20140182 Ver 1_More Info Received_20140313

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 -L- 17+22 TO 31+32 21" Cored Slab Bridge 0.47 - 0.05 0.05 - - - - - -
TOTALS: 0.47 0 0.05 0.05 0 0 0 0 0 0
Notes: 1. Project includes 0.80 acre of Total Wetland Restoration. This includes 0.45 acre of Herbaceous Restoration and 0.35 acre of Forested Restoration.
2. The 0.05 acre of Excavation in Wetlands is also classified as Wetland Enhancement.
3. 0.03 acres of the 0.05 acres of inechanized clearing is directly associated with the wetland restoration effort in the Northwest Quadrant.
�ev;s ed
�e�,�.;-� ��'w.w �n� Z S o-F 2 S
3�13// z� .s:�►+�

Onslow 26 Bridge Replacement project
Page 1 of 1
Onslow 26 Bridge Replacement project
Mathis, Stonewall D
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:35 PM
To: Herndon, Mason; Carrillo, Sonia; Shaver, Brad E SAW ([e-mail]); Lane, Stephen; Lewis,Linda
Cc: Mathis, Stonewall D
Hey Folks,
I just submitted the 404/401 applications and CAMA Major Application for subject project and realized that
there is a discrepancy between information on the 404/401/CAMA Major Applications and the previously
obtained Stormwater Permit Exclusion SW8 130722 in regard to the treatment of Stormwater. The discrepancy
deals with deck drains. I had an understanding that deck drains were not proposed for this project when I
applied for Stormwater in June of last year, however, in just looking over the Bridge Survey Report, it appears
that deck drains are proposed, �not over open water apparently, although close. I had not caught that until just
now that the Stormwater submission did not include the deck drains. I will revise the SMP submission to Linda
to include the deck drain situation and ask for another evaluation. I will keep in touch in this regard. Please let
me know if you need additional information.
Thank you,
Stoney
Email correspondence to and from this sender is sub�ect to the N.0 Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
https://mail.nc.gov/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJHI4%2b... 12/ 18/2014