540087_Inspection_20220209

Fslcilih Numhcr
it Division of Water Resources
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency —
LF: pe nC 4 isit: • Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure E►aluatian Q 'I ethnical As4istance
eason for Visit: a Routine °Complaint 0 Fttlims-up 0 Referral Q Fmergcnc Wither 0 Dented Access
pate of Visit: lad -`"k- ).--F Arrival Timer Departure Timer l Cott nn. l f Region: ek°
Farm Name: e W I qreele r T C• Owner Email:
Ov.ner Name: '�"{ s } 9 Phone:
Mailing Address: D- 3 I I S} j} f1 tl N ;5('5 0
Physical .Address:
Facility Contact: bptkn.L,) rave 'Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:lytii 7 roe
Certified Operator:
Dock -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacit4 Pop.
Wean co Finish
1b can to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Sa
IIMEN
t
Farrow to Fcedl'r
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
L.
Design Current
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pup. Cattle Capacity Pop.
[ .ikrr
\,.ri•J :lyre
Design Current
f]ry Poultry Ca Mt Pan.
rJ.a■.r�
Pullet,
Flukes,
f urkes Pnult,
Other
)1111 C'o ..%
Il:Iirs heifer
i }r} t<'uss
Non-D:lir\
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Iteci Brood t
Discharge. and Si ream Impacts
I. Is any discharge obsersc d from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b, Rid the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State )gallons)?
▪ Yes No El NA ❑NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system:! t If yes, notify DWR)
2 Is there evidence of a; past discharge from any pan of the operation:'
3. Wert: there any observable adverse impacts orpuienlial adscrsc impacts tU the water,
of the State other than Tram a discharge''
El Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yts ❑ No
❑ Vc. ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of.?
5/12/2620 Corttltrtrrd

'facility Number: St/ - ( 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a, If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2-
Date of Inspection:;,9'r . J
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e„ large trees, severe erosion„ seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the tiituatinn paws an intmedlate public health or r
tn� . unentul threat out/3 DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ern
0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
+jlulff;
Pv )`°55
[JNo [] NA ❑ NE
li/No ❑ NA [] NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
! 0, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Cs there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ heavy Metals (Cu. Zn. etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN : 10"%a or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15- Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
l6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
I 9. 1)id the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
2 i. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120Minute Inspections
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment"
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑Other,_
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
['Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
O Yes
❑ Yes
1{J
0 NA
No ❑ NA
▪ o ❑NA
❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
re No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA
`Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑N*ADNE
CI NA ❑NE
5/12r2020 Canninmed

a:late of inspection: o- - 9 _ 2
24. Did the face liiw fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
▪ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
▪ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus Toss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
]f yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the Facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
O Yes o Q \.\ ❑ NE
❑ Yes No [I NA 0 NE
❑ Failure to develop a POA far sludge levels
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[] Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA El NE
❑NA ❑NE
Wo ❑NA ❑NE
El No DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA 0 NE
33. Did the Reviewer'Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
[] NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency
©Yes No ❑ NA q NE
Cots (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any comments. Use drawin s of facility to better ex lain situations (pee additional a es as necessary).
2rti 4. Gv J c . S w; rl r r
t 4sl-c A ta cv ,l 51 5
-. C
\'‘)# q-- 2
roc9
151 fl);DV1/4)
Rev 'ewer. inspector Name:
iewcr InwpcC'Iur Signature'
rage3of3
DA
p L 2
685 t' t r
?.:L 51(--
546
Fhanc:
7 i71
�}}
Date: - `l ^2
1/0f!