960185_Inspection 2021_20210928

Faeil}ty Number
4 Division of Water Resources
O Di%ision of Soil and Water Conservation
d Other Agency
I) Pe of Visit: • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation lie►it►► 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Ierhnical _1+.Ixtance
Reason for Visit: to Routine 0 Complaint 0 Foilowi-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 [Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 -2- .Arrival Time: Departure Time:;j'.50FyyL County: ‘.AiD) IAA--RegiOrn: 1c-0cl
Farm Nsme: -\ , IX r Owner Email: 1
Owner Name: —LIMA S Sr, r1 (r ( n 4L4C. , Phone:
Mailing Address; It \'\\ S t —V/ ,) I. iy L_ -7534
Physical Address:
Facility Contact; h}-t tier I file: Phone;
Onsite Representaliye: 6 + U Integrator:
Certified Operator;
Back-up Operator;
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number;
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
in
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pap.
Layer
Non -Lager
Dry Poultry
Design Current
Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
i'urkeys
Turkey Poults
[Oilier
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
!]airy Cott
!]; irti t'aif
Dairy Heiler
[]ry Cow
Beer titot ker
Berl' Feeder
Beef Brixnd Cott
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
O Yes EfiNo [] NA ❑ ti
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NI;
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Jfyes. notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes ❑
O Yes
O Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
ONA ONE
5/12/2020 Continued

1F3cilii% Number;,_, - 9 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus hea%) rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Date of lnspectinn: C-1-) 1
Identifier:
Spillway.:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes EiliNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
]Yes pl/No ❑NA El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there an • immediate threats to the into Yes NoNA ❑ y I.
integrity of any of the sructures observed? ❑ 0
(i.t„ large trees. severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 17 Yes o ❑ NA 0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered 4es, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits. dry stacks. and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YesNo ❑ NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
l0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 21/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn. etc.)
l PAN ❑ PAN 3 10°n or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
l6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ElYes El/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? lfyes. check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes eN ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of # 5/12/2020 Continued
0 Yes I o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ID Yes ❑'NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE

FariIio\ \urnbtr: 0(
I)ate of Inspection: 1� —2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and time of first survey indicating non-compliance:
2G. Did the facility fail to provide documentation oran actively certified operator in charge? ❑ yes 7 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) eerti fication? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 040 0 NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ NC ❑ NA 0 NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ElYes ✓� No ❑ NA El NE
permit:' (i.e.. discharge. freeboard problems, over -application)
3I. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ LagooniStorage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer.lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes I`' I jVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the Facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L 1
❑Yes
DNA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain an, YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
} - S —
,r e.t.r 7oc CI G. fylt . -..f-T h jek.k�
\\ `" s_20 Eck— q.0
$ ,T 1 - .2.'
C,LAAVA, e7d6 o\‘
S
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
`
Phone: [�
Date: -l" 2 --7'
c039
Pair 3 of 3 Sff2/2020