20171605 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20220208

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20171605 Version* 1
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 02/08/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 2/8/2022
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Jason Lorch [e-mail]
Project Information
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20171605 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
County: Harnett
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Daniels Creek MY1 Report.pdf 26.69MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Print Name:* Jason Lorch
Signature:*
4G .[ C

w
WILD LANDS
E r+GIr+EE RING
February 8, 2022
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attention: Mr. Mickey Sugg
Subject: Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank—Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Third Credit Release (Monitoring Year 1 Completion)
Dear Mr. Sugg:
This correspondence is in reference to the Daniels Creek Mitigation Site, part of the Middle Cape Fear Umbrella
Mitigation Bank.The 56.144-acre site is in the Cape Fear 04 Cataloging Unit (03030004) and is in located in
Harnett County near the town of Broadway, North Carolina.The purpose of this letter is to request the third
release of credits for Year 1 Monitoring Complete with interim performance standards met.
Monitoring Year 1 (MY1) site assessments were conducted between April and December 2021. Overall, the Site
met the performance standards for MY1 and is functioning as intended. Out of 45 vegetation plots 41 are
meeting the MY3 interim success criterion of 320 planted stems per acre. Herbaceous vegetation is well
established, and wetland plant species have been observed in wetland areas. Cross-sections and visual
assessments showed that the stream channel is performing as designed and no indicators of channel instability
were observed. Multiple bankfull events were recorded on T1 R4,T4 R1, and T7. Bankfull events were not
recorded on T3 R2,T8 R1, or Daniels Creek R4. Additionally, all flow gauges exceeded the performance criteria
during MY1 with flow ranging from 108 to 255 consecutive days.
Five out of 18 groundwater gauges exceeded the success criteria with hydroperiods of at least 23.8%(63
consecutive days). Gauges began recording data at various dates throughout the growing season, missing
important early dates for hydroperiod criterion attainment. No adaptive management needs were identified
during MY1.
Pursuant to the Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument and the site-specific Daniels Creek Final Mitigation
Plan, successful completion of MY1 activities and demonstration that performance standards are being met for
all parcels within the bank grants ten percent (10%) of the bank site's total stream credits,ten percent (10%) of
the bank site's total riparian wetland credits, and ten percent (10%) of the bank site's non-riparian wetland
credits be available for sale.Therefore, we are requesting 1,202.4 stream mitigation credits, and 1.392 riparian
wetland mitigation credits, and 0.039 non-riparian wetland mitigation credits be released, constituting 10%of
the total stream restoration credits (12,024.00 stream credits), 10%of the total riparian wetland restoration
credits (13.923 riparian wetland credits), and 10%of the total non-riparian wetland restoration credits (0.392
non-riparian wetland credits).
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. • phone [phone] • 312 West Millbrook Road,Suite 225 • Raleigh,NC 27609

w
WILD LANDS
E r+GIr+EE RING
Please contact me at 919.624.0905 if you have any questions.
Sincerely Yours,
2
c--
Chris Roessler
Project Manager
Wildlands Engineering,Inc. • phone [phone] • 312 West Millbrook Road,Suite 225 • Raleigh,NC 27609

Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank:
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Cape Fear HUC 03030004 W I L D LA N IDS
Stream Credit Ledger HOLDINGS
Date Last Updated: 02-03-2022
0
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Total Credits Released To Date:3,607.20 LF
Permits Credit Impact Impact Total
Type Jurisdiction Date Permittee Project Name Credits Available Comments
(SAW#) Classification HUC Quantity Withdrawn
SMU 11/19/2019 1,842.00 SAW-2017-00998 Warm 1,842.00 Release 1.Bank Establishment. 15%
SMU NCDWR 2/22/2021 NC DEQ DMS IFB#16-042120-13 1,561.00 SAW-2017-00998 Warm 03030004 1,561.00 281.00
SMU Harnett County 3/8/2021 Dan Ryan Builders-North Carolina,LLC Tuscarora Grove SD 281.00 SAW-2020-00575 Warm 03030004 190.00 281.00 -
SMU 8/30/2021 1,765.20 SAW-2017-00998 Warm 1,765.20 As-Built Credit Release 15%
SMU NCDWR 9/30/2021 NC DEQ DMS IFB#16-042120-13 1,765.20 SAW-2017-00998 Warm 03030004 1,765.20 -

Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank:
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Cape Fear HUC 03030004 W I L D LA N D S
Riparian Wetland Credit Ledger HOLDINGS
Date Last Updated:02-03-2022
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Total Credits Released To Date:4.177 acres
Permits Impact Impact Total
Type Jurisdiction Date Permittee Project Name Credits (SAW#) Credit Classification
HUC Quantity Withdrawn Available Comments
WMU 11/19/2019 2.08 Riparian Non-Riverine 2.08 Release 1.Bank Establishment.15%
WMU Harnett County 5/14/2020 Lynn Ridge of Angier,LLC Lynn Ridge Subdivision 0.92 SAW-2020-00488 03030006 0.51 0.92 1.16
WMU Wake County 6/16/2020 Greg Bagley Summerdale ll Subdivision 0.46 SAW-2019-02106 03030004 0.23 0.46 0.70
WMU Harnett County 7/7/2020 PJ's Truck Bodies PJ's Parking Lot Crossing 0.28 SAW-2016-02372 03030006 0.14 0.28 0.42
WMU Cumberland County 10/14/2020 Fayetteville Cedar Creek 2019,LLC,Collins Hartzog Starbucks Cedar Creek Road 0.15 SAW-2020-01500 03030004 0.144 0.15 0.27
WMU Cumberland County 10/20/2020 City of Fayetteville Public Works Commission,Joe Glass Fayetteville Collection System Expansion 0.24 SAW-2018-00163 03030004 0.22 0.24 0.03
WMU NCDWR 2/22/2021 NC DEQ DMS IFB#16-042120-13 0.03 SAW-2017-00998 03030004 0.03 0.00
WMU 8/30/2021 2.097 Riparian Non-Riverine 2.097 As-Built Credit Release 15%
WMU NCDWR 9/30/2021 NC DEQ DMS IFB#16-042120-13 2.097 SAW-2017-00998 03030004 2.097 -

Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank:
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Cape Fear HUC 03030004 W I L D LAN D S (____)
Non-Riparian t Ledger
Date Last Updated: 02-03-2022 HOLDINGS
0
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Total Credits Released To Date:0.118 acres
Permits Credit Impact Impact Total
Type Jurisdiction Date Permittee Credits Available Comments
(SAW#) Classification HUC Quantity Withdrawn
WMU 11/19/2019 0.059 Non-Riparian 0.059 Release 1. Bank Establishment. 15%
WMU 8/30/2021 0.059 Non-Riparian 0.118 As-Built Credit Release 15%
0.118

Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule
Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank:
Project Name: County: Harnett
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Sponsor Name: Wildlands Holdings IV,LLC 8-Digit HUC: 03030004
USACE Action ID: SAW-2017-00998 Year Project Instituted: 2019
NCDWR Action ID: 17-1605 Date Prepared: 2/3/2022
Total Potential Credits
Non-Forested
Stream Credits Forested Wetland Credits Wetland
Credit Classification Credits
Cool Cold Riparian Riparian
Warm Water Non-Riparian Coastal
Water Water Riverine Non-Riverine
Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan 12,280.0 13.923 0.392
Potential Credits from As-Built Survey 12,024.0 13.923 0.392
Current and Future Credit Releases
Stream Credits Forested Wetland Credits Non-Forested Wetland
Credit Release Milestone Credits Projected Actual Release
Scheduled Cool Cold Scheduled Riparian Riparian Scheduled Release Date Date
Warm Water Non-Riparian Coastal
Releases Water Water Releases Riverine Non-Riverine Releases
1(Bank/Site Establishment)'-'2 15% 1,842.0 15% 2.080 0.059 15% NA 11/19/2019
2(Year 0/As-Built)3 15% 1,765.2 15% 2.097 0.059 15% NA 8/30/2021
3(Year 1 Monitoring) 10% 1,202.4 10% 1.392 0.039 10% NA Mar-22
4(Year 2 Monitoring) 10% 1,202.4 10% 1.392 0.039 15% NA Mar-23
5(Year 3 Monitoring) 10% 1,202.4 15% 2.088 0.059 20% NA Mar-24
6(Year 4 Monitoring) 5% 601.2 5% 0.696 0.020 10% NA Dec-24
7(Year 5 Monitoring) 10% 1,202.4 15% 2.089 0.059 15% NA Dec-25
8(Year 6 Monitoring) 5% 601.2 5% 0.696 0.020 NA NA Dec-26
9(Year 7 Monitoring) 10% 1,202.4 10% 1.393 0.038 NA NA Dec-27
Stream Bankfull Standard4 10% 1,202.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA Varies4
Total Credits Release to Date 40% 4,809.6 40% 5.569 0.157
Contingencies(if any):None
Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release Date
1-The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan.
2-The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank,which includes the following criteria:
1)Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2)Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3)Mitigation bank site must be secured;
4)Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5)Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6)404 permit verification for construction of the site,if required.
3-The second credit release is based on the credit totals from the as-built survey,and may differ slightly from the credit totals stated in the mitigation plan.
4-A 10%reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.

MONITORING YEAR 1 DANIELS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Harnett County, NC
ANNUAL REPORT Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030004
February 2022 USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
Data Collection Dates: April-December 2021
PREPARED FOR:
The North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT)
USACE Project Manager: Mickey Sugg
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403

PREPARED BY:
eall41111p
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Mil!brook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

DANIELS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-1
1.1 Project Quantities and Credits 1-1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 1-4
1.3 Project Attributes 1-6
Section 2: Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment 2-1
2.1 Vegetative Assessment 2-1
2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern 2-1
2.3 Stream Assessment 2-1
2.4 Stream Areas of Concern 2-1
2.5 Hydrology Assessment 2-2
2.6 Wetland Assessment 2-2
2.7 Monitoring Year 1 Summary 2-3
Section 3: REFERENCES 3-1
TAME V,
Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits 1-1
Table 2: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements 1-4
Table 3: Project Attributes 1-6
FIGURES
Figure 1-1.5 Current Condition Plan View
APPENDICES
Appendix A Visual Assessment Data
Table 4 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Stream Crossing Photographs
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Groundwater Gauge Photographs
Stream Repair Photographs
Appendix B Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Table 7a Fixed Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Table 7b Random Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Appendix C Stream Geomorphology Data
Cross-Section Plots
Table 8 Cross-Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Appendix D Hydrology Data
Table 9 Bankfull Events
Table 10 Rainfall Summary
Table 11 Recorded In-Stream Flow Events Summary
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report i

Recorded In-Stream Flow Events Plots
Table 12 Groundwater Gauge Summary
Groundwater Gauge Plots
Soil Temperature Plots
Appendix E Project Timeline and Contact Info
Table 13 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 14 Project Contact Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report ii

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Daniels Creek Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Harnett County near the town of Broadway, North
Carolina.The Site is situated on the boundary of the Piedmont and Inner Coastal Plain Physiographic
Province of North Carolina.Table 3 presents information related to the project attributes.
1.1 Project Quantities and Credits
Mitigation work within the Site includes restoration, enhancement I, and enhancement II of perennial
and intermittent stream channels along with restoration, re-establishment, and enhancement of
wetlands.Table 1 below shows stream credits by reach and the total amount of stream credits expected
at closeout. Stream Restoration Levels include restoration (R), enhancement level 1 (El), and
enhancement level 2 (E2). Wetland Restoration Levels include restoration, rehabilitation, and
enhancement.
Table 1: Project Quantities and Credits
PROJECT MITIGATION QUANTITIES
Project Mitigation As-Built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Segment Plan Footage Footage Category Level Ratio(X:1) Credits Comments
Stream
Daniels 373 366 Warm R 1.0 373.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Creek R1 Out Livestock
366 369 Warm R 1.0 366.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
Daniels
Creek R2
72 68 Warm R 1.0 72.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
818 842 Warm R 1.0 818.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
Daniels Ki/o
Creek R3
425 431 Warm R 1.0 425.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
Daniels 1 041 1 074 Warm R 1.0 1 041.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Creek R4 Out Livestock
Daniels 163 204 Warm R 1.0 163.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Creek R5 Out Livestock
390 496 Warm R 1.0 390.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
T1 R1 Out Livestock
T1 R2 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
40 40 Warm E2 2.5 16.000 Livestock
247 247 Warm E2 2.5 98.800 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock
T1 R3
83 83 Warm E2 2.5 33.200 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-1

PROJECT MITIGATION QUANTITIES
Project Mitigation As-built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Segment Plan Footage Footage Category Level Ratio(X:1) Credits Comments
Stream
813 816 Warm R 1.0 813.000* Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T1 R4
245 246 Warm R 1.0 245.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T1 R5 716 739 Warm R 1.0 716.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T1A 285 285 Warm E2 2.5 114.000 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock
T2 R1 260 257 Warm R 1.0 260.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T2 R2 198 200 Warm R 1.0 198.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T3 R1 401 401 Warm E2 2.5 160.400 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock
417 427 Warm R 1.0 417.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T3 R2
510 518 Warm R 1.0 510.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T3A 168 168 Warm E2 2.5 67.200 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock
1,029 1,039 Warm R 1.0 1,029.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
T4 R1 Out Livestock
T4 R2 538 530 Warm R 1.0 538.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T5 R1 240 240 Warm E2 2.5 96.000 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock
T5 R2 385 386 Warm R 1.0 385.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T6 R1 612 612 Warm E2 2.5 244.800 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock
18 18 Warm R 1.0 18.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T6 R2
250 249 Warm R 1.0 250.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T7 1,235 1,241 Warm El 1.5 823.330
Raised Stream Profile Stabilization,
Fenced Out Livestock
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-2

PROJECT MITIGATION QUANTITIES
Project Mitigation As-built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Segment Plan Footage Footage Category Level Ratio(X:1) Credits Comments
Stream
T8 R1 308 309 Warm El 1.5 205.330
Raised Stream Profile Stabilization,
Fenced Out Livestock
T8 R2 450 460 Warm R 1.0 450.000 Full Channel Restoration, Fencing
Out Livestock
T9 658 658 Warm E2 2.5 219.333 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock, Invasive Removal
T9A 365 365 Warm E2 2.5 121.667 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock, Invasive Removal
T10 R1 500** 600 Warm E2 2.5 166.667** Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock, Invasive Removal
T10 R2 401 401 Warm E2 2.5 133.667 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock, Invasive Removal
T10A 142 142 Warm E2 ailL 2.5 47.333 Bank Stabilization, Fenced Out
Livestock, Invasive Removal
Total: 12,024.727*
WETLANDS
Wetland 8.611 8.611 Riparian Enhancement 5.0 1.722 Planting, Cattle Exclusion
Enhancement
Wetland 1.702 1.702 Riparian Enhancement 3.0 0.567 Planting, Cattle Exclusion
Enhancement
Wetland 0.165 0.165 Riparian Rehabilitation 1.5 0.110 Planting, Cattle Exclusion
Rehabilitation
Wetland 11.524 11.524 Riparian Restoration 1.0 11.524 Planting, Cattle Exclusion
Restoration
Wetland 0.897 0.897 Non-Riparian Enhancement 5.0 0.179 Planting, Cattle Exclusion
Enhancement
Wetland 0.217 0.217 Non-Riparian Enhancement 3.0 0.072 Planting, Cattle Exclusion
Enhancement
Wetland 0.112 0.112 Non-Riparian Rehabilitation 1.5 0.075 Planting, Cattle Exclusion
Rehabilitation
Wetland 0.066 0.066 Non-Riparian Restoration 1.0 0.066 Planting,Site Grading, Cattle
Restoration Exclusion
Total:14.315
*Stream credits were miscalculated for T1 R4 in the Mitigation Plan but were updated for As-Built.
**Braided channel so valley length used for credits calculations.
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-3

Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian
Restoration Level Wetland
Warm Riverine
Restoration 9,477.000* 11.524 0.066
Enhancement I 1,028.660
Enhancement II 1,519.067
Rehabilitation 0.110 0.075
Enhancement 2.289 0.251
Totals 12,024.727* 13.923 0.392
Total Stream Credit 12,024.727*
Total Wetland Credit 14.315
*Stream credits were miscalculated for T1 R4 in the Mitigation Plan and updated for As-Built.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits.Table 2 below describes expected
outcomes to water quality and ecological processes and provides project goals and objectives.
Table 2:Goals, Performance Criteria,and Functional Improvements
Objective/ Performance Cumulative
Goal Likely Functional Uplift Measurement Monitoring
Treatment Criteria Resu Its
Construct stream
channels that will Significantly reduce
maintain a stable sediment and phosphorus ER stays over 2.2 No deviations
pattern and profile and BHR below from design.
Improve the inputs from bank erosion. Cross-section
stability of considering the Reduce shear stress on 1.2 with visual Cross sections
monitoring and
hydrologic and assessments show streams
stream channel boundary. visual
channels. sediment inputs to Support all stream showing inspections. are stable and
the system,the progression functioning as
functions above towards stabilit designed.
landscape setting, hydrology. y' g
and the watershed
conditions.
Reduce and control Visually inspect
Implement cattle the perimeter of
sediment inputs; reduce
Exclude cattle exclusion measures Prevent cattle the Site to
and manage nutrient No cattle
from project around conservation from entering ensure no
inputs; reduce and encroachments.
streams. easements adjacent manage fecal coliform the easement. easement
to cattle pastures. encroachment is
inputs.
occurring.
Install habitat
features such as Increase and diversify
available habitats for
constructed riffles, macroinvertebrates,fish, There is no
cover/lunker logs,
Improve in- and brush toes into and amphibians leading required
stream to colonization and performance N/A N/A
restored/enhanced
habitat. increase in biodiversity standard for this
streams.Add woody over time.Add metric.
materials to channel complexity including LWD
beds. Construct pools
of varying depth. to streams.
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-4

Objective/ Performance Cumulative
Goal Treatment Likely Functional Uplift Criteria Measurement Monitoring
Resu Its
Raise water table and Four bankfull T1 R4,T4 R1,
hydrate riparian events in and T7 obtained
Reconstruct stream wetlands.Allow flood separate years bankfull events
Reconnect Crest gauges
channels with flows to disperse on the within in MY1.T1 R1,
channels with appropriate bankfull floodplain. Hydrologically monitoring and/or pressure T2 R1,T5 R2,
floodplains transducers
dimensions and connect stream and period. and T8 R1
and riparian depth relative to riparian wetlands. 30 consecutive recording flow exceeded 30
wetlands. elevations.
existing floodplain. Support geomorphology days of flow for days of
and higher-level intermittent consecutive flow
functions. channels. during MY1.
Restore riparian Free 5 out of 18
wetland and groundwater 18 groundwater groundwater
surface within 12 gauges equipped
associated soil gauges had
Restore Raise local groundwater inches of the with pressure
structure by raising groundwater
wetland stream beds, elevations. Periodically ground surface transducers are within 12 inches
hydrology, inundate floodplain for 13%(35 located in
plugging existing of the ground
soils, and plant wetlands and vernal days)of the representative
ditches, removing surface for 13%
communities. livestock impacts, pools. growing season wetland areas (35 days)of the
under normal and monitored
and planting native growing season
wetland species. precipitation annually. consecutively.
conditions.
Reduce sediment inputs Survival rate of
from bank erosion and 320 stems per One hundred
Restore and Plant native tree and runoff. Increase nutrient acre at MY3, 260 square meter 41 of the 45
planted stems
enhance understory species in cycling and storage in vegetation plots vegetation plots
native riparian zone and floodplain. Provide per acre at MYS, are placed on 2% have a planted
and 210 stems
floodplain and plant appropriate riparian habitat.Add a of the planted stem density
streambank species on source of LWD and per acre at MY7. area of the Site greater than 320
vegetation. streambank. organic material to Height and monitored stems per acre.
stream.Support all requirement is 7 annually.
stream functions. feet at MY5 and
10 feet at MY7.
Visually inspect
Permanently Establish Ensure that development the perimeter of
protect the and agricultural uses that Prevent the Site to
conservation No easement
project Site would damage the Site or easement ensure no
from harmful easements on the encroachments.
reduce the benefits of the encroachment. easement
uses. Site. project are prevented. encroachment is
occurring.
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
146, Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-5

1.3 Project Attributes
Prior to construction stream and wetland stressors at the Site included livestock access and ditching.
Stream channels were generally incised, unstable, lacking bedform diversity, and lacking adequate
riparian buffers.The extents of riparian buffers and agricultural land on the Site had remained
consistent since 1992. Beginning in the early 90's, much of the Site was converted from timber land to
pasture land.Table 3 below and Table 8 in Appendix C present additional information on pre-restoration
conditions.
Table 3: Project Attributes
Project Name Daniels Creek Mitigation County Harnett County
Site
Project Area (acres) 56.144 Project Coordinates 35°26'33.99"N 79°1'39.81"W
Physiographic Northern Outer Piedmont
Province & Rolling Coastal Plain River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 8-digit 03030004 USGS HUC 14-digit 03030004010020
DWR Sub-basin 03-06-07 Land Use Classification 64%Managed Herbaceous, 24%
Forested, 12%Developed
Project Drainage 986 Percentage of Impervious Area 2.3%
Area (acres)
Parameters Daniels Creek T1 T2 T3 T4
Pre-project length (feet) 3,636 2,670 586 1,205 1,367
Post-project (feet)* 3,474 2,912 457 1,381 1,609
Drainage area (acres) 896 313 9 43 48
Perennial (P), Intermittent (I), Ephemeral (E) P P/I P/I P P
DWR Water Quality Classification C
Dominant Evolutionary class (Simon) V VI/V IV IV IV
Parameters T5 T6 T7 T8
Pre-project length (feet) 624 962 1,249 787
Post-project (feet)* 626 914 1,241 769
Drainage area (acres) 7 174 80 13
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral P/I P P P/I
DWR Water Quality Classification C
Dominant Evolutionary class (Simon) III IV IV IV
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation
Water of the United States-Section 404 Yes Yes USACE Nationwide Permit No. 27 and DWQ
Water of the United States-Section 401 Yes Yes 401 Water Quality Certification No.4134.
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Categorical Exclusion in Mitigation Plan
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes (Wildlands, 2019)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA) N/A N/A N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat N/A N/A N/A
*Post-project(feet)for streams with both Restoration and Enhancement include both in total length listed.Crossings were also included in the total
length for comparison to pre-project lengths.
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-6

Section 2: Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and site visits were conducted during MY1 to assess the condition of the project.The
vegetation and stream success criteria for the Site follow the approved success criteria presented in the
Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2019). Performance criteria for vegetation, stream, and hydrologic
assessment are located in Section 1.2 Table 3: Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional
Improvements. Methodology for annual monitoring is presented in the MVO Annual Report (Wildlands,
2021).
Vegetative Assessment
The MY1 vegetative survey was completed in November 2021. Out of the 45 vegetation plots,41 met
the MY3 interim requirement of 320 planted stems per acre. Fixed vegetation plots exhibited stem
densities ranging from 121 to 647 planted stems per acre,with an average stem density of 421 planted
stems per acre. Random Vegetation plots exhibited stem densities ranging from 283 to 1,457 stems per
acre,with an average stem density of 526 stems per acre. Herbaceous vegetation is abundant across the
Site and has flourished in both density and diversity, indicating a healthy riparian habitat.The riparian
habitat is helping to reduce nutrient runoff from the cattle fields outside the easement and stabilizing
the stream banks. Refer to Appendix A for Vegetation Plot Photographs and the Vegetation Condition
Assessment Table and Appendix B for Vegetation Plot Data.
2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
Approximately 0.82 acres along the edge of the easement on T5 R2 and T4 R2 are dominated by coastal
bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Coastal bermudagrass is allelopathic which means that it excretes
chemicals that can negatively influence the growth and survival of other vegetation and organisms.This
species also has stoloniferous growth habits which cause it to form dense mats of vegetation that can
outcompete native seedlings and even prevent other seeds from making soil contact.The bermudagrass
will be chemically treated in these areas during the spring of MY2 with ring sprays. After chemical
treatment a permanent seed mix will be applied to ensure adequate groundcover.There is also a 0.15-
acre bare area along T4 R1 that will be seeded with a permanent seed mix. Stem density, especially in
areas occupied by coastal bermudagrass, will be re-assessed during MY2.
2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY1 were conducted in November 2021. All streams within the Site are
stable and functioning as designed. All 25 cross-sections at the Site show little to no change from design
in the bankfull area and width-to-depth ratio. Bank height ratios are less than 1.2. Visual assessments
indicate that in-stream structures have remained stable. In-Stream vegetation has caused very minor
sediment accumulation in a few of the cross sections. Once in-stream vegetation is treated sediment is
expected to flush out of the system. Vegetation has become well established on the stream banks
providing adequate coverage and protection. Pebble count data are no longer required per the
September 29, 2021 IRT Technical Work Group Meeting.The IRT reserves the right to request pebble
count data and particle distributions if deemed necessary during the monitoring period. Refer to
Appendix A for the Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table and Stream Photographs and
Appendix C for Stream Geomorphology Data.
,cream Areas of Concern
Mechanical repairs were made on a 98-linear foot stretch of T1 R4 during October 2021 to address three
unstable log sills and bank erosion that resulted from water piping around and under the logs.The
angled log sills and adjoining riffles up-stream were re-built to the specifications and slopes shown in the
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 2-1

original construction plans. In October 2021, stream banks were repaired and matted, and brush toe
was added on the outside bend directly downstream of the first unstable log sill to increase bank
protection and prevent any future bank erosion.These structures are now stable and functioning as
originally intended. Visual assessments have indicated that all other stream reaches and structures were
found to be stable and performing as intended during MY1.
Murdannia has grown in several stream channels on the Site (Figure 1.1-1.5). A majority of the streams
affected by the in-stream vegetation are the smaller tributaries with shallower channels and lower flow.
Despite the presence of vegetation within the channel, no major sedimentation has been observed.The
in-stream vegetation will be treated in Spring of MY2. In addition to chemical treatment, additional live
stakes will be added to stream banks to help shade out in-stream vegetation. Live stakes will also
increase bank stabilization and act as a source of woody debris in the streams.
L. Hydrology Assessment
Bankfull events were recorded on T1 R4,T4 R1, and T7. Multiple bankfull events were recorded on T1 R4
and T7. Bankfull events were not recorded on T3 R2,T8 R1, or Daniels Creek R4. The gauge on T3 R2
malfunctioned during the early portion of MY1.The gauge was repaired in February 2022 and is
expected to capture bankfull events during MY2. Crest gauges were not installed until late March when
construction was completed.This likely affected the number of bankfull events collected on the project
streams. Streams are anticipated to meet bankfull criteria during MY2 with a full year of data available.
In addition, the presence of baseflow must be documented on intermittent reaches (T1 R1,T2 R1,T5 R2,
and T8 R1)for a minimum of 30 consecutive days during a normal precipitation year. All flow gauges
were well above the performance criteria during MY1 with flow ranging from 108 to 255 consecutive
days. Flow was also observed in these channels during visual assessments that were conducted
throughout the year. Refer to Appendix D for hydrologic data.
2.6 Wetland Assessment
Eighteen groundwater gauges were installed throughout the Site to monitor the hydrology in wetland
re-establishment and rehabilitation areas. As stated in the Mitigation Plan,the growing season dates at
this Site are March 1 to November 20, unless soil temperature or bud burst data indicate otherwise. Bud
burst observations were not recorded for MY1 as groundwater gauges were not installed until well into
the growing season. Soil temperature data was collected from September to December and is included
in Appendix D.These dates are supported by soil temperature and bud burst observations at other sites
in the region. In order to meet the success criterion, gauges must show groundwater within 12 inches of
the soil surface for 13%of the growing season (35 consecutive days).
Gauges began recording data at various dates throughout the growing season as they were installed,
convoluting a definitive and conclusive assessment of criterion attainment for MY1 (Table 12).The
balance of precipitation and evapotranspiration rates during the early spring typically favors the highest
soil moisture conditions that occur within the growing season. Monitoring equipment installation could
not take place until late March as construction completed. Since wetland hydrology was not observed
during the early spring, we believe it would be an incorrect conclusion to assume that gauges that
recorded a hydroperiod less than 13%during the observation period failed for the MY1 growing season.
Gauges 13 and 15-18 did not begin recording data until late summer or fall of 2021 due to errors in data
logger programming.This has been corrected for MY2. Complete datasets are expected during future
monitoring years which will allow for more definitive assessment of wetland hydrology.
Groundwater gauge 19 was installed in a jurisdictional wetland for informational purposes and will not
be held to hydrology performance standards.This gauge recorded groundwater within the upper 12
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 2-2

inches of the soil surface for 239 consecutive days (90.2%) of the growing season.The groundwater
gauge data exhibit that this wetland enhancement area is maintaining wetland hydrology throughout a
large portion of the growing season. No pre-construction monitoring was conducted in this wetland.
2.7 i. nitoring Year 1 Summary
Out of the 45 vegetation plots, 41 are exceeding the MY3 interim requirement of 320 planted stems per
acre. Overall species diversity and density of woody and herbaceous vegetation is showing positive
trends across the Site. Visual assessments and cross-sections show streams within the Site are stable
and meeting project goals. Areas with coastal bermudagrass will be chemically treated with ring sprays
during the spring of MY2 and seeded after treatment. Murdannia was documented across several
stream channels and will be chemically treated during MY2. Bankfull events were documented on T1 R4,
T4 R1, and T7 and greater than 30 days of consecutive flow was recorded on all flow gauges. Five out of
eighteen groundwater gauges exceeded the success criteria with hydroperiods of at least 23.8%(63
consecutive days).The dataset for MY1 was not complete enough to accurately depict wetland
hydrology, as important periods of the growing season were not captured. Results are expected to
improve during MY2 when an entire year worth of data will be collected. Overall, the Site is meeting its
goals and is on track to meet final success criteria.
Summary information and data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices.
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 2-3

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley,J., Harman, W.A.,Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Drostin, M, and Herrmann, M. 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities. North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy,J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites:An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen.Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., and Wentworth,Thomas R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4.0.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi, Pages
12-22.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-DWQ,
USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey. 1998. North Carolina Geology.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2019. Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation
Site Mitigation Plan. USACE, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2021. Middle Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Daniels Creek Mitigation
Site Monitoring Year 0 (MVO) Annual Report. USACE, Raleigh, NC.
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 3-1

-
k 'x `0 �_ _Conservation Easement
IPAr441,;6'
T6 R I' x "T
letX Daniels Creek - +tr
x x _ G3 Utility Easement
x `c .i /' aHiliK
• ,x x` •
JD Wetlands- Enhancement and Rehabilitation
r VV
k '' \ , lex k Riparian
/ to + x / �5`0 k Non-Riparian
x — h \. O r„yy
�� X —x �� �x�x \x w } 1 �p-, Daniels_( 1;13 x• Wetland Restoration
' �i -� ek .
• lNxw Riparian
� = ` 2
re
x ^+ 4 ,' ^�;. _ `'� �JV�v x .. Non Riparian
10
IP
� � � � �` Stream Restoration
y Daniels@ O „! -'far'�i:,.� y'
ti P '. .__ J7 0 '�J' Stream Enhancement I
� # +-- + f .•; •_'}•• { • * `� �,_'. , Stream Enhancement II
i+ /� Linear Wetland Not for Credit
— =�s =�s = '+ � Y ��� pve�.� + - / —Not for Credit
• + \'?-4 Daniels /% J,� x I
�+ + �'� I�I Figure. : f • h ' �s =K Fencing
A
•
'k x — — \ + \� • X x ' Q Reach Break
k \ e // • J<a
,„-kit.' -----'X s'k 0 5, l• .4•• , • vo.401,041
• . + ® ' 11,#': ce),,, •
, . 0:1- - .
,_ ../.,.. -- x 011''`-lop
r____„..,.. 0
, -4 „..P
J4 +
;. X_ k Figure 1.2 - L .�` �s7r _ '� _ �- �� s-1 4.
%X � F3
\ + - - .< f O T9A \ ht` x x + '
X \r—cX'J + �+ _ bN T2R21 rO x
\ T10 R1 �: 0 \+ x� x x „�.�,1.1 ` X I .r4
x - 'AX _ x x x x �+ + + xiii +� r 7 , ' X I �� � . 'al* Y
_ x_ x— x—
T9R1 \ X� �x ' u �. 4 k
T10A N ✓" yO i' 'ma' x `
;Of
lit 11lb Figure 1.1 a + I , -i-X i X
tiv.. ' ' - '` x,011kit • / +4 x �'i - Figure 1.5
.I. yy —i x
. k i+ ! A X
t /
417 r►. C r
51 ,
Ike Figure 1.4 _ a X
• • ■ + M X x=x x x I k ri 2017Aerial Photogra
Figure 1 - Current Condition Plan View
‘40110W I L D L A N D 5 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 400 800 Feet USACE Action ID No. SAW 2017 00998
I 1 I 1 I Monitoring Year 0- 2021
N Harnett County, NC

-
7 + dl %� 11
N
//
if ..'***\e•-F.0-0- M
V //
j : . .4
`? I �a "i\ //
A � /1 p y3 �� 4
XO z-�.L.�- //
/ O% N i 1108+00 + 00� -t•�
N PPQ3 I . ( i_ 00 x•i • r�_
c �
* ..,\Q.
_\.113 ilk ‘ 1 0 - --N,•:.".tSa• e
r `a...1O
o jokes, /7
ai. 110 0 ._T, \ \\
k 'kF f— ++ �. I1001+00. 1- 4
OO,' o `/ oi 30 O " -\1012t00
%
r i'
' L_ _Conservation Easement Fixed Vegetation Plot ® Reach Break yy
} �L
Riparian Criteria Met t
Non Riparian Criteria Not Metes- .
Stream Enhancement II Random Vegetation Plot
Not for Credit ()Criteria Met t
�s'
tt =tt Fencing
-Criteria Not Met
4 ....._ 0 Photo Point V �' ��
Murdannia Y14 Pt
,AF 2017Aerial Photography
t
Figure 1.1 Current Condition Plan View
OWILDLANDS Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 150 300 Feet USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
I I I I I N Monitoring Year 1-2021
Harnett County, NC

„, ,_
,,,,
,.,_ ,„
r/ v",��
___„,.
,,,.,,_
4 ?CpM
18 '�
, ._• 0 -__:,_. ,,\ -,,,,_
,N cif CZ=18)3 o ' ' ! . -0,--=, -__4_ ..).
_ • _ , ÷
,, - 4------ 4
o
m 12 0 o--,i �+ °�
s-- .� o 4
4��-
5� X(9 \.`� "� //
i, 4. //
1.` 7� 4 S
\ ,a1 �4J
4?\
S.
1, * /” v_
-mow—O 0 �. =.
\. c�w co q�c3�,` 20
_ __
lilt % ct;\ %;.-Cy 0
t f „ __
*lb .
` x0
�.;,-'
�* J ,, /
E3 =g ,' , bees if
��tt = o "Obe;; Q /
Off\ 7 j ,- g 1-
1
, f
I.1 C uO 9r3
/1 13 ) ; {t+
x
i 00,,',.
O, �J
L 1 Conservation Easement / ,'!' `,% 1 -
`�9°$NOO
Internal Crossing . / a 1 I1 + 1v�
JD Wetlands- Enhancment and Rehabilitation 70 00 GWG �,, t.% . �j ,
,E \
Riparian v '� ��`
Non-Riparian \\ # •i A. h,
ii
Wetland Restoration \\YA ;;' A \ `�I
!, 0 t\
Riparian \\ 20� ;f 14 ) �p�Xp �%•
0x�!d zS 15 M
Non-Riparian \\ !• - 1,
X + - II
Structures x •X� 4- •\�' Il1YgY,1I
Stream Restoration IC ' 1 \,S '1 V
Stream Enhancement I 'Ar,'1F.gyp`` GWGi
Linear Wetland- Not for Credit \\ ak `± 15,
Not for Credit "!
As Built TOB 4.
•
Cross Sections _ � � •
� ,.
K =tt Fencing / _ XV'p 1'I1.
4 - ,# ro
s
Murdannia /z k` ` �`; m �`G�
IS + Crest Gauge // ),-
/ k ` 13 1�
4 N. / .
+ Flow Gauge 4
// k 4 900+00
0 Photo Point - it ./ ..+N•
// •
k • // 44
Reach Break /
+ Groundwater Gauge r+/ 4 - —- - •
f/ 0..
Fixed Vegetation Plot >
Criteria Met x r -
// -
Criteria Not Met
Random Vegetation Plot k/
CDCriteria Met x I.
/ 2017 Aerial Photography
., _ sz -._ X - eP= }$_ k
Figure 1.2 Current Condition Plan View
1 W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet , Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
N Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Harnett County, NC

7
t r `` y
• 702+ k k L{
PP32 k� 4 i., A' . '
411,1911114.0000hot ..e\l',,A--i/
i k4 y'
f ' �;' \, -, --1 \ ■ � 'f k .-• •x tom,
•
x es
p K ` , ar k
• k Pilr
v, r 1 f'` ' up@ �. 1 k
r J '
U 11 } ,I. r' r-',132+00 �i,' k k
I 7p6+00 r, r r • - 1 ,r rn 'ti 25 k' i
7 ,,-,` s t - iiir N.,
!I # • •�, tit , r ��47, t
x '� • ' r-, _ x Daniels Creek R4 x,_ x— x y f, ' - ' C@G @O ;ram 232+00 v
R3 $x . , x_ x x .�, Gp� �o ,
k Creek �o - _ _ - ,:, 1 =) o k
—k�. panlels x x x Gpk 3 0 - - .;rJ A 1 r
x X X _fir�=C.? - ^�' cmy� lrlY l/ �'•• _ • 'N rT
ny �. - l:A'A%LJ IAJ.__ 'ef -_'\_ t I!•IY O. -. .'. ..I+-.,,•- W v' ,Lr+ - '''' ‘ (•\ ►,,
Q' Y N `r `�~ I AAJLJ�' . ' I . _c
r F 10 _ 24 �,r _i il-. �.
TNT r` p •igr O
20 ;7 `Ee--..,r,� �� •y^t: `e; r , 1'
ti V- s-
IP-
xo
ift
11 •`,. ��L
e i,' m� 'i. „I, r
' .‘., .
1"� e . 226+00 ..�
(__!Conservation Easement Stream Restoration ® Reach Break Coastal Bermudagrass + ti '
• ' lF�'to .212+00 _
Internal Crossing Stream Enhancement II Groundwater Gauge Murdannia x -0p! + I
r It
Linear Wetland- Not for Credit '!' . " `''
Utility Easement Fixed Vegetation Plot Repair Area I ,� k �+ r
JD Wetlands- Enhancement and Rehabilitation Not for Credit n Criteria Met x ~ `'j•�,,, ! +`. li•: ';" OOni!:
g
---•As-BuiltTOB ,l r 1-\ k 4111
Riparian Criteria Not Met - k
Non-Riparian —Cross Sections Random Vegetation Plot ,r 12 ; + =
Wetland Restoration tt = Fencing CD Criteria Met • PP 14 L I x
Crest Gauge I y. .,�
,__„Riparian + /
Photo Point •` 1
Structures G ,Ir' <� k
_li - �,_ XS 10 2017 vRhy
Figure 1.3 Current Condition Plan View
0 W I L D L A N D 5 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site 11LO
ENGINEERING 0 150 300 Feet USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
I I I I I Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
N Harnett County, NC

�� \X �Jk
F-
L_._j 1Conservation Easement tt =tt Fencing I
Internal Crossings + Crest Gauge I ' V, + PAP 14;
JD Wetlands- Enhancement and Rehabilitation + Flow Gauge atm '
Riparian Photo Point 4
4 ;
,•'222+00�\
Non-Riparian 0 Reach Break I \
Wetland Restoration :,` : a
+ Groundwater Gauge I ,.
rcc ; ' �\
Riparian Fixed Vegetation Plot / X% �%•` U
- ,••
, N
Structures
Criteria Met , �, �•,
,
Stream Restoration -Criteria Not Met A ���,' C� a �• � �
Stream Enhancement II ','' '''
Random Vegetation Plot �� 20+0
,,1 Chu 7 � °//
mum! Linear Wetland- Not for Credit O s r A"oo •-;%',ti ,,`' Q
Criteria Met !
Not for Credit -I /
j!, Coastal Bermudagrass ;,; ';, r3
----•As-BuiltTOB 4 �� �/e
Murdannia ��/I ,��., ;�J���
Cross-Sections ',', 4 ,' .
Bare Area
,• -,,,,.,*:, " -/----ai'.,,,,_- ,/, .1-r. :, ERIC Ograi%•,%x \4-
II . ,,,,,,,,,,,
xo g)°11
� >t „ -' O '
: �'� '( '-tlIt - •,'� ,
�
�.� o Qi- w1�1�
4ri<
rr 6' � o•
� � a �io
x
', � �! •,,i �GP4� � /�
- -
O t. 1; rap--*
ii 4 - t _ ,
'�. '�- i ' am swox ,� �:6'%50 /
fixXsSio"4-u:/;:iie,:.0:,
I,`` 3
V
' I ' 14+00 V o
�-.' GWG 19 for informational • / O ,,', ,• �a'
'''' ) 3/ 1 ,
4
-- purposes only-no hydrology ' ' ' ' , y"�/
,,,, ,, 'S 1 +00 ,
perfomance criteria. '�� ' � �,� ,� �(
x asx�� l l , ' �'/
/� .'�� rPMV
so::#cp.�,,'� a-' 0' : 1+00 y1412+00 f
/iiiii, _
511400 / it‘j 47/
14
li
i.
yOOxO . k . t
v..' +00 • I ,.: ii
,T....„
-,..„.._,
.6-,,o ,
,,,_ .. 111 00 A : : Igat@
1 I
l'i II
7 r ,,,,,,, ir
1 ,* 0/
.1..,4'08+oo-!
L•530+00 I 0„1
ini
,
�'• � lam
. fric fi • `I •412+0�j
r•.. • • f 4 llf.
' O • `
il
di !
�` Ntildr . 1\` •406+00 �I
` •; \ , • �C l
ri
�'r4 410+00
; f .. _V J . r Ns°�S • •
(I
•.
r -1 0 1
illpi, • 3
M r ti _ ll
•
A.
0
•404+00 l
•/ •
IP 4
•402+os /+
r
/1....,
— i
_Asel .:
} III
NE
2017 Aerial Photography
I
Figure 1.4 Current Condition Plan illkilowi' WILDLANDS D S 0 150 300 Feet , Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINE E R i N G I I I I I USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
N Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Harnett County, NC

fliw
n PP 231 . X 1/ X\ X— X� ,.
;` \ c\�O .' ''`.1- I_-!Conservation Easement Stream Restoration
ii i M I „„ N.'L1 x ' +f', � Internal Crossing Stream Enhancement II
�?j4' � +� 11: JD Wetlands-Enhancement Linear Wetland-Not for Credit
4------- --..- t + \ /Rehabilitation ■
Not for Credit
d a�., A � Riparian Structures
I I • " 1 Non-Riparian
J1 - As-Built TOBI
X� �© I + Wetland
&410+OOPS + . P3 = Fencing
X k Riparian
l , ••�`1,N k Q Reach Break
,
•, �3 X NZI
, k k/` 06+00 =Utility Easement
li �(�
' ,S.: aka k •``: MI' s I
`C X_ •
bL�UNG39 °
4 ;r
r�% �`, ji \'.--1--)'4`, G W G 1
"• O• O X I ,00 4, ei-
%�r�"•42 2.. -
•406+00 X •
o '� ^Sr
, i.
,,, . _
\, 10+00 X III
.`� 200+00
• X ._-
I'302+00 p '+?
!i 1 i
"- • �, n X�
12 _
X Li / �.
141► /X +/ Nam ' X Fixed Vegetation Plot Murdannia
• /+ A.
�; I n Criteria Met + Flow Gauge
k 0• +/+ •.' Q I Random Vegetation Plot 0 Photo Point
4.
k 402 00 +/ 310 l tio
, Q Criteria Met + Groundwater Gauge
/ —�} = •-- — Cross-Sections
/ , +
k / `
Figure 1.5 Current Condition Plan View
W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I I I USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
N Monitoring Year 1-2021
Harnett County, NC

APPENDIX A. Visual Assessment Data

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Reach 1-5
Number Total Amount of %Stable,
Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Number in Unstable Performing as
Performing As-Bull Footage Intended
as Intended
Assessed Stream Length 3,354
Assessed Bank Length 6,708
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour. 0 100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Bank Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
Grade Control 22 22 100%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 18 18 100%
does not exceed 15%.
T1 Reach 1-5
11111 Number
Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Number in Unstable Performing as
Performing
As-Built Footage Intended
as Intended
Assessed Stream Length 2,667
Assessed Bank Length 5,334
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour. 0 100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Bank Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 98 98%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 98 98%
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
Grade Control 26* 29 90%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 23 23 100%
does not exceed 15%.

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
T1A
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Buil1,Footage —Intended
Assessed Stream Length 285
Assessed Bank Length 570
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour. 0 100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Bank Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 0 0 0%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 0 0 0%
does not exceed 15%.
T2 R1-R2
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
ajor Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Built Footage Intended
Assessed Stream Length 457
Assessed Bank Length 914
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from 0 100%
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour.
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 23 23 100%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 4 4 100%
does not exceed 15%.

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
T3 R1-R2
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Buil1,Footage Intended
Assessed Stream Length 1,346
Assessed Bank Length 2,692
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour. 0 100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Bank Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 35 35 100%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 6 6 100%
does not exceed 15%.
T3A
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Built Footage Intended
Assessed Stream Length 168
Assessed Bank Length 336
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from 0 100%
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour.
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 0 0 0%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 0 0 0%
does not exceed 15%.

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
T4 R1-R2
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Buil1,Footage —Intended
Assessed Stream Length 1,569
Assessed Bank Length 3,138
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour. 0 100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Bank Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 63 63 100%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 4 4 0%
does not exceed 15%.
T5 R1-R2
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
ajor Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Built Footage Intended
Assessed Stream Length 626
Assessed Bank Length 1,252
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from 0 100%
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour.
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 31 31 100%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 0 0 0%
does not exceed 15%.

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
T6 R1-R2
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Buil1,Footage —Intended
Assessed Stream Length 879
Assessed Bank Length 1,758
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour. 0 100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Bank Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 6 6 100%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 0 0 0%
does not exceed 15%.
T7
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Built Footage Intended
Assessed Stream Length 1,241
Assessed Bank Length 2,482
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from 0 100%
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour.
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 19 19 100%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 2 2 100%
does not exceed 15%.

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
T8 R1-R2
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Buil1,Footage —Intended
Assessed Stream Length 769
Assessed Bank Length 1,538
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour. 0 100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Bank Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 46 46 100%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 4 4 100%
does not exceed 15%.
T9
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Built Footage Intended
Assessed Stream Length 658
Assessed Bank Length 1,316
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from 0 100%
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour.
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 0 0 0%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 0 0 0%
does not exceed 15%.

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
T9A
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-BuilA1Footage —Intended
Assessed Stream Length 365
Assessed Bank Length 730
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour. 0 100%
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Bank Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 0 0 0%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 0 0 0%
does not exceed 15%.
T10 R1-R2
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
ajor Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Built Footage Intended
Assessed Stream Length 1,001
Assessed Bank Length 2,002
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from 0 100%
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour.
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 0 0 0%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 0 0 0%
does not exceed 15%.

Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
T10A
1111—
Number Stable, Total Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Number in Unstable Performing as
Intended As-Built Footage Intended
Assessed Stream Length 142
Assessed Bank Length 284
Surface Scour/ Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from 0 100%
Bare Bank poor growth and/or surface scour.
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure
Bank appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
Toe Erosion 0 100%
modest,appear sustainable and are providing
habitat.
Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,
Bank Failure 0 100%
calving,or collapse.
Totals: 0 100%
Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of 0 0 0%
grade across the sill.
Structure
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence
Bank Protection 0 0 0%
does not exceed 15%.

Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USCAE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Planted Acreage 54.00
Mapping
Combined %of Planted
Definitions Threshold
Acreage Acreage
(ac)
Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. 0.10 0.15 0.3%
Low Stem Density Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on current MY stem count 0.10 0 0%
Areas criteria.
Total 0.15 0.3%
Areas of Poor Growth
Planted areas where average height is not meeting current MY Performance Standard. 0.10 0 0%
Rates
Cumulative Total 0.15 0.3%
Easement Acreage 56.14
Invasives may occur outside of planted areas and within the easement and will
0.82 1%
therefore be calculated against the total easement acreage.Include species with the
Invasive Areas of
potential to directly outcompete native,young,woody stems in the short-term or 0.10
Concern
community structure for existing communities. Invasive species included in
summation above should be identified in report summary. 9,038 If* 60%*
Encroachment may be point,line,or polygon.Encroachment to be mapped consists of
Easement any violation of restrictions specified in the conservation easement. Common 0 Encroachments Noted
none
Encroachment Areas encroachments are mowing, cattle access, vehicular access. Encroachment has no /0ac
threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of impact area.
*In-stream invasive vegetation(Murdannia spp.)was documented in stream channels using linear feet instead of acres.The listed percentage represents the length of
project streams impacted by in-stream vegetation.

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS

V.
r 'fir �,a z y '� $ �£ ra '"' P Nt ;V. i\i!-;,
•
t � �+ �i pa 3. - y, i rm"'•": s�,; �, SS•A" , r r•x - - ' w iY ..:
erg f rr s' 14. • k 1 } " «: t ' ,rfi�
�' ' i' E t 5 t $- a. \ , 4', x a,y? -. �x"ak✓ ; ,�y.,': 4' xS tiM q?j
lit 1 �� §sm � _ b'kv, s / 1�,„ ,y n .�� f _ 4.`'•. 1 .I r� {��
1'`- Bb•�.1G � Yr
;�� � e ct sC. �
PHOTO POINT 1 Daniels Creek Ri—upstream (11/11/2021J PHOTO POINT 1 Daniels Creek Rl—downstream(11/11/2021)
igiw
or
~ 1 t
tdi ? A4 a17 � � � �: '? ' -
$Y ° ; z' a a 1 -,> § ! k " � gs r s ),..1 " ' ' o- eT c4G x' ` r.:
ii f !, i a T 12,t,_,- ' k r : r ,, �a- r 9 p,
i.
1 + � 4!a, , p x 4,- x,F r'�i! i ` °'tiir '�av:� §, ' a 3 :Sdf s r` � f / t � 9 - e� #.3, u1 s p p 0.t ' � -" { tit " ! 'fib r -.,n - `r " p , 7 r > - ! '.*. - ''''y r m{ fi t }.. . „ • , 1;' "• y !` I , '-
r.. :-;
40
•
i.
,.. ,.. ,,. ,, ,... .„.„...5.,.
-,,,,ti .. . , 1,-4r,...0..:14,,,,,,..AA.,, •
i ,-,-,,.., ..-1,s,P.„-..-,. .?;,.-.-Npt:ri-r-."
� '\ ;�.: �S �C�� & - -+r �`�`.,- { � lam: � _ g s= S�
-yl p 'F e � �vs�sl a IC , Y �� i 1 \
/ ! 8p
PHOTO POINT 2 Daniels Creek R2—upstream (11/11/2021J PHOTO POINT 2 Daniels Creek R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
,
r.
Rft 4: ....,....1-
A
Rl
,21
r
Y
PHOTO POINT 3 Daniels Creek R3—upstream (11/11/2021J PHOTO POINT 3 Daniels Creek R3—downstream (11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
141 Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

s z oil",4 °4
1
' i ' � eta# R�ty ` -
T
f - • -- n,k 1- - c10.�A q '"wt'yP�d Y
� � � 9 � y. ryr "'",;'?4.:'
a� Y� _
'.�,.nJ- irgY ���f Il v J -
•
PHOTO POINT 4 Daniels Creek R3—upstream (11/11/2021J PHOTO POINT 4 Daniels Creek R3—downstream(11/11/2021)ii
tio
a ,1
/ -.;'''''1`%;4i4:::,:':;'`:'.''''...11:.$,41,; kk...4f",,apl!.'t. '6,'"?.-1%"-Yy.,0,14 ,4714--;'-'— - --— -- _ '1 ' '-
A
s Y.
p \ \�
F
N h
PHOTO POINT 5 Daniels Creek R3—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 5 Daniels Creek R3 downstream(11/11/2021J
o lc" #`
F. x
f e'
... ,.J.„
PHOTO POINT 6 Daniels Creek R4—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 6 Dan, ....,..,.. _
iels Creek R4—downstream (11/11/2021J
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 7 Daniels Creek R4—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 7 Daniels Creek R4—downstream(11/11/2021)
fr '' 9
'di' f
r ' A4 ry. t. *1
s _i ""..;
z r
R
F
�a nk rm „ - ."x � .L L 4. V Wd-� f i.
PHOTO POINT 8 Daniels Creek R4—upstream (11/03/2021) PHOTO POINT 8 Daniels Creek R4—downstream(11/03/2021)
]-
,
...
PHOTO POINT 9 Daniels Creek R5—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 9 Daniels Creek R5—downstream (11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
14, Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

yy. .
�.,
=r� • *,` ,dxw ,..,'- mac . $ • '
r.
•
Ong -
PHOTO POINT 10 T1 R1—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 10 Ti Ri—downstream(11/11/2021)
vim id o*-#'
1 k ; ,.fA �it'64 _..
3
PHOTO POINT 11 T1 R4—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 11 Ti R4—downstream(11/11/2021)
�t4¢fib s
J. a , ,o�`.x t.
•
1 x k '
,, : p y
PHOTO POINT 12 T1 R4—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 12 T1 R4—downstream (11/11/2021) '
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

,�e..,."�_'- �-Y,, ., ,„. i• - . '- 1 ski •
wirer.
k;
''....:- ••••.':.•..-.':.'.....-::,-..-.,.. ...-..7....;::•.... . • . .
.• -„_....,,,.„.„.,,.:...., • -
.. .
. .• .
:.: : : .
•
..,...._ ..,. . . .,
, .,..„
.. • __
. . .,.... ... ......, . .. . . .
. .,..............„ ,.. ,. _ . .. _ ,
. ........• :„..,„,,,,-„,,,,:,.:.,...„.,,,,„•::.: •,........ _. ,
. - ,..-,,• •••••4,0,,,,,,,,:„..„:„,,,,r,,,..„.....„•••,...
:, .,,,,.:•„{„..,,,,,,:..:. . . . ,
..,-,-. . ..-:.:„.::-.,... ,..•..;:„...,...„,„:„,„,„:„.....-...„:„.--,,.
. :.„••••• „:-.:-...:,,,,,,„:.,„„,,,,,t,,,,,•-•-,, ..... .,:..:„,..,... • ,
... ,.. .. -,..,..:,..,v,„:„.„.„,„,„_..,..
;: •• . .. . . . .
•• .
4.
PHOTO POINT 13 T1 R4—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 13 T1 R4—downstream(11/11/2021)
ri
y
t}
•
PHOTO POINT 14 T1 R4—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 14 T1 R4—downstream(11/11/2021)
•
yti
Lr
PHOTO POINT 15 T1 R4—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 15 T1 R4—downstream (11/11/2021) '
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

< f.
Wit.
•yy+ w
�,. 1 C / y 4
may:v,y }a` t. -4,,kasf '�. ' '.d,..• ,
PHOTO POINT 16 Ti R5—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 16 Ti R5—downstream(11/11/2021)
\1 y S 3. Y
•
•
I
•
•
•
/ f .. •
•
PHOTO POINT 17 T1 R5—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 17 Ti RS—downstream(11/11/2021)
j11,
fi !r . :.: J "�� it
•
Y .-'�.; fa t'� �R ,p4 - -
.,1,�y�, - - '§ E '�`'7 a �.,. •�
•
,�JJ 7�� L ,E
r RYi
i R
,.y' T~ Y���"j.:,r'y�".r; P' ,_ ? ",.,,,u1' s i o'�., I Odd`..
PHOTO POINT 18 T1A—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 18 T1A—downstream (11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

•1
•
a ,. • f i.. ,
•
•
PHOTO POINT 19 T2 R1—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 19 T2 R1—downstream(11/11/2021)
>w,
•
PHOTO POINT 20 T2 R2—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 20 T2 R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
e r
•
x
•
a � �r
4
F•t ' "fir ,.,a _.
PHOTO POINT 21 T3 R1—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 21 T3 R1—downstream (11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
141 Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

f i��
fA M p-4 M k. mbFM C7 S¢ `� 2 ✓' '•�•_�1'I• `J.
•
S
•
2
�.:; ,x 1x C �
PHOTO POINT 22 T3 R2—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 22 T3 R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
9 5 . ,i x.k� F L.k
r
G
i •
� �"
•
PHOTO POINT 23 T3 R2—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 23 T3 R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
te s • =42� r n
fir ' .•
r
sj ,
PHOTO POINT 24 T3 R2—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 24 T3 R2—downstream (11/11/2021)•
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

b V
.1.N., -.4. a
L.
—
r 4 & �x '' # : f+ - - •
• • i ,
•
•
..13. HOTO POINT 25 T3A-upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 25 T3A—downstream(11/11/2021)
Rc.. r .:'a'�l +� �`'&` x z p*.,r I! FJ - 4 - 1,•, p .R
.a ,�
` x ,raj 1
K>u:+�at �
w
•
1 M
•
,-,
•
S
PHOTO POINT 26 T4 R1—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 26 T4 R1—downstream(11/11/2021)
(. �' '' ; ,
•
•
•
6 m S
•
• -
/: ;' ➢�., .mil°Jd -�...raelEc-.,
PHOTO POINT 27 T4 R1—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 27 T4 R1—downstream (11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 28 T4 R1—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 28 T4 R1—downstream(11/11/2021)
0
r r , . ,; -.
j s - `'
PHOTO POINT 29 T4 R2—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 29 T4 R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
#T
$� y
2q� y&9
a Z v Ey y € rA
3.1 '"fit m " s ,4 -
3
_-r-,\77,-,...„.,,..-..f7... .5,..,..4.--...:._-rerk._.-7,.:,. ....-,..A,•.,,,,,i.-...',-;i::', 7 4.„'...1... .. ' ,, ----- . ,... ..
� - � �p►w
_ °. t• — M R -..� •'S� \•.y f', - 31, ,/£"! IhTifa'9G.Y W.i ,I \ i, >
PHOTO POINT 30 T5 R1—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 30 T5 R1—downstream (11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
14, Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

,,.:,..,i,...i,..... ., ,..,47 .,. .,,7,,,,.:4;..,kt.ik..,:44r..-'':'4"'*'''' '"--.
•
she
Kx
ttii F� � �� •
Ste, „• 1h
PHOTO POINT 31 T5 R2—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 31 T5 R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
•
•
' . • i
.,
e &ter-��' "�C4 a� l fi� - -
�fi
1, . 4:7;ii.),..:..'%
I �� \3 - - 11 a�+�tY y ,y }„ _ _
��A . .
'• G
PHOTO POINT 32 T6 R1—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 32 T6 R1—downstream(11/11/2021)
''1.;j' •'.?:-t.4?#::::IfY"-:•:-.•''34..''''' .''!••:•'',
r v v '€ Lam. P u�� • Ex t • •••
•
•
_ / f •
i •
�; t �¢
PHOTO POINT 33 T6 R2—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 33 T6 R2—downstream (11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
kikof Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

•
Fy d`4r >sh �� • ' fiR ''T i �.y J' f , S ..y
, \.'\ , ' ,y S ��,� �t �' '•tea: �!'A �' �i � � � . 4` w's
•
.: .,„•/-',..:-.1- ,. ,..,::,,i,,:i,,,,,.::,,,,..„ :::!,4;4101::,;-c
.,...,,,„,.,. ..b: ',',....n4.:''.''- j't_.—*T;a ii",', ' . . I ' ... ."---1
t ;y��yy� f x a qya
lei.
a
C d2 11� y ' l'-'' r r• -f ,,�� y:. ~."lx •`=- �] 1• y' y 51�1 � 5? •
d 1i �' tiA yQ ,• ••``•
r ''v.w ` % F 1 S•
a >' e". 1 v's y s` sd ;`/ .;. i St. A
C v . ..t 1- . ��� spy { :'� - `� -5 e , kr��, � P�,l x c -- r t,c � • '�- � 4, �'r'n ?� p�,^3^.�,�+ �.x "'t"� At re?'�
Q. �kN' 4 " J ;' - %, �. ,: '1' 5�s -'1• Ff ,?j, '>'' - :i i 'iy� - ^.
! `,'"+ `. r - „f,r.tt ,f s d '4,1'% - '! 1{a,1• ,,--•t+.k ' �'�. y',-. '4.- - i e, ``\ „�- b,
.^ _ t � 'w 11M: i' r 4 44' -Ib k �+d l,�` `xr �'4f +. ;'J
rf0 �� .,P ^T t )4� P x. '� 6 y .IX F uv'T . ' wr--ATy _.c r �
'/' h.•,�` ; (r. - * y 1 r C 8 tr r k �1 7 - .cam 'f
� 'ii i�' ♦ 1� � rr', r• r � >• +a^� 41:,rI"k tb � r �`��� Yt
r 1I- �•y' iv .. E iw. 7+.1" 4 i�r S a, a - ti- s �',G' _
``• ,I � ��y -A T �t,`Q �./'� ,b�iRh itt,r,' s� r�dc,1"��" ;
TTTT �tLtt-7 .."ice, I dY ,.��� ��� ��tya I . ��' ..-W�w� /.;��'?+A.rT '.:n0 'L` :�"\' 'A�,+!;w 1'�1, ;�;w T��,�.�/�F. � ,
PHOTO POINT 34 T7—upstream (11/11/2021J 44
PHOTO POINT 34 T7—downstream(11/11/2021J
,yn, T 1 4 /I _
W �^
k - 4ka� , K ;y ''} '�' r' • r -
R
�4- - yf k • I y r f 1, c .. "s'":
+� t,ti ''r e; --fi .a-l�t r �,F�jq p . az Wr 'S,
�" ir"�,TS . '.xj _, ti+g' �;Jy HIS • • �. v.. ,' e,7`a� y� � �" l,a �1 n,r4 '`
'.iw kw. }^ if.
41 �'Ar `'': ^®SS•'�: .Cy,, t-�° 'I ,.'d . aJ r E `'�.. h'.�;
ats w�y; ¢ ,5 r- s ',,« , ,<.; ''� ,: & ,� �# M}y%a,�,� - 3.- _
lit:
-�`�'% � 7, f a• 'H '` - `t* fi '`` �Y,. - � � �,M�,a,�i a , '.��pc Ir
,:.q. ,4,70,6.a.o.„,..?•#41.,. ..:::•, .. . ..
. , ,_,. . 0041:,...,,,:,,..,,40..v..,,,4*-4-p--,...:. ' .;
r . ..,,. . • .
I, • � 1 - ."f� '� `€� ti� =, .. �et l`a��,.�,k '19,e^` :,.<3• a,'B � �. � '
/i° - • •; r �f7 r'2 'yr 1�°� k �?.rr^�"e '� r 1
` el��91 _r-
.Skl ti r _ _.
3 i�lw � �4., k" _ r( e „r r .- r' L tihem • • ft r, \ .. .
xa. i ,- �!2`°'' "".., v e" � rr",all1:•�. SI`'"� -• . ', Ik , ,' —_
� � * ate ;v - 3 l#P, rt � ' ti�t'�44t1 'u _
- �`.-R.2E="�k. ;.ikwa "r..Y:�`� 'nP�` r.Y"9.�W/7A. ;E.:i. r�I < .s
PHOTO POINT 35 T7—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 35 T7—downstream(11/11/2021)
--sr�—
i
•
...
•
vi.Ts'= j .-^En \-
S s r' �,�. � �'m p_.yt_ i ,�,� 4 ,� $A'�:: • ^*y S, ,' 4,r -.- -
e fir' I y!M. :, x .;y#z, fi p �. r
•
5.. r -•
1 � ` �,t Y e rx� ., ' 314
a .k8,s`n e '�'- z^n, ii� Y .t �g-r e�`z ' I.
'1 . �!1 � is Y • a 9✓y 7' k ,.v r� cnvt. , t �"1 _t
•
.1� trsofa'.x'Mi`y ,, _ �, ... t:'i£ ... n:'va y v�2r.'1!'�rz!I -Y PHOTO POINT 36 T7—upstream (11/11/2021J PHOTO POINT 36 T7—downstream(11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

+� g ,5 - r !•5 f X, �jjk+,5 h ,
•' �,"• ,r,'w:'`"x- 'e++k'tc Alik - ,;a -, x to i' r 'k ., , r l l 3i i;'4r "iT ! ,
.ai. £ ' 'F
_ r Y'IJ _ - h y
�s e� ""itv .i�;,�.5�..s k n - e;',� r ia'�'s}r�'a-re� ^`,•�"
s a x y arr. s �e a` �'`' A N01 _ - 4 . L
1 * } `, ° Mire s i�,,t g a 9' <'" i A�� :', N 4 e'. `�• racy -4
'fit �` �l� S£ x'�. F.' lkj. �p� /•4 YN +,` . {,- ? r�,.'.`. a� �'IA, ,,' -w'�'' A;\} ', r
�!`�'4 i 77' ! t "'��i' fir' ' a= .1 • ,0 7',' 'L 4� 'r L..'' --
I :F T'•F •
''s� _ '' f,_' :a'�Yfr --' ...- 'st F 1 � i k,f >u�`
/ i,kp D�ifC`. pp•/� `� _ k{ •-'• '` 'r ElS'T���lt k` _a. 'tea ;,�q,,P1� ..''.r 5�
1 �Wd U.' • 'S`Gri l t" °^Y .+�., . , 1 -y,
PHOTO POINT 37 T7—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 37 T7—downstream(11/11/2021)
r
•
a -y a-`'Tr-*. , rev
S
,�'4Yl. ' `S� J ; C� a'�afpy� jd� y;: 'he"4yltw. 'r
im"5 r �' v ,... h `eA.4rt.x�. ,.'A a - „ - ~-
PHOTO POINT 38 T8 R1—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 38 T8 Rl—downstream(11/11/2021)
n
! �,r{7 s'�, s� y, � . t n°I �, , . w ' {!� x , �V ,,,
�,� 4„,;` ,, : - '- -- ' .,;. ' ' ..
•': � tt ��: ¢ ��`#aft ;,�' w I��_ �° ,� •_ r� t^ } _
•
$t'._ sa Ott F s� i i k a
sy € `L 'r, ++, � � � aa'�, �a �"Fes,-� �: s� ¢ � r •�
4 wg
{ , r } e K A Sx ��i �-`arC`• ,' y4L*
� iA� bait` °`` r -
•
P^_ � t '�''S `" +.:. ,� h _-Ha b •w x`i �,1 ':TY'� v-Tv_ °t� 7p 3" `+�4F : -
fi
,- � _, ''' ? t ! > g -'r X 3 P� `s �, r j a 't� a
i V iVfi ,, �'Y4 - ": rr- fi4y s`' ` ii€ • 1 r ,�'m �'w -�`�. �' '+
� - � �� =r �� � ��- s +�' 1 s1 g,,r.. ]� -r� 4� � - a�t.7 ^^�r^C.fiK �'.���X.t ..
J � $.te - „,' r I t d s\a L zp rt.' -..t '' Y �' 4 f Y F"'' -
rr� ',�,_ vs.� i �- / ' 1 `_ .r'k, .-f1° ( ..i.z.'.; w_':y a. TS t ^ \ s.
�. Y .. \ .\i �'i. - /- -. ra� %'.... .4'#Y4. c^f' J'f" _ 'V- ,
PHOTO POINT 39 T8 R2—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 39 T8 R2—downstream (11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

� . "...
-11
� � � J s � �.� I ram*
�w" '� -ter-- �,Pis
} wwFF. �
•
4 Y
If
k .'!- " .- - _,"` oaf a '-`. _
PHOTO POINT 40 T8 R2—upstream(11/11/2021J PHOTO POINT 40 T8 R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
,- •
°n" . .�` r•} ..off ;
§ V
• ▪ �� •
}Cam. '1+ . V
P
•
•
•
S
�,
iv▪y: Yrsh �"y \
m
'� E
PHOTO POINT 41 T9 R1—ups
tream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 41 T9 R1—downstream(11/11/2..,...:.00 :::.-...1,:t:.,:..i, 021)
:ram
•
_ xr �
.„ for �r a.
•
kM
� �� y � � • ILL •
pi7'Z''''-,::-.:i.,6',...c1:-:', ..i....7.r....-7,-.'-?,t:-,.:,:,-,':••••.4.-.1,f!.A.. ,9r..,,..;:.,' ,., . .
� �" '
PHOTO POINT 42 T9 R2—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 42 T9 R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
.01 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

ems, �y 3 �� 1a 1 i 'p¢ �:' �T r • °✓� .4 4- .. 1 ' r
71
,a }�a—q�+t �3- c�� �lw..1r �y �Q � 1 i ! * , � v' A �
B f4 A 'ti. W �J°i � 1 . �' L r, 1 �� �A5 � 9: �„
r -1- —Iir, '' "'� 'ed r,. ., ,t 1 F ' `A. r
� 1 A .,t'; e - i �u< " ``=j kr i s -. �,
•
3� �� � L J r�� �� ._* A�° �_ .. h � > = r- Y � N, �-�- az �'
•
we '� - fit I g' ".7L.'''' '•'. ‘4,W.....V:."..'4.-4! ,TV,,..-5,..N.,,,,"X.--„•_:,,,, ,,...-„,t .f., , ,..., 7:
-.
4.
;'y—y .., y„ F• '`, •04 'q- w'r°''q. # . s.i' atx,. vi `- g '�- r G i
41
PHOTO POINT 43. - !,• :* • ..,4 ., . , 4,, s it,A ,..or,-: ,.... x•,. „*.:.2, 'a t„,,z4,,L, , k '%.: '0,1`.A c-'''- -,:14,,4,,.."0.'Y, , '' % S' t 4.'
T9A—upstream(11/03/2021) :777,...1-7,!".!:„„4:4:92,A—kld:71;77(11./,,,::/-2.71) ,
/2021)
+ ! ¢ r r " r ki4 ,'ily N.,�.' q '"•� "�' �!A `r� � ,� af; a � 4 1 +r'�,y, 5 r� 4r al/ = �
,�,} , , 1` ice. V } z1 ',� 'CY z�r �k { a
ti
,,N E.'. , IL
{Va V" , L +.-n ,z 5 B r ,
4-, ''' 'L'. ' 1 i
t ' f
t —.y'4%., - JI-' - 5R
-. — ,. - t . is: .- .
gg�
„h, qi}! .. 3n& rif 6 S ^�•kYIC,'.y.,.
'r ZlrAc 1 * y
PHOTO POINT 44 T10 R1—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 44 T10 Ri—downstream(11/11/2021)
4 ire M, '' rf" : k'r' , j .i ;;;
`r
_,-, F �u. +
•
1
a
, a
> � y �C">- ���/ j i • 47 x ��"ad'Wa��,< 4 r a.�
i.
k h � `.:.� nvs 3,�S;�,hq� .r-� !��` e F i �pY t� i a� ;fin�:� �y7.,
PHOTO POINT 45 T10 R1—upstream (11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 45 T10 R1—downstream(11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
14, Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

r }
"<...
fir' °'ti
r
•
t. �2 �a•� v � r rE �
f�y� .
-',A.'
' °1
PHOTO POINT 46 T10 R2—upstream(11/11/2021J PHOTO POINT 46 T10 R2—downstream(11/11/2021)
f �„� ,j
/, s* � � Ty a • i d ,
.a tea;: s ...
te*
. 31 —
•� e / .'_' te'. ,- _
PHOTO POINT 47 T10A—upstream(11/11/2021) PHOTO POINT 47 T10A—downstream(11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Photographs

STREAM CROSSING PHOTOGRAPHS

•
{ ,i I Aa ` dy. . t..: ,arcs ' y 77!a '4 3 V , q1
Lx� f J
>i4!
•
�y •
e
- _ fi
Daniels Creek R2—Looking Upstream(11/11/2021) i Daniels Creek R2—Looking Downstream(11/11/2021)
f
a - � I I e
IL \
tk �, ..4 jfh 11
•
;
'
Daniels Creek R3—Looking Upstream(11/11/2021) Daniels Creek R3—Looking Downstream(11/11/2021)
�; f 1. y �wp�p f V x
1 r ' �' y i t to .� y�� a t AP dyi",P ''''
� /* of #,C� t ,...{-a 3` ' `ib' �.�, '� g l�(„'ai �r, ',. v l -„,e �'.'g i;. d`.��tvg-via� �
�• " '� ^,s„ ,c . !. M1 ``4 � fi a,� '!,Ya ffss 'a:fR P t{ IM �� Ir,
44.
,' h [� +r�. l{ a -- a " f ,�,�spa E I
� sp a� � ���� r° i��.-.f,{ �Y) `+irii'�5�. I� 1� �!'
i � @ • ha 1 FC } 1 ++ rJ t�t *ix,.
1,- -..-- ilk , -,., . v.,. . ...,r,„ : 4 0 ,... 0/ i ' 140
i i
s . 1st �!
��� : , .z ._ .1 ,. �v ;-. Ate " fi till
T1 R2—Looking Upstream(11/11/2021) T1 R2—Looking Downstream(11/11/2021)
rk Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
W Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Crossing Photographs

te . �
,! �, � ,..rf a * rem .
•
�u
��k a f�� � a ;� �$ �
Ar
I. -,,
T1 R4—Looking Upstream(11/11/2021) T1 R4—Looking Downstream(11/11/2021)
f"
- k 3.n rJ d �.r
C w; ` a3 '- t a ✓
! a
U
* 1 SAS C 'L. _
yfi Y 3 •' -
Y � ,- - _ -er`-
,y,h
T3 R2—Looking Upstream •
(11/11/2021) it, T3 R2—Looking Downstream(11/11/2021)
z
'" 'rG
's q n".4�r � L i �n T �fir 4 ss..."`!' �\ ,. .r
ar
''
1 1. 1 1
T6 R2—Looking Upstream(11/11/2021) T6 R2—Looking Downstream(11/11/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
141 Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Crossing Photographs

VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS

a dJ' " 5 y -" `r ax ''3 h
ate` A ''. M, zS s ., ! c
� 4
•
k ��� ram...
..,.- _
fr
oit,
�.... .
.\,
x� t ��, �s�. �r
, ,. ......
....
.,,
. ,_
. ,,, .. ,
• •
,i
, •
, .
. • 4-=', -.' .,' \\.'
•
VEGETATION PLOT 1(11/02/2021J VEGETATION PLOT 2(11/02/2021J
,.....:.,... .. .4....,....,!%,..„....: ........,..,71__
F� yti r z •�� �s ' '
r 4 ri a
,t
'' � Ott tx,, ��` -�,, �,�-' }-�
•
::'"t.',:31,. }
• =1V W�� j ` 11
As' r•[ �, z it ,.,. i�q -'
i - -
4,....ii
i4
„.„..,i7 , ..,,. ..3,_::_,,it,. ., . c,Nqi.'•
as` ` 1 .,k z,
VEGETATION PLOT 3(11/02/2021J VEGETATION PLOT 4(11/02/2021)
;.►may r,i , '- E n
a,
w1
x i ;•
h
IMr
t! _ .r
VEGETATION PLOT 5(11/02/2021J VEGETATION PLOT 6(11/02/2021J
ik Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A.Visual Assessment Data—Vegetation Plot Photographs

� 1
'� I„elk � ;
' i ( -
IF .,1,.4:.-.-;.::::2.!.2.,;,;.I,2'.2 .
r . . . . ... ,. ..
VEGETATION PLOT 7(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 8(11/02/2021)
- W.
.. �,., `~ •
i
•
f i . , E /,;. . .. / I
VEGETATION PLOT 9(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 10(11/02/2021)
r .
k..
i
"
ism
I
VEGETATION PLOT 11(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 12(11/02/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
1411 Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Vegetation Plot Photographs

lair
--_
Y
�� " . "
I
VEGETATION PLOT 13(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 14(11/02/2021)
1
flI
VEGETATION PLOT 15 (1_1/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 16(11/02/2021)
� �� ' is ;��� kj s Y_2 4r :�x - t : ,y
,40014-
''','r , _ Ai\J 4....-.!--att'.,.-4;;,,'.,Tft:4;::.7,07,,,i.,-_ . -
�Y' ad 2V ;4¢ya h ' `
2
VEGETATION PLOT 17(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 18(11/02/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Vegetation Plot Photographs

i
•
f.
s'1,,-l.-sk'z--.'3..7",.4;'.";.-7-:-",,-e-4:.,-:4.'1.1;4:4--,:4 4g 1fir.^ rr. h' ,r •
At . - "
VEGETATION PLOT 19(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 20(11/02/2021)
f
•
•
•
• •
VEGETATION PLOT 21(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 22(11/02/2021J
1.15111
ta.
•
•
r`.
.t-
E.
. ,.....,.,,...„.„...„.,..„.
R ;
,..- ...'-:,.--••:•.!!..:.''F...,6•7.1',i•3,'•K•...4'44,
a 7 i.r{s
r
'''•*•'''::.:!',:4;:::'il,,i.ecAtt:'.''''..;'t;V,,; . %.,/,'_:!.:T•`..,7,W'''.rfC7'...7 ' !'...'" .
\' f
•
4
VEGETATION PLOT 23(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 24(11/02/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Vegetation Plot Photographs

1
'1. i'./' '' 'T 7' ' . ,I, ,,—A...,
)1. r
t
a y /
� r st- s S"""/p I'II 1
y•,
� a
a
' `� � \ � 1 .§ �wag IL .1
VEGETATION PLOT 25(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 26(11/02/2021)
.,''' $j''''- ' ^
-�: sin
n5 7 any#, '3�
v -4q . r �4'
,1 s �,. - rya. . • �pp.
a
1 "-
I
''',,' „..v...-./.41i,,,,,f-e ... ,...i--..-.."-',.•‘.',.•... • v-,4n---•
,.I... yr
1)VEGETATION PLOT 27(11/02/202 VEGETATION PLOT 28(11/02/2021)
x `
Is
7
VEGETATION PLOT 29(11/02/2021) VEGETATION PLOT 30(11/02/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Vegetation Plot Photographs

a.,
-r
�_, ,
"�`• ter -*;;, .n ne i Z1
_ ‘ . ,,,„ , .... ,, votiotirt.A.
. .. ,,,,,-4., .*:,-,,..3.-4:y-oe. , ,A,--, ,T ,
.,4_,-_.A.--..,-3;7,"s',#,,,-.., t r rr, - G
a ,'}M t c 4 L % pig;` ry[ f 1:
- , L °
. x _ c ., :f _,i -, _ z
a�e
k,,' IL f x.' !' r
RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 1(11/02/2021) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 2(11/02/2021)
1.1
(
RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 3(11/02/2021) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 4(11/02/2021)
•
'w'� a P .
-..44611110lirk
.. - •. `S idb .Y'X. �3$x`�''G'
.
4..:i,.. z. _-,-,::,:.„.
. , . ,,.,45.4,...54... „...v.:
_ ,,, __ IT-
RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 5(11/02/2021) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 6(11/02/2021)
▪ Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
• Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Vegetation Plot Photographs

RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 7(11/02/2021) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 8(11/02/2021)
•
{ y
RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 9(11/02/2021) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 10(11/02/2021)
•
4
k -
RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 11(11/02/2021) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 12(11/02/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
141 Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Vegetation Plot Photographs

'1 Pfi pp�� 11111F—
•
ti - t- g �
A
•
.„.,:.,..,„:„.......,:.„. , ...:. . . . . .. ....i.....) ,._,. . T.;•..:
y
f"'l
RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 13(11/02/2021) RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 14(11/02/2021)
41.•::•. ...::::','4:4Nf,...4143-.•' A;;..':•••:
Pa k,: _
t
it'r.
•
RANDOM VEGETATION PLOT 15(11/02/2021)
e M
AppendixDanielsCre A:Visualk itigation Assessment Data—Vegetation Plot Photographs

GROUNDWATER GAUGE PHOTOGRAPHS

7 -, •• a _
. f4f y - _. _-_ • p•'
icN
.1 lii.,„„s:, -.',. ..44.'„;''",...•.t.'lis ,..,7„.,:ri.,,,.'Y:''.---.--_-.'4-'.
}' X'.' �F• tT. <=jir
rg
.:,.....1.„. .,._......,:.„.,:._____....„ ,...,„:„_ :,, :. ,..: L.
,,,...1 _.
•
It
r'
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 1-(12/7/2021) y � GROUNDWAT ER GAUGE 2-(12/7/2021)
_.,41.. ., i;,.:r,_.
4.( 4 ' YA
� >g= . a'9
.. .'2.3,:'=';'''
•
Ntii
foolt
_
_' : 1 -'�� l�'Afi ' � . �4'. ' ' -ue�� 4 . y � s
ry y ; y y3 4.1 - l ) W �� ; /;
•
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 3—(12/7/2021) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 4—(12/7/2021)
;'
,•
. . . '\•,,,t i ..-/,a,,) •....6 ...-/..... , -•••
✓ �' '� am.,. ' � 1 ,'s ,
tir J9„� Syr - 7�� - w - -
7
•'\'- \.. •
'r!1A 4 �7,0 x ,a 'i1."" - _. _r : vy .tea\
0.
-. �� , t�)�!'-'c it x • "T � , r 'Pi, } ;- . AiB�
�,Y; 4 e�y47. , F°,5 � � 6� y' t-• � f�R�� � La '1,.v, •' ' 1. � 1
ilk
y' Yet S ; , �►, - � _��■r �,ar \ +..1 :l `"L�Va -"�
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 5—(12/7/2021) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 6—(12/7/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Groundwater Gauge Photographs

1 l -'4 i I
"' v` 4 `d - 4q j s'" i1 r b }'" ". F ' •" .t
•
''' 'Y,. y4 4.E - fi CY' !c \ t',... 7Y _ g Fib
r R ' 'C 2F R a:,.• T I4, F rR ^' f
l k ro r n ` 7� I A � y, ra a �
{ y 5r , %1',' ' i•� {gg,�,, c,#d ?'S, G uA; sr u � t f: •q
•
r _ _ '�•4 Y '. s� $" . h113 f'�r'' . 1 4"c :� 5 f " f I "4 y a .w a
r 5 0'` 1 y> r l >,ur �:,V ?�!} i 6�•I.r q 4,,,,,,,,14,' i'Y F £ '4
`-A .A� -i`, i ti ti•r"8i .1 - � -.I r :I' I!?`l,a 1 'i• „,,J.,:„...,,
,' >4'.)� ' —1 ,' I'.:
iri -. F.. I ,' 5r 'l`' y k f' 1 ,1 y t.�i ..,...�P i '�r I - -
II il, �r F .4 s •-, K-r: ,," rZq¢�`' I L•_ i t - JPr�! r�t'
'� t4,14
Y+^ �sYa' '� 3 - i F. V' �1
� .em 1 �Q v�r' l -"2
•
NrK�} / ,)5rg2. of M1.1 .,'�] ?(.- �1,, i 'g ,,, _ y; �
vhcl.
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 7—(12/7/2021) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 8—(12/7/2021)
*. \''''';'- '-r.„..)6•.4' ;,_._•'-'' .'•atii",.., ., , , ,
a
_i a 'k'T:' e`
$, Iy. S as
55�� �� �I \ 21 gt�'� r-3 4 - � •' �
p��,y • Via; ' c
"` . A,I,�,� JA R k Y. { `41 • P ,.t,
VI/14y7,'t �9q Ai i �, P Yi •
-tk ..- - i a` �c] y ,1-:.
l W 11 .. F`�c�
r 4- Y I 8 } Y r' 1�1' - r i0.P r
1 �s ' t 1 h _ r 1, P fPw
F,vf 1�t 1 b 5 • � A { : ,T � l / L �'��jx, t - ¢ ` pe 2`�", se4. t o
0
- '_..ram' i�� xd. '., 5v,.p y\ It'_ / `3ErT S y�r .,r' •a"Rk: "' 'C `s° tx t� �'
�lC,•:T- •h t! s1+O I: .yn. , ' _ 1 I rdrd 5°"" ?" ,� t a,x .a'' '"a:.
ki
,.:,:„....,, . t,. __.
4„...,___,....:„..,-,,-:,..,-,
,,,,,v„ixf.„.„,,,...„
. -..,
,, .
_....N,..ii..,„ .,„,,,foir
r.
IVY'.;,-„, l fir° bf h\dill, " A¢ � *�i 9s+� -'�, .B #,' :
„..... _,,..,,,...„__:,,,,,,,,„
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 9—(12/7/2021) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 10—(12/7/2021)
k� - 5d P.• `` b y:-° 1'I sNG '. Y' 'u ''} a At
-vir
t ' \ t T4 rJ .q�`y�
1 P.[51 ` t -i°" -,,a"'?� "h ry Jr, 7. -y ��•1 � k-r ��5 r
iti
t
xdt 4 �q: ,
z •y Sr E��V O'• �� If f' ` `I.1 S t$ Ir 9 01 I / ♦'r , i 4.4.,
e1010;41 „it
�; t + fir�.E�'� ��ij ` is, ", `y� ' ° , y a Sv 'J:
1�``-' - _ i .vim+ -5 1 !It %l 'r _ ➢f,. P a r L'.t•,`yyr77eT"
^ . 3 l"Jr yi L w: T C I i,1: ' 9c..� .. C'' tb- 4t' � t f
I { •� . -,yi q '�•,�, <z i • '` i N,-'-1—I it-J': _ti.: _e*: , I ����� . ��
i / ! �/ •kp. t Jf �� � � >dt��w �s -- \9t
C 1._
\ \ l
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 11—(12/7/2021) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 12—(12/7/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Groundwater Gauge Photographs

•Nemat
1? M
Via,' r ✓ s k k'A.% >. A p ,�, M � %, •�� _ Ld`I '.,t r'�i 1 Y "i. ,x.�� � ' •,, i % C fugt r^t: , \ .,. ' _ r ! ,-. ',7y w, - ,-t,, `r,r ,, �f e�.. - 1a I .k 1 r+} � �d _ ��,
V � � fF .�• ��i,^i£Gd � �,�'f �� �`��SUC' 9. ,#�� '�i �,..�� ��' `�,�T r s�,!,e.#x�.��!�'�� I�� S 3+'s!� r -: Ig �,..
1 u 7 Y !
° y. E $ ':f pr doe. E, r A .. '1 t' +, R �.rr ✓!,
�- �fa� It. : ,', . ., :.J L `t .Ar°r r k�a \� 7p�l,� y1�t.y'.'3� f✓. - .v i+�w�"M.+.un.�a,�A M1v•1� j� Y
It-A,-W '' ' a 5Lti, a l- ,, ° 3, �4, I #ytt
,,0'.. 1;11'i, �.x "�h B p�',i d • .
> t I - f /dr1 Y z \� �'( S�Vt1 SS''�Iy,y, '} a�sz �r 9 /A
i � µ3�.• 'i/ 7 ' "r f ',1 P - i �'' ' R A$1 w�4'2. k' Y'•' . �N-, �/ '.4�q S F j
,",l ! 6 ' • - r'r�;��� �� ,, � - ip, , „�, y. ,, -mil \ ,, 1 � ,,' .
�r 'a k � 1 • Ste. ` i a tir;i7=
f•
h s ` I// L 1a p ,§ 1y, F tea'^ !"' T -,e.� "�,. err
% � ,�I. � ;, �, �,, g gyp. ��.� � ��� _., r_,,,,_ r -,' r.k :.i.,',',' -',.- 11'',''' - �, .� -�i T'/
_
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 13—(12/7/2021) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 14—(12/7/2021J
,
o
'
fiA
s.
• t .9d p p ,?has
r�wdr .ja� 1r
•
•
ii-
[ _. \1 A
N.
ir[ r' ' i f•s Mao , .°c V --� _ s - �r` i
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 15—(12/7/2021) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 16—•(12/7/2021)
Or' - r lei '� m r!`t :: ,' I: -'n° + „c✓
r a a� , t� r 1 k k3'',11 1 r ��ru 1,
yf ` 0 ray
` r ;t'ram
•
s�+f 1� 1 �`-sF 'M1• > x +-^*P. �a a v '1 �r 1%�45, , ayi
e.� rCy e
ti edi F
.. ��,�' J''♦,T � �;?3,,ix � J i.�� tr � 14-'rx .'r '�x,,,,yy�� I} 4 Y�.���a[ � I
4l *7�J Y ;;, s .. 4—_/ '°tsb `+ 'i�• r4:. .
!ir
,.- _ :v ` -i § t„/� I a V V4 ` j ai,,4 k '','
` , as �. & 4ir. - � ¢�`- °i 2, #� �� y�, -
iftl," '
��a. I ' y { P' +•L
�` a�"'' '., fir_3 �` -1 •-:r' _} s f.. .': " ��]`,�rwl, - �-� ' ��' fi r ,st f,,
r9� f + _ G� °� F 1.�f *$ram* "a >.& b M' ' !6 i +`a
♦ , aa:%. ac`aA'ae ear:_�. � . 'ri'} r
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 17—(12/7/2021) GROUNDWATER GAUGE 18—(12/7/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Groundwater Gauge Photographs

I
AiiR I`R i �, ,yip
k
, _ , ,..._4,1., ..tr,...tivoi4-4,.. ..._ ..,,,,,,,,,.: -7,_..,.1..,''4.,:71._,,f:
.y a F
t 1 eta
_r
GROUNDWATER GAUGE 19—(12/7/2021)
1111 Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
W Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Groundwater Gauge Photographs

STREAM REPAIR PHOTOGRAPHS

• -., _ 7 lycJ 9+dam w'f f f+� { ,-
� yy
�� y 1� � '9P� /am ' -
� r - � 4+w;Fpn � fit,,� �
yy 9 r ". ;a �a aid`� .,r °
�" _ '� a�. r'f'.� sIl
t c
� lip _*� k t { I 9 ',�,' mil'`
•
Unstable Log Sill 1 and Bank Erosion—(9/20/2021) Bank Erosion -(9/20/2021)
rp'^ ,w x
'': "; . }4.
lit
�
t4 v '{ „ t A 4, '4
+r }. s w
•
�4 _ 'ND'
3 . m y �1 'em= t-S '
k }e y"4 ,Rpa ) f -r' #y I YY
y .:,
'� T " a ik.,,,;'1.r‘75;:r:'
',I:E.!:
•y ,* •Z
•
1 P`
Unstable Log Sills 2 and 3—(9/20/2021) Unstable Log Sills 2 and 3-(9/20/2021)
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Repair Photographs

- -
44pia. )
Repaired Area looking upstream(10/27/2021)
aVilDaniels Creek Mitigation Site
1411 Appendix A:Visual Assessment Data—Stream Repair Photographs

APPENDIX B. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 6. Vegetation Performace Standards Summary Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Plot Success Criteria Met* Tract Mean
Fixed Vegetation Plot 1 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 2 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 3 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 4 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 5 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 6 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 7 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 8 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 9 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 10 No*
Fixed Vegetation Plot 11 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 12 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 13 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 14 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 15 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 16 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 17 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 18 No
Fixed Vegetation Plot 19 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 20 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 21 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 22 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 23 Yes 91%
Fixed Vegetation Plot 24 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 25 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 26 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 27 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 28 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 29 Yes
Fixed Vegetation Plot 30 No
Random Vegetation Plot 1 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 2 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 3 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 4 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 5 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 6 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 7 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 8 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 9 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 10 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 11 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 12 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 13 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 14 Yes
Random Vegetation Plot 15 No
*Success Criteria Met is based on the interim success criteria for MY3 of 320 planted stems per acre.Fixed Vegetation Plot 10 is still
on track to meet MY5 criteria of 260 planted stems per acre.

Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP 1 VP 2 VP 3 VP 4 VP 5
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree
Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub 1 1 1
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cephalanthusoccidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree 1 1 1
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lindera benzoin Spicebush Shrub Tree
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Prunusserotina Black Cherry Tree
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2
Quercusshumardii Shumard Oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1
Taxodium distichum Bald-cypress Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
U/mus americana American Elm Tree 1 1 1
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stem count 10 10 10 12 12 12 13 13 13 12 12 12 9 9 9
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 6 6 6 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 9 7 7 7
Stems per ACRE 405 405 405 486 486 486 526 526 526 486 486 486 364 364 364
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP 6 VP 7 VP 8 VP 9 VP 10
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 1 1 1
Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree
Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1
Cephalanthusoccidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 2 2 2
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree 1 1 1
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Lindera benzoin Spicebush Shrub Tree
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 2 2 2
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Prunusserotina Black Cherry Tree 1 1 1
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3
Quercusshumardii Shumard Oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Taxodium distichum Bald-cypress Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
U/mus americana American Elm Tree 1 1 1
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree
Stem count 13 13 13 8 8 8 9 9 9 11 11 11 7 7 7
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 8 8 8 5 5 5 6 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4
Stems per ACRE 526 526 526 324 324 324 364 364 364 445 445 445 283 283 283
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP 11 VP 12 VP 13 VP 14 VP 15
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 1 1 1
Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree
Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub 1 1 1
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Cephalanthusoccidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree
Lindera benzoin Spicebush Shrub Tree
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Prunusserotina Black Cherry Tree
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercusshumardii Shumard Oak Tree
Taxodium distichum Bald-cypress Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1
U/mus americana American Elm Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree
Stem count 13 13 13 8 8 8 10 10 10 12 12 12 11 11 11
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 9 9 9 6 6 6 4 4 4 7 7 7 7 7 7
Stems per ACRE 526 526 526 324 324 324 405 405 405 486 486 486 445 445 445
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP 16 VP 17 VP 18 VP 19 VP 20
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree
Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree
Cephalanthusoccidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree
Lindera benzoin Spicebush Shrub Tree
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Prunusserotina Black Cherry Tree
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3
Quercusshumardii Shumard Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taxodium distichum Bald-cypress Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
U/mus americana American Elm Tree 1 1 1
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree
Stem count 11 11 11 8 8 8 3 3 3 9 9 9 11 11 11
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 7 7 7 5 5 5 3 3 3 6 6 6 7 7 7
Stems per ACRE 445 445 445 324 324 324 121 121 121 364 364 364 445 445 445
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP 21 VP 22 VP 23 VP 24 VP 25
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1
Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree
Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Cephalanthusoccidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree 1 1 1
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree
Lindera benzoin Spicebush Shrub Tree
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Prunusserotina Black Cherry Tree
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercusshumardii Shumard Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taxodium distichum Bald-cypress Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 4 4 4
U/mus americana American Elm Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree
Stem count 10 10 10 12 12 12 11 11 11 8 8 8 12 12 12
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 7 7 7 8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6
Stems per ACRE 405 405 405 486 486 486 445 445 445 324 324 324 486 486 486
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP 26 VP 27 VP 28 VP 29 VP 30
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 3 3 3
Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree
Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Cephalanthusoccidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree
Lindera benzoin Spicebush Shrub Tree
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 1 1 1
Prunusserotina Black Cherry Tree
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercusshumardii Shumard Oak Tree 1 1 1
Taxodium distichum Bald-cypress Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1
U/mus americana American Elm Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree
Stem count 15 15 15 14 14 14 16 16 16 11 11 11 3 3 3
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 8 8 8 7 7 7 9 9 9 6 6 6 2 2 2
Stems per ACRE 607 607 607 567 567 567 647 647 647 445 445 445 121 121 121
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7a. Fixed Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Annual Means
MY1(2021) MY0(2021)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 12 12 12 16 16 16
Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry Shrub Tree 2 2 2
Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub 2 2 2 1 1 1
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 41 41 41 52 52 52
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree 8 8 8 11 11 11
Cephalanthusoccidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 8 8 8 2 2 2
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree 5 5 5 7 7 7
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Shrub Tree 3 3 3 4 4 4
Lindera benzoin Spicebush Shrub Tree 3 3 3
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 15 15 15 23 23 23
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 58 58 58 67 67 67
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 18 18 18 21 21 21
Prunusserotina Black Cherry Tree 1 1 1
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 19 19 19 23 23 23
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 33 33 33 41 41 41
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 21 21 21 35 35 35
Quercusshumardii Shumard Oak Tree 14 14 14 22 22 22
Taxodium distichum Bald-cypress Tree 39 39 39 51 51 51
U/mus americana American Elm Tree 13 13 13 20 20 20
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub Tree 2 2 2 7 7 7
Stem count 312 312 312 408 408 408
size(ares) 30 30
size(ACRES) 0.74 0.74
Species count 18 18 18 19 19 19
Stems per ACRE 421 421 421 551 551 551
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7b.Random Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP 1 VP 2 VP 3 VP 4 VP 5
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 3 3 1 1
Carya sp. Hickory Tree
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Tree 3 3 1 1
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Tree 1 1
Ligustrum sinense Chinese Privet Exotic
Lindera benzoin Spice Bush Shrub Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip-poplar Tree
Liquidambarstyraciflua Sweet gum Tree
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree
Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 1 1 1 1 2 2 5 5
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 3 3 1 1 3 3
Prunus serotina Black Cherry Tree
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 1 1 2 2
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1
Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Salixnigra Black Willow Tree 4 4
Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Shrub Tree 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub tree
Stem count 9 9 9 9 10 10 9 9 14 14
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 4 4 6 6 4 4 3 3 7 7
Stems per ACRE 364 364 364 364 405 405 364 364 567 567
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Te-Number of stems including exotic species
T-Number of stems excluding exotic species

Table 7b.Random Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP 6 VP 7 VP 8 VP 9 VP 10
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 17 17
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 4 4 1 1 2 2
Carya sp. Hickory Tree
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 1 1
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Tree 2 2
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Tree
Ligustrum sinense Chinese Privet Exotic
Lindera benzoin Spice Bush Shrub Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip-poplar Tree 2 2
Liquidambarstyraciflua Sweet gum Tree 8 8
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree
Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 5 5 1 1 4 4 3 3
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 1 1
Prunus serotina Black Cherry Tree 1 1
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 2 2 1 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree
Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Tree 1 1
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2
Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Shrub Tree 1 1 6 6 4 4 4 4 1 1
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 1 1 1 1 2 2
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub tree 1 1
Stem count 11 11 11 11 15 15 37 36 14 14
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 4 4 5 5 5 5 9 8 8 8
Stems per ACRE 445 445 445 445 607 607 1,497 1,457 567 567
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Te-Number of stems including exotic species
T-Number of stems excluding exotic species

Table 7b.Random Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Current Plot Data(MY1 2021)
VP11 VP12 VP13 VP14 VP15
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Te T Te T Te T Te T Te T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 1
Carya sp. Hickory Tree 1 1
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Tree
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Tree
Ligustrum sinense Chinese Privet Exotic 1
Lindera benzoin Spice Bush Shrub Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip-poplar Tree 1 1
Liquidambarstyraciflua Sweet gum Tree
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 3 3 1 1
Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 1 1
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree
Prunus serotina Black Cherry Tree
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 2 2 1 1
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 3 3
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1
Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Tree 1 1
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree 3 3 2 2
Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Shrub Tree 2 2 5 5 3 3
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 2 2
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub tree
Stem count 8 8 8 8 15 15 19 19 8 7
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 3 3 2 2 4 4 8 8 8 7
Stems per ACRE 324 324 324 324 607 607 769 769 324 283
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Te-Number of stems including exotic species
T-Number of stems excluding exotic species

Table 7b.Random Plot: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Annual Means Annual Means
MY1(2021) MY0(2021)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Te T Te T
Acer negundo Boxelder Tree 13 13
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 17 17
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 23 23 34 34
Carya sp. Hickory Tree 1 1
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree 10 10
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree 1 1
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Tree 6 6 9 9
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel Tree 1 1 2 2
Ligustrum sinense Chinese Privet Exotic 1
Lindera benzoin Spice Bush Shrub Tree 1 1
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip-poplar Tree 3 3
Liquidambarstyraciflua Sweet gum Tree 8 8
Nyssa biflora Swamp Tupelo Tree 4 4 3 3
Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 37 37 42 42
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood Tree 8 8 19 19
Prunus serotina Black Cherry Tree 1 1
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 3 3 8 8
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 9 9 10 10
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 2 2 14 14
Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak Tree 8 8 12 12
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree 19 19
Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Shrub Tree 37 37 27 27
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 6 6 2 2
Viburnum prunifolium Black Haw Shrub tree 1 1 1 1
Stem count 197 195 207 207
size(ares) 15 15
size(ACRES) 0.37 0.37
Species count 16 16 16 16
Stems per ACRE 531 526 558 558
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Te-Number of stems including exotic species
T-Number of stems excluding exotic species

APPENDIX C. Stream Geomorphology Data

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 1-Daniels Creek Reach 1
102+50 Riffle
368 1
367 ,
366 .
c
0
365
wv
364 -
363 ,
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull —— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions '.A . • .'
8.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) '- :.
13.7 width(ft) '` ` +R•
0.7 mean depth(ft) ;� �"
1.3 max depth(ft) "
14.0 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) • �-
20.9 width-depth ratio -- ' \
70.0 W flood prone area(ft) -
5.1 entrenchment ratio G. n ,� •
1.0 low bank height ratio '.-: -
r,,f, ----'..gip :4 •+' - -
Survey Date: 11/2021 � ^�
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering .+',4s .;5•r - ••4
r R ter• ` oF
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 2-Daniels Creek Reach 2
106+47 Riffle
361
360
359 -'
o_
:::
—
356
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.1 x-section area(ft.sq.)
8.7 width(ft)
0.6 mean depth(ft)
1.2 max depth(ft)
9.2 wetted perimeter(ft) -
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft)
15.0 width-depth ratio
30.0 W flood prone area(ft)
3.4 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio —
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 3-Daniels Creek Reach 3
114+39 Pool
352
351
•
$ 350
0
349
348 v
347
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
—MVO(4/2021) +MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
19.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) - t:'
14.0 width(ft) ''x`r.;z; `
1.4 mean depth(ft) •
• `•3 "-
2.5 max depth(ft)
16.1 wetted perimeter(ft) _
1.2 hydraulic radius(ft)
9.8 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 4-Daniels Creek Reach 3
114+75 Riffle
352
351
.--. 350
0
349
wv
348 -
347
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) -Bankfull Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
12.2 x-section area(ft.sq.)
12.9 width(ft)
0.9 mean depth(ft)
kr'.
1.8 max depth(ft) ._. 5r,
13.6 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.9 hydraulic radius(ft) '44144
13.8 width-depth ratio '•
130.0 W flood prone area(ft)
•
10.0 entrenchment ratio ,,•7 } � '
1.0 low bank height ratio i _
Survey Date: 11/2021 •
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering • i.
•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 5-Daniels Creek Reach 4
130+32 Riffle
331
330
•
329 -
0
328 -
w
327 -
326
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) — MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull ——- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) —Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
19.3 x-section area(ft.sq.) ,
26.0 width(ft) +'° ".9.
•
0.7 mean depth(ft)
2.1 max depth(ft)
26.9 wetted perimeter(ft)
•
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft)
34.9 width-depth ratio
140.0 W flood prone area(ft)
5.4 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering •
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 6-Daniels Creek Reach 4
130+78 Pool
329
328
327
0
326
v
w
325
324
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
—MVO(4/2021) t MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions I
23.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
24.7 width(ft) 47
1.0 mean depth(ft)
3.3 max depth(ft)
26.8 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.9 hydraulic radius(ft)
25.7 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 7-Daniels Creek Reach 5
133+38 Riffle
327
326
325
co 324 +--+ ----
323
322
321
15 25 35 45 55
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull ——- Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions •
f �
24.0 x-section area(ft.sq.) sr- ..
16.7 width(ft) • ` - '
1.4 mean depth(ft)
2.7 max depth(ft)
19.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.2 hydraulic radius(ft) — —
11.6 width-depth ratio
-
140.0 W flood prone area(ft) � •-
8.4 entrenchment ratio /
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering .
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 8-T1 Reach 1
202+17 Riffle
395
394
393
c
0
392
/
L.4.1
391 ---s,
390 ,
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) — MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions +1 }_ :r: . ;,.''
8.0 x-section area(ft.sq.) I -
12.0 width(ft) ` '
•
0.7 mean depth(ft) •
1.2 max depth(ft)
12.3 wetted perimeter(ft) -
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft)
18.0 width-depth ratio - -
33.0 W flood prone area(ft)
2.8 entrenchment ratio • ,.:-y,
1.0 low bank height ratio r•-
Survey Date: 11/2021 _'r
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering °`•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 9-T1 Reach 4
217+31 Riffle
362
361
i :::
wv
358 -
357
5 15 25 35 45
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) -Bankfull Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
10.9 x-section area(ft.sq.) •
11.9 width(ft) ' + •
0.9 mean depth(ft)
1.6 max depth(ft)
12.6 wetted perimeter(ft) t
0.9 hydraulic radius(ft)
13.1 width-depth ratio
125.0 W flood prone area(ft)
10.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio Yam..,
•
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 10-T1 Reach 4
222+32 Pool
349
♦ l
� T
348 -
347 \\1414..*
-
c
0
346
wv
345
344
10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
—MVO(4/2021) t MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
18.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) •
s it'.
13.8 width(ft) •.���
1.3 mean depth(ft)
2.5 max depth(ft) + A:
15.0 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.2 hydraulic radius(ft) -
10.3 width-depth ratio ,1► ,,r.
Survey Date: 11/2021
•
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 11-T1 Reach 4
222+61 Riffle
350 ,
349 -
348
347
v
w
346 -
345 ,
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull —— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
7.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
10.7 width(ft)
0.7 mean depth(ft)
1.1 max depth(ft)
11.2 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft) — --
14.9 width-depth ratio
55.0 W flood prone area(ft)
5.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 12-T1 Reach 5
232+17 Riffle
331
330
329 1 — • 0
c
0
328
327
326
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull ——• Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) —Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
17.1 x-section area(ft.sq.)
16.3 width(ft) r = -
1.0 mean depth(ft) 4,T
2.0 max depth(ft) .•
_
�
16.9 wetted perimeter(ft) r" a gym+^
1.0 hydraulic radius(ft) a-
15.5 width-depth ratio
115.0 W flood prone area(ft) .'5 � i• '`' l: _
7.1 entrenchment ratio
.- :
1.1 low bank height ratio ;�. -„r^, ; :�: _.�•. ah ;•
Survey Date: 11/2021 = , r .
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 13-T1 Reach 5
232+57 Pool
329
328 ••••••—•.--- -
327
c
0
326
v
w
325
324 ,
5 15 25 35 45
Width(ft)
—MVO(4/2021) t MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
32.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
17.6 width(ft) j
1.9 mean depth(ft) •-
3.7 max depth(ft)
19.9 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.6 hydraulic radius(ft) `9.5 width-depth ratio
410.k 4/10-v-::.--
Survey Date: 11/2021 .
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 14-T2 Reach 2
306+52 Riffle
384
383 -
,--, 382
O
381 -
w
380 -
379
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull —— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions -
6.8 x-section area(ft.sq.)
11.6 width(ft) .i
0.6 mean depth(ft)
1.1 max depth(ft)
11.9 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft) •
— — -- —
19.9 width-depth ratio
80.0 W flood prone area(ft)
6.9 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 15-T3 Reach 2
415+28 Pool
366 l
365 I41110.--
364
c �
0
363
w
362 N.. .1
361
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
—MVO(4/2021) t MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
13.4 x-section area(ft.sq.)
11.4 width(ft) .,. F . -=ar.
1.2 mean depth(ft)
2.1 max depth(ft) :� �:; : ;S•.:,...^3 ...
12.4 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.1 hydraulic radius(ft) i
9.7 width-depth ratio
s +
•
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 16-T3 Reach 2
415+43 Riffle
367
366
365
c
0
364
v
w
363 —
362
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull —— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions •
2.8 x-section area(ft.sq.)
6.6 width(ft)
0.4 mean depth(ft)
0.8 max depth(ft)
7.1 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft) -—
15.9 width-depth ratio
25.0 W flood prone area(ft)
3.8 entrenchment ratio f.
<1.0 low bank height ratio
•
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering •
r
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 17-T4 Reach 1
505+94 Pool
386
385
384
0
383
v
w
382 -
381
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
—MVO(4/2021) t MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions •
7.8 x-section area(ft.sq.) ' `'a
10.0 width(ft) • i f
0.8 mean depth(ft)
1.4 max depth(ft) 1 ,;• ;,t �'.r.,� -. v.`{j
10.7 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.7 hydraulic radius(ft) - --- • -
12.9 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 18-T4 Reach 1
506+05 Riffle
386
385 `t
,--, 384
1383
382 -
381
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull —— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
2.9 x-section area(ft.sq.)
6.3 width(ft) 1ti a,:_0.5 mean depth(ft) s
0.8 max depth(ft) 4 'rsY,'; ,' . - _
•
6.7 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft)
13.9 width-depth ratio
22.0 W flood prone area(ft)
3.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio „ .n:`.___ ., _Y •_ii F•
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 19-T4 Reach 2
512+03 Riffle
368
367
366 7
c
0
365 —
w
364
363
0 10 20 30
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull • Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) —Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
•
6.0 x-section area(ft.sq.) N
17.0 width(ft) • j.
0.4 mean depth(ft) •
1.1 max depth(ft) •t$ . .. rt's r K.
17.5 wetted perimeter(ft) rt _;
0.3 hydraulic radius(ft)
48.5 width-depth ratio
130.0 W flood prone area(ft)
7.6 entrenchment ratio .
1.0 low bank height ratio � "
Survey Date: 11/2021 • r
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 20-T5 Reach 2
606+90 Riffle
377
376
,--, 375
0
374
373 — - ——— _
372 ,
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) -Bankfull Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) -Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions r '_
2.3 x-section area(ft.sq.) - . b '"
5.7 width(ft)
0.4 mean depth(ft) .51
0.6 max depth(ft)
6.0 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.4 hydraulic radius(ft)
14.5 width-depth ratio
20.0 W flood prone area(ft)
3.5 entrenchment ratio
<1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 21-T6 Reach 2
706+91 Riffle
342
341
___"*.s...tz\,./"..--4 \
340 ,__:.......j
c
0
339
wv
338 -
337 - ,
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) -Bankfull Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
4.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) • �'
7.7 width(ft) ,
0.6 mean depth(ft) - $ Fy ya
1.4 max depth(ft) -
8.5 wetted perimeter(ft) - -'•
•
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft) - -
13.5 width-depth ratio F.
.44130.0 W flood prone area(ft) � ':'_ ,
16.8 entrenchment ratio - :ri1 dui*?
<1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021 .
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering .
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 22-T7
810+13 Riffle
365
364
363
0
362
wv
361
360
5 15 25 35 45
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) -Bankfull Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
4.4 x-section area(ft.sq.) x'
9.0 width(ft) \•:.
0.5 mean depth(ft)
1.0 max depth(ft)
9.5 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.5 hydraulic radius(ft)
18.5 width-depth ratio
•
50.0 W flood prone area(ft)
5.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio \ •
Survey Date: 11/2021 ~
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 23-T7
810+32 Pool
364 -
363
♦
362
0
361
wv
360
359 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width(ft)
—MVO(4/2021) t MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
10.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
10.3 width(ft)
1.0 mean depth(ft)
1.8 max depth(ft) -- —
11.2 wetted perimeter(ft)
1.0 hydraulic radius(ft)
9.9 width-depth ratio -.
Survey Date: 11/2021 ---
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering r
•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 24-T8 Reach 1
903+16 Riffle
390
389
♦
388
smii-
c
387 — —
w
386
385 ,
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) -Bankfull Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
2.0 x-section area(ft.sq.)
6.3 width(ft)
0.3 mean depth(ft)
0.6 max depth(ft) _
•
6.5 wetted perimeter(ft) •
0.3 hydraulic radius(ft) •
19.7 width-depth ratio — -
18.0 W flood prone area(ft) « .
2.9 entrenchment ratio • .
<1.0 low bank height ratio "`ice y ,;
s?•
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering •
•
•
View Downstream

Cross-Section Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Cross-Section 25-T8 Reach 2
907+16 Riffle
370
369
368
0
367
366 -
365
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
MYO(4/2021) MY1(11/2021) —Bankfull —— Bankfull(Based on MYO Area) Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
7.7 x-section area(ft.sq.)
12.6 width(ft)
0.6 mean depth(ft) ;
1.3 max depth(ft)
13.0 wetted perimeter(ft) -
0.6 hydraulic radius(ft)
20.7 width-depth ratio
40.0 W flood prone area(ft)
3.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 11/2021
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
..
F ..
View Downstream

Table 8.Cross-Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Reach 1 Daniels Creek Reach 2 Daniels Creek Reach 3
Cross-Section 1(Riffle) Cross-Section 2(Riffle) Cross-Section 3(Pool) Cross-Section 4(Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull'Area 366.06 366.07 358.13 358.12 N/A N/A 350.02 350.00
Bank Height Ratio-Based on AB Bankfull'Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 N/A N/A 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 364.73 364.78 357.11 356.96 347.74 348.03 348.37 348.24
LT0132 Elevation 366.06 366.06 358.13 358.19 351.00 351.06 350.02 350.04
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.2 3.3 2.5 1.7 1.8
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft) 9.1 8.9 4.5 5.1 30.3 19.9 11.7 12.2
Cross-Section 5(Riffle) Cross-Section 6(Pool) Cross-Section 7(Riffle) Cross-Section 8(Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull'Area 328.68 328.64 N/A N/A 323.86 323.92 391.73 391.83
Bank Height Ratio-Based on AB Bankfull'Area 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 326.57 326.56 324.98 324.63 321.28 321.07 390.43 390.67
LT0132 Elevation 328.68 328.69 328.01 327.90 323.86 323.79 391.73 391.85
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 2.1 2.1 3.0 3.3 2.6 2.7 1.3 1.2
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft) 18.2 19.3 27.7 23.7 26.3 24.0 7.8 8.0
i i
Cross-Section 9(Riffle) Cross-Section 10(Pool) Cross-Section 11(Riffle) Cross-Section 12(Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull'Area 359.12 359.09 N/A N/A 347.35 347.44 328.76 328.77
Bank Height Ratio-Based on AB Bankfull'Area 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10
Thalweg Elevation 357.58 547.41 344.49 345.07 346.14 346.27 326.98 326.89
LT0132 Elevation 359.12 359.04 347.55 347.60 347.35 347.39 328.76 328.90
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 1.5 1.6 3.1 2.5 1.2 1.1 1.8 2.0
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft) 11.5 10.9 22.4 18.4 8.8 7.7 15.1 17.1
cBank Height Ratio(BHR)takes the As-built bankful area as the bass for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation.
cLTOB Area and Max depth-These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey(The same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation).Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and tracked for each year as above.The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elevation(same as in the BHR calculation)will be
recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.

Table 8.Cross-Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
T1 Reach 5 T2 Reach 2 T3 Reach 2 T3 Reach 2
Cross-Section 13(Pool) Cross-Section 14(Riffle) Cross-Section 15(Pool) Cross-Section 16(Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull'Area N/A N/A 381.62 381.52 N/A N/A 363.29 363.33
Bank Height Ratio-Based on AB Bankfulll Area N/A N/A 1.00 1.10 N/A N/A 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 324.34 324.23 380.51 380.51 361.61 361.61 362.53 363.28
LT0132 Elevation 327.96 327.97 381.62 381.62 364.09 364.02 363.29 363.22
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 3.6 3.7 1.1 1.1 2.5 2.1 0.8 0.8
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft) 32.6 32.7 7.0 6.8 14.8 13.4 3.6 2.8
- I
Cross-Section 17(Pool) Cross-Section 18(Riffle) Cross-Section 19(Riffle) Cross-Section 20(Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull'Area N/A N/A 383.51 383.58 365.69 365.62 373.29 373.30
Bank Height Ratio-Based on AB Bankfulll Area N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 382.42 382.51 382.69 382.71 364.52 364.59 372.67 372.62
LT0132 Elevation 383.90 383.91 383.51 383.54 365.69 365.65 373.29 373.26
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 1.5 1.4 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.1
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft) 9.1 7.8 3.1 2.9 6.2 6.0 2.5 2.3
T6 Reach 2 77 T8 Reach 1
Cross-Section 21(Riffle) Cross-Section 22(Riffle) Cross-Section 23(Pool) Cross-Section 24(Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull'Area 340.07 340.22 362.79 362.79 N/A N/A 386.79 387.00
Bank Height Ratio-Based on AB Bankfulll Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A 1.00 0.64
Thalweg Elevation 338.65 338.67 361.86 361.76 360.08 360.34 385.94 386.37
LT0132 Elevation 340.07 340.09 362.79 362.75 362.12 362.19 386.79 386.93
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 1.40 1.4 0.9 1.0 2.0 1.8 0.9 0.6
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft) 5.5 4.4 4.8 4.4 11.1 10.7 2.5 2.0
- - 2
Cross-Section 25(Riffle)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull'Area 367.72 367.76
Bank Height Ratio-Based on AB Bankfulll Area 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 366.48 366.52
LTOB2 Elevation 367.72 367.77
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 1.20 1.3
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft) 7.6 7.7
cBank Height Ratio(BHR)takes the As-built bankful area as the bass for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation.
cLTOB Area and Max depth-These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey(The same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation).Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and tracked for each year as above.The difference between the LTOB elevation and the thalweg elevation(same as in the BHR calculation)
will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.

APPENDIX D. Hydrology Data

Table 9. Bankfull Events
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Reach MY1(2021) MY2(2022) MY3(2023) MY4(2024) MY5(2025) MY6(2026) MY7(2027)
T1 R4 8/20/2021
10/4/2021
T3 R2 No events
T4 R1 7/8/2021
7/8/2021
T7 8/15/2021
8/20/2021
T8 R1 No events
Daniels Creek R4 No events*
*Gauge malfunctioned causing loss of data before 9/17/21
Table 10. Rainfall Summary
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
MY1(2021) MY2(2022) MY3(2023) MY4(2024) MY5(2025) MY6(2026) MY7(2027)
Annual Precip
Total 46.49
WETS 30th
Percentile 31.80
WETS 70th
Percentile 59.92
Normal Y

Table 11. Recorded In-Stream Flow Events Summary
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Max Consecutive Days/Total Days Meeting Success Criteria*
Reach MY1(2021)** MY2(2022) MY3(2023) MY4(2024) MY5(2025) MY6(2026) MY7(2027)
T1 R1 163 Days/
255 Days
T2 R1 175 Days/
255 Days
T5 R2 255 Days/
255 Days
T8 R1 238 Days/
255 Days
*Success criteria is 30 consecutive days of flow.
**Data colleted through December 7,2021. Data will be updated in MY2.

Recorded In-Stream Flow Events Plot
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek:T1 R1
Monitoring Year 1-2021
392.0 - 9
— . — . — . — . — . — . . — • 1 Q. — . — . — . — . — . — . — . — . — . — . . - 8
391.54,163 days of consecutive stream flow I I _ • - 7
I e
I ` zr-
So
391.0 , m
a> 1i - 4 u
W
EL
E.
- 3
390.5 laa
4-31-1VijiHi
ilJlLlijJli
I ` IlII390.0 L _ u_.I' I JI Pia
I II■ 1sY
-� � .I�-■ IJ I 1 ' I `I 1 J I I +I I 0
C .0 T C 00 a t > U
�a ¢ 5 Q ru
v, O Z Si
Daily Precipitation Water Level — — Thalweg — • •Bankfull 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Recorded In-Stream Flow Events Plot
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek:T2 R1
Monitoring Year 1-2021
382.5 - - 9
175 days of consecutive strear flow
• •
- 8
- 7
f�,
382.0 - i1FYM��R.1r,'T W l 6
f i 1 -\--\11
s �o
w —\ I — I / IfYiPtt 4 .0°
__I 71)1\i
W 381.5 c 3 `
� I
, \Pill.,
I I I - 2
1
i
381.0 II 1 i JiiJIh 1111.1 I-1' IJ - 1 I JI 1 II■ 1 1 LIi LLLIIJ
1 1 I I I
I`I 1 .le I 1.1 +I I 0
C _ T C 00 a t o U
cu
Daily Precipitation Water Level — — Thalweg — • •Bankfull 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Recorded In-Stream Flow Events Plot
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek:T5 R2
Monitoring Year 1-2021
384.0 - 9
55 days of consecutive stream flow
1 - 8
— — — — — — — — — — — — — . — . .
383.5 - ` 7
J \ [ 6 c
lr I� - 5 .o
383.01.mww..._.. ��.
co
> T I I, r rlr- - 4 .�-
WITL J I { 1 `
h lit— 7`` a
3
382.5 I
iGifill., pl I I 2
382.0 L hJiL11 -.I' 1 . 1 I JI 1 II■ 1 II kJ 1.,1.1.14 I 1 I II Ili 1 e J e 1 I +I 10
c _ T c 00 a t > U
�i ¢ 5 Q V, O Z O
Daily Precipitation Water Level — — Thalweg — • •Bankfull 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Recorded In-Stream Flow Events Plot
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek:T8 R1
Monitoring Year 1-2021
9
•238 days of consecutive stream flow
•
- 8
7
IN
I 6 c
lr
- 5 .o
o `i n A _
_ f Y
>vs II
I I �1WWq�"q"N4NM�w41rM/MMMi DIY I�IA01014,yl 4,14Ir."1"T_ . - 4 0
W 386.0 c _ �f
3 14t1466r142 IL_'
I 1 \nfilt I - 2
JIJiLIh
I I ` II - 1
385.0 !LI u_.1p I . 11 is III I 1 LIi Al I.1LLIIIJ I 1 1 I I Iii 1 s Js 1 IJ +I 10
c . T c 00 a t > a
Daily Precipitation Water Level — — Thalweg — • •Bankfull 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Table 12.Groundwater Gauge Summary
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Max.Consecutive Hydroperiod(Percentage)
Gauge ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
MYl 2021 MY2 2022 MY3 2023 MY4 2024 MYS 2025 MY6 2026 MY7 2027
18 days
1 (6.8%)
*3/27/21
239 days
2 (90.2%)
*3/27/21
23 days
3 (8.7%)
*3/27/21
72 days
4 (27.2%)
*3/27/21
18 days
5 (6.8%)
*3/27/21
3 days
6 (1.1%)
*9/15/21
3 days
7 (1.1%)
*3/27/21
3 days
8 (1.1%)
*3/27/21
63 days
9 (23.8%)
*4/6/21
7 days
10 (2.6%)
*3/27/21
4 days
11 (1.5%)
*3/27/21
71 days
12 (26.8%)
*3/27/21
6 days
13 (2.3%)
*9/21/21
19 Days
14 (7.2%)
*3/27/21
95 days
15 (35.8%)
*7/16/21
0 days
16 (0%)
*9/15/21
1 days
17 (0%)
*9/21/21
15 days
18 (5.7%)
*9/15/21
239 days
19** (90.2%)
*3/27/21
WETS Station(Daily Rainfall):Lillington 2.0 W
WETS Station(30th&70th Percentile):DUNN 4 NW
Growing Season:3/1/2021 to 11/20/2021(264 Days)
Success Criteria is 13%of the growing season(35 consecutive days)
*Start date of data recording.
**Groundwater gauge 19 is for informational purposes and will not be held to hydrology performance standards.

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
c
vDaniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#1
m aJ
Monitoring Year 1-2021 0
•c o °�°0
rsj
10 2 3 10
m18 max consecutive days 2 NJ
o ~S
t o - 9
m -0
VI W
0 — J — — — — — 8
�l
ti i I 7
s -10 — — lkiti. I I ' J 6— l— _ o
' 1 it.1, 116 - 5 y
J 4
/iii ` II'rlrIL'Ll
n i
3 -20 I � ••T - / 4
a
�/' 3
A
\\ J
-30 M F-1\— 2
17
I - 1
I
-40 I L f I . 11 .. .11 I I I lI . 1 1 11.1 ..-. I . ll.W IJ I I I I I III i . I . 1 0
C _a i T C no O. +' > U
u_ 2 Q 2 -7i Q VI 0 z 0
Daily Precipitation Gauge#1 — -Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#2
ra 01
Monitoring Year 1-2021
m
Nj
10 0 3 0 10
2 239 max consecutive days 2 NJ
m • - -17
o g
t' o
0 - Al I,1lL, I► — -ok—JW—_ ---- 8
V jV 1
it,filk - k.._ - 7
v 7) . I-L. ' 11,914.1 11 AfilLifiP401411""NistvAliyft* "E
o
m I 1 \_ 1 - 5 :°
J
QJ Q
3
-20 n - 4
a
t r` I 3
r -\
-30 I
_ I 2
/
- 1
-40 I 1. 1 I . 11 .. .11 I I I lI . 1 a i l.1 .._. I . ll lie I J 1 1 ii 1 Ii III a . I I 0
u_ g Q g Q VI 0 z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#2 — -Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#3
ra
a, a,
Monitoring Year 1-2021 0 N
c Oo 0
10 0 -i 3 0- - 10
O N
8 " 24 max consecutive days - -1
a-9 moo - 9
-
,o c
N W
0 e I+- . . 1 " - - - ,...- -P:\
--_ 8
1 \
s -10 I u L ^ .I 6 ?
rI ,a, o
5 y
1
3 -20 r, i / 4 2
_ 3 a
-AJ \/\ 1\
1— All
30 I :.
::A.V.4%,.. . - ow.. ilT---Pl.r
Ir I 2
1.
I - 1
40 I Lf I I I .I II ill I� ._. I . i .W IJ I I -I I I i III . . I . I 0
C - i T C Co O. +' > V
u_ g Q g -cu co st co �i Q ,n 0 z 0
Daily Precipitation Gauge#3 — -Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#4
ra
a, ra
v Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
m m 0
10 2 3 010
76 max consecutive days 2
IN
o `�
o g
t "*4.4"e"N‘r.. L . o
N W
ro C
0 e — — — — — — 1 c --_ 8
li
\\I
f -10 I II 6
L — — 7 I�— — �. — +le_ — • I
I-20n \IN \64tvi
t r% I 3 a
Vt , I
-30 -\ L-1-t
I I 2
_/
- 1
J-40 I I. f I . 11 .. .I 1 I I 1 II . 1 1 i I� ._. I�.W I 1 I I II III 1 I I 0
C _a i It C no O. +' > V
u_ g Q g -�i Q ,n 0 z 0
Daily Precipitation Gauge#4 — -Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#5
a, a,
v Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
m O 10 0
10 0 3 010
O N
o " 18 max consecutive days - -1
S• o0 9
0 . Si__. ..- N
4.-.
W
_ ___ 8
j 1. t Y 11aJ �
r '
s -10 _ � _ LL J 6
i 1 ,
- 1 - -
a, 5
t.J , II i
ioc
\--\-(1
3 -20 n 1 \ i / 4 1 `
�t /—` \<,. k_- 3
1 wu IIII
z 30 I i
_f \\"\il
-----#i
L
1
40 I I . I 1 .. -I1 1III - i 1. 0 I -.-- I LLLIIJ I 1 III I . 1 0
C J? i 8. T C no a > V
u_ 2 Q 2 —7i Q VI 0 Z 0
Daily Precipitation Gauge#5 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#6
a, a,
v Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
m O m r
10 0 3 0- - 10
O N
o 3 max consecutive days-
t N o 9
-0
o c
Ln W 0 0 00 I C _ _____ 8
•_ , I _ 7
5 -10 - - -p 6
v �) o
a, 5 ;°
y %if\Ajle%ii
a
3 m 20 '- I '1 ,J 4
t r` I lr 3 a
1- , I-30 I I , J2
-\1 Pin-t PI
_/
- 1
40 . I I I I I I I I 1 I I i I ' J ' I 0
c _a icu co T c on a +-' > V
u_ g Q g ' Q ,n 0 z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#6 — -Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#7
ra
a, ra
v Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
m m 0
10 0 3 0 10
O N
o " 4 max consecutive days - -1
WO -�o0 9
,o W
c
N
0 rSii__ — — — — l --- 8
I J 1 - 7
Z I
s -10 I II I .. 6 -7
- - �1- - ,-, - - - - - - - - - - • o
wkiNitosil
J 1 1_ whk., _ voip 10#06 'eh‘j
iviet„004144Nelr
iii
t Ilir 3
rA r
-30 IP M I 2
_! 1 I
I - 1
I
-40 I 1. 1 I . 11 .. .Ii I I III . 1 1 1l.1 .... I . I L IJ 1 I ii I I I III i . I I 0
c _a i T c 00 O. +' > V
-' u_ Q -7i Q VIZ z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#7 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#8
ra
a, ra
0 Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
c O1 .co 0
10 0 3 0 10
O N
o " 3 max consecutive days - -1
es moo - 9
-
,o c
N W
0 e C - --_ 8
—\_ iii - 7
-10 ILR
--Ja—� —^ 6
o
a, - 5 y
J 1
ti
I I a
g 20 / n , ITilA.4(\1\441\11)\\.
i
0.
111111146°
'1113
30 Ii I I � 2
- 1
40 I L f I . I 1 .. .I1 I I III - � li 1I.1 ..-. I I�.W I �� I 1 I I III I . I 0
C - i 8. T C no O. +' > V
cu
L Q —7i Q VI z a
Daily Precipitation Gauge#8 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#9
ra
a, ra
N Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
m O I N O
10 0 3 0 10
O N
o " 63 max consecutive days -1
• • - 9
N ` W(11 ril t\ hal N
I \\11 i 1 7
> 1a, s y
1
a`, \ J r1 n ';i
3 -20 I / - � 4 ;v
t /-` I 3 a
Vt , I
30 -\ L-11\--,
I I 2
_/
- 1
-40 I I 1 . 11 ... .I i 11111 .i 11 1 1� J..__ . 1l. r IJ i. 1ii I I I . 1 I_I - i � I . 1 0
C _a i T C no O. +' > o
u_ g Q g -�i Q VI C1 z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#9 — -Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#10
ra
a, ra
✓ Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
mo mo
I? -:-7 ON 10
• m 7 max consecutive da0 —, 46 ir --= =ys
t -p
N W - 8
- '10
I
1 I n 6
20 F — n I Ill V _
11! 1 0
a, 1 5 :°
J ,
g n t � 1
�' 30 a
t- —\ f\ 3
40 \ d 1 rtr r \VI(
3
r'J - 1
-50 I . I I . 11 .. .I I I I I II . 1 I L I.1 .._. I - II.IN 1 Y I �I I I III0 . . I . I 0
c _. ,_ 8. T c ao a. +' > o
u_ g Q g0
Q ,n 0 z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#10 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#11
ra
a, ra
N Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
m m 0
Q � ON 10
M l7 \-I
0 — ° I
— Oil ' _ M .- 1 _ = -- 1' — `o — —C 9
4 max consecutive days
t a
• w
10
I 11141 I ( - 8
� � C
" zo V�r-i - „ 7
1
0
a, 5y
J
vIlii 1 a
3 / '-' 4 2
30 a
3
I , ' I
40 n z
I 1�, llli . � , 1J .._. I .-50 I } .. I L1I.LIIJ I I I I 0
C _. ._ 8. T C 00 O. +' > V
Daily Precipitation Gauge#11 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#12
ro
a, ro
N Monitoring Year 1-2021 Q N
m O m 0
10 0 3 010
O N
o " 71 max consecutive days -1
• • - 9
l i W
0 e L_ - .� 1 - —_- 8
111\1
�1 \
5 -10ill 6
v I o
> •
a, ), - 5 fa
1
'u
3 -20r 1 r n v
t r 1'�,M► I 3 a
1_ , I
-30 Lr � � 2
L
I 1JI40 I I . 11 .. .11 1 1 11 . 1 1 6 l� ._. li.I. id I 1 iI I I III I . I 0
C _. i T C no O. +' > V
co aL g ¢ g co ' ¢ ,n 0 z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#12 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#13
a, a,
v Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
c m 0
10 0 3 0 10
O N
M l7 �-I
O �
o ` g
,o c
N W
0 e e e . — — — ---_ 8
_ ` __A �ax consecutive days 7
I
v I o
> 1
m - 5 2
,7
3 -20 I / 4 v
a
t /-"` AI 3
1- r
-30 I —\\ iv\I 2
_/
- 1
40 I I I I I I I I l l I . J1 - 11 ' J ' I 0
c _a i T C on O. +' > V
L Q -7i Q VI 0 z a
Daily Precipitation Gauge#13 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#14
ra
a, ra
Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
c O1 .co 0
10 0 3 0— - 10
O N
o " 19 max consecutive days - -I
a—. moo - 9
-
,o c
N W
jbj
0 e �� 1 1 N+ A n — -
-- 8
" III ‘_ - 7
1\ i I
5 -10 - n , - 6
- - -p - - o
,- - i\..e.s. _ . � .
r
J
v a
u
3 -20 n 1 • / ' 4 2
rirI 3
-30 I , I 2
iv\
- 1
1.
-40 I f I . 1 1 . _I1 II �I . 1 1 6 I
I l li.W I I -I I III I . I 0
C _. i C no a o aL g ¢ g ' ¢ ,n 0 z a
Daily Precipitation Gauge#14 — _Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#15
ra
a, ra
v Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
c 01 .c0 0
10 0 3 0- - 10
O N
o " 95 max consecutive days 7 -1
• • -moo - 9
,o c
N W
0 e e e — — — — �.- __ 8
-1 •_ ..
- 7
n1
5 -10 .1 I 6
• ._
7 77 c
71/ 0
1
L.
a, 5J
44I
�u
3 -20 f i / / 4 v
I a
L 3
1- \ rA
1
-30 I iv\I 2
_/
- 1
-40 I I I I I - • ILL Id I I
11 _ _ I I . II.1 - 1 ' I . 10
c _a i T c 00 a +"' > V
cu
w Q -7i Q VI 0 z a
Daily Precipitation Gauge#15 — -Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#16
ra
a, aJ
aJ
Monitoring Year 1-2021 0 N
c IN O
10 0 3 0— - 10
O N
6 " 0 max consecutive days -� 71
t • -o0 9
,o c
N W
D a a a . — — — 'n\ —__ 8
_ J 1
,
5 -10 - -p — J� ^ 6
m _ 5 m
-I ,
t. u
3
—1\1
f0 -20fir n I / T ' 4 Iv
1 I a
L 3
1- \ .0.01M1..41, i A 1._ 14.r jr
frrillii
30 I I2
1
40 I I I I I I I I I I . J1 - 11 ' I . 1 0
c - i T C on O. +' > V
L Q -7' Q VI 0 z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#16 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#17
ro
a, ro
O Monitoring Year 1-2021 C N
mo IN
o O N 10
M 0 �-I
5 - - 9
ro C
N w
= o � J oo � 000 = c
- 8
5 11 max consecutive days
J1 \
JI - 7
T �/L 6 c
15 f I— 7- 1 I�1 F o
a' 1 - 5 yo
J ,
/ Q
2
--1\
`° / 4 v
�' -25 t I a
3
1- I
rt.r i A
-"\ 1_,,,
flee'
35 � z
- 1
45 I I I I I I I 11 I - iI-I - ii . I . I 0
C J] i ft C 7Ca 0- +' > V
L Q —7i Q VI 0 z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#17 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#18
ra
a, ra
v Monitoring Year 1-2021 a N
c m 0
10 0 3 0 10
O N
rn l7 \-I
O �
o ` g
t±
o c
c
N W
J. -\-
01oL _ 6
71' _ _ 'iL
a, - 5 y
J
v ` 15 consecutive days Q
`° _20 A 1I ' 4
3 1 / I a
L 3
1- \ r —\\-30 I iv\I 2
_/
- 1
40 I I I I I I I - I l l I - 11-1 - 1 ' J ' 1 1 0
c _a i Tco cu co si c on a +' > o
u_ g Q g ' Q ,n 0 z 0
Daily Precipitation Gauge#18 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Groundwater Gauge Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
c
c o
ra Daniels Creek Groundwater Gauge#19 v
N N `I
m Monitoring Year 1-2021 rsj
m o
10 •3 2 0 10
o
m o r
a 0 9
t c
r W
--_ J..._. .WI i p
0Ln
�' __ Ir. ;Ili .,:1 ..�� � I• - CI
8
J
239 max consecutive days I - 7
10 ^ 6 c-.
w �) - o
, 5 :°
r
y \ I �a
-20 / I 4 2
a
30 I U 2
ivIl
r - 1
-40 I 1.1 1 . i 1 .. J i dill 1 lii.1 .. 1 1 . 11.Ir 1 Y I i jh i I 1 III 1 . I. I 0
C _o i > C CO O. a+ > V
V
u_ Q 5 Q to 0 z o
Daily Precipitation Gauge#19 — —Criteria Level =Soil Surface 30-Day Rolling Precip Total 30th&70th Percentile

Soil Temperature Probe Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Soil Temperature Probe#1
Monitoring Year 1-2021
100
90
80
L
70
w
g 60
w
50
40 • - - - I • - - - 4
30 i
L rTs T C — UA Q +' > U
Cll
Lro l Q C V) C)Cll o
� � Q
Soil Probe#1 Temperature — — Criteria Level

Soil Temperature Probe Plots
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Daniels Creek Soil Temperature Probe#2
Monitoring Year 1-2021
100
90
80
.
2 70
ra
L
w
g 60
ai
1-
50
40 - — — — • - - - , •
30 I 1 1
C i T C — UA Q +' > U
ro Ll 2 Q 2 — C Cll V) 0 o
aJ
2 2 Q Z in
Soil Probe#2 Temperature — — Criteria Level

APPENDIX E. Project Timeline and Contact Info

Table 13. Project Activity and Reporting History
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Task Completion or Deliverable
Submission
Mitigation Plan Approved November 2019 November 2019
Construction(Grading)Completed NA April 2021
Planting Completed NA April 2021
As-Built Survey Completed April 2021 April 2021
Stream Survey April 2021
Baseline Monitoring Document(Year 0) July 2021
Vegetation Survey April 2021
Stream Repairs October 2021
Stream Survey November 2021
Year 1 Monitoring February 2022
Vegetation Survey November 2021
Stream Survey 2022
Year 2 Monitoring December 2022
Vegetation Survey 2022
Stream Survey 2023
Year 3 Monitoring December 2023
Vegetation Survey 2023
Year 4 Monitoring De
Stream Survey 2025
Year 5 Monitoring D
Vegetation Survey 2025
Year 6 Monitoring Deg,_
Stream Survey 2027
Year 7 Monitoring December 2027
Vegetation Survey 2027
Table 14. Project Contact Table
Daniels Creek Mitigation Site
USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-00998
Monitoring Year 1-2021
Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
Designer 312 West Millbrook Road,Suite 225
Angela Allen,PE Raleigh,NC 27609
919.851.9986
Land Mechanic Designs,Inc.
Construction Contractor 126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring,NC 27592
Monitoring Performers Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
Monitoring,POC Jason Lorch
919.851.9986