310455_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211203

►Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Coy
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit:
Reason for Visit:
Coey
mm liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
GRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
13
Arrival Time: Departure Time: CI tic ar,l County: ikpo N, Region: W
cr AN W\
Farm Name: p!l r,T_,7.1 1i,41',r? G i
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
�1 € ti r-t- 1c hNi J-1 14A R,r&E. lPL-
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: -3-Ac o PS N M 2-8LL-
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: (09) 5.3.51,
Certification Number:
Longitude:
s
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
1440
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
01
Poultt
Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Foull
pact
Cr
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
'C1
ap
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes liNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Di No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA El NE
El NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: S 1 -
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: ja%3I'�(3a, t
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes LLJ i� ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
1 le�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): I(J So-C7 Cy W1Sf
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 12rIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes C3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 12res ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable El Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Er\I-o ❑NA ❑NE
rirl\lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
U 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
E Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard YA/aste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 3) -t-1 S S
Date of Inspection: Ia13/Woa]
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes IEK ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 1A ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
p-lc() ❑ NA
❑ NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comment
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
®= 3,(7Q 3.$ -95,L1
— Coi..tzE r SmPLL- GANN IR2—a • MARCH ibmPi/'J(r- NEEt s To ON f3EemvDii 5167'
THE &ALIN NAS par CJ (I 3R-prilP TFfE Soy -ID SET S/Nc€ ao110, The SoID SET
0JA, IN USE V JTlL TuNc 7.cDaI , Car vJIl L L3 REPLACE W ir4 A R EL fltili�
G-J O,
E fArzm thAS 13,ed wilv100T Hoc-S 5/it- SuN1i✓ .20D-1 ,TNe-rz-g
IJv ftpinc SiN TiNC
— ti.1 u P S, &-N=a'J 0/3/2oil faux EtS fl7 INC werrne bC(2-6 AG-E ib i 6, L 3 ac,.
CA)t-YNt?p (IF PILL L Au 11Ert.wis y v4iLL 9E use)),
— 146 FNc..I L ITS-( ij p 7t' Fu^y, P t/ ,N &- A v u i 0 w ���1 ANAL(N i S , wlAOEe :
Irk 20.1s (3c.,-Fof-e lbw > hfrc e 9AMrf u N Cs-,
r --RE 13Eftnuppi, St -AND t.)Lmos IrnP &rn€(\y1 TLA►J 10 ,EED c 4-SPP, c.- in) act .
-fc ' ALL fills AcioT4 Kos Aref7 . Mori IIePRovanct 5 sN he o 43, pu Pccne,tJ
4E0, 08 1Ac,ILCr- j Shi0UL.6 Cori') Jvg - , fMPRuvE. Rfc ,Zo ttef1N G- kV) In N7'ANNee
T Nt 50249 fIao A,42J
—.PoJ \J L,. LL $ IS,,U.e 'b J1isSiNG- WA ANA F:Iue CALIDR. T ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: (I (0) 07 " s-17
Date: 1 a/ 3J? Q
5/12/2020