20220220 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220207

fr.,f DW R
mrlsloa of ware. Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20220220
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Brunswick Pines
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Kim Williams - Land Management Group
1 b. Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/7/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Shallotte River
Basin
Lumber
Water Classification
C; Sw; HOW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
33.950856
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Brunswick
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.416372
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version# *
1
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Holley Snider:eads\hasnider
1c. Primary Contact Phone:
[phone]

Has this PCN previously been submitted?"
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 It. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1 i. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?"
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Nani on recorded deed:
FMJ Holdings LLC Etals
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
David Kingman (manager)
2d.Address
Street Address
3687 Wingfoot Dr
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Southport
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28461
USA
2e. Telephone Number:
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]

2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Kyle diPretoro
3b. Business Name:
BIRD Land & Investment
3c.Address
Street Address
234 Kingsley Park Drive, Suite 110
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Fort Mill
SC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
29715
USA
3d. Telephone Number:
3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Williams
4b. Business Name:
Land Management Group
4c. Address
Street Address
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Wilmington
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28403
USA
4d. Telephone Number:
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
[phone]
4f. Email Address:
[e-mail]
C. Proiect Information and Prior Proiect History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Shallotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
21300006
2c. Project Address
Street Address
NC 179
Address Line 2
City
Shallotte
Postal / Zip Code
28470
2b. Property size:
317
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3. Surface Waters

3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Shallotte River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; Sw; HOW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Lumber
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030402080202
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Shallotte River forms the northern project boundary and unnamed tributaries of the river extends into the middle and southern parts of the site. Several ditches are located in the
northern portion of the site and tie into the wetlands adjacent to the river. There is a significant topographic break between uplands and the river and streams. Most of the wetlands located
adjacent to the river and other streams on site support a fairly dense canopy of hardwoods and pines. A Carolina Bay is located in the southeastern part of the site and supports a thick
assemblage of pines and bay species. A cypress wetland pocket is located in the eastern central part of the site. Several small pocosin wetland pockets are scattered throughout the site
and support a dense stand of pines and bay species. Uplands located east of the stream that bisects the site were recently cleared of understory growth and support a sparse canopy of
loblolly pines, with live oaks, red oaks, and sweetgum in the understory. Uplands located northwest of this stream have not been bushhogged and support a fairly thick assemblage of
loblolly pines (4" to 8" DBH), turkey oak, and laurel oak. Uplands in the southwestern part of the site support a young and dense assemblage of longleaf pines (3" — 8" DBH), with some
scattered turkey oak in the shrub layer, and wiregrass in the herbaceous layer. Two small fallow fields are located in the southcentral part of the tract. Several dirt roads provide access
throughout the site. A review of historical aerials shows that vegetation has been timbered several times within sections of the tract since at least the 1950s. Adjacent land use consists of
a mix of undeveloped and forested land and residential development.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
81
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
7,300
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a residential subdivision within the tract to serve the housing needs of Brunswick County. Jurisdictional wetland, stream, and non -stream channel
impacts are needed for road crossings to provide access throughout the site.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of constructing a residential development with 506 single-family lots. Stormwater ponds are planned throughout the site as well.
The limits of disturbance will be cleared of vegetation and graded. Roads, utilities and stormwater facilities will be installed. The roads will cross jurisdictional wetlands, ditches, and one
stream. Culverts and rip rap will be used at these crossings to maintain hydrologic flow. Headwalls will also be used to minimize impacts. The culvert at the stream crossing will be buried
per USACE and DWR requirements. Once utilities and roads are in place, homes will be constructed. Track hoe, loader, dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction equipment
will be used.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
LMG submitted AJD request to the USACE in September. This was changed to a PJD request and
resubmitted in January of 2022.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-02108
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Mark Westendorff
Agency/Consultant Company: LMG
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory

1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
• Wetlands Streams -tributaries
• Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Buffers
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition"
2g. Impact
area
Road Crossing
P
Pocosin
N/A
Yes
Both
0.210
(acres)
Road Crossing
P
Pocosin
N/A
Yes
Both
0.044
(acres)
Road Crossing
P
Riverine Swamp Forest ::]N/A
Yes
Both
0.036
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.290
2i. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.290
E
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
7)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
length*
S7
Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert :]Eelallotte
River
Perennial
Both
T;;;]�near
feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
12
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
12
3j. Comments:
This is a widening of an existing culverted crossing (dirt road).
4. Open Water Impacts
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
4a. Site #
4a1. Impact Reason
4b. Impact type
4c. Name of waterbody
4d. Activity type :114e.
Waterbody type
4f. Impact area
Road Crossing
P
N/A
Culverts
Ditch
0.01
Road Crossing
P
N/A
Culverts
Ditch
0.01
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.02
4h. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.02
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The applicant attempted to minimize impacts as much as possible. The only impacts that are requested are for road crossings. The stream crossing has
been located at an existing crossing, to minimize impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A sedimentation and erosion control permit and stormwater permit will be obtained prior to construction.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Stone Farm Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Non -riparian wetland 0.5
Riparian wetland 0.1
3c. Comments
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
Site is located in Lumber River Basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
State Stormwater Programs
Phase II Coastal Counties
HWQ or ORW Other
Comments:
Engineer is currently working on the stormwater plan.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?"
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?"
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)

3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent properties. Additionally, no other impacts are anticipated on this site in the future.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Project will tie into municipal wastewater system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database was conducted to identify areas within and around the site that are already
known to support federally listed species. According to their files, there are no known observations of federally protected species on the site. The
federally listed American alligator has been documented within a one mile of the site. The USFWS IPaC database was also reviewed and several
species were identified as potentially occurring in the region. Many of these species require coastal and/or marine habitat and would not be found within
the site. The Shallotte River (northern boundary) may provide suitable habitat for the American alligator and wood stork. No impacts to this resource are
proposed. Additionally, forested areas within the site could potentially provide appropriate winter and summer roosting habitat for the northern long-eared
bat. Although the bat is known to occur in Brunswick County, no roost trees have been identified by the US Fish and Wildlife Service in the county.
Therefore, any associated take from the proposed project as a result of cutting trees would be exempt per the Programmatic Biological Opinion for the
NLEB. The site does not appear to provide appropriate habitat for any other federally protected species known to occur in the region. The northeastern
portion of the site currently supports a canopy of medium to large loblolly pine trees with little midstory. However, the entire tract was thickly vegetated
just a couple of months ago. Longleaf pines in the southwestern part of the tract are too young to currently support red cockaded woodpeckers. For
these reasons, the site does not appear to provide suitable habitat for the RCW.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of known cultural or historic resources.
No cultural or historical resources were noted within or adjacent to the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No

8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Areas adjacent to the Shallotte River are within the floodplain. Engineer will ensure that FEMA requirements are met.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center website was reviewed.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Brunswick Pines PCN Attachments.pdf 5.45MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kim Williams
Signature
C� IA%d
Date
2/7/2022

ZLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEA company
TO: US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
February 7, 2022
NC Division of Water Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Brunswick Pines Subdivision; Brunswick County, NC
NWP 29 Application
Action ID# SAW-2021-02108
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of BIRD Land & Investment, LP, Land Management Group is submitting a Pre -Construction
Notification form and associated attachments for the Brunswick Pines Subdivision, located off
Bricklanding Road SW in Shallotte (Brunswick County), NC. The purpose of the project is to construct
a residential subdivision within the tract to serve the housing needs of Brunswick County.
The project proposes to impact 0.29 acre of jurisdictional wetlands, 12 LF of perennial stream, and
0.01 acre of jurisdictional ditches for road crossings to provide access throughout the site. The
applicant proposes to purchase 0.6 acre of wetland credit from the Stone Farm Mitigation Bank to
compensate for these impacts.
If you have any questions, or would like to discuss the application, please do not hesitate to call.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Kim Williams
Environmental Scientist
Encl.
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

Brunswick Pines
PCN Attachments
Table of Contents
1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
2.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. Soils Map
Figure 4. Aerial Photograph
Figure 5. Preliminary Wetland Map
3.0 SITE PLAN DRAWINGS
Sheet 1. Overall Site Plan Showing Proposed Impacts
Sheet 2. Close Up Views
4.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List
5.0 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK CREDIT RESERVATION LETTER

1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

Ak� LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Uwe, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for Shallotte FMJ tract located in Brunswick County, NC. All questions regarding this project
should be directed to Land Management Group.
Sincerely,
Applicant
Kyle diPretoro on behalf of BRD Land & Investment
January 10, 2022
Print Name
Date
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 • Wilmington, NC 28403

2.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. Soils Map
Figure 4. Aerial Photograph
Figure 5. Preliminary Wetlands Map

u„
FIQo�;
M5�0 AoaM+jeuelN
0� c
ns
aG� 3 4tg'N
=
CO
Q
c7
X_
i
c o!I!H 4B H
�
3S
�L
10 aldc3 0 3
o Nd eq Gls Ft]
fiH
O
O
�
cRd 5:,
O y1� mspb`
Pod
RCd,s 0 w
dRoc _
00
4a
N
w
L
�
U
rd �� p
R,,. se111irNll
ha
0 E
Z �Q
�
U �
w v
u F ^
_
R
F
w w
2E o
a
u
• ¢o
r
rc
fo
°'
c.°
Fk
S
zx
i�
MS as Ica p
a.
Zw
Q
N
w mom,,
m sq,
�s a
w
E
v
E
z 8
w
0I C
LL U
E�
>
?i nit.
S
aBp �
in
U v
a
n
3
<<
N
K
_
� O
yaLu
w
pC`J
w o
9b
x n
c
w
r a ° w
z o c
a
`J
L w
u
o v
tnO
V
t N o
w— U o
� Nzry
Wjj*$padStHw
^r
z m ms
Rd Nw
i
4j m�
F
-
d�H
w04 Afplwa�y
-
�o
Z
s
rn
E: O O
D N V
N
2 U n
N
c:
�{
7 co Q J
m j C()
m
o�
a� �
0
o
s a'0 0
m
Cl)
}�
30
0
v 9
adN w
N �
tC<mdrfY
J 0
Q
TrL
x
N
Q a w�
y
P il
V
p H
�4Ritl9e
Q` l
JSmdso�
®
Q Oo
.�
a
C r2
o
i
J ' 0] �

it
:T
•
:1
f
j y
a
L
f ¢ E a
oCL
f
aSI
V v
� zN
o 0
a Q
N N
`,l
U U
L N
F
y
N U
mm
N�
p N
� 9
N O
N 9
U' O
d C
� m T
w £
J Q
Z a m fl-
a � m
X
�
U
p O V)
N m (n
0 O O
�
W D
� O O
W O
O
J 0]

o�
_ X
a
CD O_
cn
N
rnN
v� o�
V®� v
z N
E
U
Z _
N A N
C O O
d 0 N V
O N
Q N
C .22
D N O_ J
m j c
m
i.
O
_ .
O
L
O
� 9
N O O
d
N �
N 9
cC N
� o O
O
¢
W
p
m
••
'�O i� d y
£
dC
U Q
N m aU
a
a
20 200
Z'p N i
/ram
N
m m pj
cn mmY�2E2E2EO
Q O� O
Lu Lnn
O O_
i� a m
J m

�, , � r
�,�� ohs �* ��';
r
E +�'�
v�'`
�
r�
�.
' � �
�N� a�'
af. - �
_' �
:- � �
r'
�
��
S
�0
<.
�
o
� 'a3a� hEPp, "�i
�d �._�
� _
4 F•� ��a'q\p, p Y
� 4 �� .: ��
Mom. Rry � Oi��� �ad`p�°
. Y
i, � `war g 'boo � , � �*:
��, �k,.
,,� y', �4r� �,
�}, � ,
- � w N
�: x���. �
�. � �'. s t
�a, � �
�.,� �
" �� j ��.
- � -'
i "
� lk.
�.: � 1j
�J�
.``' �.A�
•. r y» ��
,e �
i � t. a ✓' � "'-� 4 _ �
t
� " " -�F to ... i ,� f' ''� yews - .

maNiE �
a °¢ oL
CD O_
m
N
O U U O
d O U
if 0W M N '
<a N N
♦-
N O O
j N U
ddf
m ° w
O aN `o
z m<U d' a
LL N E
io
U
H U N
N z O
LP N
_ = Q = N
�U wN
LL utn
a J
d C 0
Q 2 it
CO
N
O N
LO O
In
a N
Y
ca
° d N
M 0 V / N (0 (0
— 0 = N 0 9
- U M ap N C7 'o 0
ca N t ^ a
i i �••c
L N O tea`°
v O v w .- E
"a C UI J '°
C fa c y U- mo
ca T
M Y a Q
m m m ca w�Ep
O O O O O a° 8
0
Q d n
rJ} J N 0 O
J I i w o a n
44.
a
J (n M

3.0 SITE PLAN DRAWINGS
Sheet 1. Overall Site Plan Showing Proposed Impacts
Sheet 2. Close Up Views

g',1 M � � e€�ez os'niwlaod -
'FT ao � alms ,:min �i�l eea
Vd `5301�?J3S NOIS30 ?J3�ONVH o»'lN3wls3nNiaaNmaae a3wno ,NALN�,N, �nae
2'='Wg em°mE
se unag Ec -1
jo ueld
a <aa aa<aaaaaaaa< <a _ W9�6 �
a�aa�axa��sa��w a� -§-➢�� o�", �
Owill U
6 °=gym out its,ma nm��
2
N � k gay
iiy
x�
il
�.
n
m®m-
— u•\�® / _ -- "� - s � Vag _ ""
�s
j
_ e
t _-
ax
o�
o
�p - o oVaa�� opo

mS7UW1Y9Z
\H7 _ __ Z6L 311lIS AtlM 3T1X31692
�111N3WL53ANI80Ntl10M9i13NM0
S301n:13S N`JIS34 2l3AONtlH $ F m
Saud 0iAnsuna
S71tl134 ONISS02J0 ONb'713M �� � M��„m"°
Zi
8
J o
a
O
N \ 0 �o
W Q zp
/
Q° 1 N Q 00
3 1 LLJLL
s
W k ~ Q LL �� w
LL \ I
0
`\ 0� ' o
ULLLO
_ In O
O o U o
E U
Lu�E` y
O c�
o �
QQ)
_j w
CL Z
LL-
V O my T 'sw1" 9
O N W O w
M p
m Q w e
O Ji o
s p
J Z
U x1
s 3a 11 !
W w
p W
ZI-
Zz �F
U) _LL
ct ot W ~
ui Q U
z lgis[ o z cn n
W
!i Y
m
oL CE o L U
W T TS
ca o d \
m o N
a 30150 55 Z E z \ LU
rL LO
U 03� � w O LO
U o cj��
U
J

4.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List

IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trustresources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that
follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional
information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Brunswick County, North Carolina
olgrci
Pan
Local office
,09u�'
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project
level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the
project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only
be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly. '
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species
and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:

Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
Wherever found Marine mammal
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
10
Birds
NAME STATUS 0
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Th e
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the Oy
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
Whereverfound
There is proposed critical habitat for thi pecie ocation of the
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
T
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
t ://ecc .fws. ov/ec /s ecies/7614
Wood Stork Mycteria americans
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8477
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Endangered
Threatened
STATUS
SAT

Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii Endangered
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta
There is final critical habitat for this species The location of the
Endangered
Thr e
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
Snails 106
NAME .0 STATUS
Magnificent Ramshorn Planorbella magnifica
Wh e reve r fo u n d
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
htt ://ecos. ov/ec /s ecies/6216
1 N �\-
is
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
Candidate
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered

Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Critical habitats
Endangered
Threatened
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves. 1\4
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
-and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory girds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data data mapping (Tip:

enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project
area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IFA
..................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
.....................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
........................................................................
PROJECT AREA SOMETII�dE I
............................................................ ... .......
THE TIMEFRAME Sf�ECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
......................................................................
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
.................................................B....................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS
TS ENTIORANGE. "BREEDS
.........................................................................
HERE" INDICATES THAT THE
.................................................................
BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN
..........................................................................................
YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus�
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
M
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
American Oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Breeds Apr 15 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
/ec .fws. ov/ec /s ecies/8935
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Black Skimmer Rynchops niger Breeds May 20 to Sep 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5234

Gull -billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9501
King Rail Rallus elegans
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8936
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9481
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) througho t it a e i
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citr
This is a Bird of Conservation c n (B roughout its range in
the continental USA and
Red-headed Woodp ker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird f Cons rvation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continentUSA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 1 to Sep 5
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds elsewhere
0
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
\Rd*yTurnstone Arenaria interpres morinella Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Short -billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480
Willet Tringa semipalmata Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 5
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.

Wilson's Plover Charadrius wilsonia Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any
location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur
in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to oc r
and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures c er y
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my4ifi dN n?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that
may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, bandingEand citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects,
and that have been identified as warranting svIftattention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a speci s that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development. 401
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-
round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if
you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If
a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts
and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and group o
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful ou in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal map hrqugh the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modelingand Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions an bbundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. '..
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and f?abitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the na_ nag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list? 40ON C
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle
Act should such impact ccu
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. Tole'arn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
measures, visit the FAQ 'Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

Marine mammals
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected
under the Endangered Species Act
and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora?.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are
shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears, manatees,
and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries
1 [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins, and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the
responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list; for additional information on those
species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take (to harass, hunt, capture, kill, or attempt to
.....................................................................................................................................................
harass, hunt, capture or kill) of marine mammals and further coordination may be necessary for
project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office shown.
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. 511,
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is a
treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not threaten their survival in
the wild.
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are
potentially affected by activities in this location:
NAME
Ir
West Indian Manat�ric us manatus
http://ecos.f\Ns.gov/ecp/species/4469
V4\W,1
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS ATTHIS LOCATION.

Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01 /2F
PF03/4Bd
PSS3/4Bd
PF01/2Cd
PF01 Cd
PSS1/4Cd
PF01/4Bd
PF04Bd
PF01 A
PF01
RIVERINE
R5UBH
Foy
G�Vp,
�cJv
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the
use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.

Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect suc
activities. Z\
Gp�
o\0
�O

■EEME
■o6a NC DEPARTMENT OF
i is NATURAL_ AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■M■■■
October 12. 2021
Kim Williams
Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE: FMJ Shallotte
Dear Kim Williams:
Rey Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, 5eeretary
Waiter Clark
Director, Division of land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-16014
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAIL SERVICE CENTER. PALEIGW. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

CO CO CO
\ 9 %
\
C
\
\
\
/
\
\
/
\
e
e
e
e
CO
s
s
s
s
2 m
/ \
CO<
u
&
&
&
&
-- o
\
4
e
0v
\
y/�
ee
E\/
e
e
e
e
/
_
2
�\
&v
C\2Q
_
/ CO/ /
2
QO
\\22
\\Mo
\
\
o z
a
e
o a
a
a
a
\�\z
\
CO
CO
C-1
co
0S
u
10
\
°co
\
CO
�\
\�
/
E
CO E
/ \
E
\
ue
3
CO
°
0
s
®
/
D
j
\
/
S \
\
/
\
EE
\ /
S
S
e
E
\
\ (
0
f :
—
\.-
L
/
®
\
\
LL
\
\
2
=
s
e
®\
)
® )
\
®/
=
>
CO
CO
®
\
u »
\
»
e t
E.e
\
e =
\ s\
_ _
\\.g
% y
\
s
_
/
\ /
\ /
d \
d \
/
\
CO
/
o
/
g
o
®
2
} \
\
\
/
/
\
\
m o
»
&
&
o
CO
2
o
s
/
CO
\
u g
>
>
>
>
/
_
/co
o
E0
\/
z
_\
2 E
_\_\_\
2
E 2
E 2
E
2/>
E}/
E
E 2
E 2
E
2
e\
//\
\/
\/////
///
CO
4
\
�ƒ
c
\
\
\
\
E
/
/
CO
co
\
\
CU
/
}
§
_
/

}
\\
g/
3
s
s
s
s
s
3
3
\
±
a a
v
\
/
/
e
§
\ /
3®
3
3
3
CO
\
2
\
\
\
t
\
COm
/
e
e
e
COCO
g
=
s
s
a
/
CO
CO\
\
\
\(
LLJ
LLJ
^
\
_
U
\
/
\:
\"\
\�
E
\\
/
\ /
j
\
~
/
/ \
®
s
»
J i
E
k
E
3/
6
u
>
e
e
e
e
\
4
e
O 2
z
e=
»®
/
2
s
s
s
s
\
/
&
2 g
\\
/
\
0
Y
Y
Y
Y
?
\
\
\
e
x
%
}
y
u
e
&
&
&
&
&
« 0
3
>
�
}O
®
\
/
e
v
4 /
7-0
9
\(®
e
c-i
»±
mo
\
6
E 2/ƒ
e
e
e
e
o
2
0
\
4
m /
2
�/
u
\ \ /
°
2
/ / ~ ®
z
o
p
o
\
/\�
2
\
-
a
/
\
a/
\
)(
\ \ / /
/
e
\ \
\
\
/
\
2
\
<
CO / \ \
4
/
G /
a
a
a
a
&
\
0-)
s
\
\
0
% O Z
\
O
~
%
«
CC3/
_
\
0
(�
/
>
/
\
c
4
7
\
..
/
e
3
\
\
= �
J
j
°
_
2
e
/
e
\\
CO
Z
t
e
y\
CO
CO
j
\mg
t°
\
/
.2
mc�E
c
u
\`
H
\
/\\
3_
%
\\
\
CO
\
j
CO
~
\
/
»
n
\
\
v
®
®
/3
§
�
\
_
CO
/
/
\
/
CO
\ \
®
°
J}
a)0
\
a
7
\
s \
E
CO
CO
0
2
/
/
\
S \
\
/
}
/
\ °
e
\
S
S
e
_
E
\
%
e
s
\
»
m
2
O%\°\
o
g\
J/
e
E
_
E %
O
o
CO
®
7\
o
w%
w ~
w
.-
e
E
e
©
z�
/
2
-
s
/
u
2
u
e
\
\ m
y
\
\ \
L
e
J
z
°
/ t :=
e
\
>
m
y
\
z
\ z
%
=
o
3=
c
u J
a
g
c
g/
g m_
s
2
z 2
s
t-=
e=
o
3
\
2
z
e
%
d
z
s
e
s s-
u 2
2 u
e
> e
w s
3
e
9
d » z
0
\
\
s
\/
2
\
o
(D
/
/ /
(
/
r
5
% \ /
e
/
�~
=
u
a
s
e a
c e%
x
D
a 4
E
e
u x s
s
/
e
2
=
\
\CO
z
0
/
2
E
CO
/ {
/
\
/
\
\
(
/
°
\ (
\
%
®
\
/
/
/
/
\ /
2 \
\
Z=
%E
u
o
s
CO\
/ 0
/
\
>
>
>
>
CO
CO
\
44
/
^
e
®
\ \
E
®
E
-
-
E
-
E
E
CO
CO
f
7 7
\
\
\
E
E
\
\
E
E
\ E
/
E /
E /
E
/
/
/
-0
CO
___
CO
\ \
E
//\
w e
g
w
\/////
w
w
\
\
\//
o=
co
co
o///
/
\)

�
0
�
�
U)
�
�
LL
�
�
C)
(D
W
❑
�
z
U
z
01
§
\
c

5.0 SFMB CREDIT RESERVATION LETTER

STONE FARM REGIONAL MITIGATION BANK
CREDIT REQUEST ACCEPTANCE
Date: 0210712022
BRD Land and Investment
259 Textile Way, Suite 102
Fort Mill, SC 29715
Project Name: Brunswick Pines
Expiration of Acceptance: 0810712022
SFMB Number:
Dear Kyle DiPretoro:
Q:7_1 2 I
Stone Farm Mitigation Bank, LLC
2618 New Village Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank (Bank) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision
does not assure that the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project
impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the
Bank will be approved. It is also the responsibility of the applicant to determine the appropriate credit ratios
that will be required for the corresponding wetland and/or stream impacts. You must also comply with all
other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed
activity.
This acceptance is valid for six (6) months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received payment for the accepted credits of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit
within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. Predicated on the total payment due to the Bank, as
set forth herein, a ten (10) percent non-refundable deposit is due at the time of acceptance by the Bank. It is
the applicant's responsibility to send copies of their permits to the Bank. Once the Bank receives a copy of
the permit(s), an invoice will be issued based on the information identified below. Payment must be made
prior to conducting the authorized work. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the credit types and
amounts identified below are consistent with the compensatory mitigation requirements of the permit(s)
issued. The Bank and/or its agents are not responsible for determining the applicant's mitigation
requirements.
Based on the information supplied by the applicant, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation
are summarized in the following table:
CLI Location
Stream (ft.)
Wetlands ac.
Nonri arian
Riparian
Impact
03040208
.25
.04
Credits
.5
.1
Note that the impact and credit totals above were provided by the applicant. It is the applicant's
responsibility to provide accurate information (including the requested mitigation credits). The Bank and/or
its agents are not responsible for determining the required credit amounts. The Bank's decision to accept
credits is based upon the information provided by the applicant. The Bank is not liable for any credit
shortage should the applicant's required mitigation credits exceed the amount specified in the above table.

Based upon the type and amounts of credits requested above, the following payment must be provided to
the Bank prior to issuance of credits:
Credit Type
Unit
Per Unit Credit Fee
Sub -Total
Stream
0
$603.87
$0.00
Nonriparian Wetland
.5
$67,442.06
$33,721.0
Riparian Wetland
.1
$67,442.06
$6,744.21
Total Payment Due
$40,465.2
Non-refundable Deposit
$4,046.5
Balance Due Upon Invoice
$36,418.72
Upon receipt of full payment, the Bank will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If
the regulatory agencies require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and should the applicant
want the Bank to provide such credits, it is the applicant's responsibility to submit an additional credit
request form to the Bank.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jordan Cline at 910-251-8543 or
[e-mail]
Sincerely,
Jordan Cline
Stone Farm Mitigation Bank, LLC
cc: NCDWQ-Raleigh
USACE
NCDWQ-Local
Agent