The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About470007_Routine Inspection_20220208Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 470007 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS470007 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine Date of Visit: 02/08/2022 Farm Name: Farm 5786 County: Hoke Region: Entry Time: 08:00 am Exit Time: 3:00 pm Incident #: Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Physical Address: Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Location of Farm: Integrator: Latitude: Owner Email: Fayetteville Phone: 910-296-1800 Warsaw NC 283980487 Murphy -Brown LLC 34° 56' 29" On southwest side of SR 1204 approx. 1 mile northwest of its intersection with Hwy 401 at Bowmore. Longitude: 79° 19' 18" Question Areas: ▪ Dischrge & Stream Impacts ▪ Records and Documents ▪ Waste Col, Stor, & Treat ▪ Other Issues Waste Application Certified Operator: Secondary OIC(s): James Brian McGugan Operator Certification Number: 986752 On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Cudd On -site representative Mike Cudd Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Katie Fontenot Phone: 910-433-3327 Date: Inspection Summary: Page 1 of 5 Permit: AWS470007 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Inspection Date: 02/08/22 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 470007 Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Swine Swine - Farrow to Wean Waste Structures Type 2,400 2,400 Identifier Effective Date Total Design Capacity: Total SSLW: Built Date 2,400 1,039,200 Closed Designated Observed Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon 1 06/06/2006 D1/01/1995 19.90 38.00 Page 2 of 5 Permit: AWS470007 Inspection Date: 02/08/22 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 470007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? Crop Type 1 Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ Corn, Wheat, Soybeans Page 3 of 5 Permit: AWS470007 Inspection Date: 02/08/22 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 470007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Checklists? Design? Maps? Lease Agreements? Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Weekly Freeboard? Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? Waste Transfers? Weather code? Rainfall? Yes No NA NE Coastal Bermuda Grass w/ Rye Overseed Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes Candor sand, 1 to 8% slopes ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ Page 4 of 5 Permit: AWS470007 Inspection Date: 02/08/22 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 470007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Stocking? Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon / Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 5