HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140243 Ver 1_Application_20140313��
���
���
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT L. MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
March 13, 2014
Mr. Steven Kichefski
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
ANTHONYJ.TATA
SECREI'ARY
SUBJECT: Pipe Replacement on SR 1667 (S.7. Cxawford Road), Gaston County
Dear Mr. Kichefski:
The North Carolina Deparhnent of Transportation requests authorization to replace a
deteriorating pipe on SR 1667 (S.J. Crawford Road) in Gaston County. NCDOT
proposes to replace the deteriorating 63-foot, 30" CMP with a 64-foot, 30" RCP. The
existing pipe is pexched 8 feet and on a 5.1% slope. Due to the existing site conditions,
the new pipe outlet will be left in a perched condition, the new pipe slope adjusted to
2.5% and a� 15 foot rock ladder/slide will be constructed at the outlet for limited aquatic
passage. Five feet of Class II rip rap will be placed around the pipe inlet and outlet for
structure stabilization. Due to the site conditions, NCDOT request a waiver from the
Regional Conditions 2(b)(e) permit depth specification for the construction of this
project. Temporary cofferdain/bypass pumping system will be used to divert the stream
around the construction site as needed. Areas affected by the temporary cofferdam will
be resiored to pre-project conditions.
The scope of the work will result in 20 feet of permanent impacts due to structure
stabilization/rock ladder consYrucrion to an unnamed tributary to Beaverdam Creek,
which is classified as a WS-IV Watershed by the N.C. Water Quality Section.
The project is not located within'/z mile of any critical watershed area nor is SR 1667 a
rural or urban arterial; therefoxe, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the
hazardous spill basin checklist. This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the
pxoject for historical sites and threatened/endangexed species sites. No sites listed on the
National Registex of Histaric Places are located in the viciniry of the project nor did there
appear to be any eligible structures. The project occurs within existing NCDOT right of
way. The federally listed species for Gaston County (USFWS listed date September 22,
2010) include Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitziz� and the bog turtle
SR 1667, S.J. Crawford Road
Page 2
March 13, 2014
(Glyptemys muhlenbergii)-(T/SA- Threatened due to similarity of appearance). Narional
Hexitage Program records document the nearest sunflower location 16 miles east of the
pxoposed project area. The sunflower is usually found in upland open areas pmtected
from shade or excessive competirion. There is little potential habitat within the proposed
project area and no species were observed during the site visit. Nataral Heritage Program
recards document the neazest bog turtle location 6.1 miles southeast of the proposed
project area. Bog turtles aze typically found in bogs, marshes, and wet pastures. T/SA
species are not subject to Section 7 consultation; howevex, there is no suitable habitaY
located within the project area and no impact on this species is anticipated.
I have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW#3, sketches of planned activities
and location maps relaYive to the project.
Project information far the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150456-55120005-12.203611-3126
• TIP#: NA
• Project Category: $240.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at (704) 480-9044.
Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully yours,
Reuben Chandler, P.E.
Acting Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY: �i�
Trish Beam
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
0�04.� �,F9QG
v
� sr
�i
O Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certifcation — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concem (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1667
2b. County: Catawba
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Long Shoals
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 12.203611
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC DOT Right of Way
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Reuben Chandler, Acting Division Engineer
4c. Busines s name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020
4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
4h. Email address: rchandler@ncdot.gov
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
Sa. Name: Trish Beam
5b. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
(if applicable):
Sc. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
Se. Telephone �o.: 704-480-9044
5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
Sg. Email address: pdbeam@ncdot.gov
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Properry identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.3888 Longitude: - 812590
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: <.10 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Ut to Beaverdam Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV
2c. River basi n: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A deteriorating perched pipe on a paved secondary road. Landuse is mostly residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to replace the deteriorating pipe for the safety of the travelling public.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
NCDOT proposes to replace the deteriorating 63-foot, 30" CMP with a 64-foot, 30" RCP. The existing pipe is perched 8
feet and on a 5.1 % slope. Due to the existing site conditions, the new pipe outlet will be left in a perched condition, the
new pipe slope adjusted to 2.5% and a— 15 foot rock ladder/slide will be constructed at the outlet for limited aquatic
passage. Five feet of Class II rip rap will be placed around the pipe inlet and outlet for structure stabilization. A temporary
cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the construction site, as needed. Areas affected by
temporary cofferdam system will be restored to pre-project conditions. The Project will be constructed using typical heavy
equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.)
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unk�own
Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by
Division 12 DEO.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifcations been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type ofjurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem ora T
W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 � P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
WS ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Rock
S1 � P❑ T Ladder/Riprap for UT to Beaverdam ❑ PER � Corps 1.5 20
Structure Creek � INT � DWQ
Stabilization
S2 ❑ P� T Cofferdam bypass UT to Beaverdam ❑ PER � Corps 1.5 50
pumping Creek � INT � DWQ
S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts *20
3i. Comments: *Permanent Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P�T
04 ❑POT
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. Sc. Sd. Se.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
SL Total
Sg. Comments:
Sh. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Sk. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ TarvPamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora T im act re uired?
B1 ❑P�T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑�'es
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. ImpactJustification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
To bury the pipe per regulation would result in an extreme pipe slope, which could destabilize the stream; therefore, the new
pipe will remain perched to maintain a stable channel and a rock ladder will be constructed at the outlet to dissipate energy
and to provided limited aquatic life passage.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Minimization of impacts by installing appropriate erosion control measures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
26. If yes, mitigation is required by (check alL that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linearfeet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Complies with NCDOT's individual
NPDES permit NCS000250.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
0 Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs � NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to t he above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. �II this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not result in
additional development which could impact water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater generated from project.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If y es, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Desig�ated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program database and feld site visit.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The pipe replacement project occurs within a previously impacted area (NCDOT Right of Way).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number:3710362000J
�� A ,����d �t'� l �� (/L ����x� �� ��lU 'l7
� ������ ��'�" '�'�P�i
ApplicanU enfs Printed ame ApphcanUAgenYs Signature Date
(AgenPs signature is valid only iF an authorization letterfrom the applicant
is provided.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
�
N
0
N
f �
o �
-. o
� �
� �
��
�
� �
� m
0
� �
O p�
O
� �
O
��
a �,
m
�
�
0
�
�
0
�
�
�
�y
b
y
u
V
�
�
in
�
w
�
�
��
�
N �
��
y4
R
� '
� 1'
�
� ;� �
R � �'
�
�r
��
'n1'. � � O
a ti
b l� y b a
:i � p (
O �
o �
�
�
�
�
�
y
��
�
�
��
4
W
W
ia
0
,
�c
�
�
�
�
�
�
��
��
�,
�
O
x
h
�
b
w�
`O O
��
p�j b
�b
b
I �
I �J
a
l��
H
° II
�
�
�
�`'•�:
�=
�
\�
?
���
i
�
I �
'
���
`�`�`
�
`�b
"�
��
:T �A
�
��
Q �R
.-Sd �GL
_ `!"'�d1
. �,6.�
�
�
`
:
�
�
b
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
z
y
ii
V
�
rn
U
a
m
a
�:
�
� -
�ry :
y�
R
� �
�
3
�
��'�''.
��
\�
� O `�
�
Q b _ ��
� ��'�
�a � ��� �
I �
y �
� I �b� ^
o Wo U I W��jy I �
b I II�I
I � I I
I �
� -�
b ��3
� �� : �
`�s�
� �:
� ��
z �
y �' �b
�� '�,,
� �' `�
� �s
m � `I �
W � : I `�y�
W !!�
�A !�
I � ' `A
N -3 Py-
o � 9m R
� � �a
� �
�a
� ���
�
� �
vl
ti
+11
C
:
�
Div 12 NCDOT
Gaston Maintenance
Culvert to Culvert
J. Crawford Road SR 166
Gaston County
3.10.14
_ u
/�
��
rlh
— u
�
�
��Oo� o � �
r �
o�� �� ��
� � �
�
� �3 !
�
�
� �,
.�� � �
.��' �
BM =100.00'
� � il in CL R
� ��`v� \
� 1 0
r �
z
�
�
N
C"1
i
n
-o
m
r
�
v
0
a
0
�
0
�
0
3
�
U
�
h
�
�
�
�
NC GRID
NAD 83/NSRS 2007
�
�c —_�
�����""_�—���;
UN��
� ,C�
`tir�
� �
� �
�
I.PUMPING SYSTEM TO BE USED TO
DIVERT STREAM THROUGH
CONSTRUCTION SITE AS NEEDED
W�
2. ANY CONTAMINATED WATER WITHIN
� PCJMPEDNINTO qIOI�TIBA�S TO BE
� 3. SILT FENCE IS TO BE PLACED AROUND
THE PROJECT AS NEEDED
4. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT
DISTURBED AREAS MtJST BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED WITHIN SEVEN (77 DAYS
S.REFERENCE BEST MANAGEMENT
PRATICES FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
6. Shot rock or Class II rip rop to
be placedat all fiour corners not
to exceed fiive (5') feet from
pipe
NCDOT
F-IAZARDOUS SPILL BAS1N CHECKLIST
Division: 12 County: C,arawha Project ID: 12.203611
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: NA
Route: SR 1667
Water Quality Criteria:
Stream: UT to Beaverdam Creek
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS
ORW
Wsl
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Arterial Urban '�
Arterial Rural �
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
� �
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT `Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).
Yes No
�� (J
i^" r�
r �
I ;�