20220211 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220203

DW R
mrlsloa of ware. Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
20220211
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
9800
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Centerpoint 85
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Ashley Bentz
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/3/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Pounder Fork Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
WS-V,B
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.80517
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Davidson
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Longitude:
-80.18082
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version# *
1
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Davidson Craven, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Jonathan T Smith
2d.Address
Street Address
114 Reynolda Vlg Ste M
Address Line 2
City
Winston Salem
Postal / Zip Code
27106
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:
[e-mail]
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
Yes No
Yes No
U

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Ashley Bentz
4b. Business Name:
S&ME, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
3201 Spring Forest Road
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27616
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Lexington
2. Project Identification
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
6745-04-90-8277,6754-01-09-2316
46.40
2c. Project Address
Street Address
2330 New Bowers Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Lexington
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27292
US
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Pounder Fork Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
W S-V, B
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401030206
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The project site is currently undeveloped agricultural and forested land. It is located at the southeast corner of 1-85 and US-64, but the remaining vicinity is a mixture of undeveloped,
agricultural, rural residential, and institutional.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4.25
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
3,296
u

4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The 1-85/US-64 areas has been targeted for industrial development in the Davidson County Land Use Plan since approximately 1999, which has now been made possible by the
availability of sewer on site provided by Davidson County in 2021. The site was identified as an economic development priority of Davidson County and Davidson County Economic
Development Corporation. The site will be developed as an industrial warehouse in support of this effort.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project is an approximately 272,000 square foot warehouse and distribution facility with associated employee parking, truck/trailer parking, utilities, and stormwater control facilities.
Construction will be performed by standard commercial construction equipment. No specialized equipment not regularly seen on commercial projects is anticipated.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-01593
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Walter Cole
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME, Inc
Other:
Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
A preliminary jurisdictional determination request was submitted on July 23, 2021. On August 27, 2021 Mr. Chris Hopper of the USACE confirmed that the aquatic resources delineation
has been verified by the Corps to be a sufficiently accurate and reliable representation of the location and extent of aquatic resources within the identified review area. The location and
extent of these aquatic resources are shown on the attached delineation concurrence exhibit, labeled "Feature Exhibit Centerpoint 85 Warehouse" and dated 7/23/2021 without revisions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
U
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type*
2c. Type of W.
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
2g. Impact
?)
area
W1
fill
P
Headwater Forest
W1
Yes
Corps
0.094
W2
fill
P
Headwater Forest
W2
Yes
Corps
(acres)
0.031
(acres)
W3
fill
L
Headwater Forest
W3
_
Yes
Corps
]
0.088
acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.213
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.213
2i. Comments:
Wetland impacts will be limited to two areas within the site. Wetland impacts W1 and W2 will be the result of fill required for grading of the site for the
structure and will result in 0.094 acres and 0.031 acres of permanent wetland impacts respectively. Wetland impact W3 is the result of grading of the site
for the remote trailer parking lot.
3. Stream Impacts

11
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact"
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type"
3f. Type of
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
(?)
Jurisdiction"
length"
S1
S1
Permanent
Culvert
S1
Intermittent
Corps
3nverage
2(Inear
(feet)
feet)
S2
S2
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
S1
Intermittent
Corps
3
24
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S3
S3
Temporary
Dewatering
S1
Intermittent
Corps
3
24
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
268
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
292
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
24
3j. Comments:
Stream impacts will be limited to one area of intermittent stream. This stream will be culverted, resulting in 244 linear feet (2.76 foot average width) of
permanent loss due to the culvert, an additional 24 linear feet (2.76 foot average width) of impact for rip rap inlet and outlet protection which will be a
permanent impact but not a net loss, and 24 linear feet (2.76 foot average width) of temporary impacts to allow for dewatering of the stream during
construction.
4. Open Water Impacts
4a. Site #
4al. Impact Reason
4b. Impact type
4c. Name of waterbody
4d. Activity type :114e.
Waterbody type
4f. Impact area
OW1
fill
P
P1
Fill
Pond
0.t6
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts: 4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.00 0.16
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.16
4h. Comments:
Impacts to open waters will be the result of fill being placed during grading and the construction of the structure and parking. These impacts will total
0.163 acres and will be permanent.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Plans were designed to limit impacts by shortening the trailer storage along the rear of the building. The designs also utilize a retaining wall to
accommodate the grade required along New Bowers Road, which adjusted the overall development closer to the street and therefore avoided additional
impacts to wetlands and streams. The remote trailer parking lot is accessed by a drive which ties directly into a location where impacts to the stream and
wetland were already required for grading for the structure and rear site access. This location was chosen to avoid additional impacts to the stream for a
second stream crossing. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices equaling those outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual' will be used to minimize impacts to the jurisdictional features.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Specific attention will be paid to ensure grading is only performed to the extent needed for the proposed project and all grading not required will be
avoided. Northing and Easting coordinates will be shown at the limits of the stream impacts and linear wetland impacts on site plans. Additional impacts
to the jurisdictional features will be avoided through the use of appropriate sediment and erosion control devices.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes
No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation options) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No

4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
0
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
0
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested
0
4h. Comments
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.426 ac
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
Site is located outside watershed requiring riparian buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
State Stormwater Programs
Phase II Coastal Counties
HWQ or ORW Other
Comments:
Design on stormwater plan is underway. Plans will be completed by early to mid -May and will be in accordance with NCDEQ Stormwater Manual to remove 85 % TSS. The pond will be
reviewed and permitted by the NCDEQ 401 Unit.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project will address an existing need for warehouse/distribution facility in this region.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The City of Lexington will provide sewage disposal. This project should not increase demand significantly from existing levels and will not strain the
existing City of Lexington sewer system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program online data explorer (https://www.ncnhp.org/data) and US Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and
Consultation (IPaC) report. No critical habitat was identified within the site and no element occurrences of protected species have been observed within
the site or within one mile of the site. A Natural Community was identified by the NCNHP along the southern property boundary within the 100-year
floodplain and will not be disturbed.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
The USFWS IPaC report and the National Marine Fisheries Service Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
(https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office web mapping tool HPOWEB (https://www.ncdcr.gov/aboutthistory/division-historical-resources/gis-
maps-and-data). The nearest historical site identified is the Holly Grove Lutheran Church approximately 0.55 miles north of the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
The project engineer and the FEMA firm map 3710674500J, both dated March 16, 2009. The FEMA firmette is attached. Floodplains border the eastern
and southern property boundaries and these areas have been avoided by the project engineers.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments

Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Ashley Bentz
Signature
Date
2/3/2022