740033_Inspection_20211019

Facility Number
L-Fil
-
Type of Visit: t1('ompliance inspection 0 Operation RCA
p 0 Structure Es aluatian
Reason for Visit: • Routine Q Complaint 0 E'npnn-up 0 Referral 0 Fmcri;ency 0 ()they 0 Denied Access
Region:
! Division of 'Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other :Agency
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
vio_ let- a\ I Arrisal Time:
i:1 2a\ \ J Sift VOA, AA
T�O A.d t 5 3
Departure Time:
L'•'SS
Owner Email:
Phone:
0 I echnicsal Assistance
County: 1
-37 Mailing Address: `-C 0 S L Ar 0IrN, 1244 (t RU2 q5,Acl KC c 7
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Rcprt entativ e:
Certified flper.ator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
)1 \\06.50iN
oc\son
1.atitude:
Phone:
integrator:' r(),, a IA
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop,
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
331
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I..vtrr
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry- Poultry Canaeity PoD.
I. III Cr,
Nuu•l il..
Pullt•ty
-hake).,
Turkey I'c}ult'.
t_}ther
Cattle
l)t ign f'urreaat
apacit1 Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy+ Heifer
Dry. Cow
Non -Dairy
L3eer Stocker
B,:er Feeder
Beet Brood Cow
Uischarges and Stream lin
1. Is any discharge observed lrom any part of the operation:'
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ tither:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
What is the estimated volume that reached waters ofthe State (gallons)?
aaetti
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NI
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []No ❑NA ❑NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Y" ID No ID NA NE
❑ Yes [5o ❑NA NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N l=
5422020 Continued

Factiumber: -
Odle of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 111.1.1
1
❑ Yes
❑ yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ErNo 0 NA ❑D NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D►YR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks. and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
I (1. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes [7 N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA
O NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
[No ❑ NA [] NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ Yes li/No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen (iround ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN a 10°f° or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
O Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
l2. Crop Type(s):
l3. Soil Type(s);
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAW/a'?
15_ Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need 'improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
l7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
L. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAW MP readily available'' If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections © Monthly and 1" Ra
22. Did the facility Nil to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. lfselected. did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
0 NE
❑ yes 6.10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo D NA ❑ NE
[]Yes El/NoNA NE❑
❑ Yes El/No❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ii/No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
❑ Yes 17/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
['Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
infall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
❑ Yes �N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [Io 0 NA ❑ NE
5112/2020 Continued

1-Facility umber: 1 9 - 3.2 1 'Date of inspection; \ Q _ tt _ J
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ID Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
No
No
❑ NA LINE
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Q Yes 0/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA El NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andlor document ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �f
29. At the rime of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality enncem? ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes. contact a regional Air Quality representative imntediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.. discharge. freeboard problems. over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes. check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA Q NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ffri-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency' ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain an ]'ES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
LUse drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additiouni pages as necessary).
LMG -s' S ti
1 1 - -����
l-Vz -4
S3'
itoo
c 4•\ -s5 ? 3-2 *l 3 .%-t5 1. 6
5-2,-7-- .\ k.5
1<'-,° 4-) : �- I;..
c.3-'-
C - b- -o
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
•
z
}
1
Ph qq -1 - 39
Date. 143• 1 Ck- 0
5/12/2020