, , ., --, , „,, 1 ,
\ EnB /- _..._ — � EnB
1
EnC ,
CcC
/ i
le.t(111".",4._ _ ,
�' ti. ••A
j
\ -.
- - - - EnC
_-
4.� 1 —� EnB
HhB Ma
D
h.
/ ---------- \
----- . la it 1.
iC�
t
.\------____Z
*) ti*/
N
Y
It 4, i
ApC _I
ApC
'% '---____ ../' , •, ;#
.,.. til P
I -
d
a f.1,= Property Boundary EnB-Enon fine sandy loam,2-6% r: ,� C Va P� t ' ,.
Z
Proposed Easement EnC-Enon fine sandy loam,6-10% , Pr- 4. ' \
N ,r. i 17'i v '':1.P.:..
•
* Downstream Extent of Project I EnD-Enon fine sandy loam, 10-15% I , ) 1 ;a
— Project Streams
SODS I •
i_ \ `
� ' VaB
""
MhB2-Mecklenburg sandy clay loam,2-6%eroded e.
ApC-Appling Sandy loam,6-10%
10 �_� 1 T ��C lit �. / ApC
VaC-Vance sandy loam,N Dutch Farms
/LMG
Feet Mitigation Site Figure: 6
NRCS Soils Ma
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUPA
0 200 400 800 p
a Rood Ct, comSuite
12y Guilford County, North Carolina
3101 Poplarwood Ct,Suite 120 Map Date:January 26, 2022
Raleigh, NC 27604

•
•
�+ ,, .' , .4 $ 1; �,,; ' `4•:, '~� + , -� „ Legend
`�fy. -� 't�. Y� • 1 ;i';"
Pir• II
�' ; i. i �Y '"" A, t� �4.... •NA- ,`�.,�fp-7.44... �.L• - _.k. - `r •. �'� •. ' �• `t.''' . : . ; .i*' ,. ,'`�fl' �, fi;•f• ."='‘•t ' '- . . - - NWI Wetland Type
•
! t • ��il-- . - li. i ■1i h1. .. i _, Ilir. �4 +.r.,► - ram'' Freshwater Pond Z
IS �{" Esc' r•.r.. y '' .{.'- +��� ti. ,�t �.• r• r. .� `` Riverine
el
- �' -! ell .T."S - La Wl N A'I.
". 4 •, • ... , 7 -t 1. • , A_ - • ' M- •
''':.`4_
4 r- Allk.'r. --I t• - IV %., ' • - ‘'' - -.441.. . IL. 1
-a.. ec_.II,- 11,'. .1 4 '.1- ' 4'133 t '‘41111 • 'Co..- A•1 ''' A' ' . %I ' ikap/Pr d . ; : . ' 'I'. ,
T.
%
r . . . Ill lb '`�
jp,:;%
*1)1A 41) . es 4 • •I,
OP . . 4111P ' .
id, . - .. IN,•. %-;-, .6., 0 c a IF` •trial , I '
1 .--,- :\ . , ..._. . ,. ,
„ _ . .....
•.. • sr . . ,.. ... .,_44k v k 41,1.
o- 6-- c...te - ...."s_ , --•jez. t t cts,
IL
Ili ^ ' ''' ' a - ■ . -i111116144e
t-lb .
_,,,, e - f-' A. 4-6.. .% Tt .. i : rir- litiorr- t I-, ' ,
. '.Vt ik •... . . / i IL Rik
*%111%\ I 111:111441117 lk
•
/ . -3.-
lb
I ihfig. .'' . _.1.
/ 4,ft
•
-Y ~ 0%41 1
..t :
1 r
fir; _ 31 ; ,?
.
.41:_ .,
ir—
. . :AIIP ..-.. ., la -':, -, 4. . •
04‘-t 43.*.
r ! t y I f': r
' . • 4..# i .t ' t •t•-- ;'F44 +h, l , r r'f ,. t y j.Irv:- *;M 's--r -
it.b04.:1021tV .0t-- L
„Iv sw le
ik , Ilk . ,
di, .. - 4 A. .. •• 4
r ,* 1 , :, w•
$ ' ‘I- ti r �. r
i.
e.. Iiii. .. 0- 1 , •'4 11,11}te: • 4 ' ,41
. , . .., _
. ,
A . 44 .v.ic,_ .. i .. . 1... -
.'\ . t —
illirk—--w -..1-' •-•? ,......yek_ - :-.1_,--_AV,. ' idiairleA..-- '7.41111iLL•At. -. ' 4 11111 -- '' . • r ,TAP:16.
LMG N Dutch Farms Figure: 7
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP Feet Mitigation Site National Wetlands Inventory
a DAVIEYI.company 0 200 400 800
3101 Poplarwood Ct,Suite 120 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27604 Map Date: December 21 3 2021

._ rr.-------., -____ __,_cv 2:fii,4§.
-\_1, ‘ ... . 1 •
7:)....,..2.y, NJ:JD alg'
Legend
1l
t � y- F -
Proposed Easement it
igaifOta Zoned • •y ��� � •��. Limit Lines 4
�' a+'r' ' 'r-"■n - •_ , +� SFHA/Flood Zone Boundary
L- twit
. ; ., - �,.• .' 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Ai
�� �� 7 ` * ► al y # Regulatory Floodway
s r'• r•1• " Special Floodway
ti4. ,, •
5
s 4• '1' �� r. • i •, t� '' f Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
(. -
• li _ r 4+- ••'• �. �, 3 s +Y�`' {' 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
- 4: A
MT CO
' ..- �. -
vor
Zvrre� �� JJ' �� �* r • �� ■ 3-�'� - Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard ic
r r 'R f � ~ y f a ` y1 • r P Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee 4
5TLl0Y _ � �� � ,. _
4.,.1111111% 4 , . _ _ _ �. % , , : , 1 -'. , ' -,.:-. . . Area with Risk Due to Levee
111111Niti _ _ .
. M 6 i,„„,,...• ,
104 '' k.1‘,"4514.; '4.4e/. - a•
•4".
� % 4 N.
1-7111 lit . W:44k1' „.'el . ' . - 1 ?r. %
x ' • o. ■
itlit,t
1,1411Par k ....;_r -. .• . ,----- %-c1.-
IIIP
/ • . • •( 1 ,
/ 44.44 ' .. k t f t*
t " - i •Illy.' !° A' * # e
Zone
--- -- 4 - ';..la" •- it; .. .1••••j, „yr.. , . .
' . 1 v...A". iilk er koiltAk
.4:11r1-::.i...‘i,.--it;,:.-e- es. i _.1.-2. . 1 , a.„. . ^ rit. .
. „oil...6..1F._ ,........... _., 7_..:. 4-4-_-; t .•. 1. -V ! -N. ,Eil. 411P MtION...,-,a. "Iltilli-11.
II
•
..r .•.y- +..+. •�,r is r!•-r . , • f �t FJ' • lit: 1 � i .� J -
w •- I _ - -
•
•
,, r�r �i� > L y ° -fry .0 `.�.- •- C'Sr Gta ►ii11 - . - f
1.„4,464*‘..-
r ZoneGM�- a._.-, x,
ti rl li '• 1,
• `
3 • _ • A
LMCN Dutch Farms Figure: 8 4444-„...r- 14,ei...4,
LAND MANAGEMEI'fl GROUP Feet Mitigation Site National Flood Hazard Layer
DAVEA.companyA 0 500 1,000 2,000
3101 Poplarwood Ct,Suite 120 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27604 Map Date: January 26, 2022

'i a. .i:Fl .r•.E3 7 w:y -ri !. •
,• : Imo:. �! - v,r.r ..L -, _ ' .-TAIL i. .RY} �.,.. i� _,l_ • J fORS
PIRPR
.. it .0,''''
' -
'
• , 0
_
-,+t j., , J � : -' rm
, # •
� � �. •� + - �+F . S, ' . 'i :' r , ,,,, ...., *,
i
.. r . * ' v
-'7 - ; 1.lik_ � - i )., r .,1 y • yam . 'w� ;' .•
•
i'.. , . - u : `? tl•f. - ', .. '*:
� pi,_
-ri a
Y ..:
diVier
!::i.i ;1 r9. eEirk' S .' —.. � 4 iC
ieti---i t.:)'3 • I
tool
0,010.„ f
.,
�: tyl � y `..Air / .., I , Legend
,_ if 01-4..
..; ';;. �:� _ �} ri /. Proposed Fence
6Br�,,�� ) 7 ,‘
•�� \ •�%• 0 Proposed Culvert Crossings
�'� t ����i��+i<�► ♦ / •i� Proposed Easement
� to - UT 6 -*-�
� � ��` _ , Vegetation Plot Type
W g Yp
�� ...... • Fixed Plot
- r � = / ' • Random Plot
F` ;_ V� �,; Planting Zones
- ,• ( Ai '' p• Dry Oak-Hickory Forest (-4.3 AC) •
4 . m Piedmont Alluvial Forest (-10.1 AC)
Ra 1 „...4 -./' '' W
a Streamside Assemblage (11,325 FT)
_ +,� ^a�� .�N. Riparian Buffer Mitigation Approach
_� , ♦����A 1 a-- E�. 4' I el -4.
„ �!�A" "'"` Riparian Buffer Enhancement (0-100') -0.66 ac
;If. s ', ,���,�a':,8, %, -#S - 11 �- ---- . Riparian Buffer Non-Subject Preservation (0-100') - 0.34 ac
• :T. � - ,.- �': k " a K } + r� Riparian Buffer Restoration (0-100') -11.49 ac
r'' ' r,. 1:4 _ - 'a +•�"� :, •_ - '����� . ��������� Riparian Buffer Restoration (101-200') 0.19 ac
,r:y: .,,;,f :1. x ,- aw- - 'r. �1, 4., 'f-. .;..• .: '__ f YY�F►,11/0 �����. Wetland Mitigation Approach
44 . + L u - rr r N� ���
Y �• Y � s :'� #,� '� :Fi'} ���� ,����. `,j .. Enhancement (2:1) 0.88 ac
_ :� .� - ..�,• +. +. F�A '... - •"fly�• '40 - -
T Y ;_. 5 Restoration (1:1) 1.80 ac
•
1LMG N Dutch Farms Figure: 9
LAND MAA?AC;r1IENT C;ROT?F 0 1302 0 520eet Mitigation Site Planting and Monitoring Plan
3101 PoplaDooddt Suite oan`. Map Date: January 26, 2022 Guilford County, North Carolina
rwRaleigh, NC 27604

Dutch Farms Mitigation Plan
DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank(SAW-202 1-0 1 07 1)
Guilford County,North Carolina
Appendices
Appendix AA — Buffer MBI
DM Dutch Farms Mitigation Banking Instrument;
for complete copy of Appendix request from NCDWR

Dutch Farms Mitigation Plan
DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank(SAW-2021-01071)
Guilford County,North Carolina
Appendices
Appendix AB — Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and
Nutrient Offset Letter

DocuSign Envelope ID:9B55DA4A-4C82-4E54-A331-FCEC4F18B80A
STATE
:;..„„„.
firn:
-4,n:
ROY COOPER `I g i
Governor ' ,.
ELIZABETH S.BISER n'
Secretary S `�'' °®}
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
August 27, 2021
Ben Fun
Land Management Group
(via electronic mail: [e-mail])
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset—Dutch Farms Site
Near 35.9310326, -79.6936199 in Climax,NC
Haw River Sub-watershed
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Fun,
On June 7, 2021, Katie Merritt,with the Division of Water Resources(DWR),received a request
from you on behalf of Land Management Group (LMG) for a site visit near the above-referenced site
in the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake. The site visit was to determine the potential for
riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a proposed conservation easement boundary,
which is more accurately depicted in the attached map labeled"Figure 3-Aerial Map" (Figure 3)
prepared by LMG. The proposed easement boundary in Figure 3, includes all riparian areas intended
to be proposed as part of the mitigation site. This site is also being proposed as a stream mitigation
site and therefore stream bank instability or presence of erosional rills within riparian areas were not
addressed. On July 28, 2021,Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with
LMG were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank(TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature Classification 1Subiect Riparian Land uses Buffer 'Nutrient 4'5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable at
Rule 2,249.36
lbs-N/acre
UT1 Stream Yes Mostly non-forested pasture 'Yes Yes(non- Non-forested fields-Restoration Site
grazed by cattle. Areas forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
beyond easement boundary fields only)
between UT4&UT8 are Forested pasture-Enhancement Site per
mature forest grazed by 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6)
cattle
No En Quality 1 Division Water Resources
`J�
^ �[ 512rth NorthCarolina Salisbury Street
Departmentof 1617 Marl Servicevironmental Center I Raleigh,Northof Carolina 27549-1617
�^a( ^^—� "s 919,707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID:9B55DA4A-4C82-4E54-A331-FCEC4F18B80A Dutch Farm Site
EBX
August 27,2021
Feature Classification 1Subject Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4,3Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable at
Rule 2.249.36
lbs-N/acre
UT2 Stream Yes Non-forested pasture 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested fields-Restoration Site
grazed by cattle. Areas forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
beyond easement boundary fields only)
that are forested were not Forested Areas—Preservation Site per
being grazed by cattle. See 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
map.
UT3 Stream No Non-forested pasture 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested fields-Restoration Site
grazed by cattle. Areas forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(3)
beyond easement boundary fields only)
that are forested were not Forested Areas—Preservation Site per
being grazed by cattle. See 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
map.
UT4 Stream No Mostly non-forested 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested fields-Restoration Site
agricultural fields with forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(3)
forested areas beyond fields only)
easement boundary. See Forested Areas—Preservation Site per
map 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
UT5 Stream No Upstream is forested with 2Yes No Non-forested Pasture-Restoration site
no grazing by cattle. Non- (landuse per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(3)
forested areas were being was forest
grazed by cattle but were during Forested Areas-Preservation Site per
forested during the baseline baseline) 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
of the nutrient strategy
(1997-2001)
UT6 Stream No Mostly non-forested pasture 7Yes Yes(non- Non-forested Pasture-Restoration site
with some mature forest forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(3)
grazed by cattle pasture
only) Forested pasture-Enhancement Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6)
UT7 Stream No Non-forested pasture Yes Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
grazed by cattle. .0295(o)(3)
UT8 Stream No Mostly non-forested pasture 7Yes Yes(non- Non-forested fields-Restoration Site
grazed by cattle. Areas forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(3)
beyond easement boundary fields only)
are mature forest grazed by Forested pasture-Enhancement Site per
cattle. 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6)
Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:9B55DA4A-4C82-4E54-A331-FCEC4F18B80A Dutch Farms Site
LMG
August 27,2021
Feature Classification 1Sublect Riparian Land uses Buffer 'Nutrient 4'5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable at
Rule 2.249.36
lbs-N/acre
UT9 Stream No Mature forest grazed by 7Yes No Enhancement Site per 15A NCAC 02B
cattle .0295(o)(6)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated June 1,2021 (DWR#-no ID)using the 1:24,000
scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the
NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295(o)(5)and 15A NCAC 0295(o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment. Credits are calculated differently in the Jordan Lake Watershed. Phosphorus may be calculated separately.
4Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset,must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks,even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.Easement breaks that disconnect the continuity of riparian restoration/enhancement/preservation result in no credit viable beyond
the break.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7).
7The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 3. During the site visit, LMG mentioned the possibility of
extending the proposed easement boundary and therefore, DWR assessed areas outside of the
proposed boundary on some features. The map representing the proposal for the site is attached to
this letter and initialed by Ms. Merritt on August 27, 2021. Substantial changes to the proposed
easement boundary as well as any site constraints identified in this letter, could affect the Site's
potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings,performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure,along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:9B55DA4A-4C82-4E54-A331-FCEC4F18B80A Dutch Farm Site
EBX
August 27,2021
This viability assessment will expire on August 27,2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR,whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DocuSSiign�e'dby:
�izWG , 1 00
949D91BA53E®F4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Figure 3: Aerial Map
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:9B55DA4A-4C82-4E54-A331-FCEC4F18B80A ,, — H ,- a r. i r .
a iG • k i• ,�: 't'
4
�. -qZ - .....
x ' '2__ = 4 _ General Note: Buffer width is T .
`ilk A .,
!`• • d'-'ash -''t .i•j -•
t ,. •-` _.14:, __ .' •a. ,; ". , `►;e: - anticipated to range between
. ,
:`��;;' `- =` ';;k.• n� ��` ' 50 feet and 100 feet off of top 10
• ``•{ '4. �'` of bank for UT 1 - UT 9.
_ S lit
r:. +', .I - _ -. ._
lit =�R�' ?'�i-+Y_ �. -:z3. -{ •• { r�.. _ ' • r r
alp
_--- -- - A atm
� •7 -- ' le i _ a. �.
IN.
. -... ,i, 1
. _ L__ ._ _ _
•_._
,..i. .... . At...-, - - 4, ." _ -
. 1'r-inf. .i.1
�' 11Y err -•-•
�71,.,�>* +� y _ n .'ry, y �i • v - L
y _• 7- ��� • ,{ter_ y
_ -- yam,•,r' •y • •�+-'• - il' - -,' �� _ @ .'` ---- - •' '�:'..:.,_.
.. •• i�Y "f "_�. - ..a?'• r.Y.. __.� :' r�, yy It -__ re _ .�i ti j� {i L� 7'fry,..
de-
' 4 A Lim .} - f
le., ...:,.
... .it ...,ir,.., ._•s, _ _,. .
• _,
_:.
. . ,
iii,
.•
. :e.A) .
i . _ 40.,...4,,,,,..:. _,t, . .
. .
...,..., •
4- 7- l'iT.-.. ..
- ` '� '� J::', ," Restoration (blue dots)
* • li. ' 4 Enhancement via Cattle exclusion
` -�• (orange dots)
4 t. 4 ._ •,
,_*,„,_ : . ` `. r Preservation (blue highlight)
4,7
i kirlf):S. q..Csi/
�JT � t ;I.
t
3;
•
li
7.
,
..
.a
_
L �
J •
_ _ .. Y•,!
• - ., hit:T"r.
• �...� ti ., ear-
; R, _ Lr�j Legend
5 r- 70*
elor s. Y T- .K j
'r "4 Downstream Extent
-4
•. F y• -• � �, .i+ Proposed Easement
r 4 ' • Property
. . . Boundary
,f- 'sue • Y r : f y Existing Wetlands
—J; • . ;k . _�" -� Ilk Project Streams (lIP)
...._......7._ ._ ,. '417o. ,ainvilk. ,
L.
T Ml N Dutch Farms Nutrient Offset Figure: 3
A
LAN➢MANAGEiMENTGROW Feet and Buffer Mitigation Bank Aerial Map
a DAVEY company 0 145 290 580
3101 Poplarwood Ct,Suite 120 Map Date: 07-26-2021 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh,NC 27604

STATE,;,'
ROY COOPER it
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTIr n
Secretory ` +10*',.
S. DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
June 1, 2021
Land Management Group
Attn: Ben Furr
3101 Poplarwood Ct, Suite 120
Raleigh NC 27604
Delivered via email to: [e-mail]
Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Jordan Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0267)
Subject Property: Dutch Farms Mitigation Project
Dear Mr. Furr:
On April 29, 2021, I conducted an on-site determination with you to review features located on the subject
project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted state regulations.
The attached initialed and dated sketch accurately depicts all Division stream determinations and
stream origin determinations conducted during the site visit.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. The owner(or future
owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future
correspondences concerning this property. Landowners or affected parties that dispute this
determination made by the Division may request a determination by the Director of Water Resources.
This determination is final and binding, unless an appeal request is made within sixty(60) calendar days
of the date of this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and/or within the proposed project area
and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information, please call me at 336-776-9693 or
D - North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
E
®®®JJJJjIII� Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road,Suite 300 I Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105
NORM CAAOLi
�b^ toIEnvironmentaloua\ 01" 336.776.9800

Page 2 of 2
[e-mail] determination is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 &4 of G.S.
150B.
Sincerely,
,—DocuSigned by:
liorwewood
`-456ED631098F411...
Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
Figure 3—Aerial map provided by LMG - initialed and dated
Cc: The Hauserfields Living Trust/Larry Fields, 6528 Monnett Rd, Climax, NC 27233
Randy Steve Fields, 6711 Fields Farm Rd, Climax, NC 27233
Beverly Fields, 6716 Fields Farm Rd, Climax, NC 27233
Katie Merritt, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office

I
7C
ali
, a _...A ra. .
_3., . ._..;:,..., , ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,.,...,„,p,,,, .
--lic...._
alihic
ri-
• • sf
I
piol
•
•
I Legend
Downstream Extent
•
Proposed Easement
Property Boundary
Project Streams
LAGN Dutch Farms Nutrient Offset Figure: 1
1ANDMANAGEMENTGROUP 0 30-0 �,2ooet and Buffer Mitigation Bank USGS Topographic Map
a DAVEY- .companyA3101 Poplarwood Ct,Suite 120 Map Date: 03-16-2021 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27604

..-..., , --. , . -y..,,,...--..,...... . .-_-,. .444 .K..•,-'; 'ko :_--:,k:-.."-:,fii•e.'4•ti I. *4'.-.- 'I,-,i'%.--4711.177.07.4.1i../1,41:
• i;',,,':- :-,,ibt•'414- '" •; - 4,-":"IF.14,-..41 -A-•-%-'iliiiuti; ''''T°' '-. -"L ' . - -V+.
--, A ' . .. 'A 91.-.- . --—41,..-44-4,,i..• ..,- 1..-, . - 1 - • '4,.... -Y-4-,t,, ', ' .,• ..f.' -, - .,. -,•. -Ill- '_4 Vii,.4 4': ' • - --' .' tSg, i• .i..1. -.,.: , ''....r : - ,, ' ': '
:-.... - 44•Vgjr; ,1011p11: :, 4. .4c_-'. 7 --. .:-L... .. .'10-44
.- - -- r,• .1,- ,I-L;ill .-,,,s.. ,-..=:, - i:,4 - er-i'v- ,:. -,..- , 1. r.. - "64, „....,_.... . ,A . -
,_., ... .•_• ,-- .... .. ....-7, . .; -,- .,-- • iii, . _ . -,..:i _. -.....- . ,1---„ . -L. ,•,_ ....., • ,,,,.: ,e- ...: -. 4.: , ,r, ,- ,, ..,-; ' , . ' _ .
'-4 .- '*-
.,. , ....,,, .
AFL .., 7.- :•,- ••-F- A 46;2E-. -- _ ,. •. . -.. - -••• . •-".- - Wm-4-'..,,1-._:t. ,_ ,,c, - .
-••117 -\'-.--: :4r;-• - WI :` ---- ' .. •--* ! - . -
...:= .4 iv; =, t, -: ,-.--.4-. ••• . - ,
L.--.. .11rir0
''''-• - 0-. '-i- • - ..- ' 41.-- -vi •--.''''.- s',' '-:. :..i! ..1 4 •-,----.. ..- ..4...- ..r.i..-- . ***•
1" —k,.*--_ir- .if -•---..',A-1,,,. - -,-,. , .-- !.. e -,i3A:-,-,- - , ,-...,-.; -,4=.,,.. .. 4. ---- it,
.. -.....t.-4_ .,_.:-:--.1..= --..c .- -4,,,., -•-•,,... - - -•...- .- ,- • ,-,:t. .. - ‘...--,4t.15.-.,-,...- ._ -..
-. • .
4 I,
....„:„,t,:4,4- - ..,.-...7 . - ,..
-.., , , . ....-.--. i•_41,!;,.. 41 .-,,,iii..-F..:,... - .-.44--. , -.,-,.. ... -:-.,-..,-- .(--.- _,:' -$ „ #
ti •-- . _„.....-4.., .-... .... -rt., ,h,.,. i
N., - .- - ' - —.fir, - -''-• - '2'2 ...-., ,..-..- - •-i . - -
°Att. is, ,,,,--,.. ' 1,-, . -i,"....,0...04.e, - _., - - -- - -- - 1,1- . • .,-.. , ., . L
..01
1-: ,.
A__-4, ,:.-. - ...,„,_,, rt.. L. v.• ? . , • .,.,• .t7,' ' • "-; ',
7r -..-- 4-• ,
, r
•014-/' -
. •-
'
All' , . ,.. .
_. .
! - R-
„..,-,-- -,. ,,,...t. ...---
....„, ., . . •P‘'.7-i., '-''' .
342 .-.c'
--,-1111pliffIMINIIII,11/ 1114t _.4.4- A
,.. • . _. .,. .
- 41. '-i.- •••• _ --..,7).. ....
, „ . "°4-:• .-T-----•- -
--.-' . 4,iit • ,-.4'*,: ----; .-4.„•.0 '. .'. ri,. '- -''''.. . ._[,-L ' ..'ailter ' ' —7• 4.-- -;1 :1-P- 11 . ----""glliglliggk- ----
t
r' wa.Wf!ill'i '1"F.:''1(1:1411111‘T 1!:'T-:rjj;3:.::•.:',,_11:;1'111111111-\:H I. -- --,.
441111111111110...'
'''' .-1' . ..-rt'-71c- "-!'2,---.•.- ---.' -
. - • . ,0 ,,. " - ' --:" 0 , ,1_ —_
- ' - .,=.-.. 0. . :,'•„..0t.:Iirfp...,4t__-;ft:i4atilL. ;, ,..,..%*„‘ ..„;_:.:.2. '1:4-71--__`:0:,...,..z_.,:c:.q._.... 4: ,1:7. 4.1..: 4e...„7.7.?:=1.7. iii;;:7 Fir,: :cif -.-1 i.,474r3.-::'....:i. .?;itt- 471.71,,,,1_4 - 1:1- .
00,1k
... _ 1 • ,.. ' •r'' r to.- . , ....-... r - • :
, _
. /04-;;:i•b:-•-••.-. .
• t‘: . _ A- ..,P4.- -- ' -..T' •
,,
..,' h.'. ..eir.,, !i-, r - •••-- *L., 4 i i ',Z16: ' -;0'.1_. !IL.-.'t:',°f.i ---....._--L••-•-:'•-,- -:----LC .
1111
..s...... • f ,-,.
i
il : --__. -::.- - .- „,N-;,_,.-=',.'eir..:•.•-;,--,1-1-,••4.-•.-- '''''
F."-.,.:- . ..,.:i:.--'4.--.--'''''4.k '4° :---'' ' t•
..y: :)...:, , :17.....,,,., ,.,...if.,:,,,..„,... . . .. ..L_ _...
, .e.T1r5 -.;-,N.-:00. A ,,,,, ......— . . , --._--.-.,,.„..,._ '.• ..,
41 ..
A . .
E.' ' /11E' ,f,-• . . ..._
# . . .• ,,
- .VIAL. . '- ' ' , . , ..-- - • - - .- - --. .. --
41 ' . 8C-''• :• 14-.- ..-- ,
. . _
, —... , ...1'.. • -';-' f-X, • • .4-'_*•P
-.
-
it - . :-.4- tlez., •i •ki ' '
.. ul A --- ___- ---,4-. -- - -, - •._,...,.:.---.L. -- .. -..z. _ f . 1,t, , - --.
.. -
•..
•,.:,6 Ai 10" _.,,,Sgr...40"-- 'Wt. ...0' 1- . . •-
. , , . , N ,7 :1,-3:,,,...* ..., ::ji,j.g.-r-z . ' • - ga ---,/
:ip!
"• rtg•-'. . '-r-- - .-.
--'r -
•-•":",-,- * N404. W - 1- -i'S -•V4e #0 ' 4';:, *--7-‘"•_-,;15.
.r.: • NS,
.r-- ..
' .
_
,4 ; ' , , Legend
, .
. , 0 DWQ Form Locations -,
•-'1::7;411' 7" 44.-. ; ... * Downstream Extent. ,
Ilk -
5 i'• ) .402e.-:'--7, „• -.. r
E Proposed Easement
''' !:•.':f,1
r.• ' r''''''.•4'..*.kr-r
'af ' • - '-')Dk'^-
-, ,_ • -p.---_,, -Ng.-.. •
•-‘- '0.4.-1` irk f-'' -
A.._ Property Boundary
.1.,...i.,• . . .,,i„,, -•,..;.; 15.
., _-..,i,1 Existing Wetlands
, .
• 4 .% iir - • Stream
-.' ''',., fi• - , .1i:.,,...._:, ' - ';,, : _ .,:ot: ..-.., -..,.... i:..
".......r.— . -.,_,b L
REACH 1
. ' •.I re '
'- '44tlik ''' '-*, .14..-.4*. .,41(..%-.-1-'4‘.' '.':.' ;,-,7-.; .-,..,`. --:-'. "Pre.ti -, ,_ ' • _',...,.-."-Nr.,4. --_ . REACH 2
4.:._ . 4 . . ,.._
..! .- .1iiii, ,,,,. : ...-' -- 4 1.. ...!:
• v-- -,
.
E_.____AiDS
11_,MG N Dutch Farms Nutrient Offset
6/1/2021 Figure: 3
Feet and Buffer Mitigation Bank Aerial Map
1AND MANAGEMENT GROUP
.1 DAVEY*.company
0 145 290 580
3101 Poplarwood Ct,Suite 120 Map Date: 06-01 -2021 Guilford County, North Carolina
Raleigh, NC 27604

Dutch Farms Mitigation Plan
DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank(SAW-2021-01071)
Guilford County,North Carolina
Appendices
Appendix AC — Supplementary Information

Dutch Farms
6711 Fields Farm Rd
Climax, NC 27233
Inquiry Number: 6780554.2s
December 08, 2021
The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road,4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
E DRc www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-MGA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _ ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary_ 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum_ A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map _ A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-21
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-23
Physical Setting Source Records Searched_ PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property.Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format,in whole
or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.or its affiliates.All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6780554.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence:Transaction Screen Process(E 1528-14)or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
6711 FIELDS FARM RD
CLIMAX, NC 27233
COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 35.9319300-35" 55' 54.94"
Longitude (West): 79.6942390-79" 41' 39.26"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X(Meters): 617792.2
UTM Y(Meters): 3976986.0
Elevation: 724 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 13839764 CLIMAX, NC
Version Date: 2019
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140705
Source: USDA
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
6711 FIELDS FARM RD
CLIMAX, NC 27233
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST(ft. &mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
6780554.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL(Superfund)sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state-and tribal(Superfund)equivalent sites
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state-and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID)Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS .A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS . PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
IMD Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR RCRA-Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS . Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO . Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement&Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance . Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES . NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP Animal Operation Permits Listing
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
PCSRP . Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB)Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto . EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan)sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information,the following sites were not mapped.Count: 1 records.
Site Name Database(s)
CITY OF GSBO DIESEL SPILL LAST
TC6780554.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 6780554.2S
\\
• l, ,
_ .7
. i , ,
, ,
_. / /
---,..---, 1
, / ,-, . ,
..--
S A
/ ,
4
fr
j
I / t.
..
i
j�jj
•
tiff
e"
/
•
J 6 1 5a
* Target Property 0 1i4 1/2 1 naves
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property ,= Indian Reservations BIA l' .1 Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than /��/ Special Flood Hazard Area(1%) Disposal Sites
the target property
VA 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
A Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites National Wetland Inventory
Dept.Defense Sites State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide mapinformation.The
p Y
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Dutch Farms CLIENT: Land Management Group, Inc.
ADDRESS: 6711 Fields Farm Rd CONTACT: Ben Furr
Climax NC 27233 INQUIRY#: 6780554.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.93193/79.694239 DATE: December 08,2021 1:14 pm
Copyright g 2021 EDR,Inc.(g?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6780554.2S
* Target Property 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Mlles
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property = Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than n National Wetland Inventory Disposal Sites
the target property
A Manufactured Gas Plants State Wetlands
t Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
11 Dept.Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Dutch Farms CLIENT: Land Management Group, Inc.
ADDRESS: 6711 Fields Farm Rd CONTACT: Ben Furr
Climax NC 27233 INQUIRY#: 6780554.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.93193/79.694239 DATE: December 08,2021 1:17 pm
Copyright g 2021 EDR,Inc.(g?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

I
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL(Superfund)sites
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls/
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Lists of state-and tribal
(Superfund)equivalent sites
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of state-and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6780554.2s Page 4

I
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
DEBRIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LCID 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
State and tribal institutional
control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HIST LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PFAS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC6780554.2s Page 5

I
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
SPILLS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SPILLS 90 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 80 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen /NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RMP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
DOCKET HWC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ECHO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ASBESTOS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
NPDES TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
UIC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
AOP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC6780554.2s Page 6

I
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
MINES MRDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PCSRP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEPT HAULERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CCB 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERN MENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
-Totals-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTES:
TP =Target Property
NR= Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6780554.2s Page 7

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NO SITES FOUND
TC6780554.2s Page 8

Count:1 records. ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
CLIMAX S127734044 CITY OF GSBO DIESEL SPILL COMPANY MILL ROAD 27233 LAST
TC6780554.2s Page 9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis,as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL(Superfund)sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List(Superfund).The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas.As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC)and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center(EPIC)
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments,and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980,the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/1994 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Last EDR Contact:08/15/2011
Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP)establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List(NPL)and Base Realignment and Closure(BRAG)sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System(CERCLIS)Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/24/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS(Superfund Enterprise Management System)tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States.The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS,renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015.The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states,municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,and Liability Act(CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List(NPL)and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6780554.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE(Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive)tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information.The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available.Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites.Archived status indicates that,to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List(NPL),unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site;it only means that. based upon available information,the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle,treat,store,or dispose of the
waste.TSDFs treat,store,or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG: RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Large quantity generators(LQGs)generate
over 1,000 kilograms(kg)of hazardous waste,or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Small quantity generators(SQGs)generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Very small quantity generators(VSQGs)generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 07/12/2021 Source: Department of the Navy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/06/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps,building
foundations, liners,and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/23/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2021
Number of Days to Update:81 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions,construction restrictions, property use restrictions,and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 08/23/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/23/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update:81 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2021 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/17/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/21/2021
Number of Days to Update:61 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Lists of state-and tribal(Superfund)equivalent sites
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites.The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state-and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states'equivalent to CERCLIS.These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund)are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties.Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 08/31/2021 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/09/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state,these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/24/2021
Number of Days to Update:90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site(TDDSS)Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 01/06/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/16/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020 Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notification facilities(under 2 acres in
size)in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/02/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites,as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database.Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2021
Number of Days to Update:0 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021 Source: EPA, Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas,and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021 Source: EPA Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/02/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/29/2021 Source: FEMA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/17/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:33 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act(RCRA)and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program.Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/09/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island,Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4(Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina,South Carolina,Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6(Louisiana,Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico,Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 05/17/2021 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10(Alaska, Idaho,Oregon,Washington,and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2021 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5(Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021 Source: EPA Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7(Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska,and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9(Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada,the Pacific Islands,and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Source: EPA Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,South Dakota, Utah,Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 05/27/2021 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical,or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/10/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/31/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/09/2021
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/29/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 142 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Source: EPA, Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/22/2008 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Last EDR Contact:07/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled,or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment.All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/24/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property,the expansion, redevelopment,or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant,or contaminant.Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped,open land,and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment,Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System(ACRES)stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions.A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA,as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 06/10/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/10/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:68 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
TC6780554.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/28/2021 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/31/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2021
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment& Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Last EDR Contact: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact:06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County,California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2021
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health&Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
TC6780554.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/18/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations.The U.S. Department of Justice("the Department")provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases,the source of the entries is not the Department,and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by,for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2021 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/18/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/28/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Number of Days to Update:86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA('Superfund')lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies.These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2021 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/13/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/13/2021
Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases,sanitary sewer overflows,wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets,citizen complaints,and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2021
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases.Typically,
they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012 Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990.Typically,
they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001 Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR: RCRA-Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 08/10/2021 Source: U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/17/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Number of Days to Update:66 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands,administered by the Department of Defense,that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico,and the U.S.Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by:Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness,Wilderness Study Area,Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:574 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998,with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina,Oregon, South Carolina,Tennessee,Texas,and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/03/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up,closure,and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a"Watch List"to facilitate dialogue between EPA,state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA,state and
local agencies-primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/21/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe.This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action.The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet,and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act.TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/17/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System.TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air,water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/14/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency:Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act,as amended(92 Stat. 829)requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides,active ingredients and devices
being produced,and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 07/19/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/19/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL(Superfund)site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC6780554.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances.The Risk Management Program
Rule(RMP Rule)was written to implement Section 112(r)of these amendments.The rule,which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program,which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release,an accident history of the last five years,and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance,monitoring,and employee
training measures;and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care,employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies(e.g the fire department)should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995,data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/03/1995 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Last EDR Contact:06/02/2008
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:50 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators,transporters,commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS)supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6780554.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA(Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act).To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements.To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/24/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Number of Days to Update:87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Number of Days to Update:70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:251 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:96 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database(RADINFO)contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019 Last EDR Contact:09/27/2021
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA regions.The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection&Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA
regions.The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records,it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 10/26/2021
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund(CERCLA)Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL(Superfund)sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021 Source: Department of Justice,Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/14/2021 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update:2 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators(LQG)
and Treatment,Storage,and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Source: EPA/NTIS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update: 151 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6780554.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/14/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:546 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program(FUSRAP)in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S.Atomic Energy Commission(AEC)operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/27/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2021
Number of Days to Update:87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs.When the mills
shut down,large piles of the sand-like material(mill tailings)remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low;however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update:74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/29/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2021
Number of Days to Update:24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/10/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S.where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964.These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Source: American Journal of Public Health
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS(AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem(AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS).AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies.This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution,such as electric power plants,
steel mills,factories,and universities,and provides information about the air pollutants they produce.Action,
air program,air program pollutant,and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency:Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency:Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety&Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021 Source: DOL, Mine Safety&Health Admi
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/24/2021
Number of Days to Update:89 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971.The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2021 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/24/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous(ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals,such as iron
ore or molybdenum)and nonferrous(Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals,such
as gold,silver,copper,zinc,and lead)metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/27/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines&Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:97 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining(primarily coal mining)is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977(SMCRA).The inventory
contains information on the location,type,and extent of AML impacts,as well as,information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems.The inventory is based upon field surveys by State,Tribal,and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2021 Source: Department of Interior
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/16/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and'pointers'to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS(Permit Compliance System),AIRS(Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET(Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS(Federal Underground Injection Control),C-DOCKET(Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS(Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE(State Environmental Laws and Statutes),and PADS(PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 05/05/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/18/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2021
Number of Days to Update:91 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/21/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Defense
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/02/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2021
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ECHO: Enforcement&Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 06/26/2021 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:89 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80(Code of Federal Regulations)EPA Fuels
Programs.All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 08/13/2021 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/13/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/07/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2021 Source: Department of Health&Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/18/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/31/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment,storage,
transportation,use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/22/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/24/2021
Number of Days to Update:92 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites,active and abandoned,that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2021 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/14/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2021 Last EDR Contact:09/14/2021
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/27/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure,post-closure care,and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure,post-closure care,and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2021
Number of Days to Update:23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/03/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/02/2021 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/02/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:81 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System)permits.
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2021 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/26/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2021
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2021
Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/10/2021
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/20/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site(SLAS)and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility(SDTF)sites in North Carolina.The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/06/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/05/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015 Last EDR Contact:09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/02/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6780554.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)in North
Carolina, in point data form.The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/02/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2021
Number of Days to Update:87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System(NPDES)permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit,compliance,and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011 Source: EPA, Office of Water
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/05/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Last EDR Contact:09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update:55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/06/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015 Last EDR Contact:09/30/2021
Number of Days to Update: 120 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019 Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2021
Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants(manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel.These plants used whale oil, rosin,coal,or a mixture
of coal,oil,and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar(oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals),sludges,oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment.The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly,serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6780554.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments.The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas,gas station,gasoline station,
filling station,auto,automobile repair,auto service station,service station,etc.This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were
not limited to dry cleaners,cleaners, laundry, laundromat,cleaning/laundry,wash&dry etc.This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report,the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example,the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover,the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 07/23/2021 Source: Department of Energy&Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/10/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/12/2021
Number of Days to Update:90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/21/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2021
Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/17/2022
Data Release Frequency:Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/29/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021
Number of Days to Update:72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/07/2022
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2021
Number of Days to Update:53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/24/2022
Data Release Frequency:Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/11/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2021
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Data Release Frequency:Annually
TC6780554.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Source: Department of Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/19/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019 Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2021
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Data Release Frequency:Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle(Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals,Gas Liquids(LPG/NGL),and Specialty
Gases(Miscellaneous))N =Natural Gas Bundle(Natural Gas, Gas Liquids(LPG/NGL),and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)).This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media.This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose.Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media.This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose.Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly,the sick,and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities-schools,daycares,hospitals,medical centers,
and nursing homes-where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source:American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source:Centers for Medicare&Medicaid Services
Telephone:[phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare&Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics'primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive,annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts,which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics'primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health&Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version:2003,2015
TC6780554.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR
in 2002,2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data:Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish& Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S.Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
A©2015 TomTom North America, Inc.All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6780554.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
DUTCH FARMS
6711 FIELDS FARM RD
CLIMAX, NC 27233
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 35.93193-35" 55' 54.95"
Longitude (West): 79.694239-79" 41' 39.26"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X(Meters): 617792.2
UTM Y(Meters): 3976986.0
Elevation: 724 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map: 13839764 CLIMAX, NC
Version Date: 2019
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6780554.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General NE
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
w � o
0 V N N W
RI V V A A N d
N O A �
T
North I South
TP
V
0 W V V
> W V V A W V W N W V
N N N W N G T A V A p V V
West I East
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 724 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute)basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6780554.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
3710779900J FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
3710789000J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3710778900J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3710779800K FEMA FIRM Flood data
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage
CLIMAX YES-refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6780554.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Volcanic Rocks
System: Cambrian
Series: Cambrian volcanic rocks
Code: Cv (decoded above as Era, System&Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E.Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale-a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS- 11 (1994).
TC6780554.2s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP - 6780554.2s
4111." ----
3 "W
6
4 1 12
3
8
2
\ #A
10
2
11 10
10
Mllkillill146
7
* Target Property 0 me 1/8uanvl�
/\/ SSURGO Soil
N Water
SITE NAME: Dutch Farms CLIENT: Land Management Group, Inc.
ADDRESS: 6711 Fields Farm Rd CONTACT: Ben Furr
Climax NC 27233 INQUIRY#: 6780554.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.93193/79.694239 DATE: December 08,2021 1:19 pm
Copyright ci 2021 EDR,Inc.(?2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA)Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey(NCSS)and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: Congaree
Soil Surface Texture: loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B-Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >99 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 9 inches loam Not reported Not reported Max: 14 Max:7.3
Min:4 Min:4.5
2 9 inches 70 inches Not reported Not reported Max: 14 Max:7.3
Min:4 Min:4.5
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name: Madison
Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B-Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
TC6780554.2s Page A-6

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
2 5 inches 29 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
3 29 inches 33 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
4 33 inches 79 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name: Enon
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C-Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
TC6780554.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches 11 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
3 11 inches 33 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
4 33 inches 74 inches loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: Appling
Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B-Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
TC6780554.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches sandy loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2 5 inches 18 inches sandy clay loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
3 18 inches 35 inches clay Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
4 35 inches 51 inches sandy clay loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
5 51 inches 62 inches sandy loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC6780554.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name: Enon
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C-Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches 11 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
3 11 inches 33 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
4 33 inches 74 inches loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name: Enon
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C-Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches 11 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
3 11 inches 33 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
4 33 inches 74 inches loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.8
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:6.1
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-11

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 7
Soil Component Name: Vance
Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C-Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 35 inches 50 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:4.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
2 50 inches 61 inches clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:4.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
3 0 inches 5 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:4.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
4 5 inches 35 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:4.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-12

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 8
Soil Component Name: Helena
Soil Surface Texture: gravelly sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C-Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >38 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 51 inches 61 inches gravelly sandy Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
loam Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:3.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
2 38 inches 51 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:3.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
3 0 inches 3 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:3.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
4 3 inches 38 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:3.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-13

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 9
Soil Component Name: Cecil
Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B-Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay Not reported Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200),Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches 11 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay Not reported Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200),Silty
Soils.
3 11 inches 50 inches clay Silt-Clay Not reported Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200),Silty
Soils.
4 50 inches 74 inches loam Silt-Clay Not reported Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200),Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-14

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 10
Soil Component Name: Vance
Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C-Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 35 inches 50 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:4.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
2 50 inches 78 inches clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:4.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
3 0 inches 5 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:4.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
4 5 inches 35 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max:5.5
Materials(more SOILS, Silts and Min:0.42 Min:4.5
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Silty more), Fat Clay.
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-15

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 11
Soil Component Name: Madison
Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B-Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
2 5 inches 29 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
3 29 inches 33 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
4 33 inches 79 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:6 Min:
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min:4 4.5
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-16

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 12
Soil Component Name: Appling
Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B-Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 5 inches sandy loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2 18 inches 35 inches clay Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
3 35 inches 51 inches sandy clay loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
4 5 inches 18 inches sandy clay loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC6780554.2s Page A-17

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductiviy Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
5 51 inches 62 inches sandy loam Granular COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:5.5
materials(35 SOILS, Sands, Min:4 Min:4.5
pct.or less Sands with fines,
passing No. Clayey sand.
200),Silty,or COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey Gravel SOILS, Sands,
and Sand. Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
Soil Map ID: 13
Soil Component Name: Wilkes
Soil Surface Texture: loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C-Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches loam Silt-Clay Not reported Max: Max: Min:
Materials(more Min:
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200),Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches 14 inches clay Silt-Clay Not reported Max: Max: Min:
Materials(more Min:
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200),Silty
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-18

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductiviy Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
3 14 inches 44 inches weathered Silt-Clay Not reported Max: Max: Min:
bedrock Materials(more Min:
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200),Silty
Soils.
4 44 inches 48 inches bedrock Silt-Clay Not reported Max: Max: Min:
Materials(more Min:
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200),Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 14
Soil Component Name: Mecklenburg
Soil Surface Texture: sandy clay loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C-Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential-Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: >0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: >0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductiviy Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.3
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:5.6
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Clayey
Soils.
TC6780554.2s Page A-19

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductiviy Soil Reaction
micro m/sec (pH)
2 7 inches 33 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.3
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:5.6
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Clayey
Soils.
3 33 inches 37 inches Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.3
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:5.6
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Clayey
Soils.
4 37 inches 70 inches loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max:7.3
Materials(more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min:5.6
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Clayey
Soils.
LOCAL/REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE(miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
TC6780554.2s Page A-20

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
Al NC3000000004027 1/2-1 Mile South
A2 NC3000000008992 1/2-1 Mile South
TC6780554.2s Page A-21

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6780554.2s
o iv if S , 7ettie)rip.41N ai� Oo° OAO S jf
o aa O° rittes �oOoiomi
o1 � C\(\11°7:1
J
SOUT.yASTGR' • :O':
0 A ,,..... ,.,,,,,,
fr a \ 7 ,IliF „I
,101A
o �° 0 10
ii0
°0 / oJ104r � lierive O o �o °O % ° 1464111
4iii ) I '411114,e,
g oITti ° 0 o O yitlrivjof:;::,
0
.... t Allb
. ill ,itifr0
41Ie \ 01•414
�
O , Villlic-11 .011 4
0 0
O_ ® � r
r � `
o
ILI-JD
0
1
lf
r
1 Aro 4
6.- villI , D'f -wiiiiii ihitHiwo —*, kt ,
:�, NC 0
• ilk •,:y
o
o iiiliiir,i3
O 1 ip 411f1
0 N o k,, 4107-- 1,74 , _ o r
Ill
,ilk n ( j
County Boundary 0 va vz 1 M files
N Major Roads
Contour Lines f Groundwater Flow Direction o� Wildlife Areas
IRAirports o o Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
© Earthquake epicenter,Richter 5 or greater o o Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare&Endangered Species
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
SITE NAME: Dutch Farms CLIENT: Land Management Group, Inc.
ADDRESS: 6711 Fields Farm Rd CONTACT: Ben Furr
Climax NC 27233 INQUIRY#: 6780554.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.93193/79.694239 DATE: December 08,2021 1:19 pm
Copyright g 2021 EDR,Inc.(g)2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

1
GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
Al
South NC WELLS NC3000000004027
1/2-1 Mile
Higher
PWD ID: NCO241489 System Name: QUAKER LAKE CONFERENCE CENTER
PWS Type: Non Community Transient Primary Source: Ground Water
Water Type: Ground Water Facility Name: WELL#2
Facility Type: Well Well Depth: 0
Owner: QUAKER LAKE CONFERENCE CENTER_241489
A2
South NC WELLS NC3000000008992
1/2-1 Mile
Higher
PWD ID: NC3041071 System Name: QUAKER LAKE CONFERENCE CENTER#2
PWS Type: Non Community Transient Primary Source: Ground Water
Water Type: Ground Water Facility Name: WELL#2
Facility Type: Well Well Depth: 0
Owner: NC YEARLY MEETING OF FRIENDS
TC6780554.2s Page A-23

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
1 0.70 0.7 0.7
1 0.30 0.3 0.3
Federal EPA Radon Zone for GUILFORD County: 3
Note:Zone 1 indoor average level>4 pCi/L.
:Zone 2 indoor average level>=2 pCi/L and<=4 pCi/L.
:Zone 3 indoor average level<2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 30
Area Average Activity %<4 pCi/L %4-20 pCi/L %>20 pCi/L
Living Area-1st Floor 0.503 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area-2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Basement 1.910 pCi/L 90% 10% 0%
TC6780554.2s Page A-24

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model(DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006.The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000-and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps.The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S.Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version:2003,2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR
in 2002,2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data:Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish& Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System(AIS)to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report,hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G.Schruben, R.E.Arndt and W.J. Bawiec,Geology of the Conterminous U.S.at 1:2,500,000 Scale-A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS-11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's(USDA)Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey(NCSS)and is responsible for collecting,storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape.Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed(SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service,mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic(SSURGO)database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps.This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners,townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6780554.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL/REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System(SDWIS)after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995,the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System(FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System(NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater.The groundwater data includes information on wells,springs,and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species,occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems(terrestrial or aquatic),and special animal habitats(e.g.,colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites(terrestrial or aquatic)that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species,rare or high quality natural communities,or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA)and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986-1992.Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6780554.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307&309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S.with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration,800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
A©2015 TomTom North America, Inc.All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6780554.2s Page PSGR-3

Dutch Farms Mitigation Plan
DM Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Bank(SAW-2021-01071)
Guilford County,North Carolina
Appendices
Appendix AD — Project Credits Table

Table 1.Dutch Farms Mitigation Site,DWR#2021-1422 v1,Project Credits
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040010 Project Area
64.5517 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ft5/pound)
2163.569 P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
Subject?(enter Total(Creditable) Convertible to Delivered Delivered
NO if Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer Convertible to
Credit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(fti) Area of Buffer %Full Credit Riparian Nutrient Offset: Nutrient
ephemeral or Width(ft) , Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Credits Nutrient Offset?
ditch') Mitigation(ft) Buffer? N(Ibs) Offset:P(Ibs)
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 UT 1 194,469 194,469 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 194,469.000 Yes 3,012.608 89.883
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 UT 1 3,668 3,668 1 33% 3.03030 Yes 1,210.441 Yes 56.823 1.695
Buffer Rural No I/P Restoration 0-100 UT 4,UT 6,UT 7,UT 8 284,926 284,926 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 284,926.000 Yes 4,413.919 131.693
Buffer Rural No I/P Restoration 101-200 UT 4,UT 8 4,687 4,687 1 33% 3.03030 Yes 1,546.712 Yes 72.608 2.166
Buffer Rural No I/P Restoration 0-100 UT 5 20,969 20,969 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 20,969.000 No — —
Buffer Rural No I/P Enhancement 0-100 UT 6,UT 9 28,699 28,699 2 100% 2.00000 Yes 14,349.500 No — —
Totals(ft2): 537,418 537,418 517,470.653 7,555.959 225.438
Total Buffer(ft2): 537,418 537,418
Total Nutrient Offset(ft2): 0 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area(ft5)for Credit: 0 0
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area(ft5): 138,061 0.0% Ephemeral Reaches as%TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation(ft5): 179,139 2.1% Preservation as%TABM
Total(Creditable)
Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(sf) Area for Buffer %Full Credit
Width(ft) , Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credits
Mitigation(ft')
Rural No I/P 0-100 UT 5 14,825 14,825 5 100% 5.00000 2,965.000
Preservation Area Subtotals(ft5): 14,825 14,825
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration: 508,719 503,121.153
Enhancement: 28,699 14,349.500
Preservation: 14,825 2,965.000
Total Riparian Buffer: 552,243 520,435.653
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient Offset: Nitrogen: 0 0.000
Phosphorus: 0.000