The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBP3-R010 FSM Worksheet 1 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET Return with Comments to Division by: PROJECT NO.: BP3-R010 FIELD SCOPING MEETING DATE: 2022-1-6 LET DATE: 2025-7-20 DIVISION: 3 LOCATION: On-Site COUNTY: ONSLOW ROUTE (US / NC / SR): SR 1109 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE 71 OVER HARRIS CREEK AT SR 1109 BRIDGE NO.: 660071 TIER: REGIONAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: LOCAL, URBAN MPO / RPO AREA: JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA MPO MUNICIPALITY: JACKSONVILLE ATTENDEES NAME (PRINT) PHONE No E-MAIL DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Anthony Law 910-341-2000 awlaw@ncdot.gov ASSISTANT DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Trevor Carroll 910-341-2000 tkcarroll@ncdot.gov DIVISION MAINTENANCE ENGINEER Keith Eason 910-341-2000 dkeason@ncdot.gov ASSISTANT DIVISION MAINTENCE ENGINEER Caitlin Marks 910-341-2000 cmmarks@ncdot.gov DIVISION BRIDGE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER Bradley Haste 910-467-0520 blhaste@ncdot.gov AREA CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER David Candela 910-524-4931 dacandela@ncdot.gov RESIDENT ENGINEER Kirsten Spirakis 910-398-9130 klspirakis@ncdot.gov DIVISION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Katie Hite 910-341-2000 kehite@ncdot.gov DIVISION DESIGN CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATIVE David Leonard 910-341-2000 dbleonard@ncdot.gov DIVISION UTILITY ENGINEER Lonny Sleeper 910-341-2000 lasleeper@ncdot.gov DIVISION UTILITY COORDINATOR Ben Meyer 910-341-2000 Ext-bcmeyer1@ncdot.gov DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER Mason Herndon 910-341-2000 tmherndon@ncdot.gov HYDRAULICS UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Craig Lee 919-707-6708 cjlee@ncdot.gov HYDRAULICS UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Galen Cail 919-707-6711 gcail@ncdot.gov GEOTECHNICAL UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Dean Argenbright 252-439-2870 dargenbright@ncdot.gov 2 GEOTECHNICAL UNIT REPRESENTATIVE James Batts 919-662-3576 jrbatts@ncdot.gov STRUCTURES MANAGEMENT UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Kevin Fischer 919-707-6514 wkfischer@ncdot.gov STRUCTURES MANAGEMENT UNIT REPRESENTATIVE Kristy Alford 919-707-6531 kalford@ncdot.gov DIVISION RIGHT OF WAY AGENT Eric Ray 910-341-2000 eray@ncdot.gov LOCATION AND SURVEYS REPRESENTATIVE CJ Sawyer 910-341-2280 cjsawyer@ncdot.gov US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Brad Shaver 910-251-4611 brad.e.shaver@usace.army.mil DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES Kim Harding 252-264-3901 Kimberlee.harding@ncdenr.gov DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Stephen Lane 252-208-2808 Stephen.Lane@ncdenr.gov DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Hannah Sprinkle 910-796-7306 hannah.sprinkle@ncdenr.gov DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES Travis Wilson 919-707-0370 travis.wilson@ncwildlife.org US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICES Gary Jordan 919-856-4520 ext. 32 gary_jordan@fws.gov DIVISION 3 – ASSIATANT RESIDENT ENGINEER Daniel Waugh 910-467-0520 Dgwaugh1@ncdot.gov DIVISION 3 – LOCATION AND SURVEY Monica Duval 910-341-2283 mjduval@ncdot.gov DIVION 3 – DIVISION DESIGN CONSTRUCT Brian Harding 910-341-2000 bjharding@ncdot.gov LJB INC. Scott Cooke 910-726-1839 scooke@ljbinc.com LJB INC. Rick Coffman 919-594-6738 rcoffman@ljbinc.com LJB INC. Jon Giles 910-726-1853 jgiles@ljbinc.com DESIGN CONSULTANT DESIGN CONSULTANT DESIGN CONSULTANT UTILITY CONSULTANT UTILITY CONSULTANT UTILITY CONSULTANT DIVISION (COMPLETED BY DIVISION STAFF AND SENT WITH THE FSM LETTER) EXISTING FEATURES FEATURE BRIDGED: HARRIS CREEK (BRIDGE / CULVERT) LENGTH 86’ DECK WIDTH (OUT TO OUT) 27.333’ 3 WATER DEPTH: 2.0’ HEIGHT BED-TO-CROWN: 15.1 PRIOR SURVEY DATE: 01/16/2020 POSTED: SV 19 TTST: 27 STRUCTURE TYPE: CONCRETE DECK ON TIMBER BEAMS SPAN TYPE: 5 SIMPLE SPANS (17.1-17.25-17.25-17.2-17.1) HISTORIC HIGH WATER (ELEV. TO THE TOP OF RAIL): -L- BASE YEAR: 2012 -L- BASE YEAR: 2040 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 880 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 1760 % TRUCKS/DUALS: 6% SUFFICIENCY RATING: 31.99 POSTED SPEED LIMIT IN PROJECT VICINITY: 55 MPH DETOUR: OFF-SITE: YES ON-SITE: NO STAGE CONSTRUCTION: NO IF DETOUR IS OFF-SITE, PROVIDE DESCRIPTION OF DETOUR ROUTE: SR 1109 (HOLLY SHELTER RD) TO NC 53 (BURGAW HWY) TO SR 1107 (HARRIS CREEK RD) TO SR 1109 (HOLLY SHELTER RD) APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF DETOUR? 6.9 MILES IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO ROAD ON DETOUR? YES COMMENTS: SF-4903F SR 1109 (HOLLY SHELTER RD) AT NC 53, REALIGMENT AND LANE CONSTRUCTION. IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO BRIDGES ON DETOUR? NO ARE BRIDGES ON DETOUR CURRENTLY PROGRAMMED ON TIP? NO COMMENTS: ARE THERE EMS, SCHOOL, OR BUSINESS ACCESS ISSUES? NO COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY RAILROAD CROSSINGS ON DETOUR? NO COMMENTS: WILL RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT BE REQUIRED? NO SHOULD WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION? NO REASONS: EXISTING R/W WIDTH: 60’ IMPACT RATING TO UTILITIES: ---------- POWER TRANSMISSION LINES: DUKE ENERGY AERIAL/UG/BOTH: AERIAL IN CONFLICT: YES TELEPHONE: CENTURY LINK AERIAL/UG/BOTH: AERIAL IN CONFLICT: YES CABLE TV: CHARTER AERIAL/UG/BOTH: AERIAL IN CONFLICT: YES FIBER OPTIC: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: WATER: ONSLOW WATER & SEWER AUTH. IN CONFLICT: NO, UG & AERIAL ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE SEWER: ONSLOW WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY IN CONFLICT: -------- NATURAL GAS: PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS IN CONFLICT: -------- OTHER: IN CONFLICT: -------- BASED ON THE PAST HISTORY NEAR THIS PROJECT SITE, WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED TO COMPLETE UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS MONTHS WHICH UTILITIES WILL REQUIRE PERMITS FOR RELOCATION? WHAT TYPE PERMIT? WHO WILL BE OBTAINING PERMITS FOR UTILITY RELOCATION? IS THERE ANY FUTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN THE PROJECT AREA? IS A FEMA BUY-OUT PROPERTY BEING IMPACTED? EXISTING UTILITY DRAWING ATTACHED? WILL TEST HOLES BE REQUIRED? 4 HYDRAULICS (COMPLETED BY HYDRAULICS ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE FSM) WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A FEMA PERMIT? NO IS THERE UNUSUAL SCOUR POTENTIAL? NO IS PROTECTION NEEDED? USE STANDARD PROTECTION ARE BANKS STABLE? YES IS PROTECTION NEEDED? USE STANDARD RIP RAP AMOURING DOES STREAM CARRY APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF LARGE DEBRIS? NO WILL THE PLACEMENT OF BENTS IN THE WATER BE ALLOWED? NO COMMENTS: BRIDGE TO PIPE CANDIDATE? NO COMMENTS: WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT? NO HOW WILL ROADSIDE DRAINAGE AND / OR TREATMENT OF STORMWATER VIA THE BRIDGE DECK BE ADDRESSED FOR EACH QUADRANT? NE QUADRANT: Roadway ditch SE QUADRANT: Roadway ditch SW QUADRANT: Roadway ditch and 2GI at bridge NW QUADRANT: Roadway ditch and 2GI at bridge GEOTECHNICAL UNIT (COMPLETED BY GEOTECHNICAL UNIT PRIOR TO THE FSM) EXISTING FOUNDATION REPORTS? NO IF SO, ATTACH. KNOWN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES IN AREA WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGN: LIMESTONE ARE PERMITS NEEDED FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK AT SITE? UNLIKELY COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL AND / OR VIBRATION SENSITIVE STRUCTURES NEAR BY? NO COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY KNOWN LANDFILLS AND / OR GEOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SITES AT OR WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE? NO COMMENTS: DEPTH OF WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK BELOW STREAMBED? 40-FT (ELVATION 25-FT) ARE ANY IMPACTS ANTCIPATED TO NATURAL SPRINGS OR ARTESIAN WELLS: NO COMMENTS: BOREHOLES WILL BE SEALED. POSSIBLE FOUNDATION TYPE: PILE AND DRILLED SHAFTS – RECOMMENT BENTS BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM EXISTING BENTS. ENVIRONMENTAL (COMPLETED BY DEO STAFF PRIOR TO THE FSM) WETLANDS AT SITE? YES COMMENTS: PJD ISSUED ON THIS SITE APRIL 24, 2017 (SAW-2017-00487) WHICH REMAINS VALID. WETLAND MITIGATION? NO RATIO? STREAM MITIGATION? NO RATIO? KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN AREA? COOLEY’S MEADOWRUE, GOLDEN SEDGE, PONDBERRY, ROUGH-LEAVE LOOSESTRIFE, ATLANTIC AND SHORTNOSE STURGEON, EASTERN BLACK RAIL, AND NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT COMMENTS: BUFFER REQUIREMENTS? CAMA COUNTY: YES PRIMARY NURSERY AREA: DCM CLAIMING: MORATORIA: NO IF YES-DURATION COMMENTS IS WATER FEATURE CLASSIFIED AS A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER? NO COMMENTS: 5 WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS PROJECT: C, NSW STREAM ID# 19-17-3 WILL A COAST GUARD PERMIT BE REQUIRED? NO COMMENTS: IS THE PROJECT SITE IN OR NEAR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: NATIONAL FOREST: NO WILDLIFE REFUGE: NO STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL PARK: NO AIRPORT: NO A LAKE FOR RECREATION OR POWER GENERATION: NO WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIR: NO NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS: YES PUBLIC USE BOAT RAMP: NO CEMETARIES: NO WILL A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION (FERC) PERMIT BE REQUIRED? NO IS THIS BRIDGE IN A FEDERAL PROJECT AREA THAT IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 408 PERMISSIONS? NO IS THE PROJECT AREA KNOWN FOR POTENTIAL INDIAN, COLONIAL, OR OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES? NO KNOWN OR POTENTIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE AREA? NO IS THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE ITSELF, OR ANY PART THEREOF, CONSIDERED HISTORIC? NO WILL THE PROJECT IMPACT A CHURCH, COMMUNITY CENTER, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITY? NO IS THIS PROJECT ON A STATEWIDE BICYCLE ROUTE OR A LOCAL NON-MARKED BICYCLE ROUTE? NO ANY CLARIFICATION OR COMMENTS ON ITEMS ABOVE: NO DECK DRAINAGE DISCHARGE INTO CREEK ALLOWED. NRTR LETER OF REVISION TO BE ISSUED. USE STANDARD NOTE FOR LONG EARRED BAT. CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ACCESS (DISCUSSED AT THE FSM BY DIVISION BRIDGE MANAGER) METHOD OF ACCESS: TOP-DOWN: NO MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT ACCESS TO SITE: DIRECT ACCESS FROM SR 1109 TRACTOR-TRAILER ACCESS: YES BARGE ACCESS: NO HEAVY EQUIPMENT ACCESS: YES POSTED ROADS AND POSTED BRIDGES IN VICINITY THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESS? NONE ARE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AVAILABLE NEAR SITE? YES ANY ANTICIPATED AREAS OF TEMPORARY SHORING REQUIRED? NONE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ROADWAY (COMPLETED BY ROADWAY ENGINEER PRIOR TO FSM) ALIGNMENT: EXISTING HORIZONTAL: CURVED ALIGNMENT WITH 8% SE EXISTING VERTICAL: FLAT GRADE APPROX. 0.5% POSSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS: NCDOT RDM (11/1/2021) AND ASSHTO GB (2018) POSSIBLE DESIGN SPEED: 60 MPH 6 POSSIBLE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: COMMENTS: APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH: 1100’ NUMBER AND WIDTH OF LANES: 2 LANES @ 11’ SHOULD THIS PROJECT HAVE CURB AND GUTTER OR SHOULDER APPROACHES? SHOULDER APPROACHES COMMENTS: TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH: 4’ PAVED SHOULDER WIDTH: N/A CLEAR ROADWAY ON STRUCTURE: 24’ CURB-CURB WILL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, BUSINESS ACCESS, -Y- LINES OR RAMPS NEED TO BE RELOCATED? NO COMMENTS: ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED FOR CONSTRUCTION? TCE AND PDE COMMENTS: FOR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AND 48” CROSS PIPE ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED? NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: REMOVE ASPHALT DUMPED ALONG NORTHEAST SLOPE. ARMOUR 2:1 SIDESLOPES WITH RIP RAP, USE 3:1 SIDESLOPES WHERE GR IS IN NOT REQUIRED. ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED / RESOLVED AT FSM BY ATTENDEES ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED BY ROADWAY DESIGN (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) OFF-SITE DETOUR ON-SITE DETOUR NEW LOCATION CHECK ONE TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE) LIBR ATT G PROGRAMMATIC CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE) MINIMUM CRITERIA RULE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST THE OPTIMUM LET DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS: SURVEY LIMITS: 55 MPH POSSIBLE SUPERSTRUCTURE: TYPE: CONCRETE DECK ON PRESTRESSED CONCRETE GIRDERS. NUMBER OF SPANS: TWO OR THREE LENGTH OF SPANS: TWO SPAN 30-65 (FT), THREE SPAN 30-45-30 (FT) TOTAL PROPOSED LENGTH: 95 TO 105 (FT) TOTAL PROPOSED WIDTH: 33’ OUT-OUT (FT) BRIDGE SKEW: 90 DEGREES ROW BY: PERMITS: METHOD OF CLEARING: SALVAGEABLE MATERIALS: NO REMOVAL OF REMENANT ABUTMENTS / PIERS: YES DECK OVERLAY TYPE ASPHALT 7 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: APPROACH SLAB ON SKEW OR PERPENDICULAR: PERPENDICULAR SHOULD PILES BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIAL: YES WILL TEST HOLES BE REQUIRED? YES