The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140245 Ver 1_Application_20140314f�F :%:` f„"%` ��:, ,,M \`;� :/ Q ir ; ,7 ;�1, � '3 , "� , � ��+,� �, /�r P ;j • •►rI/y`'` -� 'e'tP • �, '�� "^="',1�r �///iii///%� 4 � � �hrv i�. e ' Y4 #�'.. STATE OF Nt�RT� �ARt�LINA DEI'ART'MENT OF TRANSP+(�R"TATION FAT McCRC�RY P. O. B�x �52tJ 1, Ralei�h, NC 27611-5202 T(�NY TATA Cov�R�oR P�o�E; 919-733-2520 S�C��T�.�Y March 13, 2� 14 Mr. .�!�ndy W�1liams T.J. S. Arrny Corps af En�ineers Raleigh Regulatory Field C�f�ce 3 3 31 �-Ierltage T'rade Drive, Suite 1(�5 Wake Farest, N� 27587 Subj ect: Nationwide Per�nit # 14 Replace Bridge # 10 on SR � 150 wit�. R�BC Avery County, North Carollna Project Number: 1'7BP.11.R.55 (LIVV(1 Permit Fee: �24U) Dear Mr. Wi111ams: The North �arol�na Department of Transportatian 1s scheduled to repl�ce Bridge # 10 with a single barreled 12'x 6'� 34' RCB� at the same lc��ation. T�e �roposed culvert will have 4 sills vcfiih 9' long baffles ta maintaxn base �low channel width. The culvert will be buried 1'��to the streambed. The existing brldge is 19' long x 2tJ' wide. Ai� �11�.�0�' C0111�421�'11tS U� ti71S iJ�ll�.�� .�"� timber. There is alsa an existing cross vane rack weir just upstream of the stru�ture. Our p1a� is to avald that structure. l��Iitigation will be provided through EEP (34' x 2:1). No c�n-site detaur ls praposed. �tream impacts are tabulated belo�v. Stream Impacts: Proposed Riprap To�al Impact� �tatic�n E�isting Structure Temporary Impacts at this �tati�►n Number Structure Sizr� Size I)e�vaterin fee� feet 19' long x 20' 12'� 6'x 34' Brid e# 10 wide brid e RCBC 3Q 29 93 Perm. FilllRiprap Impacts Total Frojec� ��tre�.m = 63 f�eet Im acts = 93 i'eet The replacement of the existing bridge w�th the proposed new �ulvert �vill require temparary dewatering. An impervious dike w�l� be construct�d upstream af the exlsting structure ta create a small pool. Clean water vvill tempararily be pumped around or piped thraugh the constructlan area and vvill be discharged downstream. Any dl�ty vv�ter located inside t�ie canstruc�lo� ar�a P. O. Box 250, N. WIL�ESBaxo, N� 28659 PHC�NE (336) 667-9111 Fax (336) 667-4549 Mro Andy Williams Bridge # 10 0� SR 1150, Avery Page 2 March 13, 2014 vvill be pumped i�.to a silt bag if necessary. O�ce th� new structure is in place, the imperv�c�u� dike �ill be remc�ved and preco�structlon strearnbed eleva�tio�s w111 b� restared. Constructian of this proj ect will require impacts to waters af the T�.Tnited �tates In the Ca��.wba River $asin. The existing bridge crosses White Pine �reek (Class. C� Trout}. This project was reviewed for the preser�ce of threatened and er�da�gered species ar�d will have no effect an any federally listed threatened or endangered species. Cultural resource cc�rnplian�e worl� has be�n completed {se� attached). Th� proj ect impacts should nc�t remave or degrade existing water quality u�ses. Sto�rnwa�er wi11 be rou�ed through grass or rc�ck 11ned ditches, dep�nding on the ditch line sl�pe. Total lar�d disturbance will be less than 1 acre. B� u�illzing the erosion con�rc�l m�asures �utlined �n the attachments to this application, downstream water quality s�andards will be protected. All appropriate Bl�IPs wi11 be used during construction. By copy of this electronic letter, it is requested �hat Mrs. Marla Chambers with the North Carolina �7Vildlife Resources CO2111111SS1011 comment directly t� you cc�ncerning the 404 Nationwide Permit applicatlon with a copy sent to rne. By copy of thls electronic letter, It is requested thai th� Divisic�n of Water Quallty, 4� 1/Wetla�ds U�It, issue the �.ppropria�e permit for cons�ructia�n �f this proj ect. It is requested that ar�y camments related to the 401 certlficatic�n be forwarded directly to m� w�th �. copy sent to th� L.1TS A�:ny Corps of Eng�r�eers. We would 11ke to begin constructlan as soon as possible. If fiurther infar�natic�n is required, please let me know. Your early revievc� and co�sideration wi11 be appreciated. Slncerely, �^�'`�� ;� ��. A� �� _ �;� �Ieath Slaughter Division Environment�l Of�cer Enclosures cc: Andy �Nilliams, US Army +Cc�rps of Engineers Marla �hambers, NCWRC Amy Chapman, Divlsian of Water C�uality Dave Wanucha, Division of Water Quality Marella Buncick, IJSFWS 1V1VJCike I'ettyj ohn, PE, Division Engineer David Wayne, PE, Bridge Maintena.nce Engln�er Jamx C�uynn, Divisio� Bridge Program l��Ianag�r �Ieath �Iaughter, Divlsion Environmenta� Of��er Nell Trlvette, RQ�.C�S1C��' EI1V1r0�11�1�11��.� Fl��d. C��E��°�.�1t��'1S �,I1�111�'��' �°� �� '� Office Use C�nly. �� ,�� , � �' Cc�rps action�� i D no. � � �- 1 � �,r^'y � ��d ---► � � L..-i a F�� ri i �` t :,� * " �' �r� ,,, ,. �� n DWQ project no. �, �� z > k,� �, �` ' $� �k s°h; Y r}M.: k: . Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Cons�ruction Noiif ication (PCN) �'arm A. A lic�nt Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s} of approval sought from the ��r �: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit � 1 b. 5peci�Fy Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or �eneral Permit {GP} number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes � No 1 d. Type(s) of approval saught from the DWQ (check ail that applyj: � 401 Wafier Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Nan-4�4 Jurisdiction�l Genera# Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Cerkification -- Express ❑ Rip�rian Buffer Ruthorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the reccard For the record c�nly f�r [�WQ 401 For the record only for Cc�rps Permi�: because written approval is not required? Certification; ❑ Yes � No [J Yes � No 1 f. Is payment into a mitigatian bank or in-lieu fee program proposed far mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigatian bar�k or in-lie�a fee program. 1g. Is #he �roject located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h � Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the prc�ject lo�ated within a NC DCM Area of Environm�ntal Conc�rn (AEC}? ❑ Yes (� No 2. Project Informatian 2a. Nam� of project: Bridge #10 on �R 1150 2b. County: Avery 2c. Nearest municipality 1 town: Crossnore 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDCJT only, T.I. P. or state 17BP.11. R.55 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for L�C if applicable): 3d .�treet add ress: 8� 1 Statesvi l le Raad 3e. City, state, zip. Norkh Wilkesbaro, NC 28659 3f. T�lephane no.: 336-9�3-9202 3g. Fax no.: 33�-667-4549 3h. Email address: hslaughterC�ncdot.gov Page 1 of 14 PCN F�rm -- Version 1.3 December �10, 2Q�8 Version 4. Applicant Information {if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ C7ther, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable}: 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip. 4f. Telephone no.: 4g . Fax na.: 4h. Em�il address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Streefi address: 5d. �ity, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no�.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 2 caf 1a PCN Form -- Vers�on 1.3 December 'iU, ��UB �/ersiar� 8. Project Informatian and Prior Project Histary 1. Property Identification 1 a. Property identification na. (tax PI N or parcel I �j: 1 b. �ite coordinates in decimal de rees : Latitude: 36.04325 Longitude: - 81.923�?' � g ) (DD.DaDDDD) (-DD.DDaDDa) 1c. Property siZe: �.5 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest bc�dy of water (stream, river, etc.) to �,/hite Pine Greek proposed praj�ct: 2b. Water Quality Classificatian af nearest receiving water: C; Trout Zc. River basin: C�tawba 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general iand use in the vi�inity of the project �t the time c�f this appiication: Substandard bridge to be replaced in a rural area 3b. �ist the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property. 0 3c. �ist the total estim�ted Iinear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) c�n the property: 7+� line�r feet 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: lJpgrade substandard strearn crc�ssing 3e. aescribe the overall project in detail, including fihe type of equipment ta be used: See �ttached cover letter. 4. Jurisdicticanal Determinations 4a. Nave jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps ar State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? �� ❑ Unknown Comments. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional deter�mination, wh�t type preliminar Final of determinatian was made'? ❑ y� 4c. lf yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consult�nt Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. if yes, list the dates af the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach dacumentation. 5. Project Histary 5a. Have permits ar certifications been requested or obtained for ��.�� No [�j Unknown this pro�ect (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � Na 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 1 � PCN F�rm -- Versic�n 1.3 �ecember 1 U, 2a08 �lersion C. Proposed I mpacts i nuentory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your praject (check all that appfy}: ❑ We�lands � �treams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ C�pen Waters ❑ Pond Construction ' 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area imp�cted. 2a. 2b. 2c. Zd. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdic#ion number - Type caf impact Type of wetiand Forested (Cflrps - 444, 'I � Ar�� af imp�ct Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ -- nan-4�4, other) (acres) Tem orar T ❑ Y�s ❑ Corps W1 [] P❑ T Na DW ❑ � Q ❑ Y�s [�] Corps W2 ❑ P�] T Na DW ❑ 0 � [� Y�s ❑ Corps W3 [� P❑ T Na DW ❑ ❑ � ❑ Y�s ❑ +�arps W4 ❑ P❑ T N� QW a ❑ � ❑ Y�s ❑ Corps W5 ❑ P❑ T No DW d � � C] Y�s ❑ Corps W6 C] P❑ T Ne� DW ❑ c� C] Q 2g. Tota1 wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial ar intermittent stream impacts (including tempor�ry impacts� proposed on the sit�, then compiet� �his questian for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name F'erenniai Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (�arps - 444, 1� stre�m leng�h Permanent (P) or intermittent D\i\/Q -. nan-404, width (linear TemporarY (T� (II�T)? other} (feet) feet) RCBC, Riprap & � PER � Corps S1 � P� T White Pine Creek 4 93 Dewatering ❑ {Ni � DWQ ❑ F'ER ❑ Corps S2 ❑ P❑ T I NT DW � 0 Q P T ❑ PER ❑ Corps S3 ❑ ❑ I NT DWQ � 0 ❑ PER 0 Corps SA� [.� P❑ T I NT DVi/Q ❑ ❑ [] PER ❑ Carps S5 ❑ P❑ T i NT DWQ 0 � ❑ PER [�] Carps S6 ❑ P[] T I NT DWQ ❑ ❑ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts �3 3i. Comments: 34 RCBC, 29 riprap, 30 dewater Page 4 of �� PCN Fc�rm -- Version �.3� �ecember 10, 2U48 Version 4. Open Water Impacts ' If there are proposed imp�cts to Iakes, pands, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atiantic Ocear�, or any other open w�ter c�f the U.S. then individually list ail apen water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. C7pen water Name af waterbody impact r�umber -- (if applicable} Type of impact Waterbady type Area of imp�ct (�cres} Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 41 ❑P❑T ' {J2 ❑P�T 03 ❑P[�T Ca4 �P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Camments: 5. Pond or Lake Cc�nstruction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Im�acts (acres) Stream lmpacts (fe�t) Upl�nd F'ond ID Proposed use ar purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: N/A 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes � I�a If yes, permit 1 D no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. �i�e of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a pratected riparian bufFer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individu�lly list a11 bufifer imp�cts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D c�f this form. 6a. �] Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico [� Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba [� Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. �uffer impact number — Re�san Buffer Zone �1 imp�ct Zone 2 imp�ct Perm�nent (P} or far Stream name mitigation �square feet) (squ�re feet) Tem ara T im act re uired? [� Yes B1 ❑P[�T No ❑ [�] Yes B2 [�POT No � ❑ Yes B3 �]P❑T No ❑ 6h, Total buffer impacts ; 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 1� PCN F�rm -- Versian 103 December 'l �, 2�08 Versi�n D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. �pecifically describe measures taken to avaid or minimize the propased imp�cts in designing project. The culverk length is the minimum needed to improve safety at this locatior�. Crc�ss Vane will be retained. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the praposed impacts through cc�nstructic�n techniques. All appropriate BMPs� will be used during canstruction 2. �c�mpensatory Mitigation for Impacts �o Waters c�f the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigatian for � Yes Cj No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Vtlaters of the State? Zb. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that ap�ly}: Q DWQ � Gor'ps �� ❑ Mitigatican bank 2c. !f yes, which mifiigatic�n option will be used far this P� ment ta in-lieu fee ro ram ro'ect'? � Y � g P 1 ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Cred'rts Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Camments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment ta In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 68 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: �] warm ❑ coof �cc�ld 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acre� 4f. Nan-riparian wetland mitigatian requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Camments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plar� 5a. If using a permittee responsibie mitigation plan, prc�vide a descriptian of the proposed mitigatian plan. Page 6 of 10 ' PCN F�rm -- Version �1.3 December 10, 2�U8 �'�rsion 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Ripariar� Buffer R�uies� — required by �WQ 6a. Wiil the prc�ject result in an impact within a protected riparian bufFer that requires [� Yes � No buffer mitigation'? ' 6b. if yes, then identify th� square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Caicul�te the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Tatal impact i1/lultiplier Requir�d mitigation (square fieet) (square �eet) zone 1 3(2 far Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Tafial buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer rnitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is prapc�sed (e.g., paym�nt to private mitig�tic�n b�r�k, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoratian, payment inta an appraved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 14 PCN F�rm — Versian '�.3 December 1Q, 2�U� Ver�ion E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required �y �WQ} 1. Diffuse Flow Pian 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rufes? � Y�� N° 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flaw plan included? If no, expfain why. Camments: (� �es 0 �o 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the averall percent imperviousness of this project'? °lo 2b. Does this project require a Stormwat�r Management Plan? ❑�Yes � No 2c. Ifi this project D�ES NOT require � Stormwater Management Plar�, explain why: Disturbing less than 1 acre 2d. If this project DOES require a Storrnwater Man�gement Plan, then provide a brief, n�rrative description of the plar�: ❑ Certified Lc�cal �avernment 2e. Who wiil be responsible far the review of the Stormwater Managernent Plan? ❑ DWQ Starmwater Progr�m ❑ DWQ 4Q1 Unit 3. Certified Local Gavernment Stormwater Review 3a. in which local government's jurisdictian is this project? ❑ Ph�se II 3b. Which of the followin locall -im lemented stormwater mana ement ro rams �� g Y p � p g ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply}: � Vi/ater Supply Watershed ❑ C)ther: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approvaf been (� Yes [.] NQ attached? 4. DWQ Starmwater Pra ram Review ❑ Coastal cnunfiies 0 H�W 4a. Which of the fallowing state-implemented stormwater management programs apply �,p�� (check ail that apply}: ❑ Sessican l.aw 2t�0�-�46 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? 0 Yes ❑ No 5. DViiQ 44'I Unit Stc�rmwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? �� 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met� [� �'�� ❑ Na Page 8 of 10 P�N Farm -- Version 1.3 December 10, 2�08 Version F. Supplementary Infiormation 1. Environmental Documentation {DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the praject involve an expenditure of public (federallstat�/local} funds or the use of ublic federai/state land'? � Yes ❑ No � � ) 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the abave, does the praject require prep�ration of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the Natior�al c�r State ❑ Yes (� No (Narth Caralina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)� 1 c. If you answered "ye�" ta tne above, has the document review bee� finalized by fihe State Clearing House? (If so, attach a capy of the NEPA or SEP�O final approval letter. ) G] Yes 0 No Camments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violatian c�f DWQ Wetland Ru{es (15A NCAC 2H .4504), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ SurFace Water ar Vt/etland Standards, ❑ Yes � Na or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NGAC 2B .020�)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit applicatian? ❑ Yes � NQ 2c. If yau answered "yes" to one ar both of the �bove questions, provide an explanation of the violatian(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based can past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in Yes additional develo ment, which could im act nearb downstream water ualit ? � �� p P Y q Y 3b. if you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantit�tive cumulative impac� analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. if you answered "nc�," provide a short narrative descriptior�. 4. Sewage Qisposai (DWQ Requirement) 4a. �Iearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge ar discharge) of w�sfiewafier generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 9 of 1 Q PCN F�rm -- Vers'ron '1.3 December 14, �0�8 Versi�on 5. Er�dangered Species and De�ignated Criticaf Habitat (Corps Requirement} 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or �,�� habitat? � � ° 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered �pecies Act �,�� irnpacts? ❑ � ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field CJfiFice you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact End�ngered Species or Qesignated Critic�l Habitat'? GIS and visual observation 6. Essential Fish Habitat {Corps Requirement� 6a. Wil( this praject occur in or near an area designated as essentiaf fi�h habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether yaur site wauld impact Essenfiial Fish Habitat`? WRC will comment � ?. Historic ar Prehistoric Guttural Resources (Corps Requireme�t) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governmen�s have designated as having historic or cultural preservatic�n Yes No status e. ., National Historic Trust desi nation or ro erties si nificant in � � � � g p p 9 North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. V1/hat dat� sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources'? Project was reviewed by the OHE. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodpl�in? [� Yes � No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the flaodpl�in determinatian? ncfloodmaps.com J. Heath �laughter ��,� � 3113/14 � �� ,�� : Applicant/Agent's Printed Name tl �4pplicant/Ag�nt's Sig � ure ��te (Agent's sig ture is valid only if an author�zati letter from the applicant is pravided. } Page 1 C� of 1 a PCN F�rm — Versic�n 1.3 December 1�, 2a�8 Versir�n Hand Existing Existing PermanentPermanentTemp. Temp. ExcavationExcavationMechanized ClearingPermanentPermanent Temp. Temp. ChannelChannelNatural SheetSiteStationStructureFill InFill InFill InFill Inin in Clearingin SW SW SWSWImpactsImpactsStream No.No.(From/To)Size / TypeWetlandsWetlandsWetlandsWetlands Wetlands Wetlandsin Wetlands WetlandsimpactsimpactsimpactsimpactsPermanentTemp.Design (ac)(sq ft)(ac)(sq ft)(ac)(sq ft)(ac)(ac)(ac)(sq ft)(ac)(sq ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) 41-L- 10+65 to 13+85 (Existing Bridge #105 Site) 1 Barrel 12'x6' RCBC - 34 LF 0.004192.13 34' of struct. 29' of Rip Rap SHEET TOTAL:0.004192.1363' ATN Revised 3/31/05 SHEET 1 of 1 ####### WBS - 17BP11.R.55 (05-0010) WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTSWETLAND IMPACTS Avery COUNTY NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS T 30 " C M P 4 8" W W HEDGE HEDGE WOODS WHITE PINE RDSR 1150 EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 5 0. 0 0 ’ 5 0 . 0 0 ’ A P P A R E N T U/ G T E L E.S S 48" WW S O IL D R IV E VARIABLE WIDTH GRAVEL 17.6’ BST DALLAS McKEE DB 58 PG 535 VERNA PHILLIPS DB 40 PG 275 RICHARD PHILLIPS DB 74 PG 2177 VERNA PHILLIPS DB 40 PG 275 TREE FARM WOODS TREE FARM WOODS WOODS :: WHITE PINE CREEK B S T D R IVE VANE EX. ROCK T 4 8" W W HEDGE HEDGE WOODS WHITE PINE RDSR 1150 EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W 5 0. 0 0 ’ 5 0 . 0 0 ’ A P P A R E N T U/ G T E L E.S S 48" WW S O IL D R IV E -EL- -EL- VARIABLE WIDTH GRAVEL 17.6’ BST DALLAS McKEE DB 58 PG 535 VERNA PHILLIPS DB 40 PG 275 RICHARD PHILLIPS DB 74 PG 2177 VERNA PHILLIPS DB 40 PG 275 TREE FARM WOODS TREE FARM WOODS WOODS WHITE PINE CREEK B S T D R IVE VANE EX. ROCK N C G RI D N A D 83/ N S R S 2007 EXISTING GROUND BM-1 RR SPIKE IN 30’ WHITE PINE ELEVATION = 3459.64’ -L- STA. 12+51.8 71.8’RT. EXISTING GROUND N 847315.53 E 1135970.82 4 HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. $ F I L E $ $ D A T E $ Scale : 20 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 050010 Middlesboro, Kentucky Tri-Cities, Tennessee All Rights Reserved Charlotte, North Carolina Tennessee Knoxville, South Carolina Spartanburg, Asheville, North Carolina Copyright 2006 Vaughn & Melton, Inc.c 704 357 0488 423 467 8401 865 546 5800 606 248 6600 864 574 4775 828 253 2796 Consulting Engineers 10+00 10+50 11+00 3,440 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA = 400 = 25 = 3458.5 = 600 = 100 = 3459.67 = 466 = 50 +/- = 3459.1 3,440 3,456 3,460 3,464 3,468 3,472 3,452 3,448 3,444 3,444 3,448 3,452 3,456 3,460 3,464 3,468 3,472 -BL-3- RR SPIKE IN 30" WHITE PINE -BL- STA. 9+37.14 89.88’ RT. BM#1 ELEV.=3459.64 -BL-2- 13.92’ LT -L- STA. 12+03.20 8.62’ RT -L- STA. 13+44.98 = 1.0DRAINAGE AREA SQ MILE DATE OF SURVEY = 7/6/2011 AT DATE OF SURVEY W.S. ELEVATION = 3452.6 FT * * DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS CREST AND SAG VERTICAL CURVE K VALUES DESIGN EXCEPTION IS REQUIRED FOR THE PI Sta 11+42.54 D L = 136.09’ T = 72.85’ R = 154.00’ PI Sta 13+16.68 D L = 141.10’ T = 75.94’ R = 154.00’ P O T S t a. 1 0 + 0 0. 0 0 P C S t a. 1 0 + 6 9. 6 9 P T S ta. 12+ 05.78 P C S ta. 12+ 40.74 P T St a. 1 3 + 8 1. 8 4 P O T St a. 1 4 + 4 4. 0 8 0 2 0 5 8 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 20 10 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 01 01 00 00 01 0 2 0 2 01 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 RO = 69’ -L- CURVE DATA - L- STA. 13+85.00 END PROJECT 050010 -L- STA. 12+25.80 END CULVERT -L- STA. 12+13.80 BEGIN CULVERT - L- STA. 10+65.00 BEGIN PROJECT 050010 10 - L- STA. 14+35.00 END CONSTRUCTION 050010 TAPER OVER 50’ ROADWAY GRADE. TO MATCH PROPOSED REGRADE/ADD ABC STONE 10 ’ 10 ’ 6.6 6’ 6.1 9’ 1 0’ 1 0’ - L- STA. 13+25.00 END ASPHALT PAVING 050010 RO = 69’ SE = 0.04 SE = 0.04 17.25’ + 6 9. 3 1 17.25’ + 15 . 0 5 60’ TAPER TO EXIST. (LT. & RT.) -L- -L- PI = 11+15.00 EL = 3,457.67’ (+)1.2500% (+)2.4000% VC = 30’ PI = 11+86.50 EL = 3,459.39’ (+)0.7000% PI = 13+00.00 EL = 3,460.18’ (+)4.6154% VC = 102’ C/L ELEV. = 3459.62’ SKEW = 90 (1) 12’X6’ RCBC CL STA. 12+19.80 -L- K = 26 K = 12 K = 26VC = 20 EL = 3461.46’ -L- STA. 13+25.00 END ASPHALT PAVING * * * NWSE = 3452.6’ EL = 3464.10’ -L- STA. 13+85.00 END GRADE EL = 3457.05’ -L- STA. 10+65.00 BEGIN GRADE -L- STA. 12+13.80 BEGIN CULVERT -L- STA. 12+25.80 END CULVERT INV. = 3451.67 LOW FLOW SILL INV. = 3452.67 HIGH FLOW SILL INV. = 3450.67 +00.00 50.00 +34.00 +64.00 50.00 1-F 2-F 3-F 2-F 52.00 52.00 25.02 31.00 +00.00 EX. R/W +40.00 EX. R/W +36.00 EX. R/W+00.00 31.00 EST. EXCAVATION = 3 CY (STRUCTURAL PAY ITEM) UP TO ELEV. 3459.2 CLASS II RIP RAP EST. 39 TONS EST. EXCAVATION = 2 CY (STRUCTURAL PAY ITEM) UP TO ELEV. 3459.2 CLASS II RIP RAP EST. 27 TONS CLASS II RIP RAP EST. 3 TONS FLOODPLAIN BENCH BACKFILL TO EXIST. CLASS II RIP RAP EST. 4 TONS FLOODPLAIN BENCH BACKFILL TO EXIST. FLOODPLAIN BENCH DO NOT DISTURB EX. ROCK VANE & C F F F F FF C F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F C C F F F F FF C F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F C