Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout960092_Inspection 2021_20210929Facility Number • Division of Water Resources O Division of Soil and Water Conservation ()Other Aigencr ..._ l'r-pe of isit: 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Rev icw O Structure 1•:► aluation ❑ l cch nical : .Aitilauce Reason for Visit:• Routine Complaint C 5 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 E:n!er�enc� 0 Other 0 Denied Access p Departure Time:1I County: Uzi I Region: 4") r-D f try \0 v- r,r. Date of -Visit: Farm' arse: fl µstem 15:45- Arrival'Time! Owner tam: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: 0' Owner Email: Phone: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: 1-()cation of Farm: rta—J Title: Phone: is 4' t k ki L Integrator: _ Latitude: Certification Number: Certification lumber: Longitude: Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to finish 0 Farrow to Wean Earrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Other ▪ !� I Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pup. I aver \un.L.nycr Design Current Pou[Iry Capacity Pop. t.J.cry Nor!i.aycry Puticts orkcyti [ urkey Nulls a Other Cattle Design Current Capacity Pop. Dairy C UN Dairy cats Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non-llairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder !Wet' Brood ('tr14 Discharges and Stream Impacts I - is any discharge observed from any part of the operation' Discharge originated at: ❑ structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: O Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑NA NE a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the Slate'' (If yes. notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters ate State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? Of yes, notify DWR) 2, is there evidence ofa past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Page Iof3 ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Yes ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 24/201 S Continued 1 Facility plumber: _ SA. Waste C ltJ tion & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) Tess than adequate"? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Date of Inspection_ Li afi� identifier: Spillway?: p' y.: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): ❑ Yes ❑ Yes Structure 4 Structure 5 No DNA El NE 0 NA ❑ NE Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes (<o 0 NA ❑ NE (i.c., large trees. severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes LJ No 0 NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9, Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 1 1. [s there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, cheek the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of -Acceptable Crop Window Q Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): Reoutred Records & Documents 19. Did the Facility fail to have the Certificate at -Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA 'DINE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check n Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WDp ['Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements Or hhc•r: 21. Does record keeping need improvement'? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El -No ❑ 1VA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ['Soil Analysis Waste Transfers ❑ ❑Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stacking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑8 Slud a Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [f o ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Na ❑ NA 0 NL Page 2of3 3/12/2020 Conrinae°d 0 Yes ET/ o ❑ NA El NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 0 Yes Nn ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yews No ❑ NA 0 NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable n YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage For land application? �-.,�, ❑ Yes L..d ��a ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n Yes ❑� a ❑ NA ❑ ti E Facility Number: q. ` ,0/ IDate of Inspection: t { �� — 2.1 J 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus Toss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 23. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern If vex, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i_c., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other. ❑ Ycs ❑ Ycs [] Yes ❑ Yes di No [] Yes No ❑ Yes ❑ Ycs No ❑ Ycs [No 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a Follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes DNA LJNE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE • NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE • NA ❑ NE El NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question t ): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations ur any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). c , 7 2S_2.I 1, ILI 9 _. 2,1 I .45 �; tics ,CI -) -20 1 tk 1 5 c 2t' v 5 tom) t (1 ,ram-- �.► -1'.3 CC2-get' FloI CiSit bw-c- l e -1- 2.AD w) 17; i)AOkih Ve—(C9 Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/inspector Signature: Page 3of3 51 Phone: Date: 9- 29 -2__( 214l20f 5