960072_Inspection_20211005

Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Facility Number
L 1U1 1
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
l ype nib isit- el Curnpliance inspection Operation Resicrc a Structure Pk Mullikin 0 F chnical Assistance
Beason for Visit: a Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follms-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied .access
Date of Visit: MUM Arrival Time:
l 1
Farm Name: Name: U
Owner Name: t;,rti1 e.. r Ch--(Sorl
Departure •I'ime:I 13 • �, [ uuitty: i _ Region:
Owner Email;
Phone:
Mailing Address: 1).5 r -r-c -mot ' C
Physical Address:
c'55)
J
Facility Contact: 3Tit[e: Phone:
I kle Integrator: Sett l ri C 4
Certification dumber: f ; "" c
Certification Number:
I.atitude: Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean W Finish
Wean to Feeder
set
Fcedcrio Finish
Farrow to Wean
farm]' w I oiler
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
I JClihr•r
Design Current
N'et Pouliry Capacity Pop.
1.a.t•1
*tion-1 :ncr
I)ry Pnultrs
Design Current
t.'aoadity Pon.
I J.
Ntpri-layer,
Pu I lets
Turkeys
Turkey Poulin
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
[Ur, l ll Lk
I),iiry
Dairy ileitcr
Dry Cow
11,11-Dairy
livct' Stocker
li4ef Fecdcr
I ieef Brood Coss
Discharges and Stream imnacis
1. [s any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure 0 Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the Slate? (ifyes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Wcrc there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts i0 the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Ycs l 10 ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
CI Yes ID No NA El NE
El Yes �❑No �NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 014 NA❑❑NE
El Yes LNa ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 C o.rfi►rrred

[Facility Number: CAA, . 3-1
!Date of Inspection: k--)
tit aste ('allcrtion & 11rcatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. 1f yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Frcebaard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 4 Stnicturc 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
1. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health ar environmental threat, notify Lfl' R
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wci slacks)
9. Does any pan of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste :Triplication
1.0. Are there any required buffers. setbacks. or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance ur improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes. check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El/No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive handing ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludgeiinto Bare Sail
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16, Did the facility fail to secure and or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'
lS_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate oiCoverage & Permit readily available?
20. Doc the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? lfycs. check
the appropriate box.
❑wMIP ['Checklists 0 Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes [" , o ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑` No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes Ef
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
CI NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
f=1 ixo 0 NA ❑ NE
d/Na 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ J�1u ❑ N A
❑ NA
DkYn ❑ NA
Igco ❑NA
No ❑ NA
da ❑NA
DI No ❑NA
❑ NE
❑ �I
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
.� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application W vkIy Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis Waste Transfers
❑ W❑ Weather Ccxic
❑ Rainfall ❑sioc king rop YiSld ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ['Sludge. Spey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23, 1f selected, did the facility 1iiI to install and maintain rainbrcakcrs on irrigation equipment?
Page 2of3
❑ Ycs eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1:34io ❑ NA ❑ NE
2f4l2015 ('urrlrnued

Number:
Date of Inspection: 1 O
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge"? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structures) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of au actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Otter Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concerti? ❑ Yes 121/N/0
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ENo
permit? (i-e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ]fyes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E(No
0 Application Field ❑ Lagoon{Storage Pond D Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Q Yes 'No ❑ NA
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative' ❑ Yes Lsa ❑ NA
34. Does the facility, require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes qi.r1 No ❑ NA
Comments (refer to question t(): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other cnrnments_
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations use additional pages as necessary),
❑ NA
O NA
o 03
�ti \ -c j 0 - ! 5 _2_ a t.._l - T‘- +-I
wiz- l
caii 6,4; 2-0O31
Cv-old yet
r
,y
Reviewer,'Inspector Name:
RcvicwcriInspector Signature:
Page 3of3
\\c)c.
O NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
El NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Date: f o - S-z
241015
i