20140221 Ver 1_401 Application_20140314

r�
LUCK COMPANIES"
IGNITING HUMAN POTENTIAL February 28, 2014
Laurie Dennison ► --
Division of Water Resources T
NCDENR (� �]
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
MAR 0 7 2014
Re: Charles Luck Stone Center Raleigh j
Wetlands Permit Application
Dear Ms. Dennison,
The Charles Luck Stone Center is relocating to Capital Boulevard in Raleigh, NC,
and aspects of the property development plan require the need for a wetlands permit
application. The enclosed documents include a Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) for
Nationwide Permit 7 for shoreline impacts to allow a stormwater management structure.
There are also minimal impacts to an established RPA for this water - related activity.
The Charles Luck Stone Center is requesting authorization for this activity under
a general permit from NCDENR in association with the NWP from the Corps. Forms
and plan sheets are enclosed, as well as a check for the permit fee.
If I may be of further assistance, please call (804) 476 -6404, or contact me via
email ( markdwilliams @luckcompanies.com).
Respectfully,
Mark D. Williams
Environmental Manager
Virginia Certified Wetlands Delineator 34020000011
P.O. Box 29682 TEL [phone] WEB www.luckcompanies.com
Richmond, VA 23242 800.898.5825

130 wArFgpc
r
0 <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 7 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑Yes ❑X No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Raleigh Contractor Yard Relocation, Charles Luck Stone Center
2b. County:
Wake County,NC
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Bennett A. Rowland Estate, Reba J. Rowland, Executrix
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB 222 Page 0 -E (See BM 1997, Pg 1953)
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Luck Stone Corporation
3d.
Street address:
515 Stone Mill Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Manakin - Sabot, VA 23103
3f.
Telephone no.:
804 - 476 -6404
3g. Fax no.:
804- 784 -5380 UP
3h.
Email address:
MarkDWilliams @luckcompanies.com Brar
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Informaton (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Developer
4b
Name
Mark Williams
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Luck Stone Corporation
4d
Street address
515 Stone Mill Drive
4e
City, state, zip
Manakin- Sabot, VA 23103
4f
Telephone no
804 -476 -6404
4g
Fax no
804- 784 -5380
4h
Email address
MarkDWlliams @luckcompanies com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Wesley Webb, PE
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Alley,Williams, Carmen, & King, Inc
5c
Street address
120 South Main Street
5d
City, state, zip
Kannapolis, NC 28082
5e
Telephone no
704- 938 -1515
5f
Fax no
704- 938 -6810
5g
Email address
wwebb @awck corn
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1727 -55 -9255
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.87861 Longitude: 78.57806
1 c. Property size:
14.332 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Gresham Lake (Perry Creek)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
B, NSW
2c. River basin:
Upper Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project will redevelop a site that has been used for the storage of highway maintenance materials, especially concrete temporary walls and
highway equipment. There is commercial and retail development on the adjacent parcel.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
A proposed stormwater detention basin discharge pipe will be exposed, and requires outlet protection to reduce erosion. Riprap will be used at the lake
.✓i2
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A sediment basin will be constructed to manage stormwater runoff. A barrel and riser outlet channel will discharge water outside of the impoundment al
A I o kv' 1-Qj ey � , �'Y�kvtf %,l, it Gl 2ct % U Yl�i � `JCiSt? 1a i ll h ✓ev I C e � "�S(d.a � � if/� �G �r�r.�
D
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
TO ency /Consultant Company:
er.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ED No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers Q Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b
Type of impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts:
2h Comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary M
3b
Type of impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
_
S2 -
Choose one
_
_
S3 -
Choose one
_
_
S4 -
Choose one
-
_
S5 -
Choose one
-
_
S6 -
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indiv ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
Impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of Impact (acres)
01 P
Gresham Lake
Fill
Lake
000046
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
000046
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then Individually list all buffer Impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation. then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a. Project Is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
Impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 P
Basin Discharge Protection
Gresham Lake (Perry Creek)
No
80
B2 T
Construction of outfall
Gresham Lake (Perry Creek)
No
520
400
B3
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
600
400
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing project
Except for the 20 square feet of impact to Gresham Lake, all construction was designed to remain outside of the stream buffer Due to the terrain of
the site, construction of stormwater treatment facilities requires an outfall into the Lake An inverted nser is being constructed to reduce the size and
velocity of the energy dissipater
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques
The sediment detention basin was designed to remain outside of the lake's buffer zone The presence of a slope at the water's edge will require the
use of some nprap below the ordinary high water mark With the use of a temporary dike, all equipment can be kept out of the lake during construction
2. Compensatory Mitt ation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
projects
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Miti anon Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ❑X No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
0 Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Due to the site terrain, the proposed stormwater treatment facilities have an invert lower than the edge of
the riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
148%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
The project is an expansion of a site that was previously developed The development includes the construction of an outdoor storage and display
area for architectural stone products and will include 0 65 acres of impervious area
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Raleigh
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
apply (check all that apply)
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
❑Session Law 2006 -246
[:]Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after- the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
The
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
wastewater generated from the proposed project will be discharged to the public sewer collection system of Wake County
An existing
and connection is located on the site
system
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
El Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS web site of federally protected species in Wake County, NC; NCDENR web site for the Natural Heritage Program; no protected species
detected.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
MAFMC defines specific areas that are EFH (such as marsh, forested wetlands, or SAV areas), and the project does not impact these areas.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDCR HPO web site; the site has been significantly disturbed and impacted by previous owners. There are no structures on the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No habitable structures are proposed within the FEMA flood hazard areas. Any fill within the FEMA flood hazard area is being permitted through the
City of Raleigh. No additional fill is proposed within the riparian buffer area.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Wake County FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 1727 (May 2, 2006)
Mark Williams
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

'-ylo�`,_/�
USACE STILLING BASIN
RALEIGH CONTRACTOR YARD RELOCATION
CHARLES LUCK STONE CENTER
G921 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
-
into
WAKE FOREST QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
/

GRESHAM LAKE
100 -YR 8FE ELEV: 250.7
—N-
20 LF OF 2" SCHEDULE 40
STEEL PIPE FOR INSPECTION
DRAIN WITH 2" GATE VALVE
OPEN WATER IMPACT
20 SQ. FT.
FEMA FEMA 100-YR
FLOODWAY -� FLOOD FRINGE
SENNETTA. ROWLAND HEIRS\
C/O REBA JONES ROWLAND
PIN: 1727-54-1895
DB 222, PG O-E
(SEE BM 1997, PG 1953)
ZONING :IND -1
LAND USE: VACANT
PROPERTY TO BE RECOMBINED
WITH PIN M 1727 - 55.9255
N CAR
SEAL =
16883
-
�� •.ENGINE • • 0`:
•0 .
''� /111111111 \``
13516 USACE.dwa
USACE STILLING BASIN
24" CMP (16 GAUGE)
RALEIGH SKI CLUB LLC
RIM: 24S.0
PIN: 1727-45-11S4
24" CMP INVERT IN: 241.0
08 8005, PG 194
2" INSPECTION DRAIN: 241.0
ZONING: IND-1
BASIN INVERT: 240.58
LAND USE: AC w/ IMP
OUTLET PROTECTION
(DESCRIPTION FROM WAKE
18" DEPTH CLASS 1 RIPRAP
COUNTY (MAPS) 30' RIPARIAN
101 x 10'W APRON
BUFFER (ZONE 1)
(SEE STILLING BASIN DETAIL)
SO' RIPARIAN
PROP. 20 LF OF 24" CMP (16 GAUGE) @ 17.7% BUFFER (ZONE 2)
JUNCTION BOX JB -3
RIM: 756.0
24" CMP W TIDEFLEX VALVE INVERT IN: 245.55
24" CMP INVERT OUT: 244.55 Z�
PROPERTY LINE /Q
E.O.W. // 254
PROPOSED
DETENTION
BASIN /
IP. 70 LF OF 24" CMP
GAUGE)g10.5%
Id4
/
DETENTION BASIN RISER
/
36" CMP 116 GAUGE)
RIM: 249.4
6" ORIFICE INVERT: 245.9
Z'
Q�
v
ffmalley, williams, carmen, do king, Inc. USACE STILLING BASIN
CONSULTING ENGINEERS RALEIGH CONTRACTOR YARD RELOCATION
FIRM IJCD= No. P -0203 CHARLES LUCK STONE CENTER
120 P SIRUP P.D. ox 1245
KNmu S N C tm 704/938-115115 6921 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
H IM16 °""" RCC °"'°� G'WW 'I'- • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET 1 OF 2

2'
#4 REBAR TRASH RACK
WITH 6' OPENINGS
ATTACHED TO RISER
RIM, 245.00
MIRAFI 60OX
FILTER FABRIC
24' CMP
16 GAUGE
24' CMP (16 G
INV. IN, 241.00
BOTTOM INV.t 240.58
V ♦ ♦ V
3' x 3' x 1.5' CONCRETE
ANTI - FLOTATION BLOCK
2' SLIDE VALVE FOR
INSPECTION DRAIN
4'
RIPRAP
2' INSPECTION
DRAIN
INV. OUTt 241.00
USACE STILLING BASIN DETAIL
alley. Williams, carmen• do king. Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
MtM UCD13E MD. ►-0203
120 SI M MAN 6ww P.O. BOX 1240
KAIOIA►plS, !IC IM 704/838 -1818
W
Z
►r
J
W
a
Iri
2'
NORMAL
POOL
"Yo
.`���OQ`� ' S1••
`� • of off, y'
SEAL
16883
G�
SLEY
RALEIGH CONTRACTOR YARD RELOCATION
CHARLES LUCK STONE CENTER
6921 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
8XIM 8 or 2

�eeseee.
t GRESHAM LAKE
_ e
4a
.n.....�,•.P,ae,... '° m.u<.w,o, wp.e..P°waaerl i "����� ,
I I
alley wllllams carmen 3 king Inc
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
rml ume p> r
Im 91UI11 IWN SISRi PO BO 9 -1315 %f%b
%sl%strOla. MC pSWS )0{ /p]
¢
�� t � casr y ,� � i � �� ✓ � �/ �' f I r
r
oast 0rlaeFpMlF mnM
"'e � W m•M .°e.WS •r... WW se a M cneseYS NO in. treaty tlop
�� tWi.LL Ysm1 Ly[ • W W •x. tmb a ae w• �
n¢ v urc W.. � W mo.4 W4 M • aw•. wbv.. N aW • N r'�R
ream r.Pa _ ""�.`. _I°m... �r r•. °....� .�,.
�n°�pm�� meaw..pe ' � m R 1 ,W«°i°.�°.,,• �da..I�"�'° �Fem°'�." r�«°w.� .,,8.�,..'' w,
.e.a m °.came: mac, i/
i
A 13516
CHARLES LUCK STONE, CENTER GRADING AND STORM o
6921`,CAPITAL BOULEVARD ®` cxw DRAINAGE PLAN Z 3
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA